WEBVTT - Dan's Burning Questions

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid verbo call that for me. I'm

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>a man, I'm forty.

0:00:08.280 --> 0:00:10.119
<v Speaker 2>I've heard so many players say, well, I want to

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 2>be happy. You want to be happy for day Edith

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 2>State is that whoo whoom?

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:20.759
<v Speaker 1>And Dan and Tye welcome back to the solid verbal

0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>boys and girls. My name is ty Hildebrand, joining me

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>as always over there in sunny New York City. My

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>man Dan Rubinstein, Sir, how are you?

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 2>I wore a short sleeve shirt to the office today. Ty, WHOA,

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 2>that's a big step. It's huge, It's huge. I'm feeling great, oh,

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 2>Ty it's it's two weeks of spring that's all it is.

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:47.199
<v Speaker 2>That's all we have. But springball is over and we

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:48.519
<v Speaker 2>have a new concept today.

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>We do have a new concept what we're gonna do. Okay,

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>So we've been doing this thing once a month where

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>we do question and answered. We solicit questions from the

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>verbaler hood. You send him in via email at soliverbal

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>at gmail dot com or Twitter at soliverbal of course

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>is the handle Facebook, Reddit, you name it the whole

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>nine yards correct. But you know, sometimes we tend to

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>get so caught up in what others are asking that

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>we don't just have an opportunity to talk amongst ourselves,

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>to really have a dialogue among friends, which I think

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:23.120
<v Speaker 1>is why a lot of people like to listen to

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>this show. Am I right?

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 2>We're giving the verballer sphere a week off, given the

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:29.760
<v Speaker 2>verballer sphere a week off, actually two weeks off, if

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 2>we're going to feel about curtain a little bit more.

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 2>But you've got some questions for me, some burning questions

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:40.039
<v Speaker 2>that you've been meaning to ask me for god knows

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:41.759
<v Speaker 2>how long now, I don't know how long you've been

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 2>repressed in this state.

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:46.679
<v Speaker 1>But before us, we've got a list of questions that

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>you pondered up this week that I think you'd like

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>to throw my direction. Yeah.

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 2>I always have these questions for you, and I always

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 2>forget to ask them, or there are just ways that

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 2>I look at the sport in kind of a dumb way.

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 2>But I like to bounce things off of you. So

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 2>this is the dan Q and a week, and then

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 2>next week will be the tai Q and a week,

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 2>and then maybe after that we'll do some sort of

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 2>drafts debriefing from a college level and process level. If

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 2>that makes sense. Is that okay? That sounds delightful. Yes, Oh,

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm so glad we're on the same page. There hasn't

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:22.920
<v Speaker 2>been a ton of news. Is there any news? Did

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 2>you wanted to discuss anything? I mean, we talked about

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 2>Daniel Jones, right.

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 1>We talked about Daniel Jones, all right, now what I

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 1>wanted to talk about actually, and we don't have to

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 1>spend too much time on this, but Tommy Stevens we

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:38.080
<v Speaker 1>did not have time to discuss on this show because

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:39.919
<v Speaker 1>of the draft and all sorts of other stuff going on.

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Tommy Stevens deciding that he wants to transfer out of

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Penn State.

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 2>This is the post spring transfer. Oh, I'm not definitely

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 2>starting transfer window.

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>That is precisely what's going on. But Tommy Stevens, long

0:02:55.360 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>thought to be perhaps the runner for the starting quarterback

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 1>job up at Penn State, has a side. He's not

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:08.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna roll the dice in State College with Sean Clifford's

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 1>a guy for star recruit.

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Is that who it's gonna be?

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 1>For sure? It seems like he would be the air

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>apparent at this point. Okay, Shan Clifford, A lot of

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>folks were pretty high in Shan Clifford was apparently not

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>a slam dunk that Tommy Stevens is going to get

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>that job, So now he is keeping his options open.

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>He's looking elsewhere. Kentucky is a school I saw popping up,

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Mississippi State, maybe reuniting with Joe moorehead. Don't know if

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>either of those make a ton of sense, but hopefully

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>it works out for him because certainly he put in

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>his time in state college hoping to get that job

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and has some injuries. So yeah, we'll see. That's really

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the only notable thing from my end.

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Dabo Sweeney is everywhere. I think he threw out the

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 2>first pitch in Milwaukee today, was at the Raptors game

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 2>last night as we record this on a Wednesday, just

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 2>playing some pickup on the court.

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Also, Dabo Sweeney may have purchased all of the Azores.

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 2>He's doing well, doing well for himself. Actually, I'm going

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 2>to use Dabbo to get into our first dan Q

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 2>and a Q. He's had himself a good week though, even.

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>That, he's had a very good week. Do I have

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 1>do I play the email sound?

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 2>What is that? We discussed this over g chat. It's

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:21.039
<v Speaker 2>close enough. Congratulations Skippy, you've got mail, You've got mail.

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>On the solid verbal. So again, as often as we can,

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>we like to pay homa to the people who write in.

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>It's oliverbogmail dot Com, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, you name it all. Friendster, okay, Cupid,

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>plenty of fit. I don't know, I'm just.

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:38.719
<v Speaker 2>Rod Christian Mingle, Yeah, Farmers only all of the above.

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 2>But have you ever heard of Riya Riya riya u

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:48.600
<v Speaker 2>r a ya No. I think it's a very exclusive

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 2>dating app for famous people and influencers and you have

0:04:53.600 --> 0:05:00.160
<v Speaker 2>to get really pre approved. It's like quadruple factor checking. Okay,

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:03.600
<v Speaker 2>and neither one of us were invited when we were single, So.

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Not on that one.

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 2>If even we can't, you know how exclusive it must be.

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 2>So maybe we're on Riot, but we wouldn't know.

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:11.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, where are we going first? And what is

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>your first burning question for me?

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:16.839
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so first burning question is we now know that

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Dabo Sweeney is slash will be the richest coach in

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:25.239
<v Speaker 2>football ten years, ninety three million dollars if everything hits

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 2>kind of thing in college football. But who is who

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 2>do you as college football's most valuable, not richest, most

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 2>valuable Power five coach, which basically to me, means which

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 2>eight plus win team. Yeah, about that could most easily

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 2>backslide because of geography, school commitment, the conference therein whatever

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 2>into consistently a not bowl team if they were to

0:05:54.960 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 2>leave and be replaced by the most average college football coach. Also,

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:03.719
<v Speaker 2>who's the most average college football active Power five college

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 2>football coach?

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 1>The most average Power five college football coach is something

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that we did discuss on g chat and how would

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 1>you interpret that by we? We can't bring that up momentarily.

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to bury the lead though. Let me, okay,

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:16.159
<v Speaker 1>try to answer that question.

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 2>Who is the most valuable who gives their team three

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 2>to four wins because of how well they hire and

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 2>strategize and raise money and recruit and adjust and interact

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 2>with their players keep their players from transferring to that

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:35.919
<v Speaker 2>kind of thing. Who do you think over time is

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 2>that value?

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:39.160
<v Speaker 1>All right? Well, two names that jump off the page

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>at me, okay, I think the best answer is Kyle

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Whittingham at Utah. He has that's pretty good.

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 2>There's a good talent in Youutah.

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 1>About Yeah, third longest tenure in FBS, behind the immortal

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Farence and Gary Patterson. He is one hundred and

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty and sixty one overall at Utah and most importantly

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>eleven in two in bowl games. So he is a

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>guy who we joke about it every year, but Utah

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:07.839
<v Speaker 1>finds a way to win eight or nine games and

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>don't ever see it coming. But by and large he's

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>going to do that.

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 2>So Mountain West school that makes the leap and seems

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 2>to become even more consistent, though they're not winning eleven

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 2>a year like they were at the end of the

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 2>Mountain West tenure.

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Correct, So Whittingham is is I think choice A. Choice

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 1>B might be Pat Fitzgerald. He's an interesting selection here,

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of in the same vein as isilewaing him.

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that. I mean, there is much more

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 2>institutional support now than when he showed up, and he's

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 2>a large reason why.

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>You could very much make a case that if it's

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>not Pat Fitzgerald coaching at Northwestern, they backslide into being

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 1>a non bowl team and then the final one, even

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>though he doesn't quite have the tenure of the previous two.

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Matt Campbell at Iowa's great answer, Matt Campbell at Iowa State.

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>He's got to eight wins if he's not at Iowa State,

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Iowa States, not going five hundred.

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 2>If we were on family feud right now and I

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 2>were standing next to you, I had good answer, good answer, Good.

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 2>They really do encourage you to do that, I would

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 2>add David Shaw. I thought about Shaw. There is something

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 2>so maddeningly consistent about what he's done at Stanford, where

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 2>the down years are eight nine wins, and even though

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Harbob before him had equal, if not greater success and

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 2>was the one to pull them out, we know the

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:41.839
<v Speaker 2>depths of Stanford. We know the challenge of putting together

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 2>a roster of eighty five players who meet academic requirements.

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 2>They're not. They have to recruit nationally. You know, We've

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 2>seen David shago all over the country Virginia, Georgia, Texas

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 2>to get these enormously successful players, developed them into NFL players.

0:08:57.400 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 2>Deal with the fact that a lot of times he

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:02.840
<v Speaker 2>can't seek commitments while everybody else can because they're waiting

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 2>for grades. A lot of these guys are are borderline

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 2>to get into the school, and so I think that

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 2>kind of thing could cause panic. And the fact that

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 2>David Shaw has not only kept up the success but

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 2>has just secured an unbelievable program for Stanford is I

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 2>think he's right there in terms of value.

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:27.440
<v Speaker 1>What's interesting about him relative to Harball. Harbaugh came in

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and built that program or at least laid the foundation

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 1>for that program from the ground up since David Shaw

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:40.679
<v Speaker 1>took over because of those academic requirements, that added layer

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of complexity at Stanford. I don't want to say that

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>he's been elitist. I don't mean that he is definitely

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:50.679
<v Speaker 1>those steered into a vague elitism that comes along.

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 2>With their academic Ted talk. Yeah that, Yeah, he's.

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Done the ted talk. He is steered into that quality

0:09:56.960 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>of Stanford football and Stanford as a whole at has

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:03.559
<v Speaker 1>actually been quite impressive. He is not at all shied

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 1>away from some of their institutional requirements, and you could

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:10.200
<v Speaker 1>make a real strong case for him making that program

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>better because of it.

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 2>And think about all of the top flight assistants that

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 2>you know have you know, Mike Sandford and Derek Mason

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 2>have gone on to be head coaches or top coordin

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 2>at Lance Anderson, guys that have gone on to success

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 2>that he has replaced with. I mean, I think Tavita

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Pritchard is their new offensive coordinator so he trusts a

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 2>younger generation. There's a lot to love about how he's

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 2>kept them not just afloat, but but thriving. Even Derek

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 2>Mason is in that conversation that Vanderbilt is a consistent

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 2>bowl team. I know, playing for non conference games sort

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 2>of bolster a lot of these value coaches. Mark Stoops,

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 2>I think has to be because of where we've seen Kentucky.

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 2>You know the depths they fell to with Joker Phillips.

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:58.960
<v Speaker 1>If Kentucky's not in the SEC, he's probably turning in

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:00.719
<v Speaker 1>a better win loss record.

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:04.959
<v Speaker 2>I would probably submit Mike Leach and Washington State has

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 2>had a pretty good history of relative success. But we

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 2>do know that it's easy for Wazoo with an underwhelming hire,

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 2>let alone an average higher for things to go wrong

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 2>if everything else in the Pac twelve is pretty competitive.

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 2>So the fact that he has them at eight nine wins,

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 2>I think, all right, that's crazy impressive. So I think

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 2>that's where the value is.

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:29.959
<v Speaker 1>A lot of valuable coaches. Now onto more pressing matters. Yes,

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:32.079
<v Speaker 1>college football's most average coach.

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, how do you interpret that statement?

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>You need to consistently feel the team that is good

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>enough to maybe pull an upset but also bad enough

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 1>to lose to a team that you never really.

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 2>Should Right, there's a certain degree of competence that like, yes,

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 2>there are definitely strings of disappointing games, but at the

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 2>same time you show flashes, we're like, oh, well, somebody

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 2>in this or organization, probably him, at times, knows what

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:07.560
<v Speaker 2>they're doing, right, And so I don't necessarily think they

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 2>have to be a five hundred coach because sometimes schools

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 2>like Derek Mason has done a pretty good job at

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 2>Vanderbilt and they're kind of at five hundred, and that's

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 2>fine for Vanderbilt. I don't think that makes some average.

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:21.960
<v Speaker 1>No, the record does not make an average coach. But

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:26.679
<v Speaker 1>a record that's around average with the other prerequisites, right,

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:27.720
<v Speaker 1>is a cherry on top.

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 2>So, like, would you say Jeff Brahm is an average coach?

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 2>I think he's above average.

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 1>He's above a coach, and he's above ever run around

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>five hundred these past couple of years. Okay, So what

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at here is a coach who has had

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 1>some big moments mixed in over the last four seasons.

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 1>But there was also a quarterback situation about two years

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 1>ago which was not one of those bright spots at all. Yeah,

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and definitely gave us cause for pause our celebrity charity. Yep.

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 1>This gentleman is twenty twenty eight and twenty four in

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:04.319
<v Speaker 1>four seasons. He has two eight and five records, as

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 1>well as two five and seven records, Okay, his last

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>two seasons. I think we came to a unanimous agreement

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:16.679
<v Speaker 1>that college football's absolute average coach absolute average is Pat

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Nardozy at Pitt.

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:22.559
<v Speaker 2>I think that's right. I think it's Pat Nardoozi NARDUTSI.

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Every coach, if we are going to argue on the

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 1>scale of average or not average, needs to be graded

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>against Pat Nardoozi, at least in twenty nineteen.

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 2>I think it's the louder. The exhale is before a

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 2>fan reacts to the question, how how is your coach? So,

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 2>if you ask a Pitt fan, a random array of

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 2>Pit fans, what do you guys think of Nardoozi, I

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 2>think that's right.

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:48.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 2>I think they they start with a. I mean, he's

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:56.959
<v Speaker 2>all right. I think there's that exhale. The other coach

0:13:56.960 --> 0:14:02.199
<v Speaker 2>that I think is in that category of meeting expectations

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 2>thirty seven percent of the time. I think it's Kevin Someone. Okay,

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 2>I think Kevin Someone. He was the proto bram In

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 2>that oh my god, look what he's doing right away,

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 2>and oh are we going to lose him? And then

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 2>he just sort of settled into underachieving but not completely

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 2>like they would always go eight in five. Right, that's

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 2>not a disaster. No matter where you are, that's not

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 2>a disaster. Even if Alabama started going eight and five,

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 2>that's not Okay, maybe at Albata, but at text A

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 2>and M going eight and five is not, you know,

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 2>an emergency, right, So I understand getting tired of it

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 2>moving on and there are other issues obviously, but I

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 2>think a patent ardoozi Kevin Someone. I don't know why

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 2>I keep thinking about Purdue and Jeff Brom. I guess

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 2>because Kevin Someone went there. Is there anybody else to you?

0:14:58.000 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Like?

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 2>Is Will must Champ? He might be an average coach.

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 2>He might be a very average coach, like he did

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 2>touch his surface at Florida Way where they win the secs,

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 2>they get to a kind of big bowl game. All right,

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to is there who's the most average PAC

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 2>twelve coach? Is it Clay Hilton.

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>It's probably got to be Clay Hilton.

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 2>He's underwhelmed, he's overachieved, he's recruited all you know, to

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 2>be expected with the USC replacement level. Yeah, I think

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 2>it's Clay Helton. And the funny thing about both Helton

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 2>and Nardoozi, they're both in my Hudson News all stars

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 2>of You would never recognize them if they were buying

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 2>mints and an issue of variety in a Hudson News.

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>You would never recognize Clay Heilton without a hat on. No,

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, no, he could have Harry could have

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>a mohawk. I have no idea.

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Ty, you're a Notre Dame fan and I guess

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 2>a lesser extent Penn State fan. And the reasons that

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 2>you you are Notre Dame in a Notre Dame fan

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 2>and a Penn State fan. You were born in the

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 2>Northeast Ish, I guess do consider the Allentown area northeast.

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>This is the northeast.

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Okay, you're born in the northeast. Family's Catholic. You

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 2>attended the college in your state, the state college, and

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 2>so therefore you have Notre Dame and Penn State loyalty,

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 2>your family. You were born into a Notre Dame family,

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 2>and thus you were fans of these teams. You didn't

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 2>really choose, You chose to go along with it, that's right.

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 2>But if you had an open choice, and I was

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 2>inspired by I have some friends who went to medical

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 2>school and they do like the matching program. Are you

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 2>familiar with this?

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Sure?

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So basically, if an app existed, an objective app

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 2>on your phone, a computer, whatever, and it took into

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 2>account a program's general esthetic, the existing fan stereotypes, fair

0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 2>or not, and everything about your personality as a college

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 2>and just as a human. What school do you think

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:04.399
<v Speaker 2>the program would match you?

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Well?

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:10.159
<v Speaker 2>Like, wow, who are your people? Because if we're talking stereotypes,

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:14.879
<v Speaker 2>there's it's it's you're not old, you're not sort of

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:18.639
<v Speaker 2>tired in the Notre Dame stereotype. E.

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:21.159
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean we're getting there, but no, you're getting there.

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:23.679
<v Speaker 2>You're not. You don't you're not dripping in tradition with

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 2>everything you do. No, you don't complain that things are

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 2>not traditional enough. And with Penn State, there's an aggression

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:34.119
<v Speaker 2>there that I don't think you would habit stereotypically, So

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 2>in your mind, who's your match?

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:41.360
<v Speaker 1>This is an excellent question. Thank you when you when

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 1>you sent this one to me. This was one of

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>those one of those deals where I sat back in

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:52.200
<v Speaker 1>my chair and was like whoa, Oh okay. I went

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>back through the rolodex. I pulled out my Myers Briggs

0:17:57.080 --> 0:18:01.719
<v Speaker 1>personality type results, just to really get a good gauge

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 1>on what options we're looking at here. My Myers Briggs

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 1>personality type is e NTP. Now, if you're not familiar

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 1>with Meyers, not at all. It's it's a personality test.

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 1>There have been articles written about it. It may or

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 1>may not be accurate. Chances are it's not, but the

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 1>answers it gives are at least intriguing. It's a source

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 1>of much debate, but good conversation. E NTP says that

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I am an extrovert. Surprise, surprise, that makes sense, that

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>relies on intuition. I think instead of sense, and I

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 1>perceive instead of judge.

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 2>You're more mellow, yeap more mellow.

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:48.159
<v Speaker 1>Here is what according to our friends over at ZIP recruiter,

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the best careers for me would be okay.

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 2>So you're going to try to as an empt or

0:18:57.520 --> 0:18:59.919
<v Speaker 2>whatever you are you're going to try to match the

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to.

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Try to man it at the college football program, right

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:07.439
<v Speaker 1>all right? So number one it says I would be

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 1>good at being a stockbroker. M let's talk to you.

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I have picked some winners in my day, Okay, other

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 1>ones on here. An engineer, a lawyer, an operations manager okay,

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 1>a relationship manager, a film producer, a PR specialist, and

0:19:30.600 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 1>a training manager. Those are my eight careers, according to

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 1>ZIP recruiter.

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:37.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would say that you're a Big ten school.

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 2>I would say that you are. I would put you

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 2>as like a Michigan man. Probably.

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking Ohio State, Michigan is probably.

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 2>Now I think I think you're much more Michigan. There's

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 2>something that there's something that is kind of urban about Michigan.

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 2>I think that's the answer for you. How about I

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 2>think I'm a natural Colorado buffalo Colorado one hundred percent

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 2>for you. I think I'm a natural Colorado Buffalo where

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm more laid back by there is something that is

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:05.719
<v Speaker 2>inherently like when I think about Michael Dyer's arm that

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:09.479
<v Speaker 2>I you know, Colorado in glory days and you know,

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 2>trying to sort of stay stay optimistic, but also get

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 2>stay in the past a little bit, and I think

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Colorado outdoorsy, still pretty mellow. I think I'm a natural

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Colorado Buffalo.

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I will go along with that. You've said that for

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:25.440
<v Speaker 1>a long time too.

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:30.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yep, okay, Next question, ty Oh, I like this

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 2>one a lot. What are the best examples of a

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 2>coach having a you know what this this? Ain't it

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 2>sort of about face when he ditches his preferred way

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 2>of playing, where it's like, this is this is how

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 2>I like to do things, but it's clearly not working.

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Let's make this shift, is it? Because I love when

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:55.920
<v Speaker 2>that happens.

0:20:56.119 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Isn't this your entire hot take to a much greater

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 1>degree about what's going to go on with Chip Kelly

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and UCLA after this season?

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think that's partially on field, partially off, partially

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:09.120
<v Speaker 2>off field, but.

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, some degree, right, you're you're you're kind of going

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I think this to the extreme. With Chip Kelly, you

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 1>think I.

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Think that might be more about his recruiting, like his

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 2>his strategy behind the scenes. I think needs to be evolving,

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:25.120
<v Speaker 2>and I don't think it has yet. I trust him,

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:30.199
<v Speaker 2>just implicitly without with regard to getting things done on

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 2>the field. So okay, I think so. My answer would

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 2>probably be like Gary Patterson, right, and the shifts that

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 2>he made on offense, especially when things weren't working a

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 2>little bit into their Big twelve tenure. After they did

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 2>have a ton of success, success with Justin foh And

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 2>and going to the Rose Bowl, winning the Rose Bowl

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 2>and when he went to Sonny Comby and Doug Meatchum,

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:59.199
<v Speaker 2>I thought that was huge. Willie Taggert sort of tagger

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 2>wrapping the Yeah, the harball West Coast offense at South

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Florida and going to the Gulf Coast thing that worked

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 2>really well. Marlon Mack was tearing everybody up, by the way.

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Will mush Champs seeing the light was one of our

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:14.400
<v Speaker 1>fantasy selections.

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and they definitely improved on offense this past year.

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I think Will mush Champ is another name.

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:24.639
<v Speaker 2>He hired some duds early at Florida. Oh biguh. The

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:26.920
<v Speaker 2>Kurt Roper and Charlie Weiss not great.

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:29.639
<v Speaker 1>Dabo Sweeney sort of did this right out of the

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 1>shoot before he was even a head coach. Yeah, and

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 1>now he gets paid more than Davy Crockett. There's value

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 1>in being self aware. If you can pull this off.

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:41.919
<v Speaker 1>It also kind of feels like Gus Malshan is executing

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:43.680
<v Speaker 1>an inverted version that was.

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:48.159
<v Speaker 2>E gonna say this is it, so let's change it.

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:50.479
<v Speaker 1>It feels like he is going in the opposite direction

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:53.399
<v Speaker 1>in deciding to take over the play calling duties for

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:54.120
<v Speaker 1>this coming year.

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:57.239
<v Speaker 2>Kiring Kevin Steele. I thought was great. Oh yeah, it

0:22:57.280 --> 0:23:02.640
<v Speaker 2>was just offensively correct. Okay, some names there, interesting discussion. Yes,

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 2>by all means any of these questions. By the way,

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:07.120
<v Speaker 2>if you have an answer, please submit.

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, hit us up.

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 2>All right. I like this question a lot because this

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:15.639
<v Speaker 2>is sort of evergreen. So because we're always gonna have

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:19.920
<v Speaker 2>conversation about conference strength quote unquote strength. It's that's just

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:23.879
<v Speaker 2>a reality. So do you tie? Do you prefer the

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 2>season long product of a conference with a clear top

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 2>heavy hierarchy, so like two or four teams that are

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:36.160
<v Speaker 2>clearly above and beyond everybody else, and that everybody else

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 2>is a mix of competent, incompetent, terrible sometimes okay, whatever,

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 2>but you have your you have your ruling class, or

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:48.639
<v Speaker 2>do you like that wide open? Everybody's competent, everybody's pretty good.

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 2>You know, teams aren't go to shoot themselves in the foot.

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:52.879
<v Speaker 2>You know there's talent, you know there's quarterback play, you

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:55.879
<v Speaker 2>know there's organization on defense. But you're never going to

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 2>have the energy and hype of Oh wow. In two

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 2>weeks we have Lsubama, Oh my god, Florida State, Clemson,

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh boy, here comes Michigan, Ohio State, oh Man, usc Oregon.

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Which do you prefer. Do you like having that isolated

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 2>hype and the energy that comes with those games of

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:20.000
<v Speaker 2>the century of the universe, or do you want wild West?

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Whatever happens happens. Oh boy, I'm seeing something on the

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 2>ESPN bottom line that I did not expect. North Carolina

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 2>is beating up on whoever Florida State got to get there.

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 2>Didn't expect that.

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, what's interesting about this, Dan?

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 2>Mm hmm.

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 1>You can make a really good case that the ACC

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 1>is both The.

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 2>ACC is everything, the ACC is an annual buffet. The

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:47.159
<v Speaker 2>ACC really is both of these wrapped into one. Well

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 2>you're really asking me, though, is if I prefer the

0:24:49.440 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 2>PAC twelve or any conference that isn't the PAC twelve. Well,

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 2>I not this iteration of the PAC twelve. I don't

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 2>know who the hierarchy is. Washington's Okay, issue.

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no, I'm saying there is no hierarchy.

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 2>Rick, but I would argue there's not top to bottom confidence.

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 1>That is also a fair point. I'm going with the

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 1>top tier that keeps things interesting. Okay, I don't care

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 1>so much if the only thing on the line is

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 1>a birth to the Holiday Bowl, and I love the

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Holiday Bowl. You want stakes, I want stakes. I want

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the Game of the century, right, I want a little

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>bit more flavor to the games that I'm watching. I'm

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 1>coming at this from the perspective of I'm sure like

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:32.919
<v Speaker 1>many college football fans who listen to this show, my

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 1>team is Notre Dame mm hm. My team also Team

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 1>B if you want to call it. That's Penn State.

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:39.200
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:42.159
<v Speaker 1>The overwhelming majority of the games that I'm watching on

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 1>a college football Saturday feature neither. So you got to

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:48.440
<v Speaker 1>give me a reason to watch. I've got the built

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:50.680
<v Speaker 1>in reason of the podcast. But if I'm not watching

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>from the podcast perspective, if I just want to be

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a fan, I want a reason to watch that game.

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Why am I sitting aside three or four hours? You

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:00.400
<v Speaker 1>got to give me some meaning here, so correct give

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 1>me option A two to four teams clearly head and

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:04.120
<v Speaker 1>shoulders above the rest.

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we had was it twenty seventeen, twenty sixteen, The

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:10.400
<v Speaker 2>Big Ten did a really good job of having interesting,

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:12.679
<v Speaker 2>really good teams. The top that would have been what

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Ohio State, Penn State, Michigan State. Michigan had a down

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 2>year a couple of years ago, but Wisconsin had a

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:20.919
<v Speaker 2>what were they twelve and one? Thirteen and one. Northwestern

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:23.639
<v Speaker 2>finished with ten wins, so there was at least that

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:27.120
<v Speaker 2>element at the top. Though week to week you still

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 2>had a terrible Rutgers Maryland. I think Indiana was not great,

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:33.919
<v Speaker 2>Illinois was awful, and so that I think you need

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 2>a higher floor than what the Big ten did a

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 2>couple of years ago. I think I liked the wild

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Wild West thing. As my interest in the national championship,

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 2>I need more than Holiday Bowl stakes. Although Ty, don't

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 2>be smirched the Holiday Bowl. The Holiday Bowl rules. It's outstanding.

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 2>You get to go to San Diego in late December.

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 1>No, it's it's good. It's good.

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:59.120
<v Speaker 2>During bowl season, does the stadium randomly get flooded?

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Yes? Possibly sometimes it can sometimes happen. Yeah, I love

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:08.399
<v Speaker 1>it during bowl season. During the regular season, it is

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:10.679
<v Speaker 1>not the crown jewel I am interested in.

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 2>I think I used to have an old bit on

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:13.959
<v Speaker 2>one of the video things that I used to do,

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:16.359
<v Speaker 2>like the minor key cart the road to the road

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:20.159
<v Speaker 2>to the minikey car Cairbowl, and you don't want that.

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:22.920
<v Speaker 2>You don't want that. But where the SEC has been

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:27.120
<v Speaker 2>recently I think is interesting with in terms of at

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:31.119
<v Speaker 2>the top could potentially beat everybody, maybe outside of Alabama

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:35.200
<v Speaker 2>with the Mississippi school Mississippi schools rising up, with Georgia

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 2>and Florida and you know, Kentucky coming up into a

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 2>really fun place at least defensively, I think they've gotten

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:45.680
<v Speaker 2>to a pretty decent place where the bottom hasn't been

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:50.399
<v Speaker 2>awful awful Outside of Arkansas, I don't think the SEC

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:57.440
<v Speaker 2>has had the a Kansas Rutgers, Oregon State, Illinois situation

0:27:57.760 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 2>in the same way. So I at least like that

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:03.920
<v Speaker 2>the ACC is in a bad place right now? Would

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 2>you agree? Not at the top? But well no, I

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:09.440
<v Speaker 2>think they're in a bad place at the top.

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, they've got Clemson, Dan.

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:15.200
<v Speaker 2>They've got Clemson. But that's I didn't say one good

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 2>team right well, I said I want two, three, four.

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Dare I say Florida State is going to be Florida

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:21.960
<v Speaker 1>State before we.

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:24.440
<v Speaker 2>Would dare to say that, because that's a dumb thing

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 2>to say.

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Right now?

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:28.879
<v Speaker 2>Who who right now are you? If you are taking

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:32.400
<v Speaker 2>out a red pen a red SHARPI you're like, I

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 2>can't wait for Clemson and blahbaty blah. Who is your

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 2>blobberdy blah.

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, Miami maybe eventually eventually, uh, Virginia Tech,

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 2>You can't write maybe eventually on the side now I

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 2>know because I am not seeing that, like I like that.

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 2>Clemson's going to carry it home. So that's that's a

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 2>light pencil circle this year. But right now, I think

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 2>the ACC is in a bad place.

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, Hot takes.

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 2>Tie. I host a podcast called sports Wars. I need

0:29:05.760 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 2>some sports wars in the ACC. Where are we going next?

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 2>Next question? Let's stay in that general region. So last

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 2>year South Carolina went through the middle part of their schedule,

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 2>so like late September or October, early November, whatever. There

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 2>were five games there. They played, not the best, not

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 2>the worst teams on their schedule. So this was not

0:29:25.240 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 2>early season dumping. This was not Clemson late, who actually

0:29:29.160 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 2>played pretty well against and each of those games on

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 2>average was decided by a field goal something like three

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 2>point one or three point two points. And we used

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 2>to refer to them as or we did refer to

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 2>them as they were like the most competitive team. They

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 2>were in so many games late we were like, well,

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 2>they're not going away and they're not really good enough

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 2>to put away these teams that are pretty good. So

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 2>they're just competitive. And these were decent enough teams Missouri

0:29:54.200 --> 0:29:56.959
<v Speaker 2>and Florida, teams like that. So this year when you

0:29:57.000 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 2>look ahead and I think by the way the net

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 2>point per drive scored and allowed like netted out to

0:30:03.240 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 2>like point oh two, it worked out really really well

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 2>in South Carolina. So when you look at the twenty

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 2>nineteen season, who strikes you? And this, I guess is

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 2>in the same vein as the most average coach, But

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 2>who is the team that they're They're pretty good, They're

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 2>just not pretty or good, They're just they're aggressively competent

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 2>and competitive.

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I think the answer is Iowa.

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:31.880
<v Speaker 2>They're going to be in every game. We've got really

0:30:31.920 --> 0:30:37.160
<v Speaker 2>strong line in coming back on both sides. Okay, Nate Stanley.

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Lose two tight ends, but Nate Stanley I love, we love.

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 1>I think the answer is Iowa here.

0:30:46.960 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 2>That's pretty good. I think it's Northwestern. I think that

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 2>we both went Big ten. Yeah, we're going Big ten.

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:58.040
<v Speaker 2>I think Missouri is an interesting answer. Yeah, I think

0:30:58.120 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 2>they're especially they gave Georgia trouble last year. It was

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:05.200
<v Speaker 2>a game at halftime. I don't know of anybody that

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 2>I would take right now. Cal's a half team, and

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't like taking a half team. Like their defense

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:10.880
<v Speaker 2>is going to keep them in it, but their offense

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 2>is going to sort of keep them out of a

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 2>bunch of games. They were too lopsided last year. They'd

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:16.720
<v Speaker 2>win a game fifteen to ten, but then they'd lose

0:31:16.720 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 2>a game like thirty seven to seven. So I'm not

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 2>down with Cal there in the Big twelve. I think

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 2>man Iowa States had some blowouts, but I think they

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 2>have gotten to a point where it's going to be

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:33.719
<v Speaker 2>hard to comfortably beat Iowa State. We saw Oklahoma struggle

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:36.000
<v Speaker 2>these past couple of years, going one and one. Last

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:39.520
<v Speaker 2>Keen Butler had his way with some some Oklahoma dbs.

0:31:39.560 --> 0:31:41.720
<v Speaker 2>So I think Iowa State's a pretty good answer there.

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 2>That they're just aggressively competent, which like we mentioned earlier

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:50.200
<v Speaker 2>step in the perfect direction for the Clones. I think it's,

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 2>by the wayate the Nate Stanley thing. I'm going to

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:54.640
<v Speaker 2>load a list up right now. But I was talking

0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 2>about this with our pal Andy Staples before we did

0:31:57.160 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 2>the SI Live half night party thing that we did

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:04.400
<v Speaker 2>before the or during the first round. Who is twenty

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:08.320
<v Speaker 2>twenty Daniel Jones? Who is the quarterback? Why do you

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:09.800
<v Speaker 2>keep bringing up Daniel Jones?

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Sorry?

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 2>I know you are you? Are you still a Giants fan?

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Barely?

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:18.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay? Who is the twenty twenty quarterback that college fans

0:32:18.400 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 2>will look at as like that guy.

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Him?

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 2>Who is that guy?

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Man?

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:28.960
<v Speaker 2>I'll give you you know who? Andy's answer was, who

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 2>Felipe Franks? Oh man, that's a good, big arm, great

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:39.680
<v Speaker 2>physical tools, athletic. I think Nate Stanley's on the list, man,

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 2>you know who? I think somebody could talk themselves into

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:46.000
<v Speaker 2>because I love Jake from I've liked them since day one, right,

0:32:46.600 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 2>I think people are going Jacob easonon.

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Eason's one that jumps out at me.

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 2>He jumps out at like he's going to make some

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:57.360
<v Speaker 2>wow throws if he wins the starting job.

0:32:58.120 --> 0:32:58.720
<v Speaker 1>He's a starter.

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 2>He'll make some crazy throws and he'll finish seventh. He'll

0:33:03.800 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 2>be the seventh or eighth most efficient PAC twelfth quarterback.

0:33:07.240 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 2>And somebody's gonna talk themselves into Jacobson because the measurables

0:33:12.560 --> 0:33:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Nate Stanley I think is that conversation. I think he's

0:33:14.440 --> 0:33:18.280
<v Speaker 2>pretty good. I just wouldn't take him in the first round.

0:33:18.760 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess right now if I'm picking Jake Eason is

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting to me. Oh, man, I need no time with

0:33:27.040 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 1>this one, though.

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, Brian Lawurki looking at his efficiency metrics from twenty seventeen.

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Man, you can't. You can't shine twenty eighteen, though.

0:33:38.520 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Daniel Jones was there for a long time and had

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 2>a lot of duds and went number six. All right,

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:48.120
<v Speaker 2>next question me, the next question. Okay, ooh, this one's

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 2>pretty good. Let's say you're a shady. I don't think

0:33:52.280 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 2>you'll ever get to this point, but let's say you're

0:33:54.400 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 2>a sort of shady in the shadows. Super wealthy fan Okay, yeah, okay,

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 2>not a booster officially, but you're no stranger to facilitating

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 2>under the table payments.

0:34:07.480 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:34:08.080 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 2>I like blue chip recruits. Yeah, you're a bag man.

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 2>I like sorts and let's say for the point of

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 2>this exercise, all things are pretty even in terms of

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:23.239
<v Speaker 2>what your team needs. So aside from quarterback, if you

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:26.040
<v Speaker 2>and yours are giving yourself a budget of eight hundred

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:29.200
<v Speaker 2>and fifty thousand dollars one point two million, four hundred

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:31.600
<v Speaker 2>and eighteen thousand dollars, you give yourself a budget that

0:34:31.640 --> 0:34:36.360
<v Speaker 2>you're going to contribute to helping to pay out whatever families,

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:40.680
<v Speaker 2>specific guys, charities, whatever, however, whatever means you're going through.

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:44.359
<v Speaker 2>But you're budgeting what you like and what's important to you.

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Where your money goes. Aside from quarterback, give me specific

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 2>player archetypes that you feel most strongly about investing in.

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I am sinking all of my money into building the

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:03.880
<v Speaker 1>two point zero of Empson's defensive line from twenty eighteen. Okay,

0:35:04.239 --> 0:35:07.800
<v Speaker 1>all of my money. It might not be the super

0:35:07.920 --> 0:35:11.359
<v Speaker 1>sexy plan, but it is, as we saw.

0:35:11.640 --> 0:35:13.800
<v Speaker 2>An enormo going out and getting a Jerry Judy.

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:17.399
<v Speaker 1>No, it is an enormous competitive advantage. It stops the run,

0:35:18.360 --> 0:35:22.520
<v Speaker 1>it affects the pass. It's part of what truly has

0:35:22.520 --> 0:35:27.000
<v Speaker 1>set the SEC apart for all these years. Defensive line play. Plus,

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:30.640
<v Speaker 1>if you can do what Clemson did and get three

0:35:31.520 --> 0:35:35.400
<v Speaker 1>defensive linemen drafted in the first round. You better believe

0:35:35.400 --> 0:35:39.280
<v Speaker 1>that moving forward. Yep, that's a position group that recruits

0:35:39.320 --> 0:35:43.520
<v Speaker 1>itself long into the future. Yeah, so I go defensive

0:35:43.600 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 1>line first and foremost. The way that it can change

0:35:47.880 --> 0:35:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a college football game is something that you can't put

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a price tag on.

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:56.080
<v Speaker 2>I've been scarred by a couple of pretty poor defensive

0:35:56.080 --> 0:36:00.160
<v Speaker 2>coordinators ty as an Oregon fan recently, the to the

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:05.359
<v Speaker 2>Don Pellam and the Brady hoke eras. And thus I've

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 2>watched some bad linebackers. Okay, bad I should say bad linebackers.

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:13.759
<v Speaker 2>I mean maybe they were, but bad linebacker play. And

0:36:13.800 --> 0:36:18.800
<v Speaker 2>there is something about a just nails inside or middle linebacker,

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 2>depending on the scheme you're running, gets everybody set, makes calls.

0:36:23.520 --> 0:36:27.480
<v Speaker 2>You know, run stuffer can drop into coverage. If I'm

0:36:27.520 --> 0:36:32.320
<v Speaker 2>talking about somebody on the level of potentially Patrick Willis,

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:37.520
<v Speaker 2>Luke Keigley, somebody like that, I think that's where I am.

0:36:37.719 --> 0:36:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Just all the chips are going in that direction.

0:36:39.600 --> 0:36:42.120
<v Speaker 1>You get yourself like two or three Josh Allen's it's

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 1>not a bad play.

0:36:43.640 --> 0:36:46.920
<v Speaker 2>No, I mean he's sort of a stand up edge rusher.

0:36:47.560 --> 0:36:52.520
<v Speaker 2>But yes, I need line. I mean, you watch the

0:36:52.600 --> 0:36:56.160
<v Speaker 2>Ohio State Oregon National Championship game. I did not a

0:36:56.160 --> 0:36:59.359
<v Speaker 2>lot of Ezekiel Elliott tackling happening in that game with

0:36:59.440 --> 0:37:02.040
<v Speaker 2>an incredible defensive line with Eric Armstead and to Forrest

0:37:02.040 --> 0:37:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Buckner in front of them. So there is something immensely

0:37:05.760 --> 0:37:10.759
<v Speaker 2>personal about developing that. Like I want a neck roll.

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:13.799
<v Speaker 2>I want a lot of pointing and yelling. I want

0:37:13.840 --> 0:37:16.759
<v Speaker 2>a lot of sideline towel waving. I want a lot

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:21.320
<v Speaker 2>of celebrations on batted balls. I want that captain anchor

0:37:22.239 --> 0:37:25.960
<v Speaker 2>of a middle linebacker inside linebacker, and if he presents himself,

0:37:26.760 --> 0:37:28.280
<v Speaker 2>that's where I'm spending my cash.

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Give me defensive line all day, every day.

0:37:30.800 --> 0:37:32.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay, reasonable.

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:34.960
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting that neither one of us took offense with

0:37:35.000 --> 0:37:35.399
<v Speaker 1>this though.

0:37:36.400 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I think you can develop receivers. I think running

0:37:39.200 --> 0:37:43.240
<v Speaker 2>backs the injury risk is pretty high. I a Quentin

0:37:43.280 --> 0:37:49.120
<v Speaker 2>Nelson type sure thing inside there. That's gonna especially if

0:37:49.120 --> 0:37:51.600
<v Speaker 2>you are a team who's going to run a good amount.

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:57.040
<v Speaker 2>That's very attractive. The road grader, Tie, road grader. Yeah,

0:37:57.160 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 2>you give me a Quentin Nelson type. I'm listening. I'm

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:01.640
<v Speaker 2>not hanging up the phone.

0:38:01.360 --> 0:38:04.840
<v Speaker 1>By the way Dan. Since we're talking about money and

0:38:05.920 --> 0:38:10.920
<v Speaker 1>you know buying aquisition group, Yeah, this is true. Are

0:38:10.920 --> 0:38:13.680
<v Speaker 1>your credit card bills keeping you up at night sometimes?

0:38:13.760 --> 0:38:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:38:14.600 --> 0:38:17.080
<v Speaker 1>You got interest to find a lot of diapers. You

0:38:17.120 --> 0:38:19.040
<v Speaker 1>got interest rates in the double digits.

0:38:19.320 --> 0:38:19.960
<v Speaker 2>It's not great.

0:38:20.400 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Be smart. Pay off your credit card balances with a

0:38:23.280 --> 0:38:27.400
<v Speaker 1>credit card cansolidation loan from light Stream. Get a fixed

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:30.520
<v Speaker 1>rate as low as five point nine to five APR.

0:38:30.640 --> 0:38:34.920
<v Speaker 1>With auto pay, you could save thousands in interest. You

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:37.360
<v Speaker 1>can get a loan from five thousand to one hundred thousand.

0:38:37.400 --> 0:38:39.799
<v Speaker 1>There are no fees, can even get your money as

0:38:39.840 --> 0:38:43.360
<v Speaker 1>soon as the day you apply. Plus, light Stream is

0:38:43.360 --> 0:38:46.440
<v Speaker 1>a division of sun Trust Bank, one of the nation's

0:38:46.520 --> 0:38:51.160
<v Speaker 1>largest financial institutions, so you have complete piece of mind.

0:38:51.719 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 1>If you want to save even more, our listeners can

0:38:55.560 --> 0:38:59.120
<v Speaker 1>get additional interest rate discount. The only way to get

0:38:59.120 --> 0:39:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the discount is to go to lightstream dot com slash

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Solid l I G H T S t R e

0:39:06.200 --> 0:39:10.799
<v Speaker 1>A M dot com slash Solid of course subject to

0:39:10.920 --> 0:39:15.040
<v Speaker 1>credit approval. Rate includes a point five percent autopay discount.

0:39:15.160 --> 0:39:19.399
<v Speaker 1>Terms and conditions apply and offers our subject to change

0:39:19.400 --> 0:39:23.960
<v Speaker 1>without notice. Visit lightstream dot com slash solid for more

0:39:24.120 --> 0:39:25.160
<v Speaker 1>in formation.

0:39:26.239 --> 0:39:28.719
<v Speaker 2>Ty, can we make a quick announcement here?

0:39:28.920 --> 0:39:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh?

0:39:30.239 --> 0:39:32.399
<v Speaker 2>Did I know we're about talking? I think we're done

0:39:32.400 --> 0:39:33.879
<v Speaker 2>talking college football for this show.

0:39:34.520 --> 0:39:36.239
<v Speaker 1>Okay, yeah, do.

0:39:36.280 --> 0:39:38.040
<v Speaker 2>You have any other questions that you want to ask?

0:39:38.200 --> 0:39:38.319
<v Speaker 1>Oh?

0:39:38.360 --> 0:39:40.040
<v Speaker 2>No, actually, do we have one more? One more?

0:39:40.400 --> 0:39:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, go ahead, yeah, one more.

0:39:42.239 --> 0:39:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Sorry for the teas, and then we're moving on. Okay

0:39:44.200 --> 0:39:48.920
<v Speaker 2>from college football too, whatever our other nonsense. Somebody we

0:39:49.040 --> 0:39:53.319
<v Speaker 2>talked about how much we loved LSU's field. Oh yeah,

0:39:54.200 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 2>we talked about how the painted gradient I is just

0:39:59.640 --> 0:40:02.720
<v Speaker 2>so striking, and you love the five yard markers instead

0:40:02.719 --> 0:40:06.080
<v Speaker 2>of ten yard markers. How it was just this unique

0:40:06.160 --> 0:40:11.600
<v Speaker 2>quality when there's a lot of homogeneous named homogeneous, a

0:40:11.640 --> 0:40:16.280
<v Speaker 2>homogeneous nature to college football fields sometimes. And we actually

0:40:16.280 --> 0:40:18.239
<v Speaker 2>got an email from somebody who used to work on

0:40:18.320 --> 0:40:22.360
<v Speaker 2>the You saw this the field beautiful for LSU. Awesome,

0:40:22.520 --> 0:40:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh amazing, And he agreed with us. For the record,

0:40:26.200 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 2>he didn't correct this, He just gave us some more

0:40:28.040 --> 0:40:31.000
<v Speaker 2>details that there's no set design for there's no set

0:40:31.040 --> 0:40:34.040
<v Speaker 2>border for the eye. It's just sort of what happens

0:40:34.040 --> 0:40:36.200
<v Speaker 2>when they're painting it, and it's a autricate process.

0:40:36.320 --> 0:40:37.719
<v Speaker 1>I love it beautiful chaos.

0:40:38.040 --> 0:40:42.799
<v Speaker 2>Yes, what other fields in college football to you? So

0:40:42.920 --> 0:40:46.600
<v Speaker 2>anything between fans, So it could be you know, if

0:40:46.600 --> 0:40:50.160
<v Speaker 2>you love the hedges at Georgia, what fields to you

0:40:50.239 --> 0:40:52.799
<v Speaker 2>are the most striking that visually? Just do it for

0:40:52.840 --> 0:40:57.280
<v Speaker 2>you get your corneas all agog I would Dan, if

0:40:57.320 --> 0:41:02.000
<v Speaker 2>you'll indulge me. Mm hmm, like to construct my ideal field.

0:41:02.160 --> 0:41:05.400
<v Speaker 2>Oh my gosh, okay, your robofield.

0:41:05.760 --> 0:41:07.879
<v Speaker 1>We're not talking about stadiums, right, We're just talking about

0:41:07.880 --> 0:41:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the field of the field of play, the area the

0:41:09.920 --> 0:41:13.000
<v Speaker 1>immediate area around the field of play.

0:41:13.920 --> 0:41:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah. So like if if a stadium has a

0:41:15.920 --> 0:41:18.520
<v Speaker 2>track like Washington used to have a track around, that's

0:41:18.520 --> 0:41:20.920
<v Speaker 2>because they okay, track and field. But if you like

0:41:21.000 --> 0:41:22.840
<v Speaker 2>that vision, you're like, hey, I like that throwback.

0:41:24.160 --> 0:41:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I think. I think what you know about me is

0:41:27.400 --> 0:41:29.319
<v Speaker 1>that I like things that stray a little bit from

0:41:29.360 --> 0:41:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the norm. Maybe not as much as you. Right, I

0:41:32.239 --> 0:41:34.720
<v Speaker 1>like straying from the norm, and I'm all about sticking

0:41:34.719 --> 0:41:35.279
<v Speaker 1>it to the man.

0:41:36.000 --> 0:41:36.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah that's you.

0:41:37.480 --> 0:41:41.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm sticking mister rebel in an ideal world.

0:41:41.719 --> 0:41:42.400
<v Speaker 2>Uh huh.

0:41:42.560 --> 0:41:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Give me the blue turf from Boise.

0:41:44.840 --> 0:41:46.279
<v Speaker 2>Wow, Okay, you're going for it.

0:41:46.880 --> 0:41:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Give me that sweet LSU Tiger gradient logo and and

0:41:51.120 --> 0:41:54.759
<v Speaker 1>the yard markings every five yards. M hm. I want

0:41:54.800 --> 0:41:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the hedges from Georgia and Sanford Stadium for my money.

0:41:58.680 --> 0:42:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Nothing better than a guy getting blasted into the hedges

0:42:02.480 --> 0:42:03.600
<v Speaker 1>at Sanford Stadium.

0:42:03.760 --> 0:42:07.120
<v Speaker 2>Yep. I And you have a bulldog on the field

0:42:07.400 --> 0:42:10.000
<v Speaker 2>that counts. I didn't think of that, but yes, sitting

0:42:10.000 --> 0:42:12.520
<v Speaker 2>on a mound of ice. Yes, so he doesn't overheat.

0:42:12.640 --> 0:42:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I've got the Tennessee checkerboard in the end zone.

0:42:16.000 --> 0:42:17.319
<v Speaker 2>Love the checkerboards.

0:42:17.640 --> 0:42:18.920
<v Speaker 1>And because also if we're going to.

0:42:18.920 --> 0:42:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Talk on the power to on the midfield, yeah, well

0:42:21.520 --> 0:42:24.040
<v Speaker 2>I've already got my I know, I know midfield saying

0:42:24.680 --> 0:42:26.400
<v Speaker 2>Tennessee's field aesthetic is terrific.

0:42:26.920 --> 0:42:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Give me the checkerboard in the end zone. And I

0:42:29.920 --> 0:42:32.759
<v Speaker 1>don't know how sound fits into this equation. We're talking

0:42:32.800 --> 0:42:36.719
<v Speaker 1>about bulldogs and live mascots. But if it sound has

0:42:36.760 --> 0:42:39.000
<v Speaker 1>no dimension Dan, so it's tough to say how it

0:42:39.600 --> 0:42:42.279
<v Speaker 1>would fit into this equation. But I'm going to take

0:42:42.320 --> 0:42:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the soundtrack from Lane Stadium.

0:42:45.000 --> 0:42:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I mean that's not a that's not a terf situation.

0:42:48.320 --> 0:42:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how sound acoustics, Okay, sound that is

0:42:51.680 --> 0:42:54.680
<v Speaker 1>obviously great. But if I could, I'm going to say,

0:42:55.400 --> 0:42:56.960
<v Speaker 1>enter Samman from Laane Stadium.

0:42:57.239 --> 0:42:59.400
<v Speaker 2>Do you have trouble with any of the fields with

0:42:59.520 --> 0:43:04.640
<v Speaker 2>your vision? Sometimes I do not gonna watch ones. I

0:43:04.680 --> 0:43:09.839
<v Speaker 2>have trouble when it rains. So what happens when it rains?

0:43:08.400 --> 0:43:14.239
<v Speaker 2>When the browns and the greens? Oh, puddles really mess

0:43:14.280 --> 0:43:14.600
<v Speaker 2>you up?

0:43:14.960 --> 0:43:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like the typhoon games that we see the typhoon monsoon.

0:43:19.040 --> 0:43:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me? Yeah, so what does that look like to you?

0:43:21.400 --> 0:43:23.000
<v Speaker 1>It just all sort of looks the same.

0:43:23.280 --> 0:43:24.000
<v Speaker 2>It's a mess.

0:43:24.160 --> 0:43:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, It's just like they're playing on a cow pasture,

0:43:26.520 --> 0:43:30.040
<v Speaker 1>which isn't wrong per se. It's just tough for me

0:43:30.080 --> 0:43:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to depict where the field stops and the football begins.

0:43:34.760 --> 0:43:36.960
<v Speaker 2>I love the shades of green, and that's obviously because

0:43:36.960 --> 0:43:39.480
<v Speaker 2>I've been to and I've watched so many Aughtson stadium games.

0:43:40.239 --> 0:43:43.480
<v Speaker 2>But I love the sort of lighter, darker green alternating.

0:43:43.520 --> 0:43:46.120
<v Speaker 2>And that's it's true at a number of stadiums. Yeah, nothing,

0:43:46.360 --> 0:43:49.400
<v Speaker 2>it's terribly unique to Ottson, But I do like that.

0:43:49.480 --> 0:43:51.480
<v Speaker 2>I like how you can sort of keep track of

0:43:51.560 --> 0:43:53.080
<v Speaker 2>yardage really easily that way.

0:43:53.120 --> 0:43:53.560
<v Speaker 1>On the fly.

0:43:54.440 --> 0:43:57.080
<v Speaker 2>I think North Carolinas field. I think that that tar

0:43:57.160 --> 0:43:59.640
<v Speaker 2>heel blue that they line it with, I think it

0:43:59.680 --> 0:44:03.239
<v Speaker 2>pops really nicely with the green turf. My Number one

0:44:03.280 --> 0:44:04.960
<v Speaker 2>is going to be the Rose Bowl field. I like

0:44:05.000 --> 0:44:08.120
<v Speaker 2>how they paint the sidelines up until whatever point with

0:44:08.280 --> 0:44:11.239
<v Speaker 2>the colors of the teams, and then you have that

0:44:11.320 --> 0:44:13.719
<v Speaker 2>the dark end zones that you know, it doesn't just

0:44:13.719 --> 0:44:16.520
<v Speaker 2>say Michigan or USC, it's that, you know, they have

0:44:16.600 --> 0:44:20.080
<v Speaker 2>the Michigan blue all throughout that end zone and the

0:44:20.480 --> 0:44:23.520
<v Speaker 2>cardinal of USC whatever. There is something that is incredibly

0:44:23.560 --> 0:44:25.480
<v Speaker 2>striking of the Rose in the middle of the field.

0:44:25.920 --> 0:44:28.560
<v Speaker 2>There is something just looking at that turf and not

0:44:28.640 --> 0:44:31.400
<v Speaker 2>even talking about the bowl, not even talking about the

0:44:31.400 --> 0:44:35.680
<v Speaker 2>San Gabriel Mountains, the angle with which we watch at

0:44:35.680 --> 0:44:38.960
<v Speaker 2>which we watch the game, it's a pretty low angle, right,

0:44:39.640 --> 0:44:40.680
<v Speaker 2>the Rose Bowl angle.

0:44:41.080 --> 0:44:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and you almost.

0:44:42.880 --> 0:44:45.880
<v Speaker 2>See blades of grass when you're watching it at you know,

0:44:45.920 --> 0:44:49.680
<v Speaker 2>I think ESPN probably about fifty sixty frames per second. Yeah,

0:44:50.000 --> 0:44:53.799
<v Speaker 2>So there is something about the Rose Bowl that is

0:44:53.920 --> 0:44:57.680
<v Speaker 2>so comforting turf wise, and I've walked on that turf

0:44:57.719 --> 0:45:01.840
<v Speaker 2>before a couple of different Rose Bowls. It's just it's magic.

0:45:02.320 --> 0:45:04.480
<v Speaker 2>And so that to me is probably my number one

0:45:04.520 --> 0:45:06.680
<v Speaker 2>overall field, but elements wise, I think you nailed the

0:45:06.680 --> 0:45:09.640
<v Speaker 2>other ones. I think LSU Tennessee. The blue turf doesn't

0:45:09.640 --> 0:45:11.319
<v Speaker 2>do as much for me, but I do like that

0:45:11.680 --> 0:45:14.480
<v Speaker 2>sometimes birds land on it thinking it's a pond making

0:45:14.520 --> 0:45:19.040
<v Speaker 2>its water. I enjoy that element of it. But outside

0:45:19.040 --> 0:45:21.400
<v Speaker 2>of that, I think those are all of my answers.

0:45:21.760 --> 0:45:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, if I'm not going Blue turf, I

0:45:24.920 --> 0:45:27.160
<v Speaker 1>think I'm with you on the Rose Bowl. And you're

0:45:27.200 --> 0:45:29.759
<v Speaker 1>right to point out the angle from which we watch

0:45:29.840 --> 0:45:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the Rose Bowl as a television viewer.

0:45:32.680 --> 0:45:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Do you hate any fields or any elements of any fields?

0:45:37.000 --> 0:45:39.840
<v Speaker 2>Do you know what? I absolutely love? And it's so

0:45:40.000 --> 0:45:42.600
<v Speaker 2>terrible because I love watching the team, and I love

0:45:42.760 --> 0:45:45.640
<v Speaker 2>the tradition around the field, and I love the colors

0:45:45.680 --> 0:45:50.200
<v Speaker 2>and everything that happens. I hate Clemson's end zone yea

0:45:50.320 --> 0:45:54.600
<v Speaker 2>so much. The Seraph's Sarah Clemson get out of here.

0:45:54.960 --> 0:45:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Hmm.

0:45:55.719 --> 0:45:57.920
<v Speaker 2>I think it's awful. I think it's tacky, and I

0:45:57.960 --> 0:45:58.319
<v Speaker 2>hate it.

0:45:59.160 --> 0:46:01.399
<v Speaker 1>I really feel that. I hate I need.

0:46:01.760 --> 0:46:03.480
<v Speaker 2>I hate the Clemson en zone. I don't know how

0:46:03.520 --> 0:46:05.359
<v Speaker 2>I feel about the Notre Dame en zone. I think

0:46:05.400 --> 0:46:08.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm mostly down on it. I'm anti Yeah, I think

0:46:08.600 --> 0:46:10.440
<v Speaker 2>I used to sort of like it and now just

0:46:10.480 --> 0:46:13.319
<v Speaker 2>like the slashes are just it's there, just to be there.

0:46:13.560 --> 0:46:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Let's let's update.

0:46:14.480 --> 0:46:17.360
<v Speaker 1>There is a very simple quality to the Notre Dame field,

0:46:18.160 --> 0:46:19.520
<v Speaker 1>right that I understand.

0:46:19.800 --> 0:46:21.919
<v Speaker 2>I like the turf of Notre Dame field. Do they

0:46:22.120 --> 0:46:23.799
<v Speaker 2>do they play on grass or they play on turf?

0:46:23.960 --> 0:46:27.360
<v Speaker 1>It's turf. Now. Yeah, I like the simple nature of

0:46:27.400 --> 0:46:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the field and I can understand why would be into that,

0:46:30.760 --> 0:46:33.040
<v Speaker 1>But it doesn't do it for me. Give me the checkerboards,

0:46:33.920 --> 0:46:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think Notre Dame needs to go ostentatious

0:46:36.520 --> 0:46:38.759
<v Speaker 1>with their end zones. No, no, no, of course not.

0:46:39.160 --> 0:46:41.319
<v Speaker 2>Just add a little let's let's go a little bit.

0:46:41.520 --> 0:46:44.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, if it were some sort of shamrocky design

0:46:44.680 --> 0:46:47.160
<v Speaker 2>in there, I think that'd be great. Listen, we've had

0:46:47.200 --> 0:46:51.400
<v Speaker 2>thoughtful shamrocks. We've had issues with the Shamrocks series and

0:46:51.440 --> 0:46:54.040
<v Speaker 2>the uniforms. I don't have any level of confidence that

0:46:54.040 --> 0:46:55.799
<v Speaker 2>they could pull off the shamrock in the end zone

0:46:55.840 --> 0:46:58.239
<v Speaker 2>on the home what about ty Stay with me here.

0:46:59.000 --> 0:47:00.120
<v Speaker 2>Pots of gold.

0:47:01.800 --> 0:47:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Pots are trying. It is the end of the rainbow

0:47:04.360 --> 0:47:08.200
<v Speaker 1>right right. Metaphorically speaking, I could go with that thoughtful,

0:47:08.600 --> 0:47:10.720
<v Speaker 1>classy pots of gold.

0:47:11.719 --> 0:47:13.680
<v Speaker 2>I think you're onto something there, Dan, all right, I'm

0:47:13.680 --> 0:47:15.279
<v Speaker 2>gonna give it some more thought, but I think Notre

0:47:15.360 --> 0:47:16.680
<v Speaker 2>Dame can do something that I'm.

0:47:16.560 --> 0:47:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Going to think more about stadiums I hate or fields

0:47:19.239 --> 0:47:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that I hate.

0:47:19.880 --> 0:47:21.560
<v Speaker 2>All Right, I think we're done with college football. So

0:47:21.560 --> 0:47:23.760
<v Speaker 2>if you don't want to keep listening, thanks for the download.

0:47:23.840 --> 0:47:27.800
<v Speaker 2>It's been a pleasure. Keep driving safely, don't max out

0:47:28.160 --> 0:47:32.879
<v Speaker 2>at the gym any anywhere beyond where you're comfortable. Take

0:47:32.920 --> 0:47:34.920
<v Speaker 2>a good nap on this flight. You've earned it.

0:47:35.040 --> 0:47:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Our friend Peter Hoffin might be on a flight. He

0:47:36.960 --> 0:47:44.280
<v Speaker 1>sent us a mess. You're on a flight this weekend. Well, Peter, Ty, here's.

0:47:43.880 --> 0:47:46.879
<v Speaker 2>Here's my first non college football question. But it's sort

0:47:46.880 --> 0:47:48.840
<v Speaker 2>of related to college football. If your future son or

0:47:48.920 --> 0:47:52.600
<v Speaker 2>daughter is recruited heavily by a college coach, wow, to

0:47:52.640 --> 0:47:53.960
<v Speaker 2>play whatever sports?

0:47:54.000 --> 0:47:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Wow? Good question? What? Well?

0:47:56.640 --> 0:47:58.520
<v Speaker 2>I haven't asked the question yet, but you see it

0:47:58.520 --> 0:48:01.120
<v Speaker 2>in front of you. Yeah, what means are you making

0:48:01.160 --> 0:48:04.960
<v Speaker 2>them during the end home visit? Okay, and it's not

0:48:05.000 --> 0:48:07.480
<v Speaker 2>like you need to impress them. They're already impressed with

0:48:07.560 --> 0:48:12.000
<v Speaker 2>your son or daughter, right, But what what is the

0:48:12.040 --> 0:48:14.800
<v Speaker 2>meal that you were going to say? Man, I, especially

0:48:14.800 --> 0:48:18.440
<v Speaker 2>if your son or daughter is really leaning towards Tennessee

0:48:18.480 --> 0:48:23.719
<v Speaker 2>basketball or USC tennis, whatever, and you want to make

0:48:23.760 --> 0:48:28.080
<v Speaker 2>that really you want to have that impression with the coach. Well, Dan,

0:48:29.160 --> 0:48:31.520
<v Speaker 2>and you cannot farm this out to mama. H I'm

0:48:31.520 --> 0:48:34.120
<v Speaker 2>not farming this south town. You know.

0:48:34.440 --> 0:48:37.680
<v Speaker 1>As I said earlier, some of my defining qualities, I

0:48:37.680 --> 0:48:40.880
<v Speaker 1>do like to stick it to the man right, just

0:48:40.960 --> 0:48:44.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of my mo wove to the fabric of my being.

0:48:44.280 --> 0:48:45.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, everybody knows this about you.

0:48:46.760 --> 0:48:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I also tend to overthink things. Yeah, so I would

0:48:53.680 --> 0:48:59.600
<v Speaker 1>probably approach this from a deep psychological standpoint. I don't

0:48:59.640 --> 0:49:02.880
<v Speaker 1>want to get too fancy with this dinner. Nor do

0:49:02.920 --> 0:49:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I really want to try and impress who's ever coming

0:49:05.040 --> 0:49:07.600
<v Speaker 1>over to the house. I want to try and get

0:49:07.640 --> 0:49:13.040
<v Speaker 1>them at their absolute weakest moment, most vulnerable moment, when

0:49:13.040 --> 0:49:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I can see truly into the soul of the coach.

0:49:18.520 --> 0:49:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I want something messy, and I want something informal. So

0:49:22.000 --> 0:49:26.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe a big greasy burger, maybe we make wings, maybe

0:49:26.160 --> 0:49:29.680
<v Speaker 1>we buy wings from down the street here. I want

0:49:29.719 --> 0:49:32.240
<v Speaker 1>something messy. I want something I can cook on the grill.

0:49:33.080 --> 0:49:36.440
<v Speaker 1>You want them rolling up their sleeves, rolling up your sleeves.

0:49:37.320 --> 0:49:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I've never done a boil, but maybe we do a

0:49:40.400 --> 0:49:46.120
<v Speaker 1>boil while you're out, something that's messy, dirty and informal

0:49:46.719 --> 0:49:50.880
<v Speaker 1>to get the coach at his or her most vulnerable state.

0:49:51.400 --> 0:49:53.600
<v Speaker 2>So I'm giving the coach an opportunity because I know

0:49:53.640 --> 0:49:57.320
<v Speaker 2>this is apparently the code amongst coaches. They are always

0:49:57.320 --> 0:50:01.520
<v Speaker 2>supposed to ask for seconds. Really always ask for seconds,

0:50:01.560 --> 0:50:03.960
<v Speaker 2>because it indicates to the parents, oh my god, this

0:50:04.080 --> 0:50:06.719
<v Speaker 2>meal you've prepared is so good. It's very flattering to

0:50:06.760 --> 0:50:09.319
<v Speaker 2>go to somebody's house and say, this meal is so good.

0:50:09.360 --> 0:50:12.480
<v Speaker 2>Could I possibly have more? Could I have the recipe?

0:50:13.640 --> 0:50:16.759
<v Speaker 2>And so that is a code amongst coaches. So I'm

0:50:16.760 --> 0:50:18.600
<v Speaker 2>going to do something that would make it so obvious

0:50:18.640 --> 0:50:20.680
<v Speaker 2>and I would allow them to ask for seconds. I'm

0:50:20.719 --> 0:50:23.640
<v Speaker 2>just making a giant panel lasagna. Yeah, and this is

0:50:23.640 --> 0:50:26.320
<v Speaker 2>why I don't want to spend too much time away

0:50:26.320 --> 0:50:28.839
<v Speaker 2>from the coach. I got a lot of questions, how

0:50:28.840 --> 0:50:31.080
<v Speaker 2>are you going to use my daughter in the triangle offense?

0:50:31.480 --> 0:50:33.719
<v Speaker 2>How are you going to is my son only to

0:50:33.719 --> 0:50:38.160
<v Speaker 2>play doubles? Is my son a three down running back?

0:50:38.920 --> 0:50:41.360
<v Speaker 2>I can answer that right now. Probably not no, probably,

0:50:43.200 --> 0:50:46.840
<v Speaker 2>And I just need that one pan, that one dish

0:50:46.920 --> 0:50:49.840
<v Speaker 2>meal that you just throw the noodles, you start layering,

0:50:50.120 --> 0:50:52.640
<v Speaker 2>you get your meat, sauce, you get some Italian sausage

0:50:52.640 --> 0:50:55.800
<v Speaker 2>in there, plenty of cheese. You just throw it in

0:50:55.880 --> 0:50:58.120
<v Speaker 2>the oven. You don't think about it. Maybe throw together

0:50:58.160 --> 0:51:02.640
<v Speaker 2>a salad, maybe some roast vegetables. But I don't want

0:51:02.640 --> 0:51:04.960
<v Speaker 2>to be doing too much. I want to be sitting

0:51:05.000 --> 0:51:07.680
<v Speaker 2>down with this coach and then just hear the timer

0:51:07.719 --> 0:51:11.080
<v Speaker 2>go off and then out comes the lasagna, and then

0:51:11.320 --> 0:51:13.480
<v Speaker 2>give the opportunity a coach to say, you know what,

0:51:13.560 --> 0:51:15.280
<v Speaker 2>if you don't mind, can I get that corner piece?

0:51:16.840 --> 0:51:18.960
<v Speaker 2>If you don't, if it wouldn't be too much trouble,

0:51:19.239 --> 0:51:22.959
<v Speaker 2>because this is the best lasagna I've ever had. Could

0:51:22.960 --> 0:51:25.080
<v Speaker 2>you throw me the corner piece, throw me an edge,

0:51:25.480 --> 0:51:29.120
<v Speaker 2>that money edge. So I think lasagna is my answer.

0:51:30.520 --> 0:51:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Get to spend optimal amount of time.

0:51:32.320 --> 0:51:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Like it's a tough to answer.

0:51:34.280 --> 0:51:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Good answer, good answer, good answer. Okay, tie, This is

0:51:38.080 --> 0:51:40.880
<v Speaker 2>a question that I find myself having to answer, and

0:51:40.920 --> 0:51:45.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't answer it well. That often when you're finishing

0:51:45.560 --> 0:51:50.520
<v Speaker 2>up a meal at a decent or a nicer restaurant anniversary,

0:51:50.719 --> 0:51:52.120
<v Speaker 2>or just like, you know what, we need to go

0:51:52.120 --> 0:51:54.000
<v Speaker 2>on a Friday night date? Sure, we just go to

0:51:54.000 --> 0:51:57.200
<v Speaker 2>a couple are yeah, sure, and it's maybe it's one

0:51:57.200 --> 0:51:59.520
<v Speaker 2>of a little hipstery where everything is printed in like

0:51:59.560 --> 0:52:02.000
<v Speaker 2>a type or font on a piece of paper that's

0:52:02.000 --> 0:52:04.480
<v Speaker 2>four inches by eight inches. Those that kind of place,

0:52:04.920 --> 0:52:10.799
<v Speaker 2>they got truffle things tat. Yeah. Server asks you if

0:52:10.800 --> 0:52:14.360
<v Speaker 2>you'd like to see a dessert menu clearing your plates,

0:52:14.400 --> 0:52:15.600
<v Speaker 2>You guys interested, you want to take a look at

0:52:15.600 --> 0:52:18.960
<v Speaker 2>the dessert menu. You guys, save some room, save some

0:52:19.040 --> 0:52:22.319
<v Speaker 2>room for dessert. And so provided that you are not

0:52:22.520 --> 0:52:25.799
<v Speaker 2>on a diet, you nor Kate is on a diet

0:52:25.800 --> 0:52:28.279
<v Speaker 2>where you're not eating sugar, so you'd be open to

0:52:28.360 --> 0:52:31.600
<v Speaker 2>desserts if they had something interesting or if you were

0:52:31.600 --> 0:52:35.480
<v Speaker 2>in the mood. Is your response to that question? A?

0:52:36.680 --> 0:52:38.600
<v Speaker 2>You just answer quickly, know that you and Kate have

0:52:38.640 --> 0:52:41.319
<v Speaker 2>already sort of had the conversation your fall. Let's just

0:52:41.320 --> 0:52:45.560
<v Speaker 2>get the check. B. What do you think we're worth

0:52:45.560 --> 0:52:48.640
<v Speaker 2>a look? Are you? Are you deciding on the spot

0:52:48.680 --> 0:52:52.920
<v Speaker 2>with the server standing there waiting, Are you saying sure?

0:52:53.120 --> 0:52:56.319
<v Speaker 2>Why not? No matter if you actually mean it, Just

0:52:56.360 --> 0:52:58.640
<v Speaker 2>to see what the offerings are because maybe next time

0:52:58.920 --> 0:53:01.799
<v Speaker 2>you will be interested in that peach cobbler. Maybe it's

0:53:01.880 --> 0:53:04.560
<v Speaker 2>not for tonight, but you like to know what is

0:53:04.600 --> 0:53:09.560
<v Speaker 2>available at this establishment. Do you defer with like, you know,

0:53:09.680 --> 0:53:12.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm good, Kate, do whatever, obviously, if you feel like dessert,

0:53:12.719 --> 0:53:15.480
<v Speaker 2>get dessert, but I'm good. Is that like your natural

0:53:15.560 --> 0:53:17.760
<v Speaker 2>natural response or do you just defer to Kate?

0:53:18.160 --> 0:53:21.399
<v Speaker 1>Either way, I defer to the second half.

0:53:21.719 --> 0:53:24.279
<v Speaker 2>Right, So what is the most common what is your

0:53:24.360 --> 0:53:25.760
<v Speaker 2>natural response to that question?

0:53:26.400 --> 0:53:29.560
<v Speaker 1>My next is okay, So it multiple layers here, Dan,

0:53:31.080 --> 0:53:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I went out to dinner for my anniversary recently.

0:53:34.680 --> 0:53:36.400
<v Speaker 2>You got to read the room. That's a big part

0:53:36.440 --> 0:53:36.640
<v Speaker 2>of it.

0:53:36.680 --> 0:53:38.640
<v Speaker 1>You got to read the room. Yeah, I went out

0:53:38.680 --> 0:53:42.880
<v Speaker 1>to dinner for my anniversary recently. I also went out

0:53:42.920 --> 0:53:49.560
<v Speaker 1>for a belated Valentine's Day dinner recent In both those cases,

0:53:49.560 --> 0:53:52.520
<v Speaker 1>because it was a special occasion occasion, I just went

0:53:52.640 --> 0:53:57.719
<v Speaker 1>into that experience knowing that we were going to say, yeah,

0:53:57.800 --> 0:53:58.239
<v Speaker 1>let's take.

0:53:58.160 --> 0:54:00.640
<v Speaker 2>It headfirst into dessert. Yeah, let's just do this the

0:54:00.680 --> 0:54:05.799
<v Speaker 2>special occasion. We're gonna do dessert for course meal. When

0:54:05.840 --> 0:54:09.000
<v Speaker 2>it's not a special occasion, I think you have to

0:54:09.040 --> 0:54:09.720
<v Speaker 2>read the room.

0:54:10.320 --> 0:54:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Usually when we're in that kind of uncertain territory.

0:54:17.000 --> 0:54:20.759
<v Speaker 1>Usually it's solid wife Kate being the first to speak up,

0:54:21.280 --> 0:54:25.319
<v Speaker 1>and usually she's speaking up in a manner like, yeah,

0:54:25.360 --> 0:54:27.720
<v Speaker 1>I think we save some room, or yeah, take a look.

0:54:27.800 --> 0:54:30.360
<v Speaker 2>I've never considered room, by the way, as I'm eating

0:54:30.360 --> 0:54:34.040
<v Speaker 2>my patty mess as I'm never eating my rotisserie chicken.

0:54:34.080 --> 0:54:35.800
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, never in a million years.

0:54:36.120 --> 0:54:36.359
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:54:37.160 --> 0:54:41.520
<v Speaker 1>But it's usually her speaking up. Usually in that moment,

0:54:41.560 --> 0:54:44.719
<v Speaker 1>I will defer to her, okay. And sometimes we just

0:54:44.760 --> 0:54:48.400
<v Speaker 1>come away with coffee. Sometimes we don't come away with anything.

0:54:48.600 --> 0:54:51.319
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, look at you boldly drinking coffee at night.

0:54:51.600 --> 0:54:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Usually I'm not the first to speak up. Usually in

0:54:54.000 --> 0:54:56.080
<v Speaker 1>that moment, you defer to her. Yeah, okay.

0:54:57.960 --> 0:55:00.279
<v Speaker 2>I will almost always ask to see the menu for

0:55:00.440 --> 0:55:02.760
<v Speaker 2>the reason I gave where, even if I'm not feeling

0:55:02.840 --> 0:55:03.400
<v Speaker 2>like dessert.

0:55:03.520 --> 0:55:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Do future research?

0:55:05.080 --> 0:55:06.879
<v Speaker 2>Love the note to know the lay of the land.

0:55:07.239 --> 0:55:10.080
<v Speaker 2>I take forever at grocery stores time.

0:55:10.320 --> 0:55:12.640
<v Speaker 1>How do you do with menus? Just in general? I

0:55:12.680 --> 0:55:14.759
<v Speaker 1>find I have a d D with menus and.

0:55:14.920 --> 0:55:17.839
<v Speaker 2>I go I will always, I will always, always always

0:55:17.880 --> 0:55:19.400
<v Speaker 2>look up the menu before I go somewhere.

0:55:19.480 --> 0:55:20.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I could see that.

0:55:20.480 --> 0:55:23.200
<v Speaker 2>And there are places that you know, with changes by

0:55:23.239 --> 0:55:26.120
<v Speaker 2>the night, whatever whatever is fresh, and whatever the chef

0:55:26.200 --> 0:55:29.360
<v Speaker 2>is feeling like in terms of that night. But I

0:55:29.480 --> 0:55:31.960
<v Speaker 2>generally go in with a great sense, so I'm good

0:55:32.000 --> 0:55:32.520
<v Speaker 2>with menus.

0:55:32.560 --> 0:55:34.239
<v Speaker 1>Can I can I admit to something here on the

0:55:34.239 --> 0:55:38.240
<v Speaker 1>pom Rat since we're running yeah late here today. Yeah,

0:55:38.560 --> 0:55:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm very intimidated to place a dinner order in your presence.

0:55:43.960 --> 0:55:46.200
<v Speaker 2>And I get that a lot, And I don't understand.

0:55:46.200 --> 0:55:50.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm very intimidated by you just as a uh wow.

0:55:50.280 --> 0:55:51.959
<v Speaker 2>Just because you think I'm gonna judge your order.

0:55:52.360 --> 0:55:55.759
<v Speaker 1>No, I'm afraid of the globe tomato situation. Oh you

0:55:55.760 --> 0:55:58.120
<v Speaker 1>don't want to pronounce something. I will have a bowl

0:55:58.160 --> 0:56:00.960
<v Speaker 1>of Raymond please, something like that.

0:56:01.160 --> 0:56:03.640
<v Speaker 2>I how have your finest bull love? But you done.

0:56:04.600 --> 0:56:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little intimidated. I like you very much personally

0:56:08.360 --> 0:56:12.200
<v Speaker 1>professionally you know this is working out, But when it

0:56:12.239 --> 0:56:15.160
<v Speaker 1>comes to dining, I'm a little intimidated.

0:56:15.200 --> 0:56:17.360
<v Speaker 2>So have you ever ordered either in front of me

0:56:17.520 --> 0:56:20.000
<v Speaker 2>or in front of anybody else? You've been intimidated by

0:56:20.480 --> 0:56:23.319
<v Speaker 2>something because you are more comfortable pronouncing it more so

0:56:23.440 --> 0:56:24.800
<v Speaker 2>than that's what you actually wanted.

0:56:25.160 --> 0:56:26.799
<v Speaker 1>You know, I can't think up a moment off the

0:56:26.800 --> 0:56:29.560
<v Speaker 1>top of my head, but it definitely, it definitely seems

0:56:29.600 --> 0:56:30.440
<v Speaker 1>like something I would do.

0:56:31.000 --> 0:56:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Okay, I'm sorry. Like I can't imagine that we've

0:56:35.560 --> 0:56:41.000
<v Speaker 2>eaten at too many exotically named dish restaurants, but perhaps

0:56:41.080 --> 0:56:41.319
<v Speaker 2>we have.

0:56:41.480 --> 0:56:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Some of the Mexican places we went to when we

0:56:43.560 --> 0:56:45.120
<v Speaker 1>were out in Arizona.

0:56:45.440 --> 0:56:47.160
<v Speaker 2>There there were menu items that threw you.

0:56:47.040 --> 0:56:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Do you have a greater command of the Spanish language

0:56:49.440 --> 0:56:52.319
<v Speaker 1>than I do? I do, And there are there are

0:56:52.560 --> 0:56:55.440
<v Speaker 1>l's that I may have pronounced that you knew to

0:56:55.520 --> 0:56:56.839
<v Speaker 1>pronounces wise things.

0:56:56.920 --> 0:56:59.600
<v Speaker 2>Please just tell me, Just tell me that you want,

0:57:00.320 --> 0:57:03.280
<v Speaker 2>like say that, oh, I don't how does this pronounce?

0:57:03.320 --> 0:57:05.759
<v Speaker 2>Is it tayuda? That kind of thing, and then we'll

0:57:05.800 --> 0:57:07.279
<v Speaker 2>just go from there. I don't want you to not

0:57:07.400 --> 0:57:10.200
<v Speaker 2>get something because you're shame over.

0:57:10.280 --> 0:57:11.719
<v Speaker 1>This is a show about honesty. I just had that.

0:57:11.920 --> 0:57:14.479
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely it is. I will always ask for the dessert menu.

0:57:15.000 --> 0:57:18.000
<v Speaker 2>And I am a little bit bummed that we've gotten

0:57:18.040 --> 0:57:21.440
<v Speaker 2>to a place where a lot of the time people

0:57:21.520 --> 0:57:25.720
<v Speaker 2>feel like, oh, dessert menu, which one dessert should we order?

0:57:26.760 --> 0:57:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Because dessert tastes are pretty varied. Do you know what

0:57:30.080 --> 0:57:30.479
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying?

0:57:30.880 --> 0:57:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh? Yeah.

0:57:31.320 --> 0:57:33.800
<v Speaker 2>Like sometimes you'll like, you and Kate will get the

0:57:33.840 --> 0:57:36.520
<v Speaker 2>dessert menus and she'll be like, what should we get

0:57:36.560 --> 0:57:39.000
<v Speaker 2>the smores? Should we just go for it? But meanwhile

0:57:39.000 --> 0:57:42.439
<v Speaker 2>you're thinking, God, the blueberry tart is just calling my name.

0:57:43.240 --> 0:57:45.160
<v Speaker 2>But for whatever reason, we've gotten to this place where

0:57:45.160 --> 0:57:46.880
<v Speaker 2>you can only order one dessert. I don't know if

0:57:46.880 --> 0:57:48.000
<v Speaker 2>that's true of you and Kate.

0:57:48.160 --> 0:57:51.400
<v Speaker 1>If you're picking one dessert, what percentage of the time

0:57:51.440 --> 0:57:54.120
<v Speaker 1>would you say you are overruled by your wife? One

0:57:54.200 --> 0:57:58.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred one zero cero, I would say, I am. She

0:57:58.640 --> 0:58:00.000
<v Speaker 1>is literally undefeated again.

0:58:00.600 --> 0:58:02.800
<v Speaker 2>But I will I will just order a second dessert.

0:58:03.240 --> 0:58:06.919
<v Speaker 2>Generally that that's what will happen. If I'm feeling particularly

0:58:06.920 --> 0:58:10.960
<v Speaker 2>good about the lemon merangue pie and she's jonesing for

0:58:11.040 --> 0:58:13.920
<v Speaker 2>the berries or whatever. Yeah, it's like and throwing the lemons,

0:58:14.080 --> 0:58:16.400
<v Speaker 2>throwing the slice of lemon rang pie. Let's just solid.

0:58:16.440 --> 0:58:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Wife, Kate is undefeated against me in that conversation.

0:58:18.880 --> 0:58:20.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh, if you're just ordering the one, you are you

0:58:20.840 --> 0:58:23.440
<v Speaker 2>are merely a partner, You are merely a suggestion. You

0:58:23.520 --> 0:58:26.600
<v Speaker 2>are in, you are riding along, you are in the sidecar.

0:58:27.880 --> 0:58:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Give me, yeah, one or two more quick ones here.

0:58:30.360 --> 0:58:33.160
<v Speaker 2>If you were immediately thrust into one of the Property

0:58:33.200 --> 0:58:40.720
<v Speaker 2>Brothers jobs realtor, realtor real tour or contract tour, contractor,

0:58:41.560 --> 0:58:44.760
<v Speaker 2>which do you think you could more plausibly and successfully

0:58:44.840 --> 0:58:47.000
<v Speaker 2>navigate with zero experience and training.

0:58:47.200 --> 0:58:48.959
<v Speaker 1>I think it would have to be the real tour.

0:58:49.880 --> 0:58:52.880
<v Speaker 2>Why is that? I think I'm You're not delegating as

0:58:52.920 --> 0:58:55.520
<v Speaker 2>a realtor. You're just getting it done. Get money. You

0:58:55.560 --> 0:58:58.640
<v Speaker 2>need no market. You need to know negotiation tactics.

0:58:59.080 --> 0:59:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I think I could manage the negotiation tactics. Inspection stuff,

0:59:03.920 --> 0:59:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I think I could manage that. Okay, I think I

0:59:06.840 --> 0:59:09.600
<v Speaker 1>think I could do enough to muddle my way through it.

0:59:10.040 --> 0:59:12.600
<v Speaker 1>The problem with actually being a contractor is you've got

0:59:12.640 --> 0:59:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to build stuff or you got to know what to

0:59:14.680 --> 0:59:16.960
<v Speaker 1>delegate to people who've got to hire people. Yeah, you

0:59:17.000 --> 0:59:19.800
<v Speaker 1>got to you gotta know what you're looking for. And

0:59:19.920 --> 0:59:22.439
<v Speaker 1>as a first time homeowner, I'm telling you I don't

0:59:22.440 --> 0:59:25.960
<v Speaker 1>know what I'm looking for. Yeah, I could talk my

0:59:26.040 --> 0:59:29.440
<v Speaker 1>way into or out of most situations.

0:59:30.200 --> 0:59:32.360
<v Speaker 2>I would be terrible at both of these things. I

0:59:32.400 --> 0:59:34.360
<v Speaker 2>was just curious to see what you would say. I

0:59:34.360 --> 0:59:36.880
<v Speaker 2>would have to which one would you pick? Oh, I

0:59:36.920 --> 0:59:38.720
<v Speaker 2>would definitely be a realtor. You got to go the

0:59:38.720 --> 0:59:41.680
<v Speaker 2>same reason you could definitely talk your way into because

0:59:41.720 --> 0:59:44.360
<v Speaker 2>if I were to build a house with zero training,

0:59:45.440 --> 0:59:47.400
<v Speaker 2>there would be walls that would not align.

0:59:47.720 --> 0:59:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's a fatality somewhere in there. Gosh, yes,

0:59:52.000 --> 0:59:55.880
<v Speaker 1>wait did we not dry wall? Did we not dry wall?

0:59:55.960 --> 0:59:56.520
<v Speaker 2>Is that on me?

0:59:57.080 --> 0:59:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't even want to look at those insurance?

0:59:58.800 --> 1:00:02.880
<v Speaker 2>But that would be every day term like termites plural, Yeah,

1:00:02.920 --> 1:00:07.120
<v Speaker 2>every day. So that's that's a good answer. Good answer.

1:00:07.520 --> 1:00:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Final question here, ty, what is something you definitely don't

1:00:11.680 --> 1:00:16.240
<v Speaker 2>need to spend a ton on but prefer the premium experience?

1:00:16.280 --> 1:00:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Excuse me? And what is something you refuse to spend

1:00:19.040 --> 1:00:20.880
<v Speaker 2>a ton on but others happily do?

1:00:24.720 --> 1:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Huh? This is sort of the Apple computer dilemma, right right?

1:00:29.480 --> 1:00:30.560
<v Speaker 2>Oh, absolutely it is.

1:00:31.680 --> 1:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>That would probably be a good answer.

1:00:33.240 --> 1:00:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, you spend a ton on electronics gear if you

1:00:35.560 --> 1:00:38.080
<v Speaker 2>don't settle Yeah, any video gear.

1:00:38.120 --> 1:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Anything, electronics audio, that's.

1:00:41.440 --> 1:00:45.160
<v Speaker 2>You're setting up a possibly illegal surveillance system that is

1:00:45.240 --> 1:00:51.000
<v Speaker 2>possibly illegal, possibly illegal surveillance anything anything electronic.

1:00:51.360 --> 1:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Usually I'm going overboard on that. So okay, what do

1:00:54.920 --> 1:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>you refuse to spend a lot on let's put it

1:00:57.080 --> 1:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>this way. Anything that on Amazon also has an Amazon

1:01:01.840 --> 1:01:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Basics option, I'm almost always going with the Amazon Basics option.

1:01:07.920 --> 1:01:11.200
<v Speaker 2>The high floor of Amazon Basics, whatever it is. I'm going,

1:01:11.240 --> 1:01:14.560
<v Speaker 2>ever to cables. Do you own any Amazon pieces of clothing?

1:01:16.160 --> 1:01:19.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't have a brands. I don't yet, but I'm

1:01:19.560 --> 1:01:22.080
<v Speaker 2>not against it. They're all right. I'm not gonna I'm

1:01:22.080 --> 1:01:24.160
<v Speaker 2>not gonna name drop names because they're not sponsored. But

1:01:24.560 --> 1:01:26.479
<v Speaker 2>I've needed some a couple of things in a pinch,

1:01:26.520 --> 1:01:29.800
<v Speaker 2>all right. They do the job. I refuse to spend

1:01:29.840 --> 1:01:33.680
<v Speaker 2>money on parking. Parking, Oh, we've We've talked about this before.

1:01:33.880 --> 1:01:36.880
<v Speaker 2>I refuse, like there have I've driven in so many

1:01:36.960 --> 1:01:39.320
<v Speaker 2>cities with Jodie with an eye which it's like, oh,

1:01:39.320 --> 1:01:43.080
<v Speaker 2>there's just a lot right here, and it's twenty seven dollars. No,

1:01:44.280 --> 1:01:48.120
<v Speaker 2>I will feed that meter till I die. I'm not

1:01:48.120 --> 1:01:50.640
<v Speaker 2>paying money. I'm not paying like premium money for parking

1:01:50.720 --> 1:01:55.880
<v Speaker 2>ever ever ever Valet, Nope, there's a spot somewhere.

1:01:56.200 --> 1:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>See. I had an awakening. I don't know why that is.

1:02:00.520 --> 1:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>I had an awakening. Dane. We were planning our wedding

1:02:04.480 --> 1:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>because I very much went into that of the mindset.

1:02:08.800 --> 1:02:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to try and keep this as cheap as possible,

1:02:11.000 --> 1:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>nice and classy, sure to reflect our personalities in our lifestyle.

1:02:15.880 --> 1:02:18.040
<v Speaker 1>But I don't want to go overboard, and I certainly

1:02:18.080 --> 1:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>don't want to get fleeced on any of these things

1:02:20.080 --> 1:02:21.680
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to to buy.

1:02:22.240 --> 1:02:23.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm not paying money for flowers.

1:02:24.600 --> 1:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>And then I learned about these so called wedding tax

1:02:26.840 --> 1:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and let me tell you, I came out of that

1:02:29.080 --> 1:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>experience willing to pay fifty dollars for just about anything

1:02:33.160 --> 1:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>in life. Since then, I have not been the same.

1:02:37.600 --> 1:02:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Before that, I was a lot more miserly. Now I'm

1:02:41.280 --> 1:02:46.640
<v Speaker 1>in a spot where it's tougher for me to answer

1:02:46.720 --> 1:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the question right. But I do like Amazon Basics. Anything

1:02:50.640 --> 1:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>with an Amazon Basics option, I determined most of the time,

1:02:54.920 --> 1:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not willing to spend it. I'm going to go

1:02:56.520 --> 1:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Basics.

1:02:58.280 --> 1:03:03.680
<v Speaker 2>Would you advise somebody to not have a wedding? Yes,

1:03:04.960 --> 1:03:08.480
<v Speaker 2>I love the pregnant pause there. You would advise somebody's

1:03:08.480 --> 1:03:10.960
<v Speaker 2>city hall, then, like just like rent out the backyard

1:03:10.960 --> 1:03:13.440
<v Speaker 2>of a restaurant or something. If you can do with friends,

1:03:13.640 --> 1:03:15.000
<v Speaker 2>you can swing it, if you.

1:03:14.960 --> 1:03:19.959
<v Speaker 1>Can swing it without offending family, Yep, one hundred percent.

1:03:20.000 --> 1:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Go for it.

1:03:20.640 --> 1:03:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Have twelve people in your backyard. If somebody in your

1:03:23.200 --> 1:03:26.200
<v Speaker 2>family insists on a proper ceremony, use.

1:03:26.080 --> 1:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>That money towards a house, towards a car, towards whatever,

1:03:29.680 --> 1:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>a a trip around the world. Yeah, consider that if

1:03:34.880 --> 1:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>you can get out. I mean, do you feel the same.

1:03:37.120 --> 1:03:41.439
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, And I loved my wedding, so that a phenomenal

1:03:41.440 --> 1:03:44.160
<v Speaker 2>time at your wedding, at my wedding, whatever. But I

1:03:44.200 --> 1:03:46.720
<v Speaker 2>would advise that just in terms of the headache and

1:03:46.760 --> 1:03:48.360
<v Speaker 2>just what you could put that money towards. Did you

1:03:49.080 --> 1:03:49.480
<v Speaker 2>did you.

1:03:49.480 --> 1:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Have a moment when you were planning your wedding m

1:03:52.200 --> 1:03:56.080
<v Speaker 1>h where you looked at Jody with an eye and said.

1:03:55.920 --> 1:03:57.680
<v Speaker 2>Fake my own death, change my identity.

1:03:57.840 --> 1:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Did you ever look at her during the wedding planning

1:04:00.440 --> 1:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>process and say should we want to do this? Like?

1:04:03.520 --> 1:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe is it too late?

1:04:04.800 --> 1:04:05.720
<v Speaker 2>What are we doing?

1:04:06.520 --> 1:04:06.600
<v Speaker 1>No?

1:04:06.680 --> 1:04:09.200
<v Speaker 2>I did not have that moment. It was a great process.

1:04:09.400 --> 1:04:12.920
<v Speaker 2>But if you have the freedom to do the city

1:04:12.960 --> 1:04:15.160
<v Speaker 2>hall or backyard thing and then just do a thing

1:04:15.200 --> 1:04:19.120
<v Speaker 2>with a bunch of friends, I'd say go for that.

1:04:19.480 --> 1:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Go for that, man.

1:04:20.640 --> 1:04:23.280
<v Speaker 2>I would say go for that. In terms of something

1:04:23.280 --> 1:04:26.400
<v Speaker 2>that I insist on spending a premium for that. I

1:04:26.400 --> 1:04:29.600
<v Speaker 2>don't need to. It's always food. It's always always food,

1:04:29.960 --> 1:04:32.360
<v Speaker 2>and it's always I want to try as much as

1:04:32.400 --> 1:04:36.480
<v Speaker 2>possible at restaurants, if that is not exceedingly obvious already, Yeah,

1:04:37.000 --> 1:04:40.640
<v Speaker 2>I want if there are three appetizers that appeal to me,

1:04:40.840 --> 1:04:43.720
<v Speaker 2>and I'm with one, two, three other people, and everybody

1:04:43.840 --> 1:04:45.800
<v Speaker 2>just like what appetizers would we get? Like, no, let's

1:04:45.840 --> 1:04:49.960
<v Speaker 2>get a B and C because who cares, let's just

1:04:50.000 --> 1:04:54.200
<v Speaker 2>try it. All that to me is where I'm overspending

1:04:54.600 --> 1:04:57.520
<v Speaker 2>always always, you know one other area, yeah, that I'm

1:04:57.520 --> 1:05:01.360
<v Speaker 2>finding now as a homeowner. M I just spent an

1:05:01.480 --> 1:05:05.080
<v Speaker 2>arm and a leg to get new smoke detectors. Really

1:05:05.560 --> 1:05:07.680
<v Speaker 2>I did, man, and I didn't need to.

1:05:08.720 --> 1:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm finding that other things in that same vein, like

1:05:12.640 --> 1:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>just preventative home type stuff. Right. They really sell me

1:05:17.280 --> 1:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>on the value of peace of mind.

1:05:21.960 --> 1:05:25.320
<v Speaker 2>That's a huge thing as I am now dealing with childcare. Tie,

1:05:26.360 --> 1:05:27.960
<v Speaker 2>you're not paying for childcare.

1:05:27.600 --> 1:05:29.360
<v Speaker 1>You're paying for peace of mind. Paying for that peace

1:05:29.400 --> 1:05:31.800
<v Speaker 1>of mind. Yeah, that's where they get you.

1:05:32.640 --> 1:05:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Super cheap in New York childcare, super duper. You wouldn't

1:05:35.880 --> 1:05:40.560
<v Speaker 2>think it, but it is crazy cheap, all right, So

1:05:40.760 --> 1:05:41.440
<v Speaker 2>that's that deal.

1:05:41.760 --> 1:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>You had all these questions for me. Yeah, you put

1:05:44.680 --> 1:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>me to the test. I'm running on e here. I

1:05:46.920 --> 1:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>gotta get some food in my belly. Same all because

1:05:50.760 --> 1:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>of your heart hitting questions. Next week, it's going to

1:05:52.840 --> 1:05:56.360
<v Speaker 1>be my turn. I've got some good ones for you. Yes,

1:05:56.560 --> 1:05:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I started thinking them up today.

1:05:58.040 --> 1:06:00.480
<v Speaker 2>Good great college football, non college football.

1:06:00.560 --> 1:06:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Like if you haven't already, please do subscribe to the

1:06:03.520 --> 1:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>show where it's soliverbal dot com. You can also sign

1:06:05.640 --> 1:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>up for our newsletter out there. We've got shirts in

1:06:08.520 --> 1:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the pipeline. I am excited about these shirts.

1:06:12.520 --> 1:06:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they're pretty good, right, very good. So you wanted

1:06:15.640 --> 1:06:17.960
<v Speaker 2>to change some text on one of them, we'll circle

1:06:18.000 --> 1:06:18.320
<v Speaker 2>back to that.

1:06:19.120 --> 1:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm having second thoughts about my second thoughts. Oh okay, great,

1:06:23.200 --> 1:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's good. So we've got those coming forward.

1:06:26.880 --> 1:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>M H. Sign up for the newsletter soliverble dot com.

1:06:30.440 --> 1:06:34.360
<v Speaker 1>We'll mail out anytime we've got new shirts. Also anytime

1:06:34.360 --> 1:06:36.960
<v Speaker 1>we've got new announcements. We won't spam you, but nope.

1:06:37.040 --> 1:06:40.200
<v Speaker 1>If you're into the show, it's free to subscribe, check

1:06:40.240 --> 1:06:42.520
<v Speaker 1>it out, don't forget. You can also find us on

1:06:42.560 --> 1:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Twitter on Facebook on Instagram. Was also a subreddit started

1:06:46.600 --> 1:06:49.640
<v Speaker 1>buy Verballers four Verballers at reddit dot com, slash or

1:06:49.760 --> 1:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>slash solid verbal, where you can join the community, talk

1:06:53.280 --> 1:06:57.160
<v Speaker 1>amongst friends about the show, make fun of us, whatever

1:06:57.240 --> 1:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>you want to do out there. It's it's free country man.

1:07:01.840 --> 1:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Do everyone.

1:07:02.480 --> 1:07:06.120
<v Speaker 2>We don't care if you've learned nothing else after this show.

1:07:07.120 --> 1:07:12.840
<v Speaker 2>Matt Campbell, good coach, Good coach. Also, nobody dislikes the

1:07:12.880 --> 1:07:15.240
<v Speaker 2>person that says, you know what, let's also do the barrata.

1:07:15.680 --> 1:07:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's do it.

1:07:16.400 --> 1:07:18.200
<v Speaker 2>You know what, Let's also do the cobbler. Yeah, let's

1:07:18.240 --> 1:07:19.720
<v Speaker 2>go crazy. Let's get the cobbler.

1:07:19.400 --> 1:07:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Too, And don't forget. If you like the show, leave

1:07:22.160 --> 1:07:22.439
<v Speaker 1>the street.

1:07:22.440 --> 1:07:23.080
<v Speaker 2>It's a good person.

1:07:24.280 --> 1:07:27.320
<v Speaker 1>iTunes dot com slash Cliverble I think still works. We

1:07:27.320 --> 1:07:31.560
<v Speaker 1>were on iTunes, We're on Spotify, We're on stitcher, Google Play,

1:07:32.400 --> 1:07:35.200
<v Speaker 1>anywhere you can find podcasts. You can get in Cliverble.

1:07:37.320 --> 1:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>That's all I got, Dan. Here's my final question to you, Ty.

1:07:40.560 --> 1:07:43.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if people started tuning out thinking we were just

1:07:44.040 --> 1:07:50.400
<v Speaker 2>plugging reviews and subscriptions, would you say that you have

1:07:50.520 --> 1:07:58.160
<v Speaker 2>been flirted with since getting married with certainty? This person

1:07:58.360 --> 1:08:08.120
<v Speaker 2>a man in whoever, Pat, I have been flirted with definitively. Yeah,

1:08:08.280 --> 1:08:09.080
<v Speaker 2>your answer is yes.

1:08:10.040 --> 1:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Uh no, I'm saying, was your answer yes, Oh yeah,

1:08:13.840 --> 1:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>definitely I definitively.

1:08:16.760 --> 1:08:19.559
<v Speaker 2>I say definitely because I'm a stupid, stupid dude who

1:08:19.760 --> 1:08:22.840
<v Speaker 2>probably takes way too much as flirtation. But in my mind,

1:08:23.680 --> 1:08:30.840
<v Speaker 2>well in person, probably I will not say definitively yes. Online, yes,

1:08:31.280 --> 1:08:35.680
<v Speaker 2>I will say this in DMS have been slugged into.

1:08:37.120 --> 1:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>In general, and the solid wife Kate would back me

1:08:40.160 --> 1:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>up on this one. M I had no idea what

1:08:43.320 --> 1:08:44.680
<v Speaker 1>was going on round.

1:08:46.200 --> 1:08:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I tell Jody with an eye all the time,

1:08:48.200 --> 1:08:50.519
<v Speaker 2>like this person is DM me and is a getting

1:08:50.600 --> 1:08:51.760
<v Speaker 2>Oh oh, it's weird, look at this.

1:08:52.880 --> 1:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea my place in the universe, right,

1:08:57.160 --> 1:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and in general, I'm I'm pretty okay. And so I

1:09:02.240 --> 1:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>think there was a lot of that going on before

1:09:04.640 --> 1:09:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I was married, and you just had no I had

1:09:07.240 --> 1:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>no idea about the commodity here, that's right. The solid

1:09:10.400 --> 1:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>wife had to tell me what was going on. Wow.

1:09:13.840 --> 1:09:15.880
<v Speaker 2>So so it wasn't even just flirtation. It was like

1:09:15.920 --> 1:09:16.640
<v Speaker 2>you were being hit on.

1:09:17.240 --> 1:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I guess I'm going to assume that to some

1:09:21.880 --> 1:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>degree that's continued, I'm just not paying any attention to it.

1:09:26.320 --> 1:09:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't paying attention to it before.

1:09:28.640 --> 1:09:31.120
<v Speaker 2>Oh my gosh, Ty, first you call yourself a rebel,

1:09:31.200 --> 1:09:33.559
<v Speaker 2>Now you consider yourself a flirtation man, I mean.

1:09:33.400 --> 1:09:36.519
<v Speaker 1>That's what goes on. Wow. I have no idea, to

1:09:36.560 --> 1:09:38.600
<v Speaker 1>be honest, but maybe.

1:09:39.880 --> 1:09:42.439
<v Speaker 2>I just wanted. I was curious if you had to

1:09:42.479 --> 1:09:44.040
<v Speaker 2>like diffuse the situation.

1:09:44.920 --> 1:09:47.560
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no, no bombs have needed to be differed.

1:09:48.080 --> 1:09:51.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay, it's good to know. I love hearing that.

1:09:51.840 --> 1:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, Dan, we've covered ground here, haven't we.

1:09:54.680 --> 1:09:55.080
<v Speaker 2>I think so.

1:09:55.840 --> 1:09:58.320
<v Speaker 1>We're going to be back next week. It's a long

1:09:58.479 --> 1:10:00.519
<v Speaker 1>slog of a collegeable offseason, and we're gonna do our

1:10:00.560 --> 1:10:02.960
<v Speaker 1>best to try and make this as fun as possible.

1:10:03.400 --> 1:10:05.479
<v Speaker 1>Stay tuned to all the social channels. Sign up for

1:10:05.479 --> 1:10:07.479
<v Speaker 1>that newsletter if you haven't already, leave us a review.

1:10:07.479 --> 1:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>If you like the show, Daniel, you enjoy the rest

1:10:10.760 --> 1:10:11.679
<v Speaker 1>of your week and your weekend.

1:10:11.720 --> 1:10:14.519
<v Speaker 2>Okay, hey you too, and order those desserts.

1:10:14.720 --> 1:10:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Come get on those desserts. I'm gonna go get some

1:10:17.160 --> 1:10:21.519
<v Speaker 1>food now after this, fuel myself up for the long

1:10:21.600 --> 1:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>night of editing that surely is in front of me,

1:10:25.160 --> 1:10:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and I'll talk to you. I'm sure tomorrow I'll talk

1:10:27.040 --> 1:10:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to everyone out there.

1:10:28.320 --> 1:10:30.360
<v Speaker 2>What in a week, right, yep, next week.

1:10:30.840 --> 1:10:33.720
<v Speaker 1>In the meantime for that, go over there Dan for myself, Hi,

1:10:34.439 --> 1:10:35.400
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk to y'all soon.

1:10:35.520 --> 1:10:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Stay solid, Peace,