WEBVTT - NBA Player Rankings #12-11: Donovan Mitchell & Kevin Durant

0:00:01.280 --> 0:00:17.080
<v Speaker 1>The volume. All right, welcome to Hoops tonight. You're at

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:19.239
<v Speaker 1>the volume. Happy Wednesday, everybody. Hope all of you guys

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>are having a great week. It feels amazing to be

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>back from Alaska. Just an absolutely unbelievable trip. If you

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>stick around to the end of the show today, I'll

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>tell you guys about it, just because it just I

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>can't imagine it going any better than it did. You

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>know how, anybody who has ever been to Alaska knows

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a little bit of a crap shoot with weather,

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>and we just got so lucky and I got to

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>see so many cool things. I'll talk about that trip

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>more at the tail end of the show today. We're

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 1>getting back into our player rankings with number twelve and

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>number eleven, the beginning of a segment of this list

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 1>that was far and away the hardest segment for me

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>to rank. But we're getting to two more players today.

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>You guys know the joke before we get started to

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to the Hoops and Not YouTube channel so you

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 1>don't miss any more of our videos. Follow me on

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at underscore JCNLT so you guys don't miss show announcement.

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 1>SOTI forget about a podcast feed where you get your

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 1>podcast on our Hoops Tonight. It's also super helpful if

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:07.120
<v Speaker 1>you leave a rating and a review on that front.

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Jackson's doing great work on our social media feeds on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook,

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and TikTok. Make sure you guys follow us there. The last,

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 1>but not least, if you guys want to get questions

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>into the mail bags, we're doing Friday mail bags geared

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>around the player rankings here for the next month or so. Again,

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>if you disagree with the ranking, if you think a

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 1>guy should be higher, lower, should have made the list,

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't have made the list, whatever it is you disagree with,

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>just lay that out as concisely as you can. A

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:34.040
<v Speaker 1>little elevator. Pitch in a comment under this video that

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>says mail bag with a colon, and we'll get to

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>it in our mail bags at on Fridays throughout the

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:45.199
<v Speaker 1>remainder of this list. All right, let's talk some basketball,

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>all right, So this was by far the hardest section

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>of this list for me to rank. Kawhi Leonard and

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Joel Embiid are very clearly at the bottom. Right, Like,

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>we all know that Kawhi can outplay the top players

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>in the league. We saw him do it against Jokichen

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>in Game two, if I remember correctly, in that first

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>round series, he's capable of reaching that level. We know

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Joelmbi when he's healthy, could very well be one of

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:10.799
<v Speaker 1>the top two or three players in the entire NBA, right,

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>But they both obviously have this injury history that pushes

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:17.079
<v Speaker 1>them towards the bottom, and Kawi is obviously in better

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>shape now as someone who was able to finish his

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:21.519
<v Speaker 1>last playoff run, so he got the nod for number thirteen.

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:24.079
<v Speaker 1>Joel was at number fourteen. That was pretty straightforward, right,

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:29.799
<v Speaker 1>But there is an incredibly minuscule gap between number twelve

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>on this list and number five. For example, I'll just

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and spoil today's rankings. I have Donovan Mitchell

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>at number twelve and Kevin Durant at number eleven. We'll

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:41.639
<v Speaker 1>obviously do deep dives into both of those players today.

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Donovan Mitchell was just the best player on the second

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>best team in the league this year. He averaged thirty

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>points per game on fifty seven percent true shooting in

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>this year's playoff run. He made first team All NBA

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and he finished fifth and MVP voting. He had a

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>forty eight point playoff game, Andy forty three point playoff

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>game just in this last playoff front and there isn'take

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:06.080
<v Speaker 1>case for him to be above of anybody that I

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>have ahead of him on this list. For me, at

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>least personally, I think you could argue him to be higher.

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>But for me, I couldn't find a case to move

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 1>him up from twelve, top five in MVP voting, first

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Team All NBA, and I struggle to put him higher

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>than twelve. That's the nature of this part of the list.

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>And Kevin Durant is Kevin Durant. KD catches a ton

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>of crap online and I disagree with most of it.

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't blame him for what went wrong in Phoenix.

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>He was getting crap online for not leading his team

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>in shot attempts since twenty eighteen. I don't view that

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>as a negative for KD. Of you, that is a positive.

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>We're going to talk about that today. I think he's

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>going to massively improve Houston's ability to compete for a championship,

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and I think he firmly meets the criteria of this tier,

0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>which again this tier, the criteria is a player who

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 1>on any given night can outplay the very best players

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>in the world. They just struggle to consistently get to

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>that level. Kdi very much is in that tier, and

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>like I don't have him in my top ten. It's

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:17.160
<v Speaker 1>just a testament to how deep this league is. The

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>top twelve is completely insane. I moved the names around

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 1>a half dozen times. Multiple guys went up and down

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>several spots in different versions of this list before I

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:33.160
<v Speaker 1>landed where I landed. The point is, we are very

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:36.479
<v Speaker 1>much splitting hairs at this point, and if you disagree

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>with me and you go, Jason, I have KD at five, Jason,

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I have Donovan Mitchell at five. I know I'm going

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>to argue against it, but I'm not. There's such a

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:51.600
<v Speaker 1>small gap there that I think it's at least defensible.

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:57.039
<v Speaker 1>The guys that I have above these guys at this

0:04:57.120 --> 0:04:59.839
<v Speaker 1>point in the list, I just viewed having a more

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>liable night tonight trade. So maybe an apex athlete who

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>brings insane motor every night, or an offensive engine. You

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:09.920
<v Speaker 1>guys know how I feel about offensive engines. I don't

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:13.919
<v Speaker 1>think Durant or Mitchell kind of fall into that specific category.

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Guys who make offense easier for everyone on the roster

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>every single night. Or a defensive monster, like a guy

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>who's just an absolute pain in the ass athlete with

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>super long arms that no one can deal with on

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the defensive end of the floor. That just sets a

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:29.279
<v Speaker 1>super high floor for everybody. Those are the kinds of

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:32.359
<v Speaker 1>guys that I ended up favoring over Donovan Mitchell and

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:35.919
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Durant. But these gaps are incredibly close. I just

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 1>wanted to emphasize that from five to twelve, I mean,

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>you could just shake it up and like a bunch

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of yachtzi dice and just kind of see how it lands,

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>and you're gonna be able to make a decent case

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:52.040
<v Speaker 1>for that rank. But let's get started. But number twelve,

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Donovan Mitchell UFC three nineteen is blowing back to the

0:05:57.320 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Windy City for the first time in six years. Check

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>out the fight card and get in in all the

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>action at DraftKings Sportsbook, the official sports betting partner of

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the UFC. Drink is to Plus. He puts his middleweight

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:12.160
<v Speaker 1>title up against Cosmat Chimayev, who's a perfect fourteen and oher.

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Who are you taking first time betting on the UFC

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:17.040
<v Speaker 1>at DraftKings, Just pick something simple like a fighter to

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 1>win and make your pick. It's that easy. And if

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:22.840
<v Speaker 1>you're new to DraftKings check this out. New customers who

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 1>bet five dollars will get two hundred dollars in bonus

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 1>bets instantly. Don't miss out on all the UFC three

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>nineteen action Download the DraftKings Sportsbook app now and use

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:35.600
<v Speaker 1>code hoops that's h oops. That's code hoops for new

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 1>customers to get two hundred dollars in bonus bets instantly

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 1>when you bet just five bucks only on DraftKings. The

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:45.479
<v Speaker 1>Crown is yours. Gambling problem called one eight hundred gambler

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>In New York call eight seven seven eight hope and why,

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:51.040
<v Speaker 1>or text hope and wy to four six seven three

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>six nine. In Connecticut, help is available for problem gambling.

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Call eight eight eight seven eight nine seven seven seven

0:06:57.360 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>seven or visit CCPG dot org. Please play responsibly on

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 1>behalf of Boothill Casino and Resort in Kansas twenty one plus.

