WEBVTT - Hero Dog Unites America 

0:00:00.960 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>You are entering the freedom hunt. America falls in love

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 1>with a military super dog. A new witness emerges in

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the whole Ukraine gate fiasco. What happened to the whistleblower?

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 1>By the way Trump and maximum immunity claims, Sean Spicer

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>gets voted through California fires and utility company nonsense, China

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>has smart toilets, and Trump Turnbury not really a thing.

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>We got that and much more coming up on The

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Buck Sexton Show. This is the Buck Sexton Show, where

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the mission or mission is to decode what really matters

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake America, You're a great

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>American Again The Buck Sexton Show begins. Analysts, remember no,

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bucks. Back to the show, everybody, thank

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>you so much for being here. We have some things

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:11.040
<v Speaker 1>to get to today, although I do I promise that

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>we're going to probably jump around more than usual because

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>there's not that one dominating news story that Everburn's also

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:18.679
<v Speaker 1>focused on. I did want to take a moment just

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>to say that the Internet was a flame alight. The

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Internet was on fire with all these photos of now

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>they said they I've seen the name. I don't want

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 1>to say the name because people are saying the name

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>might not be officially the name, and but a dog

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that is credited with helping to chase down Abu Baker

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 1>al Baghdaddy has taken the hearts, has won the hearts

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>of the American people. There's a photo of that K nine,

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 1>that K nine hero that's making the rounds all over

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the place, and it's one of these moments where I

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>have to say, the American people love dogs so much,

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and I'm one of the American people who loves dogs

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 1>so much that I'm not sure that it's rational. But

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm also sure that I don't care. Dogs are a gift.

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 1>They're fantastic. Reminds me I probably need to get one,

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>even though as a guy who lives solo, it's not

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:17.639
<v Speaker 1>that easy to take care of them. I also believe

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>that it's likely that there will be a surge in

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>ownership of Belgian Malinois and Dutch shepherds. Those are the

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:33.800
<v Speaker 1>two dogs that I think these days are most often

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>now I'm not a canine handler, so any of you

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>listening who know more about this, by all means let

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:39.359
<v Speaker 1>me know. But I've met plenty of people in the

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 1>special operations community out in the field. Who those tend

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 1>to be the dog breeds that they have. There's also

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 1>German shepherds, obviously, but a lot of Belgian Malonois, a

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:52.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of Dutch shepherds, And I mean those things when

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>you see them and they're well trained, they're like fur

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 1>rockets with teeth, and they're incredibly good at what they do,

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>tracking down bad guys, getting into tight space, is moving

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 1>very quickly through buildings, tackling and grabbing the bad guys,

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>even when they're armed. I think there's gonna be a

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:13.639
<v Speaker 1>spike in ownership of those dogs. I'm a little concerned

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that people at somebody who spent way too much of

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>his childhood reading through the American Kennel Club book and

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>learning all the different dog breeds and reading about their temperaments.

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>If you get a bells in Malanma, you better know

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 1>what you're doing with a dog because they require a

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>firm hand, a master who establishes himself or herself as

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the alpha, and they are working dogs. I'm I'm just

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 1>putting that X. I feel like people out I'm like, oh,

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>look at this dog. They're amazing. There there can be

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>fantastic animals, no question about it. But you're not getting

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>a pug, you know, where the pug gets a little

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>out a lot and you're like, oh, little simy pug,

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Like this is a This is an animal that has

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>a purpose, is bred for a purpose, and that purpose

0:03:56.840 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>is to work to assist military law enforcement, to track

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and to hunt down perpetrators. So there was a little

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>bit more fall it also yesterday from the media efforts

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to take away from what is clearly a big Trump

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>national security victory. I know we spent a lot of

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:17.360
<v Speaker 1>times yesterday, so I won't get into it for very long.

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>But one of my favorites was when there was this

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:26.480
<v Speaker 1>concern over why would President Trump not inform like Nancy

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi or Adam Schiff about the raid before it happened?

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 1>And the truth is why, really, I'd put it in

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the other direction. Why would he? I know people would

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>say that it's custom, but they keep saying the president's

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 1>a trader, So I think there's a degree of ill

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>will there that we'd have to recognize on both sides.

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>But here's his answer. I mean, President Trump never want

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>to back away from the media trying to corner him.

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Here's his answer to why they didn't tell Democrat leadership

0:04:55.800 --> 0:05:01.840
<v Speaker 1>about the effort to the successful, hugely important raid against

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Abu Baker al Baghdatti playclip too please. Well, I guess

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:08.279
<v Speaker 1>the only thing is they were talking about why didn't

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I give the information to Adam Schiff and his committee?

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:14.159
<v Speaker 1>And the answerance because I think Adam Schiff is the

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:17.280
<v Speaker 1>biggest leaker in Washington. You know that, I know that

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:20.160
<v Speaker 1>we all know that. I do think a lot of

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>people would agree that Adam Schiff is a huge leaker

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and a very dishonest and dishonorable guy. And of course

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the media went apoplectic over this thing. They were still

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 1>so very very upset. How dare the president, the commander

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>in chief make this decision without getting the thumbs up

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>from not that she had to give a thumbs up,

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:48.159
<v Speaker 1>but but informing Nancy Pelosi beforehand. And then there was

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the continued shock that I think that some of the

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:53.600
<v Speaker 1>country had a lot of us expect nothing more than

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:55.160
<v Speaker 1>this from the Washington Post, but there was a degree

0:05:55.200 --> 0:06:04.119
<v Speaker 1>of shock from some quarters over Wapouan Post saying that well,

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:10.159
<v Speaker 1>the whole Austere scholar obituary for Abu Baker all back Daddy,

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>he was an Austere scholar, they claimed in the headline.

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 1>It turns out his chief propaganda guy for the Islamic

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:20.600
<v Speaker 1>State was also taken out. So clearly the Special Operations

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 1>community has a problem with Austere scholars. Our guys and

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:29.279
<v Speaker 1>jaysok are our seals and Delta and rangers. They really

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:33.239
<v Speaker 1>don't like Austere scholars in Syria. That's what we've found

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 1>out in the last few days. But Kelly on Conway,

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 1>who I think would accurately describe as fierce, she's fierce

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>when she wants to be. She pointed out that would

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:51.280
<v Speaker 1>WAPPO make such an error if it were about I mean,

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I said this too, and this is the obvious way

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>to illustrate the point. But it was funny to hear

0:06:55.760 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 1>a senior White House advisor get into it as well,

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 1>that if somebody from the White House haven't forbid passed

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>away from natural causes, would the obituary in the Washington

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Post make any effort whatsoever to be fair, to be favorable,

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>even to be respectful. No, of course, not play us seventeen.

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I just want to say this last thing on behalf

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>of the president in the White House. This obituary was

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>a disgrace. And I would ask the Washington Post close

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>your eyes and pretend that al bag Daddy worked in

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the Trump White House and then go rewrite true obituary.

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I bet you wouldn't be as kind. Wow, al bag

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 1>daddy worked in the White House. That would be a

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 1>bigger a bigger problem for the bigger issue. Perhaps a

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>bit of exaggeration, but it feels like not nearly enough.

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>And now we move on today because they lost the

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>battle to make this a problem about Trump's Oh no,

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>there's one more thing where we keep hearing about how

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>well he almost jeopardized the mission his pullout decision from Syria.

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>We keep hearing that that Trump was was so reckless

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>that this could have gone very bad, all because of Trump,

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>even though I thought, isn't he the commander chief doesn't

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 1>even get credit if the economy is terrible, doesn't they

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 1>get the president and get credit for it or blame

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 1>for it? And the same thing if it goes really

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 1>well in a way that's not really directly linked to

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 1>any one particular person. The answers, of course, we know

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>this is the case. Presidents get more credit and more

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 1>blamed than they are due. That's just the way. Things

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>are true of generals of armies too, by the way,

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 1>more credit than they deserve, more blame than they deserve,

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>depending on the circumstances. But in this issue, on this issue,

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>there are so many people in the media who have

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>really no understanding whatsoever of the military that or how

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the military operates or functions. What will the military is

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 1>capable of that this this line I was seeing even

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 1>from some conservatives of oh, we would never be able

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to do the strike we did if Trump had had

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 1>his way. Well, here's what. First of all, Trump did

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>get his way, and that's where the strike happened. But

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:12.959
<v Speaker 1>here's General Mark Milly responding about the operational capabilities of

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the United States military to pull off something like the

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Abu Baker Bagh Daddy ray play sixteen. Can you explain

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 1>how difficult this operation would have been if you didn't

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>have troops or bass on the ground in Syria and

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>in Iraq. Well, we do have video photos. Who are

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 1>not prepared at this time to release those. They're going

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>through a declassification process. I think what you'll see here

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>in the coming days is we'll set up some operational

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 1>and taxi level preefings by Central command, and you'll be

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 1>provided some video and photos, etc. Of that been to

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:50.079
<v Speaker 1>carry out this operation if he didn't have troops on

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the ground. From an operational standpoint, the United States military

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>can strike any target anywhere, anytime. I want to put

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>that at the top of the show, just as a reminder, like,

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 1>just have that as part of our opening. General Milliye

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 1>is saying, from an operational standpoint, we can hit anyone anywhere, anytime. Yeah, America.

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 1>So that was a good answer to the question, I think,

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:16.079
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully we'll silence a little bit of the bad

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 1>faith criticism that's out there. Oh, speaking of bad faith criticism,

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Schumer noted counter terrorism expert also wanted to job,

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:31.439
<v Speaker 1>we're going to get to this Ukraine testimony and more

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 1>people opining over what a transcript means that we've already

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 1>seen and discussed at nauseum what the transcript says. But

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 1>oh gosh, well someone else's opinion on this, Like we're

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 1>really supposed to care. But here's what Chuck Schumer noted,

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 1>counterterrorism expert, have you on the sarcasm there thinks about

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the defeat of ISIS play fourteen? Please, we still need

0:10:56.600 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>a plan for the enduring defeat of isis not gone.

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>We must include details on how we will deal with

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 1>escape prisoners. Nobody knows. These are evil people that want

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>to hurt us, and they can escape from the prisons,

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and Lord knows where they'll go, but we know a

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:18.680
<v Speaker 1>good chunk of them will want to do damage to

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>our homeland. So far, the administration unfortunately has articulated no

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:31.680
<v Speaker 1>coherent plan. Its top official, Secretary Pompeio, Secretary Espert, unable

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to find time to even brief Congress. You all likely

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:37.960
<v Speaker 1>could because they have nothing real to say, no plan.

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:44.199
<v Speaker 1>What was the coherent plan, Chuck Schumer? When President Obama

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:47.959
<v Speaker 1>was running things and about a half a million people

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>died in Syria, a massive terrorist group took over hundreds

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and hundreds of miles of territory and was enslaving, mutilating,

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:04.439
<v Speaker 1>and murdering at ill and engaging in external plotting, inspiring

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>attacks against European allies and against the American homeland. What

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 1>was the Obaba administration coherent plan? Oh? I remember, don't

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>do stupid stuff, and we're supposed to think that was smart.

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:21.680
<v Speaker 1>That was a brilliant strategic slogan, don't do stupid and

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>they didn't say stuff. By the way, it's almost like

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>everything now is just turned partisan for the Democrats, and

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:31.959
<v Speaker 1>so nothing else really matters. You do start to get

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>that sense, don't you, Speaking of which the impeachment proceedings,

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and yet another person coming forward to tell us what

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 1>we've already the facts that we already know, but to

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>give another spin on it. Oh, there's a bit of

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 1>a trouble bubbling up over this one. Who exactly is

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>this official? Former National Security Aid Army Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman.

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 1>We will get into what he says about how old

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 1>now the walls are closing in on Trump. Now Trump

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:08.679
<v Speaker 1>has gone too far. Now it's all, oh, no, no,

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 1>none of that is true. None of that is true.

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 1>But they never grow tired of this. The inmates and

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic Party took over the asylum a long time ago.

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>They do the same thing and expect the different result

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and don't think that it's crazy. And so here we

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 1>are talking more about this phone call with President Trump

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>and the leader of Ukraine. We will get into this

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 1>in a second. The New York Times headline is supposed

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 1>to send shivers down the spines of people throughout the

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:43.719
<v Speaker 1>Trump's supporting world official who heard Trump's Ukraine call reported

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 1>his concerns. This is Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vinmann, And now

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:51.959
<v Speaker 1>is where we have to start this by saying, yes,

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 1>he served honorably, Yes he's a Purple Heart recipient, and

0:13:55.440 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 1>we thank him for his military service. That does not

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 1>mean and the media knows this, but this is a

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 1>very dishonest game they like to play that his opinion

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>about what is a clearly political matter holds any more

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 1>weight than yours, or mind or anybody else's. That he

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 1>has expertise in Ukraine policy does not matter. This is

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>a question of whether or not the President of the

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 1>United States did anything illegal in his phone call, and

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the answer is most decidedly no. And then beyond that,

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>to the president of the United States do anything that

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>was unbecoming of the commander in chief? And the answer

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>to that is the voters decide. I don't care what

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Lieutenant Colonel Vinman thinks about the phone call. It does

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 1>not sway me one bit. But it is supposed to.

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 1>He quote plans to tell about the way I read

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>his testimony this morning. I keep wondering this testimony gets

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 1>leaked out from all these people that are speaking behind

0:14:56.680 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>closed doors, almost like this has all been orchestrated by

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Democrat and this is a sham and a scam. In fact,

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I believe this morning I saw Congressman Mark Meadows sharing

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter that this may be moved from the Judiciary

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Committee to the Intel Committee. It's ano they're going to

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 1>shift committees, I mean the shifty shift. They're just going

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to play as many games as they can to control

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the process. And in fact, one reason why they haven't

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>established a vote on the impeachment process. Yesterday they were

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 1>saying Nancy Pelosi was about to do it. Today they're saying,

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 1>oh no, Pelosi says there is no impeachment process vote

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna happen. I mean is that they're not really

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>sure because it has none of this has anything to

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 1>do with what is fair or ethical or decent. This

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>is all about what maximizes political benefit for Democrats and

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>helps them the most in twenty twenty against Donald Trump.

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Everything else is not a secondary, a non consideration. They

0:15:55.480 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>simply and truly do not care. And so now we

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 1>have the details of this, and much has been made

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 1>of VINMN, according to the New York Times, trying to

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>give advice to the Ukrainians about how to deal with

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the United States government, and people have looked at this

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 1>and said, what the heck is that all about. You

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 1>should never be helping a foreign government figure out what

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 1>America is trying to do, especially if you're a senior

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>American government official. But this is now a repetition of

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 1>what we've already been told, which is that people don't

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>like Trump's Ukraine. People that had set up a Ukraine

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 1>policy on the previous administration, and those who have been

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>working for the National Security apparatus for many years on

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 1>this issue didn't like some of the most President Trump

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 1>was it was making. It's from the New York Times.

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Quoteman will testify that he watched with alarm as outside

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>influencers began pushing a false narrative about Ukraine that was

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>countered to the consensus view of American national security officials

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and harmful to United States interests. End quote, guess what,

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Lieutenant COLONL. Vineman, I don't care that you think that

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>that's like your opinion, man, doesn't matter. You're allowed to

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>share it, sure, but this is not a high crime

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>or misdemeanor issue. This is a you don't like what

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the president was doing issue, and Democrats have so conflated

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>these two things that they really believe if they're very upset,

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if they're like really really really upset about something,

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 1>then it doesn't really matter if it's not actually a crime,

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 1>because they're angry enough about it that it should be

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:55.159
<v Speaker 1>a crime. And I think that's, in summary form, what

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 1>this whole impeachment thing is all about. They hate Trump

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:01.879
<v Speaker 1>so much that their hatred self must be evidence of

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the high crimes and misdemeanors constitutionally mandated. But it's not.

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to the Buck Sexton Show team. So continuing

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 1>on with this theme of the latest, oh my gosh,

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 1>this new addition to the whistle blower. Wait, whatever happened

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to the whistle blower? Why is it that the whistle

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>blower is not going to testify now? Just the written

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 1>statement No, no testimony from the whistle blower. Huh, Because

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I remember in the early days of this when it

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 1>was all about truth and justice in the American way

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 1>according to Congressman Shift, I remember that it was of

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 1>course necessary for the whistleblower to testify. But then they

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:43.399
<v Speaker 1>figured out the whistle Blower had coordinated with Adam Shift

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>before the complaint was made public, and that sort of

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 1>look kind of bad, almost like this was motivated by

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 1>partisanship and has nothing to do with actual crimes or

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>misdemeanors as reference in the constant, or high crimes and

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 1>misdemeaners as reference the Constitution, or just i'm crimes, which

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:04.680
<v Speaker 1>was initially alleged as well. Remember that I haven't forgotten.

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>This is the game they like to play. Oh, they

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 1>throw out some criminal charge, and everybody who knows anything

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:12.639
<v Speaker 1>about the law or can just read a legal text goes,

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 1>that's not true. That's not a criminal. You can't charge

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the president with a campaign finance violation because he was

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 1>using the pressure of his office to get an outcome

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:28.920
<v Speaker 1>that would benefit him politically. Because any president who uses

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the pressure of his office with a foreign counterpart would

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 1>be getting on a major policy, you should be getting

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>some kind of benefit politically. Doing anything smart for the

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:42.679
<v Speaker 1>president should not be illegal, which is effectively what that

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 1>interpretation of the law would mean. Up, the president just

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>signed this treaty going to help him at re election time,

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 1>clearly getting a foreign benefit from that counterpart or a

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 1>benefit from that foreign counterpart. This is absurd. That was

0:19:56.520 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the legal theory. Notice that you see this recurring in

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:03.680
<v Speaker 1>mal luments, stretching that beyond comprehension. Oh, diplomats have bought

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 1>cheeseburgers a Trump hotel. They must own Trump's foreign policy.

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 1>This is absurd. But this is really the case. They

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:14.920
<v Speaker 1>make the usage of the Logan Act, the Logan Act

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:20.680
<v Speaker 1>in order to have that interview with General Flynn entrapman

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>interview with the FBI. No one thought seriously they were

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:25.920
<v Speaker 1>going to bring a Logan Act charge. But see they

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 1>use the pretense of a legal concern in order to

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 1>bring in the apparatus of the state, and then poke

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:38.160
<v Speaker 1>around and the process becomes the punishment. Democrats excel at

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:39.919
<v Speaker 1>this and they hate that it would be used in

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the other direction. Oh no, you're not allowed to investigate.

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Even if there's a legitimate pretext for the investigation, or

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 1>rather a legitimate basis for the investigation, You're not allowed

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>to do that. We have more here. This is all

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:59.880
<v Speaker 1>about Colonel Vinman's policy concerns. Again, I simply do not

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>care what his policy concerns are. I don't even find

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 1>them particularly interesting. He wants to do things one way.

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Trump wants to do things another way. Trump's the commander

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>in chief. The NSC staff is not there to subvert

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the will or the policy directives of the President of

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the United States. I know they think they are. I

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>know the State Department thinks they are. I know all

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>these people that sit in boring Beijewald government offices all

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 1>across the DC metropolitan area believe that they are supposed

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>to thwart the will of the president because they know better.

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:38.719
<v Speaker 1>But that's not true. That's not how our system works.

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 1>That is not why they are sitting in those chairs.

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 1>And yet here we are New York Times continues. Colonel

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:48.439
<v Speaker 1>Vineman was concerned, oh no, after he learned that the

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:51.479
<v Speaker 1>White House Budget Office had taken the unusual step of

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 1>withholding the three ninety one million dollars package of security

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:59.160
<v Speaker 1>systons for Ukraine that have been approved by Congress. They

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 1>got the money, folks, nothing happened. They keep on saying this, like,

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>oh my gosh, Ukraine, they were left on the front

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 1>lines without any without any bullets, without these security assistance

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:16.119
<v Speaker 1>went through. And the Ukrainians during this whole ruckus that

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:19.119
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about here, didn't even know that there was

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:22.360
<v Speaker 1>a hold a review placed on that security assistance. So

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:25.639
<v Speaker 1>how could you have been using the security aid to

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>force them to do something that would be illicit? And

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even agreeing that it is a listit necessarily

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a legitimate basis to investigate what the

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Bidens were doing in Ukraine. I'm sorry, I know that

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>makes me a crazy person, even on the right. For

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:42.879
<v Speaker 1>some people these days, I don't care. You know, is

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 1>this a little bit like cancel culture? Some conservatives have

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:49.160
<v Speaker 1>figured out that the only way to begin to bring

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:51.679
<v Speaker 1>things back to normalcies to say you're going to cancel.

