WEBVTT - The Election And Big Tech

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:02.160
<v Speaker 1>From Mahard.

0:00:02.320 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 2>We're Innovation, Money and Power Collie in Silicon Vallet NBN.

0:00:07.080 --> 0:00:11.040
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed lud.

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 4>Love now from New York and San Francisco. This is

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Technology in selection day and the tech policies and

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 4>implications that you need to know about. On the last

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:34.839
<v Speaker 4>day of voting.

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:38.920
<v Speaker 5>Class Palenteer shares jump as it posts record profit and

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 5>made unwavering AI demand and Apple.

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 4>I's smart glasses. We discussed the internal study code named

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 4>Atlas as it follows Snap and Meta's lead. But first

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:52.599
<v Speaker 4>we check in on these markets as people head in

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 4>person to the polls. We're currently up nine ten percent

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 4>on the NASDAK. Big tech leading the charge today in

0:00:57.320 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 4>Vidiar Tesla on the higher side, and really it is

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 4>big tech that also drives from an earnings perspective. And

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 4>what are you watching on the.

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:07.639
<v Speaker 5>Micro Yes, straight to Palenteer shares up twenty three percent

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:10.320
<v Speaker 5>in the session, on track for their biggest jump since

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 5>February of this year, trading at an all time high.

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 5>What's astonishing, It's like out of nowhere. This is a

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 5>company with one hundred and fourteen billion dollar market gap

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 5>and it's all on revenue in the court have gone

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 5>a little more than seven hundred million dollars, but the

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 5>narrative incredibly clear, unwavering AI demand from corporate America and

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 5>from the public sector as well. Let's get right to

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 5>Palenteer with Mandique Singh of Bloomberg Intelligence. Where would you

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:40.759
<v Speaker 5>like to start, Mandeep, I mean, the story of Palenteer

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 5>is a long term one. It's continued with this momentum

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 5>for a while. What jumped out from its earnings print for.

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 3>You, Yeah, I mean the government segment growing forty percent

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 3>here in the US, and it is on the back of,

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, some connection that they have found with implementing llms.

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean, everyone is looking have ways to deploy, you know,

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 3>whether it's GPT, Gemini or Meta Lama, and to Palenteer's credit,

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 3>they found the right pivot when it comes to integrating

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 3>the data the ontology that they have with these llms.

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:17.519
<v Speaker 3>And I think that's why you're seeing that especially a

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 3>strong momentum on the government side, but also defense tech

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 3>companies on the commercial side. I think in the US

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 3>they've done particularly well because of their you know, data

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:31.360
<v Speaker 3>lineage and the fact that they have done so well

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 3>over the years in terms of you know, ontology.

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:37.119
<v Speaker 4>What's interesting, of course, your note that you put out

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 4>is saying, perhaps there was a rush to spend budget

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 4>that was happening from the US government perspective, from your

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:45.080
<v Speaker 4>mind's eye. Therefore many have they diversified enough to ensure

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 4>that they've got the private sector where they want it

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 4>to be.

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, look, we are in an environment of

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 3>heightened geopolitical tensions and that has traditionally benefited talent.

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:54.359
<v Speaker 1>Heer.

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm a little leary of you know, their momentum on

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 3>the international side, given its still thirty percent plus of

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 3>their business, and that's where you see a tapering of growth,

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 3>given how controversial the CEO can be at times. And look,

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to software companies, you want to show

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:15.080
<v Speaker 3>recurring revenue. That's why the cloud names have fetched, you know,

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 3>premium multiples over the year. Palentier currently trades at a

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:22.079
<v Speaker 3>premium multiple. So it comes down to can they sustain

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:24.920
<v Speaker 3>this momentum, And I think that's where international is key,

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 3>which I'm not sure they can sustain that kind of momentum.

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 4>Technically, the shares a riverboard if you're looking at the

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 4>relative strength index mandate. It's saying of BlueBag intelligence brings

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 4>us the fundamentals there. But look, let's get back to

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 4>what the day is. It is Election day, it is

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 4>here in the US, and the polling continues to show

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 4>that race as close as any in modern history. You

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 4>bring it back to Katie lines and joins us at

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 4>the start of a marathon of a day, and Katie,

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 4>just bring us up to speed with what we should

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 4>be looking at right here, right now.

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 6>Well, really, this is going to come down to turn

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 6>out that probably will surprise no one. But with the

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 6>margins this type consistently in polling, it really is going

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 6>to be about who can convince voters to get off

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 6>the couch today and vote for them. No longer is

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 6>it about convincing them to vote for either Donald Trump

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 6>or Kamala Harris, but instead to get them to vote

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 6>at all. And I would keep in mind that millions

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 6>of Americans have already done so. As of this morning,

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 6>more than eighty three million people had already cast their vote,

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 6>and the electorate in total those eligible to vote is

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 6>only two hundred and forty four millions, So it would

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 6>be a question of how much of that electorate actually

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:27.359
<v Speaker 6>shows up today when they go to the polls, and

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 6>of course it is seven states where the turnout is

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 6>going to matter most. Those battlegrounds in the Rust Belt

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:34.159
<v Speaker 6>and in the Sun Belt are what the candidates have

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 6>been zeroing in on. It's why Kamala Harris meant her

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 6>entire day yesterday in Pennsylvania, which has nineteen electoral votes.

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 6>Donald Trump spending some time in North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:46.559
<v Speaker 6>Michigan as they race today to get to two hundred

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:48.840
<v Speaker 6>and seventy. And I would just warn our audiences it

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 6>may be the case that we will not know who

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 6>gets two hundred and seventy electoral votes, not today, not tomorrow,

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 6>It could potentially take days.

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 5>Kaylee, thank you for your reporting. Just incredible command of

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:03.720
<v Speaker 5>the data, which is so important in this tight race.

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 5>Both candidates kind of had closing pitches or remarks last night.

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 5>Where do we leave things in both the Trump camp

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 5>and the Harris camp.

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 6>Well, we heard similar things from Kamala Harris, which is

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:16.919
<v Speaker 6>that she wants to essentially turn the page on what

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 6>she is referred to as a dark era in American

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 6>politics for the past decade in which Donald Trump has

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:24.720
<v Speaker 6>been involved in presidential campaigns over what has now been

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 6>three cycles. She reiterated she wants to chart a new

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 6>way forward for Donald Trump. He is basically trying to

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 6>make himself the change candidate in this race. Suggests that

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 6>Kamala Harris, as part of this Biden administration, which in

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:39.840
<v Speaker 6>many ways has been unpopular, especially with its handling of

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 6>the economy, shows that the country needs to move on.

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:45.600
<v Speaker 6>He described that the country cannot take four more years

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:48.720
<v Speaker 6>of what he referred to last night as gross incompetence.

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 6>Now they both are no longer in battleground states as

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 6>we speak, Donald Trump should be voting anytime now. In

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 6>his home state of Florida. He is still allowed to

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 6>do so, even though he was a convicted fell and

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 6>convicted in New York. But New York law dictates a

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 6>convicted felon can still vote. Therefore, Florida recognizes that he

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 6>will be able to cast a vote for himself today.

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 6>Kamala Harris meantime, is at home in DC at the

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 6>Naval Observatory, and she will be heading to Howard University,

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 6>her alma mater, for her election night party this evening.

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 6>Because at this point there's really nothing left either of

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 6>them can do. The closing arguments have been made, The

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:24.039
<v Speaker 6>ground game has been working for months now, and we

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 6>all just have to wait for the tally to come in.

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg's Katie Lynes, thank you very much. Let's get the

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:33.160
<v Speaker 5>market's perspective and bringing in Anna Ruthman of CBIZ Investment

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 5>Advisory Services. Equity markets are higher, big tech, well megacap

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:43.839
<v Speaker 5>tech stocks are kind of leading the way voting is underway.

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 5>What does that tell you, Anna?

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>If anything, I think the markets are ready for this

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>election to be over and for some of the uncertainties

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>that have been present and leading up to this day

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 1>to be over. And I think there's a lot of

0:06:57.320 --> 0:07:01.599
<v Speaker 1>excitement about that. But depending on who wins and depending

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:05.160
<v Speaker 1>on what Washington looks like, there are some issues that

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 1>may be facing tech. And that's on the regulatory side.

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>So if I'm taking a look at what might be

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>lying ahead, I mean, of course these things can change.

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:17.559
<v Speaker 1>There's three I would put them in three buckets. One

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 1>is that things that are pretty known that Washington is

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>a consensus on, and that one thing is national security,

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and so for the semiconductor industry and AI development, I

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>would really look at that and say that may be

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>a challenge, especially when we're talking about importing and exporting

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 1>things from China. Undoing some of that global supply chain

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a challenge there in creating less

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>reliance on China. The other is antitrust issues if we

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 1>look at and that's the unknown, right, So if we

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>look at potential hairs administration, we've seen Biden administration be

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>not as friendly Trump administration. I think there's assumption that

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be more friendly, especially with Republican Party,

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's not always the case.

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 2>Because we have a case while.

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Trump was president between twenty sixty and twenty twenty, everybody

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 1>remembers time order and at serprise, right.

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 5>So just real quick, we're kind of zeroed in on

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 5>this presidential race. But of course the composition of Congress

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 5>will have an impact, and I think in particular about

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 5>if you're talking about regulation artificial intelligence, but also electric vehicles, right,

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 5>the standing impact of the IRRA and any changes that

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 5>might ad that. How do you model for that? Please?

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 2>On the EB side?

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Sure, on the EB side, I think there is there's

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 1>what we established as what Congress would want, right, But

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>so if you have a democratic sweep it's going to

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:50.559
<v Speaker 1>look one way. If you have a Republican sweep, it's

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 1>going to look another way. But I think American people

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 1>have sort of spoken through sales. I mean, if we

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>look at Tesla for example, I mean, Tesla did really well,

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 1>but in terms of volume, sales was down.

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 2>If you look at.

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Ford and GM, their EV sales were down. So I

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know if Washington is going to continue to demand,

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>depending on who, especially for the Democratic Party, continue to

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:18.079
<v Speaker 1>demand that kind of regulation, but the American people might

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 1>just not be for it. So I'm not entirely sure

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>if it's going to shake out the way we might project.

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:24.959
<v Speaker 8>Tesla.

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 4>Of course, one of the leading points contributors to the

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 4>NASDAC on the day at least Anna the leading is

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 4>in Nvidio, And I just want to ask you a

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:34.719
<v Speaker 4>little bit more about the semiconductor industry and what you're

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 4>trying to factor in in terms of future policy there,

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 4>whether it be with China, whether it be building here

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 4>in the US.

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think with AI, that's the national security bit

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>that I was talking about before. I think the building

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 1>here in the US, it's going to take a very

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 1>long time. So I think that we're not going to

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>see that tomorrow or next year, or frankly even in

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the next four years, whoever is.

0:09:57.200 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 2>The president, what Washington might look like.

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>So I think with Nvidia and AI, the chips and

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the important export controls, that's going to be a big

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 1>topic probably for the next ten to fifteen years.

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 4>Have you been worried in any way about potential change?

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:17.319
<v Speaker 4>Of course, when it comes to the subsidies, the support

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 4>here in the US for the chip sector building in

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 4>the US, has that changed any of your investment assumptions?

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't worry us.

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean again, this is going to take a long time.

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:32.719
<v Speaker 1>It actually makes us excited because it actually takes the

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:37.440
<v Speaker 1>risk of relying too much on Taiwan and South Korea

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and it brings it in here. But now that also

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>then you have to question is that going to increase

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:47.719
<v Speaker 1>the cost of production here because it is essentially a

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:51.080
<v Speaker 1>little more expensive to make things here, And that actually

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:54.959
<v Speaker 1>opens up the door to other discussions here that may

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>not be tech related per se, but everyone who uses.

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 4>Tech and indeed monetary US see related if we are

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 4>indeed talking about inflationary pressure. Anna Rathman, so good to

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 4>have you on this day. Ciba's investment advisory services. Meanwhile,

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 4>we want to keep an eye on other chip related

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:13.559
<v Speaker 4>stocks today because the key contributor to the downside in

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 4>terms of points on the nurse at one hundred is

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 4>NXP Today. Why it's earnings, and we saw overall that

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 4>it was underwhelming, to say the least, with forly the

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:24.960
<v Speaker 4>most it's July issues with the car industry in particular,

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 4>we saw the fourth quarter sales and earnings forecast disappointing

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 4>because that slowed down in automotive customers and indeed a

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 4>weak industrial demand too.

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 5>Okay, coming up from the show details and the survival

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:40.680
<v Speaker 5>of Elon Musk's million dollars sweet steaks, that's next. This

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 5>is Bloomberg Technology, a legal win for Elon Musk as

0:11:56.280 --> 0:12:00.319
<v Speaker 5>a Pennsylvania judge rejected a request to halt his daily

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 5>one million dollar sweep stakes, which is run by Mosqu's

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:07.199
<v Speaker 5>pro Donald Trump America pack Bluebers Crystal match on the

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 5>ground for us and Chris, I think we've covered this

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 5>over the course of a number of days or weeks,

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 5>and at the heart of it was what is the

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 5>legal issue here? But just bring us the latest of

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:21.560
<v Speaker 5>what the judge decided in the moment about the sweepstakes,

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, hi.

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 7>The judge had a six hour hearing with the DA

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 7>of Philly, Larry Krasner on the stand for a few

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 7>hours and the treasurer of the pack, and almost immediately

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:39.839
<v Speaker 7>after decided rejected the DA's request for an immediate order

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 7>that would have halted the pack. He didn't explain its reasoning.

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 7>He said he's going to put out an order an

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:47.559
<v Speaker 7>opinion momentarily.

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 8>That will explain its reasoning. But the DA has.

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 7>Intended that the giveaway violated state lottery laws and also

0:12:56.160 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 7>on consumer protection laws because it wasn't protecting the confidential

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 7>personal information of the people who won the prize the pack.

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 7>He contended that it actually wasn't a lottery at all.

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 7>It was actually these people were given employment contracts for

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:17.079
<v Speaker 7>their time as spokespersons for the pack, and they kind

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:18.679
<v Speaker 7>of said they were being put through the ringers, so

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 7>that's what they were being compensated for. And in fact,

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 7>the treasurer of the pack said on the stand that

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:26.680
<v Speaker 7>he was surprised to hear Eli call it a random

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:29.959
<v Speaker 7>giveaway because he said it wasn't. These people were being

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 7>compensated for their time, so that.

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 4>Leads us precisely where Chris, because I suppose there's more

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:39.719
<v Speaker 4>transparency on actually what this is all about and sort

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 4>of paid spokespeople. But ultimately we're off the hope from

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 4>a legal perspective for the most part.