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Age and eligibility varies by jurisdiction void in Ontario. Bonus

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>bets expire seven days after issuance. For additional terms and

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 1>responsible gaming resources, see DKNG, dot co slash audio last

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>year in review for Donna, and he played in seventy

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>one games. That was his healthiest season since twenty nineteen,

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 1>which was his second year in the league. He averaged

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty four points, five rebounds, and five assists, one point

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>five stocks, forty four percent from the field, thirty seven

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>percent from three to eighty two percent from the line

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>fifty three percent, and effective field goal percentage that's just

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 1>field goal percentage waited for threes in fifty eight percent

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 1>in true shooting. Really stacked up the accolades this year.

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>He finished his sixth consecutive All Star appearance, first Team

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>All NBA in fifth, and MVP voting for me like

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>a classic example of why box score watching is so silly, Donovan,

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>his numbers were down across the board year over year.

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Points per game down, rebounds per game down. It's this

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>per game down, field goal percentage down, block steals down,

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>three point percentage down, free throw percentage down. Everything was

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>down year over year, and he was flat out better

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>this year than he was the previous year. Keep that

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 1>in mind when we get to KD and we start

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about his field goal numbers, because it's the same

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of idea that I think a lot of people

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 1>get hung up on now. To be clear, yes, box

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>score production is an important manifestation of how you're producing

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>for a basketball team, but it is not the only

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 1>manifestation of how well a basketball player is playing. The

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>evidence is in the play type data. Even though Donovan

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Mitchell's individual statistics weren't as impressive as the previous season,

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 1>when Donovan did more with the basketball and when Donovan

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 1>had you know, he's running a lot more pick and

0:08:57.160 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>roll every game. He's just he was just more on

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the right. Even though his numbers came down, even though

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>his individual statistics weren't as impressive, Donovan did things that

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>helped the Cleveland Cavaliers as a team score more points

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>just shot creation data. In twenty twenty four, Donovan ran

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>one thousand and sixty two pick and rolls, ISOs and

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:23.839
<v Speaker 1>post ups including passes, got one thousand and eighty three points.

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>That's one point zero two points per possession, which is

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 1>decent FIR star guard, but it's nothing to write home about.

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:34.839
<v Speaker 1>In twenty twenty five, he ran one thousand, three hundred

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:37.079
<v Speaker 1>and sixteen pick and rolls, ISOs and post ups, obviously

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 1>higher volume with him being healthier, but fourteen hundred and

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 1>five points. That's one point zero seven points per possession.

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>That's five points better per one hundred possessions than he

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 1>was the previous year. That puts him into an elite

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 1>tier as a high volume shot creator. The Cleveland Cavaliers

0:09:56.520 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 1>functioned better as an offense with Donovan Mitchell this year

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>than they did last year, even though his individual scoring

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 1>volume in percentages went down. So the question is how

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>how did Donovan Mitchell help the Calves this year compared

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:12.680
<v Speaker 1>to last year? And the short answer is he bought

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>him to what Kenny Atkinson was trying to do with

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 1>that Calves offense, getting them to play more fast paced,

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>more in transition, more ball in player movement. It required

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 1>quicker decision making, and most importantly, it required Donovan to

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 1>give up the basketball more and to play more in

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the flow of the offense, and he did just that.

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Here's a simple stat to demonstrate how much Donovan Mitchell

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>gave up the basketball last year premba dot COM's tracking

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>data in twenty twenty four, Donovan Mitchell averaged six point

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 1>three minutes of possession time per game. In twenty twenty five,

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:52.559
<v Speaker 1>That dropped from six point three to four point nine.

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Another way to put it is, Donovan's time of possession

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 1>dropped by twenty two point three per year over year.

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>That's a significant a decrease there. And yet despite a

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:13.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty two point three percent decrease in his time of possession,

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 1>his scoring volume only dropped by less than ten percent,

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 1>a little over nine percent, from twenty six point six

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 1>points per game to twenty four points per game. He

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>basically refined his role to fit exactly what the team needed.

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 1>He took a step back and allowed the finally healthy

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:35.440
<v Speaker 1>version of Darius Garland to do more of what Darius

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 1>does best, which is initiate the offense with his drivele penetration,

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and that advantaged creation just greased the wheels in so

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>many different ways for the Cavs as we know. And

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 1>then in shorter bursts when the situation called for it,

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Donovan stepped in and was super aggressive. He actually shot

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the ball, or I should say, passed the ball less

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 1>per touch last year than the year before, So he

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 1>actually passed the ball less when he had it. But

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 1>that was what the team needed. The team needed him

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 1>to seed control of a large portion of the offense

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to Darius in a larger extent than he did in

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>previous years, and for him to win, he had the

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:19.479
<v Speaker 1>ball do what Donovan Mitchell does best, score the damn basketball.

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:24.680
<v Speaker 1>The team needed him to be a score, and so

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:27.440
<v Speaker 1>he took back some of his touches and refined and

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 1>simplified his approach to being more of a score. In short,

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>he cut down on his touches but focused on what

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 1>he does best and that led to a explosive scoring

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>season for the Cavs offense. Donovan was lethally efficient in

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>pick and roll this year. He's actually more efficient as

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>a scorer in pick and roll this year than he

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>was the year before, despite his shooting percentages being down

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>across the board. Overall, he was one of only six

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:54.840
<v Speaker 1>players in the entire NBA last year to attempt at

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 1>least five hundred shots in pick and roll and to

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 1>get over a point per shot. He did this by

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>shooting fifty percent on twos. Again, that's a big part

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 1>of that shot making and pick and roll right fueled

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:09.560
<v Speaker 1>by a deadly floater. He shot fifty two percent on

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 1>over one hundred and fifty floaters this year. Donovan was

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 1>one of only eight players in the NBA to attempt

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>at least one hundred and fifty floaters and make more

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>than half of them. We're gonna talk about it more

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and when we get to here in just a second.

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 1>But he had a really useful set of counter moves

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 1>in the mid range, and he's always had these, but

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:29.080
<v Speaker 1>he's really refined it into a super efficient part of

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:30.679
<v Speaker 1>his game. We'll get to that in a second. Then

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 1>he shot thirty six point four percent on pull up threes,

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 1>and that's a very good number because of the efficiency

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:39.080
<v Speaker 1>boost that you get from that three point shot. That

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>was one point zero nine points per pull up three

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>in pick and roll. That's very good. Classic for Donovan

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Mitchell is a combination of what we've talked about with

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the athletic guards in the league. The

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>combination of that downhill burst mixed with the pull up

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:56.960
<v Speaker 1>jumper that can get defenders either on their heels or

0:13:57.000 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 1>he can easily pull up or up on their toes,

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 1>or he can ease the league go past them. And

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>again this is where the mid range counters come in.

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Donovan had this ridiculous over the top gather, I should

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:09.840
<v Speaker 1>say has. He's had it for years. This ridiculous over

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the top gather that he would pull over a defender

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>that would step underneath him, and he'd step into a

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 1>floater out of that, and then he was really nasty

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 1>with that eurostep. Those little moves in the mid range

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>allowed him to quickly get separation, almost like John Morant esque,

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 1>with his ability to quickly get separation in that short range,

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 1>that five to ten foot range where he could get

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>to an easy shot that he could make over fifty

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>percent from of the time, which removed some of that

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 1>variants and gave him a reliable piece of shot making

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>that gave him the ability to be one of only

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 1>six players in the NBA a shot over fifty percent

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 1>pick and roll on a massive volume with that or

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 1>over a point per possession, I should say on that

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>massive volume of over five hundred attempts in pick and roll.

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>He also scored really efficiently off the ball. Donovan got

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>one point one one points per possession and spot up

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 1>situations fueled by him shooting a crazy forty seven percent

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>on unguarded catch and shoot threes and then some really

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>good close out attacking when guys would chase him off

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the line. The biggest boost for Donovan Mitchell on this list.

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 1>The reason why he is higher than many of the

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 1>guys who scored more points per game than him this

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>year is the simple fact that Donovan is one of

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the best playoff risers in the NBA. Darius Garland, who

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>did not make my list this year, he hits many

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 1>of the similar markers that Donovan hits that we've talked

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>about in this segment. Darius was excellent shooting in pick

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and roll, had an excellent floater. He shot like forty

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>three percent unpull up threes in pick and roll. Darius,

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I would actually argue, in terms of just the regular season,

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 1>is a better offensive engine than Donovan Mitchell because of

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 1>his ability to consistently cut teams to pieces with his

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>dribble penetration in pass effectively out of it. It really

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>greased the wheels for this Caps team. Their offense was

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 1>actually four points better per one hundre possessions this year

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>when Darius was on versus off, but consistently every single year,

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 1>whether it be because of health or him struggling in

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 1>that environment, or a combination of both, Darius just kind

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 1>of falls apart in the postseason relative to his regular

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 1>season impact. Meanwhile, Donovan Mitchell is like straight up one

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>of the very best playoff scorers of this era. Once

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>again last year, thirty points per game in the postseason

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>on fifty seven percent true shooting. For six consecutive playoff

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>runs spanning forty seven games, Donovan Mitchell is good for

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>thirty five and five on fifty nine percent truugh shooting

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs. To put it very simply, he is

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the very best playoff scorers in the entire NBA,

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and that puts him in this special tier of players

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:04.440
<v Speaker 1>who is capable of out playing any top tier superstar

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:07.480
<v Speaker 1>on any given night, which is what put him in

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 1>this grouping now, defense has always been a bit complicated

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 1>for Donovan, But I actually think Donovan's made real strides

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of years. He's ever been good

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 1>on the ball. He competes there better than he used to.

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 1>You guys remember how bad it was in Utah. Was

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:26.920
<v Speaker 1>just a disaster on the ball there. But nowadays he

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 1>still struggles a little bit, even though he competes better

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:30.479
<v Speaker 1>because he can get too handsy. He commits a lot

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:32.439
<v Speaker 1>of fouls. He's just overly physical on the ball. As

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a defender, but he's made major strides over the last

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 1>couple of years as an off ball defender. The main

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 1>thing is is it's an excellent opportunity for him to

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 1>weaponize that trait that he loves to be physically aggressive

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:47.439
<v Speaker 1>and go after the basketball well on the ball that

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 1>can give up drill penetration too easily. Off the ball,

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 1>it actually is useful for him digging down on driving

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>lanes or digging down on cutters, and so Donovan has

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:59.119
<v Speaker 1>gotten really good at like digging down into the lane

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>attacking the back basketball, but having the foot speed and

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the fundamentals in terms of his closeouts to get back

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>out to the perimeter to a shooter, and that's made

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:11.119
<v Speaker 1>him a very good help and recover player. So as

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:14.159
<v Speaker 1>a result, like the Cavs defense was actually better this

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:16.679
<v Speaker 1>year with Donovan Mitchell on the ball versus off and

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>it's given him the ability to meet that mandatory minimum

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>which we always talk about, like in order to be

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>one of these guys in this tier, you have to

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:29.199
<v Speaker 1>be able to at least fill a role on a

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>team as a useful defender. You have to be able

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to do something that helps your team on that end

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 1>of the floor, and Donovan has found that role off

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:41.119
<v Speaker 1>the ball. He can dig down into the lane, attack

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the basketball, and he can recover out to the perimeter

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>with really quality closeouts for a star player at that position.

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:52.199
<v Speaker 1>You look at Darius Garland and we talked about it.

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Like Darius Garland, He's not a better score than Donovan Mitchell.

0:18:56.240 --> 0:18:59.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't even think he's a better playoff offensive player

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 1>overall than Donovan Mitchell. But in the regular season, Darius

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Garland is a better offensive engine than Donovan Mitchell. But

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:09.959
<v Speaker 1>even in that context, the Cavs defense was five points

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:12.680
<v Speaker 1>worse per one hundred possessions with Darius on versus off,

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and it undercut a lot of his success. It's a

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>big part of why he didn't make this list this year.

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 1>In addition to the playoff struggles that we talked about,

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Donovan has become a useful defender for a good defense.

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 1>That was the mandatory minimum that he needed to reach

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:29.880
<v Speaker 1>as a small guard and he got there. So now,

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 1>why isn't Donovan Mitchell higher on this list? Jason, He's

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 1>fifth in MVP voting, he made First Team All NBA.

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Why is he all the way down at twelve? The

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 1>big thing for Donovan is I just don't think he

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 1>has enough of that like game management, flow of the

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:50.639
<v Speaker 1>game piece, that offensive engine piece that you need to

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 1>compete with the elite offensive players that are above him

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>on this list. So let's look at last year. In

0:19:56.800 --> 0:20:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs, the injuries start to stack up. Darius Garland's

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:03.719
<v Speaker 1>got the bad toe. He's not moving as well as

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>he used to, He's not cutting the defense up the

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>way he used to. He's sitting out for entire games.

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:10.920
<v Speaker 1>A lot of their shooters go cold in large part

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:14.200
<v Speaker 1>because of that lack of advantage creation. And so Donovan

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Mitchell like kind of flashed a lot of the old

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:20.439
<v Speaker 1>Donovan Mitchell right, really taking control of the offense and

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>more to a heliocentric manner in the excuse me. In

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the regular season, his usage rate was below thirty one percent.

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 1>In the postseason it was over thirty seven percent. So

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 1>he kind of like reverted back to that hyper aggressive

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:37.400
<v Speaker 1>on ball, heliocentric, kind of ball hoggy type of player, right.

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>And for the record, I don't blame him for that.

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 1>It was the right thing for him to do in

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:46.439
<v Speaker 1>that situation. Darius didn't have it. He needed to be

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:50.400
<v Speaker 1>more in control of things. I do not blame Donovan

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:53.680
<v Speaker 1>for that. It was the best chance that Cleveland had

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>to survive their set of circumstances. But when Donovan goes

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 1>that route, he this is a lot of the easy

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>reads that are available to him, and it can be

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of make or miss, feast or famine type

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 1>of stuff, and it can lead to him not having

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the same level of offensive impact as the guys that

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:15.199
<v Speaker 1>are above him on this list. For example, in this

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>postseason run, when Donovan Mitchell was on the floor, the

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 1>Caves managed one hundred and seventeen points six points per

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:23.680
<v Speaker 1>one hundred possessions, which is fine, but it's well below

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:26.439
<v Speaker 1>what the Cavs are producing in the regular season, and

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 1>it's well below what they did when Darius Garland was

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:32.159
<v Speaker 1>in control, especially in the regular season. Right. So, like,

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I just don't see Donovan as that overall offensive engine

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:39.160
<v Speaker 1>that you get from the offensive players that have above

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:40.440
<v Speaker 1>him on this list. I have a couple of guys

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:42.920
<v Speaker 1>on the list above him that are more defensive minded players,

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 1>but are defensive weapons, I should say, But among the

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 1>offensive players in this tier, Donovan's lack of that high

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 1>level playmaking talent is what kept him kept him below.

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 1>The next step for Donovan if he wants to move

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:01.440
<v Speaker 1>up this list and get into the top seven top eight,

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:05.400
<v Speaker 1>for me, is that game management piece becoming the type

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of guy who you can give control of the offense

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:11.160
<v Speaker 1>to and he's gonna average eight nine assists per game

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 1>like the Damian Lillards of the world, right, because he

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 1>weaponizes that downhill force to generate advantages early in possession.

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 1>That greased the wheels for his offense. That's the next step.

0:22:23.800 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 1>But for right now, I have Donovan as the twelfth

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 1>best player in the NBA. Number eleven Kevin Durant. This

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>was an impossible one for me. I'm just such a

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:42.399
<v Speaker 1>huge fan of Kevin Durant and his game, and I

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 1>really do believe he's gonna be amazing for Houston this year.

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:48.159
<v Speaker 1>But again, every time I looked at a guy above him,

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I just personally couldn't unseat one of those guys. But again,

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 1>if you argued KDE as high as five, I could

0:22:56.760 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 1>at least respect the case there. Same goes for Donovan.

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Is this more again a testament to how talented the

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 1>rest of the NBA is. Our top twelve is insane, right, now,

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 1>as you guys will see as we continue to work

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>through this list. Last season in review, for KD sixty

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:17.640
<v Speaker 1>two games played, he averaged twenty seven point six rebounds

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and four assists two stocks per game. Fifty three percent

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:24.639
<v Speaker 1>from the field, fifty seven percent on two is just

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:26.639
<v Speaker 1>outrageous from two. We're gonna talk more about that in

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>a minute, because that's considering almost no rim attempts relative

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:32.880
<v Speaker 1>to his peers. Forty three percent from three, eighty four

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>percent from the line for a sixty percent effective field

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 1>goal percentage, and sixty four percent in true shooting. The

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>shot making from KD is just completely outrageous. Like, just

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 1>just listen to these numbers. KD was the best jump

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 1>shooter in the entire NBA last year. He shot over

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:55.880
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent on all jump shots, even if you wait

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:58.880
<v Speaker 1>it for threes. He got one point two to one

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:02.439
<v Speaker 1>points per attempt. That ranked number one out of the

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:05.199
<v Speaker 1>fifty eight players to attempt at least five hundred jump shots.

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Durant best jump shooter in the NBA last year.

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:14.640
<v Speaker 1>End of story, forty eight percent off the catch, fifty

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:21.679
<v Speaker 1>one percent one unguarded, fifty two percent on off the

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>dribble jump shots. He had a rough year and pull

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:26.560
<v Speaker 1>up three he didn't take very many. He took seventy three.

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 1>All years shot just below thirty three percent. But Kevin

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Durant shot fifty six percent on pull up mid range

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>jump shots. In short range when he got inside of

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:47.199
<v Speaker 1>seventeen feet he hit fifty eight percent. That's that's one

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:49.400
<v Speaker 1>of the most reliable shots in the NBA right now.

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:54.120
<v Speaker 1>It's encroaching on that Yokich territory of like mid sixties,

0:24:54.200 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>high sixties, of like unbelievable reliability and immunity to variant.

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:04.639
<v Speaker 1>Kd's become so incredibly deadly on those short range jump shots.

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:10.440
<v Speaker 1>That shot making led to insanely efficient isolation numbers. KD

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:12.680
<v Speaker 1>was the best ISO player in the NBA last year

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 1>by a mile. There were twenty two players that shot

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:22.160
<v Speaker 1>out of ISO at least two hundred times. Kd's one

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:26.160
<v Speaker 1>point one six points per possession was far and away

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>number one. Give you an idea. Shay was in second place,

0:25:30.920 --> 0:25:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and he was a full six points per one hundred

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:37.239
<v Speaker 1>possessions less efficient shooting out of ISO than KD was

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:43.680
<v Speaker 1>on twos In ISO. Last year, KD shot fifty nine

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>percent one hundred and nine for one eighty six. He's

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 1>just the best to ever do it. When you need

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:56.360
<v Speaker 1>a bucket, There's never been a better guy to give

0:25:56.400 --> 0:25:59.119
<v Speaker 1>the ball to. I've seeing the clips going around on

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:02.640
<v Speaker 1>social media the other day while I was gone of

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:06.440
<v Speaker 1>that Serbia USA game, and that still to this day

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:10.439
<v Speaker 1>is my very favorite basketball memory that I can think of.

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Just the intensity, the stakes, the fear, the legitimate fear

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:18.639
<v Speaker 1>that they were going to lose, and then seeing everyone

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 1>step up and specifically Katie, Steph and Lebron run the

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>show down the stretch, and each one of those three

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 1>guys show their greatness and unique ways, from like Steph

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 1>keeping the team afloat early in the game with his

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:33.160
<v Speaker 1>shooting and then late in the game hitting that three

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 1>coming off the left wing that was the lead changing shot.

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 1>He had the transition layup as well. Lebron James showcasing

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:41.240
<v Speaker 1>his versatility. He's guarding Yolkic on one end of the floor,

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:44.360
<v Speaker 1>having those two somehow having the leg strength to get

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 1>those two crazy transition finishes in crunch time, and then

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 1>in the final minutes I think they were up to

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:54.440
<v Speaker 1>at the time super important possession. I think it was

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 1>under a minute. If I remember quickly, they desperately need

0:26:57.280 --> 0:27:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a bucket, and Steph Lebron, all those dudes they turn

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to Kevin Durant and they say, get us a bucket.

0:27:05.280 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm staying off my couch screaming at the TV, like,

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:11.720
<v Speaker 1>get a bucket, KD, we need a bucket. And he

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:14.640
<v Speaker 1>hits that left to right crossover and hits that pull

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:17.919
<v Speaker 1>up jumper and knocks that shit down to send him

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 1>to the gold medal game. It wasn't a fluke. He's

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 1>literally the very best player in the NBA still at

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 1>it today, and he's been the very best player at

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 1>it that I've ever seen. This is where I want

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:37.359
<v Speaker 1>to touch on that shot attempts thing. So KD has

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 1>been very active on social media in the last couple

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:42.439
<v Speaker 1>of days regarding several things, but the big one was

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 1>this idea that KD hasn't led a team in shot

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:48.120
<v Speaker 1>attempts since twenty eighteen. As if it's a bad thing.

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:53.159
<v Speaker 1>I think this is one of Kadi's strengths. This is

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 1>where we have to get away from box score watching. Look,

0:27:56.560 --> 0:27:59.199
<v Speaker 1>scoring the basketball is a very important basketball trade, and

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to roll my eyes a guys, who

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:03.640
<v Speaker 1>are putting up big points per game numbers. It's too

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:06.320
<v Speaker 1>hard to score in the NBA to just gloss over that,

0:28:06.520 --> 0:28:09.920
<v Speaker 1>But we had twenty five players in the NBA last

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 1>year average at least twenty four points per game. Not

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:17.920
<v Speaker 1>all points per game totals are the same. The goal

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 1>of an NBA offense is for the team to score points,

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:25.760
<v Speaker 1>not for an individual player to score points. And there

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of guys in the NBA that can

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:31.160
<v Speaker 1>score the basketball, but at the expense of the rhythm

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and flow of their teammates and of the offense overall.

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Durant is the best I've ever seen at scoring

0:28:37.280 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the basketball in the flow of an offense, meaning doing

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 1>so without disrupting the rhythm of his teammates, without stopping

0:28:45.440 --> 0:28:49.720
<v Speaker 1>ball in player movement. This is what makes him so

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 1>easy to fit in any basketball situation. Every time he

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 1>changes teams, it just looks like such a natural fit

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 1>on the offensive end of the floor. This is why

0:28:57.480 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna fit so great for him in Houston.

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it comes down to how comes down to

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 1>two things. First of all, Katie is excellent at scoring

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 1>off the ball, both in spot up situations, and attacking

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 1>in the action that NBA offense runs. So like driving closeouts.

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Kd when he drove closeouts shot sixty four percent on

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:26.800
<v Speaker 1>twos last year. That's insane. That was on eighty one attempts,

0:29:26.800 --> 0:29:29.760
<v Speaker 1>so once a game, more than once a game, he'd

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 1>put the ball on the floor against the closeout and

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:37.720
<v Speaker 1>shoot and make almost two thirds of them. Like that

0:29:37.760 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 1>goes in hand in hand with him shooting over fifty

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 1>percent on unguarded catch and shoot jump shots. So you

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 1>just an incredibly useful spot up player if you can

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:52.000
<v Speaker 1>create an advantage for him. But then he also could

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 1>score out of action. He shot sixty percent out of

0:29:55.440 --> 0:29:58.560
<v Speaker 1>dribble handoffs. He shot forty eight percent coming off of

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:02.640
<v Speaker 1>off ball screens. He's excellent at scoring in the flow

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 1>of NBA offense, and then when he's on the ball,

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 1>he's always super decisive and super efficient with his dribbles.