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:54.679
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna cancel, You're gonna have these crazy rules. You

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>have to live by these crazy rules. And if investigations

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that are at least able to appear legitimate are going

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:07.479
<v Speaker 1>to be a tool that Democrats throw at Republicans all

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the time. If Republicans have an even more legitimate basis

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>for an investigation that just happens to negatively affects some

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:19.119
<v Speaker 1>Democrat politicians, guess what too bad? Or we can just

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:21.199
<v Speaker 1>allow one side to weaponize the law and have no

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:25.119
<v Speaker 1>response to it whatsoever, which has been the reality. I mean,

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:28.399
<v Speaker 1>we can go back to the Romney school of fighting

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:32.400
<v Speaker 1>against the left. Just keep getting smacked around and say, well,

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:36.120
<v Speaker 1>but I'm really ethical when I'm getting slapped around, I'm

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>really a nice person while they are running roughshot over

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the Constitution and taking away the rights of the people

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that I said I would protect in my elected office.

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 1>But whoops, No, I don't want to be mean. Quote.

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:54.199
<v Speaker 1>At least one previous witnesses testified that mister Trump directed

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the aid be frozen until he could secure a commitment

0:23:56.440 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 1>from Zelenski to announce an investigation of the bidens. While

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:03.399
<v Speaker 1>Colonel Vineman's concerns were shared by a number of other officials,

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:04.919
<v Speaker 1>some of whom have already testified. He was in a

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:09.159
<v Speaker 1>unique position because he emigrated from Ukraine along with his

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>family when he was a child. He's fluent in Ukrainian

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and Russian. Ukrainian officials sought advice from him about how

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:24.359
<v Speaker 1>to deal with mister Giuliani, though they typically communicated in English.

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Giuliani's an American working at the behests of the president.

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:30.719
<v Speaker 1>I know that Libs and Democrats hate this, don't like this,

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 1>reject this doesn't change anything. Julian is an American and

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:40.639
<v Speaker 1>he's the president's personal lawyer. He is working on a

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:44.400
<v Speaker 1>directive from the President of the United States, and we're

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>at the direction of the President of the United States,

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:52.919
<v Speaker 1>and this guy is helping the Ukrainians to deal with him. Now,

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:55.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm not throwing around people have been talking about about

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>dual loyalty because I don't care where a person grew

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 1>up or where they're from. That that is irrelevant to me.

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Why would you be assisting a foreign counterpart in a

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 1>process of handling and negotiating with an American interlocutor who

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 1>was working for the President of the United States. Well,

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:18.720
<v Speaker 1>what kind of authority does want to have to do that?

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 1>And why would one do that? I think we all know.

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:24.960
<v Speaker 1>And this is why when they say it's unfair to

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:28.360
<v Speaker 1>call this person a never trumper, he has a policy

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 1>dispute with the President of United States. He was very,

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>very worried about the directive to start an investigation of Biden. Oh,

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:36.639
<v Speaker 1>can we just keep two things in mind here as

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 1>we continue to get hammered with this This really just

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 1>an endless propaganda narrative. The AID was not cut off.

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 1>The investigation of Biden didn't as far as we know,

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:51.119
<v Speaker 1>did not even happen, did not even start. So what

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 1>are we also worked up about here? Again? You know,

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 1>this reminds me of how people say, oh, Trump obstructed

0:25:56.840 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the Russia collusion investigation, except he could have shut it

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 1>down any day he wanted to. So he didn't shut it.

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>He didn't obstruct it. Oh, but he wanted he said

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:11.399
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to obstruct it. This is pathetic, and we

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 1>keep running back to this over and over again. We're

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:17.159
<v Speaker 1>going to punish the president of the United States for

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 1>thought crime against liberal pieties. I don't think so. Look,

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:26.639
<v Speaker 1>this is not going to change anything. This is not

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 1>going to shift any public support I think for or

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>against the president. I believe that there's there are two

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>forces that are pushing the Democrats into this, or that

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:40.400
<v Speaker 1>make the Democrats think that they have to do this.

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 1>One of them is that their base is insane, has

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:46.360
<v Speaker 1>really lost its mind. I mean, the left wing base

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:51.399
<v Speaker 1>is completely crazy and they demand this. So there are

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:55.159
<v Speaker 1>some Democrats in Congress are saying, look, we got we

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 1>got to help out those in crazy town here who

0:26:57.320 --> 0:26:58.920
<v Speaker 1>need to see some action or else they're going to

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:02.479
<v Speaker 1>flip out it. So that's one part of it. So

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:06.680
<v Speaker 1>they're just playcating the craziest elements the Occasio Cortes wing

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 1>of the Democratic Party. That's one aspect, and the other

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:12.199
<v Speaker 1>is I do think there are some Democrats who in

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Congress who have convinced themselves that Trump is such an

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 1>existential threat to the United States. Whatever they think that

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:21.399
<v Speaker 1>even means, I don't even know how they could. But

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the nuclear war that he hasn't started, he hasn't started

0:27:24.280 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 1>any war unlike his predecessors. What exactly is this grand

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:34.200
<v Speaker 1>threat that Trump poses to the Republic saying mean things

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:40.119
<v Speaker 1>to smug, overpaid, whiney journalists for the media establishment. That's

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:42.439
<v Speaker 1>a massive threat to this country. I don't think so.

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, I don't see it that way. But I

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>do believe there are members of Congress who think that

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:52.720
<v Speaker 1>anything that they have to do to harm this president's

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 1>reelection prospects is justified, and even if that means manipulating

0:27:57.800 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 1>this impeachment process so that it makes a mockery of

0:28:01.560 --> 0:28:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the House of Representatives, which I already think they've already managed.

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:11.200
<v Speaker 1>That they have dramatically undermined any public confidence that Congress

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:14.399
<v Speaker 1>is a place where serious people gather to do serious things.

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:18.439
<v Speaker 1>It's impeachment so far as a sham, it's a clown show.

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:23.440
<v Speaker 1>It's ridiculous, And yet here we are, Here we are,

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:26.159
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna just push on. It looks now like they

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:29.439
<v Speaker 1>won't get the consensus opinion, which who knows what that

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:33.200
<v Speaker 1>even is. But the media and the Democrats are all

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:35.439
<v Speaker 1>saying to each other that looks like this will extend

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 1>into the new year. That also, though, means that if

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the Senate gets dragged into this, then you will have

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Democrat senators who should be out there on the campaign

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>trail for the primary, you know klobaschar and Warren and

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Booker and you know good on the list, who might

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden have some duties in the Senate

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 1>having to do with an impeachment trial. Now, I don't

0:28:57.440 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 1>know if they think that that's a good trade off,

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 1>but I would guess it's so Democrats haven't even figured

0:29:02.560 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 1>out what the strategy is here yet. They just know

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>they feel like they've got something, and like a terrier

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>with a bone, they're just not going to let it go.

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 1>They're just gonna keep shaking and shaking and hope that

0:29:11.920 --> 0:29:16.480
<v Speaker 1>something happens. That's pretty much the Democrats strategy just keep shaking,

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 1>just keep doing crazy stuff, and see if they can

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 1>finally break through the great Wall of trumps Um. I

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>don't think they're going to get there, but they're going

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to keep trying, folks, because their policy proposals certainly aren't

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 1>going to get it done, and the candidates they're putting

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 1>forward aren't going to get it done. So impeachment is

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 1>their X factor. I can understand why the President doesn't

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 1>want these witnesses come forward. What I find harder to

0:29:40.720 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 1>understand is why the Republican members of this body, in

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 1>this House don't want these witnesses to come forward. Where

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 1>is their duty to this institution, Where is their duty

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 1>to the constitution? Where is their respect for the rule

0:29:57.760 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 1>of law? Where's that shift's respect for the rule of law? Well,

0:30:02.800 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 1>we know that was tossed out, tossed out the window

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 1>a long time ago. Doesn't really matter, does it. Of course,

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 1>now you're going to have a response to this democrat

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 1>weaponization of a process that no one even really knows.

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 1>They're making it up as they go along, acting like

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a legal process, mind you, when it's just clearly

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:26.400
<v Speaker 1>a political process. They can figure out whatever the whatever

0:30:26.440 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 1>they want to do on any given day and then

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 1>just institute that. But I would note that there's a

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I do have a real concern about something it comes

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 1>up as a result of this. Of course, the president

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>has no choice and would be foolish if he were

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to just go along with all this stuff. So he

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 1>has no choice but to fight against and his legal

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 1>team in the White House these efforts to going into

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 1>an election, in your mind, you try to use Congress

0:30:55.040 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 1>as some bat with which to beat down the chances

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:04.560
<v Speaker 1>of a reelection for President Trump. So they should fight

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 1>it at every stage, and they should make this as

0:31:06.520 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 1>difficult as possible because there's no good faith in the process,

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:16.640
<v Speaker 1>So that should be responded to in turn. Now there's

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 1>also the concern, though about what the president's lawyers are

0:31:21.160 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 1>asserting as a result of this. The Wall Street Journal

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 1>has a piece here, Trump Attorney, a Trump Attorney's assert

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 1>immunity from a broad sweep of laws. And when you

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 1>look over the documents and the filings that Trump's legal

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 1>team has put together in response to this concerted effort

0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 1>from Democrats to destroy his presidency, you have a lot

0:31:48.920 --> 0:31:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of a very broad swath of documents that are all

0:31:56.080 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 1>more or less saying the same thing, which is that

0:31:57.760 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Trump is quote immune to civil law suits, judicial orders,

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:09.240
<v Speaker 1>criminal investigations, or congressional probes. The journal rights here. Those

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 1>arguments have become even more aggressive as mister Trump faces

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:18.120
<v Speaker 1>numerous legal threats, including a possible impeachment in Congress, a

0:32:18.200 --> 0:32:21.080
<v Speaker 1>New York state prosecute who are prosecutor who has subpoened

0:32:21.160 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 1>his tax records as part of a criminal probe? And

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:28.640
<v Speaker 1>a welter of civil lawsuits. They are trying lawfare against

0:32:28.680 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 1>this president personally. It's not the administration. They're going after

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the President United States personally, but this in response, now,

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 1>lawyers will often take a maximalist position on behalf of

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 1>their clients. You know, if you go into a divorce proceeding,

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:48.560
<v Speaker 1>your lawyer is probably going to say, well, my client

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:51.720
<v Speaker 1>deserves full custody of the kids and all the merrill

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 1>assets and should get spousals aboard, doesn't matter what the

0:32:56.000 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 1>real and you start the negotiation from there. For obvious reasons.

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 1>In this context, when you have all these different entities

0:33:04.200 --> 0:33:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that are trying to personally legally attack the president, that says,

0:33:07.520 --> 0:33:10.240
<v Speaker 1>while he's the president, I can understand why his lawyers

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 1>are saying you don't need essentially, you don't even have

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:14.800
<v Speaker 1>standing for this, You don't even have the grounds to

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 1>bring this lawsuit against the president, that he has a

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 1>de facto immunity from all of this stuff while he's president.

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 1>That said, that then does result in some of what

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 1>we've already seen, which is people saying or lawyers on

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 1>behalf of the president making the claim that he could

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:40.720
<v Speaker 1>in fact shoot somebody on Fifth Avenue and not get prosecuted.

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:47.080
<v Speaker 1>This has now become a point of legal contention amongst

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:52.360
<v Speaker 1>some and you even had Mayor Bill de Blasio who said, no,

0:33:52.520 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 1>we would arrest him in New York City even if

0:33:55.000 --> 0:33:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and can you imagine that, by the way, what happens

0:33:57.000 --> 0:33:59.719
<v Speaker 1>What happens if I just if we're theoretically playing out

0:33:59.760 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 1>this circumstances at the President United States were to shoot somebody,

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and then the local police, which is really just an

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:08.760
<v Speaker 1>extension of state police powers, but you know, local police

0:34:08.760 --> 0:34:12.040
<v Speaker 1>here in New York wanted to make an arrest. Would

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Secret Service if the Secret Service was told the President

0:34:15.440 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 1>was under threat from local I mean, this starts to

0:34:17.200 --> 0:34:19.399
<v Speaker 1>get crazy, right, it turns into a Tom Clancy novel

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 1>or something or that scene at the end of the

0:34:22.120 --> 0:34:24.879
<v Speaker 1>movie The Siege, which I actually think is an underrated

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 1>movie for what it is, with Denzel Washington and Annette Benning,

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 1>where you have US military and FBI agents all drawing

0:34:31.920 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 1>down on each other because the rogue Bruce willis, who's

0:34:34.200 --> 0:34:38.640
<v Speaker 1>a rogue colonel I think, not a general is doing

0:34:38.680 --> 0:34:40.799
<v Speaker 1>bad stuff and the FBI wants to arrest him, and

0:34:40.800 --> 0:34:44.359
<v Speaker 1>then he tells his guys and they all they all

0:34:44.360 --> 0:34:47.359
<v Speaker 1>have that standoff at the end. But I have to say,

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:52.919
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's fascinating to see the legal back

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:56.879
<v Speaker 1>end forth here over whether or not a president can

0:34:56.880 --> 0:34:59.759
<v Speaker 1>in fact be indicted for anything. The President's position right

0:34:59.800 --> 0:35:03.319
<v Speaker 1>now is nope, he cannot. We will be made to

0:35:03.360 --> 0:35:05.800
<v Speaker 1>revisit this, my friends. This is not going to go away.

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:09.479
<v Speaker 1>He was a sick and depraved man and now he's dead.

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:20.759
<v Speaker 1>He's dead. He's dead as a doornail. There are a

0:35:20.800 --> 0:35:24.799
<v Speaker 1>lot of ways that one could describe the death of

0:35:24.880 --> 0:35:30.439
<v Speaker 1>Baghdaddy and who Abubakar al Baghdaddy was. That it really turned,

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:33.240
<v Speaker 1>It really turns into a competition to find the most

0:35:35.160 --> 0:35:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the most clear put down of who this individual was.

0:35:40.560 --> 0:35:43.279
<v Speaker 1>Language that really conveys what a disgrace and what a

0:35:43.320 --> 0:35:46.680
<v Speaker 1>dehumanizing and evil piece of You know, you want to

0:35:46.680 --> 0:35:48.200
<v Speaker 1>go to the profane. I'll just say it. You want

0:35:48.200 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 1>to start dropping curses when you're talking about a guy

0:35:50.160 --> 0:35:53.120
<v Speaker 1>like this. I get that, And that's the normal feeling

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:55.960
<v Speaker 1>that all of us would have somebody who would do this,

0:35:55.960 --> 0:35:58.359
<v Speaker 1>somebody who would keep sex slave, somebody who would murder

0:35:58.360 --> 0:36:00.400
<v Speaker 1>men and women, children, have the Mexican you to have

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:03.600
<v Speaker 1>them tortured. All these the most horrible things imaginable. And

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:05.080
<v Speaker 1>by the way back, Daddy would have done it to

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:07.560
<v Speaker 1>millions of people if he could have remembered that. You know,

0:36:07.560 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 1>albib Baker, albug Daddy, if he had a nuke to

0:36:10.120 --> 0:36:12.719
<v Speaker 1>set off a New York City, he would do it tomorrow. Well,

0:36:13.040 --> 0:36:16.840
<v Speaker 1>he won't be doing anything tomorrow except burning in hell.

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:22.279
<v Speaker 1>But there aren't. Some people who, as we've been discussing,

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:26.320
<v Speaker 1>were distracted from this obvious truth of Albibaker al Baghdaddy

0:36:27.360 --> 0:36:30.719
<v Speaker 1>because to them, the bigger concern, the bigger enemy than

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the Islamic State is clearly Donald Trump. And this is

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:35.759
<v Speaker 1>a malady that has been on the left for a

0:36:35.800 --> 0:36:38.279
<v Speaker 1>long time. Right, the bigger concern than al Qaeda was

0:36:38.320 --> 0:36:40.400
<v Speaker 1>George Bush for a lot of liberals in America for

0:36:40.440 --> 0:36:43.800
<v Speaker 1>a long time. I remember I was in the CIA

0:36:43.880 --> 0:36:46.719
<v Speaker 1>during the Bush administration, and a lot of people were

0:36:46.800 --> 0:36:49.200
<v Speaker 1>much more worried about Bush than they were about Sam.

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:51.640
<v Speaker 1>They were about the Taliban, al Qaeda, you name it.

0:36:51.920 --> 0:36:56.200
<v Speaker 1>The real enemy was Bush, or the real worry was

0:36:56.200 --> 0:36:59.879
<v Speaker 1>was Bush and his foreign policy. And this is from

0:37:00.200 --> 0:37:04.879
<v Speaker 1>me of something that we have seen from the Trump

0:37:04.920 --> 0:37:09.719
<v Speaker 1>administration that I think is very important. There are a

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:13.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of things about Trump that will last long after

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:18.600
<v Speaker 1>he's out of office, hopefully in twenty twenty four. But

0:37:18.640 --> 0:37:20.920
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorites is that he has managed to

0:37:21.000 --> 0:37:26.400
<v Speaker 1>expose the media and liberals and Democrats in a way

0:37:26.440 --> 0:37:31.400
<v Speaker 1>that nobody else had before, because they dropped the pretense

0:37:31.480 --> 0:37:34.560
<v Speaker 1>that they often hide behind. They drop from behind their

0:37:34.640 --> 0:37:38.640
<v Speaker 1>hiding places and oh, I'm just an objective journalist, or oh,

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm just a government a faithful government servant who would

0:37:42.560 --> 0:37:46.320
<v Speaker 1>never ever try to take politics into my own hands,

0:37:46.800 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 1>use the power that I'm given to execute a very

0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:52.840
<v Speaker 1>specific mission of the federal government, and do something else

0:37:52.880 --> 0:37:56.680
<v Speaker 1>with that. Oh never, good heavens. And then we had

0:37:56.760 --> 0:37:59.879
<v Speaker 1>Comy and Clapper and Brennan and you struck and pay

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:02.239
<v Speaker 1>age and you know, just go down the whole list.

0:38:02.320 --> 0:38:05.560
<v Speaker 1>N CNN just making a mockery of itself on the

0:38:05.600 --> 0:38:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Washington Post, The New York Times, fall stories, fake stories,

0:38:09.640 --> 0:38:12.200
<v Speaker 1>having a fire journalists because they write fake stuff about

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the president, burning sources to write something nasty about the president,

0:38:16.400 --> 0:38:19.600
<v Speaker 1>some minor news item somewhere. I mean, just just no integrity,

0:38:19.640 --> 0:38:22.120
<v Speaker 1>no ethics, just just throwing it all out the window

0:38:22.200 --> 0:38:28.200
<v Speaker 1>because resistance is all that matters. And that's been very illuminating,

0:38:28.280 --> 0:38:30.640
<v Speaker 1>that's been really worthwhile for us as a country. We

0:38:30.680 --> 0:38:34.000
<v Speaker 1>will not forget it. I will not forget it. I mean.

0:38:34.000 --> 0:38:39.760
<v Speaker 1>The two greatest clarifiers of media bias in the last decade,

0:38:39.760 --> 0:38:43.000
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, our Twitter, because now we have journalists

0:38:43.000 --> 0:38:44.960
<v Speaker 1>who at eight o'clock in the morning go like ha

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:47.600
<v Speaker 1>ha ha lol, Donald Trump is a moron, and then

0:38:47.640 --> 0:38:50.320
<v Speaker 1>at eight o'clock at night are on TV. Tonight Donald

0:38:50.360 --> 0:38:53.919
<v Speaker 1>Trump destroyed the Constitution. Again. I'm just an objective journalist here,

0:38:54.600 --> 0:38:58.840
<v Speaker 1>just telling you the objective truth. Don't don't pay attention

0:38:58.880 --> 0:39:02.319
<v Speaker 1>to my haha. Trump is a more on tweet. They

0:39:02.360 --> 0:39:04.680
<v Speaker 1>do this all the time. So that's one part of it,

0:39:04.719 --> 0:39:08.279
<v Speaker 1>but the others also just the Trump himself. The existence

0:39:08.320 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 1>of Trump has I think heightened that that phenomenon on

0:39:12.560 --> 0:39:15.399
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and elsewhere. They just can't help themselves. They hate

0:39:15.400 --> 0:39:19.439
<v Speaker 1>this guy so much that they make errors. They get

0:39:19.480 --> 0:39:24.000
<v Speaker 1>so angry about Trump that they're not as conniving, they're

0:39:24.040 --> 0:39:28.279
<v Speaker 1>not as tactically sound in their propaganda as they were

0:39:28.320 --> 0:39:31.480
<v Speaker 1>in the past. And I think that's been very useful.

0:39:33.120 --> 0:39:34.879
<v Speaker 1>The one part of that that I have to say

0:39:34.960 --> 0:39:37.879
<v Speaker 1>is surprising, and this is what has made me get

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:42.200
<v Speaker 1>in this frame of mind, is what he has shown

0:39:42.239 --> 0:39:45.760
<v Speaker 1>us about many conservatives too. You see in the early

0:39:45.840 --> 0:39:49.719
<v Speaker 1>days of Never Trump and there were people who were

0:39:49.760 --> 0:39:54.400
<v Speaker 1>posted Trump during the primary, and I understand why, and

0:39:54.760 --> 0:39:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I had my concerns about Trump during the primary too,

0:39:57.680 --> 0:39:59.279
<v Speaker 1>did not have any concerns. As soon as he was

0:39:59.280 --> 0:40:04.719
<v Speaker 1>the nominee. He was my guy, full stop. But there

0:40:04.760 --> 0:40:08.600
<v Speaker 1>have been there has been this movement of never Trumpers

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:12.319
<v Speaker 1>who initially for about the first two years of the

0:40:12.360 --> 0:40:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Trump presidency, we're holding themselves up as the true idealists

0:40:17.880 --> 0:40:21.480
<v Speaker 1>of the conservative movement. They were the real right wing,

0:40:22.600 --> 0:40:25.920
<v Speaker 1>true believers in a sense, because they were adhering to

0:40:25.960 --> 0:40:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the principles that everybody else had abandoned because of this

0:40:31.280 --> 0:40:35.080
<v Speaker 1>reality TV barbarian who had taken over the Republican Party.

0:40:35.120 --> 0:40:38.720
<v Speaker 1>That was the basic narrative. But what we've really seen

0:40:38.840 --> 0:40:40.799
<v Speaker 1>or that many of the not all of them, I'm

0:40:40.840 --> 0:40:42.319
<v Speaker 1>not gonna put them on it, but many of the

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:47.959
<v Speaker 1>loudest voices in that category have in fact now made

0:40:48.000 --> 0:40:54.160
<v Speaker 1>common cause with Democrats, vote for Democrats, want Democrat policies

0:40:54.200 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 1>to get through, have switched teams, are the definition politically

0:40:58.760 --> 0:41:03.440
<v Speaker 1>of a turncoat, and no longer clinging to the fiction

0:41:03.480 --> 0:41:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that they're the true conservatives. So in a sense, Trump

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:12.239
<v Speaker 1>has brought out the truth of many people who were

0:41:12.320 --> 0:41:19.800
<v Speaker 1>formerly leading voices of the conservative establishment, people like Bill Crystal,

0:41:21.000 --> 0:41:25.120
<v Speaker 1>people like Max Boots, people who I used to have

0:41:25.200 --> 0:41:27.839
<v Speaker 1>on this show sometimes as guests, some of whom I'm

0:41:27.840 --> 0:41:31.600
<v Speaker 1>still reasonably friendly with, so I will try to refrain

0:41:31.800 --> 0:41:34.920
<v Speaker 1>from bringing up their names on air just out of

0:41:34.960 --> 0:41:37.760
<v Speaker 1>personal loyalty. But I always tell you that my personal

0:41:37.800 --> 0:41:40.880
<v Speaker 1>loyalties do interfere with my analysis, as in, my friends

0:41:41.360 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 1>are off limits for my show, and that's just a

0:41:45.560 --> 0:41:48.279
<v Speaker 1>point of honor that I maintain. You can disagree with

0:41:48.320 --> 0:41:50.799
<v Speaker 1>that some people would, but that's just I'm honest with

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you about it. But an amazing example of this, a stark, wow,

0:41:58.400 --> 0:42:00.480
<v Speaker 1>punch you in the face kind of example of exactly

0:42:00.480 --> 0:42:03.799
<v Speaker 1>what I'm talking about. Max Boot who is not a

0:42:03.800 --> 0:42:10.239
<v Speaker 1>friend of mine, who wears a fedora un ironically in

0:42:10.320 --> 0:42:14.399
<v Speaker 1>his main photos on Twitter and stuff, which just it's

0:42:14.520 --> 0:42:19.200
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty stunning. And he's a surly fellow, and I

0:42:19.239 --> 0:42:23.040
<v Speaker 1>think also increasingly an emotionally unwell fellow. But I can't

0:42:23.080 --> 0:42:26.400
<v Speaker 1>prove that. I'm just basically on my limited dealings with

0:42:26.480 --> 0:42:28.879
<v Speaker 1>him and what I see on TV. But he wrote

0:42:28.880 --> 0:42:31.160
<v Speaker 1>a column of The Washington Post, which also has just

0:42:31.239 --> 0:42:33.520
<v Speaker 1>made a complete fool of itself in this bag Daddy

0:42:33.560 --> 0:42:38.400
<v Speaker 1>process in which he wrote this is in a column quote.

0:42:38.400 --> 0:42:42.400
<v Speaker 1>The assertion that Bagdaddy died as a coward was in

0:42:42.480 --> 0:42:47.080
<v Speaker 1>any case contradicted by the fact that, rather than be captured,

0:42:47.120 --> 0:42:53.320
<v Speaker 1>he blew himself up end quote. So in a column

0:42:53.600 --> 0:42:57.800
<v Speaker 1>in the second large or third largest newspaper in the country.

0:42:57.840 --> 0:42:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the Washington Post is the third largest, deal

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, it's close to it, probably the second

0:43:02.719 --> 0:43:05.640
<v Speaker 1>most esteemed liberal newspaper after the New York Times. But

0:43:05.719 --> 0:43:07.080
<v Speaker 1>in a column that he had to know was going

0:43:07.120 --> 0:43:11.160
<v Speaker 1>to be read by a fair amount of people. Max Boot,

0:43:11.239 --> 0:43:16.080
<v Speaker 1>driven by his ferocious trump hatred and obvious narcissism and

0:43:16.200 --> 0:43:19.239
<v Speaker 1>hurt feelings that no longer being particularly important, not the

0:43:19.280 --> 0:43:21.360
<v Speaker 1>way that he thought he used to be. He no

0:43:21.440 --> 0:43:25.960
<v Speaker 1>longer has a political party around him that he feels

0:43:26.000 --> 0:43:29.320
<v Speaker 1>he can direct, he has an important place in There

0:43:29.440 --> 0:43:34.279
<v Speaker 1>is a selfishness that has been exposed for many, not all,

0:43:34.560 --> 0:43:38.879
<v Speaker 1>many never Trumpers who have gone so far in their

0:43:38.880 --> 0:43:43.040
<v Speaker 1>anti trumpism that they actively work to assist the other side.

0:43:43.840 --> 0:43:46.200
<v Speaker 1>And now they can't hide from that anymore, and they

0:43:46.239 --> 0:43:49.000
<v Speaker 1>also make fools of themselves. They can't hide from that either.

0:43:50.480 --> 0:43:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Why would anyone think it appropriate, even for a moment,

0:43:55.600 --> 0:44:01.120
<v Speaker 1>to suggest that Bagdaddy suicide himself and three of his

0:44:01.160 --> 0:44:04.960
<v Speaker 1>own children with a suicide vest means that he's not

0:44:05.120 --> 0:44:12.799
<v Speaker 1>a coward who would think that first of all? And

0:44:12.840 --> 0:44:15.960
<v Speaker 1>then who would write that out? Who would think that

0:44:15.960 --> 0:44:18.640
<v Speaker 1>they should write it out and then submitted under their

0:44:18.640 --> 0:44:24.560
<v Speaker 1>own name to a newspaper and not understand what the

0:44:24.600 --> 0:44:31.040
<v Speaker 1>consequences of that would be. The buffoonery here from Boot

0:44:31.880 --> 0:44:34.359
<v Speaker 1>is stunning, except you have to understand this is an

0:44:34.600 --> 0:44:39.680
<v Speaker 1>emotional an emotional response for him, because anything that is

0:44:39.719 --> 0:44:41.879
<v Speaker 1>good for a Trump, he feels like it's bad for him.

0:44:41.960 --> 0:44:44.600
<v Speaker 1>It's all personal. A lot of never Trumpers, it's all personal.

0:44:44.640 --> 0:44:47.560
<v Speaker 1>They're not important anymore. They got used to being important

0:44:47.560 --> 0:44:51.200
<v Speaker 1>within a certain set of the American right. They got

0:44:51.320 --> 0:44:55.360
<v Speaker 1>used to being celebrated and everyone listening to them at everybody,

0:44:55.760 --> 0:44:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and then all of a sudden when people started to

0:44:58.160 --> 0:45:01.759
<v Speaker 1>question either some of their ideas or question their inability

0:45:02.280 --> 0:45:04.080
<v Speaker 1>to see what many of the rest of us scene

0:45:04.080 --> 0:45:06.400
<v Speaker 1>about Trump, which is not that Trump is perfect. I

0:45:06.400 --> 0:45:08.800
<v Speaker 1>don't think Trump is perfect at all. I think that

0:45:08.840 --> 0:45:11.319
<v Speaker 1>Trump has made plenty of mistakes. I think he's got

0:45:11.320 --> 0:45:15.160
<v Speaker 1>plenty of personality flaws that are pretty shocking at times.

0:45:15.920 --> 0:45:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't sit here telling you that he's beyond reproach

0:45:19.400 --> 0:45:20.919
<v Speaker 1>at all. In fact, I think it's important we should

0:45:20.960 --> 0:45:23.760
<v Speaker 1>criticize Trump more on the let's say trillion dollars deficit

0:45:23.760 --> 0:45:26.879
<v Speaker 1>we're running this year. On some of you right and say, buck,

0:45:26.920 --> 0:45:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you can't criticize him on this, or he's trying to

0:45:28.520 --> 0:45:32.319
<v Speaker 1>build a wall, or he's not trying hard enough. But

0:45:33.640 --> 0:45:36.600
<v Speaker 1>that's a long way criticizing somebody for not doing well enough.

0:45:36.640 --> 0:45:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is a difference between a coach who's

0:45:39.080 --> 0:45:43.399
<v Speaker 1>trying to encourage his player on the field versus people

0:45:43.400 --> 0:45:45.840
<v Speaker 1>in the stands. We're saying, you stink, get out the game.

0:45:46.320 --> 0:45:50.480
<v Speaker 1>That's what never Trump became really from the beginning. And

0:45:50.520 --> 0:45:52.359
<v Speaker 1>then we find out not only are the yelling at Trump,

0:45:52.360 --> 0:45:54.959
<v Speaker 1>you stink, get out of the game, but they were

0:45:55.040 --> 0:46:00.640
<v Speaker 1>secretly rooting for the other side the whole time. Wow,

0:46:01.560 --> 0:46:03.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we should listen to them anymore about

0:46:03.320 --> 0:46:07.520
<v Speaker 1>game strategy if that's going to be their approach. Boot

0:46:07.600 --> 0:46:09.920
<v Speaker 1>had to walk this back, by the way, But he's

0:46:09.920 --> 0:46:13.280
<v Speaker 1>such a surly and smug fellow. We talked about immigration

0:46:13.320 --> 0:46:15.279
<v Speaker 1>once when I was on Rising, and he just didn't

0:46:15.280 --> 0:46:17.399
<v Speaker 1>know what he was talking about. He came on TV

0:46:17.600 --> 0:46:20.399
<v Speaker 1>figures I've written, I've written some books that were well

0:46:20.400 --> 0:46:26.279
<v Speaker 1>reviewed on the history of warfare, and therefore I know

0:46:26.320 --> 0:46:28.200
<v Speaker 1>about immigration. And so he came on TV and said

0:46:28.239 --> 0:46:30.399
<v Speaker 1>some stupid things like walls don't work, and everybody knows

0:46:30.440 --> 0:46:32.920
<v Speaker 1>that false. That's not true. Walls do work, and anybody

0:46:32.960 --> 0:46:34.919
<v Speaker 1>who knows anything about the boarder knows the walls work.

0:46:34.960 --> 0:46:40.959
<v Speaker 1>So there's that. He did have to add this little

0:46:41.080 --> 0:46:43.799
<v Speaker 1>little note to his piece quoted. An earlier version of

0:46:43.800 --> 0:46:46.880
<v Speaker 1>this column included a sentence questioning whether Trump was right

0:46:46.920 --> 0:46:49.239
<v Speaker 1>to call back Daddy a coward because he blew himself up.

0:46:49.560 --> 0:46:52.640
<v Speaker 1>The line was removed because it unintentionally conveyed the impression

0:46:52.680 --> 0:46:58.200
<v Speaker 1>that I considered back Daddy courageous. Well, that is kind

0:46:58.200 --> 0:47:00.200
<v Speaker 1>of what he said when he says someone's not a

0:47:00.200 --> 0:47:03.319
<v Speaker 1>coward because they blew himself up. I mean kind of

0:47:03.360 --> 0:47:07.040
<v Speaker 1>saying that they're not a coward. So I don't know

0:47:07.040 --> 0:47:10.279
<v Speaker 1>what else to say about that other than trump. De

0:47:10.320 --> 0:47:13.359
<v Speaker 1>arrangement syndrome is a powerful drug, and some people take

0:47:13.480 --> 0:47:16.360
<v Speaker 1>way too much of it, and we see the results

0:47:16.360 --> 0:47:19.360
<v Speaker 1>of it now. So we have I think, greater clarity

0:47:19.440 --> 0:47:21.880
<v Speaker 1>in many ways about who is who in the political

0:47:21.920 --> 0:47:25.200
<v Speaker 1>discussion right now than we've ever had before because they

0:47:25.239 --> 0:47:31.160
<v Speaker 1>can't help themselves. Trump is the great clarifier in that sense. Sure,

0:47:31.200 --> 0:47:33.920
<v Speaker 1>they'll always talk about how he polarizes things and he

0:47:33.960 --> 0:47:37.360
<v Speaker 1>makes it more difficult to have certain civil conversations with

0:47:37.440 --> 0:47:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the other side. Yeah, but he also lets us know

0:47:39.640 --> 0:47:42.200
<v Speaker 1>who really wants what and who stands for what in

0:47:42.239 --> 0:47:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the political debate in this country. And I think that

0:47:44.320 --> 0:47:47.560
<v Speaker 1>in itself is especially worthwhile. Oh, I don't think it's

0:47:47.600 --> 0:47:49.960
<v Speaker 1>aggressive at all. I would be surprised if he made

0:47:49.960 --> 0:47:52.799
<v Speaker 1>those comments in a negative way, but I don't think

0:47:53.080 --> 0:47:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the response would be if he actually said that, if

0:47:55.680 --> 0:47:58.239
<v Speaker 1>he actually meant that, I said what I do and

0:47:58.360 --> 0:48:01.920
<v Speaker 1>that I mean. So now we've got to another moment

0:48:02.000 --> 0:48:06.600
<v Speaker 1>in the media's life cycle here where they're using a

0:48:06.640 --> 0:48:10.719
<v Speaker 1>former using the words of a former Trump official to

0:48:11.840 --> 0:48:17.840
<v Speaker 1>bash the president. And here's what I believe is that issue. Here, Kelly,

0:48:17.840 --> 0:48:21.359
<v Speaker 1>who's a retired Marine Corps general, said during the Sea

0:48:21.400 --> 0:48:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Island Summit, which was hosted by the Washington Examine or CIANA,

0:48:24.239 --> 0:48:27.120
<v Speaker 1>here's a very nice place. Kelly said that if he

0:48:28.160 --> 0:48:30.000
<v Speaker 1>if he had stayed on his chief of staff, Trump

0:48:30.000 --> 0:48:32.080
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be in the midst of the current impeachment inquiry,

0:48:33.320 --> 0:48:36.120
<v Speaker 1>saying that certain White House advisors could have prevented it.

0:48:36.239 --> 0:48:38.800
<v Speaker 1>And quote, here's the quote from Kelly. I said, whatever

0:48:38.840 --> 0:48:40.319
<v Speaker 1>you do. And we're still in the process of trying

0:48:40.320 --> 0:48:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to find someone to take my place. I said, whatever

0:48:43.239 --> 0:48:46.479
<v Speaker 1>you do, don't hire a yes man, someone who won't

0:48:46.520 --> 0:48:48.960
<v Speaker 1>tell you the truth. Don't do that, because if you do,

0:48:49.239 --> 0:48:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I believe you will be impeached. Okay, well, maybe Kelly

0:48:55.480 --> 0:48:59.040
<v Speaker 1>said it, maybe he didn't. President Trump seems to think

0:48:59.080 --> 0:49:03.160
<v Speaker 1>that that wasn't. Keep in mind, people have been talking

0:49:03.160 --> 0:49:05.400
<v Speaker 1>about how Trump was going to be impeached from the

0:49:05.440 --> 0:49:09.239
<v Speaker 1>day he took office because of the ferocious hatred the

0:49:09.280 --> 0:49:12.040
<v Speaker 1>left has for him. So it's not a tough thing

0:49:12.080 --> 0:49:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to say. That's not analysis that would be that should

0:49:15.080 --> 0:49:18.480
<v Speaker 1>be surprising to anybody. Do I think that the presidents

0:49:19.360 --> 0:49:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I saw me for but where I criticized the president?

0:49:21.200 --> 0:49:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Do I think the president's choices of senior advisors and

0:49:25.320 --> 0:49:31.879
<v Speaker 1>staff around him have been almost inexplicably bad, Yes, yes

0:49:31.920 --> 0:49:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I do. There's there is no justification, there's no rational

0:49:37.320 --> 0:49:41.120
<v Speaker 1>way to explain many of the choices that Trump made

0:49:41.160 --> 0:49:43.040
<v Speaker 1>about who to put around him and who to put

0:49:43.040 --> 0:49:47.160
<v Speaker 1>in positions of real authority. Scaramucci on a Rosa, I mean,

0:49:47.320 --> 0:49:50.160
<v Speaker 1>it really was a little bit like he said, or

0:49:50.440 --> 0:49:52.800
<v Speaker 1>like he decided that he was staffing up a reality

0:49:52.800 --> 0:49:55.160
<v Speaker 1>TV show again, like he was picking people for the

0:49:55.200 --> 0:49:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Apprentice White House. That's real. Let's let's be clear, let's

0:49:59.640 --> 0:50:02.600
<v Speaker 1>be on about that. Um. There were a lot of

0:50:02.640 --> 0:50:05.920
<v Speaker 1>people that were brought in that had to be shown

0:50:05.960 --> 0:50:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the door rather quickly. And they never should have been

0:50:10.239 --> 0:50:13.719
<v Speaker 1>brought in. So that's one area. And by the way,

0:50:13.760 --> 0:50:15.399
<v Speaker 1>that does fall on the president. I mean, he's got

0:50:15.440 --> 0:50:19.279
<v Speaker 1>a lot of authority and these are important decisions to make,

0:50:19.760 --> 0:50:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and to make such poor ones reflects badly on his

0:50:23.200 --> 0:50:25.520
<v Speaker 1>judgment as a as a commander in chief. I think

0:50:25.520 --> 0:50:28.120
<v Speaker 1>that there's no way around that. I think we need

0:50:28.160 --> 0:50:32.080
<v Speaker 1>to be honest about that. So I'm telling you that's

0:50:32.160 --> 0:50:35.160
<v Speaker 1>that's what I think about where the president is on

0:50:35.719 --> 0:50:39.160
<v Speaker 1>all of it. On the upside though, they give you

0:50:39.160 --> 0:50:42.279
<v Speaker 1>a happy thing. So that's a that's a place where

0:50:42.280 --> 0:50:45.239
<v Speaker 1>I say Trump, you know, Trump gets a he gets

0:50:45.239 --> 0:50:49.440
<v Speaker 1>a C minus on appointees and seeing your advisors really

0:50:49.840 --> 0:50:54.000
<v Speaker 1>C minus. It's gotten a little bit better, but it's

0:50:54.000 --> 0:50:56.280
<v Speaker 1>because he's went through a lot of the really bad choices.

0:50:57.440 --> 0:51:01.640
<v Speaker 1>But here is on the upside of things, the president is.

0:51:01.880 --> 0:51:04.080
<v Speaker 1>And whether you're pro Trump or not, if you are

0:51:04.120 --> 0:51:08.160
<v Speaker 1>a conservative, you have to be pleased with what is

0:51:08.200 --> 0:51:11.840
<v Speaker 1>going on right now in the federal judiciary. Here is

0:51:11.880 --> 0:51:14.399
<v Speaker 1>President Trump. Play clip one. Please, I want to thank

0:51:14.480 --> 0:51:17.800
<v Speaker 1>you President Obama for giving me one hundred and forty

0:51:17.800 --> 0:51:20.719
<v Speaker 1>two open judges. How you allowed that to happen is

0:51:20.760 --> 0:51:25.200
<v Speaker 1>beyond me. It's beyond me. Thank you, President Obama very much.

0:51:25.440 --> 0:51:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Everybody in this room, thanks you. Now he's been a

0:51:28.800 --> 0:51:30.960
<v Speaker 1>little funny there, but this is a real point that

0:51:31.000 --> 0:51:36.520
<v Speaker 1>he's making. The hashtag resistance has relied so much on

0:51:36.600 --> 0:51:39.680
<v Speaker 1>federal judges who are activists, appointed largely by Obama but

0:51:39.719 --> 0:51:43.280
<v Speaker 1>also by Clinton and sometimes by Republicans too. You'll notice

0:51:43.560 --> 0:51:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Democrats never seem to slip up on this. Who is

0:51:46.200 --> 0:51:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the Democrat Supreme Court appointee you know, from a Democrat

0:51:50.600 --> 0:51:55.680
<v Speaker 1>administration that turned out to be really republican? Doesn't happen. Meanwhile,

0:51:55.680 --> 0:51:59.600
<v Speaker 1>you go back and look at Reagan and George H. W. Bush,

0:51:59.600 --> 0:52:02.520
<v Speaker 1>something to be they're putting in there into the federal

0:52:02.800 --> 0:52:07.160
<v Speaker 1>in the Supreme Court turn out to be leftists, activists

0:52:07.160 --> 0:52:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and judges robes. Never happens the other way. I'm not

0:52:09.920 --> 0:52:12.640
<v Speaker 1>making it up. Think about it. Who is it? You know?

0:52:13.880 --> 0:52:19.480
<v Speaker 1>So to Mayor liberal, Kagan liberal, Ginsburg liberal. They're all liberals,

0:52:20.080 --> 0:52:27.160
<v Speaker 1>liberals and in lockstep with liberalism. I mean, never disappoint

0:52:27.880 --> 0:52:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the party, faithful of the Democrats. Really not anything important,

0:52:31.440 --> 0:52:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I should say. On some more minor stuff, procedural things.

0:52:35.239 --> 0:52:40.200
<v Speaker 1>People have a different view, but anyway, the judiciary, not

0:52:40.320 --> 0:52:44.720
<v Speaker 1>just Kavanaugh and Gorsich, but the judiciary at the federal

0:52:44.719 --> 0:52:47.160
<v Speaker 1>and district court level, or at the district court level,

0:52:47.200 --> 0:52:51.279
<v Speaker 1>I should say, an appeals court that being changed in

0:52:51.320 --> 0:52:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the way that it is right now, and the kind

0:52:53.000 --> 0:52:54.960
<v Speaker 1>of judges that Trump is picking. This is where his

0:52:55.360 --> 0:52:58.440
<v Speaker 1>outsourcing decisions a bit to people who know more and

0:52:58.600 --> 0:53:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and he can trust on which judges to pick, has

0:53:01.520 --> 0:53:05.000
<v Speaker 1>been a good move in the federalist society, etc. So

0:53:05.600 --> 0:53:11.200
<v Speaker 1>on the upside, Spicy gets through very important news item

0:53:11.280 --> 0:53:15.640
<v Speaker 1>for you here, the show Dancing with the Stars has

0:53:16.000 --> 0:53:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Sean Spicer on as a contestant. You remember Sean Spicer.

0:53:18.760 --> 0:53:23.280
<v Speaker 1>He was White House Press Secretary for a short time

0:53:24.000 --> 0:53:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and was perhaps best known well was was in a

0:53:28.600 --> 0:53:31.919
<v Speaker 1>pop culture since, best known for the Melissa McCarthy send

0:53:32.000 --> 0:53:36.200
<v Speaker 1>up of him, impersonation of him, and also because he

0:53:36.280 --> 0:53:41.480
<v Speaker 1>was the one who came out and saying that the

0:53:41.520 --> 0:53:45.800
<v Speaker 1>inauguration was the biggest and most attendant inauguration ever and

0:53:45.840 --> 0:53:47.400
<v Speaker 1>that was a that was a bad look. It just

0:53:47.480 --> 0:53:50.400
<v Speaker 1>it didn't didn't come come off well at all. But

0:53:50.560 --> 0:53:54.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad to see that he's he's a he's a nice,

0:53:54.560 --> 0:53:57.960
<v Speaker 1>nice dude. I've bumped into him a few times at

0:53:57.960 --> 0:54:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the Trump Hotel in DC, where it's really the GOP

0:54:01.440 --> 0:54:03.600
<v Speaker 1>clubhouse where a lot of people hang out. I hear

0:54:03.640 --> 0:54:05.160
<v Speaker 1>they might be selling it, by the way, which is

0:54:05.200 --> 0:54:07.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of a bummer, because if you want to have

0:54:07.200 --> 0:54:11.600
<v Speaker 1>really overpriced drinks in a space that plays Musaic twenty

0:54:11.600 --> 0:54:14.239
<v Speaker 1>four to seven, Trump Hotel is definitely the lobby. There's

0:54:14.239 --> 0:54:16.560
<v Speaker 1>definitely the place you want to do it. The I

0:54:16.560 --> 0:54:20.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it's flombade bacon or like flamed bait whatever.

0:54:20.719 --> 0:54:24.279
<v Speaker 1>They take a blowtorch to the bacon there and they

0:54:24.320 --> 0:54:28.480
<v Speaker 1>have these hanging bacon strips and I'm telling you it

0:54:28.880 --> 0:54:32.560
<v Speaker 1>is amazing. I mean, they do. They do bacon right

0:54:33.200 --> 0:54:35.520
<v Speaker 1>at Trump Hotel. So I give credit where it's due,

0:54:35.600 --> 0:54:38.880
<v Speaker 1>always one of the mantras of this show. But for

0:54:39.120 --> 0:54:41.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, our pop culture correspondent here as producer Mark

0:54:42.000 --> 0:54:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and producer Mark, I do have to ask you, first

0:54:44.560 --> 0:54:47.759
<v Speaker 1>of all, have you ever seen have you ever seen

0:54:48.400 --> 0:54:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Dancing with the Stars, because I have not. I've seen clips.

0:54:51.239 --> 0:54:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I've seen clips too. Have you ever actually watched the show?

0:54:53.080 --> 0:54:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I think watches. It's pretty popular show apparently. Yeah, I

0:54:57.200 --> 0:54:59.440
<v Speaker 1>think my main man. Tucker Carlson was on at one point. So,

0:54:59.480 --> 0:55:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like they came asking the buckster, But I

0:55:02.120 --> 0:55:05.200
<v Speaker 1>would have you ever ballroom dance? I don't think of course,

0:55:05.200 --> 0:55:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I took some ball on dancing growing up. I had

0:55:07.000 --> 0:55:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Debbie tomp Balls to go to my friend as an escort.

0:55:09.840 --> 0:55:12.239
<v Speaker 1>Oh so you were going to escort? This is what

0:55:12.280 --> 0:55:15.000
<v Speaker 1>you're saying to a Debbie tomp Ball. We were sixteen.

0:55:16.080 --> 0:55:19.759
<v Speaker 1>But I would just point out that that spicy is

0:55:20.200 --> 0:55:24.560
<v Speaker 1>my understanding the worst in terms of actual dancing skill.

0:55:24.800 --> 0:55:26.560
<v Speaker 1>My dancing skills, by the way, I don't know. I

0:55:26.600 --> 0:55:28.800
<v Speaker 1>don't even know if America could handle these funky moves.

0:55:29.480 --> 0:55:34.680
<v Speaker 1>But spicy true true, don't that's a that's an accurate thing.

0:55:35.040 --> 0:55:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Then I don't know if they can handle it. I

0:55:36.600 --> 0:55:39.759
<v Speaker 1>don't think I can vocalize the face I just made. Yeah, yeah,

0:55:39.800 --> 0:55:40.920
<v Speaker 1>we do need to get a camera for you get

0:55:40.960 --> 0:55:43.160
<v Speaker 1>as our producer, Mark, Well, we'll work on that. But

0:55:43.719 --> 0:55:46.560
<v Speaker 1>so what I want to know is are people pushing

0:55:46.640 --> 0:55:49.520
<v Speaker 1>him through as a joke or they pushing him through

0:55:49.520 --> 0:55:51.720
<v Speaker 1>out of some kind of Trump solidarity. At this point,

0:55:52.160 --> 0:55:55.160
<v Speaker 1>it's got to be for the humor, right, They gotta

0:55:55.320 --> 0:55:56.480
<v Speaker 1>you know this is like when you used to have,

0:55:56.480 --> 0:55:59.640
<v Speaker 1>remember your student council elections. There was always a candidate

0:56:00.080 --> 0:56:03.080
<v Speaker 1>at my school growing up who would run who was

0:56:03.120 --> 0:56:05.319
<v Speaker 1>like the kid who basically lived in the tension, and

0:56:05.400 --> 0:56:09.480
<v Speaker 1>all the teachers thought was just like, you know, a

0:56:09.560 --> 0:56:12.239
<v Speaker 1>class clown, cut up, bad kid who did bad Not

0:56:12.320 --> 0:56:13.840
<v Speaker 1>bad kid, but you know the kid who was always

0:56:13.840 --> 0:56:17.120
<v Speaker 1>misbehaving and getting into trouble. You're describing me, Oh really,

0:56:17.440 --> 0:56:19.560
<v Speaker 1>definitely the class you were that kid. Oh yeah, not

0:56:19.600 --> 0:56:21.439
<v Speaker 1>in attention all the time, but I was a clown. Yeah,

0:56:21.440 --> 0:56:24.399
<v Speaker 1>that's surprises nobody. Um, yeah, you got away with it though,

0:56:24.480 --> 0:56:27.279
<v Speaker 1>right I did. Yeah, So I just I would think

0:56:27.320 --> 0:56:29.960
<v Speaker 1>that this is a little bit like that where they're

0:56:30.040 --> 0:56:32.400
<v Speaker 1>they're voting for him specifically, as it's almost like a

0:56:32.400 --> 0:56:34.719
<v Speaker 1>protest vote against Dancing with the Stars. It's like that

0:56:34.760 --> 0:56:37.759
<v Speaker 1>guy on American Idol, I forget his name that got

0:56:37.800 --> 0:56:41.520
<v Speaker 1>through because he was hilarious. Was that the the the

0:56:41.520 --> 0:56:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the William Hung. Yes, yeah, he became a star. Sang

0:56:45.520 --> 0:56:47.600
<v Speaker 1>he sang in his I remember this back then? He

0:56:47.719 --> 0:56:54.200
<v Speaker 1>sang Yang by Mary Ricky Martin. Yeah, that was fantastic

0:56:54.560 --> 0:56:56.000
<v Speaker 1>but terrible, And then you know he put it on

0:56:56.000 --> 0:56:57.799
<v Speaker 1>an album by the way, Yeah, no, I heard it.

0:56:58.160 --> 0:57:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Look you gotta pan idol credit. I was just the

0:57:00.239 --> 0:57:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Nashville of the weekend, Love you Nashville, and there was

0:57:04.280 --> 0:57:05.440
<v Speaker 1>there were the people to I was like, who are

0:57:05.440 --> 0:57:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the biggest country music stars? I asked, Nashville locals? Actually

0:57:08.400 --> 0:57:12.919
<v Speaker 1>a radio host, I asked, U uh, Clay Travis what

0:57:12.960 --> 0:57:15.919
<v Speaker 1>he what he thought about it? And and he named

0:57:15.960 --> 0:57:18.439
<v Speaker 1>all these different I said, Oh, Carrie Underwood's really carry

0:57:18.520 --> 0:57:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Underwoods like a big deal in Nashville. Yeah, because she's

0:57:21.440 --> 0:57:26.280
<v Speaker 1>married to the former captain of the Nashville Predators. Is

0:57:26.280 --> 0:57:28.640
<v Speaker 1>that a thing? I didn't know that. But she's still

0:57:28.640 --> 0:57:30.320
<v Speaker 1>a big deal form her music come on. Oh of

0:57:30.320 --> 0:57:32.600
<v Speaker 1>course for her music as well, but she's also like

0:57:33.720 --> 0:57:36.560
<v Speaker 1>over here. She was always my favorite. I like Kelly Clarkson,

0:57:36.600 --> 0:57:37.800
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know, I feel like she didn't reach

0:57:37.800 --> 0:57:39.600
<v Speaker 1>her true attend I saw Carrie at the garden once,

0:57:40.520 --> 0:57:44.320
<v Speaker 1>like Justin Guarini had his day. Remember that guy I

0:57:44.840 --> 0:57:47.080
<v Speaker 1>used in the movie From Kelly to Justin. They made

0:57:47.080 --> 0:57:52.920
<v Speaker 1>a movie after the first season American Idol. Oh, it

0:57:53.080 --> 0:57:55.480
<v Speaker 1>was so bad. I didn't see it. I saw previews,

0:57:55.520 --> 0:57:58.240
<v Speaker 1>but man, it was so bad. But hey, you gotta

0:57:58.280 --> 0:57:59.960
<v Speaker 1>grab that money while you can. You know, I think

0:58:00.000 --> 0:58:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the only season I watched was when Clay Aikin and

0:58:02.560 --> 0:58:04.920
<v Speaker 1>up stutter. I used to watch a Kanto with my parents.

0:58:04.920 --> 0:58:06.440
<v Speaker 1>It was like a bonding experience of this show. We

0:58:06.440 --> 0:58:08.760
<v Speaker 1>could in the early days. In the early days of

0:58:08.800 --> 0:58:12.160
<v Speaker 1>that show, it was a phenomenon. It was. It was amazing.

0:58:12.800 --> 0:58:14.840
<v Speaker 1>And some of the people they had come in and

0:58:14.880 --> 0:58:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the whole Simon callick, Oh, I'm a British guy and

0:58:18.400 --> 0:58:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm just like a little mean, but you'll still

0:58:21.520 --> 0:58:24.640
<v Speaker 1>love me anyway, like that whole thing. You know now

0:58:24.680 --> 0:58:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the voice is actually really big. Oh is that the one? Yeah,

0:58:28.200 --> 0:58:29.600
<v Speaker 1>that's like that's the one with the chairs that they

0:58:29.680 --> 0:58:32.240
<v Speaker 1>spin around in. And then the stars coached them a

0:58:32.280 --> 0:58:34.880
<v Speaker 1>little too theatrical for me. I'm an original guy, you know.

0:58:35.360 --> 0:58:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I said it was popular. That doesn't mean I know

0:58:37.880 --> 0:58:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not as I'm not as into it. By the way,

0:58:39.400 --> 0:58:43.080
<v Speaker 1>did you see the Have you seen? Um? What's it called?

0:58:44.680 --> 0:58:47.120
<v Speaker 1>You've seen Breaking Bad? Out? Of course I have not

0:58:47.160 --> 0:58:50.960
<v Speaker 1>seen the movie yet, so Breaking Bad Um has a

0:58:50.960 --> 0:58:54.840
<v Speaker 1>movie that's out right now, which I did watch and

0:58:54.880 --> 0:58:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I got oh wait. Producer Nick tells me that Justin

0:58:58.880 --> 0:59:02.320
<v Speaker 1>is now little sat from the Doctor Pepper Ads. Did

0:59:02.400 --> 0:59:06.160
<v Speaker 1>you know that Justin Guarini has made a comeback from

0:59:06.280 --> 0:59:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Pepper ads? I don't drink Doctor Pepper. Well. What

0:59:10.360 --> 0:59:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to tell y'all also is that the new

0:59:12.600 --> 0:59:18.800
<v Speaker 1>movie elm el Camino, Yes, is terrible, so boring. I

0:59:18.840 --> 0:59:21.160
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen anything. I have to watch it just because

0:59:21.360 --> 0:59:26.360
<v Speaker 1>you really like just an episode, a long episode of

0:59:26.360 --> 0:59:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Breaking Bad. It's not really a movie. It's like if

0:59:28.240 --> 0:59:32.520
<v Speaker 1>they added one more episode two Breaking Bad, but with

0:59:33.400 --> 0:59:36.520
<v Speaker 1>episode no it ended perfectly like why did they do this?

0:59:37.120 --> 0:59:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Why do they have to at least make it a

0:59:38.400 --> 0:59:42.200
<v Speaker 1>spinoff so I can ignore it. It's very sad, but

0:59:42.320 --> 0:59:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I've got a lot going. I mean, I've got a

0:59:43.760 --> 0:59:46.280
<v Speaker 1>book to write, but which is you know that's a problem.

0:59:46.680 --> 0:59:49.960
<v Speaker 1>But I'm watching The Americans right now and also checking

0:59:49.960 --> 0:59:52.280
<v Speaker 1>out a fair amount of Oh I will be watching

0:59:53.440 --> 0:59:56.479
<v Speaker 1>Peeky Blinders. Did you see the spin off of Breaking Bad?

0:59:57.320 --> 0:59:59.520
<v Speaker 1>At Better? So? I thought it was a little boring. Really,

1:00:00.000 --> 1:00:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I saw the first season. I didn't want to be

1:00:01.280 --> 1:00:03.080
<v Speaker 1>on the first season. Season after season one gets so

1:00:03.200 --> 1:00:06.040
<v Speaker 1>much better. It really. I have not seen the most

1:00:06.120 --> 1:00:08.640
<v Speaker 1>recent season because it's not on Netflix or any because

1:00:08.640 --> 1:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I think my man dave Reeboy told me that he

1:00:11.320 --> 1:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>also really liked Better Call Saul. I loved it, the

1:00:13.840 --> 1:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>thing with the brother and it can't go outside and

1:00:15.680 --> 1:00:17.080
<v Speaker 1>all that. Don't know. I just was like, what is this?

1:00:17.240 --> 1:00:19.919
<v Speaker 1>It gets so much better right day on. I'm gonna

1:00:19.960 --> 1:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>watch based on producer Mark's recommendation here and if it's terrible,

1:00:24.880 --> 1:00:27.640
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna make fun a producer Mark. Course. Yeah. But anyway,

1:00:27.680 --> 1:00:33.160
<v Speaker 1>so so Sean Spicer, he got through, and I guess

1:00:33.160 --> 1:00:34.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have to watch an episode of this show

1:00:35.000 --> 1:00:38.160
<v Speaker 1>now now that now that the because the Spicy phenomenon

1:00:38.320 --> 1:00:40.280
<v Speaker 1>is turning into its own things. I'm sure they put

1:00:40.280 --> 1:00:42.480
<v Speaker 1>clips out on ABC. Just watch. I've seen a couple

1:00:42.480 --> 1:00:43.480
<v Speaker 1>of the small, but I want to see that. I

1:00:43.480 --> 1:00:44.920
<v Speaker 1>gotta watch the Who show. I don't even know how

1:00:44.960 --> 1:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>this works. Like it's a professional dancer with the not

1:00:47.480 --> 1:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>professional dance. Yes, I believe, so I could see the

1:00:50.320 --> 1:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>professional dancers. That'll be kind of fun. I appreciate the technique.

1:00:54.200 --> 1:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>What you yeah, that's it? Yeah. So anyways, Spicy, I

1:00:58.720 --> 1:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>guess we gotta do it? Should we should we join

1:01:00.640 --> 1:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the vote for Spicy train. I don't know, maybe could happen.

1:01:03.800 --> 1:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I have also started to perhaps be more candid talking

1:01:09.840 --> 1:01:12.680
<v Speaker 1>about what I describe and what I believe to be

1:01:12.720 --> 1:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the elephant in the room about my campaign. What is

1:01:14.960 --> 1:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>that electability? What are your electability? You know? Essentially, is

1:01:19.760 --> 1:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>America ready for a woman and a woman of color

1:01:23.200 --> 1:01:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to be president of the United States? America was ready

1:01:25.640 --> 1:01:28.040
<v Speaker 1>for a black man to be president United State, and

1:01:28.080 --> 1:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>this conversation happened for him. There is a lack of

1:01:31.560 --> 1:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>ability or a difficult a difficulty in imagining that someone

1:01:37.840 --> 1:01:41.400
<v Speaker 1>who we have never seen can do a job that

1:01:41.520 --> 1:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>has been done, you know, forty five times by someone

1:01:44.680 --> 1:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>who is not that person. I gotta tell you, I

1:01:49.120 --> 1:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>really don't like this analysis, this view of things that

1:01:56.040 --> 1:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Kamala Harris is offering up. And we've heard it many

1:01:58.560 --> 1:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>times before. We heard it from Hillary. Is the country

1:02:01.800 --> 1:02:04.560
<v Speaker 1>ready for a woman? In this case with Kamala Harris,

1:02:04.640 --> 1:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>is this is the country ready for a president who

1:02:07.080 --> 1:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>is a minority woman? The answer is yes, Okay, we're

1:02:13.480 --> 1:02:17.360
<v Speaker 1>ready for it. The American people aren't. I know, Democrats

1:02:17.360 --> 1:02:20.960
<v Speaker 1>have all convinced themselves that we're so racist and closed

1:02:20.960 --> 1:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>minded and unless we agree with them on everything, then

1:02:23.480 --> 1:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>we're okay. But if we're if we have any other

1:02:25.960 --> 1:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>thoughts about anything, oh, we're such terrible people. These Americans

1:02:30.280 --> 1:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>are so awful, So much racism in this country. When

1:02:33.520 --> 1:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>every American I know, every person that I know, regardless

1:02:36.880 --> 1:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>of political affiliation, if you said, hey, there's a candidate,

1:02:39.760 --> 1:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the candidate shares all of your ideas on all major

1:02:42.880 --> 1:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>policy issues, and it's just really inspiring and great. But

1:02:47.720 --> 1:02:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the candidate has fill in any demographic profile you want

1:02:52.960 --> 1:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and any gender you want. I guarantee you that anybody

1:02:58.440 --> 1:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>that you do in your life, you'd be like, yeah,

1:03:00.040 --> 1:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>on who cares great, doesn't matter, you know, white, black, Hispanic, Asian,

1:03:08.040 --> 1:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, pick something out, you know, male, female, whatever

1:03:12.560 --> 1:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>it may be, if you like the person as a person,

1:03:16.800 --> 1:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>if you think they're a compelling politician, if you agree

1:03:19.200 --> 1:03:21.720
<v Speaker 1>with them on policy. The vast I'm not saying, of

1:03:21.720 --> 1:03:24.200
<v Speaker 1>course they're stupid racist everywhere in every country all over

1:03:24.240 --> 1:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the world, not saying it doesn't exist, but the vast, vast,

1:03:27.360 --> 1:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>vast majority of Americans of voters, you know, I would say, yeah,

1:03:34.680 --> 1:03:37.120
<v Speaker 1>ninety nine out of one hundred, maybe maybe nine out

1:03:37.120 --> 1:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>of ten. If you want to give yourself a little leeway.

1:03:38.640 --> 1:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>We have noe, no problem voting for a woman, no

1:03:41.080 --> 1:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>problem voting for minority, And we just went through eight

1:03:43.760 --> 1:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>years of a president who was a minority, and it's

1:03:47.920 --> 1:03:50.919
<v Speaker 1>almost like we're supposed to pretend that, you know that

1:03:50.920 --> 1:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>that didn't have any meaning. It did. Country is still

1:03:53.280 --> 1:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>just as racist as it was. Come on, It's just,

1:03:58.400 --> 1:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's such a self serving narrative, and especially

1:04:01.880 --> 1:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>in this case with Gamala Harris, it is such a

1:04:05.720 --> 1:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>self serving narrative because she's dramatically underperforming because people just

1:04:13.160 --> 1:04:15.000
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing, and I see this among deat I'm

1:04:15.040 --> 1:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>not speaking about this as a Republican. What my feeling,

1:04:18.120 --> 1:04:22.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, my least favorite candidate, it's Betto because he's

1:04:22.080 --> 1:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>just like, it's like he just reads the comments on

1:04:24.640 --> 1:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the Huffington Post and he's just like, yo, I just

1:04:27.560 --> 1:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>want to like comment and I just gonna tell everybody

1:04:30.560 --> 1:04:33.040
<v Speaker 1>that I'm gonna take all your guns. And America's like

1:04:33.160 --> 1:04:35.680
<v Speaker 1>super racist. But I'm not racist, but America is like

1:04:35.800 --> 1:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>so racist, So Betto is the worst. But from what

1:04:41.320 --> 1:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I see from Democrats, people I know and follow and

1:04:45.840 --> 1:04:53.320
<v Speaker 1>interact with, they're all really unimpressed with Kamala Harris. They

1:04:53.440 --> 1:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>really do not like the campaign that she has run.

1:04:57.000 --> 1:05:01.600
<v Speaker 1>So is that who's Is that the fault of sexism

1:05:01.680 --> 1:05:04.040
<v Speaker 1>or racism or is it the fault of Kamala Harris

1:05:04.080 --> 1:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>for not doing a good job? The same thing with Hillary?

1:05:06.560 --> 1:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, which is it was it a big reason

1:05:09.880 --> 1:05:11.720
<v Speaker 1>to vote for Hillary that she's a woman, or was

1:05:11.760 --> 1:05:13.680
<v Speaker 1>it a big hindrance to her winning the election that

1:05:13.760 --> 1:05:15.600
<v Speaker 1>she's a woman? Oh well, it depends on whether she

1:05:15.640 --> 1:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>wins or not. I guess right, And that's the way

1:05:17.920 --> 1:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the analysis always goes. Well, it depends on whatever's most

1:05:21.280 --> 1:05:24.720
<v Speaker 1>politically useful for her at any point in time. I

1:05:24.800 --> 1:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>just I find it. I honestly and truly find this.

1:05:28.080 --> 1:05:32.040
<v Speaker 1>It's so boring, it's so typical. She has not run

1:05:32.120 --> 1:05:36.600
<v Speaker 1>a she has not run a campaign in this case

1:05:36.640 --> 1:05:44.120
<v Speaker 1>with Kamala Harris. By way, Tulsi Gabbert is outperforming Kamala Harris.

1:05:44.120 --> 1:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Tulsi Gabbert is also I believe qualifies a minority female

1:05:49.840 --> 1:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>unless I'm misunderstanding something, And she doesn't complain about this,

1:05:56.000 --> 1:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>so I think the complaints are just a way of

1:05:58.080 --> 1:06:01.400
<v Speaker 1>self justifying a weak campaign. But on the on the

1:06:01.440 --> 1:06:06.840
<v Speaker 1>other side of political correctness these days. You do have

1:06:07.200 --> 1:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Dave Chappelle with his most recent special, The Name of It,

1:06:11.680 --> 1:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually forgetting, but it was do you remember the

1:06:14.040 --> 1:06:16.840
<v Speaker 1>name producer? Mark? No, I don't remember that. Whatever, it's good,

1:06:16.960 --> 1:06:19.160
<v Speaker 1>go watch it if you haven't seen it. Look, there's

1:06:19.160 --> 1:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>some stuff that's edgy, there's some stuff that you might

1:06:21.200 --> 1:06:25.240
<v Speaker 1>even be a little uncomfortable with. Exactly, it's comedy, deal

1:06:25.280 --> 1:06:26.800
<v Speaker 1>with it. He's got to push the boundaries a little

1:06:26.800 --> 1:06:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Bit's why comedy is so bad right now. In general,

1:06:30.360 --> 1:06:32.800
<v Speaker 1>nothing is allowed to be funny. No one's allowed to

1:06:32.840 --> 1:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>make a joke. You're at to laugh either, oh can't laugh?

1:06:36.360 --> 1:06:38.040
<v Speaker 1>But what about a fuck? I'm doing a bad own

1:06:38.080 --> 1:06:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Prussian and I'm just like, hey, I just want to know, like,

1:06:42.440 --> 1:06:46.160
<v Speaker 1>am I the single biggest hypocrite in the race? And

1:06:46.200 --> 1:06:47.880
<v Speaker 1>then Bernie's like, no, you don't have the biggest. I'm

1:06:47.880 --> 1:06:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the biggest. I got three houses, I'm a millionaire. Why

1:06:49.680 --> 1:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>are you doing? But I just like really don't understand

1:06:52.280 --> 1:06:55.040
<v Speaker 1>why the American people then just don't like open their

1:06:55.080 --> 1:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>hearts to better. Uh. I was I even saying, oh, yeah,

1:07:00.200 --> 1:07:02.720
<v Speaker 1>so you can make fun of politicians, that's okay. There

1:07:02.760 --> 1:07:04.400
<v Speaker 1>are very few other people you can make fun of

1:07:04.440 --> 1:07:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and get away with it. And one of my big

1:07:07.680 --> 1:07:09.640
<v Speaker 1>frustrations is that I wish that I could do different

1:07:09.800 --> 1:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>fun accents here on the show, but I can. Basically

1:07:12.320 --> 1:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>can I can reliably and without fear of dramatically negative consequence,

1:07:19.280 --> 1:07:29.160
<v Speaker 1>do accents of public figures and people from America, you know,

1:07:29.200 --> 1:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>parts of America, and European majority or European countries, and

1:07:33.560 --> 1:07:35.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe like Australia and some you know, the English speaking

1:07:35.920 --> 1:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>countries outside of America. That's it. Can't do accents from

1:07:39.200 --> 1:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>different parts of the world. Can't do you know, any

1:07:42.080 --> 1:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>any sketch. You look at Robin Williams wouldn't have even

1:07:45.440 --> 1:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>had a comedy career if you were alive today, because

1:07:48.360 --> 1:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>he wouldn't been able to do any things that he

1:07:49.840 --> 1:07:54.280
<v Speaker 1>did that made him famous. Not allowed. Can't no jokes,

1:07:55.240 --> 1:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>no Asian accents, no South Asian accents, East Asian accents.

1:08:00.240 --> 1:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't think i'd be able to. You

1:08:02.000 --> 1:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>can't do a Latino accent. You can't do any of

1:08:03.960 --> 1:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>these acts, you know all, to do any accents because

1:08:06.560 --> 1:08:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm making make doing an accent is terrible. Oh, it's awful. Okay,

1:08:11.720 --> 1:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I seem unless you know, like I said, I can

1:08:13.440 --> 1:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>do Bernie, you can do better. I can do Russian,

1:08:15.360 --> 1:08:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I can do Italian. And those are some places. You know.

1:08:18.280 --> 1:08:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I make fun of Irish people all day, but that's

1:08:21.160 --> 1:08:24.479
<v Speaker 1>an English people. That's about it. But Dave Chappelle was

1:08:24.520 --> 1:08:28.559
<v Speaker 1>asked about comedy and political correctness, and I just I

1:08:29.000 --> 1:08:31.719
<v Speaker 1>particularly enjoyed his response, would you please play clip eleven?

1:08:31.760 --> 1:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Producer mark anolitical recorrectness has his face his place. Excuse me.

1:08:36.680 --> 1:08:38.720
<v Speaker 1>We all want to live in a polite society. We

1:08:38.840 --> 1:08:40.680
<v Speaker 1>just have the kind of work on the levels and

1:08:40.760 --> 1:08:42.760
<v Speaker 1>coming to an agreement of what that actually looks like.

1:08:43.160 --> 1:08:45.919
<v Speaker 1>I personally am not afraid of other people's freedom of expression.

1:08:46.160 --> 1:08:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't use it as a weapon. It just makes

1:08:48.160 --> 1:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>me feel better. And I'm sorry if I heard anybody,

1:08:50.160 --> 1:08:52.639
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, et cetera. Yah yaha, Yeah, everything I'm supposed

1:08:52.640 --> 1:08:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to say. I like that. I want to start doing that.

1:08:57.040 --> 1:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, every time, for example, the left puts for

1:09:00.120 --> 1:09:05.280
<v Speaker 1>ord a veteran to criticize, to tear down President Trump,

1:09:05.400 --> 1:09:07.519
<v Speaker 1>or be part of the soft coup effort to destroy

1:09:07.600 --> 1:09:10.439
<v Speaker 1>the president, I want to say, you know, YadA da YadA.

1:09:10.520 --> 1:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Of course, respect the service and all that, all the

1:09:12.160 --> 1:09:14.080
<v Speaker 1>things I'm supposed to say. Now, can we talk about

1:09:14.080 --> 1:09:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the issue? You know, like, now, can we can we

1:09:16.000 --> 1:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>just assume the things that that, you know, we'll now

1:09:19.439 --> 1:09:21.240
<v Speaker 1>have to have to say to establish that we're a

1:09:21.240 --> 1:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>good person before we talk about the issue. And I

1:09:24.280 --> 1:09:26.519
<v Speaker 1>think the same thing is is kind of true with

1:09:26.560 --> 1:09:28.439
<v Speaker 1>comedy now too. You know, it's like, okay, yeah, so

1:09:28.439 --> 1:09:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I make some jokes. I don't want to offend anybody,

1:09:30.360 --> 1:09:32.200
<v Speaker 1>YadA YadA, YadA, Like, you know, can we just all

1:09:32.240 --> 1:09:35.680
<v Speaker 1>be adults about this? Unfortunately the answer is no. But

1:09:35.760 --> 1:09:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I want the I want the YadA YadA YadA right

1:09:40.240 --> 1:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>where I can just say, hey, you know, all the

1:09:42.120 --> 1:09:45.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff that you already knew about me, blah blah, YadA YadA,

1:09:45.280 --> 1:09:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I hate all the terrorists, but let's talk about this

1:09:47.000 --> 1:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>issue or blah blah blah. You know, I believe in

1:09:50.160 --> 1:09:54.519
<v Speaker 1>the Constitution, and I'm a strong supporter of the United

1:09:54.520 --> 1:09:57.880
<v Speaker 1>States military, but I disagree with this particular general on

1:09:57.920 --> 1:10:01.839
<v Speaker 1>this thing or whatever it is. Welcome back to my team.

1:10:01.880 --> 1:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>We haven't talked about the story yet. I haven't really

1:10:04.920 --> 1:10:07.519
<v Speaker 1>been paying very close attention to it, but it has

1:10:07.560 --> 1:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>been getting a lot of headlines. You have a Democrat

1:10:10.560 --> 1:10:14.600
<v Speaker 1>member of Congress who has resigned due to a I

1:10:14.600 --> 1:10:16.080
<v Speaker 1>guess we could just call it a sex scan. Well,

1:10:16.120 --> 1:10:18.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of a lot of moving parts, a

1:10:18.040 --> 1:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of stuff going on here. We have Tiana Lowe,

1:10:21.120 --> 1:10:24.479
<v Speaker 1>commentary writer for the Washington Examiner, joining us now to

1:10:24.479 --> 1:10:26.600
<v Speaker 1>tell us what Exachie went on here. Tiana, great to

1:10:26.600 --> 1:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>have you back, Hi Buck, thanks for having it all right, So,

1:10:30.120 --> 1:10:33.320
<v Speaker 1>so who is this now soon to be former member

1:10:33.320 --> 1:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>of Congress and what the heck happened? So Katie Hill

1:10:38.360 --> 1:10:43.559
<v Speaker 1>was representing a formerly a very Republican district of Los

1:10:43.560 --> 1:10:48.599
<v Speaker 1>Angeles County out Usine Valley, and then she's a diehard

1:10:48.680 --> 1:10:52.680
<v Speaker 1>progressive pro Medicare for all that she amounted to a

1:10:52.720 --> 1:10:56.679
<v Speaker 1>part of Trump's or the supposed new wave of twenty eighteen.

1:10:57.400 --> 1:11:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Now red State, the conservative news site. They wrote a

1:11:02.200 --> 1:11:08.040
<v Speaker 1>story over a week ago that showed foes and text

1:11:08.080 --> 1:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>messages indicating that Hale had had one affair with her

1:11:14.080 --> 1:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>female campaign staffer and then another affair with an actual

1:11:20.520 --> 1:11:25.560
<v Speaker 1>staffer in her congressional office. Hale, who is openly bisexual,

1:11:26.600 --> 1:11:30.240
<v Speaker 1>apparently engaged the campaign staffer another, a twenty two year

1:11:30.280 --> 1:11:33.479
<v Speaker 1>old woman in a thruffle with her husband like a

1:11:33.520 --> 1:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>polyamorous three way relationship now on its face, you know,

1:11:38.120 --> 1:11:40.639
<v Speaker 1>if they want to do polyamory. I don't think that

1:11:40.960 --> 1:11:44.040
<v Speaker 1>her voters would have a problem with that. The issue

1:11:44.240 --> 1:11:46.760
<v Speaker 1>is that, you know, a twenty two year old in

1:11:46.800 --> 1:11:50.200
<v Speaker 1>a relationship with someone more than a decade her senior

1:11:50.240 --> 1:11:53.519
<v Speaker 1>who was also her boss, is a bit problematic. And

1:11:53.600 --> 1:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>especially the texts that were released by Red State indicated

1:11:57.439 --> 1:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>that the that the campaign staffer abused in the relationship

1:12:02.080 --> 1:12:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and called Hill toxic. And the photos, brother, do we

1:12:07.360 --> 1:12:10.599
<v Speaker 1>know where the photos came from? And and I saw

1:12:10.680 --> 1:12:12.680
<v Speaker 1>some conservatives you were saying that they felt like the

1:12:12.680 --> 1:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>photos should not have been published or what can you

1:12:15.160 --> 1:12:16.680
<v Speaker 1>tell us about that? And what do you think about that?

1:12:17.600 --> 1:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I agree whoever leaked the photos does belong

1:12:22.320 --> 1:12:26.799
<v Speaker 1>in jail because it violates revenge porn statutes in most states,

1:12:26.800 --> 1:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>including California. And it's possible that it was the ex

1:12:30.800 --> 1:12:33.840
<v Speaker 1>husband who she's now going through divorced with. You know,

1:12:33.880 --> 1:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the photos should not have been leaked. However, it is

1:12:37.479 --> 1:12:41.640
<v Speaker 1>of national interest if she was having a relationship with

1:12:41.680 --> 1:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>two of her subordinates, one of which violated House ethics

1:12:46.439 --> 1:12:48.640
<v Speaker 1>rules that were passed just last year. You know, the

1:12:48.640 --> 1:12:51.800
<v Speaker 1>House agreed that you that members of Congress are not

1:12:51.880 --> 1:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>allowed to have relationships with the subordinates, and for obvious reasons.

1:12:55.160 --> 1:12:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is one where the Meto movement was

1:12:57.320 --> 1:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>very necessary. We do have to understand that there are

1:13:00.000 --> 1:13:02.720
<v Speaker 1>an abusive power that has involved when you have the

1:13:02.720 --> 1:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>power to hire and fire people. And this is a

1:13:06.000 --> 1:13:08.200
<v Speaker 1>part of the reason why conservatives cared about both Clinton

1:13:08.240 --> 1:13:11.879
<v Speaker 1>and Monica Lewinsky. Um, but those are two separate issues,

1:13:12.040 --> 1:13:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and now that the story is out there, yes, resigning

1:13:14.479 --> 1:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>was the right thing to do. Did you notice a

1:13:17.920 --> 1:13:21.960
<v Speaker 1>slowness from many of the major outlets to cover because

1:13:22.000 --> 1:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I know you've been writing about this from the beginning.

1:13:24.720 --> 1:13:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Was there a sense that you had that this was

1:13:27.520 --> 1:13:30.600
<v Speaker 1>just getting less attention than it would have had the

1:13:30.720 --> 1:13:34.559
<v Speaker 1>party affiliation of Katie O Congressman Katie Hill been different.

1:13:34.760 --> 1:13:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Or do you think that they that this story grew

1:13:37.520 --> 1:13:41.760
<v Speaker 1>naturally as more information came out, and that the complaints

1:13:41.800 --> 1:13:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that I've seen from some of our somewhat fellow conservatives

1:13:44.560 --> 1:13:47.760
<v Speaker 1>out there that this was being suppressed or perhaps a

1:13:47.760 --> 1:13:50.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit ahead of ahead of where things were. Oh,

1:13:50.800 --> 1:13:53.559
<v Speaker 1>this absolutely was slow walks. You know, it took a

1:13:53.600 --> 1:13:56.559
<v Speaker 1>week for the story to gain traction. If this were

1:13:56.680 --> 1:14:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Dan Crenshaw, there were photos of him nude rushing the

1:14:00.960 --> 1:14:04.599
<v Speaker 1>hair of one of his campaign staffers, this would be

1:14:04.960 --> 1:14:09.960
<v Speaker 1>primetime News, twenty four hour pearl clutching. Again. I'm not

1:14:10.000 --> 1:14:13.320
<v Speaker 1>saying that revenge porn is good or acceptable, or that

1:14:13.520 --> 1:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>you know that we should be focusing on the lasciviousness

1:14:17.400 --> 1:14:19.600
<v Speaker 1>of the story. But the fact is that, you know,

1:14:19.680 --> 1:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the mainstream media I had no time, had no problem

1:14:22.360 --> 1:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>salivating over the fact that I believe it was a

1:14:24.960 --> 1:14:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Republican Congressman Joe Burton's much to resigned after his ex

1:14:29.320 --> 1:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>paralm war were attempting to extort him with nude photos

1:14:32.120 --> 1:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and wound up. I believe she released them, and that

1:14:35.280 --> 1:14:37.479
<v Speaker 1>was the mainstream media story, and no one was calling

1:14:37.520 --> 1:14:41.240
<v Speaker 1>him a victim when clearly he was. Do you think

1:14:41.280 --> 1:14:43.639
<v Speaker 1>that there's also a problem at the left? Now we're

1:14:43.640 --> 1:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>talking to Tiana Low, everybody, she's a commentary writer at

1:14:46.080 --> 1:14:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the Washington Examinery. You can also follow her on Twitter

1:14:48.400 --> 1:14:51.479
<v Speaker 1>at Tiana Low. Do you think there's a there's an

1:14:51.520 --> 1:14:53.920
<v Speaker 1>issue that the left runs into, or how do you

1:14:53.960 --> 1:14:56.320
<v Speaker 1>think they handle? It was clearly there's an issue. How

1:14:56.360 --> 1:15:00.680
<v Speaker 1>do you think they handle and the problems complexities that

1:15:00.720 --> 1:15:04.400
<v Speaker 1>come up for them in dealing with women in power

1:15:04.520 --> 1:15:07.639
<v Speaker 1>in workplace situations in the era of Me too, which

1:15:07.680 --> 1:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>has so clearly up to this point been almost entirely

1:15:11.439 --> 1:15:14.840
<v Speaker 1>about men abusing positions of power. What do you think

1:15:14.840 --> 1:15:17.519
<v Speaker 1>are some of the problems they run into and the

1:15:17.560 --> 1:15:21.439
<v Speaker 1>application of the me too standard? Well, again, this is

1:15:21.520 --> 1:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, the me too movement isn't about just exerting

1:15:25.720 --> 1:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>third wave feminism, because women are capable of being aggressors,

1:15:29.560 --> 1:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>women are capable of lanning. It's about looking at power

1:15:32.000 --> 1:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>structures and caring of an evidence. And the fact is

1:15:34.720 --> 1:15:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that the evidence here was ample and showing that she

1:15:38.280 --> 1:15:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean again, so he'll denies the affair with the

1:15:41.840 --> 1:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>staffer who works for her in Congress or looked for

1:15:44.880 --> 1:15:48.800
<v Speaker 1>her in Congress, and she's besign, But the evidence indicates

1:15:48.880 --> 1:15:52.439
<v Speaker 1>that she had not one, but two affairs where she

1:15:52.520 --> 1:15:55.360
<v Speaker 1>had the power to hire and fire people. And I mean,

1:15:55.360 --> 1:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>when it's two, it's clearly a pattern. And yes, she

1:15:58.160 --> 1:16:00.400
<v Speaker 1>should absolutely be held up to account, much as I'll

1:16:00.400 --> 1:16:03.559
<v Speaker 1>Frank and Law. Are you so resigning was the right move? Yes?

1:16:04.439 --> 1:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Huh yeah, there we go. So do you think there's

1:16:06.760 --> 1:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>anything that comes after this though? Is there anything else

1:16:08.880 --> 1:16:11.360
<v Speaker 1>we should be looking out for any any changes in

1:16:11.360 --> 1:16:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the way Congress will handle this stuff going forward? Well,

1:16:14.800 --> 1:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I think in the way that the media jumped to

1:16:18.320 --> 1:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>a turn out all their actually bag Daddy was courageous

1:16:24.479 --> 1:16:27.519
<v Speaker 1>for blowing himself up in front of his three children

1:16:27.640 --> 1:16:29.479
<v Speaker 1>and killing them in the black. Oh we talked about

1:16:29.479 --> 1:16:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Max earlier in the show. He's a lunatic. But keep going.

1:16:32.320 --> 1:16:34.439
<v Speaker 1>I think I think just in the way Max Boot realized,

1:16:34.479 --> 1:16:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh wait, no one else agrees with me because this

1:16:37.479 --> 1:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>story is insane. Like the last twenty four hours, we've

1:16:40.360 --> 1:16:43.360
<v Speaker 1>gotten a bunch of sympathetic coverage of Hill and whatnot,

1:16:43.560 --> 1:16:45.679
<v Speaker 1>and I think everyone in the rest of the country

1:16:45.720 --> 1:16:50.000
<v Speaker 1>realizes this isn't about a feminist, and this isn't an

1:16:50.040 --> 1:16:53.240
<v Speaker 1>attack on a feminist. This is in me too story

1:16:53.520 --> 1:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>and there's no reason why Hill should be given special treatment.

1:16:56.439 --> 1:16:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that that much is finally apparent. Now I

1:16:58.840 --> 1:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>know you're a California name. I want to switch gears

1:17:00.960 --> 1:17:02.799
<v Speaker 1>for a second. Well, we we're talking about a California

1:17:02.840 --> 1:17:07.720
<v Speaker 1>congresswoman too. But do you have an opinion on the

1:17:08.280 --> 1:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the the debate over one whether the fires, because you're

1:17:11.920 --> 1:17:14.559
<v Speaker 1>right now, there's all this news footage, right because big

1:17:14.600 --> 1:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>fires gets people to click on things. That's just the

1:17:16.720 --> 1:17:18.720
<v Speaker 1>simple reality. A lot of news footage, a lot of

1:17:18.760 --> 1:17:20.439
<v Speaker 1>coverage of this. They've got a couple of bad fires

1:17:20.439 --> 1:17:23.080
<v Speaker 1>going in Los Angeles area, I believe, and up in

1:17:23.080 --> 1:17:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Sonoma County too. Do you have an opinion on why

1:17:26.280 --> 1:17:29.599
<v Speaker 1>this is happening or whether there's state's mismanagement to where

1:17:29.600 --> 1:17:33.639
<v Speaker 1>anything else plays a role in this. Yes, so obviously

1:17:33.720 --> 1:17:37.519
<v Speaker 1>climate change is a factor, but a big one does

1:17:37.560 --> 1:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>have to do with how so and so there are

1:17:39.760 --> 1:17:43.120
<v Speaker 1>two factors involved in the state and county governance. So

1:17:43.160 --> 1:17:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the state government is probably the most to blame because

1:17:46.640 --> 1:17:49.599
<v Speaker 1>they don't do controlled for us fires. They don't spend

1:17:49.680 --> 1:17:52.400
<v Speaker 1>enough money, you know, I mean, La County one and

1:17:52.600 --> 1:17:57.200
<v Speaker 1>four out of every ten Angelinos on medical Medicaid medicare,

1:17:57.840 --> 1:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>yet they don't they aren't willing to spend enough mone

1:18:00.040 --> 1:18:03.640
<v Speaker 1>me on you know, patrolling the actual safety and preemptively

1:18:03.680 --> 1:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>doing controlled burns. But then also there is apparently an

1:18:08.160 --> 1:18:11.200
<v Speaker 1>issue when and I don't know the semantics of it. Bucks.

1:18:11.240 --> 1:18:13.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to get into too much detail, but

1:18:13.880 --> 1:18:16.200
<v Speaker 1>it looks like there's a little bit of corruption between

1:18:16.240 --> 1:18:18.760
<v Speaker 1>pg and E, the energy company that is right now

1:18:18.800 --> 1:18:22.519
<v Speaker 1>having to do blackout, little blackout. It looks like there

1:18:22.560 --> 1:18:24.719
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit of corruption between PGINI and Governor

1:18:24.760 --> 1:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Gavin K. Newsom, Like I think that PGINI donated to

1:18:27.400 --> 1:18:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Newsom's campaign, and uh, I mean, it's everything out there

1:18:31.760 --> 1:18:35.639
<v Speaker 1>is quite corrupt. I would certainly blame more than anyone

1:18:35.720 --> 1:18:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the state government. At what point does the at what

1:18:39.000 --> 1:18:42.960
<v Speaker 1>point do is there a critical mass of Californians that

1:18:43.080 --> 1:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>just recognize that, apart from politics, their state government is

1:18:47.080 --> 1:18:49.920
<v Speaker 1>a disaster and there needs to be some change. Are

1:18:50.200 --> 1:18:52.759
<v Speaker 1>they close to that or is that never going to happen?

1:18:53.040 --> 1:18:54.680
<v Speaker 1>What you know, because I mean if you look at

1:18:54.720 --> 1:18:56.160
<v Speaker 1>this from even from the East coast, I'm here in

1:18:56.200 --> 1:18:57.760
<v Speaker 1>New York where we have you know, may or more

1:18:57.800 --> 1:19:01.439
<v Speaker 1>on the Blasio running things. But yeah, if we see California,

1:19:01.439 --> 1:19:03.040
<v Speaker 1>we see all this stuff going on, We're like, why

1:19:03.080 --> 1:19:05.840
<v Speaker 1>can't anybody understand that some of this at least is

1:19:05.880 --> 1:19:09.599
<v Speaker 1>the result of crappy government decisions? Do Californias just think

1:19:09.640 --> 1:19:10.920
<v Speaker 1>that this is the way it asked to be, or

1:19:11.080 --> 1:19:12.720
<v Speaker 1>is there a sense that they're going to cross the

1:19:12.760 --> 1:19:17.719
<v Speaker 1>tipping point? I mean, California, the supposedly most progressive country

1:19:17.720 --> 1:19:20.360
<v Speaker 1>in the States, has a Genie coefficient closer to a

1:19:20.360 --> 1:19:24.200
<v Speaker 1>South American country than any rent state. You know, the

1:19:24.320 --> 1:19:28.880
<v Speaker 1>income inequality is terrible. The racial divisions are from a

1:19:28.920 --> 1:19:33.800
<v Speaker 1>city perspective or not great. An issue there is that

1:19:33.840 --> 1:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the California State Republican Party has basically given up. If

1:19:38.080 --> 1:19:42.560
<v Speaker 1>you compare how the Republican Party in Texas treats minorities

1:19:42.560 --> 1:19:46.600
<v Speaker 1>in those outreach and how they perform quite well versus California,

1:19:46.760 --> 1:19:50.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, the difference is astounding. So it will take both,

1:19:50.880 --> 1:19:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I think a collapse, I mean the next ressession. The

1:19:55.320 --> 1:19:59.920
<v Speaker 1>debt problem in California is good, prove monumental, but it's

1:20:00.080 --> 1:20:02.840
<v Speaker 1>you look at. It will take the state government having

1:20:02.880 --> 1:20:04.559
<v Speaker 1>a week up call in terms of like the exodus

1:20:04.600 --> 1:20:07.160
<v Speaker 1>in the state that's happening right now, and then also

1:20:07.439 --> 1:20:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the California Republican Party rebuilding and storming out good candidates.

1:20:12.840 --> 1:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>All Right, we'll have to wait for that. It might

1:20:15.120 --> 1:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>be a while. Yeah, Tiana Loo everybody Washington examin or

1:20:18.320 --> 1:20:19.880
<v Speaker 1>check out. Well, what's your next piece going to be on?

1:20:20.000 --> 1:20:24.679
<v Speaker 1>Or have you not decided yet? I haven't decided yet

1:20:25.160 --> 1:20:28.479
<v Speaker 1>keeping tabs on this Ukraine thing. So we'll see. All right,

1:20:28.520 --> 1:20:30.759
<v Speaker 1>We'll go to Watchington Examiner dot com. Look for Tiana

1:20:30.760 --> 1:20:34.519
<v Speaker 1>Low follow on social media Twitter and Facebook and stuff. Gianna,

1:20:34.560 --> 1:20:38.320
<v Speaker 1>thanks for joining, Thank you buck. Let's talk about Medicare

1:20:38.360 --> 1:20:43.200
<v Speaker 1>for All for a moment, shall we? Oh? Yes, primary

1:20:43.720 --> 1:20:47.719
<v Speaker 1>policy idea of the Democrats right now, the single biggest

1:20:47.760 --> 1:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>debate in the country over a true policy issue. And

1:20:51.360 --> 1:20:54.280
<v Speaker 1>there is a bipartisan group that has just looked at

1:20:54.320 --> 1:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Medicare for all and guess what, folks, It is too

1:21:01.400 --> 1:21:06.400
<v Speaker 1>much money. The only ways I mean, if you're just

1:21:06.479 --> 1:21:08.519
<v Speaker 1>looking at this as a pure function of the numbers,

1:21:08.520 --> 1:21:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the only ways to get anything close to funding for

1:21:12.640 --> 1:21:14.839
<v Speaker 1>Medicare for all, And that's assuming you don't have spikes

1:21:14.840 --> 1:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and usage, because now people just show up like, oh,

1:21:16.800 --> 1:21:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll go to the doctor. I'll go to the doctor.

1:21:18.000 --> 1:21:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Who cares? Would be if you instituted crippling taxes on everybody?

1:21:27.439 --> 1:21:30.920
<v Speaker 1>This is what this piece today is Medicare for All

1:21:31.000 --> 1:21:35.280
<v Speaker 1>study funding Medicare for All with tax and the riches impossible,

1:21:35.320 --> 1:21:39.040
<v Speaker 1>according to this study is a bipartisan budget watchdog report

1:21:39.080 --> 1:21:43.600
<v Speaker 1>that was just released, and here are some of the

1:21:43.640 --> 1:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>most worthwhile findings. Quote. There's not enough annual income available

1:21:49.800 --> 1:21:53.040
<v Speaker 1>among higher earners to finance the full cost of Medicare

1:21:53.040 --> 1:21:57.599
<v Speaker 1>for All on a static basis. Even increasing the top

1:21:57.680 --> 1:22:00.960
<v Speaker 1>two income tax rates blind to individuals making over two

1:22:01.000 --> 1:22:03.479
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand dollars a year and couples making over four

1:22:03.600 --> 1:22:07.439
<v Speaker 1>hundred three per year to one hundred percent would not

1:22:07.800 --> 1:22:13.439
<v Speaker 1>raise thirty trillion dollars over a decade. An accompanying chart

1:22:13.520 --> 1:22:17.360
<v Speaker 1>in the study lists the tax the rich funding option

1:22:17.560 --> 1:22:23.439
<v Speaker 1>as impossible. The options for financing Medicare for All without

1:22:23.479 --> 1:22:28.559
<v Speaker 1>increasing taxes are similarly immoderate. The CRFB says the federal

1:22:28.600 --> 1:22:31.719
<v Speaker 1>government would need to cut the non health federal spending

1:22:32.240 --> 1:22:35.479
<v Speaker 1>by eighty percent in order to pay for Medicare for

1:22:35.600 --> 1:22:40.160
<v Speaker 1>All without increasing taxes. This would require get ready for it,

1:22:40.160 --> 1:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be fun, cutting Social Security benefits from approximately

1:22:44.600 --> 1:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>eighteen thousand dollars to about thirty six hundred dollars each year,

1:22:49.000 --> 1:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and cut troop numbers wait for it, from one point

1:22:53.439 --> 1:23:00.480
<v Speaker 1>three million to two hundred and seventy thousand, so truly

1:23:00.680 --> 1:23:02.960
<v Speaker 1>slash and burn the military down to numbers that would

1:23:02.960 --> 1:23:06.840
<v Speaker 1>be unrecognizable to America for the last couple hundred years,

1:23:07.680 --> 1:23:17.519
<v Speaker 1>and make social security benefits far less for people. And

1:23:18.280 --> 1:23:20.160
<v Speaker 1>this is just there's only so many ways you can

1:23:20.200 --> 1:23:23.120
<v Speaker 1>try to move these numbers around. You can try to

1:23:23.120 --> 1:23:27.559
<v Speaker 1>rebalance them, cut here, slash there, tinker around the edges.

1:23:29.439 --> 1:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>And then you might say, well, what about modern monetary

1:23:32.840 --> 1:23:36.680
<v Speaker 1>theory buck that I say, oh, they looked at that

1:23:36.720 --> 1:23:42.880
<v Speaker 1>as well. Quote deficit financing Medicare for all would be

1:23:43.040 --> 1:23:46.719
<v Speaker 1>far more damaging to the economy, according to report, assuming

1:23:46.720 --> 1:23:49.920
<v Speaker 1>that such a massive increase in the debt would not

1:23:50.120 --> 1:23:53.679
<v Speaker 1>royal financial markets or lead to high inflation, we estimate

1:23:53.720 --> 1:23:57.360
<v Speaker 1>that one one hundred and eight percent of GDP increase

1:23:57.400 --> 1:24:00.120
<v Speaker 1>in the federal debt would shrink the size of the

1:24:00.160 --> 1:24:04.840
<v Speaker 1>economy by roughly five percent in twenty thirty, the equivalent

1:24:04.880 --> 1:24:08.759
<v Speaker 1>of a forty five hundred dollars reduction in per person income,

1:24:09.240 --> 1:24:14.559
<v Speaker 1>and far more than that in the following years. You

1:24:14.680 --> 1:24:17.400
<v Speaker 1>can't pay for this with the rich, and you can't

1:24:17.439 --> 1:24:21.080
<v Speaker 1>pay for this without massive tax increases. And if you

1:24:21.280 --> 1:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>try to pay for it by just adding to our

1:24:25.080 --> 1:24:30.160
<v Speaker 1>already out of controlled debt. Guess what you're going to creter.

1:24:30.760 --> 1:24:34.200
<v Speaker 1>You're going to create the economy. And that's assuming that

1:24:34.240 --> 1:24:37.880
<v Speaker 1>there's not just a crisis that comes up that would

1:24:37.880 --> 1:24:40.880
<v Speaker 1>make everybody much poorer and worse off and all the

1:24:40.920 --> 1:24:42.960
<v Speaker 1>rest of it. But you know, I remember I was

1:24:43.000 --> 1:24:46.559
<v Speaker 1>at I was a politicon talk with people, and they

1:24:46.880 --> 1:24:50.479
<v Speaker 1>these democrats on stage with me. They think you're crazy,

1:24:50.680 --> 1:24:53.519
<v Speaker 1>or they think I'm crazy because I look at this

1:24:53.600 --> 1:24:55.360
<v Speaker 1>and I see the numbers, and I say, this is

1:24:55.400 --> 1:25:01.120
<v Speaker 1>not a good idea. There is a faith based component

1:25:01.560 --> 1:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>in medicare for all. Remember a lot of people who

1:25:03.840 --> 1:25:09.080
<v Speaker 1>are big time statists tend to be a lot of

1:25:09.120 --> 1:25:13.479
<v Speaker 1>them tend to be atheists or people of no particular faith.

1:25:14.160 --> 1:25:17.600
<v Speaker 1>And the state, then is what it would be in

1:25:17.960 --> 1:25:21.840
<v Speaker 1>loco dais in place of God. The state is in

1:25:21.920 --> 1:25:23.960
<v Speaker 1>place of God. The state plays the role of God

1:25:24.000 --> 1:25:27.960
<v Speaker 1>in many people's lives, and therefore they have no problem

1:25:28.040 --> 1:25:30.120
<v Speaker 1>with the state growing all the time and becoming a

1:25:30.200 --> 1:25:33.920
<v Speaker 1>more prominent part of everyone's lives and having more power,

1:25:34.640 --> 1:25:36.680
<v Speaker 1>because that's just going to be better for all of us.

1:25:37.680 --> 1:25:42.200
<v Speaker 1>But there's a deep ideological need that many people have

1:25:42.360 --> 1:25:46.439
<v Speaker 1>who are supporting this Medicare for All proposal to remove

1:25:47.200 --> 1:25:54.080
<v Speaker 1>any market based incentives, any individual choice from this equation

1:25:54.080 --> 1:25:56.160
<v Speaker 1>and make it all about just the government writing at checks.

1:25:56.200 --> 1:25:57.920
<v Speaker 1>The government's writing at checks. And to this, I also

1:25:57.960 --> 1:26:01.559
<v Speaker 1>just want to say health it's a very personal thing

1:26:01.600 --> 1:26:04.160
<v Speaker 1>for all of us. We all make decisions that affect

1:26:04.160 --> 1:26:05.759
<v Speaker 1>our health. I mean, you know, I know, for example,

1:26:05.760 --> 1:26:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I should eat less chocolate and like not drink tequila

1:26:09.040 --> 1:26:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and mescal during the week, but like, sometimes I want

1:26:11.240 --> 1:26:14.160
<v Speaker 1>some chocolate, you know, sometimes you know you want you

1:26:14.160 --> 1:26:16.240
<v Speaker 1>don't want any decide salad, you want to order a franchise.

1:26:16.240 --> 1:26:17.920
<v Speaker 1>We're all making decisions all the time about our health

1:26:17.960 --> 1:26:19.840
<v Speaker 1>that affect our health, I should say, And it's really

1:26:19.840 --> 1:26:22.000
<v Speaker 1>more about habits than I know, that's silly to say

1:26:22.040 --> 1:26:24.680
<v Speaker 1>any eating any one thing, but it's about habits that

1:26:24.760 --> 1:26:29.680
<v Speaker 1>we have. But we also have to understand that the

1:26:29.760 --> 1:26:32.960
<v Speaker 1>choices that we make about which doctors to see about

1:26:33.720 --> 1:26:36.760
<v Speaker 1>are about how we're going to try and maintain a

1:26:36.800 --> 1:26:39.519
<v Speaker 1>certain level of health. Those are going to affect us

1:26:39.520 --> 1:26:42.040
<v Speaker 1>no matter what the government does or sets And I

1:26:42.080 --> 1:26:45.679
<v Speaker 1>think this is where there needs to be a bigger

1:26:45.680 --> 1:26:49.519
<v Speaker 1>discussion about how people how do people stay healthy In America,

1:26:49.520 --> 1:26:52.439
<v Speaker 1>We're always talking about previousing conditions and people with terrible diseases,

1:26:52.479 --> 1:26:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's not where most healthcare spending is. Preseasing conditions

1:26:55.439 --> 1:27:00.360
<v Speaker 1>actually a very small part of healthcare spending. I mean,

1:27:00.560 --> 1:27:02.800
<v Speaker 1>put aside whether the people are covered or not. I

1:27:02.840 --> 1:27:04.680
<v Speaker 1>just mean that that's a very very small segment of

1:27:04.680 --> 1:27:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the population, a true pre existing condition that would have

1:27:06.960 --> 1:27:15.080
<v Speaker 1>been uninsurable before Obamacare. Most healthcare spending is lifestyle disease related,

1:27:15.960 --> 1:27:20.280
<v Speaker 1>most of it, or old age, and those are things

1:27:20.320 --> 1:27:27.799
<v Speaker 1>that require an approach of people educating themselves, making smart choices,

1:27:27.840 --> 1:27:30.400
<v Speaker 1>making a decision, and a different approach from the medical

1:27:30.439 --> 1:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>community about how to encourage healthy behaviors earlier and younger.

1:27:35.360 --> 1:27:37.320
<v Speaker 1>And you know this is it's just such a bigger

1:27:37.360 --> 1:27:39.080
<v Speaker 1>issue than Oh, the Governm's gonna write the check for everything.

1:27:39.120 --> 1:27:42.559
<v Speaker 1>Everything's gonna be fine, you know what I mean. If

1:27:42.560 --> 1:27:45.759
<v Speaker 1>the government is going to be writing the check for

1:27:45.960 --> 1:27:48.000
<v Speaker 1>your treatments because you have you know, cirrhosis of the

1:27:48.040 --> 1:27:50.880
<v Speaker 1>liver for example. You know that, Okay, someone's writing the checks,

1:27:50.880 --> 1:27:52.439
<v Speaker 1>but it would have been much better to figure out

1:27:52.479 --> 1:27:54.960
<v Speaker 1>how to stop that from happening. Stop the drinking that

1:27:55.080 --> 1:27:57.800
<v Speaker 1>led to that perhaps this is just it's more of

1:27:57.800 --> 1:28:00.680
<v Speaker 1>a philosophical discussion. But medicare for all. It's not going

1:28:00.720 --> 1:28:02.280
<v Speaker 1>to solve all the problems, is what I'm saying. You

1:28:02.280 --> 1:28:03.880
<v Speaker 1>all know that I find the border to be one

1:28:03.880 --> 1:28:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of the most important issues facing the country. I think

1:28:05.800 --> 1:28:08.120
<v Speaker 1>it's fascinating and I think it's one of the areas

1:28:08.120 --> 1:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>that we see the greatest amount of obvious dishonesty from

1:28:10.800 --> 1:28:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the mainstream media in their coverage of it. And that

1:28:14.280 --> 1:28:17.120
<v Speaker 1>then brings me to a story that I saw it.

1:28:17.160 --> 1:28:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I thought, why isn't this getting more attention? And you know,

1:28:21.080 --> 1:28:25.439
<v Speaker 1>and it's because the media is completely invested in the

1:28:25.560 --> 1:28:29.559
<v Speaker 1>Russia Ukraine. Trump is a trader, Trump needs to be impeached.

1:28:29.560 --> 1:28:32.760
<v Speaker 1>All that that just dominant. That takes all the oxygen

1:28:32.800 --> 1:28:35.599
<v Speaker 1>out of the room. But this story is important. This

1:28:35.760 --> 1:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>story matters in a way that I think people should

1:28:39.880 --> 1:28:44.080
<v Speaker 1>be much more aware of, much more cognizant of. And

1:28:44.160 --> 1:28:48.080
<v Speaker 1>it has to do with the Trump administration at the border,

1:28:48.160 --> 1:28:51.599
<v Speaker 1>testing or getting ready to test. It's I think they've

1:28:51.640 --> 1:28:53.800
<v Speaker 1>started to do it, but they're keeping it pretty close

1:28:53.840 --> 1:28:59.759
<v Speaker 1>hold right now. How it's working. Rapid Asylum Review, which

1:29:00.840 --> 1:29:04.400
<v Speaker 1>would mean that now border patrol and this is going

1:29:04.479 --> 1:29:06.280
<v Speaker 1>to change the process, and oh, we know there's going

1:29:06.320 --> 1:29:08.280
<v Speaker 1>to be all these lawsuits. But here's the basics of it,

1:29:09.360 --> 1:29:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the whole scam that and it was a scam. The

1:29:11.960 --> 1:29:14.720
<v Speaker 1>scam that has been run by predominantly Central American but

1:29:14.720 --> 1:29:17.519
<v Speaker 1>not entirely Central American illegal immigrants in the United States,

1:29:17.560 --> 1:29:23.200
<v Speaker 1>illegal aliens in the United States is based on exploiting

1:29:23.880 --> 1:29:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the inability of the system to process people in a

1:29:26.960 --> 1:29:33.120
<v Speaker 1>timely enough fashion, so that what ends up happening is

1:29:33.160 --> 1:29:35.880
<v Speaker 1>they're releasing the interior of the United States and released

1:29:36.680 --> 1:29:41.200
<v Speaker 1>with the promise that they will come, that they will

1:29:41.240 --> 1:29:43.479
<v Speaker 1>come back and show up further hearings. And as we know,

1:29:43.640 --> 1:29:45.719
<v Speaker 1>once you're in the United States, you established more roots

1:29:45.760 --> 1:29:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and then you have, you know, all these lawyers that

1:29:48.040 --> 1:29:51.280
<v Speaker 1>are free that will come and pro bono represent you

1:29:51.320 --> 1:29:54.000
<v Speaker 1>against the immigration courts, and they're all these so it

1:29:54.000 --> 1:29:56.120
<v Speaker 1>makes it very unlikely, very hard than any of these

1:29:56.120 --> 1:29:57.799
<v Speaker 1>people who are coming in this we're going to be deported.

1:29:57.840 --> 1:30:01.400
<v Speaker 1>So it became a big backed or scam to get

1:30:01.400 --> 1:30:03.600
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. Say you're fleeing violence in a

1:30:03.640 --> 1:30:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Central American country, Well, I mean all these Central American

1:30:06.000 --> 1:30:10.280
<v Speaker 1>countries were talking about have very high per capita homicide rates,

1:30:10.320 --> 1:30:13.880
<v Speaker 1>so anyone therefore could claim they're fleeing violence. And if

1:30:13.920 --> 1:30:16.120
<v Speaker 1>anyone could claim they're fleeing violence, well THENI minus would

1:30:16.120 --> 1:30:18.760
<v Speaker 1>just allowed the entire country of Honduras do just come

1:30:18.800 --> 1:30:21.840
<v Speaker 1>to America, and I bet a lot of them would

1:30:21.840 --> 1:30:25.799
<v Speaker 1>if they thought they could. So we've seen this scampling,

1:30:25.840 --> 1:30:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and the Democrats lied about this, and the media lied

1:30:29.080 --> 1:30:31.679
<v Speaker 1>about this. There's oh, they're just there's no one lying,

1:30:31.720 --> 1:30:33.840
<v Speaker 1>and there's no one who's scamming the system. Of course

1:30:33.840 --> 1:30:36.400
<v Speaker 1>there were. You had thirty year old saying that they

1:30:36.400 --> 1:30:38.960
<v Speaker 1>were seventeen, so they could come in as an unaccompanied minor.

1:30:38.960 --> 1:30:41.880
<v Speaker 1>You good people renting children's they could pose as family units,

1:30:42.000 --> 1:30:44.400
<v Speaker 1>you god, people who were reading from a script that

1:30:44.439 --> 1:30:46.920
<v Speaker 1>they had been taught by the cartels, so they could

1:30:46.920 --> 1:30:49.800
<v Speaker 1>get past the initial screening at the southern border. Get

1:30:49.840 --> 1:30:55.960
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff going on, and the Trump administration at

1:30:56.000 --> 1:31:00.919
<v Speaker 1>every turn has been stymied, has been has been slowed

1:31:00.920 --> 1:31:06.439
<v Speaker 1>down by Democrats and leftists who are open borders but

1:31:06.479 --> 1:31:08.919
<v Speaker 1>won't admit that their open borders. It's a very important

1:31:09.760 --> 1:31:11.640
<v Speaker 1>thing that we must all keep in mind. Here they

1:31:11.960 --> 1:31:14.200
<v Speaker 1>just want any new shows up gets to stay, especially

1:31:14.400 --> 1:31:16.360
<v Speaker 1>from a third world, especially if you're non English speaking,

1:31:16.439 --> 1:31:18.679
<v Speaker 1>you show up America, you should get to stay. That

1:31:18.840 --> 1:31:21.639
<v Speaker 1>is a widespread belief on the left. And they'll say, oh,

1:31:21.640 --> 1:31:24.479
<v Speaker 1>but we're all a nation of immigrants, and we're all yeah, right,

1:31:25.240 --> 1:31:27.519
<v Speaker 1>legal immigrants. I'm not supposed to be a nation of

1:31:27.520 --> 1:31:30.479
<v Speaker 1>people who come and breaking the law. And also the

1:31:30.560 --> 1:31:32.840
<v Speaker 1>nation of immigrants thing, are we talking about pre ye,

1:31:32.880 --> 1:31:36.960
<v Speaker 1>post welfare state, Great Society programs nineteen sixties, all that

1:31:37.000 --> 1:31:39.639
<v Speaker 1>stuff we're talking about before that or after that? Because

1:31:39.640 --> 1:31:42.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a pretty there's some pretty big distinctions in there

1:31:42.240 --> 1:31:47.479
<v Speaker 1>about the incentives for coming to this country. But the

1:31:47.520 --> 1:31:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Trauma administration was having a lot of problem in this

1:31:50.040 --> 1:31:56.000
<v Speaker 1>whole situation because the process was over The processes were overwhelmed.

1:31:56.000 --> 1:31:57.800
<v Speaker 1>People knew that they were exploiting that and they were

1:31:57.800 --> 1:32:01.559
<v Speaker 1>taking vantage. All right, So then we get to, well

1:32:02.400 --> 1:32:04.040
<v Speaker 1>what can be done about it? And they tried this

1:32:04.200 --> 1:32:07.439
<v Speaker 1>remain in Mexico program, Well, that would that would deal

1:32:07.479 --> 1:32:10.120
<v Speaker 1>with the incentive in this way, if you're not if

1:32:10.160 --> 1:32:11.439
<v Speaker 1>you come to the board. At first of all, they're

1:32:11.439 --> 1:32:14.559
<v Speaker 1>illegally crossing because another way they're trying to limit this

1:32:14.640 --> 1:32:15.920
<v Speaker 1>was to say that you have to wait at a

1:32:15.960 --> 1:32:18.160
<v Speaker 1>portive entry. They can only process so many people that

1:32:18.240 --> 1:32:20.479
<v Speaker 1>are port of entry every day. So then the illegal

1:32:20.479 --> 1:32:23.360
<v Speaker 1>aliens would just cross illegally New America, but then claim

1:32:23.479 --> 1:32:26.800
<v Speaker 1>defensive asylum secondary asylum and say, oh, no, I want

1:32:26.800 --> 1:32:29.360
<v Speaker 1>asylum even though I came into your country illegally. And

1:32:29.400 --> 1:32:31.240
<v Speaker 1>then they get into this process where they stay in

1:32:31.320 --> 1:32:35.360
<v Speaker 1>America and they're never going to leave. So to deal

1:32:35.400 --> 1:32:37.320
<v Speaker 1>with that, we'd say, okay, you're gonna claim defensive asm.

1:32:37.360 --> 1:32:39.000
<v Speaker 1>What if we keep you in Mexico while you're waiting

1:32:39.000 --> 1:32:42.680
<v Speaker 1>for your asylum hearings. A lot of them are a

1:32:42.760 --> 1:32:45.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of them all of a sudden stop showing up

1:32:45.280 --> 1:32:48.479
<v Speaker 1>because that's not what they are. That's not what they want.

1:32:48.479 --> 1:32:49.720
<v Speaker 1>They want to be released in the interier of the

1:32:49.800 --> 1:32:53.160
<v Speaker 1>United States. They want to be on US soil and

1:32:53.240 --> 1:32:55.160
<v Speaker 1>then try to game the system so they can stay.

1:32:55.720 --> 1:32:57.559
<v Speaker 1>So if you keep them on Mexican soil while they're

1:32:57.560 --> 1:33:00.719
<v Speaker 1>waiting to get their asylum hearing, that's a big removal

1:33:00.720 --> 1:33:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of incentive. Oh and the liberals fought against this and

1:33:03.360 --> 1:33:06.559
<v Speaker 1>their lawsuits and judges and you know, federal judges. Oh

1:33:06.600 --> 1:33:08.240
<v Speaker 1>you can't do that. Why can't they do that? Oh,

1:33:08.320 --> 1:33:12.880
<v Speaker 1>you can't do that because we say so. Still waiting

1:33:12.960 --> 1:33:18.160
<v Speaker 1>for a ninth Circuit judge to overturn Trump's killing of

1:33:18.439 --> 1:33:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Baghdaddy under the Administrative Procedure Act unconstitutional. The killing of Baghdaddy.

1:33:23.280 --> 1:33:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure there's a lib somewhere who's gonna say it,

1:33:25.040 --> 1:33:28.080
<v Speaker 1>who's gonna try to put that through. I'm kidding, but

1:33:28.240 --> 1:33:31.160
<v Speaker 1>only kind of. But the other the story that I

1:33:31.200 --> 1:33:32.760
<v Speaker 1>thought was so interesting that just came out in the

1:33:32.840 --> 1:33:35.920
<v Speaker 1>last few days is that they're now testing the administration

1:33:36.120 --> 1:33:45.559
<v Speaker 1>is testing rapid asylum review. Rapid asylum review. Huh So

1:33:45.600 --> 1:33:48.120
<v Speaker 1>what this would be is a change in the process

1:33:48.720 --> 1:33:53.040
<v Speaker 1>where instead of just doing a very preliminary credible fear

1:33:53.200 --> 1:33:57.160
<v Speaker 1>screening by border patrol, border patrol would do a more

1:33:57.400 --> 1:34:01.840
<v Speaker 1>extensive credible fear screening to see if somebody should even

1:34:01.880 --> 1:34:05.160
<v Speaker 1>be let into the country to begin the asylum process.

1:34:05.680 --> 1:34:08.960
<v Speaker 1>They probably as able to ask for some supporting documentation

1:34:09.120 --> 1:34:13.599
<v Speaker 1>or some details of this credible fear ie people being told, Hey,

1:34:13.640 --> 1:34:17.200
<v Speaker 1>just the cartels telling these illegal aliens just say that

1:34:17.240 --> 1:34:19.320
<v Speaker 1>you're fleeing gang violence, and you know, if you go home,

1:34:19.360 --> 1:34:22.280
<v Speaker 1>you'll be killed, then you'll be let into America. Well,

1:34:22.960 --> 1:34:25.320
<v Speaker 1>if you have somebody there who's obviously Spanish speaking, who

1:34:25.320 --> 1:34:28.320
<v Speaker 1>can say, all right, which gang was it, what threats

1:34:28.360 --> 1:34:31.559
<v Speaker 1>did you receive? Did you file up police report? Why

1:34:31.560 --> 1:34:33.559
<v Speaker 1>are they targeting you and not other people? Any you know,

1:34:33.880 --> 1:34:36.439
<v Speaker 1>very straightforward questions. I think we all know what would happen.

1:34:37.800 --> 1:34:42.800
<v Speaker 1>There wouldn't be answers to this because it's a scam,

1:34:42.840 --> 1:34:44.880
<v Speaker 1>but they think that they might be able to through

1:34:44.920 --> 1:34:50.720
<v Speaker 1>this program begin to process asylum applications in this way

1:34:50.840 --> 1:34:53.240
<v Speaker 1>within ten days. So now you would stay in border

1:34:53.280 --> 1:34:55.680
<v Speaker 1>patrol custody, not be released in the interior of the

1:34:55.800 --> 1:34:58.160
<v Speaker 1>United States, and get it done within ten days, whether

1:34:58.240 --> 1:35:00.519
<v Speaker 1>or not you even can begin the ASI lem review

1:35:00.560 --> 1:35:04.040
<v Speaker 1>process because under law, you have to establish the credible

1:35:04.080 --> 1:35:06.560
<v Speaker 1>fear standards. So this is now saying, well, they're gonna

1:35:06.720 --> 1:35:09.479
<v Speaker 1>put a little more, a little more teeth into the

1:35:09.520 --> 1:35:12.759
<v Speaker 1>credible fear standard and make this something that's a real standard.

1:35:14.280 --> 1:35:16.720
<v Speaker 1>This could be a game changer the southern border. The

1:35:16.760 --> 1:35:19.200
<v Speaker 1>crossing is already down, but this could be a game changer.

1:35:19.840 --> 1:35:22.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's going to be fascinating to watch all

1:35:22.479 --> 1:35:26.519
<v Speaker 1>of these Democrats and open border activists and media virtue

1:35:26.560 --> 1:35:29.960
<v Speaker 1>signalers who are going to say this is terrible. They're

1:35:29.960 --> 1:35:33.439
<v Speaker 1>not getting their due process. Why is in a due process?

1:35:34.439 --> 1:35:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Why should lawyers show up and tell these people what

1:35:39.479 --> 1:35:41.559
<v Speaker 1>to say so that they can try to game the

1:35:41.640 --> 1:35:44.800
<v Speaker 1>system and stay in America. They should be able to

1:35:44.800 --> 1:35:47.720
<v Speaker 1>answer straightforward questions about whether or not that why they

1:35:47.760 --> 1:35:49.880
<v Speaker 1>say they have a credible fear standard, or why they

1:35:49.880 --> 1:35:54.120
<v Speaker 1>meet that credible fear standard. Folks, the game looks like

1:35:54.160 --> 1:35:56.439
<v Speaker 1>it may be up soon here, and I think we

1:35:56.560 --> 1:35:58.880
<v Speaker 1>all need to remember that there were many people, many

1:35:58.960 --> 1:36:04.719
<v Speaker 1>prominent people, millionaires, the media, and others, who were willing

1:36:04.760 --> 1:36:06.360
<v Speaker 1>to just go along with the lies in this because

1:36:06.360 --> 1:36:08.240
<v Speaker 1>it made them feel like they were good people. And

1:36:08.280 --> 1:36:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that's what the Democrats wanted, That's what the left wanted. Oh,

1:36:11.120 --> 1:36:13.599
<v Speaker 1>we're also open minded, we have open hearts about all

1:36:13.640 --> 1:36:16.840
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. No one's lying, we've just taken people. Well,

1:36:16.960 --> 1:36:19.040
<v Speaker 1>does everyone get to say no? Not everyone gets to

1:36:19.040 --> 1:36:21.240
<v Speaker 1>say just everyone who comes and lies to border patrol

1:36:21.720 --> 1:36:24.439
<v Speaker 1>about credible fear. Just every family unit that shows up

1:36:24.479 --> 1:36:28.560
<v Speaker 1>explicitly to exploit a law meant to prevent the exploitation

1:36:28.640 --> 1:36:32.440
<v Speaker 1>of children through trafficking. But now with families, they realize

1:36:32.479 --> 1:36:35.160
<v Speaker 1>that we can't separate the kids, so they keep showing up.

1:36:36.520 --> 1:36:39.080
<v Speaker 1>The good faith and good will of the American people

1:36:39.280 --> 1:36:41.040
<v Speaker 1>was being taken advantage of by a lot of people

1:36:41.040 --> 1:36:42.559
<v Speaker 1>that are Southern border, and I I understand many of them

1:36:42.560 --> 1:36:44.960
<v Speaker 1>are poor and desperate, and I get that it doesn't

1:36:44.960 --> 1:36:46.559
<v Speaker 1>make them bad people, but it doesn't mean that we

1:36:46.640 --> 1:36:50.679
<v Speaker 1>have to continue policies that encourage that exploitation. A Trump

1:36:50.680 --> 1:36:54.120
<v Speaker 1>administration right now is trying to shut that down. Give

1:36:54.160 --> 1:36:57.000
<v Speaker 1>them process, and I think that that's a good thing.

1:36:57.720 --> 1:36:59.720
<v Speaker 1>We shall see if it works. Get ready for all

1:36:59.720 --> 1:37:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the challenge. Hey, Team Buck, It's time for roll call.

1:37:14.680 --> 1:37:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Team Bucket. Iheartbe dot com or Facebook dot com, slash

1:37:18.240 --> 1:37:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Buck Saxon if you want to be a part of

1:37:20.000 --> 1:37:28.559
<v Speaker 1>the roll call action. We have Paul writing in first

1:37:28.640 --> 1:37:31.320
<v Speaker 1>here and he writes hey Buck, hopeball as well in

1:37:31.320 --> 1:37:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the Freedom Hut. It's okay. It's okay. Brucer Mark is

1:37:35.200 --> 1:37:38.280
<v Speaker 1>not particularly grumpy today, so that's a good thing. I

1:37:38.320 --> 1:37:40.720
<v Speaker 1>was listening to Friday's show and wanted to update you

1:37:40.800 --> 1:37:46.800
<v Speaker 1>on your prediction about a Hollywood mainstreaming the idea about polygamy.

1:37:46.960 --> 1:37:51.439
<v Speaker 1>Poly amorousness or PolyAm or whatever you call it. There

1:37:51.439 --> 1:37:54.640
<v Speaker 1>are at least two shows about this topic that have

1:37:54.720 --> 1:37:58.719
<v Speaker 1>appeared on TV, Big Love, which ran from twenty sixteen

1:37:58.720 --> 1:38:01.400
<v Speaker 1>to twenty eleven on HBO, and Sister Wives, which started

1:38:01.479 --> 1:38:06.720
<v Speaker 1>in twenty ten and is still producing new episodes on TLC.

1:38:07.640 --> 1:38:09.920
<v Speaker 1>The list of entertainment to deal with a topic on

1:38:09.960 --> 1:38:13.120
<v Speaker 1>streaming services an alternative tech is too large to get into.

1:38:13.160 --> 1:38:15.559
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of scary. There's always Love, Love, Love the

1:38:15.600 --> 1:38:19.240
<v Speaker 1>show Love the hair Shield Saw Paul, Paul, you have

1:38:19.280 --> 1:38:21.880
<v Speaker 1>great taste in radio shows as well as hair so

1:38:21.960 --> 1:38:24.400
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for that. Um. Yeah, but Big

1:38:24.400 --> 1:38:27.679
<v Speaker 1>Love is about polygamy, which is I guess a little

1:38:27.680 --> 1:38:35.320
<v Speaker 1>different than polyamorous or poly is the is the noun polyamorer.

1:38:35.640 --> 1:38:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what you proiser, Mark, do you know?

1:38:37.960 --> 1:38:39.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean you're about to get married, so I mean,

1:38:39.479 --> 1:38:41.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm assuming you know this is not not an area

1:38:41.520 --> 1:38:44.240
<v Speaker 1>that it's really across your radar all that much. Oh,

1:38:44.280 --> 1:38:46.479
<v Speaker 1>I didn't tell you I'm getting married to different I

1:38:46.520 --> 1:38:48.320
<v Speaker 1>could say you're getting married to a few people that

1:38:48.320 --> 1:38:51.880
<v Speaker 1>would that would make sense. Um, that's gotta be expensive, right.

1:38:51.880 --> 1:38:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Peoples can play about kids can you imagine having multiple wives? Oh,

1:38:55.200 --> 1:38:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that'd be terrible expensive. You know, why would I want

1:38:57.960 --> 1:38:59.760
<v Speaker 1>to get nagged by more than one one? How is it? Well?

1:38:59.800 --> 1:39:03.000
<v Speaker 1>How how many times can you go through the boring

1:39:03.080 --> 1:39:05.679
<v Speaker 1>details of your day before it turns into a violation

1:39:05.680 --> 1:39:07.519
<v Speaker 1>of the Geneva Convention? Yeah? Do you just do it?

1:39:07.560 --> 1:39:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Like in a group about your day and then asking shit?

1:39:10.960 --> 1:39:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Everybody down, like you got a blackboard behind you and

1:39:13.200 --> 1:39:15.760
<v Speaker 1>a pointerre like, and then I had lunch and then

1:39:15.800 --> 1:39:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I did this and then you know, but really they

1:39:18.080 --> 1:39:19.559
<v Speaker 1>don't want to they don't care about They just want

1:39:19.560 --> 1:39:21.760
<v Speaker 1>to tell you about their day exactly. So that's you

1:39:21.760 --> 1:39:23.320
<v Speaker 1>gotta get through that fast. And then you got to

1:39:23.320 --> 1:39:26.320
<v Speaker 1>sit there and then she said this about me, and

1:39:26.360 --> 1:39:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm so upset about this. I'm like, then she said this,

1:39:28.280 --> 1:39:30.559
<v Speaker 1>and then she said this other thing. See I voted

1:39:30.600 --> 1:39:33.679
<v Speaker 1>that for a long time working nights. Now that we're

1:39:33.880 --> 1:39:37.200
<v Speaker 1>during the day, I get that again. Yeah, there we go, Thanks, Buck,

1:39:38.240 --> 1:39:44.559
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm here for, James great first name, Hey Buck.

1:39:44.600 --> 1:39:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I will never vote for a socialist or any of

1:39:46.360 --> 1:39:52.799
<v Speaker 1>the far left totalitarian controllers. Uh Nazis are far left too. Um,

1:39:52.800 --> 1:39:54.599
<v Speaker 1>I'll stick to the right of center where our wives

1:39:54.640 --> 1:39:59.200
<v Speaker 1>founders placed us. And there we go. James A. Boston,

1:39:59.240 --> 1:40:04.439
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, James Austin. Let's see here. Brandon Buck, one

1:40:04.479 --> 1:40:06.360
<v Speaker 1>of the main characters, was part of a terrorist group.

1:40:06.400 --> 1:40:09.920
<v Speaker 1>It was also part of a of a polyamorous group

1:40:09.920 --> 1:40:18.000
<v Speaker 1>in the show Caprica Battlestar Galactica prequel from Brandon, I

1:40:18.000 --> 1:40:19.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't I don't know, you know, I'm gonna say it.

1:40:19.560 --> 1:40:22.559
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't get through Battlestar Galactica. I got. I thought

1:40:22.560 --> 1:40:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the graphics and stuff were too cheesy. I got, I

1:40:24.720 --> 1:40:26.920
<v Speaker 1>got bored. And I know people say it's an amazing

1:40:27.040 --> 1:40:29.519
<v Speaker 1>show and it's like life changing if you watch it.

1:40:30.520 --> 1:40:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't do it. I couldn't do it. I couldn't

1:40:33.400 --> 1:40:36.360
<v Speaker 1>get excited about Battlestar Galactic I I really, I really

1:40:36.400 --> 1:40:41.519
<v Speaker 1>did try. Uh don take this ball and run, run run.

1:40:42.160 --> 1:40:45.480
<v Speaker 1>What an inspiration for our world. This president has confirmed

1:40:45.520 --> 1:40:50.639
<v Speaker 1>we have extinguished a demonically driven individual. How can anyone

1:40:50.640 --> 1:40:54.640
<v Speaker 1>our immediately try to spin this blah blah? There we go,

1:40:54.800 --> 1:40:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, sir, appreciate it. Bruce Book, you and your

1:40:59.680 --> 1:41:02.639
<v Speaker 1>produced your sufferer from only knowing well the happenings during

1:41:02.640 --> 1:41:06.720
<v Speaker 1>your lifetimes in sports, movies and music, no one can

1:41:06.800 --> 1:41:10.640
<v Speaker 1>match Wilt Chamberlain. He averaged fifty points per game for

1:41:10.720 --> 1:41:13.400
<v Speaker 1>one season and one scored one hundred points in the game.

1:41:13.800 --> 1:41:17.320
<v Speaker 1>The NBA even changed the court layout because of him.

1:41:17.720 --> 1:41:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I believe they widened the lane so there was more

1:41:19.880 --> 1:41:23.360
<v Speaker 1>room for penetration towards the goal without an automatic block

1:41:23.520 --> 1:41:28.920
<v Speaker 1>by Wilt the stilt Bruce in New Orleans, probably listening down,

1:41:28.960 --> 1:41:34.240
<v Speaker 1>hopefully down on our wonderful New Orleans radio station which

1:41:34.760 --> 1:41:36.400
<v Speaker 1>people can listen on, which is a lot of fun.

1:41:36.600 --> 1:41:39.080
<v Speaker 1>What do you have? What you got to say something? Well,

1:41:39.120 --> 1:41:41.559
<v Speaker 1>I was beat about and shouldn't you know the station? Yeah?

1:41:41.600 --> 1:41:43.599
<v Speaker 1>Of course I know the station. It's a wonderful station,

1:41:43.840 --> 1:41:49.280
<v Speaker 1>of course. Yeah, don't worry about it. Uh done. Add

1:41:49.360 --> 1:41:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Daniels band to your playlist. I don't know what

1:41:53.439 --> 1:41:57.599
<v Speaker 1>that is. Who is that? I don't know. It sounds

1:41:57.640 --> 1:42:02.880
<v Speaker 1>like a band. Yeah, sounds like a music recommendation. Yeah,

1:42:03.040 --> 1:42:08.640
<v Speaker 1>there we go. Maureen hey Buck and producer Mark you

1:42:08.760 --> 1:42:12.160
<v Speaker 1>men of mystery. She wrote it not me about the

1:42:12.200 --> 1:42:15.599
<v Speaker 1>whole polyamory thing. You were sometimes conflating all the variations

1:42:15.640 --> 1:42:18.519
<v Speaker 1>of such lifestyles. So here's some clarity for your listeners.

1:42:19.240 --> 1:42:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Polygamy is one man with more than one wife, you know,

1:42:22.760 --> 1:42:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I know. Polyandry is one woman with more than one husband. Oh,

1:42:27.280 --> 1:42:29.479
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know that, and they are only with her

1:42:29.520 --> 1:42:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and nobody else. Wait, polyander is one woman with more

1:42:34.160 --> 1:42:38.040
<v Speaker 1>than one husband and there with her and nobody else.

1:42:38.120 --> 1:42:40.240
<v Speaker 1>That's a thing. I don't even know. I don't even

1:42:40.280 --> 1:42:41.439
<v Speaker 1>know that was a thing. Did you know that was

1:42:41.479 --> 1:42:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a thing. I hadn't even heard of that. Learning new stuff,

1:42:45.160 --> 1:42:49.840
<v Speaker 1>all right. Polyamory, however, is a total sexual free for all.

1:42:50.439 --> 1:42:52.679
<v Speaker 1>It's one man and one woman in a relationship together,

1:42:52.760 --> 1:42:54.800
<v Speaker 1>often married, but they're free to be with any man

1:42:54.880 --> 1:42:57.519
<v Speaker 1>and woman they want to be with as many partners

1:42:57.520 --> 1:42:59.639
<v Speaker 1>of either gender as they want. It's a total free

1:42:59.640 --> 1:43:02.160
<v Speaker 1>for all, both sides of a very non monogamous pairing.

1:43:02.280 --> 1:43:05.400
<v Speaker 1>That's polyamory. It's sad. I know about the stuff, but

1:43:05.400 --> 1:43:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm a psychotherapist, so I just know about things. By

1:43:08.160 --> 1:43:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the way. I'm grateful. That's why she knew what polyandry.

1:43:10.479 --> 1:43:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I never that was like some that's some textbooks. That's

1:43:13.080 --> 1:43:15.040
<v Speaker 1>some textbook level stuff. Yeah, that's like with the dusty

1:43:15.040 --> 1:43:16.640
<v Speaker 1>books behind the doc You know what I mean that

1:43:16.680 --> 1:43:19.160
<v Speaker 1>you're like, what is in there? Polyandry's in those books?

1:43:19.160 --> 1:43:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know what that is. By the way,

1:43:21.040 --> 1:43:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm so grateful for your podcast, as you often get,

1:43:23.120 --> 1:43:26.759
<v Speaker 1>but you often get preempted for stupid sports. I love football,

1:43:26.760 --> 1:43:28.880
<v Speaker 1>but not if it hears if it interferes with hearing

1:43:28.880 --> 1:43:31.280
<v Speaker 1>your voice. So the podcast assures me I'll never have

1:43:31.320 --> 1:43:34.040
<v Speaker 1>to miss a broadcast. I saw it on Pluto TV once,

1:43:35.240 --> 1:43:37.800
<v Speaker 1>but it's not as convenient as your podcast sometimes, so

1:43:37.840 --> 1:43:39.559
<v Speaker 1>you do keep many of a safe and warm listening to.

1:43:39.560 --> 1:43:42.280
<v Speaker 1>You're simply the best Maureen in California. Well, thank you

1:43:42.320 --> 1:43:45.320
<v Speaker 1>so much, Maureen. And yes, remember, folks, if you're ever

1:43:45.520 --> 1:43:50.680
<v Speaker 1>unable to listen on your local radio station, you can

1:43:50.720 --> 1:43:52.559
<v Speaker 1>always listen to the podcast. So that's why I ask

1:43:52.600 --> 1:43:55.160
<v Speaker 1>that you please subscribe, even if you're not somebody listens

1:43:55.160 --> 1:43:57.679
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of podcasts, Please do subscribe the podcast

1:43:57.760 --> 1:44:01.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Buck Sexton Show. And that way, when ever

1:44:01.120 --> 1:44:02.559
<v Speaker 1>you want to listen to any day, it'll be on

1:44:02.640 --> 1:44:05.639
<v Speaker 1>your phone. Subscribe on iTunes or on the iHeart app,

1:44:06.040 --> 1:44:10.360
<v Speaker 1>and also download Pluto TV and you can watch this show.

1:44:10.400 --> 1:44:12.639
<v Speaker 1>Channel two forty eight, the first the best channel there's

1:44:12.680 --> 1:44:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stuff on there though, just so I'm

1:44:14.040 --> 1:44:16.200
<v Speaker 1>saying it's a worthwhile after you to download in general.

1:44:17.000 --> 1:44:19.240
<v Speaker 1>But the first channel two forty eight on Pluto is

1:44:19.240 --> 1:44:22.160
<v Speaker 1>where we do our show, and Jesse Kelly also shows

1:44:22.240 --> 1:44:23.920
<v Speaker 1>up and does his show, and we're gonna have other

1:44:23.920 --> 1:44:27.080
<v Speaker 1>people joining in the action in the weeks and months ahead,

1:44:27.080 --> 1:44:29.320
<v Speaker 1>which is gonna be fantastic. That's gonna be our show.

1:44:29.640 --> 1:44:31.960
<v Speaker 1>We gotta go because producer Mark's got important things to do,

1:44:32.520 --> 1:44:35.439
<v Speaker 1>but we will talk to you all tomorrow. Shield's Hot