WEBVTT - MLB: Leading Off August 11st, 2022 (Ep. 572)

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Leading off starts right now. What's up, friends, We're on

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros and it's me the Welsh, joined today by

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:26.599
<v Speaker 1>the Mendy David Mendelssohn from Triple Play Fantasy. We are

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk about, oh, I don't know, a pretty incredible

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 1>rookie debut yesterday, actually so much so. It was a

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:37.159
<v Speaker 1>record breaking one, something had never been done at least

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:37.840
<v Speaker 1>at his age.

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 2>Mister David mendlssoon. What's up, buddy?

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 3>Hey man, what's going on?

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 4>Man? I get to podcast with you three times in

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 4>like a week. This is freaking awesome, My buddy the

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:47.640
<v Speaker 4>Welsh get to talk some baseball.

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 2>Let's go, Let's go.

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Mendy is out of the same mold as myself, hustler,

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>doing lots of stuff big into just like good new

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 1>technology and with podcasting. And one of the things you've

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>always been really great about, which almost a disappointment we

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>should have had you do here is the ridiculous guests

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:06.479
<v Speaker 1>that you get across the board.

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 2>You've had insane guests.

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:11.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean even recently Austin Eckler on the football side.

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>We should have had you bring somebody that should be

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>like your token.

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:15.960
<v Speaker 2>Now, did you have any big baby did. What was

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:17.759
<v Speaker 2>the last baseball guy that you interviewed?

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 4>I interviewed Dinard's Span, like two three months ago. That

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:24.960
<v Speaker 4>was the last one man that was my guy as

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 4>my favorite baseball player of all time. So I was

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 4>one of the few times I was actually nervous to

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 4>interview him. So I told him that before we started,

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:34.399
<v Speaker 4>so he knew it. But it was really cool that I.

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 2>Love Dinard Span.

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, now I have to do the quick look here,

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Denard Span, Let's see seventy one career homers, one hundred

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>and eighty five career stolen bases. God, I would have

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>thought that would have been just a ton more. That's

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 1>one of those guys that just imprinted in your brain

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>that they were putting up just big old numbies back

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>in the day.

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Best season probably.

0:01:57.680 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>His second year actually, now that I'm looking at it.

0:01:59.880 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>He hit three eleven with eight homers, twenty three stolen bases.

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>He did have a thirty one stolen base season, hit

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>three h two, So maybe that's another one. With Washington

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:14.359
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and what was that two thousand and fourteen,

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>spent time with Minnesota, Washington, the Giants, and then back

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>with the Blue Jays are actually just ending with the

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Blue Oh, ending with the Seattle. Actually so good career. Uh,

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Denard Span just like to go back to it. You

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>always do a really good job about that. So go

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and follow him over at d Mindy on Twitter. I'm

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 1>make sure you check out all those awesome shows and

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:35.639
<v Speaker 1>get some awesome baseball interviews. Maybe you in the very

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>near future can get von Grisham, who became the youngest

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:43.080
<v Speaker 1>player in the history of baseball to homer and steal

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>a base in his major league debut. Now you know,

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Joe's game is to come on here and be like

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:51.800
<v Speaker 1>I told you so, I told you what did we

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 1>tell you?

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:54.919
<v Speaker 2>I don't always do that. I try to think. I'm

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 2>a little bit less agree.

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>But shout out to the Wonkey of the Penguins who've

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>always given some Denard Spam love. Wonky was on with

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:04.919
<v Speaker 1>us yesterday and gave me some love on Twitter because, uh,

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>it played out Span play not didnar Span von Grisham

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>That Denard's fans incepted my brain. Now von Grisham played

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 1>out just like we were hoping and talking about. Was

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>he the perfect type of fantasy player?

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 2>Yes? Is it gonna get extended time, We don't really know.

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:21.639
<v Speaker 2>Should you have picked him.

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Up, yes, because he was at even if you only

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>get two weeks absolute turn on that ball, crushing it

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:31.359
<v Speaker 1>on the monster with the stolen base, von Grisham looked

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>mighty mighty good. Mindy, how aggressive on the pickup? He's

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 1>still out there. He was only eight percent own at

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>like midnight last night.

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 2>I know that had to change.

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Yahoo picked up seventeen hundred pickups just yesterday. How aggressive

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>would you be on von Grisham if you assume he

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>is not going to stay up when our returns from injury.

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 4>I've still be pretty aggressive with him on this point

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 4>in the season. We just got about, you know, under

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 4>two months left of the year. I got that stole

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 4>twenty seven bases in ninety six games in the minor league.

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 4>If he can give you, you know, five to ten

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 4>steals before he you know, if he gets demoted, then

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 4>that those could be very valuable. Now there's also the scenario,

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 4>you know we talk about with our cia Ozzi Albi's

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 4>is potentially going to return. They see you in the

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 4>next couple of weeks here, but if he's hitting, I

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:17.720
<v Speaker 4>find it really difficult that they're not going to keep

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:20.039
<v Speaker 4>him up based off I mean, if you're hitting well.

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:22.359
<v Speaker 4>I mean, keep in mind, this is a guy yesterday

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 4>two for four, home run in a stolen base, one

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 4>hundred and four point seven exit velocity off his bat

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 4>yesterday on his home run, one of the two hard

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 4>hit balls in that game, four hundred and twelve feet

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:34.840
<v Speaker 4>on that home run. I know this man is swaggy.

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:37.280
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna call him swaggy V. I feel like he's

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 4>just destined to stick. I mean, we saw Michael Harris

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:42.160
<v Speaker 4>do the same type of deal where we didn't think

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:44.840
<v Speaker 4>he was gonna stick around, and sure enough, he's been

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:48.039
<v Speaker 4>there ever since because he's continued to produce. So just

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 4>the speck that he could be around for a little bit,

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:52.719
<v Speaker 4>give you a few steals which you might need, and

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 4>then if he continues to hit, he could be a

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:56.840
<v Speaker 4>good stolen base source for you for the rest of

0:04:56.880 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 4>the season.

0:04:57.560 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it's gonna be interesting to see where he's at.

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Like go guards mentioned all leagues he's owned, same as mine,

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:03.919
<v Speaker 1>But we play in a lot of dynasties as he

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>does and I do. But there's gonna be some shorter

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>leagues where he's out there.

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 2>And that bomb.

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:10.479
<v Speaker 1>If you haven't seen it, go back and watch it

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. It's just one of those just beautiful, beautiful swings.

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>It's actually one oh one at least according to Baseball

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Savant right under it.

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 2>Michael Harris had a single.

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>By the way that he hit one oh four yesterday,

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>but at least the stat cat or Baseball Savant marker

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:26.159
<v Speaker 1>was one oh one point seven on the homer with

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:29.039
<v Speaker 1>a thirty thirty two degree launch angle, which is just

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>an absolute freaking bomb. He turned on it and go

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and pick up and speculate and hopefully it works out.

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:36.160
<v Speaker 2>This is one of those really top top.

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:39.159
<v Speaker 1>Guys that I really think, a they're kind of defunct

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:40.599
<v Speaker 1>and how much are we going to get them the

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 1>rest of this year?

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 2>But if all of this is.

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Going to play out, like I was thinking, like, hey,

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit of manipulation and these guys are

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna get a little bit of run, then you know,

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Gunner and Corbyn would come up. Grissom was just never

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:54.480
<v Speaker 1>one that we really assumed and he looked great and

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>it'll be fun to monitor how he does over the

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:58.600
<v Speaker 1>next week or so, and I hope we actually get

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>to have the conversation should they send him down the Dodgers.

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:02.839
<v Speaker 2>They didn't care.

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>They just sent Miguel Vargus as good as he was.

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 2>They just heart immediately. Don Yeah, I hurt my heart

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 2>a lot.

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Literally made this big old case of the podcast. I'm like, hey,

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Michael Vargus, but with the von Grishams, I hope we're

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 1>having that conversation at least that it goes really well,

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:21.839
<v Speaker 1>because this would be a fantastic fantasy value the rest

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>of the season going into the playoffs.

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:25.919
<v Speaker 2>But you know it wouldn't have been. I don't know

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 2>how well it would have worked.

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Also, Gokards that thing mentioned this yesterday we had the

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Wonky Wednesday home run extra.

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 2>If everyone remembers.

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Where Kelly had said, if you get a homer that

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:40.919
<v Speaker 1>no one else calls, you got double and go cards

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:43.040
<v Speaker 1>literally said hey, what about von Grisham, And I was like, oh,

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 1>that would be kind of fun.

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 2>I knew I couldn't do anything.

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:47.919
<v Speaker 1>I want to know in Monkey or anybody if you

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:50.360
<v Speaker 1>did anybody call von Grisham yesterday and did they get

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the extra points? Because what a great fun call that

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 1>would have been, especially on rookies, and you know, making

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>that nice big young young history at twenty one years old.

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Jose Offerman was the last to do a homer in

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a stolen base. By the way, if he didn't see

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>about eighty days sixty to eighty days older back in

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the nineties, was the last one to homer and get

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>a stolen base at that age. Some other stuff here,

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Dodgers win their tenth straight Joey gallow with a pinch

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 1>hit home run. I am not a Joey Gallo guy.

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I know there's a few in here that were into it. Mindy,

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Can Joey Gallo be someone on a return from the

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Dodgers With the Dodgers now, I mean he's kind of

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 1>relegated a little bit, But are you a Joey Gallo

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>guy at all? And especially seeing him hit just a tiny,

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>tiny bit, I.

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 3>Mean, a pinch hit, a three run home run.

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 4>It's encouraging getting him away from Yankee Stadium and everything

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 4>he was dealing with in New York, which if you

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 4>haven't seen it, it just him talking about just not

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 4>wanting to even show his face on the streets.

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 3>I do believe there's something to be.

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 4>Said in the change of scenery, and sometimes that just

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 4>maybe mentally him being able to not realize he's under

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 4>that same type of pressure.

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 3>He could be good.

0:07:57.320 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 4>I just think if you're going to rely on him

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 4>for consistent fantas see production, you're going to be disappointed.

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 4>He could be somebody in a deeper league if you

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 4>need some power you're lacking in home runs, that you

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 4>could maybe take a spec on. I just wouldn't expect

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 4>peak Joey Gallo towards the end of the season. Again,

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 4>maybe he's better than he is in New York, which

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 4>isn't hard to do, But I don't think you're getting

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 4>the old Joey Gallo.

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 2>Since joining the Dodgers.

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Joey Galla is actually hitting two sixty seven small sample

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>size six games, but he is hitting two sixty seven

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 1>with an over five hundred slug and he has more

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 1>singles actually has the same amount or no, yeah, he

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>has more singles than homers. It feels like the first

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 1>time in forever that that's actually happened. He has four

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 1>hits at least, so two sixty seven since returning to

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the Dodgers. Maybe something to monitor with all of those.

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>And Wonky was the one that was kind of into

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>uh Gallows so maybe it's going to be working out.

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Brandon Drury, I have a question for you.

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Brand Drey hit a homer last night four RBIs, but

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>since coming over to the Padres in that trade, Drury

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:00.839
<v Speaker 1>is only hitting one point eighty five. He's got a

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 1>two fifty eight OBP. He has a bunch of RBI

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>which has been really nice. He's struck out a bit,

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>but he's got five hits in that time. Batting average

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>is really struggled. And what as nice is he has

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 1>gotten plenty of game time. I was taking a look

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 1>at his game log. Here looks like he has started

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 1>every single game. Yeah, I'm going through the days. He's

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>started every single game since he has been acquired. But

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>he only has hits in four of those games, and

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>last night was a big multi hit game.

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 2>So here's my question.

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Is there anything to worry about with Brandon Drury for

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the year. Even though he has been solid,

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 1>he struggled a bit in the transition. Tatusa is looming.

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Looks like next weekend Tatisa is going to be coming back.

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 1>We know that they've got the flexibility. Kim, your big

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 1>defensive guy in the middle. We talked to I think

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 1>with me and Kelly about defensive replacements. You've got Crony

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>in there, You've you know, they've got some other pieces.

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 2>That are kind of flying around.

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:55.319
<v Speaker 1>Do you think there's anything that could bring Brandon jury

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>down with his struggles and Tatis coming back and maybe

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 1>more platoony, Like, I don't think his value is gone,

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't. There's no scenario unless he just absolutely tanks completely.

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 1>But is there a scenario you foresee that he is

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 1>going to start losing some time and becoming more of

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a lefty split type of guy, and that's gonna hurt

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 1>him moving forward.

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean you kind of touched on it.

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 4>The Padres have arguably the most talent on their roster,

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 4>them and the Dodgers, and just like you said, they

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:28.440
<v Speaker 4>don't have to play him every day. If he's struggling,

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:30.839
<v Speaker 4>they can platoon him. I mean, cronin Worth has shown

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 4>that he should get consistent playing time. Manna Machado and

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 4>Trenched at third base. You know, we don't know where

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 4>Fernando Tatis is gonna play. Are they gonna stick him

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 4>in left field? Are they gonna dh him a lot?

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 4>Or are they going to put him at shortstop? We

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:44.200
<v Speaker 4>don't know yet, you know, maybe they move him around

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:46.720
<v Speaker 4>a little bit. But at the same time, like Drury's

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 4>a luxury for them. It's like the car that you

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 4>have in the garage. It's like I've got four other

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:51.840
<v Speaker 4>nice cars.

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 3>I have this one.

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 4>I'll drive it every once in a while, but it's

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 4>like my fifth option. And that's kind of how I

0:10:57.559 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 4>feel like when everybody's back in the fold for the pot,

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:02.319
<v Speaker 4>he's going to kind of get the short end of

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 4>the stick, especially with how he's been playing. Now again,

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:08.200
<v Speaker 4>if he starts heating up and he plays better, he could,

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 4>you know, start putting in some more playing time. But

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 4>I mean, he struggled versus lefties against small sample size

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 4>fourteen at bats so far with the Padres, a one

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:20.680
<v Speaker 4>forty three average so far against lefties. With the Cincinnati

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 4>Reds against lefties he was hitting three h nine, So

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 4>maybe that corrects itself over time. But the I mean,

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 4>the Padres could be looking at that this type of

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 4>platoon splits in just putting their best foot forward with

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 4>the match they want to play. If I have Drury,

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 4>I'm definitely concerned that he's somebody that goes from playing

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 4>you know, six or seven games a week like he

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:41.559
<v Speaker 4>was with the Reds to maybe he's someone that's playing

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 4>like three or four days a week when everybody's healthy.

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 1>With the Padres, you can't have this question, but I

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>can just speculate and throw it out there, Like, you know,

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:51.679
<v Speaker 1>if von Grisham were to stay with the Braves the

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>rest of the season, who would be more valuable. It's

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 1>easy to say Drury on the year, but I've never

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>been Maybe it's the dynasty minded me. I've never been

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:01.839
<v Speaker 1>the big Brandon Drury guy as far as like how

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:03.440
<v Speaker 1>it clicked that it was going to keep going what

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 1>he was doing against you know, there could be some

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>ballpark factors in there. Actually, you know, I didn't even

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 1>think to look at his home splits, which is gonna

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit nutty because there's a couple of

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>games in there. But let's see, he was hitting da

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 1>da da da dah yeah, two ninety yeah.

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 2>So there you go.

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>This is what I was speculating on, is talk about

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the ballpark. He was hitting two ninety one at home,

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 1>only two thirty four on the road.

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 2>This season.

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Fourteen homers came at home, So now you're putting him

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 1>into a little bit of a worse ballpark, a little

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 1>bit more crowded. Yes, he's playing DH right now. As

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at the depth chart, you could argue that

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:39.960
<v Speaker 1>there's maybe not a ton of guys that are going

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to come in. If they wanted to just drop Kim

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>and put him into the on the bench, you could

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:46.560
<v Speaker 1>just make that case and then guess what, Dury's your

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>DH and you just go. But if they want that

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>more defensive side, Tatisa is gonna play short and outfield,

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 1>and if they go and put him in, let's say

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:58.600
<v Speaker 1>over bro Profar, Profar, but they might want a DH

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>that I don't know at the answer. I don't know

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>if less at bats are going to be good and

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:04.680
<v Speaker 1>try to make it more efficient, But it does look

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 1>like he's struggling just a tiny bit, and maybe just

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:10.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe monitor it before you get into your playoffs, because

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:12.959
<v Speaker 1>if these struggles continue as fun as it is when

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>he come and drops a bomb and has four RBI,

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:17.319
<v Speaker 1>it might be a little bit more short lived in

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:19.559
<v Speaker 1>this new destination and that team doesn't they don't owe

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 1>him anything as far as what there's traded that they need.

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:24.959
<v Speaker 1>They need to play him every single day and if

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>those splits fix Maybe that's just what they do.

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 2>So I was interested on the struggle.

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we've talked, I mean before.

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 4>It's just like you see other hitters when they leave

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 4>Cincinnati and you see people like who Henneo Suarez whose

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 4>home runs have gone down dramatically. You see guys like

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 4>Jesse Winker who's struggled over in Seattle, and even Nick

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 4>Castianos is obviously not hitting as much power as he

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 4>was with the Reds too. There is a lot to

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 4>be said about hitting in that ballpark, which has been

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:53.559
<v Speaker 4>now proven to be like along with Corsfield, the best

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 4>ballparks hidden for hitters. Yeah, and then going to a

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 4>whole new environment and kind of seeing, hey, like, what

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 4>is this player outside of this ballpark? And the short

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 4>sample size so far has not been great for Dury.

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 1>No, it's really I'm outside of like the big, impactful

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>at bats and just it'll be fun. Even though Jury's

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of flexibility, It'll be interesting to monitor

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:12.959
<v Speaker 1>and Wonky. It made me laugh when you said Jury

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:14.319
<v Speaker 1>the guy that a bunch of people thought was a

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:17.080
<v Speaker 1>rookie friend of Jury because he was a part of

0:14:17.120 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a diamondback one of the big diamondback trades. I think

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 1>it was the Justin Upton one. And I see him,

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, doing good stuff otherwise, and I'm like rebel.

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 1>The other big headline, Aaron Judge hit his forty fifth

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 1>homer in New York's one hundred and twelfth game. He

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>needs just eighteen to beat Roger Merris's American League home

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>run record. Check this out too, WONK you put this together.

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 2>I like this.

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Here's a couple of fun facts about Aaron judges homers.

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Yankee Stadium is not the most home run friendly ballpark

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to right handed hitters. It's fourth, behind American Family Field,

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Roger Century, and Angel Stadium.

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting.

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Also, according to stat cast, Judge this is probably the

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 1>best one. Actually, Mindy brought this up before we got

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 1>we went live.

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 2>Judge would have.

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Fifty three homers right now if he played all games

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 1>in Cincinnati, which would put him exactly on pace with

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Barry Bonds in two thousand and one. That's a wild

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 1>and we're just talking about Brandon Drury and the numbers

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>that are going on in Cincinnati.

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Take him out.

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>If Judge was there, he would be on pace with

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the single season record of Barry Bonds. Presumably not you know,

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 1>not cheating, not doing any of the bad stuff.

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's incredible. I got a question for you.

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, so Aaron Judge has been putting together a contract

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 4>year unlike many we've ever seen. If he had sixty

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 4>home runs, he's thirty years old. Are you gonna give

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 4>him the half a billion dollar contract that he's seeking

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 4>if you're the Yankees and he's your franchise icon, or

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 4>you're gonna let him walk.

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I think they're going to especially losing out on like

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 1>a Soda. I mean that's a tough one because like

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Soto is so much easier listen to us, Soda so

0:15:57.400 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>much easier to give a half a billion dollars too.

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Judge is older thirty I think right now, thirty thirty one.

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>So giving him one of those like big old crazy ones,

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that's good.

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 2>This is where the problem is going to happen.

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 1>The big numbered contracts are sometimes what these guys want,

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and I'm talking like totality. They want to be the

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 1>guy that got five hundred million dollars. The Yankees I

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 1>don't think can do that. I don't think they can

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 1>give him a ten year. You got to give him

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 1>like six seven, and that's going to make the annual

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>go up.

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 2>So I think he gets paid.

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Because the Yankees also, they're gonna spend their money somewhere.

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 2>What is free agency going to be for them?

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Especially if the Padres lockup Soto?

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, I think he gets paid.

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know if it's gonna be half a

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>million dollars or half a billion, but I do think

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the average annual is going to be pretty up there.

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 2>That's a good question. That's a good question.

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>A couple injuries. Max Munsey diagnosed with a right hand contusion.

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 2>He was unable to.

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Grip a bat after so Joey Gallo or Miguel Vargas.

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I would be going to speculate on a little Migul

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Vargus right now, just to see if he comes back up,

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 1>because Max Munsey, that could could not be great.

0:16:58.960 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 2>And we'll see what happens.

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 1>And Shane Boz is going to be limited to pliometric

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 1>exercises only for the next twoks. What is a pliometric exercise?

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 1>You would be the guy Mindy is absolutely Jack, this

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 1>is a weight room guy. What is a pliometric exercise?

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 4>It's usually like just jump training or like a bunch

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 4>of that type of moving around. It's usually not too many,

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 4>too much weights, more like body weight exercises.

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Clearly, I know, clearly I could act. You know what

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I might need to do the Shane bazz I might

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>need to limit myself to plometric exercises for any exercise

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 1>for the next two weeks.

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 2>That's what I'm I'm gonna attempt to do.

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Some stat heroes, let's look at the stats. Tuoky de

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 1>sant five innings. A fun fact about two Ki de

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Son if you remember, the Diamondbacks literally threw him in

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>with Bronson Arroyo to the Braves to say, make a

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>royal goal away. If everyone forgets about that, Demick's got

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:51.680
<v Speaker 1>nothing back. They just said, we'll give you Bronson a

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>roy in his contract and will also give you Tuky

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>to do that.

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 2>And the Braves said, okay. He was a former Diamondback.

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Five innings, six strikeouts, Nester cortestruck out ten, did not

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:03.359
<v Speaker 1>go into a win. Brandon Woodruff struck out five, Robbie

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Ray six and one third seven strikeouts, Jeffrey Springs five

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 1>with eight strikeouts. He's been a really good k for

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:12.159
<v Speaker 1>nine guy and Kyle Wright had to strike out. There

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>was a question in the chat that came up from

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Smalls and it had to do with Robbie Ray. Would

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>you trade Let's just do this straight up. Would you

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 1>trade Robbie Ray for Kyle Schwarber right now?

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 4>Mendy Well, I also saw he said in a points

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:29.440
<v Speaker 4>league too, which Kyle Schorverer does get a lot of walks,

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 4>he does strike out a lot too.

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Right it is a points league, Yeah, points league, so

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:35.399
<v Speaker 1>big bat with some strikeouts, and trading a pitcher in

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:38.200
<v Speaker 1>a points league is always a little yeah.

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I know it's the cop out answer. Depends

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 4>on your pitching depth. If Robbie Ray is one it

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:46.640
<v Speaker 4>is like your first or second starter, I wouldn't make

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 4>the trade.

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:48.879
<v Speaker 3>You need good starting pitchers.

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you know, Robby Ray's going to give you innings,

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:52.439
<v Speaker 4>He's going to give you strikeouts, and his blow up

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 4>starts are far few in between. So I personally, unless

0:18:56.720 --> 0:18:59.679
<v Speaker 4>Robbie Ray is like your fifth starter, you need that

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 4>type the workhorse three your rotation, so I might hold

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:03.720
<v Speaker 4>on that personally.

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>You want to know a fun little thing, bug and

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I just did over on the end of This League

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Baseball podcast, which released today. We dissected thirteen first

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 1>place teams and all the stuff that we do, and

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>we took all the common denominator players and we looked

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 1>at the highest shares of first place teams in what

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>players they had, and that was a fun one and spoiler,

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Schwarber was one of the highest owned players across

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it was four of the thirteen leagues he

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 1>was owned in. And then I also threw in tout

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 1>which I'm in, which Frank Stanfele has. So we had

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:40.159
<v Speaker 1>five of fourteen teams owning Kyle Schwarber and they were

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 1>at the top. IF just a fun little experiment we were

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:45.919
<v Speaker 1>putting together on the hitter side, Albert poolholes Albert poolholes

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>one homer, two runs, two RBI, four for five. AJ

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:52.159
<v Speaker 1>Melndez had a homer, Nolan Arnatto had a home run.

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Leoti Taveres had to double a triple five RBI just

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:58.159
<v Speaker 1>when everybody was ready to drop him. Monday, we did

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:00.879
<v Speaker 1>an ITL episode where Leodie tiv is the number one

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:05.200
<v Speaker 1>drop player on ESPN and on CBS Sports, and Leodi

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Tavarrus comes in with five RBI.

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:06.960
<v Speaker 2>JD.

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Davis with a homer and large newtbar, two triples, two RBI,

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 1>two stolen bases. Wow, a very very interesting performance. James

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Anderson and I were chatting the other day and he

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 1>brought up this interesting thing.

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:21.440
<v Speaker 2>This is kind of a side note.

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 1>But everybody gets excited about prospects. Francisco Alvarez with the Mets, big,

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 1>big time hit tool prospect that everybody loves, and he's

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna come up. But we were talking about and comparing

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 1>with Gabrielle Moreno and just how a lot of these

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 1>catchers the pool is much bigger and the eliteness brings

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:43.440
<v Speaker 1>everything up, and everybody, I think over values every single prospect,

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:45.919
<v Speaker 1>especially catching prospects. And the whole point to this was

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>to say, I loved his point that imagine if Francisco Alvarez.

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 2>Came up and he hit like im J. Melndez, how

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:54.399
<v Speaker 2>disappointed people would be.

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's crazy talk because it is such a crazy

0:20:57.640 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 1>compt because in the end.

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:00.399
<v Speaker 2>Of the day, you should be excited. You would put

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 2>that up because m J.

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Melndez has been a fantastic catcher two in any two

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:06.959
<v Speaker 1>catcher format and really has been like a low end

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>solid catcher that you've got for free.

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:11.200
<v Speaker 2>And he continues to get run, continues to get hits.

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Bating average isn't quite up there, but he has been

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a pretty big plus, And I would say MJ. Melndez

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 1>is probably a very good comp to what you would

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>get if Alvarez comes up. Maybe a little bit uptick

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:25.160
<v Speaker 1>on the batting average, but that's probably about the comp

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 1>that you would get on album.

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 2>Are You big? Are you a speculative Francisco Alvarez guy?

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:32.680
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I obviously one of the best prospects in baseball.

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:35.159
<v Speaker 4>A lot of power there, great hit tool, like you've mentioned.

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 4>I love how you've talked about comparing him to MJ.

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:41.359
<v Speaker 4>Melendez and saying that people be disappointed. But like, looking

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 4>at the numbers in under three hundred at bats, fourteen homers,

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:49.679
<v Speaker 4>forty RBIs a two thirty seven average, Like isn't the best,

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:53.160
<v Speaker 4>But this is a guy that's playing in the outfield now.

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:56.880
<v Speaker 4>He's like outfield eligibility in some leagues post All Star Break,

0:21:56.960 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 4>He's been pretty decent as well. I mean, he's hitting

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:03.200
<v Speaker 4>two ninety three post All Star break right now again,

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:06.639
<v Speaker 4>and that's in seventy five at bats. But I just

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 4>I think you have to to like you have to

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:15.119
<v Speaker 4>keep your like expectations somewhat in check for catching prospects,

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:18.159
<v Speaker 4>because even Adlie Rutchman somewhat struggled, right, I mean he

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 4>had no power pretty much.

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't remember it was like his first few weeks

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 3>before he at home run.

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:25.880
<v Speaker 4>So like you have to like and he was considered

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 4>the best prospect in the last decade, So using him,

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 4>you have to realize when Alvarez does get called up,

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:33.439
<v Speaker 4>like he is going to be an asset for this

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 4>mess team that has a lot of hitting, But you

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 4>can't expect that he's going to be a game changer

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:40.240
<v Speaker 4>for your fantasy team because most catchers aren't.

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, like you said, just keep it your expectations

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 3>in check.

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 1>And he hasn't been called out, but he will be.

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 1>He'll I think he will come up at some point

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 1>in the season, probably in that same vein of the

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Carrols and the Hendersons and manipulating some time where they can.

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 1>He'd probably be a good He's a good secondary catcher

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:59.680
<v Speaker 1>that they can potentially dage. But you know, everyone focuses

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:01.639
<v Speaker 1>on like let me get that guy. If Melindas were

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:03.679
<v Speaker 1>still floating around. I just think it's been really solid

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 1>over on the stat zero side. TJ Zoisch six earned runs,

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 1>two walks, four strikeouts and four innings. Jacob Jonas or

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:14.440
<v Speaker 1>yakup yon This as I'd like to call him yac

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:17.200
<v Speaker 1>up yon this two and one third six earned runs,

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:20.920
<v Speaker 1>seven hits, walked to struck out three. Kyle Freelan four

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and one third also gave up six earned run.

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 2>Ten hits in the double.

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:26.920
<v Speaker 1>And you know what we can say is, thank god

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't the Cardinals side. Yay, it wasn't Kintana giving

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 1>up the fourteen hits in the tender and runs. It

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 1>was Colorado side. Katana actually worked out on every front.

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 1>By the way hit the strikeout prop looked.

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Good, picked up the win.

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 1>He's just a to me, Kintana is just a total

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 1>league winning pick up on the back half of the year.

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 1>If he had been sitting out there, goes to the

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals already picked up like, I'm just a big, big

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:52.439
<v Speaker 1>Kintana guy. So I don't assume he's floating out there.

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 1>But there are some formats where it might potentially be happening.

0:23:56.600 --> 0:24:00.119
<v Speaker 1>Home run calls abound, my friends, and we we have

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:02.680
<v Speaker 1>got the home run leader board. Would you look at

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:05.880
<v Speaker 1>this high. Cubbies and d Blum both in the forties.

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 1>We've got Go Cards and Terry who have jumped up.

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I think Terry might have been there, but Go Cards

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>jumped up with Mike Mayer night King of the North

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:16.679
<v Speaker 1>dropping down a little bit. We had six people receive

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:20.919
<v Speaker 1>the Wonky bonus, which was calling a player that no

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 1>one else called and them hitting a homer. And I

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 1>believe de Blum hit it, and that's why he's there,

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 1>because he had Marcelo Zuna and that jumped him up

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 1>to forty. We also had a home run calls of

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Judge and Nolan Aronado. I did not hit mine. I

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:37.440
<v Speaker 1>think I had Vladdie yesterday that did not hit. And God,

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't even remember who what Wonky? Who did you have?

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember who Wonky had. I don't think either

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 1>one of us hit unfortunately. So that is what the

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>home run board looks like, and we can jump back

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:51.439
<v Speaker 1>on it today we can get some more homers. But

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 1>before we do, we're gonna go over and take a

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:56.159
<v Speaker 1>look at some bets with our friends. Bet MGM use

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:58.119
<v Speaker 1>a promo code leading off. You're going to get a

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars risk free bet. If you get use it today,

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:03.639
<v Speaker 1>you can get it in on baseball. Football season is

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 1>coming in, so have some fun, make some bets and

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 1>get a big old risk free bet with bet MGM.

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 2>I went over on the top plays.

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I did it a little bit different today, and I'm

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:15.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna give you I'm only gonna give you two here,

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and I went with the Betting Pros cheat sheet, their algorithm,

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:22.879
<v Speaker 1>their plays, which you can go on completely free. Just

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 1>type in Betting Pros MLB cheat sheet and it'll show

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:29.440
<v Speaker 1>you everything based on their algorithm and whether you want

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 1>to make the bets and who makes the best bet.

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:34.440
<v Speaker 1>But there's a lot of juice involved today, a lot

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>of big minus money. So I found the two one

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:40.720
<v Speaker 1>total base in, one strikeout plus money. So these are

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the top plus money plays on these for the day.

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>And number one we're going back to the Cardinals and

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 1>we're going into Colorado. Except it's not a player that

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:52.119
<v Speaker 1>you think, Paul the Young. Paul the Young is just

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>over plus money plus one oh five for the total

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:57.960
<v Speaker 1>basis which is at one oh five. His projection is

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:00.920
<v Speaker 1>two point six and he has been hitting pretty well.

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 1>And it's in Colorado again and the pitcher Framber Valdez

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:10.119
<v Speaker 1>under strikeouts plus one ten, he's projected at six. The

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:12.640
<v Speaker 1>number six and a half he's going up against Texas.

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 1>That one is on FanDuel Mindy. If you had to

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 1>make one bet Paul de Young total bases, you need

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 1>two or Framber Valdez to not strike out seven?

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 2>Which one you rocking.

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:26.159
<v Speaker 4>Frambervaldez is going to get some k's today, so I

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:27.960
<v Speaker 4>think he's going to get over that. So I'd have

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:29.880
<v Speaker 4>to go to the young side just for the Framburg

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 4>side real quick. If you look just at his last

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 4>few starts, in three of his last four starts, he's

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:38.399
<v Speaker 4>had six or more k's and he's playing against the

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:41.159
<v Speaker 4>Texas Rangers, who, over the last two weeks against lefties

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:43.679
<v Speaker 4>have been striking out over twenty nine percent of the time.

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 4>So that has me hesitant about going under on his k's.

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:50.320
<v Speaker 4>The the young side, he's coming in hot. This is

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:54.199
<v Speaker 4>a guy that has I believe eleven hits or yeah.

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:57.239
<v Speaker 4>He's been eleven games back, four home runs, getting eight

0:26:57.280 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 4>sixty five ops and triple A and had a twenty

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:02.360
<v Speaker 4>four percent k raid over that time. Just about right

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:06.200
<v Speaker 4>around there, he's in Coors Field, this Cardinals offense is hot.

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 4>I'm definitely going the Deyong side. I think he's gonna

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 4>get the over there.

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Here's a fun thing.

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Since August fourth, that is six straight games he has

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:17.199
<v Speaker 1>had two or more total bases and five of the

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:20.119
<v Speaker 1>last six five of the last six, and two of

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>those were multi hit games, so he's had doubles and

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 1>homers in those non games. So I like that one

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 1>as well. I'd actually fade the Valdez one and maybe

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>go with the over. It's probably gonna not be great

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 1>money on that, but that's what I would do.

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 2>A couple DFS things.

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:37.199
<v Speaker 1>If you want to play on DK, Framber, who were

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about, I think you and I are both fading

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that projection.

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:41.200
<v Speaker 2>He's nine to eight on DK.

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a play, and I think Meryl Kelly

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Merle is a play today on DK he's a better

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:48.679
<v Speaker 1>priced nine to one, where he is over ten on

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:51.359
<v Speaker 1>Fandle he's ten to one. Framber's ten to four, and

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I think Valdez is now a better cost Nick Ldolo

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 1>though more expensive than both of them at ten to five.

0:27:57.640 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Those are some guys who can take a look at

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Stacks Houston, Colorado, Boston and those are all five runs

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 1>implied or more. Here's another fun thing. Colorado and Saint

0:28:07.880 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Louis are both implied to be over six today over

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:16.200
<v Speaker 1>six and that's where it is, and you guys want

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to play those so Houston, I actually liked the Colorado

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:20.639
<v Speaker 1>on like Jose Glacias would be someone he's hitting two

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:22.679
<v Speaker 1>in the lineup. I think today that might be a

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 1>cheap option you can throw in. And yes, you guys

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:28.400
<v Speaker 1>called me on it. No one said it yesterday, but Tierra.

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 2>I tried to.

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Find it yesterday for my bet MGM Reid Mindy.

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you had ever seen.

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:37.679
<v Speaker 1>Whenever we would do the betting stuff, Joe had this

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 1>big crown he would put on, so there was a

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 1>week he was out.

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't have a crown, but.

0:28:43.280 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I have a daughter, just Tiara, So I will be

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:49.680
<v Speaker 1>bettingpros dot com leading off promo code Tiara. When I

0:28:49.720 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 1>did my reads and ever since I did it, she

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 1>hit it from me.

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 2>She hit it from me. So I can't find the Tiara.

0:28:56.680 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh No, I will confront her today and I'll see

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 1>if we can. She one hundred percent hit it for me.

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I swear to God I am embarrassed to say this.

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I went through her room yesterday looking for it before

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the show just to see if I.

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 2>Can find it.

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely nowhere. So we're gonna get to the bottom of this.

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I promise you guys. Tune in tomorrow. We might have

0:29:14.360 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 1>some Tiara action. Let's end this bad boy with a

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>home run call. Mindy, guests, I've been doing pretty pretty good.

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 1>What do you got into a little smaller slate of

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:25.800
<v Speaker 1>games here? Give us our home run call for today

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 1>on your side?

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 4>Well, I looked at the show sheet and you have

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:32.560
<v Speaker 4>the guy I was going to pick originally, Paul Goldschmid

0:29:32.680 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 4>four home runs in his career against Herman Marquez, who

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 4>the same Hermon Marquez that at home this season has

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 4>been absolutely just awful his home games. He's got a

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 4>six to eleven ERA compared to a four oh seven

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 4>on the road.

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Not surprising.

0:29:48.160 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 4>He is somebody that can blow up at any start,

0:29:51.360 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 4>and it's in course field. Goldsmid with the four home

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 4>runs was definitely my first call. But I'm gonna give

0:29:56.720 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna pivot and we're gonna go to the guy

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 4>we talked about for the betting side, Paul the young again,

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 4>somebody that has four home runs in the eleven games,

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 4>and he's hot, and you want to pick players that

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 4>are producing. I picked up Paul de Young in probably

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:11.680
<v Speaker 4>four or five of the league's I'm inn so I'm

0:30:11.680 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 4>all in on him.

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 3>Let's go Paul de Young at least one home run today.

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:16.520
<v Speaker 2>That's a good one too.

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>If we were if we had the Wonky bonus, I

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:20.760
<v Speaker 1>think that would have a decent chance. Yeah, it's I

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:22.959
<v Speaker 1>think it's a very BVP day as well. I've got

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Paul Goldschmidt. He's probably the best home run VVP. It's

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 1>still Colorado. Love the matchup. Like you said, he's got

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 1>a three eighty two lifetime average versus Mark Hez And

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, anytime I can pick Goldie the second best

0:30:34.360 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 1>as far as homers go, that's where Wonky is with

0:30:36.280 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 1>AIRTIEDI Zechino, which that would be another one that no

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 1>one's calling. There's a big play one Airstida Zecchino for Wonky.

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 1>You've got Paul de Young. Those are some home run calls.

0:30:44.680 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 2>Friends. You guys still want to take part, you want

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 2>to check it out? Oh, you know what I forgot?

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:49.160
<v Speaker 1>This is one of the things I was going to

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 1>tell you, guys, this is why it's so cool is

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 1>go and check out the discord so you can be

0:30:53.960 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 1>in and be involved in all this stuff. So yesterday

0:30:55.920 --> 0:30:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I had Vlad and he got rained out and I

0:30:58.160 --> 0:31:00.239
<v Speaker 1>didn't catch it right in time. So I went up

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, ah, crap, you know, how do

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I make this official? They're only two games left, and

0:31:04.280 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 1>just before it, I went into the home run room

0:31:06.520 --> 0:31:08.720
<v Speaker 1>typed in Christian Walker. I didn't get it, but I

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 1>was able to change my home run call even though

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 1>it was a rain out.

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 2>So go and check it out.

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Really cool community and we can do the homer calls.

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Mindy that is it, my friend at d Mindy zero

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 1>two on Twitter give the plug for triple play. What

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 1>do you guys got going on a triple play? I

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:24.240
<v Speaker 1>just did your prospect show the call up. But you

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 1>guys have got a gajillion great thing. So what should

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the baseball people here need to know?

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 3>Call up our Prospects show.

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 4>We do it every week talking about players just in

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 4>the low miners that are producing well, who we think

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:37.400
<v Speaker 4>is going to be called up next. It's a great

0:31:37.440 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 4>show for fantasy and just for people that love prospects.

0:31:40.440 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 4>We also do a weekly just MLB focused show we

0:31:44.360 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 4>do season long with me, Doc, Marty Tallman, and Little Cheesecake.

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 4>We all just talk about hot pickups for the season

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:53.600
<v Speaker 4>and our little own fun segments that we do for

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:56.800
<v Speaker 4>the show. We'd usually do that every Thursday and all

0:31:56.880 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 4>off season. We do not miss the show for anything baseball.

0:31:59.400 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 4>There always be something from us every single week. Player

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 4>Profiles just deep dives on guys. So it's it's really cool.

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:09.800
<v Speaker 4>You guys like fantasy baseball and you like fun. We

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 4>try to combine both in there, so check it out.

0:32:12.560 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 2>Triple Play Fantasy.

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we should all have cake like names,

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 1>like I'll be like Little Key Lime, like Little Key Lime, Joe,

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I like that Little Little Joe bunk Cake.

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 2>That'll be hard.

0:32:23.080 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 3>Joe's a's name.

0:32:23.960 --> 0:32:25.920
<v Speaker 1>There we go, Yeah, Little Little Joe bunk Cake and

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Little Key Lime.

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:28.840
<v Speaker 2>We're out of here. Uh tomorrow.

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:30.600
<v Speaker 1>We got Chris Clig coming in. My buddy Chris Claik.

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Haven't done a show with him yet, but I've done

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:34.840
<v Speaker 1>plenty of shows with him. He'll be up for ending

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 1>out the week. For David Middleton, I am a little

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:38.480
<v Speaker 1>little Key Lime.

0:32:39.000 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 2>We're out of here friends, GA