WEBVTT - BrainStuff Classics: Did Velociraptors Really Hunt in Packs?

0:00:01.920 --> 0:00:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to brain Stuff production of I Heart Radio. Hey

0:00:06.480 --> 0:00:09.479
<v Speaker 1>brain Stuff, Lauren Vogebaum here with a classic episode from

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the archives. This is a fun one for me. I

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>think I mispronounced the names of a few dinosaurs, but

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:18.319
<v Speaker 1>I was excited because I was talking about dinosaurs, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>specifically about velociraptors. In this episode, we answered the surprisingly

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>complex question of whether they really hunted in packs the

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>way that we see in the movies. Hey there, brain Stuff,

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Lauren Vogebaum here. Whoever the human stars of the latest

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Jurassic Park movie are the velociraptors are the fan favorite performers.

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Packs of raptors can gang up on anyone or anything,

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:46.319
<v Speaker 1>from kids in kitchens to a hybridized dino monster. Their

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 1>tax are organized, strategic, and in most of the movies

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>they rely on a chain of command within the group.

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>But is such team oriented behavior supported by the fossil record.

0:00:56.680 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Before we can answer that question, we should clear something up.

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 1>The dinosaur that's called velociraptor in the Jurassic Park movies

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and novels was based on a completely different animal known

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>as Dano NICUs, and when it comes to size, there's

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>a huge gap between the two Velociraptor wasn't much bigger

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>than a turkey, but the adult dano Niicus measured eleven

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>feet or about three point three meters long, and may

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>have weighed more than two hundred pounds. That's both are

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>classified as Dromaeosaurids, a family of bird like carnivorous dinosaurs.

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Members of this group had a specialized toe on each foot,

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:34.040
<v Speaker 1>which famously was held in an upright position while they walked.

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:37.279
<v Speaker 1>In theory. That habit kept the large hook shaped claws

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:40.400
<v Speaker 1>on those digits nice and sharp. Historically, it was thought

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that these claws were slashing tools used to disembowel prey,

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>but recent studies have found that the claus would have

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>been better equipped for stabbing or puncturing Dromosaurus. Therefore, it

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>might have used their remarkable toes to help them cling

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>on to large thrashing victims. Think of this as sort

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>of a prehistoric rodeo. Getting back to dano Niicus, This

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 1>particular dinosaur was originally discovered in nineteen thirty one in Montana,

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>but it wouldn't be named until nineteen sixty nine. That's

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>when Yale paleontologist John Ostrom was overseeing a dig at

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:12.079
<v Speaker 1>a Montana quarry, and the bones of four dino nikus

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:14.959
<v Speaker 1>were found strewn around the partial skeleton of a much

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 1>larger herbivore called Tanantosaurus. Late in his career, Ostrom compared

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:23.640
<v Speaker 1>this paleocrime scene to a wolf pack dispatching its prey.

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:27.359
<v Speaker 1>The four dead dino Nikus, dinos he theorized had been

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>killed while attacking the big plant eater in a coordinated

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:33.959
<v Speaker 1>group effort. Later, other members of their pack presumably killed

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that tenacious dinosaur. Ostrom's work influenced author Michael Crichton, who

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>wrote pack hunting Dromaeosaurus into the first Jurassic Park book.

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>The concept has since taken hold of the public's imagination. Moreover,

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>it's had a significant impact on dinosaurs science. Therapods, the

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>group containing birds and all known extinct carnivorous dinos, are

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>often found fossilized in close proximity to other members of

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>their own species. Because of this, it's argued that plenty

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>of non dremaosaur predators like Tyrannosaurus and allosaurs might have

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>hunted in packs too, but then again, perhaps they didn't.

