WEBVTT - World Freeloads Off U.S. on Drug Pricing, Miller Says

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg pm L podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p L podcast

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:28.320
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes, SoundCloud and at Bloomberg dot com. Right now,

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I want to bring in Dr Steve Miller, chief medical

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:35.479
<v Speaker 1>officer and senior vice president at express script. It is

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:37.839
<v Speaker 1>one of the largest companies in the country. It is

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:41.239
<v Speaker 1>an American Fortune Fortune one hundred company, h the twentieth

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:43.840
<v Speaker 1>largest in the US, and it is the largest pharmacy

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>benefit management organization in the United States. Dr Miller, I

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 1>want to start with drug pricing. We hear a lot

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>about you know that the price is too high? Uh

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>do you think do you agree? Do you think that

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the cost of drugs in the US is too high?

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's start there at least I definitely think they are.

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:04.479
<v Speaker 1>Americans are actually should during their burdens for the rest

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:06.680
<v Speaker 1>of the world. So we're four point six percent of

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the world's population, We're thirty three of world drug spend.

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:13.759
<v Speaker 1>We're somewhere between fifty and seventy percent of drug profits.

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>So we truly are funding all innovation for the rest

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 1>of the world, and they're actually freeloading on America. So

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>what could be done to actually bring prices down? So

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've worked very hard, and there's certain things

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:28.479
<v Speaker 1>that we can do every day, uh that, and that

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>patients can actually do every day. So, for instance, if

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a generic available for a branded product, you should

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>be taking the generics. The FDA approves them under the

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>same process. They've been proven time and time again to

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>be equally effective. But there's also things we got to

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:45.399
<v Speaker 1>do dramatically if we're going to continue that, and that

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>is we've got to make biosimilars available in this country.

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>So biosimilars are generic versions of the complex drugs for cancer,

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>rheumatoid arthritis, other diseases. American companies have been making these

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>drugs for Europeans. They've been taking advantage of them for

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the last eight years. The discounts are somewhere between sixty

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and sev yet they're unavailable in the United States and

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>that makes no sense. Dr Miller, You've been described as

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:16.360
<v Speaker 1>a cost fighting ninja. You must there must be a

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>target on you from all of the pharmaceutical companies because

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I want you to tell us about formularies and how

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:25.360
<v Speaker 1>you arrive at the how do you go through the

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:29.919
<v Speaker 1>process of determining which drugs are covered and how much

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>is paid, Because this is something that you're dealing with

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:35.800
<v Speaker 1>by looking at your own data, not relying on the

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 1>data from let's say the drug companies or even from

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 1>healthcare providers. Yeah, so formularies are listed drugs, and that

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>list has to have any a drug to treat any

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:48.920
<v Speaker 1>patient with any disease. It walks into a doctor and

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>so there's about twenty five thousand different products in the

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 1>United States, but it turns out that doctors need about

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>dred of them, and so it allows us to put

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>drug company against drug company to get better deals. So

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:07.399
<v Speaker 1>the simplest example is there are six different statins like lipatore, zoe,

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>core crust or other things. What you do is you

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 1>say to the pharmaceutical manufacturers, I need a statun for

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>my patients. But the data shows that you're all equivalent

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>who will give us the best price, and so by

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>pitting them together, we can actually drive market share and

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>get lower prices. And so we have a process in

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 1>which our formularies are designed by external experts to express scripts,

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>no employees of express Scripts. The only thing they can

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>consider is clinical. They're not allowed to consider price. This way,

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>we can guarantee to our plans and our patients that

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 1>we've always put clinical first, that we always have the

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 1>right drugs available for them. But then we once we

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 1>have their parameters, can drive to the lowest net cost. So,

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Dr Miller, how do you respond to, let's say a

0:03:57.040 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>pharmaceutical company that would say to you, by you're doing this,

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you are reducing our R and D budget and you're

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of inhibiting the production of new drugs. Yeah, so

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I will tell you that the typical responses is that

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>you know what is we uh, there's nothing in the pipeline.

