WEBVTT - Understanding Silent Spreaders

0:00:06.640 --> 0:00:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Prognosis. I'm Laura Carlson. It's day nine one

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:16.640
<v Speaker 1>since coronavirus was declared a global pandemic. Our main story.

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>A top World Health Organization official sparked a controversy earlier

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 1>this week over comments regarding asymptomatic carriers of COVID nineteen.

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:32.879
<v Speaker 1>She first said instances of asymptomatic carriers spreading the virus

0:00:33.000 --> 0:00:39.879
<v Speaker 1>are very rare, before later clarifying her remarks. We explore

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>why some people don't get sick after they're infected with

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the virus and why their role in its spread is

0:00:46.400 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 1>still unclear. But first, here's what happened today. The World

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Health Organization said today that a persistent increase in cases

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>in Latin America is of deep concern as hospitals across

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:12.639
<v Speaker 1>the region come under increasing strain. This comes one day

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>after Anthony Fauci, the US government's top infectious disease expert,

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>said the pandemic is far from over. China is offering

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:26.399
<v Speaker 1>employees of some large state run companies the option to

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>be inoculated with two vaccines currently in development. The government

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>would only hand out the vaccine to workers intending to

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>travel overseas. The European Union plans a gradual and partial

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:43.320
<v Speaker 1>easing of a ban on most travel to the block

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 1>beginning July one. In May, the price of whitebread dropped

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the most since World War Two. That's according to the

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Bureau of Labor Statistics. Dress prices and car insurance fell

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>by the most on Kurt. Months of quarantine. It appears,

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>have turned stay at home Americans into home bakers and

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:11.520
<v Speaker 1>lowered demand for anything but casual clothing as weakness across

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>most categories pushed the overall consumer price index lower for

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 1>a third month and now our main story. A comment

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 1>by a w h O official earlier this week caught

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>many health experts off guard. She threw doubt on what

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 1>has been accepted for months. Silent spreaders, carriers of the

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>coronavirus who don't show symptoms readily transmit the disease to others.

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:49.919
<v Speaker 1>The official later clarified her comments, But just how risky

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>are these asymptomatic carriers? Bloomberg Senior editor Jason Gale helps

0:02:56.600 --> 0:03:06.639
<v Speaker 1>us untangle the issue. Back in February, the Diamond Princess

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 1>cruise ship was the center of an explosive outbreak of

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the coronavirus when it was quarantined in Japan. Of some

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>three thousand, seven hundred and eleven passengers and crew on

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:19.919
<v Speaker 1>board the luxury ship, almost a fifth caught it at

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the time of testing. Surprisingly, most of those infected didn't

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>have fever, dry cough, or difficulty breathing, the usual symptoms

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of COVID nineteen, and when doctors followed those asymptomatic cases

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>for weeks, they found that just under half never developed

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>any disease. That contradicted initial findings from the World Health Organization.

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>The agency said in March that asymptomatic infections are rare,

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>but since then reports from around the world have shown

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that asymptomatic cases aren't swer rare, and in some instances

0:03:52.600 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>they might be the source of infections. The majority of

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 1>transmission that we know about is that people who have

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>symptoms transmit the virus to other people through infectious ruplets.

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 1>That's Maria van Kirkhoff, the whose technical lead on COVID nineteen,

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>speaking during a Facebook live event in Geneva on Tuesday.

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>She was clarifying comments she made earlier in the week

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>about the risk of the virus spreading from people who

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>don't have symptoms. We do know that some people who

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 1>are asymptomatic. Are some people who don't have symptoms can

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>transmit the virus on and so what we need to

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:31.599
<v Speaker 1>better understand is how many of the people in the

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:34.920
<v Speaker 1>population don't have symptoms, and separately, how many of those

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:46.040
<v Speaker 1>individuals go on to transmit to others. The extent to

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>which these silent carriers may also be silent spreaders isn't clear,

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and it probably varies between groups of people because the

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:59.160
<v Speaker 1>fact is, like age, genetics, underlying medical conditions, and people's

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>individual and une responses, Uncertainty over how the virus behaves

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>has hindered nation's efforts to reopen bantered economies. If there

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:10.679
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of people in the community sharing crowded

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:14.279
<v Speaker 1>subway trains who don't know they're infected, well that's a

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:18.359
<v Speaker 1>big problem if they're also contagious. Dr Peter colign On,

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:21.599
<v Speaker 1>professor of medicine at the Australian National University in Canberra,

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>says it's less likely individuals without respiratory symptoms will spread

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the virus simply because they're not coughing and spluttering on

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 1>other people. I actually do think asymptomatics cause less infection

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 1>than symptomatics, maybe because they're not sneezing or coughing as

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>much and therefore they're not spreading droplets as much. Is

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:43.039
<v Speaker 1>there's a few studies that show that of cases are

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 1>due to people so super spreaders, but that still leaves

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>who are dcovers for Since infected people without symptoms aren't

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>in bed nursing their illness, they are typically more mobile,

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>which does present an infection risk. A simple nose rub

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>could transfer virus party calls to a hand that could

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 1>then touch a doorknob or a force it which someone

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>else might touch and then rub their eye or mouth,

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>inoculating themselves and causing an infection. So we've got to

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>actually assume that people with minimum symptoms are still a

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:18.720
<v Speaker 1>risk for having the virus and being able to spread it.

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:22.599
<v Speaker 1>And that actually means that's good news in the community

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:24.360
<v Speaker 1>because it means we can keep on doing a whole

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of things within limits. But we've got to just

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>assume it's there at low levels and therefore take all

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the precautions we have to not let us spread. So

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:36.719
<v Speaker 1>the hand hygiene, the physical distancing don't go to work

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>if you've got any symptoms, et cetera. That decreases the risk,

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't make the risk of zero. Peter says

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 1>that in countries where the coronavirus is spreading out of control,

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense for public health officials to target symptomatic cases,

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 1>isolate them and trace who they have been in contact

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>with the monitor for further spread. But in countries where

0:06:56.760 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 1>there is little or no obvious transmission going on, it

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:03.160
<v Speaker 1>is important to hunt down all infections. I think the

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:06.280
<v Speaker 1>asymptomatics are still important, particularly if you want to get

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 1>levels of virus at very low levels of transmission. I mean,

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>if you're in a country where it's out of control, okay, yeah,

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>concentrate on the symptomatics. I don't have a problem with that.

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>But if you're in a situation like Career in New

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Zealand Australia, the the asymptomatics are also important to find

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>um and once Europe gets down to low levels, that's

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be equally important because otherwise you find next

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>winter you're back in the same problem again. Infected people

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>can also spread the virus via droplets that come out

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 1>of them mouths in ways that don't require coffee. Dr

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>SONJ Sent and I care An infectious diseases. Physician in

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Canberra says that could be important as communities come out

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>of lockdown, especially in the context of large gatherings like

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 1>protest marches. There may be certain scenarios where an asymptomatic

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>person maybe create eating more droplets or perhaps even aerosolizing

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a bit. For example, in a choir practice. We've had

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>outbreaks in acquire setting in a loud nightclub where you

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>have to shout a lot, or a protest or or

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 1>some other event where someone won't be speaking normally. They

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>might be therefore generating more droplets, and in that situation

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>in a symptomatic person might be able to spread to

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 1>someone else that way. So j I agrees that the

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>likelihood of onward transmission is lower in a person without

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:37.679
<v Speaker 1>respiratory symptoms compared with someone who's coughing. Problem is, there

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of people who are infected without symptoms,

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and there sheer number alone amplifies the risk of some

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>transmission occurring. There are a lot of asymptomatic infections out

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 1>there and will only work out that proportion ultimately when

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 1>we have a good antibody test, So good zero surveys

0:08:56.679 --> 0:09:00.080
<v Speaker 1>will will give us that answer, And of course it

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>is kind of hard because is someone truly asymptomatic if

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 1>they're feeling a little bit under the weather, or are

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 1>they actually symptomatic. So there are those those slight subtleties

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>in definition we have to think about. Jia says, the

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>prospect that asymptomatically infected people are less likely to spread

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the virus doesn't mean we should abolish physical distancing and

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>other measures to control the pandemic. Not now, not until

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>we get a vaccine. I think we have to be

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:32.440
<v Speaker 1>very careful about that. Low risk is not no risk,

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:35.719
<v Speaker 1>and we've seen the consequences of what can happen if

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>there is a super spreader event. Uh, it has all

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the downstream effects, the impact on our health system, our economy, socially,

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 1>it's just a disaster. So we have to be very

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>very careful. But still except that asymptomatic transmission is lower risk,

0:09:56.720 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 1>but it is still not no risk. The coronavirus US

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>has a way of exploiting our vulnerabilities when we allow

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 1>it to spread. Undetected cases can snowball quickly. The only

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 1>sure fireway to counter it is to limit its ability

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>to infect others. As the w A chose said on Tuesday,

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:19.200
<v Speaker 1>in the absence of a vaccine, testing, quarantining and contact

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 1>tracing remain our best defense against this insidious disease. That

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 1>was Jason Gale, and that's our show today. For coverage

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>of the outbreak from one bureaus around the world, visit

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>bloomberg dot com slash coronavirus and if you like the show,

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 1>please leave us a review and a rating on Apple

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:55.079
<v Speaker 1>Podcasts or Spotify. It's the best way to help more

0:10:55.160 --> 0:11:00.120
<v Speaker 1>listeners find our global reporting. The Prognosis Daily edition is

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>produced by Topher Foreheads Jordan Gaspure, Magnus Hendrikson and me

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Laura Carlson. Today's main story was reported by Jason Gale.

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Original music by Leo Sedrin. Our editors are Francesco Levi

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and Rick Shine. Francesco Levi is Bloomberg's head of podcasts.

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening.