WEBVTT - Tarek Mansour on Kalshi's Plan to Create Markets in Everything

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 2>Hello odd Laws listeners and viewers, You're about to get

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:24.919
<v Speaker 2>a conversation with Turrek Monsieur, CEO of Kelshi. This was

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 2>recorded live on stage at Chicago's Untitled supper Club. We

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 2>had a blast, and we hope you enjoyed the show.

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:35.519
<v Speaker 2>You're definitely having a moment. The South Park episode last night,

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 2>it was all about prediction markets.

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 3>Did you watch it live?

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:42.639
<v Speaker 4>I try to avoid watching or reading anything about us

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 4>without kind of getting the third party reaction before. So

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:48.519
<v Speaker 4>we didn't know because we saw the thing, like the

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 4>announcement a few days ago there apisode prediction Markets, and

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:52.839
<v Speaker 4>we started kind of imagining all the types of things

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 4>that they're going to do.

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>It was crazy.

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean the highlight I think is like they copied

0:00:56.520 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 4>the app like, yeah, exactly, I was. I mean, they

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 4>even had the referrallable and they even had some of

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 4>the bugs we haven't they have. It's like it was unbelievable.

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 4>So but you know, it was. It was pretty cool.

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 4>I mean, there's a few parts that I disagree with,

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 4>but the other for the rest, I mean, we really

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:12.680
<v Speaker 4>enjoyed it.

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:14.119
<v Speaker 1>I watched it this.

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Morning why do you think prediction markets are having this

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:21.319
<v Speaker 2>moment now after they've been around for decades? Literally? Why?

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 4>Now? Yeah, I mean I think there's like path dependence

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 4>in these things, right, Like it's not sort of like

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 4>I'm a strong believer. That's sort of like you know,

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 4>in history, you have to have a few agents that

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 4>sort of like push and you know, push the boundary

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 4>of certain things and somebody's got to do it type thing.

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 4>But my view on this, and that's why we started

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 4>the companies. The fundamentals are there, like this should be

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 4>a very large market. And we could talk a little

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 4>bit about the history. But when we first started the company,

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 4>this idea of sort of like a financial market that

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 4>prices questions about the future sort of we were very

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 4>drawn to it because, you know, one, if you could

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 4>build such a financial market, it could be the largest

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 4>of them all because the largest number of people will care.

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 4>And the number two could be the most important because

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, yes, pricing the you know, Sheriff Tesla is important,

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 4>but pricing whether brexfast is going to happen, or Drum's

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 4>gonna win in election, or or what's you know, the

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 4>sort of the next natural disaster going to be. I

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:15.240
<v Speaker 4>think that's at least as important, if not more, at

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 4>least from our perspective. I mean, when I looked at

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 4>the history and you were chatting a little about the history,

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 4>like the elephant the room was regulatory, it was I mean,

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 4>there's a very simple kind of like first order factory here. Well,

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 4>well it was illegal, like you know that that that's

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 4>a pretty good reason for Yeah, I mean it's a

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 4>pretty good reason for something not to you know, generally

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 4>kind of go mainstream and exist. And the legality has

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 4>been sort of the thing that has weighed on all

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:39.919
<v Speaker 4>prior prediction markets. I don't know if you ever counted

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 4>in trade.

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:42.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I trade it on there.

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:44.079
<v Speaker 4>Well you know, so so here you go, right, I

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 4>mean in Trade was you know how that story kind

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 4>of ended?

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>How familiar are you?

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how to end it?

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 4>So so so John Delaney was this was a sort of

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:56.080
<v Speaker 4>founder of in Trade and it's just kind of visionary.

0:02:56.120 --> 0:02:57.800
<v Speaker 4>I mean, like Dawn in many ways. I mean he

0:02:57.880 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 4>really believed that. You know, he was on CNBC back

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 4>in two thousand sort of like talking about the forecast

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 4>for the election and stuff. But he sort of ran

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:06.519
<v Speaker 4>offshore from Dublin and it was kind of like a

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 4>VPN stype set up. And then the company got shut

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 4>down in twenty twelve by the government, and two weeks

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 4>later John Laney died and he died climb Mount Everest,

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 4>and there was a kind of whole controversy of like

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 4>what happened? I mean, you know, was there some sort

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:25.639
<v Speaker 4>of causation there? But for us, when we we got

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 4>really obsessed by doing this and realized like, actually, the

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 4>only way for this to go big is we got

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:33.239
<v Speaker 4>to legalize it, like there was no other way. And

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 4>no matter how big the company would get, no matter

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 4>how kind of how much culture there was going to

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 4>be around the company, it didn't really matter because the

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 4>government could shut it down and they will after a

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 4>certain level of scale. And so this was sort of

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 4>like we spent you know, three years and a half

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 4>when we started after starting CALSHI, like all we did

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 4>was basically regulatory work.

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>It was like, how do we leave fight exactly?

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 4>The fight was actually like more like five years and

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 4>a half, Like with three years and a half to

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 4>get to legalize prediction markets, and was sort of the

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 4>whole thing with the prior administration around the election market,

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 4>which we were completely uncompromising on.

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 1>We had to do that and that was kind.

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 4>Of a whole two year long process that ended without

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 4>suing the government, our own regulator. And then and then

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.919
<v Speaker 4>I think that lawsuit. I view it as sort of

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:19.159
<v Speaker 4>the probably what the turning point is for these monkeys,

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 4>like this is when we wanted the institution, Like this

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:22.720
<v Speaker 4>is when everything changed.

0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 3>I think, would you have died if Trump hadn't won

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 3>in November.

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 4>No, it would have just been slower and harder. But no,

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 4>not died. I mean, we didn't die under the harshest

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 4>environment of all. I think like, like, you know, well,

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 4>the first right, the first three years and a half

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 4>was like, well this was just not allowed, right, and

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 4>we didn't you know, we kept sort of making progress

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 4>all the way up onto legalizing and launching. But then, yeah,

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 4>the reality is like the prior government I think was

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 4>as hostile as it gets. That it was just not

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:52.720
<v Speaker 4>I mean, they just didn't want it to exist.

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:56.160
<v Speaker 2>So well, you say that, like it's really important to

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 2>have a change in the regular landscape, that there was

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 2>no way this could have taken and off had this change,

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 2>had this not changed. However, there is a competitor that

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:10.679
<v Speaker 2>you can access via VPN fund with stable coins. In theory,

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 2>there doesn't even need to be a company that had

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 2>been operating for several years. Couldn't it have happened and

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 2>could it still happen? That the future of prediction markets

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:24.480
<v Speaker 2>is on chain and essentially outside of the regulatory lands.

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 4>I don't necessarily think that on chain off chain is

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 4>sort of necessary. It kind of an unregulated regulated like

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 4>like on chain doesn't mean illegal, right, Like.

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Sure so, but I think that like.

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:36.679
<v Speaker 2>But there was a lot of volume on this entity

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:39.719
<v Speaker 2>that had all kinds of things while we're talking about

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:40.279
<v Speaker 2>poly marketing.

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:42.919
<v Speaker 4>So it's not like we couldn't go on chain, right,

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:44.920
<v Speaker 4>It's like this is not a very hard thing to build, right,

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 4>And actually, like it's funny, like the first two weeks

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 4>of cash we tried to do something on chain and realized, like, well,

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 4>again it was a good way to sort of be

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 4>maybe like somewhat smart about regular regulation, but not really

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 4>because Augur was on chain also, and like that was

0:05:56.800 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 4>also sort of shut down and it was a bunch

0:05:58.760 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 4>of issues.

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>For us.

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 4>We stood very firmly that like, for this to go mainstream,

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 4>why you should avoid a VPN, you know, but also like,

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 4>how do you have this be legitimized financial markets attract

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:10.840
<v Speaker 4>the type of institutions that would trade. You have a

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 4>bunch of institutional partners and now the brokers and actually

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:15.919
<v Speaker 4>truly take this manstream. There was just no way to

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 4>do it outside of the like this is the universe

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 4>of financial markets. You can now do it outside. You

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 4>have to expand it. And if you expand it, then

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 4>I think we have a real winner. And I think

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 4>the results show like, you know, yes, Bally has a

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:28.720
<v Speaker 4>lot of volume, but like there's not real revenue yet,

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 4>there's a lot of wash. Like it's kind of how

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 4>do you account for all this stuff? And even if

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 4>you account for all of that today we're like something

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 4>like three x bigger within a year.

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 3>So definitely want to talk about the brokers and the

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 3>market makers. But before we do, a very basic question,

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 3>but often the basic questions are the most interesting. Can

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 3>you walk us through the life cycle of you know,

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 3>a binary event contract that gets created on your platform.

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 4>It's a great question because that's a hard problem, right,

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 4>like because the traditional markets, right the life cycle is

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 4>like you know, you have an idea like grain futures

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 4>or Onion futures or GPU future your future, your futures,

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:09.119
<v Speaker 4>there is a bad idea.

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 3>It's out up a protection.

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>I do.

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 2>I do think it's a little lame that poly market,

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 2>like it hasn't done on your futures because if you're

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 2>gonna look, what's the point of on train if you're

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 2>not sticking it to the man anyway.

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 4>If like the Onion farmers are like finally having like

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 4>instrumental hedge, And what's.

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 2>The point of crypto if you're not using it to

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 2>fight against rule?

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 4>I mean, well, the Onion Future's rule is truly absurd. Yeah, yeah,

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 4>it's like that's one of those but I guess now

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 4>it's maybe kind of funny.

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we should just keep it. But like.

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 4>Or like GEP I mean, or like GPU Future, I mean,

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 4>like the point here is like you have something where

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 4>the lifetime is infinite. You list the future and the

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 4>derivative and it's sort of there forever, and then you

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 4>build a liquidity over time and you can take your time.

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 4>It takes like usually these things take time, they take

0:07:57.520 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 4>years to kind of build up to market them and

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 4>build equity. This is different, right, Like this is much

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 4>more dynamic. It comes and goes like oftentimes the trend

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 4>could be sort of like there for two to three weeks,

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 4>sometimes a week, sometimes it's a day, and you have

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 4>to much more, much faster, and kind of my mental

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 4>model for what this looks like is sort of like

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 4>there's an idea that can be from a user, from

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 4>a from the news, from a trend from some tweet.

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 4>Then there's the listing of the market, and then there's

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 4>kind of like from a listing to kind of making

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 4>it reasonably liquid and active. So we've we've gone through

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 4>like all kind of types of regulatory winters. But the

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 4>first time we listed a market, it took us eighteen months.

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:36.839
<v Speaker 4>That was just for listing and because there's a lot

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 4>like the operations attack. These are tickers, right like you

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:42.320
<v Speaker 4>list them like a stock or like a like WTI

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 4>crude oil. Now we do it within thirty minutes, and

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:48.200
<v Speaker 4>so we've expanded the territory quite a bit.

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 3>And when you list it, does it go to the

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:52.839
<v Speaker 3>CFTC or what.

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 4>Basically processes there's like a self certification which basically fight

0:08:56.679 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 4>with the CFC, and they kind of like generally historically

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 4>is basically like if you file it and you haven't

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 4>engaged with them beforehand. They usually will basically block it.

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 4>They'll call you and say stop until we talk, and

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:10.199
<v Speaker 4>then you do it. But now we've covered so much

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 4>territory and build so much technology and like the operations

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 4>and the regulator in the loop, that like most new

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:17.320
<v Speaker 4>things that we do actually fit into a bucket that

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 4>we've already done. And sometimes there are complete new things,

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 4>like right now, the frontier is actually some of the

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 4>SEC company related markets.

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the sort of next frontier.

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 4>But we've covered so much grounds now that like most

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:30.960
<v Speaker 4>things are like of a similar flavor.

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:49.959
<v Speaker 2>We've been going this whole time. You know, you talk

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 2>about company related stuff, talk about hedging onion futures, maybe

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:57.599
<v Speaker 2>hedge or sorry, hedging onion prices. Maybe you want to

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 2>strip out something related to Tesla car. But let's talk

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 2>about the business. How much of this is sports right now?

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 2>How big is the gap between volume on a Sunday

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 2>versus volume on a Wednesday.

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 4>Volume on a Sunday is very very big. But like

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 4>it's interesting, I mean, like I'll say a few things,

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 4>like the sports side has grown, Like I mean, I'm shocked.

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm still shocked.

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 4>Like every week, we do a forecast and we beat it,

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 4>and like, you know, America likes NFL.

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean I don't know.

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean they like football. I don't know, more than expected,

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 4>I guess, but it's a little bit more than that.

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 4>Like the thing about sports is, let's say there's two

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 4>things going on one there's just a lot of scheduled events.

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, there's just a lot in the week.

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 4>But if you compare like a one to one like

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 4>a game to like basically anything that Trump does, Trump

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 4>will win, like you know, like the in terms of

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 4>volume one to one. He like these markets do really

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:55.560
<v Speaker 4>really well, and it could be literally unlike any I

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 4>mean anything he does.

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 1>The problem there is like there's not enough schedule, like

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I think there may be over just what percentages on Sunday,

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Like it's not I mean probably ninety percent of sports

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 1>on like a regular weekdays like much lower.

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 2>And what's the gap and harm between three acts?

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe?

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 4>Okay, okay, so like yeah, I mean NFL Sunday is

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 4>like massive, but it's a little bit like it's it's

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 4>a littally like asking a question.

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Like okay, well, on election Day, what was the volume? Right? Yeah,

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 1>it's like nine nine elections.

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 4>Right, So, so sports is very large, but like we

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 4>have other categories now, like like culture, for example, I

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:31.320
<v Speaker 4>think is like growing at a similar rate. That's just

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:34.560
<v Speaker 4>starting from much lower baseline, and our market diversity, our

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 4>liquid is just not there yet, whereas sports is much

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:39.079
<v Speaker 4>more kind of like I would say, like much more

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 4>diverse and much more liquid.

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so I'm going to ask the obvious question, I guess,

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 3>but why is it not sports betting?

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:48.199
<v Speaker 4>You know, I don't have kind of like as much

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 4>a problem with the word betting. I think gambling is

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 4>sort of where where I have a problem. I mean,

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:53.439
<v Speaker 4>you know, when like see me launch Water Future is

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 4>like three four years ago, and you know I remember

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 4>like the headline about that is like, oh you can

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 4>now bet on water. It's like all right, I mean,

0:11:58.360 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 4>I guess the word betting is you use very sort

0:11:59.960 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 4>of loosely. But like I would say two things, the

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 4>sort of the legal question and there sort of the

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 4>ethic goal is this good for society?

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Question?

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 3>And those are we will do both of them, don't worry.

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:12.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, let's I mean, I guess. So the legal question,

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean, like our approach has always been sort of

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:17.680
<v Speaker 4>legal and regulated first, like always do it within the

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 4>bounds and expand the bounds. So we did this friction market.

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 4>Then elections, you know, I mean a year ago right

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:26.440
<v Speaker 4>well ego, even like I mean, people were saying, this

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 4>is going to destroy democracy, right like it was it

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:30.959
<v Speaker 4>was the end of the world if we ever got legalized,

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 4>and like you know, and like it was and then

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 4>we legalized, and it was like super biased and you know,

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 4>I was being accused of being more sad agent.

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember that period, but like it was.

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 4>Like I missed no one, like it was like a

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 4>whole thing about you know, I worked at pountry and

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 4>thus I'm obviously kind of rigging the election. But like

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 4>and obviously the vibe has shifted pretty dramatically with the election.

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:53.079
<v Speaker 4>And because you know, there is some kind of powers

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 4>these markets. So when it comes to sports, like on

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 4>the legal piece, like it is legal, like doc could

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 4>stop it if I wanted to, but the states can't.

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:05.200
<v Speaker 4>That's federal preemption. And that's how it works. And we're

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 4>extremely strong legal footing. I mean, Don was mentioning sort

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 4>of the I don't think safety is a sleep at

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 4>the wheel, Like you know, they have less staff but

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:12.839
<v Speaker 4>they have staff, and the staff is aware of sports

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 4>we talked about and it's not like we showed up

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 4>one day like hey, surprise, sports markets are here.

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 3>Like, isn't Trump's nominee also on your board, the nominee

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 3>for CFTC.

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:24.199
<v Speaker 1>Well he was X nominee.

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 4>Now, I mean, we'll see, but I mean I don't know,

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 4>but I don't know if it's X nominy.

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 1>But like there there's a kind of questions.

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 4>But he was not there when this happened, and like

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 4>he was, he's still not there actually, so I don't

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:37.199
<v Speaker 4>think it's very relevant to the question. I think the

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 4>change of the administration is well into the question, Like yes,

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 4>I mean I think it would have been much more

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 4>challenging in the prior administration.

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Like there's no question about that. But the law is

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty clear.

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 4>I mean, if you read the Commodities Exchange, actor's like

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 4>a two prong test and it's is an event kind

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 4>of related to war, terrism, assassination, violence, or gaming, and

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 4>then there's some sort of illegal stuff that's illegal under

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:00.439
<v Speaker 4>state or federal law, and so you can fall under

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 4>de cart We could debate whether this falls under gaming

0:14:02.360 --> 0:14:02.560
<v Speaker 4>or not.

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 1>And there's actually quite a bit of a debate there.

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 4>And then the second test, which is like, if it

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 4>does fall under dis category, tifcy can make an explicit

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 4>determination that is contrary to public interest. Right, so there

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 4>is that sort of second standard, yeah, which rais me

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 4>second question, which is like, I'm just shaw and believer

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 4>in markets, Like I think a market based model for

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 4>these market is better than the over the counter sports.

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Book model because the odds are better.

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 4>Anyone can be a price better, they don't have to

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 4>be a price taker, and the results show like less people,

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 4>Like the percentage of people that basically lose on CASHI

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 4>is closer to fifty to fifty.

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 1>It's just not the case and like a traditional.

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 4>Sports book, And I think that's the sort of argument

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 4>that wins it long term, which is like this is

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 4>just better, Like you get better prices, more transparency, and

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 4>the ability to you know, influence, like basically participate in

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 4>a way you can't an a traditional model.

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 2>You already said that you don't think that the distinction

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 2>is not between trading and betting, the distinction between betting

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 2>and gambling. See sort of preempted to question, But there

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 2>is this Facebook ad that I saw, and it says

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 2>breaking news, sports betting in California is now legal, And

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 2>I saw a screenshot but I couldn't find it. I

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 2>found it on a blog. But is that like an

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 2>actual Kelsey ad that.

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 4>Ran, well, we have a very large marketing team and

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 4>this is the ad is not there anymore, but like regardless,

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 4>I mean that was what you gotta imagine a company

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 4>that's like rule one hundred x so like like nothing, you.

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Know, you're saying like breaking news, Like I guess what

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying is like we all know what's going on.

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 4>Well, the news is breaking. I mean it is legal

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 4>to trade ony states. I mean that that's big news,

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 4>like you know, yeah, and we are ligitally I mean

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 4>you know so, but like I do actually think that,

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 4>like I'm not as worried about this, like like you know,

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:45.320
<v Speaker 4>the word gambling is the one that really irks me,

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 4>Like I think, you know, because like okay, zero zero

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 4>DT options, like like what retail is doing work like

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 4>a trillion dollars of all I mean you probably know

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 4>the numbers.

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 1>What is it there?

0:15:56.640 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 3>I can't remember, but it's a lot.

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So what is retail doing the like hedging? I mean, right, no,

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 4>what exactly are they doing.

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 2>They're gambling.

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about that.

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 2>No, I think, I mean, I think it's fun. Like

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 2>I agree with like this premise that the well.

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 4>Draw line is basically like like it's it's the sort

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 4>of thing where like I mean, in nineteen oh five,

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 4>I think we talked a little b about this, Like

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 4>the Supreme Court there was this whole question of grain

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 4>futures like should it be gambling or should it be

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 4>a financial instrument?

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>And if it was gambling was going to go under

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the bucket shop laws.

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 4>And it was this sort of Supreme Court case Chicago

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 4>Board of Trade versus Christie, where Supreme Court basically like

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 4>ruled in favor of the Chicago War of Trade, which

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 4>is like, yes, a lot of people are speculating, but

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 4>there's value to these markets beyond the actual speculative.

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, activity is taking place.

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 4>And then you get into the kind of question of

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 4>like what is the standard of the Commodities Exchange Act,

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 4>Like should all the activity be hedging? Well, if if

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 4>that's the case, then you let's just cancel the whole act.

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 4>Let's just stop trading altogether. Because in most markets, including

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 4>grain futures, like ninety five percent laws is not hedging

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 4>expeculative and I think that's true in the sock market.

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 4>And so you know, and then like, okay, well how

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 4>do you distinguish and you know, should we take out

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 4>the spectator and just keep the hedging. Well, if you

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:08.680
<v Speaker 4>do that, then there's no liquidity and so it doesn't work.

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 4>And then how do you even know who's hedging and speculating?

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 4>Do you go and check? So so you go into

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:17.440
<v Speaker 4>all these different questions. But like, to me, gambling is

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 4>sort of like you create an artificial risk and then

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:21.159
<v Speaker 4>you roll a dice and then you gamble on it,

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 4>you know, but trading on whether breaksit happened or not,

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 4>that's just like a natural risk.

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 1>That's sort of there.

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:28.919
<v Speaker 4>And then the second question is that and to me,

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:31.119
<v Speaker 4>the even more important one is like the the market

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:34.120
<v Speaker 4>based mechanism versus sort of like you walk into a casino,

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 4>the odds are like structurally stacked against you, and actually

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 4>if you start making money, they like, in the best

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:43.880
<v Speaker 4>case scenario, they basically, you know, stop you from participating,

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 4>and that happens in sportsboks and others. And the worst

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 4>case scenario, they like kneecap you right, like they and

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 4>so that to me is gambling. Like it's like the

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 4>revenue of the company is equal to the losses of

0:17:53.560 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 4>its customer and vice versa. I just don't think this

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 4>is the same here, Like, that's not how the New

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 4>York startion makes its money. It makes it funny based

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:02.399
<v Speaker 4>on fees. Same with Robin, and same with you know,

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 4>same with Calci, And so I think there's a big

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 4>structural difference.

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:08.479
<v Speaker 3>Well, this was going to be my next question actually,

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:11.679
<v Speaker 3>So setting aside the gambling terminology, part of your argument

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 3>here is that even if it is betting, it is

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 3>somehow qualitatively different than traditional betting, where you know, you

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 3>have a sports bookmaker who's setting all the prices. And

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:26.159
<v Speaker 3>you said earlier that there is more transparency and fairer

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:29.439
<v Speaker 3>pricing and all of that. But then again, if you

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 3>look at some of the words that your own company

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 3>has used to describe this. You put up job advertisements

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:39.440
<v Speaker 3>saying that you need experts in something similar to sports

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:40.160
<v Speaker 3>book pricing.

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:42.160
<v Speaker 1>No, that's not quite right.

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:45.199
<v Speaker 4>Now, the job is the sports operations, listing the markets,

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 4>how to settle them in all these different things, which

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 4>that dynamic is very similar, right, Like you have to

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:52.119
<v Speaker 4>know which markets list, how to list them? What are

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:54.119
<v Speaker 4>the price feeds to kind of like pull up to

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 4>pull to basically settle whether it's sort of like this

0:18:57.080 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 4>team one versus the other. That's very different, like you know,

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:03.919
<v Speaker 4>we need I don't know, like someone who is like

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 4>an expert and like you know, like programmed to like

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:09.879
<v Speaker 4>you know, bring in traders and figure out how to optimize,

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:12.679
<v Speaker 4>like how to like optimize like losses and things like that.

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Like this is very very different.

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, talk to us how the prices are actually set then,

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 3>And why does you know a platform that ostensibly is

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:22.400
<v Speaker 3>a peer to peer trading platform need market makers at all?

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, if you listen to new market right now, like

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:28.399
<v Speaker 4>on let's give an example, like even fed rates, you

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 4>got to kick started somehow, right, Like the financial markets

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:33.359
<v Speaker 4>need market makers right, and they are peer to Like

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 4>financial markets are the ultimate version of peer to peer.

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 1>That's what they are.

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:38.360
<v Speaker 4>But it's basically a way to kickstart and move shabequity

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:42.160
<v Speaker 4>and actually are our most liquid markets. The more successful

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 4>market becomes, the more profitable market becomes, the lower the

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:48.639
<v Speaker 4>percentage of market makers, like whether it's like partners like

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 4>Susquehanna and in soitutional market makers and others, and the

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 4>higher it is that it's basically organic liquiity. So actually

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 4>the more successful it is and the more profitable for us,

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:01.200
<v Speaker 4>and like you know anybody, it's the lower the participation

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 4>of these market makers. So the use is actually like

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:06.399
<v Speaker 4>you got to have somebody that starts to bid asked,

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:09.200
<v Speaker 4>like otherwise you put a market and there's nothing, it's

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:11.400
<v Speaker 4>just that, And so you have to kind of break

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 4>the chicken in the egg in some ways. You start

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 4>with the chicken and you incentivize that chicken so that

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 4>the egg comes and then you basically get the flywheel rolling.

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 4>So I think it's kind of exactly it's the same

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 4>as financial markets. And like a lot of our liquidity

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 4>is in the non liquid markets market make it driven

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 4>and the liquid markets non market drive.

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:49.120
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about some non sports stuff and the future,

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 2>Like you could sort of futurize anything right when you

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:56.439
<v Speaker 2>envision it. Could you have could we one day have

0:20:57.200 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 2>a future for every single stock on the extra change,

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:05.040
<v Speaker 2>a perpetual future, a perpetual Tesla future, a perpetual Apple future,

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:08.199
<v Speaker 2>a perpetual like could it be a world that we

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:11.439
<v Speaker 2>live in one day and a perpetual tenure treasury future.

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 4>I mean Goshi's everything in Arabic, right, So so you

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:16.120
<v Speaker 4>know the long term vision is like yes, I mean

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:18.880
<v Speaker 4>I just think, like you, we should have a market.

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 2>Perpetual a future for private companies SpaceX future.

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and you know, like the idea, So I get

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 4>like one, I guess general and then specific answer generally

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 4>and then specifically. So the general is sort of principles,

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 4>Like I think anything that has a different opinion, the

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:37.119
<v Speaker 4>difference of opinion of qualitative opinion, should basically have a

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:39.160
<v Speaker 4>mechanism to resolve that quantitatively.

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Mm hmm.

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:42.160
<v Speaker 4>So like instead of debating subjectively or something like less,

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:44.439
<v Speaker 4>debate about it objectively and quantitatively, which.

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:46.439
<v Speaker 1>Is trading, you know, what's something and so.

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 4>And then there's some limits, like I think there are

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:51.679
<v Speaker 4>markets that do create bad incentives and I think actually

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:54.120
<v Speaker 4>see A does handle them, and like we we haven't

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 4>done these markets. But to your question, like, yes, I

0:21:57.080 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 4>think that's that's probably what the next frontier looks like.

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:02.440
<v Speaker 4>And I think that the concept of security futures has

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 4>been like a very kind of like I'd say, it's

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 4>been a very exciting concept for that I mean even

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:09.399
<v Speaker 4>pre Calci. It's not like we're But I think the

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 4>SCF T C SEC relationship historically has been a big

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:15.440
<v Speaker 4>part of the bottleneck because if you're on the SEC side,

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 4>you can't red don't relydo futures, and if you're on

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:19.400
<v Speaker 4>CFC side, your futures that you don't do securities.

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:20.920
<v Speaker 1>And then you have this question like should I get

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:21.880
<v Speaker 1>reggae by both?

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you already have one that's sort of I

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 4>mean you're like daily in your operations already very tough.

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Now you're adding a second one.

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 4>And it doesn't scale linearly, it's scale its scale sort

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 4>of quadratically, and so it's been really tough historically. But

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 4>maybe now in this environment, I think it might be possible,

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:40.119
<v Speaker 4>and maybe maybe we'll figure it out on Monday.

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see on Monday.

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Can I go back to the market makers for

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 3>a second, because this is an area where I think

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 3>people have a lot of questions, But what are the

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 3>actual obligations of market makers on your platform? And you

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 3>talked about how in the beginning, you know, maybe you

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:59.640
<v Speaker 3>have this really esoteric contract about throwing rubber objects onto

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:01.359
<v Speaker 3>basket ball courts or whatever it is.

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>We don't have that, but but you yeah, the other

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 1>that one, the CFC would block.

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:11.359
<v Speaker 3>You know, how do market makers decide what contracts to

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:15.399
<v Speaker 3>actually support initially? And are they obligated to come in

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:17.160
<v Speaker 3>and provide for everything?

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 1>No?

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 4>Because well not everything no, because like well if well

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 4>you have fair access sort of requirements and a CFC

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:27.439
<v Speaker 4>reggae exchange, so you have to have rules that like

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 4>basically are generally like accessible by anybody in a certain

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:33.719
<v Speaker 4>sort of like trans or two or whatever. But like

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 4>if a market maker wants to come and trade on CASHI,

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:37.479
<v Speaker 4>they could do that, and they have no obligations they

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 4>can make, they could take, they could do whatever they want. Generally,

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 4>what happens is like you know, if a market maker

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 4>wants like okay, but then how do you kind of

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 4>incentivize equity? Then you could sort of say, like okay,

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 4>maybe you rebate you some fees if you basically commit

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 4>to obligations, and the obligations the way they look like

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:53.919
<v Speaker 4>is like if you make on the fed market. So

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:57.440
<v Speaker 4>that's an actual specific example, like you put like seventy

0:23:57.480 --> 0:24:01.200
<v Speaker 4>five thousand contracts up on each side within like three

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:03.600
<v Speaker 4>to four cent spread, and you have like ninety eight percent.

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Availability, so you're pretty much there.

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:07.399
<v Speaker 4>Every time we kind of probe you could, for example,

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 4>get your fees that you pay, rebate it so you

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:10.959
<v Speaker 4>don't have to pay. So that's kind of like actually

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 4>our most common type. I mean, this is pretty much

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:16.120
<v Speaker 4>like marketing program I love them. Are public and people

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:18.159
<v Speaker 4>can sign up to which markets they want to participate it.

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:20.399
<v Speaker 4>So some people sign up to economics, some people do politics,

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 4>some people do sports, some people do a combo of both.

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 4>A lot of people do financials. And the reason you

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:27.680
<v Speaker 4>want that actually is because without any sort of structure,

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 4>then no one is going to commit to anything, right

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 4>Like then people will only do it when it's like

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 4>advantageous for them, and they won't do it when it's

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:36.719
<v Speaker 4>maybe like a novel market where we need to kind

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 4>of bootshop liquidity and so on. So you have to

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 4>figure out the sort of setup incentive, especially in the beginning,

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 4>and those over time go down as the market goes

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 4>more and more liquid as you need less.

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 1>And less of them.

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 3>And are the rebates and incentives and I guess the

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 3>information is that equal for all the market makers on

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 3>the platform, because you also have depends.

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 5>On the abligations. Okay, so you're like, so finish the sentence. Well,

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 5>I was going to ask about kt Yeah. Yeah, so

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 5>people ask a lot about Cashi trade. So fully it's

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 5>fully information, like we've operated for five years. It's fully

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 5>solid Informationally it's like run independently and so on and

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:11.119
<v Speaker 5>so forth. What I can say, like emphatically, Katie has

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 5>absolutely no advantages like in any way, shape or form

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 5>of other marketmakers with market participants. And we've always said that,

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 5>you know where we don't think of this as a

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:22.399
<v Speaker 5>flank because it's true and the safety audits us and

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 5>they see the numbers and the numbers you know, are factual.

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 5>They're now the best performing trader, let alone marketmaker on

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:31.639
<v Speaker 5>Calshi by orders of magnitude.

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 3>Like you know, I leave it that they're successful because

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:35.959
<v Speaker 3>they're not that successful.

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:40.160
<v Speaker 4>They're doing okay, I would say, And it's it's fine

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 4>they haven't. I mean they you know, try to kind

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:43.159
<v Speaker 4>of like booch op to quit in some of the

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:45.159
<v Speaker 4>markets are harder and so on and so forth, and

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 4>that's a good thing, like otherwise these markets would sort

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 4>of not be there. But say for sure is they

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 4>don't have any privileges or you know, benefits out aside

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 4>from anybody else, aside from SIG. Aside from we have

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 4>some small teams two three people that sign up to

0:25:57.160 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 4>marketmaker programs. Some of these teams are actually beating all

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:02.480
<v Speaker 4>the other market institutional including ours.

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Institional usually better than ours.

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 4>But like what we do is like there's like tiers,

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 4>So if you kind of like buy by certain conditions,

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:09.720
<v Speaker 4>you can.

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:10.679
<v Speaker 1>Get more rebates.

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 4>Then if you do lower conditions and less rebates, and

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:16.400
<v Speaker 4>those tiers accessible to anybody that basically would.

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Do the conditions uniformly.

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 4>One because regulatory wise we have to and then two

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 4>otherwise like people didn't trust the sort of marketplace.

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:24.920
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, there's.

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:27.160
<v Speaker 4>No, no, none, Like we got accused a lot about

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 4>a lot of different things, you know, but like that's normal.

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:31.439
<v Speaker 4>I mean there's like a lot of incentives and interests

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 4>that on the other side of this equation for specifically

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:36.399
<v Speaker 4>now sports. At the time it was elections, but I

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:38.639
<v Speaker 4>think that kind of like we let the truth mean

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 4>revert over time.

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:43.160
<v Speaker 2>So obviously you have these sort of legacy market makers

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 2>who are now participating on your platform. You mentioned Susquehana,

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. Have you seen like I'm very curious about

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:55.919
<v Speaker 2>whether we'll see legacy institutions become actual sort of like

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:59.200
<v Speaker 2>use your markets for actual head dream purposes. Now, I'm

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 2>sure there's some around the election, but some of these

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 2>other things, Like I'm curious, for example, do you know

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:08.399
<v Speaker 2>other hedge funds that might have a particular trade on

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 2>and they want to hedge against the possibility of a

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 2>negative NFP print because they think that a bad jobs

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 2>report is going to bust some trade like that is

0:27:18.600 --> 0:27:21.720
<v Speaker 2>the risk, or maybe a sort of hot CPI trade,

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. Do you see institutions using these markets yet

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 2>to actually take hedging or positional trades yet?

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:31.920
<v Speaker 4>So, yes, But it's kind of a size thing, right,

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:34.920
<v Speaker 4>Like the main bottleneck is basically equity, And it goes

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:36.159
<v Speaker 4>back to the same question. It's like you have to

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:39.119
<v Speaker 4>incentivize more and more equity over time so that like

0:27:39.320 --> 0:27:42.119
<v Speaker 4>you get the larger sizes like a typical I mean,

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 4>the way I think about it is like there's a

0:27:43.640 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 4>small prop shops and the smaller shops like those are

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:47.879
<v Speaker 4>doing some and like because you can take millions of

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:51.399
<v Speaker 4>the querity on CASHI, it's not that difficult. Now depends

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:53.119
<v Speaker 4>on the markets and so on. But then if you

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:55.680
<v Speaker 4>get to serve of the buyside ferns, like the larger yeah,

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:58.640
<v Speaker 4>you know, like you know, we're just getting the top

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 4>ten fifteen on the street, ten to fifteen hatches on

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 4>the street, and then after that corporation is like then

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:07.160
<v Speaker 4>you're talking like the minimum minimum size like for even

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 4>two care as eight figures, but probably fifty to one hundred.

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:12.920
<v Speaker 4>And so I don't think liquity is there quite yet,

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 4>Like elections start flirting with that sort of level, and

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:20.560
<v Speaker 4>we've seen some, but like we don't see that, Like

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:22.640
<v Speaker 4>it's just a matter of time for liquity to build

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 4>up for the kind of like a deep institutional use

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:28.560
<v Speaker 4>case to basically start kicking in. And I think I

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 4>see this sort overin the next two three years. Like

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:31.399
<v Speaker 4>I think that's going to be a very big part

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 4>of CASHU. It's always in part of the division because

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:36.879
<v Speaker 4>you you create a marketplace where you can price anything.

0:28:37.080 --> 0:28:38.200
<v Speaker 4>You know, what you're doing at that point is you're

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 4>pricing risk. You're pricing any risk sort of happening in

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 4>the wild, and then when you price the risk, it's

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 4>much easier to create the liquidity. The same way it's

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 4>easy to create liquity for the option market today that

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 4>it's much higher for some esoteric event as there's more

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 4>and more price benchmarks than you can provide more liquidity.

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 4>And then after that you can basically red cater to

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 4>the sort of institutional risk transfer use case, which I

0:28:57.640 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 4>think is kind of where the term really expands long.

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I assume in addition to talking to regulators,

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 3>a big chunk of your time is spent going out

0:29:05.360 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 3>and talking to institutional players, either on the market making

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 3>side or maybe buyside, who might one day potentially be

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 3>interested in actually using this as a hedge. What are

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 3>those conversations actually, Like, you know, you have this partnership

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 3>with Suskahanna, Now what are the concerns that they lay

0:29:23.680 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 3>out when it comes to this new business and what

0:29:25.520 --> 0:29:28.479
<v Speaker 3>are the sort of I don't I guess enticements that

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:28.960
<v Speaker 3>you offer.

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 1>So I would say, like, right now, it's a lot

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 1>more just like learning. It's not.

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 4>I say, like, hey, our book is much more like

0:29:34.840 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 4>let's we learn, we learn, and then we figure out

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 4>how to build right product and then people come. It

0:29:39.280 --> 0:29:41.200
<v Speaker 4>usually works that way, not sort of like oh like.

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 3>Did Sufkahana did they approach you then we have.

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:46.680
<v Speaker 1>It took a while.

0:29:46.720 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean, like we had a reationship like way kind

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 4>of when we're starting like thinking about the company and

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 4>this we have issued with a lot of the sort

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 4>of institutional payers and like marketmakers, and I mean I

0:29:55.200 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 4>worked at CYDA before, but like I don't know if

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 4>like we I mean, we just had relationship and we

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 4>started talking, and you know they see the vision, Like

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 4>so s Quhanda really believes, I mean, Jeffy has really

0:30:04.840 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 4>believes in the vision of sort of like this idea

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 4>of like have some skin in the game to forecast

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:11.479
<v Speaker 4>any question of the future instead of debating about it.

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 4>And he's always off prediction markets. So there's a little

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 4>bit of a natural fit there. But like going back

0:30:15.720 --> 0:30:17.960
<v Speaker 4>to the kind of institutional like what.

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 1>We learned is like.

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 4>It's there right a lot of them, whether they price

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 4>these specific events like NFP specifically or like a CEO

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 4>leaving a company specifically, or or they're worried about it,

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 4>like even if they don't price it specifically, but they're

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 4>sort of like this is something that I'm worried about

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 4>on my thesis, Like I have a thesis, but these

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 4>are some of the external factors that could.

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Like screw it up.

0:30:38.320 --> 0:30:40.320
<v Speaker 4>That's a real thing, and like they would use it

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 4>for hedging. And I think the requirements of like okay,

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 4>some of them that are like solved, like compliance regulatory

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:47.239
<v Speaker 4>like that, you know you have a clearinghouse regulated all

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 4>the kind of usual stuff. But then there's liquidity like

0:30:50.920 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 4>how much size can I take for it to be

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 4>worth it for me to kind of allocate a desk

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 4>and you know, put resources into it. And then the

0:30:56.760 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 4>second one is like margins, which like you know today

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 4>it's fully cash callarer on CALSHI, So if you want

0:31:01.560 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 4>to trade one hundred dollars you have to put it up.

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 1>That's very difficult for like let's say a citadel.

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, I was gonna ask, actually, do you anticipate on

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 2>the road map sort of byside traders when there is

0:31:14.160 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 2>perhaps if it happens sufficient liquidity, will they be trading

0:31:18.600 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 2>on CALCI or will it be something they trade through

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 2>their prime broker or their futures broken cabo? But do

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 2>you like are you in talks with the brokers?

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:29.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's the same exact sort of like reason means

0:31:29.480 --> 0:31:31.120
<v Speaker 4>like what do you need basically like and how does

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 4>it work. But yes, I mean the prime brokerges are

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:37.959
<v Speaker 4>very important because like you get you basically get like

0:31:38.240 --> 0:31:40.560
<v Speaker 4>they have the full portfolio, so you can get a

0:31:40.560 --> 0:31:42.720
<v Speaker 4>bunch of margining benefits if you kind of do it

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 4>all with one prime broker. And that's why you usually

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 4>prime brokers are the gateway into financial markets. Yeah, and

0:31:48.120 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 4>the same way as a broken strategy for retail, right

0:31:50.160 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 4>like with the robin and Mebo and some of the

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 4>other brokers. It's very similar actually, because you have your

0:31:54.680 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 4>portfolio with the prime broker and then like as you're

0:31:57.200 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 4>thinking about your portfolio is like, hey, I could add

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 4>on a hatch. It's much easier for me to do

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 4>it through my prime broker then do it on a

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 4>separate platform.

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:05.120
<v Speaker 2>But by the way, it's pretty crazy if you go

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:07.239
<v Speaker 2>to the app store and you just like look at

0:32:07.280 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 2>robin Hood. It's the first thing is like the football,

0:32:09.400 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 2>the image of the football right already because yeah, because

0:32:11.880 --> 0:32:14.800
<v Speaker 2>they're trading through you. Anyway, just an interesting.

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean, well on that point, I mean there's a

0:32:18.200 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 3>social utility question here, right, Like if I download robin Hood, okay, yes,

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 3>I could get into zero or one day options and

0:32:25.120 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 3>we can talk about the social utility there. But maybe

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to invest in an actual stock that generates

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 3>some income. But now I'm seeing ads for football and

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:39.680
<v Speaker 3>sports betting, and I don't know. I'm sure there are

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 3>some old fashioned people out there potentially like me, who

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 3>would say, who would say, like, what does this do?

0:32:46.240 --> 0:32:47.000
<v Speaker 3>What's the value?

0:32:47.040 --> 0:32:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that?

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:50.680
<v Speaker 4>Do you think that's sports? Like let's even forget about.

0:32:50.440 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 3>Like I mean, first of all, I don't like sports.

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:55.440
<v Speaker 4>But well, I mean but like you know, I mean

0:32:55.520 --> 0:32:57.320
<v Speaker 4>a lot of people love love sports, right and and

0:32:57.480 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 4>like you know, I don't know that like my job

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 4>to view with these things. I mean, I'm a free

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 4>markets person, like you know, building a company where the

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 4>name is you know, we want to have markets for everything.

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:11.880
<v Speaker 4>So so I'm much more in the camp of, like

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 4>you know, you figure out what people want to do

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 4>and figure out how to do it in a safe,

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 4>equitable and fair manner, like you know, make sure that

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 4>like it's done with fair rules of the role for

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:23.080
<v Speaker 4>everybody to participate. And they want to get smart and

0:33:23.080 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 4>do their own research, and if they don't, that's on them,

0:33:24.880 --> 0:33:26.960
<v Speaker 4>and they figure it out and and add some sort

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 4>of text and balances around it to make sure it's

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:32.479
<v Speaker 4>safe and there's customer protection. But I's tetly like I'm

0:33:32.480 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 4>a strong believer that, you know, sort of the job

0:33:35.800 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 4>of regulators should not be dictating what people should do

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 4>with their money or their lives. Like I'm a very

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 4>very strong, like staunch sort of opponent of that sort

0:33:44.680 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 4>of view of what a regulator should do.

0:33:46.800 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think that fits there.

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean in some ways, maybe that's like like if

0:33:50.600 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 4>you look at romod, like there's all these these choices now,

0:33:53.000 --> 0:33:56.240
<v Speaker 4>and like it's a bit weird to me that, Like

0:33:56.280 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 4>the decision here is sort of like don't let them

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 4>make the choice, Like if they want to invest in great,

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:02.960
<v Speaker 4>then if they want to do football, then also great.

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and the decision.

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 4>That feels weird to me, which is like hide that

0:34:06.800 --> 0:34:10.399
<v Speaker 4>option because the fifty year old or thirty year old man,

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:13.520
<v Speaker 4>so Robin needs me to figure out what to do

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 4>with their money, right like, and so that to me,

0:34:15.760 --> 0:34:17.319
<v Speaker 4>that's always felt weird to me. And I think that's

0:34:17.320 --> 0:34:20.279
<v Speaker 4>where financial regulation has sort of like gone too far

0:34:20.360 --> 0:34:22.280
<v Speaker 4>in the last I would even call it regulation.

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm very pro regulation.

0:34:23.800 --> 0:34:26.840
<v Speaker 4>We chose to be regulated up front, right, So, but

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 4>it's sort of like I would say, like I would say,

0:34:30.520 --> 0:34:32.360
<v Speaker 4>I mean, people are like what law fair but whatever,

0:34:32.680 --> 0:34:33.960
<v Speaker 4>like the financial regulars.

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I think I've taken it too far in that dimension.

0:34:36.040 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 2>So, as we've mentioned a couple of times, there's this

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:43.720
<v Speaker 2>big meeting in DC Nextrik, there's gonna be a round table. Incidentally,

0:34:43.960 --> 0:34:47.680
<v Speaker 2>so Tracy mentioned earlier in the day we interviewed Terry

0:34:47.719 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 2>Duffy for an episode that'll be out in a couple

0:34:50.560 --> 0:34:52.680
<v Speaker 2>of weeks. And I guess you haven't met. He said,

0:34:52.840 --> 0:34:55.440
<v Speaker 2>you've never met, but I guess you're gonna meet on Monday. Bro, Like,

0:34:55.520 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 2>what should we ask Trek? And he said, I think

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:03.640
<v Speaker 2>if I'm getting this right, he said that Kelsey characterized

0:35:03.640 --> 0:35:08.719
<v Speaker 2>itsself as CFTC approved, and he says, it's not that

0:35:08.800 --> 0:35:13.799
<v Speaker 2>it's instead not CFTC banned that actually because it's the

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:18.239
<v Speaker 2>self listing are you CFTC approved and or is it

0:35:18.360 --> 0:35:21.480
<v Speaker 2>just that the CFTC has not said no.

0:35:22.640 --> 0:35:24.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's actually incorrect. I mean, I don't know, you know,

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:27.239
<v Speaker 4>it's like I mean, I'll be Terry Vice meaning Terry

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 4>I mean Terry's.

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Legend, but like.

0:35:30.040 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 4>We got a license and then a second one. So exhanged,

0:35:33.000 --> 0:35:35.719
<v Speaker 4>and then the clearinghouse and then the broker license. So

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:37.560
<v Speaker 4>the exchange was like in twenty twenty in the in

0:35:37.560 --> 0:35:39.880
<v Speaker 4>the clearinghouse is twenty twenty four, and then the broker

0:35:39.920 --> 0:35:44.359
<v Speaker 4>one was in twenty twenty five. There's all approvals, I mean,

0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:45.440
<v Speaker 4>it's not like you know.

0:35:45.640 --> 0:35:48.200
<v Speaker 3>But for instance, the individual contracts that go up to

0:35:48.200 --> 0:35:51.280
<v Speaker 3>the CFTC, are those each getting approved.

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:54.400
<v Speaker 4>Well obviously not actually dissip right like, and we had

0:35:54.440 --> 0:35:57.319
<v Speaker 4>to see over it and it was we were clearly

0:35:57.400 --> 0:35:59.680
<v Speaker 4>right on the log given that we won the district

0:35:59.680 --> 0:36:02.680
<v Speaker 4>and then the in the appeals court. So maybe there's

0:36:02.719 --> 0:36:04.360
<v Speaker 4>a separate dimension here, which is also the regular is

0:36:04.360 --> 0:36:06.200
<v Speaker 4>not always right. But you know, there's a whole other

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:10.759
<v Speaker 4>thing there. But self certification is a regime which by

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:13.680
<v Speaker 4>the way, CME is also operated within and they've you know,

0:36:14.080 --> 0:36:17.359
<v Speaker 4>so from from that specific perpecive for each market. Yes,

0:36:17.400 --> 0:36:19.880
<v Speaker 4>it's not that every market goes through a perspectus like

0:36:19.920 --> 0:36:21.360
<v Speaker 4>and the SEC and then gets approved.

0:36:21.920 --> 0:36:24.000
<v Speaker 1>It's actually like a disapproval regime.

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:26.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, But the CFC has authority to stay things and

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:29.080
<v Speaker 4>it's a very broad authority. Right, So maybe it's a

0:36:29.120 --> 0:36:30.520
<v Speaker 4>good question to see f to see because you know,

0:36:30.560 --> 0:36:31.399
<v Speaker 4>I can't speak on their.

0:36:31.320 --> 0:36:33.400
<v Speaker 3>Behalf, but you can ask them on Monday.

0:36:33.600 --> 0:36:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know if they'll be on that table.

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:38.279
<v Speaker 1>But you know what is the uh, well, we talk

0:36:38.280 --> 0:36:39.000
<v Speaker 1>to safety all the.

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:43.759
<v Speaker 2>Time, so you know, obviously polymarket is a major competitor

0:36:43.920 --> 0:36:46.080
<v Speaker 2>to you. What do you see as like, what's your

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:50.120
<v Speaker 2>vision for what is traded on chain and what are

0:36:50.400 --> 0:36:52.120
<v Speaker 2>like could you imagine you know, we just talked to

0:36:52.280 --> 0:36:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Don He said in hit he could see in five

0:36:55.760 --> 0:36:59.880
<v Speaker 2>years almost everything being on chain, Like do you see that?

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Maybe? I mean, well it's interesting because Pallly, now

0:37:02.680 --> 0:37:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I was they're doing.

0:37:03.200 --> 0:37:04.960
<v Speaker 4>So there's kind of the on Chaine strategy and then

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:06.759
<v Speaker 4>the kind of what we did, the regulated you know,

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:11.040
<v Speaker 4>normal clearinghouse like reggae clearinghouse strategy, and like now they're

0:37:11.080 --> 0:37:13.480
<v Speaker 4>doing this sort of they're pivoting to ours basically. That's

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:16.200
<v Speaker 4>that's and so our view, jomally is like, well, it's

0:37:16.200 --> 0:37:19.320
<v Speaker 4>a pretty positive signed for our strategy, probably right, because

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:20.759
<v Speaker 4>you know, but but.

0:37:20.840 --> 0:37:22.640
<v Speaker 3>Even setting a certain top, well, my boy is like

0:37:22.760 --> 0:37:23.440
<v Speaker 3>they're regulated.

0:37:23.600 --> 0:37:27.279
<v Speaker 4>To me, it's a regulated like front. It's more so okay,

0:37:27.320 --> 0:37:29.160
<v Speaker 4>there are a lot of benefits. I really believe that,

0:37:29.200 --> 0:37:33.279
<v Speaker 4>and I think the being on shape, yeah, because like

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:35.239
<v Speaker 4>one of the ones that I'm less interested in is

0:37:35.360 --> 0:37:38.000
<v Speaker 4>sort of like skirting regulation like that. But but I

0:37:38.000 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 4>think that like there's a number of things which is

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:42.399
<v Speaker 4>like my mental model for it is is a bit

0:37:42.520 --> 0:37:44.840
<v Speaker 4>like you know, the banking rails were set up in

0:37:44.840 --> 0:37:46.959
<v Speaker 4>the kind of early twentieth century. It's like JP Morgan

0:37:46.960 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 4>a bunch of his friends are like, hey, how do

0:37:48.080 --> 0:37:50.359
<v Speaker 4>we dominate this whole thing? And you know, they set

0:37:50.440 --> 0:37:51.960
<v Speaker 4>up a bunch of rags and then they close the

0:37:51.960 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 4>door behind them, and that was sort of that, and

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:56.680
<v Speaker 4>there's a much more complexity to that. But to me,

0:37:57.640 --> 0:37:59.560
<v Speaker 4>this sort of whole on chain thing is is it

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:02.840
<v Speaker 4>imagine a bit like having given that problem to a

0:38:02.840 --> 0:38:08.959
<v Speaker 4>bunch of smart, like like hard working developers without any

0:38:09.000 --> 0:38:12.400
<v Speaker 4>limits and let them build. Right, Obviously, that's gonna be

0:38:12.800 --> 0:38:14.480
<v Speaker 4>there's a lot of good that's gonna come out of that,

0:38:14.520 --> 0:38:16.560
<v Speaker 4>and then there's gonna be some bad that comes out

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 4>of that, obviously, But like to me, it's like, well,

0:38:19.200 --> 0:38:21.160
<v Speaker 4>there's a lot of liquity on chain today, so that's

0:38:21.160 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 4>something that we should access in at some point.

0:38:23.560 --> 0:38:23.799
<v Speaker 1>Two.

0:38:23.840 --> 0:38:27.520
<v Speaker 4>I think the clearing side there's a lot of benefits

0:38:27.560 --> 0:38:29.600
<v Speaker 4>for you know how, like you have to do no ovation,

0:38:29.880 --> 0:38:33.000
<v Speaker 4>and you have to do immute immutability, and usually right

0:38:33.040 --> 0:38:35.560
<v Speaker 4>now we do it from a like operational legal perspective,

0:38:35.640 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 4>and obviously there's some tech, but aunchin really helps with that.

0:38:39.000 --> 0:38:40.920
<v Speaker 1>That's like basically what it's designed to do.

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:43.960
<v Speaker 4>And so over time, like I think, I hope as

0:38:44.000 --> 0:38:46.480
<v Speaker 4>sort of regulators get more permissive, like I see some

0:38:46.560 --> 0:38:49.799
<v Speaker 4>parts of clearing going on chain where you know it

0:38:49.920 --> 0:38:52.440
<v Speaker 4>enables some of these use is, and then also more transplancy,

0:38:52.560 --> 0:38:54.680
<v Speaker 4>like the trades and the transactions are all transplants for

0:38:54.719 --> 0:38:58.040
<v Speaker 4>everybody to see, and then people can build interesting like

0:38:58.200 --> 0:39:00.560
<v Speaker 4>UIs and interesting projects on top of that us having

0:39:00.600 --> 0:39:02.839
<v Speaker 4>to sort of this whole permissionless sort of concept.

0:39:03.040 --> 0:39:04.120
<v Speaker 1>And so I'm very bullish on it.

0:39:04.239 --> 0:39:05.920
<v Speaker 4>I do agree with Don actually that like over the

0:39:05.920 --> 0:39:08.520
<v Speaker 4>next four or five years, you see comedies like Robinhood

0:39:08.560 --> 0:39:10.080
<v Speaker 4>like companies, like a lot of companies are leaning in.

0:39:10.239 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 4>I think, well, Cawshi is also leaning in. So I'm

0:39:12.200 --> 0:39:13.040
<v Speaker 4>pretty scorry about it.

0:39:13.520 --> 0:39:17.160
<v Speaker 3>So obviously the trajectory of your business has changed enormously

0:39:17.280 --> 0:39:19.920
<v Speaker 3>just over the past year less than a year. Really,

0:39:20.400 --> 0:39:23.440
<v Speaker 3>if you were thinking about it now today as we

0:39:23.480 --> 0:39:27.560
<v Speaker 3>sit here, what's the biggest I guess blockage to further

0:39:27.680 --> 0:39:28.720
<v Speaker 3>growth for Kushi?

0:39:31.600 --> 0:39:33.319
<v Speaker 1>You know, right now it's the question I haven't been

0:39:33.320 --> 0:39:33.879
<v Speaker 1>real thinking about.

0:39:33.880 --> 0:39:35.839
<v Speaker 4>It's been growing so much right now, it's like all

0:39:35.840 --> 0:39:38.719
<v Speaker 4>about how do we like not break basically because like

0:39:38.880 --> 0:39:43.160
<v Speaker 4>I mean honestly, like we grew way more than we

0:39:43.200 --> 0:39:46.440
<v Speaker 4>could have possibly imagined, even in the most bullish scenarios,

0:39:46.480 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 4>even both post winning the election lawsuit every like, even

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:52.279
<v Speaker 4>like December twenty twenty four with like foregus for twenty

0:39:52.320 --> 0:39:54.760
<v Speaker 4>twenty five, like, there's nowhere near what it is today.

0:39:54.840 --> 0:39:57.480
<v Speaker 1>So and it's interesting because we're not.

0:39:58.560 --> 0:40:01.239
<v Speaker 4>It feels like we're sort of like halfway through, like

0:40:01.280 --> 0:40:04.640
<v Speaker 4>there's still just the current structure. I think we're not

0:40:04.680 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 4>even halfway through. Like we have more brokers. We have

0:40:06.680 --> 0:40:09.080
<v Speaker 4>very deep pipe on a broker, so that's great. And

0:40:09.160 --> 0:40:12.000
<v Speaker 4>more sports. I think it's the frontier is the sec thing.

0:40:12.560 --> 0:40:15.080
<v Speaker 4>So I think it's like more markets, like and I

0:40:15.080 --> 0:40:16.920
<v Speaker 4>think we have a lot of what we want. I

0:40:16.920 --> 0:40:18.759
<v Speaker 4>think over time is like how do we start doing

0:40:18.800 --> 0:40:20.240
<v Speaker 4>company with dated prediction markets?

0:40:20.280 --> 0:40:21.319
<v Speaker 1>And we're very excited about that.

0:40:21.520 --> 0:40:23.799
<v Speaker 2>I just have one last question, and it's kind of

0:40:23.800 --> 0:40:28.239
<v Speaker 2>a softball. But like after years of fighting all these

0:40:28.239 --> 0:40:32.160
<v Speaker 2>different battles, regulatory battles, should states, et cetera. Like how

0:40:32.200 --> 0:40:34.560
<v Speaker 2>good does it feel? It must feel really good to

0:40:34.760 --> 0:40:39.080
<v Speaker 2>actually kind of know that the business is real and

0:40:39.239 --> 0:40:42.000
<v Speaker 2>have these battles. Yeah, I mean, just like describe that feeling.

0:40:42.200 --> 0:40:43.920
<v Speaker 4>It's weird because I don't know if I feel that

0:40:43.920 --> 0:40:46.040
<v Speaker 4>it's about this year than last year. I mean, Juan

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:47.719
<v Speaker 4>and I whly started the company. We really build a

0:40:47.760 --> 0:40:49.720
<v Speaker 4>company around. I love this book. So have you ever

0:40:49.760 --> 0:40:51.560
<v Speaker 4>read the book? Like the score takes care of itself.

0:40:53.080 --> 0:40:56.280
<v Speaker 4>I don't think it's a great book, but life like everything, honestly,

0:40:56.320 --> 0:40:59.480
<v Speaker 4>Like I really it's just you know, like so John

0:40:59.520 --> 0:41:02.440
<v Speaker 4>Woden was of basketball coaches, like most legendary about I mean,

0:41:02.480 --> 0:41:04.800
<v Speaker 4>the whole thing was always about like never mentioned winning,

0:41:05.320 --> 0:41:07.160
<v Speaker 4>but training the teams like folks in the process and

0:41:07.200 --> 0:41:09.480
<v Speaker 4>like day in day out, like just fall in love

0:41:09.520 --> 0:41:11.680
<v Speaker 4>with the training and like if you do, you just

0:41:11.719 --> 0:41:12.320
<v Speaker 4>start winning.

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:14.440
<v Speaker 1>And like I I would say a few things.

0:41:14.480 --> 0:41:16.839
<v Speaker 4>I see, these things are sort of there's good times

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:19.040
<v Speaker 4>in bad times for all companies, and so yes, right

0:41:19.080 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 4>now we're having a pretty great time like as good

0:41:21.040 --> 0:41:24.879
<v Speaker 4>as it gets for a company, But I don't feel

0:41:24.960 --> 0:41:27.600
<v Speaker 4>that different. I think it's just like solutions bring new problems,

0:41:27.600 --> 0:41:29.320
<v Speaker 4>and like then you focus on the new problems.

0:41:29.360 --> 0:41:30.239
<v Speaker 2>It would be so much.

0:41:30.520 --> 0:41:32.319
<v Speaker 4>The one person I will say, the one part I

0:41:32.320 --> 0:41:34.640
<v Speaker 4>feel pretty good about is winning the election lawsuit, like

0:41:34.680 --> 0:41:39.160
<v Speaker 4>that one because we were so there was some pretty

0:41:39.200 --> 0:41:43.440
<v Speaker 4>big time vindication there. Like I think we were, you know,

0:41:43.440 --> 0:41:46.640
<v Speaker 4>because imagine like in twenty twenty, like three going off

0:41:46.640 --> 0:41:48.520
<v Speaker 4>to our board, you know, like Seicoya and munch of

0:41:48.520 --> 0:41:51.040
<v Speaker 4>others and like, hey, like, yeah, we're not really figuring

0:41:51.040 --> 0:41:52.560
<v Speaker 4>this out. It's been two years of like you know,

0:41:52.600 --> 0:41:54.840
<v Speaker 4>pouring money into this and like we're you know, and

0:41:54.880 --> 0:41:56.759
<v Speaker 4>nothing is working. We lost half of our team over

0:41:56.840 --> 0:41:59.759
<v Speaker 4>it and like company might die, and actually what we're

0:41:59.760 --> 0:42:01.160
<v Speaker 4>going to it was a good triple down and sew

0:42:01.160 --> 0:42:03.960
<v Speaker 4>our regulator now, so you know that was they looked

0:42:03.960 --> 0:42:06.120
<v Speaker 4>at us and they're like, well that that that doesn't

0:42:06.120 --> 0:42:08.399
<v Speaker 4>feel right, you know, like and we still went through

0:42:08.400 --> 0:42:10.040
<v Speaker 4>with it and like it ended up being absolutely the

0:42:10.080 --> 0:42:14.360
<v Speaker 4>right decision. So that I think maybe like October seventh,

0:42:14.920 --> 0:42:16.680
<v Speaker 4>the day we won the election lawsuit, was probably the

0:42:16.760 --> 0:42:17.839
<v Speaker 4>day I felt happiest.

0:42:18.200 --> 0:42:20.680
<v Speaker 3>What did you do when drop the lawsuit?

0:42:21.520 --> 0:42:23.480
<v Speaker 1>That was not that important. It was the one where

0:42:23.480 --> 0:42:24.080
<v Speaker 1>we the appeals.

0:42:26.160 --> 0:42:29.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that was important because well I first screamed a

0:42:29.400 --> 0:42:31.480
<v Speaker 4>lot and like we just like you know, all got

0:42:31.560 --> 0:42:34.000
<v Speaker 4>hit faced in the office and like you know, you know,

0:42:34.040 --> 0:42:34.760
<v Speaker 4>it was amazing.

0:42:34.800 --> 0:42:35.799
<v Speaker 1>But then you know, then.

0:42:35.719 --> 0:42:38.080
<v Speaker 4>We got back to work because were anxious about set,

0:42:38.160 --> 0:42:40.880
<v Speaker 4>like you know, launching the thing. Yeah, that was a

0:42:40.880 --> 0:42:43.880
<v Speaker 4>brutal three weeks because we had to ramp up really aggressively,

0:42:43.920 --> 0:42:45.799
<v Speaker 4>and I mean we really went from we really grew

0:42:45.800 --> 0:42:48.440
<v Speaker 4>one hundred x overnight, Like it was crazy. And so

0:42:49.880 --> 0:42:51.560
<v Speaker 4>that was the three weeks away. I worked the hardest

0:42:51.560 --> 0:42:53.600
<v Speaker 4>in my entire life. I was sleeping in the office,

0:42:53.640 --> 0:42:56.080
<v Speaker 4>Like you know, I was like I was given this chance,

0:42:56.120 --> 0:42:58.360
<v Speaker 4>like we have to basically like you know, utilize it

0:42:58.360 --> 0:43:00.000
<v Speaker 4>to the fullest. And it was and we didn't charge

0:43:00.040 --> 0:43:02.239
<v Speaker 4>He's on the election market. I know, if you knew that,

0:43:02.600 --> 0:43:05.120
<v Speaker 4>it was an intentional decision because like the KPI here

0:43:05.160 --> 0:43:07.480
<v Speaker 4>is we've got to show the word that these markets work. Yeah,

0:43:07.520 --> 0:43:09.360
<v Speaker 4>and it's done safely and nothing that is going to

0:43:09.400 --> 0:43:11.480
<v Speaker 4>happen and democracy is going to be totally fine. And

0:43:11.520 --> 0:43:13.560
<v Speaker 4>actually and you'll see we're announcing a few things with

0:43:13.640 --> 0:43:16.080
<v Speaker 4>some some big news organizations pretty soon. What we'll see

0:43:16.080 --> 0:43:19.200
<v Speaker 4>the shift that's happened in culture where like the level

0:43:19.200 --> 0:43:22.040
<v Speaker 4>of embracing that's happening with prediction markets now, it's that's

0:43:22.080 --> 0:43:22.719
<v Speaker 4>that's pretty.

0:43:22.520 --> 0:43:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Nice to see.

0:43:23.680 --> 0:43:26.040
<v Speaker 3>Plus south Park and south Park.

0:43:26.280 --> 0:43:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Trek Mansur, thank you than so much.

0:43:28.600 --> 0:43:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Thanks having thanks lot, Thanks so much. Guys.

0:43:32.560 --> 0:43:36.000
<v Speaker 2>That was our conversation with Turik Monsour, recorded live on

0:43:36.200 --> 0:43:37.320
<v Speaker 2>stage in Chicago.

0:43:37.640 --> 0:43:40.839
<v Speaker 3>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway and.

0:43:40.760 --> 0:43:43.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Star Wart.

0:43:43.880 --> 0:43:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Follow our producers Carmen Rodriguez at Carman armand dash O

0:43:47.040 --> 0:43:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Bennett at Dashboard in Keil Brooks at Keil Brooks. From

0:43:49.960 --> 0:43:52.360
<v Speaker 2>our Odd Laws content, go to Bloomberg dot com flash

0:43:52.360 --> 0:43:55.440
<v Speaker 2>odd Lots with the daily newsletter and all of our episodes.

0:43:55.640 --> 0:43:57.560
<v Speaker 2>You can chat about all of these topics twenty four

0:43:57.560 --> 0:44:01.000
<v Speaker 2>to seven in our discord Discord dot slash.

0:44:00.719 --> 0:44:03.400
<v Speaker 3>Offla and if you enjoy all blocks, if you like

0:44:03.440 --> 0:44:05.560
<v Speaker 3>it when we do these live shows, then please leave

0:44:05.640 --> 0:44:09.280
<v Speaker 3>us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform. And remember,

0:44:09.320 --> 0:44:11.839
<v Speaker 3>if you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen to

0:44:11.960 --> 0:44:15.120
<v Speaker 3>all of our episodes absolutely ad free. All you need

0:44:15.160 --> 0:44:18.120
<v Speaker 3>to do is find the Bloomberg channel on Apple Podcasts

0:44:18.120 --> 0:44:20.800
<v Speaker 3>and follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening.