WEBVTT - Qualcomm Takes Aim at Nvidia with New Chips

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hide in New York

0:00:17.720 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and ed Lo Loow in sentrances.

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Go This is Bloomberg Tech coming up. Qualcomm saws as

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 2>it jumps into the AI data center market with youtips

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:32.240
<v Speaker 2>and computers aiming to challenge Nvidio.

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 3>Plus a huge week ahead for tech earnings with Microsoft, Google, Meta, Amazon,

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:37.879
<v Speaker 3>and Apple all reporting.

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:41.239
<v Speaker 4>We prepare you for the fire hose and we.

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 2>Sit down with CRUSO CEO Chase lock Miller to talk

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 2>about the company's latest ten billion dollar valuation.

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 3>From private markets to public markets. We check in what's

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 3>happening on the NASDAT today ed a new record high

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 3>for most of the benchmarks we have risk on. As

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 3>we anticipate that meeting between Trump and she will we

0:00:57.360 --> 0:01:00.959
<v Speaker 3>get some sort of positive connotation out of the meanings

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 3>between US and China, certainly in the market's anticipating it,

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:06.680
<v Speaker 3>but also looking under the hood, there are some key movers.

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 4>And I know you're looking at one of them.

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:11.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let's get straight to Qualcomm right now. The stock

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 2>is up fifteen percent. At one point in the session,

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:16.120
<v Speaker 2>it was up twenty two percent and on track for

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 2>its biggest jump since April of twenty nineteen. It has

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:23.559
<v Speaker 2>come to the market with an NPU, a data center

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:27.040
<v Speaker 2>chip for AI and machine learning tasks, and it has

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 2>a key customer. The stock's pairing some of its gain

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 2>right now. But this is a severe reaction and an

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 2>important story.

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 3>Caarra it is and treading on in videos toes on

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 3>a key week from video with GtC. Let's get to

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 3>more on Qualcomm's and its plans. Froomberg Chips reporter Ian

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 3>King is with you in Washington, Ian, give us the latest.

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 3>What already are they signaling to the market with Qualcom?

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean there's two things going on here. They're saying, look,

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 5>we've got a chip, we've got it, We've taken our time,

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 5>We've got it right here we are. We've got a

0:01:57.000 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 5>follow up chip already, we're going to have one after that.

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 5>And guess what, we've got a customer. So, you know,

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 5>late to the party. But they're making something of an entry.

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 5>I think that's the way to look at this.

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 2>An MPU or neural processing unit is just a specifically

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 2>designed chip for the task, right But in that arrangement

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:17.959
<v Speaker 2>with Humane. They're saying like two hundred megawatt deal. It

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 2>seems like, you know this, Qualcom never gets any credit

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 2>in the stock market when it comes out. But the

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:25.640
<v Speaker 2>read here seems to be this is real technology and

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 2>it's going into a real data center. But I'm assuming

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 2>they've been working on something like this for a while.

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:32.959
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean, this is a derivative of mobile technology

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 5>that they had for a while, and what they've done

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 5>is they scaled it up into the PC world and

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 5>now they're scaling up into the data center world. You

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:43.639
<v Speaker 5>remember they bought Nuvea a few years ago to improve

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 5>their processing capabilities, essentially to go big, and this is,

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 5>you know, that the latest manifestation of it, and they're

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:51.679
<v Speaker 5>going after the biggest market available.

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:54.959
<v Speaker 3>ARMS doing well because of course underlying technology of Rockqualcom

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 3>in some way feeds money and royalties over to ARM.

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 4>But there is humane being mentioned. There is Sara Arabia.

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 4>But what after that in.

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:06.080
<v Speaker 5>I mean, what we were told in the conversations we

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 5>had and we put in the story is that they

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 5>are speaking with all of the large data center operators,

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 5>all of the hyperscalers. So what I think people will

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:17.680
<v Speaker 5>be now looking for from Qualcom will be obviously more customers,

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 5>more large scale deployments, more commitments to show that this

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 5>is not just an experiment, but is real, real deployments

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:26.920
<v Speaker 5>and real you know, with billions of dollars as we're

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:30.800
<v Speaker 5>seeing floating around everywhere else behind that kind of story.

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Bloom Maggzine King, thank you very much. It is a

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 2>pivotal week for technology and markets, with five of the

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 2>Magnificent seven tech giants set to report earnings, and investors

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 2>are looking for clues on whether this tech rally can

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 2>continue here with more and what investors are expecting. Bloomberg

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 2>Equities reporter Ryan Blaslica, you had the task of previewing

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 2>a monster week what you've been writing about.

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 6>Hey, good morning, thank you for having me.

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 7>So I would say that the major takeaway this week,

0:03:57.040 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 7>or the major theme that investor is going to be

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 7>focusing on, is HAPEX. People want more clarity on how

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 7>sustainable all this AI spending is going to be. Of course,

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 7>this week we get results from Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, and Meta,

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 7>which are together four of the major Nvidia customers right there,

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 7>So anything they have to say about their spending plans,

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:19.599
<v Speaker 7>anything they have to say about what kind of ROI

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 7>they're seeing from AI. All that is going to be

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 7>very closely monitored. And of course we have the top

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 7>three cloud companies in Microsoft and Amazon and Alphabet. If

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 7>we get to see more signs of some kind of

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:33.479
<v Speaker 7>an acceleration and growth there, I think that will be

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 7>very warmly received.

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:40.119
<v Speaker 3>Those hyperscalers, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon not a single cele rating

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 3>on them, Ryan, and in fact we're getting upgrades going

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 3>into these earnings.

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 4>What are you making of the bullishness here?

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 7>It's very universally bullish. This morning I wrote about Googenheim

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 7>which upgraded Microsoft, which I believe there leaves them with

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 7>ninety nine percent bull or buy ratings and then one

0:04:56.880 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 7>person who is a hold. So obviously a lot of

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 7>optimiy there. I think if you talk to analysts, you know,

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 7>people still feel valuations are at least reasonable, maybe a

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 7>little bit elevated. But all of these companies continue to

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 7>score very highly on quality characteristics, in terms of their

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 7>cash flow, in terms of their stability and durability. People

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 7>are positive on the management teams. They're seeing this very

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:21.479
<v Speaker 7>well exposed of these major long term growth markets. So

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 7>there's still a lot of reason for optimism, but certainly

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:26.279
<v Speaker 7>it is sort of a startling to see that pretty

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 7>much everyone has the same kind of BIO rating. And

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 7>I'd also flag a story republished over the weekend about

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 7>in video which has one bearish analyst, Jay Goldberg at

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 7>a seaport. We profiled him. If you're interested in reading that,

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:37.840
<v Speaker 7>I highly recommend it.

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:40.920
<v Speaker 3>We're always interested in reading it. Ran plus Delica, thank

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 3>you very much. Indeed, look, there has been all of

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 3>this fear and anxiety and AI bubble, can anix push

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 3>back against those fears, joining us to break it all

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 3>down and the current market signals. What it can mean

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:55.040
<v Speaker 3>for invest is Denise Chism, director or Quantitative Market Strategy

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 3>at Fidelity Investments. Then is what we love about you

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:00.840
<v Speaker 3>is you bring the historical context, the research data and

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:03.600
<v Speaker 3>push us forward. Are there any alarm bells ringing as

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 3>we go into this important week?

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, it's interesting when you look at the data. I mean,

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 8>everybody highlighted the fact that numbers have been coming up

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 8>into this earning season, and interestingly enough, technology has now

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 8>reaccelerated from a sector perspective back into the top quartile

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:17.840
<v Speaker 8>of its history. And as much as we want to

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:20.719
<v Speaker 8>be skeptical and say, well, doesn't that usually mean that

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:24.279
<v Speaker 8>we have to mean revert that earnings growth typically does

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 8>prove durable when you study history. The more interesting data

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:31.039
<v Speaker 8>comes with the fact that they've actually become more expensive

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 8>obviously from that almost discount that we saw during the

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:36.599
<v Speaker 8>tariff tantrum. They're also back in the top quartile of

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 8>their valuation range as well, so meaning that you have

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:44.040
<v Speaker 8>a matched perspective of expensive valuations and really high earnings growth.

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 8>The interesting part is for the last twenty years, if

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 8>you had to decide between an environment of expensive valuations

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 8>but high growth or lower growth but lower valuations, that

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 8>would actually be it would be a better situation to

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 8>be in the high growth, high valuation, which has been

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:02.839
<v Speaker 8>much more predictive historically.

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 6>Denise.

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Over the weekend I did a lot of reading, and

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, the headline bubble comes up everywhere.

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 6>Across the newspapers.

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 2>But there is some interesting kind of points of distinction

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 2>between a stock bubble and a sector bubble. So in

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 2>a stock bubble, the argument is, well, you know, prices

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 2>and valuations being driven up without the fundamentals to support them.

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 2>But that is different where you have an entire industry

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 2>saying we're going to keep investing in this technology, right

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 2>and in the future we see a return on that investment.

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Which side of the bubble debate do you sit on,

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 2>the stock or the story.

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 8>Well, it's interesting when you look at it compared to

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 8>what we went through in the tech rec I mean,

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 8>when you look at high growth and high valuations, you say, well,

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 8>that was exactly what we saw in the prior bubble.

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 8>So isn't this the first early stages of that. Well,

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 8>relative valuations were actually seventy percent higher in two thousand

0:07:56.680 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 8>and you ended up with almost negative operating margins. Not

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:03.679
<v Speaker 8>only are we not negative in terms of operating margins

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 8>for technology as a sector, but they're actually increasing overall,

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 8>which is to say that sometimes things are expensive for

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 8>a reason. And when you look at bubble indicators like CAPEX,

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 8>if you add up all the catbex in the technology

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 8>sector and you divide it by the sales basis or

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 8>even free cash flow, you'll see that there's really nothing anomalists,

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 8>meaning that as much as some of the nominal numbers

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 8>are ie popping, some of the free cash flow is

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 8>also eye popping, as is the sales. So again it's

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:34.599
<v Speaker 8>back to that high growth is matched with high valuations.

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 8>A lot of the time, what you almost see is

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 8>high valuations are being positive predictors of future growth, which

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 8>is usually more durable than I think investors expect.

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 2>Denise for you right now, which primary or secondary data

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 2>sets are you watching most closely?

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 6>For the tech sector? So for the tech.

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:57.679
<v Speaker 8>Sector, I do think overall this shift between either economically

0:08:57.760 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 8>sensitive sectors like technology communications versus consumer discretionary and the

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 8>defensive sectors like consumer staples, healthcare utilities, the fact that

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 8>median earnings is finally starting to recover for the first

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 8>time in the better part of three years is actually

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 8>the best setup for those economically sensitive sectors like technology,

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:20.320
<v Speaker 8>even despite the fact that technology has already worked, it

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:24.199
<v Speaker 8>usually continues to work as the durability of the earning

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 8>story actually broadens out. On top of that broadening out stories,

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 8>I might say, well, are there any tailwinds that actually

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 8>are positively predictive, you know, even besides the FED cuts

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 8>that we're seeing and about to still see and the

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 8>tax cuts that we are still seeing or that have

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 8>seen and will bear fruit into twenty twenty six. Remember,

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 8>of all the sectors when you look at lower oil prices,

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 8>which were kind of a form of a tax cut.

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 8>Technology is the number one sector that outperforms after that

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 8>style of a tax cut as it filters through in

0:09:57.200 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 8>terms of cost to margins and potentially lower in flame

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 8>that increases multiples. So I think that there are a

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 8>lot of things that highlight the fact that there are

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 8>more tailwinds for overall earnings growth, which is bullish for

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:12.559
<v Speaker 8>economically sensitive sectors like technology.

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 3>And how global does that data set and do those

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 3>tailwinds tend to be right now, Denise?

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 8>So I would say that from a global perspective, you

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 8>are certainly seeing earnings growth across the globe, but right

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 8>now you are seeing an interesting what I would say

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 8>is a change in trend from the last let's call

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:34.080
<v Speaker 8>it four to six months, where international was accelerating and

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 8>the US was decelerating slightly. You are now seeing that shift,

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 8>meaning that US earnings, specifically led by technology, is reaccelerating

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 8>at the same point where Europe, EFA and emerging markets

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 8>are decelerating. That sets up, in my mind, a better

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 8>risk reward for markets, despite the fact that US stocks

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 8>are much more expensive. It's interesting when you look at

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 8>International versus the US, and you say, well, these stocks

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 8>have actually outperformed over the last ten months, you're to date, certainly,

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 8>and they're still cheap. That seems like a compelling proposition,

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 8>But when you look over the last you know, since

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 8>twenty ten, so over the last fifteen years, you'll see

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 8>that that's led to zero percent odds of outperformance for International,

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:18.959
<v Speaker 8>which again highlights the fact that look valuation sometimes doesn't

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 8>say what you think it means. Sometimes stocks are cheap

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 8>for a reason, and sometimes stocks are expensive for a reason,

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:29.319
<v Speaker 8>and a lot of times valuation almost correctly predicts whether

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 8>or not earning's growth is going to be durable or not.

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 8>So I do think that you are seeing the US

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:36.560
<v Speaker 8>be leadership from an earning's perspective.

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 3>Again, briefly, in a historical context, have you ever seen

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 3>such underpinnings of importance from the private market, Because yes,

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 3>we worry about bubbles in the public markets, but a

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 3>lot of them all go back to a few players

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:51.320
<v Speaker 3>in the private market like open AI.

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 8>So I think that the places to look from a

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:57.960
<v Speaker 8>data perspective are always in the public credit markets to

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 8>see what we are discounting interns of the private credit markets.

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 8>I don't have any specific insight, but when you see

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 8>more stress being in high yield credit spreads than there

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 8>is in the VIX or in equity valuation spreads, that's

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:13.200
<v Speaker 8>usually a negative setup. We're not seeing that so far.

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:16.680
<v Speaker 8>Credit spreads are well contained and there's still more fear

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 8>in the equity market. So whenever you see headlines like that,

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 8>you always have to step back as an investor and say,

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 8>this could be a situation where yet again the market

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 8>can climb the wall of.

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 2>Worry, denischism of fidelity. It's great to have you back

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:32.319
<v Speaker 2>on Bloomberg Tech. Thank you very much. Let's get to

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:35.079
<v Speaker 2>shares of AMD. In some breaking news crossing the Bloomberg,

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 2>the US Department of Energy is said to have formed

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 2>a one billion dollar AI packed or partnership with AMD.

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:45.080
<v Speaker 2>That's according to a report from Reuters. AMD said to

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 2>be constructing two supercomputers for the department as part of

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:51.199
<v Speaker 2>that pack. The stock was in negative territory, it swung

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 2>to a gain of about two percent. It's paired that

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 2>now up nine tens to one percent. But we'll try

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 2>and confirm that story and bring you some.

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 3>More care and coming up more AI CEO Chase Logmler

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 3>is joining us to talk about the company's latest fundraise,

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 3>a ten billion dollar valuation.

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 4>We'll talk I Compute This is Blue, their tech.

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 6>AI data centers startup.

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:21.199
<v Speaker 2>Crusoe's raised a new one point three seven billion dollar

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 2>funding round to put the company's valuation over.

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 6>Ten billion dollars.

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 2>Cruso's partnered in developing the first installation of Open Ai

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 2>and Oracles Stargate project in Abilene, Texas. Let's bring in

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 2>Cruso CEO Chase Lockmolo, who's in town for in videos

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 2>GtC DC, and you're going to be speaking The investors

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 2>in this round are important. It kind of signals maybe

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 2>where some of your next activity will be. But I

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:48.959
<v Speaker 2>think in the context of the valuation, like I understand

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 2>Cruso to be a critical piece of the build out here,

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 2>it seems almost a bit modest that valuation.

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I you know, we feel like it's a great

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 9>valuation for investors to get in and we feel like

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 9>we have a lot of room to grow from from here.

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 9>Just a lot of momentum kind of happening across the space,

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 9>and you know, we're well captured what we're well positioned

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 9>to capture. Meaningful and out of it. So you know,

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 9>we're thrilled to bring on.

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 2>You're very busy in America, right, but what is your

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 2>ambition for the Gulf and the Middle East and what

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 2>projects you might want to build out over there.

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 9>You know, we're looking at a number of different things

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 9>in the in the GCC. You know, obviously having Mubattle

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 9>as a capital partner gives us a very strong partnership.

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 9>In the UEE. We are also sort of you know,

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 9>evaluating some of the things that are going on with

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 9>the ue Stargate and some of the ambitions in Saudi

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 9>But you know, we haven't announced anything quite yet.

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 3>Jase, I want to give context to our viewers who

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 3>know you for what you're doing with Stargate. You're also

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 3>action in Europe to maybe Middle East. But coming down

0:14:56.880 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 3>to it, you're a cloud provider, data sem to revite

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 3>a manufacturing You've got an edge when it comes to energy.

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 3>That was kind of the winning formula when you first

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 3>ever founded More to service bitcoin mining, and I'm interested

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 3>as to what sets you apart from a core weave

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 3>and other neo clouds out there.

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 9>I think there's a number of things. I mean, we

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 9>we've we've we've taken this vertically integrated energy first approach

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 9>kind of from the start and the founding and the business.

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 9>You know, we you know, I think a lot of

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 9>the value that was unlocked from you know, this first

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 9>Stargate campus in in Abilene was the fact that we

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 9>had access to one point two gigawats of power that

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 9>could energize this very large cluster of Nvidia GPUs. Building

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 9>it very very fast required us to have creative designs

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 9>and flexibility with a lot of modular components that went

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 9>into constructing this very large campus with you know a

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 9>lot of those modular components being manufactured off site. And

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 9>you know, I think we've built a very high performance

0:15:57.280 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 9>software stack to enable these AI factories to work work

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 9>very effectively in at scale, integrating a lot of great

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 9>managed services like our managed file systems and managed Kubernetes

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 9>that enable innovators to do their life's work on incredibly

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 9>reliable and high performance infrastructure.

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 3>Those innovators, we know open aiye is one of them.

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 3>But you're busy building elsewhere and wyoming, not just in Texas.

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 4>Who are you building for there?

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 3>Can you tell us a little bit about where the

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 3>appetite is coming from.

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 10>Uh.

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 9>We can't speak about who we're working with directly in

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 9>uh In Wyoming quite yet, but we have a we

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 9>have a we have a great partner there, and we'll

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 9>be thrilled to come back and tell you all about

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 9>it when we're ready to announce it publicly. But it

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 9>is a exciting campus just from both energy perspective and

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 9>the scale it presents. What we've announced initially is one

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 9>point eight gigawatts, but there is a plan to take

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 9>it to ten gigawatts, so it will be a very

0:16:55.360 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 9>very large campus for you know, AI computing infrastructure, and

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 9>we're thrilled to have a wonderful partner there.

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:07.480
<v Speaker 2>Last week, the Trump administration made some announcements about how

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 2>they want to speed up the electrical hookups for data centers.

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:13.680
<v Speaker 2>That's like at the core of the president's strategy cut

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 2>red tape. Do you regulate just your reaction to what

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:20.920
<v Speaker 2>the administration is doing about speed matching supply of power

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:22.120
<v Speaker 2>to infrastructure.

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:27.640
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, you know, we're you know, I think we're we're

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 9>excited to have the support of the administration for some

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 9>of the critical blockers to to moving faster. You know,

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:36.439
<v Speaker 9>one of our core values as a business is to

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:39.400
<v Speaker 9>move fast and make things so we speed is really

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 9>at the essence of and at the core of a

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 9>lot of what we do. One of the more frustrating

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 9>things to be slowed down by is you know, waiting

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:50.399
<v Speaker 9>for a permit to be approved, waiting for you know,

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 9>some sort of application that's that's in the hands of

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:58.639
<v Speaker 9>a government agency. And you know, seeing the urgency from

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 9>this administration that saying like, hey, we need to support

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 9>the private sector to go out and build this infrastructure

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 9>so that America can lead an artificial intelligence is just

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 9>a great, you know, great indicator of what's to come.

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 9>And you know, we're really excited to have that public

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 9>private partnership. We think it's a very healthy dynamic that's

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:22.440
<v Speaker 9>at play right now. And you know, we very big

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 9>supporters of a secretary right and you know what he's

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 9>doing to you know, help make this happen faster.

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 3>The key part of the infrastructure that you're building is

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:32.680
<v Speaker 3>the chips that go in the data centers you're building

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 3>strong within video. We've just had the lead of our

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 3>show that Qualcom's trying to get in on AI accelerate

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:40.400
<v Speaker 3>a marketplace.

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 4>What do you think about an offering from a Qualcom.

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 3>What's your read or other competitors coming forward?

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 9>Well, I mean I think everybody's sort of taking a

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 9>slightly different angle on this, and you know, big supporters

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 9>of there being more competition in the marketplace. I think

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:00.400
<v Speaker 9>that's very healthy when you have a market as big

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 9>as AI and AI computing infrastructure. In the case of Qualcom,

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:07.440
<v Speaker 9>I think their flavor that you know, I think fits

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 9>them a little bit better is more you know, AI

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 9>inference closer to the edge, you know, closer to you know,

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 9>these these on device or near the end points where

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 9>users will be interacting with infrastructure. So you know, I I, uh,

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 9>you know, I think that fits very well with kind

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 9>of the qual Coon dynamic and you know, their strengths

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 9>and what they can bring to the market as AI

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 9>gets embedded in all aspects of you know, the economy

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 9>and everything that you know, people are doing on a

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 9>day to day basis. We're a big believer that we

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:45.360
<v Speaker 9>will need infrastructure everywhere to help support intelligence everywhere.

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 3>Chase Long, so great to have some time with you

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 3>as you're in town and DC for GtC and videos

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 3>big event. Co found recy of CRUSA, thank you for

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 3>joining and coming up Apple's future iPad pros.

0:19:57.600 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, they're going to borrow some key features from thenly

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:02.640
<v Speaker 4>to STI, we'll describe next. This is pretty bad tech.

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 6>Apple.

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:13.120
<v Speaker 3>When I may be pouring over one of the iPhone

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 3>pro's latest innovations to the iPad pro, the company is

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 3>said to be eyeing putting a vapor chamber into future

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:21.919
<v Speaker 3>iterations at the tablets is the subject of this week's

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:24.880
<v Speaker 3>power on newsletter from Luemag's managing editor for Consumer tech,

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:28.639
<v Speaker 3>Mark German. And talk us through Mark why this is

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:30.719
<v Speaker 3>such a big thing for the iPad and what innovation

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 3>is really at stake here.

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, let's just take a step back and talk about

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:38.119
<v Speaker 11>what is a vapor chamber. It's a liquid cooling system.

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 11>So there's actually special, scientifically developed liquid inside of the

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:44.919
<v Speaker 11>iPhone seventeen pro today.

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:47.159
<v Speaker 12>And the reason they did that is that.

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 11>They noticed their chips can run so powerfully like they're

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:53.200
<v Speaker 11>in a laptop, where it can get the device pretty hot,

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:56.120
<v Speaker 11>and something as thin and light as an iPhone you

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:58.120
<v Speaker 11>can't put a fan in there to cool it down

0:20:58.200 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 11>like you would in a mapbook pro or a dust

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 11>or what have you.

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 12>So this offsets that.

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:05.920
<v Speaker 11>But the iPad Pro is even thinner than the iPhone

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 11>and even though the thermal constraints aren't as constrained because

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 11>you have that larger surface area, the chips are getting

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:15.160
<v Speaker 11>more performance. They just put the M five processor from

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:17.399
<v Speaker 11>the MacBook Pro and the new Vision Pro and.

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 12>The iPad Pro. But you can see as they continue

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 12>to add more performance to the iPad pro and those

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 12>designs can seue to get thinner and lighter, something's going

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 12>to give, especially when you can't put in a fan.

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 11>So the solution is bringing that vapor chamber from the

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 11>latest pro iPhones to the next generation Pro iPads.

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 12>In twenty twenty.

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:38.399
<v Speaker 2>Seven, Mark real quick take us inside Apple and how

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Apple works. So why is it they try the tech

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 2>first on iPhone and then later roll it to a

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:44.360
<v Speaker 2>future generation iPad.

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 12>Uh, It really all depends, you know.

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 11>There have been so many features they've put in the

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 11>iPad first before they put in the iPhone, or put

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 11>in the mac before they brought it to another product.

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:56.160
<v Speaker 12>So there's really no consistency there.

0:21:56.560 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 11>I think it comes down to the to the performance

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:02.639
<v Speaker 11>needs for that particular and the importance much more important

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 11>to get the vapor chamber in the iPhone sooner. Remember

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 11>the iPhone fifteen pro came out a few years ago

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:11.679
<v Speaker 11>super hot. They needed to do something to address that,

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 11>and that was their solution. The iPad pros. Today they

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:16.919
<v Speaker 11>don't really overheat, but there's going to be a time

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 11>where the performance gets so high that if they didn't

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 11>have the vapor chamber of maybe you would have that

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 11>overheating issue.

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 12>So it's all dependent.

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Mark German and the latest power on from Sunday.

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 2>It's an absolute must read. Thank you very much, Welcome

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 2>back to Bloomberg Tech. Look, this is what's going on,

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 2>and it's largely semiconductor related.

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 6>Starting with in video. Right.

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 2>We are here in Washington, DC because they are doing

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:49.679
<v Speaker 2>their DTC DC edition conference this week. There will be

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 2>news They're always with is when it comes to Jensen

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 2>Wong and his company. The dynamic, though, is that the

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 2>President of the United States is on a tour of

0:22:56.680 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 2>Asia and we don't yet know where semiconductors Nvidia fit

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 2>within that dynamic. In terms of newsflow, Quile comes up

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:06.199
<v Speaker 2>twelve percent. At one point in the session, it was

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 2>up twenty two percent and on track for its biggest

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 2>jump since April of last year of sorry, April twenty nineteen,

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:16.120
<v Speaker 2>the story they have an MPU an AI accelerator card.

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 2>It will ship next year and it goes to humane

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:21.639
<v Speaker 2>in Saudi Arabia, first severe reaction to them entering the

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 2>data center market. Also go back to a story that

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 2>we covered earlier in the program. Reuters is reporting that

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 2>AMD has a pact with the Department of Energy to

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 2>build two supercomputers. And that is a report from Reuters

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 2>that's in that moment sent the stock up two percent.

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of given up some of that game, up

0:23:39.560 --> 0:23:41.919
<v Speaker 2>zero point five percent. But we started the day, as

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 2>you can see on the left of the chart in

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 2>negative territory.

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:45.440
<v Speaker 6>Goodness, that's a lot.

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:50.359
<v Speaker 3>Caro, what a semiconductor roundup. But let's head over to ASA.

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 3>You just mentioned it ed because President Trump is in

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 3>back two back summits ahead of the highly anticipated meeting

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 3>with President huzim Paying later this week Chinese and US

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 3>training go she do is they've actually lined up a

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 3>few easy diplomatic wins ahead of that meeting. They've left

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:08.879
<v Speaker 3>deeper conflicts unresolved for one Treasury Sextuary, Besson said that

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 3>he believed China would delay its latest rare earth restrictions

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:15.879
<v Speaker 3>after the latest talks, but friction over the export controls

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 3>does remain. So we go out to Bluemost Tyler Kendall,

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:21.959
<v Speaker 3>who joins us very late from Tokyo, Taya talk us

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 3>through where we stand in terms of winds for a

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:26.120
<v Speaker 3>tech perspective here.

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:31.680
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, hey, Caroline, Well, as you were mentioning the US

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:33.920
<v Speaker 13>is one of their chief of wins that they wanted

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 13>to see this week was China delaying the implementation of

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:41.160
<v Speaker 13>its recently announced export curves related to critical and rare

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:44.159
<v Speaker 13>earth minerals. But the US Treasury Secretary maintains that the

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:47.440
<v Speaker 13>US is not going to loosen its export controls related

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 13>to advanced semiconductors, and that could potentially mark a step

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 13>back for Invidia's bid to rejoin the Chinese market. Now,

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 13>I'm looking forward to your coverage this week of Jensen

0:24:56.840 --> 0:24:59.679
<v Speaker 13>Wang being in Washington, DC, and once he wraps up

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 13>his time I'm in the nation's capital, he's actually headed

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 13>over here to Asia where he's going to attend the

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 13>APEX CEO summit in South Korea. That's going to be

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 13>President Trump's next stop after he wraps up his time

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 13>here in Tokyo because that is where he's going to

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:16.159
<v Speaker 13>meet with Chinese President Jijingping. So we're going to be

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:18.920
<v Speaker 13>watching this very closely as it unfolds for the rest

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:21.120
<v Speaker 13>of the week. Now, even as the US maintains it's

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:23.879
<v Speaker 13>not going to loosen its current restrictions in place, our

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:26.680
<v Speaker 13>analysts have Bloomberg Economics say that they expect the US

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 13>to take off the table the threatened but not yet

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:34.000
<v Speaker 13>imposed restrictions, including those related to critical software and cloud computing.

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 13>There's a lot to look out for here, but really

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 13>the top line so far has been that there is

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 13>this simmering intentions that is appearing to allow for a

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 13>broader conversation about a broader trade deal down the line.

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:47.400
<v Speaker 13>But at this moment, we are really just looking at

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 13>these key diplomatic wins, these top line wins, instead of

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 13>a fuller, more comprehensive pack bluebooks.

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:57.120
<v Speaker 2>Tyler Kendo, who's traveling with the President currently in Tokyo,

0:25:57.200 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 2>thank you very much.

0:25:58.119 --> 0:25:58.199
<v Speaker 10>So.

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 2>In video, Chips have been at the center of this

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:03.879
<v Speaker 2>trade impass between the US and China, the company losing

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 2>billions of dollars in revenue with its Ai chips out

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:09.720
<v Speaker 2>of the Chinese market. The same week, President Trump plans

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 2>to meet Xijingping in videos holding one of its biggest

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:15.480
<v Speaker 2>AI conferences at a massive convention hall just a few

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 2>blocks from the White House. And it's a pretty clear

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:20.959
<v Speaker 2>sign of the growing stakes in Washington for the world's

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:24.440
<v Speaker 2>most valuable company. Bloomberg Senior Tech editor Mike Shepherd joins

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 2>us to discuss the calculus from like Jensen, Huang's point

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:29.880
<v Speaker 2>of view is very simple. Where once they had eighty

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:32.680
<v Speaker 2>percent of a critical market, they now basically have zero,

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 2>and it's something he wants to reverse through the President

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:36.359
<v Speaker 2>in this administration.

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:39.160
<v Speaker 10>He has been making great efforts to do that, as

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 10>we have seen all year. And it's not just in

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:44.959
<v Speaker 10>the many appearances that he has had with Donald Trump.

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 10>Remember he was present, of course for the unveiling of

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 10>the AI Action Plan.

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:50.680
<v Speaker 6>He was also with the President.

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 10>On his trip to the Middle East earlier in the year,

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:55.679
<v Speaker 10>and he joined Donald Trump on the visit to the

0:26:55.800 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 10>UK in August where they unveiled war AI chip deals.

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 10>But there is more to it than that. The company

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:06.400
<v Speaker 10>is also investing in its lobbying operation here in Washington.

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 10>It's not just this come and go big event at

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:12.680
<v Speaker 10>the convention Center just a few blocks from here. They

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 10>are also hiring more lobbyists and spending more to try

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:18.639
<v Speaker 10>to make sure that their influence operation is here.

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 3>To stay and that influence mike more broadly, is there

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:26.120
<v Speaker 3>an inbuilt confidence that they will have the access that's

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 3>necessary for China, because there's been this ongoing narrative in

0:27:30.119 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 3>the Republican Party itself torn a little bit about the

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:35.680
<v Speaker 3>hawkishness that they should have for China and the access

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 3>to deep technology that should be allowed or not in

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:41.119
<v Speaker 3>the case, Oh, Kerry.

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 6>You hit the nail on the head right there.

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 10>With the tension here in Washington over whether and how

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:49.399
<v Speaker 10>much to allow Nvidia to return to the China market,

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 10>and really it centers on national security concerns. Many in

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 10>both parties Here in Washington, lawmakers and policy makers from

0:27:57.520 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 10>the prior administration and even some in the current administration

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:04.919
<v Speaker 10>have some misgivings about allowing China to have access to

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 10>the sophisticated artificial intelligence chips that Nvidia produces. One of

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:13.200
<v Speaker 10>the big concerns is that granting that technology to Beijing

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 10>opens the door somehow to the Communist Party there, somehow

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 10>employing it for military and intelligence gathering. Purposes, and that

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:25.959
<v Speaker 10>would be across purposes, of course, with what the national

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:29.399
<v Speaker 10>security apparatus here in Washington wants to see. China is

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:32.920
<v Speaker 10>still seen as the top geopolitical rival with the US,

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:36.160
<v Speaker 10>and they don't want to hand any sensitive technology in

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 10>that direction, citing those national security concerns. So we will

0:28:39.800 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 10>see how that comes up in the conversations here during

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 10>the Nvidia conference. We'll be looking to see what Jensen

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 10>Wong says, not only during his keynote, but also in

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 10>other aside moments with the media and other folks. If

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 10>this comes up in any way. It will also be

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 10>interested in seeing how lawmakers who are in attendance tomorrow

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:00.960
<v Speaker 10>may actually be acting to that.

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 6>To his sales pitch of a return.

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 2>To China, Bloombos, Mike Shephard, thank you very much. So

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 2>a meeting between US and Chinese reps are drawing close

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 2>attention from the defense technology sector and its investors. Many

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 2>senior opportunities emerging under the Trump administration, particularly in areas

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 2>like space, defense, cybersecurity, advanced manufacturing sectors increasingly viewed as

0:29:22.080 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 2>arenas of competition between Washington and Beijing. Joining US now

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 2>is mina fultas he's the founder and chief investment officer

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:33.120
<v Speaker 2>of Washington Harbor Partners. Welcome to Bloomberg Tech. I mean

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 2>that is the dynamic. There is tension economically and otherwise

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 2>between the United States and China, but if you're a

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:43.480
<v Speaker 2>bench capitalist or private growth equity player, you see an opportunity.

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 14>Thank you so much both for having me here today.

0:29:46.920 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 14>At Washington Harbor Partners. We're running our daily ground game.

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 14>We're meeting with the Department of War. We're meeting with

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 14>the National security community, with the White House, with Congress

0:29:57.280 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 14>to listen and to engage and to understand and what

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 14>are the greatest mission needs, What are the market gaps,

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 14>and where can we find the best founders, with the

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 14>best leadership, with the best technologies and capabilities to meet

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 14>those needs and to fill those market gaps.

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 6>You just mentioned the Department of War.

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Last week I was in Los Angeles with many space

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:19.480
<v Speaker 2>technology leaders and they very much say that space is

0:30:19.480 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 2>the next war fighting domain. Their point, which I wrote

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 2>about for the Tech in Depth newsletter, is that Space Force,

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 2>as a government agency is a real player here. Do

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:32.479
<v Speaker 2>you agree with that argument and do you see yourself

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 2>doing business with Space Force?

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 14>That's a great question, and space is a critical workfighting

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 14>domain that we're very interested in. We're very bullish on

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 14>the Space Force. We're very excited about their leadership, their talent,

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 14>their focus, the resources they're dedicating to this very critical

0:30:49.120 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 14>work fighting domain. We're making active investments in the space domain. So,

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 14>for example, we recently invested in a company called Turion Space,

0:30:57.200 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 14>which is a space domain awareness company. IDEA unified potential

0:31:00.880 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 14>threats in space, they analyze them, and they potentially help

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 14>to react to those emerging threats and emerging technologies. We

0:31:10.520 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 14>also have investments in companies like Stoke Space, apex Space,

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 14>and Quindar to meet these mission gaps and needs in space,

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 14>and we're on the lookout to be much more active

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 14>in the space domain.

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 3>Stoke Space just had some interesting news in and of

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:24.960
<v Speaker 3>itself about its own fundraised.

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 4>I'm interested more broadly.

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 3>Than what is your ask when you're thinking about later

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:33.960
<v Speaker 3>this week the meeting between she and Trump, how worried

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:36.720
<v Speaker 3>are you about rare earth metals? How worried are you

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 3>about access at the moment when so much of this

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 3>is integral to some of the startups that.

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 14>You back, Thank you, Caroline. So the whole world is watching,

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:50.040
<v Speaker 14>everyone's following the headlines, and at Washington Harbor, we just

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 14>have our heads down and running our daily ground game.

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:54.479
<v Speaker 6>Rare Earth's.

0:31:54.560 --> 0:31:57.720
<v Speaker 14>The US supply chain we think is a very high priority.

0:31:57.960 --> 0:32:00.760
<v Speaker 14>We're investors in a company called Vulcanellum, which we think

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 14>can help create that domestic supply chain and ensure that

0:32:04.280 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 14>we have access to the most important materials for both

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 14>robotics and drones and other very important mission needs. Production

0:32:13.920 --> 0:32:17.360
<v Speaker 14>at scale we think is an increasingly important pain point.

0:32:17.600 --> 0:32:20.920
<v Speaker 14>We're investors in companies like Aerial Industries, which brings hardware

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 14>and sensors, ammunitions to the mission edge. Beyond just things,

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 14>we think data is incredibly valuable in part and valuable

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 14>and powerful. We think bringing data the edge and empowering

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 14>the warfighter and the operator with AI and AI enabled

0:32:37.520 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 14>capabilities is also of incredible importance. So we're invested in

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 14>a company called Raft which brings that decision making capability

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 14>using AI to the mission edge. And finally, power and

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 14>energy resilient, mobile, safe power and energy anywhere in the

0:32:54.880 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 14>world for the war fighter we also think is incredibly

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 14>important and very critical to this aply chain.

0:33:00.920 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 4>Just remind us of like your thesis.

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:05.960
<v Speaker 3>At this moment, we've suddenly felt like twenty twenty five

0:33:06.000 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 3>has been the year that we're all talking about defense tech.

0:33:08.520 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 3>But the LPs that are in Washington Harbor partners, the

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:13.720
<v Speaker 3>likes of the corporate pension fonts, the endowments of foundations,

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 3>have they always been there backing this thesis. How much

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:21.200
<v Speaker 3>have you suddenly heard of this wall of demand coming

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 3>from those who want to access this VC focus that

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 3>you have.

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 14>We are very fortunate to have very focused LPs who

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 14>have been very passionate about bringing the best technologies to

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:38.520
<v Speaker 14>not only the war fighter, but also the civil servant.

0:33:38.720 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 14>They see it as having been unfair that those who

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:45.720
<v Speaker 14>are making the greatest sacrifice and taking the most courage

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:49.600
<v Speaker 14>haven't had the best technologies and have critically been eight

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:53.240
<v Speaker 14>to ten years behind the Fortune five hundred. Today, they're

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 14>all universally excited that in an area where we haven't

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:02.960
<v Speaker 14>had the US military modernized and nearly a generation, all

0:34:03.080 --> 0:34:05.960
<v Speaker 14>the stars are aligning now to change things now more

0:34:06.000 --> 0:34:12.200
<v Speaker 14>than ever. Congress has appropriated real dollars to acquiring capability

0:34:12.280 --> 0:34:16.560
<v Speaker 14>and next generation technologies. Both sides of the aisle are

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 14>in agreement today that things have to change, that there

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:24.440
<v Speaker 14>needs to be acquisition reform and that they're trying to

0:34:24.560 --> 0:34:28.720
<v Speaker 14>enable the Pentagon to acquire modern technologies and capabilities very quickly.

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 2>The timeline that all of the apparatus fence OUP US,

0:34:32.120 --> 0:34:34.800
<v Speaker 2>this nation runs to is conflict of some form twenty

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:37.440
<v Speaker 2>twenty seven US and China. Do you model for that

0:34:37.520 --> 0:34:38.280
<v Speaker 2>same timeline?

0:34:38.360 --> 0:34:41.319
<v Speaker 14>You know, we model for asap. We model for the

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 14>urgent needs and not knowing when there could be conflict.

0:34:45.480 --> 0:34:50.640
<v Speaker 14>And so the critical thing here is that both military leaders,

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:56.799
<v Speaker 14>civilian leaders, entrepreneurs, investors are scaling up and they're all

0:34:56.840 --> 0:34:59.320
<v Speaker 14>acting with a sense of urgency to make sure that

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 14>the warfighter has what they need in the next two

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 14>weeks and doesn't have to wait two years to get

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 14>what they deserve and need to fight this battle.

0:35:07.400 --> 0:35:10.400
<v Speaker 3>In ft of Washington Harbor Partners, It's great to have

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:11.320
<v Speaker 3>some time with you today.

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:14.560
<v Speaker 4>Come back soon. Meanwhile, coming up on as Big.

0:35:14.360 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 3>Tech gets set to report results AI bubble fears, they're lingering.

0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 4>We're going to discuss that next. Is it real?

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:40.840
<v Speaker 3>This is Blomberg Tech? Could the AI boom be headed

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:44.839
<v Speaker 3>for a bust? Bloomberg Intelligences Brian Doherty says no, yeah,

0:35:45.080 --> 0:35:48.600
<v Speaker 3>calling AI quote the backbone of a modernized industrial economy,

0:35:49.080 --> 0:35:52.800
<v Speaker 3>not its next speculative tale. Please to say Brian joins

0:35:52.880 --> 0:35:54.719
<v Speaker 3>us now working with Jessica Lynn as well.

0:35:55.560 --> 0:35:58.680
<v Speaker 4>Just give us the fundamental underpinnings. It gives you confidence

0:35:58.680 --> 0:36:00.560
<v Speaker 4>that this isn't some tech rec written.

0:36:01.120 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 15>So I think what's really interesting is we actually look

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:05.480
<v Speaker 15>at the equities landscape a little bit different than everybody else.

0:36:05.680 --> 0:36:08.400
<v Speaker 15>So everything we do is through a thematic lens or

0:36:08.400 --> 0:36:10.960
<v Speaker 15>a thesis driven so we actually carve up the equities

0:36:11.040 --> 0:36:16.279
<v Speaker 15>landscape into AI, decentralized energy, grid, tech, space ed you

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:18.160
<v Speaker 15>guys were talking about this a few minutes ago, space

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:20.840
<v Speaker 15>quantum computing. So when we think about tech or we

0:36:20.840 --> 0:36:23.799
<v Speaker 15>think about energy, we're actually looking much more discrete and

0:36:23.880 --> 0:36:25.600
<v Speaker 15>right now. What we're looking at right now is that

0:36:25.600 --> 0:36:29.279
<v Speaker 15>we've seen an incredible rise in correlations between AI and

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 15>decentralized energy transition metals, which again rare earths and other

0:36:33.200 --> 0:36:36.360
<v Speaker 15>metals critical to the transition. So those correlations have been

0:36:36.440 --> 0:36:39.279
<v Speaker 15>rising over the last year. What's also very interesting though,

0:36:39.320 --> 0:36:41.680
<v Speaker 15>is we're seeing that those names or those themes have

0:36:41.800 --> 0:36:44.319
<v Speaker 15>much higher beta to AI than they used to, and

0:36:44.360 --> 0:36:46.680
<v Speaker 15>more specifically, it means they're getting hit a little bit

0:36:46.719 --> 0:36:49.520
<v Speaker 15>harder on the downdraft, right, So when you get AI pullback,

0:36:49.560 --> 0:36:53.120
<v Speaker 15>you're seeing those decentralized energy grid tech transition metal names

0:36:53.400 --> 0:36:56.279
<v Speaker 15>actually feel some pain on that. But when we look

0:36:56.320 --> 0:36:59.239
<v Speaker 15>at how these secular trends are actually progressing, there is

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:03.120
<v Speaker 15>just such huge, huge underlying opportunity in the bottlenecks, in

0:37:03.160 --> 0:37:06.000
<v Speaker 15>the retrofits, in the fact that, let's be honest, the

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:08.719
<v Speaker 15>power grid itself was already aging. There's a lot of

0:37:08.719 --> 0:37:10.120
<v Speaker 15>investment opportunity there.

0:37:11.520 --> 0:37:14.040
<v Speaker 2>If you are a Bloomberg Terminal client and you're listening

0:37:14.080 --> 0:37:16.000
<v Speaker 2>to the show, first of all, look up at the

0:37:16.040 --> 0:37:19.200
<v Speaker 2>screen and really focus here of what Brian's about to say,

0:37:19.480 --> 0:37:22.280
<v Speaker 2>and then check out her research on the terminal. Seriously,

0:37:23.400 --> 0:37:26.520
<v Speaker 2>you're doing a comparison with twenty twenty one. Why why

0:37:26.560 --> 0:37:29.200
<v Speaker 2>look at twenty twenty one, and then you're saying, this

0:37:29.360 --> 0:37:31.400
<v Speaker 2>is what we think will happen in twenty twenty six.

0:37:31.760 --> 0:37:32.880
<v Speaker 6>Answer those two please.

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:35.359
<v Speaker 15>So we're looking to twenty twenty one because that's the

0:37:35.400 --> 0:37:37.759
<v Speaker 15>most recent correction, if you will, that we saw, and

0:37:37.800 --> 0:37:39.359
<v Speaker 15>a lot of people refer back to twenty twenty one

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:42.120
<v Speaker 15>where we see a lot of that particular US technology

0:37:42.560 --> 0:37:45.000
<v Speaker 15>really dive down into twenty twenty two, so that's a

0:37:45.000 --> 0:37:46.960
<v Speaker 15>really good reference point for US, something that we are flagging.

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:49.239
<v Speaker 15>Though it's pretty hard to make comps right when you

0:37:49.320 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 15>go back to the dot com era. We're not in

0:37:51.239 --> 0:37:53.440
<v Speaker 15>the dotcom era. We're looking at when we look at

0:37:53.480 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 15>the eighteen biggest most powerful names in our AI theme universe,

0:37:57.120 --> 0:37:59.920
<v Speaker 15>for instance, we're talking about twenty four trillion of market

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 15>up in the dotcom area. That was more like a

0:38:03.080 --> 0:38:06.000
<v Speaker 15>seven trillion dollar type number in today's dollars. So what

0:38:06.000 --> 0:38:07.799
<v Speaker 15>we're looking at is twenty twenty one is the most

0:38:07.800 --> 0:38:10.920
<v Speaker 15>recent comp where we saw a massive market correction naturally,

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:13.640
<v Speaker 15>and where we look to twenty twenty six, though we

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:15.879
<v Speaker 15>don't expect that to happen. We've got rate cuts coming.

0:38:15.880 --> 0:38:17.399
<v Speaker 15>We've talked about that a lot in the last few

0:38:17.400 --> 0:38:19.319
<v Speaker 15>weeks as well, So rate cuts are coming, they're not

0:38:19.400 --> 0:38:21.600
<v Speaker 15>on the rise, which was also a big part of

0:38:21.600 --> 0:38:24.560
<v Speaker 15>that time period. And then, more importantly though, we are

0:38:24.680 --> 0:38:28.239
<v Speaker 15>very much flagging some tension. So while we do think

0:38:28.320 --> 0:38:30.560
<v Speaker 15>that we're very much in a boom, this isn't a bust.

0:38:30.680 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 15>It's not to say that it's not going to be

0:38:32.120 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 15>without tension. And the biggest tension we're watching for is

0:38:34.560 --> 0:38:37.480
<v Speaker 15>the fact that we've now seen tech investors tech dollars

0:38:37.920 --> 0:38:43.120
<v Speaker 15>flock towards industrial materials, energy names. Well, guess what those

0:38:43.160 --> 0:38:45.400
<v Speaker 15>tend to be longer build cycles. So the tension on

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:48.600
<v Speaker 15>quarter to quarter earnings. Tech investors maybe aren't used to

0:38:48.600 --> 0:38:50.520
<v Speaker 15>the patients that are sometimes required in there, and so

0:38:50.560 --> 0:38:52.239
<v Speaker 15>we do expect some volatility because of that.

0:38:53.600 --> 0:38:56.120
<v Speaker 2>reON deity of Bloomberg Intelligence. We just showed it, but

0:38:56.160 --> 0:38:59.200
<v Speaker 2>it's must read research on the Bloomberg terminal with Jessica Lynn.

0:38:59.200 --> 0:39:00.160
<v Speaker 6>Thank you very much.

0:39:00.440 --> 0:39:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Now coming up, we're going to discuss how Warner Brothers

0:39:02.960 --> 0:39:07.120
<v Speaker 2>Discovery is looking for help blocking the Elesons.

0:39:07.680 --> 0:39:09.879
<v Speaker 6>That's a dynamic. This is green bag tech.

0:39:25.080 --> 0:39:27.040
<v Speaker 3>It is time now for talking tech of First up,

0:39:27.080 --> 0:39:29.359
<v Speaker 3>ahead of a meeting between President Trump and the South

0:39:29.400 --> 0:39:32.640
<v Speaker 3>Korean president, Lee j Young, the South Korean leader is

0:39:32.640 --> 0:39:35.240
<v Speaker 3>saying that the countries remain stuck on all the major

0:39:35.280 --> 0:39:37.680
<v Speaker 3>details of a three hundred and fifty billion dollar investment pledge.

0:39:37.719 --> 0:39:42.880
<v Speaker 16>Take a listen, Panshi, the method of investment, the amount

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:46.080
<v Speaker 16>of investment, the timeline, and how we will share the

0:39:46.120 --> 0:39:50.120
<v Speaker 16>losses and divide the dividends. All of these remain sticking points.

0:39:50.600 --> 0:39:53.239
<v Speaker 16>The US will, of course try to maximize its interests,

0:39:53.280 --> 0:39:55.440
<v Speaker 16>but it must not be to an extent that causes

0:39:55.520 --> 0:39:58.040
<v Speaker 16>catastrophic consequences for South Korea.

0:39:58.920 --> 0:40:01.520
<v Speaker 3>Trump and Lee while they are set to meet on

0:40:01.560 --> 0:40:05.200
<v Speaker 3>the sidelines of the APEX summit. Plus, Nelson Peltz's Try

0:40:05.239 --> 0:40:08.560
<v Speaker 3>and Fund Management is teaming up with tech VC General

0:40:08.600 --> 0:40:11.360
<v Speaker 3>Catalyst to buy the rest of Janie Henderson. That the

0:40:11.400 --> 0:40:13.880
<v Speaker 3>two firms plan to use AI to drive the asset

0:40:13.920 --> 0:40:16.680
<v Speaker 3>manager's next phase of growth. After Try and Help bring

0:40:16.719 --> 0:40:20.920
<v Speaker 3>the CEO allied Budge and Janis Henderson posted five straight

0:40:21.000 --> 0:40:23.399
<v Speaker 3>quarters of positive inflows and.

0:40:23.400 --> 0:40:24.240
<v Speaker 4>Game Stop shares.

0:40:24.239 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 3>They jumped more prolly seismically in the pre market. Now

0:40:28.000 --> 0:40:29.759
<v Speaker 3>a little bit off that, but they're trading after our

0:40:29.800 --> 0:40:33.320
<v Speaker 3>white House x account reposted a company's statement declaring the

0:40:33.400 --> 0:40:37.920
<v Speaker 3>console wars over. GameStop was reacting to Microsoft's plan to

0:40:37.960 --> 0:40:41.800
<v Speaker 3>release a Halo Combat Evolved remake for rival PlayStation five

0:40:41.960 --> 0:40:43.000
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty six.

0:40:43.880 --> 0:40:44.960
<v Speaker 4>More on entertainment now.

0:40:45.000 --> 0:40:46.960
<v Speaker 3>As Warner Brothers Discovery announced a.

0:40:46.920 --> 0:40:50.680
<v Speaker 17>Strategic review Media Chants, they have been encircling the company

0:40:50.719 --> 0:40:53.120
<v Speaker 17>for a potential takeover the most aggressive of which has

0:40:53.160 --> 0:40:56.680
<v Speaker 17>been Paramount Skuidance, led by David Ellison, offering merger prospects

0:40:56.680 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 17>no less than.

0:40:57.520 --> 0:40:58.640
<v Speaker 4>Three times already.

0:40:58.920 --> 0:41:02.240
<v Speaker 3>Bluemokes Media and entertain Managing editor Lukashaw, You've been writing

0:41:02.239 --> 0:41:04.920
<v Speaker 3>about it over the course of the weekend. And why

0:41:05.200 --> 0:41:08.880
<v Speaker 3>has David Salzlov been pushing back on Paramount's guidance.

0:41:09.760 --> 0:41:12.839
<v Speaker 18>Well, the several reasons, the first of which is they

0:41:12.840 --> 0:41:15.520
<v Speaker 18>think they can get more money. I think there are

0:41:15.560 --> 0:41:18.640
<v Speaker 18>concerns about David Elson and Paramounts guidance as a buyer

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:22.000
<v Speaker 18>that we can get to. But David Ellison has increased

0:41:22.040 --> 0:41:24.080
<v Speaker 18>his offer three times in a row. All of the

0:41:24.160 --> 0:41:27.600
<v Speaker 18>chatter around potential deals has led to a huge spike

0:41:27.640 --> 0:41:30.480
<v Speaker 18>in the Warner Brothers Discovery share price, and so you

0:41:30.520 --> 0:41:32.440
<v Speaker 18>know they're trying to start something of a bidding war

0:41:32.520 --> 0:41:34.720
<v Speaker 18>because while there are other parties who may be interested

0:41:34.760 --> 0:41:37.279
<v Speaker 18>in parts of the business, so far David Ellison is

0:41:37.280 --> 0:41:38.560
<v Speaker 18>the on owned who's come out and said I.

0:41:38.480 --> 0:41:39.080
<v Speaker 6>Want the whole thing.

0:41:39.920 --> 0:41:42.200
<v Speaker 4>He wants the whole thing. How are employees reacting?

0:41:42.200 --> 0:41:44.840
<v Speaker 3>How is just the company surviving with what is a

0:41:44.840 --> 0:41:45.720
<v Speaker 3>big question mark?

0:41:46.760 --> 0:41:50.520
<v Speaker 18>Well, look, employees at Warner Brothers Discovery are unfortunately used

0:41:50.560 --> 0:41:53.880
<v Speaker 18>to this type of uncertainty around deals. You know, Warner

0:41:53.880 --> 0:41:56.480
<v Speaker 18>Brothers and HBO, and there have been various names of

0:41:56.520 --> 0:41:59.120
<v Speaker 18>the kind of the corporate entity Time Warner Warner Media,

0:41:59.200 --> 0:42:01.879
<v Speaker 18>but Time war got sold to AT and T many

0:42:01.920 --> 0:42:04.600
<v Speaker 18>years ago, then it got merged with Discovery, so it

0:42:04.880 --> 0:42:06.680
<v Speaker 18>I think a lot of them feel like they've been

0:42:06.719 --> 0:42:09.680
<v Speaker 18>in one never ending integration meeting with lots of layoffs.

0:42:10.120 --> 0:42:13.320
<v Speaker 18>And you know, David as loves a divisive figure internally

0:42:13.320 --> 0:42:15.319
<v Speaker 18>at the company. So some people are very excited about

0:42:15.320 --> 0:42:15.800
<v Speaker 18>the prospects.

0:42:15.840 --> 0:42:16.759
<v Speaker 12>Some people are dreading it.

0:42:17.880 --> 0:42:19.960
<v Speaker 3>Talking of excitement where excitement is at the moment in

0:42:19.960 --> 0:42:22.719
<v Speaker 3>the world of entertainment. Taught me through BTS, taught me

0:42:22.760 --> 0:42:25.520
<v Speaker 3>through the shar scale of desire to get into these

0:42:25.560 --> 0:42:26.479
<v Speaker 3>pop bands from career.

0:42:27.320 --> 0:42:30.600
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, so BTS is I'd say that the band most

0:42:30.640 --> 0:42:34.040
<v Speaker 18>responsible for popularizing K pop around the world, certainly outside

0:42:34.080 --> 0:42:37.200
<v Speaker 18>of South Korea, the best selling artists in the world

0:42:37.239 --> 0:42:39.000
<v Speaker 18>for a couple of years, I think in twenty twenty

0:42:39.000 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 18>and twenty twenty one, they've been on hiatus essentially because

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:45.000
<v Speaker 18>the various members of the military or excuse me, various

0:42:45.000 --> 0:42:46.960
<v Speaker 18>members of a group have been serving in the military.

0:42:47.120 --> 0:42:49.640
<v Speaker 18>They are coming back with a new album in March

0:42:50.040 --> 0:42:52.240
<v Speaker 18>and then going to go on their biggest tour ever

0:42:52.560 --> 0:42:55.719
<v Speaker 18>according to my sources, about sixty five dates, including more

0:42:55.760 --> 0:42:58.040
<v Speaker 18>than thirty in North America, and there's a huge fight

0:42:58.160 --> 0:43:00.600
<v Speaker 18>between the two biggest concert promoters in the world to

0:43:00.640 --> 0:43:02.120
<v Speaker 18>get to be the company to promote it.

0:43:02.719 --> 0:43:05.239
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, all the fights at home are for costumes for

0:43:05.560 --> 0:43:08.200
<v Speaker 3>K pop demon Hunters, so clearly it's a theme.

0:43:08.200 --> 0:43:10.399
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg's Lucashaw, thank you very much.

0:43:10.400 --> 0:43:12.640
<v Speaker 3>Indeed, it's a great read, go get to it and

0:43:12.680 --> 0:43:14.200
<v Speaker 3>his newsletters from all of his team.

0:43:14.239 --> 0:43:15.080
<v Speaker 4>Meanwhile, that does.

0:43:14.880 --> 0:43:17.920
<v Speaker 3>It with this edition at Bloomberg Tech quick check on

0:43:18.040 --> 0:43:20.319
<v Speaker 3>Qualcomm in particular, that was the breaking news at the

0:43:20.320 --> 0:43:22.760
<v Speaker 3>top of the hour, the fact that Qualcom has indeed

0:43:22.760 --> 0:43:24.960
<v Speaker 3>decided it's going to be unveiling a competitor to in

0:43:25.040 --> 0:43:27.200
<v Speaker 3>Video and wants a bit more of the AI Slice

0:43:27.239 --> 0:43:29.160
<v Speaker 3>of the Pie and Boy of Shares move off the

0:43:29.200 --> 0:43:30.919
<v Speaker 3>back of it were up more than twelve percent, coming

0:43:30.920 --> 0:43:32.960
<v Speaker 3>off of what was a twenty percent move at one point.

0:43:33.080 --> 0:43:35.440
<v Speaker 3>But we are risk on across the tech world as

0:43:35.480 --> 0:43:38.320
<v Speaker 3>we prepare ourselves for a meeting between US and China.

0:43:38.440 --> 0:43:40.759
<v Speaker 3>Don't forget to check out our podcast. You can find

0:43:40.760 --> 0:43:42.840
<v Speaker 3>it on the terminal as well as online on Apple, Spotify,

0:43:42.880 --> 0:43:45.480
<v Speaker 3>and iHeart. We've got a thick and fast earnings week

0:43:45.520 --> 0:43:46.359
<v Speaker 3>stick with us for it.

0:43:46.640 --> 0:43:47.400
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg