WEBVTT - How They’re Really Making Money On Your Free Robinhood Trades

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots podcast.

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wisn't Thal and I'm Tracy. Tracy. I have

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 1>a question about things in Hong Kong, which is, are

0:00:22.720 --> 0:00:25.079
<v Speaker 1>people going crazy for stock trading there the way they

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>are here? It's a good question. I'm not sure if

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>this is reflected in Hong Kong, but definitely in mainland

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 1>China We've had this massive rally in Chinese shares, So yeah,

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>over there we're having like a similar retail boom to

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>what we have seen in the US. Yeah, I mean

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:44.159
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty crazy. I mean that has been you know,

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of like subplots to this crisis. In fact,

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of the theme of our podcast over the

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>last several months, is just exploring all of the subplots.

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 1>But the the incredible boom that we've seen in retail

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 1>trading activity has to be one of the more surprising ones.

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>And of course the whole you know, it's the whole

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>robin hood phenomenon. All these people their home, they're not

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>their jobs, there's no sports betting going on, and so

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:12.559
<v Speaker 1>it's like, all right, well I got a few bucks

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:15.959
<v Speaker 1>laying around, maybe I'll bet on some Tesla shares for

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>free on robin Hood. Yeah. I think that's it, isn't it.

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:22.319
<v Speaker 1>It's it's not it's not necessarily that retail investors are

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:25.199
<v Speaker 1>jumping into the stock market. It's the way in which

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>they're doing that. Because we have commission free trading now,

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:31.319
<v Speaker 1>you can kind of take a punt on a bunch

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of stuff without necessarily losing that much money, at least upfront,

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess. And like the punts that we are seeing.

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Tesla hurts switched to Clared bankruptcy. Everyone's been talking about those,

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and I think that really that really stands out right now. Yeah. Absolutely.

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I remember like last year, I think it was it

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>was last year and Charles Schwab announced that who was

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>going to cut commissions to zero, and a bunch of

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>other online broker bridges followed suit, and my first though

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 1>was like, oh boy, like, people are gonna lose a

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>ton of money because they're gonna overtrade, and some people

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 1>probably are. But the weird thing is that a bunch

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 1>of people who jumped into the market over the last

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>several months have actually participated in one of the most

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:18.359
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary rallies we've seen of all time. So for now,

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 1>some people are clearly winning. Yeah, But the other part

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>of the story is, I guess the downsides of retail participation,

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:28.080
<v Speaker 1>or not the downsides, but the criticism that comes along

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>with it. So obviously a lot of people have been

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:34.920
<v Speaker 1>making fun of people who are buying Tesla stock or

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 1>bankrupt company stock. We've also had some criticism of some

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>of the trading platforms, but particularly robin Hood, which seems

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>to be at the at the forefront of commission free trading. Right,

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>robin Hood has sort of become it's kind of like

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 1>become like the like band aid or Kleenex. It's like

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:59.359
<v Speaker 1>this brand, but it also is synonymous with a phenomenon

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>or an industry, you where lots of people are getting

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>into trading and this whole commission free retail craze it also,

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>um you know, raises some questions in addition to just

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of the retail side, about how the industry is

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>making money and who is really the big winner here,

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Because sure, there are some people that have probably turned

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of money into um, you know, millions

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>thanks to investing in buying call options on Tesla, but

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>also a lot of people are just are making a

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of money just handling this incredible order flow, this

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>incredible activity. And obviously with commissions having gone to zero,

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the business model has changed a little bit safe from

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the late nineties when the online brokers say like charged

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 1>just fourteen dollars a trade or whatever it was, right,

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 1>so there's no free lunch and economics, there's supposed to

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>be no free lunch when it comes to trading. But

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>clearly retail investors are getting you know, commission free trades,

0:03:57.400 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and yet someone must be making money off of those.

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 1>How are they doing it? Exactly? And again that kind

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>of feeds into some of the criticism that we've seen

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>around the robin Hood platform. Yeah, exactly right. So that's

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>what we're going to dive into today, like who's really

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 1>making money off of all this activity? How sustainable it is,

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 1>what the new business models of online brokerage really look like.

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:24.919
<v Speaker 1>And so we're going to be talking to a great guest.

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:27.039
<v Speaker 1>He's actually with us at Bloomberg. He's the head of

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>market structure research at Bloomberg Intelligence. Larry tab is joining

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>us to explain the sort of the new retail online

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 1>broken landscape. Who's making money out Larry, Thank you very

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us, Joe and Tracy. I'm really happy

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:45.599
<v Speaker 1>to be here. It's great to be here. Thanks. How

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>surprising or weird is this moment? You've been examining the

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>world of market structure for a long time. How crazy

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>are things right now? From your perspective, that's pretty insane,

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you look at if you look at

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>equity volumes. While we didn't hit a record during during

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>February March, we you know, in terms of share volume,

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>we pretty much almost doubled the amount of notional traded

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 1>and that has a lot to do with the lack

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>of stock splits. But um, the amount of value turning

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:20.600
<v Speaker 1>over is just phenomenal, given given traditional history, and even

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 1>this is through the global financial crisis, through the dot

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:27.839
<v Speaker 1>com meltdown, the volume has just been astronomical. And and

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 1>actually the other thing you got to go provide kudos too,

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:35.679
<v Speaker 1>is the market infrastructure. We really haven't seen now. Robin

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:37.719
<v Speaker 1>Hood was was down for a day or so, but

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:40.720
<v Speaker 1>other than that, you know, you've seen very few outages

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:44.360
<v Speaker 1>and and and given all the volume, and especially over

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 1>a prolonged period, the brokers, the exchanges, the infrastructure providers

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>have really done a great job keeping up with it.

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, robin Hood was down at a pretty critical

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>time in retrospect. But before we get into all of that,

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>what do you think is driving through retail interest in

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>stock trading at the moment. Is it as simple as

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:06.720
<v Speaker 1>everyone being stuck at home and having nothing to do,

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>or is it people who saw the federal reserve response

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and assume that it would lead to a big rally

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:16.839
<v Speaker 1>in risk assets or is it something else. I think

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>you've got a couple of different factors going on. First,

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I think the initial issue was a freak alpium that

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:26.359
<v Speaker 1>everybody realized that, hey, the the economy may come to

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>an end, and you know, we might have this pandemic

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>of global proportions that they kind of erect the economy.

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>And so I think a lot of people got on

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 1>sold a lot that you know, that would would explain

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the big dips and reallocate their portfolios.

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Then I think, you know, the economy started shutting down

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>in mid March. People were stuck at home, there was

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>no sports, there was no there was no nothing um

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and you still had a lot of volatility. And then

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I think you start getting into this whole you know,

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm stuck at home. What do I do? And then

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>you've got also a lot of professionals that are also

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>stuck at home with nothing going on and a lot

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 1>of volatility. And then you start seeing things like Amazon. Oh,

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm gonna go. I'm gonna go buy everything

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 1>from Amazon. It's going to come the next day. So

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>you've got logistics pops, You've got you online pops, and

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 1>you've got the hotels you know, and entertainment sector shutting down,

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>so you have a lot of interesting plays and thoughts around, hey, look,

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 1>this sector may actually do really well, but the sector

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>might actually do very poorly. So you've got some real

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 1>directional bets. Whereas over the last decade it's really, you know,

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the secret to life has mostly been throw everything in

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the sp five and just let it grow. So now

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 1>you actually have directional bets that you can play, and

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>so I think you've got to You've got a whole

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>bunch of factors. Plus, of course, you know, commission free brokers.

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 1>We started to see the you know, in December, when

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>we started to see Schwab and the other guys kind

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of throwing the talent commissions. You start to actually see

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the retail participation tick off. Actually, then it didn't just

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 1>happen in February March. It really started December when when

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 1>folks brought their commissions down to zero. Actually, I want

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to back up for a second. So we introduced you

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 1>as the head of market structure research at Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>But UM, talk to us a little bit about your background,

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 1>but also market structure What does that mean? I don't

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 1>know if like that term is a particular one that

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 1>people have a grasp on when they hear it. And

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 1>why is it something that itself should needs to be understood?

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Why why you should people know more about the sort

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 1>of vague, big picture concept of market structure and why

0:08:56.720 --> 0:09:00.079
<v Speaker 1>is it worth researching? Well, certainly my wife doesn't understand it,

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>but market structure researches is basically not necessarily what people

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:08.679
<v Speaker 1>are buying and selling and whether IBM is expensive or cheap.

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 1>It's how all of the infrastructure fits together. So it

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:14.439
<v Speaker 1>used to be, you know, we used to have a

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>New York Stock Exchange floor and people wandered around and

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 1>negotiated and we're specialists and floor brokers. Um. And then

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>NASTAC was over the counter, mostly traded on traders desks.

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>But over the last twenty years, basically all of this

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>has been electronified. And so we now have thirteen fourteen

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:40.199
<v Speaker 1>exchanges soon to be sixteen exchanges. In US equities, we

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 1>have sixteen options exchanges. And the pricing structure and how

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:47.559
<v Speaker 1>all this fits together and how do they connect and

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>who do you route to first, and what types of

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>orders do you put where? And how do you measure

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>whether you're you're getting a good fill or not. That's

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:58.599
<v Speaker 1>all it has to do with all the rules and

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>mechanisms the markets are engaged to actually match fib consellers together.

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 1>And this occurs not just in U S dequities, but

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>fixed income. You're starting to see electronification of the fixed

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:14.599
<v Speaker 1>income markets, and that's much more complicated and fragmented than equities,

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 1>UM and foreign exchange and and so you're seeing the

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:22.840
<v Speaker 1>movement and the electronification of all of these markets, and

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 1>it has tremendous ramifications in terms of how your orders

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>are executed. And so that's that's basically what market structure researches.

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:32.960
<v Speaker 1>So it starts with the rules and regulations and then

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>translates into how all of these rules from regulations are

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>adopted through exchanges and and the market infrastructure. I gotta

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>say I used to call Larry up quite a bit

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>when I was writing market structure stories over at the FT,

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>and he was always very generous with his time and insightful.

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:53.200
<v Speaker 1>So thank you, Larry. Um, let's connect the market structure

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>argument to what's going on with the commission free brokerages

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>or trading offers I mentioned in the intro. There's this

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:06.559
<v Speaker 1>weird thing. You're offering someone the ability to trade for free,

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 1>but obviously that trade is generating a cost somewhere in

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the system. So how exactly are those trades being funded? Yes,

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 1>so this is really an interesting topic, and so at

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the very highest level it sounds really fishy. Um, you

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 1>mean that market makers and wholesalers are actually paying to

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 1>execute against my trades as a retail broker there as

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>a retail investor. How can that be good? They must

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:38.680
<v Speaker 1>know something that I don't know. They must be ripping

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>me off, They must be giving, you know, getting me

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>a horrible execution. Um, this can't be right. Actually, though,

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:49.839
<v Speaker 1>it's not necessarily as nefarious as it all sounds. And

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 1>first of all, there are two different payment for order

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>flow screens. First there's equities, which which works one way,

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 1>and then there's options, which actually is a whole different

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 1>way that's a little more challenging. What we can talk

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit that about that if we have time,

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:08.079
<v Speaker 1>um the equity side, So think about equities and think

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:11.080
<v Speaker 1>about an electronic platform. So at the heart of an

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:14.439
<v Speaker 1>electronic matching platform that works in microseconds, and all of

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 1>these exchanges now execute in microseconds, if not quicker than microseconds,

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>basically hundreds of nanoseconds, which is an unfathomably fast amount

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of time. So me, as a market maker, what what

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 1>am I doing? I'm putting out a bid the buy

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 1>or sell Apple, okay, And and so all of these

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:38.959
<v Speaker 1>really smart, really high frequency trading firms are looking at

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>my quote to buy or sell Apple and trying to

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:46.320
<v Speaker 1>determine if that's the appropriate price for this nanosecond basically

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 1>for this microsect and if it's wrong, it's either not

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>going to trade if I'm too high or too low.

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 1>But if I'm too aggressive, I'm gonna get taken out

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:58.960
<v Speaker 1>in that in a heartbeat, in in the microsection. So

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 1>me as a market maker, I have to you know,

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 1>if I'm trading on lad exchanges. I have to ensure

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:11.080
<v Speaker 1>that I'm really confident in my quote, and confident in

0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 1>that my quote not just in terms of trace here

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:17.839
<v Speaker 1>Joe or Larry trading against that quote, but confident in

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:22.359
<v Speaker 1>that quote for a big, huge mutual funds, high frequency traders,

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>and the smartest hedge funds in the world to trade

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>against that quote. Um, because the second that i'm you know,

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 1>are the microseconds that I'm wrong, I'm gonna get taken out.

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>So the quote that I provide really has to be

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:38.560
<v Speaker 1>an institutional quote, a quote that that you know, hedge

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 1>funds and mutual funds need to think, Okay, you know

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 1>that's a fair quote, not too aggressive, not to to lose.

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 1>That said, the reason why, um, they're thinking that is

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>because they're trying to buy thousands of not hundreds of thousands,

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>if not millions, of shares. You and I are are

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 1>trying to buy a hundred shares are increasingly less than

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:03.679
<v Speaker 1>a hundred shares. But that's a whole another topic about

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:07.439
<v Speaker 1>AUTI loots to promote the title of this podcast, in effect,

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 1>because you're in my order is for a fraction of

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the shares of Fidelity or Capital Group or Bridgewater or

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 1>whoever's trying to buy, I can price you're in my

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>order tighter because you know, because I don't have you know,

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>because Larry doesn't have a million shares after that first

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred share share order behind it. So if you think

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>about supply and demand, what does the market do? E

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 1>gauges supply and demand, And if there's not a whole

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of supply or demand, then the price should not

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>change that much um Whereas if there's a lot of

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 1>supplying demand that the price will change a fair amount.

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>But theoretically, actually retail trades should actually price more aggressively

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 1>than than the larger orders. And that's kind of the

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>theory behind aiming for order flow, that a market maker

0:14:57.280 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 1>could actually priced mire your shares better then they can

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 1>price a large mutual funder heads fund. And the savings

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that gets split three ways. It gets split up into

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 1>price improvement, which basically means that they're gonna they're gonna

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>give me the customer a better price. They're going to

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>pay a few cents to the broker that the retail

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 1>broker who were outed that water flow to them, and

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>that's the payment for water flow part. And then the

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>third part of course, is the wholesaler's profit. And so

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>that is if you think about it, that that's that's

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the philosophy behind internalization and equity payment for water flow.

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, there's a lot there, So let's try to

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>unpack it a little bit further. So you've made this

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>distinction between say, if if me or Tracy you want

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to buy ten shares of apple Um, then the market

0:15:56.640 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>maker at the other end can price you, said, I

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 1>think more aggressively or give a so a narrower spread

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 1>because they feel more confident. Yeah, because because you're not

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>going to come on the back of that with another

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred another hundred an ad shares. So when Schwab last

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 1>year announced that they were going to go commission free,

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>everyone's like, yeah, well they can do it because they

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 1>have this huge float of other assets and they make

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 1>money in a bunch of ways. But that's obviously not

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the case with robin Hood, which doesn't have you know,

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 1>which doesn't have nearly the asset base, that has a

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>very different business model, that doesn't have the bank attached

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>to it like Schwab does. It doesn't have all the

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 1>R I, A, S, etcetera. So just let's walk through

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>specifically the innovation on say the robin Hood side a

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit further and how payment for order flow works there.

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I opened up my robin Hood app. I make an

0:16:56.920 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>order to buy ten shares of Apple. Explain to me

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 1>specifically how robin hood makes money after that transaction without commissions. Well,

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>they make them their their money pretty much the same

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:13.679
<v Speaker 1>way that swab are a merry trade or each trade

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, doing that trade, get is going to get

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 1>routed to most likely Citadel, Virtue or Susquehanna through the

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 1>city har E tr And just just to stop you

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 1>real quickly when you those are the market makers when

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 1>you were talking about Okay, so these entities like Virtue, Citadel,

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 1>uh and so forth their market Suscohana their market makers,

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 1>their market makers. Yeah, and so they're going to route

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 1>that order flow to generally one of those three players.

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:45.679
<v Speaker 1>They're the three largest, and there are a couple of

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 1>other auxiliary players there too, like six, like two sigma.

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 1>So they're gonna wrote that order flow to those guys.

0:17:53.560 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>The wholesalers are going to execute that equity order at

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:00.440
<v Speaker 1>we're better than the best price in the mark because

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>that's how the SEC demands that those those orders get

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:08.199
<v Speaker 1>executed and they're gonna pay. They're going to probably give

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of price improvement to the order so

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:13.959
<v Speaker 1>that you'll get a price that it's actually better than

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>what you see in the marketplace, and then they're going

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>to pay robin Hood a few cents for that order.

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:24.400
<v Speaker 1>And it could be you know, it could be anywhere

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:28.359
<v Speaker 1>from the average payment for order flow is about fourteen

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:31.159
<v Speaker 1>cents per hundred shares, but actually in robin Hood it's

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 1>it's more. Yeah, I wanted to I wanted to ask

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>you about exactly this, and I think maybe it will

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 1>help us understand the process more. But one of the

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:44.160
<v Speaker 1>criticisms of robin Hood especially is that it tends to

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:49.400
<v Speaker 1>get more for every dollar in you know, customer order

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:54.199
<v Speaker 1>flow versus someone like Schwab. Why is that? What's the

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>difference there, because presumably everyone is sort of executing at

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:00.719
<v Speaker 1>at similar prices, or at least execut eoting with with

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:06.439
<v Speaker 1>the same intent of achieving best price. Yeah, that that

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 1>gets a little square me. So, So if you think about,

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, the three sections of profit, you know, the

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>price improvement, the payment for water flow, and the market

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 1>maker profit. So if you think about it, the spread

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 1>is going to be the same whether it's you know,

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:25.920
<v Speaker 1>whether you know it's you or me, are coming from

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Schwab or robin Hood or each free. So the bigger

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 1>question is how much am I going to make on

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 1>that trade? And how is that what I make going

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>to be split between what I keep, what I send

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:39.200
<v Speaker 1>to the client and what I send to the broker

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 1>and what I what I keep will probably be somewhat

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:47.679
<v Speaker 1>consistent because it's very competitive, and so the real differences

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:50.919
<v Speaker 1>between what I what I give to the client and

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:55.640
<v Speaker 1>what I give to to the broker. And and while

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:59.640
<v Speaker 1>they don't have, um the execution quality stats, that's where

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 1>there could be different you know, um that robin Hood

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 1>may keep a larger percentage or a smaller percentage, or

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>give you a larger percentage back to the client or not.

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 1>And that's where there can be some variability. How do

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 1>you measure execution quality? Execution qualities usually measured by the

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:20.399
<v Speaker 1>spread and the percentage of the spread that goes to

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the market maker versus the percentage of spread that goes

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 1>to the client. And and we've seen those numbers actually

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 1>very significantly over the last twenty years from basically the

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 1>broker or the market maker keeping the full spread, the

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 1>only keeping roughly about of half the spread, actually keeping

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:45.919
<v Speaker 1>half the spread because everything is measured on half to

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>spread between the midpoint and the execution price. So it's

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 1>gone over the last twenty years from the market maker

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:57.879
<v Speaker 1>keeping basically the whole half spread versus they're only keeping

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:02.200
<v Speaker 1>about half the spread. And so it's all measured between

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the execution price and versus the displayed price. And it's

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>a measurement called e Q effective over quoted ratio and

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 1>that's part of the SEC's reporting requirements for retail execution.

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 1>So we're seeing, you know, we're seeing much better execution quality. Now.

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 1>That execution quality differs, you know, can differ really depending

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:32.679
<v Speaker 1>upon what the broker's priority is. Do they want to

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:34.920
<v Speaker 1>get paid or do they want to give that money

0:21:34.920 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 1>to the client. So you can look at let's just

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:41.200
<v Speaker 1>say Fidelity. Fidelity doesn't take payment for water cloth from

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 1>retail clients. So all of that, all of that money

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 1>that comes back in effect from the wholesaler um goes

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:55.479
<v Speaker 1>directly to the client. Whereas folks like Robin Hood probably

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:57.879
<v Speaker 1>take a little bit more, Shub takes a little less,

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 1>but you know, it really is a dialog most depending

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 1>upon what what the pretail brooke will wants. So I

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 1>want to press you a little bit on best execution

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:13.399
<v Speaker 1>and best price as well, because one of the criticisms

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of commission free trading or payment for order flow is

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 1>that even though you're trading for free, you might not

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:24.639
<v Speaker 1>necessarily be getting the best price. And that's you know,

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 1>even though you're dealing in smaller retail orders, um that

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:33.679
<v Speaker 1>market makers can execute at tighter spread. So can you

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>can you sort of walk us through that argument? And

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:41.440
<v Speaker 1>what is what is the opportunity that retail investors are

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:46.680
<v Speaker 1>missing out on when their trade goes to a payment

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>for order flow provider versus a different system. You're you're

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 1>starting to get into a little complicated areas here, So

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 1>let's let's make it a little let's make it a

0:22:57.359 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 1>little simpler, and then we'll add some complexity to Generally

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 1>what happens is since the wholesaler receives the order and

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>executes it off exchange, they then can manage the risk

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 1>and execute it and executed at a tighter price than

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 1>you know what can happen on the exchange. So without

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the without the whole, without the wholesaler. In effect, what

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 1>would happen is that order would go to an exchange

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and that would trade on the bid or on the offer, okay,

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 1>or you know, if it traded in the dark, it

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>might be executed at a mid price, but by and large,

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 1>if it goes to an exchange, it's going to be

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:36.399
<v Speaker 1>traded at the bid or the offer. The whole saler

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 1>is going to give you uh an inside price, a

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 1>price that's better than the bid of the offer. So

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:46.159
<v Speaker 1>the whole idea that that the wholesaler is kind of

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:49.439
<v Speaker 1>ripping you off. That doesn't really fly, especially when you

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:53.159
<v Speaker 1>start seeing prices that are tighter than the best bid offer,

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:56.200
<v Speaker 1>because you wouldn't necessarily get that. If you routed to

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 1>an exchange, you would generally get the bitter offer. Now,

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>adding a little bit of complexity to this is that

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 1>in most cases, odd lot orders are not displayed, and

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's part of the new SEC Market Data Infrastructure proposal.

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:17.199
<v Speaker 1>If they want to start seeing more odd lots, be

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:20.120
<v Speaker 1>part of the bit of the offer. So there may

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:24.920
<v Speaker 1>be odd lots sitting more aggressively in the market. Then

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>then you actually see when you get on your robin

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Hood screen or your schwob screen, and so they're actually

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 1>may be more aggressively priced orders out there that you

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:39.640
<v Speaker 1>can't see. But hopefully under the new UM proposal, if

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that ever goes through UM, you know you'll see a

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:47.159
<v Speaker 1>tighter price and a little different So I wish I

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:49.720
<v Speaker 1>could say that you were always when you've got price improvement,

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:53.439
<v Speaker 1>you are always getting UM the most aggressive price that

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>you can get into an exchange. But that may not

0:24:56.400 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 1>necessarily be true, depending upon the numbers share you're executing

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:04.479
<v Speaker 1>and what you actually can't see that's more aggressively priced

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 1>because of the way that consolidated Tabeork. So I'm curious.

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 1>So obviously, payment for order flow is UM available and

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>widely used in the United States, but over in the

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:21.960
<v Speaker 1>UK the Financial Services Authority cracked down on it many

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 1>many years ago. I think it was they banned it

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:26.440
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, Yeah, I think it was two thousand twelve.

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:30.160
<v Speaker 1>So what is it that they're seeing? What's their concern

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 1>with it that, you know, the US isn't necessarily seeing. Well.

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:37.399
<v Speaker 1>First of all, retail trading in Europe tends to trading

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 1>in Europe tends to be not as retail focused. A

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of the equity trading and shares trading in Europe,

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 1>it was really done by more institutions, so that's that's

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 1>one thing. Share trading in Europe in the UK by

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 1>retail tends to be more around spread betting, which is

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 1>illegal here, so so there are different types of retail

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 1>brands actions that occur. The priority in the US has

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 1>really been to get the retail investor the best price,

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and the SEC has structured those rules to really focus

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 1>more on price then price transparency within the exchanges. Europe

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:20.680
<v Speaker 1>has been a little bit more focused on the whole

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:24.199
<v Speaker 1>idea that we're community and the exchanges are really the

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 1>central point of price formation, and that that we want

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:32.120
<v Speaker 1>a larger proportion of orders and trades to go through

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the exchange infrastructure now and that was a part of

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 1>what the MIFED to the Market and Financial Instruments Directive.

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:45.879
<v Speaker 1>Their second cut at that tried to do with with

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 1>reducing the amount of flow that could be traded in

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:52.400
<v Speaker 1>dark pools and things like that. They were not successful there,

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:57.200
<v Speaker 1>so they'll probably be a MIFED three, but they try

0:26:57.240 --> 0:27:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to push order flow into the exchanges. The US really

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:06.440
<v Speaker 1>cares more about the price that investors get then UM

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 1>basically ensuring that the orders trade on exchange M. Can

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>you explain a little bit further. You mentioned that, Uh, Fidelity,

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I think you said, didn't do payment for order flow,

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 1>which broker? Yeah? For equities? Which ones uh do and don't?

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:44.440
<v Speaker 1>And what is the alternative model? Why not engaging it? Well,

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:48.919
<v Speaker 1>first of all, Fidelity has the large mutual fun complex FUM.

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know for sure, but you can assume that

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:55.880
<v Speaker 1>fidelities you want payment for order club. If you think

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 1>about it, if the retail orders did not go to

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the sellers, they would come into the market and overall

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:06.320
<v Speaker 1>they would be accessible to the institutions to trade against.

0:28:06.520 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 1>So so if you look at Fidelity over over, you

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>know its entirety, they want access to that order float

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 1>into their mutual funds, which they're really not getting. The

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 1>contra argument to that is that you know Fidelity, and

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not just picking up Fidelity, but you know every

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:26.959
<v Speaker 1>mutual fund or every institutional trader, they hire traders, professional

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:32.160
<v Speaker 1>traders who use algorithms to study um you know, execution quality,

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 1>who really focused on how they execute their waterflow, and

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 1>that's what they get paid for. That's what you can

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 1>pay your fees to cover UM, but who represents your

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 1>order at Schwab, who represents your order you know, at