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 7>Now, the DA continue to pursue damages, and he made

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 7>it clear that he was going to seek more money.

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:55.199
<v Speaker 7>I mean, this is an emergency injunction motion. So and

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 7>for the most part, like you said, it's kind of

0:13:57.000 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 7>moot that the giveaway is over. They they're weren't going

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 7>to give away any more money. So Elon last week

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 7>tried to get this move to federal court.

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 8>This is why it took so long.

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 7>The GA only filed this dude a week ago, and

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 7>as were supposed to have you hearing on Thursday. That

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 7>get canceled when Elon tried to move it to federal

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 7>court and then it got punting back to state court.

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 7>So for the most part, this lawsuit is kind of

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 7>over for the moment, and Elon was kind of victorious,

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 7>even though oftensibly, you know, he lost his attempt to

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 7>move it out of court.

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 4>In both Crystal Match on the latest we thank you

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 4>now look Silicon Valley Heavyweights such as in Noamusque. It

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 4>made a significant impact on this year's US election. But

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 4>our next guest says, text involvement began long before the

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty four decision. Let's bring in no like technology

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 4>and geopolitics. A fellow at the Harvard Belfa Center, you

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 4>recently wrote an ophead on this exact topic. Just take

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 4>us back in history the States, back to the eighties,

0:14:56.760 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 4>really the nineties, when technology CEOs really started to make

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 4>their feelings and money known in politics.

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 9>Hi, Caroline, Yes, our current age of tech really began

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 9>in the nineteen eighties with the arrival of the desktop computer,

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 9>and then in the nineteen nineties e commas took off,

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 9>and now we're in sort of the third act of

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 9>this age in terms of AI and of course the

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 9>space phrase. But from the very start, from the nineteen

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 9>eighties Silicon Valleys players, many of whom are still the

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 9>same today as they were then. So people like starting

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 9>with Steve Jobs and right through to Bezos and Mask

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 9>started becoming politically active in the nineteen eighties and engaging

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 9>with the government in terms of the kind of changes

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 9>they wanted for in terms of regulation, investment, and also

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 9>the idea of government as a customer.

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 4>I suppose what potentially has changed here is that one

0:15:57.240 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 4>of them might well take a very leading role in

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 4>men illustration if indeed Trump does get in and talking

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 4>about Elon Musk. But moreover, it's sort of we're getting

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 4>more transparency about their roles. Is that because of the

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 4>way they're self identifying, or is that because of the

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 4>age of social media we able to find these things out.

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 9>I think it's because, well, we have people like Elon

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 9>Musk being sort of particularly flamboyant in terms of their approach.

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 9>I mean with the million dollar lottery, where there's been

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 9>so much focus on the million bucks. But actually I

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 9>think it's great to have that because we are now

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 9>seeing the power of tech, which was sort of previously

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 9>I think existed. I mean, the PayPal mafia kind of

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 9>functioned as very much with the sort of oath of

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 9>silence or omerta in terms of their political views, and

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 9>we've seen those actually coming out now and just how

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 9>much people like Musk can influence narratives, and not just

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 9>through money, but in terms of how they think about

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:04.479
<v Speaker 9>the economy, and of course how Musk has also been

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:10.639
<v Speaker 9>thinking about issues like immigration and voter flaud Now, in.

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:15.399
<v Speaker 5>Your research, have you found specific evidence that an endorsement

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:19.360
<v Speaker 5>from a technology leader like Musk, or an appeal from

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 5>leaders in technology to actually go out and vote translates

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 5>to that action by the electorate in the voting base.

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:32.399
<v Speaker 9>I think it does have some impact. The very first

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 9>Silicon Valley election was took place in nineteen ninety two

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 9>when Clinton actually went out to woule Silicon Valley because

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:44.119
<v Speaker 9>he wanted to the Democrats to be seen as a

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:49.439
<v Speaker 9>pro business, pro tech party, and the endorsement that Silicon

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 9>Valley gave him just I think three weeks ahead of

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 9>that election did actually help in terms of shifting the

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 9>mood somewhat. But of course, at that point he was

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 9>already ahead in the polls. So I think it does

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 9>help in some in some way in terms of boosting

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 9>the candidate's credentials, and we've seen that happening this time

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 9>with both Kamla Harris and Trump lying for Silicon Valley endorsements.

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:27.159
<v Speaker 5>Now, do you believe that technology is a priority for

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 5>both campaigns in this election?

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 9>Yes, absolutely, And I think that when we have candidates

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 9>competing for Silicon Valley votes and endorsements, it means that

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 9>actually it's a win win for Silicon Valley irrespective of

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:45.200
<v Speaker 9>whether it's Trump or Kamala Harris who ends up in

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 9>the White House.

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:50.639
<v Speaker 4>I think just broadly, we need to just think about

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 4>ultimately whether the electorate do you think has that transparency,

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 4>that knowledge that with endorsements, with hitting the campaign trail,

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 4>there might well be positives for the companies that they

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 4>run in the later half of the administration.

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 9>I think all of us are becoming much more aware

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:15.119
<v Speaker 9>of the power of big tech. I mean, we've now

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:17.120
<v Speaker 9>been living in the age of Tech for the last

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:20.439
<v Speaker 9>forty years, so I think, yes, the electorate is beginning

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:24.119
<v Speaker 9>to pay more attention and when we have people like

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 9>Mask making the kind of statements they do, in a way,

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:32.440
<v Speaker 9>he's helped add to the need for more transparency and

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 9>has made that the process more transparent. In fact, inadvertently.

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:41.440
<v Speaker 5>Like Technology and Geopolitics Research Fellow at the Belfa Center

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 5>of the Harvard Kennedy School, thank you, welcome.

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:53.440
<v Speaker 4>Back to BLUEMG Technology. I'm Karine Hyde in New.

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 5>York and I'm ed Loveo in San Francisco.

0:19:55.840 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 4>It's going to quick check on these markets. We of

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:00.680
<v Speaker 4>course see people lining up, willing and wanting to be

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:02.440
<v Speaker 4>able to cast their votes today at the election polls.

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 4>I'm looking at the na's that one hundred up more

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:06.120
<v Speaker 4>than one percent. In fact, we're seeing big tech leading

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 4>the charge Bitcoin on the higher side as well. So

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 4>see now as some sort of proxy as many feel

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 4>for potentially a Trump administration coming in and one that

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 4>has shown significant support of cryptocurrencies here in the United States.

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 4>But I'm looking at an ecosystem that is led higher

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 4>on the tech side, also by earnings fundamentals. Palenteers still

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:27.720
<v Speaker 4>showing that the AI demand is resilient and in many

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:30.640
<v Speaker 4>ways unabound. We're up more than twenty two percent after

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:34.120
<v Speaker 4>the numbers are beaten raised for Palenteer particularly strong growth

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:36.640
<v Speaker 4>here in the United States. Super microcomputer. Look, we get

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:39.160
<v Speaker 4>some numbers after the bell today, but for many it's

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 4>not going to be about the numbers that they show,

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 4>and in fact, we are expecting more than two hundred

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:46.360
<v Speaker 4>percent increase in their sales for this particular fiscal quarter.

