WEBVTT - Minsky Moment Is Real Possibility: Economist Bob Barbera

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penel podcast. I'm Paul swing you.

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Brahma Waits. Each day

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. From Davos, we also heard Bob

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Prince k c io of Bridgewater saying that we are

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>seeing the end of the boom and bust cycle, which

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>is particularly relevant for our next guest. Uh our guests,

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I should say plural who have been sort of honing

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:37.559
<v Speaker 1>in on this concept of a Minsky moment, and I'm

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:39.560
<v Speaker 1>really glad to say we have John Authors with a

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 1>senior editor from Bloomberg Markets, as well as a special guest,

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Bob Barbara, who wrote a book on the Minsky moment

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of people talk about and are waiting for.

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>It is also a professor at John Hopkins. So I'm wondering, John,

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>just can you give us a sense of why you

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>wanted to take a closer look at the concept of

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>a Minsky moment right now. Well, I did decide this

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 1>before somebody in a control of a very large amount

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 1>of money declared that the boom bust cycle was over,

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>which would appear to be one of the classic moments

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>that Minsky would worry about. But even a month or

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 1>so ago, when we started on the Boom bog book

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>club saying read Minsky and read Bob's book on Minsky,

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:29.759
<v Speaker 1>there was obvious concern that the key notion of Hyman

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Minsky that we were trying to get at is that

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>stability breeds instability, that when people are calm and relaxed

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and confident, they will inevitably take things too far, and

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that will lead to over expansion of credit, a Ponzi cycle.

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>And then the Minsky moment is when the coyote looks

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>down to mix my metaphors and realize that there is

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>that there is nothing to support that debt. Dr Barbera,

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>do you believe we are at a Minsky moment currently? Well,

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I like to say that the difference between me and

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:09.359
<v Speaker 1>Ray Dalio is that he had the timing precisely right,

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and therefore he has fifty billion and I don't. So

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:15.399
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell you I know we're at a Minsky

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>moment right now, but I can tell you that we

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:22.359
<v Speaker 1>we have the preconditions falling into place, and and certainly

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>on the death side. I mean, just think about the

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:30.360
<v Speaker 1>fact that junk bonds yielded sixteen percent in two thousand nine.

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:33.800
<v Speaker 1>In other words, no one was willing to to lend

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to a risky company, and now you're seeing them at

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:41.239
<v Speaker 1>less than five percent. So there's no margin for error

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>there now. If a company is offered an extraorin and

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 1>extremely easy credit term, they're going to borrow more. And

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>that's what we're seeing right now. Well, although you could

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>argue people have been trying to make this bet for

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:57.799
<v Speaker 1>a long time since the crisis. Everyone's been worried that

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>we're sewing the seeds for the next crisis. But there's

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve, in the ECB and the b o

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>J sticking their thumb on the scales. Here to Bob

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Prince's point, you know, a lot of people are saying

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>he's crazy, this sort of heralds the next Minsky moment.

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Other people saying he's right. The idea that the central

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>banks are coming in and suppressing volatility, suppressing yields changes

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the equations fundamentally. Okay, So um, I think that if you,

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 1>if you, if you were to watch what the Fed

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 1>is doing. Let's pick one central bank, the one we

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>watch most of the time. What they're saying is the

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 1>inflation backdrop is quiescent, and as a consequence, they'd have

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 1>to see a meaningful change in inflation before they would

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>begin to tighten credit. A right, that's been the movie.

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>The movie has been you watch the wrong arena. So

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>you're watching a side show the price of corn and

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 1>what you a w wages are doing, and you're ignoring

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the main event, which is what's going on in asset markets.

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>So you're staring staring at the price of corn the

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>asset markets because you've said, I'm not going to do anything,

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>get progressively risk here. At some point you get a modest,

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>unimportant rise for inflation, but you dutifully respond to it,

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and you let everybody know. It's a small inflation, it'll

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>be easy to take care of. But what happens You

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>bust the bubble, and then you discover that the cost

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of that modest tightening is much larger than you anticipated.

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 1>So Greenspan talks about secular head wings in two thousand.

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Bernankei says, we need helicopter money, and you're watching the

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:36.840
<v Speaker 1>wrong movie. And it's not that that they have ended

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the cycle, it's that they're not looking at what matters. Hey,

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 1>John tell us about the upcoming book club live chest

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 1>So this is a part of our ongoing book club

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 1>with the screamingly clever clever name of Author's Notes, Authors

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>with an E get it? Yeah good, And we'll be

0:04:56.160 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>live blogging on the terminal. So anybody on the who

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>has access to a terminal who wants to multimedia Bloomberg

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>experience this morning can keep listening to radio while following

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:11.719
<v Speaker 1>our live blog on T live t l i V

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:15.039
<v Speaker 1>go on the terminal starting at eleven carry on till

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 1>twelve thirty. If you have any questions for me or

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>particularly Bob Barbara emailed them to Author's Notes Authors with

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>any Notes Bloomberg dot nets. John Author's thanks so much

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:29.600
<v Speaker 1>for joining us, really appreciated. John Author's senior editor Bloomberg Markets,

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and Dr Barbara from JOHNS. Hopkins, who is the author

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>of the Cost of Capitalism, Understanding Market Mayhem, and Stabilizing

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:39.840
<v Speaker 1>our Economic Future. Have we had estabilization or we face

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>right exactly. One of the top stories that it really

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:58.159
<v Speaker 1>caught my attention was the FTC, the Federal Trade Commission

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 1>antitrust officials are looking into the top index fund providers

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:07.040
<v Speaker 1>that have seen incredible inflows and surge to to sort

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>of record power and scope Black Rock, Vanguarden, State Street

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>in particular. And one kind of statistic that caught my

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 1>eye here is that the Big Three, which is what

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:20.479
<v Speaker 1>they're called, collectively owned about two of the typical SMP

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>five hundred company, which could potentially give them significant influence

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 1>over major decisions like mergers. That is the theory and

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:30.799
<v Speaker 1>chopping at the bit to weigh. And here is Barry

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>rid Holes. I have to even introduce you. Yeah, come on,

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Barry rid Holts whose founder of Ridholes Wealth Management and

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:40.280
<v Speaker 1>a Bloomberg opinion columnist who has opinions. Yeah, he's got

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:43.280
<v Speaker 1>he's got some strong opinions. Let's hear it. I'm confused.

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 1>You have to break it down. So what you you

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>understand how passive indexes work? Right? A third party index

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>provider like let's say the SMP creates this index and

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 1>you passively own it. Well, no, but hold on a second.

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 1>The theory here is a black Rock, particularly black Rock

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>where you had Larry Fink come out and say, we

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 1>are such a huge owner of stocks, we are going

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>to have a more activist approach in our shareholder. Okay,

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 1>he's he's making hand motions that I wish we could.

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>He could write whatever he wants letters and he could

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>send those letters out to whoever he wants, and he

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>could go on TV and he could talk about it.

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 1>But at the end of the day, Larry Rock, that's

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 1>what the president calls him. No, Larry black Rock, like

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Tim Apple, Uh, Larry Fink of black Rock is going

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>to own funds that own indexes, and if he doesn't

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>like the companies that are in those indexes, well it's

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>too bad. That's how he got to be a seven

0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollar company. He is not going to advise companies

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>about their mergers and acquisitions. He's not going to advise

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>them about their strategy. He could write a very lovely

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 1>annual letter saying, hey, we should all be green and

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>we should be concerned about the future, bah blah blah,

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and then he's going to go back to his office

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and he's going to count the seven trillion dollars in

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>passive indexes he has and do nothing else. And we

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>could see this in how these companies vote their proxies

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 1>in what they actually do. All three of these companies

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>are on average of um U S companies. That means

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>seventy of those holdings are other owners who actually vote

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>their proxies, who elect the board of directors of these companies,

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and they don't really care what Larry think thinks about

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:36.679
<v Speaker 1>the companies in their indexes. So if I'm company A

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>thinking about buying company B, and company B is has

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:43.319
<v Speaker 1>a terrible E s G score and is a polluter

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, and I know Larry finks index Blackrock owns.

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:50.079
<v Speaker 1>You know X percent of this company is the biggest

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 1>sharehold of this company, I don't care. Well, actually, Mary,

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 1>thing you almost out there. It's not Larry think. What

0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:59.559
<v Speaker 1>we know about E s G indexes is on average

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>they've been out performing the broader indexes. And we also

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 1>know that E s G as a screen is a

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>fantastic risk management tool. When it turns out that you

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 1>have a diverse board of directors and you have fairly

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 1>gender parity and pay, you're much less likely to get

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 1>hit with the sort of compliance problems. And we meet

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>two problems that have afflicted other companies. But let's get

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>back to the real core of this issue here, which

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>is what kinds of power do the big index providers

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:34.559
<v Speaker 1>have with the companies that they own shares and given

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they are owned in passive companies in

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>passive indexes, and they really are not able to sell

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the shares if they want to protest that is the

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:48.320
<v Speaker 1>powers to sell. Active managers have the power because they say,

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I've had it with you, Jack Dorsey,

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 1>You're not running Twitter. But look at professor Scott Galloway

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:57.439
<v Speaker 1>owns ten million shares of Twitter and said, the guys

0:09:57.480 --> 0:10:00.679
<v Speaker 1>a part time CEO, he's also CEO Square is going

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to Africa for three months. I'm gonna I'm gonna sell

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 1>my show. But then there's a question sort of embedded

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>in this is the only check and balance that a

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>shareholder has, this sell option? Where are there other options?

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>You can vote? And black Rock has a lot of votes. Yeah,

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>but they don't really use them. But they could Why

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>what What's What's what's keeping them from using them? Because

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>they operate on behalf of their clients, the investors, and

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 1>if they want to diverge their activity and their belief

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 1>system from the trust that investors have put with with them.

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>So hypothetically, there are three companies. Let's say one of

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 1>these companies decides to become much more activist as a

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>passive investor. I know that it's a little bit of

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>a contradiction in terms the other two companies are gonna

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:54.679
<v Speaker 1>then start advertising, Hey, listen, we're here to invest your money.

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>We're not trying to change the world. We're not trying

0:10:57.040 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>to run a political campaign. Trust to us to manage

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>your money appropriately. Who wants to take that risk with

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>six or seven trillion dollars in client assets? So the

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the whole argument. Let's let's step back and look at

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>where this argument came from. So as passive has written

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>from a relatively insignificant part of mutual funds and e

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>t f s to now over half. Now, admittedly mutual

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>funds is still a small part of the total world

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:30.839
<v Speaker 1>of investing, but fifty of that call it of the

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>world is passive. As that's taken place, as that's risen,

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:42.679
<v Speaker 1>the active world has responded aggressively. We saw research papers

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 1>that said it's it's Marxist, it's an American it's gonna

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 1>crash the market. It's going to destroy the economy. Every

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>hair brained our argument against passive investing, very efficient, very

0:11:56.320 --> 0:12:02.079
<v Speaker 1>low cost, very unemotional, has been mustered. This, Oh my goodness,

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:05.559
<v Speaker 1>the big index ers are now you know they're gonna

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:11.479
<v Speaker 1>they might theoretically, in some alternative universe, collaborate to stop

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>um stop competition is the latest stupid to roll out.

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, the underlying academic research is based

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:24.080
<v Speaker 1>on looking at airline stocks and banking stocks, two areas

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:28.440
<v Speaker 1>that have been wildly aberrational compared to the rest of

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:32.319
<v Speaker 1>the market. Yes, of course we've we've seen total deregulation

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 1>in the airline industry. Of course that looks different than

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world. And banks, in case you

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 1>haven't noticed, received a giant bail out over a decade ago.

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:43.959
<v Speaker 1>So when we look at these things, those are not

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:49.439
<v Speaker 1>the right sectors. If there's really coordination amongst the big companies,

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:53.079
<v Speaker 1>show me how that's impacting competition. In the tech space,

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 1>where there are a lot of monopolies, it turns out

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not happening. Barry ri Hilts, thank you so much,

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Barry Hults. Guess what people he is a Bloomberg opinion

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I wonder what his opinion was on this issue. It

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>really seemed a little bit opaque to make exactly a

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:11.960
<v Speaker 1>host of Masters and business on Bloomberg Radio. Great podcast,

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>also founder chairman, chief investment officer Vert Holds Wealth Management.

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 1>We love having Barry here talking about the all things

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>financial markets. Our next guest really has a unique view

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 1>on the market. Michael Son and Felt, chairman and founder

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 1>of Tiger twenty one. Tiger twenty one is a peer

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:45.439
<v Speaker 1>membership organization for high net worth investors. Tiger twenty one

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 1>has seven seventy members with more than seventy seven billion

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 1>dollars in assets, so really a unique view on the market. Michael,

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:54.200
<v Speaker 1>thanks so what for joining us here in our Bloomberg

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 1>eleven three oh studios right now? After the move we

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 1>had in the market in what are you are members

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>saying about the market? Are they running out on that

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>risk curve? Are they saying, gee, maybe I'm going to

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 1>pull it in a little bit? So, uh, I think

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 1>sentiment to shifting. People who weren't concerned a year ago

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 1>or a little more concerned today. People who were concerned

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 1>are even more so. But our members are looking for

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>an all weather portfolio, and the way they do that

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>is sort of barbell. They have risk assets in public,

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 1>private equity, and real estate, and then they have large

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 1>reserves of cash at about twelve percent, so they're not

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 1>forced to liquidate if there's a market downturn. The very

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 1>best assets they want to hold onto. Rad Dalio said,

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 1>cash is trash, what's the argument for holding it? So

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the argument for holding it is, if you're an entrepreneur.

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 1>ARE members have built great businesses and they've done it

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of step by step by rolling up their shirt sleeves,

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 1>you want to have count cash to pounce on an opportunity.

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>If you're a pure investor like Ray, he has different

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 1>ways of looking at a fully invested portfolio. But for

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>our members who are individual they want to make sure

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 1>that if there's a tremendous downturn, they can live through it.

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 1>So they have twelve percent in cash, which is about

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 1>six years living expenses by historic standards. ARE members live

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>on about two percent of their assets. And more importantly,

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to be forced to liquidate assets at

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 1>just the wrong time at low prices. They want to

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>be able to weather through any potential storm. Michael, I

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 1>know many of your members and you as well, have

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a background in real estate. How are they looking at

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>real estate right now? Sure? So real estate is king.

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 1>It's the number one asset within our members portfolio about

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I think they look at it as the great anchor.

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>It's the income producing, the reoccurring UH income that comes

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 1>from real estate that a lot of our members count on. UH.

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>They've taken some trips off the table a year or

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 1>two ago, it was in the mid thirties, so they've

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 1>taken low hanging fruit. And you have such transformation in

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 1>real estate, particularly in the United States. You have the

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Gateway twenty force evan cities which are very strong, but

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>even there's some weakness there in the upper end here

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 1>in New York. And then you get out of those

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>gateway cities where technology companies are thriving and there's growth,

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and you have a heap of heartache out there. So

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not just the one size fits all. But that's

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 1>where our members expertise is and that's why they want

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to continue investing. When we talk about private equity, so

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 1>that that was one area that they have been increasing

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 1>allocations too. There's been record amounts of money raised record

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>amounts of dry powder to put to work. Valuations near

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 1>or at record highs. How concerned are the members that

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 1>they're perhaps getting in at the top, even though this

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 1>has been an asset class that has been delivering outside returns.

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>So our members are entrepreneurs who have built businesses from scratch,

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and so they tend to want to look at private

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>equity as a direct shareholder in a small company that's growing.

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 1>They understand that there's lots of cash, but they're playing

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 1>into that trend by growing very small businesses into large

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>They're not putting huge amounts of money in the big

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 1>mega funds. They've had their day. Our members are helping

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 1>to create the businesses that are going to take advantage

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 1>of that cash that you're talking about. So in order

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:16.399
<v Speaker 1>to be a seller into a seller's market, you have

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 1>to create companies that are the stuff of legends. And

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>that's why at the other end of the spectrum, they're

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:24.120
<v Speaker 1>staying away from the I p o s. Those were

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 1>over priced. Last year, whether people got greedy or whatever

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 1>it was, most of the I p o s traded down.

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 1>So our members have shifted from looking at I p

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 1>O opportunities to venture capital and private equity opportunities. How

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>concerned are your members about, you know, some of that

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:42.879
<v Speaker 1>geopolitical risk, whether it's impeachment or whether it's trade issues.

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>And they try to take a longer term view and

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 1>not let that noise get in away. So um, for

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the long term, our members are risk on. They have

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 1>seventy plus percent in public equity, private equity, and real estate,

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 1>so they have a long term bet on the economy

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>that is almost doesn't look at the short term, if

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:07.680
<v Speaker 1>you will. But because they know that unexpected things are

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>what trash markets, You're gonna come in one day in

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the market's going to be dramatically down. That's why they're

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 1>carrying large amounts of cash. They want to have that balance.

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>When you sell a business, you have to come together

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>with a strategy, and when you meet every month with

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 1>people who have been doing this, in particular, people who

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 1>lived through the two thousand and eight crisis and said

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:30.879
<v Speaker 1>what worked. When you can learn from your peers in

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a confidential setting, you can get an edge and figure

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>out where your place is in that In that egosistem

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:40.359
<v Speaker 1>just real quick here, I'm wondering whether you have a

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:43.880
<v Speaker 1>sense of the appropriate returns to expect in an all

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 1>weather portfolio through the cycle. So last year, I'd say

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 1>most of our members were in the high single digits

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:55.159
<v Speaker 1>and low double digits, and many of them watch the

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 1>markets up twenty eight or but they had much higher

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>return than the market over their career. Last year was

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:05.919
<v Speaker 1>an anomaly. So we'd like to be long term greedy,

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 1>not short term greedy. We'd like to be able to

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 1>weather through the storms. I think if you could get

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:15.199
<v Speaker 1>on a passive portfolio anything in the high single digits

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>over the long term, that would be pretty great. Michael

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 1>sonon Felt, thank you so much for being with us.

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:24.119
<v Speaker 1>Michael sonnon Felt, chairman and founder of Tiger One. With

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:28.360
<v Speaker 1>members who have the dollars really really interesting to hear

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>how they're thinking what it means to be cautious right

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 1>now and the bright teck Away living on two percent

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:38.360
<v Speaker 1>of their assets twelve percent being in cash, so much

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>for cash as trash. California's the biggest utility is finally

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>working through or getting closer to working through UH some

0:19:56.880 --> 0:20:00.439
<v Speaker 1>of its liabilities after wildfires put it on the for

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>billions of dollars, throwing it into bankruptcy from having been

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>an investment grade rated company. Joining us now is Phil Brandall,

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:10.119
<v Speaker 1>senior credit analyst from Bloomberg Intelligence joining us from Skullman,

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:12.399
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey. And I'm wondering where we are if you

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>could just bring us up to speed in the whole

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:18.399
<v Speaker 1>court process and uh this sort of resurrection of p

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:23.119
<v Speaker 1>G and E to a solvent company utility one more time, Hi, Lisa,

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>thanks a lot. Yeah, and no, So, Pacific s and

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Electric announced through an a K that they've reached a

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:33.399
<v Speaker 1>deal with note holders and that's about twenty two billion

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:37.879
<v Speaker 1>dollars of notes and what they're going to get back

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 1>is some some bonds will be reinstated, some will get

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:44.640
<v Speaker 1>a mix of longer dated notes and shorter dated notes.

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:49.360
<v Speaker 1>But the bottom line is is this is a tremendously successful,

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:54.199
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, progress for the company. Uh you know,

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 1>first they kind of deal with the torque claimants, the insurers, uh,

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the shareholders are getting some in here. So uh, you know,

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:05.200
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing all the pieces come together for a deal.

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>So Phil, we understand, however, that Governor Gavin Newsom of

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 1>California is not supportive of the deal. What's the status

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:16.959
<v Speaker 1>of that and what needs to happen? Right? So for

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a while there it was the company and the UH

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and the shareholders on one side, you had the governor

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>on another side, and then you had a three way

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:29.200
<v Speaker 1>standoff with the note holders. Uh. And you know, one

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 1>of our thesis was that if two of those parties

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 1>get together, the other the thirds in trouble. And and

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:37.399
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what we're seeing now by and large,

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the governor's moment to impact the plan in bankruptcy court

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 1>has passed. They arguably could have been more forceful when

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the tour climates and subrogation claimants that they had a

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:51.919
<v Speaker 1>restructuring support agreement that was up for court approval, but

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 1>they chose to be fairly silent. So, Uh, it might

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit late in the game to impact

0:21:57.359 --> 0:22:01.719
<v Speaker 1>things in the bankruptcy court. But uh, there is the

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 1>there there. The trump card that they hold is, uh,

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the CPUC needs to approve this plan and so they'll

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 1>have an impact there obviously that the Public Utility Commission.

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Can we just take a step back for a second.

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:19.879
<v Speaker 1>I remember when the wildfires first were in the news

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and when pc n G ended up filing for bankruptcy

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 1>in short order because of these liabilities. There was a

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>larger discussion about what California should do with its utilities.

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:33.119
<v Speaker 1>Who should be on the hook for this, you know,

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>whether or not this was mismanagement or just an increasing

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 1>issue that was going to occur. And I'm wondering has

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>there been any broader conversation on that front. Right So,

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's all about who made money here, who lost money?

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:53.399
<v Speaker 1>And I think the winners and losers. I think the

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>shareholders obviously were big losers. But at the end of

0:22:57.040 --> 0:22:59.719
<v Speaker 1>the day, they're probably going to walk away with twenty

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty five percent of the reorganized company on behalf of

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 1>their old stock. They are also going to be on

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the hook to put in twelve billion dollars more here,

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>So they there definitely has been you know that I

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:16.200
<v Speaker 1>think most of their pain was taken up front. Uh

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and and and that twelve billion dollar equity investment. So

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 1>there's they really uh you know, I think that's where

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the bulk of the losses were suffered. Um. As far

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 1>as the bond holders, the bond holders are coming away

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:35.639
<v Speaker 1>pretty nicely here. They're getting a full recovery, and on

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 1>top of that, the terms of that debt look to

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 1>be pretty attractive given where the market is right now.

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:47.160
<v Speaker 1>So I to some extent, the helpful credit markets right

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:51.639
<v Speaker 1>now are providing UH is providing value to some of

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the stakeholders here that otherwise wouldn't be there in a

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 1>in a different market. So at this point now with

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the with the holders signing up and saying yeah, we'll

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:05.920
<v Speaker 1>take these notes back at four nine for thirty years. Uh,

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 1>they're effectively taking the market risk from this point forward.

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, if the markets did go against them, Uh,

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 1>this state and the state and t g N have

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:20.439
<v Speaker 1>that deal already. Yeah, nailed down, Phil Brenda, thank you

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 1>so much for being with us. Phil Brendel, senior credit

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 1>analyst with Bloomberg Intelligence, ruining us from Skillman, New Jersey.

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:29.679
<v Speaker 1>You know, bigger issue, especially for people like yourself with

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:33.879
<v Speaker 1>homes in California. Uh, you really waiting to figure out

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:37.679
<v Speaker 1>what the longer term ramification because I mean, these fires

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:39.920
<v Speaker 1>aren't going away. So it's how do you, year after year,

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 1>season after season deal with it. Thanks for listening to

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Penl podcast. You can subscribe and listen to

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 1>interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Paul Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney and Lisa

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:54.360
<v Speaker 1>bram Woyds. I'm on Twitter at Lisa bramwo wits one

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:57.159
<v Speaker 1>before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide on

0:24:57.240 --> 0:25:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio