WEBVTT - Fed, Deere, US Steel, Vivek Ramaswamy, and Gambling.com Group

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller.

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Every business day, we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 2>and Bloomberg experts, along with essential market moving news.

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast on Apple Podcasts or wherever

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you listen to podcasts, and at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast.

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to Ira Jersey. He covers all the interest

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>rates stuff for Bloomberg in intelligence.

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Ira.

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>You know me, I try to stay away from that

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 1>whole interest rate thing, the whole yield curve discussion. You

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>don't want me anywhere near that. But I guess what

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm hearing today and over the last couple of days

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 1>is higher for longer for US interest rates. Is that

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>what the market's telling.

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 3>You, Well, it's not so much the higher, it's more

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:48.479
<v Speaker 3>the stay high for longer. So the story really that

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 3>we've been pricing the last couple of days, and we're

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 3>talking about very short term, is the idea that the

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:57.920
<v Speaker 3>Federal Reserve is not going to be cutting interest rates,

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, maybe even into the second half of next year.

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 3>So although we you know, we're still pricing for some

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:06.960
<v Speaker 3>probability of a hike later this year. The more important

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 3>thing is that we're starting to price out cuts, and

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 3>pricing out cuts is you know, in my opinion, that's

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 3>what the FED is really needed to try to try

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 3>to convince the market of for a long time, because

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:20.320
<v Speaker 3>the fact that you were pricing in cuts just means

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 3>that the market was was that And if you look

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 3>at equities or credit, markets have just gotten easier and

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:28.959
<v Speaker 3>financial conditions have eased because people thought that the FED

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:31.320
<v Speaker 3>was going to be early in cutting rates. And if

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 3>they're not going to cut rates early, then that's just

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:35.679
<v Speaker 3>as good as hiking.

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 2>Isn't it. I mean, we're getting close to great financial

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:43.559
<v Speaker 2>crisis levels on rates. How high did we go back

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 2>then on a ten year on the thirty year ioerd

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 2>because that was like the sky is falling and it

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:52.559
<v Speaker 2>doesn't feel like that at all right now.

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, if you're talking about the financial crisis in two

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 3>thousand and seven, eight, you know, when we go back

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 3>to the early two thousands, whereasically back to those levels

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 3>on a lot of the curve, you know after two

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 3>thousand and seven, you know, this is the first time

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 3>we've seen rates basically in the last fifteen years anywhere

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 3>close to these kinds of levels, particularly in the front

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:15.360
<v Speaker 3>end of the curve.

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 2>It's very isn't that crazy? Ira, Like two thousand and seven,

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 2>two thousand and eight, we barely got above five percent

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:27.360
<v Speaker 2>on the tenure, right, And that was when like, if

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 2>the TARP vote didn't pass, the United States was going

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 2>to fail as a country. Like, how come were that

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 2>level now?

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, mainly because we're in much different inflationary dynamics now

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:41.080
<v Speaker 3>than we were back then, Right, so we have to

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 3>have a monetary policy that's ultimately going to be more

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 3>restrictive than it was back during the financial crisis. So

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, during the financial crisis, you had easing a

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 3>monetary policy, You had the Federal Reserve, Remember you had

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 3>the TARP vote, and then very soon thereafter they started

0:02:57.120 --> 0:03:00.640
<v Speaker 3>their quantitative easing program and whether to buy a lot

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:03.959
<v Speaker 3>of treasury, started to buy a lot of mortgages. Now

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 3>that's reversing, right, So they started to do that. Remember

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 3>in twenty eighteen, twenty nineteen, the economy started to slow.

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 3>Then you had the pandemic, and that'll cause obviously the

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 3>Federal Reserve to be even easier and way easier even

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 3>than it was during the financial crisis. So I think

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 3>it's a it's reactive right now that we're going to

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 3>see higher rates because of the strength of the economy,

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:30.639
<v Speaker 3>because of the monetary policy actions by the Fed, and importantly,

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 3>and I think this is definitely can't be underappreciated. And

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 3>if you go back to when the Treasury Department at

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 3>the beginning of the month came out and said we're

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 3>going to issue a trillion dollars of debt this quarter,

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 3>so just the July through September quarter, that was eye

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 3>popping to a lot of people because it was two

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 3>hundred billion dollars more than we thought. And I think

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 3>consensus was probably somewhere near there too. So you have

0:03:56.800 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 3>supply dynamics on top of a reasonably strong economy and

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 3>monetary policy that's going to stay very uh, you know,

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 3>very tight for a while. All of those things are

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 3>going to mean that rates are going to be you know,

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 3>stuck probably at this these higher levels at least for

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, for a few quarters, if not even a year.

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:16.479
<v Speaker 4>It's no good.

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking to refinance the mortgage, IRA, You're not helping

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>me out whatsoever, all right, No, not at all. Yeah, No, no,

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much again, Uh Jackson Hole, Wyoming. Matt

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>and I will not be there, but our good friends

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:30.159
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg Surveillance will be there.

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:32.040
<v Speaker 2>And why, I mean, what's the point of even going.

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>They're sending, well, they're gonna, They're sending the A team,

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>So Ira, does it matter?

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Does it matter?

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 5>Ira?

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 3>I doubt that that Ja Powell is going to say

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:44.280
<v Speaker 3>anything to uh, you know, to groundbreaking really because with

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 3>press conferences at every single FOMC meeting, he only uh,

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:50.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, spoke to us in late July. So it's

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:53.280
<v Speaker 3>hard to imagine that even though the data has been

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:57.280
<v Speaker 3>a little bit better maybe than expectations, it hasn't been

0:04:57.320 --> 0:04:59.719
<v Speaker 3>strong enough for you know, for the FED to completely

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 3>change their view. But there will be nuance. I think

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 3>that we'll be listening for so things like if if

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:07.559
<v Speaker 3>Jay Powell starts talking about the medium term and about

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:10.919
<v Speaker 3>some of the structural shifts in the in the global

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 3>economy with wages and with supply chains and the like,

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, we might be able to at least you know,

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 3>glean some information from there. Will it be massively market moving?

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 4>I doubt it.

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 3>But at the same time, liquidity has been pretty poor,

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:27.359
<v Speaker 3>which is one of the reasons you've seen such big moves.

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 3>So if he does happen to say something that's a

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 3>little bit unexpected, you could see a pop here and

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 3>there in the market, whether it's you know rates, you know,

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 3>ten year yields, five bases points lower, five bases points.

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:41.679
<v Speaker 1>Higher, real quick, Ira, Are you surprised how successful Messi's

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:42.719
<v Speaker 1>been in Miami so far?

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 6>Not really.

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:47.840
<v Speaker 3>You know, Major League soccer teams have have salary caps,

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:50.480
<v Speaker 3>and they tend to spend their money more on attacking

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:53.039
<v Speaker 3>talent than they do on defenders. So Messi is just,

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:55.279
<v Speaker 3>you know, tearing up a lot of the defenses in

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 3>Major League Soccer.

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>It's fun to watch. It'll taste coming to New York

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>right now. And John Fair was just saying, I was

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:02.799
<v Speaker 1>listening on surveillance. A ticket that usually goes for seventy

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 1>five or one hundred bucks in New York for the

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 1>New York Red Red Bulls, when Miami comes in a

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:06.840
<v Speaker 1>thousand bucks.

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 4>Dude.

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 2>He told me that the DC game tickets start at

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 2>twelve dollars. Yeah, but I mean once Messi and when

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 2>Messi comes, tickets start at four ninety six exactly. That's

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 2>a delta.

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>That's a delta. Ira Jersey, thanks so much for joining us.

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Irad Jersey chief US interest rate strategist and soccer strategist

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>as well soccer owner. He's a mogul in the world

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>of soccer.

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 7>You're listening to the team Can's are live program Bloomberg

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:35.920
<v Speaker 7>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:39.160
<v Speaker 7>the iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg Business App, or listen

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:41.480
<v Speaker 7>on demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm so glad.

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not like like I'm managing a cyclical business. I

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>put up a really good quarter. I saw a lot

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 1>of tractors, the farmers in good shape. Yet my stock's

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>down four percent because these darn analysts and investors are

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:58.720
<v Speaker 1>looking six, twelve, eighteen months down the road and saying, hey,

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>it can't get any better than it is right now.

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Somebody has to live this on a daily basis is

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Brook Southerland, and she covers all the industrial stuff, including

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:09.480
<v Speaker 1>dear for Bloomberg Are Opinion.

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 2>Back to news.

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where are you these things still in

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Opinion bo Yeah, Brook Joints is here in our

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Interactive Brokers Studio. So Brook, what did you take

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>of the deer earnings? How's the American farmer doing these days?

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 8>You know, I think they had been doing pretty well,

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 8>you know, on the back of rising crop prices, and

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 8>that really provided an opportunity to go out and replace

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 8>farm equipment because we had a very long period where

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 8>you know, tractors were getting up there in terms of

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 8>duration and people were holding off on purchases, and of

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 8>course we've seen the other end of that, but now,

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 8>you know, we're starting to see some pressure on crop prices,

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 8>just with some of the harvesting proatorns that we've seen.

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 8>But I think, you know, sort of the the crux

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 8>of the issues. If you look at deer's numbers, they're

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 8>very good, but it's not volumes that's really driving everything here.

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:53.559
<v Speaker 8>It's priced. And they have a ton of pricing power

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 8>because they are such a dominant provider of tractors, and

0:07:57.040 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 8>they also really have invested in the technology curve in

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 8>terms of making their machines more efficient, more productive for

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 8>those farmers, and that has really helped them get pricing power.

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 8>But I think you have to wonder at what point

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 8>have we reached sort of the peak of pushing through

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 8>these price increases, we start to lap tougher comparisons. Has

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 8>the farmer maybe had enough in terms of those price increases,

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 8>And I think that's why you're seeing some of the

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 8>pressure on the stairs today in the stock.

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's come down substantially, but they're still doing really well.

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 2>I look at comp chart comp on the Bloomberg. It

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 2>automatically defaults to a five year period, and they have

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 2>more than tripled over the past five years. You know,

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:37.199
<v Speaker 2>compared to an S and P that's up sixty six percent.

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 2>The Industrials index on the S and P is up

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 2>fifty two percent. So they're a huge outperformer, right, Who

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:48.319
<v Speaker 2>are their biggest competitors? Like, who else has the name, brand,

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:51.439
<v Speaker 2>recognition and quality of a John Deere?

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 8>I mean, not really anybody, And I think that's why

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 8>they have so much pricing power. I mean, you do

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 8>have competitors like CNH is one that people look at.

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 2>I know is another tractor maker that people like. Lamborghini

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 2>actually makes trackers tractors, not the car company that's owned

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 2>by Folkswagen. But of course, yeah, Lamborghini started out as

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:14.960
<v Speaker 2>a tractor maker. That's what Feruccio Lamborghini did.

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Before make a better clutch.

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's right. He got in a fight with Enzo

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 2>Ferrari about the clutch and he shifted businesses.

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 8>But CNH has also made some comments about you know,

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:27.080
<v Speaker 8>we might be reaching sort of the limits of pricing

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 8>increases with that farmer population. But and you know, to

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 8>your point where you've seen that kind of really aggressive

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 8>share climb, this is not the first time we wondered

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:36.840
<v Speaker 8>if this is as good as it gets for deer,

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:40.319
<v Speaker 8>because it has been a very good and somewhat prolonged

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:44.080
<v Speaker 8>ag production cycle here. But you know, at a certain

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 8>point you can't go out forever.

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 1>If I'm a farmer at in Iowa, how long do

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I own it my dear tractor before I replace it?

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 3>Usually?

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:52.560
<v Speaker 8>I think it depends, I mean again on sort of

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 8>what the market dynamics are and when it is a

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 8>good time to spend on new equipment. And then, like

0:09:57.480 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 8>I said, you know, they're also investing in better technology

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 8>that can really help on the productivity front, especially for

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:06.559
<v Speaker 8>farmers that are suffering with labor shortages, to help get

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 8>around some of that. And I think that all sort

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 8>of weighs on the decision making.

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 2>Process labor was an issue for Deer, and they solved

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:16.840
<v Speaker 2>that pretty quickly. I remember, is that an issue again

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 2>or have they dealt with it for the long term

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:22.439
<v Speaker 2>and others have to now deal with that same issue.

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:25.320
<v Speaker 8>Well, I mean, the thing with these union negotiations is

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 8>they kind of come back around.

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, That's why I'm wondering, because we're seeing it in

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:32.439
<v Speaker 2>automotive right the UAW right now is trying to negotiate

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 2>a huge contract with GM and Ford and you also

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 2>see you know, pilots and in airlines. The unions are

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 2>getting agitated again. So has Deer, though, is that sort

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 2>of one tailwind that they've already dealt with this?

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 8>I think that to your point about how well Deer

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 8>has been doing. I think that's one reason why the

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 8>unions feel so empowered is that that was a pretty

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 8>significant wage increase when they struck that deal. And then

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:00.319
<v Speaker 8>you just look at how successful Deer had has been

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:02.679
<v Speaker 8>and how much it has been able to increase prices

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 8>for its customers and ramp up profits that it could

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 8>was in a great position to shoulder that extra wage

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 8>costs for those employees. UPS is obviously talking about trying

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 8>to do the same thing down the road. They sounded

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:16.840
<v Speaker 8>very confident on their earnings call about being able to

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 8>offset those higher wage costs with productivity improvements, investing in automation,

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 8>things like that. And so I think that's what's really

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:26.320
<v Speaker 8>empowering the unions is they're saying, look, you're really raking

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 8>it in and we want our for sure of that.

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>If I'm a farmer in Iowa again, I'm going back

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 1>there and I want to invest in a big tractor.

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Does Deer give me financing or where do I How

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>does that work?

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 8>They do have a financing arm?

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Yes, okay, because that guy, I mean, like Ge for example,

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:42.840
<v Speaker 1>that got to be such a huge part of their business.

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>It's not like that for Deer.

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 8>Well, Ge is now out of that.

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 5>That's right.

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 2>It didn't work that well.

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 8>For they went maybe too far, too many different directions

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 8>at the same time.

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 2>But I do wonder though, I mean, is it is

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 2>it a bonus to have your own in house financing

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 2>arm when race ries like this, because you can find

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:04.679
<v Speaker 2>ways to maybe give customers a better deal than they're

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:06.080
<v Speaker 2>going to get from their local bank.

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 8>That was always the argument. I mean, that's why Ge

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:09.960
<v Speaker 8>got into that business in the first place. And you

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 8>know why some of these other companies have these financing arms.

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 8>But it'll certainly be interesting to see how that plays

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 8>out as we get further into this interest.

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Right, we've got you in studio, so we're going to

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 1>just play around here. Rip up the script this, Tom

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Kean would say, US Steel a I didn't even think

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 1>it was still in existence as a company until the

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 1>takeover stuff happened. Where are we with that story here?

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 8>It's it's heating up. It's the center of a binning ward.

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 8>It's one of the oldest American companies, used to be

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 8>one of the biggest, and now it increasingly looks like

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 8>it is going to be bought by somebody.

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 2>But they need so here's another place where unions have

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 2>real strength. Right, Is it the case that the union

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:53.080
<v Speaker 2>has to support the bid in order for US Steel

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 2>to be able to accept it.

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 8>What US Steel has said is that the union does

0:12:57.080 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 8>not have a veto over a takeover offer, but they

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 8>do have the ability to mount a counter offer, and

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 8>they have said this morning that they are going to

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 8>transfer that right to a counter offer to Cleveland Cliffs.

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 8>But I don't know that. You know, there's a lot

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 8>of aggressive rhetoric out there, and I don't know that

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 8>we should assume that US Steal necessarily doesn't want to

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 8>sell to Cleveland Cliffs. There's some sort of bias against

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 8>that sort of What they said is that they wanted

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 8>Cleveland Cliffs to agree to an NDA to do a

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 8>due diligence process, and Cleveland Cliffs wouldn't do that until

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 8>they agreed to the economic terms upfront, which is somewhat unusual.

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 8>And I think there's just a lot more of this

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 8>process to play out. And I also don't think we

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 8>know who all of the parties are yet. So when

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 8>US Steal announced its strategic review, they said they'd had

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 8>multiple offers for all and also parts of the company.

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:49.319
<v Speaker 8>And I think there might be more players to come

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 8>out of the woodwork here, and I think there's just

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 8>a long way to go with this takeover story.

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 7>All right.

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 2>I got a question on a different issue, but you've

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 2>been writing about it. So when I moved to Berlin

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 2>into the sixteen, I had just bought myself a Portie

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 2>nine to eleven carrerass here and I didn't want to

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 2>lose it, so I paid the four and a half

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 2>thousand dollars that I think it costs for me to

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 2>get you know, half half a trailer on a freighter

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 2>ship and shipped it over to Germany and it was great.

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 2>I got to drive it on the Autuban. It absolutely

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 2>loved it. It was the perfect car for Germany. But when

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 2>I moved back to New York at the end of

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty one and I went to call the same

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 2>shipper to ask how much it would be, they quoted

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 2>me more than twenty thousand dollars, approaching twenty five thousand dollars,

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 2>So the price had essentially gone up five x and

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 2>I had to sell my beloved Carrera. It was I'm

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 2>still a little bit heartbroken, although it helped me to

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 2>finance my current home. Are those prices coming back down

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 2>to earth? Have we come back to normal now in

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 2>terms of freight shipping, they have.

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 8>Come back down. I would say you maybe or surely

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 8>moved at the raw town. If you've moved in the

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 8>spring of twenty twenty three, you might have had a

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 8>better quoted on that. But yes, so it is that

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 8>we did see shipping prices really crashing back down to

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 8>earth as we sort of had that pivot away from

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 8>good spending back towards services. But now we're starting to

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 8>see signs of life again in the freight market. The DRWY,

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 8>the WCI freight indexes increased for six straight weeks. That's

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 8>the longest positive stretch since January twenty twenty two. And so,

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 8>and you know, we're also seeing maybe some progress in

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 8>the trucking market where we might be hitting a bottom

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 8>and starting to find our way, you know, toward a

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 8>point of stabilization, because it has been really rough for

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 8>that freight sector. I mean, I know there's a lot

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 8>of debate about whether the broader economy is in a session,

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 8>but the freight sector has been there and it's been

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 8>tough out there, and we're starting to see sort of

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 8>a light at the end of the tunnel.

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you go over to like by the Port

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 1>of Newark over there, like by Newark Airport, they got

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the container stack like twenty high.

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, go get one of that. And I only needed

0:15:57.480 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 2>half from my car because the containers I think are

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 2>forty feet long and I only needed twenty feet. But

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 2>I just couldn't justify paying twenty five grand, and I

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't have been able to afford my house if I

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 2>hadn't sold the nine eleven. That's probably a good thing

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 2>in a sense. I'm living in a Porsche in West Yes,

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 2>all right, Brooks.

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Other then she covers all the industrial stuff for Bloomberg Opinion.

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Joining us here in our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers Studio.

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 7>You're listening to the tape Cat's are live program Bloomberg

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 7>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 7>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and.

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 4>The Bloomberg Business App.

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 7>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 7>flagship New York station. Just say Alexa, play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's stop tech talk here. The tech stocks have been

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 1>particularly the top five to seven names have really been

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 1>leading this market this year. As people are in search

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 1>for growth and what are they doing. They're generating a

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 1>ton of cash, which raises the question, what are these

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 1>tech companies doing with their cash? Let's bring in Angelas.

0:16:56.320 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>You know he's a senior industry analyst at CFRA Research.

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Angela.

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Again, a lot of these tech companies, you know, it's

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:06.159
<v Speaker 1>putting up gobs and gobs and cash like Alphabet, you know,

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:09.239
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and eighteen billion dollar cash pile. What are

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>these companies doing with their cash? And what do you

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:14.400
<v Speaker 1>think they should be doing with their cash?

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so for the most part, most of these you know,

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:21.440
<v Speaker 9>megacap tech names are really leveraging the cash towards buybacks,

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 9>and it's what they've been doing for years at this

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:24.680
<v Speaker 9>point in time.

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 6>Clearly, Apple kind of you know the post.

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 9>A boy child in that area buying back, announcing a

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 9>ninety billion dollar buy back earlier this year on top

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 9>of the ninety billion they did last year.

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:38.400
<v Speaker 6>So that's really where most of the cash is going.

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 9>Alphabet did the same thing, announcing a seventy billion dollar

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:44.920
<v Speaker 9>buy back this year on top of the seventy billion

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 9>announced last year.

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 6>So that's where the cash is going.

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 9>A big reason for that is they really can't do

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 9>anything else with it in the sense that the M

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 9>and A market for a lot of these large cap

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 9>companies are essentially closed outside of the fact that we

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 9>are likely going to see an improved deal of that

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 9>that Microsoft Activision transaction out there.

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 6>So we expect them to continue to.

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:09.439
<v Speaker 9>Utilize most of the cash towards buybacks going forward, and

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:11.879
<v Speaker 9>we actually think that's the right move here and a

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:14.440
<v Speaker 9>big reason for that is it will support earnings grow.

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 9>We do expect free cash flow to continue to grow

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:20.160
<v Speaker 9>here over the next five to ten years incrementally, and

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:22.160
<v Speaker 9>that'll continue to support a higher share price.

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 4>Innar view.

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, So here's my pet peeve for the big

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 1>tech names. I think they should be like Apple, for example,

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 1>they should have a two and a half to three

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent dividend yield and they don't.

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 5>Why is that?

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 9>I think there's a perception out there where if you

0:18:41.960 --> 0:18:44.920
<v Speaker 9>make a move like that, you know, it almost tells

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 9>you that the maybe the growth trajectory of the company

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:50.679
<v Speaker 9>isn't going to be as favorable as maybe they believe

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 9>that it should be. And you know, I think they

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:56.679
<v Speaker 9>do want to have a cash out there accessible in

0:18:56.800 --> 0:18:59.640
<v Speaker 9>case they were able to go out there and make

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:02.159
<v Speaker 9>a a big splash out there in the market.

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:04.160
<v Speaker 6>Gets somewhat a creative on the m and a side

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 6>of things.

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:07.920
<v Speaker 9>You know, clearly the regulatory environment does change over time,

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 9>and I think they want to just have that cash

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 9>available out there. And when you kind of look at

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 9>what specifically Apple, right since twenty twelve, they've essentially bought

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 9>back or reduced their sharecount by more than forty percent.

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 9>That's absolutely remarkable because many of these companies out there

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 9>that do have buybacks that are essentially washing out, you know,

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:31.880
<v Speaker 9>they are essentially kind of just offsetting, you know, share

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 9>dilution with those buybacks, Apple is actually reducing their shareccount

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 9>and they will will continue.

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:39.159
<v Speaker 6>To do so over the next decade.

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 9>So we think the growth rejectory for Apple continues to

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 9>be very attractive.

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:45.360
<v Speaker 6>And you know, when you look at a company like.

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:48.880
<v Speaker 9>Apple specifically, we think that is a stock that continues

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:50.959
<v Speaker 9>to be under owned in many respects because there are

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 9>a lot of fund managers out there that can't own

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 9>seven percent of a stock like Apple. So it's really

0:19:57.840 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 9>interesting that you continue to kind of reduce the share

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:03.160
<v Speaker 9>count while also having kind of this under owned asset

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:03.640
<v Speaker 9>out there.

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 6>So we think it's we continue to think it's the

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 6>right move, and we think.

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 9>Apple continues to view their stock is an attractive opportunity

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 9>from evaluation perspective.

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I I hear this angelo from other analysts

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:20.920
<v Speaker 2>as well, that you know, they don't want to send

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 2>the wrong sign to the markets that they're not a

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 2>growth company, but Apple should set the tone. You know,

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:29.120
<v Speaker 2>they they don't the markets have to send a sign

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:32.160
<v Speaker 2>to Apple, not the other way around. They they they

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 2>always have one hundred or two hundred billion dollars in

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 2>cash and cash equivalents. I wonder what else they're gonna

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:43.440
<v Speaker 2>do with the money. I mean, why don't they make

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:45.639
<v Speaker 2>a big acquisition? I look at I look at the

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 2>money they have, right, I guess last fiscal year was

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and sixty nine billion dollars, And then I

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:55.400
<v Speaker 2>look at a Disney market cap one hundred and fifty seven.

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Why don't they just use it? No?

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 6>I think that's a fair point. I think a big

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:01.199
<v Speaker 6>reason they don't do it.

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:03.360
<v Speaker 9>I mean, maybe not as much as an Apple's case,

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:05.920
<v Speaker 9>but in others I think there you know, I think

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 9>there would be too much kind of backlash from a

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 9>regulatory perspective to allow a deal like that to take place,

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:14.640
<v Speaker 9>to be honest with you, but you know, I think

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:17.120
<v Speaker 9>Apple does want to kind of have that cash available

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:19.159
<v Speaker 9>just in case they want to make a move like that.

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 9>But at the end of the day, listen, it's not

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 9>in their DNA, right. They've never made an acquisition or

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:24.639
<v Speaker 9>for three billion dollars.

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:25.160
<v Speaker 6>We know that.

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 9>And when you kind of look ahead, and we look

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 9>at their pipeline. We continue to view this as a

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 9>company that could no longer term continue to grow the

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 9>EPs at a ten percent plus clip. And those buybacks

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 9>in terms of you know, essentially buying back three percent

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:43.399
<v Speaker 9>of their shares to continue to help that EPs grow trajectory.

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 9>We'll support that ten percent plus EPs clip. So again,

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 9>we think it's the right move that they that cash.

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 9>That net cash balance has been dwindling over the last

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:56.639
<v Speaker 9>couple of years to maybe to your point where that

0:21:56.720 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 9>they don't they acknowledged that they don't need as much

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:02.399
<v Speaker 9>cash out there, But in the same respect, I mean, listen,

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:04.360
<v Speaker 9>I mean, it's it's a great problem to have, right

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:06.879
<v Speaker 9>if you're Apple, if you're Alphabet, or anybody any of

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 9>these other megacap tech firms out there.

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, Angela, Aside from from Apple, what else do

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 1>you like in your coverage area?

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean, listen, We do continue to like a

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:19.959
<v Speaker 9>lot of the chip names out there, you know, specifically

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 9>kind of the ongoing AI.

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 6>Shift out there towards general of AI. We think you're

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 6>still in the early innings there.

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 9>And Video of course, is a name that has you know,

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 9>essentially tripled this year and essentially nearly quadrupled off its lows.

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 9>But that being said, we do think that, you know,

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 9>over the next kind of three to four years, you're

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 9>going to see this shift, this titanic shift in the

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:45.200
<v Speaker 9>form of how computing and networking chips out there are

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 9>going to kind of be valued and the amount of

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 9>demand you're going to see kind of from this general

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 9>AI shift. And that being said, we continue to like

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:57.639
<v Speaker 9>in Vidia as well as Broadcom, which has been two

0:22:57.680 --> 0:22:59.400
<v Speaker 9>of the big winners out there. On top of that,

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:02.479
<v Speaker 9>mar as well as A and D we think are

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 9>going to be big winners in the coming years. On

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 9>top of kind of you know, some of our favorite

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 9>names on the megacat tech names.

0:23:08.920 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you what Angelo in Nvidia. I guess they

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>report after the close on Wednesday. Man, they better put

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:17.119
<v Speaker 1>up a big print because given what their stock has

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:20.360
<v Speaker 1>done on the back of that true big raise they

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 1>had last quarter, exciting, what's the risk in that name?

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you think? I mean, man, I can't think of

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>a company's got more expectations built into their stock short

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:28.639
<v Speaker 1>term than in Video.

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:32.440
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, And to be honest with you, it's going to

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 9>be tough for them to kind of expede exceed some

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 9>of those expectations out there. I mean, at this point

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:38.960
<v Speaker 9>in time, you kind of look at what they did

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 9>in terms of their last quarterly results essentially kind of

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 9>double the expectation on the data center side of things,

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:48.679
<v Speaker 9>and we do think that, you know, they've got a

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 9>good problem out there in the sense that their chips

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 9>are supply constrained out there. When you kind of look

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 9>at the valuation, at least relative to historical levels, it's

0:23:57.040 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 9>actually not that demanding. So we think there's very little

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 9>downside potential at least in terms of where the consensus

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:05.920
<v Speaker 9>estimates are, and there is upside potential. But that said,

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:09.160
<v Speaker 9>you know, the valuation is always kind of the question

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 9>mark with Nvidia. Here, we think where investors continue to

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 9>underestimate the Nvidia story is really kind of the fact

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:18.960
<v Speaker 9>that this is more of a total solutions company rather.

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:21.399
<v Speaker 6>Than a steamy conductor company.

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 9>So you know, the capabilities and the upside potential on

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:27.119
<v Speaker 9>the software side of the side of things, if they

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 9>taught that up on this earning school, that's where the

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 9>upside potential we think is for the stop.

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:34.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, Angela, thanks so much for joining us. Really

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 1>appreciate getting a couple of minutes of your time. Angelo

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>is you know, he's a senior industry analyst, says c

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 1>f r A Research.

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 7>You're listening to the team ken'shur Live program Bloomberg Markets

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:48.879
<v Speaker 7>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:52.119
<v Speaker 7>iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business app, or listen on

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:54.160
<v Speaker 7>demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:24:56.040 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoint off five point six percent is to just reporting

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty six tho ninety people heading for the exits.

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:01.919
<v Speaker 8>Here.

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to check in with the King of South Beach,

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Mike mcloan, senior macro strategist with Bloomberg Intelligence. Mike, what's

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 1>happening out there with the bitcoin?

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:14.400
<v Speaker 10>You always bring me on and I start laughing from

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 10>those Southeast connotations. So I appreciate that.

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 6>I appreciate that Paul.

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:21.239
<v Speaker 10>Bitcoin is I think resuming a bear mark, and I

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 10>look at it. The headline I put out today is

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 10>appeared to me it appairs similar to the US stock

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 10>market in nineteen thirty when it rolled over and then

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 10>it kept going over down after it bounced. And the

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 10>key thing about it is, let's just look at bitcoin

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 10>right before this COVID right before the biggest pomp and

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:42.120
<v Speaker 10>liquidity in history. It was around ten thousand and still

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 10>right now it's around twenty six. So I think there's

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 10>risk it can head that way. It's the leading indicator.

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 10>It's one of the most world speculative digital assets, most significant.

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 10>But I think that leading indicator is what to me

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:57.199
<v Speaker 10>is important for the rest of the market, like the

0:25:57.240 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 10>stock market. The key to me win is just look

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 10>at that US government too. You know you can purchase

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:06.679
<v Speaker 10>a too. You note around five percent lock up almost

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:09.200
<v Speaker 10>ten percent in two years, first time you've been able

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 10>to do that since about two thousand and seven. I

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:14.119
<v Speaker 10>look at it. Every rational person in the planet who's

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 10>got money and is invested is looking at that and saying,

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 10>thank you, I'll do that. And I think that's what's

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:22.160
<v Speaker 10>happening with all risk assets, and it's just getting started.

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Is there a concern that you know, Elon Musk has

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 2>sold a ton of bitcoin? Didn't I read that somewhere?

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:32.200
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I thought he sold already. I heard SpaceX today.

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:34.160
<v Speaker 10>But this is a problem I think with bitcoin. You're

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:37.160
<v Speaker 10>kind I think in this case, some of these leverage

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 10>longs that brought right when the black Rock announced that

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:42.680
<v Speaker 10>they were going to apply for an ETF, it hasn't

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 10>been approved. The market rally from about twenty five thousand

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 10>to just above thirty. You get a lot of leverage

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:50.640
<v Speaker 10>longs in theirs. I think we're stopping those people out,

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:53.679
<v Speaker 10>and it's they're getting long for the wrong reason. With

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:56.119
<v Speaker 10>the hopium that you're going to get an ETF. To me,

0:26:56.160 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 10>it's a fund of metals.

0:26:57.160 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:26:57.320 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 10>Well it's a word I learned from bitcoin people and

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:02.440
<v Speaker 10>crypto people, that opium. And so now it's the question

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 10>of what stops this downward trajectory. So one thing I

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 10>pointed out and published to say, if you just look

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 10>at one hundred week move an average at Bitcoin, it's

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 10>rolled over and it's trending downward for the highest velocity ever.

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:14.919
<v Speaker 10>Now Bitcoin's only been around about fourteen years. And then

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 10>I think to myself, what stops just normal reversion of

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 10>the best performing asset ever. And number one thing is

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 10>the FED is still tightening. The FED is still telling

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:24.640
<v Speaker 10>you is still taking liquid e the way, and here's

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:27.720
<v Speaker 10>a highly speculative asset that went up a lot. I

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 10>still think that's the risk it continues to revert.

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Mike this sounds for bitcoin. From what I'm hearing from you,

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:36.119
<v Speaker 1>that more of a technical kind of thing. Do I

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 1>look at GRET charts? Do I see where a technical

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 1>bottom is here? Do I start doing that kind of thing?

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:43.199
<v Speaker 10>I view it as the opposite. I was just on

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 10>a call and they're toat pointing all the technicals. People

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 10>trade it too much. I view it as number one

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 10>headline is the FED is still tightening. And then you

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:52.879
<v Speaker 10>try to put it into things that we see as humans.

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 10>We can't really you can see the tightening, can feel,

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 10>but you can watch the price. And I just point

0:27:57.320 --> 0:28:00.679
<v Speaker 10>out trends down, FEDS tightening. Use it discipline of a

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 10>good investor, respect the trend. So as far as I

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 10>think people are looking at twenty five thousand is the

0:28:06.520 --> 0:28:08.479
<v Speaker 10>first level, and then of course look at twenty thousand.

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:10.400
<v Speaker 10>I mentioned a level I think it could go back

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:13.360
<v Speaker 10>to in a normal recession environment, which is the view

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:15.760
<v Speaker 10>of Anna Wong our cheap economs. We should be heading

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:18.520
<v Speaker 10>towards the recession, which is the indication from the inverted

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 10>Yeeld curve, And why not go back to ten thousand,

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:23.920
<v Speaker 10>That's where it was before the FED. Well, that's where

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 10>the it was hovering around ten thousand right before this

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 10>massive pump on liquidity with the COVID. Now that liquidity

0:28:30.359 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 10>is going way to break neck pace. Bottom line is

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:36.399
<v Speaker 10>all the lessons of history in assets that pump on liquidity,

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 10>and when that liquidity goes away, you know that lessons

0:28:38.760 --> 0:28:41.880
<v Speaker 10>are that assets usually reverted. It's a question of how far.

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 2>Where do you expect to see bitcoin in the coming years.

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, is it possible that we drop back down

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 2>to sixteen thousand or even test those limits again?

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 10>So I think it has a bottom around fifteen and

0:28:57.160 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 10>most people look at that as oh, I'm going to

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 10>be buying here and getting near there, and that is

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 10>the risk I see as the bottom line for me,

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 10>Matt is this is part of the macro. It's just

0:29:05.840 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 10>a good indication that I think we're heading into more

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 10>significant bear market. We look at the stock market, it

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 10>typically doesn't bottom until about two years after the FED

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 10>starts easy. We haven't done that. They're still tightening, and

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 10>to me, this is part of just this is the

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:19.320
<v Speaker 10>leading indicator. So I see, I don't know how long

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:21.600
<v Speaker 10>it takes, but like I said, I compared it to

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 10>the stock market in nineteen thirty and right now it's

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 10>a bear market. It's heading lower and the FED still tightening.

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 10>So I don't even see light at the end of

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 10>the tunnel for risk assets the bottom and bitcoin is

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 10>just the best leading indicator.

0:29:32.240 --> 0:29:32.560
<v Speaker 4>All right.

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 1>So aside from bitcoin, what's the you know, if I

0:29:35.760 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 1>go to a BBI commodity, what are some of the

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 1>top two or three things you guys are working on.

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 10>Well, I'm still watching crude oil and now crudel is

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 10>hovering about unchanged in the year. Obviously, I'm still bears

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 10>crudel and a normal trajectory after the pump last year,

0:29:49.960 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 10>as you typically head towards two cheap levels. Two cheap

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:55.880
<v Speaker 10>levels in crudel, not at eighty, it's around forty or fifty.

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 10>And then you look at the macro of it. China

0:29:58.280 --> 0:30:03.240
<v Speaker 10>is clearly in decline. Stops this downward revision and economic

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 10>outlook for China, I don't see it now. We should

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 10>expect stimulus from there, but they just upset their biggest

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 10>export customers, Europe and the US with this war. And

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 10>it's not really China anymore. It's one leader, President Zy.

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 10>So I think you're seeing a situation in China It's

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 10>similar to peak Soviet Union and peak Japan in the

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 10>late eighties early nineties. So there's a demand side and

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 10>great and that's still going that way. When you look

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 10>at copper, copper is pointing that way. Copper is tilting lower.

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 10>It's right around three dollars and seventy cents a pound.

0:30:33.000 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 10>Its average price for the last year twenty years is

0:30:35.880 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 10>three dollars a pound. That shows deflationary forces over overall.

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 10>And I don't see what stops it from going that level.

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 10>You have to see a major pickup in China, you

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 10>have to see major weakness in US dollar and fed

0:30:46.360 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 10>easy Typically they're they're all going the wrong way at

0:30:49.120 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 10>the moment. So I look at this is the early

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:52.120
<v Speaker 10>days of a bear market, and then you have to

0:30:52.120 --> 0:30:55.320
<v Speaker 10>ask yourself, is just what happens to all these asks?

0:30:55.360 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 10>If the US dour market rolls over for normal recession

0:30:59.400 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 10>and typic, it doesn't bottom until we're well into an

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:04.000
<v Speaker 10>easing cycle. We're still tidying.

0:31:04.160 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 1>So when you're out of the clubbing South Beach, you

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 1>don't talk commodities. Do you have, Mike, Please tell me

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:10.719
<v Speaker 1>you got a better game than that.

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 10>Well, I try to avoid the subject but I have

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 10>to admit I've been in warning to most people, and

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 10>people I just point out studying the history. I've been

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:20.880
<v Speaker 10>doing a lot of that late lately. Is I think

0:31:20.920 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 10>we're heading towards the biggest reset of our lifetime. Now

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:25.959
<v Speaker 10>you just look at property values in Florida. There is

0:31:26.000 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 10>no history of major fluctuations and property values in Florida.

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 10>It looks like there's just starting to roll over. What

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 10>I'm hearing and this thing. The bottom line is we're

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 10>still taking away the punch bowl, and that is what

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 10>I'm really worried about. It's a classic example of the

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:41.719
<v Speaker 10>Look at PPI. The producer price in the next went

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 10>from eighteen to minus three. That's finished goods. That's the

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:48.840
<v Speaker 10>biggest correction since nineteen forty eight, so pretty significant deflationary forces.

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 10>And then you look at the Fed funds at five

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 10>and a quarter, it's well above and CPI well above PEPI.

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:59.479
<v Speaker 10>It's clearly contractory and we're just early days. So I

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 10>look at this this is this is just a normal cycle.

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 10>And the normal cycle is we're very elevating in risk assets.

0:32:06.840 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 10>And bitcoin is the good leading indicator, which crude oil

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 10>around forty, copper lower and you know, I just be

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:16.960
<v Speaker 10>lucky lucky. I mean, here's the lose lose. Every time

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 10>the stock market's gone up, it's increased rate height expectations.

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 10>I don't think the Fed's going to ease until the

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:24.440
<v Speaker 10>stock market tells him to by going down.

0:32:24.600 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, Yeah, good stuff.

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:28.080
<v Speaker 2>And I want to get you back on a little

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 2>bit later, Mike, if we can to talk about what's

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 2>going on with the eggs, because I think it's bigger

0:32:32.760 --> 0:32:35.720
<v Speaker 2>than people realize, certainly bigger than we give it time for.

0:32:35.880 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 2>And any he knows that stuff, I know. Yeah, all right,

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 2>that's why he's the man for that.

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:43.520
<v Speaker 7>You're listening to the tape. Catch a live program Bloomberg

0:32:43.600 --> 0:32:47.200
<v Speaker 7>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:32:47.240 --> 0:32:50.480
<v Speaker 7>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 7>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:32:53.360 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 7>flagship New York station. Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, Mat, when we talk about the economy, oftentimes

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 1>folks to say, you know, I'm thinking about a hard landing.

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking about a soft landing. And then we've recently

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 1>heard this phrase, no landing and I think we need

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 1>to talk to a licensed pilot, because I don't think

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 1>that's even possible. Fortunate for us, our next guest is

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 1>a licensed pilot, Jamie Patten. She's co head of Global

0:33:19.000 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Rates at TCW. So Jamie got a lot of smart

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 1>people there at TCW out in Los Angeles. What kind

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:27.959
<v Speaker 1>of economic landing are you guys calling for?

0:33:29.520 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 11>Well, thank you for bringing up the no landing scenario analogy,

0:33:32.520 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 11>which is my least favorite analogy of all, mostly because

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 11>it defies the laws of physics.

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 12>What goes up must come down.

0:33:40.280 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 11>But also just being a pilot, airplanes run on gas,

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 11>and even if everything goes perfectly and you really don't

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:48.880
<v Speaker 11>want to land, you're going to run out of gas.

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:50.040
<v Speaker 12>So I hate that analogy.

0:33:50.480 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 11>But I do love flying analogies, and I think that

0:33:52.920 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 11>they're perfect for monetary policy hiking cycles, especially this one.

0:33:58.720 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 12>At TCW, we are expecting a hard landing.

0:34:03.720 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 11>Specifically, the analogy that I like the most is a

0:34:06.920 --> 0:34:10.880
<v Speaker 11>soft field landing, which, to give you a little bit

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:12.880
<v Speaker 11>of background, not to talk about flying too much, but

0:34:13.040 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 11>do it. Soft field landings are notoriously dangerous. Pilots never

0:34:19.760 --> 0:34:23.160
<v Speaker 11>totally know what hazards lurk under the soft under the

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:25.520
<v Speaker 11>surface of a soft field landing. So a soft field

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:28.239
<v Speaker 11>landing is off airport. It could be grass, gravel, sand,

0:34:28.320 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 11>snow exactly so, there could be wildlife wandering around. There's

0:34:34.120 --> 0:34:37.160
<v Speaker 11>barbed wire fences difficult to see from the air. A

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 11>regional banking crisis might be brewing under the surface of

0:34:40.080 --> 0:34:43.800
<v Speaker 11>a robust economy, and as we're coming in for this landing,

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:46.480
<v Speaker 11>we are not expecting it to be soft for a

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:48.920
<v Speaker 11>lot of reasons that I can get into, but we

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:53.040
<v Speaker 11>also see so many hazards and just the chances that

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:56.320
<v Speaker 11>the economy has a soft landing with a hiking cycle

0:34:56.320 --> 0:34:58.759
<v Speaker 11>that's been the most aggressive and forty years, we just

0:34:58.800 --> 0:34:59.920
<v Speaker 11>find to be very unlikely.

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, I heard a great analogy this morning on

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:07.759
<v Speaker 2>surveillance from Laura Rain. She said that the economy is

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:11.239
<v Speaker 2>like an eighteen wheeler and before the Great Financial Crisis,

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:13.440
<v Speaker 2>when a lot of people still had fixed rate mortgages

0:35:13.480 --> 0:35:17.360
<v Speaker 2>or floating rate mortgages, sorry, floating rate mortgages, the FED

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:20.320
<v Speaker 2>could pull on the brake lever and that would slow

0:35:20.360 --> 0:35:22.880
<v Speaker 2>down like ten wheels, so it could bring, you know,

0:35:22.920 --> 0:35:25.400
<v Speaker 2>the economy to a stop relatively quickly. But now that

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:29.919
<v Speaker 2>everyone has shifted to fixed rate mortgages, the brake lever

0:35:30.040 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 2>only affects like three or four wheels, and it's much

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:34.800
<v Speaker 2>harder to slow this truck down. Does that make more sense?

0:35:36.800 --> 0:35:37.560
<v Speaker 12>Absolutely so.

0:35:37.640 --> 0:35:39.440
<v Speaker 11>The way that we talk about this is the interesst

0:35:39.520 --> 0:35:43.200
<v Speaker 11>rate sensitivity of the US economy, and specifically, we've heard

0:35:43.239 --> 0:35:45.319
<v Speaker 11>a lot of FED speakers talk about this recently in

0:35:45.360 --> 0:35:48.839
<v Speaker 11>the form of monetary policy lags. So we know they're long,

0:35:48.880 --> 0:35:50.880
<v Speaker 11>we know they're variable, we know it takes time for

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:53.920
<v Speaker 11>an adjustment and monetary policy such as the FED hiking

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:57.480
<v Speaker 11>rates to feed its way through the macro economy, but

0:35:57.560 --> 0:36:00.160
<v Speaker 11>we don't know how long. And recently these Feds SPA,

0:36:00.640 --> 0:36:03.440
<v Speaker 11>especially Waller last month, has said the lag should be

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:06.239
<v Speaker 11>shorter now because we have forward guidance that feeds into

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:09.640
<v Speaker 11>rates markets instantly, and the size of the shock will

0:36:09.640 --> 0:36:11.720
<v Speaker 11>make the lags shorter.

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 12>We very much disagree with this.

0:36:14.160 --> 0:36:16.600
<v Speaker 11>We think that lags are likely to be longer today,

0:36:16.960 --> 0:36:19.919
<v Speaker 11>not just The mortgage argument is a really good one.

0:36:19.920 --> 0:36:23.279
<v Speaker 11>It's an eight trillion dollar agency MBS market and less

0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:26.560
<v Speaker 11>than one percent now is adjustable rate. Prior to the

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 11>global financial crisis, it was twelve to twenty times that.

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:33.640
<v Speaker 11>There are also other reasons that make our economy today

0:36:33.800 --> 0:36:36.879
<v Speaker 11>less rates sensitive. One is the Fed's eight trillion dollar

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:39.360
<v Speaker 11>ballance sheet cushioning the blow of financial markets. It was

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:42.520
<v Speaker 11>one trillion prior to the global financial crisis, and also

0:36:42.640 --> 0:36:46.080
<v Speaker 11>some psychological impacts where the economy really has changed in

0:36:46.120 --> 0:36:48.960
<v Speaker 11>some ways post COVID. One thing that we talk about

0:36:48.960 --> 0:36:53.120
<v Speaker 11>here is labor hoarding. If a company had really struggled

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:56.720
<v Speaker 11>to get labor during COVID prior to COVID, they're also

0:36:56.840 --> 0:37:00.279
<v Speaker 11>really hesitant to lay off that labor or reduce that

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:03.279
<v Speaker 11>labor today. And it's harder to see that in economic data,

0:37:03.320 --> 0:37:05.239
<v Speaker 11>but one thing you could look at is something like

0:37:05.640 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 11>overtime hours, specifically in manufacturing. It's the lowest we've ever

0:37:09.680 --> 0:37:12.959
<v Speaker 11>seen outside of recessionary times. So what does that tell us?

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:15.800
<v Speaker 11>We don't really need this labor, but we're going to

0:37:15.960 --> 0:37:18.880
<v Speaker 11>keep it around, so maybe we just have them working

0:37:19.000 --> 0:37:19.680
<v Speaker 11>less and less.

0:37:20.400 --> 0:37:22.160
<v Speaker 12>And then you.

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:25.279
<v Speaker 11>Might ask, well, why does that all matter? Not just

0:37:25.440 --> 0:37:28.720
<v Speaker 11>because we need to know when these interest rate hikes

0:37:28.760 --> 0:37:30.880
<v Speaker 11>are going to impact the economy, but if the FED

0:37:30.960 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 11>thinks that the interest rate impacts are going to impact

0:37:34.040 --> 0:37:38.279
<v Speaker 11>the economy sooner, and we think that's not true. That

0:37:38.440 --> 0:37:41.760
<v Speaker 11>means the FED is very likely to keep rates too

0:37:41.920 --> 0:37:47.839
<v Speaker 11>high for too long, over tighten, and that would raise

0:37:47.880 --> 0:37:50.840
<v Speaker 11>the risks of a larger than expected decline in growth

0:37:50.920 --> 0:37:54.759
<v Speaker 11>and eventually inflation. It supports our long duration position. I

0:37:54.800 --> 0:37:58.880
<v Speaker 11>also think that's why this no landing scenario gets spread around,

0:37:58.960 --> 0:38:01.640
<v Speaker 11>where people are just expecting the lag to be short.

0:38:01.680 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 11>It's actually long. They think everything is great, but we

0:38:04.719 --> 0:38:08.600
<v Speaker 11>see it coming crashing down pretty hard, just in more

0:38:08.719 --> 0:38:11.640
<v Speaker 11>like a year instead of three months.

0:38:12.440 --> 0:38:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Man, you guys are brutal out there in la I mean,

0:38:14.520 --> 0:38:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I know you got writer strikes and actors strikes, but.

0:38:17.280 --> 0:38:20.399
<v Speaker 2>Man, that's a dour outlook, not just brutal, a big deal,

0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:23.880
<v Speaker 2>a massive attraction. If you're doing a tour around the country,

0:38:24.239 --> 0:38:25.200
<v Speaker 2>do you stop at TCW.

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:25.680
<v Speaker 13>That's me.

0:38:25.880 --> 0:38:28.040
<v Speaker 1>You build around TCW and Capitol Group and everything else

0:38:28.080 --> 0:38:28.760
<v Speaker 1>falls into place.

0:38:28.920 --> 0:38:29.239
<v Speaker 4>All right.

0:38:29.239 --> 0:38:31.839
<v Speaker 1>So are we gonna get any rate cuts next year?

0:38:31.960 --> 0:38:32.280
<v Speaker 6>Jamie?

0:38:33.920 --> 0:38:36.000
<v Speaker 12>We do think the Fed will cut rates next year.

0:38:36.320 --> 0:38:38.839
<v Speaker 11>The market has the Fed cutting rates about halfway through

0:38:38.840 --> 0:38:42.360
<v Speaker 11>the year. The Fed itself has has the Fed cutting

0:38:42.400 --> 0:38:43.800
<v Speaker 11>rates about one hundred basis points.

0:38:43.840 --> 0:38:45.360
<v Speaker 12>Next year, we agree.

0:38:45.920 --> 0:38:49.000
<v Speaker 11>We think that the FED will wait to cut rates

0:38:49.080 --> 0:38:52.359
<v Speaker 11>until they are very confident that inflation is heading back

0:38:52.400 --> 0:38:55.120
<v Speaker 11>down towards their two percent target. And even though they're

0:38:55.160 --> 0:38:57.759
<v Speaker 11>probably really happy with the progress they've seen in the

0:38:57.840 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 11>June and July inflation prints, they still have a way

0:39:00.200 --> 0:39:04.440
<v Speaker 11>to go. The last two prints for consumer prices CPI

0:39:04.680 --> 0:39:07.320
<v Speaker 11>was three percent three point two percent. That's one third

0:39:07.800 --> 0:39:11.120
<v Speaker 11>of what inflation was last summer and one half of

0:39:11.160 --> 0:39:12.799
<v Speaker 11>what it was even at the beginning of the year,

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:15.040
<v Speaker 11>but it still has.

0:39:14.920 --> 0:39:15.560
<v Speaker 12>A ways to go.

0:39:15.680 --> 0:39:18.359
<v Speaker 11>The fed's own forecast of core PC is still three

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:20.279
<v Speaker 11>point nine percent at the end of the year, so

0:39:20.320 --> 0:39:23.440
<v Speaker 11>that's really far above their two percent targets.

0:39:23.480 --> 0:39:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Still, all right, Jamie Patten, that was excellent stuff. We're

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:27.920
<v Speaker 1>going to have you back whether you like it or not.

0:39:28.040 --> 0:39:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Jamie Patten, co head of Global Rates at TCW. Not

0:39:32.719 --> 0:39:35.080
<v Speaker 1>a soft landing kind of person. Definitely not a no

0:39:35.320 --> 0:39:38.320
<v Speaker 1>landing kind of person, kind of suggesting there's a harder

0:39:38.400 --> 0:39:39.880
<v Speaker 1>landing on the horizon.

0:39:39.920 --> 0:39:43.360
<v Speaker 7>F you're listening to the tape Cancer Live program Bloomberg

0:39:43.440 --> 0:39:47.040
<v Speaker 7>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:39:47.080 --> 0:39:49.239
<v Speaker 7>tune in app Bloomberg Dot Com and the.

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:50.319
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Business app.

0:39:50.360 --> 0:39:53.160
<v Speaker 7>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:59.200
<v Speaker 7>flagship New York station. Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:00.440
<v Speaker 2>Gaming.

0:40:00.719 --> 0:40:02.520
<v Speaker 1>That's just the way of saying the casino business, which

0:40:02.560 --> 0:40:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I love. Charles Gillespie, CEO of Gambling dot Com Joints

0:40:06.239 --> 0:40:09.280
<v Speaker 1>is Charles, thanks so much for joining us here Gambling

0:40:09.320 --> 0:40:11.160
<v Speaker 1>dot Com. Tell us about this company. What do you

0:40:11.160 --> 0:40:11.640
<v Speaker 1>guys up to?

0:40:11.880 --> 0:40:14.640
<v Speaker 14>Thanks guys, great to be here. So, Gambling dot Com

0:40:14.680 --> 0:40:21.200
<v Speaker 14>group publishes essentially online comparison shopping websites for the global

0:40:21.320 --> 0:40:24.960
<v Speaker 14>online gambling industry. So you know, if you're going to

0:40:25.080 --> 0:40:28.399
<v Speaker 14>go to Paris, for example, and you need to book

0:40:28.400 --> 0:40:31.399
<v Speaker 14>a hotel, you're probably going to go to hotels dot

0:40:31.440 --> 0:40:33.880
<v Speaker 14>com or Expedia or something like that, get all the

0:40:33.920 --> 0:40:36.760
<v Speaker 14>information there at one place, and then book your hotel.

0:40:37.520 --> 0:40:39.880
<v Speaker 14>We essentially do the same thing, but for online gambling.

0:40:39.920 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 14>So if you want to bet on sports and you're

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:44.799
<v Speaker 14>in New York or New Jersey or one of the

0:40:44.800 --> 0:40:47.120
<v Speaker 14>other twenty five states where you can bet on sports

0:40:47.200 --> 0:40:50.200
<v Speaker 14>legally in the United States, you come to gambling dot

0:40:50.200 --> 0:40:51.280
<v Speaker 14>Com or one of our.

0:40:51.239 --> 0:40:52.600
<v Speaker 13>Fifty other websites.

0:40:52.640 --> 0:40:56.320
<v Speaker 14>We also have Bookies dot com, casinos dot com. We

0:40:56.400 --> 0:40:59.200
<v Speaker 14>also on rotewire dot com, and we'll give you all

0:40:59.200 --> 0:41:02.480
<v Speaker 14>that information help you find a you know, the best

0:41:02.560 --> 0:41:06.480
<v Speaker 14>sports book or online casino for whatever your needs are.

0:41:06.360 --> 0:41:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Are you comparing the odds?

0:41:07.560 --> 0:41:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Who's going to offer me the best odds? Or what

0:41:09.239 --> 0:41:10.440
<v Speaker 1>do you what are you actually measuring?

0:41:12.000 --> 0:41:12.440
<v Speaker 4>We do that.

0:41:12.719 --> 0:41:16.319
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, so bookies dot Com has got odds comparison then

0:41:16.760 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 14>and tons of data about sports, but a lot of users,

0:41:19.280 --> 0:41:22.200
<v Speaker 14>you know, they don't even need that level of information.

0:41:22.320 --> 0:41:25.120
<v Speaker 14>They just want to know, Okay, in I don't know Pennsylvania,

0:41:25.520 --> 0:41:29.400
<v Speaker 14>what sports books are even available, which ones are legal?

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:32.680
<v Speaker 14>And uh you know of the ones that are legal, well,

0:41:32.719 --> 0:41:36.480
<v Speaker 14>which ones have the best sign up offers, which ones

0:41:36.520 --> 0:41:39.040
<v Speaker 14>have the best customer service, which ones will pay me

0:41:39.200 --> 0:41:40.359
<v Speaker 14>quickly if I win?

0:41:40.960 --> 0:41:41.160
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:41:41.200 --> 0:41:44.000
<v Speaker 14>So in many cases, it's just kind of, frankly, more

0:41:44.160 --> 0:41:48.280
<v Speaker 14>more basic things that move the needle for for individual users.

0:41:47.920 --> 0:41:48.840
<v Speaker 13>That we supply.

0:41:48.920 --> 0:41:51.840
<v Speaker 14>But yeah, for the sophisticated users, we've got odds comparison

0:41:51.960 --> 0:41:53.520
<v Speaker 14>and all kinds of great stuff.

0:41:53.719 --> 0:41:59.319
<v Speaker 2>Now, Charles, this is it's kind of a controversial business.

0:41:59.719 --> 0:42:04.239
<v Speaker 2>If you're an adult, you should probably be able to

0:42:04.239 --> 0:42:06.640
<v Speaker 2>make your own decisions about what you do with your money,

0:42:06.640 --> 0:42:10.200
<v Speaker 2>and if it were illegal, you know, everybody would be

0:42:10.239 --> 0:42:13.560
<v Speaker 2>doing it underground anyway. But did you have any reservations

0:42:13.560 --> 0:42:18.759
<v Speaker 2>with using such blunt brand names? Gambling dot com and

0:42:18.800 --> 0:42:20.759
<v Speaker 2>bookies dot com is something that I don't think my

0:42:20.840 --> 0:42:22.399
<v Speaker 2>mom would want me messing around with.

0:42:24.840 --> 0:42:25.600
<v Speaker 13>Absolutely not.

0:42:25.800 --> 0:42:28.120
<v Speaker 14>I mean, you know, to borrow a British saying, you know,

0:42:28.160 --> 0:42:29.919
<v Speaker 14>they do what it says on the tin.

0:42:30.200 --> 0:42:33.760
<v Speaker 13>You know, it's very clear. It's it's good branding.

0:42:34.640 --> 0:42:34.840
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:42:34.880 --> 0:42:37.160
<v Speaker 13>I obviously I'm an industry guy.

0:42:37.160 --> 0:42:39.239
<v Speaker 14>I've been doing this for seventeen years, so you know,

0:42:39.280 --> 0:42:41.440
<v Speaker 14>I've been drinking the kool aid for a long time.

0:42:41.480 --> 0:42:45.400
<v Speaker 14>But I don't think that the industry is controversially controversial

0:42:45.600 --> 0:42:48.160
<v Speaker 14>at all. You know, when you zoom out and look

0:42:48.200 --> 0:42:51.520
<v Speaker 14>at it from a you know, you look at the

0:42:51.560 --> 0:42:53.920
<v Speaker 14>whole kind of thing in its entirety. What I think

0:42:53.960 --> 0:42:58.120
<v Speaker 14>is controversial is states that haven't regulated online gambling, because

0:42:58.120 --> 0:43:01.120
<v Speaker 14>it's not like online galling isn't happening in these states.

0:43:01.160 --> 0:43:03.000
<v Speaker 14>You said it yourself that you know, all these people

0:43:03.080 --> 0:43:05.399
<v Speaker 14>are playing online regardless. This is a question of whether

0:43:05.400 --> 0:43:07.400
<v Speaker 14>they're at the regulated sites or if they're at the

0:43:07.440 --> 0:43:11.480
<v Speaker 14>Costa Rican and Panama based sites. And you know, you

0:43:11.520 --> 0:43:14.880
<v Speaker 14>can't help the problem gamblers if they're not within the

0:43:14.960 --> 0:43:17.560
<v Speaker 14>regulated ecosystem because you don't know anything about.

0:43:17.320 --> 0:43:20.840
<v Speaker 13>Them, you know. So it's it's it's clearly a net.

0:43:20.719 --> 0:43:24.480
<v Speaker 14>Positive for every jurisdiction that regulates the industry because they

0:43:24.480 --> 0:43:27.319
<v Speaker 14>get they get so many more tools to actually help

0:43:27.360 --> 0:43:30.479
<v Speaker 14>people that need help. And that is the real thing

0:43:30.560 --> 0:43:32.600
<v Speaker 14>that we should all be doing, is trying to do

0:43:32.640 --> 0:43:36.320
<v Speaker 14>what we can to minimize gambling related harm and that

0:43:36.320 --> 0:43:38.600
<v Speaker 14>that obviously starts with a regulated market.

0:43:39.360 --> 0:43:42.799
<v Speaker 1>How important was it for the industry and Charles for

0:43:43.440 --> 0:43:46.680
<v Speaker 1>ESPN to really to ink their deal? I think was

0:43:46.719 --> 0:43:48.680
<v Speaker 1>it with Pen? I forget was it with pen, but

0:43:48.800 --> 0:43:50.600
<v Speaker 1>just to ink their deal to really kind of put

0:43:50.680 --> 0:43:54.239
<v Speaker 1>jump into the deep end of the pool with their

0:43:54.280 --> 0:43:55.280
<v Speaker 1>deal with Pen Entertainment.

0:43:56.680 --> 0:43:58.960
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I'm not sure they're in the deep end of

0:43:58.960 --> 0:43:59.279
<v Speaker 13>the pool.

0:43:59.320 --> 0:44:02.400
<v Speaker 14>I'd say they've they're in the shallow end or at

0:44:02.400 --> 0:44:03.600
<v Speaker 14>the kittie pool, you know, they're not.

0:44:03.680 --> 0:44:05.480
<v Speaker 13>They're not actually the ones taking the bets.

0:44:05.520 --> 0:44:08.319
<v Speaker 14>And what they've done with Penn is they've licensed the

0:44:08.560 --> 0:44:11.640
<v Speaker 14>ESPN name to Penn, but Pen is the regulated gambling

0:44:11.680 --> 0:44:13.960
<v Speaker 14>operator with all the licenses that's going to do the

0:44:14.680 --> 0:44:15.360
<v Speaker 14>heavy lifting.

0:44:16.440 --> 0:44:17.479
<v Speaker 13>But it is a very big deal.

0:44:17.600 --> 0:44:21.440
<v Speaker 14>You know, this, this American sports betting renaissance started in

0:44:21.560 --> 0:44:24.680
<v Speaker 14>twenty eighteen with the Supreme Court decision, and you know,

0:44:24.800 --> 0:44:28.040
<v Speaker 14>ever since that moment, all eyes have been on ESPN

0:44:28.200 --> 0:44:31.439
<v Speaker 14>and there's been tons of speculation about what they may

0:44:31.480 --> 0:44:35.520
<v Speaker 14>actually do. Disney's, you know, obviously had a very kind

0:44:35.560 --> 0:44:37.799
<v Speaker 14>of conservative approach to the whole thing. They don't want

0:44:37.800 --> 0:44:39.400
<v Speaker 14>to be seen to be in the gambling business. They

0:44:39.400 --> 0:44:43.040
<v Speaker 14>certainly don't have anything to do with online casino. And

0:44:43.680 --> 0:44:45.600
<v Speaker 14>it took five years, but they've finally done a deal.

0:44:45.719 --> 0:44:48.839
<v Speaker 14>It's a it's it's a relatively simple deal where they

0:44:48.880 --> 0:44:51.719
<v Speaker 14>licensed their brands to pen and as they said, Penel operated.

0:44:53.320 --> 0:44:56.840
<v Speaker 14>You know, there's there's other chess pieces they got moved

0:44:56.840 --> 0:44:59.600
<v Speaker 14>around when Penn announced that deal.

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:00.959
<v Speaker 13>Uh, you know, they.

0:45:00.880 --> 0:45:04.480
<v Speaker 14>Had previously acquired our Stool, which is, you know, a

0:45:04.520 --> 0:45:09.640
<v Speaker 14>fascinating media organization and and talk.

0:45:09.520 --> 0:45:12.400
<v Speaker 2>About controversial David, Yeah.

0:45:12.960 --> 0:45:17.040
<v Speaker 14>There's plenty of things have been said about about Barstool,

0:45:17.080 --> 0:45:19.080
<v Speaker 14>and I don't want to wade into that conversation, but

0:45:19.120 --> 0:45:21.200
<v Speaker 14>just from a pure media perspective, I mean, they have

0:45:21.280 --> 0:45:24.920
<v Speaker 14>incredible engagement and a lot of the content is highly compelling.

0:45:24.960 --> 0:45:27.280
<v Speaker 14>You know, it is a it is a fascinating business.

0:45:28.640 --> 0:45:32.400
<v Speaker 14>And and in the in the end, Pen, you know,

0:45:32.440 --> 0:45:36.640
<v Speaker 14>I think realized maybe that's not the best fit for

0:45:36.680 --> 0:45:39.880
<v Speaker 14>a regulated gambling company. You know, obviously not everybody agrees

0:45:39.920 --> 0:45:42.560
<v Speaker 14>with everything that that Portanoy says. And you know, I

0:45:42.560 --> 0:45:46.960
<v Speaker 14>think certain gaming regulators in the end were just not

0:45:47.120 --> 0:45:51.440
<v Speaker 14>totally comfortable, right, And and Pen needed to essentially replace

0:45:51.560 --> 0:45:52.200
<v Speaker 14>that partner.

0:45:52.280 --> 0:45:53.799
<v Speaker 13>And that's what they've done.

0:45:53.960 --> 0:45:56.359
<v Speaker 14>And and and Dave Portnoy at the end of this

0:45:56.480 --> 0:46:01.800
<v Speaker 14>is has come out looking like an absolute legend, sold

0:46:01.880 --> 0:46:07.120
<v Speaker 14>barstool for you know, an actual proper fortuit, and then

0:46:07.560 --> 0:46:09.920
<v Speaker 14>and now having gont it back for a dollar exactly.

0:46:09.960 --> 0:46:12.520
<v Speaker 13>It's it's the stuff that's fun to follow.

0:46:12.560 --> 0:46:14.520
<v Speaker 1>That, that's for sure. Charles Gillespie, thanks so much for

0:46:14.600 --> 0:46:18.920
<v Speaker 1>joining us. Charles Gillespie is the CEO of Gambling dot Com.

0:46:18.960 --> 0:46:19.960
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg.

0:46:20.280 --> 0:46:23.880
<v Speaker 7>You're listening to the tape Cansur live program Bloomberg Markets

0:46:23.960 --> 0:46:27.360
<v Speaker 7>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the tune

0:46:27.360 --> 0:46:29.040
<v Speaker 7>in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and.

0:46:29.000 --> 0:46:30.319
<v Speaker 4>The Bloomberg Business App.

0:46:30.360 --> 0:46:33.200
<v Speaker 7>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:46:33.200 --> 0:46:38.280
<v Speaker 7>flagship New York station. Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:46:39.320 --> 0:46:42.279
<v Speaker 2>Now. I have been covering the automotive industry for a

0:46:42.280 --> 0:46:44.680
<v Speaker 2>couple of decades. As a result, I kind of know

0:46:44.920 --> 0:46:49.080
<v Speaker 2>everybody that works in the industry. So oftentimes these manufacturers

0:46:49.120 --> 0:46:52.200
<v Speaker 2>will give me cars or motorcycles to test drive for

0:46:52.239 --> 0:46:54.520
<v Speaker 2>a week and figure out, you know, what the product

0:46:54.560 --> 0:46:58.000
<v Speaker 2>is like, which is I think very helpful in my reporting.

0:46:59.080 --> 0:47:02.600
<v Speaker 2>This week, I'm driving a car from a brand that's

0:47:02.719 --> 0:47:06.080
<v Speaker 2>very close to my heart. It's an Audi qight.

0:47:05.840 --> 0:47:09.000
<v Speaker 1>E tron Audi qateron.

0:47:08.320 --> 0:47:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Art, which is a little bit confusing, but basically it's

0:47:11.000 --> 0:47:19.040
<v Speaker 2>their biggest suv that's powered solely by batteries and well

0:47:19.080 --> 0:47:21.480
<v Speaker 2>we have video of it as well, so if you're listening,

0:47:21.520 --> 0:47:24.480
<v Speaker 2>you can go to YouTube dot com and just type

0:47:24.760 --> 0:47:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Radio and you'll see this vehicle. Now close to

0:47:27.680 --> 0:47:30.759
<v Speaker 2>my heart because the first car I ever bought was

0:47:30.800 --> 0:47:34.640
<v Speaker 2>an Audi a four Avant, the station wagon version sure

0:47:34.760 --> 0:47:37.239
<v Speaker 2>that was not battery powered, back in two thousand and

0:47:37.320 --> 0:47:40.680
<v Speaker 2>that was a two point five liter turbo diesel, which

0:47:40.719 --> 0:47:43.960
<v Speaker 2>I loved so much, same color, pretty much, and the

0:47:44.000 --> 0:47:46.120
<v Speaker 2>interior felt the same. Everything kind of felt the same.

0:47:46.200 --> 0:47:48.640
<v Speaker 2>The only difference is the powertrain. I want to bring

0:47:48.640 --> 0:47:52.239
<v Speaker 2>in Kyle Stock. He is a senior correspondent for Bloomberg BusinessWeek.

0:47:52.320 --> 0:47:57.320
<v Speaker 2>He covers the car industry very closely as well. And Kyle,

0:47:57.400 --> 0:48:00.360
<v Speaker 2>first of all, I'm not sure if you've driven this Audi,

0:48:00.480 --> 0:48:03.279
<v Speaker 2>but if you've driven almost any Audi, the experience is

0:48:03.320 --> 0:48:05.399
<v Speaker 2>really similar. And I think that's what they're going for.

0:48:07.160 --> 0:48:07.440
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:48:07.560 --> 0:48:11.360
<v Speaker 5>And then and it's like very techy luxury, right, I

0:48:11.400 --> 0:48:12.799
<v Speaker 5>mean it's.

0:48:13.719 --> 0:48:16.920
<v Speaker 15>They do this very well with the screens, with the

0:48:16.960 --> 0:48:21.080
<v Speaker 15>digital dials, with the you know, the real time map information.

0:48:22.880 --> 0:48:25.320
<v Speaker 5>It's a it's a spaceship cockpit for me.

0:48:25.600 --> 0:48:28.120
<v Speaker 2>It is, but in a in like an understated way.

0:48:28.160 --> 0:48:31.640
<v Speaker 2>So they have Obviously tech is their thing. I think

0:48:31.680 --> 0:48:35.280
<v Speaker 2>their motto is for sprung doorche Technique, which who Germany.

0:48:35.520 --> 0:48:38.959
<v Speaker 2>In German, it means advancement through technology. That's what they've

0:48:38.960 --> 0:48:43.399
<v Speaker 2>always done. Uh. The you know, everything in the car

0:48:43.560 --> 0:48:46.840
<v Speaker 2>is luxurious and it's and it's and it's almost perfect

0:48:47.080 --> 0:48:49.799
<v Speaker 2>in a refined kind of way, not in a flamboyant,

0:48:49.800 --> 0:48:52.200
<v Speaker 2>like in your face kind of way. You're not drowning

0:48:52.280 --> 0:48:55.239
<v Speaker 2>in leather there's not a fifty five inch screen, but

0:48:55.280 --> 0:48:57.319
<v Speaker 2>there's exactly as much as you need, which I think

0:48:57.400 --> 0:49:01.520
<v Speaker 2>is really cool. But I don't think they've cracked the

0:49:01.560 --> 0:49:04.839
<v Speaker 2>whole battery tech thing because the range just isn't as

0:49:04.840 --> 0:49:09.760
<v Speaker 2>impressive as other electric SUVs and you don't get Kyle

0:49:09.800 --> 0:49:12.200
<v Speaker 2>to kind of, you know, punch you in the gut

0:49:12.400 --> 0:49:15.680
<v Speaker 2>acceleration that you do in other electric vehicles.

0:49:16.320 --> 0:49:18.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you're talking about the Q eight.

0:49:18.120 --> 0:49:20.359
<v Speaker 2>You were just saying the Q eight e Tron, which

0:49:20.400 --> 0:49:22.399
<v Speaker 2>is their new version of the E Tron. Now they're

0:49:22.400 --> 0:49:24.600
<v Speaker 2>calling it the Q eight Etron, even though it's not

0:49:24.680 --> 0:49:28.880
<v Speaker 2>nearly as big um or as you know, special looking

0:49:28.920 --> 0:49:31.520
<v Speaker 2>as the gas powered Q eight. But yeah, they just

0:49:31.640 --> 0:49:35.200
<v Speaker 2>they don't seem to have the get up and go

0:49:35.360 --> 0:49:38.719
<v Speaker 2>the other evs have, or you know, three hundred four

0:49:38.800 --> 0:49:39.480
<v Speaker 2>a mile range.

0:49:39.520 --> 0:49:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Why is that? I thought it isn't an E You

0:49:42.440 --> 0:49:44.040
<v Speaker 1>don't talk about horsepower anymore, do you?

0:49:44.239 --> 0:49:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Or do you can talk about horsepower equivalent? And this

0:49:47.600 --> 0:49:50.720
<v Speaker 2>one has four hundred horsepower equivalent. Don't get me wrong.

0:49:50.880 --> 0:49:54.600
<v Speaker 2>It's not slow, right, zero to sixty in like six seconds,

0:49:54.640 --> 0:49:58.080
<v Speaker 2>which for a gas car is fast, right, But for

0:49:58.120 --> 0:50:00.319
<v Speaker 2>an EV. I mean Kyle, we're looking at you know,

0:50:00.680 --> 0:50:04.320
<v Speaker 2>the Kia GT ev stix or whatever it's called. The

0:50:04.480 --> 0:50:07.640
<v Speaker 2>zero sixty and five seconds, Like, you know, these evs

0:50:07.640 --> 0:50:09.200
<v Speaker 2>are beating Porschas off the line.

0:50:10.000 --> 0:50:10.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:50:10.400 --> 0:50:12.399
<v Speaker 15>Well, part of the part of the equation you're seeing

0:50:12.480 --> 0:50:15.120
<v Speaker 15>here is that QA and a lot of the Audi's

0:50:15.160 --> 0:50:16.120
<v Speaker 15>are big cars.

0:50:16.440 --> 0:50:17.520
<v Speaker 5>For one, they're heavy.

0:50:17.600 --> 0:50:20.919
<v Speaker 15>Evs are heavy, and the content they put in there

0:50:21.400 --> 0:50:25.000
<v Speaker 15>is heavy. So you know, you have seats that massage you.

0:50:25.000 --> 0:50:27.080
<v Speaker 15>You have all the heaters, you have, all the electronics,

0:50:27.080 --> 0:50:29.960
<v Speaker 15>you have all the you know, the luxury trappings and

0:50:30.040 --> 0:50:33.759
<v Speaker 15>trimmings and that you know, weighs on a zero to

0:50:33.800 --> 0:50:37.879
<v Speaker 15>sixty time. But it is notable that, you know, all

0:50:37.920 --> 0:50:42.479
<v Speaker 15>the Mercedes Electric SUVs are super heavy too, and those

0:50:42.480 --> 0:50:45.080
<v Speaker 15>things are quick. The BMW i X, which is.

0:50:45.080 --> 0:50:46.560
<v Speaker 5>Their new like a bat out of hell.

0:50:47.719 --> 0:50:51.880
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, that's pretty quick. You can choose your own picture,

0:50:52.719 --> 0:50:54.680
<v Speaker 15>you know. The Cadillact Lyric is another one in this

0:50:54.760 --> 0:50:59.600
<v Speaker 15>class that's honestly, really nice and kind of understated. Like

0:50:59.640 --> 0:51:04.440
<v Speaker 15>these they they, you know, are subtle with their choices.

0:51:04.480 --> 0:51:07.160
<v Speaker 15>It's not all screens, it's not all you know, theater

0:51:07.320 --> 0:51:09.120
<v Speaker 15>and drama and rushing lights.

0:51:09.280 --> 0:51:12.000
<v Speaker 1>But Kyle, What are what are the EV manufacturers what

0:51:12.040 --> 0:51:15.160
<v Speaker 1>are they really marketing here? Or what are consumers finding

0:51:15.200 --> 0:51:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a board?

0:51:15.680 --> 0:51:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Is it range?

0:51:16.600 --> 0:51:19.279
<v Speaker 1>Is it that it's zero to sixty that Matt focuses on.

0:51:19.440 --> 0:51:20.960
<v Speaker 2>Is it screens?

0:51:21.080 --> 0:51:22.319
<v Speaker 1>What are they really marketing on?

0:51:23.719 --> 0:51:27.600
<v Speaker 5>So they're really it's funny it used to be range.

0:51:28.280 --> 0:51:30.840
<v Speaker 15>It's then it went to sort of charging time, like

0:51:31.200 --> 0:51:33.480
<v Speaker 15>high speed charging. You know, you won't have to wait

0:51:33.520 --> 0:51:36.920
<v Speaker 15>more than ten minutes. And now it's sort of drifting

0:51:36.960 --> 0:51:39.799
<v Speaker 15>into this like no compromise zone, Like you can have

0:51:40.040 --> 0:51:43.000
<v Speaker 15>the giant CV you want with all the trappings and trimmings,

0:51:43.239 --> 0:51:45.160
<v Speaker 15>and it will go far enough and it will charge

0:51:45.160 --> 0:51:47.080
<v Speaker 15>fast enough, and you just just kind of don't worry

0:51:47.080 --> 0:51:47.440
<v Speaker 15>about it.

0:51:47.520 --> 0:51:47.680
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:51:48.600 --> 0:51:53.600
<v Speaker 15>Mercedes, like all the Mercedes electrics, except like the really

0:51:53.719 --> 0:51:58.520
<v Speaker 15>entry level ones have you know, very impressive range figures.

0:51:58.880 --> 0:52:01.240
<v Speaker 5>A lot of them are over three or miles, and

0:52:01.360 --> 0:52:02.719
<v Speaker 5>they're they're frank about it.

0:52:02.760 --> 0:52:04.840
<v Speaker 15>They say that, you know, if you buy a Mercedes,

0:52:04.880 --> 0:52:08.719
<v Speaker 15>you don't want to have to worry about range. And

0:52:08.760 --> 0:52:10.840
<v Speaker 15>then and then there's a there's another slice of the

0:52:10.840 --> 0:52:13.960
<v Speaker 15>market that is really going after the performance.

0:52:14.080 --> 0:52:17.120
<v Speaker 5>Like Matt mentioned that that new Kia.

0:52:16.960 --> 0:52:20.799
<v Speaker 15>GT Audi has a couple of electric gts that are

0:52:20.880 --> 0:52:23.240
<v Speaker 15>that are just kind of bonkers, the Porscha, of course,

0:52:25.400 --> 0:52:27.040
<v Speaker 15>and and they're thrilling to drive.

0:52:27.680 --> 0:52:29.160
<v Speaker 2>You know what. The the funny thing is And this

0:52:29.239 --> 0:52:30.800
<v Speaker 2>is the only time I think I've ever said anything

0:52:30.840 --> 0:52:31.399
<v Speaker 2>like this in my life.

0:52:31.440 --> 0:52:32.000
<v Speaker 7>Oh, here we go.

0:52:32.280 --> 0:52:34.880
<v Speaker 2>Even though it's not the fastest, even though it doesn't

0:52:34.880 --> 0:52:37.799
<v Speaker 2>have the most range, this might be the one that

0:52:37.880 --> 0:52:40.080
<v Speaker 2>I would buy if I were looking for a bee

0:52:40.280 --> 0:52:46.120
<v Speaker 2>V SUV because the road handling is so nice, you know,

0:52:46.160 --> 0:52:50.040
<v Speaker 2>the air suspension is so luxurious, because it has everything

0:52:50.080 --> 0:52:53.040
<v Speaker 2>you need but not a thing more. And because I've

0:52:53.080 --> 0:52:57.040
<v Speaker 2>grown up with Audi kind of in my blood, I

0:52:57.080 --> 0:53:00.719
<v Speaker 2>really like it. It starts at seventy five grand, which expensive,

0:53:00.800 --> 0:53:04.319
<v Speaker 2>but it's not as expensive as you know, a Mercedes

0:53:04.560 --> 0:53:08.239
<v Speaker 2>or the BMW i X, which is ridiculously expensive. But

0:53:08.280 --> 0:53:10.680
<v Speaker 2>it is more than the Lyric and certainly more than

0:53:10.719 --> 0:53:11.440
<v Speaker 2>the Kia.

0:53:12.080 --> 0:53:14.640
<v Speaker 5>That BMW starts at eighty seven the Lyric.

0:53:14.800 --> 0:53:18.160
<v Speaker 2>I think it's the Cadillac the Okay, I got you, Okay.

0:53:18.800 --> 0:53:19.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, the Lyric.

0:53:21.200 --> 0:53:25.680
<v Speaker 15>That thing starts at basically fifty nine thousand, and it's

0:53:25.719 --> 0:53:28.839
<v Speaker 15>a lot of car for that money. I mean fifty

0:53:28.960 --> 0:53:30.800
<v Speaker 15>nine thousand, you can get an electric Kia.

0:53:32.200 --> 0:53:34.959
<v Speaker 2>It's really really like Nissan Ariyah costs about that much

0:53:35.000 --> 0:53:36.520
<v Speaker 2>when you had the good one exactly.

0:53:37.160 --> 0:53:39.000
<v Speaker 5>I mean, Cadillac's not making a lot of them.

0:53:39.080 --> 0:53:41.440
<v Speaker 15>It costs extra to get all wheel drive and like

0:53:41.760 --> 0:53:45.200
<v Speaker 15>you know, the super crew stuff. But that car, there's

0:53:45.239 --> 0:53:47.840
<v Speaker 15>a lot of value there at that price point.

0:53:48.560 --> 0:53:50.880
<v Speaker 1>So, Matt, what do you once you get the what's

0:53:50.960 --> 0:53:51.879
<v Speaker 1>Missus Miller driving?

0:53:52.640 --> 0:53:57.160
<v Speaker 2>She drives evolvough XC ninety T eight and she's it's

0:53:57.160 --> 0:54:00.120
<v Speaker 2>a hybrid, it's not a fully there and she's so

0:54:00.239 --> 0:54:02.439
<v Speaker 2>in love with it. She says, you can pry this

0:54:03.320 --> 0:54:06.319
<v Speaker 2>truck away from my cold dead hands. Okay, so we're

0:54:06.360 --> 0:54:09.200
<v Speaker 2>not on there, but you know, I think it's fine.

0:54:09.520 --> 0:54:12.759
<v Speaker 2>I would go hybrid as well right now, because I'm

0:54:12.800 --> 0:54:15.239
<v Speaker 2>just I don't think the infrastructure is quite there yet.

0:54:15.280 --> 0:54:18.120
<v Speaker 2>Kyle for a fully for a full ev and they're

0:54:18.120 --> 0:54:21.160
<v Speaker 2>such great choices. The Volvo's a nice one, especially for

0:54:21.600 --> 0:54:24.919
<v Speaker 2>my wife. I like the BMW X five hybrid because

0:54:24.960 --> 0:54:28.319
<v Speaker 2>it actually has the Inline six, the incredibly refined you

0:54:28.320 --> 0:54:30.240
<v Speaker 2>know BMW engine in line.

0:54:30.080 --> 0:54:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Six that's an internal combustion engine.

0:54:32.360 --> 0:54:35.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but Inline six and a twenty five kilot battery.

0:54:35.560 --> 0:54:36.160
<v Speaker 6>So it's got.

0:54:37.520 --> 0:54:40.720
<v Speaker 2>But what do you think, Kyle about fully V versus hybrid.

0:54:42.000 --> 0:54:44.680
<v Speaker 15>I'm all in, man, I think it's there. I think

0:54:44.719 --> 0:54:48.200
<v Speaker 15>the charging is getting there. You'll see we're doing a

0:54:48.200 --> 0:54:49.800
<v Speaker 15>big piece. You'll see it in the next week or

0:54:49.800 --> 0:54:52.440
<v Speaker 15>two about how much infrastructure.

0:54:51.760 --> 0:54:55.400
<v Speaker 5>Went in in the past year. Nice and then I didn't.

0:54:55.880 --> 0:54:58.840
<v Speaker 15>Five billion dollars is going into charging in the next

0:54:59.239 --> 0:55:01.880
<v Speaker 15>twelve months from the I administration, not twelve months, and

0:55:01.880 --> 0:55:03.680
<v Speaker 15>that's probably twenty four months.

0:55:03.719 --> 0:55:06.839
<v Speaker 5>But those stations will start popping up. I live out

0:55:06.880 --> 0:55:07.160
<v Speaker 5>here in.

0:55:07.080 --> 0:55:08.720
<v Speaker 6>Colorado, so cold weather's a deal.

0:55:09.400 --> 0:55:10.959
<v Speaker 5>Elevations a deal wins a deal.

0:55:12.360 --> 0:55:15.120
<v Speaker 15>But I've never I haven't had a problem, and.

0:55:15.200 --> 0:55:16.200
<v Speaker 5>I think it's getting there.

0:55:16.280 --> 0:55:18.680
<v Speaker 15>Oh but I'll tell you the Goldilocks rig that I

0:55:18.719 --> 0:55:23.799
<v Speaker 15>really like, Matt. I just had the Mercedes GL four

0:55:23.840 --> 0:55:26.800
<v Speaker 15>point fifty E, which is a hybrid and a serious hybrid.

0:55:26.880 --> 0:55:31.640
<v Speaker 15>So this thing, like standard great Mercedes SUV goes fifty

0:55:31.680 --> 0:55:33.759
<v Speaker 15>miles on a charge, which to me is kind of

0:55:33.760 --> 0:55:36.840
<v Speaker 15>a magic number because like, yes, you're hardly for burning

0:55:36.920 --> 0:55:39.480
<v Speaker 15>gas if you have that kind of range, and you

0:55:39.600 --> 0:55:41.800
<v Speaker 15>have the gas if you need it, if you're going farther.

0:55:42.640 --> 0:55:44.200
<v Speaker 15>I love this car. I don't know if you've been

0:55:44.239 --> 0:55:44.800
<v Speaker 15>in it yet.

0:55:44.920 --> 0:55:48.080
<v Speaker 2>I haven't tried it out. I definitely would would like to,

0:55:49.520 --> 0:55:51.880
<v Speaker 2>but for now I've got to give this Q eight

0:55:51.960 --> 0:55:53.680
<v Speaker 2>E Tron back. And it's a little bit of a

0:55:53.680 --> 0:55:57.120
<v Speaker 2>bummer because you get in the flashy special cars and

0:55:57.160 --> 0:55:58.960
<v Speaker 2>they're kind of fun and interesting to drive, but there

0:55:58.960 --> 0:56:01.480
<v Speaker 2>are also a lot of work. This out eve to

0:56:01.520 --> 0:56:05.759
<v Speaker 2>me like the perfect car for commuting. It's executive, it's

0:56:05.880 --> 0:56:07.320
<v Speaker 2>German and.

0:56:07.480 --> 0:56:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Everything you like. All Right, Kyle, thanks so much for

0:56:09.920 --> 0:56:11.319
<v Speaker 1>joining us, and we'll get back to you on This

0:56:11.360 --> 0:56:15.040
<v Speaker 1>is more car stuff. Kyle Stocks, Senior correspondent, Bloomberg BusinessWeek.

0:56:15.239 --> 0:56:17.319
<v Speaker 1>What is Matt Miller driving? We're gonna do this more

0:56:17.360 --> 0:56:19.359
<v Speaker 1>often because it's always fun to talk cars, and we'll

0:56:19.360 --> 0:56:20.719
<v Speaker 1>get some smart car people on here.

0:56:20.920 --> 0:56:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcasts. You can

0:56:24.040 --> 0:56:27.840
<v Speaker 2>subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:56:27.920 --> 0:56:31.640
<v Speaker 2>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:56:31.840 --> 0:56:33.759
<v Speaker 2>at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three.

0:56:34.200 --> 0:56:36.600
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:56:36.719 --> 0:56:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:56:39.400 --> 0:56:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio,