WEBVTT - 2024 Conference Finals Preview | Celtics-Pacers & Wolves-Mavericks

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Hymn this tuesdays.

0:00:10.680 --> 0:00:15.200
<v Speaker 2>I'd see thozlerd alert.

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 3>It's Tuesday.

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Every time I think about Tuesday, I go, oh, yeah,

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>what do you do?

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 3>Mmmm?

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 2>That's right? And never get old. It's alway, isn't it?

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Good morning sweel then, welcome to the No Dunks Podcast

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>on the Athletic Network. It's Tuesday, May twenty one, twenty

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty four. I'm Jake here in the Classic Factory and

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 1>alongside me as always tas Mellis.

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 2>I swear that person has fixed my car down here.

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 2>But on the Tuesday he fixed my card. He said.

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:05.400
<v Speaker 2>It's Tuesday, different every different.

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Next to him, it's the bearded woman, Touchha, hot boy,

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Trey Kirby, hey Jo, and last but not least making

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the magic happen, super producer JD.

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 2>Hello, there he is here.

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>We are shout out to the stream team. Joining us

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 1>live right now on YouTube. Hit the like button, subscribe

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>podcast listeners, five stars, ratings and reviews. We got a

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 1>fun one here because we will get into the rookie teams.

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:27.399
<v Speaker 1>Trey Kirby's got tweeted the night. But we are doing

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>our conference finals previews here for our two series that

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>get underway tonight in the Eastern Conference. Let's begin there.

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>The Pacers qualified for their first East Finals since twenty fourteen.

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:44.479
<v Speaker 1>They began the playoffs as the number six seed. They

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:48.279
<v Speaker 1>beat Milwaukee with no Jannis, they beat the banged up Knicks,

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and now they face the conference's top contender here in

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the Celtics, who entered their sixth East Finals appearance in

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the past eight seasons. If you care, the Celtics won

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the season series with Indiana three to two. They played

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>five times thanks to that in season tournament only. The

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>last game saw Pascal Siakam in a Pacers jersey, So

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:12.919
<v Speaker 1>you know what, check it out, throw it out, none

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:13.639
<v Speaker 1>of it matters.

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 2>Horor Pascalley played the Celtics a lot of time, including

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:18.679
<v Speaker 2>the Raptors, right, That's right, they lost a lot.

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>He's got some experience against them. So yeah, the number

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:24.399
<v Speaker 1>one seeded Celtics versus the number six seeded Pacers, let's

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>break it down. We'll get to our predictions. But what's

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>one thing you're watching for in this series?

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 2>Test pace. I know we always talk about the pace

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:34.359
<v Speaker 2>with the Pacers. That is their name, though, we got

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 2>to talk about it. They are the fastest team in

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:39.360
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs. The Celtics are the slowest team in the playoffs.

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Will the Celtics make shots enough to slow the Pacers

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 2>down a little bit, because we know the Pacers like

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 2>to speed up their versatile they are randomized. They do

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 2>everything in their offense. They're gonna go through absolutely everyone.

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:55.639
<v Speaker 2>But but, but the Celtics are the best defense that

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:58.359
<v Speaker 2>the Pacers have played so far in the postseason. They've

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 2>got that length and listen, sometimes they calm down. We

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:05.359
<v Speaker 2>may see a shootout Celtics, Pacers just let's just shoot

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:07.800
<v Speaker 2>it out and have a great fun game for the

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 2>rest of us. And also, the Pacers are not faced

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:13.639
<v Speaker 2>as good as an offense as the Celtics team has been.

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:17.920
<v Speaker 2>They have been stacked. I know you you excluded Giannis

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 2>from their their opponents this year's this playoffs and you said, hey,

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:24.639
<v Speaker 2>the Knicks are banged up. This is all true. The

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 2>Celtics are just healthy and ready to go.

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:30.240
<v Speaker 1>And we Christis is not going to play the first

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 1>two games.

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 2>This is one hundred.

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Probably still have enough firepower them, but.

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 2>They have many many fower firepowers. And I will well,

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 2>I do want to see Tyres Haliburton, uh and who

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 2>he's going to guard on on most likely Drew Holiday

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 2>matchup because you can't hide him anywhere. The Celtics are

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 2>just so versatile. They do have all these weapons well,

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 2>whether Christops Porzingis is playing or not. So just just

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:57.119
<v Speaker 2>the fun pace of it all.

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 3>Love a pace, love the pace, Love the the Pacers

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 3>made it this far because you get to see the

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 3>n season tournament mentioned in every single preview, right, you know,

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 3>these are the two healthiest teams in the Eastern Conference.

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 3>No surprise, they actually made it this far. And I

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 3>think you're onto something. I think Halliburton should absolutely guard

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 3>Drew Holliday because I think that could maybe trick the

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 3>Celtics into going to Drew Holliday. If you're the Pacers,

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 3>you're living with a bunch of Drew Holiday post ups

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 3>on Tyrese Halliburton. That takes the Celtics out of their

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:25.720
<v Speaker 3>drive and kick game. We know they like to get

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 3>three pointers up. That's a huge thing for them. So

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 3>the Pacers have been pretty good in this playoffs and

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:33.279
<v Speaker 3>during the season taking away three pointers. You can score

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 3>inside on them, though, but we know the Celtics want

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 3>to get three pointers up. That's how they have become

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 3>the second best offense in the playoffs their first and

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 3>three point rate. I wonder how the Pacers are able

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 3>to keep oh pace with them from the three point line.

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 3>A lot of that comes down to Tyreese Halliburton, I

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:51.480
<v Speaker 3>do believe, because he's gonna need to score in this series.

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 3>He's the best offensive player on the perimeter for the Pacers.

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 3>But the Celtics have a lot of guys they can

0:04:57.080 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 3>throw at him. It's like Drew Holliday and Derek White,

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 3>you can take two. We could go with Jason Tatum

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 3>if we're feeling crazy. We need some size on him.

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 3>Jalen Brown I think will be kind of like the

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:08.720
<v Speaker 3>third option. There as a kind of in between size

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 3>and speed there. It'll be interesting to see how Haliburton

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 3>attacks those guys. They're gonna try and send them left.

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 3>They're gonna do everything they can to make anybody else

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 3>beat them besides Halliburton. So getting three point attempts, getting

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 3>into the lane, getting the driving kick game going, that's

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 3>gonna be huge for Halliburton, but they need him to

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 3>score efficiently as well.

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he needs to have the series of his life

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 1>for this to be competitive, or to even pull off

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the upset. Halliburton's production dipped in the four games he

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>played against Boston. It makes sense. They're playing a lot

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>of defensive minded guys, all defensive candidates, and Drew and

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:43.159
<v Speaker 1>Derek White just sixteen points per game. I'm even rounding

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 1>up there a little bit forty one percent shooting for Halliburton.

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:49.159
<v Speaker 1>But he's got to be aggressive. You're gonna be happy

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 1>if the three's fallen for him, but he needs to

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>touch paint and probably get that floater going. They're gonna

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 1>do drop coverage, you know, if it's al If Porzingis

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 1>comes back in the series. That's how they've played them before.

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:00.160
<v Speaker 1>There's gonna be room there in the middle if you

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:02.359
<v Speaker 1>can get by those elite defensive guys on the wings.

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Got to hit that little floater. I think he's got

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>to shoot it with some confidence and probably shoot it

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>often because they don't need to. I'm gonna be throwing

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:11.840
<v Speaker 1>doubles at him. They're happy with guys playing one on

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:13.919
<v Speaker 1>one because they have so many elite defenders. But yeah,

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>can they just stop them? Is the other point you

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:18.840
<v Speaker 1>said in your Boston is like incredible, that's going to the ball.

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 1>They scored one hundred and twenty six points per one

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred possessions against Indiana the season. I was a little

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>inflated because of that one hundred and fifty five point

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>game I guess they had early in the year, but

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:32.160
<v Speaker 1>still some other high octane games. So just can they

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:34.119
<v Speaker 1>slow them down, because we even saw the Pacers against

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:35.919
<v Speaker 1>the Knicks there in some of those games it was

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>high scoring affairs and we're stopping them for a majority

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 1>of it. And Boston's even better offensively, so can they

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>get enough stops?

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, these are the top two offenses in the playoffs.

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:50.279
<v Speaker 2>The Celtics can do it. As Trey brought up, the

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:52.559
<v Speaker 2>time that the Celtics find a problem with their offense

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 2>is when they're trying to do one particular thing, and

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 2>that's it could be in this case, Dale trying to

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 2>give it to tyres Sealiburn because they excel like the

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Pacers do when they give it to everybody. Yeh, when

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 2>they make it all happen when they move it, when

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 2>all five guys are getting into it. So it's really

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 2>if the Celtics just kind of go back to their

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 2>old ways and have a bad stretch. But they have

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 2>been resting and ready for this series. They are absolutely fresh.

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 2>They just give game twos away. That's what they do.

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 2>They gave game two away in each of their first

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 2>two series. So it's highly likely the Celtics will win

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 2>game one. It's that game two mystery that if the

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 2>Pacers can go into Boston and steal one.

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 3>I wonder if the Celtics will play drop, especially with

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 3>Porzingis out. Al Horford's a better switch defender than Porzingis is,

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 3>and I think he's a little bit more comfortable there.

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 3>You also saw in that Game five against the Cavaliers,

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 3>the Celtics were saying, you're not taking three pointers, live

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 3>in the lane if you want to. That's how Evan

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 3>Mobley had a huge game, took twenty four shots in

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 3>that one. So I think that's probably what the Celtics

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 3>will do. They're gonna switch everything. Makes it even tougher

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 3>for the Pacers to get three pointers up.

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And on the other side, does Al let a

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 2>few rip from three point line because Miles Turner will

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 2>want to be in the lane to help out on defense.

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 2>And these numbers sometimes don't mean anything, but he did

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 2>shoot six of eleven from three against the Boston or

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 2>the Indian Pacers, excuse me from three, so they will

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 2>try and get Miles as far away from the rim

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 2>as possible because he is there to turn.

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you think you're not concerned? You said really at

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>all that Porzenkis is not going to start this series

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 1>in all likelihoods, maybe misses game one and two, and

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>then we move forward there and maybe we see him Indiana,

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>but Al Horford starts, Luke Cornette backup minutes. Do we

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>see Tillman, do we see even Oshae Brissett? Does he

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 1>get a chance here in a more athletic type of

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>series and you're not going to be punished, but the

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>size of Indiana probably What do you.

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Think I don't think so. No, To be quite honest,

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 2>I think they want Christopsportzings back in this series to

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 2>get him ready for the NBA Finals potentially right, and

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:56.079
<v Speaker 2>Game three would give him twenty five days off for

0:08:56.280 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 2>the injury. Kelly Dwyer loves a good calendar, and I

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:04.079
<v Speaker 2>got that date from him, twenty five days off to

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 2>help the bum CAF get ready for the NBA Finals.

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's a problem. Does anybody else really

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 2>think it's a problem that al Horford, who has been

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 2>primed for these playoff minutes because he didn't play a ton.

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:18.079
<v Speaker 2>He did be played in the regular season, obviously, but

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 2>they didn't have to go to him a lot. Plus

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 2>they are arresting in the fact that they had two

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 2>shorter series. Yeah, so I don't think it's problem.

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I definitely don't think it's a problem. I don't

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 3>really think Tillman or Persette is going to factor into

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 3>this series at all. I think Tilman's played like twenty

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 3>five minutest hasn't touched the floor yet in the playoffs.

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:37.319
<v Speaker 3>But the Pacers did a pretty good job against the

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 3>Knicks on the offensive glass, so you're gonna want a

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 3>big out there at the very least. Though, I imagine the Celtics,

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 3>if the Pacers are really really running, they could try

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 3>five out play Tatum at the five if they really

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 3>wanted to, and then who knows who comes in as

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 3>the guard, probably Pritchard or something like that. But I

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 3>don't think that Porzingis is necessary for the Celtics to

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 3>win this series, right.

0:09:57.120 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>And Missoula has been pretty hesitant to want to go

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>to him as sort of a small ball center five.

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 1>He likes the size there, so that's why we see

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Luke and stuff like that. And obviously Al Horford who

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 1>has played great as the series went on. Against the Cavs.

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:11.080
<v Speaker 1>He was not hitting anything to start that series, but

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>then sort of caught fire and you know, sort of

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>found his rhythm, so he could be instrumental. Here. Is

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>there anything else to watch for in this one? And

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:19.679
<v Speaker 1>you want to pivot to straight up X factors? We

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 1>could do both teams if.

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 2>You want, Yeah, let's do the five. Let's pivot.

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>What do you got for an X factor?

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 2>The two pests TJ McConnell versus Peyton Pritchard. I think

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 2>that will be interesting because TJ McConnell was monstrous last series.

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 2>He was so key against the New York Knicks and

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 2>according to the stats he was eighteen of thirty three

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:43.960
<v Speaker 2>from the floor against these Boston Celtics. But Peyton Pritchard

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 2>will have fun against him, so that matchup is going

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 2>to be important. I think if there's anything that the

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:53.679
<v Speaker 2>Pacers do benefit from, it is their depth, and at

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 2>times TJ McConnell was what was really huge. I mean

0:10:57.040 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 2>he created turnovers in the backcourt in both of these series,

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 2>so that's really important, and Payne Pritchard I think will

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:06.679
<v Speaker 2>be up for the challenge when he looks into the

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:08.440
<v Speaker 2>mirror and he sees TJ mcconalll. I know they play

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:10.959
<v Speaker 2>a little differently, but they're going to be in that

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 2>same role. So just that matchup is interesting. Pritchard really

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 2>has to be up in TJ McConnell because TJ mcconnald

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 2>can cause it a big problem. So that matchup will

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 2>be fun for me and it is key, I think

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:26.440
<v Speaker 2>for Indiana to win that thing to win this series.

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Indiana's bench was phenomenal against the Knicks really throughout the postseason,

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:32.559
<v Speaker 1>he said McConnell. I mean, he's been one of the

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 1>biggest stories from the postseason. Eleven points per game in

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs. He had forty two assists to just ten

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 1>turnovers in that Knick series. Obie Toppins averaged eleven points

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 1>per game in the playoffs. He hit a decent number

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:45.840
<v Speaker 1>of threes against the Knicks, seven to sixteen, so not

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a huge volume, but knocked him down. Ben Sheppard been

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>rebounding really well for a shooting guard when his opportunity.

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>He's shooting forty seven percent from deep in the playoffs.

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>And then Isaiah Jackson, who's played the less of those guys,

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the fewestmount of winnets. Excuse me, but a hustle guy

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe gives you ten minutes per game. Maybe we see

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 1>him a little bit more about block shots. He's been

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>a positive in almost all his games against the Knicks.

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 1>So like, yeah, the X factor for the Pacers to

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 1>make this interesting. Halliburton's got to be a star. But

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 1>these guys got to continue to play at this elite

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>level because it might be might be one one tiny

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>advantage when you do the old columns between the two teams,

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 1>but can they keep it up against a much better

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Celtics team.

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:21.199
<v Speaker 3>That was my X factor as well. Who's going to

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 3>be the best white guy in this series? McConnell or Pritchard.

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:25.960
<v Speaker 3>That's kind of what it comes down to, because the Pacers,

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:28.720
<v Speaker 3>their bench was a major advantage against the Knicks. Of course,

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:31.320
<v Speaker 3>the Knicks bench didn't get a whole lot of run there,

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 3>and you know, was depleted by the end. But I

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 3>still think that the Pacers can probably run against this

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:39.559
<v Speaker 3>Boston Celtics bench, though you know they'll be blended lineups

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:41.439
<v Speaker 3>that kind of stuff. So a little further down on

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 3>the X factor list, I think is going to be

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 3>Drew Holliday's offense because it would be smart of the

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:48.720
<v Speaker 3>Pacers to make him beat you. Because there are good

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:50.719
<v Speaker 3>games from Drew Holliday. We've seen a lot of good games.

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 3>We've also seen a lot of games where he's forcing

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 3>it a lot of turnovers, can't really get into his

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 3>offense efficiently. I think he's going to be getting a

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:01.079
<v Speaker 3>large part of the Halliburton Assignment defense lay, so he's

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 3>probably putting a lot of effort there. If the Pacers

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 3>can trick the Celtics into a one on one game,

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 3>that definitely favors them because a mishot there going the

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:11.200
<v Speaker 3>other way. That's how the Pacers want to play.

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:13.560
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of white guys who can help, Sam Houser can

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 2>help the Boston Celtics because Indiana hasn't really faced a

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 2>guy like this off the bench in their two series

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 2>here against the Knicks and Milwaukee. Sam Hauser would be

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 2>the best shooter out of all between both those teams

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 2>coming off this bench, and he can let it rip,

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 2>so that is something they have to guard. He can

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 2>literally fill it so that there is that you're right

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 2>about the advantage for the Indiana Pacers has to be

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 2>their bench. It really has to be. So they have

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 2>to watch Sam Hauser for those open threes.

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Are you excited to watch Nie Smith do his best

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>to slow down A Tatum. I assume that will be

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 1>majority of his assignment, maybe some Jail and Brown. But

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:54.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, Tatum and Brown had great numbers against the

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Pacers in the regular season in terms of scoring the ball,

0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:58.719
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we barely even talked about them here.

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:00.320
<v Speaker 1>It's just like we're sort of just put them in

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Pennett feels like for their numbers exactly. You know, the

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 1>only thing bad thing is Tatum can't hit a three

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>to save his life. Right now, if you're a Pacers fan,

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>you're hoping that continues. But speak to that matchup there

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and Nie Smith. You know the revenge series here, it's

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 1>a team that's sort of a cut him and let

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>him go and all that.

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 3>I think Aaron Nesmith is the Patrick Beverly of the wing.

