WEBVTT - Week 3 NFL Best Bets (Ep. 57)

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, welcome back to another episode of the Betting

0:00:16.640 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Pros NFL podcast. I'm your host, Dan Harris. With me,

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:22.639
<v Speaker 1>of course, is Matt Pearl. You can find us on

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Dan Harris Ady and at Sports Talk Matt.

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Matt. What's going on?

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 3>I am ready to go here. I feel a five

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 3>and oh coming in the DraftKings. I like the slate.

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm hot and ready to go today.

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:36.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, you are hot, that is true. I hate

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>this slate. So this is gonna be very interesting as

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>we talked through it. What did you do in the circle?

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:44.560
<v Speaker 1>By the way, how did you go in the circa.

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Breaking two, three and two, five and five in both contests?

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:50.479
<v Speaker 1>All right, so yeah, let's recap the where we are

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>in the DK contest before we get in. We are

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 1>five and five. We were two and three last week.

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>We had the Eagles getting one and a half from

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the Rams. It was a terrible loss. We had the

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Vikings getting three and a half from the That was

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>even worse laws And to be clear, that was the

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:04.039
<v Speaker 1>one that I really liked.

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:04.679
<v Speaker 3>The cut.

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>We did hit on the cards, giving six and a

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>half to Washington. We took two other games which were

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders getting five and a half from the Saints

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>and the Cowboys laying four and a half to the Falcons.

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I told you on the show to make sure to

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>follow us on Twitter again at Dan Harris Hadi at

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Sports Talk, Matt, because we you know, it's early in

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the week we want to talk about.

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:23.959
<v Speaker 2>That was on Wednesday night.

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 1>By the way, We're going to be doing this on

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:27.319
<v Speaker 1>Thursday night from now and going forward, just so we

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:29.480
<v Speaker 1>can make sure we have as much information as possible.

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 2>I said to follow us because we might change. We

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 2>did change.

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>We moved off those two bets, so we moved off

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:36.959
<v Speaker 1>to bets that we would have gone one and one

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>on you know, not a huge deal, Matt. I mean,

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I think we both just sort of felt like, especially

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 1>where you weren't in Vegas, it was just such a

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:47.559
<v Speaker 1>so much money. So all the public was just running

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>in of course to back the Raiders in that first game.

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 3>Which what was so funny about that though, is that

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 3>and this is where I need to be careful. Okay,

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 3>that is true except for everywhere outside Nevada. Correct, And

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 3>I didn't know that because I'm in my literally my

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 3>Vegas bubble right right. So in the Vegas Bubble. It

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 3>was like, oh my god, the line crashed in Vegas.

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 3>It closed at three and a half. I couldn't believe it,

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:13.640
<v Speaker 3>and I was nervous. That freaked me out by that.

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 3>But everywhere else it was eighty percent of the money

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 3>on the Saints. So that was my bad.

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, no, no, I mean it doesn't matter. And

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I liked the Cowboys. But what's funny is that Matt

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:24.919
<v Speaker 1>and I talked, because Matt and I talked anyway, just

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>about this stuff, and he actually he's in the circle

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>with a partner and he was taking the other side

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>of that game. He had the falcons, which you know,

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>turned out to be correct. So I was like, I

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't feel that strong about it.

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Let's think more about it. And so we moved off that.

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>We went to the Panthers getting nine and a half

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 1>against the Bucks for one of them, which was close.

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, man, I mean, it very easily could

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>have covered, but they didn't. So that's where that was.

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>But we also moved What was the other game that

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>we moved to that we hit on, Matt am I

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 1>drawing a blank.

0:02:57.000 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 3>Now, the game we hit on was I'm blinking on it.

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh, the Ravens the rankings. Yes, the Ravens laying seven

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>a half. By the way, Matt is always just a Ravens.

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:08.359
<v Speaker 1>And Matt said, you said you talked to a bookmaker

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>or somebody who said they would bet that all the

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>way up to ten.

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Correct.

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So we were like, all right, that's that's that

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 1>sounds good to me. And again laying on the Ravens

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 1>here early, because the Ravens play to rip your heart out.

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>They don't just play to you know, barely cover the spread,

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>barely win. They played to rip your heart out. So again,

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>really a distinction, that difference. We went too and three.

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 1>We're five and five overall, so that's not good. But

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the good news, at least in the DraftKings contest is

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>it was a bad week for everyone. Twenty four percent

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>of participants took the Chiefs laying eight and a half. Wow,

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty one percent were on the vikings with us forty percent.

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 2>We're on the Eagles.

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>As Matt and I talked about, you know, I messaged

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Matt on the live stream that Matt does.

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 2>Which you should be tuning into YouTube.

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Dot com slash betting pros every Sunday morning Eastern eleven

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>am to noon, so that's eight to nine. Where Matt is,

0:03:57.200 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>he goes through the slate and I'm going to be

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>popping in and I'll I'll write them questions anything like that.

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Forty percent we're on the Eagles and twenty one percent

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 1>we're on the Jets against the Niners. You should not

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>be on the Jets against anyone ever, So everybody took

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>a back. Here we sit two hundred and forty third

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>out of six hundred and ninety one, so that is

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 1>not terrible. Two undefeated teams are still in the contest,

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:21.040
<v Speaker 1>but neither one of them made a pick last week. Remember,

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 1>you can take two weeks off whatever reason. Maybe they

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 1>were like, man, I was really hot that first.

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 3>Week, until you're doing week two. To take it very weird,

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:30.720
<v Speaker 3>very weird to me, Like I'm only you got like

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 3>a family emergency or something like, right, so weird weak

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:35.799
<v Speaker 3>to take off, especially after a five and oh start.

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 3>Why not keep rolling? You're clearly seeing the board clearly,

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 3>so let's go there. Deal.

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:42.840
<v Speaker 1>There are two undefeated teams, but they're both five and out.

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>They're not ten and out. Four teams have picked nine

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>out of ten games correctly, that's it. Everybody else is

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 1>eight and eight out of ten or worse. So we're

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>still right in the mix there. But here's what we're

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna do for the show today. Usually what I do

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>is I say, all right, man, let's go through the game.

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Do you give me your picks? You like, no, No,

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>We're done with that. We're now going to go back

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>and forth, back and forth a little bit. Now Matt

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>loves some games this week. I'm like, all right, I

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of have a lean on you know, four maybe five,

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:10.160
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not. I'm I'm really like one game, which

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 1>I think we're both gonna be on.

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 2>But that's really it.

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:15.719
<v Speaker 1>Some of you as that have asked for player props, Matt,

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about you. Like where I'm at DraftKings

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:19.279
<v Speaker 1>and especially in any of the online books, they're just

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:21.359
<v Speaker 1>not really out points. Bet has these props that you

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:24.799
<v Speaker 1>can do that are, you know, over under fifty yards,

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>rushing over under seventy five yards, rushing at massive odds.

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 2>I just think it's silly.

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 3>To do, so I'll plug the live stream. That's what

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:34.479
<v Speaker 3>the live streams for. Okay, correct live stream is going

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 3>to be a props player prop, I'm gonna give you

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 3>my picks on the Daily Juice so you can hear

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 3>my plays on Sunday for the Daily Juice, and chances are,

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 3>unless there's like a gigantic crazy injury or a massive

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:49.359
<v Speaker 3>line swing, there's not going to be much change to

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:51.839
<v Speaker 3>my Daily Juice plays on Sunday morning heading into the

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 3>Sunday morning live stream. But the player props will one

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 3>hundred percent be you know. That's where I'm gonna give

0:05:57.120 --> 0:05:58.799
<v Speaker 3>you the player props. So if you want the player

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 3>props live stream every Sunday morning at eleven o'clock Eastern

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 3>on the Betting Pros YouTube channel.

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and don't forget to subscribe. And if you want

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>to be notified when mac go's live, click the notification

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>button that I'll let you know. But also I do

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:13.840
<v Speaker 1>props because I do player projections because of Fantasy's that's

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 1>where I'm at. So I will message Matt. I'm not

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna be on, but I will give Matt some of

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>my player props that I like based on my projection

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:20.479
<v Speaker 1>so we can relay them there.

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:22.039
<v Speaker 2>All right, we've got to get into it.

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 1>We've been talking a lot, but before we do, I'm

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 1>just gonna say I hope that Matt does not have

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>a particularly strong lean on the Saints lanth three and

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a half to the Packers, because I do not. But

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>if the line were instead, if either team scores a touchdown,

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:38.839
<v Speaker 1>you win one hundred dollars, then I would take that,

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:41.599
<v Speaker 1>because that's what it is. If you go to bettingpros

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:44.359
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash bet MGM through that link, if you

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>bet a dollar on either team to win that game,

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>you win one hundred dollars in free bets.

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 2>If either team.

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:52.479
<v Speaker 1>Scores a touchdown either way, you win one hundred dollars

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>in free bets. There is going to be a touchdown

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:57.159
<v Speaker 1>scored in that game. I can virtually guarantee it you

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:00.359
<v Speaker 1>will win. This available in New Jersey, Colorado, Indiana, and

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 1>West Virginia again betting pros dot Com slash bet MGM.