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Kadi averaged just three point three seconds per touch last

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 1>year and just two dribbles per touch. That's per NBA

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 1>dot COM's tracking data. Now compare that to a guy

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 1>like Luka Doncic, who averaged seven seconds per touch and

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 1>four dribbles per touch. Now, Luca is a better player

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 1>than KD. But I'm trying to show the difference in

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 1>just the quickness, how quickly and how efficiently Katie attacks

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 1>when he has the ball. And even though I do

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 1>believe in Luca and his supreme ability, I have talked

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:45.400
<v Speaker 1>about how him dribbling the air out of the basketball

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:48.240
<v Speaker 1>can disrupt the rhythm and flow for other players. It's

0:30:48.240 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 1>been part of the reason why I've talked so much

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 1>about Lebron and Austin and how they have to become

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:54.479
<v Speaker 1>better catch and shoot players, because a lot of Lebron

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 1>and Austin's on ball ability can get a little bit

0:30:57.160 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 1>of a diminishing return in the context of a Luca

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 1>led offense because he can dribble the air out of

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the basketball Kadi. Him being hyper efficient, him taking less

0:31:07.360 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 1>than half as much time per touch and less than

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 1>half as many dribbles per touch as a Luka Doncic

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:16.040
<v Speaker 1>is what makes him super easy to play with. You

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 1>know what he's gonna do. He's predictable in a good

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>way to play an offense alongside of you know when

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 1>to cut, when to relocate, when to screen because he's

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:33.000
<v Speaker 1>not pausing. He's super decisive. We've all played with guys

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 1>like that before that dribble the air out of the

0:31:35.560 --> 0:31:38.600
<v Speaker 1>basketball and you don't know what to do. You don't

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 1>know if you're gonna cut a relocate. You don't even

0:31:40.280 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 1>know if he's looking at you. You don't know if

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:44.719
<v Speaker 1>he's trying to set something else up. That unpredictability can

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 1>be difficult to play off of. If you're playing basketball

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 1>with Kevin Durrant and you pass him the ball and

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:54.520
<v Speaker 1>he has an advantage he likes with some good spacing,

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 1>you can count on him to quickly put the ball

0:31:57.480 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 1>down or throw a jab stet and do something super efficient.

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 1>One or two dribbles, rise and fire within a like

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 1>two or three seconds max. He's not gonna stop and stare.

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna attack quickly. And that makes him super easy

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 1>to play with. And it's not like, you know, I

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 1>saw some of the criticisms because KD doesn't want all

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 1>that response bullshit. Yeah, Like, every time the game's on

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the line, KDI wants the ball. He's always been that guy.

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 1>He's literally one of the best clutch players ever. I

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 1>mean he literally the whole beef he had with Draymond

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>literally stemmed from him wanting the basketball at the end

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 1>of a game. It's it is this hyper efficient, quick,

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 1>decisive scoring that fits extremely well in the team context.

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 1>We've talked a lot about this idea, the scoring player

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 1>versus the offensive engine, and how scorers can be susceptible

0:32:53.680 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 1>to variance and scorers can disrupt the flow. A bad

0:32:57.200 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 1>game for a score is way worse than a bad

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:03.240
<v Speaker 1>game for an advantage creator. Not as much so for

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 1>a guy like Kevin Durant, who shoots well over fifty

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 1>percent from two and on his pull up jump shots

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 1>he makes over half of his jump shots, so he's

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 1>less susceptible to variance, and he's so quick and so

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:16.400
<v Speaker 1>decisive that he's just super easy to play with and

0:33:16.400 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 1>he's never going to disrupt the flow of your offense. Now,

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:24.080
<v Speaker 1>why did I leave Katie down at eleven? It has

0:33:24.120 --> 0:33:26.920
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with defense. Do I wish Katie would

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:30.480
<v Speaker 1>have devoted more energy and focus to defense over his career? Sure,

0:33:30.560 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 1>but even in that context, he's still an excellent defender

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:37.600
<v Speaker 1>even today. His tools are just insane, and he can move.

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 1>He's got good anticipation, He's good both on the ball

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and off the ball. He's been well over a block

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:46.520
<v Speaker 1>per game for years. That's that off ball anticipation and

0:33:46.560 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 1>his ability to use his length at the rim. And

0:33:49.000 --> 0:33:52.400
<v Speaker 1>he is a nasty ISO defender because he has that

0:33:52.520 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 1>length and mobility to give ground to keep the ball

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:59.400
<v Speaker 1>in front, but also close that gap and get great contests.

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Guys shot just twelve for forty five from the field

0:34:06.040 --> 0:34:10.040
<v Speaker 1>against KD and ISO last year out of one hundred

0:34:10.080 --> 0:34:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and fifty one players to guard at least fifty ISOs

0:34:12.840 --> 0:34:15.480
<v Speaker 1>last year. Is zero point seven to six point per possession,

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:18.359
<v Speaker 1>ranked sixteenth sixteenth out of one hundred and fifty one.

0:34:18.640 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 1>He's literally one of the best isolation defenders in the NBA.

0:34:22.200 --> 0:34:25.480
<v Speaker 1>KD being being outside of the top ten came down

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:28.880
<v Speaker 1>to three things for me. One, he's declined as a

0:34:28.920 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 1>defensive rebounder. He posted his lowest rebounds per game total

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 1>since rebounds per game number since his rookie season two.

0:34:36.840 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 1>He straight up does not pressure the rim. He averaged

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:41.880
<v Speaker 1>just two point eight shot attempts per game at the

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:44.200
<v Speaker 1>rim last year. That ranked two hundred and twenty eighth

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:47.920
<v Speaker 1>in the NBA. Guys like Kevin Herder and Corey Kisspert

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:50.640
<v Speaker 1>attempted more shots at the rim per game last year

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:52.440
<v Speaker 1>than KD. A lot of it has to do with

0:34:52.440 --> 0:34:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the Achilles injury. He's stopping short a lot of the time,

0:34:55.200 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 1>but him not threatening the rim prevents him from generating

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:02.040
<v Speaker 1>some of the advantages kickout opportunities that his peers generate.

0:35:04.239 --> 0:35:06.239
<v Speaker 1>And then lastly, he's just not the same level of

0:35:06.239 --> 0:35:08.920
<v Speaker 1>playmaker as his peers at the top of the league.

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm hoping KD proves me wrong on this particular point.

0:35:15.320 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I saw KD reach crazy heights as a pick and

0:35:18.600 --> 0:35:23.000
<v Speaker 1>roll passer in Brooklyn, and he's kind of just gone

0:35:23.040 --> 0:35:26.359
<v Speaker 1>away from that that role of the high volume pick

0:35:26.360 --> 0:35:29.719
<v Speaker 1>and roll weapon, and I actually think Houston could really

0:35:29.760 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 1>benefit from it. So I'm hoping they dig that back

0:35:33.040 --> 0:35:34.680
<v Speaker 1>out of KD. And I hope that we get to

0:35:34.680 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 1>see a higher level playmaker this year. But in the

0:35:37.080 --> 0:35:39.399
<v Speaker 1>last several years he has not been the same level

0:35:39.440 --> 0:35:43.360
<v Speaker 1>of advantage creator, the guy who generates easy opportunities for

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:46.000
<v Speaker 1>his teammates as his peers that are above him. On

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:49.840
<v Speaker 1>this list overall, this was one of the hardest rankings

0:35:49.840 --> 0:35:53.319
<v Speaker 1>for me to make. You could easily argue KD as

0:35:53.400 --> 0:35:56.439
<v Speaker 1>high as number five on this list, but for right now,

0:35:56.920 --> 0:35:59.839
<v Speaker 1>I haven't met number eleven. All right, before we get

0:35:59.840 --> 0:36:01.800
<v Speaker 1>out here, guys, I'll tell you a little bit about Alaska.

