WEBVTT - Nick’s Top 50 NBA Players of the Last 50 Years: #43-40

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>The Apple Watch Series ten is here. It has the

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>biggest display ever. It's also the thinnest Apple Watch ever,

0:00:07.640 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>making it even more comfortable on your wrist whether you're running, swimming,

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:15.240
<v Speaker 1>or sleeping. And it's the fastest charging Apple Watch, getting

0:00:15.240 --> 0:00:17.919
<v Speaker 1>you eight hours of charge in just fifteen minutes. The

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Apple Watch Series ten available for the first time in

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the glossy jet black aluminum compared to previous generations. iPhone

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Tennis are later required. Charge time and actual results will vary.

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 2>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 2>inspiring true story about Anthony Roeblass, who defined every expectation

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:40.960
<v Speaker 2>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:44.600
<v Speaker 2>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg,

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:47.839
<v Speaker 2>Evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 2>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 2>including Jerrel Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Panya, and

0:00:54.880 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Bobby Canavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 3>Welcome in to another special episode of the What's Try

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:18.320
<v Speaker 3>with Nick Wright podcast and YouTube show. This is part

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 3>of our series the fifty Greatest Players of the last

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 3>fifty years in the NBA. Today we will reveal players

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:30.320
<v Speaker 3>forty three through forty. There are some very familiar names

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:32.839
<v Speaker 3>on this list we are, I mean, we're already getting

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:35.119
<v Speaker 3>to the real meat of the list. But the person

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 3>we are going to start with I feel was the

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 3>single most glaring omission from the NBA's just released top

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 3>seventy five list. Now, we've had a few people already

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:47.039
<v Speaker 3>on my list that didn't make the top seventy five.

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Sidney Moncreef, who we discussed, Bernard King, who we discussed

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 3>who I felt were unfairly excluded. After this name, we're

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 3>about to reveal, there's only one more person on my

0:01:57.200 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 3>list that is not on the NBA's list, and that

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 3>will be contrab And we will get to him of

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 3>probably a couple months from now, because he is very

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 3>high on my list despite not making the top seventy five.

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 3>But this person right here, in my opinion, his absence

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:14.919
<v Speaker 3>of being on the top seventy five list nearly invalidated

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 3>that list in its entirety. This person is, of course,

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 3>the forty third best player of the last fifty years

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:25.360
<v Speaker 3>in the NBA Dwight Howard.

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 4>For forty three Dwight Howard.

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 3>The fact that he was not included on the top

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:36.800
<v Speaker 3>seventy five list made that more about popularity than about credibility.

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:41.399
<v Speaker 3>Dwight Howard, let's go over his resume five times. We're

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 3>gonna go slow on this. By the way, five times

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 3>All NBA First Team for context, that is more than

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 3>Dark Novitzky, Chris Paul, Kevin Garnett or as of this moment,

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:58.959
<v Speaker 3>Steph Curry. None of those guys have as many first

0:02:59.000 --> 0:02:59.959
<v Speaker 3>teams as Dwight Howard.

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 4>He is a three.

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 3>Time Defensive Player of the Year APEX Dwight in Orlando

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 3>was so far and away the best defensive player in

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 3>the league there was not even a debate or.

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 4>A discussion about it.

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 3>Career top fifteen all time and rebounds and blocks, and

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 3>now I want to talk about the MVPs because yes,

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:22.799
<v Speaker 3>he's five time First Team All NBA plus one time

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 3>second team, two time thirteen. But the MVP part of

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 3>it is really the biggest part of his case. There's

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 3>a five year stretch where he was a consensus top

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:32.800
<v Speaker 3>five player.

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 4>You saw it right there.

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 3>He finished second MVP voting once and he finished top

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 3>five three other times, so he has four top five

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 3>MVP finishes. And when he was at his apex, we

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 3>will go to the postseason. He was the best player

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 3>on a finalist. A finalist by the way that if

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 3>not for the courtney Lee missed putback, maybe maybe takes

0:03:57.560 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 3>that Lakers series not only to seven, maybe they win it.

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 3>But how did Dwight peak? Dwight before his bat gave out?

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 3>For he had real issues. And again some of this

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 3>is his own doing because his game never matured, and

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 3>some would argue he never matured. I understand that, but

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 3>you can't hold the potential against him when what he

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 3>realized was so great. Peak Dwight not only beat Lebron

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 3>in a series, but the series that the Magic beat

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 3>the Cats. Lebron in that series averaged thirty nine, eight

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:32.359
<v Speaker 3>and eight. It might be the single best series Lebron's

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 3>ever played, one could argue, and Dwight beat him in six.

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 3>With Jamir Nelson, Hadu Turklou and Rashard Lewis as his

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 3>key contributors, Dwight in that series averaged a humble twenty

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 3>six and thirteen and in the deciding game six to

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 3>go to Dwight's first career NBA Finals, He put up

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:57.039
<v Speaker 3>a forty and fourteen forty and fourteen to send Lebron

0:04:57.080 --> 0:04:59.480
<v Speaker 3>home to go to the finals, and then they lost

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 3>in six to Kobe obviously, So then was Dwight's career

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 3>over there? No, everyone kills him for the Lakers year,

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:07.679
<v Speaker 3>even though that was one of the what five years

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:10.839
<v Speaker 3>he led the NBA in rebounding his first year in Houston,

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:13.679
<v Speaker 3>you guys remember the playoff series that was Dame's first

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 3>career walk off the Dame where he waves goodbye to

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 3>everybody and he beats Houston in round one. In that series,

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 3>Dwight averaged twenty six and fourteen with three blocks for

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 3>a series again that his team loses in six.

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 4>For in the playoffs from.

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 3>Two thousand and eight to twenty fifteen, so the entirety

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:37.840
<v Speaker 3>of his prime and then a couple of years after

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:43.160
<v Speaker 3>his prime, he was twenty and fourteen in the playoffs

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:45.919
<v Speaker 3>and by the way, he's now a champion now. Was

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 3>he a huge part of that Lakers title?

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 4>Seem No? But was he getting minutes? Was he valuable?

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 4>You bet your ass he was?

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 3>Is not being included in the top seventy five is ridiculous,

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:57.159
<v Speaker 3>and I want it Before we get to our caller,

0:05:57.279 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 3>I want to ask him on's a quick question.

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 4>You don't do a tunnel on these shows, but it's good.

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm glad you're here.

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:05.279
<v Speaker 3>Do you feel like Dwight is viewed by a lot

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 3>of people, particularly your age are younger, as more of

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 3>a joke or more of an all.

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 4>Time I'd say it's pretty mixed, but I'm probably going

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 4>to err on the side of a joke. Yeah, I

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:18.840
<v Speaker 4>think so. I think that you don't.

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:21.479
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you don't have a lot of recollection of

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 3>when Dwight was dominating the league. No, you remember like

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 3>you remember the images of the slam Dunk contest and

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 3>then the bad stand Van Gundy press conference. Again, he

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 3>was an absolutely all parties agreed top five guy in

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:41.480
<v Speaker 3>the league for a five year stretch, top three guy in.

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 4>The league for a two year stretch.

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:46.840
<v Speaker 3>For him to be non included in the top Nunning

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 3>five list was outrageous. I think we have a caller

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 3>that is going to comment on Dwight Howard. I want

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:52.840
<v Speaker 3>to hear it.

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:59.479
<v Speaker 5>Question for you, Nick, if you took Moses Ballone's accomplishments

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:04.040
<v Speaker 5>and Dwight Howards and you made it a blind resume test,

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:06.720
<v Speaker 5>how would you be able to tell the two apart?

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:08.280
<v Speaker 4>Just curious?

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 3>Okay, all right, so Rick is actually going a step

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 3>further than I would go. Rick is saying he and

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 3>Dwight Howard and Moses Malone have similar resumes. They flatley

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 3>do not. Now now I have to give Dwight all

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 3>that praise. I now have to bring realities. Moses Malone.

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 3>You're going to see him on this list. He's not

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 3>just a top thirty guy. He's not just the top

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 3>twenty five guys, not just the top twenty guy. He's

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 3>not just a top fifteen guy of the last fifty years.

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 3>Dwight has four MVP top fives. Moses has three actual MVPs.

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 3>Dwight was the best player on a finalist, Moses was

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 3>finals MVP on arguably the greatest team to ever play,

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 3>the eighty three six Ers. So listen, I think it

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 3>made it pretty clear. I'm a big Dwight Howard supporter.

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:01.239
<v Speaker 3>Let's not go crazy and acting he and Moses Malone

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 3>of the same resume.

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 4>They do not.

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 3>Moses Malone and his fellow Sixer teammate Julius Irving are

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 3>probably two of the most disrespected players in NBA history.

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:13.559
<v Speaker 3>We'll get to them in a few months on this list,

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 3>but now we will get to number forty two. And

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 3>number forty two is another controversial inclusion.

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 4>Number forty two Anthony Davis.

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 3>So Anthony Davis's top line resume is a clear, no

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 3>doubt guy. But then it gets a little hazier. So

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 3>he's four time first Team All NBA.

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 4>Which, as I mentioned just a.

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 3>Moment ago, that's the same number Dirk and Kevin Garnett,

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 3>two of the greatest power forwards ever. But he has

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 3>no second or third team All nbas. He just has

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 3>those first Team All nbas. He was third in the

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 3>MVP voting in twenty eighteen, and by the way, he

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 3>has another top five, so he already has two top

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:55.959
<v Speaker 3>five MVPs. We know he's a great defensive player, four

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 3>time All the Defense, three time champion Blocks Champion. The

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:04.719
<v Speaker 3>question though, is the resume thick enough if he had

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 3>a bigger body of work, his top level talent and

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 3>his top level achievements, if the body of work were bigger,

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 3>would have him higher than forty two. I'm comfortable with

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 3>where he is because even though his playoff resume does

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 3>not span many games, he has an underrated, unbelievable playoff resume.

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:29.080
<v Speaker 3>So I'm going to tell you some things I'm certain

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 3>you don't know about Anthony Davis. He is for his

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 3>career twenty seven points per game in the postseason. That's

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:41.560
<v Speaker 3>good enough for top ten all time. During that title run,

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:45.079
<v Speaker 3>he was twenty eight and ten. He was the second

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:48.320
<v Speaker 3>best player on a champion. That has to matter. He

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:50.959
<v Speaker 3>goes to the Lakers, they immediately win the titler the

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 3>second best player. And the first two games of those finals,

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 3>which were the first two finals games of his career,

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 3>how does he answer the bell? Thirty four nine followed

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 3>by thirty two and fourteen after two games of those

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 3>NBA Finals looked like man, is Anthony Davis going to

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:07.840
<v Speaker 3>be Finals MVP?

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 4>Maybe? But it wasn't like.

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 3>He had just started showing up to the playoffs with

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 3>those finals when he was with New Orleans. Not only

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 3>did they sweep Portland, people forget this game. I don't

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 3>to win his first playoff series ever, Game four against

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 3>Portland forty seven and ten forty seven and ten to

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 3>send the Blazers, who were favored in the series home,

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 3>then in his first playoff series with the Lakers to

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 3>close out Portland forty and nine. The next round against Houston,

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 3>he was good. Don't forget the Western Armands Finals, Western

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 3>Hermand's Finals. Hey, battle of the big men, Jokicch versus

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 3>Anthony Davis. Yokicch would go on to win the next

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 3>MVP and damn near win another MVP right after. How

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 3>did Anthony Davis end up doing it? How do you

0:10:56.960 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 3>do against Jokis? Now on they win five? He averaged

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:03.839
<v Speaker 3>for the series thirty one and six against the guy

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 3>who would then immediately become in some circles the best

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 3>player in the league. He had a buzzer beating playoff game,

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:14.439
<v Speaker 3>winning three in that series. And so I think that

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 3>the playoff resume again doesn't have a ton of games.

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 3>He has thirty nine career playoff games. He's scored twenty

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 3>five or more in twenty.

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:25.560
<v Speaker 4>Nine of them. She has shown up.

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 3>And as far as his regular season resume, the MVP

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 3>finishes the all NBAS speak to it. Here's another thing.

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 3>Career in the regular season twenty three and ten. Some

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:41.079
<v Speaker 3>context in the last fifty years. So from this list,

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:44.440
<v Speaker 3>our start of it. How many twenty and ten regular

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 3>season guys do you think there are? He is twenty

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 3>three and ten. Ten other guys in the last fifty

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 3>years to average twenty and ten for their careers.

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 4>He's at twenty three and ten.

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 3>So the championship, the peak in New Orleans, the playoff

0:11:57.200 --> 0:11:59.440
<v Speaker 3>run with the Lakers, the fact that I think this

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 3>list will look stupid as soon as two or three

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 3>years from now if he's not included. He has to

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 3>be on it. I know he became because he got

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 3>hurt this year. Again somewhat unbald. He shouldn't have been

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 3>top seventy five guy. Let's be honest and Davids top

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:13.559
<v Speaker 3>seventy five guy, and we're not including what you do

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 3>in college. But the title run at Kentucky matters at

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 3>least a little bit. Is number one pick title in

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 3>Kentucky amazing. Immediately sounds like top seventy five guy. We

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 3>have an Anthony Davis caller.

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 4>I do believe.

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 6>Anthony Davis, always injured. Anthony Davis. Two playoff appearances in

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 6>seven years in New Orleans. Anthony Davis, that's who you

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 6>got in your top fifty. I can't wait to find

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 6>out where you have Kevin Love.

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Comparing Anthony Davis and Kevin Love is just totally disingenuous.

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 3>Anthony Davis didn't have a lot of success in New Orleans,

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 3>but he had more success in New Orleans than Kevin

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 3>Love did in Minnesota. And Kevin Love, when he did

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:02.079
<v Speaker 3>team up with Lebron, was not the second best guy

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 3>averaging twenty eight and ten in a playoff run. He

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:08.319
<v Speaker 3>was the clear and obvious third best guy who became

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 3>a liability.

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 4>At spots in the playoff run.

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:14.199
<v Speaker 3>So, I again, that's a that's just not a fair

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 3>com and I understand he doesn't have and I've said it,

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 3>I said it for I'll say it again. The volume

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 3>you would love to have, but the top level production

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:28.559
<v Speaker 3>is so good plus never backing down in the playoffs again.

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 3>Top ten all time playoff points per game. A guy

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 3>who in his first playoff series victory closed it with

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 3>a forty seven and ten, his first playoff series with

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 3>the Lakers close it with a forty and ten, opened

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 3>his first two career NBA Finals games with thirty two

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 3>and thirty four. Top seventy five player will be back

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 3>with players forty one and forty right after this.

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 7>Hey there, Ryan Reynolds here, it's a new year, and

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 7>you know what that means. No, not the diet resolutions away,

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 7>for us all to try and do a little bit

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:03.559
<v Speaker 7>better than we did last year. And my resolution, unlike

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 7>Big wireless, is to not be a raging and raise

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 7>the price of wireless on you every chance I get.

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 7>Give it a try at midmobile dot com slash switch.

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:15.439
<v Speaker 8>Forty five dollars up front payment required equivalent to fifteen

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 8>dollars per month new customers on first three month plan only,

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 8>taxes and fees, Extra speeds lower above forty gigabytes on

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 8>unlimited cementmobile dot com. For details, Welcome back into What's

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 8>Right with Nick Wright podcast and YouTube show special editions

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 8>Best fifty players the last fifty years in the NBA.

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 3>We are counting them down. We are already to number

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 3>forty one. Today, we will do forty one and forty

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 3>then we'll be back in one week with we're already

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 3>into the top forty players, thirty nine and so on

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 3>and so forth. We already did today Dwight Howard and

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 3>Anthony Davis. We're going to stay with a couple contemporary names.

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 3>The oldest name involved in today's edition is player number

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 3>forty one, and that is iconic Gary Pate. The glove

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 3>number forty one, Gary Payton. We'll go through the accolades.

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 3>Those should be relatively simple. He has on the MVP front.

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting he has won top three, as you can see,

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 3>third in nineteen ninety eight, but six times he was

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 3>top six, so he has no other top fives.

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 4>I expanded it to six.

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 3>Because five separate times he came in sixth in MVP voting.

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 4>He won a Defensive Player of the Year. Why does

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 4>that matter?

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 3>He is the only back court player to win Defensive

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 3>Player of the Year in the last thirty plus seasons.

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 3>In the eighties, Jordan One Moncrete won backcourt guys could

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 3>win it. From the nineties to right now, the only

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 3>one to do it was Gary Payton. He's one of

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 3>the greatest defensive players ever. Peyton was a Defensive Player

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 3>of the Year and in fact was the only guard

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 3>to win the award for thirty plus years. Marcus Smart

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 3>just broke that streak actually this season with Gary Payton

0:15:57.440 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 3>presenting him that award, as they are now the only

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 3>two guards to win this award since the eighties. And

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 3>then you get to the tougher part of Gary's argument,

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 3>which is he was good in the playoffs. It's hard

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 3>to argue he was great in the playoffs, which because

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 3>those accolades I just listed those types of MVP finishes,

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 3>those all NBA appearances, how long he played, and the

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 3>fact that the statistically he's never going to get the

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 3>full He's always going to get a bit of the

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 3>short end of the stick because so much of his

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 3>impact was on defense. You would think deserves to be

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 3>a little higher than what he is. Some would certainly

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 3>argue you should be ahead of the guy who's we're

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 3>about to introduce you to, who's very next on the list,

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 3>who also is a point guard who played just after Gary,

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 3>well really at the same time as Gary's, just they

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 3>their careers at least overlapped the end of Gary's to

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 3>the beginning of the next guys.

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 4>So why is Gary not higher?

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 3>Because the playoff resume has some we're missing some spots. Now,

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 3>he was the best player on a fivest and in

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:04.399
<v Speaker 3>that run to the finals in nineteen ninety six, he

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:07.880
<v Speaker 3>was twenty one, five seven and two.

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 4>That matters.

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 3>That absolutely matters. It was the best he ever was

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:16.159
<v Speaker 3>and in those finals. Don't listen to what Michael Jordan

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 3>tried to tell you on that propaganda fest that was

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:22.119
<v Speaker 3>called The Last Dance, where he's like, oh, Gary Payton

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:26.920
<v Speaker 3>never really bothered me that much. In those NBA Finals,

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:31.399
<v Speaker 3>George Carl foolishly did not let Gary guard Michael at

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:34.479
<v Speaker 3>the beginning of the series. The Bulls promptly went up

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:38.360
<v Speaker 3>three games to nothing. Jordan did whatever he wanted. Then

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:42.199
<v Speaker 3>once they put Gary Payton on Michael game four, the

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 3>Sonics won, Game five, the Sonics won Game six, was

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 3>close until the end. The Bulls end up winning the title.

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:52.680
<v Speaker 3>In those final three games, Michael Jordan was twenty three

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 3>points per game and thirty seven percent shooting.

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 4>It is far and away.

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 3>The worst three games of any of Jordan's Finals appearances,

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:04.879
<v Speaker 3>so Gary gets credit for that. The problem is on

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 3>his playoff resume, not a lot of other.

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:09.160
<v Speaker 4>Great moments he had.

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:12.639
<v Speaker 3>In two thousand, he had won great game against Utah

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:14.440
<v Speaker 3>thirty five, ten to eleven and six.

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 4>That's, you know, the one of his few.

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 3>Thirty point career playoff games and his only career playoff

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:25.159
<v Speaker 3>triple double. He Overall, he averaged twenty two to seven

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:28.359
<v Speaker 3>during his nine year playoff prime. Again, that's good, and

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 3>he did it with great defense, but it wasn't enough

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 3>to quite break through even when he had Apex Sean

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:34.920
<v Speaker 3>kemp Now.

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:36.679
<v Speaker 4>Where I don't think he gets enough credit as this.

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 3>He was a more than a rotation player for the

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 3>Miami Heat that won the title in two thousand and

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 3>six with Dwayne Wade. During that playoff run, he was

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:48.639
<v Speaker 3>twenty four minutes per game, so he's at the end

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 3>of his now.

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 4>The numbers aren't good, but.

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 3>He was valuable enough to be on the court for

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:56.200
<v Speaker 3>half of the game in those in that playoff run,

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:59.440
<v Speaker 3>and in Game five of the six Finals, the critical

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 3>game for Miami to win their third straight to go

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 3>up three games to two, he played thirty one minutes

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 3>in that game that was a one point Miami win.

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:10.679
<v Speaker 3>So some high leverage moments in there as well. But

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:14.399
<v Speaker 3>he's not higher because there's not a lot of great

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:18.199
<v Speaker 3>iconic playoff moments we can point to. Let's go to

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:21.440
<v Speaker 3>one of our callers on a Gary Payton question.

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 9>I'm Martin Weis. I'm about to tell you why Gary

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:27.640
<v Speaker 9>Payton is a no doubt top twenty player of all time.

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:30.119
<v Speaker 9>First of all, one of the two to three best

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:32.640
<v Speaker 9>two way point guards in the game, thirty fifth all

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:35.359
<v Speaker 9>time and points tenth all time and assists that wasn't

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:38.959
<v Speaker 9>even his specialty. Nine defensive teams in a row. I mean,

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 9>come on, one, seventeen year career, Hall of Famer, top

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 9>seventy five player and the best NBA trash talker in

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:49.160
<v Speaker 9>the history of the game, Top twenty without a doubt.

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:50.679
<v Speaker 9>Talk to me, Nick, am I tripping?

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 6>Or no?

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 4>All right, Martin, you're my guy. That's Martin Weiss. Great

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 4>job by him, Yeah you're tripping.

0:19:57.480 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 3>There is no argument that can be made that he's

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 3>one of the twenty the greatest players the last fifty years.

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 3>This is not too many other point guards. So like

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 3>forget Magic and step and Isaiah, But there isn't a

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 3>compelling argument that Harry Payton's had a better career than

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 3>Chris Paul. Just doesn't exist. Chris Paul is also the

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 3>best player on a team that lost in the finals.

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 3>His other accolades far out strip Gary. There's not a

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:22.439
<v Speaker 3>compelling argument that he was a better player overall than

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 3>John Stockton or even Jason Kidd. Both those guys went

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 3>to two finals, so stock him the second best player.

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 3>Kid was the best. So now we've got what seven

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:32.640
<v Speaker 3>point guards at a minimum ahead of him, So there's

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 3>seven point If there's seven guys in your own position,

0:20:34.640 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 3>had to you, you can't be top twenty all time.

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 4>But I do appreciate that young Martin is.

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 3>Respecting his elders and respecting what a great defensive player

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:44.359
<v Speaker 3>Gary Payton was, and maybe I should give him a

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:47.199
<v Speaker 3>few more bonus points for trash talk. Number forty is

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:49.880
<v Speaker 3>a guy not known for his trash talk, instead known

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 3>for his beautiful floppy hair. And that is our first

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 3>Canadian on the list, maybe our only Canadian on the list.

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 4>One Steve Nash.

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 9>Number forty, Steve Nash.

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 3>So you guys know this already, back to back MVP.

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 3>What you might not know is this, after he went,

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:10.879
<v Speaker 3>he won the MVP. The next year, he wanted it

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 3>again the very next year, Dirk's year, he came in second.

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:17.680
<v Speaker 3>He almost won three straight MVPs. He is a four

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 3>time fifty forty ninety guy. He won five assists titles

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:26.479
<v Speaker 3>and all NBA teams three times first team the three

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 3>years I just mentioned, two times second team, two time

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:33.440
<v Speaker 3>third team, so seven total all NBA teams and his

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 3>apex with the suns, I mean, they were the seven

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 3>second or less suns were a real thing. And the

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:42.640
<v Speaker 3>way if if he probably would.

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:44.880
<v Speaker 4>Have shot more, if he would have shot more threes.

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 3>If they would have had the data that we have now,

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 3>maybe they do breakthrough and they did have some bad luck. Demonse,

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:52.679
<v Speaker 3>you're too young to remember this, but Joe Johnson was

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 3>a key player for them. Breaks his face during one

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 3>playoff run, the notoriously cheap Robert Sarver.

0:21:58.080 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 4>Won't pay him and then he ends up going to Atlanta.

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 3>Another one, Amari Stodemeyer gets suspended after Steve Nash gets

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:07.679
<v Speaker 3>body checked by Robert Rory, so he gets suspended for

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 3>a critical game against the Spurs.

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 4>They lose.

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 3>So he had his opportunities sometimes they were you know,

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 3>you feel like there's some big what ifs. With that said,

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:18.639
<v Speaker 3>it's not like he didn't have great playoff moments. Despite that,

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:21.200
<v Speaker 3>he was the best player on a team that made

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 3>three conference finals, and people should go back and think

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 3>about when.

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 4>He truly broke through the year. He one league MVP.

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 3>They are playing Dirk, his old team, his old teammate Dallas,

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:36.359
<v Speaker 3>the team that wouldn't pay him in the West in

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 3>the Western Conference semis games four, five, and six. To

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 3>move on, here's what Steve Nash did to get to

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 3>his first career conference finals.

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 4>To beat his old team, to beat Dirk Game four,

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:52.399
<v Speaker 4>forty eight, five and five. But they lost.

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 3>So now it's two to two Game five, thirty four,

0:22:56.640 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 3>thirteen and twelve. They win and move and get to

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 3>a game six, game six, thirty nine, nine and twelve

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:07.120
<v Speaker 3>to get to his first career Western Armends finals.

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 4>All right, so then think about what he did the

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:15.119
<v Speaker 4>following year. Down three to one to Kobe and the Lakers.

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 3>Now wasn't great Lakers team, but down three to one

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 3>in the first round, how do you do?

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 4>Well?

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 3>He goes thirty two and thirteen in Los Angeles in

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:25.879
<v Speaker 3>Game six and then beats Kobe in a Game seven,

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:27.920
<v Speaker 3>the famous game where Kobe refused to shoot in the

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 3>second half. So a three to one comeback against Kobe

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:32.920
<v Speaker 3>when he's the best guy that's got a matter from

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 3>during his three years of when he won league MVPs

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 3>and almost one a third in the playoffs in the

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:43.439
<v Speaker 3>playoffs twenty one and eleven on fifty to forty ninety

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 3>in the playoffs over that three year stretch, and then

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 3>the brief Steve Nash kind of renaissance when it looked

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 3>like the Sun's run was over. They make another Western

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 3>Armends Finals in twenty ten, and in Western Arms Finals

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:01.679
<v Speaker 3>Game five, it's two to two against the Lakers, the

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:05.439
<v Speaker 3>defending champion Lakers. Is a chance to break through and

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 3>get your first NBA Finals. He has twenty nine and

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:12.159
<v Speaker 3>eleven and that's the game the Suns had won, and

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 3>then metalworld Piece tips it in and the Lakers go

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 3>up three to two, and once again there's a big

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 3>what if with Nash. So his apex didn't last quite

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 3>as long as some other guys because he got started slow,

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:27.640
<v Speaker 3>because he wasn't really the centerpiece of a guy until

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 3>he'd been in the league damn near a decade. But

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 3>once he was the centerpiece of a team, they damn

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 3>near reinvented basketball. He's the fortieth best player despite his

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 3>defensive limitations of the last fifty years.

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 4>Let's get to our Steve Nash caller.

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 10>Question for you, Nick, do you think that nash is

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 10>back to back MVPs have actually hurt his legacy That

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 10>so many people make a point of proving that he

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 10>didn't deserve back to back MVPs. The pendulum has actually

0:24:56.240 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 10>swung too far, and if he just had the one MVP,

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 10>it'd be like, yeah, you know what, he deserved that MVP,

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 10>But the fact that he got back to back people

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 10>want to knock him down. Maybe having one would have

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:09.679
<v Speaker 10>been better than having too.

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 1>What do you think?

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:11.359
<v Speaker 4>So?

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:14.399
<v Speaker 3>I think it's an interesting point by Wilds, my buddy,

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:18.639
<v Speaker 3>that does the back to back MVPs thing almost get

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:21.400
<v Speaker 3>used as a cudgel against Nash because we look back

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 3>on it, we're like, oh my god, he shouldn't have

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 3>been back to back MVP. To a degree, I agree

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:29.239
<v Speaker 3>with him that it maybe gets used against him in

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:32.119
<v Speaker 3>some barroom arguments, but I.

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:33.359
<v Speaker 4>Don't think it's for me.

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:35.639
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't get used against him when people who know

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 3>what they're talking about stack him up against the other

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 3>all timers, because just like with Shaq, you don't hold

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 3>against him the only one one. He probably should have three.

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't really I don't add a ton to nash

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 3>his case because he has that second MVP. It's more,

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 3>there was this brief three year stretch of time where

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:57.200
<v Speaker 3>he was one of the five best players in the league,

0:25:57.640 --> 0:26:01.439
<v Speaker 3>and that is immensely valuable. He's as similar as the

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 3>situation that Dwight had. There's a stretch of time we

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 3>are consensus one of the five best guys. The fact

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 3>that he won a couple MVPs doesn't help him as

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 3>much as some might think it should, but it certainly

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:14.919
<v Speaker 3>doesn't hurt him in my eyes. Now, had he won

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:17.400
<v Speaker 3>a third straight, which he almost did, and the list

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 3>of guys with three straight MVPs are Bill Russell, Wilt Chamberlain,

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:24.879
<v Speaker 3>Larry Bird, and Steve Nash, that wouldn't have been great.

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 3>That might have got him kicked off the list on principle,

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 3>but they didn't.

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 4>Dirk ended up winning it. Okay, there it is. We

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:37.919
<v Speaker 4>are through players fifty through forty.

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:41.399
<v Speaker 3>Next week we start with player thirty nine and listen,

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:43.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm not so to spoil the list, but nothing will

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:46.159
<v Speaker 3>get people to tune in like a promise of the

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 3>ratings bonanza that is next week's episode. Bob McAdoo prominently

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:52.399
<v Speaker 3>featured to see that