WEBVTT - Is The Kinks’ “Waterloo Sunset” The Most Beautiful Song Ever?

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to five hundred Greatest Songs, a podcast based on

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Rolling Stones hugely popular, influential, and sometimes controversial list. I'm

0:00:07.840 --> 0:00:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Britney Spanos and.

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm Rob Sheffield. We're here to shed light on the

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 2>greatest songs ever made and discover what makes them so great.

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>So, Rob, what song are we going to talk about today?

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:18.160
<v Speaker 3>Song?

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:21.640
<v Speaker 2>Very Near and Dear to my Heart Waterloose Sunset by

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 2>the Kinks.

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 1>And this song was at forty two on the original

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>list in two thousand and four and jumped up to

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>fourteen and twenty twenty one.

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 3>Mind blowing.

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:33.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there was one of very many moments going through

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 2>the list when seeing the new vote totals and seeing

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 2>the reaction for the list and seeing the Waterloo Sunset?

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:44.880
<v Speaker 3>Was this high? Just a beautiful, beautiful thing?

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:46.519
<v Speaker 1>Was the song on your list at all?

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:47.640
<v Speaker 1>It was?

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 2>And I love so many songs by the Kinks, but

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:51.640
<v Speaker 2>this one is so special.

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I love this song. I feel like I know

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of a lot of the bigger songs by the Kinks.

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>There was also a well respected man I've always really

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>liked his was in Juno.

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 3>It's so good.

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it seems very well and you know but yeah, Like,

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I feel like there's so many different facets of the

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Kinks sound that it's kind of fascinating that's all the

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:12.759
<v Speaker 1>same band, you.

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Know, Yeah, the hard rock Kinks and then the delicate

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 2>introspective Kinks.

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and it's so.

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:23.400
<v Speaker 2>Well that they're the the ultimate brother band, right. It's

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:28.400
<v Speaker 2>like there's Ray Davies, who's the shy, introspective, bookish one

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:32.399
<v Speaker 2>who's writing these incredibly delicate lyrics, and then there's brother Dave,

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:38.560
<v Speaker 2>the guitar solo guy, and such opposite personalities. And no

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:42.960
<v Speaker 2>brother band ever made more out of hating each other.

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 2>Over the years, they made, you know, the Gallagher brothers

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 2>look like one big, happy family. They would just routinely

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 2>gush blood on stage from fisticuffs, and that was something

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 2>they were doing in the sixties when nobody was doing that.

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>We don't really have brothers doing that anymore. I kind

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of wish we did. We need we need a new

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>pair of brothers to fight on stage.

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Yes, awesome, we need sisters to open out this.

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>We need time to get if.

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 3>You have any issues you want to work out on

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 3>sta on stage.

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Yes, while you're all like doing the joint drumming moment

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:19.800
<v Speaker 1>like's let's get some blood.

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, absolutely. It was shocking to me that Waterloo

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Sunset was so high up on the list, given that,

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's never been a radio hit. It's never

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 2>been a song that you hear in the deli, it's

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 2>never been a song that gets synced in movies or

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 2>TV shows, and so really for its entire history, it's

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:45.359
<v Speaker 2>been sort of a cult favorite song. It's very comparable

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 2>to pet Sounds, I think, in terms of the way

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:54.959
<v Speaker 2>Pet Sounds never blockbuster, but every generation discovers it and

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:57.240
<v Speaker 2>once you hear it, it's in your soul forever.

0:02:57.440 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:00.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember why I first heard it. I'm I

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 1>might have honestly been from the original list, like it

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:04.639
<v Speaker 1>might have been from reading the two thousand and four

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:07.080
<v Speaker 1>list and finding music from that, just because like I

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:09.360
<v Speaker 1>feel like every other really big Kink song I have

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 1>very distinct like my shron in Reality bites and like

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you Really Got Me the Van Halen cover and like

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 1>listening to that and like you know, I mean, Lola

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>was just like always played on radio and stuff like that.

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 1>So I feel like this song, I can't really remember

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 1>why I first heard it and why I love it

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>so much. I honestly do think it might be from

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the original list and from listening that's so interesting, like

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 1>it feels like appropriate for kind of how long I

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>feel like I've known this song and where it probably

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>came from.

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 2>It's just so delicate and vulnerable. I remember hearing it

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 2>on the radio as a little kid, yea, and it

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 2>was terrifying for me, just how vulnerable it was that

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 2>here's this guy, and I knew in my head that

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 2>he was the same guy who's sang you Really Got

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 2>Me and all Day and all of the Night and

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 2>all these bangers, and of course I knew and loved

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 2>Lola and so many any of Ray Davies' songs were

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 2>so funny, and some of them were so rowdy, and

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 2>I hadn't yet heard his quiet, introspective, fearful side, and

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 2>just this incredibly intimate portrait of just a man living alone,

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 2>looking out his window and following people day today, and

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 2>knowing this couple who meet at the subway station every

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 2>Friday night, and just rooting for them, and even though

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 2>he's got no friends and no love of his own,

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 2>he totally takes pleasure in this life that they're having

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:37.279
<v Speaker 2>there's no other.

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 3>Song like it. It's really amazing and you hear its.

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:44.039
<v Speaker 2>Influence and songwriters now from Lord to Taylor Swift to

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:46.719
<v Speaker 2>even Drake. I think Drake has a lot of Waterloo

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Sunset energy in his songs. Yeah, Waterloo Sunset. It's so

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 2>quiet and almost defenseless sounding, but just overwhelmingly joyful too. Yeah.

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>When I was reading about the song and like the

0:04:56.360 --> 0:05:00.279
<v Speaker 1>history of it, it was really like how ray I felt

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>so felt almost too vulnerable to share it with the band, Yeah,

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:06.720
<v Speaker 1>which is such like a striking thing about just kind

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:09.279
<v Speaker 1>of how intimate it felt, and also the fact, I

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 1>mean it was originally going to be Liverpool Sunset and

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>then a Peen Waterloo Sunset. But there's also like his

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 1>history with that particular tube station in London, and how

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 1>there's a hospital he was hospitalized as a teen really

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 1>close today. Just like all those little connections to it

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:26.160
<v Speaker 1>are really fascinating to learn about it.

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, London is a city, you.

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:31.359
<v Speaker 1>Know, Well, you become a regular in London and it

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 1>loves you. I do listen Waterloos. I like to listen

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to songs of the cities that I'm going to when

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I go to them, just to get into little method traveling,

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>you know. But I do listen to Waterloo Sunset every

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>time I go to London.

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 3>It's so beautiful.

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Also it changes a song so much when you

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 2>see the train station, which is not a romantic.

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Places truly horrendous. I mean I can't imagine romanticizing a

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 1>single tube station in London, but especially the Waterloo stations

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>easy in there.

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it's giant, it's impersonal. It's better now than it was,

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 2>you know in the eighties when it was totally dump

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 2>and in Ray Davies's time, it was you know, he

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:12.840
<v Speaker 2>really loved singing songs about London and it's when it

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:14.480
<v Speaker 2>was the big Black smoke because he loved to sing.

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:18.479
<v Speaker 2>He loved to sing songs about the seediest, crampedest, least

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 2>glamorous parts of the city and to find romance there.

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, Waterloo Sunset really captures that.

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:27.559
<v Speaker 1>I mean watching a sunset on river times is very,

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>very beautiful, I will say, in spite of the station

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 1>itself being kind of chaotic, you know, it is a

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>there is a lot of beauty in that sort of

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 1>scene no matter what. So I'm like I could see why.

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:45.039
<v Speaker 2>I remember I was in London interviewing Lily Allen, the

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 2>ultimate London girl you know from Clapham like and because

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 2>she is so quintessentially London, and I was like, I'm

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 2>here for a couple of days. What should I go see?

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 2>What should I do? What kind of London experience? And

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 2>she was like, to go to Waterloo Station and I

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:05.279
<v Speaker 2>was like really, And She's like, everything you think about

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:08.599
<v Speaker 2>the song is totally different when you see the station

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 2>and you see the river and you know, he says

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 2>it's dirty, old river. It's dirty, it's old. Yes, And

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 2>to have this beautiful story that's set in such an

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 2>unglamorous urban environment, and that's the way he liked to

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 2>tell his stories. Yeah, it's funny that this song, like

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 2>you said, he meant it to be Liverpool Sunset and

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 2>he's changed his mind after the Beatles did Penny Lane.

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 3>It's funny because.

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Penny Lane is such a Ray Davies kind of song,

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 2>and Paul McCartney was really the only other songwriter like

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Ray Davies at the time who's writing these songs about

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 2>women in this really empathetic way that was completely unusual

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 2>for male songwriters at the time. That these aren't romantic objects,

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 2>and they aren't sexualized in any way, and they aren't

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 2>glamorized in any way. But when Paul sings about the

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 2>nurse and Penny Lane and he's just like wondering what

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 2>she thinks about, how she feels as if she's gonna play.

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 2>Their characters have interior lives in a way that just

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 2>makes other male songwriters of the era sound just really silly.

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah. And the kind of like voyeuristic element, I

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>mean kind of you know, kind of beautiful sort of

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 1>witnessing of a love story unfold who reminds me so

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>much of heroes as well, And like, of course David

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Bowie covered Waterloo Sunset and has a great version of it,

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>but it always reminds me of that. The idea of

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>like kind of looking through a window and seeing these

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>lovers and kind of seeing it unfold in front of you.

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 2>That's such a brilliant comparison. That's absolutely right on. Yeah,

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 2>it's very similar stories in a very ugly, unromantic, dirty

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 2>unromantic kind of place to have this beautiful romantic moment

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 2>that somebody witnesses. But you know, Terry and Julie that

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 2>of course, like herrying it as a little kid. I

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 2>didn't realize that they were named after you know, famous

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:59.319
<v Speaker 2>movie stars at the time symbolize swinging London for people,

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Terence dam and Julie Christie. Just the idea of this

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:05.080
<v Speaker 2>old man. It's funny that I have such a vivid

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 2>picture of a character and Waterloo sunset, and I picture him,

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 2>this old guy, this really vivid narrow apartment and this

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 2>narrow window that he's peaking through and seeing people walk by,

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 2>and he's just happy that they have their lives and

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:22.719
<v Speaker 2>he doesn't feel bitter that he doesn't have that love

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 2>and romance in his own life.

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, really amazing.

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean even just the way that he sings

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>and I Am Not Afraid is so heart wrenching, Like

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:30.359
<v Speaker 1>it's so beautiful.

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 3>It's really beautiful.

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, Yeah, and both those songs are kind

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 1>of witnessing these like this love and romance unfold. There's

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:41.200
<v Speaker 1>so much optimism, obviously, you know, this is Bowie and

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Berlin and kind of singing about the optimism of the

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>future and like our hopes for it. And then of

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 1>course this is like just just watching a mundane kind

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:49.680
<v Speaker 1>of day and seeing a lot of beauty in that

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>is very striking in both.

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:55.559
<v Speaker 2>Yes, absolutely and weird. There was such a commercial flop

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 2>at the time. Yeah, and that's something that's as with

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:01.719
<v Speaker 2>Pet Sounds. It's like easy part of the story. I mean,

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Pet Sounds is such a classic now, it's weird to

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:06.199
<v Speaker 2>think that it was a total flop that almost destroyed

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 2>the Beach Boys when it came out. And the same

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 2>is true with something else of the Kinks, that they

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 2>had all those great earlies when they were like just

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:18.839
<v Speaker 2>you know, the ultimate London garage band, and you really

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:21.200
<v Speaker 2>got me is so great all day and all of

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 2>the night. Like you said, there's a lot of hope

0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 2>and optimism in a song that you know, it's very

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 2>like coming from a very sad place in some ways,

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 2>but you know you could definitely hear that. I love

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:33.679
<v Speaker 2>his wife's vocal on the song. He's always said that

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 2>he meant it to be a Liverpool song, and then

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 2>he thought, wait a minute. I've been a Londoner my

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:39.560
<v Speaker 2>entire life. I was born here, I grew up here.

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 2>Why am I doing Liverpool song? London is my place?

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 3>And he had his.

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 2>Wife come in and sing, and she's doing those beautiful

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 2>like vocal harmonies and you know, he's with his brother

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 2>and they're getting along great that day. And it's funny

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 2>that this song was made in an atmosphere of joy

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 2>and community when the song is about feeling very alone

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:00.840
<v Speaker 2>but like you said, not feeling afraid.

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And why do you think it jumped up so

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>much on the list in between?

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:09.319
<v Speaker 2>I partly think it's because there's so many songwriters now

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 2>who are trying to do this kind of song. And

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 2>Waterloo Sinse that was very unique kind of song. But

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 2>I still remember as a little kid hearing it for

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 2>the first time, yea, being really shocked. I was like, wait,

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 2>he doesn't need any friends. Wait, why is he out

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 2>there trying to make friends? Isn't that how what usually

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 2>happens in a song is somebody has an emotional problem

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 2>and they learn something, they get over it whatever. I'm like, No,

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 2>this guy begins a song very sad and alone, and

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 2>he ends very alone, but he takes joy in other

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 2>people having their lives.

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 2>And that was a lot of process for me as

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 2>a little kid. And I think because songwriters are now

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 2>so interested in stories like that. You know, we mentioned

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:57.439
<v Speaker 2>Taylor Swift and Lord and Drake, but there's certainly a

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:00.200
<v Speaker 2>lot more. The song is sort of a template for

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 2>kind of songwriting that people are more ambitious about trying now.

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 2>And I remember that song. I remember when the two

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 2>thousand and four version of a list came out. I

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:11.680
<v Speaker 2>was so surprised it was so high then, And I

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 2>was so glad to see it so high, because you know,

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 2>it was never any kind of hit or radio staple.

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:20.319
<v Speaker 2>But something about the bravery of the song, that it's

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 2>a song about a very shy person speaking up and

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 2>telling the story of their life. I think that really

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 2>speaks to people. I don't know what to make of this,

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 2>but the fact that the balloting for this list was

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 2>done in the spring of twenty twenty, when a lot

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 2>of people were feeling this way. I wasn't in the

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 2>mood at all to listen to Waterloo Sunset. In the

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 2>spring of twenty twenty, the pandemic started, we all thought

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:48.960
<v Speaker 2>it would be. It took everyone by surprise not to

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 2>get into the whole story of it. But at that moment,

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 2>a song like Waterloose Sunset was speaking way too much

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 2>to like how I was feeling. That was part of

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 2>my surprise seeing it so high in the list. I thought,

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, are people just feeling this way?

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>You could feel so much of that in a lot

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 1>of songs in the way that things like shook out

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:09.560
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the voting, where you can tell people

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>were literally going to their comfort songs in a lot

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 1>of ways, and going to the songs that like bring

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>them some sort of like warmth or like sometimes hope

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 1>or sometimes kind of just like letting them kind of

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>sit in whatever sadness or anger they were feeling at

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the time.

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, Ray Davies, He's got so much in common for

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 2>me with Smokey Robinson as a singer and songwriter and

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 2>someone who is able to like type into emotions that

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 2>other songwriters at the time were just terrified of going

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:39.359
<v Speaker 2>anywhere near, and that they both had this really forlorn

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:43.200
<v Speaker 2>quality in their voices, and yet there's so much wit

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 2>and humor and playfulness in their songs. But I think

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 2>of Ray and Smokey as two songwriters that were had

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:52.199
<v Speaker 2>a lot in common but very different from what anybody

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 2>else was doing at the time.

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Ray Davies.

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 2>Something I love about Ray Davies that I love so

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 2>many things about Ray Davies, but the fact that he's

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 2>always surprised by which songs of his striking nerve with

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:09.599
<v Speaker 2>people over the years, and he's often expressed surprise that

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:12.720
<v Speaker 2>Waterloo Sunset means so much to people. It's funny that

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 2>he did all these lofty, theatrical concept albums in the

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 2>seventies The Kinks Present a soap Opera or preservation Act too,

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 2>and that he thought of those at the time as

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 2>his major works of the period. And it was always

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 2>so funny for him that people attached to Kink's deep

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 2>cuts and B sides. It was really wild that for

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 2>a long time he was in a couple with Chrissy

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Hind from The Pretenders when she was like the coolest

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 2>punk rocker in the universe, and it was so wild

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 2>that she was into all these songs that were Kink's

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 2>B sides. She's saying I Go to sleep and stop

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 2>your Sobbing, which were total deep cut yeah songs, and

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 2>that Van Halen did. Of course, they're huge version of

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 2>you Really Got Me, But they also did this incredibly

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 2>obscure Kinks by side where of all the good Times Gone.

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 3>He has so many.

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Songs from this period that people will hear and they're like, nope,

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 2>that's my song. So songs that were totally obscure and

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 2>forgotten just became touchstones for people.

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I love that there are multiple Van Halen the Kinks

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>like connections. I didn't realize there's a second song that

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 1>they also.

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 3>You mentioned David Bowie.

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and of course he did a beautiful version of

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 2>this song after being a fan of it his whole life.

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 2>It's fairly in two thousand and three with reality, But

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 2>the connections between Ray Davies and David Bowie are so interesting.

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I love his version of it a lot.

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I didn't hear that until later. Honestly, I don't think

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I heard reality until like much later, But I do

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>love that.

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 2>Very underrated, Oh my god, great period for Bowie. But

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:57.359
<v Speaker 2>Bowie always cited Ray Davies is one of his best influences,

0:15:57.400 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 2>not just as a songwriter but as a singer. That

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 2>they both were very into doing the London accent without

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 2>toning it down to explain where it sounds really funny

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 2>to American ears, like yeah, but you know, Bowie did

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 2>wear of All the Good Times Gone on his Pin

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 2>Ups album, and he really played up the sort of

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, cartoon London schoolboys sort of accent. But yeah,

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 2>the connection you made between Waterloo Sunset and Heroes is

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 2>so fascinating because they were both so interested in these

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 2>kind of love songs that take place with people who

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 2>are misfits from the rest of the world and they

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 2>just have nothing but each other, but that's enough for them.

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean just kind of the sort of like

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>witness scene of a scene in pop music is always

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 1>such an underrated kind of vehicle in singing about something

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>like I just I love that sort of kind of

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 1>that window into something else that a great pop writer

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>could really yeah do where they kind of go outside

0:16:56.120 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>of themselves and they're like, here's what I'm witnessing right

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>in front of my eyes of this beautiful scene and

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of adding these kind of making up these characters

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:04.400
<v Speaker 1>in the same way that a person does when they're

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 1>listening to a great song.

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Anyway, absolutely, I remember in the eighties Bob Geldoff did

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 2>a sequel to Waterloo Sunset where.

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:15.879
<v Speaker 3>Really where Terry and Julie.

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 2>Got married and then got divorced, and I remember thinking, like,

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 2>Bob Geldoff, this is not your this is not your story. Yes,

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 2>you don't have to break I get now that this

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:30.360
<v Speaker 2>is you know, like people hear different parts of their

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 2>story in this song. But I remember I was appalled, like,

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:35.359
<v Speaker 2>you know, like when Bob Geldoff did this and I was,

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, a teenager, and I was like, you can't.

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 3>Have Terry and Julie break up.

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 2>There was the whole purpose, yes, But it's funny that

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:47.159
<v Speaker 2>to me Waterloos, since I was in a song identified

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 2>with so much when I was nineteen and I thought, Wow.

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:52.159
<v Speaker 3>This is me.

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm the guy in this song. I felt so old

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 2>at nineteen that I was like, yep, this is me.

0:17:57.400 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 2>This is how the rest of my life will be.

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:02.120
<v Speaker 2>And it's funny that a few years later I've felt

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 2>much more like Terry and Julian, And I thought, isn't

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 2>that weird that when I was a teenager, I was

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:09.359
<v Speaker 2>so sure that I was the Ray Davies guy in

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 2>this story, and a few years later I was like

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 2>back to like feeling like Ray Davies again, and a

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 2>few years later is back to feeling like Terry and

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 2>Julian again. Like, it's really funny that this is a

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 2>story that we're all part of, from different areas, from

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 2>different parts of the story, from different perspectives, and it's

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 2>just a song that changes as you love it over

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 2>the years. And the way he says very beautifully in

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 2>the song, the social anxiety he talks about in such

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 2>a matter of fact way, you know, like I'm so lazy.

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:40.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't like to wander. I stay at home at night.

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:42.719
<v Speaker 2>And I thought he liked Terry and Julie because they

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:45.159
<v Speaker 2>leave the city behind and go home. It's like, no,

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:47.879
<v Speaker 2>they're not going home. They're going out, probably to the

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:51.159
<v Speaker 2>same bar and soho where Lola is hanging out. It

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:55.159
<v Speaker 2>really kind of changed the song that his selfless joy

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:58.440
<v Speaker 2>in the life that they have. It's just astonishing, what

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:00.879
<v Speaker 2>a generous song it is. It realids, you have a

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 2>Beatles song that I know you love as much as

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:05.920
<v Speaker 2>I do. She loves you? Yea where Paul who's narrating

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:08.680
<v Speaker 2>the song, if we can call it Paul. It sounds

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:11.640
<v Speaker 2>like Paul to me. But he's like, look, she loves you.