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 4>But people want to know what an earth is going

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 4>on with a DOJ investigation, what on Earth happened in

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:54.360
<v Speaker 4>terms of them losing their accounting and one on Earth

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 4>about overall the focus on these businesses and transparency around

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 4>super microme. Looking at Trump media, so DJJA up fifteen

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:04.399
<v Speaker 4>percent seven out of the last eight trading days. ED,

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 4>we've seen double digit moves, quadruple the volatility that we

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 4>see for bitcoin. This again a proxy on Trump and

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 4>a win ED okay.

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 5>A story that broke late last night. Predictions betting platform

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 5>Polymarket has been paying US based influencers to promote election

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 5>betting on the site, even though it's barred from letting

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:27.120
<v Speaker 5>anyone in the country use the tool to place wages,

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 5>including on today's presidential race. Bloomberg's Margie Murphy broke the

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 5>story and joins us, now, what did you learn?

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so, I think a lot of people may have

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 10>seen polymarket across the social media. There's just been a

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:50.680
<v Speaker 10>flurry of memes and graphics showing Carmela versus Trump with

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 10>a landslide to Trump. And so we were we'd heard

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:59.679
<v Speaker 10>that Polymarket had been reaching out to US based social

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 10>media influences saying, look, we'll pay for you know, we

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 10>want to sponsor any of your political content. And that

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 10>happened in September and since then that's when we've seen

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 10>this kind of rise of Polymarket partners, and we learned

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 10>that basically, even though Polymarket isn't supposed to be targeting

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 10>a US audience, they're really going for they want the

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 10>eyeballs from the US, and they've been basically picking up

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 10>with any social media influencer who's based in the US,

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:35.440
<v Speaker 10>not raising any concerns about the fact that their audience

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:38.159
<v Speaker 10>is US based, and saying kind of, just go for it, polease, like,

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 10>flood your audience with adverts for our market and really

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 10>encouraging people to get on in trade even though technically

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:46.920
<v Speaker 10>they're not supposed to be doing that.

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 4>Let's talk about whether or not it is indeed trades

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 4>they want, or whether or not Polymarket predictions betting platform

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:57.639
<v Speaker 4>also brings data for many. Is their counter argument that

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:00.399
<v Speaker 4>they just want eyeballs people to come to the service,

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 4>even if in the US you're barred from making any

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 4>particular back right.

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:08.119
<v Speaker 10>So the argument is the poly Market spokesperson said to us,

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 10>ninety nine percent of people are just coming to the

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 10>website to view it as a news source for them,

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 10>and you know, only one percent actually plays trades. And

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 10>that's interesting because the way that it's been shown on

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 10>social media the way that influencers explain to us how

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 10>they were asked to present themselves. It's very much like

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:31.119
<v Speaker 10>polling data. So when you look at these social media posts,

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 10>it looks like you're viewing pole data. So if this

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 10>one percent who are based outside the US are the

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 10>ones who are actually making these trades and creating this data,

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:48.679
<v Speaker 10>that means you're seeing kind of predictions from people who

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 10>are outside the US, except it looks like a poll

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:55.400
<v Speaker 10>and polling data is not supposed to have information from

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 10>anyone outside of the US, So it's a little bit

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:05.959
<v Speaker 10>manipulative for people who may not understand that it's predictions, Betty,

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:08.879
<v Speaker 10>because it just it really doesn't like poll data.

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 4>Meanwhile, the ads are viewers, whether they were voting on

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 4>Trump or Harrison, telling them, don't trust the polls. Trust

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:18.879
<v Speaker 4>the market's fascinating story. Go read it, Margai Murphy. We

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 4>thank you on all things poly markets. Meanwhile, in a

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 4>presidential campaign marked by what seems amplified devisive rhetoric and rumors,

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 4>many are working to combat misinformation. Separate fat from fiction.

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 4>Danielle Lee Thompson so the Center for an Informed Public,

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:36.720
<v Speaker 4>which focuses on translating research about misinformation into policy. You

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 4>join us now, and Danielle, there is a feeling of

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 4>amplified divisiveness, but is that feeling a reality?

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 2>Good morning, Carolyn, thank you for having me on the show.

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 2>The truth is, when you're online on social media on

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 2>election day, it's like trying to drink water from a

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 2>fire hydrant. There are so many feelings, so much on

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 2>circuit certainty, so much speculation about what is going on,

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 2>that it's actually very hard to get a true sense

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 2>a signal and the noise on a day like today.

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 2>So that's something that it's hard to tell exactly. We're

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 2>trying to sip through all of the rumors that are

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 2>happening to get a sense of what's going on.

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 5>Danielle. We've reported on this program in recent days about how,

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:27.880
<v Speaker 5>for example, US cybersecurity officials are trying to re establish

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:31.400
<v Speaker 5>some trust with the voting base. Have you any sort

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:36.639
<v Speaker 5>of data research study that tells us how in this election,

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 5>literally today in twenty twenty four, misinformation and voter distrust

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 5>will be a factor relative to elections in the past.

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, So something that we have to understand that is

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 2>unique about this election in general is that so much

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 2>of the American public is primed to mistrust election results

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 2>on the Republican right, so we think of it as

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:06.119
<v Speaker 2>kind of like the three c's right now, there are

0:26:06.200 --> 0:26:09.680
<v Speaker 2>people out there who have convinced the American public that

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:14.119
<v Speaker 2>this election won't be safe, although it overwhelmingly by officials

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:17.680
<v Speaker 2>it is safe. They encourage folks to go out and

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 2>collect evidence that there's something wrong happening on election day,

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 2>and of course, with one hundred and thirty thousand different

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 2>polling sites in America, there are bound to be irregularities

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 2>or glitches or altercations, but these have remedies, and then

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:36.200
<v Speaker 2>finally people will go out and try to contest the

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:42.400
<v Speaker 2>election results or processes or procedures legally or politically after this. So, yes,

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:48.400
<v Speaker 2>it is true there is increased mistrust, particularly or predominantly

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 2>among Republicans. Democrats tend to trust elections, and we're going

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:55.199
<v Speaker 2>to see some of that on play out online.

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 5>In twenty twenty, I was in Arizona election in tech

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 5>or the integrity of voting systems was the issue. Then,

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:05.399
<v Speaker 5>what is the issue now today?

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 5>Twenty four.

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 2>We've seen a couple of themes emerge in during early

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 2>voting and during today some of those were around alleged

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 2>fraudulent voter registration forms. Some of them are alleged glitches

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:24.400
<v Speaker 2>in machines that are being extra one small problem being

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:29.440
<v Speaker 2>extrapolated into a larger conspiracy theory. So those are some

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:33.160
<v Speaker 2>issues that we've seen and that we will continue to see.

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 2>But it's important to remember that these issues tend to

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 2>have remedies, and that's a good thing.

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 4>Talking of remedies, you're looking and researching into misinformation and

0:27:43.640 --> 0:27:46.399
<v Speaker 4>then trying to convert it into policy. Is their future

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:48.399
<v Speaker 4>policy that can help tackle this going forward?

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 2>It's a good question. Today we mostly focus on gathering

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 2>different types of data sets of how rumors spread on

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:02.159
<v Speaker 2>platforms that is going to inform policy change, whether that

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 2>is internal to tech organizations or to government organizations, or

0:28:06.520 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 2>also to all the different election officials and boards of

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 2>elections around the country who want to gain the trust

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 2>and keep the trust of the American public. So that's

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:20.720
<v Speaker 2>what we're focused on today, is getting that data to

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 2>help those solutions later.

0:28:23.440 --> 0:28:26.879
<v Speaker 5>Danielle Lee Thompson of the University of Washington, thank you

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 5>very much. Now coming up here on the program, why

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:33.440
<v Speaker 5>election interference fears could linger, We speak with a former

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 5>chief of staff of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency,

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 5>Kiss and Todd, the snacks, the Spoonberg technology.

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 4>Voters heading out to the polls, top of mind is

0:28:55.840 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 4>security and alleviating fears of election interference for what could

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 4>be a hotly tested outcome. Joining us to discuss is

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 4>Kiss and Todd, former chief of staff for the Cybersecurity

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 4>and Infrastructure Security Agency, also now president of Creative Agency

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:12.240
<v Speaker 4>wander Us and we rely and go to your CASO

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 4>and cyber readiness expertise here because we understand the misinformation concerns.

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 4>We were just talking about them with our previous guest.

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 4>Give us the facts that this is resilient, that we

0:29:22.800 --> 0:29:23.280
<v Speaker 4>are safe.

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 2>We are safe.

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 11>So while elections themselves are political, election security is not.

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:34.239
<v Speaker 11>Election security is national security, and our election officials, our

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 11>election infrastructure stakeholders have never been more prepared to administer

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 11>a safe, secure, and resilient election. What's important to note

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 11>is that after the twenty sixteen election, elections themselves became

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 11>critical infrastructure, which means that we determined, as a federal

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 11>government with industry that elections are critical to how we

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:57.200
<v Speaker 11>function as a society. Therefore, additional resources have been allocated

0:29:57.320 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 11>to all of the state and local officials that are

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 11>actively prepare, have actively prepared for, and are now administering

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:04.240
<v Speaker 11>these elections.

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 4>Can you give us exact details of I mean, resuls

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 4>is one thing, but actual practices, ways in which we

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 4>know and can trust in the systems that exist.

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 10>So first of all, we have to look historically.

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 11>So since the beginning of twenty twenty three, the federal

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 11>government has worked closely with state and local officials to

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 11>conduct physical assessments of election systems. Importantly, to run almost

0:30:26.360 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 11>two hundred exercises that prepare these individuals and these communities

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 11>in these regions for different scenarios that may come into play.

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 11>It's also important to note that elections are not connected

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 11>to the Internet, therefore giving it a different level of resilience.

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 11>And what's also very critical is that ninety seven percent

0:30:45.480 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 11>of registered voters are in jurisdictions with paper records, meaning

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 11>we have this backup and this resilience for audits, etc.

0:30:54.680 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 5>Kissen. Last night, US intelligence agencies issued a joint statement

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 5>that in our reporting we say is unprecedented. Warning the adversaries,

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 5>Russia being at the forefront of it, has stepped up

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 5>efforts to disrupt this election, calling on your experience and

0:31:13.760 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 5>your time in relevant agencies. Why is that significant, Well,

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 5>what we know is.

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:25.760
<v Speaker 11>That our foreign adversaries are absolutely conducting malign influence operations

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 11>that have two real goals. The first is to undermine

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:33.000
<v Speaker 11>the confidence of Americans in our democracy and the second

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:36.880
<v Speaker 11>is to sow discord, to just pit Americans against one

0:31:36.880 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 11>another when there's actually nothing there. But what is critical

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:42.960
<v Speaker 11>about this election is we're seeing the federal government work

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 11>across agencies to put out these joint announcements and to

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:49.760
<v Speaker 11>get this information out as quickly as possible. This is

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 11>a big difference from where we were in twenty sixteen,

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:55.520
<v Speaker 11>twenty eighteen, twenty twenty twenty two. It's improved each year.

0:31:55.840 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 11>So actually the more that we hear about this, the

0:31:58.320 --> 0:32:02.000
<v Speaker 11>better because there is information that we are being able

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 11>to communicate to voters to say, be aware of this,

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 11>so that we're creating a more educated electorate.

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:14.959
<v Speaker 5>Through cybersecurity. What are the biggest vulnerabilities that a voter today,

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 5>of all days, might face throughout the day. Where is

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 5>this manifesting itself for everyday people.

0:32:23.120 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 11>I worry less about cybersecurity. I worry more about just

0:32:26.800 --> 0:32:30.400
<v Speaker 11>people's confidence in the system. There's never been a more

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 11>important time for individuals for citizens to believe in the

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 11>resilience of this nation, to believe in our ability to

0:32:38.520 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 11>conduct safe, secure elections, and to be personally resilient. And

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:45.880
<v Speaker 11>each voter has accountability and responsibility in this moment to

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 11>get the right information. State and local election officials are

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 11>the trusted sources for information. If a voter has any

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 11>doubt about anything, to go, Typically they're on websites. Vote

0:32:56.960 --> 0:32:59.479
<v Speaker 11>dot Gov can direct you where to go. But it's

0:32:59.520 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 11>really portant that individuals and voters find this information to

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 11>be secure.

0:33:06.560 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 5>OK, bear with us. Former President Donald Trump is speaking

0:33:10.000 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 5>in Palm Beach, Florida, where he's cast his vote.

0:33:13.000 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 8>In force, So we'll see how it turns out. But

0:33:16.360 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 8>it seems that they have really shown up in force.

0:33:19.240 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 8>I just got a call from Dan Patrick in Texas.

0:33:22.880 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 8>He said, they've never seen anything like It's been great.

0:33:32.600 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 8>Look regrets, you always have regrets. I can't think of

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:37.200
<v Speaker 8>any to be honest, to use her expression, I can't

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:41.800
<v Speaker 8>think of any Look. I ran a great campaign. I

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 8>think it was maybe the best of the three. We

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 8>did great in the first one. We did much better

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 8>in the second one, but something happened and this was

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 8>the best. I would say this was the best campaign.

0:33:54.360 --> 0:33:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Were in.

0:33:57.000 --> 0:33:59.680
<v Speaker 12>The possibility that you and Vice President Harris both might

0:33:59.760 --> 0:34:02.160
<v Speaker 12>not get to two hundred and seventy electoral votes by

0:34:02.160 --> 0:34:02.720
<v Speaker 12>the end of tonight.

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 8>It should never happen. A thing like that should never happen.

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:08.680
<v Speaker 8>This election should be over. They spend all this money

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:11.880
<v Speaker 8>on machines, and frankly, if they'd use paper ballots, it

0:34:11.920 --> 0:34:14.319
<v Speaker 8>would be over by ten o'clock. And by the way,

0:34:14.400 --> 0:34:17.160
<v Speaker 8>the paper ballots would cost eight percent. It would be

0:34:17.440 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 8>eight percent of the cost. If they would use paper ballots,

0:34:22.480 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 8>voter ID proof of citizenship and one day voting, it

0:34:26.680 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 8>would all be over by ten o'clock in the evening.

0:34:29.040 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 8>It's crazy. They use these very expensive computers and they

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 8>I'm hearing in Pennsylvania they won't have an answer till

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 8>two or three days from now. I think it's an

0:34:40.760 --> 0:34:44.439
<v Speaker 8>absolute outrage. If that's the case, well maybe it'll be later.

0:34:44.560 --> 0:34:49.080
<v Speaker 8>But it's paper ballots. In France they went paper ballots

0:34:49.120 --> 0:34:51.800
<v Speaker 8>because the mail in was not working. It was corrupt.

