WEBVTT - MLB Team Futures and Awards (Ep. 81)

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 1>It's time to place your bets. Let's talk to the pros.

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:19.799
<v Speaker 1>Welcome everybody to betting Pros. It's me Joey p joe Pisapia,

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:21.959
<v Speaker 1>and we've got a great show for you today. It

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 1>is me, it is Dan Harris, and it's you, and

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:28.040
<v Speaker 1>we're talking major League Baseball. Dan Harris and I are

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 1>going to take you through the winners for the divisions,

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 1>the odds that we like. We're going to talk about

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:37.239
<v Speaker 1>World Series and playoffs as well, and we're gonna talk

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>about some of the big awards. We're talking MVP, Rookie

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:43.559
<v Speaker 1>of the Year, Cy Young, all the biggies. So, Dan Harris,

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:46.199
<v Speaker 1>it's a little betting pro's action for you today. Are

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 1>you excited to talk a little baseball here and change

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>things up? Because I know it's March nevery long. Everyone

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 1>wants to talk about is basketball, but I don't. I

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>want to talk some baseball today.

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 2>I have been enjoying March madness. I will admit even

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 2>more than I usually do. But now now I am ready.

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 2>We are recording this on Tuesday. The season starts on Thursday.

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:06.680
<v Speaker 2>I am ready to go. I have very strong feelings

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 2>on a lot of this stuff. So let's do it.

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I like when Dan has strong feelings. That's what I like.

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't like weak feelings. You take those weak feelings

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>to get out of my show. Get out, Get out

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>with the weak feelings. Only the strong survive here. And

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:20.760
<v Speaker 1>of course, if you want to get some of these

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>odds here, the great thing about Betting Pros is it

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:25.399
<v Speaker 1>takes all the different ads from all these different places.

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>You get the Betting Pros consensus lines too, and then

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 1>you can look for lines that you want to exploit. Basically,

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>whether it be on FanDuel or DK or Fox Better

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>or MGM, all these kind of different sites, they've got

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>them all here in one condensed spot on Betting Pros.

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 1>And that's why you hang out with us here on

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:43.919
<v Speaker 1>the show. So let's start with the American League East.

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:47.040
<v Speaker 1>The Yankees are a consensus minus two hundred. That's no fun.

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Then the Rays plus three fifty, the Blue Jays are

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the same plus three fifty, Red Sox at twenty to one,

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and the Orioles forget it, five hundred million to.

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 2>They don't have a number high enough for the orders.

0:01:57.560 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Actually it's actually broken. The site's it's plus fifty two

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred just in case you wanted to see it. But

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, let's talk about the Yankees, Dan, because you

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>always pay attacks on the Yankees because they're the Yankees,

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>and you know, to wager two hundred just to wait

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>one hundred. To me, I'm never a big fan of that.

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:17.920
<v Speaker 1>And plus the Yankees have some question marks in that rotation.

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, you got Tion's innings, question, you

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 1>got Klueber's health, you got whether or not herman, can

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, do it for a whole season? And I

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:27.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know, Man, this just does not feel like a

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>smart wager to me. Now that being said, that kind

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>of opens the door for maybe the Rays or maybe

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the Blue Jays. So do you have any feelings about

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>either of these two? We're both basically at three and

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:37.799
<v Speaker 1>a half to one, all right, So I know.

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 2>I said I had strong feelings about this is not

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 2>a division of strong feelings. To be as fair as possible,

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:44.079
<v Speaker 2>I will have it later. I agree with you. The

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Yankees at minus two hundred definitely not worth it. Do

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 2>I think they're the favorite to win the division? I do,

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 2>but it's not something that I feel comfortable enough with

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 2>those odds. I don't mind either the Rays or the

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 2>Blue Jays at plus three fifty. Now, the Blue Jays

0:02:57.280 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 2>are already dealing with a bunch of injuries. They're gonna

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 2>lose Springer a little bit at the start of the season.

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:04.080
<v Speaker 2>They have already lost Kirby Yates. Robbie Ray is going

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 2>to miss his first couple of starts after he fell

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 2>and heard his elbow on the stairs. So I think

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 2>if I were going to go somewhere, and maybe I'm

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 2>just overrating the fact that the Rays always managed to

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 2>figure out how to maximize their potential. But I do

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 2>like the Rays, and again you mentioned it, Joe, the

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 2>consensus line is three to fifty. You look at the

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 2>different books which we have on bettingpros dot Com at BETMGM,

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:25.919
<v Speaker 2>theyre plus four fifty and at points bet their plus

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 2>six hundred if you can get that at points bet

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 2>at plus six hundred, I really like that at plus

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:32.960
<v Speaker 2>three fifty, I still think it's worth a sprinkle on

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 2>them to win the division. We'll talk about it. I

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 2>like the Rays in some different features a little bit later,

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 2>but if I'm looking at this division, not one of

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 2>the more enticing divisions, I think I probably would favor

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 2>the Rays at plus three fifty, and again, if you

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 2>can get it at one of these higher numbers, I would.

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with the Blue Jays here. I think

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>they've got enough goods down there in the farm system

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 1>to keep making some more moves, and I think they're

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>going to acquire some more pitching at some point in

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>this season. So to me, I think there's a young

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 1>team that doesn't know any better. Doesn't They're not supposed

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>to compete with the Yankees, and I think that makes

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>them very dangerous. I'm off the Rays this year. You

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>lose more than you lose Snell. That's a lot to lose.

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>This is in my opinion, So I just I can't

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>get there. They were built for sixty game season. Last year.

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>The Rays were made for that one sixty two is

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>a different animal. I'm gonna go with the Blue Jays

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>here as the best wager, and that's where I would lean.

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Now on the central side, the White Sox consensus minus

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:25.159
<v Speaker 1>one twenty. Then you have the Twins at plus one

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, Cleveland at seven to one at plus seven hundred,

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the Royals at plus four thousand, and the Tigers at

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 1>plus six. Now, for me, Cleveland is they're really intriguing

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:38.559
<v Speaker 1>one because yes, they did lose Lindor, but you're getting

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>basically seven to one in some places, even seven point

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 1>fifty or eight on points bet. But they've got Shane Bieber,

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>who is, in my opinion, the best pitcher in that division,

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:49.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the best pictures in baseball. And on top

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 1>of that, you got a great manager who's been there

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and done that in Terry Francona. They did bring in

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 1>some more offense there to replace what they lost with Lindor.

0:04:57.560 --> 0:05:00.799
<v Speaker 1>Is there replacing Lindor. No, but Jimenez be a nice player,

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I think, And on top of that, Eddie Rosario was

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>a good bat. So to me, I think Cleveland's got

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>enough pitching to really make this interesting. At the end

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 1>of the day, I think the White Sox are markedly

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>better the Twins. I am completely lukewarm on. To me,

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 1>there's too many problems there. But the interesting wager here

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 1>is maybe you bet the White Sox and then take

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:22.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit and, as you like to say, sprinkle

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and sprinkle a little bit on Cleveland at those higher odds,

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>because I think there's an outside chance that they could

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>surprise people.

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.839
<v Speaker 2>Cleveland is my favorite bet actually at plus seven hundred

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 2>to win the division, don't We talked about the White

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 2>Sox before Joe. We did an episode a couple of

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 2>weeks ago about sort of the win totals, and you know,

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:40.040
<v Speaker 2>it was ninety one and a half I think at

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:42.920
<v Speaker 2>the time. Obviously, the White Sox have since lost Eloy

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Jim Andez, which is a big loss. It's not a

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 2>critical loss to them necessarily, but it's a big loss.

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 2>And again that's going to open up more playing time

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 2>for Andravaon who you know, I like very much. I

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 2>just don't think that either the White Sox or the

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Twins is significantly better than the other one. So I

0:05:57.200 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 2>don't have a great feel for one of those teams. Well,

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 2>what I do know is that Cleveland is always able

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:04.839
<v Speaker 2>to outperform what it should be able to do. And

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:07.919
<v Speaker 2>maybe say that is Francona, or maybe it's just you know,

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 2>the front office knowing what to do.

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Pitching two. I mean, they've always got good starting pitching.

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Every year.

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:16.839
<v Speaker 2>They are able to take these command guys and just say,

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 2>what if you have the command, we can mold you

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 2>into a successful major league pitcher. They do it every

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 2>year they did it with Plisak, who again you know,

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm not a huge polea sack guy, but no, but

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 2>we like Savallee pretty much, you know, in that rotation.

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 2>Of course, Bieber is, if not the best pitcher in

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 2>the American League, then the second best behind Garrett Cole.

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 2>But again, their bullpen's pretty good. Karen Jak has some

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:40.840
<v Speaker 2>control issues, but he can strike out everybody. Nick Whickgren

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 2>is sort of a quiet cog there. And the addition

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 2>of Eddie Rosario was really key because again he's just

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:50.279
<v Speaker 2>kind of this forgotten guy. When he plays all around

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 2>solid baseball, he really lengthens that lineup. He gives them

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 2>another hitter behind Jose Ramirez, and again you are going

0:06:56.839 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 2>to have Andres Himinez, who I think is going to

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 2>add that nice extra speed dimension. Plus these are Hernandez,

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:04.479
<v Speaker 2>decent guy at the top of the order. They're a

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 2>team that I don't expect to win the division, but

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 2>at plus seven hundred, those are the odds I like best.

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 1>That's a pretty good middle up up the middle defense too,

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with Hernandez and Jimenez as well. So I don't know

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>what they're gonna do with Rosario. It doesn't look like

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>not much, but yeah, at this point, I think Jimenez

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>is clearly the guy that they were targeting in that

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>deal when they moved Lindor went onto the West. Here,

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the Astros are the favorite at plus one twenty five,

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the A's plus one forty five. Again this is the

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>consensus at betting pros, and then the Angels at plus

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>three seventy five, with the Mariners bringing up the rear

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>plus twenty six, and the Rangers that you're nice old

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>sixty to one. So we'll forget about the bottom feeders here.

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>It's really whether or not you want to make a

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 1>case for the Angels because the A's are tricky. The

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>is are always a tricky wager because you're not getting

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 1>huge odds on them because they're always kind of hovering

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>around that. The Astros are the favorites for a reason

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I think they should be. They still have mcolors and

0:07:57.160 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Granky at the top of that rotation. They still got

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>a ton of talent. That it's whether or not you

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>want to make a case for the you know somewhere

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>around three and a half or even to four to

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 1>one Angels odds, So for them to win this division

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things would have to break right. I'm

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>still the stay away. If anything, I would still go

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 1>with the Astros because I just think, you know, the

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Astros are that team that just doesn't want to go away,

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and I know a lot of people want them to.

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>But I still think they're very good and I think

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Dusty Baker's gonna have them right back in the playoffs,

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>and I do think they're gonna win this division. So

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm going chalk here with the Astros. What do you

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>think about the Angels and the Astros or even the

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:30.119
<v Speaker 1>A's in this one.

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm I'm with you. I'm on the Astros and

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 2>know they're the favorite at plus one twenty five as

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned, and again, you can't get much better than that.

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:39.199
<v Speaker 2>Maybe plus one thirty out there at bet MGM, but

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 2>that's pretty much where you're at. But I still think

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 2>there's value there the A's. Look, they always outperform what

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 2>they're supposed to do, but they're just not going to

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 2>be as good as they have been in previous years.

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 2>They would need a lot of things to go right.

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 2>I think losing Hendrix at the back end of that bullpen.

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 2>I know Trevor Rosenthal is there but they're not the

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:57.719
<v Speaker 2>same caliber pitcher, and I just think there's gonna be

0:08:57.760 --> 0:09:00.320
<v Speaker 2>some fall off for them. The Angels. Again, we talked

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:03.439
<v Speaker 2>about this at the wind totals like the the You know,

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 2>the Angels basically haven't gone above five hundred in like

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 2>six seasons at this point, and yes, could show hal

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Tani completely transform them, it's possible. We'd love to see it.

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 2>He obviously had the blister yesterday, but I don't think so. Man,

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 2>It's not even worth a sprinkle to me. At close

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 2>to four to one. To me, this is the Astros division.

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 2>They're gonna be fine. And again we'll talk about this

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 2>little later because I like some other futures with the Astros,

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 2>but they have the ability to trade and do whatever

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:29.320
<v Speaker 2>they want because they've got a good form system and

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 2>they will go forward here. So I do like the Astros,

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 2>even as the favorite at plus one twenty five.

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, so let's do our winner in the American

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>League then, because the Yankees are the favorites at plus

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 1>two thirty, the White Sox at three eighty, the Twins

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>at plus seven fifty, and then after that you got

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the Rays at eight fifty, the Blue Jays of plus

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>eight seventy five plus nine hundred for the A's and

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>then ten to one for the Astros, which is funny

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:54.559
<v Speaker 1>because I think people kind of discounting the Astros a

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit. Yeah, the Astros at ten to one is

0:09:56.960 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>fascinating because they could absolutely get back in this and

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:03.200
<v Speaker 1>be super annoying and piss off Major League Baseball and say, hey,

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>look at us, everybody. If they were in the playoffs

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>last year and they caused problems. So I'm just throwing

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 1>that out there. But in terms of short series, I

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 1>really like the White Sox plus three eighty. That's where

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go. That's my lean, and I feel strongly

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 1>about it because they added Lancelynn along with Gilito and Kaiko.

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Those are three pitchers I believe in. You could add

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 1>in a guy like Michael Kopek. If you do indeed

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 1>get Alloy back healthy, what a boost that is in

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>September potentially, And again that's a big if. But still,

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 1>this is a great team, and it tells you how

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>good they are because they lost Aloy and they're still

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:37.679
<v Speaker 1>the favorite in this division by a fair amount. So look,

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the White Sox are the fascinating bet because

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I think in a short series, this team is in again,

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>it's young, it's hungry. They've got the closer now to

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that shutdown guy in Hendrix. So I like the White

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Sox here the Yankees of the Chalk. I don't think

0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the Chalk is bad here. But to me, I think

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the nice in between is that plus three eighty about

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>consensus you're getting with the White Sox. Who do you

0:10:57.080 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>like to represent the American League in the World Series.

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Favor bet and it's clear favorite bet for me, and

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 2>this one is the Astros at plus one thousand. Again,

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 2>I think there are a couple of things. Number One,

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 2>I think you want to avoid a team that might

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 2>be a wild card, right because you're sure you can

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 2>get bounced, which is one of the reasons, by the way,

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 2>why I worry a little bit about the White Sox

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 2>because I don't know that they're going to win that division.

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 2>I feel pretty common and maybe I shouldn't, but I

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 2>feel pretty confident that the Astros are going to win

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 2>their division. And if they do, they've got two things

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 2>really working for them. Number One, I guarantee you if

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 2>they're there, they're going to add a significant piece. And

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 2>again Franber Valdez, who was originally out for the entire season.

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 2>He's not going to be out for the season now anymore.

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean he may miss a significant chunk, but coming

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 2>back late in the season, that's going to be a

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:44.839
<v Speaker 2>significant ad as who also might be is Verlander. It's

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:47.079
<v Speaker 2>possible that he's going to come back in the playoffs

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 2>at this point, even if he's just a bullpen piece,

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:52.199
<v Speaker 2>even if he's a closer, perhaps even in there, given

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 2>that he's going to come back, he could be another

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 2>addition that can make them really difficult. We talked about

0:11:56.920 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Carlos Carey on previous podcasts. We really like him. The

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 2>Astros were abysmal last year. They couldn't hit anything, and

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 2>they still made the playoffs. So I think they're gonna

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:07.200
<v Speaker 2>make it back. I think they're gonna do some damage

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 2>here in the playoffs. So they are my pick at

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 2>plus one thousand to win the American League.

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>So if I gave you odds of plus or minus

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 1>one inning for Justin verlind Or in twenty twenty one,

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>you're going the over. Hunh.

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:22.319
<v Speaker 2>I think I Well, all right, if the postseason counts,

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna take the over. Yeah, I'm gonna say that

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:26.119
<v Speaker 2>he pitches in this postseason.

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Wow, I love that. That would be a great story.

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I love this. I love the scripture writing for twenty

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty one. Okay, let's talk a little National League East here.

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 1>The Braves at plus one twenty consensus number one, while

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 1>by the Mets at plus one forty, the Nats at

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>plus six hundred, the Phillies eight to seventy five, and

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the Marlins plus twenty five hundred. So we'll leave the

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Marlins and the Phillies alone here. I don't think either

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of us really want to go there. Yes, baseball, anything

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 1>can happen, but let's not get crazy here with some

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:56.680
<v Speaker 1>of these. The Braves are the easy chalk, and I

0:12:56.679 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's a bad idea. The Braves of the pitching.

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 1>The Brave have consistency, and look, they're built for the

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 1>regular season. I'm always worried about them in the postseason though.

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 1>That's always where and it's always been the case. You know,

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>it's been bullpen issues. It's also they strike out a ton,

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>it's creating runs. Sometimes it's a problem for the Braves.

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:15.839
<v Speaker 1>Now the Mets are doing a better job. I think

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>this year constructing a lineup to create runs this year

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>for little Door is very good. But to me, this

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 1>is kind of like the I guess, the same version

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:27.719
<v Speaker 1>of the Cleveland situation in the American League. Yeah, if

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>everything breaks right for the Gnats, they have the best

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 1>rotation in this division, and that is what's built for

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 1>one sixty two. Not to mention Josh Bell and Schwarber

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:39.199
<v Speaker 1>coming over to join Sodo and Turner and Victor Roblez

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 1>hopefully bouncing back and still your very young player. So

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the Nats at plus six hundred some places can get

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:47.440
<v Speaker 1>them for six fifty. Also, Dan, that's very tempting for me.

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, man, I got it. It's almost annoying that we

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 2>see things. So I'd eye on this one just because

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 2>it'd be great to have more back and forth. But

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 2>I agree with you. Do I expect the Nationals to

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 2>win this division? No, but it's very much like Cleveland,

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:01.080
<v Speaker 2>and actually it's better in Cleveland, which is why their

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 2>odds are a little shorter at plus six hundred. And

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 2>again you mentioned plus six fifty at bet MGM, plus

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 2>six fifty at points bets. You can get even better

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 2>if you go there. But I agree with you there

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 2>is there is a very very clear path for them

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:15.679
<v Speaker 2>to win this division. It takes their starters getting back

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 2>to what they do best. Shurezer looks good and healthy

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 2>right now. Hopefully Strasburg is fine. Corbin hasn't had the

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 2>greatest spring, but again, if he gets back, it's going

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 2>to be good. Their bullpen, obviously, with the addition of

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Brad Hannon you mentioned Josh Bell having a monstrous, monstrous spring,

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 2>really lengthn's that lineup. Adding Schwarber to maybe the best

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 2>player in baseball in Lon Soto, they can really make

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 2>some noise. So it's something where if I had to

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 2>do between the Braves and the Mets, I don't really know.

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 2>It might be the Mets a little bit, just because

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 2>I feel like, again you're seeing it right now, Carlos

0:14:44.880 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 2>Carrasco goes out. In past years, it would be, oh

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 2>my god, They've got to go into the minor leagues

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 2>and get this reliever and have them spot start for

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, two months. But they have lu Casey, they

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 2>have depth right now.

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 1>They walk Peterson, they've got it, They've got they've got options,

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 1>which is smart, and you know what, I think they've

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 1>done a very good job of you know, continuously building

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>this offseason for the depth. And I'll say this too,

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the depth of the bench for the Mets

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>is very good.

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yea.

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>The versatility, the athleticism that they have on that bench,

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the Mets are a decent you know. It's funny the East.

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 1>You can really make a case for all three teams

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>at the top. Obviously, the Nats are the one where

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of boom or bust there, but the six

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 1>to one odds there. But look there, this is one

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 1>where you could hedge if you wanted to a little bit, yea,

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>because I think there's some opportunity there depending on how

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 1>you want to strategically wager and how much you want

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>to put on each one of these teams. Let's move

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>over to the central where the Cardinals, of course being

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>a national team, are r at the top there plus

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>one oh five, the big addition of Aeronauto that's great

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and all, but we'll get to that in a second.

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Brewers at plus three hundreds, the consensus for them, Reds

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>at plus three thirty, which is kind of surprising to me.

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't get that. Nuts nuts, the Cubs four twenty five,

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and the Pirates sixty five hundred. So Pittsburgh, gum, sorry,

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be a rough home. The Cubs are out

0:15:56.680 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 1>of it too, I'm sorry. They're a team that's going

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 1>to Jettis and everybody as soon as they can, which

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 1>leaves us the Brewers and the Cardinals. And I mean,

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 1>what are we gonna learn that? The Brewers are always

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be good. I mean they as long as

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Christian Yellwich is healthy, this team's gonna compete. And now

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Freddy Parolta looks like he might be putting it together.

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>And if he does, you got him. Cormyn Burns and

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Woodrof at the top of that rotation, with arguably the

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>best bullpen in the league. Right with Devid Williams and

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Josh Hater. This is a good team. Cold Wong and

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Jackie Bradley shure up the defense. It's all about saying

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 1>healthy now. But still, man, I like this Brewers three

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 1>to one in some spots can get like on Fox

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 1>bet plus three seventy five at fox.

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 2>Bet, Joe, the Brewers have longer odds to win the

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 2>division than the Reds. In what universe are we in

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 2>where the Reds should have better odds? You know where

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 2>are we? Where are we?

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Where are we? Where? The Cardinals are such a prohibitive favorite. Yes,

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just easy. What's the rest of this rotation?

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Because it's not great?

0:16:57.040 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 2>No, I mean I was shocked when I saw it,

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 2>and I get that. The Cardinals, you know, they added

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:04.359
<v Speaker 2>aeronauto and they have a strong lineup and their rotation

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 2>is okay, I guess, But the.

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Brewers, Pitcher, do you feel good about besides Flowerty on

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals?

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Nobody right now, nobody else.

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I agree. That's my problem. You're giving me one hundred

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and sixty two of his staff and you're gonna tell

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 1>me that what Reyes finally becomes something or Carlos Martinez

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>figures things out again, it gets on track. No, I'm

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 1>not buying that. That just not doing it anymore.

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 2>I I didn't. I mean, I have zero interest in

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:31.640
<v Speaker 2>the Cardinals basically even money right plus one oh five.

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 2>The Brewer is a plus three hundred all day. All

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 2>that we talked about. The wing total that was my

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:37.879
<v Speaker 2>favorite bet was over eighty two and a half. I

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 2>think it's gone up now to eighty three and a half.

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 2>I still like it there, but I liked it at

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 2>over eighty two and a half. This is a very

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:45.959
<v Speaker 2>very underrated team. You mentioned a couple things. First of all,

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 2>Yellow's just going to bounce back. I guarantee it. When

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:51.119
<v Speaker 2>Lorenzo Caine, a guy we both liked, again missed all

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:53.199
<v Speaker 2>of last year because he opted out. He is back now,

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 2>and again he was not healthy at the Quad, but

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:58.160
<v Speaker 2>he is back playing now. The addition of Wog is huge,

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 2>if for no other reason than his defense as a

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 2>huge dynamic there. The bullpen is fantastic. Corbyn Burns is

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 2>absolutely legitimate. Brandon Woodrift does not get the respect he

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 2>deserves one percent. And I have always been the fade.

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Freddy peralta guy like I've never liked him, but I

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 2>don't know. I like what I've seen a lot in

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 2>this spring, so I'm kind of excited to see what

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 2>he can do. So Brewers, this is not close to me.

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Brewers at plus three hundred is the bet that I

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:25.680
<v Speaker 2>love in this division.

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:28.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm with you one hundred percent here. All right,

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:29.880
<v Speaker 1>let's go to the West, which is basically a two

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:32.400
<v Speaker 1>team race. I mean, the Giants are fifty to one,

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the d Backs are fifty to one, the Rockies are

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>fifty one. I think we can all kind of dismiss them.

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:37.440
<v Speaker 1>It's whether or not you want to pay the premium

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:39.879
<v Speaker 1>on the Dodgers, which is minus two fifty. So for

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 1>those of you are new, it's putting two fifty down

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:43.919
<v Speaker 1>to win Andre That doesn't seem like a good day

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>at the office, no matter how good the Dodgers are.

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Or to have a little fun with the Padres at

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the plus two hundred, now here's the thing. It would

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:54.119
<v Speaker 1>be fun to play around with the Padres. But I

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:55.880
<v Speaker 1>think at the end of the day, the Dodgers still

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>win this division. So for me, I'm gonna stay away

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 1>from the West because it's just not Now. If the

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Padres were three or four to one, yeah, okay, now

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of listening. But two to one, it's kind

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 1>of like it's okay. But so many things would have

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to go wrong for the Dodgers. You'd have to have

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Kershaw with the back issue. You'd have to have Walker

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Bueller continue to be bad like he's been in spring.

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 1>You'd have to have Trevor Bauer, you know, be bad

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Bauer, and maybe a Cody Bellinger injury. Like you

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:22.199
<v Speaker 1>have to have all these things happen, but I don't know.

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I just don't see a world where the Dodgers aren't

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>winning this division. So I'm just gonna pass on this one.

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:28.440
<v Speaker 2>We talked about the fact that Dustin May was named

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:30.680
<v Speaker 2>the fifth starter, and I was like, cool, that change

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 2>is absolutely nothing for me because I know that they're

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 2>going to have all tho those guys start with David

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 2>Price in Gonsolan. It means nothing. This is a team

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 2>there was ever a team that's built for every part

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:42.919
<v Speaker 2>of the season. There. They have so much depth, so

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 2>much would have to go wrong for them to not

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:46.880
<v Speaker 2>win the division. But at minus two fifty, come, what's

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 2>the point? You know, it's just not something I want

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:51.359
<v Speaker 2>to do because the Padres are a very good team.

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 2>But again, yeah, it's just to stay away. I mean,

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:56.159
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sprinkling at all on you know, the Giants

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:58.679
<v Speaker 2>or the d Becks or the Rockies or plus five thousand.

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:01.440
<v Speaker 2>It's just not worth it. There's no chance. So for me, yeah,

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 2>just not a bet. I mean, if you want to

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:04.399
<v Speaker 2>get in on the Dodgers, as we'll talk about in

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 2>a little bit, for like the World Series or the league, fine,

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:08.640
<v Speaker 2>but to win the division forget about it, just stay.

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:11.159
<v Speaker 1>Away, all right. So that'll bring us to the National

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 1>League Winner, where the Dodgers are obviously the favorites to

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>defend their crown at plus one seventy five the Padres.

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Now here's where I like the Padres. Plus three ninety.

0:20:20.040 --> 0:20:23.439
<v Speaker 1>This is where I'm listening because look at this pitching

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 1>staff in a short series. Look, they could even bring

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 1>up the Mackenzie Gore at some point, right. They've got

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:30.920
<v Speaker 1>all this depth. They got guys like C. J. Abrams

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 1>in the minor leagues too, Like if they need something,

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 1>they can go down and pluck it and they can

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 1>fill the holes. I do think at some point in

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>time they will get better in the bullpen, I really do.

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's gonna be pegana moll Hanson when

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:42.880
<v Speaker 1>all said and done. I don't know who it's going

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 1>to be, but it's.

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Not gonna hate the bullpen, by the way. I mean,

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 2>if Palmerance is healthy and he's pitching right now, I

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:47.919
<v Speaker 2>don't hate it.

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't They're gonna go in on somebody. I don't

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 1>know who it's gonna be.

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 2>You can tell they're not holding back this season, and

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 2>they've got.

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>The chips to move to do it, to make it

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 1>all work. And that's the other thing too. That's why

0:20:57.280 --> 0:20:59.399
<v Speaker 1>I like Toronto, you know, because I feel like they

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:03.440
<v Speaker 1>can keep the aggressive. So the Dodgers plus one seventy five,

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the Padres three to ninety, the Braves are five to one,

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the Mets are at plus five twenty five, the Cardinals

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>ten to fifty, the Reds blah blah blah. So let's

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 1>be realistic here. I don't like any of the long shots.

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:15.399
<v Speaker 1>If you want to play around with the Nationals and

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 1>that narrative at twenty to one, okay, because once again

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:20.440
<v Speaker 1>you get the Nats in a short series with a

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>healthy Strasbourg, Corbin and Max Scherzer. Yikes, Like that is

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot to deal with. So I get that long

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 1>shot in the National League. That's the only long shot

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>of all these I like. But to me, that Padres

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 1>at plus three ninety, that pitching those four guys we've

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:40.200
<v Speaker 1>talked about before with Musgrove, with Snell, Darvish and Chris Paddock.

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I like this group. I think they're they're hungry, they're

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>ready to go, and I think they will add more pieces,

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of scary when you think about it.

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 1>And they're good defensive team too. Hosmer at first is

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:52.879
<v Speaker 1>really good defensive player to tease the Machad. All these guys,

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:55.360
<v Speaker 1>very good defensive team. So I like the Padres. Where

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:56.880
<v Speaker 1>are you leaning for the National League Crown?

0:21:57.160 --> 0:21:59.200
<v Speaker 2>My worry with the Padres is again I don't think

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna win the division, which means they've got to

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 2>get through a wildcard, which means it's just automatically an

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 2>extra variable that we may not see. Now again, do

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:09.120
<v Speaker 2>they have the staff? Oh? Sure, you can start darbashing

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:10.879
<v Speaker 2>that game and you're going to be the favorite no

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:13.399
<v Speaker 2>matter who you're facing. So I don't mind them at

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:15.399
<v Speaker 2>three ninety if we are talking a long shop. By

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 2>the way, you did mention Nationals, which again at plus

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:19.399
<v Speaker 2>two thousand. But I also kind of like the Brewers

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 2>at plus twenty five hundred because I do think they

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:24.120
<v Speaker 2>will win their division, and if they win their division,

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:27.119
<v Speaker 2>if they add a real a starter, if they're able

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 2>to sort of make a move at the deadline, they

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 2>could become a true powerhouse. But outside of that, I

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:35.440
<v Speaker 2>actually kind of like the Mets at plus five twenty five.

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:37.919
<v Speaker 2>And the reason is I think it's probably at this

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 2>point they're probably like, I don't know. They obviously have

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 2>a decent chance to win their division for everything goes well.

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Now you want to talk about the playoffs, You've got

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:48.679
<v Speaker 2>the best pitcher in baseball who you're going to be

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 2>favored when you get there. The Mets have not only

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 2>the money, but they have enough in the farm system

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 2>to be able to take a move at the deadline.

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:58.159
<v Speaker 2>And again the money thing, Joe, this is what I

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:00.640
<v Speaker 2>screamed about with the Wilponds. Joe and I both Mets founds.

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 2>By the way, if you have not heard that before, miserable,

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 2>miserable human beings and baseball fans. But you now have

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:10.679
<v Speaker 2>Steve Cohen, who oh, are you trying to give somebody away?

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 2>So we cannot have to really give up grade a prospects,

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:15.199
<v Speaker 2>But you need somebody to take on salary. Great, we

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 2>can do that because money is irrelevant. That's great. You

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 2>can do that at the deadline hopefully. And also, who

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 2>hopefully will come back in the middle of the year

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 2>is Noah Cindergarten. You add to him Carrasco and suddenly,

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:30.360
<v Speaker 2>if those guys are all healthy, you've got to get

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 2>through to gram and Carrasco and Cinderguard and hopefully Stroman,

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:36.239
<v Speaker 2>who I think is going to take a step up.

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 2>That's a really really good rotation and a team that

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:41.920
<v Speaker 2>could make some noise. So for me, I think there's

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 2>a good chance the Mets are going to get into

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 2>the rotation into the playoffs, and if they do, I

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:47.439
<v Speaker 2>think they have a team that's kind of built for it.

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 2>So I kind of like them, Like I like them

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:51.640
<v Speaker 2>much better than the Braves at plus five hundred, because

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 2>you talked about it. You worry about the Braves a

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 2>little bit once you get to the playoffs. Once you

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 2>get to the playoffs. For the Mets, I feel good

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:58.359
<v Speaker 2>about it, So I do like them a little bit.

0:23:58.400 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 2>At plus five twenty five.

0:23:59.880 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I certainly hope so. I haven't seen them win a

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 1>World Series since I was eight years old, so you

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:06.119
<v Speaker 1>could do the math on the folks, all right. So

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:08.640
<v Speaker 1>to win it all the World Series, the Dodgers plus

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 1>three fifty, the Yankees at five p fifty, the Padres

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 1>at eight hundred, the White Sox at eight to fifty.

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Then the Braves are ten to one, Mets are ten

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:19.359
<v Speaker 1>to one, Twins are twenty to one. Astros twenty two,

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:22.239
<v Speaker 1>Blue Jays, twenty two Cards, twenty two, and then they

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:24.119
<v Speaker 1>get to the twenty five then over starting with the

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Rays and A's and Nationals at plus thirty three hundred.

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 1>So for me, obviously, I've kind of mapped out my

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:33.680
<v Speaker 1>White Sox Padres World Series, which I would very much

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:35.720
<v Speaker 1>like to see. I think that would be good fun.

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 1>They're both kind of the same here plus eight hundred

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:41.359
<v Speaker 1>plus eight to fifty at the end of the day. Look,

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:44.199
<v Speaker 1>I think the White Sox are just that lineup that

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:47.879
<v Speaker 1>doesn't quit, and I think that the pitching staff is

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 1>very good. The Padres are there too. I think you

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>could kind of hedge with either one of these and

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:54.360
<v Speaker 1>bet them at the top of the season, both of them.

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:56.959
<v Speaker 1>I think one of them might actually come in there potentially.

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:00.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm not feeling the Yankees and Dodgers that I'm just

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not buying the big time teams here in the

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>chalk on this one this year. Give me the Podgers

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 1>of the White Sox. I think those are my two

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:09.359
<v Speaker 1>favorite picks on the board. Do you have Are you

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 1>sticking with your mets here, because certainly ten to one,

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, put one hundred bucks that's a pretty

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>good term.

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think the Mets at plus a thousand

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:21.120
<v Speaker 2>are a pretty decent bet. I do prefer Again, I've

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:22.879
<v Speaker 2>talked about all the teams obviously, so it's going to

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 2>be where I was leaning to with the you know,

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 2>winners of the National League in the American League, and

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 2>I do like the Astros a plus twenty two hundred

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:32.679
<v Speaker 2>because I do think that this is a team that

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 2>could really really They're going to add somebody if they're

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 2>in there, they're going to add somebody. Their lineup is

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:40.200
<v Speaker 2>deep and can do some real damage. Again, they were

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 2>terrible last year and they came real close to moving on.

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 2>So for me, my favorite bet of it is the

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:48.679
<v Speaker 2>Astros at plus twenty two hundred for you know the reasons.

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 2>At number one, I feel pretty confident that they're going

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:53.199
<v Speaker 2>to win the Division. Two, I feel pretty confident that

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:56.480
<v Speaker 2>they're going to add a significant piece at some point

0:25:56.560 --> 0:25:59.120
<v Speaker 2>during the season and again get over Lander back, which

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:00.680
<v Speaker 2>is I don't know if that's a ball prediction. I

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 2>know I love it.

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 1>It's bold.

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 2>I like it because Verlander is like not human and

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 2>I think if you're like hi, it's been more than

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 2>a year since.

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I just took him for a buck in my home

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:11.159
<v Speaker 1>fantasy league at the end of the auction where nobody

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 1>had any more money and I was the last person

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 1>with money, and I was like, I'm gonna go Justin

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Verlander for a buck if which is again next year,

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:17.920
<v Speaker 1>that's a heck of a keep.

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:19.679
<v Speaker 2>I'm just saying, you give it you, you give this

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 2>guy where you're basically like, hey, what every other day,

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna give him an inning in that bullpen and

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna be throwing ninety miles. Now, I mean that

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:28.240
<v Speaker 2>that's a that's kind of a game changer when you

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:30.239
<v Speaker 2>get to the playoffs. So for me, I will My

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 2>favorite World Series bet based on the odds is the

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 2>astros a plus twenty two hundred.

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go to the odds for MVP will

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:38.680
<v Speaker 1>start in the American League trout or the field. Basically,

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean.

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 2>That the odds are like, what is trout to twenty

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 2>or something.

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:47.119
<v Speaker 1>That's twenty five? After that, it's Aaron Judge is the

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 1>consensus at plus twelve. Again, the Yankee tacks Jose Ramirez

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:54.119
<v Speaker 1>at plus twelve, which, again, if you think the Indians

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:56.160
<v Speaker 1>really have a chance, yeah, he was in this conversation

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:59.399
<v Speaker 1>last year. You got Bregman at twelve, you got Rendona fifteen,

0:26:59.480 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Chapman a fifth fifteen, Otani a plus twenty, which is

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:06.679
<v Speaker 1>that's the one that again, if he can pitch one

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 1>hundred innings and drive in one hundred runs, how is

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 1>he not the MVP of the league. That is my

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:15.119
<v Speaker 1>case for the show. Aotani dart throw, now that's risky,

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>but you're getting twenty to one on it, and Jose

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:19.359
<v Speaker 1>bre You the defending champ, there is plus twenty five,

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of funny to me that he doesn't

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>get more respect he should personally. But a bray you

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and Otani are fascinating long shots. You know you're getting

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:29.919
<v Speaker 1>basically the simple two to one with Mike Trouts if

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 1>you want to bet big on Mike Trout in the

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 1>plus two twenty five. Okay, but how do you see

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the al MVP race?

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 2>I see it as something where I hate it, Like

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 2>I really just don't like it because I do think

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:41.120
<v Speaker 2>that it and again.

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 1>It's sink or swim. There's no you know, there's no

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:46.119
<v Speaker 1>in between where you can like find that in between.

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Nice ways. Yeah, that's a good smart investment. It's like

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 1>it's Mike Trout of the field. It's back to the

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:52.119
<v Speaker 1>old Tiger Wood days.

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 2>And I think what you really need to do at

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:55.840
<v Speaker 2>this point if you're not gonna go with Mike Trout

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:57.880
<v Speaker 2>is this is the problem with this is it's a

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 2>it's a it's an award that's voted on, right, so

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:02.359
<v Speaker 2>you have to think about you know, the what are

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 2>people going to be thinking about.

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 1>It's the award like OWI because to me, that is

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the story of twenty twenty one.

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:12.640
<v Speaker 2>If that happens, it's a good point. My only thing is, like, man,

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:16.160
<v Speaker 2>he has to absolutely explode because on his own team

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 2>is Mike Trout, and so you really have to dominate

0:28:19.160 --> 0:28:19.679
<v Speaker 2>my Trout.

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Don't pitch.

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:23.159
<v Speaker 2>It's lot of courds. He probably could know if he

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:25.119
<v Speaker 2>was there. So look at when I was looking at it,

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 2>I think Jose Ramirez again, you'd have to see something

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:33.160
<v Speaker 2>where a guy is really responsible for his team's surprising success.

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Jose Ramirez is a good one. Matt Chapman again, it's

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:37.920
<v Speaker 2>only it's a little short. I was surprised if it

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 2>was only plus fifteen hundred. But he's a guy with

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:42.720
<v Speaker 2>his defense, you know, especially adding on on the war.

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 2>If the A's do surprise, he could be somebody. And

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 2>the only other guy I kind of thought of, is

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 2>this a guy who everybody waits for. You know, the

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 2>breakout's going to happen at some point. If it does

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 2>happen this year and his team overperforms, and that's Laddie,

0:28:56.240 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 2>it's a plus twenty five hundred. Again, if he does

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 2>suddenly live up to his potential and the Blue Jays

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 2>somehow win that division, and you know odds that you liked,

0:29:04.520 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 2>it's a little tough because their lineup is really very,

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 2>very good, So he'd have to really really stand out

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:13.960
<v Speaker 2>among a lot of very quality hitters, with George Springer especially.

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 2>But again, if he does and if he lives up

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 2>his potential, and if they win that division, he could

0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 2>win it. So plus twenty five hundred, that's really the

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 2>only one I might take a shot on.

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's move to the National League, which is

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 1>very different, way more wide open YEP consensus. Mookie Betts

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 1>is plus seven fifty, Juan Soto my one to one,

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 1>plus seven to fifty. Cody Bellinger at eight, which I

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:36.960
<v Speaker 1>don't think is a great wager. Talked about his health

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit earlier, Ronald Acunia plus eight hundred, Tetis

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Junior plus eight to fifty, Freddy Freeman at twelve, Noan

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Aernato at twelve, Lindora at plus twelve hundred, and yell

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 1>At at plus twelve hundred, not to mention the Rice

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Harper plus fifteen. This thing is wide open, and we

0:29:50.960 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't even talk about Manny Machado and some other guys

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:55.960
<v Speaker 1>that could even kind of throw into this mix. But

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:58.479
<v Speaker 1>I think that's kind of you know, you could throw

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Pete Alonzo in there too if you wanted to. But

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 1>to me, this is this is simple. This is I

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 1>think Juan Soto is the best player on his team.

0:30:05.920 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I think he's the best player on the planet. So

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go plus them fifty. There. The other guy

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 1>that would be my number two ranking here in wagers

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 1>would be Fernando Tatis Junior plus eight to fifty because

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:18.160
<v Speaker 1>he's kind of becoming that new face of baseball. And

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a media narrative to the Padres this

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 1>year because they're fun and exciting and they're all in

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and you know, the snazzy new uniforms they debuted last year.

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 1>There's there's juice there. Okay, when it comes to Fernando

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Tatis Junior and when you go to Acunya and Freeman again,

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 1>same team, Bellinger bets it's always tough when they're on

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the same team. To me, it's Tatis and Jansto. I'm

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna go with Sodo as my number one. How do

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 1>you see National League working out?

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 2>Soto is also my number one because he I don't

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 2>think the Nationals have to win that division, even for

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:50.959
<v Speaker 2>him to win it if he has a monstrous yere

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:54.200
<v Speaker 2>like I mean, his trajectory is otherworldly at this point,

0:30:54.240 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 2>and they are just better than you think. They win

0:30:55.960 --> 0:30:58.040
<v Speaker 2>eighty eight games, but they lose the division, you know,

0:30:58.080 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 2>in the last weekend or something like that. That should

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 2>be enough for him to get it. So at plus

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:04.080
<v Speaker 2>seven to fifty, I do like him. There the other

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:05.600
<v Speaker 2>guy who I'm looking at it, And again this goes

0:31:05.640 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 2>into maybe I'm just a Brewers homer this year. Who

0:31:07.680 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 2>knows would be Yelich just because sure he's won it,

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 2>but you've said Yelich is the guy on that team,

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 2>right if that team does, if there's one guy on

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:18.080
<v Speaker 2>that team who could go crazy, And again, he has

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 2>performed at an MVP level for two years straight, and

0:31:21.160 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 2>then you had last year, which was just I'm throwing

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 2>it out, forget it. If he gets back to what

0:31:24.920 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 2>he can do at plus twelve hundred, I'm willing to

0:31:27.600 --> 0:31:29.400
<v Speaker 2>go with that. I don't mind tattoos either, by the way,

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 2>but Sodo is my number one at plus seven to fifty,

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 2>and then Yelich at plus twelve hundred is my second favorite.

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's move on to the cy Young. And

0:31:36.560 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 1>if you pay attention to sy Young, you know these

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 1>usually come in bunches. So although Garrett Cole is one

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:44.320
<v Speaker 1>of the best pitchers in baseball plus three fifties, that

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 1>consensus number, Shane Bieber is four to one at plus

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 1>four hundred. That's where my money's going. It's going to Biber.

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I think we're in the Shane Bieber cycle right now.

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:54.520
<v Speaker 1>It just feels like that watching him this spring. The

0:31:54.560 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 1>guy is just so good. Gilito's at four to fifty

0:31:57.560 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 1>glass now I just don't think he's gonna throw enough innings.

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 1>So he's nine to fifty. Then Ryu thirteen hundred, and

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Lance Lynn's seventeen hundred, along with Barrios and my Ada,

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 1>so This is kind of a two man race as

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 1>far as I'm concerned. Even Gilito's great and all, but

0:32:10.880 --> 0:32:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with Bieber. That's where I'm gonna lean.

0:32:13.080 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take the four to one, how about you.

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:18.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Realistically, it's very difficult to make a case for

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 2>anybody other than those two guys, because this year, especially,

0:32:21.640 --> 0:32:23.760
<v Speaker 2>you are going to deal with innings concerns with almost

0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 2>every pitcher and probably not those two guys. They're gonna

0:32:26.440 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 2>pitch a lot of innings and that's just gonna make

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 2>a difference. And I will say that I feel like

0:32:30.160 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 2>the you know who, Brian Kenny used to go on

0:32:32.600 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 2>the rant about kill the win, right.

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:35.719
<v Speaker 1>Kill the win.

0:32:35.800 --> 0:32:39.120
<v Speaker 2>But voters have have wised up, you know. They they

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 2>they now look beyond just the classic stuff, and I

0:32:42.120 --> 0:32:44.880
<v Speaker 2>know they're going to realize the impact of innings. So realistically,

0:32:45.320 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 2>it probably is one of those two guys, and I

0:32:47.040 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 2>would favor Bieber at plus four hundred. I really like Gilito,

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:52.720
<v Speaker 2>but his odds are it just had four to fifty

0:32:52.840 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 2>is just not worth it. Like I you know, if

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:54.920
<v Speaker 2>it was.

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Double that, if it was seven fifty or something like that,

0:32:57.800 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I'd be more exactly.

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:02.000
<v Speaker 2>But at four fifty, I'm surprised. I mean it's too close.

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean tells you how good Giolito is.

0:33:03.800 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 2>It does I'm surprised, though I didn't think. And again Glass,

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:08.800
<v Speaker 2>now I also like a little bit. But at plus

0:33:08.880 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 2>nine fifty, again not there. If I'm going to go

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 2>for a long shot, it's a guy who I really

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 2>like this here, and that's Lance mccullor's at plus four thousand,

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:18.280
<v Speaker 2>and I think again, what would have to happen is

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 2>mccullor's I think he threw fifty five somewhere around those

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:23.960
<v Speaker 2>indings last year. He'd have to add at least one hundred,

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:26.920
<v Speaker 2>maybe one hundred and ten. And I'm not saying he

0:33:27.000 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 2>will or won't. I don't know what necessarily their plan

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:30.680
<v Speaker 2>is with him. But if he does, and if he

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:32.640
<v Speaker 2>does take that next step, and again, this is a

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 2>guy I look around. He's plus four thousand, is consensus.

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:38.000
<v Speaker 2>At fox Bett it's plus six thousand, So there, I

0:33:38.040 --> 0:33:41.000
<v Speaker 2>would definitely just do a little taste at that point.

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:44.479
<v Speaker 2>But again, realistically it's Cohl or Bieber, and I would

0:33:44.680 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 2>side with Bieber overcall like.

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:49.720
<v Speaker 1>You with amazing. I think about Gi Alito. Heavity's stuck

0:33:49.760 --> 0:33:52.040
<v Speaker 1>on that national's rotation, and they didn't deal him for

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Adam Eaton. How different things might be here? And now,

0:33:54.400 --> 0:33:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, really, you know, I talked about it the

0:33:56.280 --> 0:33:58.000
<v Speaker 1>other day on another show here, which is if you

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:00.120
<v Speaker 1>think it back to that, if you know, Anthea and

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Don probably would have stayed, they would have paid him

0:34:02.240 --> 0:34:04.360
<v Speaker 1>as so as Strasbourg if they had Gilito, and that

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:07.000
<v Speaker 1>would have been a far better investment. But they dealt

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 1>three pitching prospects for Adam Eaton. I just yeah, all right,

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 1>National League Cy Young plus four to twenty five for

0:34:15.120 --> 0:34:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Jacob Degroma. Are we still in the d gram window? Well?

0:34:17.719 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Vegas seems to think so. Trevor Bauer plus seven hundred, No, thanks,

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I just can't do it. It's a good odd too, it

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:26.239
<v Speaker 1>really is. Seven to one is nice. Max Scherzer plus

0:34:26.320 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 1>nine to fifty is also very intriguing. Walker Buehler at

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:32.440
<v Speaker 1>ten to one, at plus one thousand, you Darvish is

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 1>at plus twelve hundred. This is the one I like

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:37.239
<v Speaker 1>the most. I'm sicking with this, you Darvish narrative. I

0:34:37.360 --> 0:34:39.640
<v Speaker 1>just think people don't realize that, you know, and sometimes

0:34:39.680 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 1>people get tired of voting for the same guy. And

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 1>if you Darvish really hasn't Like Let's say you Darvish

0:34:45.600 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 1>wins twenty games and his peripherals are similar to de

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:50.799
<v Speaker 1>Gram and de Grom wins sixteen. They're gonna give it

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 1>to you, Darvish, because winning twenty games in twenty twenty

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:55.440
<v Speaker 1>one is hard. It is a hard thing to do.

0:34:56.120 --> 0:34:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't look at Nola or Snell. I mean, I

0:34:58.440 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 1>know you're a Snell guy, Strasbourg or even Charlie Mood.

0:35:02.000 --> 0:35:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I think these are all just long shots. I think

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 1>it's de Groam. I think Scherzer is going to get

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:07.879
<v Speaker 1>into that conversation. But at the end of the day,

0:35:07.920 --> 0:35:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I think Darvish and deGrom is where I would kind

0:35:10.640 --> 0:35:12.759
<v Speaker 1>of spend my money. How do you see National League

0:35:12.760 --> 0:35:13.560
<v Speaker 1>SciTE young working out?

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 2>I think de Gram should be like a shorter favorite.

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I think he should be at least like three to

0:35:18.480 --> 0:35:21.080
<v Speaker 1>one or under like I'm you know, and you can

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:24.200
<v Speaker 1>find plus three point fifty at FanDuel for him. That's

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 1>about Yeah, you know, that's as bad as it gets

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 1>bad as it gets there.

0:35:27.760 --> 0:35:30.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the consensus line is four twenty five. That's where

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 2>it is at most it's crazy, there's value on that.

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:36.279
<v Speaker 2>De Gram is the obvious choice because I mean, not

0:35:36.400 --> 0:35:39.239
<v Speaker 2>only has he shown no slippage in his performance, but

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:41.399
<v Speaker 2>he looks better than ever, like he's just going going.

0:35:41.440 --> 0:35:43.320
<v Speaker 2>And you know, you think about a guy like de Grom,

0:35:43.480 --> 0:35:46.440
<v Speaker 2>who again was not a pitcher originally, he does. He

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:48.760
<v Speaker 2>was injured, so he doesn't have a ton of miles

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:50.920
<v Speaker 2>on his arm. He could have several years left of this.

0:35:51.480 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 2>He's just so much better than the field wings on,

0:35:53.239 --> 0:35:55.440
<v Speaker 2>so I would go with him. I don't hate Darvish whatsoever.

0:35:55.760 --> 0:35:57.759
<v Speaker 2>I do like Snell as well, which you know, again

0:35:57.800 --> 0:36:00.080
<v Speaker 2>we have seen the upside of Snell, so I do

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:02.760
<v Speaker 2>like him. And again I don't mind Morton at twenty

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 2>two hundred because I do think that again, innings are

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:06.719
<v Speaker 2>gonna make a difference. Is here. I expect a guy

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 2>like Morton who was injured last year, but when you

0:36:08.560 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 2>saw his velocity come back in the postseason, you saw

0:36:10.719 --> 0:36:13.560
<v Speaker 2>his performance come back as well, maybe the last year

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:15.920
<v Speaker 2>of his career. They're gonna let him pitch as much

0:36:15.960 --> 0:36:17.239
<v Speaker 2>as he can, so if he is able to get

0:36:17.239 --> 0:36:18.680
<v Speaker 2>out there with one hundred and seventy one hundred and

0:36:18.680 --> 0:36:21.200
<v Speaker 2>eighty innings, because what's the need to save Charlie Morton

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:23.120
<v Speaker 2>and he does get back to what he does best,

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 2>he's got a shot there. But realistically, to Gram at

0:36:25.560 --> 0:36:29.000
<v Speaker 2>plus four twenty five, there's massive amounts of value on

0:36:29.080 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 2>that still at this point, and he would be the

0:36:30.960 --> 0:36:32.600
<v Speaker 2>real guy. If I only had one pick to make,

0:36:32.600 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 2>it would be that.

0:36:33.560 --> 0:36:35.480
<v Speaker 1>All right. Moving on to the Rookie of the Year

0:36:35.480 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 1>in the American League, Randy Rose Arena my goodness, plus

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:41.840
<v Speaker 1>three point fifty the consensus top. I am fading this

0:36:42.920 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 1>so hard. I'm just fading it all together. Jared Kelnick

0:36:47.239 --> 0:36:49.440
<v Speaker 1>is plus one thousand, wander Franco plus one thousand. I

0:36:49.480 --> 0:36:51.480
<v Speaker 1>do think you're gonna see Wander Franco this year. But

0:36:51.800 --> 0:36:54.279
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Vaughan at plus eleven consensus, by the way, you

0:36:54.320 --> 0:36:57.040
<v Speaker 1>can get him at plus twenty to one on places

0:36:57.040 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 1>like bet MGM. Yeah, oh my goodness, he's gonna be

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:01.920
<v Speaker 1>playing for day one. This is to me one of

0:37:02.000 --> 0:37:04.440
<v Speaker 1>my favorite things we're gonna talk about today, because Andrewon's

0:37:04.440 --> 0:37:06.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna get the abs. He's gonna be there from day one.

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:09.120
<v Speaker 1>He's got a ton of line up support. It's Andrew

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Vaughan I'm sorry, and if it's not, I'll take the

0:37:11.440 --> 0:37:14.719
<v Speaker 1>heat on it. Yep, but mis has been terrible, Pearson's hurt.

0:37:14.800 --> 0:37:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Rutchman and Malcastle play for the Orioles, and I just

0:37:17.160 --> 0:37:18.960
<v Speaker 1>don't think they're gonna really make that kind of a

0:37:19.600 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 1>big jump. And I like kirol Off, but he's not

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:24.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna be starting day one. Interesting McKenzie is a nice

0:37:24.360 --> 0:37:27.200
<v Speaker 1>pitcher to me, it's Andrew Vaughn and stand back and

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Wander Franco is probably the higher rated prospect, and he

0:37:29.160 --> 0:37:31.319
<v Speaker 1>should be. But Andrew Vaughn I think is the best

0:37:31.480 --> 0:37:33.120
<v Speaker 1>set up this year to win Rookie of the Year.

0:37:33.520 --> 0:37:36.239
<v Speaker 2>Absolute agree. I mean he's going to start the year

0:37:36.320 --> 0:37:38.560
<v Speaker 2>in the majors almost certainly. I mean, as we record this,

0:37:38.600 --> 0:37:40.319
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if that's been officially announced yet. But

0:37:40.480 --> 0:37:43.719
<v Speaker 2>he's been playing the outfield as well, which apparently he's

0:37:43.760 --> 0:37:46.800
<v Speaker 2>not terrible at, which is a little surprising to me.

0:37:47.200 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 2>That's awesome. That is awesome, bar true, the bar exceptionally low.

0:37:51.760 --> 0:37:53.799
<v Speaker 2>Lo He is gonna play and he can hit, I mean,

0:37:53.840 --> 0:37:55.520
<v Speaker 2>without a doubt heating it. I have no doubt that

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:57.919
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna end the Major so at plus eleven hundred yeah,

0:37:57.960 --> 0:38:00.239
<v Speaker 2>there is. And again you mentioned it, bet mg M

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:02.919
<v Speaker 2>plus two thousand all day long. I love that, I will.

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:06.239
<v Speaker 2>I don't mind, Kira lof you mentioned it. He is

0:38:06.280 --> 0:38:08.279
<v Speaker 2>not starting in the majors. I did not expect him

0:38:08.320 --> 0:38:10.239
<v Speaker 2>to start in the majors this year. They'll buy the

0:38:10.280 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 2>extra year of control. He also made it easier for them.

0:38:12.640 --> 0:38:15.040
<v Speaker 2>But the fact that he had a terrible spring, but

0:38:15.120 --> 0:38:17.040
<v Speaker 2>his minor league track record shows.

0:38:16.800 --> 0:38:17.680
<v Speaker 1>That he can't play.

0:38:17.680 --> 0:38:20.239
<v Speaker 2>It's Jake Cave and left field. They're going to need

0:38:20.280 --> 0:38:21.960
<v Speaker 2>to win to be able to keep up with the

0:38:22.000 --> 0:38:23.560
<v Speaker 2>White Sox, so I think he's going to be up

0:38:23.600 --> 0:38:24.640
<v Speaker 2>in like three weeks.

0:38:24.800 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Would Jake Cave sound like a like a fake singer

0:38:27.200 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 1>from a Disney Channel show? Like I just felt, I

0:38:29.520 --> 0:38:30.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know, like.

0:38:30.719 --> 0:38:33.239
<v Speaker 2>Wherever you were, wherever you were going with that, I

0:38:33.280 --> 0:38:35.680
<v Speaker 2>was going to find it humorous because you could go

0:38:35.719 --> 0:38:36.719
<v Speaker 2>anywhere you want with Jake.

0:38:37.120 --> 0:38:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Color's Jake Cave. He's the coolest guy on campus.

0:38:40.640 --> 0:38:42.160
<v Speaker 2>So whatever he is, he's going to be. He's going

0:38:42.239 --> 0:38:43.560
<v Speaker 2>to be out of a job in three weeks as

0:38:43.600 --> 0:38:45.239
<v Speaker 2>my guess. And I think ki av hit as soon

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:47.879
<v Speaker 2>as he gets there. But he is not good defensively either.

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:50.160
<v Speaker 2>So again I think it's Vonn because you know you've

0:38:50.160 --> 0:38:52.560
<v Speaker 2>got it. But at plus two thousand, I wouldn't mind

0:38:52.560 --> 0:38:53.919
<v Speaker 2>taking a shot at Kilof as well.

0:38:54.200 --> 0:38:55.919
<v Speaker 1>All right, So let's close things out here at National

0:38:55.960 --> 0:38:57.720
<v Speaker 1>League Rooki of the Year, could Brian Hayes a plus

0:38:57.719 --> 0:39:00.920
<v Speaker 1>three fifty the favorite, which is yep, I'm fine with this.

0:39:01.000 --> 0:39:04.520
<v Speaker 1>It's good. It's fine. Six Do Sanchez a plus five hundred.

0:39:05.360 --> 0:39:07.239
<v Speaker 1>I love six Do Sanchez, but I don't know if

0:39:07.239 --> 0:39:09.279
<v Speaker 1>this is where I want to go. Dylan Carlson is

0:39:09.320 --> 0:39:13.680
<v Speaker 1>plus seven hundred, and then wait, Ian Anderson plus seventy fifty.

0:39:14.320 --> 0:39:17.239
<v Speaker 1>You gotta be kidding me. Ian Anderson's a brave Have

0:39:17.320 --> 0:39:19.319
<v Speaker 1>we not seen how many brave rookiy of the Years

0:39:19.320 --> 0:39:22.080
<v Speaker 1>we've had in our lifetime? I mean, look, you want

0:39:22.080 --> 0:39:24.120
<v Speaker 1>to build a narrative. This is a good team. It's

0:39:24.160 --> 0:39:26.919
<v Speaker 1>going to be winning probably ninety plus games, and Ian

0:39:26.920 --> 0:39:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Anderson is gonna be a big part of it. So

0:39:28.719 --> 0:39:31.000
<v Speaker 1>as much as I love the talent of Cabrian Hayes,

0:39:31.360 --> 0:39:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Ian Anderson is my wager here. If you want to

0:39:33.600 --> 0:39:37.000
<v Speaker 1>look past this, you're looking at Joey Barton, Pasha and

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Stevenson and Hassy Young Kim hasn't hit a damn

0:39:39.719 --> 0:39:42.759
<v Speaker 1>thing this spring, and Spencer Howard is already sent down.

0:39:42.800 --> 0:39:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Same thing with Gore. So like to me, it's Ian Anderson.

0:39:46.920 --> 0:39:48.720
<v Speaker 1>If you want to make a case for Dylan Carlson

0:39:48.800 --> 0:39:50.919
<v Speaker 1>or Cabrian Hayes, the floor is yours. But I'm gonna

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:51.480
<v Speaker 1>go with the pitcher.

0:39:51.840 --> 0:39:54.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Ian Anderson is my favorite at plus seven to fifteen,

0:39:54.480 --> 0:39:56.719
<v Speaker 2>and again we both like him. We do a lot

0:39:56.760 --> 0:39:58.520
<v Speaker 2>of fantasy work, and you know when you do that,

0:39:58.560 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 2>you really have to dig in to all of these pitchers,

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:04.080
<v Speaker 2>and it just again we I think we both had

0:40:04.080 --> 0:40:05.960
<v Speaker 2>the same feeling on him, which is when we started

0:40:06.200 --> 0:40:09.280
<v Speaker 2>sort of our preparation for the twenty twenty one baseball season,

0:40:09.440 --> 0:40:11.160
<v Speaker 2>we did not like Ian Anderson, and by the time

0:40:11.200 --> 0:40:13.080
<v Speaker 2>we were done with it, we loved Ian Anderson. Now

0:40:13.120 --> 0:40:15.480
<v Speaker 2>there is a bottom out situation here, for sure. He

0:40:15.560 --> 0:40:17.760
<v Speaker 2>struggles with the control. His control isn't great the spring,

0:40:17.960 --> 0:40:20.840
<v Speaker 2>but still he's really really good in the Braves rotation

0:40:20.880 --> 0:40:22.759
<v Speaker 2>at plus seven to fifty. I like it. The only

0:40:22.840 --> 0:40:24.640
<v Speaker 2>other one I would I would take a shot on

0:40:24.960 --> 0:40:27.480
<v Speaker 2>is the favorite Cobrian Hayes because I'm I'm actually a

0:40:27.560 --> 0:40:29.040
<v Speaker 2>pretty big Cabrian Hayes.

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:31.480
<v Speaker 1>And worry about the lack of line of protection.

0:40:31.200 --> 0:40:33.399
<v Speaker 2>Right, But I don't think that matters nearly as much

0:40:33.400 --> 0:40:35.799
<v Speaker 2>when you're talking about one of these individual awards that's

0:40:35.880 --> 0:40:36.919
<v Speaker 2>not an MVP award.

0:40:37.040 --> 0:40:40.200
<v Speaker 1>MVP no, no. I mean to support him having good stats,

0:40:40.239 --> 0:40:43.320
<v Speaker 1>because when you take away all the lineups likes no Marte,

0:40:43.800 --> 0:40:44.759
<v Speaker 1>there's no Josh Bell.

0:40:45.080 --> 0:40:46.520
<v Speaker 2>That lineup is abysmal.

0:40:46.640 --> 0:40:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, a lineup is abysmal. And I wonder about that

0:40:48.400 --> 0:40:50.480
<v Speaker 1>because when the young kid does he start to go

0:40:50.560 --> 0:40:52.879
<v Speaker 1>fishing when they don't throw many fastballs anymore. That's why

0:40:52.880 --> 0:40:54.239
<v Speaker 1>I can, Sir Brian Hayes, that's it.

0:40:54.280 --> 0:40:57.399
<v Speaker 2>I think you know it's possible, but he certainly didn't

0:40:57.440 --> 0:40:59.799
<v Speaker 2>last year, which was you know, the lineup wasn't quite

0:40:59.840 --> 0:41:02.719
<v Speaker 2>as bad, but it was pretty bad. And I do

0:41:03.040 --> 0:41:05.160
<v Speaker 2>I like his talent. I like sort of the stack

0:41:05.160 --> 0:41:07.080
<v Speaker 2>cast ata that I saw. That makes me think. But

0:41:07.120 --> 0:41:08.840
<v Speaker 2>it's true, when you are a young player and you

0:41:08.880 --> 0:41:10.919
<v Speaker 2>are in a team that is absolutely terrible and you're

0:41:10.920 --> 0:41:14.040
<v Speaker 2>the only hitter that can really do some damage, had

0:41:14.120 --> 0:41:15.960
<v Speaker 2>chances or you're not gonna see some great pitches, and

0:41:16.000 --> 0:41:17.719
<v Speaker 2>that might make you a little impatient, But at plus

0:41:17.760 --> 0:41:20.000
<v Speaker 2>three fifty, I'm still willing to take the shot. I

0:41:20.000 --> 0:41:22.320
<v Speaker 2>agree though that Ian Anderson at plus seven to fifty

0:41:22.360 --> 0:41:23.960
<v Speaker 2>is my favorite. The only the other thing I do

0:41:24.040 --> 0:41:26.520
<v Speaker 2>love six do Sanchez as well, But he's gonna start

0:41:26.520 --> 0:41:28.719
<v Speaker 2>the year in you know, the either the alternate inside

0:41:28.760 --> 0:41:30.480
<v Speaker 2>of the miners or whatever it is, just to build up,

0:41:30.520 --> 0:41:32.719
<v Speaker 2>So it's going to be really difficult to see him

0:41:32.760 --> 0:41:35.799
<v Speaker 2>topping like maybe one hundred and forty innings this year.

0:41:35.800 --> 0:41:37.719
<v Speaker 2>They're gonna be careful with them. So for me, that

0:41:37.800 --> 0:41:39.759
<v Speaker 2>takes me off of him at plus five hundred much

0:41:39.760 --> 0:41:41.280
<v Speaker 2>prefer Anderson at plus seven fifty.

0:41:41.440 --> 0:41:43.200
<v Speaker 1>That's where they keep Dan and myself when we're not

0:41:43.239 --> 0:41:45.960
<v Speaker 1>doing shows. It's the alternate site. That's the place they

0:41:45.960 --> 0:41:48.279
<v Speaker 1>put us away and then they dust us off for

0:41:48.320 --> 0:41:50.800
<v Speaker 1>a show whenever they need us here over at betting Pros.

0:41:50.800 --> 0:41:53.439
<v Speaker 1>So again I go to bettingpros dot com. You could

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:55.800
<v Speaker 1>take a look at all these futures that we're talking about.

0:41:55.960 --> 0:41:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Everything's on here, Dan, anything else to mention here before

0:41:58.960 --> 0:42:01.360
<v Speaker 1>he close things out here today from Betting Pros.

0:42:01.239 --> 0:42:04.840
<v Speaker 2>Just that I'm so incredibly excited to get started for

0:42:04.960 --> 0:42:07.280
<v Speaker 2>the MLB season. By the way, if you haven't joined

0:42:07.760 --> 0:42:10.960
<v Speaker 2>discourse okay, which is our free it's betting pros dot

0:42:10.960 --> 0:42:15.200
<v Speaker 2>com slash chat. If you follow Matt's Parral's Daily Juice podcast,

0:42:15.239 --> 0:42:17.239
<v Speaker 2>you're probably already in there. But Betting pros dot Com

0:42:17.239 --> 0:42:20.720
<v Speaker 2>slash Chat, it's a bunch of people who talk about

0:42:20.800 --> 0:42:22.839
<v Speaker 2>sports betting. And there are different channels, and there's an

0:42:22.920 --> 0:42:27.160
<v Speaker 2>MLB betting channel. I'm gonna be in there all season long.

0:42:27.200 --> 0:42:29.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna be giving out bets per you know, maybe

0:42:29.960 --> 0:42:32.399
<v Speaker 2>not on every single day, but most days I'm gonna

0:42:32.400 --> 0:42:34.600
<v Speaker 2>be doing it. I'm gonna be talking. I mean, just

0:42:34.600 --> 0:42:36.080
<v Speaker 2>just come talk about some betting.

0:42:36.120 --> 0:42:37.359
<v Speaker 1>Where can everybody get in there?

0:42:37.520 --> 0:42:42.160
<v Speaker 2>Bettingpros dot com, slash chat, c h at slash chat

0:42:42.400 --> 0:42:45.080
<v Speaker 2>free to enter. It's got over. We just passed five

0:42:45.239 --> 0:42:48.560
<v Speaker 2>thousand members in there. Wow, it's awesome. Yeah, it's great.

0:42:48.560 --> 0:42:50.560
<v Speaker 2>A lot of people like to talk about sports betting.

0:42:50.600 --> 0:42:52.839
<v Speaker 2>It's fantastic again, and you meet a lot of people,

0:42:52.920 --> 0:42:55.040
<v Speaker 2>by the way, Not only that, there are a lot

0:42:55.080 --> 0:42:57.719
<v Speaker 2>of like really sharp people in there, and if you're

0:42:57.760 --> 0:43:00.399
<v Speaker 2>new to sports betting, especially, you can learn a lot.

0:43:00.520 --> 0:43:02.160
<v Speaker 2>You learn a lot about the way a lot of

0:43:02.160 --> 0:43:04.399
<v Speaker 2>different people, and there's every I mean, we have an

0:43:04.600 --> 0:43:08.160
<v Speaker 2>esports betting channel, right you have, you have every single

0:43:08.239 --> 0:43:10.920
<v Speaker 2>anything you want to bet on. Going there again, totally

0:43:10.920 --> 0:43:13.239
<v Speaker 2>free betting pros dot Com, slash check.

0:43:13.920 --> 0:43:15.719
<v Speaker 1>All right, that'll do it for us, But the story

0:43:15.760 --> 0:43:18.239
<v Speaker 1>of the game goes on for Dan Harris. I'm Joe Pizzapia.

0:43:18.640 --> 0:43:19.840
<v Speaker 1>We'll see you next time. Kids,