1 00:00:03,520 --> 00:00:07,040 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Law Podcast. I'm June Grosso. Every 2 00:00:07,120 --> 00:00:09,680 Speaker 1: day we bring you insight and analysis into the most 3 00:00:09,720 --> 00:00:12,200 Speaker 1: important legal news of the day. You can find more 4 00:00:12,240 --> 00:00:16,120 Speaker 1: episodes at the Bloomberg Law Podcast, on Apple podcast, SoundCloud, 5 00:00:16,280 --> 00:00:19,920 Speaker 1: and on Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. It's the first 6 00:00:19,960 --> 00:00:22,800 Speaker 1: gun rights case the Supreme Court has heard in almost 7 00:00:22,800 --> 00:00:26,160 Speaker 1: a decade, and gun rights advocates were hoping a new 8 00:00:26,239 --> 00:00:31,120 Speaker 1: conservative majority would expand Second Amendment protections. However, the Justice 9 00:00:31,120 --> 00:00:33,760 Speaker 1: has spent most of an hour long argument on Monday 10 00:00:33,920 --> 00:00:36,800 Speaker 1: debating whether to issue a ruling at all or to 11 00:00:36,800 --> 00:00:40,000 Speaker 1: toss out the New York City firearms case now that 12 00:00:40,040 --> 00:00:43,840 Speaker 1: the city has scrapped the restrictions on transporting licensed handguns 13 00:00:44,000 --> 00:00:46,320 Speaker 1: that were at the center of the case. Joining me 14 00:00:46,400 --> 00:00:49,360 Speaker 1: is a leading authority on the Second Amendment. Adam Winkler, 15 00:00:49,400 --> 00:00:52,400 Speaker 1: a professor at u c l A Law school. What's 16 00:00:52,400 --> 00:00:55,560 Speaker 1: at stake in this case? Well, there's a lot at 17 00:00:55,600 --> 00:00:57,680 Speaker 1: stake in this case. On one hand, it could be 18 00:00:57,680 --> 00:01:00,320 Speaker 1: a very minor case. New York City. You to have 19 00:01:00,440 --> 00:01:03,960 Speaker 1: these regulations in place that restricted where you could transport 20 00:01:04,000 --> 00:01:07,880 Speaker 1: your firearms, but they were very unusual and unique provisions. 21 00:01:07,920 --> 00:01:10,880 Speaker 1: No other city or state has similar restrictions on where 22 00:01:10,920 --> 00:01:13,880 Speaker 1: you can transport a firearm, So the Court could rule 23 00:01:13,920 --> 00:01:16,080 Speaker 1: in this case in a way that's very minor. But 24 00:01:16,280 --> 00:01:18,680 Speaker 1: the truth of the matter is there's been several justices 25 00:01:18,720 --> 00:01:21,000 Speaker 1: who really been pushing the Court to take a Second 26 00:01:21,000 --> 00:01:25,160 Speaker 1: Amendment case so that the Court can articulate broader principles 27 00:01:25,319 --> 00:01:28,479 Speaker 1: for the Second Amendment and expand the scope of gun 28 00:01:28,600 --> 00:01:32,399 Speaker 1: rights in America. Many legal experts were surprised when New 29 00:01:32,480 --> 00:01:36,200 Speaker 1: York City changed the law and the Justices didn't dismiss 30 00:01:36,240 --> 00:01:39,240 Speaker 1: the case, and people were reading into that. Did you 31 00:01:39,240 --> 00:01:42,720 Speaker 1: read into that? Well, it is always unusual for the 32 00:01:42,800 --> 00:01:46,800 Speaker 1: Court to eagerly seek out a case when the law 33 00:01:46,840 --> 00:01:50,560 Speaker 1: has been repealed. However, this was an unusual circumstance. It's 34 00:01:50,560 --> 00:01:53,600 Speaker 1: not often that lawmakers repeal a law at the moment 35 00:01:53,640 --> 00:01:57,200 Speaker 1: that the Supreme Court accepts um an appeal in a case. 36 00:01:57,480 --> 00:02:00,960 Speaker 1: So this was an unusual circumstance. So perhaps it wasn't 37 00:02:01,000 --> 00:02:04,160 Speaker 1: all that surprising that the Justice has decided to move forward, 38 00:02:04,360 --> 00:02:06,920 Speaker 1: But it did sound like from the oral argument that 39 00:02:07,040 --> 00:02:10,079 Speaker 1: was heard in the case, that the justices seemed likely 40 00:02:10,240 --> 00:02:12,840 Speaker 1: to determine in the end that this is a moot 41 00:02:12,919 --> 00:02:15,720 Speaker 1: case and not issue a final ruling on the merits 42 00:02:15,880 --> 00:02:19,160 Speaker 1: of the particular provisions that have been repealed. Chief Justice 43 00:02:19,280 --> 00:02:23,080 Speaker 1: John Roberts, who could be a swing vote here, asked 44 00:02:23,120 --> 00:02:26,480 Speaker 1: New York City's lawyer whether declaring the case moot would 45 00:02:26,520 --> 00:02:29,840 Speaker 1: harm gun owners in any way. How do you read 46 00:02:30,040 --> 00:02:34,480 Speaker 1: his question? It did seem that Chief Justice John Roberts 47 00:02:34,639 --> 00:02:38,160 Speaker 1: was hyper focused on this mutinous issue. It could be 48 00:02:38,200 --> 00:02:41,160 Speaker 1: that the Court has so many big, high profile cases 49 00:02:41,240 --> 00:02:44,880 Speaker 1: coming before it this term that the Chief Justice wouldn't 50 00:02:44,919 --> 00:02:48,360 Speaker 1: mind pushing off the Second Amendment case for a future date. 51 00:02:48,720 --> 00:02:51,680 Speaker 1: And that's all it really would be. Ruling on muteness 52 00:02:51,760 --> 00:02:55,400 Speaker 1: in this case does not save gun safety reform advocates 53 00:02:55,600 --> 00:02:58,680 Speaker 1: from a Supreme Court decision. It's only a matter of 54 00:02:58,720 --> 00:03:01,600 Speaker 1: time before the Court steps back into the Second Amendment anyway. 55 00:03:01,600 --> 00:03:04,720 Speaker 1: There's a bunch of cases that are awaiting the Supreme 56 00:03:04,760 --> 00:03:07,959 Speaker 1: Court action on the Second Amendment. During the oral arguments, 57 00:03:08,000 --> 00:03:11,320 Speaker 1: it appeared that the liberal justices thought nothing was left 58 00:03:11,360 --> 00:03:16,360 Speaker 1: of the case, while conservative Justices Samuel Alito and Neil 59 00:03:16,440 --> 00:03:21,360 Speaker 1: Gorsch thought the controversy was still alive. But Conservative Justice 60 00:03:21,400 --> 00:03:24,480 Speaker 1: Brett Kavanagh, who wrote a dissent when the d C. 61 00:03:24,639 --> 00:03:29,120 Speaker 1: Appeals Court upheld a ban on semi automatic rifles was silent, 62 00:03:29,480 --> 00:03:33,119 Speaker 1: which is unusual for him. That is unusual for him, 63 00:03:33,160 --> 00:03:35,880 Speaker 1: and it's hard to know exactly what to make of 64 00:03:36,040 --> 00:03:39,560 Speaker 1: his silence. It could be that he agrees that this 65 00:03:39,640 --> 00:03:43,000 Speaker 1: case is moot or believes that is a very strong argument. 66 00:03:43,480 --> 00:03:46,680 Speaker 1: Even many of the conservative justices, even if they're eager 67 00:03:46,720 --> 00:03:50,280 Speaker 1: to step back into the Second Amendment Fray, are maybe 68 00:03:50,520 --> 00:03:53,480 Speaker 1: reluctant to do so in a case where the provisions 69 00:03:53,520 --> 00:03:56,720 Speaker 1: themselves have really been repealed and in a decision would 70 00:03:56,720 --> 00:03:59,680 Speaker 1: come out in the middle of election, in flaming the 71 00:03:59,720 --> 00:04:03,680 Speaker 1: elect direct all the more. The Deputy Solicitor General said, 72 00:04:03,840 --> 00:04:08,320 Speaker 1: lower courts have basically given thumbs up to restrictions on 73 00:04:09,000 --> 00:04:12,480 Speaker 1: gun rights, but thumbs down to gun rights. Is that 74 00:04:12,520 --> 00:04:16,960 Speaker 1: basically true? Have the lower courts, even the appellate courts, 75 00:04:17,360 --> 00:04:21,520 Speaker 1: turned away challenges to gun regulations. Well, I wouldn't think 76 00:04:21,560 --> 00:04:24,240 Speaker 1: that that's highly accurate. I mean, there's certainly the case 77 00:04:24,279 --> 00:04:28,400 Speaker 1: that many forms of gun control law have survived judicial scrutiny, 78 00:04:28,440 --> 00:04:32,520 Speaker 1: but that's in part because America has pretty weak gun 79 00:04:32,640 --> 00:04:36,320 Speaker 1: laws relative to other nations. That the gun rights movement 80 00:04:36,400 --> 00:04:40,320 Speaker 1: is so strong politically that it prevents most states from 81 00:04:40,440 --> 00:04:44,520 Speaker 1: enacting very restrictive laws. So while it's no doubt that 82 00:04:44,600 --> 00:04:47,040 Speaker 1: courts have upheld many forms of gun control, I don't 83 00:04:47,040 --> 00:04:50,479 Speaker 1: think that's necessarily a sign of disrespect for the Second Amendment. 