1
00:00:03,480 --> 00:00:07,560
Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Law Podcast. I'm June Grosso. Every

2
00:00:07,640 --> 00:00:10,440
Speaker 1: day we bring you insight and analysis into the most

3
00:00:10,480 --> 00:00:13,399
Speaker 1: important legal news of the day. You can find more

4
00:00:13,480 --> 00:00:18,040
Speaker 1: episodes of the Bloomberg Law Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud

5
00:00:18,320 --> 00:00:22,680
Speaker 1: and on Bloomberg dot com slash podcasts. Earlier today, President

6
00:00:22,720 --> 00:00:26,160
Speaker 1: Trump tweeted that he's asked the SEC to study ending

7
00:00:26,280 --> 00:00:30,680
Speaker 1: quarterly reporting for US businesses to quote allow greater flexibility

8
00:00:30,840 --> 00:00:34,880
Speaker 1: and save money. Morgan Stanley CEO James Gorman voice support

9
00:00:34,960 --> 00:00:39,000
Speaker 1: for the idea on Bloomberg Today. I think quotally reporting,

10
00:00:39,280 --> 00:00:41,080
Speaker 1: and to Budda bluntly, I think it's s and I

11
00:00:41,840 --> 00:00:43,640
Speaker 1: every third in weeks and by the way, quote has

12
00:00:43,640 --> 00:00:47,239
Speaker 1: come around with alarming frequency. Right, They've been trying to

13
00:00:47,280 --> 00:00:49,440
Speaker 1: get this thing to stop. But at least you know

14
00:00:49,520 --> 00:00:53,000
Speaker 1: this is one thing the Brits definitely have figured out

15
00:00:53,040 --> 00:00:56,160
Speaker 1: what the six months reporting. Joining me is Peggy Collins,

16
00:00:56,160 --> 00:01:00,000
Speaker 1: Bloomberg News US Investing team leader. So, Peggy, it seems

17
00:01:00,080 --> 00:01:03,800
Speaker 1: natural that corporations would welcome getting rid of two reports

18
00:01:03,840 --> 00:01:06,520
Speaker 1: a year. But what are the dangers? Well, A couple

19
00:01:06,520 --> 00:01:10,640
Speaker 1: of the dangers are that investors have less transparency, right,

20
00:01:10,720 --> 00:01:13,360
Speaker 1: So We've seen this in the news of late with

21
00:01:13,720 --> 00:01:16,600
Speaker 1: Elon Musk saying he might take Tesla private. And one

22
00:01:16,600 --> 00:01:19,959
Speaker 1: of the reactions that we've had from shareholders or shareholder

23
00:01:20,000 --> 00:01:23,559
Speaker 1: activists is that, well, you're not getting as much information

24
00:01:23,600 --> 00:01:26,319
Speaker 1: then in terms of what the company's earnings might be,

25
00:01:26,520 --> 00:01:30,720
Speaker 1: what their executive pay is to influence whether you buy yourself.

26
00:01:31,080 --> 00:01:33,560
Speaker 1: The other potential is that when companies are in the

27
00:01:33,640 --> 00:01:38,600
Speaker 1: dark more, there's more potential for them to do nefarious

28
00:01:38,640 --> 00:01:41,400
Speaker 1: things such as insider trading, for example, and for it

29
00:01:41,440 --> 00:01:45,200
Speaker 1: to be harder for people to spot, or for companies

30
00:01:45,200 --> 00:01:47,440
Speaker 1: to be more worried about doing it in the first place,

31
00:01:47,520 --> 00:01:51,680
Speaker 1: and because they might get caught. So what are some

32
00:01:51,840 --> 00:01:56,480
Speaker 1: of the less obvious advantages to corporations besides just not

33
00:01:56,560 --> 00:01:59,000
Speaker 1: the extra work. Well, I think, as you said, the

34
00:01:59,080 --> 00:02:02,320
Speaker 1: extra work and all so costs for smaller companies. A

35
00:02:02,400 --> 00:02:04,240
Speaker 1: number of the plates that we've heard is that with

36
00:02:04,280 --> 00:02:08,240
Speaker 1: all the regulation today and the requirements from the SEC

37
00:02:08,400 --> 00:02:11,120
Speaker 1: of reporting, that if you're a smaller company, that's a

38
00:02:11,160 --> 00:02:14,359
Speaker 1: big burden. And therefore there's more and more smaller companies

39
00:02:14,400 --> 00:02:16,280
Speaker 1: that say I'm not going to go public, I'm going

40
00:02:16,320 --> 00:02:18,120
Speaker 1: to stay private because I don't want to have to

41
00:02:18,160 --> 00:02:20,639
Speaker 1: do all those things. So that's one of the things

42
00:02:20,880 --> 00:02:23,280
Speaker 1: I think. Another point is that we've talked to some

43
00:02:23,320 --> 00:02:26,560
Speaker 1: people today. You said it could make financial analysts more

44
00:02:26,600 --> 00:02:30,400
Speaker 1: popular or valuable because they are supposed to be talking

45
00:02:30,400 --> 00:02:33,800
Speaker 1: to companies regularly, and so if the public has information

46
00:02:33,800 --> 00:02:37,280
Speaker 1: on a less frequent basis, they the financial analysts who

47
00:02:37,360 --> 00:02:40,640
Speaker 1: put out reports could be become more important. So, Peggy,

48
00:02:40,680 --> 00:02:44,480
Speaker 1: this was released by the White House to clarify President

49
00:02:44,600 --> 00:02:47,920
Speaker 1: Trump's tweet. It says the President is interested in examining

50
00:02:47,919 --> 00:02:51,200
Speaker 1: this issue on whether short term earnings reporting requirements for

51
00:02:51,280 --> 00:02:55,079
Speaker 1: public companies reduce incentives for them to engage in long

52
00:02:55,200 --> 00:02:58,519
Speaker 1: term investing in the United States, a part of the

53
00:02:58,520 --> 00:03:03,040
Speaker 1: administration's ongoing regulatory form efforts. So put in that context,

54
00:03:03,080 --> 00:03:06,080
Speaker 1: does that give you more insight into what he's looking for.

55
00:03:06,280 --> 00:03:08,440
Speaker 1: So that's something definitely that I've been hearing over the

56
00:03:08,520 --> 00:03:11,799
Speaker 1: last few years, covering a variety of investors and family

57
00:03:11,880 --> 00:03:15,480
Speaker 1: offices that invest in companies in the US that aren't public,

58
00:03:15,520 --> 00:03:18,280
Speaker 1: a lot of family owned businesses across the country, And

59
00:03:18,320 --> 00:03:20,960
Speaker 1: one of the things that we've heard repeatedly is that

60
00:03:21,440 --> 00:03:23,720
Speaker 1: companies are saying, you know, what if we're under this

61
00:03:23,840 --> 00:03:27,120
Speaker 1: pressure every quarter to hit certain numbers in order for

62
00:03:27,200 --> 00:03:29,560
Speaker 1: our shareholders and the stock price to be in the

63
00:03:29,600 --> 00:03:33,079
Speaker 1: limelight in a good way. That prevents us from sometimes

64
00:03:33,080 --> 00:03:36,720
Speaker 1: putting money into research and development efforts that would actually

65
00:03:36,760 --> 00:03:39,280
Speaker 1: benefit the company over the longer term. So I'm not

66
00:03:39,280 --> 00:03:41,120
Speaker 1: going to go public. I'm going to take some private

67
00:03:41,160 --> 00:03:44,160
Speaker 1: investment money so that way I can spend some more

68
00:03:44,200 --> 00:03:47,600
Speaker 1: money in the shorter term on the long term value

69
00:03:47,760 --> 00:03:51,720
Speaker 1: of building another plant or or doing some research on technology,

70
00:03:51,760 --> 00:03:55,720
Speaker 1: for example. The SEC has been reticent to make changes.

71
00:03:55,800 --> 00:03:59,720
Speaker 1: Where does it stand well? The Trump tweet this morning

72
00:03:59,720 --> 00:04:03,200
Speaker 1: would surprising for a lot of us, including me, um

73
00:04:03,400 --> 00:04:06,119
Speaker 1: and so people have asked, you know, how quickly could

74
00:04:06,120 --> 00:04:09,200
Speaker 1: they do something like this? My opinion is not very fast.

75
00:04:09,320 --> 00:04:13,000
Speaker 1: Most regulatory items, and certainly something that would be such

76
00:04:13,040 --> 00:04:15,480
Speaker 1: a sea change like this one take a long time

77
00:04:15,520 --> 00:04:18,159
Speaker 1: to go through. There's a lot of public comments and

78
00:04:18,240 --> 00:04:21,679
Speaker 1: studies and um and this might have to go through Congress,

79
00:04:21,680 --> 00:04:23,479
Speaker 1: so I think it would take a while to have

80
00:04:23,560 --> 00:04:25,800
Speaker 1: to happen. The SEC also has a lot on its

81
00:04:25,800 --> 00:04:29,240
Speaker 1: plate between Elon Musk and Tesla and all sorts of things.

82
00:04:29,360 --> 00:04:32,360
Speaker 1: The SEC is always busy, but it would it be

83
00:04:32,480 --> 00:04:38,039
Speaker 1: likely to initiate this kind of a fundamental change. I

84
00:04:38,080 --> 00:04:41,360
Speaker 1: think it's possible. We've seen this happened in other places

85
00:04:41,440 --> 00:04:43,800
Speaker 1: around the world. You played that clip from James Gorman,

86
00:04:43,839 --> 00:04:47,359
Speaker 1: and essentially what happened in the UK of late in

87
00:04:47,400 --> 00:04:49,800
Speaker 1: the last decade or so is that they switched to

88
00:04:49,960 --> 00:04:53,320
Speaker 1: a more six month model of reporting. There's mixed results

89
00:04:53,320 --> 00:04:56,040
Speaker 1: on what that has actually mean. In some cases companies

90
00:04:56,080 --> 00:04:59,040
Speaker 1: have actually continued to put out the same types of

91
00:04:59,080 --> 00:05:02,880
Speaker 1: information on a more regular basis than six months anyway,

92
00:05:02,920 --> 00:05:05,200
Speaker 1: But it is one of those things that it's possible.

93
00:05:05,240 --> 00:05:09,120
Speaker 1: There's precedence for it. There's certainly a lot of corporate

94
00:05:09,920 --> 00:05:14,080
Speaker 1: uh excitement around it, and we've seen President Trump say

95
00:05:14,120 --> 00:05:16,479
Speaker 1: things and actually get them done in some cases faster

96
00:05:16,520 --> 00:05:19,520
Speaker 1: than people expected and with less and less regulations. Who

97
00:05:19,520 --> 00:05:21,359
Speaker 1: knows what will happen. So just we have about a

98
00:05:21,400 --> 00:05:25,160
Speaker 1: minute here. What's your what's your opinion of it? It's

99
00:05:25,160 --> 00:05:27,840
Speaker 1: a good question. I think the first thing that came

100
00:05:27,880 --> 00:05:31,120
Speaker 1: to my mind being a journalist is that more information

101
00:05:31,200 --> 00:05:33,960
Speaker 1: is usually better than less. Um So I think you know,

102
00:05:34,040 --> 00:05:36,280
Speaker 1: I was a personal finance reporter for many years here

103
00:05:36,279 --> 00:05:39,800
Speaker 1: at Bloomberg before leading our investing coverage, and that was

104
00:05:39,839 --> 00:05:41,520
Speaker 1: the first thing that came to my mind that I

105
00:05:41,520 --> 00:05:43,800
Speaker 1: I usually deferred to the fact that if you have

106
00:05:43,920 --> 00:05:46,839
Speaker 1: more information and shareholders have more information on what a

107
00:05:46,839 --> 00:05:49,120
Speaker 1: company is doing, that it keeps them more accountable to

108
00:05:49,160 --> 00:05:52,560
Speaker 1: what It also helps you make a more informed decision

109
00:05:52,560 --> 00:05:55,080
Speaker 1: on whether to buy yourself. I think you'll have quite

110
00:05:55,080 --> 00:05:57,680
Speaker 1: a while before we actually get to that point if

111
00:05:57,720 --> 00:05:59,880
Speaker 1: we do. Thanks so much, Peggy. That's Peggy Collins for

112
00:06:00,120 --> 00:06:08,120
Speaker 1: burg News US Investing team leader. At a cabinet meeting yesterday,

113
00:06:08,200 --> 00:06:11,720
Speaker 1: President Trump addressed the continuing fight against opioid addiction in

114
00:06:11,760 --> 00:06:15,720
Speaker 1: the US, asking Attorney General Jeff Sessions to take legal action.

115
00:06:16,760 --> 00:06:20,440
Speaker 1: I'd also like to ask you to bring a major

116
00:06:20,520 --> 00:06:24,039
Speaker 1: lawsuit against the drug companies on opioid. Some states have

117
00:06:24,120 --> 00:06:26,960
Speaker 1: done it, but I'd like a lawsuit to be brought

118
00:06:27,400 --> 00:06:32,800
Speaker 1: against these companies that are really sending opioids at a

119
00:06:32,880 --> 00:06:36,919
Speaker 1: level that it shouldn't be happening. Joining me is Richard

120
00:06:36,960 --> 00:06:40,000
Speaker 1: Austin is a professor at the University of Kentucky Law School.

121
00:06:40,520 --> 00:06:44,360
Speaker 1: Richard drug makers are also already facing more than nine

122
00:06:44,400 --> 00:06:48,480
Speaker 1: hundred lawsuits by more than twenty five cities, states, counties,

123
00:06:48,920 --> 00:06:52,400
Speaker 1: and others over opioid addiction, most of those in federal court,

124
00:06:52,960 --> 00:06:55,719
Speaker 1: and the Trump administration has filed a request to join

125
00:06:55,839 --> 00:06:59,680
Speaker 1: settlement talks in the multi district litigation in Ohio. So

126
00:07:00,040 --> 00:07:04,560
Speaker 1: I have the Justice Department bring a separate suit. Well,

127
00:07:04,640 --> 00:07:09,160
Speaker 1: I think the theories that they would use are somewhat

128
00:07:09,240 --> 00:07:12,880
Speaker 1: different from, UH, the theories that the other plantiffs have

129
00:07:13,000 --> 00:07:15,680
Speaker 1: been bringing in in the litigation that you spoke of.

130
00:07:16,400 --> 00:07:19,840
Speaker 1: In particular, they are a variety of federal statutes that

131
00:07:20,280 --> 00:07:23,160
Speaker 1: the drug companies and when I say drug companies, I

132
00:07:23,200 --> 00:07:28,400
Speaker 1: mean manufacturers, distributors, and large scale retail sellers UH that

133
00:07:28,520 --> 00:07:31,880
Speaker 1: they may have violated some of these federal statutes UH

134
00:07:31,880 --> 00:07:37,200
Speaker 1: and so UH. And indeed, the federal government has brought

135
00:07:37,360 --> 00:07:42,280
Speaker 1: suits against most of these UH pharmaceutical companies and has

136
00:07:42,320 --> 00:07:46,520
Speaker 1: either one or has reached settlements that were very favorable

137
00:07:46,560 --> 00:07:50,520
Speaker 1: to them. So I'm guessing that they don't want to

138
00:07:50,560 --> 00:07:53,960
Speaker 1: get caught up in a settlement process that the global

139
00:07:54,000 --> 00:07:56,840
Speaker 1: settlement process, which is which is what would come out

140
00:07:56,880 --> 00:08:01,160
Speaker 1: of the multidistrict litigation. So if they're so, if there's

141
00:08:01,160 --> 00:08:03,800
Speaker 1: a global settlement process going on in the multi district

142
00:08:03,840 --> 00:08:07,200
Speaker 1: litigation and there's a federal separate federal lawsuit, would that

143
00:08:07,240 --> 00:08:14,440
Speaker 1: affect the settlement process? Well, not directly, of course. Um, realistically,

144
00:08:14,560 --> 00:08:17,400
Speaker 1: there's only so much money the drug companies have, so

145
00:08:17,800 --> 00:08:21,200
Speaker 1: to the extent that they pay some of that to

146
00:08:21,280 --> 00:08:24,440
Speaker 1: the federal government, there will be less left for the

147
00:08:24,480 --> 00:08:29,080
Speaker 1: other plaintiffs, assuming that there is a settlement. Now, what

148
00:08:29,240 --> 00:08:34,840
Speaker 1: about criminal proceedings by the Justice Department. Well, that's a

149
00:08:34,920 --> 00:08:38,480
Speaker 1: very real possibility because many of these federal statutes I

150
00:08:38,559 --> 00:08:42,720
Speaker 1: spoke of our criminal as well as civil UH and

151
00:08:42,880 --> 00:08:46,199
Speaker 1: UH and therefore there's the prospect there's some pretty substantial

152
00:08:46,559 --> 00:08:50,600
Speaker 1: criminal liability, even jail time theoretically, although of course you

153
00:08:50,600 --> 00:08:52,880
Speaker 1: can't put a corporation in jail, but you can put

154
00:08:52,920 --> 00:08:57,640
Speaker 1: their officers in jail. And that almost happened about ten

155
00:08:57,720 --> 00:09:02,199
Speaker 1: years ago with Perdue Farm and Oxyconton. They were charged

156
00:09:02,320 --> 00:09:07,640
Speaker 1: with uh mislabeling, which in that case meant that their

157
00:09:08,440 --> 00:09:13,760
Speaker 1: sales reps were telling doctors that making statements to doctors

158
00:09:13,760 --> 00:09:18,240
Speaker 1: that were um contradictory to what the labeling on the

159
00:09:18,280 --> 00:09:21,679
Speaker 1: product approved by the FDA set And they were ultimately

160
00:09:21,760 --> 00:09:25,400
Speaker 1: find about six d million dollars and there was serious

161
00:09:25,400 --> 00:09:29,680
Speaker 1: talk about the sending some of the top executives to jail,

162
00:09:29,760 --> 00:09:33,520
Speaker 1: and instead they were find very substantial amounts of money

163
00:09:33,559 --> 00:09:37,800
Speaker 1: as well on these criminal charges. What do you see

164
00:09:38,040 --> 00:09:41,480
Speaker 1: and what has history shown us about the effectiveness of

165
00:09:41,600 --> 00:09:47,320
Speaker 1: litigation as a tactic to fight drug abuse. Well, I

166
00:09:47,400 --> 00:09:49,840
Speaker 1: don't think the track record is very good, at least

167
00:09:49,840 --> 00:09:53,400
Speaker 1: not so far. Of course, they were the only things

168
00:09:53,480 --> 00:09:56,800
Speaker 1: we have to to compare this with is the tobacco

169
00:09:56,880 --> 00:10:00,920
Speaker 1: litigation of some fifteen years ago, if twenty years ago,

170
00:10:01,520 --> 00:10:04,520
Speaker 1: and that certainly resulted in a very large settlement that

171
00:10:04,600 --> 00:10:07,440
Speaker 1: went to the States, But I'm not sure people gave

172
00:10:07,520 --> 00:10:11,040
Speaker 1: up smoking UM. And indeed it was almost the devil's

173
00:10:11,080 --> 00:10:15,560
Speaker 1: bargain because now the states, at least that were parties

174
00:10:15,600 --> 00:10:19,319
Speaker 1: to that settlement, UM had a strong incentive not to

175
00:10:19,400 --> 00:10:22,840
Speaker 1: put the tobacco companies out of business, because that would

176
00:10:22,960 --> 00:10:26,280
Speaker 1: kill the goose that was laying the golden egg. UM.

177
00:10:26,320 --> 00:10:32,960
Speaker 1: As far as the present UM litigation is concerned, I'm

178
00:10:31,600 --> 00:10:36,960
Speaker 1: uh skeptical that it will have much of an effect.

179
00:10:37,440 --> 00:10:40,880
Speaker 1: It might, of course, drug companies might change their conduct

180
00:10:40,880 --> 00:10:46,479
Speaker 1: in response to the prospect of even more UM damage awards.

181
00:10:46,520 --> 00:10:50,160
Speaker 1: But in the past they've pretty much just taken it

182
00:10:50,240 --> 00:10:52,880
Speaker 1: as a cost of doing business, then moved on. Even

183
00:10:52,920 --> 00:10:56,559
Speaker 1: that very substantial uh fine that I've spoke of earlier,

184
00:10:56,600 --> 00:11:00,680
Speaker 1: six million dollars perdue, just blew it off. They paid

185
00:11:00,720 --> 00:11:02,760
Speaker 1: the money, and they went back to pretty much doing

186
00:11:02,760 --> 00:11:06,440
Speaker 1: what they've been doing before. So I don't know that

187
00:11:06,559 --> 00:11:11,840
Speaker 1: it would uh really address the problem very very much.

188
00:11:12,160 --> 00:11:15,160
Speaker 1: Only only a minute here on a topic that certainly

189
00:11:15,200 --> 00:11:19,400
Speaker 1: deserves a lot of consideration. But so is the answer

190
00:11:19,440 --> 00:11:23,040
Speaker 1: then in legislation, what's the best answer? Well, I think

191
00:11:23,080 --> 00:11:26,520
Speaker 1: that's certainly part of it. I think in addition, um

192
00:11:26,600 --> 00:11:29,199
Speaker 1: the federal government in particular is going to have to

193
00:11:29,640 --> 00:11:34,360
Speaker 1: um uh finance some programs to try to deal with

194
00:11:34,400 --> 00:11:37,880
Speaker 1: the addiction problem. Uh. You know, you've got perhaps as

195
00:11:37,920 --> 00:11:40,760
Speaker 1: many as two million people who are addicted, and they're

196
00:11:40,800 --> 00:11:43,800
Speaker 1: going to stay addicted, perhaps for the rest of their lives,

197
00:11:43,800 --> 00:11:47,400
Speaker 1: and so you can't just leave them out there. You

198
00:11:47,440 --> 00:11:49,920
Speaker 1: have to do something to help them, and there isn't

199
00:11:50,000 --> 00:11:54,440
Speaker 1: much available at the present time. And of course, giving

200
00:11:54,440 --> 00:11:56,160
Speaker 1: the states a lot of money doesn't mean they're going

201
00:11:56,200 --> 00:11:59,319
Speaker 1: to spend it on these kinds of programs. It's it's

202
00:11:59,400 --> 00:12:03,400
Speaker 1: it's it's a really serious problem. Almost seventy thousand Americans

203
00:12:03,440 --> 00:12:06,880
Speaker 1: died from opioid overdoses last year alone. Thanks so much

204
00:12:06,920 --> 00:12:10,560
Speaker 1: for joining us this conversation. Richard. That's Richard Austinus, professor

205
00:12:10,559 --> 00:12:13,839
Speaker 1: at the University of Kentucky Law School. Thanks for listening

206
00:12:13,880 --> 00:12:17,160
Speaker 1: to the Bloomberg Law Podcast. You can subscribe and listen

207
00:12:17,200 --> 00:12:20,760
Speaker 1: to the show on Apple podcast, SoundCloud, and on Bloomberg

208
00:12:20,840 --> 00:12:25,560
Speaker 1: dot com slash podcast. I'm June Brosso. This is Bloomberg