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:56.719
<v Speaker 8>And in France they went paper ballots, and at ten

0:34:56.760 --> 0:34:59.280
<v Speaker 8>o'clock in the evening they had thirty seven million votes

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:01.640
<v Speaker 8>counted done, they had a winner, they had a loser,

0:35:02.400 --> 0:35:04.080
<v Speaker 8>and in this country, I mean, I'm just hearing that

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:08.399
<v Speaker 8>in certain states, it's going to be a long time

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 8>and it won't even be close. It won't even be

0:35:11.360 --> 0:35:13.400
<v Speaker 8>that close. They say I'm going to win the state,

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:16.080
<v Speaker 8>but it's going to take a long time to certify.

0:35:17.080 --> 0:35:19.400
<v Speaker 12>Did you see a world where you don't declare victory tonight.

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:22.879
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean, I'm hearing the same things that you're hearing.

0:35:22.960 --> 0:35:24.960
<v Speaker 8>I'm hearing states where I'm up by a lot, but

0:35:25.040 --> 0:35:26.960
<v Speaker 8>they won't have a final number for a long time

0:35:28.239 --> 0:35:31.239
<v Speaker 8>in terms of watching the results and so forth. So

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:34.360
<v Speaker 8>we're going to have a very special group of people,

0:35:35.160 --> 0:35:37.960
<v Speaker 8>many of whom you know, and they'll be at Marlago.

0:35:38.000 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 8>In addition, we'll have four or five thousand people at

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 8>the convention center on the assumption I win. I mean,

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:47.440
<v Speaker 8>I don't know if something else happens. I don't know

0:35:47.600 --> 0:35:50.360
<v Speaker 8>what's going to happen in terms of declaring victory. But

0:35:52.480 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 8>if in normal times, I would go over to the

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 8>convention center, let's say at ten o'clock or eleven o'clock

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:01.439
<v Speaker 8>or something. But I just don't know. Well, it looks

0:36:01.520 --> 0:36:03.680
<v Speaker 8>like we have a very substantial lead. It looks like

0:36:03.760 --> 0:36:07.000
<v Speaker 8>we have many more Republicans voting today than Democrats. So

0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:09.399
<v Speaker 8>if you have a lead and we have a bigger vote,

0:36:09.440 --> 0:36:11.719
<v Speaker 8>that means you're doing very well. But they have to

0:36:11.800 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 8>call a winner. They should, and they should call a winner. Yes,

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:27.800
<v Speaker 8>I just stopped talking about that. Go ahead. Oh, I

0:36:27.840 --> 0:36:30.880
<v Speaker 8>don't know. I was honored to get Joe Rogan last night.

0:36:30.960 --> 0:36:32.920
<v Speaker 8>I mean, if Joe Rogan's a big deal, is a

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:38.800
<v Speaker 8>very respected person. And I must tell you Megan was fantastic.

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:40.799
<v Speaker 8>She got up and said some things that were really

0:36:40.840 --> 0:36:43.759
<v Speaker 8>pretty amazing. But before that, I just think we ran

0:36:43.840 --> 0:36:46.719
<v Speaker 8>a good campaign. I had good policy. I had. We

0:36:46.840 --> 0:36:48.759
<v Speaker 8>want people to come into our country, but they have

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:51.280
<v Speaker 8>to come in legally. You know. We want strong boarders

0:36:51.320 --> 0:36:53.680
<v Speaker 8>and we want people to come in. We want to

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:55.759
<v Speaker 8>be totally inclusive, but they have to come in. I

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:57.239
<v Speaker 8>think that was a big issue. To me, that was

0:36:57.280 --> 0:36:59.920
<v Speaker 8>the biggest issue. I may be wrong. A lot of

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:02.640
<v Speaker 8>people said inflation. Inflation is a disaster, but I think

0:37:02.680 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 8>it's a second issue. I think the first is the border.

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:09.120
<v Speaker 8>We can't allow criminals to be put back into our

0:37:09.160 --> 0:37:10.920
<v Speaker 8>country or to be put into our country.

0:37:11.719 --> 0:37:12.160
<v Speaker 3>So you have.

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:17.040
<v Speaker 8>Thirteen thousand plus murderers allowed to roam in our country,

0:37:17.560 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 8>I'm not going to be allowed to have to go.

0:37:19.880 --> 0:37:23.719
<v Speaker 8>You have drug dealers, you have terrorists, you have a

0:37:23.840 --> 0:37:26.560
<v Speaker 8>tremendous amount of people that should not be in our country.

0:37:26.640 --> 0:37:29.320
<v Speaker 8>And we need strong borders in this country. And I

0:37:29.360 --> 0:37:31.360
<v Speaker 8>think people are voting that. I think it's personally. I

0:37:31.400 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 8>think it's a number one issue. We'll see how it

0:37:33.520 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 8>pans out, but I think it's a number one issue.

0:37:41.640 --> 0:37:44.080
<v Speaker 8>I don't have to tell them that. I don't have

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:46.520
<v Speaker 8>to tell I don't have to tell them that there'll

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:48.480
<v Speaker 8>be no violence. Of course there'll be no violence. My

0:37:48.600 --> 0:37:52.239
<v Speaker 8>supporters are not violent people. I don't have to tell

0:37:52.320 --> 0:37:56.000
<v Speaker 8>them then, and I certainly don't want any violence. But

0:37:56.160 --> 0:37:58.120
<v Speaker 8>I certainly don't have to tell these are great people.

0:37:58.680 --> 0:38:03.000
<v Speaker 8>These are people that believe in no violence. Unlike your question,

0:38:03.160 --> 0:38:11.960
<v Speaker 8>you believe in violence. Where would you be going, Well,

0:38:12.000 --> 0:38:13.440
<v Speaker 8>I think I'll be at mar A Lago for the

0:38:13.520 --> 0:38:16.600
<v Speaker 8>most part. We have a lot of political professionals. I'm

0:38:16.640 --> 0:38:20.800
<v Speaker 8>going over now with Malaney, who I'm very proud of.

0:38:20.920 --> 0:38:23.400
<v Speaker 8>She's got the number one best seller, can you believe

0:38:23.440 --> 0:38:26.879
<v Speaker 8>that he can believe it. But so we're very proud

0:38:26.920 --> 0:38:28.680
<v Speaker 8>of the job she's done with that. Your book is

0:38:28.800 --> 0:38:31.200
<v Speaker 8>number one. But we're going to go over to the

0:38:31.280 --> 0:38:34.279
<v Speaker 8>office in West Palm and we're going to say a

0:38:34.320 --> 0:38:38.120
<v Speaker 8>lot of the workers they've worked very hard for your

0:38:38.160 --> 0:38:40.920
<v Speaker 8>first indication. I think so. I mean, I hear we're

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:43.920
<v Speaker 8>doing very well there in Georgia. I hear we're doing

0:38:44.080 --> 0:38:49.400
<v Speaker 8>very well. I hear we're doing very well everywhere. Now

0:38:49.520 --> 0:38:53.239
<v Speaker 8>I may be I may regret that statement, but I'm

0:38:53.320 --> 0:38:59.920
<v Speaker 8>hearing that we're doing very well. Would you go out.

0:39:05.520 --> 0:39:08.759
<v Speaker 8>I haven't prepared a speech. I did speeches last night,

0:39:09.800 --> 0:39:13.040
<v Speaker 8>all day long, all night long. At two o'clock in

0:39:13.080 --> 0:39:17.560
<v Speaker 8>the morning, we left and we did a lot of speeches.

0:39:17.600 --> 0:39:24.880
<v Speaker 8>You can probably tell no, I don't have to do that.

0:39:25.400 --> 0:39:30.319
<v Speaker 8>You know, I'm not a Democrat. I'm able to make

0:39:30.360 --> 0:39:33.440
<v Speaker 8>a speech on pretty quick notice if I win. I

0:39:33.600 --> 0:39:35.960
<v Speaker 8>know what I'm going to say, and I don't even

0:39:36.000 --> 0:39:38.320
<v Speaker 8>want to think about the losing part. I would like

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:40.839
<v Speaker 8>to tell all of the people that are on line

0:39:40.960 --> 0:39:45.680
<v Speaker 8>to stay online. We have tremendous Republican lines and I've

0:39:45.719 --> 0:39:49.120
<v Speaker 8>been asked I actually to say it it takes a while.

0:39:50.000 --> 0:39:53.640
<v Speaker 8>I'd like to just make the satement that I'd like

0:39:53.880 --> 0:39:57.400
<v Speaker 8>the Republicans to stay online. Democrats, if they'd like, they

0:39:57.440 --> 0:40:00.800
<v Speaker 8>can leave, but I like the Republicans to stay online.

0:40:10.160 --> 0:40:13.479
<v Speaker 8>I have no pressure whatsoever. I'm winning big cases. Those

0:40:13.560 --> 0:40:15.800
<v Speaker 8>cases are all being one. The biggest case was the

0:40:15.880 --> 0:40:19.120
<v Speaker 8>Florida case, and it's been one. I appreciate your nice question.

0:40:21.640 --> 0:40:25.680
<v Speaker 8>No pressure nine for nine years, regardless of what happened tonight.

0:40:25.760 --> 0:40:26.880
<v Speaker 8>Is this your last campaign?

0:40:27.120 --> 0:40:27.400
<v Speaker 2>Are you?

0:40:27.560 --> 0:40:29.719
<v Speaker 8>Are you done after this? I would think so. I

0:40:30.800 --> 0:40:37.239
<v Speaker 8>would think, so, said said and very fulfilled. I think

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:41.120
<v Speaker 8>we're gonna have a very big victory today. Very good,

0:40:41.200 --> 0:40:51.879
<v Speaker 8>thank you, Thank you. Start transition team. But I don't

0:40:51.960 --> 0:40:54.800
<v Speaker 8>like talking about that until I find out how we do.

0:40:55.040 --> 0:41:05.080
<v Speaker 8>I mean, well, it doesn't look we're not looking to

0:41:05.160 --> 0:41:07.320
<v Speaker 8>do damage to a RAM. But they can't have a

0:41:07.400 --> 0:41:10.040
<v Speaker 8>nuclear weapon, and say, you know, my terms are very easy.

0:41:10.120 --> 0:41:11.800
<v Speaker 8>They can't have a nuclear op and I want to.

0:41:12.480 --> 0:41:15.000
<v Speaker 8>I'd like them to be a very successful country, but

0:41:15.120 --> 0:41:20.600
<v Speaker 8>they just can't have a nuclear with well, I think

0:41:20.719 --> 0:41:25.960
<v Speaker 8>Secret Service has been a little bit tougher. To put

0:41:25.960 --> 0:41:29.279
<v Speaker 8>it mildly, I see more machine guns than I've ever

0:41:29.320 --> 0:41:32.719
<v Speaker 8>seen in my life was surrounded by I feel very

0:41:32.800 --> 0:41:35.879
<v Speaker 8>confident with Secret Service. I think they've stepped up. Look,

0:41:35.920 --> 0:41:37.680
<v Speaker 8>for a long time, they didn't give us the help.

0:41:37.760 --> 0:41:41.080
<v Speaker 8>They didn't give us the assets, as they say, the manpower,

0:41:41.160 --> 0:41:43.600
<v Speaker 8>woman power. They didn't give it to us, and would

0:41:43.600 --> 0:41:46.439
<v Speaker 8>have rallies. You saw the rallies fifty sixty thousand people

0:41:46.520 --> 0:41:49.600
<v Speaker 8>and I'd have less people than Joe Biden who had

0:41:49.640 --> 0:41:53.040
<v Speaker 8>five people show up. And I'd have fifty five thousand

0:41:53.120 --> 0:41:55.279
<v Speaker 8>people show up, and I had fewer people than him.

0:41:56.160 --> 0:41:58.920
<v Speaker 8>So they should have done a much better job. And

0:41:59.360 --> 0:42:02.600
<v Speaker 8>by frank and frankly, the President should make a very

0:42:02.640 --> 0:42:08.600
<v Speaker 8>strong statement to the outside world because I think my

0:42:08.719 --> 0:42:11.560
<v Speaker 8>team is incredible. Look, they say it's the best run

0:42:11.640 --> 0:42:15.000
<v Speaker 8>campaign they've seen. Some people say it's the best run

0:42:15.120 --> 0:42:18.080
<v Speaker 8>campaign they've ever seen. But in order to make that stick,

0:42:18.080 --> 0:42:18.319
<v Speaker 8>you have.

0:42:18.360 --> 0:42:18.719
<v Speaker 2>To win.

0:42:20.320 --> 0:42:20.680
<v Speaker 8>Campaign.

0:42:20.760 --> 0:42:23.200
<v Speaker 10>Are you more confident now than you were that you were.

0:42:25.239 --> 0:42:27.600
<v Speaker 8>My team? I'm very confident. And many of them are

0:42:27.640 --> 0:42:30.960
<v Speaker 8>the same players, as you know, Susie. A lot of

0:42:31.000 --> 0:42:42.960
<v Speaker 8>the people of the same players have been very good. Well.

0:42:43.120 --> 0:42:45.000
<v Speaker 8>I think it's ridiculous. You know, Oprah, I was on

0:42:45.120 --> 0:42:47.880
<v Speaker 8>her last show or one of her last shows and

0:42:48.080 --> 0:42:50.759
<v Speaker 8>they picked the biggest people and all of that and

0:42:51.719 --> 0:42:55.160
<v Speaker 8>made a big deal. And I'm actually I'm disappointed. I

0:42:55.200 --> 0:42:57.800
<v Speaker 8>think Oprah has become a major divider in our country,

0:42:58.400 --> 0:43:01.160
<v Speaker 8>and I think frankly should be She's be ashamed of herself.

0:43:01.640 --> 0:43:04.280
<v Speaker 8>And you know who else should be ashamed? Fox? Because

0:43:04.320 --> 0:43:07.320
<v Speaker 8>I've seen Oprah on Fox about fifty times making the

0:43:07.400 --> 0:43:10.640
<v Speaker 8>same statement, and I think it's a disgrace what Fox does.

0:43:10.719 --> 0:43:13.680
<v Speaker 8>Because everyone thinks Fox is so pro Trump, They're not

0:43:13.760 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 8>pro Trump at all. They've put Oprah on all morning long.

0:43:17.760 --> 0:43:20.600
<v Speaker 8>That's all I see is Oprah. And you know I

0:43:20.800 --> 0:43:23.320
<v Speaker 8>do Oprah very well. She's been a Marlago many times.

0:43:23.480 --> 0:43:27.160
<v Speaker 8>Roger King had his funeral. That's a head of Kingworld,

0:43:27.280 --> 0:43:31.919
<v Speaker 8>which was Oprah's mentor, and Oprah chose the location. She said,

0:43:32.000 --> 0:43:34.360
<v Speaker 8>Marlago is the most beautiful place. Would it be possible

0:43:34.400 --> 0:43:37.320
<v Speaker 8>to have Rogers funeral at mar Alago in the ballroom.

0:43:37.360 --> 0:43:39.160
<v Speaker 8>We did it the only time I've ever had a

0:43:39.200 --> 0:43:42.800
<v Speaker 8>funeral there. And I think Oprah should be ashamed of

0:43:42.880 --> 0:43:44.719
<v Speaker 8>herself to say that she should be a shaped. She

0:43:44.840 --> 0:43:47.520
<v Speaker 8>knows me. She wanted to run with me as a

0:43:47.640 --> 0:43:49.720
<v Speaker 8>vice president. She was going to be the vice president.

0:43:49.800 --> 0:43:51.800
<v Speaker 8>She wrote me a letter, it's in the book. And

0:43:51.920 --> 0:43:53.960
<v Speaker 8>now she goes to make statements like that she's a

0:43:54.040 --> 0:43:57.719
<v Speaker 8>divider and Barack Hussein Obama is a divider too.

0:44:00.000 --> 0:44:02.520
<v Speaker 12>Concerned that you didn't concede the election in twenty twenty

0:44:02.560 --> 0:44:04.520
<v Speaker 12>when you lost, they're concerned that if you lost this election,

0:44:04.560 --> 0:44:06.439
<v Speaker 12>you wouldn't concede again. What do you say to those people?

0:44:06.760 --> 0:44:08.960
<v Speaker 8>I think they're crazy. If I lose an election, if

0:44:09.000 --> 0:44:11.400
<v Speaker 8>it's a fair election, I'm going to I'd be the

0:44:11.480 --> 0:44:15.960
<v Speaker 8>first one to acknowledge it. And I think it's well

0:44:16.040 --> 0:44:17.879
<v Speaker 8>so far, I think it's been fair. I think there's

0:44:17.960 --> 0:44:21.600
<v Speaker 8>been a lot of court cases. Both sides are lawyered up.

0:44:22.280 --> 0:44:25.680
<v Speaker 8>Thousands of lawyers are involved, you know, thousands, can you imagine?

0:44:26.680 --> 0:44:28.920
<v Speaker 8>And part of that is because we have too complicated

0:44:29.000 --> 0:44:31.440
<v Speaker 8>a process. If we had a piece of paper watermark

0:44:32.080 --> 0:44:35.320
<v Speaker 8>you know that paper is more sophisticated now than computers.

0:44:35.920 --> 0:44:43.400
<v Speaker 8>It's watermarked paper, you cannot It's it's unbelievable what happens

0:44:43.480 --> 0:44:47.400
<v Speaker 8>with it. There's nothing you can do to cheat, and

0:44:47.520 --> 0:44:50.600
<v Speaker 8>of course you have practically nothing to run. Think of it.

0:44:51.040 --> 0:44:54.360
<v Speaker 8>We spend hundreds of millions and billions of dollars on

0:44:54.440 --> 0:44:57.279
<v Speaker 8>these campaigns. You could do it for eight percent of

0:44:57.400 --> 0:45:00.360
<v Speaker 8>the cost and have accuracy and we wouldn't have to

0:45:00.440 --> 0:45:04.120
<v Speaker 8>be worried about when is Pennsylvania going to announce? It's

0:45:04.160 --> 0:45:17.120
<v Speaker 8>really a shame. Well, he knows exactly what, but that's

0:45:17.200 --> 0:45:19.600
<v Speaker 8>only based on what RFK told. I don't think RFK

0:45:19.719 --> 0:45:24.120
<v Speaker 8>wanted that. You're talking about health and human services. Let

0:45:24.200 --> 0:45:26.600
<v Speaker 8>me tell you he's a great guy, RFK, and he's

0:45:26.680 --> 0:45:28.319
<v Speaker 8>going to do pretty much what he wants as far

0:45:28.320 --> 0:45:31.279
<v Speaker 8>as I'm concerned. He wants health for women, for men,

0:45:31.440 --> 0:45:34.520
<v Speaker 8>for children, and I happen to agree with a lot

0:45:34.600 --> 0:45:37.200
<v Speaker 8>of the things he says. The one thing I told

0:45:37.280 --> 0:45:39.680
<v Speaker 8>him and I've told you in speeches for the last

0:45:39.719 --> 0:45:42.000
<v Speaker 8>two weeks, we got to keep them away from the

0:45:42.080 --> 0:45:44.440
<v Speaker 8>liquid goal because the liquid goal we have more than

0:45:44.480 --> 0:45:47.840
<v Speaker 8>any of it. It's oiled called oil and gas. That

0:45:47.960 --> 0:45:48.880
<v Speaker 8>one I'm going to handle.

0:45:51.440 --> 0:45:51.600
<v Speaker 7>Well.

0:45:51.640 --> 0:45:53.719
<v Speaker 8>I'd be honored to have him now, and I haven't

0:45:53.719 --> 0:45:57.680
<v Speaker 8>spoken a hard about that, but look, if you think

0:45:57.719 --> 0:46:01.560
<v Speaker 8>of it, he came in third, you know, and running

0:46:01.600 --> 0:46:03.800
<v Speaker 8>for president, right, He ran a very good race. He

0:46:04.680 --> 0:46:08.279
<v Speaker 8>had obstacles. The Democrats just really unfairly put obstacles up,

0:46:08.320 --> 0:46:11.839
<v Speaker 8>and hence A Kennedy left the Democrat Party for the Republicans.

0:46:12.520 --> 0:46:14.600
<v Speaker 8>There's a very smart Guy's are very carey guy. It's

0:46:14.680 --> 0:46:16.800
<v Speaker 8>very popular too. We get up and introduce him, the

0:46:16.840 --> 0:46:20.239
<v Speaker 8>place goes well. No, we love having them, and you

0:46:20.280 --> 0:46:23.759
<v Speaker 8>know who else. We love having Elon He's been great

0:46:24.040 --> 0:46:28.000
<v Speaker 8>and everybody. Look, everybody getting Joe Rogan last night and

0:46:28.160 --> 0:46:31.440
<v Speaker 8>Megan Cally. We just have This is very inclusive. This

0:46:31.600 --> 0:46:36.880
<v Speaker 8>is a movement. This is the greatest political movement in

0:46:36.960 --> 0:46:40.600
<v Speaker 8>the history of our country. And even new people and

0:46:41.719 --> 0:46:46.160
<v Speaker 8>some of you affairs sometimes, but it's the greatest movement

0:46:46.239 --> 0:46:49.000
<v Speaker 8>in the history of our country. And I've made that

0:46:49.120 --> 0:46:52.440
<v Speaker 8>statement a thousand times. It has never been challenged. It

0:46:52.560 --> 0:46:55.880
<v Speaker 8>is the greatest movement. And we're going to make America

0:46:55.960 --> 0:46:56.399
<v Speaker 8>great again.

0:46:56.480 --> 0:46:58.600
<v Speaker 5>Thinks recap on the podcast. You know where to find

0:46:58.640 --> 0:47:01.120
<v Speaker 5>it online on those platforms. Do on the Bloomberg ones

0:47:01.160 --> 0:47:03.360
<v Speaker 5>as well. Thank you team in New York, Thank you

0:47:03.520 --> 0:47:07.040
<v Speaker 5>team here in San Francisco. Get some rest because there's

0:47:07.080 --> 0:47:09.440
<v Speaker 5>a lot more to come. This is Bloomberg Technology