Speaker 1: Let not your heart be troubled. You are listening to
Speaker 1: the Shawan Hannity Radio show podcast. All right, so I
Speaker 1: have insomnia, but I've never slept better. And what's changed
Speaker 1: just a pillow. It's had such a positive impact on
Speaker 1: my life. And of course I'm talking about my pillow.
Speaker 1: I fall asleep faster, I stay asleep longer. And now
Speaker 1: you can to just go to my pillow dot com
Speaker 1: or call eight hundred zero nine zero use the promo
Speaker 1: code Hannity, and Mike Lindell, the inventor of My Pillow,
Speaker 1: has the special four pack. Now you get off to
Speaker 1: my Pillow premiums and to go anywhere pillows. My pillows
Speaker 1: made here in the USA has a sixty day unconditional
Speaker 1: money back guarrantee and a ten you warranty. Go to
Speaker 1: my pillow dot com right now or call eight zero
Speaker 1: nine zero promo code Hannity to get Mike Lindell's special
Speaker 1: four pack offer. You get to my Pillow Premium pillows
Speaker 1: and to go anywhere pillows forty percent off. And that
Speaker 1: means once those pillows arrive, you start getting the kind
Speaker 1: of peace full and RESTful and comfortable and deep peeling
Speaker 1: and recuperative sleep that you've been raving and you certainly
Speaker 1: deserve my pillow dot com promo code Hannity, you will
Speaker 1: love this pillow. I have the most insane staff in
Speaker 1: all of radio. Welcome my studio today. Balloons everywhere, every
Speaker 1: and it's not my birthday, it's not a holiday. The
Speaker 1: only tip off I had they were up to no
Speaker 1: good was yesterday. Linda goes, Oh, by the way, if
Speaker 1: you had a choice, do you like apple cherry lemon?
Speaker 1: Uh pie? And I'm like apple? Why? Actually my favorite
Speaker 1: of all time is blueberry? Uh Sarah Lee's blueberry one
Speaker 1: the one you cook for and it takes forever to
Speaker 1: cook it. It's so annoying. So they're not coming to
Speaker 1: her coming on the air here and where did you
Speaker 1: get these number one finger things? Then put who's doing
Speaker 1: all this work? This is crazy as a team effort,
Speaker 1: all very very proud of you the number one. So
Speaker 1: so we're gonna we'll tweet out some pictures because it's
Speaker 1: a visual is priceless. But basically, there's a thousand a
Speaker 1: thousand balloons. We have a bunch of number one balloons.
Speaker 1: And then our friend Quinn was able to find because
Speaker 1: I went to five different stores this morning. I spent
Speaker 1: my morning running around Manhattan looking for foam finger number one.
Speaker 1: Oh my god, he'th been tried to get them at
Speaker 1: the Rangers game last night for some reason, nobody has
Speaker 1: foam finger number one. Well, the Rangers aren't exactly number
Speaker 1: one at the start of the year. They were last night.
Speaker 1: Last night was at okay, but anyway, So finally Quinn
Speaker 1: was like, Yo, there's this tourist novelty shop and they have, uh,
Speaker 1: the fingers you want. I'm like, oh my god, I'm
Speaker 1: on my way. You don't you don't have enough in
Speaker 1: your life trying to furnish a new house, going back
Speaker 1: and forth between the department and put on did you
Speaker 1: see what? Wait, did you see that? Did you see that? Ugly?
Speaker 1: That's right? That's that looks like a criminal shot? That
Speaker 1: looks one right there? And last night, so during the
Speaker 1: TV show last night, I am asking uh Linda for
Speaker 1: a particular name that I've forgotten as I'm actually on
Speaker 1: the air, and she it's back to me at midnight,
Speaker 1: and I'm like, well, it's a little late. The show's over.
Speaker 1: Your rerun starts right there, so and she goes, oh,
Speaker 1: I'm out walking the dog. That's what she's I'm out
Speaker 1: walking the dog. Did you need it now? And I'm like, no,
Speaker 1: I needed it when I was live on television at
Speaker 1: nine o'clock. What happened was, and you should give me
Speaker 1: some credit, was I took my son out for his
Speaker 1: first Halloween and he had his first piece of candy.
Speaker 1: Little did I know that would keep him up for
Speaker 1: nineteen hours. So I did not get my son to
Speaker 1: sleep till hence not seeing your text to eleven fifty
Speaker 1: four later than you needed it. My apologies, oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: nine one shot on his toll free telephone. Thank you
Speaker 1: all I do have Listen, I have the best staff
Speaker 1: in all of Brandy on television and you people are
Speaker 1: all crazy and Jason, I even saw you put the
Speaker 1: number one thing on, but I think yours was surprised
Speaker 1: to you. I can't be jovial from time to time.
Speaker 1: Occasionally a little joviality over there would be good, although
Speaker 1: you do have that on the weekends. From all the
Speaker 1: reports that I get from everybody else on the staff,
Speaker 1: your happiest on the weekend. Is there dossier about me too? Jeez? Uh, Well,
Speaker 1: I don't know. There might be actually, who knows. I
Speaker 1: hope it's not the same one that's been circulated. List.
Speaker 1: We won't have to spend nine million dollars to build
Speaker 1: one on you. We've we've weaponized the intelligence community, We've
Speaker 1: weaponized the I RST we discovered against conservatives. Why not? Uh? Anyway,
Speaker 1: thank you all amazing crew that I have. And alright,
Speaker 1: everybody thought they were funny and I you got me.
Speaker 1: Although just as all of a sudden, I look up
Speaker 1: and Stangers never in the studio. He's now an executive.
Speaker 1: He's been with me twenty six years, so he has
Speaker 1: a big office. Uh. And even Rush people, even they
Speaker 1: came in which was pretty cool. Uh. And Rush was
Speaker 1: on our show in the month of October, so he
Speaker 1: does her part. Credit to anyway, Uh, as we continue,
Speaker 1: all right, I am I was until they did this
Speaker 1: pretty piste off today, and I'm piste off with good reasons.
Speaker 1: You know, what are we what are we learning? I
Speaker 1: brought up yesterday in the discussion, we're gonna find out
Speaker 1: this guy was radicalized, and that there was evidence proof
Speaker 1: out there on social media that he had some social
Speaker 1: media presence, and that we were gonna we now know
Speaker 1: everything that about this guy, and we apparently find out
Speaker 1: that he was interviewed by the New York interviewed in
Speaker 1: twenty fifteen about is possible terror tized? Now, this is
Speaker 1: not funny. This is and then it gets worse than that,
Speaker 1: and it gets much worse than that, and it gets
Speaker 1: to the point where you can't even believe it's that bad.
Speaker 1: Now we find out that he came in through what
Speaker 1: is the diversity visa program? What's the diversity visa program? Now?
Speaker 1: The President rightly pointed out today that Senate Minority Leader
Speaker 1: Chucky Schumer of New York was the one responsible for
Speaker 1: creating the diversity lottery program. Well, how do you get
Speaker 1: a lottery into this? What does that mean? You apply
Speaker 1: for a lottery and you can be a homeless person
Speaker 1: with no skills, that's radicalized. What you won the lottery,
Speaker 1: you get to go to America. And of course, Chuck
Speaker 1: Schumer and no Democrats supports any vetting of any refugees
Speaker 1: from anywhere, even those countries that literally abused women and
Speaker 1: gaze and lesbians get killed and Christians and Jews get
Speaker 1: persecuted if you live under Shariah. Anyway, the media is
Speaker 1: so outraged that the President did the right thing, and
Speaker 1: that was holding Chuck Schumer responsible and accountable for this program,
Speaker 1: which is the program this terrorist used to get into
Speaker 1: this country. And had he not had the the visa
Speaker 1: lottery diversity program, we wouldn't have this guy in this country,
Speaker 1: at least not that way. He would have had to
Speaker 1: find some other way to get into the country. So
Speaker 1: he gets the diversity visa program, he gets into America,
Speaker 1: he gets a green card, he's radicalized, and now eight families,
Speaker 1: extended families are in mourning today because their loved one
Speaker 1: was mowed down, you know, in a on a beautiful
Speaker 1: fall day in New York City as they were either
Speaker 1: biking or wall walking along a pedestrian path in New
Speaker 1: York City. And then the other fifteen injured on top
Speaker 1: of that. Anyway, but let's go back in time. So
Speaker 1: the President this morning said that this terrorist immigrant that
Speaker 1: killed a people and wounded all these others with this
Speaker 1: rental truck entered the US through the diversity visa lottery program,
Speaker 1: and that it was President Schumer and others that loosen
Speaker 1: the nation's borders. Well, it's just a fact. Now, the
Speaker 1: President at the time didn't provide the evidence of this.
Speaker 1: So we did some digging this morning, and what do
Speaker 1: we find? And I get, by the way, an NBC News.
Speaker 1: They didn't know how to possibly use Google. NBC News.
Speaker 1: You can use Google, because if you found Google, you
Speaker 1: guys are all upset. He didn't cite any evidence. Well,
Speaker 1: we found on Google, NBC news fake news, NBC that
Speaker 1: because two minutes after searching, you have a quote from
Speaker 1: Chuck Schumer that says I was the author of the
Speaker 1: diversity visa program, and literally on Radio Liberty, Charles Schumer
Speaker 1: uh with the Gang of eight, the U. S. Senators
Speaker 1: wrote the nearly one thousand page immigration reform legislation now
Speaker 1: being considered in Congress. Last month, he said fellow Democrats
Speaker 1: had agreed to scrap the lottery on the grounds of
Speaker 1: both politics and substance. Quote. I was the author of
Speaker 1: the diversity visa program, so I care about it, he said.
Speaker 1: We had strong opposition from both our Republican colleagues in
Speaker 1: our Gang of eight, and we heard that for House
Speaker 1: of Representative Republicans it was a non starter. The program
Speaker 1: was an effort to bring in people from Europe and Africa,
Speaker 1: and it was successful for a while. So he's the
Speaker 1: author of this. Now, that bill was eventually blocked in
Speaker 1: the Senate, so Schumer's diversity lottery program remained in force
Speaker 1: right up until yesterday's attack. It doesn't matter to the
Speaker 1: fake news media in this country, which is desperately trying
Speaker 1: to cover up Schumer's contribution to yesterday's attack. Now, the
Speaker 1: Washington Post version of the cover up is President Trump
Speaker 1: and some of his allies and the extreme right have
Speaker 1: found a new culprit in Tuesday's deadly terrorist attack in
Speaker 1: New York City, Senator Charles Schumer of New York, and
Speaker 1: details emerged about the incident, Prominent right wing commentators and
Speaker 1: news outlets seized on ABC seven story reporting the alleged attacker.
Speaker 1: The terrorists had come to the United States from Uzbekistan
Speaker 1: under a State Department program known as the Diversity Visa Program. Oh,
Speaker 1: that story is unconfirmed, the Washington Post said, But Trump
Speaker 1: appeared off base in his criticism of Schumer. Well, we
Speaker 1: now have the fact. When are they going to correct
Speaker 1: themselves over there at the Washington Post? And this is
Speaker 1: why there is no truth in media anymore. They're only
Speaker 1: advancing their sick, twisted ideology. So Trump is off base. Uh,
Speaker 1: really no, because we now have Trump Sumer saying it
Speaker 1: in his own words, bragging about it. Now, does that
Speaker 1: mean yesterday wouldn't have happened? Not necessarily. Does it mean
Speaker 1: the guy wouldn't have gotten in under that program, Yes,
Speaker 1: he wouldn't have been here. Does that mean it would
Speaker 1: have been more difficult for him ever to get to America? Yes?
Speaker 1: Does that lessen the possibility of yesterday? Yes, that's the answer.
Speaker 1: If you think that's bad, it gets even worse now.
Speaker 1: In New Jersey, there have been a number of areas
Speaker 1: where certain mosques evidence has led. Because I've known a
Speaker 1: lot of policemen and counter terrorism experts, some are personal
Speaker 1: friends of mine that put their lives on the line
Speaker 1: for us every day. Anyway, it turns out that the
Speaker 1: mosque that this terrorist attended, you know, this guy that
Speaker 1: most out eight people on a beautiful fall day in
Speaker 1: New York City, had been under surveillance by the New
Speaker 1: York Police Department. You say, why, it's a New Jersey
Speaker 1: I'll explain. It's in Patterson, New Jersey. And it turns
Speaker 1: out that the terrorists in this case attended this and
Speaker 1: was among several in New Jersey and the New York
Speaker 1: Police Department. This was one mosque that these police departments targeted,
Speaker 1: and they targeted it based on evidence that there was
Speaker 1: a budding terrorist conspiracy network in these mosques. Now here's
Speaker 1: the interesting part. Anyway, it was around the corner this
Speaker 1: particular Moss from where this terrorists lived and Wednesday, the
Speaker 1: mosque was within the three blocks section that was blocked
Speaker 1: off because the investigation of the apartment building. But law
Speaker 1: enforcement sources said the mosque itself was an under investigation.
Speaker 1: Now under the surveillance program, well, the NYPD actually used
Speaker 1: what they call mosque crawlers to listen and in on
Speaker 1: sermons and conversations that were taking place at Moss that
Speaker 1: they were told and that evidence might be controversial and
Speaker 1: support some type of radicalism. And then these NYPD officers
Speaker 1: were to report back what they heard. And officers also
Speaker 1: recorded license plate numbers, mounted cameras on light poles, They
Speaker 1: mapped and photographed some of these mosques, and they listed
Speaker 1: their ethnic makeup. According to the Associated Press, which first
Speaker 1: disclosed the existence of this ny D p D program,
Speaker 1: this was done by Commissioner Ray Kelly at the time.
Speaker 1: This is like stopping frisk. It actually worked in New York.
Speaker 1: Now in incomes comrade Mayor do Blasio. What did he do?
Speaker 1: He pulled the plug on the mosque do NYPD mosque
Speaker 1: surveillance program. We're gonna meet today in our next hour
Speaker 1: one of the policemen that was part of this surveillance,
Speaker 1: that actually surveiled this mosque, and he's gonna tell you
Speaker 1: that evidence show ode and was indicative that there was
Speaker 1: some type of radicalism at least within that mosque and
Speaker 1: people within that mosque. So he'll give a firsthand account.
Speaker 1: So build the Blasio said his administration and promised the
Speaker 1: police force that keeps our city safe. But that's also
Speaker 1: respectful and fair. This reform is a critical step and
Speaker 1: easing tensions between the police and the communities they served.
Speaker 1: So you've got Chuck Schumer bragging about authoring the diversity
Speaker 1: visa program brings in the terrorist You have that specific
Speaker 1: mosque that he attended that drew the attention of the
Speaker 1: NYPD in Patterson, New Jersey. Chris Christie at the time
Speaker 1: blasted the NYPD for doing that. Isn't that the job
Speaker 1: that they're supposed to do? Now, had we done the
Speaker 1: if the visa program didn't exist, and in fact, the
Speaker 1: surveillance program had continued. Are the odds better that yesterday
Speaker 1: doesn't happen? And are we gonna put the safety and
Speaker 1: secure of Americans first? That's our most important question. What
Speaker 1: do you think of when you hear the word Lutheran?
Speaker 1: Do you think liberal women in clerical colors? Gay marriage?
Speaker 1: Social justice warriors find out how the sixteenth century Lutheran
Speaker 1: Reformation was really a conservative movement intent on reform, not
Speaker 1: revolution with the podcast Issues Etcetera Issues etc. Dot Net
Speaker 1: Real Reformation, Radio Issues etc. Dot Net Issues etc. Dot Net.
Speaker 1: Right as we roll along Sean Hannity Show, So you're
Speaker 1: gonna meet a retired lieutenant from the n y p D.
Speaker 1: And his job was a ten years in the counter
Speaker 1: terrorism unit, and you're gonna hear from him and part
Speaker 1: of his job he surveiled the very mosque in Patterson,
Speaker 1: New Jersey, that this terrorist yesterday went to. And then
Speaker 1: we've got to ask ourselves as a big mayoral race
Speaker 1: coming up in New York City, and nobody it doesn't
Speaker 1: matter how corrupt the Blasio is or how bad the
Speaker 1: economy is, or how bad crime is now getting and
Speaker 1: how the city is beginning to slowly rot back to
Speaker 1: where it was before Julianni was the mayor of the city.
Speaker 1: You know, this will be a big issue and they
Speaker 1: have a big debate tonight. I think it's seven Eastern.
Speaker 1: Uh bou Dietle will join us later. He's one of
Speaker 1: the mayoral candidates. But you know, it's been hard for
Speaker 1: Bow unfortunately, because neither party wants to, you know, talk
Speaker 1: about stopping frisk or talk about keeping the city safe.
Speaker 1: And you know, even earlier today I was the Blasio
Speaker 1: is having a hard time, you know, on CBS this morning.
Speaker 1: Just listen to him thread the needle. You hear it yourself.
Speaker 1: Is the assumption that he was inspired by ices, but
Speaker 1: that's the extent of it. The assumption is he is
Speaker 1: an extremist and a terrorist who he is inspired by.
Speaker 1: And how it's too early to say there wasn't there
Speaker 1: which one of the reasons without going to detail, I
Speaker 1: would simply say the note and what he said coming
Speaker 1: out of the vehicle and the manner of the attack
Speaker 1: made it very clear as the act of terrorism. But
Speaker 1: we have to be smart about not ascribing to a
Speaker 1: particular group until we have more evidence. Oh okay, he's
Speaker 1: a radical Islamist. That left note saying he's a radical
Speaker 1: Islamist pledging allegiance to isis that we knew that last night.
Speaker 1: What is it about the left in this country that
Speaker 1: they put this, this thing that they called diversity ahead
Speaker 1: of your safety. I'm all for diversity, you know what.
Speaker 1: We're all children of God in the sense potentially. But
Speaker 1: those that that will kill in the name of whatever
Speaker 1: radical ideas they have, I don't care what it is.
Speaker 1: In this particular case, it's radical Islam. You know, they'd say,
Speaker 1: strapped bombs on themselves. They send their kids in the
Speaker 1: pizza parlors with with these bombs on them, blow themselves up.
Speaker 1: They seventy two versions in heaven and they think they're
Speaker 1: doing the will of Allah. Well, I'm sorry. Is eight
Speaker 1: families in New York today that are mourning the loss
Speaker 1: of their loved ones, and there's many more hoping on
Speaker 1: their knees and praying that the injuries sustained. While innocent
Speaker 1: people are riding their bikes, are walking on a pedestrian
Speaker 1: path on a beautiful fall summer day. They're praying that
Speaker 1: these people will recover. All of this and much more
Speaker 1: coming up Congressman Meadows, Congressman Bratt, much more till the
Speaker 1: top of the hour one. Shawn, you want to be
Speaker 1: a part of the program, right, We got a lot
Speaker 1: coming up in the program today. Uh, you're gonna meet
Speaker 1: the retired lieutenant with the NYPD that worked ten years
Speaker 1: in the counter terrorism unit. That actually part of his job,
Speaker 1: he surveilled the very mosque that this terrorist attended in Patterson,
Speaker 1: New Jersey. By the way, at the time, Chris Christie
Speaker 1: was livid about the fact, Well, why are New York
Speaker 1: p D people here because that's where the evidence led them.
Speaker 1: I talked to the guy earlier. He goes, we all,
Speaker 1: we only we only followed the evidence. We only we
Speaker 1: only followed where the evidence took us. So let me
Speaker 1: play the difference here between that and Comrade build the
Speaker 1: Blasio ending the surveillance program that was surveilling this very mosque.
Speaker 1: And then of course you got Chuck Schumer bragging that
Speaker 1: in fact he's the one that was responsible and authored
Speaker 1: the diversity visa program. You know, then we've got this
Speaker 1: other argument in the country that people like me have
Speaker 1: been making for a long time that if you come
Speaker 1: from a country that has radical views where women all right,
Speaker 1: imagine this. This is what I've never understood about the left.
Speaker 1: They should support John Hannity because Sean Hannity saying that
Speaker 1: if you come from a country where men are allowed
Speaker 1: two and there's many of them, where marital abuse of
Speaker 1: a woman is legal, where men telling women how to
Speaker 1: dress is legal, where it's not a crime, when it's
Speaker 1: marital rape, it's legal, or that you have instances women
Speaker 1: can't drive cars, can't travel abroad without their husband's permission, legal,
Speaker 1: that women can't leave the house without a male relative
Speaker 1: the law. All of this is reality, and people grow
Speaker 1: up in societies and culture cultures that should offend. Every
Speaker 1: feminist should be with me on this because women shouldn't
Speaker 1: be treated like that. End of sentence. Gays and lesbians
Speaker 1: on Hannity, you don't support gay marriage. There's no louder
Speaker 1: voice in the country than mind that has been saying
Speaker 1: that these countries that kill innocent people because of who
Speaker 1: they are and what they do in the privacy of
Speaker 1: their bedroom is evil. Sean Hannity's champion to stop the
Speaker 1: insanity of of Shariah as practiced in some countries where
Speaker 1: gays and lesbians are killed with regularity. They're slaughtered, they're
Speaker 1: thrown off roofs, they're hung in public squares, their stone
Speaker 1: to death. You know, we did the stoning of sarriah
Speaker 1: M years ago. Uh it was cyrus Neassa did that
Speaker 1: uh film, right, you know, and I remember watching it
Speaker 1: and it's real. It should we should you should still
Speaker 1: see that movie. And then you got you know, the
Speaker 1: persecut You know, in Saudi Arabia, you can't build a church,
Speaker 1: a Christian church, good luck, it's illegal. You can't build
Speaker 1: a Jewish temple, it's illegal. And then you look at Israel,
Speaker 1: this tiniest country in the world. Where's the Alaska Mosque
Speaker 1: right there? You go to the Old City and what
Speaker 1: do you have? The Armenian sector, the Islamic Center, the
Speaker 1: Christian center, the wall uh for Israel, the Jewish community.
Speaker 1: I mean, I would think that if you are a
Speaker 1: champion of women's rights, gazingly gay and lesbian rights, and
Speaker 1: religious freedom, you're with shahn Hannity. But no, Donald Trump
Speaker 1: is saying, do you come from those countries, We're gonna
Speaker 1: vet you to make sure you're not bringing those insane
Speaker 1: values with you, because to me, that's insanity. That is.
Speaker 1: It's like living in in fred Flintstone Barney rubble Land.
Speaker 1: We don't treat people like that in this country. We
Speaker 1: believe in liberty, freedom. This is what the President said today.
Speaker 1: A man drove a truck into a pedestrian bike path
Speaker 1: and murdered eight people and injured very, very seriously at
Speaker 1: least eleven more. All of America's praying and grieving for
Speaker 1: the families who lost their precious loved ones. Horrible black
Speaker 1: Our hearts break for them, and we pledged to renew
Speaker 1: our resolve in their memory. My administration is coordinating closely
Speaker 1: between federal and local officials to investigate the attack and
Speaker 1: to further investigate this animal who did the attacking, and
Speaker 1: updates will be provided as available. I am today starting
Speaker 1: the process of terminating the diversity lottery program. I'm going
Speaker 1: to ask Congress to immediately initiate work to get rid
Speaker 1: of this program, Diversary and diversity lottery. Diversity lottery sounds nice.
Speaker 1: It's not nice. It's not good. It's not good. It
Speaker 1: hasn't been good. We've been against it. So we want
Speaker 1: to immediately work with Congress on the diversity lottery program,
Speaker 1: on terminating it, getting rid of it. We want a
Speaker 1: merit based program where people come into our country based
Speaker 1: on merit, and we want to get rid of chain migration.
Speaker 1: This man that came in or whatever you want to
Speaker 1: call him, brought in with him other people, and he
Speaker 1: was a point he was the point of contact, the
Speaker 1: primary point of contact for and this is preliminarily twenty
Speaker 1: three people that came in or potentially came in with him. Uh.
Speaker 1: And that's not acceptable. So we want to get rid
Speaker 1: of chain migration. And we've wanted to do that for
Speaker 1: a long time, and I've been wanting to do it
Speaker 1: for a long time, and we'll be asking Congress to
Speaker 1: start working on it immediately. There are bills already about
Speaker 1: ending chain migration, and we have a lot of good
Speaker 1: bills in there. We're being stopped by Democrats because their obstructionists,
Speaker 1: and honestly, they don't want to do what's right for
Speaker 1: our country. We need strength, we need resolve, we have
Speaker 1: to stop it. So we're gonna get rid of this
Speaker 1: lottery program as soon as possible. He came in through
Speaker 1: the diversity program, as you know, and we're gonna stop that.
Speaker 1: We're going to as quickly as possible to get rid
Speaker 1: of chain migration and go to a merit based system.
Speaker 1: Terrorists are constantly seeking to strike our nation, and it
Speaker 1: will require the unflinching devlope into our law enforcement, homeland security,
Speaker 1: and intelligence professionals to keep America is safe. We will
Speaker 1: take all necessary steps to protect our people and our
Speaker 1: communities and to protect our nation as a whole. We
Speaker 1: have to get much tougher, we have to get much smarter,
Speaker 1: and we have to get much less politically correct. We're
Speaker 1: so politically correct that we're afraid to do anything. And
Speaker 1: that's not only our country, that's other countries too that
Speaker 1: are having very similar problems. And we have to get tough.
Speaker 1: We have to get smart. We have to do what's
Speaker 1: right to protect our citizens. We will never waver in
Speaker 1: the defense of our beloved country ever and will never
Speaker 1: ever forget the beautiful lives that have been taken from us.
Speaker 1: That was a horrible event, and we have to stop it,
Speaker 1: and we have to stop it. Called we also have
Speaker 1: to come up with punishment that's far quicker and far
Speaker 1: greater than the punishment these animals are getting right now.
Speaker 1: They'll go through court for years. At the end there
Speaker 1: will be who knows what happens. We need quick justice,
Speaker 1: and we need strong justice, much quicker and much stronger
Speaker 1: than we have right now, because what we have right
Speaker 1: now is a joke and it's a laughing stock, and
Speaker 1: no wonder so much of this stuff takes place. And
Speaker 1: I think I can speak for plenty of other countries
Speaker 1: too that are in the same situation. Yeah, there's the president.
Speaker 1: President gets at the president. Understand what's the downside of
Speaker 1: the President's plan? Is it more likely that America will
Speaker 1: be a safer country? That's the question you have to ask.
Speaker 1: Is his job diversity or the safety and security of
Speaker 1: the people of the United States of America. Now, to me,
Speaker 1: if you're the president, your job, your number one job
Speaker 1: is the national security or the commander in chief. Your
Speaker 1: job is to keep this country safe. And then I
Speaker 1: guess as a country, based on who it is that
Speaker 1: we elect, we're then gonna have to now begin the
Speaker 1: process of thinking how much how much security are we
Speaker 1: willing to give up in the name of diversity. If
Speaker 1: you want no vetting whatsoever? Are you rolling the dice?
Speaker 1: Are you taking risks? Because to me, I think it's
Speaker 1: fairly obvious where this is going. I say, we see
Speaker 1: what migration immigration uh, which has been unlimited in Europe.
Speaker 1: We see what has happened there. I can go through,
Speaker 1: I can give you a list of all the attacks.
Speaker 1: I did it last night on TV. And to me,
Speaker 1: it's I am not willing to gamble with your life.
Speaker 1: And you know the Democrats are. It was so dumb
Speaker 1: to listen to, you know, Governor Cuomo in New York today.
Speaker 1: You know, literally he's criticizing begins criticizing the president for
Speaker 1: pointing out that Zbekistan, the terrorists, was allowed into the
Speaker 1: country by a law, a visa lottery immigration law authored
Speaker 1: by Chuck Schumer. So he's mad, you play into the
Speaker 1: hands of terrorists to the extent that you disrupt and
Speaker 1: divide and frightened people in society. Within thirty seconds, he
Speaker 1: is now talking about New York and the guns safety
Speaker 1: laws in the country, the safe fact, and I'm like,
Speaker 1: what are you doing but politicizing it? Here is a simple, basic,
Speaker 1: fundamental truth. There are people in The reason we love
Speaker 1: our country is because of its values, because of its
Speaker 1: system of laws, that its foundation is called the Constitution
Speaker 1: of the United States of America. We the people are
Speaker 1: founding document our declaration endowed by our create or that's
Speaker 1: what we believe. We both fundamentally it's in every American's
Speaker 1: DNA that we are to live free. There are people
Speaker 1: that don't live like this. There there are people that
Speaker 1: that literally believe that. Look, I don't want to judge
Speaker 1: the people in this sense. If that's the way you
Speaker 1: want to run your country, in your life, I think
Speaker 1: it's insane. But it's on it. We can't be the
Speaker 1: world's policeman. We're never going to democratize. In my view,
Speaker 1: you can only encourage liberty and freedom. People have got
Speaker 1: to want it. You can't force it upon them. But
Speaker 1: you know, there are people that grow up in countries
Speaker 1: whose values and culture are a direct contradiction to our
Speaker 1: values and culture. And even saying this, in the minds
Speaker 1: of some people somehow gets rolled into oh, bigotry, not bigoted,
Speaker 1: Well maybe it is. Maybe I'm I am prejudiced in
Speaker 1: this sense. I am prejudiced that our society should never
Speaker 1: ever treat women differently, that women deserve the full rights
Speaker 1: of men, and that men should not have the right
Speaker 1: to hit women or the right to punish them based
Speaker 1: on quote religious law, or tell women how to dress. Really,
Speaker 1: what do I know about fashion? First of all, that
Speaker 1: women shouldn't have women should be allowed to vote, and
Speaker 1: they should be allowed to drive. And that if you
Speaker 1: want to be a Christian and you want to build
Speaker 1: a church, and you buy the property, it's your property,
Speaker 1: build your church, do what you want. You want to
Speaker 1: build a Jewish synagogue, you have every right to practice.
Speaker 1: We believe in freedom of religion. We believe in freedom
Speaker 1: of the individual. Yes, America has made mistakes. I've explained,
Speaker 1: We've talked about that at length. We've had many horrible
Speaker 1: things in this country. Sure, but there's never been a
Speaker 1: country that has accumulated more power and abused it less
Speaker 1: and advanced the common good of humanity more than the
Speaker 1: United States of America. There's never been a country that
Speaker 1: has stood up for the cause of liberty more than America.
Speaker 1: And frankly, with all the criticism that we hear of
Speaker 1: all our founders and framers, they did design a system
Speaker 1: that allowed we the people to correct wrongs, evils, and injustices.
Speaker 1: So the prejudice I might have is against persecuting women,
Speaker 1: killing gays and lesbians, and and persecuting Christians and Jews
Speaker 1: and the the idea that somebody grows up in that environment.
Speaker 1: You have to assume a lot of things here that
Speaker 1: a they really just want the breath of freedom that
Speaker 1: all of us take for granted. I bet many do. Actually,
Speaker 1: I'm pretty convinced they're not happy living under tyranny, living
Speaker 1: under there such Arcanian, old fashioned, outdated, Fred Flintstone error
Speaker 1: rules and laws. So that's what we want. And and and
Speaker 1: it's a matter of well, okay, how do we what's
Speaker 1: wrong with vetting them? Do you support the values you
Speaker 1: grew up under? Or do you really want to be
Speaker 1: an American because you want pretty but you know you
Speaker 1: open doesn't have to be an open ended question. We
Speaker 1: need to know what's your background? Did you will you
Speaker 1: ever a member of ISIS. By the way, Trump may
Speaker 1: send these New York City terrorists to Gitmo. This guy,
Speaker 1: I'm all for it. He's an enemy combatant. This is
Speaker 1: a war for him against the people of the United States.
Speaker 1: Those people were victims of war yesterday that was slaughtered
Speaker 1: in the sick, twisted war. By the way, Democrats are
Speaker 1: threatening a government shutdown unless Trump caves on the dreamers. Okay,
Speaker 1: I let's see if they fund the wall there's gonna
Speaker 1: be an interesting show down. It's that's another thing. Why
Speaker 1: can't we control our borders? Yeah, I know people crossed
Speaker 1: the border because they want jobs, an opportunity, et cetera.
Speaker 1: There are also people that cross that border because they
Speaker 1: want to bring harm to American communities. That's the thing
Speaker 1: I've always said the most about about building the wall.
Speaker 1: All Right, eight nine one, Shawn Tolfrey telephone number. You're
Speaker 1: gonna meet this cop that I told you about. He
Speaker 1: was a retired lieutenant NYPD. He was one of the
Speaker 1: members that actually surveiled that specific mosque. Patrick bow Deetle
Speaker 1: All coming up next hour. All right, Sean Hannity Show,
Speaker 1: Toll free one, Sean, You'll meet the former NYPD retired
Speaker 1: lieutenant who actually was part of the counter terrorism unit
Speaker 1: that build the Blasio canceled in New York, that was
Speaker 1: monitoring this specific mocks. Also, Merrill Kennedy bow Dietle will
Speaker 1: join us. Patrick Pool checks in today and the Freedom
Speaker 1: Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows and and Congressman Dave brad All
Speaker 1: stopped by. Is his busy breaking news day. So much
Speaker 1: going on. We have probably the best TV show we've
Speaker 1: ever had for you tonight nine eastern cent d v
Speaker 1: R on the Fox News Channel. Quick Break Right Back
Speaker 1: will continue sexual activated Level one were watching. Hey, I
Speaker 1: saw the shooter come outside of the car, and I
Speaker 1: saw an exit and run towards the group of kids,
Speaker 1: and then I went back into the police have said
Speaker 1: he was waving some sort of an imitation gun. Did
Speaker 1: you see that? We see it now. They They looked
Speaker 1: real to me. Um, But he was waving them around.
Speaker 1: I didn't see that. And he sprinted towards the group
Speaker 1: of kids. Towards the group of kids, That's what I saw. Yeah,
Speaker 1: And and and about how long did this take place?
Speaker 1: How how long were you watching them for? Um? I
Speaker 1: was watching them for about, uh maybe twenty seconds before
Speaker 1: I was I had to just run back in, uh,
Speaker 1: just for my own David. Those are some of the
Speaker 1: sounds from obviously this terror attack in New York yesterday,
Speaker 1: monitoring what's happening now in London, and much much more.
Speaker 1: But you just heard there this van attack the hallmark
Speaker 1: of an ISIS attack, and there was a picture of
Speaker 1: a cell phone with an ISIS flag in the exact
Speaker 1: same area where this attack took place. We're also told
Speaker 1: that the perpetrator of this terrorism was in fact doing
Speaker 1: dry run throughs, and the FBI and the government had
Speaker 1: interviewed him back in what and just among the few
Speaker 1: developments we have here joining us as Bill mcguardy. He
Speaker 1: is a retired lieutenant with the m y p D
Speaker 1: worked ten years in the counter terrorism unit. Patrick Poole,
Speaker 1: national security correspondent, p J Media, Thank you both for
Speaker 1: being with us. You know, as I brought up yesterday,
Speaker 1: Patrick pool, sure enough, everything that I said that usually
Speaker 1: happens happened here, and that is that they were the
Speaker 1: signs and the evidence that terror was gonna happen. This
Speaker 1: guy was telegraphing at all, and we didn't pick it
Speaker 1: up again and sewn absolutely And yesterday, UM in the
Speaker 1: aftermath of this attack, we were talking about this known
Speaker 1: war terrorism problem where these individuals already known to law enforcement.
Speaker 1: In this case, Uhipov was interviewed by the Department of
Speaker 1: Homeland Security in twenty fifteen because he was the contact
Speaker 1: point for two other terrorist suspects, one of which who's
Speaker 1: on the LAMB. They don't know where he is. And
Speaker 1: yet we have all these um UM officials and experts
Speaker 1: running around talking about lone wolf Um when we know
Speaker 1: or the internet he was radicalized on the internet. Well
Speaker 1: we know, we know that he was part of this
Speaker 1: terrorist So I mean, it's it's blindingly obvious. And yet
Speaker 1: here again we have the media and officials trying to
Speaker 1: gaslight this whole incident, as we see every time, to
Speaker 1: convince us to believe that this is something other than
Speaker 1: what it plainly is, you know, and and look at CNN,
Speaker 1: for example, they couldn't even say they said they put
Speaker 1: up a chiron, which is a lower third TV talk
Speaker 1: for those people that may not know what it means,
Speaker 1: but it's actually said, oh he uh, the the terrorist
Speaker 1: was saying God is great in Arabic and I'm like,
Speaker 1: and then Jake Tapper, fake Jake. He went out there
Speaker 1: and well, sometimes under the most beautiful of circumstances, Uh,
Speaker 1: people say Allahu akbar. That's not how most people hear it.
Speaker 1: That's what they were screaming on nine eleven one. And
Speaker 1: there is this mysterious reluctance and resistance to call this
Speaker 1: what it is. Bill. And when you look at what
Speaker 1: do Blasio had done in New York, I mean he
Speaker 1: basically did away with all the checks and balances that
Speaker 1: would have helped keep New Yorkers safe. So what are
Speaker 1: we to think about that? Absolutely, Sewan, and let me
Speaker 1: say it's an honor to be on the phone with
Speaker 1: both of you. Uh. I was watching that press conference
Speaker 1: today and it is sickening to me that this political correctness,
Speaker 1: and like you said, we were not calling it what
Speaker 1: it is, and we're using terms like it's isolated and
Speaker 1: it's a lone wolf. Yeah, it is a lone wolf,
Speaker 1: but it's not because it's ten six thousands of these
Speaker 1: individuals that it's talking to each other through the Internet,
Speaker 1: and it's not isolated because it's happening all through It's
Speaker 1: every other week we're hearing about another low tech attack.
Speaker 1: And until we get proactive about this. You know the thing,
Speaker 1: the things that were put in place by Ray Kelly
Speaker 1: are being undone by the Blasio and I had the
Speaker 1: privilege of serving under Ray Kelly from nine eleven to
Speaker 1: two thousand and fourteen, and he had the insight to
Speaker 1: put forth a couple of different things, not only over
Speaker 1: programs like Nexus and Shield, but covert going out getting
Speaker 1: sources and putting trip boys within communities that you think
Speaker 1: you might have a problem and that's we're four moving
Speaker 1: away from that. For the past seventeen years, we've been
Speaker 1: moving backwards instead of moving forward. Yeah, let me play
Speaker 1: the president from earlier today, as we now know that,
Speaker 1: you know, if the President's immigration initiatives have been in
Speaker 1: place in New York City, would have been spared yesterday's
Speaker 1: terrorist attack because they suspected foreign national terrorists behind this
Speaker 1: attack in New York City yesterday came to the United
Speaker 1: States through what's known as a diversity visa lottery, which
Speaker 1: is a program that President Trump has been trying to eliminate. Anyway,
Speaker 1: the twenty nine year old enter the US from Uzbeka,
Speaker 1: Stan under the diversity visa lottery system and then ultimately
Speaker 1: got a green card. Now, Trump, along with people like
Speaker 1: Senator Tom Cotton, Senator David Purdue, they've been calling for
Speaker 1: an end to this and also, of course he wants
Speaker 1: to vet refugees so that we know their background. If
Speaker 1: we can't vet you, why are we going to risk
Speaker 1: the lines of American I am today starting the process
Speaker 1: of terminating the diversity lottery program. I'm going to ask
Speaker 1: Congress to immediately initiate work to get rid of this program.
Speaker 1: Diversary and diversity lottery. Diversities lottery sounds nice. It's not nice.
Speaker 1: It's not good. It's not good. It hasn't been good.
Speaker 1: We've been against it. So we want to immediately work
Speaker 1: with Congress on the diversity lottery program, on terminating it,
Speaker 1: getting rid of it. We want a merit based program
Speaker 1: where people come into our country based on merit. And
Speaker 1: we want to get rid of chain migration. This man
Speaker 1: that came in or whatever you want to call him,
Speaker 1: brought in with him other people and he was a
Speaker 1: point he was the point of contact, the primary point
Speaker 1: of contact for and this is preliminarily twenty three people
Speaker 1: that came in or potentially came in with him. Uh.
Speaker 1: And that's not acceptable. So we want to get rid
Speaker 1: of chain migration. And we've wanted to do that for
Speaker 1: a long time, and I've been wanting to do it
Speaker 1: for a long time, and we'll be asking Congress to
Speaker 1: start working on it immediately. There are bills already about
Speaker 1: ending chain migration, and we have a lot of good
Speaker 1: bills in there. We're being stopped by Democrats because their obstructionists,
Speaker 1: and honestly, they don't want to do what's right for
Speaker 1: our country. We need strength, we need resolve. We have
Speaker 1: to stop it. So we're gonna get rid of this
Speaker 1: lottery program as soon as possible. He came in through
Speaker 1: the diversity program, as you know, and we're gonna stop that.
Speaker 1: We're going through as quickly as possible to get rid
Speaker 1: of chain migration and go to a merit based system.
Speaker 1: Terrorists are constantly seeking to strike our nation, and it
Speaker 1: will require the unflinching devotion to our law enforcement, homeland security,
Speaker 1: and intelligence professionals to keep America is safe. We will
Speaker 1: take all necessary steps to protect our people and our
Speaker 1: communities and to protect our nation as a whole. We
Speaker 1: have to get much tougher, we have to get much smarter,
Speaker 1: and we have to get much less politically correct. We're
Speaker 1: so politically correct that we're afraid to do anything. And
Speaker 1: that's not only our country, that's other countries too that
Speaker 1: are having very similar problems. And we have to get tough.
Speaker 1: We have to get smart. We have to do what's
Speaker 1: right to protect our citizens. The president is dead on accurate,
Speaker 1: correct and on the money. So if I didn't add
Speaker 1: that's that is the rhetoric. I want to hear from
Speaker 1: my government officials about what they're going to do to
Speaker 1: stop it, not sit there and talk saying kumbay r
Speaker 1: and say how we're going to build more more barricades
Speaker 1: to stop them from going up on the street. That's
Speaker 1: not what I want to hear as a citizen of
Speaker 1: the United States. And if I could just add about
Speaker 1: that mosque in in Jersey in two thousand and five,
Speaker 1: when Ray Kelly expanded in his intelligence program to outside
Speaker 1: New York City, I was one of the first people
Speaker 1: to go out there, and that was one of the
Speaker 1: first mosque that we started looking at. And we didn't
Speaker 1: look at it just blindly. We looked at it because
Speaker 1: we had leads and sources telling us that there are
Speaker 1: people going there that have anti American views, involved in
Speaker 1: certain different things that you should be worried about. And
Speaker 1: that's the leads that we followed. And just like you said,
Speaker 1: you saw them up ended, you saw this particular mosque,
Speaker 1: you are directly involved in monitoring it. Were there radicalized
Speaker 1: people there? And how long did we know it? Absolutely
Speaker 1: there's there was radicalized people there since the nineties. The
Speaker 1: mosque in Patterson, the mosque that the Blind Cheek was
Speaker 1: involved with Don Kennedy Boulevard in Jersey City. The reason
Speaker 1: we went out there was we knew that um who,
Speaker 1: we said, who is looking at these locations? We they're
Speaker 1: going to plan outside of New York and come into
Speaker 1: New York. But who's out there watching that? We know
Speaker 1: the FBI is and they do a great job, but
Speaker 1: they're inundated there swamp. So Kelly said, I want my people,
Speaker 1: my office is to go out follow the leads that
Speaker 1: they get from their sources and protect our city. And
Speaker 1: that's what needs to be done. Tell us specifically the
Speaker 1: types of I think what people want to know. What
Speaker 1: are the types of things that you saw and that
Speaker 1: you heard and that you knew were going on there.
Speaker 1: Individuals I can't say the names because they're still under
Speaker 1: investigation and some are still in that area. Some have
Speaker 1: moved on to different parts of the country. But Zazi
Speaker 1: Nabu is one name that I can mentioned. He was
Speaker 1: involved in most that were in Queens and in Jersey.
Speaker 1: Other individuals that we had reporting on, we're people talking
Speaker 1: about how they could do haunt in New York City,
Speaker 1: How do they can do harm to the United States
Speaker 1: in any way possible, whether it's building a bomb, picking
Speaker 1: up a knife stabbing somebody. Back then in all five
Speaker 1: oh six, there wasn't that much rhetoric about using vehicles,
Speaker 1: but it was rhetoric aimed at hurting American citizens and
Speaker 1: hateful speech, hateful speech against the United States. All right,
Speaker 1: stay right there, we're going to continue with Bill McGarty
Speaker 1: is with us. He personally was first handy his firsthand
Speaker 1: knowledge of the surveillance that took place at these mosques.
Speaker 1: And Patrick Pool, national security correspondent for p J Media,
Speaker 1: on what is a busy breaking newsday. Yes yet again
Speaker 1: undred nine four one, Shawn as our toll free telephone number.
Speaker 1: You want to be a part of the program, quick
Speaker 1: break right back, and we will continue right as we
Speaker 1: continue with Bill mcgartney, retired lieutenant with the m y
Speaker 1: p D. Worked ten years in the counter terrorism unit
Speaker 1: and actually surveiled some of these mosques where, in particular
Speaker 1: this mosque where this terrorist attended frequently. Patrick Poole, national
Speaker 1: security correspondent for PJ Media. Patrick, you're listening to Bill.
Speaker 1: He was there, he saw, he heard, he knew radicalization existed,
Speaker 1: and then of course it stops. It ends. I mean
Speaker 1: to me that that's a government failure that's a that's
Speaker 1: a mayor failure, that's a federal government failure. Absolutely. And
Speaker 1: one of the critical tools UH that Bill's units UH
Speaker 1: made available was a report in two thousand seven about
Speaker 1: the process of radicalization. And one of the things in
Speaker 1: that report talked about how these terror cells end up
Speaker 1: separating themselves from the mosque incubators. And UH that report
Speaker 1: ended up getting buried um and and retracted by the
Speaker 1: BLASIO because there were all these complaints from groups like
Speaker 1: care and in the usual suspects scene, it bosted islamophobia.
Speaker 1: That was an important tool and and again it was
Speaker 1: the these political, politically correct officials that ended up pulling
Speaker 1: that reports. There was a very useful tool for law
Speaker 1: enforcement all over the country. Unbelievable. You know, Bill walked
Speaker 1: the average person exactly what is it you're hearing until
Speaker 1: this ended that was going on in the mosque of
Speaker 1: this terrorist What Now, just to clarify, Sean, we wouldn't
Speaker 1: just blindly pick this mosque out of a hat and say, well,
Speaker 1: it's an Islamic moss let's look at it. It's leads
Speaker 1: generated that drewis to that mosque. And what do I
Speaker 1: mean by leads? Source reporting from human intel stating such
Speaker 1: and such individual is attending this mosque. When he's at
Speaker 1: this mosque, he's meeting with other people, and then afterwards
Speaker 1: going to a private house, going to other places to
Speaker 1: meet and talk about UH doing harm to America. That's
Speaker 1: the best way I could phrase it. We would then
Speaker 1: go out there. From there, we would either listen to
Speaker 1: recordings that our sources would take, not while in the mosque,
Speaker 1: but afterwards when they would leave the mosque, because they
Speaker 1: knew we were we were looking at the masque, so
Speaker 1: they wouldn't say anything inside the mosque. They would meet, pray,
Speaker 1: leave and then have their meetings about what they were
Speaker 1: going to do, if and how they were going to
Speaker 1: do it. And it was not only in New Jersey
Speaker 1: was we We ran cases from Maine to Miami to Seattle.
Speaker 1: And it was because of us following leads and not
Speaker 1: sitting back saying, well, we can't do this because it
Speaker 1: and it ends. How How did we end this? I
Speaker 1: retired in two thousand and fourteen. It ended when de
Speaker 1: Blasio basically took over. When de Brasio took over, he
Speaker 1: wanted to go down the route of political correctness. He
Speaker 1: didn't He didn't want us to say, go to go
Speaker 1: out there and make it appear that we were blindly
Speaker 1: surveiling Islamic moss, which we were not. We were following leads.
Speaker 1: And that's you know, there's a fine line between political
Speaker 1: correctness and not doing your job. And this this is
Speaker 1: what he did. He wanted us not to go out
Speaker 1: there and do our job and basically turn everything over
Speaker 1: to the FBI. What is that cause it causes a
Speaker 1: backlog in the FBI. You see it in this instant.
Speaker 1: This individual who committed this attack was on the radar.
Speaker 1: But they're swamp. They can't look after everybody. So Ray
Speaker 1: Kelly really was a hero. And between Chuck Schumer bragging
Speaker 1: I authored the diversity visa program that brought this guy
Speaker 1: to the country, and the Mayor of New York, Comrade
Speaker 1: de Blasio, ending the new NYPD eight Kelly surveillance program.
Speaker 1: But for those two issues, we probably would have been
Speaker 1: able to stop this absolute and it was done in
Speaker 1: the legal sense. We did not violate. You're following leads,
Speaker 1: as good policemen do. That's what they do. All right,
Speaker 1: stay right there, we gotta we gotta take a break.
Speaker 1: We'll carry you guys over for a few more minutes.
Speaker 1: Bill mcguarty and also Patrick Pool. Patrick Pool has been
Speaker 1: writing extensively on what is known as Lone Wolf or
Speaker 1: known Wolf. We'll get into that when we get back.
Speaker 1: We'll get to your calls as well. Eight nine for
Speaker 1: one Shawn if you want to be a part of
Speaker 1: the program. We also have Freedom Caucus members Mark Meadows
Speaker 1: and Congressman Dave Bratt and much more. One Shawn is
Speaker 1: our number. Now, you can't always believe what the other
Speaker 1: side claims. That's why there's the Shaw and Hannity shows
Speaker 1: the assumption that he was inspired by ices, but that's
Speaker 1: the extent of it. The assumption is he is an
Speaker 1: extremist and a terrorist who he is inspired by, and
Speaker 1: how it's too early to say there was a note found,
Speaker 1: there was a no found, which one of the reasons
Speaker 1: without going to detail, I would simply say the note
Speaker 1: and what he said coming out of the vehicle and
Speaker 1: the manner of the attack made it very clear as
Speaker 1: the act of terrorism. But we have to be smart
Speaker 1: about not ascribing to a particular group until we have
Speaker 1: more evidence that the only yeah, he did he did
Speaker 1: make a statement and he exited the vehicle and if
Speaker 1: you just look at the m oh with the attack, uh,
Speaker 1: that that's consistent with what's been going on, So that that,
Speaker 1: along with the statement, has enabled us to label as
Speaker 1: a terrorist defend. The notes were handwritten in Arabic um.
Speaker 1: They had the symbols UH and words, but the gist
Speaker 1: of the note was that the Islamic state would endure
Speaker 1: forever follow us uh. John Er attact that the note
Speaker 1: was written aravaticum. How significant is then and does it
Speaker 1: speak at all to the level of radicalization of Mr Siam.
Speaker 1: I don't know, but we're going to go back through
Speaker 1: all of his contacts and habits. But I think this
Speaker 1: is an important time to say, Uh, this isn't about Islam,
Speaker 1: It's not about what mosque he attends. There are hundreds
Speaker 1: of thousands of law abiding Muslims in New York City
Speaker 1: who are adversely affected by things like this, and UM,
Speaker 1: it's probably a good time to say we have seen
Speaker 1: in the aftermath of incidents like this, bias incidents, hate crimes, assaults,
Speaker 1: and Bob Boyce and his hate crimes. People will respond
Speaker 1: to those, investigate those, and anybody behind those will be prosecuted.
Speaker 1: To the fullest extent of the law. UM as has
Speaker 1: been said here before, it is it is the time
Speaker 1: to come together and to not confuse um this terrorist
Speaker 1: act with any broad brush against UH in a religion
Speaker 1: or a particular institution. All right, As we continue with
Speaker 1: Bill mcgrorty's with us, Patrick Poole is with us. Bill
Speaker 1: retired lieutenant NYPD, worked ten years in the counter terrorism unit.
Speaker 1: Patrick Poole, national security correspondent for PJ Media. You know,
Speaker 1: I've you know, Patrick, you have done extensive, extensive reporting
Speaker 1: on all of this over the years. You know, October
Speaker 1: year wrote lone Wolf or known Wolf. And here we
Speaker 1: are again, and I'm I'm listening to Bill on the
Speaker 1: other line. And Bill knew about this mosque that this
Speaker 1: terrorist had attended. We know that Mayor the Blasio of
Speaker 1: New York ended the NYPD surveillance program. Even Chris Christie
Speaker 1: at the time in twelves that it was arrogant, that,
Speaker 1: in fact, born out of arrogance, that New York Police
Speaker 1: Department was spying on some of these radical mosque where
Speaker 1: some of their evidence had taken them evidence and evidence only.
Speaker 1: And I'm looking at this, and then I say, Chuck
Speaker 1: Schumer he's bragging that he authored the Diversity Visa Act,
Speaker 1: and I'm saying, this is just absolutely ridiculous on everybody's front.
Speaker 1: Sean absolutely. And I camed that term no More Terrorism
Speaker 1: because three years ago I saw that, whether it's here
Speaker 1: in the US or over in Europe, almost without exception,
Speaker 1: all these terrorist incidents involved people who were already known
Speaker 1: to law enforcements. They were already known, they were known wolves.
Speaker 1: And what we see with this incident yesterday is really
Speaker 1: a convergence of a number of issues. Uh. You're you're
Speaker 1: talking about the the zetting and the visas. Uh. And
Speaker 1: we've been here before. DHS interviewed this guy back in
Speaker 1: we had the Somali refugee Arton who did the attack
Speaker 1: at Ohio State last November. We had the Zarnayev's at
Speaker 1: the Boston bombing. Again, We've got zetting problems, we have
Speaker 1: the the UM. I wrote extensively about the counter terms
Speaker 1: and training purge that was directed directly by the Obama
Speaker 1: White House, which the dismantling of Bill's former MLPD unit
Speaker 1: was a component of. We've got these counter terism officials
Speaker 1: who are prohibited from asking certain questions. And then we
Speaker 1: have the media gas lighting, the media continuing to tell
Speaker 1: us that what we're seeing is not what we're seeing.
Speaker 1: There's there's a higher reality, and it's just so tiring
Speaker 1: and it's frustrating to see. Yet again is getting people
Speaker 1: killed without I think it's just fair to say the
Speaker 1: Blasio ending the NYPD surveillance program could have stopped this guy.
Speaker 1: Chuck Schumer bragging I authored the diversity visa program. If
Speaker 1: we didn't have it, there's a likelihood this guy never
Speaker 1: would have been here. The odds are Americans wouldn't be
Speaker 1: in the hospital today fighting for their lives, and families
Speaker 1: wouldn't be mourning the death of their loved ones. You know,
Speaker 1: eight of them yesterday. Is that a fair statement? Bill? Absolutely?
Speaker 1: And And the the report that Patrick mentioned earlier about
Speaker 1: the radicalization it was was a perfect example of how
Speaker 1: political pressure and political correctness has caused what has happened today.
Speaker 1: When we were out in New Jersey, and and the
Speaker 1: political pressure that was put on officials in New Jersey,
Speaker 1: officials in New York. And if the officials in New York,
Speaker 1: like Bloomberg and Kelly didn't been to it, but the
Speaker 1: officials in Jersey did because they didn't want to out
Speaker 1: there in the first place. One we didn't they didn't
Speaker 1: want us to embarrass them. And number two, for whatever reason,
Speaker 1: they wanted us to stop going into New Jersey. And
Speaker 1: that report, along with lawsuits that I was personally involved with,
Speaker 1: put the pressure to first minimize us around two thousand
Speaker 1: and twelve, two thousand and thirteen, and then after the
Speaker 1: election of the Blasio basically put an end to what
Speaker 1: we were doing for the later for most of the
Speaker 1: two thousand decades. Let me bring in mayoral candidate, longtime
Speaker 1: friend of my personal friend and uh he is running
Speaker 1: for the mayor of New York City and very tough
Speaker 1: on law enforcement himself. Is candidate Beau Diedle and Bou.
Speaker 1: I've known you for a many many years, and I've
Speaker 1: interviewed you a lot over the years. You're now in
Speaker 1: the fight with this guy, Comrade de Blasio, and what
Speaker 1: do we discover? But he ended the m y p
Speaker 1: D surveillance program at a very specific mosque that this
Speaker 1: terrorist yesterday attended, and I just, you know, I figured
Speaker 1: this isn't political for you. It's just something that I
Speaker 1: know that you've always supported. A somebody that also saw
Speaker 1: that lives were saved in New York City, would stopping
Speaker 1: frisk Yeah, well, you know, right now, I don't want
Speaker 1: to policize what happened yesterday to the fact, my heart
Speaker 1: is with those people that were killed in the ones
Speaker 1: that we interest. But with all that said, you know
Speaker 1: this current mayor right now, all of a sudden, he's
Speaker 1: putting his arms around the cops. Stand out great. He's
Speaker 1: the same one that the cops turned their back on
Speaker 1: during the funerals when they would let them take out
Speaker 1: of the Brooklyn Bridge. These disturbing people. What do we
Speaker 1: want dead cops? When do we want them now? And
Speaker 1: now all of a sudden he's having a love fest
Speaker 1: because it's it's reelection time. The point is, right now,
Speaker 1: what we were doing with the surveillance of these mosque
Speaker 1: are very important. What is the life work as far
Speaker 1: as when you're gonna have a terrorist that's completing to
Speaker 1: kill himself. He killed people in New York City. We
Speaker 1: need a mayor that's going to stand up this to
Speaker 1: this threat that we have. And this thread is not
Speaker 1: going the way. I could talk about this threat long
Speaker 1: before I ran from maya. I talked about showing if
Speaker 1: we were going to be hit with something. And this
Speaker 1: could be the beginning of the way. I don't know,
Speaker 1: but right now, even yes, he when the mayor and
Speaker 1: the guy came on, I think it was a little
Speaker 1: irresponsible for them to say that, oh, this is a
Speaker 1: long wolf attack. No. No, you gotta conduct an investigation
Speaker 1: and find out all the facts before you start to
Speaker 1: talking like that. People have to be aware. People have
Speaker 1: to see something, you have to have, you have to
Speaker 1: say something, you have to be well, they're well aware
Speaker 1: of your surrounding. Well. Bo. I think this is really
Speaker 1: important because I think this delineate you distinguishes you from
Speaker 1: all these candidates in this race, and and that is
Speaker 1: a you support stopping frisk, which, by the way, we
Speaker 1: had a murder rate of almost three thousand in New
Speaker 1: York I went down a five hundred and even lower
Speaker 1: one year because of it. That's been stopped by the
Speaker 1: Blasio and now we're seeing the murder rate rise once
Speaker 1: again in New York City, and we're seeing New York
Speaker 1: City becoming more dangerous as a result. And he ends
Speaker 1: the surveillance program. And you're talking also with offer, Sir
Speaker 1: former m yp the retired Lieutenant Bill McGarty and he was.
Speaker 1: He was on the ground and literally monitoring this specific mosque.
Speaker 1: Those are things that I think you, as mayor would
Speaker 1: do well. You want to know something, there's a little
Speaker 1: more information. And by the way, it's not because it's
Speaker 1: a mosque. It's because that's where the evidence lead them,
Speaker 1: not because of religion. And they and they had to
Speaker 1: have some evidence because they were able to obtain warrants
Speaker 1: to go into that mass. They had to have evidence
Speaker 1: to the fact that there was something there that was
Speaker 1: enough for judge to sign a warrant to go in there. Now,
Speaker 1: the other thing a lot of people will know he
Speaker 1: talks about crane being down. I get this from the
Speaker 1: school safety offices. Just pick up today's school safety officers
Speaker 1: are directed not to make police reports on a soult weapons,
Speaker 1: drugs slush and flushed the drugs down the toilet, so
Speaker 1: they're not making reports. Let me ask Bill, Bill, can
Speaker 1: you respond to what Merrill canaidate? Bow deetle aside with
Speaker 1: the numbers in the police apartment with Cris, I agree
Speaker 1: with him and the numbers in the least department. Crime
Speaker 1: is on the rise, and don't let anyone tell you
Speaker 1: different thing. The men and women I talked to every
Speaker 1: day s the crime is on the rise. The numbers
Speaker 1: are played with that is an absolute fact. No one
Speaker 1: will admit it. But they knocked uh, they knocked the
Speaker 1: categorizations down, so the numbers play right and everything looks
Speaker 1: good and everyone could say, yeah, crime is down. And
Speaker 1: I just want to put it one point out there, Sewan.
Speaker 1: Think about this. Under eight years of Bloomberg and Kelly,
Speaker 1: not one successful terrorist attack in less than four years,
Speaker 1: We've had two successful attacks within this city because of
Speaker 1: one reason, the blasil and political correctness. And you don't
Speaker 1: want to know something to show them when you have
Speaker 1: nine out of ten cops this was done by the
Speaker 1: Daily News. Ninety other ten cops that if they found
Speaker 1: another job did lead the NYPD morale is down in
Speaker 1: the ground. You've got a lot of New York to
Speaker 1: the cups that don't want to get involved now the
Speaker 1: course of this mayor. They do not like this mayor
Speaker 1: be hated by the police officers, and you don't want
Speaker 1: to know something. We need the mayor at these cops
Speaker 1: to look up that will support him and not turn
Speaker 1: them down. Every time there's a questionable something happens. Disney
Speaker 1: is right away. He wants to be the judge and
Speaker 1: jury right away. Let's get Patrick pulling this. Patrick Sean,
Speaker 1: I want to go back to what Bill talked about
Speaker 1: about the Mosque surveillance, and he talked about the Nabula
Speaker 1: Zazi case, which again just showed that, um, how important
Speaker 1: it was for these surveillance techniques, which again are are
Speaker 1: driven by active intelligence were Notably, Zazi was actually ticked
Speaker 1: off by his mom, um after the FBI had asked
Speaker 1: the m y p D to talk to this a mom,
Speaker 1: your mom member that enough the phone and and uh
Speaker 1: chipping him off. So you know, these are important programs.
Speaker 1: Uh they were shut down by the Blasio yep. Um,
Speaker 1: that's the scary thing in all of these cases, you know.
Speaker 1: And and then of course the social media impact, where
Speaker 1: we know what these guys their stay saying, all right,
Speaker 1: Bill Patrick, mayoral candidate bow Deetles, stay right there. We
Speaker 1: gotta take a quick break and we'll come back. We'll
Speaker 1: we'll finish this. We have a trip to Washington that
Speaker 1: we've got to make. We gotta find out what's going
Speaker 1: on in this economic plan. We have so many great
Speaker 1: economic indicators out there that we've got to keep the
Speaker 1: momentum going and the only way that's gonna happen is
Speaker 1: through the President's Economic stimulus tax reform bill. And we'll
Speaker 1: have an update from Freedom Caucus members Mark Meadows and
Speaker 1: Dave Bratt coming up. We'll have full coverage of how
Speaker 1: stupid Schumer, how stupid uh, comrade build the Blasio are
Speaker 1: and the danger that they now brought to the City
Speaker 1: of New York because of their adherence to political correctness.
Speaker 1: All right, as we continue Sean Hannity Show with Bill mcguharty,
Speaker 1: his retired lieutenant n YPD. He actually surveiled the specific
Speaker 1: mosque of this terrorist. Patrick Poole, National Security Corresponding PJ
Speaker 1: Media and bow Dietle, mayoral candidate New York City. Big
Speaker 1: debate tonight between Comrade the Blasio and bow Dietle. You
Speaker 1: don't want to miss it in light of these events. Uh,
Speaker 1: let's start with your final thoughts, Bill Well, the final
Speaker 1: thoughts for my first thing I want to say is, bo,
Speaker 1: if I still live in the city, you'd have my vote.
Speaker 1: Unfortunately I live up in Rockland County. Thank you. We
Speaker 1: we need to stop political correctness and we need to
Speaker 1: start policing in the twenty second century, proactive sources, trip
Speaker 1: wire is moving forward to keep us in safe. What
Speaker 1: is your final word, Patrick pull Sean, I gotta applaud
Speaker 1: to you you. You've had me on repeatedly talking about normal
Speaker 1: terrorism and the counter terrorism purge. Sean, I think what
Speaker 1: your your listeners need to keep their their eye on
Speaker 1: is the media here again we're seeing this media narrative
Speaker 1: trying to suppress all the information, trying to tell us
Speaker 1: that this is something that it isn't and we need
Speaker 1: to push back on that. All right, bow Dietles, there's
Speaker 1: a big debate tonight. Obviously this is going to be
Speaker 1: a major focus of us debate. Give us a preview.
Speaker 1: What can Comrade the Blasio expect, especially considering he ended
Speaker 1: the m y p D surveillance program of this specific mosque. Well, again,
Speaker 1: I don't want to politicize this. I got enough amily
Speaker 1: initiations to him with his corruption. And again, we have
Speaker 1: some ideas for the New York City Police depart One
Speaker 1: of my big ideas we loved the community policing. We
Speaker 1: love the cops to look like the community. I want
Speaker 1: to wait a two year college degree and get some
Speaker 1: kids from the inner cities on the police department. Let
Speaker 1: him go to college at night and get their degrees.
Speaker 1: But let's have the police department reflect our neighborhoods. Then
Speaker 1: this whole division that this may as plus can be eliminated.
Speaker 1: And we have cops out there. All they want to
Speaker 1: do is do their job, and this may has been
Speaker 1: in the middle of it, stopping them from doing a job.
Speaker 1: People don't care. There's a lot of cops that rides
Speaker 1: around now. I talked to him every day. I want
Speaker 1: these top bold to be out there and be observant
Speaker 1: to what's going on. We get the greatest police department
Speaker 1: in the world. We need the police department. The police
Speaker 1: officers to love their mayor, and I will be the mayor.
Speaker 1: They will never turn near facts on me. That's such
Speaker 1: a good point. People forget that too. And uh, I've
Speaker 1: got to believe though, this is gonna be a big
Speaker 1: part corruption. The two big issues tonight will be corruption
Speaker 1: and will be him ending the surveillance program and people
Speaker 1: like Bill McGroarty were actually they're monitoring what He saw
Speaker 1: a lot of radicalism on display and we stopped I
Speaker 1: could have saved lives potentially. Thank you all, bo good luck.
Speaker 1: Tonight in the debate, we will be watching Bill McGarty,
Speaker 1: Patrick Pool. Thank you eight one Shawn toll free telephone number.
Speaker 1: What's going on in d C. We'll have an update
Speaker 1: Freedom Caucus members their Chairman Mark Meadows and Dave Brack,
Speaker 1: Congressman from Virginia. Next. We've now had two straight quarters
Speaker 1: of three or more economic growth GDP, but our economy
Speaker 1: and our country cannot take off the way it really should.
Speaker 1: So it's really really competitive with the rest of the world.
Speaker 1: Unless we get the kind of tax cuts for our
Speaker 1: companies and our middle class are workers, unless we get
Speaker 1: the jobs we need, it can't really take off until
Speaker 1: we get the tax cuts and reform past. This week,
Speaker 1: the House Ways and Means Committee will unveil a historic
Speaker 1: tax plan that will create new jobs, higher wages, which
Speaker 1: hasn't happened in many years, and now it's starting to happen.
Speaker 1: I'm happy to tell you many many years. People making
Speaker 1: less money today than they made twenty years ago. You've
Speaker 1: heard it many times before, but it will lead to
Speaker 1: tremendous prosperity for American families, communities, and also for our
Speaker 1: job producing businesses. At the center of our plan our
Speaker 1: tax cuts for the working Americans. We will reduce tax rates,
Speaker 1: increase the amount of income that is taxed at zero,
Speaker 1: and increase the child tax credit, which is very important
Speaker 1: to families. Will make the tax coats simple and fair
Speaker 1: so that the vast majority of Americans can file their
Speaker 1: taxes on a single sheet of paper. We will restore
Speaker 1: America's competitive edge by lowering taxes on America's businesses for
Speaker 1: the first time in more than thirty years, and it
Speaker 1: will be a historic cut. Right now, other countries are
Speaker 1: so far below us. And then when you wonder, you
Speaker 1: see all these companies leaving, one after another, they leave.
Speaker 1: That's not going to be happening. And I've must tell
Speaker 1: you I've stopped it even before this, but we're going
Speaker 1: to be uh stopping it in full. People are coming back.
Speaker 1: Under our plan. Will go from being one of the
Speaker 1: highest tax nations in the world to one of the lowest,
Speaker 1: meaning more jobs, more factories, more plans, more opportunities right
Speaker 1: here in America where we want them, tremendously different trade deals.
Speaker 1: Our trade deals are horrible. They were made by people
Speaker 1: that honestly, Uh, it's sad, it's very sad for our country.
Speaker 1: Every trade deal we have is disastrous. We're renegotiating our
Speaker 1: trade and if we have support from Congress, will make
Speaker 1: trade deals that are horror shows into very good and
Speaker 1: respectable trade deals and trade deals that are good for
Speaker 1: both countries and in fact many countries. But very important
Speaker 1: is that we renegotiate our trade deals. All right. That
Speaker 1: was the President talking about the economy today, as we
Speaker 1: follow all our top stories the terror attack in New
Speaker 1: York City, what we're learning about how the New York
Speaker 1: mayor end of the n y p D surveillance program
Speaker 1: that literally targeted the monster's guy went to Chuck Schumer's
Speaker 1: out there bragging, Wow, I'm the one that I'm the
Speaker 1: one that authored the diversity visa program that allowed this
Speaker 1: guy into the country. The President addressed that too today. Uh, first,
Speaker 1: we do have a little bit of troubling news if
Speaker 1: you want things done, and that is the headline in
Speaker 1: political today is the House GOP has delayed the tax
Speaker 1: bill rollout. We're not exactly sure why. And then we
Speaker 1: have a Bloomberg report that the GOP is praising for
Speaker 1: all hell to break loose when the tax bill finally drops. Well,
Speaker 1: we thought that we were gonna see the bill actually
Speaker 1: this week. Joining US Freedom Caucus Chairman Congressman Mark Meadows,
Speaker 1: North Carolina, North Carolina Freedom Caucus Member Congressman Dave Bratt. Guys,
Speaker 1: welcome back to the program. What's going on. It's great
Speaker 1: to be with you, Sean, And uh, it's it's actually
Speaker 1: a good day for America and that the president is
Speaker 1: talking about jobs and job growth and tax reform. Uh,
Speaker 1: we just got to get it done. And and I
Speaker 1: think the headlines that you're talking about there, Sean, is
Speaker 1: is really maybe just uh twenty four hour delay. I'm
Speaker 1: hopeful tomorrow that we actually see the details. Met with
Speaker 1: Chairman Brady today, and I think we're very close to
Speaker 1: actually seeing the legislative text in the in the next
Speaker 1: few hours instead of the next few weeks. All right,
Speaker 1: what is it gonna be? Why is that? Why are
Speaker 1: their predictions all hell is gonna break loose? I know
Speaker 1: that there's been a framework for this bill, and I
Speaker 1: understand that the that a move was made to get
Speaker 1: the House and the Senate on the same calendar, as
Speaker 1: I understand it. Do you believe that Congress Mementos, Well,
Speaker 1: I think there was a move to do that. Perhaps
Speaker 1: the real problem is is we're talking about thousands of
Speaker 1: pages of legislative texts, and and I know that I've
Speaker 1: met with the President and the administration. I've met with
Speaker 1: a number of other people to try to de find
Speaker 1: some some parameters that both Congressman Bratt and myself can support.
Speaker 1: The real problem, the reason why all hell may break loose,
Speaker 1: is that there's a long ways between a set of
Speaker 1: principles that unites in the pay force and how it
Speaker 1: applies to uh, your listeners and our constituents. And even
Speaker 1: within the last few hours, I started to hear a
Speaker 1: few troubling things that might uh provide for a real
Speaker 1: rigorous debate in the coming days. Okay, Congressman Bratt, do
Speaker 1: you see this delay as a problem? Yeah, I mean
Speaker 1: it's a little problem. It's it's hinting already there they're
Speaker 1: struggling to find votes. But I I'm still optimistic. The
Speaker 1: same structure is still in place right at the seat
Speaker 1: corps as corps. Some of the details and they're they're
Speaker 1: they're mid sized details, right keeping the high rate on
Speaker 1: the high income folks at thirty nine. Most Republicans want
Speaker 1: to see rate reductions for everybody is typical. And then
Speaker 1: the salt the state and local piece. You know, they're
Speaker 1: they're gonna maybe get rid of the state piece but
Speaker 1: keep the local pieces, a compromise for the New Yorkers
Speaker 1: and New Jersey folks, et cetera. But at the end
Speaker 1: of the day, the structure still there. Everything President Trump
Speaker 1: was talking about is still in play. The good news
Speaker 1: is there. And then just you know, to the folks
Speaker 1: list out there, Contrast this to what you would hear
Speaker 1: if Hillary Clint were president today. And look at the
Speaker 1: progressive budget the Democrats put in. A tax plan doesn't
Speaker 1: get any airtime. You can go google it. It raises
Speaker 1: taxes ten trillion dollars, raises spending eleven trillion, and adds
Speaker 1: more debt and deficit than our budget does when we
Speaker 1: cut taxes. And you won't ever hear that covered by
Speaker 1: the mainstream press. They all, I want to copy. I
Speaker 1: never even saw that, and I think I pride myself
Speaker 1: and being informed. Can you send me a copy of that?
Speaker 1: But I like the other night too, he was all fascinated.
Speaker 1: He was like, oh boy, I'm gonna blow this thing up. Yeah, well,
Speaker 1: you give it to me and I'll blow it up too,
Speaker 1: so I'll look forward to it. Uh. Let me ask
Speaker 1: you both, So, is it basically the same that we
Speaker 1: have had the president running on we're here, we're gonna
Speaker 1: get what corporate tax rate we are, middle class taxes
Speaker 1: are gonna be cut. We're gonna lower the rates uh
Speaker 1: what on on repatriation like ten percent so we can
Speaker 1: incentivize trillions for multinationals to come back. Uh. And we're
Speaker 1: gonna get rid of state local deductions. Now, people like
Speaker 1: Chucky Schumer, you know that lives in the liberal state
Speaker 1: like New York, and he wants to support the liberal
Speaker 1: governor Andrew Cuomo and the liberal mayor Mayor do Blasio
Speaker 1: that all have state local income taxes. Uh. Those taxes
Speaker 1: may not be deductible, or some of them may not
Speaker 1: be deductible. What's the latest on that, Congressman Medals, Well, Uh,
Speaker 1: I think we've got some type of an agreement on
Speaker 1: the state and local It looks like they'll roll that
Speaker 1: out with having uh most of the the benefit not
Speaker 1: just going to New York or or California or New Jersey. Uh,
Speaker 1: from from other hard working American taxpayers. But your your
Speaker 1: question was, is is this really what the President campaigned on,
Speaker 1: and I would say an unqualified yes. I mean, it's
Speaker 1: about lowering the rates for the middle income ware wage earners,
Speaker 1: getting our our economy to go again. And uh, he
Speaker 1: has been really laser focused on this and probably understands
Speaker 1: the whole tax reform issue better than many members of Congress,
Speaker 1: and so he's he's personally engaged in it. And so
Speaker 1: I'm very optimistic. Like uh uh Dave Bratt was was
Speaker 1: just mentioning that we're not only going to get it done,
Speaker 1: it will come at a great Uh. I guess back
Speaker 1: and forth headlines starting, I believe tomorrow where they're saying, well,
Speaker 1: we're affecting this group, are not helping this this particular
Speaker 1: special interest group. As long as we keep the focus
Speaker 1: on moms and dads and aunts and uncles on Main Street, uh,
Speaker 1: we will be in a good place and not just
Speaker 1: a special interest lobbyists here in Washington, d C. So
Speaker 1: as I understand that Dave Bratt that the big struggle
Speaker 1: this week was the income thresholds for the top rater
Speaker 1: are going to be higher than they currently are, likely
Speaker 1: between what seven fifty thousand and a million dollars. The
Speaker 1: estate tax would likewise be replaced, but may have to
Speaker 1: be phased out. To say money phased out means it's
Speaker 1: not gonna happen to me, and other you know, other
Speaker 1: unresolved issues in the House Ways and Means Committee um
Speaker 1: that they say led to this delay, including how to
Speaker 1: win over GOP lawmakers from these high tax states. And
Speaker 1: they're balking. Meanwhile, why don't they just fix their states?
Speaker 1: It's not my fault that New York State has a
Speaker 1: nearly ten percent state income tax on top of you
Speaker 1: guys hit me with not you personally right? No, that
Speaker 1: that's right. I mean the war we're all talking about
Speaker 1: with the swamp right. Chairman Meadows was just getting at that, right,
Speaker 1: that's the war and all the pay forces the swamp right,
Speaker 1: the special loopholes, the special deductions. They can walk in
Speaker 1: with their lobbyists and get a special line put in
Speaker 1: the budget to give them a preference, and anything they win,
Speaker 1: it's a it is a fixed pie. Right. We got
Speaker 1: a trillion and a half to work with in the
Speaker 1: Senate budget, and so that's the total amount we get
Speaker 1: to dole out right. The whole thing in totals about
Speaker 1: five trillions. But there's a fixed sum, right, so either
Speaker 1: the swamp gets it or the middle class gets it.
Speaker 1: So the Freedom Caucus obviously is biting nail on behalf
Speaker 1: of the middle class and to get economic growth, and
Speaker 1: that that parts underplayed, right the press. You always do
Speaker 1: those clips series on your shows. Put a clip series
Speaker 1: together of the democratcy. You're never gonna have three percent growth.
Speaker 1: That's a your your utopian there's no way that can happen. Well,
Speaker 1: imagine if we didn't have the hurricanes in that period
Speaker 1: of time, I would have been amazing. All right, stay
Speaker 1: right there. When we come back, I want to ask
Speaker 1: Congressman Brad Congress Memados about uranium one and about this dossier,
Speaker 1: and about the congressional investigations that finally have been kick started,
Speaker 1: as I've been screaming my lungs out forever that it
Speaker 1: needs to happen. We'll take a quick break, we'll come back.
Speaker 1: We'll continue straight ahead. Right as we continue with the
Speaker 1: Chairman of the Freedom Caucus, Mark Meadows, and the he's
Speaker 1: from North Carolina and also Freedom Caucus member from the
Speaker 1: Commonwealth of Virginia, Dave Bratt Is with US Congress Memados.
Speaker 1: Finally we're getting congressional action on the uranium one deal.
Speaker 1: And what we see is is that the new information
Speaker 1: that we've been breaking is that in two thousand and nine,
Speaker 1: the FBI, and that would mean the former FBI now
Speaker 1: Special Counsel Director, which was Robert Mueller, he knew everything
Speaker 1: about bribery and kickbacks and money laundering and a stortion
Speaker 1: and racketeering all happening in two thousand and nine, that
Speaker 1: there was a network within the United States set up
Speaker 1: by Vladimir Putin, the hostile regime, the hostile actor that
Speaker 1: he is, for the very distinct purpose of cracking into
Speaker 1: our uranium market. And even though they knew these crimes
Speaker 1: were being committed, apparently they let this insane uranium one
Speaker 1: deal go go through in but they knew these crimes
Speaker 1: were happening. So now that's being investigated, as is the
Speaker 1: Clinton Boughton paid for d n C bought and paid
Speaker 1: for Obama bought and paid for phony, salacious Russian dossier
Speaker 1: that had you know, all this misinformation and lines about
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. To me, there's real Russia collusion in both cases.
Speaker 1: Your reaction, well, I can tell you at this particular time,
Speaker 1: maybe it's time to get a special prosecutor for our
Speaker 1: special prosecutor. You know, if if indeed some of the
Speaker 1: stories that you've actually been reporting for some time, Sean, Uh,
Speaker 1: if if the investigation into all of this really bears
Speaker 1: out the facts where we have uh the d n
Speaker 1: C and the Clinton campaign and others paying for a
Speaker 1: dossier that uh potentially could have been used in a
Speaker 1: number of different ways. Uh. Really that's where the Russian
Speaker 1: collusions are all there, and now the jury is is
Speaker 1: not even out for deliberation. As you mentioned, I think
Speaker 1: it's imperative that we look at it and actually investigate
Speaker 1: it in a real way here on Capitol Hill. But uh,
Speaker 1: some of the reporting and the facts that seem to
Speaker 1: support that reporting, uh paint a very bleak picture for
Speaker 1: many of my Democratic colleagues who have been claiming Russian
Speaker 1: collusion on behalf of President Trump. Now all of a sudden, Uh,
Speaker 1: those those chickens are starting to come home to roost,
Speaker 1: and uh it's perhaps getting too close for comfort to
Speaker 1: the d n C. So we're gonna get to the
Speaker 1: bottom of it. I'm I'm on oversight, as you know,
Speaker 1: uh on and uh so, whether it's it's investigations in
Speaker 1: our committee or other committees. It's time to really uncover
Speaker 1: the real truth behind a lot of these stories that
Speaker 1: you've been reporting for some time. The evidence is overwhelming,
Speaker 1: and here we are. We get the Manafort indictment. There's
Speaker 1: nothing about Russia, Congressman Bratt, nothing, zero, zip, not a thing.
Speaker 1: And the financial transactions are from two thousand and six
Speaker 1: to two thousand and fourteen. What is this? What are
Speaker 1: they doing here? Yeah, well, what they're doing is obviously politics,
Speaker 1: and you've been on it. And then, uh, the the
Speaker 1: special prosecutor that is in place hired a lot of
Speaker 1: folks who are Clinton donors, and so the only place
Speaker 1: Russia does turn out is when they do the rate ups.
Speaker 1: You will notice they do mention Russia in the headline,
Speaker 1: and then they mentioned the term Russia, Russia, Russia when
Speaker 1: there is no connection. So the whole thing has been politicized.
Speaker 1: And our Oversight Committee, we got great people on there,
Speaker 1: but our leadership on both sides Senate in the House
Speaker 1: haven't moved forward aggressively enough on this, and I don't
Speaker 1: think they get how important this is to the American people.
Speaker 1: You can't have two standards of justice, right, one for
Speaker 1: the middle class, and one for the elites up here
Speaker 1: in the bubble that if you get busted. Uh, everybody
Speaker 1: knews where the bodies are buried up here, right, So
Speaker 1: one side gets in trouble, they threatened the other side.
Speaker 1: And uh, I think the American people have caught on
Speaker 1: to what's going on up here. It's unbelievable. I'm gonna
Speaker 1: tell you if they lost. If you guys, and I'm
Speaker 1: not saying this to you because frankly, but for the
Speaker 1: Freedom Caucus and a couple of senators, I don't trust
Speaker 1: any of your fellow colleagues there. If this tax bill,
Speaker 1: reform bill is not done, forget it. Good luck And
Speaker 1: and in two thousand and eighteen, good luck. You're not
Speaker 1: gonna it's not gonna be what you want. Well, Sean,
Speaker 1: you're exactly right. It's we've got to actually produce results.
Speaker 1: We gotta quit talking about what we're going to do
Speaker 1: and actually do what we said we were gonna do.
Speaker 1: And if you can do that, then ultimately it will
Speaker 1: be a good day at the ballot. The economy grows
Speaker 1: the forgotten men. And when we already have great statistics
Speaker 1: to build off of which I don't have time to
Speaker 1: get into now. But all right, thank you both. Congressman
Speaker 1: Meadows North Carolina apparently doesn't want me down in North
Speaker 1: Carolina campaigning for him. Doesn't want to be seen with me.
Speaker 1: Maybe I'll just have to offer my Maybe I'll have
Speaker 1: to do my campaigning with Dave Bratt. But maybe he
Speaker 1: doesn't want to be seen with me either. I don't
Speaker 1: blame you. How are your next mate for my breakfast?
Speaker 1: Next mate? Okay, call me in April. All right, quick break,
Speaker 1: we'll come back. We'll continue. It's the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 1: Congressman Ron de Santis wants to limit the limit the
Speaker 1: scope of Robert Mueller. That's coming up. We'll continue. It
Speaker 1: was the FBI director when all of this stuff was
Speaker 1: going on, Robert Mueller, who's now the special counsel, who
Speaker 1: was the U S attorney in charge of copying the
Speaker 1: plea deal, which many of us believe was a sweetheart
Speaker 1: deal with the main perpetrator here, Rod Rosenstein, who's the
Speaker 1: Deputy Attorney General. Obviously Eric Holder was involved. You feel
Speaker 1: like are you're saying you feel like this was an
Speaker 1: intentional cover up because of this non disclosure agreement. Do
Speaker 1: you think that Mueller and Rosenstein knew more than they
Speaker 1: led on to connect these dots. So far, there's a
Speaker 1: lot of smoke here. Well, that's what we need to
Speaker 1: figure out. I mean, here's what we do know, Leland.
Speaker 1: None this everything the confidential informant was giving to the authorities.
Speaker 1: None of that was produced to Congress or to the
Speaker 1: Scifius Board before the Uranian one deal was approved. I
Speaker 1: don't know why that was the case, but it's very
Speaker 1: odd that that was the case, because clearly this was
Speaker 1: an individual who was knee deep and uncovering a massive
Speaker 1: racketeering scheme involving this deal. You had an opportunity, you said,
Speaker 1: to talk to this informant and to their lawyer. Tell
Speaker 1: us what they told you happened, and what you think
Speaker 1: then didn't happen that should have. Well, I spoke with
Speaker 1: the attorney, and obviously there's a lot of things that
Speaker 1: I think the individual wants to be able to provide
Speaker 1: that he's just not doing now because but but what
Speaker 1: what is it that he wants to provide? So what
Speaker 1: he will be able to provide I believe, just reading
Speaker 1: between the lines is that he was involved with these
Speaker 1: Russian agents, and the Russian agents from very be the
Speaker 1: very beginning. We're interested in the Clintons and really believe
Speaker 1: that the Clintons would be their pathway to doing this deal.
Speaker 1: And obviously there was a lot of money that exchange
Speaker 1: hands um in the intervening time period. So this is
Speaker 1: somebody who was involved with these people, I think would
Speaker 1: be able to testify both of what they said and
Speaker 1: then what they did. And you'll notice, like in the
Speaker 1: Robert Menendez, the Senator Menendez bribery scandal, right now you
Speaker 1: have a quid, you have a quote. You don't necessarily
Speaker 1: have anyone filling in the details there. He still may
Speaker 1: get convicted, we'll see. But this one, I think you
Speaker 1: would have this confidential informant would provide some really significant information.
Speaker 1: And so but I'm also one let's let the chips
Speaker 1: fall where they may. I mean, you know, if if
Speaker 1: there was somehow a reasonable explanation for this, fine, let
Speaker 1: the American people see that. But I think it's very
Speaker 1: odd that none of this would have come out fire
Speaker 1: to the approval of that deal. In two, this was
Speaker 1: critical information that those Ciffiest board members, including Secretary Clinton,
Speaker 1: needed to have before approving this deal. Well, I've been
Speaker 1: able to speak with the confidential informant that helped the
Speaker 1: FBI uncover this bribery scheme. I've spoken with his attorney,
Speaker 1: and this informant wants to tell his story, but he's
Speaker 1: currently under a non disclosure agreement that was signed with
Speaker 1: the Eric Holder Justice Department. He came forward in sen
Speaker 1: was threatened with reprisal from the Loretta Lynch Justice Department. Clearly,
Speaker 1: it's in the interests, in the public's interest that this
Speaker 1: individual will be able to tell this story to Congress.
Speaker 1: Because what you have, Leland, is we have the money
Speaker 1: that went to Bill Clinton for the speech, the half
Speaker 1: a million dollars, millions of dollars to the foundation. That's
Speaker 1: Congressman Rhonda Santa's twenty four now till the top of
Speaker 1: the hour, And while the main street media spent all
Speaker 1: of this time on allegations about Trump Russia collusion, which
Speaker 1: is over a year now, produced no evidence zero, as
Speaker 1: we learned in the even the Maniford indictment. Now we've
Speaker 1: got all these scandals that we have been in the
Speaker 1: forefront of reporting along with Sarah Carter and of course
Speaker 1: John Solomon, And what De Santis was saying is, you know,
Speaker 1: speaking about these reports about Democrats and Hillary's campaign. We
Speaker 1: know Hillary's campaign, we know the d n Z, and
Speaker 1: now we know Obama all paid for the phony, salacious
Speaker 1: dossier that was Russian misinformation, propaganda and lies. Anyway, he
Speaker 1: was also referencing the House Intelligence Committee announcing the investigation
Speaker 1: into the administration Obama administration's decision to allow Russia to
Speaker 1: acquire of our uranium, which nobody can give me an
Speaker 1: answer why that's ever a good idea. Anyway. De Santis
Speaker 1: is a member of the House Oversight Committee, And uh,
Speaker 1: thank you so much for being with us. How are you.
Speaker 1: I'm doing good, good work. Yeah, I mean it's been
Speaker 1: you know, it's like been pulling teeth to get your
Speaker 1: colleagues to wake the hell up. With all due respect
Speaker 1: to your colleagues. Well, I think last week though, was
Speaker 1: an inflection point because we not only launched the Uranium
Speaker 1: one investigation, we also launched um and and I think
Speaker 1: brought it to a different level of the Fusion GPS
Speaker 1: and the dossier and then the Comy investigation with all
Speaker 1: the Comy memos and so this should have happened before.
Speaker 1: I agree with you, I've been fighting to do this,
Speaker 1: but at least we've turned that corner and can start
Speaker 1: getting the answers that the American people deserve. Okay, can
Speaker 1: you think of any good reason to give a bad
Speaker 1: actor Putin and a hostile regime Russia of our uranium? None? None?
Speaker 1: So why did how could this possibly happen? Especially in
Speaker 1: light of this what we discovered last week, which is
Speaker 1: the FBI informant, Well, we're going to find out. When
Speaker 1: I'm waiting, I'm not. And then, by the way, I'm
Speaker 1: not being angry at you. You're you've been fighting. I'm
Speaker 1: just I'm like, so I've been you know, I've been
Speaker 1: screaming about You've been all over this with the informant,
Speaker 1: he is, he is categorizing and getting all of his documents.
Speaker 1: He's got a lot of documents, so he's getting all
Speaker 1: of those together. He is absolutely planning to come in,
Speaker 1: provide those to conquer, going to testify, probably do some interviews,
Speaker 1: you know, outside the public view. And I think what
Speaker 1: will then do is take that information no by these
Speaker 1: people we don't even know about right now, that will
Speaker 1: have to go and bring in and I think eventually
Speaker 1: he will, definitely because here's what I want to understand
Speaker 1: because the FBI director, they knew in two thousand and
Speaker 1: nine that Vladimir Putin wanted to get a monopoly and
Speaker 1: a foothold in the American uranium market, and we knew
Speaker 1: that he had operatives inside the country. And the informant
Speaker 1: actually infiltrated on behalf of the FBI. That means in
Speaker 1: two thousand nine, the FBI knew about documents. They had
Speaker 1: a first hand insiders account through the informant. I'm told
Speaker 1: they're emails and I'm told there are tapes. That means
Speaker 1: Robert Mueller, the head of the FBI at the time,
Speaker 1: had to know that means are cold to the head
Speaker 1: of the Justice Department, who also was one of the
Speaker 1: nine signing off of the uranium one deal, he had
Speaker 1: to know. And then then at that point, how do
Speaker 1: you allow Putin was using bribery, kickbacks, extortion, money laundering,
Speaker 1: and racketeering to actually succeed when we know he's doing it,
Speaker 1: or you're right? And Ron Rosenstein knew. He was the
Speaker 1: U s attny that was overseeing the case at the time.
Speaker 1: And so the question is, we already had enough evidence
Speaker 1: to bring this case forward. Why didn't they bring it
Speaker 1: forward before Decifius Ford to prove this. There has to
Speaker 1: be a reason why they wouldn't have done that. Normally,
Speaker 1: when you investigate and you have people committing serious offenses,
Speaker 1: you indict him and then you bring that sounds to
Speaker 1: me like a question that Mueller, and a question that Hillary,
Speaker 1: and a question that everyone of the nine members, including
Speaker 1: Holder on that board. And you're right, Rosenstein, because they
Speaker 1: all knew about the bribery, extortion, money laundering, kickbacks, and racketeering.
Speaker 1: And I think that's going to be one of the
Speaker 1: central questions to both Mueller and the Rosenstein. You guys
Speaker 1: had this informant in two thousand nine, They had them
Speaker 1: for a year and a half before the Cippius sport
Speaker 1: to prove uranium one. So the question is you had
Speaker 1: all this inculpatory evidence, damning evidence, and yet you sat
Speaker 1: on it and you didn't move a case forward. Had
Speaker 1: they moved the case board, imagine what that would have
Speaker 1: done to the debate in the Congress. I mean, you
Speaker 1: already had people like Peter King who were saying, don't
Speaker 1: do this. I think it would have blown the whole
Speaker 1: deal up. It would have been absolutely critical information because
Speaker 1: it's an it's an insane proposition to even consider giving
Speaker 1: Putin and Russia this. You know, this is the foundational
Speaker 1: material for nuclear weapons. This is madness. Oh that's right.
Speaker 1: And then it's it's interesting how they try to pin
Speaker 1: Russia on all this stuff now since the president has
Speaker 1: been elected. But look at this, holy years about all
Speaker 1: the things. This is just one of the things that
Speaker 1: was done. Obviously, it's a very agreed dispect. So a
Speaker 1: lot of the Democrats have really changed their tune on
Speaker 1: Russia conveniently in the last year. Okay, how then, how
Speaker 1: can Mueller and Rosenstein be investigating anything Russian related when,
Speaker 1: in my opinion, there needs to be an investigation into
Speaker 1: what they knew about uranium one, what they knew about
Speaker 1: this network. Look, I mean I think that for for
Speaker 1: them to have been in charge of this, uh, it
Speaker 1: really blows the mind. I mean, we have three and
Speaker 1: or million people in this country. You couldn't have found
Speaker 1: people who were not involved in any of this undertow
Speaker 1: like they were for years and years. Um. I think
Speaker 1: this whole thing from the appointment of Mueller has been
Speaker 1: a total disaster. I don't think it should have ever happened.
Speaker 1: I don't think they followed the Department of Justice regulations
Speaker 1: when they did it, because they didn't identify a crime. Um.
Speaker 1: And so here we are with this thing with really
Speaker 1: no limits, and he's just out to try to find
Speaker 1: whatever he can. Yeah, let's talk about fusion GPS. And
Speaker 1: now we know that the very thing that the Democrats
Speaker 1: and Hillary were accusing the Trump campaign of that led
Speaker 1: to disappointment of a sp actual counsel that they themselves
Speaker 1: are guilty of. We now know that Hillary, through her
Speaker 1: lawyer law firm, the d n C through their law firm,
Speaker 1: which is the same and Obama through the same law firm,
Speaker 1: all funded the Russian lies, the salacious dossier that they
Speaker 1: ended that ended up getting repeated again and again as
Speaker 1: a means of influencing the electorate before an election. They
Speaker 1: bought and paid for the lies, the Russian lies. Yeah,
Speaker 1: and so this is an example of money from her
Speaker 1: campaign and the National Committee going directly to the creation
Speaker 1: of adoptier, Which what did you have to do to
Speaker 1: get the dossier? You had to collude with Russian operatives.
Speaker 1: That's what they did. That's how they got that information.
Speaker 1: And so now we're sitting here worried about some papadopolis
Speaker 1: sending an email about some meeting, and the press is
Speaker 1: all in a tizzy about that. What about this actual
Speaker 1: dossier collusion that is polluted? Well, I just want to
Speaker 1: know how does everything get so asked backwards? And like,
Speaker 1: I feel like a voice in the wilderness here, you know, saying, hey,
Speaker 1: look over here, because we've got evidence here. There's no
Speaker 1: evidence what you've been looking at for a year, But
Speaker 1: I've got evidence of real collusion. Hillary, the d n C.
Speaker 1: Obama bought and paid for Russian propaganda and lies to
Speaker 1: spread to the American people, to influence the American people,
Speaker 1: to influence an election. How come nobody seems to care
Speaker 1: about this? Well, the people do care about it, and
Speaker 1: I think that's one of the reasons why you're doing
Speaker 1: so well. You're whipping Matt out but Um on your
Speaker 1: Fox show, and I think that's one of the reasons
Speaker 1: that people do care. But do you want to know why?
Speaker 1: But you know, I want to say something. You don't
Speaker 1: want to know why, Congressman, because I'm I want the
Speaker 1: American people to know the truth, and I'd like to
Speaker 1: focus on things that matter, you know, like getting the
Speaker 1: economy that you're not invested in the narrative that the
Speaker 1: d C media has invested in. They are invested in
Speaker 1: this Russia narrative. They started it from the day he
Speaker 1: got elected and they're continuing it, and so anything that
Speaker 1: diverged us from that, they do not want to give
Speaker 1: it a fair shake. And so that's just where we are.
Speaker 1: I mean, after all these many months, what evidence do
Speaker 1: we have to support their narrative? We still don't have
Speaker 1: any evidence to support the media's narrative. This has now
Speaker 1: gone on a year. What do you think about Mueller
Speaker 1: in this sense that you know, the big indictment comes
Speaker 1: out has nothing to do with Trump, Russia, the campaign nothing.
Speaker 1: It has to do with financial dealings of Paul Manifort
Speaker 1: from the years two thousand and what six team was
Speaker 1: the last transaction. Yeah, I think you do not need
Speaker 1: a special council to do that. I think that case,
Speaker 1: I don't know, if there's merit to it, it it should
Speaker 1: be immediately transferred to the Department of Justice. Say that's
Speaker 1: what their job is. They can handle that case. You
Speaker 1: don't need a special counsel to do that. Um, well,
Speaker 1: do you think of special counsel would be a good idea? Well,
Speaker 1: I don't think you need one for for any of
Speaker 1: this stuff involving frump. I mean, I think we probably
Speaker 1: need one for some of the fusion, GPS and the
Speaker 1: uranium one simply because Sessions has already said he's going
Speaker 1: to refuse on anything involving the Clintons, and then Rosenstein
Speaker 1: was involved in some of this, so he clearly can't
Speaker 1: do it. So I think it would make sense for
Speaker 1: those cases to get somebody with a fresh set of eyes.
Speaker 1: Let me let me move on now. I think probably
Speaker 1: this is a make or break moment for the Republicans
Speaker 1: if they want any shot that's staying in power, and
Speaker 1: that is this entire tax reform deal. Um. I happen
Speaker 1: to speak to some of the leadership today and I said,
Speaker 1: you guys gonna get this done. And apparently they're they're
Speaker 1: confident it will get done. But I have no confidence
Speaker 1: in Mitch McConnell or you know Snowflake out in Arizona,
Speaker 1: or you know Ben sass Is an ass and us
Speaker 1: and John mccainn and some of these other people. Do
Speaker 1: you Well, we'll pass it in the House, Sean. That's
Speaker 1: all I can say. It's a good bill. The President's
Speaker 1: right now. But you pass the healthcare bill in the
Speaker 1: House too, and then pass it in the Senate, and
Speaker 1: that doesn't help you here. I think this is I
Speaker 1: think this is make or break for the Republican establishment
Speaker 1: in the Senate. They've always said they could get things
Speaker 1: on that Conservatives were the problem. But as you mentioned,
Speaker 1: conservatives have passed all these things out of the House
Speaker 1: so far, and now time for the McConnell aligned establishments
Speaker 1: to show they can produce, put some points on the
Speaker 1: board and passed the tax bill, all right, So you
Speaker 1: think it's gonna pass in the House, what is gonna
Speaker 1: be in there? Because we have I know, we have
Speaker 1: a framework, we don't have a bill yet. When are
Speaker 1: we going to see the bill? We should have had
Speaker 1: a bill by now. I mean, I think this has
Speaker 1: been taken too long. We knew what we wanted to
Speaker 1: do from day one. We should have had a bill
Speaker 1: before the August recess. I think we would have passed
Speaker 1: it by now. So the danger in waiting to unveil
Speaker 1: the legislative text that's late is you know, if there's
Speaker 1: a four oh one k rollback in there, if there's
Speaker 1: things that we're not on board with then you start
Speaker 1: to lose the coalition. So hopefully they don't do that.
Speaker 1: But I just think it would have been better to
Speaker 1: have this bill produced six weeks ago. Now I agree
Speaker 1: with you, all right, Congressman, We really appreciate you being
Speaker 1: one of us, and thanks for being one of the
Speaker 1: good guys that's actually out there fighting and trying to
Speaker 1: get us to a point where we can get to
Speaker 1: and understand the truth about what is now a massive
Speaker 1: boomerang back on the Democrats, which I've been predicting. Thank
Speaker 1: you so much for being with us. Keep up the
Speaker 1: good fight. We appreciate its God speed. Right. That's gonna
Speaker 1: wrap things up at today. We have an amazing show
Speaker 1: tonight nine Eastern. We will tell you specifically and exactly
Speaker 1: how people like Mayor the Blasio of New York and
Speaker 1: people like Chuck Schumer have made America less safe, specifically
Speaker 1: with the New York City terrorists. Well, a full complete
Speaker 1: coverage of all that. Also tonight, we investigate the investigators
Speaker 1: and also we investigate the most dishonest corrupt media in
Speaker 1: the country, Sebastian Gorka, Sheriff Clark. You'll meet a guy
Speaker 1: that was on the n Y p D counter Terrorism
Speaker 1: that literally surveiled that mosque, will get to that. Pam
Speaker 1: Gella Horaldo More nine Eastern Hannity on Fox, We'll see
Speaker 1: you back here tomorrow.