WEBVTT - Oath Keepers Convicted

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, Pete Sen. Welcome to Okay app Daily with

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:19.079
<v Speaker 1>Meet your Girl Danielle Moody. Recording from the Home Bunker, Folks,

0:00:19.160 --> 0:00:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm so excited to welcome back to woke after many

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 1>many weeks of our schedules not matching up and being

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:33.480
<v Speaker 1>in court. Glenn Kirschner, MSNBC Legal analyst and the host

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>of Justice Matters here to give us a supersized breakdown

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>into the Oathkeeper's trial that just concluded last week with

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a seditious conspiracy conviction four Stuart Rhodes, the founder of

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the Oathkeepers, as well as another one of his band

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of idiots. Glenn will give us an entire overview into

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the implications for the verts in this trial and the

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>fact that in the upcoming weeks we have the second

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>part of the Oathkeepers trial that will be taking place,

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:12.479
<v Speaker 1>as well as the trial of the Proud Boys. What

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>does this mean for Jack Smith is special counsel that

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>was appointed by Merritt Garland to oversee the investigation into

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump and whether or not he can be tied

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>to the insurrection. So we get into that and so

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:34.919
<v Speaker 1>much more on this supersize, jam packed interview with our friend,

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 1>welcome him back to woke F Glenn Kirshner. Folks, it

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:45.480
<v Speaker 1>has been a long time and I am so happy

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and grateful to welcome our friend Glenn Kirshner back to

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>woke F Daily. Glenn, you have been on duty in

0:01:55.080 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the courthouse for weeks and weeks and weeks, UM, following

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the UM trial of the oath Keepers right the the

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I believe it is five people that were on uh

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>that were on trial, including the founder of the Oath Keepers,

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Stuart Rhodes. This week, UM, the verdict finally came out

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and it was a mixed verdict in a lot of

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>ways that I'm sure you'll be able to walk us through.

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>But what has made the headlines and made you a

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 1>staple UH for the for this for for this week

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>on every show on MSNBC, has been the verdict that

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:41.799
<v Speaker 1>came down for two of the oath Keeper members UM

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>for seditious conspiracy. So I'm just going to turn it

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 1>over to you to tell you know, to tell us

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>what this mixed bag is and how important it was

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:58.359
<v Speaker 1>for the Department of Justice to have this win of

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:02.360
<v Speaker 1>this very um UH it is. It is not a

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>commonly used charge that they have now won in this verdict. Yeah,

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>really interesting and there's tons to unpack, and I'm so

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 1>happy to be back with you. We were doing this

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>every week forever and then all of a sudden, our

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:20.359
<v Speaker 1>schedules went sideways, So I'm glad to be back. So

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>this really was historic. I think you can you can

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>accurately use that word to describe a seditious conspiracy conviction,

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the first one for what these people did at the

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Capitol on January sixth, the first one the federal prosecutors

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 1>have won since the mid nineties. It is a rarely

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>brought charge, which is a good thing because that means

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>generally people aren't trying to violently overthrow the government. But

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's important for so many reasons. First of all,

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 1>as you say, it was a mixed verdict, But having

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 1>sat through all seven weeks of the trial and full disclosure,

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I think I can be objective. But the lead prosecutors

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>where my former homicide prosecutors, Jeff Nessler and Kate Racozzi.

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I actually tried Kate's first murder case with her when

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>she was a young homicide prosecutor. I probably learned more

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>from her than she learned from me. This was an

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>expertly tried case. And Danielle, you and I beat up

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:20.360
<v Speaker 1>on the Department of Justice regularly when we believe they

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 1>need a good whooping to kind of prod them into action.

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>But I think we need to give props where they

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:30.840
<v Speaker 1>are due. And this prosecution team and this FBI team

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:35.479
<v Speaker 1>presented a masterful case to the jury. It was a

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>mixed verdict, but having watched the evidence, I understand why.

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Let me just give you one example. Most importantly, they

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>convicted the two leaders, Elmer Stuart Rhodes, the head of

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the Oath Keepers, and one of his top lieutenants, Kelly Megs.

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Convicted them of seditious conspiracy the attempted violent overthrow of

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the government, or an attempt to use violence to stop

0:04:56.480 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the execution of the laws of the United States, just

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>precisely what they did. They tried to stop the certification

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>of Joe Biden's win. The others were followers. Now, they

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>did some egregious stuff, and they were all convicted of

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 1>multiple felony crimes, but the jury made some common sense

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>decisions about how far they wanted to reach with conspirator liability.

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>This is the most compelling example Stuart Elmer Stewart Rhodes

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>was convicted of all counts except one interfering with the

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:34.040
<v Speaker 1>duties of a police officer to use Lehman's terms, because

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>he never went into Here's why that's so interesting for

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>vital nerds like me. He as a member of the conspiracy, indeed,

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>as the head of the conspiracy. Conspiracy law says every

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>member of the conspiracy can be convicted for every single

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 1>crime committed by every other member of the conspiracy, even

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 1>if that person didn't participate in it. Now, the law

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:04.599
<v Speaker 1>allows that, but the law doesn't require that. So these

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 1>jurors were crazy, attentive and thoughtful in the way they

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:13.679
<v Speaker 1>parsed out the evidence and did what may feel right

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 1>in holding everybody responsible. But here and there saying no,

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to convict mindlessly on all charges. We're

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna thoughtfully assess the evidence. Now, the reason that's so important,

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 1>as appellate lawyers will tell you, is that shows that

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 1>this jury was not just unduly swayed or prejudiced by

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the nature of these egregious crimes. They still thoughtfully work

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 1>through it. That actually strength strengthens the case on appeal,

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:49.479
<v Speaker 1>and I predict Judgemita presided over the trial extraordinarily. Well,

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 1>all of these convictions will be appealed and all of

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:56.159
<v Speaker 1>them will be affirmed on appeal. Now, what are some

0:06:56.200 --> 0:07:00.840
<v Speaker 1>of the other takeaways? Yeah, this one I love. Next

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 1>week we have part two of the oath Keeper's seditious

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:08.719
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy trial. Remember that military stack going into the capital

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 1>that day with these little faux soldiers with their hands

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 1>on each other's shoulders, marching into the Capitol in their

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>play military uniforms. When they got in there, seven of

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>them split off one way to go to the House chambers.

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>The other seven split off to go to the Senate chambers.

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 1>They wanted to stop what was going on in both chambers.

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>We only went we federal prosecutors only took on half

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 1>of that stack. Next week, the second half of the

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>stack goes on trial for seditious conspiracy. December thirteenth, the

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Proud Boys go on trial for seditious conspiracy. So what

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>do these guilty verdicts of seditious conspiracy do, Danielle. Every

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 1>one of those defendants is meeting with his lawyer or

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 1>her lawyer right now and saying, we got we gotta

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>renegotiate a possible guilty, hopefully with cooperation, because the government

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>just proved beyond a reasonable doubt we all were engaged

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>in a seditious conspiracy. We're screwed. What does that do?

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>It will undoubtedly prompt more guilty please, probably with cooperation.

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 1>And here's the best part of all of that. We

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>know who some of the suits of the insurrection are

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 1>that we're intimately involved with oath Keepers and Proud Boys.

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>So the likelihood that we will now see indictments of

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Roger Stone, Alex Jones, and Mike Flynn have shot up

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 1>as a result of this conviction. One last takeaway I

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 1>just I wrote a piece for MSNBC Daily and I

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 1>put the main takeaways in that piece. It went up

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>a day or two ago. One last one, Even though

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>there are so many is the prosecutors were really smart

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:56.319
<v Speaker 1>about not injecting politics into this trial. Well, how can

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:59.679
<v Speaker 1>you not inject politics into an attempt to overthrow the government.

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 1>They almost never even uttered the name Donald prosecutors because

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 1>they didn't want to make this about politics. They wanted

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 1>to make it about violence and an attempt to undermine

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>our democracy, regardless of political affiliation. But the defendants, including

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Elmer Rhodes dragged politics into the courtroom at every opportunity.

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Danielle I wish, I wish we could have broadcast Elmer's testimony.

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:30.559
<v Speaker 1>It was so deceitful, it was so off putting, it

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>was so abrasive because he said to the jury the

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:40.559
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty presidential election was unlawful and unconstitutional. And then

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 1>he said to them, the disbarred Yale lawyer that he is,

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 1>he said, ladies and gentlemen, I'm a constitutional expert. Now

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>who anointed him the arbiter of the constitutionality of presidential elections?

0:09:55.679 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but he thought because he determined it

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>was unconstitutional, he and the oath keepers could do anything.

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 1>They damned well pleased the first stop to Joe Biden's certification.

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 1>They dragged politics into the courtroom, and the jury, by

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 1>its verdicts, said to them, you were not acting as patriots,

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 1>because all five of these defendants trying to say they

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 1>were patriots, You weren't patriots, your traitors. We reject a

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 1>big lie, reject your rigged election narrative, and all of

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>you mo fos are guilty. That is a nice atmospheric

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:36.719
<v Speaker 1>benefit of this jury's decision to convict them for what

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 1>they did on January sixth. You know, one of the

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 1>things that I have been wanting to ask you is

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 1>in the trial they brought in the voicemail either was

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 1>a voicemailer or was a text message of Rhodes saying

0:10:56.480 --> 0:11:00.079
<v Speaker 1>that they should have brought more weapons in, right, that

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 1>if they had known how things were going to go out,

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 1>they should have brought more weapons in. They would have

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>strung up Nancy Pelosi. Um. And I mean it was

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>really violent and really incredibly off putting, And I want

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>to know how you saw the jury react to that,

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to that statement. That's number one and then two, you know,

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the other thing about the election being stolen and the

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 1>election being rigged. Was there anything in his testimony where

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 1>he said we were acting on behalf of the President

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:44.959
<v Speaker 1>of the United States, waiting for him to essentially either

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:49.560
<v Speaker 1>call for martial law or or I forget what it

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:53.679
<v Speaker 1>was like to there there was another act, the insurrect

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:57.559
<v Speaker 1>or waiting for the president to you know, and enact

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the Insurrection Act. Was any of that said in his

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:05.559
<v Speaker 1>testimony and statement? Yeah, So to answer your first question,

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I think you saw the jurors were pretty sort of

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>reserved and circumspect and thoughtful. I think they really seemed

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>to appreciate the weight and the gravity of what they

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:22.719
<v Speaker 1>were being asked to do. But particularly when the defendants testified.

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Three of the five defendants testified, which is really unusual

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>in a big federal trial. They usually rely on the

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>government's very high burden of proof and the presumption of innocence,

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:35.079
<v Speaker 1>and once they start opening their mouths, they get cross

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 1>examined and they often fall apart, as did all three

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>of these defendants. But you could see when some of

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the more expressly violent evidence, the posts, the texts, the

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 1>recorded statements came into evidence, you could kind of see

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 1>them gently recoil even though they were trying not to.

0:12:56.520 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 1>And the one you mentioned, I mean, think about this defendant,

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Elmer Stewart Rhodes said, the only thing I regret is

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>not that there was all this violence at the Capitol,

0:13:06.240 --> 0:13:10.439
<v Speaker 1>not that the certification was actually stopped. It was delayed

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 1>so they succeeded at least until they could reassemble and

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>continue certifying Joe Biden's win. Not that people were killed.

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 1>He said. The only thing I regret is we didn't

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 1>bring our weapons in because we could have. I'm going

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:28.680
<v Speaker 1>to paraphrase, I don't remember his exact words. We could

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>have killed a bunch of politicians and I would have

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>strung up Nancy Pelosi from the lamp. Post human beings.

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 1>If you have any moral core, you can't help but

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>recoil from that, and they did. And then your second question,

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 1>with respect to was there anything that expressly tied Donald

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:53.439
<v Speaker 1>Trump into what happened on January sixth, you asked were

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 1>they acting at the direction of or were they waiting

0:13:57.240 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>for orders? From the answer to your first question is

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 1>they really weren't acting at the direction of I would

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>love to say they were, because that would more firmly

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of entrench Donald Trump into this seditious conspiracy. But they,

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, el Elmer kept saying in recorded video statements,

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, mister President, invoke the Insurrection Act so we

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>can come in with our guns ablazing. I'm taking liberties

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 1>with his exact words. But if you don't, the oath

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>keepers will take matters into their own hands. And what

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Danielle is Donald Trump didn't. So I think that the

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>fair assessment of the evidence is Donald Trump didn't tell

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 1>them to do it. They weren't acting at the request

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 1>of Donald Trump. Indeed, he didn't even do something they

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 1>wanted him to do because they invoke the Insurrection Act

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 1>because that would have unleashed them and their weapons. So

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 1>but it really is I don't want it to sound deflating,

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 1>because the evidence is what it is. But but because

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the prosecutors were so careful not to bring Donald Trump

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>into the courtroom figuratively the specter of Trump, because you

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know what the political ideologies or preferences are of

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the twelve people in the jury box. That doesn't mean

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>they don't have a whole bunch more evidence. But the

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 1>evidence that was presented in this trial does not lead

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 1>to the conclusion that they were acting at the direction

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 1>of Donald Trump. Indeed, it suggests they wanted Donald Trump

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>desperately to do something that he wouldn't do invoke the

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Insurrection Act. But there's so much other evidence that warrants

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>an indictment of Donald Trump for inciting an insurrection and

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 1>attempting to overthrow the government that you know this this

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>trial may not have forwarded the bat ball, but it

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really matter at the end of the day. You

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 1>know there's something there are There are a couple of

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 1>things that have that have come up over the last

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks. One the reminder that there were members

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 1>of Congress who were using the oath Keepers as their

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 1>own quote unquote private detail. Right, So was that brought

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 1>up in the trial or how do you think that

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 1>that information can and should be used moving forward as

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 1>we look ahead, as you said at the top, to

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the second Stas trial as well as the Proud Boys,

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Because when I think about Alex Jones, Mike Flynn, and

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Roger Stone, I think about the way in which they

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 1>were utilizing these two groups as their private militia and army, right,

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 1>And so how does that evidence, how does that knowing

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>help these cases as they as they move forward. So

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll stop there because I have a follow up. Okay,

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>So there really was no mention of members of Congress

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>in this trial. Why because that information was unnecessary to

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:17.120
<v Speaker 1>convict the oath Keepers of the crimes with which they

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 1>were charged. So again, the prosecutors were smart not to

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 1>stray into political territory that was unnecessary for purposes of

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 1>winning guilty verdicts. Now, yeah, there's a lot to unpack

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:34.439
<v Speaker 1>on the members of Congress front, because I do believe

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 1>some of them were complicit in the insurrection. The oath

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 1>keepers kept saying, we were there just providing protection, security details.

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>But that was such full because one when they got there,

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:53.359
<v Speaker 1>they didn't protect anybody, no security details. And more importantly,

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the thousands of text messages and signal chats and Facebook

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 1>posts where they were communicating nothing about security details. It

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>was all we got to get our guns. We got

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:07.959
<v Speaker 1>to go put a stop to this. We gotta And

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>then following on that, Elmer Rhodes said in one of

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 1>his posts, all right, everybody, we have to keep saying

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Insurrection Act, Insurrection Act, Insurrection Act, because that will give

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:22.679
<v Speaker 1>us legal cover for what we're doing. So all of

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:25.639
<v Speaker 1>this we're there to provide security details to members of

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:29.879
<v Speaker 1>Congress or others was cover. It was bs right because

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:33.200
<v Speaker 1>they knew what they were really there to do. So

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that there was no evidence that they

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:38.880
<v Speaker 1>were providing any sort of services for members of Congress

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:44.880
<v Speaker 1>that day. But here's the thing. We know that members

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:48.680
<v Speaker 1>of Congress were complicit in any number of ways in

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 1>either the insurrection itself or in providing aid and comfort

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:58.159
<v Speaker 1>to those who participated in the insurrection. And what needs

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to happen now and I hope Special Counsel Jack Smith

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 1>is just the person to do. What we can talk

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>more about that what needs to happen now is one,

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 1>they need to see if there's enough evidence to criminally

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 1>indict all of these members of Congress who are part

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:19.160
<v Speaker 1>of the insurrection. And two they need to be there

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 1>needs to be a challenge to them continuing to sit

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 1>as members of Congress. And here's the good news. We

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 1>know that the Fourteenth Amendment, Section three, flat out says

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:34.919
<v Speaker 1>if you were a part of the insurrection and you

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:37.639
<v Speaker 1>had previously taken an oath of loyalty to the United States,

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>like you were a member of Congress, you are disqualified

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>from serving in public office. But the fourteenth Amendment doesn't

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:49.160
<v Speaker 1>have any mechanism to implement that. It just says, as

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:53.400
<v Speaker 1>a matter of fact, you are disqualified. Well, there is

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 1>there's something brewing where when the new Congress is about

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to be sworn in, other members Congress can object to

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the insurrectionists who are about to take the oath. Stay

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:08.400
<v Speaker 1>tuned on that front, because that will take some brave

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 1>members of Congress. And I believe there's some stuff brewing,

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 1>and announcements will be made whenever announcements are made if

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 1>it sort of ripens to that point. But first and

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 1>foremot that's a political population, right, But first and foremost,

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>if the evidence supports it, and I believe the evidence

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:28.639
<v Speaker 1>probably does support criminally indicting some of these members of

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Little Josh Hallie go in directionists go I got your back,

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you, and then you see him running away

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 1>when the insurrectionists to make their way into the capital.

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>What a punk these people? Oh man, I just want

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 1>to go back to my Jersey roots. These people need

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 1>to be held accountable. And if whatever your follow up is,

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:55.159
<v Speaker 1>let's do that, and then let's talk about how I

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 1>think Jack Smith may may take us. I mean, you

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of answered part of it because it was going

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to be about, you know, these members of Congress and

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:06.199
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember. You will remember the member that was

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 1>in the bulletproof vest that happened to be under his uh, Mobrooks.

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Mobrooks who was at the stop the Steel rally with

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:19.960
<v Speaker 1>a bulletproof vest underneath his underneath his clothing. Why would

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 1>you need that? Right? No one else was in was

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 1>in bulletproof regalia. Right, So you must have had some

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>previous knowledge as to what could possibly be unfolding. The

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 1>other piece, Glenn, is that now that these people, these

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:41.879
<v Speaker 1>other folks who have yet to who have yet to

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 1>sit for their trials, see that this charge was now,

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 1>see that this charge was upheld. Now do the hey

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 1>is now the pressure to say, Okay, maybe we don't

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:01.640
<v Speaker 1>go after you for a seditious conspiracy, but you got

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:04.639
<v Speaker 1>to give up who gave you the maps, who gave

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 1>you right the prior tour the day before, right to

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>give you the lay of the land. Because I tell you,

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 1>as somebody who worked on Capitol Hill, the way that

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 1>those people found those unmarked offices. I worked on Capitol

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Hill for years and couldn't find those would still have

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:28.680
<v Speaker 1>to ask, you know, Capitol police, Oh you know, am

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:31.439
<v Speaker 1>I going to this tunnel or this place or that?

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 1>And they knew to go direct So where did they

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:38.239
<v Speaker 1>get that information from? Is that the root of the

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 1>route that we were going to see the Feds going after? Absolutely?

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:47.160
<v Speaker 1>And when I said these guilty verdicts will inspire oathkeeper

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:50.719
<v Speaker 1>boys to want to plead guilty and cooperate to reduce

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:53.439
<v Speaker 1>their exposure, you know, I said that will sort of

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 1>directly I believe implicate guys like Flynn Stone and Alex Jones.

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 1>But I also think you're exactly right. These people have

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:05.120
<v Speaker 1>information about members of Congress and what they did to

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 1>enable and assist and you know, so I think these

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 1>guilty verdicts up the anti on the members of Congress

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:15.399
<v Speaker 1>as well. And you know, when you talk about the

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 1>Capitol Police, let me give a shout out to now

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 1>my friend Harry Dunn. You know, I worked with Mike

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:24.639
<v Speaker 1>venone decades ago. We were working murder cases together when

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:28.719
<v Speaker 1>he was in one d in the DC and I

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>was the chief a homicide. So I have known Mike

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:33.399
<v Speaker 1>for a very long time. I've only come to know

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:37.439
<v Speaker 1>Harry recently. And I was in the courtroom for his testimony,

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and Danielle, first of all, yes, he is a human wall.

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Harry is enormous, right, And Harry testified, and there was

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:51.359
<v Speaker 1>video that captured this. Harry is standing there. Yep, I

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 1>get emotion. I get emotional. He's but one man. He's

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>blocking the stairwell that leads to the Speaker's office and

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>there are rioters and oathkeepers who and he said, y'all

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>aren't getting by me. And he was one man who

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 1>held that line and four hit for it. They called

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:15.200
<v Speaker 1>him every name in the book that you know, and goodness, gracious,

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 1>there are heroic public servants that walk among us, like

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Harry Dunne. And you know, as much as we beat

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 1>up on police and we beat up on the Department

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:29.400
<v Speaker 1>of Justice, goodness, when heroes do what Harry Dunn did

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and Mike Fenone and Aquilino Gonell and the rest of

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 1>those officers that day, my goodness, we need to thank

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:38.640
<v Speaker 1>them and we need to honor them, and we need

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:44.159
<v Speaker 1>to remember that we have heroic public servants like Harry Dunn. Yeah,

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:46.399
<v Speaker 1>thank you for that, Glenn, because it is it is

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:54.439
<v Speaker 1>a very you know, needed reminder about who allowed for

0:24:55.720 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, true devastation not to come down on our capital,

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 1>on our democracy that day, because they put their lives

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 1>and their bodies on the line, and for that, I

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 1>think all of us should be grateful. With a few

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 1>minutes that we have left, I do want to talk

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:16.920
<v Speaker 1>about Jack Smith now and what you believe the Department

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:20.679
<v Speaker 1>of Justice is doing right because I got to tell you,

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:23.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think I might have text you that

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 1>day when the announcement was made and I was just like,

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:28.400
<v Speaker 1>what the f is going on, you know, because this

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:33.160
<v Speaker 1>feels like another another avenue and a flashback deja vu

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:36.679
<v Speaker 1>to the Mala Report, which was well all about nothing,

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 1>you know at the end of the day. So what

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 1>do you think, because we hadn't had the opportunity to talk,

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 1>what do you think about the Special Council, what do

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 1>you think about Jack Smith? And how do you think

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to use, hopefully god willing, use these

0:25:55.440 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 1>verdicts as a way to get to the architect head,

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the snakehead that is Donald Trump. Yeah, so I'm with you,

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Danielle that we are suffering from hero fatigue. We thought

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Bob Muller was going to bring it home now. I

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:15.639
<v Speaker 1>think when you read volume two of the Trump, the

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Trump Russia Report, where he meticulously details as many as

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:23.879
<v Speaker 1>ten felony obstruction of justice crimes by a man that

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 1>he was not permitted to indict because of that stupid

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:32.960
<v Speaker 1>assj policy saying you can't indict a sitting criminal president.

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 1>That is some banana republics yet right there, and I

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 1>hope somebody revisits that Mueller could only do what he

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 1>could do, and of course he was blocked significantly by

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Bill Barr and his lies about the Mueller Report. Then

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 1>we had Merrick Garland coming in. Now, Merrick Garland was

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a prosecutor in my office thirty forty or more years ago.

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Then he was highly regarded. Handled cases like the Mayor

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Mary Ran Barry case, which was obviously politically charged, which

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:06.680
<v Speaker 1>was a difficult case on the evidence, he handled it well.

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 1>He went on to handle obviously Oklahoma City bombing and

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 1>other high profile cases that he supervised, he didn't try them.

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:15.920
<v Speaker 1>And then for a quarter of a century he was

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 1>a judge, very good judge by all accounts. You can

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>agree or disagree with some of the ideological underpinnings of

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 1>some of what he decided. But I think we learned

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:32.119
<v Speaker 1>over the last eighteen months that Merrick Garland lost his

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 1>prosecutorial chops and was running the Department of Justice in

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the Age's office more like a judge's chambers than a

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 1>really aggressive prosecutor's office at this most dangerous moment in

0:27:43.640 --> 0:27:47.160
<v Speaker 1>our nation's history. So I feel like we're being fooled up,

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe a third time. Jack Smith and Danielle like you.

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:55.159
<v Speaker 1>It's funny. In advance of the announcement, I actually talked

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>on air or somewhere or maybe it was just in

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:03.960
<v Speaker 1>my head. I actually did say I don't think appointing

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:07.880
<v Speaker 1>a special counsel now is necessary or is a good thing,

0:28:08.040 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 1>because look look at how when they appointed Bob Muller,

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 1>he had to start from scratch. He had to hire investigators,

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 1>higher prosecutors, hire a support staff, stand up in office,

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:23.720
<v Speaker 1>begin investigating. That takes a long time. But then, but

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I did say back then, the only way I could

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:28.959
<v Speaker 1>see it working is if they put him in place

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>to oversee all of the investigations that have been up

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:34.360
<v Speaker 1>and running for a year and a half now and

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 1>say now accelerate them. So the first thing I did

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 1>when I saw I was in the courthouse covering the

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Oathkeepers trial. I saw the announcement. Actually a reporter got

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 1>an advanced notice of it, and she pulled me over.

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 1>She's like, Glenn, look at this. So the first thing

0:28:51.120 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I did is I reached out to my friends who

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 1>had worked directly for Jackson when he was the head

0:28:55.680 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 1>of the Public Integrity Section. And what I learned from

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 1>people that I respect immensely is that Jack Smith is

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 1>a real, without fear or favor kind of guy. He

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 1>abhors political corruption. He abhors obstruction of justice and witness tampering.

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 1>And he is fearless, and he's willing to take politically

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 1>charged cases that are not sure things. And he walked

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:32.160
<v Speaker 1>that walk. He prosecuted Virginia governor Republican Governor Bob McDonald,

0:29:32.800 --> 0:29:36.479
<v Speaker 1>won convictions, and then years later on appeal, the Supreme

0:29:36.480 --> 0:29:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Court didn't like the fact that the Department of Justice

0:29:39.280 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 1>could so aggressively go after high politicians and they reverse

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the convictions. That's not a failing of Jack Smith and

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:49.719
<v Speaker 1>his team, that's a failing of our Supreme Court, surprise,

0:29:50.560 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 1>protecting high government high government officials. So and then he

0:29:54.920 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 1>went after He went after a Democrat Senator Bob Edwards,

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 1>John Edwards, excuse me, John Edwards, who was running for

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 1>president right. He went after him for campaign finance violations.

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:10.000
<v Speaker 1>It was a hard case to make. In what happened,

0:30:10.280 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the jury hung. They actually acquitted on one count and

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 1>hung on the other five hard case. He didn't win it,

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 1>but he wasn't afraid to bring it. What did he do?

0:30:21.120 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 1>He brought a case against the Republican member of Congress,

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:28.040
<v Speaker 1>a representative a zer As Ease I forget his last name.

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Precisely charged that Republican member of Congress with bribery, extortion,

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:38.479
<v Speaker 1>and racketeering, convicted him. What did he do next? He

0:30:38.600 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 1>brought a criminal execution against Bob Menendez, a Democrat senator

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:49.280
<v Speaker 1>from New Jersey. Not a strong case, but he said,

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't care. I have enough evidence to get the

0:30:52.120 --> 0:30:55.960
<v Speaker 1>question to the jury. Public corruption is the devil. I'm

0:30:56.080 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 1>bringing it. The jury hung and they opted not to

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 1>read retry the case. After the hung jury, Danielle, what

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:05.720
<v Speaker 1>has he done? Oh, we brought a case against the

0:31:05.760 --> 0:31:08.880
<v Speaker 1>CIA officer for miss handling classified information and he won

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 1>convictions in that case. What has he done? He's gone

0:31:11.200 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 1>after Republicans, He's gone after Democrats. He's gone after people

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 1>who abuse the public trust. He hasn't won every cases.

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I swear, give me a prosecutor on my team who

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 1>has lost some cases because they brought the tough cases

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 1>against high government officials. That's my kind of teammate. Based

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:33.480
<v Speaker 1>on everything. And then he's putting pen to paper and

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:37.880
<v Speaker 1>filing stuff on Thanksgiving Day in the Eleventh Circuit saying

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump's lawyers are wrong, Judge, don't be fooled. And

0:31:41.840 --> 0:31:43.960
<v Speaker 1>he had the goods to back it up. I mean,

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 1>and he went to the Hague to prosecute war criminals.

0:31:49.080 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 1>He is, he has gone after some of the worst

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:55.720
<v Speaker 1>of the worst in this world, and now he is

0:31:55.760 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 1>going after one of the worst of the worst in America,

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 1>a former criminal president. Let's get it on. Let's get

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 1>it on. Okay. You know, I always appreciate your insight, Glenn,

0:32:09.440 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 1>because of your obvious thirty years of prosecutorial experience and

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you still have friends and talk to

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 1>folks inside of the Department. And I will say that

0:32:23.760 --> 0:32:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm in a wait and see, right, I'm gonna I'm

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, because I have had and you have had

0:32:30.240 --> 0:32:34.719
<v Speaker 1>our hopes dashed way too many times since the beginning

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:39.680
<v Speaker 1>of the Trump presidency, after the Trump presidency, during the insurrection,

0:32:39.800 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 1>after the insurrection, until now. So I will wait and

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:47.240
<v Speaker 1>see because I believe that we are in for come January,

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:51.560
<v Speaker 1>an entire fucking circus with the Republicans taking control of

0:32:51.600 --> 0:32:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the House. But you just gave me a sliver of

0:32:54.400 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 1>hope that if there are in fact objections to those

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 1>that are going to be sworn in, and in fact,

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 1>like there should be Republicans that are quaking in their

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:10.959
<v Speaker 1>boots right now about what these other oath keepers and

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 1>proud boys can say about their involvement in providing recon

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:20.960
<v Speaker 1>work to the insurrection, then that gives me something, and

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I hope it gives our listeners something to hang onto

0:33:25.800 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 1>that we will see, you know, because I tell you

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 1>that the January sixth anniversary, it's gonna be what this

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 1>second year anniversary, and none of the architects of the

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 1>insurrection have been indicted, have been tried, have been put

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:47.680
<v Speaker 1>in prison, and so it is hard to hold on

0:33:47.760 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 1>to hope that we will see it. But what you

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 1>have given us today, as always, provides, you know, some

0:33:55.880 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 1>ray of light in the clouds that we have been

0:33:58.320 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 1>existing in for for the last couple of years. So

0:34:02.120 --> 0:34:05.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, for Glenn, you know, as always, I appreciate you.

0:34:05.680 --> 0:34:10.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm so happy to have had this supersized unpacking of

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:13.760
<v Speaker 1>where we've been over the last several weeks and hopefully

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:18.279
<v Speaker 1>a window into where we're going in January, and we're

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 1>back on track, all right, Glenn, appreciate you so much.

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:30.520
<v Speaker 1>That is it for me today, dear friends on Woke

0:34:30.560 --> 0:34:33.640
<v Speaker 1>a f as always, power to the people and to

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:37.520
<v Speaker 1>all the people. Power get woke. And stay woke as

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:37.840
<v Speaker 1>fuck