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>It turns out that because of American ingenuity, we have

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>over seven thousand products in clinical testing in the United

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>States right now, and that's the data according to the

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:28.239
<v Speaker 1>pharmaceutical manufacturers. When you look at FDA approvals, two thousand

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and fifteen was almost a record. You have to go

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>back twenty years to have that many drugs approved. So

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>we actually have a very vigorous drug pipeline. That's funded

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>by the ni H, it's funded by the pharmaceutical manufacturers,

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>it's funded by others. And so I'm not worried that

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>US trying to drive to the lowest cost. This is

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 1>still a four hundred billion dollar industry. There's plenty of

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>profitability there for the drug companies to do R and D.

0:04:56.880 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 1>The President has publicly come out against high drug prices.

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>He's singled out various pharmaceutical companies. What can the president

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>do without Congress? Can he do anything in order to

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:14.359
<v Speaker 1>change drug pricing? Yeah? So we there are things that

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>require legislation, obviously, but there's a lot that can be

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:21.839
<v Speaker 1>done by regulations. So the f d A, cms all

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>have really a lot of influence over drug pricing. So

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you a couple examples. Right now, we have

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>a backlog of generic approvals that the f d A.

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 1>The FDA could obviously do things to accelerate those approvals.

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Getting those generics out into the marketplace lowers drug prices.

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:45.599
<v Speaker 1>We have these situations where we have only one generic

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 1>in the marketplace, they've been jacking up the price. You've

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:52.479
<v Speaker 1>seen this with situations like Derra prim The FDA could

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:57.279
<v Speaker 1>actually prioritize a competitor to uh DERA prim So don't

0:05:57.320 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>just accept the applications as they come in in but

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:03.039
<v Speaker 1>when there's a shortage in the marketplace, put that at

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the top priority list and get a competitor and faster.

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:09.359
<v Speaker 1>So there are plenty of regulatory things that can be

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 1>done to bring down drugs. Thank you very much for

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:14.600
<v Speaker 1>being with us. Dr Steve Miller is the Chief Medical

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Officer Senior Vice president Express Scripts. Joining us here at

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the National Medicare Advantage Summit taking place in Arlington, Virginia.

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 1>It is hosted by a Better Medicare Alliance. We are

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 1>broadcasting for the National Medicare Advantage Summit taking place in Arlington, Virginia,

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 1>right across the River Potomac from Washington, d C. And

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>here to tell us more about the healthcare system in

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the United States is Tom Scully. He's a general partner

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>with Welsh, Carson, Anderson and Stow. He has also senior

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>counsel at Austin and Bird. But perhaps more importantly for

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 1>our conversation, he was the administrator of the Centers for

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Medicare and Medicaid Services under President George W. Bush. And yes,

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>both both bushes, one push, one end push too. Um,

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and you also really played a very important role in

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 1>helping to design Medicare Part D Medicare Advantage both. Right, um, so,

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>where do where do you? Where do you start when

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>you try to explain to people the current state, because

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 1>there's so many pieces to this, whether it's Medicare advantage,

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>whether it's supplemental, whether it's Medicare Medicaid. You say you're

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>on the board of a Medicaid insurance program here in

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>d C. How do you tease all this out so

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 1>that we can understand at least where we are and

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>what are some of the options to move forward to

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>make it better. Who would ever know healthcare was so complicated?

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Well maybe maybe the best way the reason you were

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>you were the admit you would the administrator for the

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. What does the c

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>m S. C MS is a giant agency in Baltimore,

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>which most people in Washington you know. It's in Baltimore,

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and it runs Medicare and Medicaid and it also runs

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the exchanges, the Obamacare exchanges, UH and a number of

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 1>other things. But it's um so you probably have seventy

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>seven million people. One of the four Americans roughly in

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the Medicaid program, which is lower income you know, lower

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>income healthcare for women and kids, covers seventy the nursing

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:35.560
<v Speaker 1>homes in the country, covers most the disabled mentally retarded

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>people in the country as far as mentally disabled UM

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and Medicare is forty four million seniors and chronically disabled people.

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>So their giant programs. The combined budget for CMS with

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 1>between all of Medicare, Medicaid and the problems about one

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 1>point four trillion dollars a year, So it basically runs

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 1>about half the health care economy, and uh a lot

0:08:56.880 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of it is on autopilot. So I would say n

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 1>of the you know, the these seven right people have

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the job in less twenty years. Democrats Republicans were all friends,

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 1>and most of the job is running giant insurance plans

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:09.839
<v Speaker 1>and making sure all these beneficiaries getting take care of.

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 1>And in certain periods of time, like with Obamacare or

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>in my case with the Party and Medicare advantage, they

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:18.959
<v Speaker 1>get very legislative legislator in tense times, you spend time

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>changing the problem. So when I came in with Pushing

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 1>two thousand one, it was like called heck, I changed

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the name. The CMS been a week after I got there.

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>You didn't want to work for HECA? No, you know

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 1>what a long story. I used to run the for

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:35.319
<v Speaker 1>profit Hospital Association for eight c A and ten and

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 1>those guys back in the nineties, and I had a

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of friends at HeLa. But there's a perception, fair unfair,

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 1>that there's a big slumbo and bureaucracy. So I told

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>my boss at the time, Tommy Toomp, said hey, let's

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>change the name. And there's nothing in the statute. So

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>we just sat around made up in her name. Well,

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:50.959
<v Speaker 1>so you were talking about at one point for a

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollar budget for all of these agencies, and you're

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>saying so on a pilot. Meanwhile, we're looking at budget

0:09:57.360 --> 0:09:59.559
<v Speaker 1>projections that are saying that the cost is going to

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 1>balloon as the population does age. Are there conversations that

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:05.959
<v Speaker 1>are being had that you're involved with with the current

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:11.959
<v Speaker 1>legislators for making feasible changes that would reduce costs over time?

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:15.680
<v Speaker 1>And what the House bill? This is the biggest debate

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:18.599
<v Speaker 1>in the country list you know three months is the

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Paul Ryan House Bill didn't pass. So if you take Obamacare,

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not trying to criticize President Obama. I think he

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>was worthy effort to try to cover and of universal coverage.

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 1>But what happened under President Obama's healthcare plan is if

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you look at before I kicked in two thousand twelve,

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>you had fifty five million people on the medicaid. Problem.

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Between then and today, it's going from fifty five million

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:42.080
<v Speaker 1>to seventy seven million, So two million people on Medicaid.

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 1>If you kept it going for the next ten years,

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>you go to ninety seven million. Current spending on Medicaid

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 1>now six hundred billion dollars a year, six hundred billion

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 1>dollars here, it's a big number already, a drums round.

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>It will be from six to nine hundred and fifty

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 1>billion over the next ten years. But isn't that more

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 1>of a commentary on sort of the fact that there

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>are people who are falling into poverty or falling into

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 1>a lower income bracket and help. No, you're President Obama did,

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not trying to be good pro con that bill

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 1>expanded the poverty coverage of Medicaid and mandated there was

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna go to a hundred and thirty eight percent of

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 1>poverty in every state. The Supreme Court came out said

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 1>you can't force the states to do that. So thirty

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>one northern, largely democratic states took the hundred percent from

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the money and expanded their problems massively, and nineteen largely southern,

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 1>more conservative states said we're not going to do it.

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:32.679
<v Speaker 1>We don't want to have these giant new in talent problems,

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:34.959
<v Speaker 1>and until nineteen of them skipped it. Okay. So the

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 1>real issue is what the Republicans have done. These are

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:41.079
<v Speaker 1>big policy changes that effect have an enormous impact in

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 1>every American the economy. Republicans largely said we're gonna freeze

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 1>it where it is, So spending a Medicaid under what

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Paul Ryan wanted to do would go from six hundred

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>billion this year to about seven d fifty billion, and

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 1>ten years if you left it on the cruise control

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 1>from Obamacare, we go from sillion to nine hundred billion.

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:58.560
<v Speaker 1>The Republicans would freeze it where it is at about

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:01.559
<v Speaker 1>seventies seven million people. Those are big policy issues. Do

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 1>you want to cover all those new people in those

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:04.960
<v Speaker 1>other states? Do you want to you know, those are

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:07.320
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about another twenty million people in the medicaid

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>problems that good or bad those are big, fundamental, gigantic

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>economic issues. So I have been to love to medicaid problem.

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>But every person, let's every person is paying taxes out

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 1>there listening to this, pays four thousand dollars per year.

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 1>You're not a Medicaid that is your tax contribution to

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 1>pay for Medicaid every year is four thousand dollars per taxpayer.

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 1>And you and all make a decision do you want

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>to cover all those people and have universal coverage. I

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:32.559
<v Speaker 1>think it's the right thing to do. The Medicaid problems

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of a mass I could you could spend hours explaining

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to you how screwed up it is structurally, but it's

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>a wonderful problem. I happen to be a fan of

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>usual coverage. But how much do you want to spend where?

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>These are the single biggest issues in the government. Medicare

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and Medicaid are the biggest problems in the governments security,

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 1>and they drive all your taxpayer spending. And these policy

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>issues about who you want to cover where and whose

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:54.559
<v Speaker 1>air subsidies and who should get subsidies are massive and

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>they're important to people. And I know they're incredibly complicated.

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Who health is so complicated, but they are the budget

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and they are the governments that this is the future

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:06.679
<v Speaker 1>of government policy. Is there a model or is there

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:10.199
<v Speaker 1>another country that is doing something that we can learn from.

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:11.839
<v Speaker 1>If you were given a clean I mean you're not

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:13.679
<v Speaker 1>going to ever get a clean slate, there is no

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:16.199
<v Speaker 1>clean slate. But if you were to be given, you know,

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 1>half a clean slate, what would you do? What would

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 1>you say? You can't? And I've been doing this forever,

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:22.559
<v Speaker 1>and I think things changing incrementally, and I look at

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I was not a big fan of Obamacare structurally, I

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>think he's trying to do the right thing. If you

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>look at President Obama's package, and I've said this publicly

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:31.199
<v Speaker 1>a lot, it looks a hell of a lot like

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>that George H. W. Bush Plan that I helped design

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety with a lot more money. So what they

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 1>were trying to do, the unerfual covers was worthy in

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 1>a in a rational goal. I think they ever did

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:43.679
<v Speaker 1>it went too far and and and and put too

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:45.679
<v Speaker 1>much on the structure. But they were trying to do

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the right thing. And I think when you look at

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans are trying to do, they're actually trying to

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 1>scale back what President Obama did. So whatever happens, the

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>problems are going to get bigger. It's a matter of

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 1>how much bigger. And even on the Republican bills, Medicare

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and Medicator and grow dramatically. The issue is are they

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna grow really fair star less fast so you can't

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 1>really change it. Did the Dutch have a pretty good system? Yes,

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:06.719
<v Speaker 1>the Germans I think a pretty good system. They have

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:08.559
<v Speaker 1>kind of neighborhood based systems. But you have to go

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 1>back to and blow the whole thing up and start

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 1>from the scratch. We have an incredibly complicated web of

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>multiple problems the cover people, and you really have no

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 1>choice but to build on it. Tom Scully, thank you

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Truly a fascinating to hear

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts. Tom Scully was the head of CMS under

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>both President George one. Okay, you were in the White House,

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 1>but you've been making healthcare policy and you did a

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Medicare party and you also did Medicare advantage, and we

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate you being with He looks incredibly healthy. Like

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 1>about nine seven, Tom Scully general partner at Wells, Carson

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Anderson and still also Senior council at Austin and bird

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 1>l LP. We are here broadcasting live at the National

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Medicare Advantage Summit in Arlington, Virginia. It is hosted by

0:14:54.920 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the Better Medicare Alliance. This is Bloomberg. We are live

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 1>at the National Medicare Advantage Summit in Arlington, Virginia, and

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>we are so lucky to have Dr Kvita Patel here

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 1>with us. She is a nonresident Senior Fellow at Brookings

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Institute and a former advisor to the Obama White House.

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>She worked on the Affordable Care Act. Uh So, Dr Ptel,

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 1>you really have a clear insight into what's going on

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>right now? What should we pay attention to. What's the

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>most realistic change that could happen in short order to

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the a c A Affordable Care Act. So I still

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 1>think the most realistic change is going to be no

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 1>change that we're not going to see a repeal or

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>something that kind of completely rips out the Affordable Care Act.

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>There's still a lot of discussions going on, but the

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 1>bottom line is the votes are not there right now.

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Dr Ptel, maybe you could just disc ride to people

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 1>how Medicare advantage works in the health care system and

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 1>how this partnership between the public system, which is of

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>course Medicare UH and private insurance. How does that come

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 1>together and how does they How did that present a

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 1>challenge because most people look at this situation they go, boy,

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>it can't get any more complicated, right, right, So the

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Medicare Advantage Program really started as a way to expand

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of what we would call private sector choices in

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>insurance for Medicare beneficiaries. And that was actually done during

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 1>a Republican administration previously, the actual George H. W. Bush administration,

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and that failed a little bit in its first attempt,

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>and then there was a little bit of a reboot

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>in the in the George W. Bush administration, where we

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 1>then got what we have today, which is the Medicare

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Advantage Program. And basically of people in Medicare are in

0:16:57.080 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>private plans, which are Medicare Advance Plans, which are basically

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>confusing because and what if you have a family member

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>like I do they just get a bunch of brochures

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 1>like around October and they have all these choices, And

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 1>that's what you're referencing. But where we've gotten now is actually,

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>in about five years, more than half of the Medicare

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 1>beneficiaries are going to be in these Medicare advantage or

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:27.400
<v Speaker 1>private commercial insurance plans in Medicare, then the traditional fee

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:33.119
<v Speaker 1>for service a million people currently in Medicare correct about

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>fifty five to sixty million in the Medicare program. That

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>number is going to grow in the next five years.

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 1>But then half of the people in this program in

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Medicare will be in the Medicare advantage program. How does

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Medicare advantage and partnering private health insurance companies with public

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 1>ones reduce costs? So the way it reduces cost is

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>basically by what what the government does is it actually

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 1>pays the private insurance plan kind of a lump some

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:07.119
<v Speaker 1>amount to take care of basically everything. Right now, at

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:11.399
<v Speaker 1>traditional Medicare, there's hospital costs, physician costs, drug costs, and

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:13.920
<v Speaker 1>it's all pays out of separate pockets and pieces of

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the government. Pie Medicare advantage, the government pays one lump

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 1>sum to the private plan and says you take care

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:23.399
<v Speaker 1>of everything, no matter how much it costs. And if

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 1>someone doesn't necessarily need all that money, then the plan

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>keeps that extra money. And what the plans will do

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:32.879
<v Speaker 1>in a way to save money. Is they will do

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:35.920
<v Speaker 1>really aggressive things like send a nurse out to a

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 1>patient's home to do an in home assessment and not

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 1>ever have to even see the doctor to establish kind

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 1>of what that patient needs, all in an attempt to

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>create a more efficient system. Okay, so talking about private

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:51.399
<v Speaker 1>health insurers brings me back to A C A and

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the path forward. The latest plan that was unveiled today

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:59.439
<v Speaker 1>by an Alabama Republican congressman shows that there is an

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 1>attempt to try to pull out high risk pools or

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of group people by how risky they are they

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>are and their pre existing conditions. Can you speak to

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 1>that and how effective that could be? Yeah? So you

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>remember the criticism of the American Health Care Act is

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that potentially the older or sicker you are, you're gonna

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>have to pay potentially a thousand percent more than you

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 1>would today under the Affordable Care Act. So what's being

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:26.440
<v Speaker 1>introduced now is ways to actually deal with sicker patients

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:29.679
<v Speaker 1>who are older and to try to acknowledge that they

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 1>need something different than just regular old Medicare insurance. So

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>what you're seeing proposed um not just for Medicare but

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 1>for actually any age are these high risk pools that

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 1>take people out based on the numbers of kind of

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, numbers of diseases that they have, or how

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 1>sick they are, based on how much money they're using

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:53.879
<v Speaker 1>in the system, or potentially pre existing conditions, and then

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:56.920
<v Speaker 1>charge them more. And then well if one charges them more,

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 1>but then it also puts them in a different cool

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 1>almost like medicare advantage, where it's a private insurance system

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:06.840
<v Speaker 1>that then has to take care of them for a

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 1>dedicated amount of money. But I don't understand this works

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 1>why any insurance company would agree to take them on.

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>So it's yes, that's a good question. Will anyone actually

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>take on the sickest people in a population? If you

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 1>pay enough money, somebody will. But who's gonna put that?

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:22.919
<v Speaker 1>This gonna put the government is so at the end

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 1>of the day, you have mentioned I obviously am a

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:27.879
<v Speaker 1>fan of the Affordable Care Act, even with its warts

0:20:27.920 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and flaws. At the end of the day, somebody has

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:33.640
<v Speaker 1>to foot the bill. We can't skirt or get around

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the fact that as a society we have to pay

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>for healthcare as a society, including people who are really

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 1>sick and including people who are super healthy. And that's

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the bottom line. I want your thoughts on prescription drug

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>prices and the insurance plans around those, because the president

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:53.160
<v Speaker 1>has the President Donald Trump has come out via tweets,

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:59.159
<v Speaker 1>via verbal uh rhetoric, he's saying drug prices are too high. Correct.

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 1>So the emphasis on drug pricing is very interesting for

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a Republican administration, and it's largely, as you mentioned, because

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of President Trump's quotes. Translating that into something that will

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:14.639
<v Speaker 1>change the way all of us receive our prescription drugs

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>is very hard to do. However, that's something if you

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:21.879
<v Speaker 1>listen to all the people who work under President Trump,

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 1>they've said that this is one of the top priorities

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>for the White House. The way prescription drug plans work

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 1>right now, most of us in America don't even realize it.

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 1>It's a third party that deals with the way your

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:38.159
<v Speaker 1>drugs are paid for, and those are called prescription benefit plans.

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 1>And so there's a whole different entity and industry outside

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 1>of your insurance card that actually deals with all of this.

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:49.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's why it's complicated and I am not likely

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to see a change happen soon. Well, I want to

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>thank you for helping us understand that at least a

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:57.680
<v Speaker 1>little bit. Dr Kvita Patel, Nonresident Senior Fellow, Brookings Institution.

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 1>We are broadcasting at the National Medicare Advantage Summit taking

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:17.439
<v Speaker 1>place in Arlington, Virginia, is hosted by Better Medicare Alliance.

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>And to turn our attention now to politics and America's

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 1>relationship with China, I want to bring in Brendan A. Hearn.

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 1>He is the chief investment officer of Crane Shares and

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:31.399
<v Speaker 1>Brendan of course, we're all wondering about the Chinese President

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Jijing Ping's visit to UH President Donald Trump's mar Alago

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Club in Florida. What do you think the most pressing

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:42.880
<v Speaker 1>topic their meeting will be. It's going to be North

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Korea him. It's an area of mutual interest in an

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>area where there's potential a lot of potential collaboration and

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 1>coming up with a solution that is certainly a factor

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 1>for both countries. Well, so North Korea is definitely even

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 1>more on people's minds just because of the recent missile tests.

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:06.439
<v Speaker 1>But don't both sides have a reason to not say anything.

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's the best case scenario that neither of

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>them say anything and they make nice and then they

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:13.119
<v Speaker 1>have a nice photo up with each other. I agree

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>at Lisa. I think ultimately you want to get the

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>dialogue going between you know, the first and second largest

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 1>world economies leaders talking with one another, and hopefully that

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 1>sets a path for more communication um in the years

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 1>to come. You know, Brendan, one of the issues has

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:33.720
<v Speaker 1>been Chinese acquisitions of what are considered to be essential assets.

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 1>For example, Chinese companies attempts to purchase oil companies in

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the United States that was thwarted. Do you think that

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>there is going to be talk about the Westinghouse Toshiba

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 1>unit that is up for sale that is facing financial problems.

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:52.119
<v Speaker 1>Good question. I believe the this is an opportunity for

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 1>President g to show Trump and and really the United

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 1>States in general about how much business China is doing

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:04.160
<v Speaker 1>here in the US. Last year, three million tourists, three

0:24:04.240 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand Chinese students studying. China is the second larger

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 1>buyer of agricultural products, and there's US companies doing well

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 1>in China. I think this gives China opportunities to show

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:17.919
<v Speaker 1>how they can be a good business partner. And yes,

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:22.239
<v Speaker 1>there are sensitive sectors, you know, technology being one of them,

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 1>nuclear energy. Well, what we're talking about with Westinghouse nuclear

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 1>energy well, and China has a pollution issue. UM nuclear

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:34.160
<v Speaker 1>is going to be is currently one of those solutions,

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 1>along with hydro wind and solar bringing Westinghouse technology to China.

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna build you know, it's upwards of two dozen

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 1>nuclear plants in the years to come. And why wouldn't

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:46.879
<v Speaker 1>that be a good thing for Westinghouse to have a

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Chinese ownership, either partial or full Brennan. I imagine that

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:53.160
<v Speaker 1>one thing that will be brought up is the trade

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>deficit that the US has with China. President Trump has

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 1>talked extensively about it. He has lamented how big it is,

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:02.119
<v Speaker 1>even though it has contracted over the years. What do

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:04.399
<v Speaker 1>you expect to come out of this particular meeting with

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>respect to the trade deficit. I think it sets a

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>this dialogue and communication going forward. I believe that you

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 1>have a little bit of a team of rivalries within

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration where you've got say, Jared Kushner, Gary Cohen, Manuchin,

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and Male Pass on one side, uh more of say

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:27.359
<v Speaker 1>the globalist trade proponents, and on the other side you

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>have a Steve Banion, Wilbert Ross, Peter Navarro, and so

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I believe you have a little bit of, uh, the

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 1>administration finding its way between these two camps that have

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 1>divergent views. Well, hold on a second. It's really interesting

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that you mentioned that because Steve Bannon, as you know,

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 1>was just removed from the National Security Council. Do you

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>think that that's going to affect this conversation that President

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:54.399
<v Speaker 1>Trump has with President Jejim ping and possibly ease the

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:57.639
<v Speaker 1>negotiations over some kind of trade contract. I think behind

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the scenes that the hand, the visible hand of Henry

0:26:01.560 --> 0:26:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Kissinger is at play. Uh. He visited China in December

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 1>to help arrange this meeting. He's been meeting with the

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>administration to help them prep for this meeting. And and

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 1>so certainly I think you're going to see a more

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:18.360
<v Speaker 1>balanced view potentially. I mean, time is gonna tell um

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:23.119
<v Speaker 1>in in this course of dialogue. Now, Brendan Crane Shares

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:27.159
<v Speaker 1>has a variety of exchange traded funds designed for a

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Chinese investments. Is the Chinese you want? Is it currently

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:35.359
<v Speaker 1>in your mind overvalued or undervalued versus the US dollar?

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 1>That's a good question, PIM. I mean, I think ultimately

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 1>interest rate differentials helped drive currencies China has slowly slightly

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 1>started the titan not the official interest rates. So so

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think China meets the Treasury departments uh definition

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 1>of a currency manipulator. Um. But I think if we

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:59.360
<v Speaker 1>were in euro, yen or pound, you might say it's undervalued. Yeah,

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be something that that could come

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:05.400
<v Speaker 1>up because President Trump has said that, uh, that China

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:07.680
<v Speaker 1>is manipulating its currency. And yet you know, you do

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:10.119
<v Speaker 1>wonder if there was some kind of removal of some

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of state control, the direction probably would be down

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 1>not up right. It probably would de appreciate. Beginning in

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 1>China cut the official interest rates, the FED moves to

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:27.680
<v Speaker 1>a tightening bias the the yuan depreciates versus the dollar.

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 1>China is slowly starting to tighten up a little bit

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 1>in advance of a big political turnover at the end

0:27:34.520 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 1>of this year. This is the year of stability for

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 1>China economically, in advance of the political and leadership changes coming. Brendon,

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 1>before we, you know, sort of look at China as

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>a monolithic entity. Is it worth noting that they have

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:52.639
<v Speaker 1>their own problems such as bad loans, and is it

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:57.159
<v Speaker 1>possible that we are underestimating the issues that face the

0:27:57.280 --> 0:28:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Chinese leadership. It's not just all about the United States. Oh,

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I agree, there's a domestic agenda that's been set, you know.

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:06.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you one looks at the thirteen five

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 1>year Plan, the um Chinese government is very explicit and

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 1>where they want to drive not only their economy but

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the society. And there there are liabilities on the balance sheet.

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 1>At the same time there's assets. And I think you

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 1>bring up a great point. China is a big country,

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 1>just not geographically, but the economy and parts of China

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:27.840
<v Speaker 1>is doing very well right now. Domestic consumption parts of

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:33.639
<v Speaker 1>China geared to more traditional um steal aluminum coal, you know,

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:35.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of of of a tougher roach. You've

0:28:35.640 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 1>got this barbelled economy right now. So for President Jijmping,

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 1>it's an election gear. He wants to send a message

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 1>to his constituents back home. What's the best case scenario

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 1>that could emerge from this meeting for that purpose. I

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 1>think ultimately this is a sign of respect of face

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and that that Trump is willing to meet with g

0:28:56.640 --> 0:29:00.280
<v Speaker 1>at this stage of his new presidency. Is a tree

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 1>in in and of itself. So I think it's a.

0:29:03.000 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>It's a good sign and shows something that's so important

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:08.880
<v Speaker 1>to China, which is respect. Yeah, and so what about

0:29:08.920 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 1>for President Trump? I think ultimately Trump, you know, Trump

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 1>is going to one. He was elected with a set

0:29:17.000 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 1>agenda from the people who voted for him, and he

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 1>wants to satisfy those voters. At the same time, the

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 1>US is a global leader economically, and I think upsetting

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 1>what what will be an increasingly better mutually beneficial relationship economically,

0:29:33.560 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>um it especially around an area like North Korea where

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 1>China can help. Right, Brendan to Hearn, thank you so

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. This will be something that we

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I am sure we'll talk to you again about soon.

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Brendan to Hern is chief investment officer at Crane Shares

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:50.480
<v Speaker 1>in New York City, talking about President Trump's meeting with

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 1>President Jejan Ping of China. Thanks for listening to the

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg p Now podcast. You can subscribe and listen to

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 1>interviews at iTunes, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm Pim Fox. I'm out there on Twitter at Pim Fox.

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm out there on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one

0:30:14.760 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 1>before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide on

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio