WEBVTT - OpenAI Debacle and Nvidia Earnings

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:01.040
<v Speaker 1>From Mahart.

0:00:01.040 --> 0:00:05.440
<v Speaker 2>We're Innovation, Money and Power Collie in Silicon Valley, NBN.

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:26.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm Caroline Heiner Bloomberg's World headquarters in New York, and

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 4>I'm Ed Ludlow in San Francisco.

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 5>This is Bloomberg Technology coming up.

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 4>Of course, full coverage of Open Ai ahead, as investors

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 4>seek to reinstate Oltman as CEO while the company tries

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 4>to prevent an employee exodus.

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:42.240
<v Speaker 5>More ahead, and we'll preview what to expect from chip

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 5>giant Nvidia, with AI accelerators expected to drive a sales

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 5>surge for the company. We have all the details.

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 4>Plus Elomsqu's x IT sues Media Matters in a lawsuit

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 4>of maliciously trying to drive away advertisers from the social

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 4>media platform. I want to discuss that and so much

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 4>more throughout this hour. Let's get right to it. The situation.

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 4>It just continues to unfold, and it's chaotic, certainly has

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:06.399
<v Speaker 4>been for the last few days of boardroom coup investors

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 4>pushing for Altman's return, Microsoft hiring Alman and to lead

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 4>a new AI research team, and in a show supporting

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:15.839
<v Speaker 4>nearly all of open AI's employees, threatening to quit enjoying

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 4>Microsoft unless Altman is reinstated and the board resigns look.

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 4>An open Ai memo viewed by Bloomberg says that the

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 4>company is in quote intense discussions to unify once again.

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:30.199
<v Speaker 4>Look whatever the outcome ends up being, Microsoft CEO Saturn

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:33.959
<v Speaker 4>Nadella emphasized the company fully backs Sam Alman and former

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:36.759
<v Speaker 4>open ai chair Greg Bockman. Just take a listen.

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 3>We are leading in this next generation of AI technology.

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:43.200
<v Speaker 6>We continue to be committed to open ai, and we

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 6>continue to be committed to Sam and Greg and the

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 6>team irrespect your where they.

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 4>Are joining us now to break it all down, Bloomberg's

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 4>Sharon Gafari and Sharon, you had up to the moment

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 4>reporting on what's happening internally at those left at open ai,

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 4>and really it feels as though we could even see

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 4>a reinstatement or reunification.

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 3>That's right.

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 7>So there is still hope.

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 8>With buyo employees and management at the company that they

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 8>will be able to reach some kind of agreement with management.

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 8>But at around eight thirty last night, management sense a

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 8>memo to staff saying that you know they're going to

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:25.520
<v Speaker 8>call it a night and in the morning, you today Tuesday,

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 8>when people have a little more sleep, they'll pick back

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 8>up for sure and.

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 5>Grab aable supper water, because I know it was a

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 5>late night for you just as much as it was

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:37.799
<v Speaker 5>for me. This memos come from Anna MacAndrew, who's basically

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 5>this was, as I understood it, the global affairs chief.

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 5>I think what the audience doesn't have a sense of

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 5>is who is inside open AI actually doing any of

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 5>this negotiating, at least on the open AI side.

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so there's kind of a you know, a core

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 8>management team. It's it's kind of like almost you know,

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 8>government in exile, you could call it, right, It's sort

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 8>of a group of people who are trying to act

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 8>as a bridge right between this new board and the

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 8>old guard, and of course their goal is to try

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 8>to get Sam Altman, Greg Brockman, the old leaders of

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 8>open AI back in place.

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:16.399
<v Speaker 5>There's a difference between the reporting that we've done, which

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:19.080
<v Speaker 5>is basically Satya Nadela is behind the scenes being the

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 5>peace broker bringing the investors to the table. The board

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 5>wasn't talking for a while, are they now talking? And

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:27.080
<v Speaker 5>then there's what he said on camera, which is we

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 5>back Sam either way. Do we have a real sense

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 5>of what Sam's position is in all of this.

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 8>I mean, look, we know that Sam has said he's

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 8>going to go to Microsoft right with his old colleague

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 8>Greg Brockman and start an AI leader AI department there. However,

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 8>at the end of the day, we also know that

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 8>Sam's goal is ultimately you know, Opening is a company

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 8>that he built, right, So if he's being offered an

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 8>executive position to go lead again back there, it's hard

0:03:57.680 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 8>to imagine him not taking that. And that's definitely what

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 8>inmployees rallying for him right now.

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 9>We're pushing for all.

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 5>Right, bloom Mosteringforry, late night for you, late night for

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 5>the team. Once again, Let's keep a conversation going on

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 5>the story though, and we're excited to say. Josh Wolfe,

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 5>co founder and managing partner of Lux Capital, joins us

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 5>on the program. Josh, just as a scene setter, you

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 5>are not an investor in open Ai, as I understand it,

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:25.160
<v Speaker 5>there's this tender that was due to happen in the background.

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 5>Start by asking you would you invest in open ai

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 5>right now if you could through a tender mechanism or otherwise.

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:36.040
<v Speaker 10>Right now, I would not just because of the instability.

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 10>You could see that as an opportunity. I will say,

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 10>I actually think that they should, once they get this

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 10>as sorted out, immediately file to go public. I think

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:46.360
<v Speaker 10>that the demand and the outpouring and interest that you've

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 10>seen and the support for SAM is just absolutely unprecedent

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:52.040
<v Speaker 10>in the tech company. It's almost like an unintended pre

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 10>IPO roadshow to shill the overwhelming demand. So while we're

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:59.479
<v Speaker 10>not an investor in Opening Eye, I do think that

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 10>if them and I was the ultimate board, which I

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 10>think has to be a restructured, real governance board, I

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 10>would file for IPO.

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 4>I'm digging in there, Josh, because that is a contrarian view.

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 4>When ultimately it looks like the entire company is destroying itself.

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 4>What would the governance have to look like if a

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:19.919
<v Speaker 4>company was to go public.

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:22.720
<v Speaker 10>I think it's the kind of traditional governance that you

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:24.479
<v Speaker 10>want to see. You want to have checks and balances.

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 10>There's a big difference between giving founders control, which has

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:30.159
<v Speaker 10>actually worked we know in tech from Google and Meta

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 10>and many others, and then just having basic governance checks

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:35.600
<v Speaker 10>and balances that you can avoid these sort of capricious

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 10>whims of just a handful of individuals around a table.

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 10>You want the judgment to avoid, As you said, this

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:44.840
<v Speaker 10>sort of making devastating mistakes that can be very hard

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 10>to recover from. And the really important thing here we're

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:50.159
<v Speaker 10>seeing is this wasn't because of absence of GPUs, This

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:53.280
<v Speaker 10>wasn't because of absence of compute, This wasn't because of algorithms.

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 10>You know, the great irony is people are so worried

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 10>about AI destroying all this stuff. It was human nature.

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 10>It was a bunch of people in a room and

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 10>the emotions that drove the sort of whimsical and capricious

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 10>decision to say we're going to oust this beloved leader

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 10>in tech.

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 5>We just showed a graphic with some of your portfolio companies.

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 5>You guys are investing in AI, either AI native IAI

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 5>adjacent companies. What does this do for the competitive landscape?

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:25.160
<v Speaker 5>Right there are dozens of companies building large language models.

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 5>We all recognize that open AI was the sort of

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 5>technological leader and in some sense the commercial leader. What

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:36.160
<v Speaker 5>opportunity does this present to those you're backing.

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 10>Well, start generally and just remember that the one thing

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 10>that open ai had was this pole position, and I

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:43.720
<v Speaker 10>believe that they can recover it. But they had predictability,

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 10>they had stability, they had reliability, and all of that

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 10>gives confidence, and confidence gives trust, and trust is the

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 10>ultimate currency. The reason that I watch Bloomberg, the reason

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 10>that people watch you every day is because they trust you.

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 10>People partner with a company because they trusted and this

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 10>weekend trust blew up. So it could take ten years

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:01.599
<v Speaker 10>to build a reputation, ten to build trust, and ten

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:03.840
<v Speaker 10>seconds to lose it. So a week prior, you had

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 10>all of these startups that basically with the open Aide

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 10>demo day thought all right, they just killed our latest

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 10>product or our latest feature. Now they have a second chance.

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 10>Because any company that's working with a hospital system, or

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 10>a government group or a major corporation, all those entities,

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 10>all those customers want to know that they're working with

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 10>someone who is reliable and predictable and stable. Now you

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 10>look at some of our companies hugging face on the

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 10>open source. We are huge believers in open source. We

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 10>think that this is probably like exhibit A of why

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 10>you want open source systems as opposed to closed siloed

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 10>concentrated systems. If you care truly about humanity, if you

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 10>care about AI really getting out into the far reaches

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 10>of the industry, you want open systems. So, whether it's

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 10>hugging face together, doing distributed compute Mosaic mL, which we

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 10>sold to Data Bricks, Runway mL, they're all the fastest

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 10>growing and well positioned companies in these spaces because they

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 10>are very heavily geared towards open.

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 4>Source, marked to being safe, and to ultimately ensuring that

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 4>in some way that aligns if not. In open AI's case,

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 4>came first above profitability, and I'm interested in that tension

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 4>that we continue to see around artificial intelligence and ultimately

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 4>whether or not we can see absolutely monumental valuations and

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 4>profitability at the same time as well ethical use and deployment.

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 3>I do think so.

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 10>I think that the ethics and the safety are just

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 10>basic good judgment. You know what we saw here in

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 10>this board coup and all this craziness was just bad judgment.

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 10>Now you just want good people making good decisions. And

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 10>whenever I hear anybody say, oh, I'm just trying to

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:39.320
<v Speaker 10>do this to save the world, that actually really gets

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 10>my spidey sense going I actually find it quite cynical.

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't trust that.

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 3>But when you have somebody that's.

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 10>Just like I want to build this thing. I want

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 10>to solve problems. I want to get every student a

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 10>teacher in a tutor. I want to help reduce hospital

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 10>bills and get people better differential diagnoses. I want to

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 10>help discover new drugs. Those are the things that you

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 10>really want to be backing. Most of those people are

0:08:57.000 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 10>thinking what could go wrong. I always say that failure

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 10>from a failure to imagine failure, and if you are

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 10>adequately thinking about the downsides, what can go wrong?

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:07.199
<v Speaker 3>Without just a pure.

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 10>Techno optimist view, we're going full speed of had without

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 10>looking to the sides and looking through this year rear

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 10>view mirrors. You don't have to have regulation, you don't

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 10>have to have intense scrutiny. It should just be self

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 10>reflection and good leadership to anticipate the failure points so

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 10>as to avoid them. What happened this weekend with open

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:27.080
<v Speaker 10>AI and what's still happening was a failure of imagination.

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 10>People did not imagine that this was possible, that so

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 10>much risk could be concentrated in just a handful of

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 10>people's hands. To make a decision on what the future

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 10>would be. There's one big winter here. There's one big

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 10>winter gear, which, as you noted just in the prior comms,

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 10>is Microsoft. Microsoft.

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean people are forgetting this ten.

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 4>Really, Josh really, because ultimately they now have regulatory exposure,

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 4>they now have a cost exposure. They also don't have

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 4>that arm's length protection of seeing hallucination built on their

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:56.840
<v Speaker 4>own brand type.

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 10>I will trade that if I was a Microsoft shareholder

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 10>or a board member or employee there, I would trade

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 10>that every time they put ten billion dollars of committed capital,

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 10>how much actually has gone in whatnot? And what did

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 10>they get in marketcap value? A trillion dollars. That is

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 10>one of the best trades in technology history. Ten billion

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 10>dollars to create a trillion dollars of market value. So

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 10>I think that they can afford, whether it's one hundred

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:22.200
<v Speaker 10>million dollars of regulatory costs, whether it's Bradsmith going and

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 10>trying to get regulatory capture, which I don't approve of.

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:26.560
<v Speaker 10>I think it's wrong for this industry. I think that

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 10>it's really disingenuous in its attempt. But Microsoft has won

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 10>ten billion dollars to yield. The trillion dollars of market

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 10>value is a coup of epic proportions.

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 4>Boy, are we going to talk about that a little

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 4>bit more perfect? Start to the show, Josh Warfe, We

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 4>thank you so much, co found a managing partner of

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 4>Lux Capital, and of course an investor in hugging face.

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 4>Just to warn you a little bit later, of course,

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:48.439
<v Speaker 4>you have Margaret Mitchell joining us on the show. She's

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 4>hugging face, chief ethics scientist, so a little bit more

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 4>there on the ethics side of the equation. Meanwhile, they're

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 4>coming up. We push ahead to the big earnings after

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:57.840
<v Speaker 4>the bell calls. We're talking AI. Of course, we're talking

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:00.359
<v Speaker 4>in videos results as a bloom make technology.

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 5>In Video's earnings are the big one coming after the bell.

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 5>Here's what to watch for. Analyst expects sales to jump

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 5>one and seventy one percent from a year ago, driven

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 5>by demand for its AI accelerators. Profit also expected to jump.

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 5>Wall Street also sees a leap in profit three dollars

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 5>thirty six cents of earnings per share, and Video already

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:36.440
<v Speaker 5>leads the market with its h one hundred GPU used

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 5>to train artificial intelligence models. Investors will want an update

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 5>on the GH two hundred or Great Shopper super chip,

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 5>the next gen accelerator that started shipping last quarter. An

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 5>improved version with HMB three E memory supposed to go

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 5>out in the second quarter of next year. Those are

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:56.200
<v Speaker 5>the numbers. Let's get the analysis with Bloomberg Intelligence and

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:59.680
<v Speaker 5>this Kunjan Sabani high bar going into earnings, what do

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:00.200
<v Speaker 5>you look for.

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 11>A significantly higher beaten Race. I mean, look, the expectations

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 11>have been climbing up and up. Everyone expect them to

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 11>beaten race. But it's going to come down to how

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:11.599
<v Speaker 11>much more can they keep repeating the performance that is

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 11>in the last two quarters.

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:16.679
<v Speaker 5>A part of the repeat performance is that their supply constraint, right,

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 5>So wherever you look those demand for AI accelerators, how

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 5>does that factor into your model.

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 11>I think they're going to definitely ship a lot more

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 11>H one hundreds. Based on our estimates, the first half

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 11>H one hundred contribution would be thirty to forty percent

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:34.079
<v Speaker 11>of the total GPU volumes server GPU volumes. We expect

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 11>that to significantly increase in the second half because with

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 11>each H one hundred they get a lot more ASP

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 11>fascinating Counji.

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 4>We thank you so much you'll be glued to the

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:46.680
<v Speaker 4>screens after the bell Conjensibani bluemeg Intelligence. We appreciate it

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 4>joining us now to think more broadly about AI and

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 4>indeed where we're currently trading across the board for the

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 4>nasdac Heni fishes with us senior research analyst of Technology

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 4>software at Clearbridge and really do deep dive insights into

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:00.239
<v Speaker 4>certain names out there that have been powered and benefiting

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 4>from artificial intelligence. Have we seen valuations exceed ultimately the

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 4>growth trajectory the monetization options here?

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 9>It's good to be here. Thank you care lyon think

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 9>you had no, I don't think so. I think we've

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 9>been playing a little bit of push and pull between

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:23.200
<v Speaker 9>valuations and fundamentals coming through. But fundamentals are only just

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 9>starting to come through. AI monetization is just in the

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 9>earliest stages. We're just on the cusp of seeing what

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 9>these companies will garner from their GENAI offerings.

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 4>What has been so disruptive, largely to sleep of journalists

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 4>and those working in open AI, but also just the

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 4>ecosystem more broadly, has been this sort of self destruction

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 4>path that open air has been on. More generally now

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 4>this is a private company, not one that you'll be

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:49.319
<v Speaker 4>doing deep dive research on too much. But what they

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 4>have done has created fierce competition and exuberance ever since

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 4>the launch of originally CHATCHYPT back in November of last year.

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:01.559
<v Speaker 4>Is it more competitive now the space? Do you think the.

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 9>Space is more competitive? And it will become increasingly competitive.

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:08.680
<v Speaker 9>But the opportunity set continues to rise with each week,

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 9>each month, meaning companies are figuring out more and more

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 9>ways to utilize AI. Vendors are figuring out more and

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 9>more applications to which to apply it. And I think

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 9>we're we're just in the infancy of all that. So yes,

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 9>it will become more competitive.

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely.

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 4>Has it been a worry for you for the companies

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 4>that you do monitor or those that more broadly that

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 4>your company holds, that are based upon the large language

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 4>models of open ai?

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 9>Do you think I'm sorry with your painting?

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 4>Well, ultimately, many companies have been building around the architecture

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 4>that open ai has built. Oh yeah, and now everyone

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 4>suddenly is worrying about that architecture, about its resiliency.

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 9>Sure, is that a concern? Well, none of the situation

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 9>at open ai has introduced some level of near trum uncertainty.

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 9>But Microsoft just gave every open Ai employee big bear hug.

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 9>Sam Altman has apparently joined Microsoft in a research fashion.

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 9>I think it's too soon to call this a major issue.

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:10.160
<v Speaker 9>I think Microsoft has had exclusive access to the technology,

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 9>So I think what Microsoft needs to do is actually

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 9>just to draw this situation to some form of conclusion.

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 9>Either they can help stabilize open Ai. They could encourage

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 9>sam Altman to go back to a I to open AI,

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 9>or they could actually take on the majority of the

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 9>employee base of open Ai or the employees which they like,

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 9>which they certainly can do. So I think I think

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 9>we're going to see conclusion before not too long, and

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 9>then we can look forward. Other companies are certainly competing.

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 9>I'm not sure that this gives them a major leg up,

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 9>yet there seems to be some loyalty on the part

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 9>of that team. They would like to stay together if

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 9>they can. Microsoft just clearly gave signals that they're making

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 9>that possible.

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 4>We always have having you on because you like stocks

0:15:56.800 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 4>like Microsoft, Hype Scalers, CRM, Snow, and Oracle, to name,

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 4>but a few really appreciate you coming on this holiday

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 4>shorten week, It's called Hillary Fish of Clearbridge time now

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 4>for talking tech. First up crypto exchange platform Craken is

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 4>in some hot water with the USSCC, the Securities in

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 4>Exchange Commission. Now, the SEC is saying Cracken com mingled

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 4>client assets with its own, even going as far as

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 4>to pay expenses from bank accounts that held customer cat.

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 4>Craghan said it disagreed with the SEC cleans and planned

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 4>to vigorously defend its position. Meanwhile, President Biden and Vice

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 4>President Kamala Harris are officially on threads. White House officials

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 4>also open accounts for the First Lady and second and Gentlemen,

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 4>and the move, of course, comes just days after the

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 4>White House condemned enol Musk's endorsement of anti Semitic posts

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 4>on x Fulling known as Twitter plus. The US Senate

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 4>Judiciary Committee is calling a number of social media executors

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 4>to testify at a Decembiner sixth hearing regarding online child

0:16:56.200 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 4>sexual exploitation. Those subpoenad include Jason Citron of Discord Snaps,

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 4>Evan Spiegel, an X CEO, Ninda Yakarina at more on X.

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah More on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 5>is suing watchdog group Media Matters, claiming it quote maliciously

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 5>drove advertisers away from the social media platform. Let's bring

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 5>in Bloomberg's ashaccounts. Who's been all across this. Musk has

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 5>been very vocal on X. Yakarino has been quite vocal

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:25.600
<v Speaker 5>on X. What is it that they're accusing Media Matters of.

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 7>Well, they're essentially saying that Media Matters mischaracterize some of

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 7>the content on the platform.

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 5>Right, This is in a report a week ago exactly,

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:34.359
<v Speaker 5>a Matters report.

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 7>Yes, the Media Matters report came out and basically said

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 7>they found ads from huge advertisers like IBM and Apple

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 7>next to pro nazi content. And so what Yakarino and

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 7>Musk and the Right Association X are arguing is that

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 7>that's not the case. It was only a small number

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:50.879
<v Speaker 7>of people that saw it that Media Matters sort of

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 7>manipulated their feed to do that. So they have all

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 7>these sorts of arguments against why they don't think that's

0:17:56.760 --> 0:17:57.680
<v Speaker 7>exactly accurate.

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:02.399
<v Speaker 4>Meanwhile, Media Matters says they stand by their reporting and

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 4>ultimately think that this is well a mistrodden path for

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 4>them to be being sued right now.

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, Medium Matters is saying that, look, we see the ads.

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:15.879
<v Speaker 7>We looked at them, we saw the ads next to

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 7>pronati content. And unfortunately this is not something that is new, right.

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 7>Advertisers have seen this over the past year. This has

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:24.680
<v Speaker 7>been an ongoing saga of advertisers finding their ads next

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:27.199
<v Speaker 7>to content that they don't like, and so media managers saying, look,

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 7>we've done the research, we saw the ads, here's examples

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 7>of it, and so they stand by what they put.

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 5>At the heart of this is the pervasiveness of fake

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 5>content on the platform and the exposure of the advertisers.

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 5>You and I reported that Yakarino has acknowledged broadly advertiser flight.

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 5>What has she said about addressing the issue at heart,

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:57.160
<v Speaker 5>which is the pervasiveness of content on that platform.

0:18:57.280 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 7>I mean, again, they sort of continue to go back

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 7>to their part. They said they've taken a number of

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 7>steps to combat anti submitic content on the platform. They

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:07.439
<v Speaker 7>stand by some of the policies that they have, but

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 7>it's just hard because they continue to say that, but

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 7>then advertisers are continuing to see their ads next to

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 7>this content, and agency executives at this point are pretty

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 7>fed up with a lot of the stuff that they're seeing,

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:20.119
<v Speaker 7>and so they've consistently pointed to their policies into the

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:22.919
<v Speaker 7>actions that they're taking. But from the advertiser perspective, it

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 7>doesn't seem to be making a difference, which is why

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 7>we're seeing Apple and IBM and Comcast and all these

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 7>companies pull their ads off the platform or at least

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 7>suspend temporarily.

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:33.679
<v Speaker 4>And she counts busier is always We thank you so

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:34.919
<v Speaker 4>much for the date dive, the.

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:45.919
<v Speaker 5>Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. I'm Ed Loveler in San Francisco.

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:48.119
<v Speaker 4>I'm Caroline Heid in New York. We had some breaking

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 4>news earlier this hour, the Wall Street Journal reporting that

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:53.440
<v Speaker 4>the CEO of Binance and it is founder Ceazy, has

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 4>a step down and plead guilty to violating US anti

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 4>money laundering requirements. Now, the cryptocurrency exchange will also pay

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 4>some four point three billion dollars in fines, but no

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 4>mention Oni bus I is here with the breakdown. This

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:07.159
<v Speaker 4>is in of course, the DOJ's investigation, not the SEC.

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 4>But what caught your attention from this line from the

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:11.119
<v Speaker 4>Wall Street Channel.

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, we've already reported that the fines could be more

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:15.440
<v Speaker 1>than four billion dollars. We now know that it will

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 1>be four point three billion dollars, and it does close

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 1>a matter that has been going on for many, many years.

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>This investigation from the Justice Department, with involvement also from

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury Department and the Commodity's Futures Training Commission, the CFTC.

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 1>So this does close that page for Finance and Chong Panjao.

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:35.199
<v Speaker 1>He's not only stepping down to CEO. You have to

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:37.640
<v Speaker 1>remember also, according to the Wall Street Journal, he can

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 1>retain his majority ownership of Finance, and the settlement would

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>allow them to keep operating. Remember this is the world's

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 1>largest crypto exchange we're talking about, so to kind of

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>save the company is a big deal. In light of

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:53.680
<v Speaker 1>this probe and settlement, he is expected, according to the Journal,

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:56.439
<v Speaker 1>to appear in a federal court on Tuesday afternoon and

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 1>enter his guilty plead. I think what's interesting here too

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>is the Journal does draw parallel to a prior case

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 1>to bitmex and in that instance, Arthur Hayes had plied

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:11.119
<v Speaker 1>guilty to violating anti money laundering laws and was sentenced

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>to two years of probation and avoided jail time. So

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:16.879
<v Speaker 1>the sentencing of course will come later, but he is

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 1>expected to plead guilty today in court.

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 4>So notably, as you say, Hayes didn't have any jail time.

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:27.440
<v Speaker 4>And we wonder what, indeed what would happen in terms

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 4>of the guilty plea coming from cz But is this

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 4>enough to then appease the SEC as well? What would

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 4>be the potential offering to them to be able to

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 4>settle the ongoing investigation.

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:41.360
<v Speaker 1>These are interesting questions because we know that the SEC,

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 1>among all regulatory bodies, the DJ has come down quite

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:47.200
<v Speaker 1>hard on the industry, but the SEC, the sheer scale

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 1>of how they've been approaching the industry has been massive,

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and you just saw recently their approach to Kraken, for example,

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 1>And they're concerned with many crypto exchanges and their ability

0:21:56.640 --> 0:22:00.120
<v Speaker 1>to list tokens or what the SEC believes are secure.

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 1>And so for Binance to keep operating, it draws a

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of questions not only just about the SEC's approach

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:10.119
<v Speaker 1>to Binance itself, but also remember what is fixed here?

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 4>If he's pled guilty to.

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 1>Violating anti money laundering laws in the United States, what

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 1>is being fixed at a place like Binance to be

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:21.119
<v Speaker 1>able to ensure that this doesn't happen in the future,

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I think is another critical question as we think about

0:22:23.640 --> 0:22:25.719
<v Speaker 1>the future of these crypto exchanges.

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 4>And indeed the future of retaining talent at that company,

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 4>which quite a few executives have been departing of late

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:32.879
<v Speaker 4>Chanali Bassec always all across these breaking news headlines. You

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:34.680
<v Speaker 4>can catch Nali along with Calee lines coming up on

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:37.639
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Crypto one pm New York time. They'll be speaking

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:40.439
<v Speaker 4>with the SEC Commissioner has to piss. Perfect time for

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 4>that conversation ed right.

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:44.639
<v Speaker 5>The other top story that we're trying to keep on

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 5>top of, open ai investors are still trying to return

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:51.679
<v Speaker 5>co founder Sam Outman to a leadership role at the company.

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:54.920
<v Speaker 5>At the same time, open ai staff are threatening mass mutiny,

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:59.400
<v Speaker 5>saying they'll follow Outman to Microsoft unless the board resigns.

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 5>Microsoft c Satianadella spoke with bloombergs Emily Chang last night.

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 5>He says he would not suppose Altman's return to open Ai.

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:06.919
<v Speaker 5>Take a listen.

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 3>We are leading in this next generation of AI technology.

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 6>We continue to be committed to open ai, and we

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 6>continue to be committed to Sam and Greg and the

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:19.119
<v Speaker 6>team in respect to where they are and you know,

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 6>I think about Sam has chosen multiple times now to

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:25.439
<v Speaker 6>work with us, and that's fantastic to see. And I

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:28.919
<v Speaker 6>think the real thing is that the capability that Microsoft

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 6>has across the tech stack is what attracts great people

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 6>like Sam, you know, and people like Sam and you know,

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:38.680
<v Speaker 6>innovators like Sam when it comes to ai to come

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:39.959
<v Speaker 6>to us, and we are thrilled about it.

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 12>You incredibly quickly hired Sam as well as Greg. We

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:51.359
<v Speaker 12>are hearing that Sam wants to return. Investors want him

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 12>to return to open ai. How would you feel about that?

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, as I said, we really want to partner with

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:01.480
<v Speaker 6>open ai, and we want to partner with Sam. And

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 6>so in respect to where Sam is, he's working with

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 6>Microsoft and that is the case on Friday, and that

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 6>will be. That's the case today and we will I

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:12.160
<v Speaker 6>absolutely believe that will be the case tomorrow.

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:16.200
<v Speaker 12>Now we understand that to support a return of Sam

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:19.399
<v Speaker 12>mom and two open Ai, Microsoft wants some changes to

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:23.120
<v Speaker 12>the board to governance to its overall contract with open Ai,

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 12>so something like this never happens again. What specifically are

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:30.200
<v Speaker 12>you looking for, for example, would you want to board

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 12>see and if not, what else?

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:35.479
<v Speaker 6>I mean I think we definitely will want some governance changes,

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 6>so you know, you know, surprises are bad and we

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 6>just want to make sure that things are.

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 3>Done in a way that will allow us to continue

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 3>to partner. Well, that's about it, right.

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:49.159
<v Speaker 6>You know, this idea that somehow, you know, suddenly changes

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:52.120
<v Speaker 6>happen without being you know, in the loop is not good,

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 6>and we will definitely ensure that some of the changes

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:58.480
<v Speaker 6>that are needed to happen and we continue to be

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 6>able to go along the partnership with open Ai.

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 4>Microsoft CEO Sati under the Nadella there along with our

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:08.439
<v Speaker 4>own Emily chang Us keep digging on how all of

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 4>this impacts Microsoft and indeed well broadly AI in general.

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 4>But Austin Carr has a really interesting take our own

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 4>Brimberg reporter. Austin the initial read was Satio wins lemonade

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:22.400
<v Speaker 4>out of lemons. He manages to do this deal very

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:26.359
<v Speaker 4>quickly and turn around the situation. But you're digging perhaps

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:28.360
<v Speaker 4>shows that longer term, this is not the best case

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:31.159
<v Speaker 4>scenario to have Microsoft bringing open Ai in house.

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:25:33.119 --> 0:25:36.440
<v Speaker 13>I think right at the beginning there was that sort

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 13>of the idea that Microsoft was the big winner and

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:40.960
<v Speaker 13>all of that and I think the reality is a

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 13>bit more complicated. They've invested ten to thirteen billion dollars

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 13>in open Ai. If that suddenly falls apart, that doesn't

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:50.199
<v Speaker 13>look good for Microsoft. It doesn't look good that they

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 13>invested so much money given so much governance hurdles that

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 13>the startup clearly had. The second thing is just hiring

0:25:57.080 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 13>Sam Oltman. You heard how many times Satya said Sam

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 13>and that inner you maybe about a dozen, if not more.

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 13>This was a lot about damage control. How can we

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:08.919
<v Speaker 13>keep Sam Altman within the Microsoft family? And that was

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 13>the first thing that they did. Hire Sam to read

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:15.160
<v Speaker 13>this new advanced research group. But that doesn't come without complications.

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 13>It's going to be tremendously expensive if you have these

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 13>one hundreds of employees exiting open Ai to try to

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 13>rebuild something similar from scratch. Inside Microsoft, you have IP issues,

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 13>and then you all have a lot of bureaucratic issues

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 13>within Microsoft, which has its own AI and research teams

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 13>that are working on other things. So I think it's

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 13>really too early to say that Microsoft is the clear

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 13>winner in all this. Sachi, I think doing a really

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:42.440
<v Speaker 13>excellent job at damage control in these last seventy two hours,

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 13>all Right, bloom.

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 5>Bezos Sinkhar who's been writing in The Tech Daily. You

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:49.400
<v Speaker 5>should subscribe to the Tech Daily. It's a fantastic summary

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 5>and smart take on the news of the day in

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:54.360
<v Speaker 5>the news of the hour. Let's send to another actual

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 5>player in the field of artsficial intelligence. Hugging Face dive

0:26:57.560 --> 0:27:00.960
<v Speaker 5>more into the implications for the AI industry at large

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 5>with Delcense, to be joined by Hugging Faces chief ethics

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 5>scientists Margaret Mitchell and Margaret I know that you have

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 5>relationships with many that work at open AI. They are

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 5>your industry peers that you have direct relationships. I'd just

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:17.159
<v Speaker 5>like to first invite you to give your overall thoughts

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 5>of what is happening at open ai HQ about three

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:23.360
<v Speaker 5>miles from where I'm sitting right.

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:25.639
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, So I think I have a sort of different

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 14>perspective than a lot of people, although your recent interviews

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 14>are sort of hitting on them where I don't know

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 14>that it's the case that the board has failed broadly.

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 14>I do think they've failed the employees because of this

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:42.919
<v Speaker 14>creation of shock and trauma, and what we're seeing is

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 14>a response based on that. Right when you have the

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:48.360
<v Speaker 14>rug pulled out from you, you just want to get

0:27:48.359 --> 0:27:51.880
<v Speaker 14>the rug back. So that is happening, and that can

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 14>be arguably be a failure of the board. But I

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:58.880
<v Speaker 14>think broadly the board is sticking to some of its

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 14>original goals, which is to balance the profit and the

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:08.200
<v Speaker 14>non profit, make sure that safety concerns are being taken seriously,

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 14>and even making the decision to lose profit in cases

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 14>where some of the safety concerns are starting to become overwhelming.

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:21.119
<v Speaker 4>I think if one goes openly to open AI's website

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 4>and looks at its governance and the statements it makes,

0:28:24.119 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 4>it makes it abundantly clear that they put safety ahead

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 4>of profits and are not for profit governance board. In hindsight,

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:37.399
<v Speaker 4>perhaps for vcs wasn't totally aligned. Has the discussion point

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:40.960
<v Speaker 4>changed longer term here, Margaret, Do you think that people

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:42.720
<v Speaker 4>start to say, Okay, well, we have to put the

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 4>safety to one side because we need to keep on

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 4>building and founders need to keep on doing deals and

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 4>the compute power is so expensive.

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, I mean, I think that there will definitely be

0:28:55.840 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 14>some changes and updates to this kind of structure. The

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 14>profit model that OpenAI was spearheading was more of an experiment,

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:08.880
<v Speaker 14>and with experiments, in general with AI and in science,

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 14>you just update based on the results you're getting, and

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 14>so I think we're seeing that here. We'll probably see

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:18.080
<v Speaker 14>changes in light of the fact that there clearly is

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 14>a need to have a reliance on commercial interests companies

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 14>like Microsoft to provide compute and so you don't want

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 14>to surprise Satchya, right if you have this kind of dependency.

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 14>So there probably will be some updates here. But I

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:38.000
<v Speaker 14>do think that the board as originally constructed is basically

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 14>doing what it's supposed to be doing.

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:45.240
<v Speaker 5>Margaret, how do we find a middle ground? If this

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 5>existential threat issue is the issue, and frankly, we don't

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 5>know why the board fired, Sam Outman, how do you

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 5>appease both sides?

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 14>Actually, if you work towards the solutions, if you sort

0:29:58.280 --> 0:30:00.959
<v Speaker 14>of take what the issue is and then work backwards

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 14>towards the solutions, you'll find that the solutions for safety,

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 14>for existential risk, for bias issues, non discrimination, a lot

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 14>of these sort of ethical values that a lot of

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 14>tech companies are holding right now, the solutions end up

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 14>being roughly the same, as far as I can tell.

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 14>And so really the middle ground is, let's go back

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 14>to what the solutions are for all these issues that

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 14>we're thinking and seeing, and can we agree on these

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 14>solutions even if our goals are somewhat different, and I

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 14>think that will really be a place where across the

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:36.760
<v Speaker 14>industry we'll see alignment.

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 5>Margaret Chief Ethic Scientists, Margaret Mitchell, thank you for being

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 5>with us. We have some breaking us just crossing the Bloomberg.

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 5>Open AI and its board are in open talks with

0:30:49.280 --> 0:30:53.320
<v Speaker 5>Sam Outman about a return for Sam Outman to Open AI.

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:56.320
<v Speaker 5>I'm reporting this with actually Evans. What we're hearing the

0:30:56.400 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 5>latest is that Adam D'Angelo is talking with Sam Altman.

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 5>One source tells me that a possible scenario is that

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:09.920
<v Speaker 5>a transition board comes into place and Sam Altman takes

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 5>a director role on that transition board. That is one

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 5>caroline possible way forward that we're hearing about. Investors are involved,

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 5>Investors are speaking with both the open AI side and

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:27.240
<v Speaker 5>the open aiye board. And what we're hearing myself, Ashley

0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 5>Emily Chang reporting this as well, is that EMMITTT. Sheer,

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 5>whose interim open AI CEO is having a pretty tough time,

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:38.200
<v Speaker 5>is basically in the dark and at breaking point. At

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 5>this point, and.

0:31:39.280 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 4>It's notable, of course that Veno Kosler, for example, very

0:31:42.600 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 4>early investor in open Ai, had been saying how much

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 4>the Quora ceo had DeAngelo had been digging in and

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:53.000
<v Speaker 4>ultimately whether or not that was going to be a

0:31:53.040 --> 0:31:56.880
<v Speaker 4>difficult scenario to be able to have a board change

0:31:56.960 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 4>of direction. Ultimately, though, what are you hearing in terms

0:31:59.800 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 4>of being pushed for of the makeup of that board,

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 4>because many would say it doesn't just need Sam Altman

0:32:05.120 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 4>to be reinstated.

0:32:06.840 --> 0:32:09.280
<v Speaker 5>Yes, I mean the name Brett Taylor, who is the

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 5>co CEO of Salesforce, keeps coming up time and time

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 5>again as someone that would be an appeasement to both

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:18.920
<v Speaker 5>sides of the discussion that we make the point in

0:32:18.960 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 5>the story we've just reported, just as the sources make

0:32:22.280 --> 0:32:24.560
<v Speaker 5>the point to us that the fact that Sam is

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:28.960
<v Speaker 5>even speaking to Adam Dangelo is news. It is complete

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 5>change from the weekend. We sat there all day Sunday saying, Okay,

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 5>well Sam's definitely coming back and the board's going to go.

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 5>That wasn't the case at all. The board was digging

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:40.360
<v Speaker 5>in and there was very little communication at AOLS. So yeah,

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 5>we keep going, we do.

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:45.320
<v Speaker 4>And as Emily chattered to Satya yesterday, he of course

0:32:45.360 --> 0:32:47.959
<v Speaker 4>supports no matter where Sam ends up being, whether at

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 4>OpenAI or in house with Microsoft. So much more to come,

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:52.280
<v Speaker 4>and of course we're going to be talking a little

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:55.520
<v Speaker 4>bit more about Ed's scoops one about a chip venture

0:32:55.680 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 4>that Sam Ammon was apparently trying to be bringing to

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 4>the world. Will have Cleo Capital Serracance joining us. Next,

0:33:02.240 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 4>this is blue Meg Technology. Now, of course we just

0:33:18.400 --> 0:33:20.560
<v Speaker 4>had that breaking news coming from our own Ed Ludlow

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 4>and team that Sam Alman and the Open Ai board

0:33:23.240 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 4>are open to talks for his possible return. And while

0:33:26.400 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 4>the saga continues, we want to go to our VC

0:33:28.400 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 4>spotlight now Cleo Capital founder and managing director Serracus, for

0:33:31.800 --> 0:33:34.600
<v Speaker 4>your own take on all of this, the repercussions for

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:38.440
<v Speaker 4>AI startup ecosystem more broadly, Sarah, is it that it

0:33:38.480 --> 0:33:41.239
<v Speaker 4>becomes more competitive? Is it that becomes more concerning of

0:33:41.240 --> 0:33:42.480
<v Speaker 4>profits visa V safety?

0:33:43.640 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 15>You know, I honestly think the biggest takeaway about this

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 15>isn't going to be about AI.

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 2>I think it's going to be about corporate governance.

0:33:49.960 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 15>You know, this on the heels of everything that happened

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:56.160
<v Speaker 15>with FTX, and obviously could not be more different situations.

0:33:56.200 --> 0:33:58.600
<v Speaker 15>But in both cases you have companies that have been

0:33:58.680 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 15>super super hot, you know, is billions of dollars, and

0:34:01.960 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 15>there's no board, there's no traditional corporate governance, and so

0:34:05.560 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 15>when things go sideways, they tend to go sideways in

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:10.759
<v Speaker 15>a really big way and catch a lot of people unawares.

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:13.160
<v Speaker 15>You know, ventures a business where we usually like to

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:16.400
<v Speaker 15>sort of handle the messy stuff a little bit quietly,

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:19.240
<v Speaker 15>and that's really impossible to do when there's no board,

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:22.240
<v Speaker 15>you know, no traditional board just sort of say, let's sit.

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:28.560
<v Speaker 5>Down and hash this out quietly. We're reporting that one

0:34:29.600 --> 0:34:33.480
<v Speaker 5>possible outcome is that there's a transitional board, right Sam

0:34:33.480 --> 0:34:38.920
<v Speaker 5>Outman joins this transitional board as a director, as a

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:41.040
<v Speaker 5>bench capsus. If somebody put in front of you the

0:34:41.040 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 5>opportunity to participate in the tender, which we believe is

0:34:44.680 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 5>still pending based on that information I just gave you,

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:48.759
<v Speaker 5>would you take an allocation?

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:53.040
<v Speaker 15>I do early stage ventures, so they are out of range,

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 15>and that's all I'll say.

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 2>But you know the reality is that I.

0:34:56.560 --> 0:34:58.960
<v Speaker 15>Think that this is going to be a moment where

0:34:59.080 --> 0:35:01.759
<v Speaker 15>the investors around the table say, look, you know, we

0:35:01.840 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 15>played by your rules. You started as a nonprofit, you

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:06.799
<v Speaker 15>had this capped profit model, you know, you had this

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:10.799
<v Speaker 15>board that didn't directly oversee you know, and wasn't wasn't

0:35:10.800 --> 0:35:13.080
<v Speaker 15>necessarily a fiduciary to the for profit arm.

0:35:13.400 --> 0:35:14.840
<v Speaker 2>I have a feeling that if Sam.

0:35:14.640 --> 0:35:18.040
<v Speaker 15>Comes back, that is all going to change, possibly in

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 15>a good way for him, but I think probably in

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 15>a way that's a.

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:23.480
<v Speaker 2>Bit more investor in for profit friendly as well.

0:35:24.280 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 4>A rule early stage investment outlook right now, there is

0:35:28.760 --> 0:35:31.759
<v Speaker 4>this thesis at one point when indeed we thought that

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:33.759
<v Speaker 4>Sam was going to be sticking with Microsoft, is that

0:35:34.280 --> 0:35:36.640
<v Speaker 4>open AI talent might not just go there, and they

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 4>might go off and start creating their own businesses. One

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:41.799
<v Speaker 4>found at telling us that yesterday, are you seeing as

0:35:41.880 --> 0:35:45.960
<v Speaker 4>much exuberant about building AI companies at the smaller check

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:47.080
<v Speaker 4>range at the moment?

0:35:48.000 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 15>So, you know, there's it's structurally hard to build a

0:35:51.200 --> 0:35:54.280
<v Speaker 15>true AI company right foundational models. You know, it takes

0:35:54.400 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 15>billions and billions of.

0:35:55.560 --> 0:35:56.960
<v Speaker 2>Dollars worth of compute power.

0:35:57.239 --> 0:36:00.279
<v Speaker 15>You know, we've heard reports this year of VC who

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:03.160
<v Speaker 15>are actually going out and you know, getting compute space,

0:36:03.239 --> 0:36:06.359
<v Speaker 15>getting cloud space, you know, buying chips AI chips so

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 15>that they can use that as sort of an enticement

0:36:08.640 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 15>to founders, And the other reality is it's not just

0:36:11.680 --> 0:36:13.920
<v Speaker 15>enough to be sort of smart and hungry when you're

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:16.840
<v Speaker 15>talking about building in these kind of foundational AI spaces.

0:36:16.880 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 15>You really need serious engineering chops, and not a ton

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:22.920
<v Speaker 15>of people have them. So, you know, certainly the bloom

0:36:22.960 --> 0:36:25.200
<v Speaker 15>is a bit off the rose right now at open AI.

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:27.680
<v Speaker 15>And I think that, you know, when things change, they

0:36:27.680 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 15>tend to stay somewhat changed, and so we might see people,

0:36:31.239 --> 0:36:33.320
<v Speaker 15>you know, who are planning to stick around a couple

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:33.960
<v Speaker 15>more years.

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:36.360
<v Speaker 2>You know, the macro environment's not great.

0:36:36.480 --> 0:36:38.480
<v Speaker 15>They you know, liked what they were doing at open AI,

0:36:38.880 --> 0:36:41.440
<v Speaker 15>who are now you know, sitting there saying, you know,

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:44.720
<v Speaker 15>have whiplash and feel like, wow, maybe I do want.

0:36:44.600 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 2>To go out on my own. And that's not necessarily

0:36:47.520 --> 0:36:48.040
<v Speaker 2>a bad thing.

0:36:49.239 --> 0:36:52.440
<v Speaker 5>Clear Capital Founder Managing Directors, Hurricanes Goods catch up here

0:36:52.520 --> 0:36:58.920
<v Speaker 5>on bloom By Technology.

0:37:01.120 --> 0:37:03.600
<v Speaker 4>Zoom was out with earnings, reporting better than expected revenue

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 4>on some strong enterprise sales and raising is fully of forecast.

0:37:06.680 --> 0:37:09.680
<v Speaker 4>In fact, Zoom CFO Kelly Stackowa joins us now and

0:37:09.800 --> 0:37:14.240
<v Speaker 4>Kelly there was some significant international slowdown and I'm interested

0:37:14.280 --> 0:37:16.919
<v Speaker 4>as to how resilient the sort of growthing you saw

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:19.160
<v Speaker 4>in the prior quarter is for the next.

0:37:20.800 --> 0:37:23.720
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, So we were really pleased with our Q three results.

0:37:23.760 --> 0:37:24.720
<v Speaker 3>As you said, we.

0:37:24.640 --> 0:37:28.960
<v Speaker 16>Exceeded both our top line as well as our profitability expectations,

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:30.160
<v Speaker 16>and we were able to raise for.

0:37:30.120 --> 0:37:30.719
<v Speaker 2>The full year.

0:37:31.320 --> 0:37:34.759
<v Speaker 16>We saw growth in the Americas. We did see some

0:37:34.840 --> 0:37:37.560
<v Speaker 16>headwinds both in AMYA and Asia Pac, some of that

0:37:37.719 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 16>due to FX and currency. Were an Asia Pac for example,

0:37:42.000 --> 0:37:44.879
<v Speaker 16>we would have been flat year every year, but we

0:37:45.200 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 16>are starting to see some momentum in both of those

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:51.279
<v Speaker 16>regions and are looking forward to further progress as we

0:37:51.280 --> 0:37:52.759
<v Speaker 16>moved through the rest of this year and in the

0:37:52.840 --> 0:37:53.279
<v Speaker 16>next year.

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:57.560
<v Speaker 5>Like Kelly, the sales side analysts are basically saying that

0:37:57.719 --> 0:38:00.840
<v Speaker 5>the raising guidance is just not bullish, and they're still

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:04.440
<v Speaker 5>worried about the long term growth of Zoom based on

0:38:04.520 --> 0:38:08.479
<v Speaker 5>how society behaves today, how we communicate one another. How

0:38:08.520 --> 0:38:12.320
<v Speaker 5>do you tell them definitively I can grow this company forever.

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:14.640
<v Speaker 3>You know, we.

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:18.520
<v Speaker 16>Achieved some amazing milestones during Q three. For example, Zoom

0:38:18.560 --> 0:38:23.000
<v Speaker 16>Phone hit seven million seats, our Zoom contact center grew

0:38:23.120 --> 0:38:28.960
<v Speaker 16>to over seven hundred customers, and Zoom AI Companion It's

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:31.160
<v Speaker 16>only been out for approximately two months and it's already

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 16>activated in over two hundred thousand accounts.

0:38:33.840 --> 0:38:35.279
<v Speaker 3>So that shows you that.

0:38:35.280 --> 0:38:39.680
<v Speaker 16>We are expanding to be a full collaboration and communication platform,

0:38:40.239 --> 0:38:43.040
<v Speaker 16>and that's really what's going to drive our growth in

0:38:43.120 --> 0:38:45.560
<v Speaker 16>the future. And that's exactly what investors are looking for.

0:38:45.600 --> 0:38:49.439
<v Speaker 16>They're looking for reacceleration in our direct segment and they're

0:38:49.440 --> 0:38:51.320
<v Speaker 16>looking for stabilization.

0:38:50.680 --> 0:38:51.800
<v Speaker 2>And our online segment.

0:38:52.360 --> 0:38:55.160
<v Speaker 16>And as I said, the expansion of the platform is

0:38:55.160 --> 0:38:57.000
<v Speaker 16>exactly what's going to drive that over time.

0:38:57.760 --> 0:39:00.760
<v Speaker 4>How then, have you been reacting to the going changes

0:39:00.800 --> 0:39:02.200
<v Speaker 4>within AI?

0:39:02.360 --> 0:39:02.719
<v Speaker 16>Right now?

0:39:02.760 --> 0:39:05.840
<v Speaker 4>You've got Companion AI, you incorporate, you have a federated approach,

0:39:05.880 --> 0:39:08.759
<v Speaker 4>you incorporate your own MLM, you have metas you have

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:11.960
<v Speaker 4>open AIS Andthropic. Your key competitor really is Microsoft in

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:13.480
<v Speaker 4>the space and they look to we ever closer to

0:39:13.480 --> 0:39:15.640
<v Speaker 4>open AI. How does this situation impact you.

0:39:16.719 --> 0:39:19.960
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, So in setting up this model, just like we

0:39:20.000 --> 0:39:22.280
<v Speaker 16>do everything, we think about it from a customer's perspective

0:39:22.280 --> 0:39:25.440
<v Speaker 16>and we want them to have the best possible performance

0:39:26.040 --> 0:39:29.440
<v Speaker 16>and we believe that a federated approach does that. As

0:39:29.440 --> 0:39:32.600
<v Speaker 16>you mentioned, we're working with many partners in this space.

0:39:32.680 --> 0:39:35.839
<v Speaker 16>That gives us the opportunity to really fine tune our

0:39:35.880 --> 0:39:38.759
<v Speaker 16>models and get the absolute best result for our customers.

0:39:39.080 --> 0:39:41.080
<v Speaker 16>And I also want to highlight that we're doing it

0:39:41.120 --> 0:39:44.480
<v Speaker 16>in a very cost effective way. Zoom ad compand is

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:47.680
<v Speaker 16>included for free in all of our paying for all

0:39:47.719 --> 0:39:50.680
<v Speaker 16>of our paying customers. So that's a really key competitive

0:39:50.680 --> 0:39:54.160
<v Speaker 16>differentiator as it comes included where some of our competitors

0:39:54.160 --> 0:39:57.680
<v Speaker 16>are char charging up to thirty dollars per month per

0:39:57.800 --> 0:39:58.400
<v Speaker 16>user for that.

0:39:59.160 --> 0:40:01.319
<v Speaker 4>Certainly the focus on the competition there. We thank you

0:40:01.400 --> 0:40:05.400
<v Speaker 4>so much soom CFO k Steckelberg on the reporting of

0:40:05.480 --> 0:40:09.880
<v Speaker 4>earnings and future growth drivers. Meanwhile, another extraordinary show of

0:40:09.920 --> 0:40:12.479
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Technology. We're just breaking news after breaking news.

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:15.600
<v Speaker 5>It reminds you that the world of technology happens in

0:40:15.640 --> 0:40:18.600
<v Speaker 5>re time. Recap everything we discuss on the podcast. We

0:40:18.680 --> 0:40:21.240
<v Speaker 5>are publishing to all the Bloomberg platforms, but also Apple,

0:40:21.440 --> 0:40:24.040
<v Speaker 5>Spotify and iHeart. Remember there's a lot in the world

0:40:24.080 --> 0:40:26.120
<v Speaker 5>of crypto going on to check out the Crypto Show

0:40:26.160 --> 0:40:28.880
<v Speaker 5>as well. Incredibly important from SF and New York. This

0:40:29.320 --> 0:40:32.240
<v Speaker 5>is Bloomberg Technology