WEBVTT - #916 Packers Unscripted: Lots to unpack

0:00:06.570 --> 0:00:10.570
<v Speaker 1>Hi everybody, welcome to another edition of Packers Unscripted from Packers.com.

0:00:10.770 --> 0:00:13.630
<v Speaker 1>I am Mike Spofford, joined, as always, by my partner

0:00:13.670 --> 0:00:16.530
<v Speaker 1>in everything Packers, Wes Hodkowitz. We're coming to you here

0:00:16.570 --> 0:00:20.900
<v Speaker 1>from the Pottawatomie Sportsbook studio inside the walls of Lambeau Field.

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:23.459
<v Speaker 1>A lot to cover on this show, Wes, and I

0:00:23.500 --> 0:00:25.279
<v Speaker 1>don't know if we're going to be able to touch

0:00:25.340 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>on everything that we need to, but we have to

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:31.010
<v Speaker 1>start with the 20-17 loss on a walk-off field goal

0:00:31.170 --> 0:00:35.390
<v Speaker 1>at Ford Field on Sunday. And I'll let you start

0:00:35.409 --> 0:00:36.950
<v Speaker 1>where you want to, whether you want to talk about

0:00:36.970 --> 0:00:38.790
<v Speaker 1>the penalties, whether you want to talk about the Packers

0:00:38.830 --> 0:00:40.830
<v Speaker 1>in the red zone or some of the other things

0:00:40.870 --> 0:00:43.850
<v Speaker 1>that went on in that game. However you slice it,

0:00:43.890 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>this was a really, really, really tough one to swallow.

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 2>I just think it was the definition of a frustrating

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:53.520
<v Speaker 2>loss in so many different regards. Now, obviously, I want

0:00:53.540 --> 0:00:56.820
<v Speaker 2>to start with this because, you know, I belabored penalties

0:00:56.880 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 2>on social media. I did a video on it. We

0:00:59.100 --> 0:01:01.900
<v Speaker 2>will happily talk about it on this show. But I

0:01:01.940 --> 0:01:04.300
<v Speaker 2>think if you look at it just strictly from the Packers'

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:08.380
<v Speaker 2>point of view, just too many things that they've struggled

0:01:08.420 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 2>with throughout the course of this season showed up again

0:01:10.860 --> 0:01:14.620
<v Speaker 2>against the Detroit Lions, right? And for as much as

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:19.030
<v Speaker 2>Alex Moore and his staff made life more difficult on

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:22.550
<v Speaker 2>Green Bay, it was also the Packers making life difficult

0:01:22.610 --> 0:01:25.050
<v Speaker 2>on themselves as well. When you talk about one for

0:01:25.110 --> 0:01:29.130
<v Speaker 2>four inside the red zone, two missed field goals, Josh

0:01:29.170 --> 0:01:32.429
<v Speaker 2>Jacobs with the drop, on third and five, third and six,

0:01:32.450 --> 0:01:34.510
<v Speaker 2>that could have potentially put that game away or at

0:01:34.569 --> 0:01:38.569
<v Speaker 2>least put the Lions in a position where they had

0:01:38.590 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 2>to go down and score a touchdown. They were not

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:43.260
<v Speaker 2>able to finish that opportunity. Jordan Love was hit way

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:46.340
<v Speaker 2>too often. I actually thought in the second half there

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 2>were some bright spots with the run game. I thought

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:50.620
<v Speaker 2>it showed some signs of life there behind Josh Jacobs,

0:01:50.660 --> 0:01:55.380
<v Speaker 2>but again, started very slowly. There were too many drops defensively,

0:01:55.480 --> 0:02:00.230
<v Speaker 2>not enough pressure. on Jared Goff, and certainly Amon Ross St.

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:03.900
<v Speaker 2>Brown just went to town. And for all the production

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 2>in this game, over 400 yards of total offense for Detroit,

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:10.959
<v Speaker 2>300 and change for Green Bay, still only 37 total points.

0:02:11.100 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 2>I thought this was a game where both teams might

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 2>have potentially threatened over 30, but it wasn't the case.

0:02:16.100 --> 0:02:18.190
<v Speaker 2>And for the Packers, I just think Again, we can

0:02:18.210 --> 0:02:21.050
<v Speaker 2>talk about some of the penalty issues as well, but

0:02:21.790 --> 0:02:23.989
<v Speaker 2>there's a reason why Green Bay's at 4-3 right now,

0:02:24.030 --> 0:02:26.510
<v Speaker 2>and I thought this game sort of underscored a lot

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 2>of those reasons.

0:02:27.300 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I would agree with you there. The penalties are

0:02:30.580 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>getting frustrating. There's no doubt about it. I don't want

0:02:35.180 --> 0:02:38.100
<v Speaker 1>to belabor it too much, but the NFL is just

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:42.810
<v Speaker 1>embarrassing itself with the refusal to do something to get

0:02:42.970 --> 0:02:46.510
<v Speaker 1>the calls correct, and they are obviously wrong on the field.

0:02:47.710 --> 0:02:50.829
<v Speaker 1>So I don't want to talk too much about that

0:02:50.889 --> 0:02:53.829
<v Speaker 1>because what I wrote about for the most part after

0:02:53.850 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the game, and I know you had a really good

0:02:55.590 --> 0:02:58.700
<v Speaker 1>piece on everything that Xavier McKinney had to say, and

0:02:58.740 --> 0:03:00.420
<v Speaker 1>I give a lot of credit to Xavier McKinney for

0:03:00.460 --> 0:03:02.220
<v Speaker 1>standing up and saying what needed to be said in

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:05.139
<v Speaker 1>the locker room. I do understand why Matt LaFleur did

0:03:05.180 --> 0:03:08.079
<v Speaker 1>not take that approach at the podium because I know

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:10.930
<v Speaker 1>what was more on Matt LaFleur's mind than the penalties

0:03:11.410 --> 0:03:14.710
<v Speaker 1>was not just the one for four in the red zone,

0:03:14.810 --> 0:03:18.799
<v Speaker 1>but that seven total points in the red zone in

0:03:18.900 --> 0:03:22.980
<v Speaker 1>four trips. That's just awful. I mean, it was two

0:03:23.020 --> 0:03:25.660
<v Speaker 1>missed field goals. It was an ill-advised fourth down that

0:03:25.700 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Matt LeFleur immediately regretted. You cannot get into the opposing

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:33.060
<v Speaker 1>team's red zone four times and come away with only

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:35.740
<v Speaker 1>seven points and expect to win the game, even if

0:03:35.780 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>you get every single officiating call to go your way.

0:03:39.700 --> 0:03:43.150
<v Speaker 1>That's where the Packers lost this game. And that's what's

0:03:43.190 --> 0:03:47.580
<v Speaker 1>so frustrating because Yes, there's a lot of outside talk

0:03:47.700 --> 0:03:49.900
<v Speaker 1>about the officials and all that. I'm not saying that

0:03:49.940 --> 0:03:53.420
<v Speaker 1>it's not warranted. But for anybody who says, in my opinion,

0:03:53.540 --> 0:03:56.100
<v Speaker 1>that the Packers lost this game because of the officiating,

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that's completely misguided because this game, what was

0:03:59.660 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 1>in the Packers, you can't control the officiating. What was

0:04:02.540 --> 0:04:05.630
<v Speaker 1>in the Packers' control was to get points. Yeah. And

0:04:05.650 --> 0:04:08.130
<v Speaker 1>they didn't get enough and they had plenty of opportunity

0:04:08.170 --> 0:04:08.610
<v Speaker 1>to do so.

0:04:09.110 --> 0:04:12.210
<v Speaker 2>Tons of opportunities. And the other thing, Green Bay started

0:04:12.270 --> 0:04:14.860
<v Speaker 2>very fast this season. Most of their first drives of

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 2>the game have produced some type of points. This was

0:04:17.860 --> 0:04:19.360
<v Speaker 2>a case where they got all the way down deep

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:22.359
<v Speaker 2>inside the red zone there. They were converting fourth downs

0:04:22.540 --> 0:04:24.599
<v Speaker 2>when they kept going for fourth downs. They converted the

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:27.450
<v Speaker 2>first three of those. Kind of a chip shot field

0:04:27.470 --> 0:04:30.210
<v Speaker 2>goal there that Trey Smack is unable to make, but

0:04:30.310 --> 0:04:32.870
<v Speaker 2>the offense bounced back. I mean, that next series at

0:04:32.890 --> 0:04:36.170
<v Speaker 2>the end of the first quarter, a nice, productive, efficient

0:04:36.210 --> 0:04:38.940
<v Speaker 2>drive that ends with Jordan Love being able to maneuver

0:04:38.980 --> 0:04:41.060
<v Speaker 2>the pocket, show his speed a little bit, show his

0:04:41.140 --> 0:04:43.580
<v Speaker 2>legs a little bit, and buy enough time to open

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:45.479
<v Speaker 2>up Tucker Kraft on kind of sort of a scramble

0:04:45.500 --> 0:04:48.260
<v Speaker 2>drill on the back of the end zone. The Packers

0:04:48.300 --> 0:04:51.839
<v Speaker 2>were put in another tough spot where injuries up front,

0:04:52.380 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 2>Sean Ryan gets the high ankle sprain. Immediately after that,

0:04:55.740 --> 0:04:58.380
<v Speaker 2>Jacob Monk gets the quad injury. And you're down to

0:04:58.420 --> 0:05:02.180
<v Speaker 2>John Williams, who has sort of apprenticed a little bit

0:05:02.460 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 2>at center, but that is not his natural position.

0:05:04.580 --> 0:05:06.719
<v Speaker 1>That's putting it mildly, I think.

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:09.779
<v Speaker 2>But if you go back to training camp, he was

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:11.850
<v Speaker 2>mostly working at left tackle. He played a lot of

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:14.050
<v Speaker 2>different positions, but it was left tackle where he kind

0:05:14.089 --> 0:05:15.770
<v Speaker 2>of settled in as the Packers sort of projected out

0:05:15.810 --> 0:05:18.860
<v Speaker 2>their offensive line. So what does that mean? That means

0:05:18.900 --> 0:05:21.260
<v Speaker 2>that Jordan Love, once again, more was on his plate,

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 2>more was on his shoulders to make plays, to extend plays,

0:05:25.020 --> 0:05:28.910
<v Speaker 2>to absorb some hits and some contact. And again, we'll

0:05:28.930 --> 0:05:30.589
<v Speaker 2>get into the roughing the passers and the fact that

0:05:30.610 --> 0:05:33.870
<v Speaker 2>it's now 8-0 against Green Bay in that regard, despite

0:05:33.910 --> 0:05:36.770
<v Speaker 2>the numerous times that Jordan's been hit this year. But

0:05:37.070 --> 0:05:39.770
<v Speaker 2>I think when you, again, go back to the controllables, right,

0:05:40.710 --> 0:05:42.820
<v Speaker 2>it's the players around Jordan Love that need to start

0:05:43.170 --> 0:05:45.310
<v Speaker 2>you know, picking things up and being able to help

0:05:45.430 --> 0:05:47.610
<v Speaker 2>out their quarterback, whether it be with the drops, whether

0:05:47.630 --> 0:05:49.790
<v Speaker 2>it be with the production, whether it be with some

0:05:49.810 --> 0:05:51.950
<v Speaker 2>of the things they're doing, running the ball, uh, there's

0:05:51.990 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 2>just not been enough of that so far. So, um, yeah,

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 2>a very disappointing outcome in this one, in addition to, um,

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:02.620
<v Speaker 2>a lot of penalties that, uh, I think everybody was

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 2>left scratching their head about afterwards.

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:05.900
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no doubt. I mean, my hat is off to

0:06:05.940 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>John Williams and the job that unbelievable, you know, to

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:10.140
<v Speaker 1>come in. I mean, that would have, that would have

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:13.380
<v Speaker 1>been a tough assignment at Lambeau field and to, for

0:06:13.420 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 1>him to be the number three center and get thrust

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:19.110
<v Speaker 1>in there in the beginning, you're on the road, noisy environment,

0:06:19.170 --> 0:06:21.790
<v Speaker 1>having to, you know, run the silent count and all

0:06:21.810 --> 0:06:25.349
<v Speaker 1>the communication that's required that is so much more difficult, um,

0:06:25.710 --> 0:06:28.150
<v Speaker 1>you know, in a dome on the road and all that. Um,

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:31.020
<v Speaker 1>did really, really well. And, and we'll see, he may

0:06:31.260 --> 0:06:33.650
<v Speaker 1>need to be called on again. There, there potentially are

0:06:33.690 --> 0:06:36.289
<v Speaker 1>some other options if the Packers want to go that

0:06:36.370 --> 0:06:39.030
<v Speaker 1>route on this short week, Thursday night in Carolina. But, um,

0:06:39.170 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>but Williams certainly, uh, certainly gives them a viable option

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:43.180
<v Speaker 1>there to keep going.

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:45.730
<v Speaker 2>He certainly does. And Mike, the thing that was most

0:06:45.790 --> 0:06:48.070
<v Speaker 2>surprising to me, we always talk about the next man up.

0:06:48.130 --> 0:06:51.770
<v Speaker 2>He was the last man up. If John Williams, something

0:06:51.810 --> 0:06:54.770
<v Speaker 2>happens there, none of those other guys, to the best

0:06:54.810 --> 0:06:57.989
<v Speaker 2>of my knowledge, snapped before. You mentioned the other options

0:06:58.010 --> 0:07:00.429
<v Speaker 2>Green Bay has. Well, that's Jagger Burton and that's Donovan Jennings.

0:07:00.490 --> 0:07:03.310
<v Speaker 2>Both of those guys were inactive. I don't know the

0:07:03.350 --> 0:07:05.690
<v Speaker 2>path or the history of a Kevin Zeitler or a

0:07:05.710 --> 0:07:08.450
<v Speaker 2>Lakin Tomlinson. Maybe Lakin did it at Duke. I'm not sure.

0:07:08.529 --> 0:07:11.170
<v Speaker 2>Certainly hasn't done it in the NFL. And Travis Glover

0:07:11.230 --> 0:07:13.670
<v Speaker 2>is a converted tackle that has been playing guard. And

0:07:13.690 --> 0:07:16.490
<v Speaker 2>then we found out afterwards on the injury report on Monday,

0:07:17.350 --> 0:07:19.470
<v Speaker 2>he actually has a knee injury that had him as

0:07:19.590 --> 0:07:22.770
<v Speaker 2>did not participate estimation on Monday. So Green Bay is

0:07:22.830 --> 0:07:25.830
<v Speaker 2>going through it right now. Jacob Monk has been placed

0:07:25.910 --> 0:07:28.850
<v Speaker 2>on IR. Mekhi Becton is now up on the 53-man roster.

0:07:28.870 --> 0:07:32.670
<v Speaker 2>So they have another option there. But especially if Sean's

0:07:32.690 --> 0:07:34.130
<v Speaker 2>going to be down a little bit of time here too,

0:07:34.170 --> 0:07:35.710
<v Speaker 2>and he's been one of the most durable pieces of

0:07:35.750 --> 0:07:38.050
<v Speaker 2>this offensive line, the Packers are going to have to

0:07:38.090 --> 0:07:39.330
<v Speaker 2>get even more flexible up front.

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And you mentioned before, you know, Jacobs, I think

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>he provided a little bit of a spark to the

0:07:45.060 --> 0:07:47.230
<v Speaker 1>running game in the second half. It took a while

0:07:47.310 --> 0:07:49.570
<v Speaker 1>for some of those holes to develop and for some

0:07:49.610 --> 0:07:52.730
<v Speaker 1>things to work. He obviously had a great 25 yard

0:07:53.230 --> 0:07:55.750
<v Speaker 1>catch and run tight roping the sideline, you know, that

0:07:55.810 --> 0:07:58.950
<v Speaker 1>type of play from a Packers running back in the

0:07:58.990 --> 0:08:01.660
<v Speaker 1>passing game. We haven't really seen too much of that

0:08:01.780 --> 0:08:04.580
<v Speaker 1>so far this season. Unfortunately, he wasn't able to catch

0:08:04.660 --> 0:08:07.260
<v Speaker 1>the third down pass in the red zone last in

0:08:07.290 --> 0:08:09.350
<v Speaker 1>the last few minutes of the game that then led

0:08:09.410 --> 0:08:11.730
<v Speaker 1>to the missed kick that kept the game tied there

0:08:11.790 --> 0:08:13.850
<v Speaker 1>as Detroit got the ball back for the final possession.

0:08:14.990 --> 0:08:16.870
<v Speaker 1>I do want to talk about the defense though here

0:08:16.950 --> 0:08:20.820
<v Speaker 1>too because the Lions had a lot of production. They

0:08:20.860 --> 0:08:24.020
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of explosive plays. I think the defense

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>caught a couple of breaks. I know, I guess I

0:08:28.550 --> 0:08:30.630
<v Speaker 1>was going to ask you, end of the first half

0:08:31.270 --> 0:08:34.069
<v Speaker 1>when the Lions fumble inside the 10 yard line. They're

0:08:34.090 --> 0:08:35.929
<v Speaker 1>looking like they're going in to get seven. They're at

0:08:35.970 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>a minimum going to get three points there. I think

0:08:38.260 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>they credited Isaiah McDuffie with a forced fumble, but Was

0:08:42.820 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 1>that kind of a friendly fire thing? Did the Packers

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:48.940
<v Speaker 1>just get lucky there, or did McDuffie really knock that

0:08:48.980 --> 0:08:49.679
<v Speaker 1>ball out? Well, no.

0:08:49.700 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Isaiah, if you watch the play, he kind of gets

0:08:53.620 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 2>knocked back. He's down on the ground. I never saw

0:08:56.020 --> 0:08:57.570
<v Speaker 2>a good look at it, so I was curious how

0:08:57.590 --> 0:09:00.270
<v Speaker 2>that turned out. Jameer Gibbs had just terrible ball security

0:09:00.330 --> 0:09:02.150
<v Speaker 2>on the play. It was almost like if you run

0:09:02.210 --> 0:09:04.570
<v Speaker 2>headfirst into a wall and you're not really paying attention

0:09:04.590 --> 0:09:07.270
<v Speaker 2>to what is going on with the football anymore. Just

0:09:07.330 --> 0:09:10.780
<v Speaker 2>a very lazy play on Gibbs' perspective. But I think

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:13.310
<v Speaker 2>why they credit Isaiah is it's the nearest defender. It's

0:09:13.330 --> 0:09:16.590
<v Speaker 2>the guy that was in there. I mean, the... Lions

0:09:16.650 --> 0:09:19.690
<v Speaker 2>had numbers on that play. I mean, Isaiah was sort

0:09:19.710 --> 0:09:22.090
<v Speaker 2>of the only one standing up. They had almost three

0:09:22.530 --> 0:09:25.530
<v Speaker 2>offensive linemen getting into the second level there, but Gibbs

0:09:25.550 --> 0:09:27.790
<v Speaker 2>just doesn't protect the ball. And yeah, there were so

0:09:27.830 --> 0:09:30.970
<v Speaker 2>many small errors that Detroit made in this game. And honestly,

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:32.770
<v Speaker 2>what it ended up coming down to, I went into

0:09:32.790 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 2>the game thinking it was going to be all about

0:09:34.270 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 2>the explosive plays. And to a certain extent it was,

0:09:36.940 --> 0:09:38.700
<v Speaker 2>because that was really the biggest difference. Some of the

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 2>downfield posts that they were able to run over the

0:09:41.340 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 2>middle for big gains. But realistically, it just kind of

0:09:44.380 --> 0:09:46.460
<v Speaker 2>came down to which team made fewer mistakes. Yeah.

0:09:46.860 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And I thought the Lions were making their share

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:52.910
<v Speaker 1>of mistakes along the way. The fumble at the end

0:09:52.929 --> 0:09:54.929
<v Speaker 1>of the first half, the fumble at the beginning of

0:09:54.950 --> 0:09:57.229
<v Speaker 1>the second half. I mean, the Lions essentially are in

0:09:57.270 --> 0:10:00.340
<v Speaker 1>position to double up on Green Bay and they end

0:10:00.380 --> 0:10:02.739
<v Speaker 1>up getting nothing out of those two possessions and the

0:10:02.780 --> 0:10:06.610
<v Speaker 1>Packers get the recovery off the fumbled snap to start

0:10:06.650 --> 0:10:08.650
<v Speaker 1>the third quarter and Green Bay goes in and gets

0:10:08.710 --> 0:10:12.030
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown and the game kind of changed there. But

0:10:12.050 --> 0:10:16.020
<v Speaker 1>then the one moment the Packers defensively didn't take advantage

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:19.209
<v Speaker 1>of the break was Evan Williams missing the interception that

0:10:19.250 --> 0:10:21.570
<v Speaker 1>hit him in the hands. He could have run that

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:24.330
<v Speaker 1>one back a long way because he had his momentum.

0:10:24.350 --> 0:10:26.990
<v Speaker 1>He broke on the ball perfectly. He would have had

0:10:27.010 --> 0:10:29.770
<v Speaker 1>a shot to maybe take that one of the house.

0:10:30.390 --> 0:10:34.230
<v Speaker 1>That's one of those that you really regret because overall

0:10:34.270 --> 0:10:38.089
<v Speaker 1>what was a, I won't say great, but I guess

0:10:38.130 --> 0:10:41.150
<v Speaker 1>I would say against that offense in that building and

0:10:41.230 --> 0:10:44.610
<v Speaker 1>as explosive as they are, The Packers' defense was holding

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:47.790
<v Speaker 1>its own. They were doing all right, and they needed

0:10:47.850 --> 0:10:50.910
<v Speaker 1>that one more play, and unfortunately it was there for

0:10:50.950 --> 0:10:53.829
<v Speaker 1>Williams to make, and he's made them all season long

0:10:53.950 --> 0:10:56.450
<v Speaker 1>until that moment, and that was really a tough break.

0:10:56.550 --> 0:10:58.650
<v Speaker 2>For sure, and those are the type of plays you've

0:10:58.670 --> 0:11:00.510
<v Speaker 2>got to make. Those are the money plays. Those are

0:11:00.530 --> 0:11:02.709
<v Speaker 2>the ones that get you paid. The one thing I

0:11:02.770 --> 0:11:04.829
<v Speaker 2>will say and why I think ultimately Green Bay's defense

0:11:04.870 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 2>is going to be pretty darn good this year The

0:11:07.150 --> 0:11:09.660
<v Speaker 2>first half, they gave up way too many yards, but

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 2>they were opportunistic. They were good inside the red zone.

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 2>They found ways to keep Detroit off the board. In

0:11:16.020 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 2>the second half, they made the adjustments. A lot of

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:20.740
<v Speaker 2>quick three and outs and just Detroit not being able

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:23.660
<v Speaker 2>to move the football. They were, again, very good against

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:26.220
<v Speaker 2>Jameer Gibbs. Jameer Gibbs did not have a big run.

0:11:26.260 --> 0:11:28.319
<v Speaker 2>He made some plays, but I mean, it was a

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 2>24 for 99 type of game. The problem was it

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:34.460
<v Speaker 2>was some of those big gashes that they gave up,

0:11:34.500 --> 0:11:37.750
<v Speaker 2>the Jamison William touchdowns, that type of things. Um, that,

0:11:38.020 --> 0:11:40.200
<v Speaker 2>and then, and then obviously you can, again, go into

0:11:40.820 --> 0:11:43.060
<v Speaker 2>roughing the passer on Brenton Cox Jr. Ends up leading

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 2>into a touchdown. Like there's these small things that end

0:11:46.260 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 2>up happening throughout the course of this game. Um, but, uh, yeah,

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 2>certainly I think Green Bay, given the fact that Zyre Franklin,

0:11:53.179 --> 0:11:55.070
<v Speaker 2>they found out on Thursday was not going to be available.

0:11:55.090 --> 0:11:57.170
<v Speaker 2>I tipped my cap to McDuffie for the job he did.

0:11:57.330 --> 0:12:00.420
<v Speaker 2>He was the Johnny on the spot player during the botched, uh,

0:12:00.470 --> 0:12:03.690
<v Speaker 2>handoff exchange, uh, between Goff and Cade Mays, who was

0:12:03.730 --> 0:12:07.380
<v Speaker 2>making his return in this game, their, their starting center. So, Yeah,

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:11.900
<v Speaker 2>I thought by and large, I mean, 400 total yards

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 2>is 412 yards. That's not a good day. But Green

0:12:15.380 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 2>Bay's defense gave them a chance to win this game.

0:12:17.300 --> 0:12:19.500
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and a tip of the cap as well to

0:12:19.540 --> 0:12:23.609
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Cisse because that one drive in the third quarter

0:12:23.850 --> 0:12:26.510
<v Speaker 1>where there was at least a penalty or two on

0:12:26.550 --> 0:12:29.210
<v Speaker 1>that drive that the Packers were kind of scratching their head.

0:12:29.350 --> 0:12:32.090
<v Speaker 1>One of them was against Cisse where he gets called

0:12:32.110 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 1>for DPI and it wipes out his own interception. and

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:37.599
<v Speaker 1>then the Lions are in goal to go. They ultimately

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 1>decide to go for it after Cisse breaks up the

0:12:40.750 --> 0:12:42.730
<v Speaker 1>third down pass in the end zone, and then he

0:12:42.750 --> 0:12:45.090
<v Speaker 1>gets the push out of Jamison Williams in the back

0:12:45.110 --> 0:12:47.689
<v Speaker 1>of the end zone on fourth down to prevent the

0:12:47.730 --> 0:12:50.050
<v Speaker 1>Lions from getting any points on that drive. I mean,

0:12:50.070 --> 0:12:54.510
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was, I mean, we've talked plenty about Cisse,

0:12:54.530 --> 0:12:57.810
<v Speaker 1>of course, but I mean, for a young player and

0:12:57.910 --> 0:13:00.290
<v Speaker 1>to have that moment taken away from him by a

0:13:00.350 --> 0:13:03.370
<v Speaker 1>flag and then to come back just a few plays

0:13:03.450 --> 0:13:06.790
<v Speaker 1>later and to make those back-to-back plays in the end

0:13:06.809 --> 0:13:10.130
<v Speaker 1>zone to keep this game within reach for Green Bay

0:13:10.550 --> 0:13:13.270
<v Speaker 1>and to give the offense a chance. You can't say

0:13:13.309 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 1>enough about what that rookie has meant to this defense.

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:20.900
<v Speaker 2>No, you can't at all, especially with all the questions

0:13:20.940 --> 0:13:24.380
<v Speaker 2>at that position going into the season. He talks about

0:13:24.420 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 2>his relationship with Stephon Gilmore, and the more I watch

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:29.740
<v Speaker 2>his play style, the more I see parallels. The fact

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:31.850
<v Speaker 2>that when this guy is not just 21 years old,

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:34.230
<v Speaker 2>when he's 25, when he has some seasoning underneath his belt,

0:13:35.150 --> 0:13:38.729
<v Speaker 2>if he stays healthy, what his ceiling and what the

0:13:38.790 --> 0:13:41.709
<v Speaker 2>potential looks like for him in this defense. He's just

0:13:41.750 --> 0:13:44.220
<v Speaker 2>such a heady player. He's such an athletic player, and

0:13:44.250 --> 0:13:47.020
<v Speaker 2>he's not afraid of the fire. He just embraces it. Now,

0:13:47.059 --> 0:13:49.020
<v Speaker 2>he wasn't perfect. There was a couple times that he

0:13:49.059 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 2>got beat too, but those plays are going to come

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:54.819
<v Speaker 2>together for him. He's smart enough, he's intelligent enough, and

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:58.150
<v Speaker 2>he's athletic enough to be able to overcome some of

0:13:58.170 --> 0:14:01.530
<v Speaker 2>that early adversity. And the Packers have desperately needed him.

0:14:01.970 --> 0:14:04.069
<v Speaker 2>I will say here, just to correct myself, I don't

0:14:04.110 --> 0:14:07.320
<v Speaker 2>need any more Lions fans in my mentions. There's already

0:14:07.340 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 2>been so many of them. The roughing the passer on

0:14:12.300 --> 0:14:14.740
<v Speaker 2>Brenton Cox Jr., that was on the series where Cissé

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:16.439
<v Speaker 2>nearly got the pick. It was on the series where

0:14:16.460 --> 0:14:18.940
<v Speaker 2>Cissé ended up getting the back-to-back. So the Packers did

0:14:18.980 --> 0:14:21.350
<v Speaker 2>earn the stop there, the roughing the passer that continued

0:14:21.370 --> 0:14:24.730
<v Speaker 2>the drive. was over on Carl Brooks later on.

0:14:24.810 --> 0:14:30.430
<v Speaker 1>On the final drive of the game, yeah. Well, as

0:14:30.490 --> 0:14:32.750
<v Speaker 1>I said, I'm not going to belabor the point, but

0:14:32.810 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>before we turn the page to Carolina, with regard to

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:38.940
<v Speaker 1>the penalties, and I'm not going to go through chapter

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:41.020
<v Speaker 1>and verse on every single one of them, but you

0:14:41.060 --> 0:14:44.310
<v Speaker 1>know this, Wes. I have been saying, I mean, you

0:14:44.350 --> 0:14:46.950
<v Speaker 1>and I have been writing Insider Inbox for, what, this

0:14:47.010 --> 0:14:48.170
<v Speaker 1>is the 11th season?

0:14:48.290 --> 0:14:50.130
<v Speaker 2>11th season for me. Obviously, you went back to the

0:14:50.190 --> 0:14:50.910
<v Speaker 2>Aspen case.

0:14:50.930 --> 0:14:53.790
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I only kind of filled in occasionally back then,

0:14:53.810 --> 0:14:56.010
<v Speaker 1>so I don't consider myself a regular writer of the

0:14:56.030 --> 0:14:56.470
<v Speaker 1>column then.

0:14:56.550 --> 0:14:58.430
<v Speaker 2>You're like a supporting cast on SNL.

0:14:58.510 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah. It's been a decade now that I can't

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:06.620
<v Speaker 1>even count how many times I have written, I have

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:09.950
<v Speaker 1>said you know, why doesn't the NFL just make the

0:15:09.990 --> 0:15:13.330
<v Speaker 1>safety rules reviewable? Take the safety rules out of the

0:15:13.390 --> 0:15:15.910
<v Speaker 1>hands of the officials on the field. Let the eye

0:15:15.950 --> 0:15:19.500
<v Speaker 1>in the sky adjudicate the safety stuff and let the

0:15:19.540 --> 0:15:22.260
<v Speaker 1>officials on the field figure out the rest. You know,

0:15:23.580 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>it just, it seems, it seems so obvious. And you

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:29.460
<v Speaker 1>have a game like this where, where it just, it

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>just gets out of hand where these major calls, these

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>15 yard penalties are just flat out wrong. And, Here's

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:41.140
<v Speaker 1>the thing. I understand the league does not want to

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:45.450
<v Speaker 1>get into having replay reviews where flags are thrown from

0:15:45.610 --> 0:15:49.229
<v Speaker 1>New York, so to speak, from the replay center. So

0:15:49.350 --> 0:15:51.250
<v Speaker 1>if you want to have it where, okay, the replay

0:15:51.270 --> 0:15:54.130
<v Speaker 1>center can review and pick up a flag, okay, fine.

0:15:54.610 --> 0:15:59.860
<v Speaker 1>I can live with the missed helmet-to-helmet hit Branch and

0:15:59.880 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Tucker Craft early. I can live with that if they

0:16:02.300 --> 0:16:07.910
<v Speaker 1>miss it. but what's really hard is when these 15

0:16:07.910 --> 0:16:12.260
<v Speaker 1>yard penalties that you could very easily confirm or disprove

0:16:12.340 --> 0:16:16.940
<v Speaker 1>by replay are just allowed to stand. Um, and, and

0:16:16.940 --> 0:16:20.930
<v Speaker 1>15 yard penalties impact football games. And again, I will

0:16:20.970 --> 0:16:23.870
<v Speaker 1>not say the Packers lost this game because the officials,

0:16:23.970 --> 0:16:26.450
<v Speaker 1>because of the officials, because I simply don't believe that,

0:16:26.990 --> 0:16:32.010
<v Speaker 1>but 15 yard penalties impact football games in a major way. And, uh, um,

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>For the NFL to continue to keep its head in

0:16:35.740 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the sand on this in terms of doing what is

0:16:38.590 --> 0:16:42.130
<v Speaker 1>necessary to get these calls right, it's embarrassing for the league.

0:16:42.330 --> 0:16:45.470
<v Speaker 2>It is, Michael. And unfortunately for the NFL, considering you

0:16:45.490 --> 0:16:47.790
<v Speaker 2>and I have spent years talking about this now, they

0:16:47.810 --> 0:16:51.270
<v Speaker 2>are so many years behind now. We've been saying since 2021, 2022,

0:16:51.270 --> 0:16:54.380
<v Speaker 2>there's things that have to change. There's adjustments they have

0:16:54.410 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 2>to make. They need to embrace technology. The league has

0:16:56.880 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 2>not embraced technology. It has nothing to do with, okay, well,

0:16:59.940 --> 0:17:02.330
<v Speaker 2>we're going to use the whatever the aerial thing to

0:17:02.370 --> 0:17:04.730
<v Speaker 2>determine what's the first down, you're still subjectively putting the

0:17:04.750 --> 0:17:07.650
<v Speaker 2>ball in a spot and then making a determination based

0:17:07.690 --> 0:17:09.250
<v Speaker 2>on what the computer says and whether or not that's

0:17:09.290 --> 0:17:11.620
<v Speaker 2>a first down rather than having two, you know, 55

0:17:11.619 --> 0:17:14.859
<v Speaker 2>year old guys running out with chains. Uh, the fact is,

0:17:14.920 --> 0:17:16.899
<v Speaker 2>and I wrote this in insider inbox, you know, you

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:19.780
<v Speaker 2>look at ABS in major league baseball, what that's done

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:22.360
<v Speaker 2>and actually made the game better. Uh, it's it's, there's

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:24.199
<v Speaker 2>a strategy to it. You know, how are you going

0:17:24.220 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 2>to use your challenges? It's efficient. And by the way,

0:17:27.300 --> 0:17:30.850
<v Speaker 2>umpires get over themselves. They're like, yeah, I missed that call.

0:17:31.270 --> 0:17:33.609
<v Speaker 2>It was on the corner. Move on.

0:17:33.850 --> 0:17:35.590
<v Speaker 1>I don't, I don't think, and I don't think anybody,

0:17:35.650 --> 0:17:37.409
<v Speaker 1>when you look at baseball, I don't want to go

0:17:37.530 --> 0:17:40.189
<v Speaker 1>too far on a tangent here. I don't think anybody

0:17:40.270 --> 0:17:44.210
<v Speaker 1>blames the umpire when a sliver of the ball catches

0:17:44.290 --> 0:17:45.970
<v Speaker 1>the strike zone and he calls it a ball or

0:17:46.030 --> 0:17:48.350
<v Speaker 1>the ball barely misses the strike zone and he called

0:17:48.390 --> 0:17:51.370
<v Speaker 1>it a strike and the ABS overturns it, whatever. Like,

0:17:51.869 --> 0:17:55.290
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's any animosity whatsoever with, with the umpire,

0:17:55.369 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the players. And, you know, it's like, Hey, it is

0:17:57.300 --> 0:17:59.649
<v Speaker 1>what it is, but we're going to use technology to

0:17:59.670 --> 0:18:03.060
<v Speaker 1>the best of our ability, I still think major league

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:06.060
<v Speaker 1>baseball should just go fully automated and forget the challenges

0:18:06.100 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and the strategy because you can do it without slowing

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:10.380
<v Speaker 1>down the game. So let's get every call right. But

0:18:10.420 --> 0:18:15.790
<v Speaker 1>that's my opinion. The NFL can use replay and the

0:18:15.830 --> 0:18:19.310
<v Speaker 1>closer looks at these plays for calls that have a major,

0:18:19.350 --> 0:18:24.070
<v Speaker 1>major impact on the the flow of a game and, and, um,

0:18:24.150 --> 0:18:27.230
<v Speaker 1>and how a game unfolds. Um, and they just, they,

0:18:27.270 --> 0:18:29.070
<v Speaker 1>they refuse to do it. And I, I think it's,

0:18:29.710 --> 0:18:31.910
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a, it's a disservice to the players

0:18:32.530 --> 0:18:33.930
<v Speaker 1>and to the fans that watch this game.

0:18:34.030 --> 0:18:36.389
<v Speaker 2>Well, and that's balls and strikes, right? Um, let's look

0:18:36.410 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 2>at the NBA flagrant ones, flagrant twos are all upon review. Um,

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 2>and that isn't just college basketball too. I saw it

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:45.239
<v Speaker 2>at a, a GB basketball game. You have to use this.

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:48.409
<v Speaker 1>And college football goes after the, helmet shots with the

0:18:48.450 --> 0:18:50.730
<v Speaker 1>targeting thing. And they, they, they stop the game to

0:18:50.770 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 1>look at it, to make sure that, you know, if somebody,

0:18:53.490 --> 0:18:56.020
<v Speaker 1>if somebody makes helmet to helmet contact, obviously the rule

0:18:56.060 --> 0:18:59.100
<v Speaker 1>is harsher where you get ejected from the game. But, uh,

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>but that's a sign that the safety part is taken

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:02.959
<v Speaker 1>pretty darn seriously.

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:19:03.540 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 1>And, uh, and, and, and the, and the NFL, as

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we talked about before, you have flags that aren't fined

0:19:10.350 --> 0:19:13.450
<v Speaker 1>and fines that aren't flagged and, you know, everything else, the, the,

0:19:13.570 --> 0:19:17.420
<v Speaker 1>the incongruity of it all. is embarrassing. Yeah.

0:19:17.460 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 2>The, the flag thing, or at least the, the safety thing. I,

0:19:20.500 --> 0:19:22.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't, I don't see a correlation with the national

0:19:22.660 --> 0:19:24.750
<v Speaker 2>football league. I don't, I don't, I don't, I've covered

0:19:24.770 --> 0:19:27.650
<v Speaker 2>the league for 10, 15 years now, uh, 10 years here,

0:19:27.690 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 2>five years earlier with the press Gazette. Sure. Um, if,

0:19:31.690 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 2>if there's an emphasis there, I don't, I haven't seen it.

0:19:34.369 --> 0:19:37.869
<v Speaker 2>I see yearly emphasis is emphases. Uh, but, but it

0:19:37.910 --> 0:19:40.100
<v Speaker 2>hasn't been consistent enough. And I want to say this too,

0:19:40.260 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 2>before we go, cause there's so many different things. about

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:44.260
<v Speaker 2>this game, you could talk about the roughing the pass.

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:47.430
<v Speaker 2>You can talk about the intentional grounding. Yeah. Um, you know, the,

0:19:47.510 --> 0:19:49.270
<v Speaker 2>the taunting thing that I kind of went in on,

0:19:49.530 --> 0:19:54.190
<v Speaker 2>on social media nfl social accounts uh promoting that um

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:56.300
<v Speaker 2>was very odd and bizarre to me.

0:19:56.220 --> 0:19:58.740
<v Speaker 1>Sorry i just i continue i i can't help but

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:00.639
<v Speaker 1>laugh at that because i just think that's all.

0:20:00.580 --> 0:20:02.700
<v Speaker 2>Which again i'm not silly there's a lot of lions

0:20:02.740 --> 0:20:04.060
<v Speaker 2>fans that are all up in my business about it

0:20:04.100 --> 0:20:06.380
<v Speaker 2>i'm not saying i'm not begrudging the lions at all

0:20:06.460 --> 0:20:09.990
<v Speaker 2>it's an exciting play good for you um Matthew Golden

0:20:10.030 --> 0:20:12.250
<v Speaker 2>had money taken out of his wallet a week earlier

0:20:12.270 --> 0:20:15.780
<v Speaker 2>for flexing. Yeah. Okay. I guess it wasn't enough of

0:20:15.820 --> 0:20:17.820
<v Speaker 2>a good firework clip for the National Football League to

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 2>profit off of. I'm not sure.

0:20:19.220 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:20:20.300 --> 0:20:21.719
<v Speaker 2>But I just want to mention this because I know

0:20:21.740 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 2>there was a lot of consternation about the third down

0:20:26.220 --> 0:20:27.740
<v Speaker 2>at the end of the game where Green Bay jumps

0:20:27.780 --> 0:20:31.470
<v Speaker 2>off sides. One thing, again, I'm not expecting Alex Moore's

0:20:31.510 --> 0:20:33.389
<v Speaker 2>crew to catch this considering a lot of the blatant

0:20:33.410 --> 0:20:37.950
<v Speaker 2>stuff they missed. I mean, Cade Mays is literally on

0:20:38.260 --> 0:20:41.859
<v Speaker 2>Jared Goff's cadence, opening his left hand every single time

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:45.380
<v Speaker 2>they're doing that. That's a false start. Yeah. Alex Moore's

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:47.220
<v Speaker 2>crew is not going to catch that. And if you're

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 2>a defensive tackle, yeah, should, should, do you got to

0:20:49.740 --> 0:20:51.540
<v Speaker 2>stay within your rules? Do you got to understand what,

0:20:51.660 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 2>what the game is at that point and what could

0:20:53.340 --> 0:20:54.510
<v Speaker 2>happen if it's a first down?

0:20:54.850 --> 0:20:55.070
<v Speaker 1>Sure.

0:20:55.690 --> 0:20:58.950
<v Speaker 2>But when you go back to the player safety rules

0:20:58.990 --> 0:21:00.590
<v Speaker 2>and why the eye in the sky maybe should be

0:21:00.869 --> 0:21:03.550
<v Speaker 2>overseeing a lot of this. so that the officials on

0:21:03.570 --> 0:21:05.070
<v Speaker 2>the field can actually start to get some of these

0:21:05.109 --> 0:21:05.570
<v Speaker 2>calls right.

0:21:05.650 --> 0:21:08.409
<v Speaker 1>That's, that's been, that's been my point all along. I mean,

0:21:08.510 --> 0:21:10.609
<v Speaker 1>and this is where I try not to get too,

0:21:10.630 --> 0:21:14.490
<v Speaker 1>I try not to get too upset at the officials

0:21:14.580 --> 0:21:17.340
<v Speaker 1>on the field. I mean, I, I, the, just the

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:20.879
<v Speaker 1>blatant misinterpretation of rules and everything by Alex Moore's crew

0:21:21.020 --> 0:21:24.919
<v Speaker 1>is a whole nother story, but in the larger general sense,

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:28.639
<v Speaker 1>big picture here for years now, the NFL has simply

0:21:28.700 --> 0:21:31.100
<v Speaker 1>made the officials jobs way too hard.

0:21:31.260 --> 0:21:31.379
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:35.360
<v Speaker 1>With all the rules, everything they're piling on everything. And,

0:21:35.780 --> 0:21:38.570
<v Speaker 1>and that's what I go back to is if you just,

0:21:38.940 --> 0:21:41.030
<v Speaker 1>if you take the safety rules, which have been so

0:21:41.490 --> 0:21:43.709
<v Speaker 1>many of those have been added over the last 10 years,

0:21:43.710 --> 0:21:47.550
<v Speaker 1>15 years, if you take the safety rules and put

0:21:47.570 --> 0:21:50.290
<v Speaker 1>that in the purview of replay and let the officials

0:21:50.369 --> 0:21:53.770
<v Speaker 1>on the field focus on all the other stuff, then

0:21:54.070 --> 0:21:56.830
<v Speaker 1>the officiating in this league of all the other stuff,

0:21:57.390 --> 0:21:59.929
<v Speaker 1>gets way better. There's no doubt in my mind that

0:21:59.970 --> 0:22:03.910
<v Speaker 1>that would happen. And to me, it's a simple cause

0:22:03.950 --> 0:22:04.369
<v Speaker 1>and effect.

0:22:04.490 --> 0:22:06.660
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And to be honest with you, I can't believe

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Alex Moore was actually an umpire on Bill Vinovich's cruise.

0:22:10.180 --> 0:22:16.440
<v Speaker 2>He must not have got much out of that. To me,

0:22:16.660 --> 0:22:18.460
<v Speaker 2>I've said it before, I think Vinovich is the gold

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:19.679
<v Speaker 2>standard of this thing. I think he's one of the

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:22.230
<v Speaker 2>few guys that have in terms of way that the

0:22:22.270 --> 0:22:24.570
<v Speaker 2>game has been officiated, probably should be officiated.

0:22:24.650 --> 0:22:26.750
<v Speaker 1>And before Vinovich, it was probably Gene Sterritore.

0:22:26.770 --> 0:22:29.869
<v Speaker 2>Sterritore, and Sterritore's in a booth now making probably a

0:22:29.890 --> 0:22:30.470
<v Speaker 2>lot more money.

0:22:30.510 --> 0:22:31.490
<v Speaker 1>Making a lot more cash.

0:22:31.510 --> 0:22:34.850
<v Speaker 2>Dean Blandino is making a lot more money doing referee

0:22:34.890 --> 0:22:37.060
<v Speaker 2>stuff for Fox than I'm sure what the league paid

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:38.500
<v Speaker 2>him in those four or five years that he was

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:41.580
<v Speaker 2>the head of officiating, which to me, people always hear

0:22:41.619 --> 0:22:43.179
<v Speaker 2>me talk about Blandino, but he was the one that

0:22:43.220 --> 0:22:46.100
<v Speaker 2>kind of got them out of that darkness of 2012.

0:22:46.100 --> 0:22:50.740
<v Speaker 2>after everything that happened with, you know, the replacement refs

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:53.260
<v Speaker 2>and all these other little issues they ran into. And

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:55.940
<v Speaker 2>then look when he left in 17, what immediately followed.

0:22:55.960 --> 0:23:00.120
<v Speaker 2>OPIs in the playoffs. And again, Packers lost that game,

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:02.460
<v Speaker 2>no doubt about it. But to all the people that

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 2>get upset and say, oh, this or that about the Packers,

0:23:05.420 --> 0:23:08.920
<v Speaker 2>come to playoffs when it's your team in a best

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:10.400
<v Speaker 2>of one, not a best of three, not a best

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:12.949
<v Speaker 2>of seven, a best of one for 60 minutes. And

0:23:12.990 --> 0:23:15.629
<v Speaker 2>something comes back and, you know, bites you that way.

0:23:16.980 --> 0:23:19.090
<v Speaker 2>Remember these moments. Yeah. Yeah.

0:23:19.130 --> 0:23:22.070
<v Speaker 1>Well, all right. I said we weren't going to belabor it.

0:23:22.090 --> 0:23:23.970
<v Speaker 1>We did anyway. Oh, well, that's why the show is

0:23:24.010 --> 0:23:26.010
<v Speaker 1>called Packers Unscripted. We do need to turn the page.

0:23:26.030 --> 0:23:26.930
<v Speaker 2>We're not hourly employees.

0:23:27.170 --> 0:23:29.369
<v Speaker 1>We do need to turn the page to Carolina, and

0:23:29.410 --> 0:23:32.350
<v Speaker 1>we will do that after this quick word from our sponsors.

0:23:33.810 --> 0:23:38.629
<v Speaker 1>Sirius XM NFL Radio delivers hard-hitting analysis and up-to-the-minute NFL

0:23:38.690 --> 0:23:44.510
<v Speaker 1>news that true football fanatics need 24-7, 365. Did you

0:23:44.530 --> 0:23:47.430
<v Speaker 1>know Lambeau Field is just one of our state's many wonders?

0:23:47.910 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Start making unforgettable memories on your next vacation. Discover Granddad

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Bluff and more at TravelWisconsin.com slash wonders. Welcome back to

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:01.070
<v Speaker 1>Packers Unscripted. Short week, Wes, Thursday night football. It'll be

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:05.389
<v Speaker 1>here at Lambeau against Carolina. And while the Packers are

0:24:05.450 --> 0:24:08.630
<v Speaker 1>at 4-3 and in last place in the NFC North,

0:24:08.770 --> 0:24:11.669
<v Speaker 1>the Carolina Panthers are at 3-3 and in first place

0:24:12.190 --> 0:24:14.660
<v Speaker 1>in the NFC South. just in case you didn't think

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:21.260
<v Speaker 1>this league was crazy enough. But for those who are thinking, oh, Carolina,

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:24.680
<v Speaker 1>they just got destroyed by a division rival, Tampa Bay,

0:24:24.700 --> 0:24:27.750
<v Speaker 1>43-13 on Sunday. This should be a get-right game for

0:24:27.790 --> 0:24:33.190
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay, yada, yada, yada. Well, don't forget that last year,

0:24:34.230 --> 0:24:37.890
<v Speaker 1>right before Carolina came to Lambeau Field, they were blasted

0:24:37.910 --> 0:24:42.949
<v Speaker 1>40-9 by the Buffalo Bills. And what did Carolina do

0:24:44.260 --> 0:24:49.140
<v Speaker 1>Dave Canales, that staff, Bryce Young, the quarterback, they did

0:24:49.220 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 1>what it took to come into Lambeau and pull the

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 1>upset of Green Bay. And, uh, and one of those,

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, tough head scratching losses for the Packers last year,

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay cannot let that happen again.

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:03.689
<v Speaker 2>No, cannot. Um, this is going to be a tough one.

0:25:03.950 --> 0:25:07.230
<v Speaker 2>I wrote in inbox today that this is a dangerous,

0:25:07.270 --> 0:25:10.570
<v Speaker 2>dangerous football team. Uh, Bryce Young has had some big

0:25:10.609 --> 0:25:12.119
<v Speaker 2>games this year. Did not have one of them on

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:12.910
<v Speaker 2>Sunday against Tampa.

0:25:12.930 --> 0:25:13.930
<v Speaker 1>No, that was not his best.

0:25:14.070 --> 0:25:16.469
<v Speaker 2>But he's been airing it out more. You can see

0:25:16.490 --> 0:25:19.590
<v Speaker 2>the confidence in his arm more. And he has two

0:25:19.650 --> 0:25:22.690
<v Speaker 2>really talented receivers. I think Ted McMillan is probably, within

0:25:22.710 --> 0:25:25.170
<v Speaker 2>the next two years, if not, he's already there, probably

0:25:25.190 --> 0:25:26.950
<v Speaker 2>going to be in the conversation for top wideouts in

0:25:26.970 --> 0:25:29.270
<v Speaker 2>the league. I think Jalen Coker, he's dealing with a

0:25:29.310 --> 0:25:31.030
<v Speaker 2>shoulder injury this week. I don't know what that's going

0:25:31.050 --> 0:25:33.750
<v Speaker 2>to mean for him. Maybe it's nothing. But those two

0:25:33.770 --> 0:25:36.730
<v Speaker 2>guys won too. There's so much there that they're built

0:25:36.770 --> 0:25:38.270
<v Speaker 2>in a similar way of Green Bay where they're going

0:25:38.290 --> 0:25:41.850
<v Speaker 2>to pass the ball. Chuba Hubbard, I've said this for years.

0:25:42.460 --> 0:25:44.990
<v Speaker 2>He didn't have a great game again against Tampa on Sunday,

0:25:45.030 --> 0:25:47.210
<v Speaker 2>but he is one of the most underrated running backs

0:25:47.230 --> 0:25:51.490
<v Speaker 2>that nobody talks about. And he is consistent. He's been

0:25:51.510 --> 0:25:54.630
<v Speaker 2>there for years. They extended him. They've had other guys

0:25:54.670 --> 0:25:57.470
<v Speaker 2>come in. There were Christian McCaffrey's. You look at last

0:25:57.510 --> 0:26:01.629
<v Speaker 2>year with Rico Dowdle, they've had different guys, the man,

0:26:02.190 --> 0:26:06.540
<v Speaker 2>but Chuba has always been the standard. He's been the

0:26:06.619 --> 0:26:08.380
<v Speaker 2>one you can count on. And now that they lost

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:11.359
<v Speaker 2>Brooks again, he's having to be the back. And then

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:13.400
<v Speaker 2>the only thing I will say, though, much like Green Bay,

0:26:13.859 --> 0:26:16.830
<v Speaker 2>Carolina is very beat up. They've gone through a lot

0:26:16.869 --> 0:26:19.250
<v Speaker 2>of injuries this year going back to the offseason program.

0:26:19.270 --> 0:26:22.139
<v Speaker 2>They don't have either top cornerbacks right now. Jalen Phillips,

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:23.590
<v Speaker 2>there's questions of whether or not he's going to be

0:26:23.609 --> 0:26:26.770
<v Speaker 2>available for this one. That is one thing to definitely

0:26:26.790 --> 0:26:27.260
<v Speaker 2>keep an eye on.

0:26:27.530 --> 0:26:32.270
<v Speaker 1>And they just lost their right tackle against Tampa Bay.

0:26:32.430 --> 0:26:35.149
<v Speaker 1>A terrible injury there for him as he's carted off

0:26:35.170 --> 0:26:37.970
<v Speaker 1>the field and his season is over. Yeah, I mean,

0:26:38.580 --> 0:26:40.660
<v Speaker 1>McMillan was a top 10 pick in the draft for

0:26:40.680 --> 0:26:42.940
<v Speaker 1>a reason, right? And maybe it didn't show up right

0:26:42.980 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 1>away as a rookie, but it's starting to show up now.

0:26:45.980 --> 0:26:48.060
<v Speaker 1>Bryce Young was the number one overall pick in the

0:26:48.100 --> 0:26:50.400
<v Speaker 1>draft for a reason. And again, it didn't necessarily show

0:26:50.460 --> 0:26:52.899
<v Speaker 1>up right away. but the development is there. You can

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:54.780
<v Speaker 1>see it. And when you talk about the confidence part

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 1>of it, you can see the confidence that the Carolina

0:26:59.530 --> 0:27:02.650
<v Speaker 1>coaching staff is gaining in Bryce Young because of how

0:27:02.670 --> 0:27:05.250
<v Speaker 1>they're calling the game, how they're letting him run the

0:27:05.290 --> 0:27:07.889
<v Speaker 1>show out there. He's got a 93 passer rating on

0:27:07.910 --> 0:27:10.230
<v Speaker 1>the season right now, which maybe doesn't jump off the page.

0:27:10.260 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 1>It was a lot better than that before a rough

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:17.230
<v Speaker 1>game against Tampa Bay last week. But This offense, this

0:27:17.330 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>offense is, is dangerous. And I love what you said

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 1>about Chuba Hubbard too, because, uh, because yeah, he's sort

0:27:22.260 --> 0:27:25.100
<v Speaker 1>of like in some ways, the guy they're always trying

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 1>to replace, but yet he won't go away. And whenever

0:27:27.619 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>there's an injury or if they need him to be

0:27:29.340 --> 0:27:31.810
<v Speaker 1>the number one back, like he has been now because

0:27:32.090 --> 0:27:36.330
<v Speaker 1>Rico Dowdle left, um, he's, he delivers, you know, he,

0:27:36.390 --> 0:27:39.010
<v Speaker 1>he comes through for them defensively. There's a lot of

0:27:39.070 --> 0:27:41.909
<v Speaker 1>questions with the Panthers. You meant you mentioned some of

0:27:41.930 --> 0:27:45.430
<v Speaker 1>the injuries. They also will be coming into Lambeau Field

0:27:45.490 --> 0:27:47.890
<v Speaker 1>just as Dallas was a couple of weeks ago. They're

0:27:47.910 --> 0:27:51.070
<v Speaker 1>coming into Lambeau with the league's worst run defense. The

0:27:51.090 --> 0:27:53.450
<v Speaker 1>Packers now have Josh Jacobs. He's got one game under

0:27:53.490 --> 0:27:55.950
<v Speaker 1>his belt. We'll see if that makes a difference and

0:27:55.990 --> 0:28:00.340
<v Speaker 1>if the Packers can establish more on the ground. But

0:28:00.859 --> 0:28:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I pull this out, you know, whatever, three or four

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:05.700
<v Speaker 1>times a season going into a game based on where

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:08.379
<v Speaker 1>the Packers are in their season, the importance of the game,

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:11.340
<v Speaker 1>what's happened to Green Bay and everything. And this is

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:13.370
<v Speaker 1>one of those that I'm going to say it. This

0:28:13.410 --> 0:28:16.010
<v Speaker 1>game is not about the Carolina Panthers. This game is

0:28:16.070 --> 0:28:19.440
<v Speaker 1>about the Green Bay Packers playing their own football game

0:28:19.580 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 1>in their own yard under the lights on Thursday night

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 1>football and taking care of business. Because if the Packers

0:28:25.900 --> 0:28:28.440
<v Speaker 1>play their game, this is a game that they win.

0:28:28.540 --> 0:28:30.480
<v Speaker 2>Yes. Yeah. And the Packers have to run the football.

0:28:30.780 --> 0:28:32.770
<v Speaker 2>They have to run the football. You have to do it.

0:28:34.170 --> 0:28:36.530
<v Speaker 2>They didn't take advantage of Dallas being the last.

0:28:36.369 --> 0:28:38.690
<v Speaker 1>Ranked run off. No, they didn't. And I thought that

0:28:38.730 --> 0:28:41.730
<v Speaker 1>was going to potentially be the turning point for the

0:28:41.770 --> 0:28:44.390
<v Speaker 1>running game, and it wasn't. And the running game needs

0:28:44.410 --> 0:28:45.820
<v Speaker 1>to find that turning point here soon.

0:28:45.890 --> 0:28:50.980
<v Speaker 2>Tampa ran for 258 yards on Sunday. Baker Mayfield threw

0:28:51.020 --> 0:28:54.100
<v Speaker 2>for 64. I mean, that's the type of game that

0:28:54.140 --> 0:28:54.330
<v Speaker 2>that was.

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:55.480
<v Speaker 1>And there's 43 points on the board.

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 2>And there's 43 points on the board. So you talk

0:28:57.740 --> 0:28:59.540
<v Speaker 2>about at times where a running game can be a

0:28:59.580 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 2>quarterback's best friend. By the way, 64 passing yards still

0:29:02.420 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 2>had over 100 passer rating, though, with the touchdown. They

0:29:04.780 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 2>just were able to do everything they wanted to against Carolina.

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:09.460
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying the Packers are going to be able

0:29:09.510 --> 0:29:11.350
<v Speaker 2>to match that, but this is a game where it

0:29:11.390 --> 0:29:14.590
<v Speaker 2>would behoove Green Bay to get over 100 rushing yards. Again,

0:29:14.630 --> 0:29:17.390
<v Speaker 2>it'll be really interesting to see what the machination is

0:29:17.410 --> 0:29:19.970
<v Speaker 2>going to look like on the offensive line. Is Travis

0:29:19.990 --> 0:29:23.580
<v Speaker 2>Glover available? Could this be the Kevin Zeitler debut? Who

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 2>starts at center? All things Green Bay is going to

0:29:25.420 --> 0:29:27.820
<v Speaker 2>have to figure out. But one thing we do know,

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 2>and Josh Jacobs talked about it afterwards, Jacobs is going

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:33.790
<v Speaker 2>to be four days better. He's going to be one

0:29:33.830 --> 0:29:37.110
<v Speaker 2>week better from that experience in Detroit. And I think

0:29:37.150 --> 0:29:39.510
<v Speaker 2>when you see his ability to break tackles, to run

0:29:39.530 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 2>through coverings, to find holes, that's only going to improve.

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 2>But it's going to be that marriage between what Green

0:29:47.340 --> 0:29:50.060
<v Speaker 2>Bay can do with its offensive line and what Jacobs

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 2>in the backfield is going to be able to kind

0:29:52.620 --> 0:29:53.860
<v Speaker 2>of pull out of that. Yeah.

0:29:54.990 --> 0:29:57.490
<v Speaker 1>Um, very quickly, any other keys to victory that jump

0:29:57.540 --> 0:30:00.020
<v Speaker 1>out to you aside from the obvious, the running game?

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:02.860
<v Speaker 2>Protect Jordan Love. Um, because if you can give Love

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 2>time in this game, there's going to be big play opportunities.

0:30:05.220 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 2>Like I said, they're, they're down both, you know, JC

0:30:07.220 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Horns on IR, um, they're down there, their top two corners. So, uh,

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:15.460
<v Speaker 2>for Christian Watson and Matthew Golden, I think the easiest way,

0:30:15.500 --> 0:30:17.220
<v Speaker 2>the best way to work through some of these drops

0:30:17.260 --> 0:30:19.660
<v Speaker 2>issues that Green Bay has had is just to keep

0:30:19.700 --> 0:30:21.900
<v Speaker 2>feeding them, just to keep going to them. Um, and

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 2>then as I talked about in our little takeaway video,

0:30:24.790 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 2>I really love what Savion Williams is bringing to the slot.

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 2>Six foot four, he is not your traditional slot, but

0:30:30.260 --> 0:30:34.660
<v Speaker 2>he's really not your traditional receiver either. So without knowing

0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:36.300
<v Speaker 2>you're not going to get Jaden Reed back this year

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:40.030
<v Speaker 2>and without Sky Moore right now, he's made some really

0:30:40.110 --> 0:30:42.430
<v Speaker 2>big contested catches across the middle where I thought he

0:30:42.690 --> 0:30:45.210
<v Speaker 2>showed a lot of moxie, a lot of hands, and

0:30:45.410 --> 0:30:48.710
<v Speaker 2>you need those secondary pieces. I think Tucker Kraft is

0:30:48.750 --> 0:30:51.810
<v Speaker 2>getting going. He had some good plays on Sunday in Detroit.

0:30:51.830 --> 0:30:53.870
<v Speaker 1>That was a nice touchdown catch he had, by the way.

0:30:54.070 --> 0:30:56.410
<v Speaker 2>Nice touchdown catch, and then obviously stood up on that

0:30:56.490 --> 0:31:01.480
<v Speaker 2>play after branches helmet to helmet. Green Bay has all

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 2>the tools, man. I think the frustrating thing beyond the

0:31:03.820 --> 0:31:06.020
<v Speaker 2>penalties has just been the fact that Green Bay has

0:31:06.100 --> 0:31:08.500
<v Speaker 2>not been able to implement all of them at the

0:31:08.540 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 2>same time, absent, I guess, that game against Chicago.

0:31:11.180 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, for sure. Well, and when you look at

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:19.060
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in the NFC North this week, the

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:21.740
<v Speaker 1>importance of this game for the Packers just jumps out.

0:31:21.780 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 1>If you win this game, get yourself to 5-3. 6-0

0:31:26.500 --> 0:31:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota is at 4-2 Detroit. So one of the teams

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:33.020
<v Speaker 1>in front of you is going to take a loss,

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 1>barring an overtime tie, of course. And then Chicago is

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:38.640
<v Speaker 1>at Seattle. I believe that's the Monday night football game

0:31:38.720 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 1>coming up this week. And Seattle seems to have righted

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:44.990
<v Speaker 1>the ship. Really strong performance against the Kansas City Chiefs.

0:31:45.030 --> 0:31:47.610
<v Speaker 1>Handed the Chiefs their first loss. If the bears go

0:31:47.650 --> 0:31:49.950
<v Speaker 1>out to Seattle and get beat, they get their third loss.

0:31:49.990 --> 0:31:54.750
<v Speaker 1>I mean, for as frustrating as everything was about Detroit and, and,

0:31:55.070 --> 0:31:58.010
<v Speaker 1>and division losses are, you know, are hard to overcome.

0:31:58.030 --> 0:32:00.630
<v Speaker 1>They're going to, they're going to linger in this division

0:32:00.690 --> 0:32:03.800
<v Speaker 1>race all the way to the end. But if you

0:32:03.820 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 1>can get to five and three on Thursday night, and

0:32:06.140 --> 0:32:07.900
<v Speaker 1>then you sit back and watch what happens in the

0:32:07.940 --> 0:32:10.460
<v Speaker 1>rest of the NFC North over the weekend, you can

0:32:10.960 --> 0:32:13.340
<v Speaker 1>come into the second half of the season off this

0:32:13.380 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 1>little mini buy over the weekend and And, uh, and just,

0:32:16.910 --> 0:32:18.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, crank up and get ready to go.

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:20.180
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And that's what this is about. You need to

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:22.160
<v Speaker 2>be able to build some momentum going into this buy,

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:24.770
<v Speaker 2>this mini buy. Cause the problem is I was talking

0:32:24.790 --> 0:32:27.489
<v Speaker 2>to my great friend, Scott Venci on my way to, uh,

0:32:27.810 --> 0:32:30.270
<v Speaker 2>the office this morning. I said, man, it would be

0:32:30.370 --> 0:32:32.920
<v Speaker 2>really nice after this game, if it really was the buy.

0:32:33.600 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 2>But the reality is the Packers got another month yet

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:37.719
<v Speaker 2>to go before they even get to whatever you want

0:32:37.740 --> 0:32:39.860
<v Speaker 2>to call that buy between the fake, the fake buy.

0:32:40.320 --> 0:32:42.560
<v Speaker 2>So there's many buys and there's fake buys this season.

0:32:43.560 --> 0:32:44.900
<v Speaker 2>You know what it is? You know what this buy

0:32:44.940 --> 0:32:47.500
<v Speaker 2>is this year? It's like a two for one where

0:32:47.540 --> 0:32:49.380
<v Speaker 2>it's like, OK, well, you're getting those first few days

0:32:49.460 --> 0:32:50.510
<v Speaker 2>off and then you got to come back and play

0:32:50.530 --> 0:32:52.010
<v Speaker 2>the Rams. But then you're going to have another few

0:32:52.030 --> 0:32:52.469
<v Speaker 2>days off.

0:32:52.570 --> 0:32:54.290
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, whatever.

0:32:54.750 --> 0:32:56.090
<v Speaker 2>National Football League catch the fever.

0:32:56.250 --> 0:32:59.490
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well. We're getting close to the midway point of

0:32:59.510 --> 0:33:02.370
<v Speaker 1>the season. We will see what all of the standings

0:33:02.410 --> 0:33:05.210
<v Speaker 1>in the NFC North look like after the next several days.

0:33:05.730 --> 0:33:07.870
<v Speaker 1>We won't have another show this week on Thursday because

0:33:07.890 --> 0:33:09.690
<v Speaker 1>we have a game to cover, so we'll be back

0:33:10.210 --> 0:33:13.670
<v Speaker 1>next Tuesday to recap everything else that's gone on at

0:33:13.710 --> 0:33:17.790
<v Speaker 1>Lambeau Field and elsewhere around the league. But with that,

0:33:17.970 --> 0:33:20.380
<v Speaker 1>we've got to call it a wrap for now on

0:33:20.390 --> 0:33:22.690
<v Speaker 1>this edition of Packers Unscripted. Be sure to follow all

0:33:22.710 --> 0:33:24.960
<v Speaker 1>of our coverage of the team and of Thursday night's

0:33:25.000 --> 0:33:27.200
<v Speaker 1>game From Lambeau Field, we'll have it all for you

0:33:27.310 --> 0:33:30.230
<v Speaker 1>on Packers.com. For Wes, I am Mike. Thank you for

0:33:30.270 --> 0:33:31.720
<v Speaker 1>tuning in, everybody, and we will.