WEBVTT - Cancel Culture is Solvable

0:00:15.076 --> 0:00:26.076
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin, this is solvable. I'm Jacob Weisberg. America is being

0:00:26.196 --> 0:00:30.436
<v Speaker 1>called out. There's a reckoning taking place, and at times

0:00:30.476 --> 0:00:34.236
<v Speaker 1>a quite confrontational push to face up to our country's

0:00:34.356 --> 0:00:39.876
<v Speaker 1>racist roots. One hundred and fifty demonstrators just gathered and

0:00:39.996 --> 0:00:44.796
<v Speaker 1>they have just torn down the statue of Christopher Columbus. Yesterday,

0:00:44.836 --> 0:00:47.276
<v Speaker 1>Cult announced that she would not make a planned appearance

0:00:47.316 --> 0:00:49.836
<v Speaker 1>at University of California, Berkeley. People are talking a lot

0:00:49.876 --> 0:00:52.676
<v Speaker 1>about what happened after a dinner date between the comedian

0:00:52.756 --> 0:00:54.756
<v Speaker 1>as He's I'm Sorry and a young woman going by

0:00:54.756 --> 0:00:58.596
<v Speaker 1>the name of Grace. In America's streets, across our university

0:00:58.636 --> 0:01:02.356
<v Speaker 1>campuses and every day on social media, people are battling

0:01:02.396 --> 0:01:05.916
<v Speaker 1>about what should be done to address racism, sexism, and

0:01:06.036 --> 0:01:11.476
<v Speaker 1>other forms of historically embedded prejudice and justice. Battling power

0:01:11.636 --> 0:01:18.156
<v Speaker 1>differentials that disadvantage people is the central goal of basically

0:01:18.156 --> 0:01:21.476
<v Speaker 1>being any kind of moral actor in society. As justified

0:01:21.476 --> 0:01:24.916
<v Speaker 1>as this outrage is, it comes in places with its

0:01:24.916 --> 0:01:30.196
<v Speaker 1>own intolerant edge, demands to conform rather than debate, to suppress,

0:01:30.276 --> 0:01:34.156
<v Speaker 1>and punish rather than engage. In other words, cancel culture

0:01:34.236 --> 0:01:36.196
<v Speaker 1>is a real thing. Many people say why do these

0:01:36.196 --> 0:01:38.156
<v Speaker 1>people have to be so mean? But you wouldn't ask

0:01:38.156 --> 0:01:40.436
<v Speaker 1>that if it was about pedophilia. Nobody thinks that we

0:01:40.436 --> 0:01:44.316
<v Speaker 1>should be very gentle in ejecting a pedophile from general society,

0:01:44.596 --> 0:01:47.876
<v Speaker 1>but as firing someone always the right fix to shutting

0:01:47.876 --> 0:01:51.796
<v Speaker 1>down debate equal progress. Has cancelation become a form of

0:01:51.876 --> 0:01:56.996
<v Speaker 1>left wing McCarthyism. We haven't had an honest grappling with

0:01:57.036 --> 0:02:00.316
<v Speaker 1>this yet, where a critical mass of people resist the

0:02:00.356 --> 0:02:04.796
<v Speaker 1>stalinist extremes. John mcwarter is a professor of linguistics in

0:02:04.876 --> 0:02:08.516
<v Speaker 1>American history at Columbia University. He spends a lot of

0:02:08.556 --> 0:02:11.196
<v Speaker 1>his time thinking about how we choose and use words,

0:02:11.716 --> 0:02:17.316
<v Speaker 1>and he believes cancel culture is solvable. My co host

0:02:17.316 --> 0:02:20.596
<v Speaker 1>Anna Applebaum talked with Nick Warder about how a linguist

0:02:20.596 --> 0:02:23.836
<v Speaker 1>looks at the battles around free speech and how those

0:02:23.916 --> 0:02:27.516
<v Speaker 1>unfairly caught in the crosshairs can respond to name calling

0:02:27.636 --> 0:02:32.156
<v Speaker 1>without engaging in shouting matches. Here's their conversation. It's some

0:02:32.316 --> 0:02:36.836
<v Speaker 1>level cancel culture is. These are arguments about language, what

0:02:36.996 --> 0:02:41.236
<v Speaker 1>you are and aren't allowed to say, how things are pronounced.

0:02:42.356 --> 0:02:44.876
<v Speaker 1>How did you first fall in love with the quirks

0:02:44.916 --> 0:02:48.876
<v Speaker 1>and hiccups of language. What drew you to this field.