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Do not turn down free money, all right, Matt, start off?

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Don't say sans and backers to lead off off here?

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'll give you now.

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 3>Am I giving you my most confident play or just

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 3>one that I like?

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>And you know what, man, the world is your oyster.

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Whatever you want, I'm gonna go with probably what I

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 1>like the most to what I like the least. So

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 1>if you want to start that way or do whatever

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>you want, it doesn't all right.

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 3>To play that. I'm the most confident on The Patriots

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 3>are going to kick the living daylights of the Raiders.

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:30.239
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so we're just to be clear. We'll talk about

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>that very briefly. But that was also my most confident pick.

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 1>So we we're locking at it.

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 3>But they're going to absolutely wipe the field with the Raiders.

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 3>And this is a classic spot for a young football team.

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 3>Josh Jacobs was in that practice on Thursday. The Patriots

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 3>are going to take away Darren Waller. Stefan Gilmour is

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 3>furious after what happened with DK Metcalf eating his lunch.

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 3>If the Raiders score more than fourteen points, I'm going

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 3>to be shocked.

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh all right, I'm not going to go that far.

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, this is a very classic Belichick against the

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 1>spread after a loss is miraculous.

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he's, you know.

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Obviously, if not the greatest coach of all time, one

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of so he's mad.

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean you look at the picture. The picture says it,

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 2>all right. He looks like God did, right.

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he is not going to go to sleep

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 1>until he fixes all these old things in a game.

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 2>By the way, that the Patriots were, you know, extremely.

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Close to winning one play, so one play exactly, So

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I love that play too. I really think that this

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>is something where you mentioned it. I think they're going

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to take away a waller because that's exactly what they do.

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I think they're going to stack the box and they're

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 1>going to say, okay, go ahead, beat us over the top,

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Derek Carr, and again they're traveling east.

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 2>Don't forget that.

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 1>It's just it's got all the hallmarks of a Patriots

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 1>beat down. So it is five and a half. It

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:46.079
<v Speaker 1>is the Matt paraltism. But you're throwing it out right now.

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 1>I will say one thing. On betting pros dot com,

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:51.079
<v Speaker 1>we have consensus lines. The consensus line is.

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:53.199
<v Speaker 3>Actually five, so it's going down.

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So why Why is that though?

0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 3>Because the public is going to bet with their eyes

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:03.560
<v Speaker 3>off of Monday night football. Everyone everyone's flush with money.

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 3>Everyone watched the Raiders beat the Saints. Oh my gosh.

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 3>Bet MGM announced today that their number one liability for

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:11.320
<v Speaker 3>any team to win the Super Bowl are the Las

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 3>Vegas Raiders. Okay, yeah, they are the new Cleveland Browns.

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 3>Fade fade fade.

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 1>So if you look on bettingpros dot com, which gives

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you the consensus lines, it also gives you lines of

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the various sports book it's basically torn between five and

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:25.960
<v Speaker 1>five and a half. If you look, you know, we

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>have various experts from around the industry who make picks.

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>New England is being picked with the spread right now

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 1>at minus five. So that's you know, at eighty three percent.

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Eighty three percent of experts are taking them. It's just

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:41.319
<v Speaker 1>something where it's just it's the best game. It's the

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>best game of the week.

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:44.080
<v Speaker 3>And my bookmakers could not have this game on the board.

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:46.680
<v Speaker 3>They take it down. Yeah, just chuck it up. You

0:09:46.720 --> 0:09:49.480
<v Speaker 3>just say, okay, we lost, move on, okay, all right.

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:51.960
<v Speaker 1>So here's a game that I like, which I here's

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 1>here's where I get a little worried about.

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 2>This in the classic sort of way you try to

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 2>think about gambling, which is the bylow sell high. Teams

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:02.720
<v Speaker 2>are you know, never as bad.

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:04.679
<v Speaker 1>As they look sort of, you know the last week

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>where they get absolutely blown out. Teams are never as

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 1>good as they look when they're really winning. I thought

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that maybe with the Eagles last week with the Rams,

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and again that was the quote unquote sharp side. That's

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>where the money came in. But for me, I'm gonna

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 1>take the Titans, and you can let me know. The

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Titans minus two and a half in Minnesota. Now, if

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>there were fans in Minnesota, I might be a little

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>less confident on it. And this is a spot where

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:33.319
<v Speaker 1>you would say, well, I'm gonna buy low on Minnesota

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>right now and I'm gonna sell high.

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:36.479
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's not like the Titans.

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Have looked that good. They barely squeaked by the Jaguars.

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>They barely squeaked by the Broncos, although they should have

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:45.679
<v Speaker 1>won that game. They're probably gonna be without aj Brown

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 1>here still. But Minnesota and that defense right now, I

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know if they're quite this bad that secondary, but

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:55.599
<v Speaker 1>I do know that as of right now, whether or

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:58.559
<v Speaker 1>not it's just because they're young and they're still getting

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 1>their communication worked out right now, they're terrible. They are

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:05.679
<v Speaker 1>absolutely terrible. Tennessee is incredibly well coached. I like Mike

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Zimmer as a coach, but he cannot figure this out

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 1>this quickly with what he has.

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 2>The fact that this is under a field goal.

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 1>For me, if it was over a field goal, I

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 1>would I would be concerned. It's a key number three.

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 1>But at two and a half, that's probably the game

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>other than the one game that I love is the Patriots.

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Other than that, that's the game that I like second most.

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>So what do you think about that one?

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm with you. It's on my list, and it is

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 3>a It is a square play and it's going to

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 3>be a number. Where it opened at one and a half,

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 3>it's been bet to two and a half. I think

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 3>by the time it get to kick off it maybe three,

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 3>but being under three is a key. So here's the

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 3>number that everyone's talking about. If you're on Twitter, you've

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 3>probably seen it a million times. Teams that are oh

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:43.599
<v Speaker 3>into against the spread heading into week three oh and

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 3>two against the spread, not oh and two overall oh

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:48.320
<v Speaker 3>and two against the spread, are twenty two and seven

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 3>against the number in week three.

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:50.440
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 3>So everyone's going to run around and say that they're

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 3>gonna hamm and this is one of those games that

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 3>fit into that narrative. Okay, so oh and two against

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:00.679
<v Speaker 3>the spread the Titans. The thing that the problem I've

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 3>got with that is that trends don't mean really anything

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 3>going into a game. It's all about matchups. It's not

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 3>about trends. It's about how do teams match up against

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 3>each other. The secondary for this Vikings team is just

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 3>got awful and it's really really young, so you can't

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 3>fix it overnight. The other problem is Kevin Sefanski. His

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 3>offense is no longer there and Kirk Cousins looks atrocious.

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 3>So I don't know if you fix that in one

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 3>game in one week. Given that, the Titans are not happy.

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 3>They're two and zero, but they're not happy about the

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 3>way things are going. I mean, they didn't cover last week.

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 3>They nearly they won the game by three, and you know,

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:37.679
<v Speaker 3>it wasn't that great to kind of watch. It was like,

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 3>oh my gosh, are they gonna blow this against Jacksonville?

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:42.680
<v Speaker 3>So they almost wound up being one and one, and

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 3>then we know the kicking problems we had on Monday

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:47.440
<v Speaker 3>night two weeks ago. So the Titans have a lot

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 3>to play for here and they're very angry about the

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:51.320
<v Speaker 3>way things are going. So you're right home field for

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 3>the Vikings always one of the biggest deals. But pro

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 3>football focus is rating this defense near the bottom of

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:58.960
<v Speaker 3>the entire NFL right now. So yeah, I'm taking the

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:01.079
<v Speaker 3>Titans here minus two and a half. I think we

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 3>win the game. I'm with you on under under a

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:05.319
<v Speaker 3>field goal. Yeah, let's take the Titans.

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>So there is one book out there again and got

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the consensus lines to see the book. Fox bet is

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 1>at three already, so I wouldn't be surprised if it

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:13.719
<v Speaker 1>moves there. And again our experts seventy five percent of

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>them as well, are going with the Titans laying two

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:16.959
<v Speaker 1>and a half.

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 2>Again.

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 1>That's why I think this is what we talked about,

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 1>man at the beginning of the season, where a lack

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:25.720
<v Speaker 1>of continuity, be young team that's inexperienced, you need These

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 1>preseason games were pretty critical to working out a lot

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>of these issues, and they just don't have it, and

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 1>there's no way they're going to work it out after

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 1>how terrible they looked last week. So I like and

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 1>backing a team like the Titans, by the way, makes

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>me just feel because I'm so confident in the coaching staff,

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 1>it just makes me feel like.

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 2>It's like a security blanket a little bit.

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, well, Vrabel's not going to go there, and

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to just be like, oh yeah, we're

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna look past this team. It's not gonna work that way.

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:50.679
<v Speaker 1>So all right, you want to lock that one in.

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:51.559
<v Speaker 1>Then both of those two.

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 3>All right, very good, good Titans.

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:55.439
<v Speaker 2>Those two done, done. Go to your next one.

0:13:55.880 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 3>Chargers minus six and a half against the Carolina Panthers.

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 3>On paper, Carol defensively is the worst defense in the NFL.

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:04.840
<v Speaker 3>Justin Herbert getting the start is a good thing for

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 3>this team. I like Tyrod Taylor. Herbert is really really interesting.

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:11.200
<v Speaker 3>I think this kid is going to cause a ton

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 3>of problems. And here's the big issue. Yes, no Derwin

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 3>James is not there for the Chargers, but no run CMC.

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 3>How are the Panthers going to score? I mean, it's

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 3>all on Bridgewater now. And if you're gonna have him

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 3>back there, this is a pass rush. It's gonna get

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 3>up the field and get after Carolina. I'm laying less

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 3>than a touchdown here, Chargers minus six and a half.

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, So I would say that I lean in

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>that direction. I don't absolutely love it. I agree though,

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 1>that the lack of CMC here, I'm surprised that this

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 1>is under a touchdown.

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 2>I really am Herbert I agree.

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Surprising to me because I talked pretty poorly about Herbert that,

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, just in terms of what his value would

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>be in his rookie season. You think about really last week,

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the fact that he did not know he was starting

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 1>until legitimately the coin toss is insane, and he played really,

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>really we well, and they think he makes that offense better.

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>My one worry here and I think that seems he

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 1>makes that Panther's offense much better.

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 2>I think Mike Davis is a capable.

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Fill and not anywhere close to it, but they do

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of capable wide receivers in DJ Moore

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and Robbie Anderson, and they're going to get Curtis Samuel

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Moore involved. My worry here is maybe it was just

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 1>because they were trying to keep the ball out of

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Patrick mahomes hands. But you saw what Anthony Lynn really

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 1>desperately wants to do, which is run the ball as

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>much as he possibly can.

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 2>Kelly, Joshua Kelly had.

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Twenty three carries last week and he's not even the

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 1>primary ball handler. You know, they could have probably put

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>that game away if they were a little more adventurous.

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 1>My worry here is adventurous.

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 3>Okay, all right, Anthony Lynn had a backbone.

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 2>You mean I'm being diplomatic?

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 3>What grow up?

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 2>So I think.

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 1>That that is the way though, that he naturally wants

0:15:56.960 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>to go. And yeah, it's under a touchdown, so that

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>does serve make it a little easier. But I'm still

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>not convinced that they'd be beyond the back door cover

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>in this game, because I do think that even if

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 1>they get ahead, they are the type of team that's

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna be like, oh, you know, we're just.

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 3>Gonna run the back Chargers defense. You're gonna pass and

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 3>throw that ball forty times a game. That Charger defense

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 3>is gonna eat him. Bridgewater is gonna be run for

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 3>his life.

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 2>It is fair.

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 3>It is a line is not good and no node

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't again, this is another game like I don't

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 3>know who scores more Panthers or Raiders, but neither one

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 3>scores much.

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, so what we're gonna put that one in

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>pencil on the list. But not a guarantee. Not a

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 1>guarantee you there is no way you're gonna like this

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 1>next game. I'm just putting out. By the way, I'm

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna mention it. The contentus line is also six and

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 1>a half, as it is in the DraftKings contest. Sixty

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 1>percent of people of our experts are picking the Charges,

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 1>so not overwhelming. Not that that is the be all

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>end all at all. I mean, we're gonna pick what

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>we want to pick, but that does favor your side.

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 2>You're not gonna like this, Matt.

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to warn you right out, especially since I

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>also like this team last week and then we got

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 1>off it because it was Taraball. It's the Cowboys plus

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 1>four and a half in CEA. Let me explain my reasoning.

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 1>The Seahawks usually play close games. I mean, whether it's

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>this year, whether it's not. I mean they could have

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:10.679
<v Speaker 1>very easily lost that game in a game where you know,

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson threw a million touchdown passes.

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 2>They let teams stay in the game. They don't.

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:18.439
<v Speaker 1>They're not great at covering the spread historically. I know

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:21.359
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't matter, but their defense is not great. The Falcons,

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 1>which has a good offense, was able to score pretty.

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Much at will. The Patriots were able to score very.

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Well and again Newton through were almost four hundred yards.

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Julian Edelman, I think is at a career

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:34.880
<v Speaker 1>high in yardage. That doesn't usually happen when your defense

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 1>is particularly strong. Now Dallas isn't perfectly healthy. I think

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Tyron Smith sounds like he's gonna play. I'm not one

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent sure there. They are banged up on their defense,

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 1>but the Seattle line doesn't get that much pressure like

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 1>they just don't. And I think you saw last week.

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>As bad as the Atlanta's offense is, Dallas has the

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:55.359
<v Speaker 1>ability to put up points, especially towards the end of

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the game, even if they're behind, pretty much at will

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:01.640
<v Speaker 1>when things are going right. Considering they have Zeke, they're

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>big three wide receivers, even Dalton Schultz.

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 2>So four and a half to me. This game without fans.

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:09.359
<v Speaker 1>Again, with fans, different story to me because I think

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Seattle really loses that home field advantage with that. But

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:15.200
<v Speaker 1>without fans, this strikes me as a game that should

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 1>be closer to a field goal. So I imagine you

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:19.439
<v Speaker 1>hate this game, but go ahead and give your thoughts.

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Gritting my teeth. You have the whole board, you could

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:28.639
<v Speaker 3>pick any game you want, yep, And you want to

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 3>fade Russ right now?

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, what is he?

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 3>What is he now? Seventy five percent completion percentage.

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:36.919
<v Speaker 2>Russ is amazing Rus.

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:39.360
<v Speaker 3>If you want to go into that team, you want

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 3>to go up against that guy right now, with the

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 3>way that they're throwing the football, with the way DK

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 3>metcalf is playing against a team that got lit up

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:47.200
<v Speaker 3>by the Falcons last week.

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so maybe we should explain my pick because it's

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 1>obviously not coming through. I'm not picking the Cowboys to win.

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to lose by a field goal. But I

0:18:57.080 --> 0:18:59.159
<v Speaker 3>think there's a good possibility that they just got the

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 3>greatest luckiest break in the history of sports, and father

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 3>time and everything else comes back your your pendulum swings

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 3>the other way, and they got every lucky break you

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 3>can imagine, including some team deciding dan Quinn again deciding

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:13.120
<v Speaker 3>to throw up all over himself.

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to recover, try to recover onside kicks, man,

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why it's I mean.

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:18.919
<v Speaker 3>I don't know why. I mean, you can't touch it

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 3>till ten yards right there. When we're taught in Pop Warner,

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:23.400
<v Speaker 3>you can't touch that ball if you're the receiving team.

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 3>So I mean, I don't know how or why you'd

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:28.879
<v Speaker 3>want to go near this team. It's a I mean,

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 3>I credit the buy low factor with this, because this

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:36.919
<v Speaker 3>is buying low on the Cowboys. It's just my gosh,

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 3>Russell Wilson.

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 1>All Right, the over under right now is fifty six,

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 1>so that's an implied total for the Seahawks of what thirty.

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm not debating. I'm not debating the point that points

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 3>are going to be scored, if.

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:49.160
<v Speaker 2>That's what I'm saying.

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing, Russell. I'm not fading Russell Wilson. I know

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson is going to put up points. I'm more

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>buying the Cowboys' ability to put up a ton of

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:00.399
<v Speaker 1>points to hang with this offense.

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 2>But it's fine. This is a team that we that

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 2>you and I do together.

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:05.880
<v Speaker 1>That's why we throw them out so we can move

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that one to the side, just like we did with

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the Giants against the Bears last week.

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:12.679
<v Speaker 2>All Right, my friend, go ahead, start up with your

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 2>next pick. Give it to me.

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 3>All right, I'm going back to the old Oh I'm

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 3>two and l fad in this team. I'm fading again.

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:21.920
<v Speaker 3>Pittsburgh Steelers, according to Pro Football Focus, of a top

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:25.440
<v Speaker 3>five defense right now, Yep, they are crushing people they

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 3>are young, they are talented, and they blitz as much

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:31.639
<v Speaker 3>as anybody in football. This offensive line for the Houston

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 3>Texans is god awful. They're not going to be able

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 3>to protect Sean Watson. Now that Shaun can run around, okay,

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 3>and you can move, you can pick up first downs

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:40.920
<v Speaker 3>with his legs, I get it. Incredible athlete. He has

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:43.800
<v Speaker 3>no one to pass to. This dude's got no help whatsoever.

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:46.920
<v Speaker 3>Big Ben's getting healthy. Him and Juju are starting to click.

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 3>Lay the four Pittsburgh minus.

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:51.919
<v Speaker 1>Four, it's actually three and a half a month, love

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:53.399
<v Speaker 1>but even more unless I missed it.

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Let me check what is I think that was four?

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>No, I don't know four circus, so check what I

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 1>messaged you, because I'll tell I. Look up what it

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>is in betting pros for right now for our consensus

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>lines the Steelers, which for whatever reason I can't find

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, give me a second Steelers against the Texans.

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:13.400
<v Speaker 3>Three and a half? Love it?

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah it's three and a half. Okay, good, so you

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 1>love it even more? Okay, The consensus line is four

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:23.439
<v Speaker 1>in Bettingborough, so we're getting a little bit of a

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>deal there. Yeah, that is on my list. I'm going

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:27.640
<v Speaker 1>to write it in because it was on my list

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and it was the next one that I was going

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to talk about.

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 2>So if you're good with it, I'm fine with it.

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 1>That's minus Pittsburgh minus three and a half to the Texans.

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I feel for the Texans a little bit,

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 1>just because they got so much crap what they did

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:41.640
<v Speaker 1>on the off season and they roll out with this.

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Schedule where they just have a horrific schedule.

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 3>It's the hardest schedule I can remember for the first

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:50.440
<v Speaker 3>three games of anybody in the NFL that Like, I mean,

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 3>and I've been watching football for a really long time,

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:53.920
<v Speaker 3>I can't remember a time when you have to play

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 3>against the two best teams in football and then go

0:21:56.880 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 3>on the road to one of the more difficult places

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 3>in a team in Pittsburgh. Google loves playing in Hinz Field.

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:04.399
<v Speaker 3>Ouch. I mean, this is just this is It's not

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 3>even Bill O'Brien's fault. I mean, you want to hammer

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 3>the guy, fine, but this oen three is almost like

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:10.160
<v Speaker 3>an automatic.

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 2>That's what I'm saying. Yeah.

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Look, my one fear of it is that I legitimately

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 1>despise backing Tomlin in these situations. Where you think Tomlin

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 1>has knocked me out of so many survivor pools and

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>coaching career, right, Like, this is the type of game

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be like, Oh, you just forgot to show

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 1>up then in this game.

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:26.160
<v Speaker 2>But I do think Look, it.

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:29.399
<v Speaker 1>Was my fourth, my fourth game, so I'm I'm totally

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 1>with you there, and I'm good to put that in

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the contest. To be clear, our experts because I didn't

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:35.719
<v Speaker 1>give that for Dallas, because maybe you'll be surprised, are

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>experts for Pittsburgh sixty one percent favor Pittsburgh over Houston's

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:42.439
<v Speaker 1>are not crazy? But in Dallas Seattle it's fifty three

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:45.640
<v Speaker 1>forty seven in favor of Seattle. So I'm not I'm

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 1>not crazy, and I'm going to take that one.

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 2>We do.

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:49.919
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Matt and I are two of the

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 1>experts who put in our picks for betting pros. I'm

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 1>taking the Cowboys at four and a half and then

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:58.640
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday we're going to be yelling at each other.

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 3>Oh no, but I don't mind it. I mean, it's

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 3>just as as these five picks are so valuable, Like,

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't mind you picking in the game.

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, this is why I'm telling you, I hate this slate, Matt,

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 2>But you.

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 3>Can pick as many games as you want on that.

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 3>So it's like if you if you go, you know,

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 3>ten and one in the one game you get wrong

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 3>happens to be this game. Well, I mean, that's kind

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:20.959
<v Speaker 3>of where we are. But so to me, it's got

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:22.440
<v Speaker 3>a lot to do with the fact that these five

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 3>picks are so valuable that I just my gosh, going

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:29.840
<v Speaker 3>up against Russell Wilson just of the five. We have

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 3>so many other games we could pick, and this is

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 3>the game we're gonna pick.

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:33.479
<v Speaker 2>Uh, Yeah, that's right.

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm willing to go against Russell Wilson if I'm getting

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the four and a half points with the Cowboys, because

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 1>I think they're gonna hang with them, so deal with it.

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:39.919
<v Speaker 2>But it's fine, we're gonna leave it out.

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 1>You know what else We're gonna leave out the next

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 1>one I like, which you are going to despise. I'm

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>just putting this out there. I have more, which I

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 1>know you would like, and so I could kind of

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 1>pus your foot around this and be like, well, Mann

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>will probably.

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 3>Like, don't take the Giants.

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 2>Oh oh you know, oh giants plus three and a half.

0:23:57.200 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 3>And I wouldn't bet this game with your money.

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:01.159
<v Speaker 2>I mean you should. I will give you money, and

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 2>I would.

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 3>I would if you gave me one hundred dollars. I

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't bet that with your money. In the hell of

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 3>all the games? Why would you ever pick this game?

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 2>Name me.

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Two starting offensive players for the forty nine ers that

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 1>will be playing in this game.

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 3>I can't kill, right, kill, He'll probably play. He might play,

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:22.639
<v Speaker 3>but why would you Why would you play him? If

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:23.480
<v Speaker 3>you're the forty nine ers?

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 2>Why correct? Why would you play him?

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 3>Don't play?

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>You're right, you shouldn't play him, and you're not going

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 1>to play anybody else of any consequence. And you're not

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna play Bosa or Thomas.

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:35.679
<v Speaker 3>Well, you can't play Bosa, I mean, because that's what

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:36.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm saying.

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 2>You're not going to play the guys who are out

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:39.879
<v Speaker 2>for the season. Okay, You're not going to.

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:42.199
<v Speaker 1>Play either of your starting running backs. You're not going

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to play your quarterback. You're going to just be throwing

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 1>nothing out there.

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 3>And there's no Saquon Barkley for well.

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I understand, but you know, we talked about this last

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 1>week with Chicago. There was no Saquon Barkley in that

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>game either, and they still covered because the Giants offense, that's.

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:02.360
<v Speaker 3>Because of the offense is garbage for for the Bears.

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 3>That's good. I mean it's you can't you can't go

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:05.680
<v Speaker 3>one to the other here.

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Just oh no, I said when I was making this pick,

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:14.640
<v Speaker 1>and again I've already put this pick in. Actually, I'd

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:16.119
<v Speaker 1>like to see what it is right now. Hold on,

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I just I would like to see exactly what is.

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:20.119
<v Speaker 1>First of all, I want to see what the consensus

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 1>line is. The consensus line is still three and a half,

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>so that is where it is. I want to see

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:28.399
<v Speaker 1>have a curiosity. Okay, yeah, San Francisco sixty two to

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:31.439
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight percent. Not overwhelming, not like the Patriots, but

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 1>that's fine. Look for me, this is also back to back.

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 3>This is contrarian by contrarian, but by contrarian standards. I

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 3>love this contrarian. This is the pupil that.

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:45.920
<v Speaker 1>You've got to stay out east. Now, to be fair,

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:48.439
<v Speaker 1>they did not go back west. I don't think. I

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 1>think they stayed somewhere on the East coast because they

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 1>played the Jets and now.

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 2>They're playing the Giants.

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they did the travel but it's back

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>to back games on the East Coast and the time

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 1>that really doesn't work. They have no one Matt and

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:04.719
<v Speaker 1>even their defense putting aside. But all right, first of all,

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:06.119
<v Speaker 1>I'll love you. Make it clear we're not going to

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 1>take the game, of course, because we've got to fight.

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:10.240
<v Speaker 1>So I'm just saying it relaxed. I'mbout trying to talk

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:13.359
<v Speaker 1>to you again. As I said, I like one game

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 1>this week and it was your number one pick, and

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:17.119
<v Speaker 1>that's it. But I don't love this slate. But that

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 1>would be one of my games if I were doing

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 1>this by myself, because I really do think their cornerbacks

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:26.120
<v Speaker 1>are all injured. They've got, you know, decimated on their defense,

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 1>decimated on their offense, and the Giants have enough frisky

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:33.440
<v Speaker 1>pieces that they can put up view points even without

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Saquon Barkley. So for me, if I'm getting more in

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the fieldal here, I'm taking I am betting it, all right,

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>So everybody listening out there, you can make fun of

0:26:40.240 --> 0:26:41.480
<v Speaker 1>me on Sunday betting this.

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh I'm betting it. Yeah, I'm betting it.

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm not I'm not going crazy with it, but I've

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:48.400
<v Speaker 1>made a bet on it. I'm willing to roll with that, so.

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 3>I wring ballins to drop forty on you.

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 2>It would if you know, it wouldn't be the worst

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:55.360
<v Speaker 2>bet I've ever made. I'll be out of it, all right,

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 2>Go to your next one, Matt, What do you have?

0:26:57.040 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 1>All right?

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:00.360
<v Speaker 3>So I've got two plays, and you can tell which

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 3>one you want to talk about. I like in the

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 3>both dogs Detroit plus five and a half are Chiefs

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:07.400
<v Speaker 3>plus three and a half? Which one do you want

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 3>to talk about?

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I actually want to talk about both of them. Start

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 1>what you're gonna do with two for one? Which is

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:14.439
<v Speaker 1>fine because I've already I'm already at the Giants getting

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 1>points from the forty nine ers range of my pick.

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about all them because I'm interested in

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:20.639
<v Speaker 1>the Lions back because you and I kind of we

0:27:20.680 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 1>go back and forth a little bit. You know, we

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:24.320
<v Speaker 1>talked about it a little bit before, and we both

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of had this. This is very much the spot

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:31.200
<v Speaker 1>where classic the way you think about sports gambling, classic

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 1>time where this is a game for the Lions. But

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 1>the more I dug into it, I got nervous about it.

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 3>So I'm way nervous about both these picks. And I

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:43.639
<v Speaker 3>was trying to find my fifth one because of my

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:46.919
<v Speaker 3>five pat Steelers, Titans Chargers, those are my four. The

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 3>fifth one is when I was struggling. And so with

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:53.399
<v Speaker 3>the Lions, I think, I think car I think the

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 3>Cardinals win, all right, Yeah, But my question is with

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 3>backs against the wall, you have to win because or

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 3>at least you have to play competitively because Matt Patricia

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:04.440
<v Speaker 3>already has folks saying he should be fired. Yep, And

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:07.480
<v Speaker 3>there's already already this call right now for you know,

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 3>complete regime change and completely scrapping everything, pull everything down

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:13.359
<v Speaker 3>and start all over again. Because they tried it with Patricia.

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 3>It didn't work. This expatriot way hasn't worked. Fire, the

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:20.000
<v Speaker 3>GM fired, the coach, redo everything. So my concern is

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 3>they've had back to back double digit leads in Week

0:28:22.359 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 3>one and Week two and they've blown them both. You know,

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:28.119
<v Speaker 3>at some point do they win that one game like

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:30.440
<v Speaker 3>the Celtics did in Game three against the Heat where

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 3>they had they blew the lead but they still hung

0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 3>on to win. So I wonder, like, do the Lions

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 3>get the lead and then blow it again and the

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 3>Cardinals come back and then win by four? Yeah? And

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:43.200
<v Speaker 3>you're catching five and a half, and so I'm I'm

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 3>with you on being more and more afraid. I just

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 3>think I think it's gonna be a really a public play,

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:50.479
<v Speaker 3>and I think it could be like seven by time kickoff.

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 3>So I might bet this game with the Lions for

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 3>our sake at five and a half. It's a number.

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:56.719
<v Speaker 3>Obviously I don't like correct.

0:28:56.760 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 1>By the way, can we also talk about the fact

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that you were like, you're gonna learn something about me, Dan,

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:03.480
<v Speaker 1>There are certain paralisms.

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't go five and a half and.

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:06.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't minus five and a half.

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't, but oh you don't take well take.

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 3>Points, Oh take five and a half points. It's minus

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:13.960
<v Speaker 3>five and a half.

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't lay like we're taking the Patriots with your

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 2>best bet.

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 3>Well that's different though, because again this my team is

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 3>my pay as I told you, as I told you

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 3>when I tweeted you this or to text you this

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 3>to me, when it comes to my team and the Patriots,

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't care what that line was, got it. I'm

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 3>taking the Patriots six, seven, nine, whatever. The Patriots are

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 3>winning that game big in my mind.

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 2>Kind of like what I do with the Jets, except

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 2>the opposite way.

0:29:34.360 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 3>Just take there anyway, taking five and a half, I

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 3>know problem taking five and a half. It's live five

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 3>and a half.

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 2>My fault. I misunderstood the prophism.

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:44.720
<v Speaker 3>So the plus five with the Lions is intriguing. It's

0:29:44.800 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 3>six right now, and it's climbing, so like the people

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 3>are taking the number and they're pushing it up. So

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 3>the Lions are definitely a live dog here in this game,

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 3>but I feel like it might be a little bit

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 3>too public. And then the contrarian of contrarian plays is

0:29:59.360 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 3>Monday Night.

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I do want to talk about that one actually,

0:30:02.480 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 1>because I'm more intrigued by that one. And it's funny

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 1>that you brought that up, because I was like, man,

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know if this one's gonna be worth

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 1>bringing up. I'd rather bring up the Giants with the

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 1>three and a half than saying the Chiefs taking the Ravens,

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 1>which mattters just like the Ravens the Ravens, which you

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 1>are correct. Here's my problem with this. First of all,

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give it on betting pros it is still

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:20.400
<v Speaker 1>five and a half. With the Cardinals laying five and

0:30:20.440 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 1>a half, there is a six out there right now,

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:25.160
<v Speaker 1>and it is that Fox bet, which is a little

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 1>off the expert consensus for our picks seventy six percent

0:30:30.320 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 1>is taking Arizona, and I am actually on that side.

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:30:33.800 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 2>I was originally thinking, here's what I think.

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I just think at this point that Vegas and sportsbooks,

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they're properly valuing the Cardinals yet. I

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 1>don't think they've caught up to what the Cardinals actually are.

0:30:49.280 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>And kudos to you, Matt, because you liked this team.

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 1>We talked about it preseason. I did not. I did

0:30:54.680 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 1>not think that this team was gonna be something that

0:30:56.600 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 1>was going to make any noise.

0:30:58.040 --> 0:30:59.520
<v Speaker 2>But they look really really good.

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Their defense looks a little better than expected, and I

0:31:02.400 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 1>think they're better than bookmakers are giving them credit for it.

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's going to become apparent pretty soon.

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 3>Well here's here, here's a little yeah, a little add on.

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:31:11.680 --> 0:31:13.160
<v Speaker 3>I haven't give this out in the Daily Juicy yet,

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 3>but I'm gonna do it tonight. Go bet the Cardinals

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 3>to win the NFC at plus twelve hundred. Yeah, if

0:31:18.840 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 3>you look at the NFC, I'm not saying winning the

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 3>Super Bowl now because you're dealing with the other side

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 3>with the Raves and the Chiefs, but just to win

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 3>the Super Bowl. If you look at the teams in

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 3>the NFC and how the Cardinals match up with them,

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 3>at plus twelve hundred, it's incredible odds, incredible value on

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:34.360
<v Speaker 3>the Cardinals there. So sorry to interject, but that's a

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:36.000
<v Speaker 3>bet I think people should make right now at plus

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:37.880
<v Speaker 3>twelve hundred for the Cardinals to win the NFC.

0:31:38.160 --> 0:31:39.120
<v Speaker 2>That's a great call.

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Actually, yeah, I definitely people if the odds are twelve

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred ad and looked at it, they should do that. Conversely,

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:47.240
<v Speaker 1>as I was saying, the Lions just suck, like that's

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the bottom line. Their defense is young and injured. I

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 1>know they're gonna Getkenny GALLIAI back, I don't care. This

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 1>is just not the defense. I don't think they're gonna

0:31:54.680 --> 0:31:56.200
<v Speaker 1>be able. I think it's going to be a monstrous

0:31:56.320 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 1>day for every significant piece of the Arizona off Keny

0:32:00.560 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 1>d we talked about it. We just had a daily

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 1>fantasy sports show that we do on Thursdays. Kenyan Drake

0:32:04.920 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 1>was a guy that we all loved. Kyler Murray was

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:08.960
<v Speaker 1>a guy that we all loved. If you're willing to

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 1>spend up on quarterback on a wide receiver, do it

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:13.760
<v Speaker 1>with DeAndre Hopkins. This is just the game where I

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:15.800
<v Speaker 1>think that in the end, this is going to be

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of like the Oh the Cardinals are a scary team.

0:32:18.840 --> 0:32:20.480
<v Speaker 2>So I'm staying away from the lines.

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 1>But go to the Chiefs plus three and a half

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 1>because I think this is going to wind up being

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:28.920
<v Speaker 1>somehow in the DK contest.

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 2>But go ahead.

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 3>So here's Chiefs plus three and a half. And I

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 3>believe the hook here is a big deal to me. Yep,

0:32:36.480 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 3>Kansas City doesn't lose these games as underdogs. They have

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 3>not been a dog in a long time. I forget

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:46.480
<v Speaker 3>the actual stat, but it's been like two years since

0:32:46.480 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 3>they've been an underdog. You have Patrick Mahomes playing in

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 3>the AFC Super Bowl, because that's what this is. It's

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:56.240
<v Speaker 3>the regular season super Bowl. Everyone all eyes. I know

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 3>that you've got Lamar Jackson and I like the running

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 3>game a lot, but the problem is that the Ravens

0:33:00.440 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 3>get behind. They got a tough time making games up.

0:33:02.800 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 3>They have a tough time coming back from from deficits.

0:33:04.760 --> 0:33:06.640
<v Speaker 3>And what do the Chiefs do. That's all they do

0:33:06.800 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 3>is come back from deficits matter what you put them

0:33:08.760 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 3>in ten twenty, it doesn't matter. This team just comes back.

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:14.800
<v Speaker 3>The best team in football are the Chiefs. I'm catching points.

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't care where the game's being played. Plus three

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:19.200
<v Speaker 3>and a half. Give me the Chiefs.

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is going in the contest match, okay, because

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 1>it was on my list, and I was like, I'm

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:26.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna save this one for a little bit down because

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's crazy. And I know you love the

0:33:27.720 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Ravens and you have been on you have been I

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 1>mean you have been completely like oh no, no, no, no,

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 1>this is it. I don't care what they're giving. That's

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:35.640
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half. I've got no problems taking that whatsoever.

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 1>You've been uber confidence. So I was like, well, you're

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:39.200
<v Speaker 1>not gonna want it the Chiefs. But I agree with you.

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure necessarily that they're the best team.

0:33:41.720 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know whether or not they're better than the Ravens,

0:33:43.840 --> 0:33:45.520
<v Speaker 1>but I do know if I'm getting more than a

0:33:45.520 --> 0:33:47.200
<v Speaker 1>field goal, I'm good with it.

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:49.720
<v Speaker 2>So for me right now, you correct me if I'm wrong.

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:51.280
<v Speaker 2>We're pretty much in agreement right now.

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 1>At the Pats laying five and a half against the Raiders,

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the Titans laying two and a half to Minnesota. Yep,

0:33:57.600 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers laying three and a half to the Text,

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs getting three and a half to the Ravens.

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 1>The only other, right, we're good on this, We're good,

0:34:05.680 --> 0:34:08.920
<v Speaker 1>all right. For the other one that's under consideration is

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers laying six and alfter the Panthers. Now that

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:14.359
<v Speaker 1>is under consideration. Let's talk through some of these other

0:34:14.440 --> 0:34:16.640
<v Speaker 1>games and let's just see whether or not we think

0:34:16.680 --> 0:34:19.239
<v Speaker 1>there's anything else that we could be missing. How do

0:34:19.280 --> 0:34:22.880
<v Speaker 1>you feel about the Bears getting three and a half

0:34:22.920 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 1>in Atlanta?

0:34:24.600 --> 0:34:27.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this is the problem with the Bears, because

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:28.799
<v Speaker 3>they win a game and everyone's going to be like,

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 3>here we go and it's Tribbitsky. Oh he's playing great.

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:34.399
<v Speaker 3>Look out, give me a break. It's Tribitsky. Okay, it's

0:34:34.400 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 3>the first start. I don't care it's one. It doesn't

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:39.319
<v Speaker 3>make a difference to me. In my mind. I am

0:34:39.360 --> 0:34:41.640
<v Speaker 3>not looking at this as like an opportunity where we're saying, yes,

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 3>this is smart. I'm going you know, I'm gonna fade

0:34:45.120 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 3>as much as I can. I'm gonna fade the Bears.

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 3>I can't go near that game.

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, So for me, this would be one where

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I knew you wouldn't because I'm not a lunatic, but

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:57.439
<v Speaker 1>it would be one where if I'm forced to choose

0:34:57.440 --> 0:35:00.239
<v Speaker 1>a side, it would be Chicago in this one. The

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:02.279
<v Speaker 1>consensus line, by the way, is down to three. There's

0:35:02.280 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 1>only one three and a half that I see out there.

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:08.120
<v Speaker 1>So getting the hook in the DK contest is something

0:35:08.160 --> 0:35:10.759
<v Speaker 1>that makes a little bit of a difference. I don't

0:35:10.800 --> 0:35:14.719
<v Speaker 1>really trust uh Trubisky, and there's no way that I

0:35:14.719 --> 0:35:17.239
<v Speaker 1>would really be like, if I can find any way

0:35:17.280 --> 0:35:19.440
<v Speaker 1>to avoid doing this, that I would want to do it.

0:35:19.760 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 1>But Atlanta is just so bad and they may be

0:35:22.960 --> 0:35:26.920
<v Speaker 1>down Julio Jones by the right, But I agree with you.

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to see because if you were on

0:35:28.640 --> 0:35:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the fence about it, I would be willing to talk

0:35:30.680 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 1>this one through.

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:32.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, the only our game that I'm on the fence

0:35:32.800 --> 0:35:34.560
<v Speaker 3>on is the Rams at the Bills.

0:35:34.840 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 1>How do you feel about that one, because that is

0:35:36.520 --> 0:35:39.239
<v Speaker 1>the what is the that is the Rams getting one

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and a half in Buffalo.

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:41.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So, by the way, I.

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Do want to point out, just on that one, seventy

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:46.279
<v Speaker 1>seven percent of our experts are on Atlanta in that game.

0:35:46.320 --> 0:35:48.279
<v Speaker 1>If I'm if I'm forced to choose a side, I'm

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:50.439
<v Speaker 1>taking Chicago at the three and a half. It's three

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 1>again on our consensus. But go ahead, Mat, I'm sorry.

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:55.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no, I It's just like last week. Right, So

0:35:56.000 --> 0:35:58.960
<v Speaker 3>last week the Eagles were laying one one and a

0:35:59.000 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 3>half and it closed. I guess it opened with the

0:36:03.160 --> 0:36:05.880
<v Speaker 3>Rams getting I guess the Rams were open as favorites

0:36:05.920 --> 0:36:08.239
<v Speaker 3>and it flipped and the Eagles one up being favorites. Right,

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:11.920
<v Speaker 3>but the Rams are this is the tel game for

0:36:12.000 --> 0:36:14.200
<v Speaker 3>me with LA. So if they can go back to

0:36:14.239 --> 0:36:16.439
<v Speaker 3>the East Coast on back to back weeks and beat

0:36:16.480 --> 0:36:19.520
<v Speaker 3>the Buffalo Bills, who, by the way, have played nobody. Okay,

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:21.400
<v Speaker 3>Miami and New York are not teams.

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:23.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean I also, by the way, if you are

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 1>new to this podcast, Matt despises the Buffalo Bills and

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:27.359
<v Speaker 1>talks them down all the time.

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Yes, go ahead.

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:29.959
<v Speaker 3>And I actually had somebody on that because I ripped

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:31.840
<v Speaker 3>them on the Daily Juice last night and people somebody

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:34.239
<v Speaker 3>email me said, what's your problem with Judge Allen? And

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:35.880
<v Speaker 3>so they got a big problem with Josh Allen can

0:36:35.960 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 3>get the balls out of a barn. But see So

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:39.839
<v Speaker 3>my thing is this, So the Rams have played played

0:36:39.840 --> 0:36:42.480
<v Speaker 3>a higher level of competition, and it goes back to

0:36:42.520 --> 0:36:44.840
<v Speaker 3>my whole theory about winning on the road with the

0:36:44.840 --> 0:36:47.279
<v Speaker 3>fact that you can have the communication with McVeigh and

0:36:47.360 --> 0:36:50.560
<v Speaker 3>Jared Goff, which clearly worked against the Eagles. So if

0:36:50.600 --> 0:36:53.279
<v Speaker 3>my theory is right, the golf's gonna play much better

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:56.200
<v Speaker 3>this year because no fans on the road. And I

0:36:56.239 --> 0:36:58.279
<v Speaker 3>don't think this team in Buffalo is all that good.

0:36:58.320 --> 0:37:00.439
<v Speaker 3>They're good, okay, but the Rams may be the best

0:37:00.440 --> 0:37:02.399
<v Speaker 3>team in the NFC West. Okay, we got to see

0:37:02.400 --> 0:37:04.400
<v Speaker 3>what happens with Seattle Ford. Nine ers are out of

0:37:04.440 --> 0:37:06.759
<v Speaker 3>the conversation and the Cardinals are too young to really

0:37:06.800 --> 0:37:08.840
<v Speaker 3>know exactly what they are only two games end of

0:37:08.840 --> 0:37:11.680
<v Speaker 3>the season. But to me, this is a show me game.

0:37:11.760 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 3>The Rams go there and win that game outright, the

0:37:14.280 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Rams are gonna be in the conversation for everything. I

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:21.240
<v Speaker 3>means winning it all, I mean everything. So I am

0:37:21.040 --> 0:37:23.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm fifty to fifty on this is taking the one

0:37:23.080 --> 0:37:24.640
<v Speaker 3>and a half points and going with the Rams.

0:37:24.880 --> 0:37:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, the consensus now is two and a

0:37:26.560 --> 0:37:29.920
<v Speaker 1>half for the lines and the Rams are getting fifty

0:37:29.960 --> 0:37:31.839
<v Speaker 1>two percent of our bets, so it's pretty much split

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 1>down the middle. Is not a game I'm gonna take.

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I agree, though, with everything that you're saying. I do

0:37:38.200 --> 0:37:40.799
<v Speaker 1>think I like the Rams before the season started. I

0:37:40.800 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 1>thought they were underrated. I think your point about no

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:45.640
<v Speaker 1>fans and McVeigh being able to talk to Goff your

0:37:45.680 --> 0:37:48.440
<v Speaker 1>theory is great. I think that really does make a difference.

0:37:48.560 --> 0:37:50.839
<v Speaker 1>I think if you're going to Buffalo and you're doing

0:37:50.880 --> 0:37:53.200
<v Speaker 1>it at a time where there are no fans and

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:55.640
<v Speaker 1>it is not freezing, that's the time that you can

0:37:55.640 --> 0:37:56.360
<v Speaker 1>play in Buffalo.

