WEBVTT - What is a glueball?

0:00:08.480 --> 0:00:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Daniel, what's it like to discover a new particle

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>of nature?

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's a lot less dramatic than you might expect.

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:19.599
<v Speaker 1>Oh really, there's no Eureka moment or some grand reveal.

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:22.960
<v Speaker 2>It's usually a lot more gradual than like dropping a

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 2>velvet curtain or something. It's more like watching water drain

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:28.520
<v Speaker 2>out of the tub to reveal the toys at the bottom.

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>You make it sound so exciting.

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:32.159
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure how Steven Spielberg is going to portray

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:34.519
<v Speaker 2>that in a moment of my life. But you know,

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 2>it gets even worse. Sometimes we don't even agree about

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:40.240
<v Speaker 2>whether or not we did discover something.

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it's like it is that a toy at the

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 1>bottom of the tub or is that something else? But

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>what do you mean? Like, sometimes you discover something and

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>some people are like, no, I don't think that's the thing.

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:52.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we can basically disagree about anything in particle.

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Physics, even about whether you disagree or not.

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 2>That's the one thing we can agree on.

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:14.760
<v Speaker 1>I am more handmade cartoonists and the creator of PhD comics.

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 2>Hi, I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist and a professor

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 2>at UC Irvine. And when I got into this field.

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:22.119
<v Speaker 2>I really did think there were going to be more

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:23.759
<v Speaker 2>discoveries to be had.

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, isn't it kind of up to you to make

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:27.960
<v Speaker 1>those discoveries? Why are you sound like you're complaining.

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 2>It's partially up to me, but it's also up to nature.

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 2>You know, when you go out and do research, you

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 2>never know what you're going to find, and you never

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:38.319
<v Speaker 2>know what's out there for you too fine. It's like

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:40.760
<v Speaker 2>the folks who were hoping to discover life on Mars.

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 2>They worked hard, they did their job, they built their rovers.

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 2>There just wasn't life on Mars for them, too fine.

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 2>And it's sort of the same way in particle physics.

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:52.279
<v Speaker 2>It's been a little bit dry for us thirsty folks.

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Mmmm. Are you going to ask for your money back

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>from nature or your career back?

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm hoping the government doesn't ask for their ten billion

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 2>dollars back. We'll have to auction off bits of the LHC.

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, there you go, offer it the souvenirs like

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>memorial you know, special keepsakes. You get a little bit

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>of this super conducting magnet.

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 2>The world's nerdiest Etsy shop bits of the LHC. There

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 2>are actually people who've done salvage on the super Conducting

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 2>super Collider in Texas. A lot of the equipment there

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 2>was just abandoned and people have grabbed some of it

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 2>and saved it as keepsakes.

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:30.640
<v Speaker 1>A bit of people would buy a piece of the LC, right,

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't they. It's the thing that discovered the Higgs boson.

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of a big deal. Like you might actually find,

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, the little sensor pad that actually caught the

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:43.359
<v Speaker 1>first Higgs. Let's let's get in on that. Let's kill

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:45.240
<v Speaker 1>it on the Daniel and Jorge online shop.

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 2>It can be like pieces of the true Cross. We

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:50.639
<v Speaker 2>can sell more of them than actually existed.

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there you go. Amazingly. It's magical as well. It

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:58.399
<v Speaker 1>multiplies the LHC. But what do you think you would

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>have done if you hadn't been a particle physics someone

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:02.080
<v Speaker 1>who explores life on Mars.

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, I actually did two degrees as an undergraduate physics

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:09.079
<v Speaker 2>and computer science, and I also applied to grad school

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:11.920
<v Speaker 2>and computer science. I was going to do artificial intelligence

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 2>and machine learning, so that was sort of my other life.

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Wow, man, I'm sorry to say, but you totally missed

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 1>that boat. He would probably a billionaire, I guess, But

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 1>then we wouldn't have this podcast, or we would have

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:27.239
<v Speaker 1>a super popular podcast about Ki.

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:29.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but then I'd be responsible for people's self driving

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 2>cars crashing, and I don't know if I could handle

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 2>that kind of responsibility.

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's not your fault, it's the car's fault. That's

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>why you give them sentience to absolve yourself of any responsibility.

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Right right, Just like we're not responsible for whether our

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 2>kids grew up to be serial killers or not.

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Exactly right, Wait, what what's going on with your kid there?

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's your kids are already making a head.

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 2>I do wonder about those serial killers and whether their

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 2>parents feel responsible. Yeah.

0:03:56.880 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I thought you're gonna say I do wonder about my son.

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I was like, whoa, But anyways, Welcome to our podcast,

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 2>We are not responsible for the incredible, crazy, bonkers, beautiful

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 2>universe out there, but we do feel responsible for helping

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 2>you to understand it. We dig in deep into what's

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 2>going on out there in the universe, and we try

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:20.840
<v Speaker 2>to process it. We chop it up, and we serve

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 2>it all up to you, hoping to educate and entertain

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 2>you at the same time.

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 1>It's right, welcome to our two hundred and ninetieth course

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>meal here on the amazing food for thought that is

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the universe, because it is pretty awesome. And to be honest,

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I do feel a little bit responsible to that.

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, you were reaching for a big number there,

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:40.919
<v Speaker 2>but I think the number of episodes is more like

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:42.559
<v Speaker 2>four hundred and eighty or something.

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>By now, oh my goodness, it's like the banquet that

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 1>never ends. Like maybe it's more like a buffet where

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 1>we take a bring on this food little by little.

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 2>That's right. Every course has to be super tiny for

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:55.159
<v Speaker 2>you to be able to finish course number five hundred.

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 2>Eventually we'll get to dessert.

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:58.719
<v Speaker 1>Now, do we reveal each course of this meal or

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>do we just let the work and let the food

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>say that good.

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:04.839
<v Speaker 2>Bottom Every episode is letting the water drain and hoping

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 2>that there's some understanding to be revealed.

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:10.600
<v Speaker 1>That is how we record it. We just sit down,

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 1>you start talking, and we hope that some knowledge comes

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:15.040
<v Speaker 1>out of it.

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 2>We hope there's gold and not a floating turret in

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 2>that Baptob.

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh Man, can you say that on our podcast? I

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>guess you just did.

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Let's see if it guests passed the sensors.

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Which are you?

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:25.039
<v Speaker 2>Yes?

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Crazy? Well, speaking of pushing things out, let's dive into

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:34.279
<v Speaker 1>the topic of the episode here today. So it is,

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>as we said, an amazing and incredible universe full of

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 1>amazing and lots of little things, lots of little things

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 1>out there that keep the universe together.

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 2>And over the last fifty years or so, we have

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 2>pulled apart matter to reveal its basic constituents. We know

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 2>that you are made of molecules, which are made of atoms,

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 2>which are built out of electrons, protons and neutrons. We've

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:57.719
<v Speaker 2>even pulled the protons and neutrons apart to discover that

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 2>they are made of quarks. We have found the quarks

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:02.839
<v Speaker 2>out there and other versions of the electron. We have

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 2>this wonderful periodic table of the fundamental particles that we

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 2>describe using the standard model, which paints a very nice

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:13.279
<v Speaker 2>picture of what's going on microscopically inside of me and

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:15.160
<v Speaker 2>you and at the hearts of stars.

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:17.359
<v Speaker 1>That's right. We've come a long way from thinking that

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the universe and everything in it is made out of

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>four things like earth, wind and fire and water, to

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:26.919
<v Speaker 1>basically chop up the entire matter of the universe into

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>smaller and smaller bits until we get to basically bits

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>that you can't chop up anymore.

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:34.720
<v Speaker 2>And it's been a really fascinating ride, not just discovering

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:38.720
<v Speaker 2>what matter is inside of us, which is mostly the upcork,

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:41.839
<v Speaker 2>the down cork, and the electron because you can assemble

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 2>the upcork and the down cork into protons and neutrons

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:47.160
<v Speaker 2>and put the electrons around them to make atoms, but

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 2>also to discover what else the universe can do. The

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:53.239
<v Speaker 2>things that we are made out of are the stable bits,

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 2>the things that last forever and can get mixed together

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 2>to make more interesting chemistry. But there are also other

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 2>weird things that the universe can do, things that don't

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 2>last for very long, so they take special conditions to

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 2>reveal them.

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:08.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the universe has its own buffet of things that

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 1>it can make out there, and not just the things

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>that we can eat that make up who we are.

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 1>There's lots of other things out there in the universe,

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and little by little we've put together a pretty complete

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>picture of what's out there or what can be out

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>there in the universe.

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 2>We have a whole fun series of podcast episodes about

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 2>the discoveries of these particles, how the top quark was discovered,

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 2>how the gluon was discovered, how the photon was discovered.

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 2>All these pieces of the Standard Model, and we put

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 2>them together into a picture and ask like, does it work?

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 2>Are there any missing bits? And that's how some of

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 2>those discoveries were made. We like assemble them together and

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 2>we notice patterns. We say, huh, there's a hole here.

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if there's another particle missing. The way you

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 2>can look at the periodic table and say, where's element

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 2>thirty four? Why is there a thirty three and a

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 2>thirty five? There should be one in the middle. In

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 2>the same way, we filled in a lot of the

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 2>gaps in the Standard model just by looking for patterns

0:07:56.760 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 2>and hoping for simplicity and mathematical beauty and symmetry. And

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 2>this has been a very useful guiding principle in helping

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 2>us to discover things. That's how, for example, we knew

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 2>to look for the Higgs boson.

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we have a periodic table for the fundamental particles

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 1>of nature. It's called the Standard Model, and it does

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of look like the periodic table right, it's a

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 1>grid and you got little spas for all the different

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>particles like quarks and electrons and neutrinos, and they're sort

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>of in order. Also, it sort of looks like a

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 1>periodic table. Yeah, because there are patterns there.

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 2>Like you can take the electron, the muon and the

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 2>tow and you notice that they're increasing in mass. The

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 2>muon is heavier than the electron, the tow is heavier

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 2>than the muon, And the same pattern exists in the upcork,

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:42.599
<v Speaker 2>the charm cork, and the top cork. The charm in

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 2>the top is just like heavier versions of the upcark.

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 2>So we notice these patterns. We see these things in

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 2>the table, and so we arrange our table in that

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:52.679
<v Speaker 2>way to bring out those patterns to like inspire us

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 2>to think about what could be explaining them. And so

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 2>there's sort of two directions to think about there. One

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 2>is like, well, what's inside these particles? Is there a

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 2>deeper layer of reality? And so that's definitely something we're exploring.

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:06.080
<v Speaker 2>But sometimes we look in the other direction and we say, well,

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 2>what are the consequences of these particles? What can these

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 2>particles do? If this is real? If those particles are

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 2>actually out there, what do we expect to see in

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 2>our colliders? What can these things come together to make?

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 2>And that's another very fruitful way to test our understanding

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:22.080
<v Speaker 2>of what's going on in the particle world.

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so we have a grit called the standard model,

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's called the standard model because they think it's

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>standard and it's a model. But when did they come

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>up with this name? I wonder? And how did they

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>know it is going to be standard for the entire universe?

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 2>I knew you were going to have concerns about the names.

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 2>The standard model itself comes out of the seventies when

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 2>people realized that there were connections between the weak force

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 2>and electromagnetism and that explained a lot of what we

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 2>were seeing happening with the electron and the muons, and

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 2>so they put this together into a model of leptons,

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 2>which then became a standard model of leptons, and so

0:09:57.559 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 2>it was sort of adopted around then. And the standard

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:02.560
<v Speaker 2>that sense, just sort of means like consensus. There are

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 2>lots of different views of what was happening in particles,

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 2>and this just sort of emerged as the most popular model,

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 2>the one that people thought was the most parsimonious and

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 2>explained what we were seeing, and it also predicted the

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 2>Higgs boson, and so when we saw the Higgs boson

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 2>in nature, people were like, Yep, that's it.

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>The standard model is the way to go interesting. It's

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:25.320
<v Speaker 1>it's like the thing that all physicists can agree on, kind.

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 2>Of mostly that can happen. It can happen, although of

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 2>course there are lots of disagreements about what is the

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 2>standard model. Some people, for example, say that the standard

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 2>model requires neutrinos to have no mass, but we know

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 2>neutrinos do have mass, and some people say, no, no,

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 2>we can have massive neutrinos in this standard model. And

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:47.319
<v Speaker 2>so there's a lot of disagreement about exactly what constitutes

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 2>the standard model. Probably was a bad idea to call

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:51.199
<v Speaker 2>it standard in the first place.

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Ye should have called it a model. But it's interesting because,

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>like what you said, is that it's not just a

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of like a listing of all the fundamental particles,

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of like the periodic table is. It's also kind

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>of about the rules that govern what happens between the

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 1>things in the table, and a lot of it is

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 1>also just the math of how all of these things

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:12.959
<v Speaker 1>work just like the periodic table. It's not just the

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 1>listing of element. It's also like a model of how

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the electron you know, orbits around the nucleus, and what

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>happens when two atoms get close together, how do they

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>share electrons and things like that. The Standard model also

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:26.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot more to it than just the listening

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>to particles.

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly. We often focus on the matter particles like

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:33.679
<v Speaker 2>the upcork, the down cork, and the electron, but also

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 2>in the standard model we have the force particles, the photon,

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 2>the W, the z, the gluon, and as you say,

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 2>these play a very important role in building things. Without

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 2>the forces, you couldn't put the up, the down, the

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 2>electron together to make ice cream or kittens or lava

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 2>or hamsters or anything. Right. Really, the forces are required.

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 2>And I often feel that way when somebody says, oh,

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 2>the atom is mostly empty space, because they imagine the

0:11:57.200 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 2>tiny little nucleus or the tiny electrons really are apart

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:02.840
<v Speaker 2>from each other in mostly empty space. But the truth

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 2>is is not really empty. It's filled with fields, force

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:09.200
<v Speaker 2>fields and virtual particles tying them together. It's a swarm

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 2>of oscillating energy and so you're right, we need to

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 2>think not just about the little bits of matter, but

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:16.439
<v Speaker 2>also the forces that tie them together and how that

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:19.080
<v Speaker 2>works and what those can do. And that's something we

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 2>are still exploring, still trying to figure out.

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that's something that maybe a lot of

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 1>people don't know. And I wonder if that's because, you know,

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:28.079
<v Speaker 1>when they discovered the Higgs Boson, it was kind of

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 1>a big deal. At least that's what the headline said.

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:32.959
<v Speaker 1>That it was a big deal because it completed this

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:35.559
<v Speaker 1>standard model. The Higgs Boson sort of like was the

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 1>cherry on top where it put the last little lego

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>piece or jigsaw puzzle piece on the standard model and

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 1>then you guys were done, right, you could all retire

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and become hey experts or something.

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 2>We've been napping in our offices ever since. Yes, confirmed,

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 2>Oh okay, that's good to know. Then I do want

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 2>my money back, Please wait for the check. Yeah, and

0:12:57.800 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 2>so it was sort of a big deal because they

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 2>said they'd the standard model. But you're telling me maybe

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 2>that it's not complete. Maybe it's something that people disagree about.

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:06.679
<v Speaker 1>Still.

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:08.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, it's not like the New York Times were

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 2>liars or anything. When they said it completed the standard model.

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 2>That's true from one perspective, from the perspective of like

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:17.959
<v Speaker 2>looking at the periodic table of fundamental particles and saying,

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 2>do we have all the pieces necessary to make a

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:23.680
<v Speaker 2>complete theory? You know, are there any obvious holes? And

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 2>so we had found the top core, we had found

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 2>the Towe leapt on, and the last like definitely predicted

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 2>missing fundamental piece, little jigsaw piece, as you say, was

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 2>the Higgs boson. It was definitely missing, and we definitely

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 2>needed to find it if the Standard Model was real,

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:39.839
<v Speaker 2>if it was a description of nature. And now we

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 2>found it, and it clicks in, and we do have

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 2>what we consider a fairly complete theory. Of course, it

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 2>doesn't describe gravity or dark matter or all sorts of

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 2>other crazy stuff. And we just did an episode about

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 2>like the problems of the Standard Model. But you know,

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 2>from one perspective, it really did complete it. It was

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 2>like an obvious hole that needed to be filled. There

0:13:56.559 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 2>are no more open holes in that sense, like fundamental

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 2>particle that the Standard Model predicts that we haven't found yet.

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 2>From another perspective, there's lots of things left to study,

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, like how these particles dance together to make

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 2>new things. That's not how these particles come together to

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 2>make more interesting, complicated things. That's not something we fully

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 2>yet understand. And there are lots of predictions there that

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 2>have not yet been verified.

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I feel like you're pulling off a nice marketing

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 1>trick here, where you're saying, like, what we did was awesome,

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and where's all that money? And we finished it, but

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 1>there are still things less to do to keep giving

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>us money.

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 2>That is the summer of every science grant proposal ever, basically,

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 2>not just in particle physics.

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I see, it's just a reflex for you know.

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know that's the story. It's like, look, we

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 2>did awesome stuff with the money you gave us. We

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 2>will do more awesome stuff with the future money we

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 2>hope you keep giving us. That's the way it works.

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, like you said, there's still more to discover, I guess,

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 1>or to check off about all of the things that

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the standard model predicts. And so one of those predictions

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>is kind of an interesting sounding object.

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 2>It is a super fun prediction of the standard model,

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 2>and one people have been hunting for for a long

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 2>time and disagree about whether it's possible to find it,

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 2>or whether we already have.

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a sticky subject. Well, to the end of the episode,

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll be tackling the question what is a glue ball?

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 1>That sounds like something that happens when you're playing with glue.

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 2>It does sound like a very everyday object, but it's

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 2>also a very esoteric prediction by the standard model that's

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 2>been surprisingly difficult to verify.

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Actually, it does kind of sound like something that might

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>be useful, like a ball made out of glue that

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>then you can use to stick things together.

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 2>It sounds like the thing you could keep next to

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 2>your rubber band ball. Yeah right, let's start selling those.

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 2>You can get those on our online store now, balls.

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Of glue, oh man.

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 2>With little bits of the LEDC stuck inside.

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there you go. Or it's sticking together bits of

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>the lac.

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Even better, How does the lac work it's held together

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 2>with spit in glue balls.

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Well that might be actually true, right.

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 2>That might be actually trueious.

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm sure a lot of physicists were drilling

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 1>when they were putting it together. That's where all this

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 1>bit comes from. Well, anyways, as usual, we were wondering

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 1>how many people out there had heard of a glue

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 1>ball or have any idea what it can be.

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 2>So thank you very much to everybody who answers these

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 2>random questions. It's super helpful to get a sense for

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 2>what people already know and what they think about these ideas.

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>So think about it for a second. What do you

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 1>think a glue ball can be? Here's what people had

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to say.

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 3>There must be some silly ball made by kids to

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 3>play with during lunch of races. Yeah, I'm kidding. So

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 3>glue ball is a very relatively new concept. It is

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 3>basically combination of glue on particles without anyone and squawk.

0:16:56.200 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 1>A glue ball sounds like something to do with glue ons.

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 1>That's maybe like a ball of glue on, just a

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:05.720
<v Speaker 1>bunch of them just interacting and stuff, just hanging out.

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 4>A glue ball. Yeah, I have no clue what that

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:12.120
<v Speaker 4>could possibly be. The only thing that comes to mind

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 4>maybe is it might have something to do with glue ones.

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 4>But other than that, I can't even begin to guess.

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Uh, probably something my cat pukes after she ates some clue.

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:26.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. All right, sounds like we're not the

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 1>only ones who thought it's a kit's toy, or that

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:33.679
<v Speaker 1>it involves spit somehow from cats.

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:35.879
<v Speaker 2>I feel sorry for that guy's cat. I mean, who

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 2>lets their cat eat glue? Seriously?

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. But are you responsible if your cat

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 1>eats glue? Or is that the cat's faut.

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, But if your cat turns out to

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 2>be a serial killer, maybe you are responsible.

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, at least the cat wouldn't get far, very far.

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 1>Just get stick to everything. The sticky glue ball, serial

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 1>killer sticky cat? Did you mean?

0:17:57.160 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 2>But I think a lot of these folks really got

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:03.400
<v Speaker 2>the idea from the name, right, a ball of gluons.

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Maybe this is actually a thing in particle physics that

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:09.120
<v Speaker 2>has gasp an appropriate name.

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, I don't know, it's if it is a ball

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>or not. I bet it's more like a teohedron or something.

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 2>I see you're gonna withhold judgment, all right, let's dig in.

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's see what happens here. We'll step us through this, Daniel,

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:24.640
<v Speaker 1>What is glue ball?

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 2>So a glue ball is a predicted particle that would

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 2>be made entirely of gluons, No quarks, no electrons, no

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 2>other matter particles at all, just gluons.

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:43.400
<v Speaker 1>M Okay, So it's a theoretical or a predicted object

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 1>that can happen out in nature, and you would get

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>it by putting together gluons. Now what are gluons?

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:50.639
<v Speaker 2>Right? So this is a predicted particle of the standard model.

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:53.159
<v Speaker 2>It says gluons should be able to come together and

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 2>make this weird thing we call a glue ball. So

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 2>to understand that, you have to understand what is a gluon? Right. So,

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 2>as we said, each of the forces that are out there,

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 2>the fundamental forces that we know about, get mediated in

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:08.360
<v Speaker 2>terms of fields, but you can also think about them

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 2>in terms of particles. Like what happens when two electrons

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 2>talk to each other, But they're doing it as they're

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:15.640
<v Speaker 2>pushing on each other, and they push on each other

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:18.640
<v Speaker 2>using their electric fields. But you can also think about

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:22.119
<v Speaker 2>those fields as like a swarm of virtual photons. So

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 2>one way to think about how two electrons talk to

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 2>each other is that they bounce photons back and forth.

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 2>They're using photons to send messages to each other. So

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 2>every force that's out there you can think about in

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 2>terms of a field or the particle for that field.

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 2>So for electromagnetism, we have the photon, which is the

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:43.439
<v Speaker 2>particle which carries the electromagnetic force. And then for the

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 2>strong force, we also have fields, and those fields are

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:51.640
<v Speaker 2>gluon fields, and so the gluon is the particle that

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 2>carries the strong force. So, for example, how do you

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 2>make a proton. We make it out of upquarks and

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:00.399
<v Speaker 2>down quarks. How do you tie the up quarks and

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:04.160
<v Speaker 2>down quarks to gather into a proton? You use gluons.

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 2>So inside the proton is not just upquarks and down quarks.

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:10.719
<v Speaker 2>There's a whole mess of gluons in they're holding it together.

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:12.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we talked a little bit about this in our

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 1>last podcast, about how photon are the particles that kind

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 1>of mediate, like you said, the electromagnetic force, like every

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:22.399
<v Speaker 1>time an electron is repelled by another electron, or an

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 1>electron is attracted to another particle like a proton, there's

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 1>an exchange of photons. But we also kind of talked

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:31.399
<v Speaker 1>about how these are not like real, real particles, like

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:34.159
<v Speaker 1>they don't actually exchange these particles. It's more sort of

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:36.720
<v Speaker 1>like in the sense of like quantum virtual particles.

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:39.399
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, that's exactly right. I find it more intuitive

0:20:39.440 --> 0:20:42.159
<v Speaker 2>to think about these things in terms of fields, like

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:45.160
<v Speaker 2>the electron has a field and it's using that field

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 2>to push on another electron. But if you don't like

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:49.400
<v Speaker 2>the idea of fields, you can also think about these

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:52.439
<v Speaker 2>things in terms of virtual particles, and you just replace

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 2>the field with an infinite number of virtual particles that

0:20:56.280 --> 0:20:59.119
<v Speaker 2>are filling space. Mathematically, it's really the same thing. And

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 2>those are the virtual particles, which you're not like real particles.

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 2>But these fields are also capable of having real particles,

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Like what is a real photon? A photon that leaves

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:10.399
<v Speaker 2>the Sun and hits your eyeball. That's a ripple in

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 2>the electromagnetic field. And in the same way, a gluon,

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:17.879
<v Speaker 2>like a real gluon, is a ripple in the gluon field.

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 2>So there can be virtual gluons exchanged between particles inside

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 2>a proton, for example, and they're also real gluons that

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:25.959
<v Speaker 2>can like fly through space.

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:30.359
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so there are real gluons and virtual gluons, and

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 1>so like you're saying, these are the particles that mediate

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 1>or that transmit the strong force, which is what keeps

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>quarts together to make protons and neutrons, And those are

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the nuclei and all of the atoms in your body.

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>But maybe let's paint the picture of how these gluons

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:48.959
<v Speaker 1>actually keep things together, and then let's talk about what

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 1>happens when you try to glue two gluons together. So

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:54.399
<v Speaker 1>let's get into that, but first let's take a quick break.

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>All Right, we're talking about glue balls, which is not

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:11.679
<v Speaker 1>a toy, but it is a pretty good name for

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:12.120
<v Speaker 1>a toy.

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's right. Gluons sound ridiculous, but they are a

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:18.919
<v Speaker 2>real thing in particle physics, and we use them in

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 2>our calculations and exist in nature sticking your quarks together

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 2>to make you okay.

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 1>So we talked about how gluons are the particles that

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:30.920
<v Speaker 1>transmit the strong force, and so you said they sort

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of come up when, for example, a quark is attracted

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 1>to another quark. So maybe paint is a picture. I'm

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:38.919
<v Speaker 1>a quark and I have another quark here next to me,

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and I feel the strong force between us. What does

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:44.439
<v Speaker 1>that mean? Does that mean I'm like throwing gluons at

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:47.360
<v Speaker 1>each other, or does it mean that there are virtual

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:49.959
<v Speaker 1>gluons popping up in the space between us, or what

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 1>does that mean?

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:52.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the way you should think about it is that

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 2>quarks have a field. That field is just like an

0:22:57.119 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 2>electric field from an electron. But electrons have a electric charges,

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 2>which is what makes the electric field, and quarks have

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 2>a different kind of charge. They have a charge for

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 2>the strong force, which is a different force from electromagnetism,

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 2>and that kind of charge we call a color charge

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:17.200
<v Speaker 2>because it has three different varieties red, green, and blue.

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 2>So electromagnetism has like plus and minus charges, the color

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:24.680
<v Speaker 2>charge is much different and very weird as three versions

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 2>of it. Quark can be like blue or green or red,

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 2>and so it can have a field, a color field,

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 2>and that color field pulls or pushes on other things

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 2>that have color charges to them. So, for example, that

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:42.119
<v Speaker 2>quark inside your proton has a color field, and that

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:45.200
<v Speaker 2>color field is applying a force to the other quarks

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 2>inside the proton. And now you can always think about

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:50.359
<v Speaker 2>these fields in terms of virtual particles, and so the

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:53.399
<v Speaker 2>virtual particle for this field is a glue on. So

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:55.639
<v Speaker 2>one way to think about it is these quarks are

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 2>bound together because of their color field that's putting forces

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 2>on the other quarks, or that they're exchanging virtual gluons

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 2>constantly to tie themselves together into a proton.

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 1>And you sort of need this idea of particles that

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:13.400
<v Speaker 1>transmit the force because these forces are not, as far

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 1>as we can see, instantaneous, like from a quark here

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:19.439
<v Speaker 1>and you're a quark over there. I don't exert a

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:22.959
<v Speaker 1>force and you kind of immediately or magically right like

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:25.400
<v Speaker 1>there's something that has to somehow go from here to there.

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:29.640
<v Speaker 2>No information can move instantaneously in the universe, and that's why.

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 2>For example, if you take an electron, it has a

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 2>static electric field, but then if you wiggle that electron,

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:39.159
<v Speaker 2>the whole field doesn't move all at once. If that

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 2>field extends from here to your neighbor's house. But if

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 2>you wiggle the electron, your neighbor can't tell that you

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 2>wiggled it instantly. They have to wait for that wiggle

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:50.439
<v Speaker 2>to move through the field to get to him. And

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 2>that's what we think of as a ripple in that field,

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 2>which you can interpret as a particle. In fact, that's

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 2>how you make photons. You take electrons and you wiggle them.

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 2>That's an he is and so you can interpret these

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:05.400
<v Speaker 2>ripples in the field sometimes in terms of real particles

0:25:05.440 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 2>if they have certain properties special ripples or if there

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:09.720
<v Speaker 2>are other kinds of ripples in the field, then we

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:11.399
<v Speaker 2>just call them virtual particles.

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so now let's paint the picture. I have a

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>quark right here in front of you, and it's a

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 1>red cork, and you right next to me have a

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 1>green cork, and so, which means that two quarks are

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of attracting each other, right, I'm pulling on each

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 1>other to smush them together through the strong force. But

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>they're not moving yet. What's happening? Are there like virtual

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:33.639
<v Speaker 1>gluons popping up in between the two? Is my quark

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:37.439
<v Speaker 1>sending gluons to your quark? How would you describe it?

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Or nothing's happening until one of them moves.

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Remember that these are quantum particles, so you can't really

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:46.879
<v Speaker 2>think of them as having like a specific location and velocity.

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 2>The same way you can't really think about the electron

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 2>as having a specific location and velocity as it moves

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 2>around the nucleus. Instead, you can think of it as

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 2>having like a probability distribution of various possible locations around

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:02.399
<v Speaker 2>the nuclear Because it's trapped in a little well, the

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:06.479
<v Speaker 2>nucleus creates an electromagnetic potential, which traps the electron inside

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 2>of it, and the electron is somewhere in that well,

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 2>but we don't know exactly where. So in the same way,

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 2>these quarks all create color potential, a strong force potential

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 2>which traps the other quarks with them inside this potential.

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:23.440
<v Speaker 2>So where is any individual quark well, it's not determined

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 2>just as a probability distribution, but it's all balanced and solved,

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:29.119
<v Speaker 2>and all the quarks have a happy wave function to

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 2>be on top of each other inside this little potential

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 2>well that they all create. So it's like a little

0:26:34.640 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 2>bound state of these quantum functions.

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's sort of like you know, like you're saying,

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the quark that I have here in my red QRK

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:45.200
<v Speaker 1>isn't really like a billiard ball. It's more like a

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:49.439
<v Speaker 1>fuzzy cloud here that I'm holding. And then your quark

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:52.119
<v Speaker 1>is also not a billiard ball. It's another fuzzy cloud.

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:54.960
<v Speaker 1>And so when I sort of bring them together, the

0:26:55.000 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 1>two clouds cand of merge or smoosh together into one,

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of like a system made out of two particles.

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of what you're saying, right, It's like it's

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 1>more like the two quantum functions or wave functions merge

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:10.480
<v Speaker 1>together to make one that maybe has some sort of

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:11.679
<v Speaker 1>potential to stay together.

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 2>Remember that quantum mechanics tells us that the universe is random,

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 2>but it's not totally random. It's still deterministic in some way.

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Like old Newtonian classical physics told us that everything was

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 2>like a billiard ball, and if you bounce things the

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:27.440
<v Speaker 2>same way twice, the same thing would happen. Everything was deterministic.

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Quantum mechanics says, well, we're deterministic, but only about the probabilities.

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 2>Quantum mechanics says, I will predict exactly what the probability

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:38.200
<v Speaker 2>of various outcomes is. I won't to tell you which

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 2>outcome is going to happen, but i'll tell you the

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 2>various probabilities. So here quantum mechanics applies to these little particles,

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 2>and it says, well, your red cork has a higher

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:48.639
<v Speaker 2>chance of being over here and the smaller chance of

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 2>being over there, and they have to satisfy all the

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 2>mathematics of the equations. And so you can solve these

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:55.680
<v Speaker 2>equations and figure out where the red cork is likely

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:58.359
<v Speaker 2>to be, given that there's a blue cork nearby and

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:01.440
<v Speaker 2>a green cork nearby side the proton. The really cool

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 2>thing about the strong force is these weird charges. Like

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 2>the atom is neutral because you have a positively charged

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 2>nucleus and a negatively charged electron. Plus one and minus

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:14.159
<v Speaker 2>one makes zero. Right, Well, the proton has no color

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 2>charge because inside of it it has one of each

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:20.680
<v Speaker 2>of the charges. It has a red, a green, and

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 2>a blue, and together those add up to make no

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 2>color or white as we call it, in the same

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:29.639
<v Speaker 2>way that like having one of each of the electromagnetic

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 2>charges plus and minus add up to zero electromagnetic charge.

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:35.600
<v Speaker 1>And so that's how the quarks add up. But then

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 1>where do the gluons come in?

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 2>So the gluons are super duper weird and much more

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 2>complicated than in electromagnetism. Electromagnetism you have two charges and

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 2>you just have the single photon which transmits it. The

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 2>photon itself is not charged, right, The photon is a

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:53.320
<v Speaker 2>neutral object, which is going to be important because photons,

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 2>they don't like, bounce off of each other. They pass

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 2>right through each other for the most part. Check out

0:28:56.920 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 2>our whole podcast episode about lightsabers and photons bouncing off

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 2>each other. But gluons are different. Gluons are charged in color.

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:08.240
<v Speaker 2>In fact, gluons have two colors. So for example, like

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 2>a quark has one color like red or blue or green,

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:14.959
<v Speaker 2>a gluon has two colors simultaneously. It can be like

0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 2>red and anti blue or blue and anti green.

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Does that depend on sort of like what the two

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 1>quarks are that are interacting? Like if I have a

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 1>red cork and you have a green cork, is it

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 1>that they can only exchange red green or red anti

0:29:31.440 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 1>green bluons?

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's just like that. If you have, for example,

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 2>a blue cork and a green cork, a blue cork

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 2>can emit a blue anti green gluon and then it

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 2>becomes green. Its blueness has gone into the gluon and

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 2>it becomes green because they also gave that gluon anti green.

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:55.560
<v Speaker 2>Then the green cork absorbs the blue anti green gluon

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 2>and it becomes a blue cork. So like a blue

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 2>cork and a green cork, or can swap colors by

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 2>exchanging a gluon.

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 1>And so this swapping happens when they move relative to

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:11.680
<v Speaker 1>each other. Is it always happening at all times? Like

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 1>with these virtual particles? What exactly is going on?

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, like everything else quanta mechanical, nothing is definitive. So

0:30:18.560 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 2>you have your quarks inside the proton, and none of

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 2>them are like actually red, or actually green or actually blue.

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 2>They all have a probability to have one of those

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 2>colors simultaneously, And if you really needed to know, you

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 2>would like send a really high energy particle inside the

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 2>proton to break it up to figure out what the

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 2>color was, and then the universe would roll the die

0:30:38.480 --> 0:30:40.479
<v Speaker 2>and say, Okay, this one happened to be green at

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 2>that moment, or this one happened to be red at

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:44.719
<v Speaker 2>that moment. But just right now, inside your proton, as

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 2>everything is jiggling, each of your quarks has a simultaneous

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 2>probability for each of these colors. But the fact that

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 2>the gluon has to have these colors itself makes it

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:57.960
<v Speaker 2>really complicated. So two gluons can also interact with each

0:30:58.000 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 2>other the way two photons really cannot. Two gluons can

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 2>talk to each other directly.

0:31:03.000 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Okay, and you're talking about the real gluons or the

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:07.000
<v Speaker 1>virtual gluons.

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Both all kinds of gluons. These fields all bounce off

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 2>each other and interact with each other and make more gluons.

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Two gluons can come together to make two more gluons.

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 2>It gets really complicated really fast, because everybody's talking to

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 2>everybody else.

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 1>All right. So then gluons are particles, just like an

0:31:24.600 --> 0:31:26.720
<v Speaker 1>electron is or a photon is that they have their

0:31:26.720 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 1>own field in the universe. I'm trying to put the

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:32.360
<v Speaker 1>picture here together. And what they do is they sort

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:36.240
<v Speaker 1>of fly or exist between different quarks that have the

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:39.960
<v Speaker 1>color charge, and that's sort of how the strong force

0:31:40.040 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 1>comes about. And they have different flavors, different colors. And

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 1>sometimes these gluons can interact with each other, and I

0:31:46.960 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 1>imagine they can also stick to each other, which is

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe where a glue ball comes in exactly.

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:54.520
<v Speaker 2>Because they can talk to each other, and they have

0:31:54.760 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 2>charges relative to each other, they feel forces relative to

0:31:57.720 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 2>each other. They can also get bound together. They can

0:32:00.920 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 2>form complicated stuff.

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 1>But wait, if two gluons can interact and push on

0:32:05.120 --> 0:32:08.440
<v Speaker 1>each other, what causes to push it? Is there a

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:12.600
<v Speaker 1>force another force particle just for transmitting the strong force

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 1>or the glue force between gluons.

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 2>No, they can push on each other directly, the way

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:20.440
<v Speaker 2>like a photon can push on an electron directly. That's

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:24.000
<v Speaker 2>an immediate interaction. Those two fields couple and energy can

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 2>flow from one to the other. Gluons can talk to

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:30.600
<v Speaker 2>each other directly without any other intermediate particle. Like quarks

0:32:30.640 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 2>can't talk to each other directly. They have to use

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 2>photons or gluons, whatever, But those photons can talk to

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 2>quarks or two electrons. Gluons can talk to each other directly,

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 2>like in the language of finement diagrams. You can have

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 2>a vertex that's just like gluon, gluon, gluon or four

0:32:46.240 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 2>gluons in fact, can make a vertex, so you don't

0:32:48.840 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 2>need an intermediate field. This is the field and it

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:52.960
<v Speaker 2>can talk to itself.

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 1>And that's kind of weird, right because for example, the

0:32:55.320 --> 0:32:58.760
<v Speaker 1>photon is another particle that transmits forces, but it can

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:00.200
<v Speaker 1>interact with itself.

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:02.000
<v Speaker 2>That's right. It can't interact with itself, so you can't

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 2>have like a light ball. There is ball lightning out there,

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:07.880
<v Speaker 2>I think people think, but it's not like photons bound

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 2>together in the same way. But gluons, because they can

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 2>do this, they can talk to each other, they can

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:15.560
<v Speaker 2>feel forces relative to each other. They can create a

0:33:15.560 --> 0:33:19.000
<v Speaker 2>little potential well and trap each other inside, and they

0:33:19.000 --> 0:33:22.640
<v Speaker 2>can make. We think this particle called a glue ball,

0:33:23.000 --> 0:33:27.280
<v Speaker 2>which is a particle made just out of gluons, which

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:31.120
<v Speaker 2>is really weird because it would have no matter particles inside,

0:33:31.120 --> 0:33:34.920
<v Speaker 2>no fermions at all, no electrons, no quarks, nothing that

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 2>we think of as making up matter. It would be

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 2>pure force.

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Now do gluons only attract each other or do they

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:44.720
<v Speaker 1>also repel each other? Or does it depend on what

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:46.600
<v Speaker 1>color combination they are.

0:33:46.800 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 2>It depends on the color combination. It also depends on

0:33:49.320 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 2>the distance. The strong force is super duper weird, and

0:33:52.600 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 2>it's very attractive at some distances and repulsive at other distances.

0:33:56.160 --> 0:33:58.640
<v Speaker 2>And the strong force in general is very difficult to

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:02.880
<v Speaker 2>understand and also to do calculations with one because it's

0:34:02.960 --> 0:34:06.080
<v Speaker 2>so strong. Like a lot of times when we're doing calculations,

0:34:06.360 --> 0:34:09.680
<v Speaker 2>the actual calculation we want to do is impossible. Say,

0:34:09.680 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 2>for example, I want to know how an electron is

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:14.759
<v Speaker 2>going to move through the universe. To really know that,

0:34:14.880 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 2>I have to account for like all the electrons that

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 2>are out there, the electrons in other galaxies. Technically those

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:23.239
<v Speaker 2>affect my electron, but because they're so far away, I

0:34:23.280 --> 0:34:25.839
<v Speaker 2>can ignore it. I'll mostly get the right answer that's

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:28.920
<v Speaker 2>not true for the strong force. The strong force is

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:32.320
<v Speaker 2>so strong, so powerful that a lot of these effects,

0:34:32.440 --> 0:34:35.960
<v Speaker 2>other quirks in other places and gluons that are created

0:34:36.000 --> 0:34:39.200
<v Speaker 2>by other gluons become very very difficult to calculate and

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:43.359
<v Speaker 2>are not small effects. And so the approximations that help

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:47.280
<v Speaker 2>us succeed in doing otherwise impossible calculations for other forces,

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:50.279
<v Speaker 2>those tricks don't work for the strong force. So a

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 2>lot of basic stuff about the strong force we just

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:55.759
<v Speaker 2>don't know how to calculate because gluons can do this

0:34:55.880 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 2>thing where they create other gluons, and because the force

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 2>itself is so so powerful.

0:35:00.880 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Mmmm. Well, going back to my question, I guess is like,

0:35:03.840 --> 0:35:06.719
<v Speaker 1>what makes two gluons attract each other? Is it like

0:35:07.040 --> 0:35:09.880
<v Speaker 1>all the red ones attract anything with red or repel

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:12.440
<v Speaker 1>anything that has read in it? You know, like you

0:35:12.520 --> 0:35:15.839
<v Speaker 1>have a red blue glue on, what does it get

0:35:15.880 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 1>attracted to a green blue?

0:35:20.600 --> 0:35:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, you can't have a red blue gluon. You can

0:35:23.280 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 2>have like a red anti blue or a blue anti red,

0:35:26.320 --> 0:35:29.480
<v Speaker 2>or like a red anti red gluon. But whether they're

0:35:29.480 --> 0:35:31.720
<v Speaker 2>attracted to each other or repel to each other depends

0:35:31.760 --> 0:35:34.920
<v Speaker 2>on a lot of complicated calculations. I mean, the attraction

0:35:35.040 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 2>comes from like having a potential. Now, are all forces

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:41.200
<v Speaker 2>in the universe really come from potential differences? Forces are

0:35:41.320 --> 0:35:44.439
<v Speaker 2>due to changes in the potential. Things like to roll

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:47.960
<v Speaker 2>down hill as a gravitational force because the gravitational potential

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 2>energy is lower at the bottom of the hill, or

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:53.400
<v Speaker 2>electrons are pushed towards the nucleus because that's where the

0:35:53.440 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 2>bottom of the electromagnetic potential is. So to think about

0:35:56.600 --> 0:35:59.120
<v Speaker 2>things in terms of forces pulling or pushing, you have

0:35:59.160 --> 0:36:02.120
<v Speaker 2>to understand where the potential is at a minimum, and

0:36:02.160 --> 0:36:04.640
<v Speaker 2>that's really complicated. For the strong force, it's not always

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:06.920
<v Speaker 2>that simple. Remember we even try to talk about it

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:10.439
<v Speaker 2>once for the weak force, and it's not always obvious whether,

0:36:10.480 --> 0:36:13.600
<v Speaker 2>for examples, W bosons and Z bosons push or pull

0:36:13.640 --> 0:36:15.880
<v Speaker 2>on each other. They can do both or sometimes it

0:36:15.880 --> 0:36:19.000
<v Speaker 2>depends on the context. And that's even more complicated here

0:36:19.040 --> 0:36:22.440
<v Speaker 2>for the strong force. So in some arrangements, these gluons

0:36:22.520 --> 0:36:25.359
<v Speaker 2>can tug on each other, create a potential minimum and

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:27.960
<v Speaker 2>get trapped in this well and become a bound state.

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:31.799
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so I'm getting the sense that it's complicated. It's complicated,

0:36:31.960 --> 0:36:34.680
<v Speaker 1>but it can seem to happen throughout If you sort

0:36:34.719 --> 0:36:37.359
<v Speaker 1>of pierce through all of the mass, there are situations

0:36:37.400 --> 0:36:41.400
<v Speaker 1>where you can get a couple of two or maybe

0:36:41.400 --> 0:36:45.319
<v Speaker 1>more gluons kind of wanting to hang out with each other,

0:36:45.360 --> 0:36:47.840
<v Speaker 1>really close together. That's kind of the idea I'm getting.

0:36:48.000 --> 0:36:51.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, from the calculations, which are not perfect and are approximate,

0:36:51.480 --> 0:36:54.000
<v Speaker 2>and nobody is one hundred percent confident in them, we

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:56.239
<v Speaker 2>see this prediction emerge that gluons should be able to

0:36:56.239 --> 0:36:58.880
<v Speaker 2>get bound to each other and create this persistent state

0:36:59.120 --> 0:37:01.960
<v Speaker 2>that lives for a while, not forever. It's not stable.

0:37:02.160 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 2>It's not like you can make a glue ball and

0:37:03.640 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 2>then come back a billion years later and still have

0:37:05.560 --> 0:37:07.880
<v Speaker 2>a glue ball. But very briefly, they'll hang out in

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:10.799
<v Speaker 2>this little state, do their thing, and then explode into

0:37:10.880 --> 0:37:12.239
<v Speaker 2>a shower of other particles.

0:37:12.600 --> 0:37:16.239
<v Speaker 1>That's the prediction, and so when they come together, that's

0:37:16.280 --> 0:37:19.320
<v Speaker 1>what you would call a glue ball, Etceterronically, the gluons

0:37:19.320 --> 0:37:20.560
<v Speaker 1>don't stick around very long.

0:37:21.880 --> 0:37:23.480
<v Speaker 2>They're not as sticky as we'd like them to be.

0:37:24.360 --> 0:37:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Gluons are not sticky. You mean, glue balls don't stick together.

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 1>And you were saying this is a good name.

0:37:31.040 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Maybe in super symmetry, we'll have super gluons and those

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 2>will make super glue balls that will really stick together.

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:41.080
<v Speaker 1>There you go, all right, so then so gluons can't

0:37:41.120 --> 0:37:43.960
<v Speaker 1>stick to each other, and then you think this happens. Now,

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:46.840
<v Speaker 1>does this happen with real gluons or virtual gluons, or

0:37:46.880 --> 0:37:47.919
<v Speaker 1>it can happen to both.

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:50.759
<v Speaker 2>This happens from real gluons. So if you create enough

0:37:50.760 --> 0:37:53.800
<v Speaker 2>real gluons, they can come together to make a glue

0:37:53.800 --> 0:37:55.600
<v Speaker 2>ball in the same way that for example, if you

0:37:55.640 --> 0:37:58.440
<v Speaker 2>make quarks, you make a spray of quarks. Quarks do

0:37:58.520 --> 0:38:01.000
<v Speaker 2>not like to be a part Two quarks are very

0:38:01.040 --> 0:38:03.840
<v Speaker 2>far apart from each other. There's a huge potential energy there,

0:38:04.200 --> 0:38:07.000
<v Speaker 2>and that potential energy gets turned into other particles, and

0:38:07.040 --> 0:38:11.000
<v Speaker 2>those particles quickly find partners and form masons and baryons.

0:38:11.000 --> 0:38:14.520
<v Speaker 2>Those are combinations of pairs or triplets of quarks. So

0:38:14.560 --> 0:38:17.680
<v Speaker 2>for example, you have protons or pions or k masons

0:38:17.719 --> 0:38:19.239
<v Speaker 2>or all sorts of other stuff. You know, at the

0:38:19.320 --> 0:38:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Large Hadron Collider, when we smash two protons together, we

0:38:22.600 --> 0:38:25.719
<v Speaker 2>expose the quarks inside them. Briefly, we got these sprays

0:38:25.760 --> 0:38:28.160
<v Speaker 2>of quarks and gluons but they really don't like to

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:30.879
<v Speaker 2>be by themselves, and so they very quickly create these

0:38:30.920 --> 0:38:34.000
<v Speaker 2>streams of other particles with them, and then they form

0:38:34.080 --> 0:38:36.640
<v Speaker 2>these states. And so what we actually see in our

0:38:36.680 --> 0:38:40.400
<v Speaker 2>detector are streams of like protons and chons and neutrons

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 2>and all sorts of other stuff. So quarks do this,

0:38:42.760 --> 0:38:45.319
<v Speaker 2>they find partners and form other states. And so we

0:38:45.360 --> 0:38:47.640
<v Speaker 2>think that maybe gluons can do this too, that like

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:50.880
<v Speaker 2>two or three gluons can come together and make something

0:38:50.920 --> 0:38:52.239
<v Speaker 2>we call a glue.

0:38:51.960 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Ball, because the math is telling you that they are

0:38:55.280 --> 0:38:57.279
<v Speaker 1>sort of compatible, that there is sort of a way

0:38:57.360 --> 0:38:59.839
<v Speaker 1>where you can put together two or three gluont where

0:38:59.840 --> 0:39:02.120
<v Speaker 1>they'll want to stick together exactly.

0:39:01.880 --> 0:39:04.000
<v Speaker 2>And they will be color neutral. They will be white.

0:39:04.400 --> 0:39:06.600
<v Speaker 2>You can match all their colors together to make a

0:39:06.640 --> 0:39:09.480
<v Speaker 2>color neutral object, which in principles should last for a

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:10.080
<v Speaker 2>little while.

0:39:10.200 --> 0:39:12.239
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, let's stick a little bit deeper into

0:39:12.280 --> 0:39:15.319
<v Speaker 1>what a glue ball is like and whether or not

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:17.719
<v Speaker 1>we found it, and if we have, what does it

0:39:17.800 --> 0:39:20.879
<v Speaker 1>mean about our understanding of the universe. But first, let's

0:39:20.880 --> 0:39:35.960
<v Speaker 1>stick another quick break. All right, we're talking about a

0:39:36.080 --> 0:39:40.480
<v Speaker 1>very sticky subject glue balls, which is what happens when

0:39:40.480 --> 0:39:43.840
<v Speaker 1>you potentially get a couple of gluons together, they'll maybe

0:39:43.880 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 1>stick to each other and form basically a ball.

0:39:46.440 --> 0:39:49.840
<v Speaker 2>Of glue, a literal ball of fundamental glue.

0:39:50.040 --> 0:39:52.040
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like you're saying that if you take a

0:39:52.080 --> 0:39:54.640
<v Speaker 1>couple of gluons and they do stick together, then they

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:56.560
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be stick anymore because it would all sort of

0:39:56.600 --> 0:39:59.239
<v Speaker 1>cancel each other out in terms of their charge. Right,

0:39:59.360 --> 0:40:02.120
<v Speaker 1>So glue ball be sticky at all, It wouldn't right,

0:40:02.120 --> 0:40:03.560
<v Speaker 1>it would just be lethal.

0:40:03.719 --> 0:40:07.000
<v Speaker 2>That's a great point. They'd be sticky on the inside, right,

0:40:07.080 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 2>but all the stickiness would be reserved for the other gluons.

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 2>On the other hand, you know, that's also truer protons. Technically,

0:40:13.239 --> 0:40:15.960
<v Speaker 2>protons have no color charge, and yet if you bring

0:40:16.000 --> 0:40:18.560
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of protons together, they can get stuck together

0:40:18.600 --> 0:40:21.200
<v Speaker 2>from the residual color charge. If you're on one side

0:40:21.200 --> 0:40:23.000
<v Speaker 2>of the proton, you might be closer to one of

0:40:23.000 --> 0:40:26.640
<v Speaker 2>the quarks than the others, so the charges don't exactly balance,

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:29.680
<v Speaker 2>and that's how the nucleus is together. So in principle,

0:40:29.680 --> 0:40:32.200
<v Speaker 2>it might be possible to like have a bunch of

0:40:32.239 --> 0:40:34.800
<v Speaker 2>glue balls and have them all stick together. But yeah,

0:40:34.840 --> 0:40:36.880
<v Speaker 2>they're stickiest on the inside, for sure.

0:40:37.560 --> 0:40:40.239
<v Speaker 1>You mean they might be sticky on the outside, but

0:40:40.360 --> 0:40:42.879
<v Speaker 1>from afar, a glue ball would not be very glue.

0:40:43.120 --> 0:40:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, a glue ball technically has no color charge and

0:40:45.960 --> 0:40:47.319
<v Speaker 2>no electric charge either.

0:40:47.480 --> 0:40:49.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, well, what else can you tell us about

0:40:49.360 --> 0:40:51.320
<v Speaker 1>these theoretical glue balls.

0:40:51.400 --> 0:40:54.520
<v Speaker 2>So it's predicted that if these gluons exist, that they

0:40:54.520 --> 0:40:56.839
<v Speaker 2>would not be very very heavy. You know, they would

0:40:56.880 --> 0:41:00.760
<v Speaker 2>only be like one to five giga electron volt in mass,

0:41:01.200 --> 0:41:03.160
<v Speaker 2>which is not that heavy. You know, a proton is

0:41:03.200 --> 0:41:06.000
<v Speaker 2>about one gigle electron bolts. So we're talking about something

0:41:06.040 --> 0:41:09.240
<v Speaker 2>that's like one to five times as massive as the proton,

0:41:09.400 --> 0:41:11.440
<v Speaker 2>and that sounds like something we should be able to

0:41:11.520 --> 0:41:14.120
<v Speaker 2>discover because our collider has found things that are much

0:41:14.200 --> 0:41:16.799
<v Speaker 2>much heavier. We're usually limited by the energy. You want

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:19.320
<v Speaker 2>to make something really massive, you have to pour enough

0:41:19.440 --> 0:41:22.200
<v Speaker 2>energy into the collision to make that thing, because remember

0:41:22.560 --> 0:41:25.200
<v Speaker 2>energy and mass are sort of interchangeable. You want to

0:41:25.239 --> 0:41:27.399
<v Speaker 2>make a heavy Higgs boson, you have to have enough

0:41:27.520 --> 0:41:31.200
<v Speaker 2>energy of one hundred and twenty five protons in your collision.

0:41:31.239 --> 0:41:35.680
<v Speaker 2>But our collider is super powerful. It's thirteen thousand GeV

0:41:36.239 --> 0:41:38.480
<v Speaker 2>in the collision, so there's plenty of energy to make

0:41:38.520 --> 0:41:41.640
<v Speaker 2>heavy stuff. Glue balls are really pretty light in comparison,

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:43.799
<v Speaker 2>They're not really very massive. There are only a few

0:41:43.840 --> 0:41:44.839
<v Speaker 2>proton masses worth.

0:41:45.000 --> 0:41:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's interesting that they have mass, right the gluons, Like,

0:41:48.120 --> 0:41:51.600
<v Speaker 1>does an individual gluon have mass by itself? It's a

0:41:51.640 --> 0:41:55.160
<v Speaker 1>force force transmitting particle, Does it have mass on its own?

0:41:55.280 --> 0:41:58.320
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't. Gluons themselves do not have mass, like photons

0:41:58.320 --> 0:42:01.320
<v Speaker 2>do not have mass, but a globe all would have mass,

0:42:01.640 --> 0:42:04.720
<v Speaker 2>the same way that, like a proton has mass, Most

0:42:04.719 --> 0:42:07.160
<v Speaker 2>of the mass of a proton doesn't come from the

0:42:07.239 --> 0:42:10.160
<v Speaker 2>quarks that make it up, Like a proton is one GeV,

0:42:10.600 --> 0:42:13.600
<v Speaker 2>but the quarks inside of it are like one percent

0:42:13.680 --> 0:42:16.200
<v Speaker 2>of that mass. Most of the mass of the proton

0:42:16.320 --> 0:42:20.280
<v Speaker 2>actually comes from the gluons inside the proton. Because remember

0:42:20.280 --> 0:42:22.560
<v Speaker 2>that mass is this weird thing. It's not just like

0:42:22.640 --> 0:42:25.799
<v Speaker 2>how much stuff is inside something. It's all of the

0:42:25.840 --> 0:42:28.719
<v Speaker 2>internal stored energy. So if you have a bunch of

0:42:28.880 --> 0:42:32.640
<v Speaker 2>energy stored in the bonds between your quarks, that counts

0:42:32.680 --> 0:42:35.880
<v Speaker 2>towards your mass. And that's true for other kinds of things,

0:42:35.920 --> 0:42:38.279
<v Speaker 2>like if you could get a bunch of photons and

0:42:38.360 --> 0:42:41.880
<v Speaker 2>store them inside something. Even if they're massless, they would

0:42:41.880 --> 0:42:44.319
<v Speaker 2>add to the mass of that object. In fact, you

0:42:44.360 --> 0:42:46.960
<v Speaker 2>take a rock and it absorbs a photon, that rock

0:42:47.040 --> 0:42:50.760
<v Speaker 2>gets more massive because it's now absorbed that photon's energy.

0:42:50.880 --> 0:42:52.520
<v Speaker 2>So mass is a weird thing. You can make it

0:42:52.560 --> 0:42:53.960
<v Speaker 2>out of massless stuff.

0:42:54.200 --> 0:42:56.279
<v Speaker 1>Well, we talked about before, and I know we talked

0:42:56.280 --> 0:42:58.520
<v Speaker 1>about this in our book. Frequently asked questions about the

0:42:58.600 --> 0:43:03.000
<v Speaker 1>universe that the mass doesn't really exist, Like mass is

0:43:03.080 --> 0:43:06.759
<v Speaker 1>just energy, and what you think of as gravity or

0:43:06.760 --> 0:43:09.880
<v Speaker 1>inertia is really just what happens when you kind of

0:43:10.000 --> 0:43:13.120
<v Speaker 1>concentrate energy in one little spot. And so that's kind

0:43:13.120 --> 0:43:16.200
<v Speaker 1>of what's happening here. Is like an individual gluon doesn't

0:43:16.239 --> 0:43:19.360
<v Speaker 1>have mass, but when you put it together with another gluon,

0:43:19.640 --> 0:43:22.640
<v Speaker 1>you're sort of trapping energy in one spot and then

0:43:22.640 --> 0:43:25.120
<v Speaker 1>suddenly you've got a little spot of energy, and so

0:43:25.200 --> 0:43:27.440
<v Speaker 1>that feels gravity and it feels inertia.

0:43:27.560 --> 0:43:30.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's what we call mass, right, that's inertial. Mass

0:43:30.239 --> 0:43:35.239
<v Speaker 2>is localized. Internally stored energy has this property that if

0:43:35.239 --> 0:43:37.680
<v Speaker 2>you push on it, it takes a force to accelerate it.

0:43:37.719 --> 0:43:39.960
<v Speaker 2>That's what we call inertial mass, and that's kind of

0:43:40.000 --> 0:43:42.879
<v Speaker 2>a weird and deep mystery of the universe. But yeah,

0:43:42.920 --> 0:43:45.319
<v Speaker 2>you can make it out of massless stuff, as you say,

0:43:45.360 --> 0:43:47.440
<v Speaker 2>as long as you concentrate some energy in there. And

0:43:47.480 --> 0:43:50.960
<v Speaker 2>glue balls definitely have energy inside them. These gluons have

0:43:51.160 --> 0:43:52.840
<v Speaker 2>energy even though they are massless.

0:43:53.200 --> 0:43:55.719
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, it sounds like a glue ball is

0:43:55.760 --> 0:43:58.640
<v Speaker 1>not really sticky, and like you were saying, it's also unstable,

0:43:58.840 --> 0:44:01.319
<v Speaker 1>like it's not only not sticky, but it doesn't want

0:44:01.320 --> 0:44:02.040
<v Speaker 1>to stick to its over.

0:44:02.600 --> 0:44:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, like many of these particles, it's unstable. You know,

0:44:05.719 --> 0:44:09.000
<v Speaker 2>the proton is a very unusual particle because it is stable,

0:44:09.040 --> 0:44:13.200
<v Speaker 2>but every other combination of quarks, for example, is unstable.

0:44:13.400 --> 0:44:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Even the neutron will fall apart in about eleven minutes.

0:44:16.800 --> 0:44:20.600
<v Speaker 2>And these other particles, pions and chons, they're created, they

0:44:20.640 --> 0:44:24.200
<v Speaker 2>live sometimes very briefly before they spray out into other

0:44:24.320 --> 0:44:26.719
<v Speaker 2>lighter particles. And the glue ball is no different. It's

0:44:26.760 --> 0:44:29.759
<v Speaker 2>a combination of these strong color charged particles. But it

0:44:29.840 --> 0:44:33.320
<v Speaker 2>also decays into other stuff. And so for example, glue

0:44:33.320 --> 0:44:37.000
<v Speaker 2>ball can turn into two photons, or can turn into

0:44:37.080 --> 0:44:40.520
<v Speaker 2>like four quarks or a shower of gluons or all

0:44:40.560 --> 0:44:41.960
<v Speaker 2>sorts of other stuff.

0:44:41.640 --> 0:44:43.280
<v Speaker 1>You can get showered with blue bits.

0:44:44.040 --> 0:44:46.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they can basically explode into little bits of glue.

0:44:46.880 --> 0:44:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Wow, doesn't sound very glue like at all. I'm slowly

0:44:52.560 --> 0:44:56.440
<v Speaker 1>ungluing your use of the name glue here. Oh man, Well,

0:44:56.480 --> 0:44:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I get The big question now is have we found

0:44:58.719 --> 0:45:03.040
<v Speaker 1>glue balls? Theoretical, we think they can exist and maybe

0:45:03.080 --> 0:45:06.480
<v Speaker 1>exist out there using our math, but have we found one?

0:45:06.560 --> 0:45:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Have you ever seen a googball?

0:45:07.840 --> 0:45:10.680
<v Speaker 2>The weird thing is that we're not sure. Sometimes it's

0:45:10.800 --> 0:45:14.080
<v Speaker 2>very obvious when you've discovered a particle because there's only

0:45:14.120 --> 0:45:16.359
<v Speaker 2>one thing that it can do and nothing else can

0:45:16.400 --> 0:45:19.400
<v Speaker 2>do that. So, for example, when we discovered the Higgs boson,

0:45:19.680 --> 0:45:23.040
<v Speaker 2>we didn't see the Higgs directly, but we saw pairs

0:45:23.080 --> 0:45:26.400
<v Speaker 2>of photons that it decayed into that were flying apart

0:45:26.400 --> 0:45:29.840
<v Speaker 2>from each other with a very specific characteristic energy. We

0:45:29.920 --> 0:45:32.399
<v Speaker 2>found lots and lots of examples of photons with those

0:45:32.480 --> 0:45:34.800
<v Speaker 2>kinds of energies, and we said, this can only really

0:45:34.840 --> 0:45:37.520
<v Speaker 2>come from the Higgs boson, and therefore we're pretty sure

0:45:37.560 --> 0:45:40.279
<v Speaker 2>we found the Higgs boson. And the key there is

0:45:40.280 --> 0:45:43.120
<v Speaker 2>that it was doing something unusual, something that made it

0:45:43.160 --> 0:45:46.200
<v Speaker 2>like stick out from the background. Now, glue balls are

0:45:46.320 --> 0:45:50.200
<v Speaker 2>much more complicated because number one, we're not exactly sure

0:45:50.480 --> 0:45:53.040
<v Speaker 2>what they can do, Like, we're not sure exactly how

0:45:53.120 --> 0:45:55.640
<v Speaker 2>much masks they have. Maybe they have one GV, maybe

0:45:55.680 --> 0:45:58.080
<v Speaker 2>they have five GV. Maybe we're wrong and they have

0:45:58.200 --> 0:46:02.560
<v Speaker 2>like fifty gvre. Because the calculations we talked about are

0:46:02.680 --> 0:46:05.880
<v Speaker 2>very complicated and make a lot of approximations that nobody

0:46:05.880 --> 0:46:08.319
<v Speaker 2>really believes are right, and we hope didn't mess up

0:46:08.360 --> 0:46:12.040
<v Speaker 2>the calculations. And also there's lots of other particles down there,

0:46:12.320 --> 0:46:14.200
<v Speaker 2>like the Higgs boson we found it where there are

0:46:14.280 --> 0:46:17.120
<v Speaker 2>very very few particles of that kind of mass, very

0:46:17.120 --> 0:46:20.520
<v Speaker 2>heavy particles, but there's lots and lots of very light particles.

0:46:20.840 --> 0:46:22.919
<v Speaker 2>If you look at like the list of particles, there's

0:46:22.960 --> 0:46:26.520
<v Speaker 2>like hundreds of particles around one GeV, all sorts of

0:46:26.600 --> 0:46:30.000
<v Speaker 2>crazy combinations of quarks. So it's hard to pick out

0:46:30.040 --> 0:46:32.080
<v Speaker 2>a new one and say, oh, this one is a

0:46:32.080 --> 0:46:35.000
<v Speaker 2>glue ball, especially because we're not exactly sure what a

0:46:35.000 --> 0:46:35.960
<v Speaker 2>glue ball would look like.

0:46:36.280 --> 0:46:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Hmmm, I see, the theory doesn't predict what it would look.

0:46:39.160 --> 0:46:41.919
<v Speaker 2>Like, so the theory is impossible to do perfectly. There's

0:46:41.960 --> 0:46:45.279
<v Speaker 2>lots of approximations people have made, and they make different predictions.

0:46:45.480 --> 0:46:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Some predict like one point four GeV, some predict five GeV,

0:46:49.200 --> 0:46:51.840
<v Speaker 2>and they also give different predictions for how these things

0:46:52.040 --> 0:46:55.520
<v Speaker 2>might appear. You know, these glue balls have different properties

0:46:55.560 --> 0:46:58.560
<v Speaker 2>from the other particles, like they're weird internal spin and

0:46:58.600 --> 0:47:03.040
<v Speaker 2>other quantum states. Those might make like characteristic signatures, you know,

0:47:03.120 --> 0:47:05.440
<v Speaker 2>like how they turn into other particles, and how those

0:47:05.480 --> 0:47:08.200
<v Speaker 2>particles look. There were angles between each other and the

0:47:08.640 --> 0:47:10.959
<v Speaker 2>relative spin states and this kind of stuff. But again,

0:47:11.360 --> 0:47:14.960
<v Speaker 2>different theoretical calculations make different predictions here, and it's also

0:47:15.080 --> 0:47:18.640
<v Speaker 2>sometimes hard to disentangle from what we're seeing out there. So,

0:47:18.719 --> 0:47:21.560
<v Speaker 2>for example, there is a particle that people have found

0:47:21.840 --> 0:47:24.560
<v Speaker 2>that has about one and a half GeV. It's called

0:47:24.600 --> 0:47:27.880
<v Speaker 2>the F zero, and there's a raging debate in the

0:47:27.920 --> 0:47:30.839
<v Speaker 2>literature about whether or not it is a glue ball.

0:47:31.040 --> 0:47:33.799
<v Speaker 2>Some people say this is totally consistent with the glue ball,

0:47:34.080 --> 0:47:35.719
<v Speaker 2>and other people say, no, Look, it can do this

0:47:35.800 --> 0:47:37.480
<v Speaker 2>and that, and gloe balls shouldn't be able to do that,

0:47:37.600 --> 0:47:39.879
<v Speaker 2>so we don't think it's a glue ball. Nobody can

0:47:39.920 --> 0:47:43.000
<v Speaker 2>really agree about whether the F zero is a glue

0:47:43.040 --> 0:47:43.719
<v Speaker 2>ball or not.

0:47:44.000 --> 0:47:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Whoa wait, wait, wait a minute. You've discovered a particle

0:47:46.719 --> 0:47:49.600
<v Speaker 1>out there. You gave it the name F zero, but

0:47:49.719 --> 0:47:50.880
<v Speaker 1>you don't know what it is. What do you mean

0:47:50.880 --> 0:47:52.440
<v Speaker 1>you don't know what it is? What do you mean

0:47:52.440 --> 0:47:54.160
<v Speaker 1>you've found something that you don't know what it is?

0:47:54.160 --> 0:47:55.439
<v Speaker 1>Wouldn't that be a big deal.

0:47:55.600 --> 0:47:58.680
<v Speaker 2>So we found this particle, we've seen it decay into

0:47:58.800 --> 0:48:02.239
<v Speaker 2>like two pions into four pions, right, and so we

0:48:02.320 --> 0:48:04.800
<v Speaker 2>know that it exists. We can see that it's there.

0:48:04.880 --> 0:48:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Like you find the pions, you add up their energies,

0:48:07.239 --> 0:48:09.520
<v Speaker 2>they're consistent with a particle of mass one and a

0:48:09.560 --> 0:48:12.920
<v Speaker 2>half GeV. That doesn't mean that we know what's inside

0:48:13.000 --> 0:48:15.160
<v Speaker 2>the F zero, Like, is the F zero made out

0:48:15.200 --> 0:48:17.399
<v Speaker 2>of two quarks? Can you explain what the F zero

0:48:17.480 --> 0:48:19.880
<v Speaker 2>is doing just using quarks or do you need this

0:48:19.960 --> 0:48:23.880
<v Speaker 2>special gluon state to explain it? People disagree about whether

0:48:23.920 --> 0:48:26.239
<v Speaker 2>what the F zero is doing can be explained using

0:48:26.280 --> 0:48:29.200
<v Speaker 2>only quarks or requires gluons to explain it.

0:48:29.960 --> 0:48:31.759
<v Speaker 1>I see, so you're not quite sure if you found

0:48:31.760 --> 0:48:35.320
<v Speaker 1>a particle, you found something that could be a particle.

0:48:35.400 --> 0:48:38.360
<v Speaker 2>We found something. The F zero is definitely something. It exists,

0:48:38.440 --> 0:48:40.799
<v Speaker 2>We're just not sure what's inside of it? Like, is

0:48:40.840 --> 0:48:42.759
<v Speaker 2>the F zero made out of quarks or is it

0:48:42.840 --> 0:48:46.520
<v Speaker 2>made out of gluons? Nobody's one hundred percent sure because

0:48:46.560 --> 0:48:48.040
<v Speaker 2>it's a mess down there, and it's hard to make

0:48:48.160 --> 0:48:50.600
<v Speaker 2>very precise measurements of what the F zero is doing.

0:48:50.880 --> 0:48:53.680
<v Speaker 2>We're sure it's there. Nobody's doubting that the F zero

0:48:53.880 --> 0:48:56.239
<v Speaker 2>is real. They just don't really know exactly what it's

0:48:56.280 --> 0:48:57.920
<v Speaker 2>doing and what it's made out of.

0:48:58.120 --> 0:49:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, are people looking for glon or is this something

0:49:01.400 --> 0:49:05.359
<v Speaker 1>you're just looking at from the debris of other experiments?

0:49:05.440 --> 0:49:08.399
<v Speaker 1>Is there like a glue ball experiment other and are

0:49:08.440 --> 0:49:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the scientists called glue ballers.

0:49:11.000 --> 0:49:14.080
<v Speaker 2>This is a really exciting frontier in particle physics, but

0:49:14.080 --> 0:49:16.560
<v Speaker 2>also very very difficult. You know, it's a place where

0:49:16.600 --> 0:49:19.960
<v Speaker 2>we don't have crisp predictions and it's really hard to

0:49:19.960 --> 0:49:22.760
<v Speaker 2>see what's happening because everything is a big, messy spray

0:49:22.800 --> 0:49:25.919
<v Speaker 2>of particles. It's not like very crisp and clear one

0:49:25.960 --> 0:49:28.880
<v Speaker 2>photon one electron bouncing off of each other like in

0:49:28.920 --> 0:49:31.239
<v Speaker 2>the early days. You got like a big mess of

0:49:31.239 --> 0:49:33.799
<v Speaker 2>stuff you have to sift through. But there are dedicated

0:49:33.840 --> 0:49:38.239
<v Speaker 2>experiments just to understanding the strong force and specifically to

0:49:38.320 --> 0:49:41.160
<v Speaker 2>understanding gluons. So at Jefferson Lab in the East Coast

0:49:41.200 --> 0:49:43.880
<v Speaker 2>the United States, it is an experiment called glue x.

0:49:44.320 --> 0:49:46.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if they pronounced it gluks or glue

0:49:46.760 --> 0:49:49.759
<v Speaker 2>x or glueeks. I'm not exactly sure, but it's an

0:49:49.800 --> 0:49:53.440
<v Speaker 2>experiment that's running right now to study specifically gluons. What

0:49:53.480 --> 0:49:56.480
<v Speaker 2>can they do? Can we find glue balls? Can we

0:49:56.520 --> 0:49:59.080
<v Speaker 2>see it doing other stuff maybe that we didn't expect?

0:49:59.360 --> 0:50:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Have they found it?

0:50:00.640 --> 0:50:03.759
<v Speaker 2>They have not yet found confirmation of glue balls. They're

0:50:03.760 --> 0:50:05.719
<v Speaker 2>trying to study this f zero, but they don't have

0:50:05.840 --> 0:50:08.319
<v Speaker 2>enough data yet to confirm whether or not that's real

0:50:08.520 --> 0:50:11.120
<v Speaker 2>and understand it's decay products. So far, they've been putting

0:50:11.160 --> 0:50:14.520
<v Speaker 2>out preliminary studies and understanding all sorts of other things.

0:50:14.840 --> 0:50:17.200
<v Speaker 2>This is a sort of general powerful detector that can

0:50:17.239 --> 0:50:20.480
<v Speaker 2>study lots of different things about the strong force, because

0:50:20.520 --> 0:50:23.000
<v Speaker 2>whether glue balls exists is one question, but there's so

0:50:23.120 --> 0:50:26.080
<v Speaker 2>many other questions about what's going on with the strong force,

0:50:26.120 --> 0:50:27.560
<v Speaker 2>and this is exploring a lot of them.

0:50:27.560 --> 0:50:29.839
<v Speaker 1>Would you say then that they're kind of stuck at

0:50:29.840 --> 0:50:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the moment.

0:50:30.880 --> 0:50:32.120
<v Speaker 2>I would say it's a sticky question.

0:50:32.200 --> 0:50:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure, well, let's see if they do find

0:50:34.680 --> 0:50:37.640
<v Speaker 1>glue balls. And it's kind of an interesting idea because

0:50:37.880 --> 0:50:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I think, as you're saying, it's not just about finding

0:50:40.560 --> 0:50:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the glue ball themselves. It's about understanding how the strong

0:50:44.120 --> 0:50:47.560
<v Speaker 1>force works, right, Like, it's one of the fundamental forces

0:50:47.600 --> 0:50:51.240
<v Speaker 1>of nature. It's what keeps our nucleus in our atoms together.

0:50:51.320 --> 0:50:53.239
<v Speaker 1>But it sounds like we don't really sort of like

0:50:53.400 --> 0:50:56.320
<v Speaker 1>know everything about it or know exactly how it works,

0:50:56.600 --> 0:50:58.719
<v Speaker 1>and so finding or not finding a glue ball would

0:50:58.719 --> 0:51:00.919
<v Speaker 1>sort of tell you a little bit of about what's

0:51:00.960 --> 0:51:02.160
<v Speaker 1>going on at that level.

0:51:02.320 --> 0:51:05.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's exactly right. The same way that understanding the

0:51:05.360 --> 0:51:08.680
<v Speaker 2>structure of the atom has taught us a lot about electromagnetism.

0:51:08.760 --> 0:51:11.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, why electrons fill these shells, the hyper fine

0:51:11.560 --> 0:51:14.479
<v Speaker 2>splitting of electron energy levels has led to a really

0:51:14.520 --> 0:51:18.160
<v Speaker 2>deep understanding of magnetism and spin and electricity and all

0:51:18.160 --> 0:51:20.560
<v Speaker 2>this kind of stuff. You know, seeing these forces in action,

0:51:20.680 --> 0:51:23.640
<v Speaker 2>what kind of complex things they can do or reveals

0:51:23.760 --> 0:51:26.640
<v Speaker 2>their fundamental nature. So we're trying to do the same

0:51:26.680 --> 0:51:28.919
<v Speaker 2>thing for the strong force, like see the strong force

0:51:28.960 --> 0:51:31.799
<v Speaker 2>in action, see what it's capable of, what it can't do,

0:51:32.160 --> 0:51:34.399
<v Speaker 2>and that'll tell us if we understand what it's doing

0:51:34.520 --> 0:51:36.960
<v Speaker 2>or not. But in the end, it's much harder than

0:51:37.000 --> 0:51:40.440
<v Speaker 2>it is for electromagnetism because it's more complex. Instead of

0:51:40.440 --> 0:51:42.960
<v Speaker 2>one photon, we have eight gluons of all sorts of

0:51:42.960 --> 0:51:46.239
<v Speaker 2>different colors, sloshing around and banging into each other and

0:51:46.280 --> 0:51:48.640
<v Speaker 2>confusing each other. It's like having a conversation with eight

0:51:48.680 --> 0:51:49.879
<v Speaker 2>Toddlers at the same time.

0:51:50.080 --> 0:51:53.279
<v Speaker 1>Every PhUSE is a stream, but it sounds like it

0:51:53.320 --> 0:51:56.120
<v Speaker 1>is a prediction of the current standard model, like our

0:51:56.160 --> 0:52:00.200
<v Speaker 1>current model of the universe does predicted glue balls should exist,

0:52:00.239 --> 0:52:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and so if you find them, it would be another confirmation,

0:52:03.400 --> 0:52:06.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe the final confirmation about the standard model. But if

0:52:06.120 --> 0:52:08.560
<v Speaker 1>you don't find them, and you can conclusively say that

0:52:08.600 --> 0:52:10.920
<v Speaker 1>they do not exist, then maybe we need to rethink

0:52:11.000 --> 0:52:12.400
<v Speaker 1>our whole model of the universe.

0:52:12.640 --> 0:52:15.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's exactly right. It would be almost as big

0:52:15.719 --> 0:52:18.960
<v Speaker 2>a deal as discovering the Higgs boson if we did

0:52:19.040 --> 0:52:20.840
<v Speaker 2>find confirmation of a glue.

0:52:20.680 --> 0:52:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Ball or not a confirmation about blueball.

0:52:23.280 --> 0:52:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if you could prove that glue balls don't exist,

0:52:26.080 --> 0:52:27.520
<v Speaker 2>that would also be fascinating.

0:52:27.960 --> 0:52:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I can just see the headline scientists fine glue balls

0:52:30.680 --> 0:52:31.440
<v Speaker 1>do not exist.

0:52:33.360 --> 0:52:35.280
<v Speaker 2>Scientists fail to find glue balls.

0:52:35.160 --> 0:52:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Again, Scientists get stuck with blue balls. All right, Well,

0:52:38.960 --> 0:52:41.759
<v Speaker 1>we hope you enjoyed that. Thanks for joining us, see

0:52:41.760 --> 0:52:42.279
<v Speaker 1>you next time.

0:52:50.120 --> 0:52:52.920
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening, and remember that Daniel and Jorge Explain

0:52:53.000 --> 0:52:56.960
<v Speaker 2>the Universe is a production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts

0:52:57.000 --> 0:53:01.640
<v Speaker 2>from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:53:01.719 --> 0:53:03.440
<v Speaker 2>you listen to your favorite shows.