WEBVTT - Patriots Draft Prospect Review: Receivers

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:03.920
<v Speaker 1>This is the Draft Prospect Review Podcast on Patriots dot

0:00:03.920 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Com Radio. Welcome to the NFL Draft. The Draft Prospect

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Review Podcast is your source for all the latest news

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and information on the NFL Draft. The New England Patriots

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>like now here to preview the wide receivers and tight ends.

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:20.079
<v Speaker 1>The writers of Patriots dot Com Time yet again for

0:00:20.200 --> 0:00:25.479
<v Speaker 1>another draft review podcast. Here with Mike desol Matisse, Bowman

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 1>and myself Paul Perillo, coming at you with a big,

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>big position. We're gonna talk about pass catchers in general,

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>but obviously we're gonna focus more on wide receivers number

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 1>one because it's more fun to talk about wide receivers

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>number two. Because I think, guys, the Patriots could be

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:48.200
<v Speaker 1>in the market for one anywhere in this draft, including

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>at the top. What say you, I think absolutely, I

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>think it's I mean, I've been here three years, it's

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the third year in a row. There's a bunch of

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>really good wide receivers. Pick whatever kind you like. You

0:00:57.920 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>want a big one, you want a fast one, you

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>want to fast, big one. They've got them all. It's

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>just I think a question of preference and you know

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>what they exactly like. But there's plenty to like about

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the whole class once again, all right, a lot of

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 1>different opinions as to um which guys people are the

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 1>consensus like the most, but also some question marks in

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>terms of health with some of the high rated guys.

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:22.319
<v Speaker 1>So tis I'll go to you, um, which which guy?

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 1>Forget about where in the draft, but if you had

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:26.960
<v Speaker 1>to pick one receiver, which guy do you like the most?

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 1>Jamison Williams one. I think he's just the all around

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:34.679
<v Speaker 1>guy and he's against Deuce. Here we go. We don't

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>need a guy who can make an impact this year.

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:38.399
<v Speaker 1>So I've joked I was doing damage in the SEC

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and that says a lot. So yeah, I mean, and look,

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>he's a great player and we have some some funny

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>side things on PU about him, but I can't sit

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 1>here and tell you he's not a dynamic threat, explosive athletic.

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I do think that that some of his questions are

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>um a little bit swept away. Maybe that's because he

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>has the ACL and you know that's the issue that

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>people are focused on. I think he's gone, uh just

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>just you know, he's a little undersized. I think there's

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>some questions about how's he going to deal with the

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 1>physicality in the NFL. Why you know, the left Ohio

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 1>state You've got two other Ohio state receivers who are

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 1>highly ranked as well. Um, So you know, little things,

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:18.079
<v Speaker 1>but um, overall, I think he's very good. I also

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I really like Garrett Wilson. Um. You know. And it

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>was interesting kind of development with him because I think

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>initially in the draft process people are always gonna run

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:27.800
<v Speaker 1>like a five four or five five. He's he's not

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>as fast as Olave is um. And then he ran

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 1>like you know four three eight, Uh, you know, which

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 1>is faster than Olave. But I just think he's a

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>versatile guy. With the ball in his hands, he's tough. Um.

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:40.839
<v Speaker 1>I like, I like how he runs with the ball

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>is good, versatile, his he's with Duce has learned from

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 1>from Paulie. Like you can say facts but don't explain

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>it at all. Like as an example, one of the

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>questions about Jamison Williams is his size at six one

0:02:57.120 --> 0:03:00.639
<v Speaker 1>seventy nine, Um, Garrett Wilson, he like better at six

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>feet one hundred and eighty three much bigger, much bigger,

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>much bigger. Uh. You know a lot of questions about

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Garrett Wilson speed, but he ran at four three eight,

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 1>which was actually faster than Chrystal Lays four three nine. Like, wow,

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:19.359
<v Speaker 1>he's made difference between four. He's brilliant. He's brilliant. Uh,

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>they're all that's trailing Burkes's four to five five. That's that.

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 1>That's a different that's a different animal. Uh, totally different

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>skill set too. But I actually I'm not going to

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:31.080
<v Speaker 1>break the tie. I'm gonna tell you I like them both.

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:35.119
<v Speaker 1>I do like Williams better. I think he has enormous potential,

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and I do think that he at Ohio State found

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>a way to make some place. It wasn't like he

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>was just buried and never saw the field. I think

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 1>he looked at it and knew that Ohio State was

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be three guys, four guys, and at Alabama

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>he had a chance to be the man. And he

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>was right. He stepped in with you know, eighty catches

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>fifteen hundred yards twenty yards to catch. I mean, like

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>just really incredible production. But yeah, you can't ignore the

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 1>torn acl and a guy who is just so incredibly dynamic.

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I know that medicine nowadays these guys get past this,

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>But you do wonder if he loses a step. Mike

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>is right, he's one hundred and eighty pounds, soak and wet.

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, does he have enough physicality if he's not

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>quite as lightning quick? But I'm with tease. I would

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 1>take Williams. I like Wilson a lot as well, and

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I do I think like Traylan Burks more than Mike does.

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a really interesting guy who I'd like

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to see in a more traditional passing offense that's like

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:40.839
<v Speaker 1>Arkansas to me, is still one of those kind of

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>stone age kind of offenses that didn't accentuate. They did

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot to get the ball in his hands, and

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I think he's dynamic enough that he made plays, but

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I like to see him in a more sophisticated passing attack.

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Do you have anything on Burkes because I got some,

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 1>so I'm a little more out on Burks. Yeah. I

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 1>think I like Christian Watson more in that type of

0:04:58.440 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>role where you can get the ball and he'll just

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 1>do it thing level of play. Yeah, I like both those.

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:06.719
<v Speaker 1>I really like Burks, Paul, I mean, he is really

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I think an option at the end of the first round.

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I really am kind of thinking that Jamison Williams probably

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:13.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be gone, so I don't dedicate too much

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:16.599
<v Speaker 1>of my head space to him now. But I came

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>into Trail and Burkes thinking I got nick kill Harry Ptsd.

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm worried about a guy who doesn't have maybe the speed, um,

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, and but he can play. And I think

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing that they move him all around. I

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>think you're totally right Paul about you know, more traditional role.

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 1>How does he fit is he? I don't think he's

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>really that outside burner guy. I think he's an inside guy.

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that, you know, and they're able to move

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 1>him around do some different things with him. Had a

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 1>chance to talk to him at the Combine a little bit.

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I love saying that kind of stuff, um, But but

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:49.599
<v Speaker 1>really liked him, really liked his his personality. He just

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>seemed focused on on, you know, what he was, what

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 1>he had to do. Um. I'm a big Burks fan,

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and I think he could be a realistic option down

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a down at twenty one in And I also love

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Christian Watson. I think, you know, I I look at

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>him almost as a budget Jamison Williams a little bit,

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:06.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's got similar I mean, he's a little taller,

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I think, But I think he's a guy that praised

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>for character, you know, those kind of things. I know

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>that they that they qualify as well as you know,

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 1>just able to do a bunch of different things, kind

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>of like Burke. So I think he's kind of maybe

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:20.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a mesh of those two first

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>couple of guys that we talked. But I like Watson too.

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I will I love Watson now let tease talk about

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:27.920
<v Speaker 1>him because it looks like he's the guy that it's

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>actually not my main guy, but he does have some

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 1>moves that like, you know, he just he's always there

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:34.599
<v Speaker 1>in NORTHDA Coast, State's offensively ran through him. So yeah,

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and a really dynamic player. I just I always worry

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>at that level. You know what the especially with speed guys,

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:46.720
<v Speaker 1>speed and like size guys like is you're just bigger

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>and faster than everybody that you're playing against. And that's

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:51.479
<v Speaker 1>why I don't think that's true. I think this guy

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a good pro, you know, I

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know, second third round, maybe somewhere in there, I

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:59.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know what you guys see him following. I think

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:02.159
<v Speaker 1>he's a chance to be a really good player. You

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:05.039
<v Speaker 1>can't teach the kind of measurables that he has. I

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 1>did like him, and I like Alavi a lot too.

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we just we brought his name up. We

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>haven't really talked about him. But it was funny, like

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I read some of these different things and you hear like,

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 1>really technically sound route runner, and then you hear like, oh,

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:20.239
<v Speaker 1>needs help with his footwork. And how could two guys

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 1>watch a guy and get two diametrically opposite views. But

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>no question, a lot of different opinions. The smoothest guy

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>in the draft, and I count that for both that's great,

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's also how much does it tell you about

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>how his game is going to translate to the pros.

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a little bit of question, you know,

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>same thing, the size stuff with him, But just's he's

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>fun to watch, just how smooth he is, how easy

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>he makes everything look. I'm a little bit on the

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>fence with him at twenty one overall, but but I

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>think he's a good player. Yeah, I don't know about

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty one. I don't know if I would take a

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 1>receiver at twenty one. So I mean, I do think

0:07:57.240 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of needs that the Patriots have and

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that's the biggest one. I don't

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 1>know if I would take one at twenty one. I

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>think if you really believed in somebody like Burkes could

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 1>be like a game changer, maybe what they thought Harry

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 1>was gonna be. You know, who can play anywhere and

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>so scary to do that though, because of the comparisons,

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know, tease anyone, um Wandale Robinson. You know,

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>he's just the gadget guy. I have a star, a

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 1>little small, but I mean he can do everything. He

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 1>can return kicks, Cato yep, yeah, I wrote Debo yep him.

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's just so much upside on Day two guy,

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>late day two guy. Uh. These are the kinds of

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>players I think you can find, um and I think

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>these are the kinds of players teams have found in

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the second in early in the third day of the draft.

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't have to be twenty one. I love one.

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Dale Robinson, Um, by the way, just learning how to play.

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>He played he was a running back, so he's just

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of learning how to be a receiver. He's small, compact,

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>but tough in plays with a ton of heart. Um.

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the kind of guy that could could take,

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe make some some short passes and make

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 1>big plays out of them. That's the kind of guy, Paul,

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 1>And we've we talk about this all the time about

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, people call into the show and ask about

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:16.719
<v Speaker 1>drafting a receiver first overall, and it's it's that kind

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 1>of guy that they need more of. And I take

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:19.959
<v Speaker 1>a couple of them, you know, I take a couple

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>of those kind of guys that are just electric. I mean,

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I just sudden was the word that I wrote down,

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>And I mean, I think you ran a four four

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 1>nine and it's not not crazy, but it's just a

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 1>guy with the ball in his hands to makes things happen.

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>So tough too, and similar to to to kind of

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 1>bringing it Skymore, I thought they were similar kind of players.

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I think Skymore maybe has a little bit more pedigree

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 1>right now, just as far as what people think he Um,

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, might be able to do a little bit

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>smaller Um in terms of height, But I think Skymore

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>is another one electric inside kind of guy. Um makes

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of plays with the ball on the inside

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>portion of the field. So what are your thoughts on Metchi? So,

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:00.079
<v Speaker 1>I mean I I'm with everybody. I think every but

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 1>he thinks, hey, he knows Mac. He's got a degree

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:05.080
<v Speaker 1>of familiarity. We do have the you know, the ACL

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:08.840
<v Speaker 1>issue with acl ACL issue with him as well. But

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I think he's another great fit. I love these day

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:13.680
<v Speaker 1>two guys, and he might even be, you know, a

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>third rounder I think based on based on the health.

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 1>But just it's got to be intriguing to Patriots fans,

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 1>no one. The connection there exists. You can bring in

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 1>a young guy that's going to be here for four

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 1>years and they can continue to grow together. I gotta

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 1>be honest. If he wasn't an Alabama guy, I don't

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>think I'd be overly interested. The connection does intrigue me,

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>and I know that, you know, people have watched like

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Borrow and Chase and Tua and Waddle and they've said, hey,

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, let's get one of these for Mac, and

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I am sort of interested in it. From that perspective.

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a good player. I don't think he's

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 1>anything special. I think he's I think he's a good

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:53.680
<v Speaker 1>college receiver who I thought was kind of average in

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>terms of creating separation. I think there's so much space

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 1>in that offense, it's kind of hard to develop in

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 1>it might listen, maybe I'm getting claud By Williams for

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the same reason. Yeah, you know, maybe there's just so

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 1>much space in that offense that these guys all look

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 1>better than they are. I'll tell you a guy, you know,

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>a Day two guy that the numbers don't jump out

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>at you average to below average speed, which is a

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 1>concern the Patriots don't want another slow receiver. But David

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Bell at Purdue is a guy that in an offense

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:27.319
<v Speaker 1>that was basically David Bell, he was the guy. This

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>is sort of the opposite of the Alabama thing that

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:31.959
<v Speaker 1>I just talked about. Everybody on the field knew the

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 1>balls going to David Bell, and he just produces every

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 1>single week with an average quarterback on an average team,

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>and they find ways to win games because David Bell

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>was better than the guys covering him on a week

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:46.079
<v Speaker 1>to week basis. But he's like a four sixty. He

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 1>did not test well. He had a bad pro day,

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 1>so I understand if teams are gonna but because of that,

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 1>if you could get him in the third round instead

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of the second round, I think there's a guy that

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you might have to look at smart player. Yeah, he's

0:11:58.040 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 1>He's the guy that just kind of knows how to

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>play and maybe makes the most of what he Ninety

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 1>three catches almost fourteen yards to catch. That's a lot

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:08.840
<v Speaker 1>of catches for an average that that high last year. Uh.

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 1>One other guy that I wanted to bring up was

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 1>George Pickens from from Georgia. Uh. He tore his ACL

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 1>in the spring, right, Yeah, and yeah, he had only

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 1>four games played, which I think really impressed scouts that

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>he worked so hard to get back before the end

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of the year, ended up being a contributor in the

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:30.960
<v Speaker 1>National Championship game. Caught a bomb in that game. Um really,

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think he played four games, right, is

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>that right? Four games? Thirty six catches, Like the guy,

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the guy can play, The guy can play. Um yeah,

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 1>that's another one where you talk about coming off an injury.

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that that affects his status a little bit. I mean,

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:50.559
<v Speaker 1>I love not to again go back to Harry and blocking,

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 1>but watching him block is just hilarious because he just

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>tosses guys left him right, Why would you watch him block?

0:12:56.679 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Somebody cut up something and I enjoy it.

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I enjoy seeing people go flow. So I mean there's

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of a lot of other names that we

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:09.680
<v Speaker 1>haven't even mentioned. Yeah, so I mean Drake London, I know.

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not huge. I'm not huge, and he's and

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I always have problems with guys when you turn it

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 1>on and all the highlights are contested catches down the field,

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>you know. And but when I was in the when

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I was at the combine um, he seemed to me

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>like a kid who's still very much growing into what

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:29.559
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be. And that was my pause for him,

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 1>because going into it, I didn't I wasn't really too

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 1>high on him. It just seemed like he's bigger than

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 1>everybody else and is able to go up and get

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the ball. Um. But there is part of it that

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I think if a team reached on him, I could

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>see them saying, I think he's going to develop into

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 1>a more well rounded guy. He certainly has the size.

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:46.959
<v Speaker 1>Do you think he's gonna be a top ten pick?

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean I'm seeing people saying that, and that's still

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:52.560
<v Speaker 1>surprising to me because I don't see the overall dominance

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:55.080
<v Speaker 1>of a top ten pick where you know, Jamison Williams

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:57.439
<v Speaker 1>his best highlights that's a top ten plar. That's a

0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 1>guy who is making people miss left and right, tear

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>him him around. Did I see but that's clear. I don't.

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:06.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't see him. And to be honest, I think

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>with even with Garrett Wilson, I don't really see a

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:10.200
<v Speaker 1>top ten pick there. I see a mid mid first

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>round kind of a guy. I'm not sure that this

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:15.319
<v Speaker 1>class has what last year's class had in terms of,

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, the waddles and the chases of the world.

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you guys know we're gonna talk

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 1>about tight ends a little bit. I'd like to throw

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:23.120
<v Speaker 1>two more and I want to know if there was

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 1>like a late, like a Day three guy, maybe you

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 1>guys had had an eye on I got. I gotta

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>mention Kyle Phillips just from UCLA. I call him a

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Wes Welker cost player. UM actually did talk to him

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 1>with the combine, asked him about Welker and he was like,

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>you know that's my guy, Um, But you know he's

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a he's a Day three we talk about slot. He's

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 1>a Day three slot kind of a guy. But surehanded

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 1>catches everything his way. You watch you watch him in film,

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 1>he they just the same thing as Welker. Guys just

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>can't seem to cover him. He has a smart attitude

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 1>about how he plays and setting guys up. I think

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 1>he's a punt returner. He can do a number of things.

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 1>He's just seeing him give people problems. He doesn't look

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>like much standing there, but he seems to me like

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 1>a patriot guy. And and one other guy throwing the

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>mix was Khalil Shaker from Boise State, who I like him.

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Did it all you know, direct snaps, part return, kickoff,

0:15:09.760 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 1>run after catch um. I think he's another guy that

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 1>that I gave a start too, along with with jan

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Dale Robinson. That those are two guys I look at

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 1>that day two, day three kind of area that that

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:21.760
<v Speaker 1>could come in and and bring something to the table

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>that they need. Teaset did you have one? I had

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Taekwon Thornton from Baylor. I mean he's just a burner.

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 1>He did a four point two eight forty and I

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>think you can't go wrong tessing anything with that. Just

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>throw it deep and he'll be there. You can't teach me.

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I also liked Calvin Austin as a late, late round

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of guy, another one of those sort of hybrid

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>cat too. I think you could. I think you could

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 1>use him in a lot of different ways. Small five eight, tiny,

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>tiny guy to about a thousand yard seasons maybe, but

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe you can find a way to use him. I

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 1>just think explosive athlete his first thing that I wrote

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>down when I was watched him a little bit, uh,

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 1>And he has good hands and rint looked like he

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 1>got open like ran good route too. So yeah, there's

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>some interesting guys top to bottom in this class. I

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 1>think we'd all be stunned if the Patriots don't come

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 1>out of this draft selecting at least one wide receiver

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 1>type player. I would have said that last year too,

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and I was surprised, But you know, with just Kendrick

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Bourne under contract for next year, you know potentially, you

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>know you have to address the position long term, and

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 1>I think to get some youth to get any one

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>of these guys, and some of us are higher or

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>lower on certain guys, I would take literally any single

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>one of them. I feel I could help this this

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 1>group right before I close it with tight ends and

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to talk about them for a long time.

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 1>But if it was twenty one, at twenty one, who's

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>your pick you had to take a receiver for at

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty one? Burks? I think I would do it Teas Williams,

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>James and Williams at twenty one. You think he's gonna

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 1>be available at twenty one? All right? For who's available,

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking Pickens. Oh, I like Pickens, but I'm gonna

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>go Burks as well. But I think the three of

0:16:57.280 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>us would all agree that it's probably unlikely at twenty

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 1>one for a wide receiver. I think so, especially with

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:04.359
<v Speaker 1>the depth that we just talked about. I mean, there's

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna be guys, let's get deep into the weeds into

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 1>late day two, early day three, because I believe that's

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:12.920
<v Speaker 1>about the high point of where any of these tight

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 1>ends are gonna come off the board. Um, most of

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:22.119
<v Speaker 1>the experts have guys like Trey McBride, Jalen Widemeyer, Kay Doughton,

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Jeremy there's a lot of sort of workman like college

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers in this in this group, and I think

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 1>there's some potential for teams like the Patriots that like

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:37.439
<v Speaker 1>to use two tight ends. I kept reading solid option

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 1>as t E two in twelve personnel. Yeah, and there's

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot you know, the Kaye Doughton's of the world,

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:47.439
<v Speaker 1>even the kid Jake Ferguson, Barry Alvarez's grandson from Wisconsin.

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>A lot of these guys just really good college tight ends,

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 1>but I think all would need some development. Yeah, I mean,

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I think Tray McBride would probably be the one that

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I was, you know, most impressed with. Most of that's

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 1>coming from just getting a chance to see him at

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the Senior Bowl a little bit um and the practices,

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and I mean, I think he has potential to kind

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 1>of develop into into an all around tight end. But

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:09.879
<v Speaker 1>I think the thing with this position group in general

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:11.919
<v Speaker 1>right now is that you mostly have guys who are

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>just bigger than the defensive backs that are trying to

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:16.479
<v Speaker 1>cover them, and so they're able to just go up

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and get the ball, and if they're able to, you know,

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 1>sneak out and get wide open and so you see

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that run after catching. But there's not

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:25.919
<v Speaker 1>any burners. Really. There's some athletic guys Isaiah likely I

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:30.640
<v Speaker 1>know Tease likes him, yeah, from Everett High that Paul

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:32.919
<v Speaker 1>knows him well. Um, but you know, I think he

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 1>was he was an athletic downfield, could could have. He

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:37.399
<v Speaker 1>came out of a wide receiver and they made him

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>into a tight end at coach and I and I

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 1>agree with with teeth. If you were going to take

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:44.200
<v Speaker 1>a flyer on a guy with the most upside, now

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:46.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't there's a chance that he'll give you nothing.

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:48.199
<v Speaker 1>But if you were going to take a flyer on

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 1>a guy out of this group that might be have

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the highest ceiling, I think it might be likely, it

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:57.160
<v Speaker 1>would likely be likely. I'd agree with that. And then, uh,

0:18:57.200 --> 0:18:59.119
<v Speaker 1>and just you know a lot of these guys. I

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:01.160
<v Speaker 1>watched him. I'm like, he looks the same, Hey, looks

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the same. It's pretty big, um. But the one guy

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and Tisa and I were watching them upstairs with Gilanni Woods,

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>who was just an absolute like he's just too big.

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:12.360
<v Speaker 1>He's like the Trent Brown of the tight Ends. Um,

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>it looks like a Madden Creative player. It does like

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Matt Like, you're like, I'm gonna make him six foot seven,

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean six six point seven five two hundred and

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>sixty pounds, um, you know, and he doesn't look like

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:26.640
<v Speaker 1>a smooth I didn't watch that match. I watched eleven

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>tight ends, and I you know, purposely didn't watch a

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 1>ton of them because I don't think they're going to

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>take a tight end anywhere in the draft, and if

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>they do, I think it would be pretty late. Yeah. Yeah,

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>but he's uh, he was just one that um kind

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 1>of stood out to me just because of his size.

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:43.400
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know if that's going to translate uh

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>sneaky good hands too seeking good hands, I mean hard

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:48.679
<v Speaker 1>to tackle. Obviously. There was a couple of guys that

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>could block, yeah, and a couple of guys that were

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 1>good receivers. There were very few that showed the ability

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>to do any of them. That's the kay dot And

0:19:57.680 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 1>is a guy who didn't have a ton of production

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:02.360
<v Speaker 1>as a re ever, but showed good hands when they

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>did throw it to him. And I think he's a

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty good blocker. So he's the one guy I put

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 1>a star on. Yeah, Um, I put plotter. Oh yeah,

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:11.919
<v Speaker 1>no, no no, no, not dying. Not a dynamic athlete by

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 1>any you know, any stretch of the imagination. I thought

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:17.680
<v Speaker 1>he looked like he was a pretty good inline blocker, though,

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:22.120
<v Speaker 1>um yeah, I thought Jeremy Rutgerd from Ohio States kind

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of feel yeah, And he's another guy in that offense.

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, we make fund of the Alabama guys, so

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:28.440
<v Speaker 1>you got you know, you get you get all those

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 1>guys out there creating space for you. And Rutgard was

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 1>there to to take advantage. He was like the fifth

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:38.639
<v Speaker 1>option in that Ohio State option offense. So you know

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the Ohio State kid Charlie Kohler gets I was just

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:42.880
<v Speaker 1>looking at him. Yeah, he gets a lot of attention.

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Every game is like, you know, the big twelve games

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 1>around all the time. I saw him play a lot,

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and every time he's like, yo, that's why the NFL

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 1>sculls are drooling over him and I and I would

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:52.879
<v Speaker 1>watch him and said, what, like, I know, I'm not

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:55.680
<v Speaker 1>an expert. What are they drooling over? He looks thoroughly

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:58.119
<v Speaker 1>averaged to him that steady I just took. I saw

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>him as steady um also an act the academic Heisman winner,

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Heisman winner Um. But I liked him. But I liked him, Yeah,

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:07.359
<v Speaker 1>I just I you know what he looks player, right,

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:10.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, it felt similar, you know about but

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the guy they drafted here and that we haven't seen yet. Uh,

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's a better athlete, but probably who knows.

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 1>I had certainly not me Jago Konkuo from Maryland just

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 1>because they think they said he can move him around

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:26.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot. You know, I saw him running jet sweep first, yeah,

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>first out there you go. U. Yeah, that's what that

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:31.160
<v Speaker 1>was where I wrote down with him like jet sweep,

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:32.879
<v Speaker 1>Like I didn't see any tight ends run maybe a

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 1>little fullback action move around six two forty two. So yeah,

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't think it's a big position to

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 1>need and it's certainly not a stellar class um. But

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:45.400
<v Speaker 1>you never know, one of those late round guys. Maybe

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe a big fatty that can that can block a

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit. I think that that wouldn't It wouldn't totally.

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Johnny would be I mean, put him next to Trump

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:54.719
<v Speaker 1>Brown and you know, just try to hide people behind him.

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess, well, yeah, because you might lose Justin harn

0:21:57.119 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>he might actually have to play this year. You'll need it,

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, that extra tight end. There you go. But

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to spend much more time on the

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>tight ends for obvious reasons, and we a lot of

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:08.399
<v Speaker 1>guys to talk about. This one went a little longer

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:11.680
<v Speaker 1>than most of our draft podcasts will. But the way

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 1>these wide receivers stack up. I think, maybe not quite

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 1>as deep as it's been the last couple of years,

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>but still, as Mike said at the top, there's fast guys,

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 1>there's big guys. There's big fast guys. There's a lot

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to choose from, and I think it would be really

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>interesting come draft weekend to see what Bill Belichick thinks

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 1>and if he feels like a sky More or some

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of these slot guys with the production.

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to see a little bit more consistent route

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 1>running and separation, but a lot of a lot of

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:41.199
<v Speaker 1>guys to choose from. That that seems like the bear

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:43.359
<v Speaker 1>level to me. It's just, you know, to get a

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:45.680
<v Speaker 1>guy that's inside and quick, because that seems like what's

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:48.159
<v Speaker 1>kind of missing from their group right now is just

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:50.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, some little, quick, inside guys that can get open,

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:52.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, third and three and pop up and they're open.

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:55.120
<v Speaker 1>But you know, if they want to shake a chance

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 1>on one of these outside guys like Burkes or Watson

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:01.200
<v Speaker 1>to develop them, I can see that too. So I

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 1>think they need at least one. I'd take two in

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:06.719
<v Speaker 1>this draft. I think Watson's a guy I'm really intrigued

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>with two, like Tsus, but we'll put a wrap on

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 1>this epic podcast. They don't usually go this long, but

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>we're almost through with the offense. Guys, we have offensive line.

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 1>We'll get to that one next. Thank you for downloading

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>this podcast. Subscribe on Apple, google Play, and everywhere else

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:28.240
<v Speaker 1>you listen. Like the show, please rate and review us.

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Listener comments and ratings help keep us high in the

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:34.400
<v Speaker 1>podcast rankings so new listeners can find us. Be sure

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to Checkpatriots dot com for more news and more podcasts.