WEBVTT - Listener Mail: An Un-remembered Dream

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:10.080 --> 0:00:12.240
<v Speaker 2>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. Listener mail.

0:00:12.320 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 2>My name is Robert.

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:16.439
<v Speaker 3>Lamb and I am Joe McCormick, and it's Monday, the

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:18.799
<v Speaker 3>day of each week that we read back messages from

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 3>the Stuff to Blow your Mind mail bag. If you

0:00:21.760 --> 0:00:23.639
<v Speaker 3>have never gotten in touch and you would like to,

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:25.800
<v Speaker 3>why not give it a shot. You can email us

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:29.480
<v Speaker 3>at contact at stuff to Blow your Mind dot com.

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:33.199
<v Speaker 3>Whatever you want to send is fine. Obviously a lot

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:35.879
<v Speaker 3>of people send in feedback to recent episodes. Maybe they

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:38.519
<v Speaker 3>have something interesting they want to add to something we

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 3>talked about, or a question about the subject matter. Corrections

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:45.280
<v Speaker 3>are welcome as well. Any of that. Just send it

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 3>on in. Or if you just want to say hello,

0:00:47.800 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 3>tell us how you listen to the show, where you're from,

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 3>and so forth, that's all fair game too. Send it

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 3>on in contact at stuff to Blow your Mind dot com.

0:00:57.000 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 3>Let's see, Rob, do you mind if I kick things

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 3>off with this message for Steve about our series on

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 3>the on Horse Hooves.

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let's have it, Steve.

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 3>Says, Hi again, Robert and Joe in Your Hooves Part two,

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 3>Episode Robert briefly mentioned the discovery that five fingers become

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 3>one in horse embryos during one of the phases of

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 3>their growth. I have to stop you right there, Steve.

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 3>That was me that said that, not Robert. But you know,

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 3>people mix us up sometimes It's okay, it happens. Yeah,

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:35.040
<v Speaker 3>we're not wearing name tags. Steve goes on. Though quite interesting,

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 3>this revelation did not surprise me because it seems like

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:42.040
<v Speaker 3>I've read about similar discoveries regarding the development of embryos

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 3>and all kinds of different animals, not specifically about fingers,

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 3>but a general pattern of growth that seems to repeat

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 3>known evolutionary developments, beginning from the very simple and progressing

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 3>to more complex forms, almost like a reenacted history of

0:01:56.520 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 3>a given animals deep evolutionary past up to its present

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 3>physical paradigm or morphological configuration. This possibility is fascinating, but

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if there's a biological term for it,

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 3>or if it is something that has even been rigorously

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 3>examined as a legitimate part of the gestation slash growth

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 3>process of embryonic science. I'm not a biologist or a scientist,

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 3>but I have been a student of human anatomy and

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 3>how it affects external form. Having professional experience as both

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:29.119
<v Speaker 3>a biomedical designer of three D printed titanium surgical guides

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:32.799
<v Speaker 3>and as a figurative sculptor. From this perspective, I can

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:36.839
<v Speaker 3>imagine how there might be structural slash shock absorbing advantages

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 3>to merging five fingers together from one in your example

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 3>of a horse hoof, if some traces of the other

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 3>four remain integrated with the whole. This is a crude analogy,

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 3>but if you try to break five sticks in a half,

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 3>it can be more difficult than breaking one, because there

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 3>is potentially more flexibility in the separate thin sticks than

0:02:57.080 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 3>one thick one. At the risk of betraying my profe ignorance,

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:03.800
<v Speaker 3>I also wonder if there is some kind of potential

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 3>energy conservation in the storage of DNA derived information used

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 3>by nature to control embryonic development from simple to more

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 3>complex states inherent in the DNA simply stacking revised versions

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:19.360
<v Speaker 3>of itself on top of older versions. Thank you as

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 3>always for the fantastic content, and congrats again to Joe

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 3>on being a new dad. Happy Father's Day, Steve. Oh,

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 3>thank you Steve well. Regarding your question about animal embryos

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 3>sort of repeating their evolutionary history as they develop. We

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 3>could come back one day and do a deeper dive

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 3>on this, but I'll try to do the very short

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 3>and simple version. There is actually an obsolete hypothesis in

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 3>the history of evolutionary theory, no longer held to today,

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 3>associated most with the German naturalist Ernst Heckel, that proposes

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 3>that as an animal embryo develops, it essentially goes through

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 3>all of its ancestral forms from quote lowest to highest.

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 3>So a developing horse embryo would at some point to

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 3>sort of become a fish and then become a primitive tetrapod,

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 3>et cetera. This idea was summarized in the slogan that

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:19.600
<v Speaker 3>quote ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny ontogeny meaning the development of an

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:25.159
<v Speaker 3>individual organism, phylogeny meaning its evolutionary history. We note today

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 3>that as a blanket statement, this hypothesis was not correct.

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 3>In fact, it seems that while Ernest Teckel was a

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 3>great illustrator, he probably fudged some of his drawings of

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 3>animal embryos to make them better fit with his hypothesis.

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 3>But a few general comments about this idea. First of all,

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 3>in evolution, there is not actually a higher or lower.

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:52.160
<v Speaker 3>You can order your ancestors or the ancestors of a

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:56.480
<v Speaker 3>species chronologically, but that progression is not actually like climbing

0:04:56.520 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 3>a mountain of sophistication or refinement to quote high higher forms.

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 3>At each stage, the organism is simply adapting to its

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 3>environment and whatever pressure has happen to weigh upon it

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 3>at that point in time. But even more importantly, scientists

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:15.359
<v Speaker 3>have discovered that ontogeny, the growth of an individual organism,

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:19.839
<v Speaker 3>is something that itself evolves like, so how an organism

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 3>grows is something that can be selected for, and different

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:26.840
<v Speaker 3>organisms go through different kinds of developmental stages that are

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:30.479
<v Speaker 3>selected for the needs of the species. But it is

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 3>true that organisms in development often do manifest particular features

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:41.040
<v Speaker 3>that look like the embryonic forms of distant ancestors, even

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:44.480
<v Speaker 3>if those forms are not found in adults of the

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:48.359
<v Speaker 3>embryo's own species. Hence, you get horse embryos with five

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 3>distinct toes before they vanish and then become more like

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:55.040
<v Speaker 3>the horse hoof that it will have when it's after

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 3>it's born, or you get things like a rob You

0:05:57.440 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 3>mentioned this example, when it came up in the episode

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 3>Untold Nostrils and Dolphins. Dolphin embryos will first have a

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 3>more frontally positioned nostril that gradually moves to become a

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 3>top facing blowhole as the embryo develops. But this kind

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 3>of thing is contingent. These are isolated examples of where

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 3>that happens, and as a general rule, an organism does

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:23.160
<v Speaker 3>not have to go through all of the past stages

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 3>of its evolutionary history during growth. Sometimes it shows some

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:30.479
<v Speaker 3>of them, and so the interesting question becomes in the

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 3>cases when it does. Why is that? I don't know

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:36.920
<v Speaker 3>enough to comment on your idea about like the efficiency

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:40.159
<v Speaker 3>of information storage in DNA, whether it's more efficient to

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:42.359
<v Speaker 3>just like stack the new plan on top of the

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 3>older I couldn't say, but it could be interesting to

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 3>come back and look at that someday.

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely all right. The next message comes to us from

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 2>Jamie concerning our episodes on Dreams and if memory serves this,

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 2>I think this came out after the first episode, but

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 2>before the second. Yeah, Jamie writes, Dear Robert and Joe,

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm enjoying the pod as always, and especially your recent

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 2>episode on Dreams. It reminded me that, as Frank Herbert

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 2>tells us, dreams our messages from the deep. I wonder

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 2>if Herbert was drawing in this as in so much

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 2>of the Doom series on Islamic tradition, in which there

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 2>is a long history of the interpretation of dreams. In fact,

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 2>there is a hattoth Or tradition in which the prophet

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Muhammad is said to have said a good vision is

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 2>from Allah and a bad dream is from Satan, with

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 2>various later scholars developing methods for distinguishing good from bad dreams.

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 2>If this sounds very similar to Homer's Gates of Horn

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 2>and Ivory, I think that's probably because, rather than being

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 2>some kind of opponent or negation of classical antiquity, much

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 2>of early Islamic thought and civilization was actually a continuation

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 2>of it. Looking forward to the next installment, best wishes, Jamie, Well,

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 2>thanks for Jamie where of course, we're always up for

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 2>any questions or comments concerning Dune And now this particular quote.

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Joe and I were just talking about this off mic

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 2>before we came in here, but this quote is from

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 2>the recent Part one movie adaptation, but does not occur

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 2>in the actual Frank Herbert novel.

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 3>Or at least we couldn't find evidence of it. I

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 3>think it is not in the novel. I saw some

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 3>website in my quick googling here saying it was just

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 3>unique to the film, but it is how the Dnievil

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 3>New movie begins.

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:39.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Now that's not to say dreams are not important

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 2>within the novel Dune, and then ultimately within the larger

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:47.559
<v Speaker 2>series of Dune novels that Frank Herbert wrote, dreams do

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 2>play an important role there, and of course he does

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 2>draw tremendously on Islamic culture and Islamic ideas, including I think,

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:59.319
<v Speaker 2>the importance of dreams. At the same time, he also

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 2>ends up drawing heavily on like Jungian ideas of concerning

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 2>like dreams. So I think likely with this quote that

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:08.680
<v Speaker 2>they put together for the film, they are you know,

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 2>they're hinting at both of those.

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 3>Now, Jamie, As for your quote from the Hadith, I

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:16.079
<v Speaker 3>was interested in this, so I went and looked it

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 3>up in a couple of online databases for the hadith,

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 3>which are collections of the sayings and sometimes the deeds

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 3>of the prophet Muhammad, organized by like which teacher or

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:29.959
<v Speaker 3>companion of the prophet recorded or narrated them. So when

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 3>I dug this up on an English language resource called

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 3>the Prophetic Hadith Encyclopedia, it records two very similar sayings

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 3>next to each other. One of them is passed on

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 3>by Abu Qatada, which says a good vision is from

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 3>Allah and a bad dream is from the devil. If

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 3>any one of you sees something which he dislikes, he

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 3>should spit on his left three times and seek refuge

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:58.079
<v Speaker 3>with Allah from the devil, then it will not harm him.

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 3>And then there's a second recorded similar to the second

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 3>half of that. This one is attributed to the version

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 3>told by Jabir that says, if any one of you

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 3>sees a dream which he dislikes, then let him spit

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 3>three times on his left side, seek refuge with Allah

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 3>from the devil three times, and then change his sleeping position.

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 3>And the interpretive material with it says that this last

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 3>piece of advice probably means if you're sleeping on one side,

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 3>roll over to the other side. And it struck me

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 3>as interesting because the advice attributed to the prophet here

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 3>for repelling a nightmare, which may well be from Satan,

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 3>is a mix of the sacred and the mundane, like

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 3>it says to take refuge with Allah to be protected

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:44.200
<v Speaker 3>from the devil, but also to roll over onto your

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 3>other side. Oh yeah, and also to spit three times

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 3>on the left side. So yeah, scholars of the Hadith

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 3>or Islamic history, if you're listening, you've got any contexts

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 3>on this kind of advice, I'd be curious if there's

0:10:58.640 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 3>anything more to know about this.

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, because we in the second episode in our

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:07.320
<v Speaker 2>dream series, we get into some Islamic dream traditions, but

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 2>they are keyed into a very particular time and place

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 2>within the Islamic world. So there's so much that we

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 2>did not research or cover for that part of the episode.

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 2>All right, so we skip ahead to some Weird House

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 2>Cinema messages.

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, okay, So to kick things off on Weird

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 3>House Cinema, I'm going to mention that we heard back

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 3>from Michelle who wrote in and we read her message

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 3>on a previous Listener mail episode where she described a

0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 3>movie that she had seen about a woman who left

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 3>her human boyfriend in favor of a relationship with a robot.

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 3>Gave us some plot details and so forth, and we

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 3>were trying to figure out what the movie was. We failed.

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 3>We also tried to see if AI could help us

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 3>with the task. AI also failed. But then we read

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 3>the message out and it turns out that one of

0:11:57.040 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 3>the listeners who got in touch with the potential answer

0:11:59.840 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 3>was on the money. Michelle says, thanks guys, and Chris.

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 3>Chris was the listener who wrote in about this. The

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 3>Creation of the Humanoids is the movie I was thinking of.

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:17.719
<v Speaker 3>This was the one from the nineteen sixties, was not

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 3>in black and white as she originally said. I think

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 3>this one is in color. But Rob you said this

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:24.440
<v Speaker 3>one looked like it was worth a look.

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 2>I believe Michael Weldon's write up of it said it

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 2>was fun and hey, it has Dudley man Love in it,

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 2>with that cinematic charisma like that in the cast. You

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 2>can't dismiss it. You've got to go in for a

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 2>closer look.

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:40.440
<v Speaker 3>Don't you sometimes wish it had been Dudley man Love

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 3>in the role in two thousand and one, Like he's

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 3>the one going through the stargate, He's there in the

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 3>baroque French room and all that.

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 2>Man, If only, if only it could have been your

0:12:50.880 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 2>stupid mind. This the next one comes to us from Kelsey.

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:06.079
<v Speaker 2>Kelsey says, Hello Robin Joe. While I love the regular

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 2>feed of science efacts and tellings, I normally only half

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 2>listened to the Weird House Cinema episodes, as I have

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 2>never had the attention to watch movies, and especially ones

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 2>with strange plots, weird storylines, etc. However, when I saw

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:21.960
<v Speaker 2>Blade come across this week, I knew I had to

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 2>listen see. I am a young millennial whose mother had

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 2>a strange fascination with Wesley Snipes. So when these movies

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 2>came out, and when we subscribe to mail order Netflix

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 2>in the following years, my mom insisted that her children

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 2>watch them with her. Now, my sister and I are

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 2>neither quite thirty years old yet, so this places us

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 2>in the under ten category when these movies were released.

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 2>This may not seem strange except for the fact that

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:50.320
<v Speaker 2>I was raised in a very Christian conservative household where

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 2>Harry Potter and the Da Vinci Code were banned. I

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 2>was shocked when you describe the amount of cursing in

0:13:56.040 --> 0:14:00.439
<v Speaker 2>the movie, as in our household, even euphemisms for such

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 2>as darn or frick were off limits. Anyways, I guess

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 2>it goes to show you how much influence Wesley Snipes

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 2>has in the world. Ps. I also had a garage

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 2>TV growing up with that my dad would often watch

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 2>while working on cars, tractors, et cetera. I believe it

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 2>was the style that they built in VCR.

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 3>Sincerely, Kelsey, is this because I mentioned that I watched

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 3>Blade on a garage TV?

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 2>I think you did. Yeah, that was as an episode

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 2>from last year that we reran recently.

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, I love this email. So yeah, Harry Potter, the

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 3>Da Vinci Code demonic, absolute hard. No, but Blade the

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 3>R rated non stop swearfest with like beheadings and people

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 3>like melting into piles of blood. That's good.

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know where Blade stands, you know where he stands,

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 2>and it is just it's a captivating performance. It's just

0:14:56.440 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 2>as we discussed at length in that episode. I mean,

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 2>Wesley Snipes just absolutely brings it.

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 3>Who could disagree? But wait, Kelsey says she she says

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 3>these movies so not just Blade. It sounds like she's

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 3>talking about the Blade franchise. Like, Kelsey, if you if

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 3>you want to reply to us again, do you mean

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 3>that your mom also Netflix ordered Blade two and Blade

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 3>three and so forth. I don't know if there ever

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 3>was a Blade four, Like did you see them all?

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 2>No, there was no four. There was there was Blade one, terrific,

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 2>Blade two, incredible, Blade three almost entirely disappointing outside of

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 2>like one or two lines from Blade. Then there was

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 2>a TV series which I haven't seen, that does not

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 2>have Wesley Snipes in it. And then I think there

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 2>may have been some animated stuff as well, and so

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 2>forth here and there. But you know, we're on the

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 2>we're on the cusp of getting a new Blade film.

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 2>His fingers crossed that they can they can make it work.

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 2>It sounds like it's off to they keep changing who's

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 2>involved in it, and there have been some shakeups with it,

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 2>but I mean, at hard it sounds like they're going

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 2>back to some of the core material concerning this character.

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, I'm fingers crossed that it's great.

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 3>I actually saw Blade two since we recorded that episode.

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 3>A friend of mine was like, well, you've got to

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 3>see it, and he brought it over for us to watch.

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 3>It was fantastic fun. But that movie is so two

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 3>thousand and two.

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I haven't watched it in many years at

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 2>this point, but I mean, it's got that Del Toro

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 2>charm to it. Like Del Toro's monsters definitely occupy the

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 2>film monsters that you're supposed to be a sympathetic for

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 2>on some level, but they also are entirely monstrous. Yeah,

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot to love in there, but there are

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 2>some aspects of it there maybe a little rougher around

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 2>the edges. I know that del Toro was never completely

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 2>satisfied with some of the CGI elements and so forth.

0:16:56.960 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 3>Everything CGI heavy from the early two thousands will, I think,

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 3>always have that issue.

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well you need to see Blade Trinity and complete

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 2>the journey.

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 3>Okay, speaking of dated visual effects, do Rob do you

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 3>mind if I finish up with this message from Jeff

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 3>go for it. A quick note, this was a very

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 3>long email, so it's edited a bit for length. Sorry

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 3>about that. Jeff just took a few things out and

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 3>tightened it up. Jeff says, greetings regarding the series on

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 3>three D movies, your description of the mask this is

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:35.360
<v Speaker 3>the one from the sixties, not the Jim Carrey reminded

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 3>me of the best implementation of three D I've ever seen.

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:43.359
<v Speaker 3>The Magic Journeys three D movie at Epcot in the

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 3>early nineteen eighties, Epcot was still a place of wonder

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:50.199
<v Speaker 3>and cutting edge tech. I was fascinated by the touchscreen

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 3>GUI interface. I guess that's gooey gooey interface on the

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 3>world key park information Kiosks, which did Google Maps tricks

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:02.399
<v Speaker 3>years before the first Macintosh, was a thing, offered a

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 3>search engine, played video, and operated like a modern website.

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:11.679
<v Speaker 3>You could also make restaurant reservations via video phone parentheses.

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 3>Pretty Much every conversation began with the Epcot representative explaining

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 3>that yes, I am a real human, and yes I

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 3>can see you just like you can see me. While

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 3>Blade Runner and other films were telling us that the

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 3>future would be nothing but boundless misery, Epcot attractions matter

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 3>of factly explained that in the twenty first century, you'll

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 3>go to school at the bottom of the ocean, call

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 3>your friends terraforming the desert via three D phone, visit

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 3>your relatives on holidays in suburban space stations, etc. Everyone

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 3>would be living the dream, a fulfilling life with plentiful resources.

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 3>Integrated into all the fantasy was real life, impressive tech

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 3>that actually worked. Magic journeys was featured in the Journey

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:58.359
<v Speaker 3>into Imagination pavilion in the now corrupted and renamed Future

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:01.440
<v Speaker 3>World section of the park. Isn't that the name of

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 3>the sequel to Westworld?

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 2>Ah? Yeah, yeah, yeah, it is Future World, but a

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 2>different attraction.

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:11.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah okay. Jeff goes on where the other attractions focused

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:15.920
<v Speaker 3>on specific elements of future living. The imagination Pavilion explained

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 3>that those innovations would be impossible without human creativity and

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 3>abstract thinking. Your description of the mask reminded me of

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 3>a sequence of eerie floating masks from the film, which

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 3>begins as a dreamy, trippy flight of wonder and at

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 3>the halfway point turns decidedly creepy and weird. House. One

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 3>scene in particular featured a witch shooting lightning bolts from

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:43.439
<v Speaker 3>her fingers directly at the audience, and to my eyes,

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:46.719
<v Speaker 3>the bolts seem to end just inches in front of

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 3>my nose. Usually at least one small child would start

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:53.440
<v Speaker 3>crying loudly at that point. I've never before or since

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 3>seen an effect that seemed to jump so far out

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:59.199
<v Speaker 3>of the screen. And then Jeff provides some links to

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:01.680
<v Speaker 3>like a podcast I think about this three D film

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 3>in a video showing samples from it. Jeff goes on

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:08.680
<v Speaker 3>the eight millimeter film to YouTube conversion leaves a lot

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 3>to be desired, but I assure you the visuals were stunning.

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 3>The deliberate slow pace created the feel of altered consciousness,

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 3>although this does not translate at all in a crappy

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:21.680
<v Speaker 3>two D resolution, and you might be tempted to hit

0:20:21.720 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 3>the two X speed button. However, the music is worth

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 3>experiencing properly. It was similarly bizarre, featuring rich eighty synth

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:34.639
<v Speaker 3>and freaky lyrics about quote splashing in the stream of

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 3>an unremembered dream end quote, the atoms that repose in

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 3>the heartbeat of a Rose. Disney would never make anything

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 3>so meditative and aggressively weird these days, and then an

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:52.360
<v Speaker 3>unrelated Jeff also recommends an Amazon Prime video series called

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:56.639
<v Speaker 3>Jean Claude Van Johnson, which is about Jean Claude Van

0:20:56.720 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 3>dam quote. The premise is that JCVD, the actor, was

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:03.920
<v Speaker 3>also a secret agent in real life. It's an action

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 3>comedy that is both a parody and a celebration of

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 3>the actor in his movies VANDAM is hilarious in multiple

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 3>roles and a surprisingly effective actor and good sport. You

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 3>can easily binge the whole series in a weekend, and

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 3>then he goes on to say some things. Apparently it

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 3>also ends in a cliffhanger. But to wrap it up,

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:26.160
<v Speaker 3>Jeff says finally, in regards to attempts to conceptualize distance

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 3>between the planets discussed in the Urinus episodes, on the

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:33.920
<v Speaker 3>Washington Mall in DC, beginning near the Air and Space Museum,

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 3>there is a one to ten billion scale model of

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:39.399
<v Speaker 3>our solar system. The Sun is about the size of

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 3>a grapefruit, and following the trail along the sidewalk, you

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:46.680
<v Speaker 3>quickly run into the inner planets, with information stations and

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 3>size comparisons at each one. By the time you get

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 3>to Neptune, it's easy to forget why you were walking

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 3>in that direction in the first place, especially with all

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:58.359
<v Speaker 3>the exciting distractions in DC. Thanks for continuing to present

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:01.400
<v Speaker 3>us with diverse information pour into our brains while stuck

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:06.360
<v Speaker 3>in traffic and doing otherwise tedious chores. You are appreciated, Jeff. Well,

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:09.399
<v Speaker 3>thank you. Jeff. I had never seen this movie. I

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 3>think I went to Epcot as a young child, but

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:14.399
<v Speaker 3>if I saw this, I don't remember it. So I

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 3>looked up like a YouTube rip of this film. Obviously,

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:20.199
<v Speaker 3>as you say, you can't really get the feeling of

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 3>what it would be like with three D. But the

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:27.359
<v Speaker 3>Witch was extremely funny. She's kind of like the you know,

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 3>she's like the Wizard of Oz Witch, like green makeup

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:34.360
<v Speaker 3>and the long fingernails and stuff. Beyond that, I did

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 3>get to the part you were talking about with the

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:39.359
<v Speaker 3>masks flying out of the screen. There's like an onny

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:43.720
<v Speaker 3>mask asteroid that blasts at you. Later, there is also

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 3>a clown segment that has strong resemblance to when Trumpy

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:53.159
<v Speaker 3>does magic things in Pod People, but with clowns running

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 3>out of the screen and screaming at you. And also,

0:22:56.960 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if this is like a sign of

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 3>a neurological disorder on my part, but when I watched

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 3>this movie, I could literally smell cigarettes. I don't know why.

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:10.479
<v Speaker 2>I'm always impressed anytime I learned something new about the

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 2>like the history of Epcot and so forth. And I

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 2>got to go to Epcot in the last year for

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 2>the first time, and you know, I know, they are

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:21.640
<v Speaker 2>aspects of Epcot that folks like to rag on here

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 2>and there, but I really enjoyed it. I also admire

0:23:26.880 --> 0:23:31.639
<v Speaker 2>this kind of like this retro now retro optimistic vision

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:35.680
<v Speaker 2>for the future, you know, in which technology, like you say,

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 2>is going to make everything brighter. I also thought about

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:41.160
<v Speaker 2>it a lot when we were discussing the black Hole.

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:45.119
<v Speaker 2>Like I say, I guess it's the imagineer's fingerprints on

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 2>that one, but I feel like it has strong epcot energy,

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:51.440
<v Speaker 2>even if it's ultimately telling a darker story away from Earth.

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 2>They don't really talk about Earth much in that. They're

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 2>just like, oh, you know, things are the same, it's

0:23:56.600 --> 0:24:02.880
<v Speaker 2>going great. But what what what they mean by boring

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:05.360
<v Speaker 2>is like amazing. You have no idea. It's just it's

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:07.119
<v Speaker 2>only boring to them because they're used to all the

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 2>flying cars and so forth.

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:13.680
<v Speaker 3>And telepathic clowns screaming in your face. Yes, but I

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 3>don't know. Sometimes I think on weird house cinema, it

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 3>might be fun to feature more like non narrative films,

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:24.159
<v Speaker 3>things like this that on some like special episodes. I

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:26.160
<v Speaker 3>don't know, that could be a fun different kind.

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 2>Of thing to do, like an amusement park films like

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 2>the like.

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 3>What were service industry training films or anything? Anything sufficiently weird.

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:39.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, it's sufficiently weird. Then it's you know, we're

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:41.840
<v Speaker 2>already halfway there, right, all right. Well, on that note,

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:43.679
<v Speaker 2>we're going to go and close it out for today,

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 2>but hey, write in. We'd love to hear from you

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 2>any questions or comments about past president or future episodes

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 2>of Stuff to Blow your Mind, Weird House, Cinema, Artifact,

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 2>Monster Fact, other episodes of listener Mail. It's all fair game,

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 2>so sent them in and you'll find these episodes on

0:24:57.200 --> 0:25:00.679
<v Speaker 2>Mondays in the Stuff to Blow Your Mind podcast feet.

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 3>Huge thanks to our excellent audio producer JJ Posway. If

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 3>you would like to get in touch with us with

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 3>feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest topic

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 3>for the future, or just to say hello, you can

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 3>email us at contact at stuff to Blow your Mind

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:21.240
<v Speaker 3>dot com.

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:27.200
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.