0:37:56.400 --> 0:37:58.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, once it gets late. I went to school there.

0:37:58.200 --> 0:38:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Once it gets late, it's insane, and the fans nuts

0:38:00.680 --> 0:38:03.600
<v Speaker 1>are absolutely nuts. It's a tough place to play. But

0:38:04.000 --> 0:38:07.439
<v Speaker 1>all that said, I am not quite as convinced that

0:38:07.840 --> 0:38:12.479
<v Speaker 1>the Bills are as fake as you will forever think

0:38:12.520 --> 0:38:14.480
<v Speaker 1>that they are. I get the Josh Allen, you know,

0:38:14.800 --> 0:38:17.960
<v Speaker 1>misses plenty of throws, but I think I'm not willing

0:38:18.000 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to say I even like either side on this game.

0:38:20.560 --> 0:38:21.279
<v Speaker 3>For either want to win.

0:38:21.320 --> 0:38:22.200
<v Speaker 2>I feel like it's awesome.

0:38:22.280 --> 0:38:23.920
<v Speaker 1>So I think we're gonna wind up going with the

0:38:24.000 --> 0:38:25.879
<v Speaker 1>Chargers laying six and a half to the Panthers because

0:38:25.880 --> 0:38:27.839
<v Speaker 1>I do like it better than everything else. Let's very

0:38:27.960 --> 0:38:30.200
<v Speaker 1>quickly just touch on the remaining games, yep, and just

0:38:30.239 --> 0:38:32.640
<v Speaker 1>make sure we don't like it. Bengals getting five and

0:38:32.640 --> 0:38:34.440
<v Speaker 1>a half from the Eagles.

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:36.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the Eagles have to win. But how in

0:38:36.560 --> 0:38:38.160
<v Speaker 3>the heck can you back Carson Wentz? Right now?

0:38:38.400 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 2>That's the problem.

0:38:39.040 --> 0:38:40.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, how could you back him?

0:38:40.880 --> 0:38:42.200
<v Speaker 2>I this has everything.

0:38:42.280 --> 0:38:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Even if the Eagles come out and again they just

0:38:44.440 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 1>lost Jalen Rager again, even if they come out and

0:38:47.600 --> 0:38:50.200
<v Speaker 1>they're on fire and they're good, the Bengals are off

0:38:50.440 --> 0:38:53.200
<v Speaker 1>essentially a mini bi because they played on Thursday. Burrow

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:55.920
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a backdoor cover machine this year.

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:57.799
<v Speaker 1>That's what, right, That's what you could just see. He

0:38:57.880 --> 0:39:00.399
<v Speaker 1>just has no fear. He's just gonna run around, throw

0:39:00.480 --> 0:39:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the ball. I could see the Eagles winning this game,

0:39:03.000 --> 0:39:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and this is sort of the spot where you could

0:39:04.560 --> 0:39:08.279
<v Speaker 1>buy them. But I can't back Carson Wentz. I can't

0:39:08.400 --> 0:39:11.959
<v Speaker 1>put one of our five coveted picks in for Carson Wentz.

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:12.719
<v Speaker 2>I agree you there.

0:39:13.480 --> 0:39:16.879
<v Speaker 1>Washington getting seven and a half from the Browns.

0:39:17.840 --> 0:39:22.000
<v Speaker 3>No, just no, on every level. No, No, I'm not

0:39:22.000 --> 0:39:25.000
<v Speaker 3>going to trust the Browns. They're at home here. I'll

0:39:25.040 --> 0:39:28.160
<v Speaker 3>bet the Browns here and I'll take the Browns. Yeah,

0:39:28.200 --> 0:39:30.960
<v Speaker 3>but not in this contest. Not knowing that again, back

0:39:31.000 --> 0:39:32.960
<v Speaker 3>door seven and a half is wide open for the

0:39:33.040 --> 0:39:34.160
<v Speaker 3>Washington football team.

0:39:34.520 --> 0:39:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah no, I completely agree. I would take the Browns,

0:39:37.440 --> 0:39:40.160
<v Speaker 1>like if I'm forced to choose a side, but not

0:39:40.440 --> 0:39:43.520
<v Speaker 1>in the contest. The Jets plus ten and a half

0:39:44.080 --> 0:39:44.640
<v Speaker 1>in Indye.

0:39:44.800 --> 0:39:47.800
<v Speaker 3>Look, I have a long standing I'm not laying double

0:39:47.840 --> 0:39:50.200
<v Speaker 3>digits in this contest. It's just not worth it. In

0:39:50.239 --> 0:39:52.200
<v Speaker 3>my mind, ten and a half is too many points.

0:39:52.200 --> 0:39:54.399
<v Speaker 3>I don't care who it is. It's the NFL. It's

0:39:54.440 --> 0:39:56.480
<v Speaker 3>either a dog or a pass, and I'm not taking

0:39:56.480 --> 0:39:57.520
<v Speaker 3>that team that's the dog.

0:39:57.960 --> 0:40:01.799
<v Speaker 1>And that spread is rising after the Jets announced we

0:40:01.880 --> 0:40:04.600
<v Speaker 1>will be without any actual players this weekend. I mean

0:40:04.640 --> 0:40:08.200
<v Speaker 1>they legitimately announced their whole offense, their offensive line, everything,

0:40:08.239 --> 0:40:08.879
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter.

0:40:09.080 --> 0:40:09.960
<v Speaker 2>It's too many points.

0:40:10.040 --> 0:40:12.640
<v Speaker 1>If I'm forced to choose side, I'm taking the Cults

0:40:12.680 --> 0:40:16.160
<v Speaker 1>because the Jets are truly abysmo. But I agree with you,

0:40:16.239 --> 0:40:18.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not a line that I want to go near

0:40:18.080 --> 0:40:19.080
<v Speaker 1>in this sort of contest.

0:40:19.360 --> 0:40:23.800
<v Speaker 2>Bucks playing six and a half in Denver, Boy, it's.

0:40:23.640 --> 0:40:27.439
<v Speaker 3>A cold weather city. With a real hot, warm weather team.

0:40:28.160 --> 0:40:30.319
<v Speaker 2>And is it cold in Denver right now?

0:40:30.440 --> 0:40:34.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? And Denver not cold cold, but it's colder than Tampa.

0:40:34.920 --> 0:40:35.200
<v Speaker 2>Sure.

0:40:35.280 --> 0:40:39.640
<v Speaker 3>And Tom Brady's record in Tampa in Denver is horrific,

0:40:40.200 --> 0:40:43.160
<v Speaker 3>and I mean, like capital h horrific. So you know,

0:40:43.239 --> 0:40:45.960
<v Speaker 3>Jeff Driscolls the quarterback though it doesn't matter, I don't care.

0:40:46.080 --> 0:40:48.920
<v Speaker 2>You know Courland Sutton's out right, yep, I did.

0:40:49.160 --> 0:40:52.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't care. I'm not I'm not taking Tom Brady

0:40:52.040 --> 0:40:53.400
<v Speaker 3>on the road in that in that building.

0:40:53.520 --> 0:40:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh yeah, either way, I don't want that game whatsoever.

0:40:56.000 --> 0:40:57.879
<v Speaker 1>I just like to play Devil's advocation. Yeah, I agree.

0:40:57.920 --> 0:41:00.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't like the way the Bucks offense look right now.

0:41:00.800 --> 0:41:03.120
<v Speaker 2>I just don't. It just seems out of sort.

0:41:03.320 --> 0:41:05.520
<v Speaker 1>And again I talked about this on the Fantasy on

0:41:05.520 --> 0:41:06.600
<v Speaker 1>one of our Fantasy podcasts.

0:41:06.640 --> 0:41:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Jeff Driscoll's going to throw that ball. He don't care.

0:41:09.280 --> 0:41:11.640
<v Speaker 2>He definitely is at the point and be like, I'll

0:41:11.680 --> 0:41:12.360
<v Speaker 2>throw a couple.

0:41:12.200 --> 0:41:14.840
<v Speaker 3>Home dogs in the NFL home dogs in the NFL.

0:41:14.960 --> 0:41:16.880
<v Speaker 3>Not not with Brady's record in Denver nowhere.

0:41:16.920 --> 0:41:20.240
<v Speaker 1>And early on we talked about this with the Titans,

0:41:20.239 --> 0:41:22.200
<v Speaker 1>even though we were very clearly on the right side

0:41:22.239 --> 0:41:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of that game that Denver just has a way of

0:41:24.719 --> 0:41:27.200
<v Speaker 1>either winning or covering, at least early in the season

0:41:27.560 --> 0:41:30.160
<v Speaker 1>when they're home. So definitely not a place that I

0:41:30.200 --> 0:41:32.279
<v Speaker 1>want to go to. And I mentioned it at the

0:41:32.280 --> 0:41:35.600
<v Speaker 1>start Packers getting three and a half in New Orleans.

0:41:37.719 --> 0:41:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to go near it.

0:41:38.680 --> 0:41:42.560
<v Speaker 3>I into my head, I'm taking the Saints because they're

0:41:42.600 --> 0:41:44.040
<v Speaker 3>at home, and I think people are a little bit

0:41:44.040 --> 0:41:45.279
<v Speaker 3>too high on the Packers right now.

0:41:45.320 --> 0:41:46.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think Devanta Adam is going to be out here,

0:41:46.960 --> 0:41:48.520
<v Speaker 1>by the way, so I do think that that does

0:41:48.600 --> 0:41:49.200
<v Speaker 1>make a difference.

0:41:49.239 --> 0:41:49.799
<v Speaker 2>I think he is.

0:41:49.840 --> 0:41:51.879
<v Speaker 1>There's no way to know that yet, but he misspracticed.

0:41:51.920 --> 0:41:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess ow report that that it doesn't look real

0:41:53.600 --> 0:41:56.439
<v Speaker 1>good for his availability. So you know, if that makes

0:41:56.440 --> 0:41:59.000
<v Speaker 1>a difference to you find I still though, don't Michael

0:41:59.040 --> 0:42:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Thomas is also going to be out.

0:42:00.480 --> 0:42:04.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's not it overfield goal. It's just it's.

0:42:04.680 --> 0:42:06.080
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to stay away game from me on

0:42:06.360 --> 0:42:08.560
<v Speaker 3>either side. But I mean, if I had to play it,

0:42:08.560 --> 0:42:09.640
<v Speaker 3>I'll take the Saints.

0:42:09.640 --> 0:42:09.960
<v Speaker 2>Correct.

0:42:10.000 --> 0:42:12.000
<v Speaker 1>That's where I'm okay, all right, So this was not

0:42:12.000 --> 0:42:13.839
<v Speaker 1>that hard. You feel a lot better about this than

0:42:13.880 --> 0:42:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I do. I feel good about two of the picks

0:42:15.880 --> 0:42:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and the rest of them are like, okay, I lean

0:42:17.719 --> 0:42:19.000
<v Speaker 1>that way, but I do you know.

0:42:18.960 --> 0:42:19.920
<v Speaker 2>What I really like, Matt.

0:42:19.960 --> 0:42:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I love that I have the Chiefs getting more than

0:42:22.400 --> 0:42:24.759
<v Speaker 1>a field goal. That's what I'm going to watch that game,

0:42:24.960 --> 0:42:26.480
<v Speaker 1>because there's never going to be a point.

0:42:26.480 --> 0:42:28.960
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna be like, well this this BET's dead, like million,

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:30.359
<v Speaker 2>right not with not with the Chiefs.

0:42:30.400 --> 0:42:32.160
<v Speaker 3>It could be twenty. They could be down twenty at

0:42:32.160 --> 0:42:34.839
<v Speaker 3>halftime and you could be like, yep, we're so we're good,

0:42:35.080 --> 0:42:35.360
<v Speaker 3>We're so.

0:42:35.440 --> 0:42:36.600
<v Speaker 2>Alive, all right.

0:42:36.760 --> 0:42:40.640
<v Speaker 1>So our five official picks, and again follow us on Twitter,

0:42:40.719 --> 0:42:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Dan Harris eighty at sports Talk Matt and go to

0:42:43.920 --> 0:42:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Matt's live stream Sunday mornings at eleven am Eastern YouTube

0:42:48.400 --> 0:42:51.600
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash Betting Pros. Subscribe, click the notification button.

0:42:51.600 --> 0:42:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Matt will be talking about it and give player props.

0:42:53.920 --> 0:42:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Again it's Thursday. We don't have all the player props,

0:42:56.120 --> 0:42:57.400
<v Speaker 1>so we're not able to get them here, but we

0:42:57.440 --> 0:42:59.440
<v Speaker 1>will give them. Matt will give them. I'll give him

0:42:59.440 --> 0:43:01.600
<v Speaker 1>some of mine. But for our five picks as of

0:43:01.680 --> 0:43:04.000
<v Speaker 1>right now, again we may change them. Are the Patriots

0:43:04.080 --> 0:43:05.520
<v Speaker 1>laying five and a half to the Raiders.

0:43:05.560 --> 0:43:07.520
<v Speaker 2>We both love that game. The Titans laying two and

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:08.880
<v Speaker 2>a half to the Vikings.

0:43:08.920 --> 0:43:11.160
<v Speaker 1>We like that game. The Steelers laying three and a

0:43:11.200 --> 0:43:13.239
<v Speaker 1>half to the Texans. I think Matt loves it. I

0:43:13.360 --> 0:43:16.160
<v Speaker 1>like it, Chiefs laying three and a half getting three

0:43:16.160 --> 0:43:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and a half pardon me from the Ravens.

0:43:18.040 --> 0:43:20.560
<v Speaker 2>We both have talked ourselves very much into that game.

0:43:20.840 --> 0:43:22.360
<v Speaker 2>And the Chargers laying six.

0:43:22.200 --> 0:43:24.960
<v Speaker 1>And a half to the Panthers. Matt likes that game.

0:43:25.320 --> 0:43:27.359
<v Speaker 1>I am very much of I don't really like any

0:43:27.440 --> 0:43:29.880
<v Speaker 1>other game in this slate. I lean that way, so

0:43:29.920 --> 0:43:30.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm good to go with it.

0:43:30.880 --> 0:43:32.160
<v Speaker 2>All right. You feel good about.

0:43:31.920 --> 0:43:33.680
<v Speaker 3>That, Matt? I do. I like those five plays?

0:43:33.680 --> 0:43:34.680
<v Speaker 2>I do, all right?

0:43:34.719 --> 0:43:34.879
<v Speaker 3>Man?

0:43:34.920 --> 0:43:36.000
<v Speaker 2>All right, So this is great.

0:43:36.040 --> 0:43:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I love doing this podcast because it's just fun and

0:43:38.400 --> 0:43:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Matt and I other than we send each other maybe

0:43:40.680 --> 0:43:43.240
<v Speaker 1>a couple of minor leans early on to say, hey,

0:43:43.440 --> 0:43:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I kind of like this game. We use this podcast

0:43:46.440 --> 0:43:48.640
<v Speaker 1>to discuss it. So that's all right. Again, Go to

0:43:48.680 --> 0:43:50.719
<v Speaker 1>bettingpros dot com because not all the odds. I tried

0:43:50.760 --> 0:43:52.840
<v Speaker 1>to give the updated odds when I could. That shows

0:43:52.880 --> 0:43:54.680
<v Speaker 1>you what the consensus lines are, and they're gonna move

0:43:54.680 --> 0:43:57.719
<v Speaker 1>the Draftking lines lock Wednesday. So they, as Matt had

0:43:57.719 --> 0:43:59.800
<v Speaker 1>said when we talked about earlier, they try to predict

0:43:59.800 --> 0:44:03.480
<v Speaker 1>what it's going before the line is actually there. So

0:44:03.600 --> 0:44:05.800
<v Speaker 1>usually when they said it it's not there, they predict

0:44:05.840 --> 0:44:08.120
<v Speaker 1>where it's gonna go. So sometimes you're gonna get much

0:44:08.200 --> 0:44:10.600
<v Speaker 1>better value. Sometimes it get worse value than what we

0:44:10.600 --> 0:44:13.200
<v Speaker 1>talk about here. And again you can see which way

0:44:13.440 --> 0:44:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the experts are going when they're picking the game, and

0:44:16.040 --> 0:44:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I think you can see the way Matt and I

0:44:17.360 --> 0:44:18.839
<v Speaker 1>have picked it. If you go on betting pros dot

0:44:18.840 --> 0:44:21.359
<v Speaker 1>com check it out. Also download the Betting Pros app.

0:44:21.400 --> 0:44:22.000
<v Speaker 2>It is awesome.

0:44:22.040 --> 0:44:24.959
<v Speaker 1>Actually most times I just make my picks from there

0:44:25.040 --> 0:44:26.880
<v Speaker 1>because I can do it, but it tracks your bets.

0:44:27.120 --> 0:44:29.279
<v Speaker 1>They just updated it a couple of weeks ago. It's

0:44:29.320 --> 0:44:31.480
<v Speaker 1>really awesome. Again, just download it from the app store.

0:44:31.680 --> 0:44:34.640
<v Speaker 1>It's great, all right. That is it for our Week

0:44:34.680 --> 0:44:36.800
<v Speaker 1>three show was a good one. I enjoyed it. Remember

0:44:36.920 --> 0:44:39.040
<v Speaker 1>check out the livestream on Sunday morning, YouTube dot com,

0:44:39.040 --> 0:44:41.440
<v Speaker 1>slash Betting Pros at eleven. Matt will give you more information.

0:44:41.760 --> 0:44:44.680
<v Speaker 1>But until then or until next week, rest easy and

0:44:44.880 --> 0:45:03.920
<v Speaker 1>good luck with all your bets.

0:45:04.280 --> 0:45:04.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah,