1 00:00:02,480 --> 00:00:07,000 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. 2 00:00:10,360 --> 00:00:13,760 Speaker 2: Welcome to the Daybreak Asia podcast. I'm deg Chrisner. The 3 00:00:13,800 --> 00:00:18,480 Speaker 2: global economy is grappling with dramatically higher oil prices after 4 00:00:18,520 --> 00:00:21,960 Speaker 2: the US and Israel began attacking Iran back on February 5 00:00:22,000 --> 00:00:25,560 Speaker 2: twenty eighth. Well, now the Trump administration is taking part 6 00:00:25,600 --> 00:00:29,120 Speaker 2: in a move to bring those prices down. Energy Secretary 7 00:00:29,200 --> 00:00:32,559 Speaker 2: Chris Wright has announced one hundred seventy two million barrels 8 00:00:32,560 --> 00:00:36,920 Speaker 2: of crude will be released from the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve. 9 00:00:37,280 --> 00:00:39,839 Speaker 2: This is part of a plan announced earlier by the 10 00:00:39,840 --> 00:00:43,559 Speaker 2: International Energy Agency. Nations from around the world will be 11 00:00:43,680 --> 00:00:47,200 Speaker 2: releasing a total of four hundred million barrels from their reserves. 12 00:00:47,720 --> 00:00:51,440 Speaker 2: But despite these moves, the essential problem remains. The closure 13 00:00:51,560 --> 00:00:53,920 Speaker 2: of the Strait of Horn Moves the choke point for 14 00:00:54,000 --> 00:00:57,840 Speaker 2: about twenty percent of the world's seaborn oil. It's also 15 00:00:58,000 --> 00:01:02,200 Speaker 2: a critical passage for liquefied natural gas. Now. On Wednesday, 16 00:01:02,240 --> 00:01:05,680 Speaker 2: three vessels in the Strait were hit by suspected projectiles, 17 00:01:05,760 --> 00:01:10,240 Speaker 2: and according to two US intelligence sources, Iran began laying 18 00:01:10,319 --> 00:01:14,080 Speaker 2: mines in the strait using small watercraft each carrying two 19 00:01:14,120 --> 00:01:17,039 Speaker 2: to three mines and now we are learning Iraq's oil 20 00:01:17,080 --> 00:01:20,560 Speaker 2: ports have completely stopped operations. For a look at how 21 00:01:20,600 --> 00:01:23,800 Speaker 2: this is impacting market action, I'm joined by Bloomberg strategist 22 00:01:23,840 --> 00:01:26,959 Speaker 2: Mark Cranfield. He joins us from our studios in Singapore. 23 00:01:27,120 --> 00:01:29,880 Speaker 2: Thank you for being here, particularly on a day like today. 24 00:01:30,000 --> 00:01:32,200 Speaker 2: I'm going to take a step back. Mark, give me 25 00:01:32,360 --> 00:01:33,960 Speaker 2: your sense of the bigger picture here. 26 00:01:35,880 --> 00:01:39,360 Speaker 3: Well, it's really all about this, the fear that investors 27 00:01:39,400 --> 00:01:43,160 Speaker 3: have the long term supplies are going to be hit. 28 00:01:44,040 --> 00:01:46,160 Speaker 3: They don't really see an end to it. As you're 29 00:01:46,200 --> 00:01:49,280 Speaker 3: talking about. The key point, obviously is the strait of Homus, 30 00:01:50,160 --> 00:01:55,080 Speaker 3: and until traders are really happy to see oil flying 31 00:01:55,120 --> 00:01:57,240 Speaker 3: through that on a regular basis, they're going to be 32 00:01:57,320 --> 00:02:02,760 Speaker 3: extremely cautious about pricing what's going to happen. And we've 33 00:02:02,840 --> 00:02:06,160 Speaker 3: already seen a big premium, a so called war premium 34 00:02:06,480 --> 00:02:09,239 Speaker 3: is being priced into oil. If you look at where 35 00:02:09,240 --> 00:02:11,320 Speaker 3: the prices are in the market, and you look at 36 00:02:11,320 --> 00:02:17,120 Speaker 3: where global demand was before the Iron conflict began, prices 37 00:02:17,160 --> 00:02:21,000 Speaker 3: are substantially higher, maybe as much as thirty dollars is 38 00:02:21,040 --> 00:02:23,760 Speaker 3: into the price which people are taking as a risk 39 00:02:23,800 --> 00:02:27,040 Speaker 3: element related to the conflict in the Middle East. Now 40 00:02:27,120 --> 00:02:32,320 Speaker 3: even if the hostilities were to end this week, even 41 00:02:32,360 --> 00:02:36,080 Speaker 3: if the strait of horr moves was fully open initially, 42 00:02:36,919 --> 00:02:40,000 Speaker 3: people would still want a premium, fearing that it could 43 00:02:40,040 --> 00:02:42,720 Speaker 3: restart at any time. That doesn't go away us. What 44 00:02:42,760 --> 00:02:46,480 Speaker 3: we learned from previous conflict is that the premium will 45 00:02:46,520 --> 00:02:48,440 Speaker 3: stay in place. It might get a little bit smaller, 46 00:02:48,760 --> 00:02:52,280 Speaker 3: but there will be a premium embedded in oil prices, 47 00:02:52,320 --> 00:02:56,040 Speaker 3: particularly for quite a long time. And so because of that, 48 00:02:56,120 --> 00:02:58,240 Speaker 3: it feeds through to bond prices, it feeds through to 49 00:02:58,280 --> 00:03:02,359 Speaker 3: equity prices, even currencies are all dependent on what they 50 00:03:02,400 --> 00:03:05,519 Speaker 3: see going into oil. Everybody has to become an oil trader, 51 00:03:05,600 --> 00:03:08,040 Speaker 3: even when they don't want to, and that is a 52 00:03:08,160 --> 00:03:12,200 Speaker 3: very uncomfortable position for asset managers who usually like to 53 00:03:12,200 --> 00:03:15,000 Speaker 3: see oil as being something which is quietly in the background, 54 00:03:15,520 --> 00:03:16,640 Speaker 3: not right in their face. 55 00:03:16,880 --> 00:03:20,440 Speaker 2: Or you touched on the inflationary implications. Obviously that will 56 00:03:20,440 --> 00:03:23,760 Speaker 2: bring about in most cases, higher sovereign yields. There seems 57 00:03:23,760 --> 00:03:26,320 Speaker 2: to be a dull or positive story, does it not. 58 00:03:27,440 --> 00:03:32,280 Speaker 3: Things have changed dramatically because the United States no longer 59 00:03:32,320 --> 00:03:35,720 Speaker 3: needs to import oil as once did. In fact, it's 60 00:03:35,720 --> 00:03:40,000 Speaker 3: a net exporter of oil. So if you remember backsay, 61 00:03:40,040 --> 00:03:43,560 Speaker 3: for example, to two thousand and eight, when oil prices 62 00:03:43,560 --> 00:03:45,640 Speaker 3: were at record highs. I think WTI got to about 63 00:03:45,640 --> 00:03:48,680 Speaker 3: one hundred and fifty dollars a barrel. At the same time, 64 00:03:48,720 --> 00:03:51,600 Speaker 3: the US dollar was plunging because at that time the 65 00:03:51,680 --> 00:03:56,280 Speaker 3: United States still needed to import. The conditions have changed dramatically, 66 00:03:56,440 --> 00:03:58,800 Speaker 3: so rather than being a negative for the US dollar, 67 00:03:58,880 --> 00:04:01,960 Speaker 3: it's a slight positive for the US dollar this time around, 68 00:04:01,960 --> 00:04:04,840 Speaker 3: because everybody else the rest of the world needs to 69 00:04:04,840 --> 00:04:07,880 Speaker 3: buy the US dollars too, because everything is priced in 70 00:04:07,920 --> 00:04:11,680 Speaker 3: that currency, So the US is more immune to the 71 00:04:11,800 --> 00:04:13,120 Speaker 3: conflict from that point of view. 72 00:04:13,200 --> 00:04:17,480 Speaker 2: What about the distribution of the economic impact. Obviously Europe 73 00:04:17,520 --> 00:04:20,480 Speaker 2: is a heavy oil importer, there's a lot of risk there. 74 00:04:20,960 --> 00:04:24,200 Speaker 2: But I was struck by a report on Bloomberg earlier 75 00:04:25,040 --> 00:04:28,159 Speaker 2: that since the war with Iran began, shipping data show 76 00:04:28,800 --> 00:04:31,600 Speaker 2: that Iran sent more than eleven million barrels through the 77 00:04:31,640 --> 00:04:35,440 Speaker 2: straight bound for China. Do you think the Chinese economy 78 00:04:35,640 --> 00:04:38,720 Speaker 2: is in the same situation, let's say, as the Japanese 79 00:04:38,720 --> 00:04:42,000 Speaker 2: economy or the South Korean economy, both of which happened 80 00:04:42,040 --> 00:04:43,600 Speaker 2: to be heavy oil importers. 81 00:04:44,320 --> 00:04:47,599 Speaker 3: According to some stories, we have on Bloomberg. China is 82 00:04:47,720 --> 00:04:51,200 Speaker 3: far less dependent on oil than it will, say, ten 83 00:04:51,279 --> 00:04:54,560 Speaker 3: years ago. It's even less dependent and relative terms than 84 00:04:54,560 --> 00:04:58,760 Speaker 3: the United States. Definitely less dependent in Japan and Korea. 85 00:04:59,600 --> 00:05:02,760 Speaker 3: China has done a lot to It's got nuclear energy, 86 00:05:03,160 --> 00:05:07,040 Speaker 3: it's got various other Coal is still a big factor 87 00:05:07,080 --> 00:05:09,680 Speaker 3: of energy in China as well. It has a much 88 00:05:09,720 --> 00:05:13,120 Speaker 3: better protection in that sense. It's not totally immune, but 89 00:05:13,200 --> 00:05:16,800 Speaker 3: it is much more insulated than other Asian economiess. 90 00:05:16,440 --> 00:05:18,800 Speaker 2: So, do you think the bigger question mark right now 91 00:05:18,880 --> 00:05:21,640 Speaker 2: is whether the Trump administration at some point begins to 92 00:05:21,760 --> 00:05:26,400 Speaker 2: dial back on its aggressiveness. The risk is that President 93 00:05:26,400 --> 00:05:31,479 Speaker 2: Trump continues with this move to kind of reorder the 94 00:05:31,839 --> 00:05:35,080 Speaker 2: Iranian political leadership and the economy as well. But I'm 95 00:05:35,120 --> 00:05:37,200 Speaker 2: wondering whether or not at some point there's a breaking 96 00:05:37,240 --> 00:05:40,039 Speaker 2: point potentially for the president. We use the term taco 97 00:05:40,200 --> 00:05:43,599 Speaker 2: sometimes as it related to movement in the equity market 98 00:05:43,600 --> 00:05:46,440 Speaker 2: around the issue of trade and tariffs. Do you think 99 00:05:46,440 --> 00:05:49,279 Speaker 2: the same thing could happen again in the oil patch? 100 00:05:50,480 --> 00:05:55,200 Speaker 3: Investors would certainly be happy if they saw a dialing 101 00:05:55,240 --> 00:05:58,200 Speaker 3: down of the military action in the Middle East. There's 102 00:05:58,200 --> 00:06:01,880 Speaker 3: no doubt about that. As we were speaking about earlier. 103 00:06:01,960 --> 00:06:05,840 Speaker 3: The bottom line is the Strait of Hormus. Oil needs 104 00:06:05,960 --> 00:06:09,880 Speaker 3: to flow freely through that area, particularly to get to Asia. 105 00:06:09,960 --> 00:06:13,200 Speaker 3: Asia is so dependent on what not just for oil, 106 00:06:13,240 --> 00:06:18,159 Speaker 3: but for LNG as well, so that strait needs to 107 00:06:18,160 --> 00:06:20,880 Speaker 3: be Everyone needs to be safe and secure that it 108 00:06:21,240 --> 00:06:25,159 Speaker 3: can open operate as normal. Insurance costs can come down, 109 00:06:25,800 --> 00:06:29,920 Speaker 3: Tankers don't need to fear pay extra premiums for going 110 00:06:29,960 --> 00:06:32,920 Speaker 3: through there. That's the bottom line for everybody, even more 111 00:06:32,960 --> 00:06:38,440 Speaker 3: so than suddenly military action stopping. Because even if the 112 00:06:38,560 --> 00:06:42,520 Speaker 3: United States says there's no more military action, who knows 113 00:06:43,600 --> 00:06:46,000 Speaker 3: what they're on from their point of view, what they're 114 00:06:46,120 --> 00:06:50,039 Speaker 3: up to. So investors are very cautious from that side 115 00:06:50,040 --> 00:06:52,560 Speaker 3: of things, and they will continue to price a premium 116 00:06:52,600 --> 00:06:53,640 Speaker 3: for oil based on that. 117 00:06:54,080 --> 00:06:57,280 Speaker 2: So, as we mentioned earlier, bond markets globally have been 118 00:06:57,320 --> 00:07:00,880 Speaker 2: forced to reprice inflation risk. Where does that leave actual bankers? Though, 119 00:07:00,920 --> 00:07:01,479 Speaker 2: at the end of the. 120 00:07:01,520 --> 00:07:06,120 Speaker 3: Day, between a rock and a hard places very very 121 00:07:06,160 --> 00:07:08,720 Speaker 3: difficult job. We've got I think eight central bank meetings 122 00:07:08,760 --> 00:07:11,160 Speaker 3: coming up next week. The timing could hardly be worse 123 00:07:11,640 --> 00:07:15,120 Speaker 3: from that point of view. As you were suggesting, it's 124 00:07:15,120 --> 00:07:17,600 Speaker 3: going to be some very cautious language from the central banks. 125 00:07:17,640 --> 00:07:19,520 Speaker 3: Reserve Bank of Australia probably is going to be one 126 00:07:19,520 --> 00:07:22,640 Speaker 3: of the first to respond with higher interest rates. Others 127 00:07:22,640 --> 00:07:25,880 Speaker 3: will certainly be thinking about it. How quickly they pulled 128 00:07:25,920 --> 00:07:29,920 Speaker 3: the trigger will vary, but certainly everybody will have to 129 00:07:29,920 --> 00:07:34,080 Speaker 3: give warnings that they see inflation ticking up and in 130 00:07:34,120 --> 00:07:37,160 Speaker 3: some cases they suspect it's going to go above the 131 00:07:37,200 --> 00:07:40,800 Speaker 3: thresholds that will make them very uncomfortable. So the common 132 00:07:40,840 --> 00:07:44,280 Speaker 3: thread will be warning signals everywhere from central bankers that 133 00:07:44,640 --> 00:07:48,400 Speaker 3: inflation is going in the wrong direction. Some of them 134 00:07:48,400 --> 00:07:51,240 Speaker 3: will respond quickly, some of them more slowly. But it's 135 00:07:51,240 --> 00:07:54,360 Speaker 3: a complete sea change, because, of course it's only a 136 00:07:54,360 --> 00:07:57,120 Speaker 3: few weeks ago that we're hoping US Federal Reserve is 137 00:07:57,160 --> 00:07:59,560 Speaker 3: going to lower interest so rate. It's more most other 138 00:07:59,560 --> 00:08:02,000 Speaker 3: people will at least be on hold, not really thinking 139 00:08:02,040 --> 00:08:05,600 Speaker 3: about raising interest rates. The conditions have changed completely. That's 140 00:08:05,640 --> 00:08:07,840 Speaker 3: why bond yields around the world are going up so much. 141 00:08:07,880 --> 00:08:10,480 Speaker 2: So is it a case of stagflation? Potentially? Is that 142 00:08:10,680 --> 00:08:11,960 Speaker 2: really what we're describing here? 143 00:08:12,640 --> 00:08:15,280 Speaker 3: I think a little bit early to be calling that. 144 00:08:15,440 --> 00:08:18,080 Speaker 3: If you look at what's going on, it doesn't appear 145 00:08:18,120 --> 00:08:23,080 Speaker 3: that economies are grinding to a halt by any means 146 00:08:23,120 --> 00:08:25,520 Speaker 3: in six months time, if we're in the same situation, 147 00:08:25,600 --> 00:08:28,400 Speaker 3: if the Middle East is still locked down in six months, yes, 148 00:08:28,720 --> 00:08:31,200 Speaker 3: people will be taking stackflation very seriously. But it's a 149 00:08:31,240 --> 00:08:32,560 Speaker 3: little bit early to be discussing that. 150 00:08:33,000 --> 00:08:35,400 Speaker 2: What are the other things that you're most concerned about 151 00:08:35,400 --> 00:08:37,360 Speaker 2: when you look at some of the price action here. 152 00:08:37,400 --> 00:08:40,480 Speaker 2: I was wondering about the level of leverage. A couple 153 00:08:40,520 --> 00:08:42,280 Speaker 2: of weeks ago, you and I were speaking about the 154 00:08:42,320 --> 00:08:45,520 Speaker 2: meltdown in South Korean stocks, and it seemed like a 155 00:08:45,520 --> 00:08:49,880 Speaker 2: lot of that moved to the downside was catalyzed by 156 00:08:50,040 --> 00:08:54,960 Speaker 2: forced liquidation as the result of maybe excessive leverage. Has 157 00:08:55,000 --> 00:08:57,600 Speaker 2: most of that leverage exited the system, would you say, 158 00:08:57,679 --> 00:09:00,839 Speaker 2: or is there still maybe a few things that need 159 00:09:00,880 --> 00:09:01,880 Speaker 2: to be shaken out further. 160 00:09:03,120 --> 00:09:07,000 Speaker 3: The resilience of the Korean stocks this week especially suggests 161 00:09:07,000 --> 00:09:08,839 Speaker 3: that a lot of that leverage has been taken out. 162 00:09:09,080 --> 00:09:12,880 Speaker 3: The immediate concern for everybody's private credit. Just in the 163 00:09:12,960 --> 00:09:17,160 Speaker 3: past twenty four hours, JP Morgan has said they're going 164 00:09:17,160 --> 00:09:20,720 Speaker 3: to write down some levels Morgan Stanley today saying they're 165 00:09:20,720 --> 00:09:25,840 Speaker 3: restricting access. This is a huge factor for markets partly 166 00:09:25,920 --> 00:09:29,280 Speaker 3: because it's so a lot of people don't understand what's there. 167 00:09:29,559 --> 00:09:32,040 Speaker 3: They can't see the data behind. They know it's a 168 00:09:32,080 --> 00:09:36,080 Speaker 3: big aspect in financial markets, but as the name suggests, 169 00:09:36,280 --> 00:09:38,800 Speaker 3: there's not much public information on private credits, so people 170 00:09:38,840 --> 00:09:40,920 Speaker 3: a little bit in the dark. But when they hear 171 00:09:41,000 --> 00:09:44,640 Speaker 3: that two of America's largest financial institutions are very concerned 172 00:09:45,120 --> 00:09:48,600 Speaker 3: about what's going on, suddenly everybody is on edge because 173 00:09:48,679 --> 00:09:50,640 Speaker 3: if they're worried about it, then we should be worried 174 00:09:50,679 --> 00:09:53,520 Speaker 3: about it too, So we could be at the beginning 175 00:09:53,960 --> 00:09:56,640 Speaker 3: of what is a very unpleasant story in the private 176 00:09:56,679 --> 00:10:02,040 Speaker 3: credit space that would impact across equities. Everybody will be 177 00:10:02,080 --> 00:10:05,439 Speaker 3: subject to the fallout from that. So people now scrambling 178 00:10:05,480 --> 00:10:08,360 Speaker 3: to try and find out is it really a very 179 00:10:08,400 --> 00:10:12,480 Speaker 3: serious situation, how bad is it and how quickly is 180 00:10:12,520 --> 00:10:13,320 Speaker 3: it going to unfold. 181 00:10:13,559 --> 00:10:16,079 Speaker 2: I'm wondering whether some of the redemptions that we're seeing 182 00:10:16,120 --> 00:10:19,520 Speaker 2: in the space, though, may be tied to weakness and 183 00:10:19,600 --> 00:10:21,880 Speaker 2: other as said classes, which is to say that you 184 00:10:21,960 --> 00:10:24,800 Speaker 2: have to raise funds to take care of the business 185 00:10:24,800 --> 00:10:27,240 Speaker 2: elsewhere that may not be working so well. Is that 186 00:10:27,280 --> 00:10:28,079 Speaker 2: a possibility. 187 00:10:28,840 --> 00:10:31,600 Speaker 3: If it is, then it's a very dangerous situation because 188 00:10:31,600 --> 00:10:35,080 Speaker 3: once these things start to spiral, if you need to 189 00:10:35,120 --> 00:10:37,800 Speaker 3: sell in one asset class to make up for losses 190 00:10:37,840 --> 00:10:41,240 Speaker 3: in another, then yeah, it can turn into a very 191 00:10:41,320 --> 00:10:45,200 Speaker 3: nasty position. And we're hearing that hedge funds having a 192 00:10:45,360 --> 00:10:47,840 Speaker 3: very bad time at the moment because of the commodity losses. 193 00:10:47,880 --> 00:10:50,400 Speaker 3: So I think Gold and Sachs had a report this 194 00:10:50,480 --> 00:10:53,800 Speaker 3: morning saying that it's the worst period for hedge funds 195 00:10:53,840 --> 00:10:56,560 Speaker 3: since the Liberation Day sell off in April last year. 196 00:10:57,200 --> 00:11:01,760 Speaker 3: So everywhere you look, the certainly vulnerabilities in the system 197 00:11:01,800 --> 00:11:04,880 Speaker 3: here which investors will have to digest and they'll have 198 00:11:04,920 --> 00:11:08,120 Speaker 3: the price accordingly, which will make them much more defensive. 199 00:11:08,360 --> 00:11:10,240 Speaker 3: And we're coming towards the end of the first quarter 200 00:11:10,360 --> 00:11:12,559 Speaker 3: as well. Not great timing, really, not. 201 00:11:12,559 --> 00:11:14,839 Speaker 2: At all, Bark, Thank you so very much. It's always 202 00:11:14,840 --> 00:11:18,480 Speaker 2: a pleasure. Bloomberg Strategist Mark Cranfield joining from our studios 203 00:11:18,520 --> 00:11:29,360 Speaker 2: in Singapore here on the Daybreak Asia podcast. Welcome back 204 00:11:29,400 --> 00:11:32,480 Speaker 2: to the Daybreak Asia Podcast. I'm Dog Krisner. Let's get 205 00:11:32,520 --> 00:11:35,320 Speaker 2: some more analysis on what we're seeing in oil markets 206 00:11:35,320 --> 00:11:39,760 Speaker 2: today with Dylan Wu, research strategist at Pepperstone. Dylan spoke 207 00:11:39,800 --> 00:11:43,080 Speaker 2: with Bloomberg TV host Heidi Stroud, Watts, and April Hong. 208 00:11:43,240 --> 00:11:45,920 Speaker 1: At this point, there's no sort of real opportunity or 209 00:11:46,040 --> 00:11:49,559 Speaker 1: site of an off ramp for either side. Clearly, releasing 210 00:11:49,559 --> 00:11:52,600 Speaker 1: more suppli in oil markets is not releasing that oil 211 00:11:52,640 --> 00:11:56,280 Speaker 1: premium from investors either. So how do you kind of 212 00:11:56,400 --> 00:11:59,440 Speaker 1: view this energy driven a shock? Is it a temporary hit? 213 00:11:59,760 --> 00:12:02,319 Speaker 1: Is the beginning of something more structural and problematic? 214 00:12:04,440 --> 00:12:08,160 Speaker 4: While I stay really cautious about calling it a sustainable 215 00:12:08,640 --> 00:12:11,640 Speaker 4: pullback in oil prices, I mean, some of the headlines 216 00:12:12,040 --> 00:12:15,840 Speaker 4: may have briefly lifted market sediment, but they are far 217 00:12:16,000 --> 00:12:19,600 Speaker 4: far away from enough to justify a lost in decline oil. 218 00:12:19,840 --> 00:12:23,000 Speaker 4: I mean, on the giubilical side, Donald Trump just suggested 219 00:12:23,040 --> 00:12:26,560 Speaker 4: the war could end soon, but Iran has hinted that 220 00:12:26,840 --> 00:12:31,839 Speaker 4: the reciprocal strikes could turn into continual strikes, and it's 221 00:12:31,880 --> 00:12:34,680 Speaker 4: also taking a very hard line on the reopening of 222 00:12:34,720 --> 00:12:37,480 Speaker 4: the Strait of Hormis. So at this stage we're really 223 00:12:37,520 --> 00:12:40,800 Speaker 4: not seeing any clear size or signals of this kind 224 00:12:40,880 --> 00:12:44,520 Speaker 4: of de escalation, and the geopolitical risk premiums do very 225 00:12:44,600 --> 00:12:49,920 Speaker 4: much alive. And then let's come to the strategic reserve story. 226 00:12:50,240 --> 00:12:53,760 Speaker 4: So the IEA members have a grade to release about 227 00:12:53,800 --> 00:12:57,520 Speaker 4: three hundred to four hundred million barrels, which sounds like 228 00:12:57,840 --> 00:13:00,640 Speaker 4: a big number, but when you read we run, the 229 00:13:00,679 --> 00:13:04,440 Speaker 4: mass is actually quite small compared with the potential distruction 230 00:13:04,600 --> 00:13:08,080 Speaker 4: from hormers. So roughly twenty million burros passed through the 231 00:13:08,120 --> 00:13:11,079 Speaker 4: strait of hormers every day. So even in a very 232 00:13:11,200 --> 00:13:15,720 Speaker 4: very coordinated scenario, those reserves would only cover about two 233 00:13:15,800 --> 00:13:20,600 Speaker 4: to three weeks of supply. And that assumes a perfect release, 234 00:13:20,679 --> 00:13:24,760 Speaker 4: I mean, which is quite unluckily from my perspective. So yes, 235 00:13:25,080 --> 00:13:27,840 Speaker 4: reserve releases can ease price pressure for a while, but 236 00:13:28,120 --> 00:13:32,800 Speaker 4: they can't really fully offset a large supply distruction. That's 237 00:13:32,880 --> 00:13:35,560 Speaker 4: why we only sort of brief pullbacking oil after the 238 00:13:35,559 --> 00:13:37,680 Speaker 4: headlines Dylan. 239 00:13:37,800 --> 00:13:40,520 Speaker 1: As we're speaking, we're also being reminded that trade still 240 00:13:40,559 --> 00:13:43,520 Speaker 1: remains a major uncertainty for investors in the markets as well. 241 00:13:43,600 --> 00:13:47,040 Speaker 1: Right to that end, the US Trade Representatives Office has 242 00:13:47,040 --> 00:13:50,880 Speaker 1: begun a Section three oh one investigation totally three hundred 243 00:13:50,920 --> 00:13:53,640 Speaker 1: and three oh one probes related to manufacturing sectors in 244 00:13:53,679 --> 00:13:58,440 Speaker 1: two countries including China, the EU, Singapore, Switzerland, Norway, Indonesia, 245 00:13:59,000 --> 00:14:01,480 Speaker 1: Malaysia and Cambodia. And Thailand also among them as well. 246 00:14:01,559 --> 00:14:04,200 Speaker 1: Hearing will be held on May fifth, but they've requested 247 00:14:04,240 --> 00:14:07,920 Speaker 1: consultations with the economies that are under investigation. This comes 248 00:14:07,960 --> 00:14:10,720 Speaker 1: as we're looking at a series of new trade probes 249 00:14:10,840 --> 00:14:14,840 Speaker 1: after of course Donald Trump's so called reciprocal duties were 250 00:14:14,840 --> 00:14:17,720 Speaker 1: struck down by the US Supreme Court. So this is 251 00:14:17,800 --> 00:14:20,280 Speaker 1: just another reminder that that tower of war, that the 252 00:14:20,320 --> 00:14:25,160 Speaker 1: trade uncertainties remain even as we are contending with war 253 00:14:25,400 --> 00:14:30,000 Speaker 1: and energy crisis as well. So with all of the uncertainties, 254 00:14:30,080 --> 00:14:32,720 Speaker 1: not to mention the implications on global growth and inflation, 255 00:14:33,240 --> 00:14:36,440 Speaker 1: are there markets or sectors where you see places that 256 00:14:36,520 --> 00:14:41,920 Speaker 1: investors could potentially find a respite or a place to 257 00:14:42,000 --> 00:14:43,640 Speaker 1: hide while all of this is playing out. 258 00:14:45,760 --> 00:14:49,040 Speaker 4: Yeah, I mean that's a really great question. And first 259 00:14:49,080 --> 00:14:52,960 Speaker 4: of all, I think, apart from the high will of 260 00:14:53,040 --> 00:14:57,080 Speaker 4: higher energy sector, I think the tech sector, including the 261 00:14:57,240 --> 00:15:02,160 Speaker 4: US tech equities, are quite resilient at the moment. I mean, 262 00:15:02,160 --> 00:15:05,320 Speaker 4: in the first place, people are putting many of their 263 00:15:05,360 --> 00:15:09,480 Speaker 4: capitals into the Asian tech sectors, including some of their 264 00:15:09,560 --> 00:15:12,560 Speaker 4: memory ships and the surge name. But at the moment, 265 00:15:12,640 --> 00:15:18,080 Speaker 4: because US is less reliance on this kind of energy 266 00:15:18,120 --> 00:15:23,640 Speaker 4: imput and Also, we're seeing great corporate earnings from the 267 00:15:23,680 --> 00:15:27,280 Speaker 4: previous queue for earning season, so I think we can 268 00:15:27,360 --> 00:15:31,000 Speaker 4: potentially looking into some of the buy the deep opportunities 269 00:15:31,040 --> 00:15:35,600 Speaker 4: in US equities. But that's sad. We really need to 270 00:15:35,800 --> 00:15:40,640 Speaker 4: looking into the potential development in the jeopilical site. If 271 00:15:40,680 --> 00:15:45,200 Speaker 4: we are seeing a sustained elevated oil price, then the 272 00:15:45,240 --> 00:15:49,240 Speaker 4: inflationary pressure can come into the US market and that 273 00:15:49,280 --> 00:15:52,200 Speaker 4: could potentially burden to the bullish sediment. 274 00:15:54,760 --> 00:15:58,120 Speaker 5: Dylan, does that mean that when it comes through the dollar, 275 00:15:59,080 --> 00:16:03,400 Speaker 5: some of these uh, you know, tailwinds from the US 276 00:16:03,520 --> 00:16:07,040 Speaker 5: being an exporter of energy are going to offset the 277 00:16:07,360 --> 00:16:09,200 Speaker 5: trade risks ultimately. 278 00:16:11,400 --> 00:16:16,400 Speaker 4: Well, I think that's a fair core. I do have 279 00:16:17,600 --> 00:16:23,600 Speaker 4: a cautious optimism about the dollars further testing to the upside. 280 00:16:24,000 --> 00:16:27,480 Speaker 4: I think three key factors are currently supporting the dollar performance. 281 00:16:27,840 --> 00:16:33,880 Speaker 4: Rising safe haven demand, higher inflation expectations alongside climbing treasure yields, 282 00:16:33,960 --> 00:16:37,360 Speaker 4: and also the possibility that the US could emerge as 283 00:16:37,400 --> 00:16:41,960 Speaker 4: an alternative energy supplier. I mean the third reason is 284 00:16:42,360 --> 00:16:45,960 Speaker 4: perhaps more interesting here. As the world's largest oil and 285 00:16:46,200 --> 00:16:51,600 Speaker 4: gas producer, the US may actually gain a relative advantage 286 00:16:51,640 --> 00:16:55,080 Speaker 4: when we're seeing some of the energy facilities in salt, 287 00:16:55,160 --> 00:16:59,440 Speaker 4: the Qatar or Israel phase disorptions and shipping through the 288 00:16:59,480 --> 00:17:03,560 Speaker 4: strait of war is becomes somehow constraints. Market are starting 289 00:17:03,600 --> 00:17:07,040 Speaker 4: to pricing in a new narrative, which is the US 290 00:17:07,119 --> 00:17:11,520 Speaker 4: could step in as a stronger alternative energy supplier. I 291 00:17:11,520 --> 00:17:16,119 Speaker 4: think as well as inflation expectations remain elevated and geopolitical 292 00:17:16,200 --> 00:17:19,680 Speaker 4: tensions posis, the downside for the dollar may remain quite limited. 293 00:17:21,640 --> 00:17:24,400 Speaker 5: Where does this leave Chinese assets? Did in what's been 294 00:17:24,400 --> 00:17:27,440 Speaker 5: interesting is China's been seen as a sort of haven 295 00:17:27,920 --> 00:17:31,600 Speaker 5: amid the war because of its energy reserves. Then we 296 00:17:31,600 --> 00:17:34,000 Speaker 5: are looking as well towards the end of the month 297 00:17:34,080 --> 00:17:36,359 Speaker 5: where Trump and Sea are set to meet, you have 298 00:17:36,400 --> 00:17:40,440 Speaker 5: these tariff developments. China is not part of. Chinese is 299 00:17:40,520 --> 00:17:43,320 Speaker 5: part of some of these investigations. What are you seeing 300 00:17:43,320 --> 00:17:46,280 Speaker 5: in terms of the trajectory for Chinese assets? 301 00:17:47,800 --> 00:17:51,159 Speaker 4: Well, I think I'm quite bullish on the Chinese asset. 302 00:17:51,240 --> 00:17:56,800 Speaker 4: Although from the NPC just concluded, Chinese revised down it's 303 00:17:56,880 --> 00:18:00,400 Speaker 4: twenty six GDB target and it was sad are from 304 00:18:00,520 --> 00:18:03,040 Speaker 4: a four point five percent to five percent. And you know, 305 00:18:03,119 --> 00:18:06,639 Speaker 4: some people are concerning about the economic outlook for China. 306 00:18:06,680 --> 00:18:09,960 Speaker 4: But I think it's basically the government saying we're okay 307 00:18:10,040 --> 00:18:13,320 Speaker 4: with moderate growth if it gives us more room to 308 00:18:13,480 --> 00:18:18,600 Speaker 4: push through structural reforms. So market shouldn't you know, to 309 00:18:18,600 --> 00:18:21,960 Speaker 4: to be overreacted to the headline Nomber. The focus is 310 00:18:22,160 --> 00:18:24,680 Speaker 4: still on the policy direction and the room it creates 311 00:18:24,720 --> 00:18:27,960 Speaker 4: for for longer term transformation. So at the moment, I 312 00:18:28,000 --> 00:18:32,680 Speaker 4: think China is pushing forward to you know, transform from 313 00:18:33,280 --> 00:18:41,240 Speaker 4: solely rely on export and like the infrastructures two more 314 00:18:41,320 --> 00:18:44,040 Speaker 4: on the high and tach and this kind of development. 315 00:18:44,400 --> 00:18:47,640 Speaker 4: So I think I'm quite bullish on China as long 316 00:18:47,680 --> 00:18:53,240 Speaker 4: as it can find another driven forces to boost their 317 00:18:53,280 --> 00:18:54,920 Speaker 4: domestic economy and consumption. 318 00:18:55,240 --> 00:18:59,480 Speaker 2: That is Dylan will Research Strategistic Pepperstone speaking with Bloomberg 319 00:18:59,480 --> 00:19:03,040 Speaker 2: TV hosts Heidi Stroud Watts and April Hong, bringing you 320 00:19:03,119 --> 00:19:08,679 Speaker 2: their conversation here on the Daybreak Asia Podcast. Thanks for 321 00:19:08,720 --> 00:19:13,359 Speaker 2: listening to today's episode of the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia Edition podcast. 322 00:19:13,680 --> 00:19:16,800 Speaker 2: Each weekday, we look at the story shaping markets, finance, 323 00:19:17,160 --> 00:19:20,239 Speaker 2: and geopolitics in the Asia Pacific. You can find us 324 00:19:20,280 --> 00:19:24,480 Speaker 2: on Apple, Spotify, the Bloomberg Podcast YouTube channel, or anywhere 325 00:19:24,480 --> 00:19:27,600 Speaker 2: else you listen. Join us again tomorrow for insight on 326 00:19:27,640 --> 00:19:31,760 Speaker 2: the market moves from Hong Kong to Singapore and Australia. 327 00:19:32,200 --> 00:19:34,679 Speaker 2: I'm Doug Prisner, and this is Bloomberg