WEBVTT - Risky US Rail Strike Looms

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world of business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all purtnising the power of Business

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. So among the things on

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>our radar, it's also on investors radar. It is among

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:37.479
<v Speaker 1>our most right on the Bloomberg Today about the looming

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>US rail strike that threatens to push inflation even higher

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>across the country. And Tim, this is coming, of course,

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:46.520
<v Speaker 1>excuse me after we saw this morning's pp I report

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 1>where prices jump more than expected last month. Yeah. Look,

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>railroads account for a significant portion of goods that are

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>transported within the US, more than a quarter of the

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>goods transported here, so that would cause a real snarl,

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>to say the least. Let's get into it with Katya Dmitrieva.

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>She's U S economy reporter for Bloomberg News. She joins

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>us this afternoon from in the field just outside of

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:11.039
<v Speaker 1>Washington this afternoon, Katia, how are you. I'm doing well.

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>How are you good? It's good to have you with us. Hey. Um,

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>before we get to what the strike is about, I

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 1>want to dig into the economic implications of this because

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>it's something that that you wrote about earlier today. UM,

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>give us some numbers here. What would happen if rail

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>workers went on strike? Well, the stakes are definitely high.

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>As you mentioned, Uh, just over quarter of all goods

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>are transported by rail in the US, and that includes

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>everything from consumer goods uh, to basic inputs that businesses used,

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:44.639
<v Speaker 1>really all businesses used, like oil, even like oil, like coole,

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>like timber lumber. I mean, you name it, and it's

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>probably on one of these trains that could be you know,

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>stopping as as early as fatty if there isn't a

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>deal reached. Um, the estimates in terms of the economic impact,

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>we got it. Goldman Sacks note just recently actually a

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>new note showing that it's one point eight billion dollars

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 1>potentially at stake in one week for the Class one rails.

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>That's just in the first week of if there's a

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>stoppage alone. Broadly, we have an industry group saying that

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>it's two billion dollars of cost per day UM and

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>that's for the entire U S economy, and they factor

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>in things like worker productivity and wages, UM. You know,

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:30.639
<v Speaker 1>all of the related organizations and companies that are involved.

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Because if you can't get goods on a train, you're

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>not going to need people to take them off the

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>train to get them onto trucks to get them then elsewhere.

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>So the costs are really going to be adding up

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>every hour of every day. No pressure, President Biden and

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 1>your team. UM, let's talk about that. Because US Labor

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Secretary Marty Walsh has been holding conversations. You've been posted

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>outside the US Labor Department today. What do we know

0:02:57.040 --> 0:03:01.079
<v Speaker 1>about those conversations? That's for Yeah, I'm here right now.

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>The conversation started just after nine am this morning. So

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 1>it's the two sides, the railway companies and the representatives

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and the unions. UH. And then Marty Walsh and his

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 1>team kind of acting as the the broker middleman and

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>and as you just said, I mean, the stakes are

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:20.920
<v Speaker 1>high and there's a lot of pressure to get a

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>deal across. So what we know is that they've been

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 1>talking NonStop since this morning. Uh. You know, at one

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>point we were supposed to get uh some commentary from

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the secretary. We still expect that at some point today. Um,

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>but he hasn't been outside the building yet. Uh. And

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>they actually kept negotiating all through lunch. So according to

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>someone familiar, uh, they just ordered lunch in and and

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>continued talk all throughout that. And you can tell from

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>from that kind of a pace of talks that this

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>is this is pretty serious. We're getting down to the wire.

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>TikTok though when we look at the clock. Um, Under

0:03:56.760 --> 0:04:00.040
<v Speaker 1>the Railway Labor Act, right, Congress can step into the

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>imposer resolution based on a Presidential Emergency Board plan that

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>was submitted in August or order the trains to operate

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>as usual while the two sides continue to negotiate. So

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>is that likely to happen even if they don't come

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to some agreement. Yeah, that's right. That is that continues

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>to be an option, right. So that's what they did

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:21.480
<v Speaker 1>in in the ninety nineties to avert a real strike

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>back then, which would have been equally as as catastrophic

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:27.559
<v Speaker 1>to the economy. UM. And politically that's still an option

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:30.840
<v Speaker 1>on the table, UM, but as my political colleagues and

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>White House colleagues have reported, it's not necessarily something that

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 1>they want to do. UM. The ideal situation here is

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>that they come to an agreement the two sides and uh,

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, hopefully hammer something out. But as far as

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>right now, as far as we know, UM, you know,

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the likelihood of that happening right this minute is not high.

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we had another union, a smaller union UM involved,

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:58.159
<v Speaker 1>find out a press statement earlier today saying that they

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>don't agree to the current deal and UM are kind

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 1>of holding out UM and could strike later. So uh, yeah,

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 1>a big goal, Kata. How big is the delta between

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>what the rail workers want and what the companies are

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:17.919
<v Speaker 1>willing to give? In thirties in the last thirty seconds

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:20.719
<v Speaker 1>we have, Yes, Well there's a lot of thirty seconds.

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's that, there's wages, there's the ongoing wages

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and benefits issues, but I think scheduling is the is

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the top thing. So you're hearing a lot from both

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:32.360
<v Speaker 1>sides with the companies saying, you know, we're giving a

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>lot as we can on scheduling, and then you hear

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the unions and the workers saying, well, actually, we need

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:39.479
<v Speaker 1>more flexibility and we need more, um, we need you

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to give more, essentially, and that's that's really the main

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 1>sticking point here and probably exactly what they're discussing right now.

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:47.240
<v Speaker 1>And we do want to mention we have a headline

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 1>crossing Amtrack is canceling all long distance trains starting September

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:55.600
<v Speaker 1>fift so, UH talk about some additional pressure, certainly on

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 1>our individuals in the United States as well as our economy.

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Katia dmitriev uh US Economy Report at Bloomberg News Outside

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the US Labor Department. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. This is one of those stories that we

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 1>have come to love Business Week for It's one that

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:17.280
<v Speaker 1>taps into some of the big themes of our time

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:19.840
<v Speaker 1>but may not be on your radar but should. And Tim,

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:23.039
<v Speaker 1>it's about a prime spot between Mexico's industrial capital and

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the US board that's become a haven for Chinese manufacturer.

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>It's in Monterey, Mexico. It's if you look at a map,

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>it's just south of the border with Texas. Uh. It's

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 1>an area of the country that has really changed a

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>lot in just a few years. Writing about it in

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:41.919
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg business Week Magazine, as this issue is actually this

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:43.599
<v Speaker 1>is story is gonna be featured in the upcoming issue

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>of Business Week Magazine. Read it now though on the

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg and at Bloomberg dot com slash business Week. The

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>editor of this piece is Christina Lindblad. She's Global Economics editor.

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>She's with us in the Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. Also

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:56.960
<v Speaker 1>here is Joel Webber, the editor of Bloomberg Business Week.

0:06:57.120 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>You can follow him on Twitter at Joel Webber. Show

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 1>this area of Mexico, northern Mexico, just south of the

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>border with Texas. What did it look like a few

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>years ago? Joel? Well, it was a little quieter than

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 1>it is now, with fewer factories. And uh lo and behold. Uh,

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 1>China became very interested in sort of a side door

0:07:18.480 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>to the US there, and so we have seen an

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>explosion of factories there and uh it is effectively a

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>workaround of Trump's tariff policy, which the Biden administration is

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>basically kept in place. Um. And so it's interesting about

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>that is that you know, you basically have gained the system. Uh.

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>And so things going forward may not be manufactured in

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>China as before you find some cheap real estate uh

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 1>in other countries. Mexico is not the only version of this,

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>but certainly the closest to the U. S UM. So,

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>how's this, how's this working out? As uh as a

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit of arbitrage Christina, Well, that's the globalization as

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 1>always rash, right. So I think when we interviewed companies

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>that are based in one particular industrial park that we

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>focused on, they most of the Chinese firms preferred to

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>emphasize the you know, proximity to the US market and

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 1>this and this savings on shipping. But when pressed they

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>admitted that, you know, for example, one furniture maker was

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 1>facing taffs of twenty when they were shipping from China

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and now uh qualified for duty free shipments into the US.

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>What blew me away is how quickly they were able

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>to do that, right, Like I always feel like when

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:35.079
<v Speaker 1>we're talking to CEOs and like, well, the shift you know,

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 1>if we have to shift our production elsewhere, it's going

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to take a long time. I mean, they moved pretty quickly,

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:41.599
<v Speaker 1>and it reminds us that they are still the manufacturer

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to the world. Yes, and I think some of these

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>companies are pretty I mean, they're not all big. I

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 1>mean one of the manufacturers is a really big manufactor

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:51.839
<v Speaker 1>in China, but like so they are nimble and they

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:57.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, um, as a policy, China has been basically

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>willing to shed kind of low mar in manufacturing businesses

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:04.679
<v Speaker 1>as it you know, as it focuses on high end

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff like you know, new new fuel vehicles and biotechnology

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:13.559
<v Speaker 1>and semiconductors. So I think that the first wave went

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>to places like Vietnam. But now you know, you can see,

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 1>like you know, businesses are moving further away, you know,

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>from those comfort kind of locales where they first landed.

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>And um, yeah, I mean I think what I thought

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>it was kind of funny was that do you remember

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 1>when Trump tweeted basically ordering American companies home, and I said,

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>what came floating across like the Pacific or Chinese Chinese

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 1>plants didn't exactly work that way. I don't know, it

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 1>seems like there could be like a way for the

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 1>US to close this loophole. I mean, they know what

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 1>these Chinese companies produce, and isn't there a way that

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:55.079
<v Speaker 1>they can say, Okay, well we know that it comes

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>from a subsidiary of a Chinese company, and you're not

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>sticking to the spirit of the role. Um, we're going

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to attack on that tariff. Do they want to? Oh?

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I mean that might cause issues with

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:07.839
<v Speaker 1>the U s m c A right like the successor

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to NAFTA. I mean, I think Mexico would have legitimate

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 1>reason to say, well, what are you doing? You know,

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:16.079
<v Speaker 1>as long as they meet the content requirements, which they

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 1>are and to do that. I mean, we should be

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:21.560
<v Speaker 1>clear that this applies a certain amount of effort on

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the part of these Chinese companies because they're having to

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 1>source products from Mexico, could be even North America. There.

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>They can't just import assemble everything from Chinese parts and

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>shipping across. Yeah. The other thing to keep in mind here,

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, Belt and Road is a very top down

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>initiative in China. This is not that this is just grassroots,

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 1>grassroots effort by Chinese exporters to be like, how do

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 1>we it's kind of simple, but it makes so much sense. Also,

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we talked to some companies that off the

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 1>record explicitly said, part of the reason we're doing this

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 1>isn't just cost savings, is that there's political risk, I

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>mean policy risk rather in China in recent years, we've

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>seen like crackdowns in tech and other sectors. And so,

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:09.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, so we talk about the Mexico saidators to

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 1>AMLO being obviously UM, the president of Mexico has been

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, very eager to try and get employment whatever

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 1>there can be employment. How is this shaping out domestically

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>for him? Well, the interesting thing is at the federal level,

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:28.319
<v Speaker 1>Mexico has never really actively courted Chinese investment because they

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>see Chinese exporters as rivals in third markets, right. So,

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>but the state, at the state level, they like states

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:39.560
<v Speaker 1>have so Nueo Leone, which is where you know this

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:42.080
<v Speaker 1>particular industrial park, uh, and these are a lot of

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:45.440
<v Speaker 1>these companies are setting up shop. UM has has done

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:47.959
<v Speaker 1>and they're building a special road for example, from like

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, the UH from the industrial park to the border. Uh.

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>And so yeah, but I think that some people have

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:59.440
<v Speaker 1>said that Mexico might have actually seen even a bigger

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 1>in the fall of this kind of investment if am

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Low was being less nationalistic on topics like energy and

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 1>you know and things like that. But I mean, this

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:12.959
<v Speaker 1>is great for Mexico, right, Like the number that really

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 1>jumped out at me here is UH near shoring. UH

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>could boost Mexico's exports by thirty five billion year, a

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>bit over seven percent. I mean that's like real asformative. Yeah. Also,

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean while the Chinese investment, like like the most

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 1>recent figures five million dollars a year is not huge,

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 1>there is there are a couple of deals that could

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 1>happen this year that would be transformative that that we're

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about billion dollar factories. One of them is there

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>an e V engine maker that's looking at two different

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:48.679
<v Speaker 1>sites in Mexico. And those kinds of investments pulls supply

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 1>chains you know around them. You know, so that kind

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>of that kind of thing I think would take it

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>to the next level suppliers that play into it. Hey, um,

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:00.559
<v Speaker 1>you guys point out in the story, though Chinese companies

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 1>aren't the first to seek shelter from US, Terra Japan did.

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 1>It went back in the similar playbook when Reagan started

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 1>layering all these different restrictions on Japanese cars, and then

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 1>when NAFTA took effect, they saw, well this is a

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 1>great export platform now. But I think it's interesting right

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:18.840
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the globalization conversations that we're having about

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 1>what's going on. What I forgot about that? We haven't

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:28.439
<v Speaker 1>talked about that forever. An the way I think about it, Well,

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 1>we didn't use the word friend shoring. Friend shory. Yes,

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>that's when you go to friendly countries like you know,

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:38.679
<v Speaker 1>I haven't heard that refriend shoring where you can have

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>a special edition on Won't Talk, Stay tune to come

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 1>all right, we gotta go, guys. Jill Webber, editor of

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week here in our Interactive worker studio, and

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Christina Limblad, she's Global Economics editor. This story, it is

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 1>a Bloomberg Big Take, and it is in the upcoming

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>new issue of Bloomberg Business Week magazine. It's un newstands tomorrow.

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:09.839
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes. Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio, Well shares of Walmart.

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I think little change down the day at list. When

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I checked at last this is the world's largest retailer,

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 1>gets ready to offer up checking accounts. Yeah, this is

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting story. Jenny Seraine is with us. She's

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>finance reporter for Bloomberg in here. She's with us in

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg in her active brokers. I mean, it kind

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 1>of makes sense. When you know a company like Walmart

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 1>wants to continue to grow, it has to get into

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>other parts of business. The question that I have is

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>who are these checking accounts meant for? These bank accounts

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>been for? Walmart has more than one million employees. Have

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 1>they been kind of like trialing this with the employees?

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 1>What's going on here? Yeah, so that's what we're actually

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>expecting to see in the coming weeks. UM. So Walmart

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>last year actually set up this outside fintech startup UM,

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and they've been super secretive up till now, and we're

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 1>basically expecting them to roll out these new bank accounts

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>UM in the coming weeks too. For now, a small

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 1>set of Walmart's employees here in the US, and even

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 1>UM a small percentage of their online shoppers. So it's

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:05.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of in test and learn mode right now, but

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty soon, UM, they are expecting to roll this out

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to one point six million Walmart u S employees and

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>all Walmart shoppers as well. First of all, kudos to you.

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 1>It's an exclusive. It's among the most read on the

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg so really really well done. What's interesting to me,

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and it also speaks to me that it's they're going

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>after what many would say are an underserved part of

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 1>our population when it comes to the financial infrastructure here.

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 1>It's it's kind of super smart. Yeah, I think that's

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. Walmart is very keenly aware of what all

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>of its customers really need and kind of the gaps

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 1>that can be filled, and so they've talked a lot

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:44.239
<v Speaker 1>about how they want this to be something that's affordable.

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 1>UM So you can, you know, imagine that there probably

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 1>won't be lots of fees attached to this new account. Um.

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I think it's a very interesting move for them.

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I will say they've tried this in the past, so

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 1>this is not Walmart's first foray into finance um and

0:15:57.200 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 1>they haven't always been successful. So I think they're taking

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 1>another back at it. They're trying to go a little

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 1>bit more digital, a little bit more flashy. So we'll

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>see if this time makes a difference. How long ago

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>was their last attempt do you know it's it's been

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 1>a while. So they currently have a bevy of financial

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>services products, so you can get a relttable debit card,

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you can change money. The reason the reason I ask

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 1>is because we're in a mobile first world right now,

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's a big part of the you know, quote

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 1>unquote disruptors who are coming into fintech and Jenny, you've

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>written a lot about these companies, like, you know, companies

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>like Dave and Chime and other one word you know,

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>so called neo banks. Right, So, even though you know

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 1>it could be a smart move from Walmart, this is

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 1>a really crowded field already because a lot of companies

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 1>are going after that underbanked consumer. Yeah, no, that's exactly right.

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I do think the fact that they so one of

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the big problems facing those other companies right now is

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>they have to spend so much money acquiring customers. And

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 1>these guys have kind of the built an advantage. You know,

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 1>they've got the world's largest retailer with five thousand plus

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 1>stores ready to advertise this, put this in front of

0:16:57.040 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>their shoppers, put this in front of their employees. So

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 1>that helps a lot. It means their expenses will be

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot lower um and maybe they can spend that

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>money on something else. All right, can I can I

0:17:05.760 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 1>just share with the audience that before we got going,

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:09.440
<v Speaker 1>you and I were talking, we're talking about Shark Tank

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that while I was home, I kind of did a

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a deep dive and did a little

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>bit of binge watching. I like Shark Tank, but Shark Well,

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 1>it's fascinating because this is so much the backbone of

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 1>our our our country and our economy. These all these

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 1>small companies, but so much they talk about customer acquisition,

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and I think if I am an individual and I

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 1>shop at Walmart, I know the brand, It's a company

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>that's been around for a long time, and I would

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 1>be first of all comfortable with it. And then I

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 1>think about for Walmart, right, they're right there. It's not

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>going to cost them a lot to get to these

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 1>additional customers for financial services. Yeah, no, that's exactly right.

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think the one of the most interesting

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:49.159
<v Speaker 1>stats was Walmart has more locations than most of the

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 1>major all four of the major biggest banks in the

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:54.160
<v Speaker 1>closing them exactly. So you know, if you're really thinking

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:57.399
<v Speaker 1>about a subset of customers who will mobile first, do

0:17:57.560 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 1>like that kind of in store experience, this kind of

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>chuck saw the boxes for them. Okay, so well, I

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know it just dumbfounded that I like did a

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 1>deep deve on shark Tech. Ye, JENNI are bonding on

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>this anyway. Jenny like Shark Tank too. I know it's fast.

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:15.719
<v Speaker 1>Everyone like Shark Tank. So so what does this end

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 1>up looking like for Walmart's bottom line? Here, because this

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>is something that investors certainly want to know about it.

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 1>In the past, large companies getting into financial services didn't

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 1>always end well, I'm talking about you know ge. Yeah, no,

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:29.679
<v Speaker 1>that's actually a great point. I think the way they

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 1>structured this is super interesting. So they set up this

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 1>outside fintech. It's completely independent, um, but they are the

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 1>majority owned shareholder or majority shareholder, and they're also a

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:41.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of their executives around the board of this outside fintech,

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 1>so they have a vested interest. But it is a

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>separate effort. So I think we'll see I can't imagine

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:49.880
<v Speaker 1>that like right now, the financials are what's most compelling.

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the idea that when you're a consumer,

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:54.959
<v Speaker 1>you can go to Walmart now and basically get anything

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 1>not just you know, your groceries or your gas, but

0:18:57.280 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 1>also your bank accounts. So it's Amazon model, right, Like,

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:04.679
<v Speaker 1>you've already got how many users embedded in your system?

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 1>What else can I offer them? I actually think a

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 1>bit more of like the Ali Baba model, because that

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:11.160
<v Speaker 1>those guys really started out in retail and then slowly

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>branch their way into every other thing. And um, so

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>you're starting to see those models kind of make their

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>way here in the US. But it makes so much sense, right,

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 1>You've already got this installed base, and like, how do

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:21.920
<v Speaker 1>you how do you monetize it even further? Um, As

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 1>we said, it's an exclusive thanks to our Jenny Surrene,

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:27.640
<v Speaker 1>finance reporter at Bloomberg Music is among our most read

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:29.399
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg. So if you want to read it

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:30.879
<v Speaker 1>and it's entire to be sure to check it out

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and check out Jenny also on Twitter, She's at Jenny Surrene.

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm bro journal. Yeah, but you let me drive, no novels.

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 1>I want to drive. It's a good question. Good drive

0:19:56.160 --> 0:20:02.199
<v Speaker 1>ride to the clothe bloom Bird radio all. I just

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 1>got about ten minutes left in today's trading session. Yep,

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>chopping and sloppy is how Charlie Pellett called today's trade.

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:10.119
<v Speaker 1>And it's really accurate. We're bouncing off our lows, but

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 1>well off our highs. Call it little change tim overall

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 1>for today's equity trade, you're gonna hear what Megan Horneman

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:18.800
<v Speaker 1>has to say, Chief investment officer at Verden's Capital Advisors.

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Megan this afternoon, joins us on the phone from Hunt Valley, Maryland.

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:24.440
<v Speaker 1>All Right, Megan, you've had twenty four hours to breathe

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 1>that after yesterday's route, certainly a different story in today's

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:30.919
<v Speaker 1>equity markets. Um, I mean, how are you looking at this?

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Are you looking at today's trade? Well? I think today

0:20:34.760 --> 0:20:36.919
<v Speaker 1>you're going to see and and even up to the

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>FED meeting, you're going to see a lot of this chopping.

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Is it's just going to be an ugly market over

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the next week, the markets just waiting for that FED report,

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and then even between now and then, we have quite

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:50.160
<v Speaker 1>a bit of economic data to digest. So I think

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:52.440
<v Speaker 1>you're just going to see a very sideways choppy market

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:54.640
<v Speaker 1>until we get a little bit more clarity on exactly

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>what the Fed's gonna do. Hey, Megan, what do you

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>make of You know, we were talking earlier with some

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:01.239
<v Speaker 1>of our TV colleagues about the significance of you know,

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 1>we had quite a route yesterday, very impressive, uh, the

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:08.119
<v Speaker 1>SMP basically giving back all of the games that had

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 1>made in the previous four sessions. But we didn't see

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:13.679
<v Speaker 1>a huge surge in the VIX right the fear gage,

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:17.400
<v Speaker 1>which some meant to mean that maybe the sell off

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:20.439
<v Speaker 1>was a recalibration of those expectations rather than panic selling.

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:24.160
<v Speaker 1>How do you see the VIX again down almost three

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:27.680
<v Speaker 1>quarters of a point today? Yeah, I think you're exactly right.

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 1>The fact of the matter is that the market continues

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:34.119
<v Speaker 1>to be in this whipsal mode where you know, something

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:37.880
<v Speaker 1>like that CPI report comes out and then they readjust

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the expectations for the federal Reserve. The risk I see

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 1>right now is yes, that the VIX still hasn't really

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:45.679
<v Speaker 1>spiked up. You need to see that VIX much higher

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 1>to say that we've really reached that full capitulation mode.

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 1>But forty, we need to hit fourty or what I

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:54.119
<v Speaker 1>think you need to hit forty consistently and stay above that.

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we haven't been above hit forty since the pandemic,

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:00.399
<v Speaker 1>and we've seen quite a bit of daily moves, some

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:03.200
<v Speaker 1>daily volatility, but we haven't really seen it translate into

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 1>that vix. That's what we want to see to say, hey,

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 1>we might be getting in this capitulation phase. Yeah, Carol,

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:11.640
<v Speaker 1>were you the one who said a few weeks ago

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that with all the economic data we get and then

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:15.479
<v Speaker 1>the FED, it's like we're jumping from stone to stone

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:17.439
<v Speaker 1>in the pond. It's like a little kid, you know,

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:20.440
<v Speaker 1>skipping stones across a block. That's what it feels like here,

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:22.640
<v Speaker 1>because it's like, and I hear time and time again, Megan,

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 1>it's like, Okay, we just wait for the next data

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>point and then we're gonna get some clarity. We wait

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 1>to hear from the FED, and then we're gonna get

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:30.120
<v Speaker 1>some clarity. But it seems like every time we get

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>to one of these other stones, as Carol's sort of

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 1>metaphor points out, we're still waiting to jump to that

0:22:35.680 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 1>next stone. I mean, what are we going to start

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 1>to see like a good understanding of what's coming in

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the U. S. Economy? I think we have to get

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 1>a little realistic and there's certain areas of the market

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 1>that I don't think are realistic right now. For example,

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 1>earnings haven't been translated. The weakness we've seen in the

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>economic environment as well as what we expect over the

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:58.440
<v Speaker 1>next year isn't really fully reflected in the earnings expectations

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>for this year and next year. And then when you

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 1>look at the FED funds futures market, they're looking for

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 1>prem FED rate cuts as early as the first half

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:10.199
<v Speaker 1>of next year. The FED flat outside they're not going

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:12.879
<v Speaker 1>to do that. You said, they're gonna keep hiking and

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:15.879
<v Speaker 1>then they're going to stay there. So I don't understand it.

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:17.399
<v Speaker 1>It really doesn't make a lot of sense to me

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:20.359
<v Speaker 1>on how the fixed income market can be translating this

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:23.680
<v Speaker 1>into FED cuts as soon as early next year. As

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:27.680
<v Speaker 1>long as that continues that there's not realistic up expectations

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 1>in fixed income or earnings, you're going to get see

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 1>this whip songing along with economic data and FED rhetoric. Yeah,

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and think speaking of going from you know, the point

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 1>to point stone to stone, I think about going from

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:41.879
<v Speaker 1>earnings to earnings, and I am curious again when we

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:45.639
<v Speaker 1>get to the next earnings round, Megan, what ceo s

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and their teams have to say about the outlook and

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>what it means for a reset in terms of earning

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the growth, revenue, growth margins, what kind of pressures we

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:55.199
<v Speaker 1>continue to see in whether or not that leads to

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 1>evaluation resets. And I think we've got to look at

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:02.440
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing for the future. So I think you

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:04.439
<v Speaker 1>want to hear not just about you know, what interest

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>rates mean, but are they going to slow down hiring?

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Are they cutting jobs? We're starting to see that now already,

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:14.120
<v Speaker 1>especially from some of these mortgage related jobs. You're already,

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you know. I feel like every day we have a

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>company that comes out and says and maybe some of

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 1>them are very company specific stories, but nonetheless we talked

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 1>about it with a lot of the big tech names. Right.

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>It feels like we went through a period to him

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>where it was every big tech name talking about slowing hiring, right,

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:31.240
<v Speaker 1>And maybe we'll see this reflected intomorrow's you know, weekly

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:34.440
<v Speaker 1>jobless claims. But you know, you know, Megan, we're still

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:37.400
<v Speaker 1>not seeing the weakness anecdotally that we're hearing from these

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 1>companies reflected in the monthly jobs reports, right, And again,

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:44.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that's going to take time because we still

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 1>are dealing with a pretty tight labor market. I mean,

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 1>you have almost two jobs out there still for every

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 1>one person unemployed. So there's still is a very job

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:56.639
<v Speaker 1>plentiful environment. I don't think you're gonna see that really

0:24:56.680 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 1>translated into that job. There's jobs and numbers, and we

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 1>hope it that we don't. That's why some people are

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 1>still holding onto the soft landing environment over the next year,

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:07.639
<v Speaker 1>because we do have such a good labor market. All right.

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 1>So as I look with about five minutes to go

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:13.399
<v Speaker 1>in today's trading session, we're seeing some buying into the

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 1>clothes um kind of a straight lineup. We're still just

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 1>up about eight on the S and P still down

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:21.199
<v Speaker 1>about twelve on the Dow, twelve points that is an

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:24.159
<v Speaker 1>up seventy two. So but again we are seeing some

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:27.479
<v Speaker 1>buying into the clothes. Megan, what should investors be buying

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 1>at this point in your view? So, what we've been

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 1>looking at is those areas that have really reflected at

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the downside risk. So and I would

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 1>avoid some of those you know what they call your

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 1>growth at any price, those very expensive tech growth memes.

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I think there's still is some more discovery for them

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:48.399
<v Speaker 1>from evaluation and intence like, what are some names in

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that category? I mean, I wouldn't. I would just look

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:52.879
<v Speaker 1>at the sector as a whole. I'd be I'd be

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 1>cautious there at the sector as a whole. We have

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 1>not seen that really decline as much as I would like.

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 1>I would also focus on those areas, like you're small

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:06.119
<v Speaker 1>and mid cap stocks that they've been very underloved. We've

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 1>started to see aside from yesterday, some bottoming there in

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the in the Russell two thousands, so I think that

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 1>you're starting to get some people coming in buying there

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 1>because again they were pricing in worst case scenario down.

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 1>So I would focus on that right now, wait for

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the large cap space to wash itself out a little

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:26.640
<v Speaker 1>bit more, and then maybe look at some area's there. Yeah,

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:29.680
<v Speaker 1>like the SMP that down the nestack. We are seeing

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 1>investors moving into the Russell too. It's up about one

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 1>quarter one percent right now. To look at that, well,

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:38.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, up and down. Um, you got me thinking,

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Carol and pulling up the comp function on the Bluebird

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 1>terminal looking at the the Russell two thousand because it's

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of unloved. Yeah, absolutely, can we often talk about it? Um? Hey, Megan, Um,

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 1>what what keeps you up at night? Here? When it

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 1>comes to the investment out looking just got about five seconds, Um,

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:58.200
<v Speaker 1>fiscal policy leave it right there. Okay, Yeah, that's a lot.

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:00.639
<v Speaker 1>That says a lot, um, Megan, think so much. Always

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:02.680
<v Speaker 1>fun to check in with you. Megan Hornaman. She's Chief

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 1>investment Officer at Verden's Capital Advisors. They are a wealth

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:09.119
<v Speaker 1>advisory and multi office, multi family office firm. Joining us

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from Hunt Valley, Maryland. Funny to hear

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 1>say fiscal policy when you know monetary policy is also

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 1>keeping a lot of people up right, A lot of

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:19.119
<v Speaker 1>policy keeping people up at this point, doesn't matter if

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 1>it's taxes or interest rates, it's keeping people up. Thanks

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:27.959
<v Speaker 1>for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 1>or Bloomberg dot com, and you can also listen to

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 1>our radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 1>or watch us on YouTube search Bloomberg Global News