84 00:04:50,880 --> 00:04:54,080 Speaker 1: Do you expect that if the Court decides that this 85 00:04:54,160 --> 00:04:58,120 Speaker 1: case is moot, would they just dismiss the case or 86 00:04:58,320 --> 00:05:01,720 Speaker 1: might they also issue a ling that could give guidance 87 00:05:01,800 --> 00:05:05,880 Speaker 1: to this area. It seems unlikely that the Court will 88 00:05:06,000 --> 00:05:09,239 Speaker 1: articulate broad principles about the Second Amendment in a case 89 00:05:09,360 --> 00:05:12,320 Speaker 1: that the Court declares as moot. The whole point of 90 00:05:12,360 --> 00:05:15,040 Speaker 1: declaring the case moot would be that the Court doesn't 91 00:05:15,040 --> 00:05:18,320 Speaker 1: have to issue a decision on the merits. One never 92 00:05:18,360 --> 00:05:20,440 Speaker 1: knows what the Supreme Court will do, of course, and 93 00:05:20,480 --> 00:05:22,400 Speaker 1: we'll have to see how it goes. As you know, 94 00:05:22,839 --> 00:05:27,120 Speaker 1: Justice Clarence Thomas has basically said that the Second Amendment 95 00:05:27,360 --> 00:05:31,159 Speaker 1: is a disfavored amendment. Do you agree with that? I 96 00:05:31,240 --> 00:05:33,640 Speaker 1: don't think so. I think the Second Amendment is enjoying 97 00:05:33,640 --> 00:05:37,359 Speaker 1: a resurgence in popularity, and just ten years ago or 98 00:05:37,360 --> 00:05:40,119 Speaker 1: twelve years ago, the Supreme Court, for the first time 99 00:05:40,160 --> 00:05:42,599 Speaker 1: in history in the Heller case said that the Second 100 00:05:42,600 --> 00:05:45,440 Speaker 1: Amendment protects an individual right to bear arms. Over the 101 00:05:45,560 --> 00:05:48,880 Speaker 1: last ten years, we've seen more cases challenging gun control 102 00:05:48,920 --> 00:05:52,280 Speaker 1: laws and more gun control laws struck down than ever 103 00:05:52,360 --> 00:05:55,080 Speaker 1: before in American history. So I know, I don't think 104 00:05:55,080 --> 00:05:57,680 Speaker 1: the Second Amendment is being treated as a second class right. 105 00:05:58,279 --> 00:06:02,400 Speaker 1: Some analysts say that or think that it was Justice 106 00:06:02,640 --> 00:06:06,680 Speaker 1: Anthony Kennedy who was holding back the other conservatives on 107 00:06:06,760 --> 00:06:10,920 Speaker 1: the Court from enhancing gun rights. Well, we don't know 108 00:06:11,040 --> 00:06:15,320 Speaker 1: exactly what happens behind closed doors in the private conferences 109 00:06:15,400 --> 00:06:17,760 Speaker 1: of the Supreme Court justices, so we can't say for 110 00:06:17,880 --> 00:06:22,040 Speaker 1: certain if anyone justice was creating a barrier to the 111 00:06:22,080 --> 00:06:25,560 Speaker 1: courts taking a new case. It is somewhat telling, however, 112 00:06:25,960 --> 00:06:30,040 Speaker 1: that within months of Justice Kavanaugh replacing Justice Kennedy, the 113 00:06:30,080 --> 00:06:33,080 Speaker 1: Supreme Court decides to hear its first big Second Amendment 114 00:06:33,080 --> 00:06:37,680 Speaker 1: case in nearly a decade. Thanks for being on Bloomberg Law, Adam. 115 00:06:37,720 --> 00:06:40,760 Speaker 1: That's Adam Winkler, Professor at u c l A Law School. 116 00:06:41,480 --> 00:06:44,640 Speaker 1: A note. Michael Bloomberg, the founder and majority owner of 117 00:06:44,640 --> 00:06:48,040 Speaker 1: Bloomberg LP, the parent company of Bloomberg Radio, is a 118 00:06:48,120 --> 00:06:51,560 Speaker 1: donor to groups that support gun control, including every Town 119 00:06:51,560 --> 00:06:56,839 Speaker 1: for Gun Safety. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Law podcast. 120 00:06:57,200 --> 00:06:59,719 Speaker 1: You can subscribe and listen to the show on apple 121 00:06:59,720 --> 00:07:03,880 Speaker 1: Pie podcast, SoundCloud, and on Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. 122 00:07:04,240 --> 00:07:12,440 Speaker 1: I'm June Brosso. This is Bloomberg m