WEBVTT - MLB: Leading Off May 8th, 2022 (Ep. 506)

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>The Adventures of Kirby. Let's play ball. Welcome in, everybody

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>to Fantasy Pros. This is leading off, brought to you

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>by bet MGM, the King of sports books. It is

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:26.479
<v Speaker 1>b Joey, p Joe Pi's appia with me Today is

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the Welsh and it's a multiverse of madness on a

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Monday here. And that's just not a literation. That's the

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:34.319
<v Speaker 1>way things are going. Who knows what might happen. Who

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:36.559
<v Speaker 1>might play us later in the show. Maybe we'll ask

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Welsh who might play him in a different multiverse.

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 2>That would be fun.

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>But we're gonna break down all the weekend's action in

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Major League Baseball for you, and as always, we want

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:46.879
<v Speaker 1>you to subscribe to our YouTube channel YouTube dot com

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 1>slash Fantasy Pros MLB, where we do this show every

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:53.559
<v Speaker 1>single day neon Eastern for you, for the people, for

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the Peanuts and Crackerjacks. And when you subscribe, you can

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>be a peanut and a Crackerjack one or the other,

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>who knows, and you can make your comments and talk

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and we'll make you famous on the show The Welsh.

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:04.320
<v Speaker 1>It's good to see you. I hope you had a

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>nice Mother's day. You called your mother and your mother? Right,

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:11.120
<v Speaker 1>my mother is good. How's your mother is? Everyone? Mother

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>is good, and.

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 3>It was good. All the mothers are good.

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:17.400
<v Speaker 4>Actually, my mother and my wife's mother watched our kids

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 4>while I took the mother of my kids out.

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 3>To Sedona, Arizona.

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 4>I have you saw my tweet also with this beautiful

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 4>airbnb and it apparently had velociraptors there because we were

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 4>sitting and there was this sound coming out of this

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:34.960
<v Speaker 4>waterfall that was next to where we were staying, and

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 4>we just looked at each other for hours trying to

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 4>find what it was, and it was the creepiest velociraptory

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 4>or the you know, the remember the dinosaur that goes

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:46.199
<v Speaker 4>and then spits on whatever.

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 3>The guy's you know, the guy was like yeah, yeah, exact.

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, exactly. It was wild. So that that was my

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 4>mother's day. Dinosaur.

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:54.279
<v Speaker 2>I saw your tweet.

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I didn't have the sound on my phone because I

0:01:56.920 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>was sitting and watching TV with the kids, but I

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>was like, what is he talking about?

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 2>I was like, I can go back to this later.

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>So now I'm gonna definitely go back to it again.

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>So and follow him at is it the Welsh for airbnb?

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Recommendations and other things as well.

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 3>Apparently here, hold on, hold on, here it is here

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 3>it is.

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:11.839
<v Speaker 1>Oh oh oh, you can see it on the show.

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 3>Oh my, this is that night.

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Let's that's kind of terrifying.

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>And I having spent some time in Arizona, I feel

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>like at any point in time there could be some

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>bizarre creature or things there and you never.

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 3>Heard anything like it. Never heard anything.

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Sounds like a motor going in the waterfall, That's what

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like.

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:28.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it wasn't it was.

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:33.920
<v Speaker 4>It was some type of reptilian prehistoric dinosaur that was

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 4>that was coming out.

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:35.359
<v Speaker 3>To get us.

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Oh goodness, it was. It was a hard ohsaurus. I'm

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 2>pretty sure that's.

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:44.359
<v Speaker 3>What a Yes, the elusive heart o asaurus.

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yes, can only be found in Sodona. All right,

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>let's get to some of the headlines from baseball for

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the weekend. The Texas Rangers manager Chris Woodward uh not

0:02:56.480 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>too happy about Yankee Stadium, calling it a little league

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:01.919
<v Speaker 1>ballpark after Bert Torres hit his walk off home run.

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 1>JA Carlos Stanton also hit to run homer as well

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:07.800
<v Speaker 1>against the Rangers. Walcarea Cole with ten and no decisions

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 1>of the Yankee game was something everybody was talking about. Welsh,

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:14.920
<v Speaker 1>It's been a whiffleball field for years.

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 2>I've always called.

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>It that, and you know, I don't think it's gonna

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>change anytime soon. What are your thoughts on Chris Woodwards

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>sounding off. I kind of enjoyed this.

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I don't know.

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 4>I'm kind of over all of this stuff where it's like, uh,

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 4>you see the one the other day where I'm forgetting

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 4>who it was, if his affilies or the Yankees or

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 4>whatever that ended up hitting, Like, yeah, I think it

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 4>was the Yankees that hit like a homer and they

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 4>were like they were up so much. Narcolo Stan didn't

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 4>need to hit a homer. Like this complaining about ballparks

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 4>and guys hitting homers late and any of the offense, Like,

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 4>what does that serve except making you sound like a

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 4>cry baby, Like, okay, whatever are you petitioning to get

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 4>Yankee Stadium pushed back next year? It's cry baby stuff.

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 4>You lost homers get hit. Uh, the big old little

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 4>league ballpark.

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 3>This isn't fair.

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 4>The Texas Adium used to be kind of like that.

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 4>It used to be a little baby ballpark until they

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:14.119
<v Speaker 4>changed it out and it's nonsense. It's absolute cry baby nonsense.

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I agree, and I gotta tell you it's like, that's

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:20.720
<v Speaker 1>that's loser mentality. It's like when you care about when

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the when a call goes against you. I mean, I

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:25.719
<v Speaker 1>coach the nine year old ten year old kids every

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>weekend in football, and I was on the same thing.

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't care if you get called in a penalty

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 1>or something like that, but don't complain about it. I mean,

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:35.279
<v Speaker 1>if we lose because of a penalty, they didn't play

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 1>good enough to win. It's the same thing with this.

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 1>It's like it's like, I'm sorry you gave up a

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>home run to Labor Torres, who had been struggling for

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>two years up until recently. I mean, what do you

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:46.279
<v Speaker 1>want from me? You're pitching socks. Go talk to the

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:49.160
<v Speaker 1>pictures about don't complain about the ballpark. Chris Woodward all right.

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Next on the list here, Mike Mayer put this in

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:54.480
<v Speaker 1>In Boston, an adult gave a young Red Sox fan

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>a ball at Fenway Park over the weekend, and Mike

0:04:57.520 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Mayor wants to know why this isn't viral and why

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>we're not all talking about it.

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:04.559
<v Speaker 4>Why does he full heel. Yeah, one hundred percent agree,

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 4>Like I was gonna be the heel. Remember the first

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:08.280
<v Speaker 4>week I was here, it was like, hey, I mean

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 4>I still have my heel. I'm more of like the

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 4>anti hero, like you're kind of in that. Yeah yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 4>like the old still stone cold where it's like sometimes

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 4>he could be just a jerk and then sometimes he's good.

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 4>But Mayor is like going full on Vince McMahon here,

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:26.039
<v Speaker 4>Like this is full on heel with just hating nice

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 4>things to happen to anybody.

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 3>He hates children.

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Too, children getting baseballs from adults. He hates all of it.

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>George Kirby, he had some base balls and I don't

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:38.600
<v Speaker 1>know if he's an adult, maybe just barely. George Kerby

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>six scirls hitnings in his debut on Sunday. He was

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>a hot waiver wire pick up in a lot of

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>leagues when he got the call, you know, Matt Brash

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>was sent down. So what were your thoughts on the

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>George Kirby performance. What's kind of the projectability for him

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:50.160
<v Speaker 1>in your opinion?

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 3>Now, I'm actually a.

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 4>Little The only thing I'm a tiny bit surprised about

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 4>is that he beat Mike Max Mass would say Mike

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 4>Max Mayor up to the majors, But the whole Brash

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:01.479
<v Speaker 4>movement kind of wait. I think we even talked about

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:04.040
<v Speaker 4>on the show. It was like get Ready with Brash

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 4>moving not only to the miners but into a bullpen roll.

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 4>It leaves open the possibility of George Kirby. George Kirby's

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 4>phenomenal It is interesting to see where his vlo is

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 4>gone because he started the game up.

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 3>I think our Rob Silver had actually tweeted this out where.

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 4>He'd started up right around in ninety six ninety seven

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 4>on average, and then he ticked down innings two through

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 4>four where he'd really upticked his velocity. When COVID ended

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 4>and I was able to go to the backfields out

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 4>here in surprise, the very first like the first person

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:36.599
<v Speaker 4>I saw after a year and a half of not

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:39.840
<v Speaker 4>in person looks was George Kirby. And George Kirby hit

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 4>one hundred back here in the backfields, and everyone was

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 4>their mind was blown. He was at ninety nine one hundred,

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 4>and I think that took away a little bit from

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:50.359
<v Speaker 4>how he could really just pinpoint the zones. And I

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:53.359
<v Speaker 4>think in that time he's refined high end velocity with

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 4>being able to just move the ball throughout the zone

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 4>and be able to hit his spots.

0:06:57.120 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 3>And that's what he did. He looked fantastic.

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 4>He was moving that, he was cutting the ball, he

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:04.719
<v Speaker 4>was putting the ball in, he was getting his secondary stuff.

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I'm a big George Kirby guy. The only

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 4>thing I'm a little bit cautious about is he really

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 4>hasn't put.

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 3>On a whole bunch of innings.

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 4>The Mariners really kind of babied him ever since he

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 4>got drafted off of Elon, so I'm not sure how

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 4>far he can go into the season. So him coming

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 4>up in May, I just don't know if he's a

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 4>guy that is gonna stay in the rotation full on

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 4>and just get unlimited innings for the rest of the year.

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 4>I kind of feel like they might temper him down

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 4>a little bit. So I would have used waiver. I

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 4>would be picking him up. It was a killer start.

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 4>I think he's going to be one of the better

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 4>pitchers you can get as a rookie. I just don't

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 4>know if he's gonna be reliable the whole year. So

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 4>when people talk about fab like, you know, how much

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 4>should I spend.

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure I would have gone more than twenty

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 4>percent or something like that on a guy that I

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 4>worry will not be able to finish out the year

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 4>based on innings and you know in just a innings

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 4>management from a Mariner's team, No.

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 2>That's fair. In redraft leagues.

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we all know keeper dies is very different.

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, in redraft leagues, I agree with you. I mean,

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I think right now you always by the end of June,

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>you have to evaluate your pitching staff and say how

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>many innings realistically do I have and do I want

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to flip these guys that I have now for maybe

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>guys haven't pitched as well, but I think are going

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to pitch in offense, so.

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 3>Much more likely, so much more.

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 4>Likely to move these rookie pitchers very early on to

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 4>try to get and maximize my assets over everything else

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 4>because of everything you just said. If I can go

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 4>and get them for maybe underperforming pitchers, injured guys. Castille's

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:35.679
<v Speaker 4>about to come back, Jack Flaherty hasn't return in trades

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 4>like those, that's what I would try to do. I mean,

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 4>here's the only thing we don't fully know. This is

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 4>kind of this new world of baseball where all the

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 4>rookies are coming up early and they're being relied on.

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:51.079
<v Speaker 4>Could this change how teams manage their pitchers? Could management

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 4>finally be a more understood thing possible? Because under that circumstance,

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 4>if you have a guy that if teams were more

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 4>reliant on maybe just pushing one start, you know, and

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 4>then letting the guy finish out the year and not

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 4>sending them down or shutting them down, that makes.

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 3>Them like something I would want more. But we just

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 3>don't know. We don't know.

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 4>How enough teams have moved into managing their young pictures

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 4>and or is there a new thought process with all

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 4>the new collective bargaining agreements and take out manipulation a

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 4>little bit more? Are teams willing to push these guys

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:23.839
<v Speaker 4>a little bit further with how the last couple of

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 4>years have gone, and that could change it. But regardless

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:28.719
<v Speaker 4>of the point, I would still be the person that's

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:31.960
<v Speaker 4>trying to move some of these young pitchers in redraft.

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:33.959
<v Speaker 1>All right, before we move on to the rest of

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the headlines, I got to bring up this quote here

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>from Walkee Penguin. Over in the chat, Mike Mayer would

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:41.559
<v Speaker 1>catch a foul ball and give it to someone else's

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 1>kid just to teach his own son a lesson about evil.

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 2>I agree that is that is the.

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Winner of the day right there.

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:49.559
<v Speaker 4>I feel like you would take the ball from a

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 4>kid and then throw it on the field.

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Like, yeah, the kid catch it, or you would catch it,

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:56.959
<v Speaker 1>walk over to the kid and then just.

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:59.199
<v Speaker 3>And then go back on the field stare at the

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 3>kid too in the face.

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, just stare the right Yeah.

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:04.959
<v Speaker 1>Cody Bellinger had three hits and Sunday Walker Bueller fan

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>six over the Cubs, and Pete Alonzo hit two homers

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and a win over the Phillies, while Jake Odorezi combines

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>in a one hitter with the Tigers. Oil Boy, that

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:15.680
<v Speaker 1>little conversation for Jake Odorezi with Justin Erlander certainly turned

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 1>things around for him.

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 2>How shocking is that? Bad news?

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Carlos Korea unlikely to returned Tuesday, But the good news

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 1>was that the X rays were negative, so hopefully we'll

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>be back sooner than later. I want to talk about this.

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:30.559
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get into a little bit of a FIP

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:32.719
<v Speaker 1>versus E ra, the X FIP versus era, because I

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:34.079
<v Speaker 1>always think this is a good time of year to

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 1>start looking at guys who've gotten off to some terrific

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>stars with the era looks really good, and then the

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:40.840
<v Speaker 1>vice versa where you're like, hmm, the x FIP not

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 1>so much. And to me, that's always where you're looking

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>at pictures where you have to be a little bit

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 1>concerned about potentially when that all meets back up. So

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be yeah, yeah, exactly. The pictures were beating

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 1>their FIP and buy a lot. And I always think

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>this is a good thing to take a look at

0:10:57.440 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>because tomorrow we're gonna do the inverse of this. We're

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>pictures who are have high a eras, but the X

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 1>ship is pretty good, and you're kind of like, okay,

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>well let's take a look.

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 4>The biggest beating them but Russia and Russia yeah drive

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 4>you yeah, exactly, yes.

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 1>In Russia closer. No, never, let's get to some of

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>these guys in some of these names here, uh, some

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>of them Michael Kopek as a one point one seven

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>e RA right now, this is again minimum of twenty

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 1>innings that we're doing here.

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:30.080
<v Speaker 2>X FIP is at four point thirty.

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 4>Uh.

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Then you have a couple other pictures here that I

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 1>thought were really worth talking about.

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Madison Bumgunners.

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 1>The RAS one fifty, the FIP is four a two,

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the x FIP is five oh one. Huge difference there

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 1>for him in terms of the variants. Another big variance

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Tony Gonsol in a picture that again you know, he

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 1>is so razor thin in terms of I think the

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 1>margin for error with a picture like Gonsolin is not

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a dominating kind of guy. He's at one six four

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>in the RAH. The FIP is at three three nine,

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the XPIP is at four o six right now, So

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 1>big variants. Any of these guys pop to you? Or

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 1>is there another one too? I mean Julio Urius too

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 1>one eight eight versus A four to three one x

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 1>fIF that's a big variance also, So there's some guys

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 1>out there, Yeah, crushing life in terms of era, but

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 1>there's some underlining issues. Are you worried about any of

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 1>those guys? And why is it Tony Gonsolin?

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean Gonsolin like Bumgarner, It speaks for itself. It's

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:27.680
<v Speaker 4>like a completely uh I mean he's Bumgarner, you know

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 4>what I mean. It's like, what is that three and

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 4>a half run difference between RA and except you know what,

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 4>the one that kind of jumped out to me, I

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:37.560
<v Speaker 4>think it's interesting is Alec Manoa. And Manoa has been

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 4>phenomenal this year. He's been exceptional, probably from a rank perspective,

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 4>one of those guys that I think a lot would

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 4>put inside the top ten. But I do look and

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:49.080
<v Speaker 4>I see he's got a one seven to five ERA,

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 4>an x FIP of three six three, which is not

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 4>horrible by any means. It's not bad, Yeah, it's not.

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 4>But I take a look at a couple other things.

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 4>He's got an under nine K per nine, so it's

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 4>not elite. You know, there's nothing to lead there, and

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 4>also a very unsustainable left on base percentage of over

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 4>ninety percent, like that will not stick. So it's one

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 4>of those things where I look at Manoa and I

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 4>he's gonna regress. I mean, and I think it's kind

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:16.200
<v Speaker 4>of obvious. You can sometimes look at some of these

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 4>numbers and you can go, well, you're going to retract,

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:21.200
<v Speaker 4>but you know, going compare to like Clayton Kershaw, I

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 4>would think, and I could be I could be speaking

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 4>out of turn here. I think a lot of people

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 4>would value this season Manoa over Kershaw d to age

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 4>due to kind of some of the dominance. Sure, and

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 4>Kershaw's got a small variant between ERA and x FIP.

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 4>He's got a better K per nine, he's walking under

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 4>one per nine. He's got a little bit more realistic

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 4>left on base rate. It's just it's one of those

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 4>things where I don't think you're trying to unload a

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 4>guy like Manoa, but you should know that the regression

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 4>is gonna come. Manoa is going to backtrack a little bit.

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 4>And he also doesn't He's not, at least right now

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:58.319
<v Speaker 4>exhibiting like some exception like Eric Lauer, Like Eric Laher's

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:00.200
<v Speaker 4>got like a twelve k per nine right now, or

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:04.199
<v Speaker 4>Corbyn is eleven peras dominant. Yeah, it's an average K

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:07.559
<v Speaker 4>per nine that's boosted up by four wins right now

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 4>and an unsustainable left on base rate.

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 3>So like he's gonna come back down to earth a

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 3>little bit. So what does that mean to you?

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:16.199
<v Speaker 4>Do you just hold on and go for the ride

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:18.319
<v Speaker 4>because you know, a three and a half VRA with him,

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 4>he's gotta be great this year.

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:22.119
<v Speaker 3>Or do you sell at the height.

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 4>And you know, try to pick up some pieces, you know,

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 4>maybe maybe no maybe you could get a kershaw plus

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 4>a little bullpen arm or something like that. You never

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 4>know what those trades can be. So I think a

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 4>lot of these are a kind of obvious names, especially

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 4>when you put out like the Bumgarner and the Gonsolin,

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 4>Like those are guys that it's like.

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>You can't even surprised me a little bit, to tell

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 1>you the truth.

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 2>Kopek was when it surprised me.

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Gonsolin did not. But Gonsolin's one where I look at it,

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and once again, a guy who pitches to contact a

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>lot on a good team I think has more value

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 1>on the trade market than people realize. And I think

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 1>perception wise is greater than reality when it comes to Gonsolin.

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>So's that's a pitcher, and specifically that I would say,

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'd love to move him with another guy

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>and get somebody better that I just feel better about tomorrow.

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, we're gonna be the inverse of these,

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 1>But these are some of the guys to be a

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 1>little aware of in terms of regression. Also, I want

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to talk about this because Buster Posey caught the first pitch,

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 1>which was fun. His kids went out there to throw

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the first pitch, this weekend, and then throwing a first

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>pitch after that was Brian Wilson, the old crazy beard

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 1>guy I haven't seen or heard about in a very

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 1>long time, who is super entertaining. The beard is gone,

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>He's replaced it with incredibly long hair. One of the

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>great characters in baseball who I feel like completely disappeared

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 1>off the grid. Just shut it up, and I'm here

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>for it. Wel I thought this was super fun, man.

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 3>You I know, a funny story.

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 4>So I've worked in this building that is right next

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 4>to a major hotel where ballplayers stay, basketball players, a

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 4>lot of baseball players would stay. And one time, you know,

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm like walking it's just like this corridor down there

0:15:57.080 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 4>where there's restaurants and stuff. And I'm walking down and

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 4>this is in the summer, and it is one hundred

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 4>and nine, one hundred and ten something like that out

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 4>here in Arizona.

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 3>It's absurd. It's absurd, And.

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm walking down this long like outdoor hallway and it's

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 4>just me and one person walk up. You can guess

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 4>who that person was, and it's Brian Wilson. And as

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 4>he walks up, Brian Wilson in one hundred and let's

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 4>just round it up to one hundred and ten degree weather,

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 4>has full on jeans, he's got a button shirt that

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 4>is open to his chest, and he's wearing a beanie

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 4>with the long beard. And I knew who he was

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 4>as I was walking up. I'm like, I could tell

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 4>this is Brian Wilson. And he never looks at me.

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 4>He looks straight ahead the whole time. And he's just walking,

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 4>mind you, his chest is out of his shirt and

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 4>he's wearing a beanie in one hundred and ten degree weather.

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 4>And I was like, this is the most Brian Wilson moment,

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 4>probably of all time. Doesn't give me the time. It

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 4>doesn't even look and acknowledge that. I think he looks ridiculous.

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 4>He is full on buying into his bit. That's just

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 4>like it's like a wrestling bit, Joe, Like he fully

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 4>bought into his He's had.

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:07.200
<v Speaker 2>Theme music going on in his head. Yeah.

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that Mike Mahyer probably would not approve of

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the children throwing out first pitches either.

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 2>I imagine he would be against it.

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 3>I probably ag yeah, probably wrote a letter, wrote a letter.

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Here's a giants, here's a It was becoming like Chuck

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Norris things you like, Chuck Norris can do this, and

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:25.159
<v Speaker 1>I was like, how how Helish can Mike Mayor be

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 1>That's like the equivalent now what we're doing. Here's a

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:29.160
<v Speaker 1>question for one of the Peanuts and the Cracker Jacks

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 1>from Adam Schalm. Uh so high on Pablo Lopez and Bregman.

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:36.640
<v Speaker 1>For Jose Ramirez, that's a lot to give. I say

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 1>too much. As great as Jose Ramirez is, Bregman and

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Pablo Lopez, those are two really good pieces. I would

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>say no to this, even though Pablo Lopez has been great.

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I believe in Pablo Lopez and pitching's hard to find.

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm a no for this deal. I get it if

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 1>you want to make it. If it's a keeper league,

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I get it. More your thoughts on.

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 4>This, I'm probably doing this. I mean this is a

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:58.880
<v Speaker 4>first like if you want to break it down to rounds,

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 4>this is the first round for a six and an

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:06.119
<v Speaker 4>eighth round. Let's call it valued player. Paul Lopez has

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 4>been phenomenal. He was on this cra list, he had this.

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 3>He has the second way.

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Alex Bregman's on a sixth round player.

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:15.680
<v Speaker 4>Uh yeah, Alex Brett, Well, like in a twelve man.

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 4>He was going around like the seventh.

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:19.679
<v Speaker 2>He should have been. That was stupid, but he's not.

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:23.399
<v Speaker 4>I mean two years breaking it down from there, I mean, okay,

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:26.120
<v Speaker 4>two years ago, all right, Well, Jose Ramirez this year.

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 3>Is a first round been one of the best players.

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:32.119
<v Speaker 4>I don't think the gap is close between Bregman and Ramirez,

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 4>but there are situations where I agree with you on this.

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 4>If this is like a sixteen team league or twenty

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 4>team league, this is an impossible These are impossible type

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 4>of trades. But you want to talk about the regression,

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 4>like we talked about, Pablo Lopez is one of those guys.

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 4>He's almost got a two run differential between Cray and

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 4>x set at the top.

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 1>He's number two in the league right now in ERA

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 1>at one. But like a x FIP is two a two,

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:54.160
<v Speaker 1>it's still sterling.

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:56.199
<v Speaker 3>I guess it's still great. He's still good. He's been

0:18:56.240 --> 0:18:57.199
<v Speaker 3>striking out guys.

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 4>Bregman has been okay, But in a ten to twelve

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 4>twelve team league, I'm gonna do this for the advantage

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:04.880
<v Speaker 4>of Jose Ramirez, even though I would love to try

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 4>to push back or get something back on it. Keep

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 4>your league it might even be a little bit more difficult.

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 4>Points league is even a little it's even tougher with

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 4>getting rid of Pablo Lopez.

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:14.119
<v Speaker 3>But I think I will all right.

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 2>Let's do all right.

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Some of the weekend stat heroes from the pitching side.

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Luis Garcia nine ks, seven innings, Merle Kelly, our boy,

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Merle boy.

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 2>I never thought he would be this good.

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Eight k's, one earned run, boy, I wish I had

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>to share him. Eric Lowers, we talked about, continues to dominate.

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:31.399
<v Speaker 1>Eight k's one earned and six innings. Pablo Lopez eight innings,

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>five k's, zero earned runs. Eduardo Rodriguez. I just wrote

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 1>a thing last week about he's a guy that I

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:39.880
<v Speaker 1>would buy on for numerous reasons, the slow start last year,

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 1>all this nonsense. He'll figure it out. He'll be fine

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 1>as the weather heats up. And look at this eight k's,

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:48.159
<v Speaker 1>one earned six and two third so by if you

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>can on Eduardo Max Reid's seven innings, one earned run,

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 1>eight k's yet, Garrett Cole's good performance, show Manaia and

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Joe Musgrove both at eight k's and both came out

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. The hitting side, who was hot this weekend

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Mandy Margo was hot OI model and three home runs

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 1>this weekend for Mandy Margo at a stolen base, Colin

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Morana two home runs, a Lonzo ed to Mookie Betts

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:14.680
<v Speaker 1>at a home run in five ribies, so did Brandon Drury.

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Dylan Carlson four for ten and a homer. Is Dylan

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Carlson showing some signs of life here, Welsh.

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 3>That might be some signs of life.

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:24.160
<v Speaker 4>Remember at the beginning of the year too, this team

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:26.480
<v Speaker 4>was willing to drop him and pop him at the

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 4>leadoff spot, which made his value phenomenal. He's now up though, too,

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:33.440
<v Speaker 4>twenty with one homer and one stolen base.

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:35.640
<v Speaker 3>Low k rate, which.

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 4>Again I think whenever I see these guys that are struggling,

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 4>but I see really low k rates and walk rates

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 4>that are kind of skewed.

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Well the water rate. To me, the high walk rate

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 1>is always something because whenever you see a guy I

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 1>always used to say this on the Daily Fantasy Show,

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 1>when every guy starts walking who's been struggling, to me,

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:53.439
<v Speaker 1>that's always like the beginning of the breakout because he's

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 1>starting to get disciplined again, he's starting to wait for

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 1>good pitches to hit. That is always the first indicators

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:00.640
<v Speaker 1>when you see that walk rate to where you see

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 1>a guy you know he went oh for you know

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:05.119
<v Speaker 1>two but he had two walks in the day. Yeah,

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 1>that's a good sign, so go ahead.

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 4>But that's no, I mean, And the walk rate's it's

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 4>a little skewed, but it's starting to come back up.

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 4>With a insanely low strikeout rate, he had a twenty

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 4>four almost twenty five percent if we round up k

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 4>rate last year, it's only had sixteen and a half

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 4>percent right now with a really low babbot bround two

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 4>point fifty. He was like a three thirty guy last year.

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:27.200
<v Speaker 4>So I do think these are signs. The only thing though,

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:29.119
<v Speaker 4>is he really needs to pick it up because you

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:32.199
<v Speaker 4>got like Wanya Pez who is starting to heat up.

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 4>You've got guys like Lars Noobar who are waiting in

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 4>the wings, and you've also got Nolan Gorman coming up

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:40.920
<v Speaker 4>positionally to move all around. But I think they're committed,

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:45.239
<v Speaker 4>and I think I am. I think I'm encouraged by it,

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 4>but I'm not going nuts. And even right there, I

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 4>point out the villain. Mike Mayer even pointed out that

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 4>Carlson swing rates are way up. He's swinging everything, but

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:55.679
<v Speaker 4>I think that was a lot of early on stuff.

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 4>I think we might be slowing down.

0:21:57.359 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 3>And I'd point out if you have kind of.

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 4>Swinging at everything crazy swing rates with low k rates,

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 4>that's actually kind of a good thing. And I mean

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:08.400
<v Speaker 4>not that he's swinging in everything. He's got to adjust,

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:10.919
<v Speaker 4>but if those aren't coming within sane K rates, like oh,

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, Jared Kelnick or something like that, I

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 4>think that's encouraging to the future. But Dylan Carlson is

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 4>also I've never been the biggest guy on him.

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 3>People with nuts, Oh, it gonna be a thirty to

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 3>thirty guy.

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 4>I just think the still base and the homer rates

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:26.920
<v Speaker 4>are over inflated. I don't think he's that exciting. I mean,

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:29.399
<v Speaker 4>Manny Margo has been exceptionally more valuable than him.

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it's in a long line of underwhelming Saint

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Louis Cardinal outfield prospects between gritchik Piscatti. I mean, we

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>could do this for days with those guys. They're just

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 1>like a factory for mediocre outfielders over the years. Ronald

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Acunya two home runs, two stolen basis is so much

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 1>for slow to steal bases again, Ronald Acunya, What a

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 1>joke that is? Jared Kelnick as aforementioned one home run

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 1>in a stolen base, three for eight over the weekend,

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 1>fingers cross things get better for him. Forddie Freeman was

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:58.199
<v Speaker 1>six for twelve, Dever six for eleven, and the for

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Animal Don't look now Kids six for ten, one home run,

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 1>stad zero's wall, eight earned runs for Steven Mattz Shane

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:08.639
<v Speaker 1>Bieber seven earned runs, zero strikeouts.

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:12.359
<v Speaker 3>What up with that? Well, what up with that would be?

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 4>Remember those low spin rates and that big Vlo tip

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 4>and he wasn't getting hit up early. Now he's getting

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 4>hit up and they're taking advantage of it. Ball might

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:26.960
<v Speaker 4>be flying a little bit as the weather's uncooling off

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 4>and heating up a little bit. I am not the

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 4>biggest Biaber guy. I really wish I wasn't preseason, but.

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:35.160
<v Speaker 3>This is a bad warning sign.

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if you can get out from under

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 4>Bieber right now, even at all, after a bad one.

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:43.119
<v Speaker 3>Like this, because people have been waiting for this.

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 4>But you know, maybe he'll heat up off a couple

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:47.479
<v Speaker 4>and then maybe you can move him if you are

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 4>worried I'm a bit worried, as I have been since

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 4>the start of the year.

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Ashby six earned runs, Theo Castillo zero innings, pitch

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't get one out the game of five earned runs.

0:23:58.320 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Good, good job, Diego.

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Keller five earned runs. Spring Training Darling turning into a pumpkin.

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 1>The Renz in with five earned and here we go.

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:08.160
<v Speaker 1>The Zeros on the hitting side for the weekend. Here

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:11.159
<v Speaker 1>you go, ready for this? Chris Taylor one for eleven,

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>eight strikeouts, Brett Phillips, oh for eight, eight strikeouts, the

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:20.119
<v Speaker 1>perfect Weekend's tough? Just wh fantastic, Brett Phillips. I mean,

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:21.400
<v Speaker 1>why would we want to put a ball in play?

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Why would we wan? What is that?

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:24.199
<v Speaker 3>You know what I say? Like the golden sombrero is

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:25.120
<v Speaker 3>like what, oh for four?

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what it is.

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:28.120
<v Speaker 1>That's that's like a platinum sombrero if you get eight,

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:29.920
<v Speaker 1>because that's for each time.

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 3>It's like a space space helmet eight.

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, spa, it's a platinum sombrero. Tyler Nate win one

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 1>for ten with seven k's. I dropped him today in

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the league. Trevor's story won for twelve six k's. Again,

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:44.359
<v Speaker 1>we talked about Trevor story last week, it's not been good.

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Say a Suzuki told you so, two for ten, five strikeouts.

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Tucker had a bad weekend as well, rendone two

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:53.879
<v Speaker 1>for thirteen, and Rowdy t lez Al. Rowdy went south

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 1>two for thirteen over the weekend.

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:56.199
<v Speaker 2>Three k's but that.

0:24:56.240 --> 0:24:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Was bound to happen because he was so hot. Let's

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 1>get to the home run board, shall we and see

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 1>who is at the top of it. And there it

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:07.680
<v Speaker 1>is Niking in the north, still at the top with twelve.

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 2>All I do is win at eleven.

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 1>JP is still at eleven as well, and Dee Bloom

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 1>is at ten. So those are our double digit people

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and looking forward to the rest of these.

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 4>I did pull by the way, I want to point

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 4>out I did pull off a homer on Friday with

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 4>my Luis Robert. He hit a bomb and that would

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 4>be number five, so I'm up at five two.

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Did you both have that? So I can't know.

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:36.360
<v Speaker 3>We had Schwarver the day before mayor pick something.

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's what it was, right, Okay. The Bloom actually

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 1>got two runs from Unio Suarez of all people, and

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Flooringe Socks had two home runs from Brandon Laws move

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 1>up to nine. So good job on y'all. Let's get

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to the prop bets here and again use that promo

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:54.639
<v Speaker 1>code leading off and download bet mgm, the King of

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:58.119
<v Speaker 1>sports Books. Ten bucks to bet wins you two hundred

0:25:58.160 --> 0:25:59.919
<v Speaker 1>when you bet on any game regardless of the out.

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:02.639
<v Speaker 1>That's a special offer for new users when you use

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the promo code leading off at betmgm dot com or

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 1>on the app bet mgm again bet ten win two

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:12.119
<v Speaker 1>hundred with leading off. And today I got Carlos rodon

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>on Fandel the over at plus one ten at six

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and a half on the K's. I got Brandon Woodruff

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>against Cincinnati six and a half even money on him

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:24.160
<v Speaker 1>on the over as well. I've also got young Carlos

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:27.879
<v Speaker 1>Stanton over at bet mgm for Ribby's at point five.

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I've got the over at plus one forty five. Me

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 1>lovey that because Stanton's hot. He just gets one RBI

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:36.479
<v Speaker 1>boom plus one forty five. Welsh, what you got your

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:38.160
<v Speaker 1>eye on in the prop market today.

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, I want to tell you on yours. I like

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:43.199
<v Speaker 4>all three of yours, I think, man, I think the

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:45.640
<v Speaker 4>Stanton RBI one I think I like the most.

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 3>But I really like those k Ones.

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 4>I was gonna tell you I didn't like the Woodroff one,

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:52.119
<v Speaker 4>but then I didn't realize it was against Cincinnati.

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:52.959
<v Speaker 2>Cincinnati I do.

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:55.919
<v Speaker 4>And I like the Redon one as well. Those are

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 4>all three really good bets.

0:26:57.400 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 3>Two that I like here, I like Julio Urias K's

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 3>at five and a half over versus Pittsburgh.

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:05.640
<v Speaker 4>But it's minus money. It's minus one twenty, but that's

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:08.359
<v Speaker 4>not too bad. He's hit this in three of his

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 4>five appearances, and this is against the Pirates. And like

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:15.880
<v Speaker 4>Luis Roberts total bases one and a half over versus Cleveland,

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:19.200
<v Speaker 4>that's plus money. And Louise Robert is hitting a cool

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:22.439
<v Speaker 4>over five hundred over Zach Kleisak on his career. So

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 4>Luis Robert total bases and gimme Luise Arias strikeouts. And

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:29.480
<v Speaker 4>I might even want to kind of like have some

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:31.400
<v Speaker 4>fun with it. You want to really have some fun.

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:34.200
<v Speaker 4>Maybe you could find those numbers probably not too far

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:37.639
<v Speaker 4>off in maybe the Luis Arius one on FanDuel and

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 4>then I don't know, maybe just parlay have a nice

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:42.200
<v Speaker 4>little strikeout. Parlay put all three of those together, put

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:43.399
<v Speaker 4>just a couple bucks on it.

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:45.199
<v Speaker 3>You have to pull full unit or anything like that.

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 4>But if you like to usually bet twenty five bucks

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 4>on a game, put five bucks on it and put

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 4>all three of those together and see what happens.

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:54.680
<v Speaker 3>Because those are some really really good K props for mine.

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Indeed, all right, let's talk a little bit dfs.

0:27:58.080 --> 0:27:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:01.680
<v Speaker 1>The DK schedule starts in the main at six o'clock hour,

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 1>FanDuel starts at seven. So Vandel is gonna lose that.

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Dodger gave him the main slate tonight, a couple others

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:10.639
<v Speaker 1>in there. So looking at this urius on DK's eight

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:12.920
<v Speaker 1>point two woodroff against the Reds at nine point three,

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a good investments, especially with Castillo making

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:18.440
<v Speaker 1>his first return. And I can't imagine, you know, here

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 1>you go, gid go go pitch against the Brewers, and

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what I actually you want to know

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:24.439
<v Speaker 1>the leash is gonna be on him to throw to

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 1>throw that out on I want to say it was DraftKings.

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:29.720
<v Speaker 4>His strikeout prop is at five and a half. I

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:32.200
<v Speaker 4>don't usually like to go unders. I saw that really

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 4>like the under I didn't put it onto here, but

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 4>I really am interested in that under k prop on

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 4>Luis Castillo at five and a half.

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 1>The other big money arms are cars Verdona ten k,

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 1>which again I can justify getting in there. Urius is

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 1>better at eight point two, though just just from a

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 1>return on investment standpoint against the Pirates. Beckenzie Gore at

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>nine point seven, Copek at nine point five. Also, Paul

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Blackburn is the secondary arm at seven point five. Continues

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 1>to pitch well, so until he, you know, goes south,

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 1>just keep riding this wave, I mean, you just keep

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 1>doing it. The strikeout to walk ratio has been impeccable,

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and I understand that the might league track record doesn't

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 1>support it, but who knows, maybe he has found something.

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 1>This happens sometimes to pitchers well at last, probably not,

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 1>but until it breaks down at seven point five on

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 1>DK's the secondary arm, I'm in same thing. On Fando,

0:29:19.000 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 1>he's eight point six in the minslate. He's pretty cheap

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>there if you want to go all in, but I

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 1>would prefer to go with rodn even though he's eleven

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 1>point one. I would still go that route. Mackenzie Gore

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 1>a ten k and Copeic at nine point two. If

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 1>you want to split the difference. Tonight, the lineup builders

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 1>on dk Aj Pollock three point seven, Sheldon Noisy at

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:39.720
<v Speaker 1>three point eight, Rhys Hoskins at three seven, and then

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 1>on the FanDuel side David Peralta just two point five,

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Joey Wendell hit and clean up two point five, and

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Ramon Loreano at two point six. For me, I'm going

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 1>against Chris Flexen today with my home run call. Give

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 1>me Bryce Harper. That's who I want. Chris Flexen number

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:56.720
<v Speaker 1>two in the league in terms of giving up fly balls.

0:29:56.720 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I think one of them goes over the fence for

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Bryce Harper today. He's my pick. Welsh, who you're going

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 1>with for your home run call.

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 4>I'm going with big bad Gean Carlos Stanton, who has

0:30:05.920 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 4>got a little bit of a track record in eleven

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 4>played appearances versus John Gray.

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:14.000
<v Speaker 3>Three of those are extra base hits, and it is.

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 4>Just Gean Carlos Stanton, big power against John Gray, who.

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 3>You know, give up some homers.

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 2>There you have it.

0:30:20.440 --> 0:30:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Mike Maher's doing Mike Trout tonight. That's his call, and

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I was contemplating I had Trout. I changed it to

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Harper after looking a little deeper at the Chris Flexen numbers.

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 1>So we shall see how that all shakes up. And

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 1>if you want to get involved, make sure you go

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:39.680
<v Speaker 1>ahead and you subscribe to our Fantasypros dot com as

0:30:39.680 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a pro member. If you just got to upgrade your

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 1>membership there, you can get into our discord at Fantasypros

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash chat. It's free to join discord, but

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 1>if you want to get access to all the other channels,

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the stages, the AMA channels, and the home run calls,

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>you have to be a pro member at Fantasy Pros.

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:58.120
<v Speaker 1>And again it's Fantasypros dot com slash chat to join

0:30:58.160 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the discord for free and just go check it out.

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:00.680
<v Speaker 2>Poke around.

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Also, I want to announce a winner of our April giveaway,

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 1>because we had an April giveaway from the podcast from

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Pristine Auction. That winner is where is it? It is

0:31:11.600 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Chris from Ontario. I assume not theon Great Joy, just

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Theon from Ontario. So he gets Vladimir.

0:31:19.840 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 3>Pretty that would be from Winterfell.

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:23.959
<v Speaker 2>Not I don't know.

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean he he did go way north at one point,

0:31:26.720 --> 0:31:26.960
<v Speaker 1>you know.

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 3>From Ontario. What's just you know what kind of north?

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Kind of north? Last time I checked? So theon from

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Ontario all you gotta do is email us. UH. Send

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:39.400
<v Speaker 1>an email to at mail bag. It's just Mailbag at

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Fantasypros dot com. Again mail Bag at Fantasypros dot com.

0:31:42.600 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Theon from Ontario. Congratulations that Vlad Guerrero autograph ball is yours.

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:49.520
<v Speaker 1>So thanks for joining us all today on the program.

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:51.520
<v Speaker 1>We hope to do it all again tomorrow, same time,

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:55.120
<v Speaker 1>newn Eastern at Fantasypros dot com. UH, and our MLB

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 1>channel over on YouTube, Fantasy Pros MLB. That'll do it

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:00.200
<v Speaker 1>for us, but the story of the game goes on

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:03.440
<v Speaker 1>for the Welsh. I'm Joey P. We'll see you next time, kids,