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:15.120
<v Speaker 2>She doesn't love me, she loves you. I think she's

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 2>wrong about this. I think she's an idiot to love

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 2>you so much. But you two have each other. You

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:21.880
<v Speaker 2>should be glad about this, and you should make things

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 2>right with her. It's really amazing, Like how generous that

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:27.159
<v Speaker 2>song is that the narrator is very like, Yeah, you

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 2>screwed it up with this girl. You need to make it,

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 2>you need to fix it up because you're very lucky.

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 2>And the narrator of that song is so just something

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 2>so selfless and generous about that. And there's a lot

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 2>of that in Waterloo Sunset too. He's not watching them thinking, well,

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:45.479
<v Speaker 2>where's my Turry, where's my Julie. Yeah, he's just so

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:47.680
<v Speaker 2>happy to see how much they love each other.

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's just just pleasantly watching and witnessing their love.

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 2>It's so nice, right, And it's funny because, like, you know,

0:19:56.840 --> 0:19:58.920
<v Speaker 2>the way we're describing the song, it seems like there's

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:00.959
<v Speaker 2>no way you should be a to get away with it.

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 2>It should end up being like sentimental in modeling.

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it's so joyful.

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 2>Yes. Robert Chris Gaut called it memorably in his famous words,

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 2>he called it the most beautiful song in the English language. Yeah,

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 2>and when I hear it, I think Robert Christgau is

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:16.360
<v Speaker 2>absolutely right.

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 3>It really is one of a kind.

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 2>It's a kind of beauty that isn't even a more

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 2>beautiful version of other songs. It's the only one like it.

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we are joined now by Rolling Stone senior writer

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Corey Grow. Thank you so much for being here with us.

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:34.399
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for having me, Thanks Scry, Yeah, thank you.

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:34.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>And of course the song clocks in at number fourteen

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 1>on the list. Were you surprised to see it ranked

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 1>so highly?

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:41.399
<v Speaker 4>I was pleasantly surprised to see it rank so highly.

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:44.400
<v Speaker 4>I think it's ranked higher than I Want to Hold

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 4>your Hand and lower than give Me a shelter, which

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:52.880
<v Speaker 4>is weird that it's a rare error right there. But yeah,

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 4>I was. I was surprised, you know, especially since it

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 4>wasn't really a hit here. Yeah, you know, it speaks

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 4>to its influence with the way that resonated with people,

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 4>you know, songwriters and people who actually like listen to

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:05.920
<v Speaker 4>music beyond the radio.

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And what do you think kind of brought it?

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, for so many voters to rank the song

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 1>so highly or included in their ballots, Like, what do

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 1>you think it is about this song that for this

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:18.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one list, the song was so enduring that

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 1>so many people voted for it.

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 4>I think it's just it hits you with this sentimentality

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:24.919
<v Speaker 4>you didn't. I mean, I guess there were a lot

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 4>of bands that did a lot of that sentimentality back

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:29.359
<v Speaker 4>in the sixties, especially the late sixties, but there's just

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 4>some nostalgic aspect of that song that I think reaches people,

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 4>and just that melody, it just it just keeps you.

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 4>You know, you want to hear it again, You want

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:39.639
<v Speaker 4>to hear it again and again again. I was listening

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:43.159
<v Speaker 4>to what's his name from the old ninety sevens Rhett Miller. Miller,

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 4>he did a live recording of it, and he says,

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:47.360
<v Speaker 4>this is the greatest song ever. I wish I could

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 4>have written this, And like you know, there's so many

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:51.920
<v Speaker 4>different covers of it from like def Leppard that a

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:55.879
<v Speaker 4>really weird hard rock version of it, and Bowie covered

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 4>it and all sorts of people. But there's just something

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 4>about it that's got this nostal too that just hits

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:04.399
<v Speaker 4>everybody from all different walks of life.

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, David Bowie was the last song he sang on

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 2>stage in his entire life, which wasn't planned that way,

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 2>but such a perfect song for him to sign off with,

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 2>and that there's so much emotion and yearning in the

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 2>melody and such an intensely like gritty, real visual story

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 2>and seen through the eyes of this character. And you know,

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 2>we learned so much about him just staring him talk

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 2>about these people.

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 4>If you analyze the literature of the song, it's really

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:40.200
<v Speaker 4>fascinating because here's this sort of voyeuristic look at these

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:44.639
<v Speaker 4>two lovers from some unseen space. That's he's hiding up

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 4>high and looking at them, and he's got this sort

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 4>of Shakespearean son at one thirty lust for this train station.

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:56.160
<v Speaker 4>It's like he loves Waterloo Station the way that only

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 4>lou Reid could love New York, you know what I mean,

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:01.480
<v Speaker 4>Because it's just so like Bend to Waterloo Station and

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:04.440
<v Speaker 4>they gets gross and dirty, and he even likes he

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 4>talks about people moving around like flies in Waterloo sunset.

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 4>But you don't notice it because it sounds so beautiful.

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 4>But you know, if you actually were to like analyze

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:18.120
<v Speaker 4>the lyrics, there's some really kind of weird grittiness to it.

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:20.959
<v Speaker 4>It gets hidden in there. But going back to Bowie,

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:22.359
<v Speaker 4>one of my favorite things that I was reading, I'd

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:23.920
<v Speaker 4>read an interview with the Raid where he was talking

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:26.919
<v Speaker 4>about how when he and Bowie did it together at

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 4>Carnegie Hall, and three they tried to sing like each

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:32.880
<v Speaker 4>other and that was their their challenge that like Ray

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 4>wanted to sing like Bowie, and Bowie wanted to sing

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 4>like Ray. If you listen to it online, it's really

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 4>fascinating to hear it from that perspective. They're tossing it

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 4>at one another.

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 3>There.

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:47.639
<v Speaker 2>Wow, I never knew that, but they obviously such a

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 2>huge influence on Bowie. Yeah, and just that really kind

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:53.920
<v Speaker 2>of vulnerable, quavery sort of voice.

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>And you've interviewed Ray before. What kind of stands out

0:23:56.800 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 1>to you about him as a songwriter and performer, especially

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>in comparison to his peers of that time.

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:07.479
<v Speaker 4>A couple of things. One is he's unapologetically British. He

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:10.680
<v Speaker 4>loves to be English, you know. Obviously Village Green Preservation

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:14.359
<v Speaker 4>Society is him. He even you know, not in the

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:16.879
<v Speaker 4>sense of political, but he says it's a conservative album

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 4>because he wanted to conserve the England that he grew

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 4>up with. So even like Waterloo Sunset, like you know,

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 4>I compared it to lou Read before, like the only

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 4>other artists that I could think of that loves his

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 4>locality as much as Ray loves England would be like

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 4>Lou with New York, you know what I mean, to

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 4>the point that it's anti commercial, to the point that

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 4>it really kind of in some ways just stymy to

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 4>his career where he's this great songwriter that could have

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 4>been so much bigger if he had written about other

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:45.200
<v Speaker 4>places or things rather than just England does his big news. Yeah,

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:47.439
<v Speaker 4>and that's how Lou was too. Lou, didn't you have

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 4>big hits other than you know, Walking the Wildside. But

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:51.919
<v Speaker 4>the other thing that strikes me about Ray is just

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 4>how much he sort of cloaks himself and hides and

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:58.119
<v Speaker 4>sort of evades things. And you can hear that a

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 4>bit in Waterloo Sunset, because like the Terry and Julie characters,

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:03.919
<v Speaker 4>you know, he originally said that they were Terrence Stamp

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:06.159
<v Speaker 4>and Julie Christie, who were dating at the time, and

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:09.159
<v Speaker 4>then later said that Terry was based on like just

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:12.439
<v Speaker 4>the name of his nephew, and that Rosie, his sister

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 4>who had moved off to Australia, was sort of the

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 4>Julie type character, and that he had just picked Julie

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:20.399
<v Speaker 4>as a name. And there's so he changes these things,

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 4>and I don't know, have you read X Ray.

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:23.199
<v Speaker 3>Have you read his memoir.

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:24.359
<v Speaker 4>You have you read that?

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was written at a very strange time for

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:30.879
<v Speaker 2>him in terms of like, yeah, getting his story straight.

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 2>It was really weird whether it was written when it

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:35.879
<v Speaker 2>was written, and some of it he clearly believes in

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 2>some of it he clearly doesn't.

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:41.199
<v Speaker 1>Love that title. Yeah, great title for a memoir, and.

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 4>The book is like it's written from a perspective of

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:46.399
<v Speaker 4>a character and he's liken it. He wanted it to

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:49.399
<v Speaker 4>be his in abook of book and like unreliable narrator

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 4>and all this stuff. So it's just like he'll do

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 4>anything he can to sort of just hide his own

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 4>the truth or whatever it is. So it's like nobody's

0:25:57.560 --> 0:25:59.880
<v Speaker 4>ever really going to know the truth of Waterloo Sunset

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 4>because he's given so many different explanations of it over

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 4>the years too. But yeah, those are the things that

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:06.400
<v Speaker 4>probably stand out to me most thinking about him.

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and they invented the brother band who hate each other. Yes,

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 2>Like in terms of you know, like the Gallagher brothers

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:15.159
<v Speaker 2>had nothing on them when it came to just punching

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:17.920
<v Speaker 2>each other out on stage, never having a kind word

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:20.880
<v Speaker 2>to say about each other, but their brothers, and they

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 2>did in one of their nineties albums. They had that

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 2>great duet where they're saying hatred will keep us together,

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 2>and it's really like their story, you know, Like there

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:30.120
<v Speaker 2>was that time, like a few weeks ago where they

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 2>posted photo of themselves watching the Arsenal game. I think

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 2>it was they were just watching the football together, and

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 2>like people around the world were like, oh my god,

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 2>like Y and Dave like watching football together. That was

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 2>so exciting to people, Like it's such a fascinating brotherhood.

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, And I mean, but they're still not reuniting. You know,

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 4>the Stones are playing met Life on a couple of weeks.

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 4>Where's the Kinks tour? You know, that's that's the sibling rivalry.

0:26:56.680 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you Brob. The van Halen thinks they forgot

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 1>about that, and you're the perfect person to talk about

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 1>this with our as a resident metal expert. But like,

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 1>what was that connection for Van Halen to to the Kinks,

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 1>And like, you know, do they speak about it extensively

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:10.479
<v Speaker 1>and kind of that influence that outside of that guitar

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>riff sort of inspiring so many bringing many genres.

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 4>Van Halen began as this backyard rock and roll party band,

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:21.200
<v Speaker 4>and so they did covers, you know. I think what's

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 4>funny is they were originally called Rat Salad before they

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 4>were called Mammoth, and rat Salad's like it's an instrumental

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 4>break on a Black Sabbath record.

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but they they played.

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 4>Just whatever would get people moving, whether it was Sabbath

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 4>or the Kinks or whatever. So I think the Kinks

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 4>was just a hold over there.

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 3>They did where have all.

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:41.399
<v Speaker 4>The Good Times Gone? Which is the that is the

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 4>apotheosis of David Lee Roth in a single song, Like

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 4>he just like owns that vibe of like where have

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:50.959
<v Speaker 4>all the good Times gone? Especially at that time and

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:53.159
<v Speaker 4>especially now, And it's just like, yeah, they were, they

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:55.119
<v Speaker 4>were the party band. So I think I think that

0:27:55.200 --> 0:27:56.920
<v Speaker 4>it was just that it was just like, let's keep

0:27:56.920 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 4>the live thing going, like especially if you listen to

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 4>like old live record so that they would do it

0:28:00.880 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 4>like the Whiskey and stuff like that.

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:03.360
<v Speaker 3>It's just like, all right, everybody.

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:05.640
<v Speaker 4>Knows the song, let's do it, you know. But yeah,

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 4>it's just amazing to think of how prolific he was,

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:10.359
<v Speaker 4>you know, and that he would just dash off these

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:12.880
<v Speaker 4>songs and probably forget them and they would be brilliant.

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, thank you so much Corey for joining us today.

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 1>I really appreciate it.

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I have real joy to hear you talk about

0:28:20.320 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 3>the Kinks.

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 2>You are like you, Ray and Dave are probably the

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:26.400
<v Speaker 2>living experts on the topic.

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:28.400
<v Speaker 3>And Andy Green who should be here too.

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, thank you very much for having me.

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:33.200
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much.

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much for listening to Rolling Stone's five

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:38.959
<v Speaker 2>hundred Greatest songs. This podcast is brought to you by

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:43.720
<v Speaker 2>Rolling Stone and iHeartMedia. Written and hosted by Rob Sheffield

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 2>and Brittany Spanos, Executive produced by Jason Fine, Alex Dale,

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Christian Horde and Gus Winner, and produced by Jesse Cannon,

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:54.360
<v Speaker 2>with music supervision by Eric Siler.