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 1>In a two thousand seven paper, paleontologists Bryan Roach and

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Brinkman dissected the issue at length, and in their opinion,

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:19.920
<v Speaker 1>neither Dana Nikeus, nor velociraptor, nor any other non avian

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:24.959
<v Speaker 1>predatory dinosaur would have formed packs. Via email, Brinkman explained,

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>mammal like cooperative pack hunting is an extremely rare and

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>complex behavior, so let's talk terminology. Brinkman and Roaches paper

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>defines true cooperative pack hunting as a group effort carried

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>out by animals that habitually worked together with others of

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>their species to capture and subdue prey too large for

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>an individual predator to kill alone. Furthermore, these team players

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>also defend their territory collectively and may share youngster rearing duties.

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>No living bird or reptile fits the criteria. It's true

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 1>that nile crocodiles sometimes gang up on big mammals like wildebees,

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 1>but they later disperse, and although Harris hawks have been

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>known to form hunting parties of up to nine birds,

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>they target small game while doing so. That said, there

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>is one living animal that, according to Roached Brinkman, might

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:16.159
<v Speaker 1>offer us some insight into how Dramosaurus and other non

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>avian therapods behaved. Around big prey items. The Komodo dragon.

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Komodo dragons are solo hunters and effective ones at that

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 1>an adult can bring down victims ten times its own

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>body weight. These reptiles are also eager scavengers, and when

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>one of them kills a large prey item, others are

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>likely to come running. What follows is a gruesome feeding

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 1>frenzy with a dozen or more commodo dragons mobbing the carcass.

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Such meetings get violent fast. While squabbling over a corpse,

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:46.279
<v Speaker 1>komotos may attack one another. Sometimes they even kill and

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>eat their smaller competitors at the site. So when paleontologists

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>find a large collection of therapod bones and or teeth

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>in the same fossil deposit, what should they make of it?

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Should they interpret the remains like a wolf style family unit,

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>or should they be viewed as the site of a

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>disorganized mob where side squabbles and cannibalism would have been rampant.

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>For their part, Brinkman and Roach find the latter scenario

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:12.359
<v Speaker 1>more probable. Brinkman said Dina, nikes and other non avian

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>therapods were most likely solitary hunters who engaged in antagonistic

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Komodo dragon like feeding aggregations, and they interacted with each

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:23.360
<v Speaker 1>other in ways that were much more contentious, combative, and

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 1>cannibalistic than has been widely believed. Okay, but what about

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>dinosaur footprints? Can they shed any light onto the pack

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>hunting debate. In two thousand and seven, a hundred and

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:38.359
<v Speaker 1>twenty million year old drmaosaur trackway was discovered in China.

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Six different sets of parallel tracks were found, each made

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>by an animal standing about four feet or one point

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:46.720
<v Speaker 1>two meters tall at the hip, and judging by the

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 1>nature of the sediment, it looks like these prints were

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:51.359
<v Speaker 1>all laid down within a very short span of time.

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Anthony J. Martin, a leading paleo ichnologist a trace fossil scientist,

0:05:57.360 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 1>thinks the animals who made them were traveling in some

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:03.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of group. He said via email. The trackways showed

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 1>these drmaosaurs were moving at about the same pace, in

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:09.359
<v Speaker 1>the same direction parallel, and spaced more or less the

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 1>same distance apart. So I'm fairly certain that this is

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 1>evidence of group behavior. Still, this doesn't necessarily mean the

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>dromosaurs hunted in packs. Maybe they were rushing toward a

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 1>dead body like those independently minded Komodo dragons. In order

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:26.479
<v Speaker 1>to confidently cite any footprint assemblage as the product of

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>pack hunting or a similar activity, would need, said Martin,

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>more evidence, such as tracks of a prey animal that

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:36.280
<v Speaker 1>was clearly preceding them and not by much time. Best

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>of all would be the dromosaur tracks ending at a

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:48.919
<v Speaker 1>kill site and acknowledgist can dream right. Today's episode was

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>written by Mark Mancini, whose name I also original name

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:55.039
<v Speaker 1>is pronounced, and produced by Tristan McNeil and Tyler Klang.

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>For more on this and lots of other topics because

0:06:57.600 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>at how stuff works dot com. Brain Stuff is produce

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:02.159
<v Speaker 1>action of I Heart Radio or more podcasts to my

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:05.039
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio, visit the I heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows. H