0:36:01.920 --> 0:36:05.719
<v Speaker 1>So we had gone on an Alaskan cruise when my

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:08.600
<v Speaker 1>wife I was working for this company. She got an

0:36:08.640 --> 0:36:10.920
<v Speaker 1>incentive trip a while back where we got to go

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:12.880
<v Speaker 1>with a bunch of the people that were in her industry,

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:15.640
<v Speaker 1>and it was like a loop that went out of Seattle.

0:36:16.800 --> 0:36:18.560
<v Speaker 1>And the loop was kind of a bummer in a

0:36:18.600 --> 0:36:21.279
<v Speaker 1>couple of different ways because one, you just didn't get

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to see all the same ports. When you're doing a

0:36:23.120 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 1>seven day loop, you've got to account for a return trip,

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 1>so there's like three of the seven days you're just

0:36:28.280 --> 0:36:30.640
<v Speaker 1>on the ocean, and so you just don't get to

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:33.319
<v Speaker 1>spend as much time. Each port call is like five

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:36.239
<v Speaker 1>hours four hours, so you're just like really not having

0:36:36.280 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the time to explore all of the different areas that

0:36:39.680 --> 0:36:41.759
<v Speaker 1>you're going. And then secondly, because you're going in a loop,

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:43.760
<v Speaker 1>you don't get to go as far up into Alaska,

0:36:43.800 --> 0:36:45.920
<v Speaker 1>which is like the further you get up, the cooler

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:47.399
<v Speaker 1>it is. Right for those of you guys have been

0:36:47.440 --> 0:36:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you know what I'm talking about. And so we really

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 1>wanted to go back for two reasons. We wanted to

0:36:52.680 --> 0:36:54.680
<v Speaker 1>go outside of a work context. We wanted to be

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:58.040
<v Speaker 1>able to enjoy it more, just like without the all

0:36:58.120 --> 0:37:00.840
<v Speaker 1>of the constraints that came from my wife's job at

0:37:00.880 --> 0:37:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the time. And then two, we wanted to do the

0:37:03.840 --> 0:37:06.160
<v Speaker 1>one way. We wanted to do a one way cruise

0:37:06.440 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 1>so that you could actually spend a lot of time

0:37:08.320 --> 0:37:11.160
<v Speaker 1>at each port. Now I'm not much of a cruise guy,

0:37:12.400 --> 0:37:14.880
<v Speaker 1>but you kind of need to do a cruise to

0:37:15.000 --> 0:37:18.960
<v Speaker 1>experience the majority of Alaska, just because a lot of

0:37:18.960 --> 0:37:21.799
<v Speaker 1>these places are not accessible by road, and you get

0:37:21.800 --> 0:37:23.520
<v Speaker 1>to see a lot of really cool things that you

0:37:23.600 --> 0:37:25.439
<v Speaker 1>only get to see on a boat in that sort

0:37:25.440 --> 0:37:27.440
<v Speaker 1>of instance. So like, for instance, we got to see

0:37:27.440 --> 0:37:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the Hubbard Glacier on this particular trip. That is the

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 1>largest title a title glacier in the entire world. So

0:37:37.120 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to see that unless you take a

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:42.000
<v Speaker 1>cruise ship into that bay, right. So I'm not much

0:37:42.000 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of a cruise guy, but it's kind of the way

0:37:43.200 --> 0:37:45.120
<v Speaker 1>you have to do it. And so we traveled with

0:37:45.120 --> 0:37:46.359
<v Speaker 1>my parents, which is a lot of fun. I haven't

0:37:46.360 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 1>traveled with my parents since I was a kid, since

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I was a teenager. Basically and so my dad was

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:53.480
<v Speaker 1>always big into outdoorsy stuff, and so it kind of

0:37:53.520 --> 0:37:55.440
<v Speaker 1>just worked out with our schedules, and my dad and

0:37:55.440 --> 0:37:57.839
<v Speaker 1>mom are both finally retired, and so we were able

0:37:57.840 --> 0:38:00.600
<v Speaker 1>to do it, and we did a whole We did

0:38:00.719 --> 0:38:02.960
<v Speaker 1>a little trip to Victoria beforehand, so we went up

0:38:03.000 --> 0:38:06.400
<v Speaker 1>to Vancouver and we got an airbnb in Victoria. The

0:38:06.440 --> 0:38:09.360
<v Speaker 1>weather was amazing. In Victoria, we went to like Bouchart Gardens,

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:13.160
<v Speaker 1>which is a really cool like basically like a botanical

0:38:13.200 --> 0:38:14.919
<v Speaker 1>garden that's up there where you can get to see

0:38:14.920 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 1>some incredible stuff and you know, hung out in that

0:38:18.680 --> 0:38:20.920
<v Speaker 1>area we had. The weather was just so great. I

0:38:20.960 --> 0:38:22.560
<v Speaker 1>got like great views of like Mount Olympus and you

0:38:22.560 --> 0:38:25.600
<v Speaker 1>could literally see Blue Glacier from inside Victoria. You like

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:28.560
<v Speaker 1>got to see seaplanes landing and all this good food.

0:38:28.560 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of a fun little trip before we went

0:38:31.080 --> 0:38:33.200
<v Speaker 1>on the cruise and got to take the ferry to

0:38:33.320 --> 0:38:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and from Victoria from Vancouver, which was beautiful as you

0:38:36.000 --> 0:38:39.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of get into all those islands that surround Vancouver Island.

0:38:39.960 --> 0:38:42.920
<v Speaker 1>And then we left out of Vancouver. And if you've

0:38:42.920 --> 0:38:44.600
<v Speaker 1>been on the Alaskan cruise before, you know that the

0:38:44.640 --> 0:38:46.440
<v Speaker 1>ports that are on the southern end are not super

0:38:46.440 --> 0:38:48.799
<v Speaker 1>interesting like ketch a can. It's not my favorite place.

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:51.359
<v Speaker 1>It's just super rainy there all the time. The one

0:38:51.360 --> 0:38:53.840
<v Speaker 1>thing that was cool is when we went three years ago,

0:38:54.280 --> 0:38:56.120
<v Speaker 1>for whatever reason, there just wasn't a lot of same

0:38:56.200 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 1>in activity. I think we just got there a little

0:38:58.120 --> 0:39:00.720
<v Speaker 1>too early. But we got there at like the peak

0:39:00.800 --> 0:39:02.800
<v Speaker 1>of the salmon returning. It says, you know, the salmon

0:39:02.880 --> 0:39:05.080
<v Speaker 1>they like go out to ocean and then when they're

0:39:05.080 --> 0:39:08.960
<v Speaker 1>ready to reproduce, they go back up into fresh water,

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:13.160
<v Speaker 1>like by jumping up these like like creeks and rivers

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and stuff, and then they spawn and then they die,

0:39:15.760 --> 0:39:17.880
<v Speaker 1>right and so like you see them out in the

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:21.360
<v Speaker 1>ocean up against these like uh, you know whatever you

0:39:21.360 --> 0:39:22.960
<v Speaker 1>call it the deltas, where like the rivers in the

0:39:23.160 --> 0:39:24.880
<v Speaker 1>in the ocean meet where it's like a mix of

0:39:24.920 --> 0:39:27.759
<v Speaker 1>fresh and ocean water, and they like practice jumping and

0:39:27.760 --> 0:39:29.600
<v Speaker 1>you just see them jumping. Just you literally look off

0:39:29.640 --> 0:39:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the shore and you just see hundreds of salmon just

0:39:32.080 --> 0:39:33.880
<v Speaker 1>jumping in and out of the water. And then like

0:39:34.160 --> 0:39:36.680
<v Speaker 1>you'd see them jumping up the creeks, you'd see them

0:39:36.719 --> 0:39:39.440
<v Speaker 1>climbing the salmon ladders. It's basically like a structure that

0:39:39.480 --> 0:39:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the locals build to help the salmon get upstream. So

0:39:41.680 --> 0:39:43.520
<v Speaker 1>that was kind of cool, but it's just so rainy,

0:39:43.600 --> 0:39:45.200
<v Speaker 1>up and catch a can And then we went to

0:39:45.280 --> 0:39:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Juneo and the weather was amazing and Juno we got

0:39:47.080 --> 0:39:49.520
<v Speaker 1>super lucky there again. But like we went to go

0:39:49.520 --> 0:39:52.359
<v Speaker 1>see Mendenhall Glacier and we like canoe up to super cool,

0:39:52.640 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 1>but it's retreated so far back that it's literally out

0:39:56.160 --> 0:39:58.680
<v Speaker 1>of the water now, Like when I went there three

0:39:58.760 --> 0:40:01.400
<v Speaker 1>years ago, it was in the wa and now Mendenhall

0:40:01.440 --> 0:40:03.319
<v Speaker 1>Glacier is like completely out of the water. And when

0:40:03.320 --> 0:40:05.240
<v Speaker 1>you're canoeing to it, they have all these like orange

0:40:05.280 --> 0:40:09.360
<v Speaker 1>signs that like demonstrate different times in the history where

0:40:09.400 --> 0:40:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the glacier was further out. I can't remember the exact number,

0:40:12.960 --> 0:40:15.680
<v Speaker 1>but like it retreats at some crazy pace. It was

0:40:15.719 --> 0:40:17.880
<v Speaker 1>like two hundred feet per year or something like that,

0:40:17.920 --> 0:40:20.600
<v Speaker 1>so that one's like really retreating back in there. And

0:40:20.680 --> 0:40:23.839
<v Speaker 1>thankfully we did all that stuff first, because each subsequent

0:40:24.000 --> 0:40:26.000
<v Speaker 1>port that we went to that was further to the

0:40:26.040 --> 0:40:29.160
<v Speaker 1>north was crazier and crazier that we got to see,

0:40:29.200 --> 0:40:32.920
<v Speaker 1>and like the Hudderd Glacier was absolutely unbelievable that we

0:40:33.080 --> 0:40:36.239
<v Speaker 1>just got perfectly clear weather. So as you're like pulling in,

0:40:36.320 --> 0:40:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you see this massive glacier, but out in the distance

0:40:39.160 --> 0:40:42.480
<v Speaker 1>just all these like fifteen thousand foot peaks. I have

0:40:42.560 --> 0:40:45.360
<v Speaker 1>always had a thing for super tall mountains, particularly volcanoes,

0:40:45.360 --> 0:40:47.240
<v Speaker 1>but I've also had a thing for super tall mountains,

0:40:47.320 --> 0:40:49.839
<v Speaker 1>and you get to see We got to see Mount

0:40:49.840 --> 0:40:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Saint Elias, which is over eighteen thousand feet. That's now

0:40:52.040 --> 0:40:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the tallest mountain that I've ever laid eyes on, So

0:40:53.920 --> 0:40:55.160
<v Speaker 1>that was super cool. We got to see it on

0:40:55.200 --> 0:40:57.680
<v Speaker 1>a very clear day. I got to see another big

0:40:57.719 --> 0:41:00.600
<v Speaker 1>volcano up there. I can't remember I think it was

0:41:01.600 --> 0:41:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember what it was called, but it's the

0:41:02.880 --> 0:41:05.319
<v Speaker 1>volcano right outside of Sidco. We got a crazy view

0:41:05.320 --> 0:41:06.839
<v Speaker 1>of it as we were going around on the cruise ship.

0:41:07.160 --> 0:41:09.600
<v Speaker 1>But then, you know, my mom and my wife were

0:41:09.640 --> 0:41:13.759
<v Speaker 1>shopping in Juno and I was looking at our itinerary

0:41:14.400 --> 0:41:17.479
<v Speaker 1>and we had we had like six hours to kill

0:41:17.600 --> 0:41:20.480
<v Speaker 1>in Seward and Seward was the final port, and we

0:41:20.520 --> 0:41:21.799
<v Speaker 1>never even thought of it as a place to do

0:41:21.840 --> 0:41:23.680
<v Speaker 1>an excursion because we're like, oh, we're just leaving, like

0:41:23.680 --> 0:41:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that's when we get off the boat and that's when

0:41:25.040 --> 0:41:27.279
<v Speaker 1>we'll go home, right, And then I looked at it,

0:41:27.320 --> 0:41:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I was like, Okay, we're getting off the boat at

0:41:29.040 --> 0:41:31.359
<v Speaker 1>seven point thirty and we're not getting on the train

0:41:31.480 --> 0:41:33.360
<v Speaker 1>until six pm. So we got all this time to do.

0:41:33.400 --> 0:41:36.040
<v Speaker 1>And so I did some research and then I heard

0:41:36.080 --> 0:41:38.399
<v Speaker 1>about this like keen I Fjords National Park, this big

0:41:38.520 --> 0:41:41.920
<v Speaker 1>national park that's like right by seward, but you can't

0:41:42.000 --> 0:41:46.080
<v Speaker 1>get there unless you go by boat or like helicopter, right,

0:41:46.600 --> 0:41:49.480
<v Speaker 1>And so I found an excursion like a boating company

0:41:49.520 --> 0:41:53.480
<v Speaker 1>that would take all four of us out into those fjords.

0:41:53.880 --> 0:41:56.200
<v Speaker 1>And that ended up being like by far the coolest

0:41:56.200 --> 0:41:58.680
<v Speaker 1>part of the trip, even though we had amazing weather

0:41:58.680 --> 0:42:01.600
<v Speaker 1>everywhere else. It was like super But even though the

0:42:01.680 --> 0:42:04.799
<v Speaker 1>rain had some downsides, what was cool about it was

0:42:06.040 --> 0:42:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the rain actually essentially like lubricates the glaciers and causes

0:42:09.680 --> 0:42:12.680
<v Speaker 1>them to move a little faster into calve a little

0:42:12.719 --> 0:42:14.680
<v Speaker 1>bit more calving for a glacier. All it means is

0:42:14.920 --> 0:42:18.240
<v Speaker 1>as the glacier kind of flows downhill, these big pieces

0:42:18.280 --> 0:42:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of ice like fall off into the ocean, and by

0:42:21.640 --> 0:42:25.040
<v Speaker 1>like sheer luck, I happened to have my iPhone out

0:42:25.080 --> 0:42:29.320
<v Speaker 1>like zoomed in on a spot where this massive piece

0:42:29.320 --> 0:42:32.239
<v Speaker 1>of ice fell off of the Iliic Glacier, which was

0:42:32.360 --> 0:42:34.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the two glaciers that we went to go see,

0:42:34.960 --> 0:42:37.879
<v Speaker 1>and it was the guy who was on the boat

0:42:37.880 --> 0:42:39.719
<v Speaker 1>said it was literally the biggest calving they had seen

0:42:39.719 --> 0:42:43.320
<v Speaker 1>in the entire season. It launched like this massive wave,

0:42:43.480 --> 0:42:45.920
<v Speaker 1>like this thirty foot wave that was like coming towards

0:42:46.000 --> 0:42:48.640
<v Speaker 1>us from the from the glacier. So we had to

0:42:48.680 --> 0:42:50.560
<v Speaker 1>like turn the boat away from it and like go

0:42:50.719 --> 0:42:52.840
<v Speaker 1>further away so that we could like wait for the

0:42:52.880 --> 0:42:55.440
<v Speaker 1>wave to spread out and like hit us at a

0:42:55.440 --> 0:42:58.680
<v Speaker 1>at a lower at a lower level. But I have

0:42:58.719 --> 0:43:00.400
<v Speaker 1>a video of this, you guys can find. It's on

0:43:00.440 --> 0:43:02.840
<v Speaker 1>my Instagram and it's on my Twitter at underscore jsonlt.

0:43:03.320 --> 0:43:05.120
<v Speaker 1>But it was like literally one of the coolest things

0:43:05.120 --> 0:43:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I've ever seen, just watching that piece of that glacier

0:43:08.840 --> 0:43:10.960
<v Speaker 1>fall off. And like one of the things that's cool

0:43:11.000 --> 0:43:13.960
<v Speaker 1>with glaciers too, is when it's super sunny, they appear white,

0:43:14.880 --> 0:43:16.960
<v Speaker 1>but when it's super cloudy, they appear like almost like

0:43:17.000 --> 0:43:21.720
<v Speaker 1>a radioactive shade of blue because of just the lesser

0:43:21.760 --> 0:43:24.319
<v Speaker 1>amount of light that they're absorbing. And so it just

0:43:24.440 --> 0:43:28.400
<v Speaker 1>was like this eerie, creepy, like cloudy, rainy day with

0:43:28.440 --> 0:43:31.240
<v Speaker 1>these beautiful glaciers that were just like having like crazy

0:43:31.239 --> 0:43:33.759
<v Speaker 1>in front of us because of the rain, and it

0:43:33.800 --> 0:43:37.080
<v Speaker 1>was just an incredible experience. And then, like I kept

0:43:37.120 --> 0:43:39.680
<v Speaker 1>waiting for things to get more difficult, but it's like

0:43:39.719 --> 0:43:42.359
<v Speaker 1>then we get on this train, this Alaska Railroad train,

0:43:43.120 --> 0:43:45.359
<v Speaker 1>and it goes from Seward up to Anchorage, and it's

0:43:45.440 --> 0:43:49.920
<v Speaker 1>just four hours of incredibly beautiful scenery outside of a train.

0:43:50.760 --> 0:43:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I saw three additional glaciers, beautiful mountains. The bay that

0:43:54.600 --> 0:43:57.160
<v Speaker 1>goes thereby I can't remember what it's called. The bay

0:43:57.200 --> 0:44:00.160
<v Speaker 1>that goes there right by Anchorage is super pretty. This

0:44:00.280 --> 0:44:03.960
<v Speaker 1>was like one thing after another of incredible sight seeing

0:44:04.200 --> 0:44:06.759
<v Speaker 1>and I just felt so lucky. I felt so lucky

0:44:06.760 --> 0:44:08.200
<v Speaker 1>that the weather was the way that it was. I

0:44:08.200 --> 0:44:10.360
<v Speaker 1>felt so lucky that we got to see the things

0:44:10.360 --> 0:44:12.799
<v Speaker 1>that we got to see. It was obviously super cool

0:44:12.880 --> 0:44:14.640
<v Speaker 1>to get to spend some time with my mom and dad,

0:44:14.880 --> 0:44:17.440
<v Speaker 1>which I who haven't traveled with in years, and it

0:44:17.560 --> 0:44:19.399
<v Speaker 1>just was a really special trip. I think it might

0:44:19.400 --> 0:44:22.200
<v Speaker 1>be my favorite trip that I've ever gone on. A

0:44:22.200 --> 0:44:23.840
<v Speaker 1>couple of things. If you're if you're ever gonna go

0:44:23.840 --> 0:44:28.239
<v Speaker 1>to Alaska. There's several cruise ships that do it, several

0:44:28.280 --> 0:44:30.960
<v Speaker 1>companies that do it. We use Celebrity. I've been pleased

0:44:31.000 --> 0:44:32.680
<v Speaker 1>with them. They give a very good experience. I actually

0:44:32.719 --> 0:44:35.960
<v Speaker 1>think they're relatively affordable too. Uh. They have really good food,

0:44:36.000 --> 0:44:37.759
<v Speaker 1>which is something that my wife and I are you know,

0:44:37.840 --> 0:44:39.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty picky on there were foodies. We just really like

0:44:39.960 --> 0:44:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to have good food. But a couple things to be

0:44:41.600 --> 0:44:43.839
<v Speaker 1>prepared for. Do the one way, don't do the loop,

0:44:43.880 --> 0:44:45.919
<v Speaker 1>because you actually get to spend so much more time

0:44:45.960 --> 0:44:48.960
<v Speaker 1>in each of your ports and less time at sea. Also,

0:44:49.000 --> 0:44:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the one way takes you further north in Alaska, Like

0:44:51.520 --> 0:44:53.160
<v Speaker 1>you'd get to see Hubbard Glacier. You don't get to

0:44:53.200 --> 0:44:54.920
<v Speaker 1>see that on the loop. You get to go up

0:44:54.920 --> 0:44:56.640
<v Speaker 1>into Seward, which you don't get to see if you're

0:44:56.680 --> 0:44:58.360
<v Speaker 1>on the loop, So you get to see the better

0:44:58.400 --> 0:45:03.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff that's further north Alaska. A couple things though, if

0:45:03.920 --> 0:45:06.440
<v Speaker 1>if you do the cruise, when you leave the last

0:45:06.520 --> 0:45:08.879
<v Speaker 1>port and you go into the Gulf of Alaska, it's

0:45:08.880 --> 0:45:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a famously rough ocean, and so like come prepared for

0:45:12.880 --> 0:45:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, seasickness by having you know, dramamine or you know,

0:45:16.040 --> 0:45:18.680
<v Speaker 1>weed or whatever it is you use to survive seasickness,

0:45:18.680 --> 0:45:21.560
<v Speaker 1>make sure you're prepared for that. And then if you

0:45:21.640 --> 0:45:26.080
<v Speaker 1>want to do Alaska without doing a cruise, Seward kind

0:45:26.080 --> 0:45:29.239
<v Speaker 1>of captures a lot of the same vibe as some

0:45:29.280 --> 0:45:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of the other ports, and so just fly to Anchorage

0:45:33.080 --> 0:45:36.759
<v Speaker 1>and then take the Alaska Railroad down to Seward, buying

0:45:36.800 --> 0:45:39.719
<v Speaker 1>an airbnb or a hotel somewhere there, and then just

0:45:39.760 --> 0:45:41.640
<v Speaker 1>make sure you do the ken I Fjords tour because

0:45:41.640 --> 0:45:43.279
<v Speaker 1>it's just super cool and it's an awesome way to

0:45:43.280 --> 0:45:45.560
<v Speaker 1>get to experience like the glaciers and a lot of

0:45:45.600 --> 0:45:48.200
<v Speaker 1>like that kind of stuff that you get to experience

0:45:48.200 --> 0:45:49.799
<v Speaker 1>in Alaska. But it was just a ton of fun.

0:45:49.840 --> 0:45:54.040
<v Speaker 1>And I Uh, it's kind of crazy because I'm we're

0:45:54.080 --> 0:45:57.160
<v Speaker 1>preparing for our phase two of our move to Denver

0:45:57.280 --> 0:45:59.399
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesday, so it's kind of hectic and obviously there's

0:45:59.440 --> 0:46:01.840
<v Speaker 1>works around, but like, it just felt really nice to

0:46:01.880 --> 0:46:03.799
<v Speaker 1>disconnect for him a little bit. There's like almost no

0:46:03.880 --> 0:46:06.680
<v Speaker 1>cell service out there and Wi Fi on cruise ships

0:46:06.680 --> 0:46:08.319
<v Speaker 1>is terrible, so it was like an opportunity for me

0:46:08.360 --> 0:46:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to disconnect from work a little bit. And I just

0:46:10.640 --> 0:46:13.040
<v Speaker 1>had a great time and I just I just highly

0:46:13.040 --> 0:46:14.719
<v Speaker 1>recommend if you ever have a chance to go check

0:46:14.760 --> 0:46:18.880
<v Speaker 1>out Alaska, go check it out. And if you want

0:46:18.920 --> 0:46:20.719
<v Speaker 1>to see some pictures, I've shared quite a few on

0:46:20.719 --> 0:46:22.879
<v Speaker 1>my twitter feed. You guys can see them there. All right, guys,

0:46:22.920 --> 0:46:24.520
<v Speaker 1>it's all I have for today. It's always a sincerely

0:46:24.560 --> 0:46:26.359
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you guys for supporting me and supporting the show.

0:46:26.360 --> 0:46:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll see you guys on Friday. Four Hour Mailbag