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 3>He's tricking, y'all. He just tries really really hard. Yeah,

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 3>and he's guarding on the ball. He gets lost on

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 3>backdoor cuts. He's not really an offensive player unless he's

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 3>hitting threes, which is up and down for him. So

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 3>I think he needs to be effective offensively for the

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 3>Pacers and then hopefully slow down one of either Tatum

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 3>or Brown, which is a tough spot for him because

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 3>guess what, there's another guy who could go off. You know,

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 3>like we barely even get to Jason Tatum and Jalen

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 3>Brown until we're at the end of the X Factor series.

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 3>These guys are averaging basically thirty a game, yeah, throughout

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 3>the playoffs, so they could use a second Niemith honestly, Yeah,

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 3>there's so many Yakam. I guess has got to be

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 3>a good defender as well. We haven't mentioned him yet.

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure. I mean, yeah, they're obviously they have guys.

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>They have size, at least in theory on pay to

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 1>slow them down. But like Jalen Brown's completely overlooked throughout

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the entire postseason. We barely talked about the Celtics, for

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 1>being honest, because they've taken care of business outside of

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>these weird games they have in Game two and they're

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 1>suddenly like, oh my god, we got a one one

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 1>series and then they dominate from there on out. I'm

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 1>interested to watch and this is by way of Schumann.

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Celtics have played basically no clutch time

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>in this postseason. I think it's seventy nine seconds where

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the score was within five points in the last five

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 1>minutes of the fourth quarter. So nine of their ten games,

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 1>including both of their losses, they're double digits. Like, they're

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>not close games. Now, I'm not like worry some or

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 1>worried that if they get in that like, oh, they'll

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 1>just panic and don't know what to do. I mean,

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you have great star players, but they just haven't had

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 1>to play. Any of the Pacers have played I think

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 1>four clutch games already and I think they split those.

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Just so I hope we get close games. I just

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know if we will continue with the Boston Celtics

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>here in just these blowout varieties.

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 2>I think one thing we do overlook when we look

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 2>at the Pacers versus Celtics in the regular season or

0:15:57.280 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 2>just the Pacers overall, is that their defense has gotten

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 2>better as the season has gone along and in this postseason.

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 2>And so yeah, Tatum and Brown are good against them,

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 2>but they do have four really good defenders besides Halliburton,

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 2>the other four guys that they play in Nie Smith

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 2>and them Hart and Turner and Siakam are good defenders

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 2>to start, and then there's more off the bench. Yeah,

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 2>and so for sure, absolutely they changed defensive team. Yeah,

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 2>and they put they put Ni Smith and them Hart

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 2>into the starting lineup to be pests. So there's that.

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 2>But the Celtics are just damn talented and they fire

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 2>away from three. They've average averaged thirty eight threes per

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 2>game here in the first two rounds. And you just

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 2>think that they are more talented offensively than the Inana Pacers,

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 2>which is odd to say because the Pacers are so

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 2>damn good offensively, But then the Celtics do have the

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 2>good defense as well. So yeah, it's a very well

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 2>rounded team. There's no doubt, do you think.

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we talked about the Pacers obviously getting a

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>little injury luck here against the teams they play, and

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 1>there's no doubt with the Giannis and then obviously Nicks.

0:16:57.600 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 1>But do you think the Pacers are better than the

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>two thousand twenty one Hawks comparable much worse like these

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 1>teams that make sort of surprise runs to the conference finals.

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Where do you like have this Pacers team and sort

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 1>of the hierarchy there equal.

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:14.199
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I mean I don't I don't think that.

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 3>I think the Knicks would have beat him if they're healthy,

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:17.920
<v Speaker 3>and I think Buck would have beat him they're healthy,

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 3>right right, right, So I mean that kind of falls

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 3>along the same lines as the Hawks, where it's like

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:24.880
<v Speaker 3>Ben Simmons had a mountdown Joelle and beiid couldn't hang

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 3>onto the ball in Game six and seven. They went

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:29.359
<v Speaker 3>to the conference finals. But that's kind of how it

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:31.400
<v Speaker 3>goes in the playoffs. A lot the healthiest teams get there.

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 3>The Celtics haven't played a healthy team yet either.

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's good to play point prediction time. Where are

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you going? How many game?

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:41.680
<v Speaker 2>There's gonna be some weird stuff because the Pacers haven't

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 2>lost a home game in months, It's been a long

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 2>time March eighteenth. But the Celtics haven't lost a game

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 2>on the road this postseason, so something is going to change.

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:54.919
<v Speaker 2>But the Celtics have lost both game twos. As I

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 2>said earlier, I do think the Celtics will get on

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:00.879
<v Speaker 2>a roll just because they have had a lot of

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 2>rest to win Game one and the Game two is

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:05.160
<v Speaker 2>a question. This one. I think they'll just feel better,

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:09.400
<v Speaker 2>and this is the biggest stage for the Pacers and

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 2>since the since the is a what a stage that

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:16.640
<v Speaker 2>was in Las Vegas, Well, I wish I was there

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 2>to see that stage. I have Celtics in five. I

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 2>do think that they'll They'll take care of home in

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 2>the first two games for the first time this postseason,

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:28.439
<v Speaker 2>so I think that's a big factor in this.

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 1>You see Indiana winning one of their home.

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:31.920
<v Speaker 2>Games, Yes, for sure, I hope, so, I hope.

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>So Celtics in five seems like a very common pick here.

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, maybe you go sweet, maybe you think it's longer.

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 1>What's tray curb?

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 2>You think?

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 3>I think the Pacers are going to win game one? Okay? Yeah,

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 3>the best most whole team that Boston has faced yet

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 3>in the playoffs as some major change in style from

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 3>the way they've been playing. They played against Cleveland. They

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:54.400
<v Speaker 3>played against Miami teams that wanted to generally slow it down,

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 3>though Cleveland started chucking at the end of the series

0:18:56.760 --> 0:18:59.119
<v Speaker 3>when Donovan Mitchell was out. They also haven't played for

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 3>a week. The Celtics have played ten games in thirty

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 3>seven days. It's unbelievable, Like you have to remember, Oh yeah,

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:07.159
<v Speaker 3>the Celtics are in the playoffs, the team that was

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:10.399
<v Speaker 3>the best record for the entire season. Yeah, they're still going.

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 3>So I think I will go for the Celtics in six.

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, they will.

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 3>It'll be two too after four games, just because the

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 3>three point variants. There will be a game when the

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 3>Pacers out shoot the Celtics. It happens every series, right.

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll go with task. I'm going Celtics in five. I

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:29.679
<v Speaker 1>don't think though, I'd love it for the narrative of

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the series. If Indiana pulls off this game one victory tonight,

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>but just too much talent, you know, there's obviously the

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:37.119
<v Speaker 1>experience factor we just said, this team has been to

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:41.399
<v Speaker 1>so many conference finals. They also be and again, like

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>this is set up so perfectly for the Celtics. They

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 1>could not be set up better for them to obviously

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:49.120
<v Speaker 1>go to the championship and to maybe win the whole thing.

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 1>Now that Denver, the only team that sort of had

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:53.640
<v Speaker 1>their number during the regular season, is completely removed as well,

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>So I will go Celtics in five. There will be

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a game, of course where Indiana, probably at home, gets

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:01.680
<v Speaker 1>helped from their bench. Maybe Helliburton has a star performance

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and that'll be enough. But I'm going with the common

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>pick here. It feels like that's the most most common

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>pick up seat Celtics in five. We have the poll

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 1>going up there on YouTube.

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:16.879
<v Speaker 3>Forty eight percent say Celtics in four or five, thirty

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:21.119
<v Speaker 3>four percent say Celtics in six or seven, sixteen percent

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:24.200
<v Speaker 3>say Pacers in six or seven, and zero percent going

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 3>for Pacers in four or five. Okay, which I think

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 3>is fair. That's fair.

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:30.360
<v Speaker 1>That's fair. Okay. Well, let's move over to the Western

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:33.639
<v Speaker 1>Conference Final Game one. It's gonna mark just the second

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 1>postseason series between the Wolves and Mavericks. The last playoff

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>matchup between these two came in the opening round of

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the two thousand and two playoffs, when we saw a

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 1>fifty seven win Dallas squad defeat Many three to zero

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:47.159
<v Speaker 1>before they lost in the next round. But more recently,

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota finished three and one against Dallas during the regular season.

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Luca missed two of those games, Kyrie set out three,

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and all of them occurred before Dallas brought in Daniel

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Gafford and PJ Washington at the trade deadline. I want

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 1>you to throw those games up, Okay, they mean nothing.

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 1>So number three Wolves versus the number five MAVs. Very

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>excited here matchups. Yeah, you got your Andrew Wiggins Minnesota

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 1>tim Midlals jersey.

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 2>On my time. It's time wow to pull out of Minnesota.

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 2>I just love the blue more so than anything.

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:16.399
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 2>If there's an Andrew Wiggins autograph on the back of this,

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 2>I totally had forgotten about that, but it's it's autograph.

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 2>The number two. They also sent a shoe.

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 3>Right they did?

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the old Wigans shoe. Just one this to the starters.

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, interest, I took it.

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So what are you watching for in Wolves MAVs.

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:39.159
<v Speaker 2>Also the first time probably that Dallas is hosting both

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 2>a conference finals and a conference final in hockey, the

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 2>conference final, don't call me finals. The Dallas Stars hosting

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 2>as well. What exciting Stars Oilers, Stars Oilers. Oilers took

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 2>care of business against fan City yesterday.

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 3>Ryan Nugent Hopkins scoring. He was raised in Barnaby, vc BC,

0:21:57.480 --> 0:22:00.680
<v Speaker 3>only eight miles from the arena. He was so excited

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 3>to be playing a game seven.

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 2>There, right, yeah, absolutely, what a nugent of information there,

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 2>What a name nugent?

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Right man?

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 3>No basketball on last night? You can watch whatever you

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:12.440
<v Speaker 3>want It was the sympathizer and Game seven of Boilers

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:14.919
<v Speaker 3>Canucks for me, that was the sympathizer. That's pretty good.

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 3>Oh okay, so far we're three episodes in and Robert

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 3>Downey Junr Is playing four roles. Oh Jesus, that's crazy.

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 3>It's like naughty professor mode. Check it out.

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 2>That was the TNT show for a second. The sympathizer.

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Edwards. He hooked me in when he said post

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 2>the series against the Nuggets, he said, I'm guarding Kyrier

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Ving next series. He got mem Yeah, and Kyrie as

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 2>good as he was defensively against Jalen Williams against Okay, see,

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 2>in round two, he didn't have to do that much offensively.

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 2>They weren't running plays for him. Kyrierving, the talented Kierving

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 2>averaged only fifteen point seven points per game in round two.

0:22:56.200 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 2>Very weird stuff. So you know, he will have I

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 2>think a little bit of ease on the other end. Defense.

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 2>Will probably have to guard some Conley and some mcdanielson.

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Maybe he'll have to guard Edwards because that's where Dallas

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 2>suffers a little bit. I mean, who's gonna guard Anthony

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Edwards Probably Luca, but anyway, just the fact that Anthony

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Edwards said I'm guarding Kyrie is going to be interesting

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 2>to me. And if Kyrie can turn it up a

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 2>little bit, because he is going to be needed very

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:26.719
<v Speaker 2>much to be a better offensive player, if they're going

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 2>to be able to beat the Timberwolves.

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:30.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's going to be a fun matchup. We have

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the league's highest scoring duo against one of the best

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 1>pairs of perimeter defenders in McDaniels and Edwards. Everybody's bringing

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 1>up that clip from a regular season game. I know

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 1>they don't mean anything, but that one where they did

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 1>a good job. McDaniels and Edwards did of sort of

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:47.160
<v Speaker 1>shutting down Kyrie and Luke at the end of there,

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and they're like, who' shooting it? Who's shooting it? Who's

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:50.640
<v Speaker 1>shooting it? And they were doing a good job on them.

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:52.160
<v Speaker 1>So that is going to be a fun fun watch.

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 1>What are you watching for in this.

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:56.879
<v Speaker 3>Best player wins this series? Okay, who's the best player?

0:23:57.760 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 3>That's the question for me. Is it going to be

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 3>and Edwards or is it to be Luka Doncic Luca

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 3>more established, He's been to a conference finals, all the

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 3>All nbas in the world basically since his rookie season,

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 3>and Edwards though, feels like he's got a lot of

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 3>momentum behind him and not great matchups. I don't think

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 3>for him on the Dallas side, like Derek Jones junior,

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 3>He's probably getting the majority of that assignment on Edwards,

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:20.879
<v Speaker 3>I would imagine, but Kyrie will guard him a little bit.

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:23.399
<v Speaker 3>I think maybe Dante Exam gets a little turn. I

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:26.560
<v Speaker 3>think Josh Green will guard as well. So the MAVs

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 3>are gonna have to be really schemey with things, which

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:31.399
<v Speaker 3>we saw quite a bit in their Thunder series. They

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 3>were at boxes and elbows on Shay the entire time.

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 3>They would double him, they would double Jalen Williams. They're

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 3>gonna pack the paint, so the three point shooters from

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 3>Minnesota are gonna have to hit for Luca. It all

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:44.400
<v Speaker 3>comes down to controlling his emotions. It really really does.

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 3>Because Jaden McDaniels is a guy who likes to get

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 3>under your skin. He's gonna have to be up on

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 3>Luca because I don't think he has the bulk that

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 3>like Alu Doort does to be able to be physical

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:56.359
<v Speaker 3>with him. I'm also a little worried about will he

0:24:56.440 --> 0:24:58.239
<v Speaker 3>be poised enough, because that's a guy who can go

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 3>just a little bit over the edge, I think as well.

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:04.199
<v Speaker 3>But it's gonna have to be an efficient scoring uh

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 3>series from Luka Doncic, which we haven't really seen yet

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 3>in this playoffs. He's been getting his numbers like I

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 3>don't even think we mentioned the guy was like a

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 3>thirty point triple double in their last game to close

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:16.120
<v Speaker 3>out the Thunder. But he still hasn't shot the ball

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:18.919
<v Speaker 3>really well, hasn't shot it very well from three. So

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:22.959
<v Speaker 3>I'm interested to see if Luca keeps the crown between

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:25.439
<v Speaker 3>these two guys or if Aunt supersedes him. And I

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:27.200
<v Speaker 3>really really hope we get these two talking trash to

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 3>each other. These are like two of the biggest trash

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 3>talkers in the game, and they'll do it NonStop.

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yes, absolutely love all that stuff. I'm also watching

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the offensive glass. These are the two best offensive rebounding

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:41.120
<v Speaker 1>teams left in the playoffs, both the Wolves and the Mavericks.

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 1>The Mavericks they got at least fourteen offensive rebounds in

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 1>four games so far in the playoffs. But Minnesota, man,

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>they got the size, like these guys are jumbo. We

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>got Rudy kat nasried. They're gonna try their best to

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:53.920
<v Speaker 1>limit those second chance opportunities. So that's something to watch.

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:55.679
<v Speaker 1>Like some of these teams, Both of these teams, I

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 1>should say, like a little sloppy with the ball at times,

0:25:58.200 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 1>and so you know they can they both have to

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 1>be really good on the offensive glass when you're talking

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 1>about possessions. So who can do a better job at

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 1>getting those second chance opportunities which more times than not,

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, you get the rebound, they'll lead out to

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a or they get kicked out to a three point

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 1>shooter who usually knocked it down in rhythm. So fun

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:17.880
<v Speaker 1>fun stuff. X factor either team, where are you going

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 1>this is?

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 2>This is a deep one. It's a deep cup. But

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 2>I think, just like what the Minnesota Timberwolves did against

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 2>the Denver Nuggets, where Rudy Gobert was basically sort of

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:31.119
<v Speaker 2>along the baseline at times guarding Aaron Gordon, he was

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:34.439
<v Speaker 2>allowed to stay near the rim and that helped them

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:37.120
<v Speaker 2>a lot. I think them haves really really really need

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 2>Maxi Kleba back, and it'd be huge just to get

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Rudy Colbert the heck away from the rim as much

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 2>as possible. He would play the five and there would

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 2>be no choice, but Rudy Gobert would have to go

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:50.120
<v Speaker 2>out to take him outside, because we've.

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Seen that before. Yeah, twenty twenty two, get in the

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:54.639
<v Speaker 1>matchup between the Mavericks and then go Beart when he

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:55.200
<v Speaker 1>was with the Jazz.

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:58.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and Luca was able to abuse Rudy Gobert in

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:00.440
<v Speaker 2>that matchup, they'd get the switch and he would be

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:02.680
<v Speaker 2>really good on him. Now, Rudy Gobert has improved even

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 2>since then, so I don't doubt Rudy Gobert's defense. It

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:09.399
<v Speaker 2>will be interesting to see how many bodies as you

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:13.399
<v Speaker 2>went through. Luca had to be guarded by Dort last series.

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Now it's McDaniel's a different body type, but a long, long,

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 2>really good defender. There's going to be multiple guys who

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:23.399
<v Speaker 2>are thrown at him, I'm sure, and Luca could hunt

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 2>a Conley or an Edwards or a Gobert or a

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 2>Cat because they're just going to try and get the switches.

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:34.479
<v Speaker 2>But Gobert is so good against those lobs, like when

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 2>he will be guarding Gafford or Lively, He's just he's

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 2>really good at it. So I think they just want

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 2>to stretch him as much as possible. That is the benefit,

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 2>the benefit they could could could have. Maximilian Kliba is

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:49.719
<v Speaker 2>not scheduled to come back until multiple games. I mean

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 2>he's been working out, yes, but it's doesn't look all

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 2>that good and he is key, I think, to helping

0:27:57.280 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 2>this Dallas offense because this one, it just has so

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 2>many freaking guys offensively. It is going to be interesting

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 2>to see Luca Versus Anthony Edwards Paquett in this series.

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 2>Should should go off. He's gonna be guarded by PJ

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Washington most likely. He should have a good series, and

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:15.440
<v Speaker 2>he looked good obviously in the last round.

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Maxi Kleiba right shoulder injury and he's begun basic

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:23.439
<v Speaker 1>basketball activity. He's scheduled to be reevaluated later this week,

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:25.280
<v Speaker 1>so we may not even see him at all. But yeah, yeah,

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 1>he was on fire in that series in twenty twenty

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 1>two because yeah, go Behar couldn't get out to him

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:30.959
<v Speaker 1>and he was knocking the threes. But some of these

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:32.880
<v Speaker 1>other Maverick guys have obviously done a great job of

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:35.439
<v Speaker 1>hitting three pointers. The corners are gonna be there and

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 1>those guys can't miss. Right now, PJ Washington, Jerk Jones Junior.

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 1>A lot of them are just money right now in

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the corners. They got to continue that. Who's your X factor?

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 3>TK Dallas Bags is huge, I think, and then Kat

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 3>factors in as an X factor because the guy's like

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:52.160
<v Speaker 3>a super mismatch right now. I also wonder if Kyle

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 3>Anderson will guard Luka Doncetz a little bit, he'll get

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 3>torn up. I do believe if that happens, but they

0:28:56.320 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 3>can at least try it for a little bit. As

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:00.080
<v Speaker 3>for another X factor, I think it's JD and d

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:03.960
<v Speaker 3>Jaden McDaniels and Derek Jones Junior. They're in the exact

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 3>same spot, and this one they've got a huge defensive responsibility.

0:29:08.280 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 3>They got to take care of. Jane's gonna be gardening

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:12.960
<v Speaker 3>Luca a lot, Derek Jones Junior is gonna be garden

0:29:13.120 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 3>at a lot. And then on offense, that's where anybody

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 3>is hiding. Jane McDaniels, you're getting open three pointers. Derek

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 3>Jones Junior, you're getting open three pointers. Who makes more

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 3>of them? That might be the entire series right there.

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Right Derek Jones Junior obviously turned it on in that

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 1>last series as it went on. Jaden McDaniels shot seventy

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 1>five percent over the last two games against Denver, average

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty two points in those Game six and Game seven victories.

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 1>That's a that's a huge one. That's who I wrote

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 1>down is exactly what I wrote down to TK was

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Jayden McDaniels and Derek Jones Junior. Which one can keep

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 1>playing at that sort of incredible level offensively. You know

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna bring it defensively. You're always watching foul trouble

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 1>like well Ant you know, sort of bait Derek Jones

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Junior into one or two, you know, crappy fouls. Same

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:55.680
<v Speaker 1>with the Luca on Jana McDaniels. But they're gonna be

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 1>sound there. It's just can they contribute offensively because someone's

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>got to be left open and it will be those guys. Yeah,

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>but they've made a lot of these teams pay and

0:30:03.080 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the reason why they're into the conference finals.

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 2>Right. We didn't even mention Nikhil. Alexander Walker is a

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 2>guy who could potentially be thrown on Luca or thrown

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 2>on Kyrie just to get under their skin a little bit.

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Not that they're going to play fourth quarter. He's going

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 2>to play fourth quarters. But we saw him do a

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 2>great job against Devin Booker in round one just to

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 2>get under his skin when they played the Phoenix Suns,

0:30:21.840 --> 0:30:23.920
<v Speaker 2>and around two wasn't needed as much because of the

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Timberwolves were just so good because Anthony Edwards is a

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 2>good defensive player. But there's just a huge list of

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 2>defensive players on the Minnesota Timberwolves. They're very, very good

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 2>at that. So I want to see how Dallas their

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 2>strength is their back coward. They're two guys, and so

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 2>they are going to have a lot of guys thrown

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 2>at them, many guys thrown at them.

0:30:41.440 --> 0:30:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I think prediction time, TK, Let's start with you, because

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm going with whoever you pick. You've been on fire

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 1>in the Western Conference Finals when it comes to predictions.

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 1>This is obviously a great matchup, feels like it's going

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to go long. Wolves are maps how many games.

0:30:56.320 --> 0:30:58.040
<v Speaker 3>It's because I keep picking the MAVs that I keep

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:01.240
<v Speaker 3>coming to you can win this series. If Luca and

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 3>Kyrie are the best two players in the series. Luca

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 3>has to be the number one best player. Kyrie probably

0:31:06.520 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 3>slots in at number three. But if they're two of

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 3>the top three, I think the MAVs can absolutely win

0:31:10.520 --> 0:31:14.040
<v Speaker 3>this series. Their defense is pretty good, like we're kind

0:31:14.040 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 3>of obviously. The Timberwolves are a legendary defense. People are

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 3>talking about him as the best defense in the past

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 3>twenty years. But the MAVs are pretty good as well.

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:24.960
<v Speaker 3>And I think there might be more players on the

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 3>Timberwolves who could be taken out of this series, like

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:31.719
<v Speaker 3>Kyle Anderson wasn't a factor against the Nuggets. Eventually Nikhil

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 3>Alexander Walker, they were leaving him open against the Nuggets

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:37.480
<v Speaker 3>or the Nuggets were as well. So I worry about

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 3>having like all three of Alexander Walker, SloMo and Rudy

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 3>Gobert on the court. That's three non shooters for a

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 3>team in Minnesota that doesn't always score super well. Though

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:50.200
<v Speaker 3>they have been awesome, It's so such a weird story

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 3>with the Timberwolves. Karl Anthony Towns goes out at the

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 3>end of the season. You're like they're gonna be bad,

0:31:54.880 --> 0:31:56.640
<v Speaker 3>and then they got great on offense and it has

0:31:56.720 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 3>continued into the postseason as well. Very very oppressive. Man,

0:32:03.160 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't know picking against Anthony Edwards right now. I

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 3>don't love it. MAVs in seven.

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Wow, MAVs in seven. He's gonna stick with the Dallas

0:32:10.880 --> 0:32:14.080
<v Speaker 1>train working for him. Here, where are you going?

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:16.720
<v Speaker 2>I hear you, well, I wore this jersey for the

0:32:16.760 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 2>reason that I'm taking on Minnesota Timberwolves. Yeah. I wasn't

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:22.720
<v Speaker 2>smart enough to take Dallas last series, that's for sure.

0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 2>And they were doing a good job of guarding Shay

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:29.239
<v Speaker 2>with multiple bodies, even though she was awesome, But they

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:31.560
<v Speaker 2>were showing him multiple bodies, which I assume they're going

0:32:31.600 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 2>to do the same with Anthony Edwards. Here's our guys,

0:32:34.480 --> 0:32:36.960
<v Speaker 2>what are you gonna do? Anthony Edwards? And it is

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 2>miraculous that they lose Karl Anthony Towns for six weeks

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 2>and they become better in the postseason. Their offense is

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:46.080
<v Speaker 2>actually better, and I think part of it is Anthony

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Edwards has gotten better at reading defenses, reading, Oh, there's

0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 2>two bodies close to me, even though they're not doubling me.

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:55.480
<v Speaker 2>To keep moving that thing. He's become a quicker decision maker.

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 2>He's become a postseason decision maker. And I just believe

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:03.040
<v Speaker 2>in the Wolves offensively, and I think that the fact

0:33:03.080 --> 0:33:05.240
<v Speaker 2>that they lost both games to start the series against

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 2>the Denver Nuggets excuse me not to start the series,

0:33:08.400 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 2>but those two key games at home in Games three

0:33:11.440 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 2>in Games four will help them a little bit going

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 2>forward because that was just abysmal for them. I'm taking them.

0:33:18.360 --> 0:33:21.400
<v Speaker 2>I do think home court helps them out in this

0:33:21.520 --> 0:33:23.720
<v Speaker 2>series because I don't see them losing two games in

0:33:23.720 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 2>a row like that. Again, it's gonna be a fun one.

0:33:26.120 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 2>The Dallas Mavericks. What is Jason Kidds stat that he's

0:33:28.840 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 2>like one on eleven in his last twelve game ones

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:33.600
<v Speaker 2>or something ridiculous that.

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Lucas even yeah, of course game one record.

0:33:36.200 --> 0:33:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, listen, Luca got better as that series went on.

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Game six and game seven, he was good. So I

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:42.640
<v Speaker 2>don't know how you take against bet against Dallas, but

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 2>this kind of feels like Dallas of twenty eleven when

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 2>everybody was picking against Dallas in that postseason. Kind of

0:33:49.320 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 2>feels like the timber Wolves are in that position. So

0:33:52.520 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 2>I think they get to the finals. I'm taking the Wolves.

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 2>I'll give them. I'll give a lot of respect to Dallas.

0:33:57.000 --> 0:33:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Seven games for me.

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you're going Wolves in seven. You got Mavericks in seven.

0:34:00.840 --> 0:34:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I told you I'm going wherever Drey Kirby's going, so

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm going Mavericks and seven. It's a coin flip. I

0:34:04.880 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 1>think this is going to be a seven game series.

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna go along. What's really fun is by the

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:11.440
<v Speaker 1>end of June, we are gonna have either Anthony Edwards

0:34:11.520 --> 0:34:14.239
<v Speaker 1>winning a championship at twenty two years old. We're gonna

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:16.600
<v Speaker 1>have Luca doing it at what twenty five his first

0:34:17.080 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Tatum twenty six or Halliburton at twenty four. A young

0:34:20.719 --> 0:34:23.239
<v Speaker 1>star in this league is going to get their first championship.

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Is going to be one of those teams. And look,

0:34:25.680 --> 0:34:27.879
<v Speaker 1>some people say, if we get Wolves and Celtics, then

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:32.440
<v Speaker 1>that means Al Horford and Mike Conley winning too. Do

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 1>you have a dream finals matchup that you just like

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:38.640
<v Speaker 1>as a fan, just want to see the most. Is

0:34:38.680 --> 0:34:42.520
<v Speaker 1>it Wolve Celtics, Is it Mavericks Celtics? Do you want

0:34:42.520 --> 0:34:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the Pacers in there to feel good story? Where are

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 1>you going? Or do you care?

0:34:47.320 --> 0:34:51.200
<v Speaker 2>When I dream? I don't usually dream about the finals,

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:55.480
<v Speaker 2>but today today it's kind of hard to dream for

0:34:55.520 --> 0:34:58.320
<v Speaker 2>the Celtics when they had the opportunity to go to

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 2>so many and they've been there already to one. I

0:35:02.040 --> 0:35:05.279
<v Speaker 2>mean I don't know. No, I'm dreamless. I gotta be

0:35:05.560 --> 0:35:07.680
<v Speaker 2>got to question the finals.

0:35:08.040 --> 0:35:08.640
<v Speaker 3>This is a dream.

0:35:08.680 --> 0:35:10.280
<v Speaker 2>You you asked for a dream.

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:11.320
<v Speaker 3>Okay, who do you want.

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:11.800
<v Speaker 1>To see the finals?

0:35:12.280 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 3>I want to see balls Timberwolves.

0:35:14.239 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, who do you? A realist?

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Very good? Who are you dreaming?

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to see.

0:35:18.719 --> 0:35:21.759
<v Speaker 3>Edwards in the Okay, I'm looking for otherwise, I don't

0:35:21.760 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 3>really care.

0:35:22.120 --> 0:35:22.840
<v Speaker 1>It's just a preference.

0:35:23.200 --> 0:35:25.400
<v Speaker 3>And if if the Timberwolves make it, I'll do Timberwolves

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:28.200
<v Speaker 3>of Minnesota again because the old lyrics have Dangelo Russell.

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh wow, yeah, yeah, I was a banger for sure.

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:33.040
<v Speaker 1>All Right, well, let's hear from everybody. You want to say,

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to see Wolve Celtics. Yeah, I want to

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:36.919
<v Speaker 1>see Anthony Edwards in the finals, but.

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 2>Luca deserves to get there.

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Sure, I just went through it. You won't be upset

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:44.000
<v Speaker 1>with any of those, Well, I mean there will people.

0:35:44.040 --> 0:35:45.839
<v Speaker 1>People will be upset with the Celtics winning because people

0:35:45.880 --> 0:35:48.319
<v Speaker 1>just like to shoot on the Celtics. But a young

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:50.799
<v Speaker 1>star winning their first ring, that's fantastic. So all four

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:52.640
<v Speaker 1>of those is awesome. But I just want to see

0:35:52.680 --> 0:35:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Aunt because he's the most charismatic guy in the league.

0:35:55.520 --> 0:35:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Guess did him in the finals? Oh my god?

0:35:57.760 --> 0:36:01.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah. The tatums is he doesn't feel young because

0:36:01.920 --> 0:36:04.040
<v Speaker 2>he's this is year seven and has gone through so

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:06.080
<v Speaker 2>many playoffs and have been through so many conference finals.

0:36:06.080 --> 0:36:09.319
<v Speaker 2>He is the oldest of all of them, and they've

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:11.200
<v Speaker 2>got so many old guys, so it just it's a

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 2>it's a perfect recipe for them.

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. It would also be hilarious for Karl Anthony Towns

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:18.680
<v Speaker 1>to win a championship ring before Jimmy Butler. That would

0:36:18.719 --> 0:36:19.719
<v Speaker 1>just be very funny as well.

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 3>Wigan's got one.

0:36:20.600 --> 0:36:23.920
<v Speaker 1>That's right. That's right. He did there, he did, So

0:36:24.040 --> 0:36:26.200
<v Speaker 1>let's hear from everybody out there. Predictions for both of

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 1>those conference finals series. They start tonight in the East

0:36:29.239 --> 0:36:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and then it's West on Wednesday night, and I guess

0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:33.560
<v Speaker 1>it's just every other night until they're done.

0:36:33.600 --> 0:36:34.160
<v Speaker 3>Every other night.

0:36:34.320 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 1>There's no big gaps, which is good. We're getting one

0:36:37.120 --> 0:36:39.040
<v Speaker 1>basketball game a night. You can really focus and we'll

0:36:39.040 --> 0:36:40.799
<v Speaker 1>be breaking it down here on the show the next

0:36:40.800 --> 0:36:41.839
<v Speaker 1>morning stream team.

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:44.440
<v Speaker 3>They think it's a coin flip as well. Fifty two

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:47.280
<v Speaker 3>percent are taking the Timberwolves in six or seven games.

0:36:48.120 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 3>Thirty four percent are taking the Mavericks in six or

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:53.279
<v Speaker 3>seven games. Then you got nine percent Timberwolves in four

0:36:53.400 --> 0:36:56.359
<v Speaker 3>or five, three percent MAVs in four or five. Sorry,

0:36:56.400 --> 0:36:57.720
<v Speaker 3>there's only four choices available.

0:36:57.760 --> 0:36:59.920
<v Speaker 1>That's right, that's right, right, Yeah, we can't give you

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:01.279
<v Speaker 1>seven options or what.

0:37:01.200 --> 0:37:03.759
<v Speaker 3>Can't do it? All? Right?

0:37:03.840 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to some news from yesterday. Victor Wemenyama chet

0:37:06.520 --> 0:37:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Holmgren have been unanimously selected to the twenty twenty three

0:37:10.000 --> 0:37:13.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty four All Rookie First Team. Both players received first

0:37:13.640 --> 0:37:16.800
<v Speaker 1>team votes on all ninety nine ballots from a global

0:37:16.880 --> 0:37:21.279
<v Speaker 1>panel of sports writers and broadcasters. Why is chet in

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:27.280
<v Speaker 1>at okac Jersey No one knows? Joining Wemby, chet Aka, Wett,

0:37:27.280 --> 0:37:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and Chembi on the All Rookie First Team are Hornets

0:37:30.080 --> 0:37:33.400
<v Speaker 1>wing Brandon Miller, heat forward Jim Hawks Junior and Warriors

0:37:33.400 --> 0:37:39.240
<v Speaker 1>guard Brandon Pojimski the NBA All Rookie Second Team, Maverick

0:37:39.280 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 1>center Derek Lively the second, Rockets guard Slash forward on

0:37:42.680 --> 0:37:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Men Thompson, Jazz guard Kiante George, OKC guard Case and Wallace.

0:37:46.600 --> 0:37:47.920
<v Speaker 3>Also in a.

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Summary League Jerseys and Grizzlies forward Gigi Jackson the second.

0:37:52.080 --> 0:37:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Jackson the only member of either All Rookie team not

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:57.920
<v Speaker 1>drafted in the first round. He went forty fifth overall.

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Any issues with these selection here on the all Rookie teams,

0:38:01.600 --> 0:38:03.359
<v Speaker 1>any snubs? What do you think?

0:38:04.520 --> 0:38:06.719
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think it's weird that there's only ninety nine votes.

0:38:06.760 --> 0:38:08.919
<v Speaker 3>Once again, there was ninety nine votes for the Rookie

0:38:08.960 --> 0:38:12.000
<v Speaker 3>of the Year award. One voter didn't turn in their awards.

0:38:12.000 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 3>I'll also say it's weird that Brandon Miller wasn't a

0:38:14.320 --> 0:38:17.600
<v Speaker 3>unanimous first teamer. He only got ninety eight votes total. Yeah,

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:20.800
<v Speaker 3>so somebody left him off the one and two teams.

0:38:21.000 --> 0:38:23.399
<v Speaker 3>Does not make sense to me. It doesn't make sense

0:38:23.440 --> 0:38:27.040
<v Speaker 3>at all. I think it's interesting to see Brandon Pajemski

0:38:27.239 --> 0:38:30.200
<v Speaker 3>as the fifth slot in the on the first team

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:33.279
<v Speaker 3>ahead of Derek Lively. Derek Liveley has also obviously had

0:38:33.280 --> 0:38:36.839
<v Speaker 3>an awesome postseason, Pods was probably better in the regular season.

0:38:36.880 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 3>I feel like we all came down on choosing him

0:38:39.040 --> 0:38:40.719
<v Speaker 3>as our fifth guy because it was between those two

0:38:41.239 --> 0:38:43.160
<v Speaker 3>for the end of the first team. I think the

0:38:43.160 --> 0:38:46.319
<v Speaker 3>biggest snub is probably Trace Jackson Davis, but I like

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:48.480
<v Speaker 3>Gg Jackson getting a little love as well. He had

0:38:48.480 --> 0:38:50.600
<v Speaker 3>a really good season for the Grizzly, so I'm too

0:38:50.640 --> 0:38:51.279
<v Speaker 3>upset about it.

0:38:51.440 --> 0:38:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Trace Jackson Davis nearly made that All Rookie second team.

0:38:55.480 --> 0:39:00.799
<v Speaker 1>You're in one point less than GG Jackson. Maybe there

0:39:00.840 --> 0:39:03.240
<v Speaker 1>was a mistake in terms of Jackson or Jackson Davis

0:39:03.280 --> 0:39:06.280
<v Speaker 1>when people were doing the voting. Who knows, but Jackson,

0:39:06.480 --> 0:39:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the Grizzlies forward, made four fewer ballots but received five

0:39:09.640 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 1>first team votes. Well, tjd was on the second team

0:39:12.200 --> 0:39:14.239
<v Speaker 1>on all forty two ballots. He appeared, and that's why

0:39:14.320 --> 0:39:15.759
<v Speaker 1>GG Jackson just got in there.

0:39:16.320 --> 0:39:21.920
<v Speaker 2>GG Jackson nineteen year old who was basically elevated almost

0:39:22.000 --> 0:39:24.759
<v Speaker 2>midway through the season. He's only played in forty eight

0:39:24.800 --> 0:39:27.200
<v Speaker 2>games this season, but he was elevated when they had

0:39:27.239 --> 0:39:32.480
<v Speaker 2>all those injuries with John Morant and Smart Smart. Everybody

0:39:32.520 --> 0:39:34.719
<v Speaker 2>was injured, so he comes in and fills in. I

0:39:34.719 --> 0:39:38.919
<v Speaker 2>think if there's anyone that you can ridicule for making

0:39:39.000 --> 0:39:42.160
<v Speaker 2>a bad vote and ridicule him for a specific award,

0:39:42.160 --> 0:39:45.080
<v Speaker 2>it's probably this one because every other award they seem

0:39:45.120 --> 0:39:47.640
<v Speaker 2>to get it right, but in this one you can

0:39:47.719 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 2>poke some holes in their second team. I think the

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:54.040
<v Speaker 2>first team is absolutely correct, but there's guys that should

0:39:54.120 --> 0:39:57.799
<v Speaker 2>get some some nods trace Jack and Davis. Sure, I'm

0:39:57.800 --> 0:40:01.560
<v Speaker 2>sorry Thompson. I know he he had a bad ending

0:40:01.640 --> 0:40:04.160
<v Speaker 2>to the year, but he was really good to start

0:40:04.160 --> 0:40:05.920
<v Speaker 2>the year, and he played a ton of games and

0:40:05.960 --> 0:40:08.640
<v Speaker 2>he did get injured, so he's not even not even

0:40:08.719 --> 0:40:13.080
<v Speaker 2>sniffing the second team here, which is odd. I mean,

0:40:13.120 --> 0:40:15.960
<v Speaker 2>he was good. I know the Piston's stunk, but anyway,

0:40:16.680 --> 0:40:19.800
<v Speaker 2>it's nice to get all these rookies just mentioned again

0:40:20.360 --> 0:40:22.000
<v Speaker 2>one more time, just mentioned them.

0:40:22.200 --> 0:40:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Of the top fourteen picks so the lottery in the

0:40:25.239 --> 0:40:28.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty three draft, only five got All Rookie honors, the

0:40:28.560 --> 0:40:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Wemby Miller, Aman, Thompson, Wallace who did play all eighty

0:40:32.480 --> 0:40:35.640
<v Speaker 1>two games, and then Lively. So you know, some notable

0:40:35.719 --> 0:40:37.480
<v Speaker 1>names that didn't make it. Scoot Henderson, you know, not

0:40:37.560 --> 0:40:39.399
<v Speaker 1>being on one of these squads as rough. He shot

0:40:39.440 --> 0:40:41.319
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight percent from the field on a very bad team.

0:40:41.360 --> 0:40:43.600
<v Speaker 1>He averaged fourteen to five and three. You know, he

0:40:43.680 --> 0:40:46.920
<v Speaker 1>found it for weeks at times, but really overall shot poorly.

0:40:47.239 --> 0:40:49.279
<v Speaker 1>And then a bunch of other names like Coolibali, people

0:40:49.280 --> 0:40:52.600
<v Speaker 1>were upset maybe didn't sniff an all rookie second team.

0:40:53.239 --> 0:40:54.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, a bunch of other guys didn't play as

0:40:54.719 --> 0:40:57.759
<v Speaker 1>much like Walker and Hendricks and stuff like that. But yeah,

0:40:57.880 --> 0:41:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the SR Thompson, the TJD and probably you know, the

0:41:01.239 --> 0:41:03.319
<v Speaker 1>Scoot and maybe Bulow cool of BALI I can't get

0:41:03.320 --> 0:41:05.040
<v Speaker 1>too upset about All Rookie second Team, So I gotta

0:41:05.040 --> 0:41:08.120
<v Speaker 1>be honest. I just I'm like, okay, okay, all right.

0:41:08.400 --> 0:41:10.040
<v Speaker 3>I would for me, It's more like I would be

0:41:10.080 --> 0:41:12.919
<v Speaker 3>disappointed if I'm a Portland fan. Y See, the guy

0:41:12.960 --> 0:41:16.040
<v Speaker 3>that you tanked basically two seasons for you got a

0:41:16.120 --> 0:41:18.160
<v Speaker 3>number three pick in Scoot and he didn't even make

0:41:18.200 --> 0:41:19.600
<v Speaker 3>the second team. The guy's just got to become the

0:41:19.640 --> 0:41:21.479
<v Speaker 3>biggest Deer and Fox fan in the world. He didn't

0:41:21.520 --> 0:41:23.920
<v Speaker 3>even make an All Rookie team. Yeah either, look at

0:41:23.960 --> 0:41:24.839
<v Speaker 3>him now he's an All star.

0:41:24.920 --> 0:41:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Yep, all right, before we go, Tweet of the Night.

0:41:29.960 --> 0:41:34.320
<v Speaker 2>Tweet O the Night wowwet.

0:41:33.719 --> 0:41:35.600
<v Speaker 3>Oh tweeted the night he gets brought to you by

0:41:35.640 --> 0:41:41.640
<v Speaker 3>Anthony Edwards. Basically he's doing a whole bunch of Minnesota tourism. Yeah, increasingness.

0:41:42.040 --> 0:41:45.120
<v Speaker 3>So our first tweet from Tweet of the Night comes

0:41:45.160 --> 0:41:48.120
<v Speaker 3>to us from Steve Russian, who mentions, bring you ass

0:41:48.120 --> 0:41:52.279
<v Speaker 3>dot Com takes you to the Minnesota tourism website the

0:41:52.280 --> 0:41:56.480
<v Speaker 3>Star of the North. Explore Minnesota dot com apparently comedian

0:41:56.560 --> 0:42:00.239
<v Speaker 3>and Wolves fan John Savat perched it, purchased bring You

0:42:00.360 --> 0:42:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Ass dot Com and then redirected it to Explore Minnesota's website.

0:42:04.520 --> 0:42:08.399
<v Speaker 3>And I saw even Explore Minnesota has been telling people

0:42:08.440 --> 0:42:10.879
<v Speaker 3>to bring their ass all right to Minnesota. It's gotten

0:42:10.920 --> 0:42:11.760
<v Speaker 3>all over the place.

0:42:11.880 --> 0:42:12.320
<v Speaker 2>D D. F.

0:42:12.400 --> 0:42:15.360
<v Speaker 3>Baker did up there Welcome to Minnesota sign with a

0:42:15.360 --> 0:42:17.520
<v Speaker 3>little bring you Ass down at the bottom. And then

0:42:17.560 --> 0:42:21.359
<v Speaker 3>our friends over Breaking Tea they dropped a new Minnesota theme,

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:24.040
<v Speaker 3>bring you Ass Tea that you can get by going

0:42:24.080 --> 0:42:26.600
<v Speaker 3>over to Breaking Tea dot com. You guys, ever been

0:42:26.640 --> 0:42:28.520
<v Speaker 3>to Minnesota? Ever been to Minneapolis?

0:42:29.239 --> 0:42:29.399
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:42:29.640 --> 0:42:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I have not.

0:42:30.600 --> 0:42:32.160
<v Speaker 3>I would, I would. I would like to go to you.

0:42:32.200 --> 0:42:34.680
<v Speaker 3>I assume I did. I wanted to for a wedding

0:42:34.760 --> 0:42:38.040
<v Speaker 3>once upon a time. Within five minutes of landing, walking

0:42:38.040 --> 0:42:41.520
<v Speaker 3>through the airport, I saw Michael Beasley. Oh yeah, he

0:42:41.600 --> 0:42:44.680
<v Speaker 3>was a wolf at one point in time. I think

0:42:44.719 --> 0:42:46.920
<v Speaker 3>we went to the Minnesota State Fair. They've got like

0:42:47.000 --> 0:42:49.879
<v Speaker 3>a legendary state fair. Really it was awesome, but just like.

0:42:49.840 --> 0:42:52.080
<v Speaker 1>In sure size of it or yeah, and.

0:42:53.880 --> 0:42:56.120
<v Speaker 3>The treats they will offer you. I remember we had.

0:42:56.160 --> 0:42:59.479
<v Speaker 3>The best thing we had was bucket of cookies pretty

0:42:59.480 --> 0:43:03.120
<v Speaker 3>self explained, just a straight up like I don't know,

0:43:04.200 --> 0:43:08.680
<v Speaker 3>ten inches by diameter wise ten inches, it was a circle.

0:43:08.880 --> 0:43:10.880
<v Speaker 3>You're just walking around with a whole pail of cookies

0:43:10.880 --> 0:43:13.439
<v Speaker 3>for the whole day. It's great and last year until

0:43:13.440 --> 0:43:14.920
<v Speaker 3>you get to the deep fried tent where you can

0:43:14.960 --> 0:43:17.880
<v Speaker 3>get a deep fried anything. We had deep fried oreos.

0:43:18.160 --> 0:43:20.799
<v Speaker 3>I know what you're thinking, chocolate chip cookies into oreos. Yeah,

0:43:20.920 --> 0:43:23.239
<v Speaker 3>I did it. I'm crazy. That's what it's like at Minnesota.

0:43:23.600 --> 0:43:25.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what other stuff they got going on.

0:43:25.280 --> 0:43:28.080
<v Speaker 3>I think we set foot in the Mall of America

0:43:28.160 --> 0:43:30.160
<v Speaker 3>for a second. They've got like an amusement park there.

0:43:30.280 --> 0:43:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I was just about to ask you there. It

0:43:31.920 --> 0:43:33.200
<v Speaker 1>looks like it's in Bloomington.

0:43:33.320 --> 0:43:35.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how close Bloomington, but.

0:43:35.719 --> 0:43:39.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure it's pretty goody Okay, you like to go?

0:43:39.920 --> 0:43:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Fly you there? With all this branding you got going.

0:43:41.719 --> 0:43:43.960
<v Speaker 2>On right here, I'd love to go to Little Canada

0:43:44.040 --> 0:43:50.120
<v Speaker 2>for sure. Yes, I've heard some great Minnesota accents. Not

0:43:50.200 --> 0:43:53.319
<v Speaker 2>from Minnesota, but people who journey out down here to

0:43:53.360 --> 0:43:55.600
<v Speaker 2>the South it feels like I'm talking to a Canadian

0:43:55.600 --> 0:43:59.240
<v Speaker 2>at times, So yeah, I'd love to go. It seems beautiful.

0:43:59.560 --> 0:44:01.800
<v Speaker 1>My favorite part about the whole bring You Ass comment

0:44:01.960 --> 0:44:04.680
<v Speaker 1>from Anthony Edwards to Charles Barkley, who said he'd basically

0:44:04.719 --> 0:44:08.640
<v Speaker 1>never been to Minneapolis, was people then pointing out, hold on, Chuck,

0:44:08.680 --> 0:44:11.080
<v Speaker 1>weren't you just there for the Final four like five

0:44:11.160 --> 0:44:14.520
<v Speaker 1>years ago in twenty nineteen. I believe the Final Four

0:44:14.600 --> 0:44:16.719
<v Speaker 1>was in Minneapolis, and I think he was covering it

0:44:16.760 --> 0:44:20.880
<v Speaker 1>with you know, TBS and all that Auburn his team

0:44:21.000 --> 0:44:23.360
<v Speaker 1>was like in the Final four. So oh yeah, I

0:44:23.360 --> 0:44:24.560
<v Speaker 1>guess he just forgot he was there.

0:44:24.719 --> 0:44:27.640
<v Speaker 2>I see a photo of him here, Yes, April six,

0:44:29.000 --> 0:44:33.160
<v Speaker 2>Banks Stadium, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Pretty sure that's Chuck and Minnison. Yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:44:33.200 --> 0:44:34.440
<v Speaker 2>he just last than twenty years.

0:44:34.480 --> 0:44:36.719
<v Speaker 1>He just forgets he was there. Thanks jesss Myers, and

0:44:36.760 --> 0:44:39.560
<v Speaker 1>you brought up that fantastic break Bring Your Ass shirt

0:44:39.560 --> 0:44:42.760
<v Speaker 1>that's available at Breaking Tea. We also because the people

0:44:42.800 --> 0:44:46.080
<v Speaker 1>wanted it. They wanted some No Dunks, Wolves and Mavericks

0:44:46.160 --> 0:44:48.399
<v Speaker 1>gear because we've got a lot of our No Dunks

0:44:48.480 --> 0:44:51.640
<v Speaker 1>logos sort of remixes for a bunch of the other teams.

0:44:51.680 --> 0:44:54.880
<v Speaker 1>We have the Pacers, we already have the Celtics. We

0:44:55.160 --> 0:45:00.720
<v Speaker 1>now have a Wolve shirt and a Maverick shirt. No Dunks.

0:45:00.760 --> 0:45:03.239
<v Speaker 1>That's gonna be going up basically right this second. I'm

0:45:03.280 --> 0:45:07.680
<v Speaker 1>getting emails from Jamie Matrum saying feel free to tease

0:45:07.719 --> 0:45:10.319
<v Speaker 1>on air. It's coming right up, he says. So by

0:45:10.360 --> 0:45:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the time you're listening to this, maybe even watching it

0:45:12.440 --> 0:45:15.600
<v Speaker 1>later on YouTube, go to Breaking Tea dot com and

0:45:15.680 --> 0:45:17.600
<v Speaker 1>search for those. You can go to No Dunks dot com.

0:45:17.640 --> 0:45:19.600
<v Speaker 1>They'll take you right to our page there on Breakingtea

0:45:19.880 --> 0:45:22.759
<v Speaker 1>dot Com. So Breaking Team, man, they move fast. The

0:45:22.800 --> 0:45:25.799
<v Speaker 1>people wanted it and we got it. They're nice looking

0:45:25.800 --> 0:45:29.600
<v Speaker 1>shirts too. Yeah, I know, all right. We'll call it there.

0:45:30.400 --> 0:45:32.719
<v Speaker 1>Conference Finals previews again, let's hear from everybody out there.

0:45:32.760 --> 0:45:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to see your picks in the comments below,

0:45:35.320 --> 0:45:38.680
<v Speaker 1>your reasoning, what you're watching for, your X factors, obviously,

0:45:38.840 --> 0:45:41.760
<v Speaker 1>who's winning it and how many games? And also, please

0:45:41.840 --> 0:45:46.000
<v Speaker 1>somebody tell me your dream Finals matchup. Let me know

0:45:46.040 --> 0:45:48.200
<v Speaker 1>in the comments. We'll be back tomorrow breaking down Game

0:45:48.280 --> 0:45:51.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the Eastern Conference Finals and all the NBA news.

0:45:51.719 --> 0:45:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I think we have all defensive teams being named later

0:45:55.640 --> 0:46:01.200
<v Speaker 1>this afternoon, we'll talk a little defense Deff. That's tomorrow

0:46:01.280 --> 0:46:02.280
<v Speaker 1>until Dan Clipper Brose.

0:46:02.480 --> 0:46:05.000
<v Speaker 3>You heard it here first. Have a great time, turn up.

0:46:05.200 --> 0:46:07.440
<v Speaker 3>Love you guys, awesome, thanks for joining us.

0:46:07.480 --> 0:46:09.880
<v Speaker 2>And remember I know people out there don't like the

0:46:09.960 --> 0:46:13.320
<v Speaker 2>banging of tables during our podcast, but it has been reduced.

0:46:14.280 --> 0:46:17.040
<v Speaker 2>It has been reduced greatly this season. I would say,

0:46:17.160 --> 0:46:20.040
<v Speaker 2>somebody do the stats. How many bangs there have been

0:46:20.560 --> 0:46:22.640
<v Speaker 2>months to months to month. It's reduced.

0:46:22.680 --> 0:46:23.520
<v Speaker 1>It definitely got better.

0:46:23.640 --> 0:46:24.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's reduced.

0:46:24.520 --> 0:46:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Brace the day, people,