WEBVTT - Listener Mail: Yearly Dad Joke Inundation

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind, a production of

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>My Heart Radio. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Listener mail. My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick.

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.120
<v Speaker 1>And it's been a lot of groans over here lately

0:00:18.160 --> 0:00:21.960
<v Speaker 1>because Carney, our loyal mail bot, has now been procedurally

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:26.320
<v Speaker 1>generating dad jokes, and they are not very good. Rob

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>did you catch that most recent one? Uh? Yeah, I did,

0:00:29.560 --> 0:00:32.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, but you know, it may not have been funny,

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's endearing in a way, you know. Yeah,

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>so so he It's all stuff like what do you

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 1>call a turkey that goes to space? I don't know.

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:41.520
<v Speaker 1>What do you call a turkey the coast of space?

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:46.519
<v Speaker 1>Poo poo in the toilet? The answer? M hmm, okay.

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I have questions about the logic behind that one. But

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:52.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's the thing about artificial intelligence is that

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>you let it run wild, and it begins operating on

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a level that we can no longer connect with. That's right.

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 1>You don't know if it's too stupid to be funny,

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>or if it's so far over your head that you'll

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 1>never catch up. Could be either way. Uh So, Luckily,

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Carney is still obeying his basic programming. He is still

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>bringing us listener mail, and of course everybody out there,

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>you're still sending us listener mail related to our stuff

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:21.199
<v Speaker 1>to blow your mind. Episodes are artifact episodes are weird,

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>how cinema episodes. So once more we have a selection

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:26.959
<v Speaker 1>of listener mail to consider. That's right, We've got the

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:31.040
<v Speaker 1>seasonal yearly inundation of Dad jokes and uh, and we're

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>very excited to get right into them. Rob do you

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:35.040
<v Speaker 1>want to start off? Let's see, should I read this

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>one from Brett about the Nile inundation? Go for it.

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:45.839
<v Speaker 1>Brett says, Hello, Joe and Robert. I hope this note

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>finds you both well. I just wanted to write a

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>quick note about the Nile episode and how you guys

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>were able to take it to a biochemical angle. You

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>have had Daniel whiteson on your show before, and he

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>has mentioned a quote about the ocean that I forget

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>in detail. It goes something like, we left the ocean

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 1>when we learned to take the water with us. Now

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>it seems we should say we left the water's edge,

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily the ocean. H Now, I could be wrong

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 1>about this, but I think we have had Daniel Whiteson

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:16.800
<v Speaker 1>on the show before. Daniel Whiteson is a physicist and

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the hosts of Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe. Uh,

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and Daniel was a great guest on the show. But

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>unless I'm mistaken, Brett, I think you're actually remembering us

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about Brian Green's book Until the End of Time,

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>where Green in the book is explaining the role of

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 1>water in biochemistry and he quotes the Nobel Laureate Albert

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>sent Georgie, who said, quote water is life's matter and matrix,

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 1>mother and medium. There is no life without water. Life

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 1>could leave the ocean when it learned how to grow

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a skin a bag in which to take the water

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 1>with it. We're still living in water, having the water

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>now inside. I should say it would be it would

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>be easy to confuse these two interviews since they occurred

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 1>so close together. Um, I remember we I think we

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>talked to Daniel Whiteson and then basically the next episode

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:09.119
<v Speaker 1>of the next week was when we talked to Brian Green. Yeah.

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that's exactly right, But but who knows. Maybe

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm forgetting something that we talked about with with Daniel

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 1>that was very similar. But anyway, I think, yes, this

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 1>makes a good point that what synt Georgie was saying

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>is sort of true in a broad evolutionary sense, but

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:26.680
<v Speaker 1>it's also a little bit too simple because as we

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:29.640
<v Speaker 1>we talked about in the Nilon Inundation episode, Uh, you

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>can't just have a cell be a bag of water.

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>A cell actually needs to very tightly control and regulate

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>what happens to the water contents inside it because of

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>how dangerous water can be too organic molecules or I

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>guess especially the long chain molecules needed for life, like DNA,

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>RNA and so forth. But anyway, Breath's message goes on.

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned organic chemistry and how water is the enemy,

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>which it can be for sure. As an organic chemist,

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 1>we try to use an hydrus meaning free from water

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>solvents and reagents daily because of the sensitivity of the

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>reagents to something as polar as water. Water causes byproducts

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>which we then need to remove. But this is more

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>about how reactive our reagents could be to one another,

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:18.040
<v Speaker 1>which helps us design and synthesize drugs for disease. But

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting sidetracked here. The reason I write today is

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:23.919
<v Speaker 1>because of a basic process of life that all amino

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>acids undergo to form peptides. When two amino acids linked together,

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>they form an amide bond from an amine and a

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>carboxylic acid, and the waste product of this step a

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>water molecule. As you can see, water is the essence

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 1>of life because it is derived from the process of

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:46.280
<v Speaker 1>making life. It's very interesting. Our cells then had to

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 1>learn to regulate how much water was in the cell

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>as more and more peptide bonds were formed. But this

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:55.719
<v Speaker 1>is at a very small amount relative to the size

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>of a cell. Please keep the twists coming. I really

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:01.279
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed how you were able to start with crop growing

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:05.039
<v Speaker 1>for food and lead it to how life might have started.

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Definitely one of my favorite podcasts, and I look forward

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>to what you guys will discuss next. Cheers Brett. Yes,

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 1>our discussions are are are lawless affair. You never know

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:18.040
<v Speaker 1>where they're gonna go, what we're gonna end up talking about. Uh,

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:21.679
<v Speaker 1>it's very very free form. Some of the time maybe chaotic,

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 1>but I hope at least chaotic good one would hope.

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 1>All Right, we received a lot of feedback from our

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Dad Jokes episode, which we knew would be the case,

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:35.280
<v Speaker 1>given how connected people are to the topic. Either, you know,

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:37.960
<v Speaker 1>parents making bad jokes are just bad jokes in general

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 1>and humor itself. Uh so we're gonna get into some

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>of these now. This first one comes to us from Mark.

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Good evening, gentlemen. I hope this finds you well. I

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>loved your episode on dad jokes and thought I would

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>share one of my own creation. I am assuming the

0:05:57.240 --> 0:06:00.719
<v Speaker 1>rule of infinite probability predicts either some one has already

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:05.040
<v Speaker 1>made it or will soon enough. Anyway, here it goes question,

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:11.840
<v Speaker 1>what do you call a questionable toilet? Answer? A skeptic tank.

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I hope you enjoyed my lame joke. Thanks for all

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the knowledge. Mark. Why does Mark get a voice a

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:22.160
<v Speaker 1>voice for a listener before? I don't know, just because

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 1>he's I don't know, good evening gentleman's tended to demand it.

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 1>So it just happened. Good evening to you, Mark. A

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:38.600
<v Speaker 1>skeptic tank. Okay, uh okay, close, Yeah, yeah, I like it.

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it'll work. I would tell it to my son,

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:42.720
<v Speaker 1>except I'm not sure he knows what a what a

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:44.720
<v Speaker 1>septic tank is. At this point. I'd have to first

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:47.160
<v Speaker 1>school him in that then wait, wait a few days,

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and then release the joke on him. Um, so just

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>educating him as a precursor to sharing humor. Dad, why

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:59.599
<v Speaker 1>the six hour lesson about septic tanks? Just wait until Thursday.

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>It'll come together, alright. This next message comes from Jim

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 1>in New Jersey. Jim says Robert and Joe, the purpose

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>of dad jokes is to embarrass your adolescent children in

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>front of their adolescent friends. If you can embarrass your

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>children in public from time to time, why even bother

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>to have them. Jim in New Jersey PS, I didn't

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>get the assassin joke until I listened to it for

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the second time. Oh. Yeah, that one is rather tricky,

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 1>isn't it. Uh this is a good point, Uh, the

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Jim raises, and I think one that I don't know

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>how much we've got into it, but I think this

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>does fall into the category of like the teasing joke. Um,

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, the joke as a way of teasing. Parental

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>teasing as one of the categories of teasing that humans

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>engage in. Yeah, And one of the things we talked

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>about in the episode was the possibility that sometimes when

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 1>you make bad jokes at like an adolescent or teenager.

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 1>It can at least elicit some kind of noticeable reaction

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>from them when not much else does. Yeah, yeah, absolutely,

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 1>all right. Here's another one. This one comes to us

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 1>from Sebastian Hi, Rob, Joe, and Seth for the recent

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 1>dad jokes episode. I just wanted to add a couple

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 1>of bits of information. The first is that in French,

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>or at least in Canadian French, the equivalent term to

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>dad jokes is uh and forgive me my I'm terrible.

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 1>With the French uh le jokes demons uncle or um

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>or uh leblas de mon monacle, depending on your region.

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 1>This translates not to dad jokes, but rather too uncle jokes,

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:44.959
<v Speaker 1>with the understanding that dad jokes in French are a

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 1>lot more brown and blue than in English, and that

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>it's considered to be the responsibility of the uncles to

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>corrupt their nieces and nephews when the sister or sister

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:56.960
<v Speaker 1>in law isn't there to shoot them. Many a Christmas

0:08:57.000 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>dinner have led to comparisons of gravy to diarrhea as

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>soon as the matriarch's attention is diverted. In a French household,

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:08.440
<v Speaker 1>this is what we hear about that sophisticated French sense

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 1>of humor. The Americans, you know, just we can't get there, yeah,

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:19.439
<v Speaker 1>Uncle Pierre. Anyway, they continue. The second thing is that

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I take mild exception to you are using the army's

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>sleeve's joke as an example of a dad joke. Maybe

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 1>it's more of a Canadian thing, but dad jokes here

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 1>are usually considered more contextual and opportunistic. They tend to

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:35.679
<v Speaker 1>be cheap and fast and lack structure, and to be

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>tied directly to observations in the immediate environment, such as

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>pointing out things that look like a butt, or deliberately

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>mishearing things. Oh god, this is a big one. Mom

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 1>says you should thank your dad, causes the dad to say,

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I should shank the cat for this angle. Dad jokes

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 1>are more like riffing, albeit a more infantile type of

0:09:55.800 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>riffing based on crafts humor. Yes, the mishearing things was,

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>um what was pretty big in my household, and also

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>from I think from my dad, But I always I

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't know it was universal. I was kind of chalked

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:11.599
<v Speaker 1>it up to the fact that my dad's hearing was

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a little like his hearing was a little bit damaged,

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:16.679
<v Speaker 1>so I think he oftentimes did not hear things all

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the way and found humor in them and then kind

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>of past that form of humor on to all of

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>us so that we're all intolerable in conversations with other people. Now,

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that is more universal that uh. I think

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:33.079
<v Speaker 1>that's a kind of classic movie riff, where whatever is

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>in the dialogue is hard to hear, and then you

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 1>can you can go off of it. I can't think

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 1>of a perfect example right now, but I know there's

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that on Mystery Science Theater. Yeah. Um, anyway,

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 1>they continue. Similarly, there's a growing concept of mom jokes

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:49.679
<v Speaker 1>that I've seen more and more, at least among Canadians.

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Whereas dad jokes are innocent and crass, mom jokes tend

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>to be more exhausted and beset upon and oftentimes rather dark.

0:10:57.800 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>So when a kid might say I don't like broccoli,

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 1>a mom joke would be to reply with you're gonna

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:04.439
<v Speaker 1>die of scurvy if you don't learn to ram that

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 1>in your face, Or if you say I don't think

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 1>those shoes will go with that dress, and they reply

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:11.679
<v Speaker 1>with welp, I guess I should just go lay in

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>a ditch and wait for the cold grip of death.

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 1>In other words, whereas the dad joke is exceedingly immature,

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the mom joke tends to be exceedingly mature jokes about death, disease,

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>abandonment and isolation and other darker topics, and usually with

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>cartoonish hyperbole and either a dead pan or over the

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>top delivery. But most importantly, mom jokes, like dad jokes,

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:37.559
<v Speaker 1>are contextual and can't be repeated unless in a similar context.

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Now this is that this is interesting, UM I wonder

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, one would be tempted to sort of take

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:49.319
<v Speaker 1>like sort of traditional stereotypical um like gender roles and

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 1>apply that and think, well, okay, if you have if

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:54.959
<v Speaker 1>you have a mom who maybe is around the kids

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>more like they're forced to speak and even employ humor

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:01.719
<v Speaker 1>at a child's level, and then you you want the

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 1>release of making a joke that is more sophisticated or darker.

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 1>And whereas it might be the reverse with the sort

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 1>of the stereotypical dad right like the dad has been

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 1>at the I guess like the Madman era office all

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>day making all sorts of body and sophisticated jokes and

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 1>when he comes home, he just wants to make like crude, dumb,

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>but ultimately innocent jokes. I don't know. I I like

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I said, that's probably a I'm sure that's a very

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>simplistic way to look at it, and it's ultimately more

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 1>complicated than that. But but I don't know. This is interesting.

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:34.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm very familiar with this kind of humor, but I

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 1>guess I've never heard of it conceptualized as a mom

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 1>joke before. That's interesting. Yeah, anyway, they close out here

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>with I think the point of dad and mom jokes

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 1>is that they are the unwanted punch line to a

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:49.080
<v Speaker 1>set up that nobody made, like a parasite of laughs

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>on a tense situation. A traditional joke with a standard

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 1>set up and a standard punch line feel like they

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>fall outside of this kind of humor domestic improv in

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>other words, at least to me hope things are. Sebastian, well,

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 1>that was a searing assault on my use of the

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>army sleeves joke as as an example. So, according to Sebastian,

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a joke with a setup and a punch line is

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 1>not a dad joke and can never be a dad joke,

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:19.079
<v Speaker 1>speaking of the Army sleeps joke, I try after you

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:20.959
<v Speaker 1>shared it with me. I tried it out on my

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>own son and he already knew the punch line and

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>thought it was hilarious. Um. Now, I don't know how

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:29.719
<v Speaker 1>much of that was the fact that he knew the

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:31.839
<v Speaker 1>punch line and therefore it was not my joke, it

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>was his. But but he thought it was just high humor. Well,

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:38.719
<v Speaker 1>there's no higher praise than making a child laugh or

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 1>not phrase? Uh? What was it? No higher honor than

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:49.679
<v Speaker 1>making a child laugh? One last one about dad jokes here.

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 1>This one comes from Danny. She says, Hi, I'm a

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:56.440
<v Speaker 1>mother and love making my son grown with dad jokes,

0:13:56.880 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 1>simply because it's fun to be able to annoy him

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:02.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. Kids can be quite annoying at times,

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and here is a small childish way to annoy them back.

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:08.319
<v Speaker 1>And sometimes he even laughs at how much my jokes

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>annoy him. Love from Switzerland, Danny, You know the revenge factor?

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 1>We didn't even think about that. All right, are you

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>ready for some spoons? Let's do it? Okay. This one

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 1>picks up after we read a message from a listener

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 1>on previous listener mail about a spoon that was designed

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 1>to discourage left handedness, and it could only be easily

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 1>used at least with the right hand, because the bowl

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 1>part of the spoon bent to the left. And we

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 1>talked briefly about how I remembered at least one of

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>my teachers in elementary school telling me that when they

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>were growing up, left handedness was bullied out of them

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 1>by adults who thought that there was something wrong with it.

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it was a religious thing or

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 1>just a sort of cultural uh you know, No, you

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 1>need to suck it up and learn to use your

0:14:57.480 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 1>right hand like you're supposed to. I'm not sure what

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 1>that was, but Darren Darren has a story along those

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 1>same lines. So Darren says, Hi, gents, I've listened for years,

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 1>but the latest Listener Mail episode really spoke to me.

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Back in nineteen eighty one, growing up in South Yorkshire, England,

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>our class teacher of German descent told us stories of

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 1>him having his left hand tied closed as a child.

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 1>He told us this almost apologetically, as he was aware

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 1>his now right handed writing was sometimes difficult to read. Ironically,

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 1>then at school there would be an incident only a

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 1>few weeks later, where we were in the dinner hall

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>having school lunch, the head mistress singled me out for

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 1>having my knife in my left hand. She berated me,

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>saying that I needed to eat right handed, and I

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 1>tried but couldn't. Embarrassed to the point where I took

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a stand as a nine year old, I walked out

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of school, the head mistress furious at me, and my

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 1>classmates cheering all the way back home. Yes, walking from

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>school was a thing. My parents at first were annoyed

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I was home early, but when I explained why, my

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 1>dad went down to the school, and let's just say that,

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>he made it clear that I'd continue using my knife

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 1>with my left hand. I tell my daughter this story

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and she is amazed that this was only really a

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 1>generation ago. Thank you for hopefully taking time to consider

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 1>this email, and thanks for continuing to blow mine in

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 1>my daughter's minds. Kind regards, Darren. Yeah, I mean, it's

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 1>that's it's crazy that that sort of thing took place.

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if them now, it seems crazy, and I

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know, it's hard to imagine at the time how

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 1>that would have how that was was was allowed. I

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know, it's just crazy to think about. Okay, I'm

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>getting more convinced that maybe we should do this as

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 1>an episode and look into like, why is it that

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 1>they were doing. I mean, was it just the idea that, well,

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things are designed for right handed people

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and it will be easier if kids learned how to

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 1>use the right hands for things. Or is it more

0:16:53.800 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 1>like a I don't know, superstitious religious thing where it's

0:16:56.960 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 1>like the left hand is the hand of the devil. Yeah,

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I remember there being at least a little bit of

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 1>that mixed in. Yeah, it's been a while since I

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 1>looked at it, so yeah, we should we shoul think

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 1>about coming back to this as a topic. Al Right,

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:18.920
<v Speaker 1>here's another one. This one comes to us uh from Maybe,

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and it is about spoons once more. Dear Robert and Joe,

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I just finished listening to your excellent spoon episodes. Regarding

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the fancy silvil ware that never gets used, I have

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a story. My mother hated silver ware because polishing the

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>silver had been one of her household chores when she

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>was young. However, she and my father were rather badly

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 1>off financially for many years, so they used sterling silverware

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 1>because they couldn't afford to buy a set of stainless flatware.

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 1>The silverware had been a wedding gift. When I was

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>about ten. They bought stainless and we never used the

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 1>silver again, not even for holidays. It just amuses me

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 1>that the stainless flatlet where was the aspirational purchase, given

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:00.880
<v Speaker 1>how expensive real silverware is. They gave me a nice

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 1>set of stainless steel flatware when I got married. Also,

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I submit that sports are the perfect utensil for baked

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 1>potatoes and for mango has. Thanks for all the great content, Mayve,

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 1>rob do I need to stop you from exploding with

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 1>invective against may Have for defending the use of sports. Um,

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess if if they want to use them, fine,

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:29.919
<v Speaker 1>but I would argue, I mean of spoon works perfectly

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>fine out a baked potato. I don't know why anybody

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>needs a fork to get in there. And uh, mango has,

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I guess mango. The thing about mango, I will admit

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 1>is it does tend to be a bit slippery. Um So,

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I guess that is that is where one might insist

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 1>upon having some some prongs on your utensil. Um So,

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I've certainly never used a sport to eat them, maybe trying.

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I think I've just used a spoon to eat mango

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:00.119
<v Speaker 1>that has been like properly cut up in all, but

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. It's rare I get my hands on

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:04.719
<v Speaker 1>a mango in this household because my son eats them all.

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I didn't include the full message, but we did also

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 1>get a piece of email from somebody who wanted to

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about grapefruit spoons. Yes, now that I will, I

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>will argue strongly that a grapefruit spapoon is not a spork.

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 1>But I I do believe in grape fruit spoons. I

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 1>think they are They're very handy. I prefer to use

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:25.680
<v Speaker 1>one when I eat a grape fruit, though I was once.

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 1>This was when we were, you know, more properly. I

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 1>guess when we were how stuff works. I remember eating

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 1>a grape fruit with a grapefruit spoon, and there's somebody else,

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:39.399
<v Speaker 1>like they worked in the office, and they they began

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:42.120
<v Speaker 1>they were getting on my case saying, no, the grape

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:43.879
<v Speaker 1>fruit spoon is not the way to go. You need

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 1>a grape fruit knife. You need a special knife for

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>eating your grape fruit. That is the only way to

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 1>eat them the spoon is malarkey? Is this strickland? No?

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember who this individual was. They weren't like

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 1>in our department. I think they were more of a

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:01.159
<v Speaker 1>technical role in the cup. But it was one of

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:02.879
<v Speaker 1>those where like they were coming on kind of strong,

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 1>and I think I kind of like backed out of

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:07.919
<v Speaker 1>the room with my grape fruit and spoon. I mean,

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe the argument was like, this is a better way

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>to eat your grapefruit at your computer, because certainly, like

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 1>when you eat a grape fruit, when I eat a

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:17.880
<v Speaker 1>grape fruit with a grape fruit spoon, it still makes

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:20.199
<v Speaker 1>kind of a mess, like you're gonna get some sprays

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:25.159
<v Speaker 1>of citrus. So maybe the knife cuts down on that

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:27.159
<v Speaker 1>to a certain extent. I don't know, but you know,

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 1>that was back in the glorious time when we had cubicles,

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and those cubicle walls could protect your next door neighbors

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:35.160
<v Speaker 1>from the citrus spray. That's right. At least it's only

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:37.639
<v Speaker 1>you and your stuff that are getting doused in citrus

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:40.440
<v Speaker 1>juice in you in your dink cave of bones. And

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>we remember you had some really weird decorations when I

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:46.359
<v Speaker 1>first moved in. Well, you know, stuff kind of accumulated. No,

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean it was good. I was like, I could

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:57.640
<v Speaker 1>see your desk and I was like, that's good people. Okay,

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 1>This next message comes to us from Paul. It is

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 1>about sun dogs and halos. Paul says, Hi, Robin Joe

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:06.640
<v Speaker 1>just had to throw this link your way regarding halos

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and sundogs. One of the most impressive I've ever seen.

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for the great comment. And then Paul attaches a

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 1>link to an Astronomy Picture of the Day UH entry.

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:18.920
<v Speaker 1>A p o D is a thing that NASA does

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:23.159
<v Speaker 1>where they collect cool photographs of natural phenomenon and photographs

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 1>from space and stuff. This one was by a photographer

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>named Let's see Magnus ed Back and it's from the

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty one December two thousand eighteen if you want to

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:38.919
<v Speaker 1>look it up. The caption UH title was extraordinary solar

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 1>halos and this one is fantastic. The caption explanations says

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:47.720
<v Speaker 1>quote captured at lunchtime on a cold December fourteenth near

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Ute and Doll, Sweden. The image includes the relatively ordinary

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:56.359
<v Speaker 1>twenty two degree halo, sun dogs or par helia, and

0:21:56.760 --> 0:22:00.399
<v Speaker 1>sun pillars, the extensive array of rarer halo those has

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 1>been identified, along with previously unknown features. All the patterns

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:08.160
<v Speaker 1>are generated as sunlight or moonlight is reflected and refracted

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:12.120
<v Speaker 1>in flat six sided water ice crystals in Earth's atmosphere.

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:15.880
<v Speaker 1>In this case, likely local contributors to the atmospheric ice

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:20.679
<v Speaker 1>crystals are snow making machines operating at a nearby ski center.

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:25.439
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting, but the yeah, this picture is worth looking up.

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 1>It is gorgeous and it looks almost like the Earth

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 1>is plummeting down a tunnel made of sun's. Yeah, this

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:35.639
<v Speaker 1>is impressive. It looks I'm it kind of seems like

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 1>a cosmic church window to me, or indeed like some

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:41.119
<v Speaker 1>sort of angelic visitation. It almost has like the makings

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 1>of some sort of inhuman face. It's this is gorgeous,

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 1>But that's hilarious that this may well be aided by

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the utter artificiality of a snow making machine. It is

0:22:53.480 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 1>angered the gods. Alright, for this next one, if you're

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>listening on a device that has a way to speed

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 1>up things, uh, speed up our voices. Go ahead and

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:12.640
<v Speaker 1>speed us up to about three eggs because it will

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 1>be appropriate. This one comes to us from Jesse, Dear

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Robert and Joe. On the most recent listener Mail episode one,

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:22.159
<v Speaker 1>someone wrote in mentioning that they listen to podcast up

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 1>to three times speed. Robert, you mentioned that while you

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 1>were listening to sped up audio, you feel like your

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 1>mind speeds up to keep pace, and you find it unsettling. Joe,

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you notice that it affects the way you perceive the

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 1>speed which someone is speaking in regular conversation. I too,

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 1>have sped up podcast to get through backlogs. I noticed

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 1>that when I listened to podcasts at a higher speed,

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:46.879
<v Speaker 1>I feel increased stresses. My mind has to work harder

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 1>and pay closer attention so I don't miss anything. But

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 1>more than that, if I listen at increased speeds for

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:55.399
<v Speaker 1>a few days or more, I feel like it starts

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to affect my own speech. I notice I tend to

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:00.640
<v Speaker 1>speak more quickly, which means my mind can't always keep

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:03.680
<v Speaker 1>up and I end up tripping over my words. Another

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:06.400
<v Speaker 1>thing I've noticed is when I slowed down a conversational

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 1>podcasts such as Stuff to Bow Your Mind to around

0:24:09.240 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 1>point eight times, it has a subtle relaxing effect. This

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 1>intuitively makes sense. I don't notice it's slowing down my speech,

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 1>but I suspect this is because I do this exclusively

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:23.160
<v Speaker 1>for podcasts that I put on to help me get

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 1>to sleep. This is not when I do most of

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:28.639
<v Speaker 1>my podcast listening, so perhaps it doesn't have to have

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:30.640
<v Speaker 1>as much of a chance to mess with my head

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:33.680
<v Speaker 1>as it would during the day. One last thing, As

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:36.200
<v Speaker 1>other listeners have admitted, I too have listened to stuff

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to bow your mind to get me to sleep when

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 1>it is your turn. Though it is a vault episode

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:43.639
<v Speaker 1>that I turned to that way, I don't feel like

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I am missing out on anything. Please know that you're

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:50.880
<v Speaker 1>not boring, just common, relaxing, stay brilliant, Jesse. Oh thanks Jesse.

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:54.119
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, I can't imagine listening to us at

0:24:54.240 --> 0:25:01.160
<v Speaker 1>zero point eight speed. Yeah, that sounds so drunk, just hammer. Yeah,

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:03.679
<v Speaker 1>if you if you heard me laughing a little bit

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 1>or through my reading of that, it's it's uh not

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:10.159
<v Speaker 1>not because there's I'm I'm I'm judging Jesse for doing this,

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 1>but I'm just imagining that if I did that, it

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>would be kind of like nightmare juice, because I have

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:18.440
<v Speaker 1>like literally had nightmares in which voices are slowed down.

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 1>So it's not something I really I really like, but

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I could second see where it could be relaxing for

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 1>someone else. I mean, you and I both have Tennessee

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 1>speech anyway, which is already on the slower side of

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>accent pace, and oh man, that that would be rough.

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:36.639
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, it's interesting to hear to hear from everyone,

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, just there's so many nuances to how people

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:43.879
<v Speaker 1>listen to podcasts that it's always interesting to pick up

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:45.399
<v Speaker 1>on what the trends are. And I guess it what

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:47.439
<v Speaker 1>used to be not as easy to do this, right?

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean when did iPhones and so forth start getting

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 1>that that speed up slow down option? Oh I don't know.

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I feel like that's apt dependent for me. It depends

0:25:57.640 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 1>on what I used to listen Google podcast, So we'll

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 1>let you pick pretty much any speed you want. Yeah,

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 1>but of course they're also like trying to shame you

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 1>and to listen to everything. I noticed, like when I

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:10.199
<v Speaker 1>use it and it's like I go to a podcast

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:11.879
<v Speaker 1>I haven't listened to in a few days and it's like,

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 1>have you given up on this podcast? You still want

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 1>to be subscribed at all? And I'm like, yes, I

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:19.400
<v Speaker 1>just wasn't in the car for a few days. I said,

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 1>don't want to keep up with it. Don't make me

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 1>feel bad just because I just because I'm like, you know,

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 1>a few dozen episodes behind. I'm gonna get to it.

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>But seriously, we love you Apple. Okay, let's go on

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:38.479
<v Speaker 1>to our next one. What do we have for us here, Joe? Okay, now,

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 1>we got some messages about Weird House Cinema. All right,

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:45.920
<v Speaker 1>some very substantive messages about Weird House. So we'll say

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>this first one comes from John. John says, Hi, Robert

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 1>and Joe. I just listen to your Weird House Cinema

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:54.040
<v Speaker 1>episode on Hands of Steel, and I enjoyed it a lot.

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I actually passed through Page, Arizona last week and after

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>leaving town, walked on the Navajo footbridge where the finale

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>took place. It's a great but vertigo inducing view of

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the Colorado River before the canyon really widens out. I'm

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:11.879
<v Speaker 1>also writing because I noticed a funny connection between the

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 1>movie and it's real world setting. Although I can't speak

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>for acid rain. Remember in the movie, there was a

0:27:18.600 --> 0:27:21.440
<v Speaker 1>there was like a stationary acid rain hazard. There's like

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 1>a sign on the highway there's like warning you're about

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 1>to drive through acid rain, which is pretty great. Um,

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:29.920
<v Speaker 1>uh sorry, John goes on. Although I can't speak for

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 1>acid rain, the state of Arizona does have an ongoing

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 1>history of water and land pollution from mining, including groundwater

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:41.440
<v Speaker 1>pollution by the acid waste of copper mines. Southern Arizona

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:44.960
<v Speaker 1>has a high concentration of large open pit copper mines,

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and in order to extract the copper from or strong

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:52.120
<v Speaker 1>acid solutions are often used, along with other toxic chemicals.

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 1>These waste products can leach into the surrounding environment, including

0:27:56.119 --> 0:28:00.680
<v Speaker 1>into groundwater, endangering surrounding communities. A good resource on this

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:04.359
<v Speaker 1>is the book Boom Bust Boom, who's author Bill Carter,

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:08.439
<v Speaker 1>recalls being poisoned by the vegetables in his own garden

0:28:08.560 --> 0:28:12.119
<v Speaker 1>in Bisbee, Arizona, a mining town, and learning that his

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 1>house was built on the arsenic and lead lace tailings

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:20.560
<v Speaker 1>from a nearby copper mine. Wow and John attached some photos,

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:22.920
<v Speaker 1>one an aerial photo and one from the ground level

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:25.159
<v Speaker 1>of one of these open pit copper mines that has

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 1>been partially filled in. It is a It is a

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 1>truly dystopic site. Looks kind of like a like a

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:35.480
<v Speaker 1>colosseum for earth elementals. Though I guess if you're an

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:37.679
<v Speaker 1>earth elemental. I'm not sure what kind of animals they

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 1>would throw you too, maybe like some kind of rock

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 1>dissolving fungus or something. I don't know. Well, we'll come

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 1>back to that idea, um. But then John goes on.

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I briefly lived in Aho, Arizona, which has its own

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 1>open pit copper mine. The now retired pit still has

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 1>a turquoise and toxic pool at the bottom, and the

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 1>tailings pile from the mine dominates the landscape images attached

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 1>to both though that's what these images are, Okay. While there,

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I was told that the tap water had more arsenic

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 1>than would be ideal, but I can't say whether this

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>was from the mind or some other environmental factor. It

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 1>was fun to see a connection between the film's vision

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 1>of dystopian environmental degradation and the stuff that goes on

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:21.440
<v Speaker 1>in the real world. Sometimes American truth is stranger than

0:29:21.520 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Italian fiction. For a future weird house cinema, could I

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 1>suggest Altered States. Given that the podcast has discussed Timothy

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Leary and Terence McKenna at length, this movie might be appropriate.

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 1>It seems like the writers did some brief reading about

0:29:35.680 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 1>traditional uses of psychedelic mushrooms and sensory deprivation, did mushrooms themselves,

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 1>and then wrote a script. Thanks for all the fun

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and interesting conversations, Best John with Altered States? Am I

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 1>wrong in thinking that was written by Patty Chaievsky the

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 1>same person who wrote Network? Uh that sounds familiar? Yes, yes,

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that is correct. U. Yeah, so it has an interesting writer.

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 1>And then of course it's a kin Russell film. Um So,

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean I feel like we probably do need to

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 1>take on a kin Russell film at some point. I

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 1>assume you've seen Altered States, right, I have? I have.

0:30:09.760 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 1>It's been a long time since I watched it in

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 1>its entirety. Uh so it would it would totally be

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:17.960
<v Speaker 1>a different experience watching it now, but uh, it could

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 1>be a pretty fun one. It's got some neat connections

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 1>in it. John Lara Catt, isn't it as an X

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 1>ray technician? Oh? That's funny. Uh So My main memory

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:28.520
<v Speaker 1>of it is that William Hurt is the main character. Yeah,

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and he plays a I don't know, Timothy Leary type

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:34.640
<v Speaker 1>some a A an academic who becomes interested in the

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 1>use of psychedelics and in sensory deprivation tanks. And he

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 1>starts to discover that as he like does more and

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 1>more sensory deprivation, he like regresses to some kind of

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 1>pre previous state of existence, and which is an interesting idea,

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 1>but I think it sort of ends up with him

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 1>just like turning into a werewolf. Yeah, he's sence some

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of like caveman monster mode towards the end, as

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I recall. But in an interesting coincidence, this next piece

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 1>of listener mail also concerned sensory deprivation. Alright, this one

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 1>comes to us from Dan. Dan rights to Robert and Joe.

0:31:13.760 --> 0:31:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I made the unfortunate mistake of watching the Janet um

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Agrin video of Teddy Bear that Robert posted on his

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Commuta Music blog, and now I am trapped in the

0:31:22.000 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 1>hell Raiser Laborath dimentioned, just as Joe had warned, I

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 1>should have listened. While the pain and anguish has been

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 1>unbearable and my suffering soon to be legendary. My cinebye

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 1>masters have permitted me to send you this listener mail.

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 1>By the way, they're big fancy show. Earlier this week,

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I was going through the show's archive and listened to

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the Creepy Pasta Experiments episode that Robert did with Christian

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and this episode you discussed one creepy pasta about a

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Russian sleep experiment that descended into violence and madness and

0:31:49.760 --> 0:31:52.960
<v Speaker 1>related it to your own experiences with sensory deprivation and

0:31:53.040 --> 0:31:55.560
<v Speaker 1>isolation tanks. It made me think about how the last

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 1>twelve months since the covid vandemic forced me to start

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 1>remotely working from home, that in order to get through

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 1>my day I need to listen to a lot of

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:05.959
<v Speaker 1>podcasts to keep me focused on my job. Ironically, if

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't have some kind of auditory stimuli, I lose concentration,

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:12.720
<v Speaker 1>focus and find I cannot function in a complete, in

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 1>complete silence. Perhaps this is related to how I used

0:32:15.760 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 1>to work in a very noisy office with a lot

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 1>of phones ringing, people talking, laughing at various machines going off,

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and I need to replicate the illusion of being in

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the company of a lot of people to maintain some

0:32:26.160 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 1>sense of normalcy. I wonder if you've had similar experiences

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 1>since transitioning to your home offices. Apologies for the lengthy email,

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:36.440
<v Speaker 1>but I must now be going CD rom Centebyte is

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 1>calling such sites to show me. Keep up the great work,

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Dan Well I'm so glad. Dan remembers there is a

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 1>c D cinemyte c D cinembyte shows up in the

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 1>third one that's in that weird club. Yeah, I think

0:32:47.680 --> 0:32:50.400
<v Speaker 1>he's a what is He's like several ideas kind of

0:32:50.440 --> 0:32:55.160
<v Speaker 1>slammed together, right, he's us. I think bartender and a

0:32:55.320 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 1>DJ and like a c D face. Um. At times

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 1>we may have to do uh how Raiser three Hell

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:04.480
<v Speaker 1>on Earth at some point because it is kind of

0:33:04.520 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 1>like the Gremlins too of Hell Raiser films, you know, um,

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:12.680
<v Speaker 1>or every everybody at the writing table gets to design

0:33:12.720 --> 0:33:15.960
<v Speaker 1>their own cinemabyte for the movie. That movie is just

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:23.720
<v Speaker 1>a ladle full of vegetable shortening. It is gross. Okay,

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 1>what was I gonna say? Oh? Yeah, well this is

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:29.959
<v Speaker 1>an interesting idea, Dan. Yeah. I sometimes find that certain

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 1>types of music and noise can help me focus on tasks,

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:37.200
<v Speaker 1>but not any kind of music or noise, And I

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:39.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know, I guess it depends on what kind of

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 1>work I'm doing. But yeah, there can certainly be a

0:33:41.440 --> 0:33:43.920
<v Speaker 1>thing I think for some people where it can be

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:47.560
<v Speaker 1>harder to focus if you have less stimulation, because if

0:33:47.600 --> 0:33:51.280
<v Speaker 1>you have less stimulation, you're more likely to let your

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 1>mind start to wander, you know, people who are prone

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 1>to rumination, and then you get distracted by your thoughts. Yeah,

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean I I can't take silence at all. Like

0:34:01.360 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I'll I'll be listening to Deepeche Mode and they're like,

0:34:03.960 --> 0:34:06.280
<v Speaker 1>enjoy the silence, and I'm like, no, That's why I

0:34:06.360 --> 0:34:08.560
<v Speaker 1>put you on depeche Mode. So I don't have to

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:11.959
<v Speaker 1>hear the silence. Now, just keep singing, so I don't

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:15.279
<v Speaker 1>think too hard, uh for something that effect. I don't know,

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, it varies. There's different depending on where I

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 1>am during the day. I might need something more ambient

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:25.560
<v Speaker 1>or or or something a little more um complicated. But

0:34:25.680 --> 0:34:28.040
<v Speaker 1>then also it's like we live in such an area

0:34:28.160 --> 0:34:30.560
<v Speaker 1>that I'm setting out on the front porch working like

0:34:30.640 --> 0:34:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't really need any music. There's plenty of noises

0:34:32.840 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 1>going on, like they're multiple trains going by, there's traffic,

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:41.360
<v Speaker 1>their dogs, their lawnmowers. There's plenty of of auditory stimuli.

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh to keep me on task. You know. I gotta

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:47.960
<v Speaker 1>say one of my all time now productivity albums is

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 1>an album that I never heard until you shared it

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:54.360
<v Speaker 1>with me. It's Biosphere The Petrified Forest. Oh, Yeah, that

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:56.480
<v Speaker 1>was so good. I put that one onto work all

0:34:56.640 --> 0:34:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the time. I mean all the time. That's a that's

0:34:58.719 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a good one. Yeah. Yeah, uh, you can't beat Biosphere.

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Play play a lot of Biosphere. Also play a lot

0:35:04.480 --> 0:35:08.360
<v Speaker 1>of Steve Roach. Um. Yeah, listeners out there, let us know,

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:11.120
<v Speaker 1>do you have particular ambient or even not so ambient

0:35:11.239 --> 0:35:14.560
<v Speaker 1>tracks or artists that you turn to, uh to to work,

0:35:14.640 --> 0:35:16.920
<v Speaker 1>either during the pandemic or you know, just in general.

0:35:17.480 --> 0:35:20.839
<v Speaker 1>Let us know. We're always always looking for listening suggestions. Oh.

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Another good one that I've been listening too lately to

0:35:23.200 --> 0:35:27.720
<v Speaker 1>work is cluster Zucker site. Yeah. Oh that's good. Yeah, older,

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:36.920
<v Speaker 1>older stuff, but but great, still stands the test of time. Okay,

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:39.880
<v Speaker 1>one last message here. This comes to us from Kenny.

0:35:40.200 --> 0:35:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Kenny says, Dear Robert and Joe High there from Scotland.

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm a longtime listener who, like many others, enjoys your

0:35:46.200 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 1>podcasts in the evenings, often letting them play as my

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:51.440
<v Speaker 1>wife and I go to sleep. This leads to some

0:35:51.680 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 1>very confusing blended episodes, as we fall asleep to a

0:35:54.640 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 1>discussion about Jovian moons and wake up in the night

0:35:57.560 --> 0:36:00.719
<v Speaker 1>to a debate about ancient fungus. I recently listen to

0:36:00.800 --> 0:36:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Your Weird House Cinema episode about Ewoks the Battle for Indoor,

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:07.720
<v Speaker 1>and Joe made an observation that the gas giant around

0:36:07.800 --> 0:36:13.080
<v Speaker 1>which Indoor orbits being depicted on the horizon as absolutely enormous,

0:36:13.160 --> 0:36:16.759
<v Speaker 1>apparently taking up half the sky. The point was accurately

0:36:16.840 --> 0:36:19.280
<v Speaker 1>made that even from the vantage point of an observer

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:23.120
<v Speaker 1>on Io, Jupiter's innermost moon, the gas giant would only

0:36:23.200 --> 0:36:25.520
<v Speaker 1>appear to be a fraction of the size of Tanna

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:29.000
<v Speaker 1>indoors planet, and that this was done for dramatic effect

0:36:29.160 --> 0:36:32.520
<v Speaker 1>rather than accuracy. However, this got me thinking about how

0:36:32.680 --> 0:36:35.480
<v Speaker 1>our own moon appears when it is high in the

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:38.640
<v Speaker 1>sky compared to how it does when it's on the horizon.

0:36:39.080 --> 0:36:42.480
<v Speaker 1>The Moon obviously doesn't change size, but it often appears

0:36:42.560 --> 0:36:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to us as if it does. As far as I'm aware,

0:36:45.200 --> 0:36:48.200
<v Speaker 1>The mechanism by which this occurs is not fully understood,

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:51.279
<v Speaker 1>but this is referred to as the moon illusion and

0:36:51.400 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 1>as puzzled observer since antiquity. It is now commonly accepted

0:36:55.160 --> 0:36:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to be a psychological rather than a physical phenomenon. The

0:36:58.560 --> 0:37:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Moon obviously doesn't change size, but it fools us into

0:37:01.800 --> 0:37:04.919
<v Speaker 1>thinking that it does. This effect seems to have something

0:37:05.000 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 1>to do with context. When the moon is high in

0:37:07.320 --> 0:37:09.839
<v Speaker 1>the sky and there's nothing around it to give its

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:12.200
<v Speaker 1>scale and help us judge distance, we see it as

0:37:12.239 --> 0:37:15.719
<v Speaker 1>relatively small because our brains interpret it as being very

0:37:15.840 --> 0:37:18.719
<v Speaker 1>far away. When it is on the horizon. However, the

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:21.359
<v Speaker 1>moon often appears to be much larger, and it may

0:37:21.400 --> 0:37:23.960
<v Speaker 1>be that when there are other objects in our field

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:26.680
<v Speaker 1>of view, this tricks our brain into perceiving the Moon

0:37:26.840 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 1>is significantly closer. Perhaps an observer on io would perceive

0:37:30.680 --> 0:37:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Jupiter to be truly vast as it rises and sets,

0:37:33.760 --> 0:37:36.719
<v Speaker 1>but smaller and ever so slightly less intimidating when it

0:37:36.840 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 1>was higher in the sky, That is, if they lasted

0:37:39.760 --> 0:37:42.440
<v Speaker 1>long enough to perceive anything at all before they succumbed

0:37:42.520 --> 0:37:45.880
<v Speaker 1>to their radiation. Bath yours, Kenny, And of course if

0:37:45.960 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the moon is to the left, it's a part of

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:50.000
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts, right yeah, And a part of my thoughts

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 1>is a part of me? Is me? Uh well? Uh so, Kenny,

0:37:55.280 --> 0:37:57.960
<v Speaker 1>raise some wonderful points here, uh this that I will

0:37:58.120 --> 0:38:00.120
<v Speaker 1>just jump in real quick. This has nothing to do

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:04.040
<v Speaker 1>with their content, but they mentioned the indoor movies. Battle

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:06.680
<v Speaker 1>for Indoor the e Walks movies. If if you out

0:38:06.719 --> 0:38:09.920
<v Speaker 1>there listening are not aware, these are finally coming to

0:38:10.000 --> 0:38:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Disney Plus, uh next month. I'm very excited by this

0:38:14.440 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 1>because when we recorded that episode on the Battle for Indoor,

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:19.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the things we stressed was you sadly have

0:38:19.719 --> 0:38:21.879
<v Speaker 1>to go to like Russian YouTube to watch these things

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 1>right now, or you know, pick up a used DVD.

0:38:26.080 --> 0:38:28.839
<v Speaker 1>But soon that that that battle will be over. These

0:38:28.840 --> 0:38:31.840
<v Speaker 1>will be available on Disney Plus along with the the

0:38:31.920 --> 0:38:37.320
<v Speaker 1>excellent uh Tartarkovski Clone Wars series, So I'm excited for that.

0:38:37.400 --> 0:38:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh and the animated segment from the Holiday Special with

0:38:40.560 --> 0:38:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Boba Fette in it, but not the whole Holiday special,

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:47.239
<v Speaker 1>right that couldn't know? I mean, I think it just

0:38:47.360 --> 0:38:50.120
<v Speaker 1>could not be allowed. It needs to remain in its prison.

0:38:51.000 --> 0:38:54.000
<v Speaker 1>That's where the gods put it. This is a good choice. Yeah,

0:38:54.040 --> 0:38:55.840
<v Speaker 1>so they're uploading the e walk So now are we

0:38:56.000 --> 0:38:58.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to get the Wicked the Ewalk

0:38:58.120 --> 0:39:02.080
<v Speaker 1>manson Family Eyes in four? Yeah? Yeah, hopefully so. I

0:39:02.160 --> 0:39:04.719
<v Speaker 1>haven't heard anything about them restore it doing any kind

0:39:04.760 --> 0:39:07.680
<v Speaker 1>of restoration on it, are certainly adding any effects to it,

0:39:07.880 --> 0:39:10.920
<v Speaker 1>so I'm guessing it'll be in It's in all its glory.

0:39:11.040 --> 0:39:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Now one wonders on the on the question of um

0:39:15.719 --> 0:39:19.440
<v Speaker 1>of possible cursing in the film, if Wilford Brimley actually

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:23.160
<v Speaker 1>did anything like cursing, which has been an argument that's

0:39:23.200 --> 0:39:24.920
<v Speaker 1>been made. I wonder if they're going to go in

0:39:25.000 --> 0:39:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and remove anything. I wonder if they're gonna make any changes.

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Be interested to find out if they take out Wilford

0:39:30.480 --> 0:39:33.239
<v Speaker 1>Brimley saying the F word, that is that is censorship

0:39:33.600 --> 0:39:38.440
<v Speaker 1>that will not be tolerated. Um Allegedly. We don't know

0:39:38.520 --> 0:39:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that for sure that he seasoned Afford, but some have

0:39:41.239 --> 0:39:43.800
<v Speaker 1>made that that case. If they take out the Brimley Ffford,

0:39:43.880 --> 0:39:49.239
<v Speaker 1>this is stall in a Strussia absolutely unacceptable. Well we

0:39:49.440 --> 0:39:52.239
<v Speaker 1>we shall see, we shall see. All right, Well, we're

0:39:52.280 --> 0:39:55.239
<v Speaker 1>gonna go ahead and close the book on everything right here.

0:39:55.320 --> 0:39:59.919
<v Speaker 1>But this has been your weekly listener mail episode. Uh so, yeah,

0:40:00.160 --> 0:40:01.960
<v Speaker 1>right in. Let us know, do you have responses to

0:40:02.120 --> 0:40:04.719
<v Speaker 1>what we talked about in this episode? You have responses

0:40:04.800 --> 0:40:06.960
<v Speaker 1>to our core stuff to blow your mind episodes or

0:40:07.080 --> 0:40:10.600
<v Speaker 1>two Weird House Cinema. Let us know we'd love to

0:40:10.680 --> 0:40:12.360
<v Speaker 1>hear from you. We don't have time to read everything

0:40:12.560 --> 0:40:15.480
<v Speaker 1>in these episodes, but we do read everything that comes in.

0:40:16.400 --> 0:40:19.920
<v Speaker 1>If you would like to follow our podcast, check out

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the Stuff to Blow Your Mind podcast feed wherever you

0:40:22.719 --> 0:40:25.359
<v Speaker 1>find that. Just make sure you rate, review, and subscribe,

0:40:25.680 --> 0:40:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and don't don't let whatever whatever you're listening platform is,

0:40:28.840 --> 0:40:30.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, don't let them try and shame you. Don't

0:40:30.680 --> 0:40:32.960
<v Speaker 1>let them give you a hard time about skipping an

0:40:33.000 --> 0:40:36.440
<v Speaker 1>episode or we're having to catch up, or and certainly

0:40:36.560 --> 0:40:39.719
<v Speaker 1>listen at any speed that your brain can bear. Huge things.

0:40:39.760 --> 0:40:42.880
<v Speaker 1>As always to our excellent audio producer Seth Nicholas Johnson.

0:40:43.239 --> 0:40:44.719
<v Speaker 1>If you would like to get in touch with us

0:40:44.760 --> 0:40:47.280
<v Speaker 1>with feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest

0:40:47.320 --> 0:40:49.239
<v Speaker 1>a topic for the future, or just to say hello,

0:40:49.360 --> 0:40:51.920
<v Speaker 1>you can email us at contact at stuff to Blow

0:40:52.000 --> 0:41:01.560
<v Speaker 1>your Mind dot com. Stuff to Blow Your Mind is

0:41:01.560 --> 0:41:04.880
<v Speaker 1>a production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts for my heart Radio,

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:07.840
<v Speaker 1>visit the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:41:07.920 --> 0:41:09.160
<v Speaker 1>listen to your favorite shows