0:02:50.116 --> 0:02:52.956
<v Speaker 1>I'm a linguist, not for the reasons that I think

0:02:52.996 --> 0:02:55.676
<v Speaker 1>many people might expect. It's not that I was especially

0:02:55.676 --> 0:02:58.236
<v Speaker 1>well traveled as a child. Both of my parents spoke

0:02:58.276 --> 0:03:01.956
<v Speaker 1>only English. But if I hear somebody speaking something other

0:03:02.036 --> 0:03:06.036
<v Speaker 1>than English, I have this visceral desire to want to

0:03:06.076 --> 0:03:08.676
<v Speaker 1>do it too, Like I'd like to understand what they're saying,

0:03:08.676 --> 0:03:10.276
<v Speaker 1>but also I want to be able to do that.

0:03:10.396 --> 0:03:13.276
<v Speaker 1>The first time I heard anybody speaking something other than English,

0:03:13.276 --> 0:03:16.356
<v Speaker 1>who was Hebrew? Actually, I found myself thinking, I am

0:03:16.396 --> 0:03:18.396
<v Speaker 1>so jealous of that girl that she can talk in

0:03:18.436 --> 0:03:21.316
<v Speaker 1>that way that I can't understand. For me. Originally, it

0:03:21.476 --> 0:03:24.076
<v Speaker 1>was just that they're these seven thousand different codes, and

0:03:24.116 --> 0:03:26.796
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to know only one, so I also

0:03:26.876 --> 0:03:31.516
<v Speaker 1>speak several languages. Tell me what you think about English.

0:03:31.556 --> 0:03:33.836
<v Speaker 1>What does it do well and what does it do poorly?

0:03:34.156 --> 0:03:36.396
<v Speaker 1>Do we debate a certain way in English? I think

0:03:36.396 --> 0:03:38.316
<v Speaker 1>we do, actually, but I'd love to know what you think.

0:03:38.716 --> 0:03:42.236
<v Speaker 1>We're an oddly unfussy language about all sorts of things

0:03:42.236 --> 0:03:45.916
<v Speaker 1>that other languages make you mark and pay attention to.

0:03:46.236 --> 0:03:49.636
<v Speaker 1>Because we're a language of the long written history. We

0:03:49.756 --> 0:03:54.116
<v Speaker 1>have a kind of artificially preserved, enormous vocabulary, and that's

0:03:54.156 --> 0:03:56.156
<v Speaker 1>true of any language with a long written history, but

0:03:56.196 --> 0:03:58.476
<v Speaker 1>English is one of them, and it means that you

0:03:58.596 --> 0:04:03.436
<v Speaker 1>have unnecessarily large collections of synonyms that allow you to

0:04:03.476 --> 0:04:09.436
<v Speaker 1>express yourself in various ways. I find English to be funny.

0:04:09.476 --> 0:04:11.396
<v Speaker 1>People who are into the speeches of Winston Churchill, et

0:04:11.396 --> 0:04:14.076
<v Speaker 1>cetera think I'm crazy, But I find English crude. You know,

0:04:14.196 --> 0:04:18.076
<v Speaker 1>it's it's fascinatingly streamlined. But it's other languages where I

0:04:18.076 --> 0:04:22.036
<v Speaker 1>find myself just drowning in the subtleties and the things

0:04:22.036 --> 0:04:23.516
<v Speaker 1>that they have to say that we have to leave

0:04:23.556 --> 0:04:26.276
<v Speaker 1>the context. Yeah, I actually wonder if that isn't run

0:04:26.276 --> 0:04:28.956
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons why English is the universal language, because

0:04:28.956 --> 0:04:32.556
<v Speaker 1>in fact, it's pretty easy to speak bad English. It

0:04:32.156 --> 0:04:35.396
<v Speaker 1>doesn't acquire a lot of grammatical knowledge. It's it has

0:04:35.436 --> 0:04:38.396
<v Speaker 1>that symposim You can speak it badly quite easily, which

0:04:38.436 --> 0:04:41.996
<v Speaker 1>is not true of actually most language. Yes, exactly. You know,

0:04:42.076 --> 0:04:44.676
<v Speaker 1>as a linguistic professor, do you know how do you

0:04:44.756 --> 0:04:47.676
<v Speaker 1>navigate sensitive language debates? Is there a different way to

0:04:47.716 --> 0:04:50.116
<v Speaker 1>do it? There are certain things that you're taught, you

0:04:50.156 --> 0:04:53.996
<v Speaker 1>are not supposed to say in our society. I'm just

0:04:54.156 --> 0:04:57.196
<v Speaker 1>somebody who one. I like to keep things tidy, I

0:04:57.316 --> 0:04:58.916
<v Speaker 1>like to make a case. I think, really I should

0:04:58.956 --> 0:05:00.796
<v Speaker 1>have been a lawyer. I don't know if I would

0:05:00.796 --> 0:05:02.356
<v Speaker 1>have been a good one, but that's the kind of

0:05:02.396 --> 0:05:05.556
<v Speaker 1>mine that I think I have. And also I want

0:05:05.596 --> 0:05:08.356
<v Speaker 1>to find stuff out. And I watch other people being

0:05:08.396 --> 0:05:10.716
<v Speaker 1>told that they're not a allowed to and it certainly

0:05:10.716 --> 0:05:12.876
<v Speaker 1>happened to me two or three times in my own

0:05:12.916 --> 0:05:15.436
<v Speaker 1>academic career, and I don't think it's right. And I

0:05:15.436 --> 0:05:17.436
<v Speaker 1>have a hard time keeping quiet when I don't think

0:05:17.476 --> 0:05:20.276
<v Speaker 1>something is right. One person said about me once that

0:05:20.356 --> 0:05:23.316
<v Speaker 1>when John gets mad, he writes a book, and that's

0:05:23.876 --> 0:05:26.356
<v Speaker 1>more or less true. I just can't help it. I

0:05:26.396 --> 0:05:29.116
<v Speaker 1>want things to be better than they are, and I'm cranky.

0:05:30.036 --> 0:05:32.836
<v Speaker 1>What do you think of the term cancel culture? What

0:05:32.916 --> 0:05:35.716
<v Speaker 1>do you think it now means? Well, we're already getting

0:05:35.876 --> 0:05:37.996
<v Speaker 1>beyond it in a way, or at least I hope

0:05:38.036 --> 0:05:41.076
<v Speaker 1>we can. Because originally the idea was that if and

0:05:41.116 --> 0:05:43.676
<v Speaker 1>originally by that I mean say two years ago, the

0:05:43.716 --> 0:05:47.076
<v Speaker 1>idea was that if we find out something unsavory and

0:05:47.156 --> 0:05:51.236
<v Speaker 1>often genuinely unsavory about some celebrity that we're supposed to

0:05:51.276 --> 0:05:53.836
<v Speaker 1>flush them from our consciousness as much as possible, And

0:05:53.876 --> 0:05:57.556
<v Speaker 1>so that has become more extreme lately, is accepted by

0:05:57.676 --> 0:06:01.196
<v Speaker 1>a larger number of people. And I think it's I

0:06:01.236 --> 0:06:05.476
<v Speaker 1>could say dangerous, but it's also just really unfair, it's immoral,

0:06:05.796 --> 0:06:08.996
<v Speaker 1>and yet I think most of us are inclined to

0:06:09.196 --> 0:06:12.396
<v Speaker 1>pretend to go along with it because we're really frightened

0:06:12.396 --> 0:06:14.996
<v Speaker 1>of a certain weapon that that crowd have, which is

0:06:14.996 --> 0:06:16.916
<v Speaker 1>that they can call you a racist or a sexist.

0:06:17.196 --> 0:06:20.476
<v Speaker 1>That's something that we need to renegotiate. And where is

0:06:20.516 --> 0:06:23.716
<v Speaker 1>the desire to cancel people coming from? And you said

0:06:23.756 --> 0:06:27.276
<v Speaker 1>that crowd or those people, who are they and what's

0:06:27.316 --> 0:06:29.916
<v Speaker 1>their motive? Do you think this is what it is?

0:06:30.516 --> 0:06:35.076
<v Speaker 1>Critical race theory? What it is is people who have

0:06:36.036 --> 0:06:41.916
<v Speaker 1>drunk in an idea that battling power differentials that disadvantage

0:06:41.956 --> 0:06:46.676
<v Speaker 1>people is the central goal of basically being any kind

0:06:46.716 --> 0:06:49.396
<v Speaker 1>of moral actor in society, and that it must center

0:06:49.756 --> 0:06:52.916
<v Speaker 1>what we consider intellectual inquiry to be. It must center

0:06:53.276 --> 0:06:56.516
<v Speaker 1>what we consider art to be, It must center what

0:06:56.556 --> 0:07:00.876
<v Speaker 1>we consider humor to be. That that one thing must

0:07:00.916 --> 0:07:03.676
<v Speaker 1>be what it's all about. That even civility goes out

0:07:03.676 --> 0:07:05.996
<v Speaker 1>the window, which is not crazy. Many people say, why

0:07:05.996 --> 0:07:07.636
<v Speaker 1>do these people have to be so mean? But you

0:07:07.636 --> 0:07:10.316
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't ask that if it was about petilia. Nobody thinks

0:07:10.316 --> 0:07:13.156
<v Speaker 1>that we should be very gentle in ejecting a pedophile

0:07:13.236 --> 0:07:16.556
<v Speaker 1>from general society. When I was at in college in

0:07:16.636 --> 0:07:20.356
<v Speaker 1>the eighties, we had sort of there was a PC moment.

