WEBVTT - JPMorgan Earnings, Obama Endorses Biden

0:00:00.440 --> 0:00:02.960
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Jason Kelly. We're here every day bringing you the latest

0:00:05.519 --> 0:00:09.800
<v Speaker 1>news from the world of business and finance, plus technology, politics, economics,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>all harnessing the power of Bloomberg Business Week reporters and editors,

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:16.639
<v Speaker 1>not to mention our hundred journalists and analysts more than

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and twenty countries. You can download Bloomberg Business

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:22.159
<v Speaker 1>Week on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com. You can

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 1>also listen to our radio show weekdays at two pm

0:00:24.520 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Eastern only on Bloomberg Radio. Well. As we said at

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the top of the show, Jamie Diamond, he is a

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:34.880
<v Speaker 1>voice everyone listens to. JP Morgan earnings out today. Jamie

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Diamond back UH from very serious surgery, but he is

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>back in the seed. He is as lively as ever.

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's check out a little bit of what he had

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>to say. The bad economy has very adverse consequences way

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:52.479
<v Speaker 1>beyond just the economy, you know, and in terms of

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>mental health, domestic abuse, UH, substance abuse, et cetera. So

0:00:57.800 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>we have a rational plan to get back to work,

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the j the things to do, UH, and you know,

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>hopefully it'll be keen around later, but it will be

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>mad at July August, all right, So Jing July August.

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 1>That seemed to set a little bit of a tone

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and people, as I said, really listen to Jamie Diamond,

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>someone who knows this bank inside and out. We count

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:23.039
<v Speaker 1>on her for her insights. Is Michelle Davis, finance reporter

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Jonius on the phone from Vermont, one of

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the hardest working reporters out there. Uh, Michelle, good to

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>have you with us on such a busy day. Thank you.

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, So everybody checking out what j D was

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 1>having to say, He seems like he's back to his

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>old self in in many ways. What did he say

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>that was most notable from the perspective of not just

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 1>investors in the bank, but sort of the world at large,

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 1>because he's a statesman of sorts at this point. Yeah, definitely. Um, well,

0:01:57.480 --> 0:02:00.120
<v Speaker 1>I think the most notable thing, just in terms of

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>what it means for the holy economy was the fact that,

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, Jupimorgan's profit fell to the lowest more than

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>six years. Um. He had previously said that, you know,

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the bank wouldn't be immune to fall out from the

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>pandemic and that he was predicting a Bader session. But

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:19.079
<v Speaker 1>the comments that you guys highlighted earlier about wanting to

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, get people back to work and reopen the

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:26.079
<v Speaker 1>economy were also I would say, very interesting because, um,

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 1>you know something that there's a lot of debate about

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>right now, and that I don't think anyone really knows

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>like how soon this is going to happen. That the

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>one definitive thing he did says he doesn't think it

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>will happen before May. Um. And the other thing you

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:44.359
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that I thought was pretty interesting is that, you know,

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>after he had hurt surgery, a lot of people I

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 1>thought that, you know, this pretty severe surgery would would

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 1>cause him to reevaluate, you know, his life choices, possibly

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>retire earlier than anticipated. Um. And he totally you know,

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 1>knocked those assumptions away and said that he was really

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>eager to get back to work. But um, you know,

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>having undergone this surgery, uh, did not change any of

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>his his retirement plans. Um. Even though it did underscore

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the strength of of the banks bench and the fact

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>that you know, managers were able to carry on without

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 1>him for the for the four weeks that he was away.

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I love what he said, the quote that you guys

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>have I'm walking several miles a day. I like working.

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:28.079
<v Speaker 1>I've been working for several weeks now. It doesn't really

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:30.399
<v Speaker 1>change very much how I view the world. So he's

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>at their front and center. I thought also what was interesting, um,

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>not only his take, and I do agree with Jason,

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>that we are looking at leaders, you know, that transcend

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 1>their industry to get an idea of, Okay, how do

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>we come back from this virus? When do we reopen

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the economy, especially when you've got such uh, seemingly a

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>battle between what's going on in Washington versus governors on

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the front lines in various states, certainly here in the

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 1>New York metro area. Um, but it's interesting, you know

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>what he had to say, because I think we are

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>we are looking to these types of individuals to get

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>an idea of, Okay, how do we come back? When

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 1>do we come back exactly? And something that he didn't

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>mention today but that was in his annual letter last

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>week is that he thinks, uh, testing, an access to testing,

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:18.719
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be something that's going to be really crucial

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 1>to reopening the economy and getting people back to work,

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:27.040
<v Speaker 1>all right, Michelle Davis, we are going to leave it there.

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Jason

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Kelly on Bloomberg Radio. Well, coronavirus cases are surpassing one

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 1>ninety three million. Deaths are topping about a hundred and

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty d around the world. US docks, so they are

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>shrugging that off because they're really rallying on signs of

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:50.040
<v Speaker 1>virus spread is easing, and there's more talk globally of

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>countries and economies reopening. Let's talk about the realistic expectation

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:58.920
<v Speaker 1>of that. With Dr Joe and Roberts, chief Quality Officer

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:01.919
<v Speaker 1>Providence Sancho's of Health, on the phone from Everett, Washington.

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 1>You might recall the first US case of the virus

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>was confirmed in Washington State at Providence Regional Medical Severn

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:11.719
<v Speaker 1>Center and Everett, which is that part of that Providence St.

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Joseph's Health System UM. Dr Roberts, nice to have you

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:18.239
<v Speaker 1>here with us. There is an awful lot of talk

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:23.359
<v Speaker 1>about reopening UM economies around the globe, and at the

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:26.559
<v Speaker 1>same time we're hearing a lot of individuals including JP

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:32.159
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Chase CEO, Jamie Diamond also the governor Massachusetts. Everybody says,

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 1>more testing, more testing. How do you see it? Can

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:39.719
<v Speaker 1>we reopen without doing more testing? Um? Yeah, So thanks

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>for having me really appreciate it. Um Carol, Um, I

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>do think uh testing uh is going to be a

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>requirement for us we opening. We already are talking about

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:54.840
<v Speaker 1>just on the healthcare side, about what the world may

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 1>look like as we slowly reopen our systems. Um, We'll

0:05:59.839 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>look ing at the backup of things like surgery for

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 1>slow growing cancers that had been put on pause as

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:11.279
<v Speaker 1>we responded to the acute pace, and folks are going

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:14.279
<v Speaker 1>to need that care. The question is how do we

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 1>deliver that care in a safe way. We have certainly

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>figured out how to isolate our COVID patients from all

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:27.160
<v Speaker 1>other patients. We know that our emergency rooms in our

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:32.839
<v Speaker 1>and our surgery departments are free of COVID because we've

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:35.839
<v Speaker 1>done such a good job of testing in the hospitals.

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:39.479
<v Speaker 1>But because testing is still limited, we just are not

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>able to know where our communities are and how many

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>people are infected out in the community, which is really

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>difficult than to know exactly how quickly we should all

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>come back online. And so Dr Roberts. Help us understand

0:06:57.279 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>from from your perspective and for a layment like myself,

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 1>what does effective testing and tracing look like? What what

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>could have you know regular person? You know, a regular

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 1>well person reasonably expected in terms of our daily lives

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 1>going forward if we get what we need in place.

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>So if we have testing available, and that's both testing

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>for people with infection, either before they have symptoms or

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>active symptoms. So that's one set of tests, and the

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>other set of tests are the test for antibodies shows

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>who's been infected. We need both. We have some We

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>have pretty we have improving testing on that active infection side.

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 1>We still have gaps on the antibody side. But once

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:50.239
<v Speaker 1>we have those, then we can go into communities, test

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>people randomly in a sampling of a statistical sample, and

0:07:54.960 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>then understand more deeply where the infections clusters lie. So

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 1>a small community might have a lot of infections of

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>asymptomatic people. We might have communities or areas of communities

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>that we have a lot of immunity built up, and

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>it will be important to know that in both in

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 1>these economic discussions and in the health care discussions. All Right,

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>so you're talking about test to see who as the

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 1>antibodies test to see who has had the virus itself

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 1>or who might have it. That's a lot of testing. Um,

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>do we have the tests out there? Is it just

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a case that our medical community understandably is consumed which

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>is taking care of people right now that have the virus?

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Is that why we're not getting things down to what's

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the hold up? So we don't have those tests right now?

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:46.679
<v Speaker 1>So the medical community is going on the proposition that

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>until proven otherwise, people could be effect infected. So we

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>deliver our care in with a lot of equipment to

0:08:56.000 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>keep everybody safe. But on the broader economy, is you, um,

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>we don't have the test yet. We don't know what

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the best antibody test is going to be. We have

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>quite a few out there on the market. Um, this

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:13.680
<v Speaker 1>is a complex virus to test for, so when testing

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the antibodies, we have to know which antibodies are the

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 1>ones that are going to be correlated with immunity to

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the future covid infection if any M and so Dr

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Roberts in just a sort of minute or so, we

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 1>have left, what have you learned that may be given

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:35.440
<v Speaker 1>that you guys were ahead of the curve, as it were,

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>You dealt with this earlier than even though the infection

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 1>may have been the same, you certainly dealt with it

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:43.199
<v Speaker 1>earlier than we did here on the East. Because what

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:45.200
<v Speaker 1>have you learned that that you know, we might be

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>thinking about and especially maybe for some of the folks

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>who are listening in areas where it hasn't really hit

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 1>yet and may still. Um, I'll tell you what I

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>have learned is communities come together in a crisis. So

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>despite what decisions are being made on a policy level,

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>we see communities coming together to help one another out.

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's a wonderful part of a crisis, as painful

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>as a crisis is. The second piece that I've learned

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>is that our country has to prepare better for pandemics.

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>We've always prepared well for things like hurricanes and earthquakes,

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 1>but this is something of a totally different magnitude that

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 1>we have to be thinking about always. Do you think

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>we are thinking about it? Are you hearing from you know,

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>folks that you work with on a federal in a

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>state level, that we're thinking about it? Better only got

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>about thirty seconds, Uh not yet? I think so. I

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>think it's not the time to have that discussion. I

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>think one thing settled down, we'll all have to sit

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:45.679
<v Speaker 1>down and be honest with one another about how prepared

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>we were and how prepared we need to be. Yeah,

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and let's not right, you and we can't go back

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 1>like We've got to make this part of our emergency

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>planet going forward. We have to hope for the best

0:10:57.160 --> 0:11:00.959
<v Speaker 1>and plan for the worst. Absolutely well, we really appreciate

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 1>your work and your colleagues there. Dr Joan Roberts, Chief

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Quality Officer Providence St. Joseph Health on the phone from Everett,

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Washington and Carol, As you said, I mean, these guys

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 1>have been an invaluable resource resource for us. Dr Roberts

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and her colleagues, especially Dr Amy Compton Phillips who joined

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 1>us in the early stages of this to help us

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 1>understand what was going on. I felt a lot smarter

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:26.559
<v Speaker 1>in terms of being able to deal with it, even

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of from a community perspective, knowing what they know

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:32.199
<v Speaker 1>and what Dr Roberts had to said about the different

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>kinds of tests that need to be done and that

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 1>we just don't even have those tests yet to be

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 1>able to do it is really important to understand this

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Jason Kelly

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. We've been talking about this a lot

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:48.680
<v Speaker 1>on air, about where we are in the financial markets.

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:52.319
<v Speaker 1>Bull market, bear market. It's a fair question. Let's put

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that to Michael Reagan. Mike is Bloomberg Markets Live Blog

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:59.679
<v Speaker 1>senior editor joining us from New Jersey. Uh and he

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:04.960
<v Speaker 1>has this story in the magazine this week. So Mike

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:10.679
<v Speaker 1>talk to us because we've seen quite large moves in

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 1>both directions for the equity market to the point where

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 1>we were in a bear market and then we came

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:17.719
<v Speaker 1>back and then we technically could have started a new

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>bull market. But I don't know where are we? Well, right, Carol,

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of there's not really a textbook definition to say, Okay,

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>this is what a bull market or a bear market is.

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:29.679
<v Speaker 1>But the sort of rule of thumb that everyone uses

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>is obviously, once you drop from a peak, you're in

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>a bear market. But a lot of people think that

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:39.439
<v Speaker 1>if a bull market can then be defined as a

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 1>gain from that low. So we have seen that, we've

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:47.200
<v Speaker 1>seen the SMP up more than from it's it's low

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 1>in one on March. The problem is that the worst

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>bear markets in history are famous for having episodes where

0:12:56.160 --> 0:13:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the market rebounds significantly more than say it happened during

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the financial crisis at the end of two thousand and

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:06.599
<v Speaker 1>eight and in the early two thousand nine, but ultimately

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the low as yet to come. UM. Historically, if you

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:14.079
<v Speaker 1>look how long it takes for the SMP to find

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>that bottom, to find that low point in a bear market,

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 1>it take usually takes a long time, something like three

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred and seventy trading days on average, according to some

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 1>numbers trunched by my colleague Cameron Christ. So obviously there's

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:33.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of disparity in that. UM. Look at say

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the crash of nineteen nine, the bottom wasn't uh found

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 1>until ninety two UM. In the two thousand and eight

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 1>nine example, you know the market peak in two thousand

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and seven, the low wasn't found until two thousand and

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 1>nine UM. And if you go all the way back

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:53.680
<v Speaker 1>to seven that that was the shortest time it took

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:57.439
<v Speaker 1>to reach a low. It was something like seventy four

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:00.120
<v Speaker 1>trading days. So if you look at this episod so

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>that low we reached in March was only about twenty

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>three days after the last record in the sp so

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 1>historically it would just be unprecedented to see that low

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 1>reached in such a short amount of time, right, all right,

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>So Joel Weber also with this editor of the magazine,

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and you know, Joel, it it falls to you, lucky

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>for us and maybe unfortunately for you, to sort of

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>synthesize all of this and and understand the financial markets

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>in the context of the economy and the world of business.

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>And we are reminded so often that the markets are not, uh,

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the economy. How did you approach this story? Well, first

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 1>of all, it's great to hear Mike's voice. It feels

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>like it's been way too long. And well, well we

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>talked to you yesterday, so you know, I'm getting lonely.

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting lone you know, look like I think the

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 1>backdrop for everything for a lot of people here has

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>obviously been unemployment number. But you know, here in the

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 1>middle of all this, obviously the markets trying to figure

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 1>out what to make of it, and the numbers that

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Mike um has in this story, you're just staggering to

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, go from this like highest high to lowest

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 1>slow and just like a matter of days, really, Um

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>and and I what I see when I look at

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 1>it all is the markets trying to figure out what

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 1>it all means. And um, you know, it really wants

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 1>this to be over the other thing. And I think

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing that even today. Um, it's just desperately wanting

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to like get around the corner. And I'm not so

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 1>sure that that, you know, And that's part of what

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Mike has in the story is like I'm not so sure. Um,

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>you know that's gonna be. Um what we what we

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 1>get to loose through? Um. But you know, Mike, I

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>think the other thing, and this is in your story

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>as well, Um, is the poster of Jerome Powell that

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 1>you have on your wall, Um, which is a joke,

0:15:52.560 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>but but you know it could happen. The The other

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 1>thing that's happening here, obviously, is that traders know you

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 1>do not fight the fit. Yeah, and that's where you know,

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 1>as much as I just cited a bunch of historical precedents,

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>it's very difficult in this current situation to really go

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 1>back and compare it to anything in history because it's

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>so unique. It's so unlike anything we've seen in history. Um.

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>And the response from the Federal Reserve and the government

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 1>that quick, massive, do whatever it takes. Response from both

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the Fed and Congress is is completely unprecedented in the

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>history of you know, economic cycles that the markets had

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to work through before. So part of you know, one

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 1>of the things that really caught my eye this week

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 1>was that Goldman Sachs, their strategist, came out and said

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>they think there's a good chance that that low is

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the load that it's been set, that this stimulus from

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the Fed and the Congress is so great, um that

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>regardless of how ugly the data is gonna be coming

0:16:56.920 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>up and and it's gonna be nasty. I mean JP

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Morgan estimating something like a fort contraction in GDP, I mean,

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:08.159
<v Speaker 1>just a head around that, right, I know, it's just

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>mind boggling uh to think about. And you know, the earnings,

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the dipping earnings, it's going to be just as bad,

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you know. I think it's like a thirty some percent

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:23.400
<v Speaker 1>UH decrease expected in the second quarter. UM. But when

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>you have that much support from the Fed, when you know,

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:30.159
<v Speaker 1>sort of suppressing interest rates, buying up all sorts of

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 1>assets to keep that liquidity flowing, it's very hard to

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>put a d faith into those historical precedents because of

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:42.679
<v Speaker 1>this uh you know, unprecedented response that we're saying. But

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you know that said, there's just a lot of bad

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 1>news that we sought to work through. Um it's it's

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 1>really hard to imagine this market continuing on this sort

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>of V shaped recovery that it's in. Well. And the

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:58.439
<v Speaker 1>thing is, you know you're right and if one are

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the big gifts out there, as you write in your story,

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 1>is if infections come back a second time, I mean,

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 1>then all bets are off. What I wanted to ask you, though, Mike,

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:09.159
<v Speaker 1>is the rally as respected when it's courtesy of the

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 1>FED and policymakers and big stimulus programs. You know, there

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>were there will always be people that sort of um

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 1>roll their eyes, were you know, pinch their nose that

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:22.160
<v Speaker 1>at the notion that the FED is doing so much,

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>um to support the market. Fed. Let's get to mean,

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:27.680
<v Speaker 1>what else could they do? This is such a shock

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to the economy there, you know, they had to respond aggressively,

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 1>uh and with force, as did the Congress and the government. UM.

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>So I think eventually there's you know, the worry about

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>a day of reckoning. What does this all mean? Down

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the line, how does the FED ever exit from this

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 1>uh great support it's given to the economy. Um, when

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:50.919
<v Speaker 1>do we know it's it's sort of healthy enough to

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 1>begin exiting? And what happens then? I mean, we already

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 1>saw sort of a crack in markets when they started

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:02.119
<v Speaker 1>raising interest rates and started on winding their quantitative using

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:06.720
<v Speaker 1>uh from the last cycle. So you know, I think

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:09.399
<v Speaker 1>that the concern is not that they're doing it, but

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>are they sort of pushing the kicking the can down

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the road and creating a problem with the deal with eventually. Yeah, alright,

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Mike Reagan, always good to catch up with you, writer, broadcaster,

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 1>podcaster extraordinaire. Check out his podcast. Check out j Powell Poster.

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Come on, Mike, you can come clean with us. We

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:30.680
<v Speaker 1>are going to still love you. Yeah, exactly, We're gonna

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 1>love you even more alright. Check out that Story's on

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Today and on Bloomberg dot Com in the

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>upcoming issue of Bloomberg Business Week. This is Bloomberg Business

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Week with Carol Messer and Jason Kelly on Bloomberg Radio.

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 1>We're also watching some big political news today, so let's

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:51.720
<v Speaker 1>get into that with Jennifer Epstein she's political reporter at

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News. She's on the phone from Washington. So Joe, So,

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden Um getting a big endorsement from his former boss,

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Barack Obama. We've got a little snippet of what Mr Obama,

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 1>former President Obama had to say. The kind of leadership

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:13.440
<v Speaker 1>that's guided by knowledge and experience, honesty and humility, empathy

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and grace. That kind of leadership doesn't just belong in

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:20.879
<v Speaker 1>our state capitals and mayor's offices. It belongs in the

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>White House. And that's why I'm so proud to endorse

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden for President of the United States. Choosing Joe

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:30.640
<v Speaker 1>to be my vice president was one of the best

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>decisions I ever made, and he became a close friend,

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and I believe Joe has all the qualities we need

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:42.359
<v Speaker 1>in a president right now. So Jennifer, Okay, nice, thank you.

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>President Obama took them long enough. Yeah, you know, President,

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of a weird thing because President Obama made

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:52.159
<v Speaker 1>clearer even before Joe Biden got into this race just

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>about a year ago at this point, Um that he

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>wasn't going to endorse anybody until the whole primary had

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:01.919
<v Speaker 1>been decided by the orders of the party, and yet

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's still this kind of thing where it's like, Okay,

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 1>this guy was your vice president and close friends for

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the last eight years, um, you know. So there was

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of an expectation and in a little bit of

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 1>a dishonest argument sometimes from President Trump another Republicans saying well,

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:20.920
<v Speaker 1>if you know, they clearly see why Biden shouldn't be president,

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 1>or or Obama would be endorsing him already, which is

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:27.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, um, you know, but disingenuous. But here, uh,

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:31.360
<v Speaker 1>you have this endorsement from Obama today. It was really

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 1>an effort, I think, to get Democrats and people who

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>are persuadable to vote for Biden to start thinking seriously

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:42.400
<v Speaker 1>about doing that, um, even if they supported Bernie Sanders

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>or somebody else in the primary. But now the focus

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:49.160
<v Speaker 1>is solely on beating Trump in November. Um, and that's

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 1>where all the energy for anybody who doesn't like Trump

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>needs to go. And President Obama's view all right, So

0:21:56.600 --> 0:22:01.199
<v Speaker 1>speaking of that energy, Jennifer, how much energy do we

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 1>think we'll see from former President Obama, maybe former First

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Lady Michelle Obama really out there? Um, and I guess

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 1>out there is a relative term in this current environment, right, Um,

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:15.679
<v Speaker 1>what is it going to look like now that the

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:19.399
<v Speaker 1>Obama's are engaged? Yeah, well, I think out there is

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:23.199
<v Speaker 1>part of the challenge, because there is out there is

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the inside everybody's respective home in front of the camera. Um.

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:31.679
<v Speaker 1>Because presumably, sorry to interrupt you, but like presumably in

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:34.159
<v Speaker 1>a more normal world, this would have been done in

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 1>a huge rally, you know, like an Obama you know,

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of a classic Obama get them all riled up,

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:42.919
<v Speaker 1>you know sort of situation. Right. Well, you know, I

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>covered the Hillary Clinton campaign in T six team for

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News, and back then it was actually done similar

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 1>way where there was a video put out by Obama

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:56.640
<v Speaker 1>and then that was very quickly followed by the announcement

0:22:56.760 --> 0:22:58.440
<v Speaker 1>of a rally that he was going to do with

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton that I ended up having to get rescheduled,

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:04.399
<v Speaker 1>and it finally did happen. It ended up being not

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 1>a great It was a complicated newsday otherwise, so it

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>was not didn't have as much of a splash as

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:11.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe they wanted to, but it was still a big

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 1>rally in North Carolina in Charlotte. UM that got plenty

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of media attention and obviously that can't be done this time. Um,

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's unclear whether we're going to be able

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 1>to have any kind of you know, big traditional rallies

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:28.679
<v Speaker 1>at all between now and November, for for Biden or

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 1>for Trump. Uh. So in the in the meantime, I

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>think that you will see UH Obama do some more

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:40.440
<v Speaker 1>things digitally for Biden. I think that the exact terms

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:42.400
<v Speaker 1>of better to be determined. I think it will be

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 1>around the message and getting people support Biden, but I

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 1>think it will also be fundraising. Uh that's an area

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:52.920
<v Speaker 1>where uh Biden has a lot of ground to make

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:56.359
<v Speaker 1>up for. Um, he's he's you know, hundreds of millions

0:23:56.359 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 1>of dollars behind uh, the Trump campaign and the Republican

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:05.159
<v Speaker 1>National Committee in fundraising right now. And UM, you know,

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>digital stuff costs money. It's not like somebody just sits

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:12.879
<v Speaker 1>at their computer. And how important that goes into it?

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 1>How important is that in this race? I mean, I know,

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I understand advertising and political advertising is very persuasive, very important,

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:23.680
<v Speaker 1>But I feel like you've got a president who has

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a four year track record or three and a half

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 1>year track record, right, and so they've got that and

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:33.680
<v Speaker 1>either people like that and want another four years or

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:36.119
<v Speaker 1>theyre going to be those who don't like it. Is

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>it as simplistic as that this time around? Well, I

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 1>think that there are there are a lot of people

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 1>who are sort of in between. They like certain things

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:47.160
<v Speaker 1>that the president has done, not other things. They may

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>have voted for him the last time and having a

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:52.639
<v Speaker 1>bit of remorse, or they might have not voted for

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 1>him the last time and regretted that, or be sort

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:58.159
<v Speaker 1>of on the fence where they say, well, you know,

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 1>my pocketbook is doing well. Let's say even amid this

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 1>this crisis, that they're still doing well because its tax

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 1>breaks and maybe they're even trying to find a way

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:12.640
<v Speaker 1>to maximize the stimulus money for themselves. So they say, okay,

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing well, but I don't agree with how the

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:19.439
<v Speaker 1>overall coronas virus response has gone. Or you know, there

0:25:19.480 --> 0:25:22.200
<v Speaker 1>are a million different permutations of that are actually probably

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, a hundred fifty two million. However many people

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 1>end up voting in this election, you know, for everybody

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>to a specific different choice um, and you know it

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 1>does cost money, not just for the ads, but just

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:37.440
<v Speaker 1>to have to have the outrage run getting getting people

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:39.440
<v Speaker 1>out to vote, which is a big piece of this

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:41.920
<v Speaker 1>is going to be if Democrats are gonna win, it's

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:44.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be because there is a significant surgeon turnout,

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 1>likely UM and that that will take a lot of energy.

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:52.240
<v Speaker 1>There's also gonna be the complication of the extent to

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:55.440
<v Speaker 1>which UM mail and voting or really voting or other

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:58.960
<v Speaker 1>accommodations are made. UM. You know, we don't. It's hard

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:01.879
<v Speaker 1>to know whether there's going to be another surge in

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:05.479
<v Speaker 1>coronavirus in the fall, and whether that will have already

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 1>started fall er winter, and whether that it will already

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:12.719
<v Speaker 1>have started by November three. Yeah, absolutely, all right, We're

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:16.159
<v Speaker 1>gonna leave it there. I love Jennifer Epstein. Follow her

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at jen Epps. She is on top of it,

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:22.640
<v Speaker 1>one of our top political reporters, as she said, has

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 1>the context of covering election, and it's going to be

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:28.639
<v Speaker 1>fascinating to compare and contrasts throughout. We're going to be

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 1>keeping in touch with her. Yeah, votes, online, endorsements, tweets,

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 1>all of it. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week.

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:40.359
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe to the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com. You can also listen to our radio

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 1>show every weekday at two pm Eastern, only on Bloomberg

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Radio