0:07:20.436 --> 0:07:22.476
<v Speaker 1>Do you remember this? I was there for that, and

0:07:22.596 --> 0:07:25.356
<v Speaker 1>then it went away, I'm told by people who are

0:07:25.436 --> 0:07:28.036
<v Speaker 1>ten years younger than me, and then it came back

0:07:28.116 --> 0:07:31.676
<v Speaker 1>again in this new woke form. And the question is

0:07:31.716 --> 0:07:34.076
<v Speaker 1>what's the mechanism of that. I almost think the mechanism

0:07:34.236 --> 0:07:37.756
<v Speaker 1>is that the people younger than us pushed back against

0:07:37.796 --> 0:07:40.276
<v Speaker 1>PC because they thought it was stupid, and then the

0:07:40.356 --> 0:07:42.796
<v Speaker 1>people younger than them. You know, I wonder if there's

0:07:42.796 --> 0:07:45.876
<v Speaker 1>almost like a cyclical generational Yeah. I don't know if

0:07:45.916 --> 0:07:48.916
<v Speaker 1>there's some you know, if it's some youth culture thing,

0:07:49.436 --> 0:07:52.156
<v Speaker 1>and that the pendulum will swing and that everybody will say, wait,

0:07:52.236 --> 0:07:53.796
<v Speaker 1>this is nuts, and then it will go back again.

0:07:53.876 --> 0:07:57.996
<v Speaker 1>But nineteen ninety undergraduates were pushing back against the excesses

0:07:57.996 --> 0:08:01.196
<v Speaker 1>of PC. Then everything was quiet. Woke is exactly what

0:08:01.396 --> 0:08:04.116
<v Speaker 1>PC was back in the eighties. It's the same. It's

0:08:04.156 --> 0:08:06.276
<v Speaker 1>the same alignment. And you know, to tell you the truth,

0:08:06.316 --> 0:08:09.556
<v Speaker 1>I'm often asked, how do you work on a college campus?

0:08:09.916 --> 0:08:12.116
<v Speaker 1>And I generally say that, frankly, I get the feeling

0:08:12.236 --> 0:08:15.956
<v Speaker 1>most undergraduates in Morningside Heights see what's wrong here. It's

0:08:15.996 --> 0:08:18.516
<v Speaker 1>just that there's a certain vocal minority that they always

0:08:18.556 --> 0:08:21.916
<v Speaker 1>tell me they're scared blankless of. And so yeah, I

0:08:21.996 --> 0:08:25.356
<v Speaker 1>think that there's already that pushback, just as an asside.

0:08:25.836 --> 0:08:28.596
<v Speaker 1>I taught a class at Johns Hopkins last fall and

0:08:28.796 --> 0:08:31.756
<v Speaker 1>I assigned them a book by Milan Kundera, who the

0:08:31.956 --> 0:08:37.196
<v Speaker 1>check writer, yeah who. On rereading, I found was unbelievably sexist.

0:08:37.276 --> 0:08:38.876
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's just how he writes. You know. It's

0:08:38.916 --> 0:08:42.076
<v Speaker 1>all about men sleeping with lots of women. It's on right.

0:08:42.156 --> 0:08:44.796
<v Speaker 1>And I, having assigned this book and having reread it

0:08:44.876 --> 0:08:47.036
<v Speaker 1>in advance of the class, I suddenly worried, oh my god,

0:08:47.076 --> 0:08:49.636
<v Speaker 1>I've just given this book to, you know, a bunch

0:08:49.676 --> 0:08:52.596
<v Speaker 1>of twenty year olds. You know what if they're all

0:08:52.636 --> 0:08:54.716
<v Speaker 1>really angry? And I said the first thing I said

0:08:54.756 --> 0:08:56.676
<v Speaker 1>in the classroom the next day, it was, was anybody

0:08:56.756 --> 0:08:58.356
<v Speaker 1>bothered by this book? And they looked at me like

0:08:58.396 --> 0:09:01.396
<v Speaker 1>I was nuts. They were like, no, you know, just

0:09:01.556 --> 0:09:05.596
<v Speaker 1>a you know check novelist. Right, I've done that. You know,

0:09:05.756 --> 0:09:08.996
<v Speaker 1>I will play something on YouTube or assign some paths

0:09:09.316 --> 0:09:12.396
<v Speaker 1>for some reason. And before anybody was calling it trigger warning,

0:09:12.436 --> 0:09:14.436
<v Speaker 1>I would just say to the class, this was written

0:09:14.436 --> 0:09:16.916
<v Speaker 1>a long time ago. There certain kind of language, there,

0:09:16.916 --> 0:09:20.076
<v Speaker 1>certain assumptions, Um, I know you understand that I'm not

0:09:20.156 --> 0:09:22.436
<v Speaker 1>assigning because of that. It's because it shows something else.

0:09:22.876 --> 0:09:24.836
<v Speaker 1>And most of the class nods, and if I know

0:09:25.596 --> 0:09:28.316
<v Speaker 1>of two or three of them being in their actual

0:09:28.476 --> 0:09:31.756
<v Speaker 1>lives the sort of Wokester types, they don't bring it

0:09:31.836 --> 0:09:35.196
<v Speaker 1>to class. So even in that setting, they don't say anything,

0:09:35.276 --> 0:09:37.356
<v Speaker 1>partly because I guess I'm a figure of authority, but

0:09:37.756 --> 0:09:40.556
<v Speaker 1>partly because they know they're outnumbered. And so it seems

0:09:40.596 --> 0:09:45.876
<v Speaker 1>that we're dealing with a minority group with disproportionate influence.

0:09:46.476 --> 0:09:49.836
<v Speaker 1>And isn't part of their disproportionate influence also just to

0:09:49.916 --> 0:09:53.476
<v Speaker 1>do with social media, I mean, because they can broadcast

0:09:53.756 --> 0:09:55.556
<v Speaker 1>you know what, you know, they can they can reach

0:09:55.716 --> 0:10:01.396
<v Speaker 1>huge audiences with Twitter and video clips and um, you

0:10:01.436 --> 0:10:03.516
<v Speaker 1>know and so on, and that that gives them a

0:10:03.636 --> 0:10:06.396
<v Speaker 1>kind of power that they would never have had before. Yeah,

0:10:06.556 --> 0:10:09.476
<v Speaker 1>I think twenty twelve is when that crests, and that's

0:10:09.476 --> 0:10:11.396
<v Speaker 1>why we're where we are today. If there were no

0:10:11.476 --> 0:10:13.996
<v Speaker 1>such thing as this thing called Twitter, as handy as

0:10:14.036 --> 0:10:16.956
<v Speaker 1>it can be, this wouldn't have happened. We're too connected.

0:10:17.156 --> 0:10:20.476
<v Speaker 1>But we can't reverse that. So what do we do

0:10:20.556 --> 0:10:23.356
<v Speaker 1>about it? We have, as you say, people who are

0:10:23.476 --> 0:10:25.996
<v Speaker 1>now afraid of being called out, people who are maybe

0:10:26.076 --> 0:10:31.396
<v Speaker 1>just defiably afraid of being attacked on social media. Senior people, professors,

0:10:31.876 --> 0:10:35.596
<v Speaker 1>editors of newspapers have all become wary about how they

0:10:35.676 --> 0:10:39.796
<v Speaker 1>speak because they're afraid of name calling. What's the solution.

0:10:40.556 --> 0:10:43.836
<v Speaker 1>It has to start slowly. It can't be everybody who

0:10:43.876 --> 0:10:47.516
<v Speaker 1>stands up to this woke mob as it's often called,

0:10:47.956 --> 0:10:49.676
<v Speaker 1>because for some people it really is a matter of

0:10:49.796 --> 0:10:53.036
<v Speaker 1>job security. It would interfere with their livelihoods. But they're

0:10:53.036 --> 0:10:57.636
<v Speaker 1>cases that are hazier. If you're sitting on a school board,

0:10:58.196 --> 0:11:02.196
<v Speaker 1>if you are a writer and you look and see

0:11:02.196 --> 0:11:05.756
<v Speaker 1>what people are saying about you on Twitter, if you

0:11:06.196 --> 0:11:10.556
<v Speaker 1>are just a person in your neighborhood having a conversation

0:11:10.676 --> 0:11:13.636
<v Speaker 1>with other people like you on a play date or

0:11:13.716 --> 0:11:15.756
<v Speaker 1>the like, it's gone to the point where we need

0:11:15.836 --> 0:11:18.916
<v Speaker 1>to consider that the sky won't always fall in if

0:11:18.996 --> 0:11:22.316
<v Speaker 1>somebody calls you a certain name. We have to think

0:11:22.356 --> 0:11:23.956
<v Speaker 1>of the kind of person who's ready to call you

0:11:24.036 --> 0:11:26.956
<v Speaker 1>a really dirty name on the basis of something that

0:11:27.076 --> 0:11:30.876
<v Speaker 1>doesn't merit that approach as a shark. And I hear

0:11:31.436 --> 0:11:34.876
<v Speaker 1>that with sharks, one way that you can make them

0:11:34.996 --> 0:11:37.596
<v Speaker 1>leave you alone is to bop them on the nose. Now,

0:11:37.676 --> 0:11:39.916
<v Speaker 1>I am not remotely saying that anybody should be punched

0:11:39.956 --> 0:11:42.516
<v Speaker 1>in the nose or bopped or physically abused in any way,

0:11:42.836 --> 0:11:45.916
<v Speaker 1>but metaphorically, these people need to be seen as the

0:11:45.996 --> 0:11:47.716
<v Speaker 1>kinds where they'll say, well, now I guess you're just

0:11:47.836 --> 0:11:51.756
<v Speaker 1>a racist, Well that's really problematic, you're a sexist when

0:11:51.796 --> 0:11:54.036
<v Speaker 1>the charge is clearly not deserved and you can tell

0:11:54.076 --> 0:11:57.276
<v Speaker 1>everybody around you agrees. And people need to be able

0:11:57.316 --> 0:12:01.156
<v Speaker 1>to start saying I disagree with you on these issues,

0:12:01.196 --> 0:12:03.196
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think it makes me a racist, and

0:12:03.316 --> 0:12:05.756
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to back down, and the person will

0:12:05.876 --> 0:12:08.716
<v Speaker 1>yell louder. I frankly have been dealing with this kind

0:12:08.716 --> 0:12:10.556
<v Speaker 1>of person for the past twenty five years, so I

0:12:10.676 --> 0:12:13.636
<v Speaker 1>know this from experience. The person will yell louder and

0:12:13.756 --> 0:12:16.276
<v Speaker 1>then you just say sorry. And what it would do

0:12:16.396 --> 0:12:19.036
<v Speaker 1>is not eliminate a kind of point of view. I

0:12:19.276 --> 0:12:21.436
<v Speaker 1>don't think we should try to eliminate the woosters anymore

0:12:21.476 --> 0:12:23.636
<v Speaker 1>than they should be trying to eliminate us. But the

0:12:23.756 --> 0:12:27.076
<v Speaker 1>ideas for them to sit back down with the rest

0:12:27.116 --> 0:12:28.596
<v Speaker 1>of us, and the only way to do that is

0:12:28.636 --> 0:12:32.436
<v Speaker 1>to metaphorically, metaphorically bought them on the nose like a shark.

0:12:33.636 --> 0:12:36.356
<v Speaker 1>So how do we set the limits of you know,

0:12:36.636 --> 0:12:40.636
<v Speaker 1>what is acceptable and unacceptable? We talk a lot about

0:12:40.676 --> 0:12:43.036
<v Speaker 1>free speech and the free press, but in fact, there

0:12:43.116 --> 0:12:45.836
<v Speaker 1>have always been certain kinds of topics and subjects and

0:12:45.956 --> 0:12:47.756
<v Speaker 1>certain kinds of speech that have been out of bounds,

0:12:47.796 --> 0:12:52.596
<v Speaker 1>whether it's shouting fire in a crowded theater or you know,

0:12:52.836 --> 0:12:56.036
<v Speaker 1>or screaming hateful things at a mob. You know. So

0:12:56.156 --> 0:12:59.556
<v Speaker 1>there have always been outer limits. Yeah, but who decides

0:12:59.596 --> 0:13:02.076
<v Speaker 1>what those outer limits are? And how can we come

0:13:02.156 --> 0:13:06.956
<v Speaker 1>to a broader agreement, if only within universities, about about

0:13:06.996 --> 0:13:09.516
<v Speaker 1>where those lie? You know? And I can't answer that

0:13:09.716 --> 0:13:14.436
<v Speaker 1>because we haven't had an honest grappling with this yet.

0:13:14.556 --> 0:13:18.836
<v Speaker 1>Where a critical mass of people resist the stalinist extremes.

0:13:19.356 --> 0:13:22.836
<v Speaker 1>I would like to see what sort of middle ground

0:13:23.316 --> 0:13:25.916
<v Speaker 1>we find. And I don't know if I can put

0:13:25.956 --> 0:13:28.436
<v Speaker 1>a label to it, but I think the idea. Unfortunately

0:13:28.516 --> 0:13:31.036
<v Speaker 1>people love to call me conservative. I guess this is conservative.

0:13:31.196 --> 0:13:33.116
<v Speaker 1>We need to go back to where things like this

0:13:33.316 --> 0:13:37.276
<v Speaker 1>were in roughly two thousand seven or eight, which is that, yes,

0:13:37.636 --> 0:13:40.836
<v Speaker 1>we're going to think of racism as societal as well

0:13:41.076 --> 0:13:45.956
<v Speaker 1>as attitudinal, and yes we want to make change. Nevertheless,

0:13:46.036 --> 0:13:49.796
<v Speaker 1>the idea can't be something rather obsessive and based more

0:13:49.916 --> 0:13:55.316
<v Speaker 1>on reforming personal psychology and on society itself, etc. Where

0:13:55.436 --> 0:13:58.556
<v Speaker 1>you draw the line, people will vary as society has

0:13:58.596 --> 0:14:02.276
<v Speaker 1>to settle gradually upon that. In the Burkeyan sense, I

0:14:02.316 --> 0:14:04.756
<v Speaker 1>would say in this case that a pendulum has gone

0:14:04.796 --> 0:14:06.836
<v Speaker 1>too far? Would we want to go back to nineteen

0:14:06.916 --> 0:14:11.316
<v Speaker 1>thirty five? Goodness gracious no, But what's happening now where

0:14:11.396 --> 0:14:13.796
<v Speaker 1>we're about to be in say twenty twenty five. If

0:14:13.836 --> 0:14:16.476
<v Speaker 1>we don't put a check on this is a pendulum

0:14:16.756 --> 0:14:19.276
<v Speaker 1>in the other direction, it's a new kind of repression.

0:14:19.556 --> 0:14:24.156
<v Speaker 1>So John, what is step one? You know how we

0:14:24.276 --> 0:14:27.636
<v Speaker 1>can stop, as you say, this pendulum from swinging too far.

0:14:28.596 --> 0:14:31.316
<v Speaker 1>Do you have to be confronted or can you be

0:14:31.476 --> 0:14:34.836
<v Speaker 1>proactive well with the way things are today, you don't

0:14:34.876 --> 0:14:37.236
<v Speaker 1>have to wait. This has become a major part of

0:14:37.276 --> 0:14:39.756
<v Speaker 1>the warp and woof of a great deal of American society,

0:14:39.876 --> 0:14:43.716
<v Speaker 1>especially since last spring. I would just say, and I'm

0:14:43.756 --> 0:14:49.956
<v Speaker 1>basing this on the depressing and massive amount of feedback

0:14:50.036 --> 0:14:52.956
<v Speaker 1>that people like me and my aspiring colleague Glenn Lowrie

0:14:53.036 --> 0:14:56.796
<v Speaker 1>get from aggrieved people of all colors all over this country,

0:14:56.836 --> 0:14:59.356
<v Speaker 1>not to mention in Canada and often for some reason,

0:14:59.476 --> 0:15:04.476
<v Speaker 1>in Germany and Scandinavia. This is now a problem that

0:15:04.596 --> 0:15:07.596
<v Speaker 1>spreads even beyond these shores. And if you are the

0:15:07.676 --> 0:15:10.276
<v Speaker 1>kind of person where this is rearing its ugly head

0:15:10.276 --> 0:15:14.116
<v Speaker 1>in your workplace or on the co op of your apartment,

0:15:14.716 --> 0:15:17.836
<v Speaker 1>or in some organization that you serve in, or frankly,

0:15:17.916 --> 0:15:20.636
<v Speaker 1>even your relatives, try it out. Some of you will

0:15:20.636 --> 0:15:22.836
<v Speaker 1>be more up for it than others. I understand. Not

0:15:22.996 --> 0:15:26.596
<v Speaker 1>everybody is into conflict, not everybody is into being yelled back,

0:15:26.756 --> 0:15:30.316
<v Speaker 1>So sorry to interrupt. Try it out. I means saying no,

0:15:30.516 --> 0:15:32.796
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a racist and I disagree with you. Is

0:15:32.836 --> 0:15:35.276
<v Speaker 1>it just that simple? Yeah, just say no, I'm not

0:15:35.356 --> 0:15:37.476
<v Speaker 1>a racist and I disagree with you and treat it

0:15:37.916 --> 0:15:40.316
<v Speaker 1>the way many people treat trying to talk about religion,

0:15:40.516 --> 0:15:43.196
<v Speaker 1>that the conversation has to end there, just like you

0:15:43.316 --> 0:15:45.956
<v Speaker 1>cannot teach a person not to have faith in Jesus.

0:15:46.236 --> 0:15:48.276
<v Speaker 1>That's going to be one out of fifty thousand people

0:15:48.316 --> 0:15:49.716
<v Speaker 1>that you're going to convince of that if that's what

0:15:49.836 --> 0:15:53.076
<v Speaker 1>you were trying to convince somebody of. You can't usually

0:15:53.196 --> 0:15:55.196
<v Speaker 1>teach somebody out of this frame of mind. But you

0:15:55.276 --> 0:15:57.396
<v Speaker 1>have to reach a point where you say, not only

0:15:57.476 --> 0:15:59.356
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to talk about it, because then what

0:15:59.516 --> 0:16:03.076
<v Speaker 1>that person learns is that you are not awake and

0:16:03.436 --> 0:16:05.756
<v Speaker 1>you haven't done the work, and that they have further

0:16:05.836 --> 0:16:08.156
<v Speaker 1>work to do to change. You tell them, no, I'm

0:16:08.236 --> 0:16:10.636
<v Speaker 1>not a racist. I know we're not going to agree, however,

0:16:11.036 --> 0:16:13.596
<v Speaker 1>and so I'm afraid this is over. And they'll say,

0:16:13.916 --> 0:16:17.156
<v Speaker 1>but you about patriarch, Yeah, complicit, and just say no,

0:16:18.036 --> 0:16:20.316
<v Speaker 1>I don't agree that I'm a racist and I'm not

0:16:20.436 --> 0:16:24.156
<v Speaker 1>going to Your solution is actually just like I mean,

0:16:24.196 --> 0:16:26.676
<v Speaker 1>it's almost like not even that there's no way to

0:16:26.756 --> 0:16:28.916
<v Speaker 1>make it sound sophisticated, but I know what I mean.

0:16:28.996 --> 0:16:30.796
<v Speaker 1>It's not like it's not like we need like this

0:16:30.916 --> 0:16:35.156
<v Speaker 1>special kind of electricity infrastructure in this village. Right, yeah,

0:16:36.236 --> 0:16:38.396
<v Speaker 1>we need like village levels. You know, there was all

0:16:38.436 --> 0:16:40.636
<v Speaker 1>these like complications. This one doesn't have that kind of

0:16:40.716 --> 0:16:43.236
<v Speaker 1>ted talk answer, but I think that it really is

0:16:43.276 --> 0:16:46.916
<v Speaker 1>a matter of a kind of consciousness raising. Hopefully we'll see.

0:16:47.516 --> 0:16:51.196
<v Speaker 1>What would you say to people listening who want to know, Um,

0:16:51.516 --> 0:16:54.156
<v Speaker 1>you know, what can I do? What are three things

0:16:54.676 --> 0:16:57.556
<v Speaker 1>that I can do to make this better without making

0:16:57.636 --> 0:17:01.916
<v Speaker 1>the situation angrier or or more contentious? Why not just

0:17:02.036 --> 0:17:06.516
<v Speaker 1>go out and do real work, like grassroots activism and

0:17:06.796 --> 0:17:09.756
<v Speaker 1>getting out the vote and really thinking about houses works.

0:17:09.916 --> 0:17:12.956
<v Speaker 1>How society works is not whether or not you fully

0:17:13.076 --> 0:17:15.836
<v Speaker 1>understand the black condition. By the time you do, you're

0:17:15.876 --> 0:17:18.596
<v Speaker 1>going to die. So that's something that I would also

0:17:18.756 --> 0:17:21.036
<v Speaker 1>ask people to consider. Look at some black people. Just

0:17:21.236 --> 0:17:25.116
<v Speaker 1>look and listen. Remember that we're talking about real human beings,

0:17:25.276 --> 0:17:29.516
<v Speaker 1>not the idealization of this punitive, zen like structure that

0:17:29.596 --> 0:17:38.116
<v Speaker 1>we were being taught is the new big thing. John

0:17:38.196 --> 0:17:42.236
<v Speaker 1>mcwarter is a linguistics professor at Columbia University. A contributing

0:17:42.316 --> 0:17:46.316
<v Speaker 1>writer at the Atlantic. He hosts the podcast Lexicon Valley.

0:17:46.596 --> 0:17:49.076
<v Speaker 1>You should check it out and remember to check out

0:17:49.116 --> 0:17:52.076
<v Speaker 1>our show notes for lengths and suggestions about how you

0:17:52.156 --> 0:17:56.356
<v Speaker 1>can get involved. Solvable is brought to you by Pushkin Industries.

0:17:56.796 --> 0:18:01.076
<v Speaker 1>Our show is produced by Camille Baptista, Senior producer Jocelyn Frame.

0:18:01.676 --> 0:18:05.476
<v Speaker 1>Catherine Girdoe is our managing producer, and our executive producer

0:18:05.596 --> 0:18:09.636
<v Speaker 1>is Mia Loebell. Special thanks go to Heather Fane, Eric Sandler,

0:18:09.796 --> 0:18:13.516
<v Speaker 1>Harley Migliori and Kedjia Holland. I'm Jacob Weisberg.