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 1>each trade you can argue that that is the wholesale

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 1>of the wholesaler you know, gives you that best price

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:53.320
<v Speaker 1>in effect, because they are the guy that's guaranteeing that

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 1>best execution. And SWAB and those guys, they don't have

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:02.240
<v Speaker 1>those teams of traders studying every fill, every order UM

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and every nuance of transaction. So it's a it's a

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 1>difference of philosophy that it's it's really it'd be great

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to say the payment for order flow is good or

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 1>bad or this to that it's very nuanced and it's

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 1>general life fall on that it's been. It's it's a

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 1>good thing. We'll put it this way. The whole sailing process.

0:29:22.160 --> 0:29:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Whether the firm like Fidelity gives all that money back

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:28.200
<v Speaker 1>to the client, I think that's a great thing. UM.

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I would much rather see um price improvement go to

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the client rather than the brokerags take a portion of it.

0:29:36.360 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 1>But on the other hand, you know that payment for

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 1>water flow along with securities lending, which is the other

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:45.480
<v Speaker 1>way that these guys make money. You know that that's

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you know what funds the ability to have pre commissions,

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 1>so it's not like they're going to town on your

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 1>order flow. It's a very competitive market and generally execution

0:29:55.960 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 1>quality has just been getting better and better, so it's

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 1>really this whole pros This has actually been good for

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 1>individual investors um so. In addition to the big boom

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 1>in retail trading, one of the recent trends that we've

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 1>seen is all the banks reporting their results and a

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of them posting better than expected trading results. You

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 1>mentioned internalization towards the beginning of our conversation. Could you

0:30:21.840 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe give us an overview of what internalization actually means

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:31.680
<v Speaker 1>at banks and how it it might be I guess

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 1>how the business might be doing at the moment given

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:38.240
<v Speaker 1>that retail trading boom. There's been actually major shifts in

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 1>terms of food trades and why if you look at

0:30:43.440 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 1>our food trades and who profits. If you look at

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 1>market share of you know, the over the counter business,

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 1>it has shifted really dramatically to you know, to the wholesalers.

0:30:57.560 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Citadel Is trading like you know alone of all the

0:31:03.480 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 1>overcount over the counter trades, and they have gained share

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of months. Virtue um is less

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:15.560
<v Speaker 1>than them. I think they're in the you know or

0:31:15.560 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 1>something range. And so you're seeing a tremendous shift of

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:23.880
<v Speaker 1>word flow to these wholesalers. The folks who are actually

0:31:23.920 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 1>losing ground are, you know, the traditional brokers, the government's access,

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the Morgan Stanley's, the city groups, the Bank of American

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 1>merrell Inches. They are losing, they have been losing ground

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:38.640
<v Speaker 1>in terms of equities, and and that's because a certain extent,

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 1>it's very difficult for them to keep up with the

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 1>technological race, the technology race, you know, compared to the Citadels,

0:31:47.440 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the virtues, the two stigmas, the Susquehannas, Because to certain

0:31:52.840 --> 0:31:55.479
<v Speaker 1>extent you think about it, it's all about agility. If

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I can find a faster way, a faster server, a

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 1>better way to calculate this stuff. If there were fewer

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 1>levels of bureaucracy and technology layers between me and the

0:32:06.640 --> 0:32:10.479
<v Speaker 1>ability to get you know, changed, I can adapt quicker

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and I can be more competitive. And if you look

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:16.040
<v Speaker 1>at the big banks, they've gotten so big and so

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 1>large and and so so massive. So if so, if

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm in the equity trading side of big bank, a um,

0:32:23.960 --> 0:32:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm competing for resources, not just with the fixed income side,

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and not just with the institutional side, but I'm competing

0:32:31.120 --> 0:32:35.960
<v Speaker 1>for resources with retail banking, credit cards, mortgages, you know,

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 1>wealth management, all sorts of different players. And so whereas

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 1>if I am Citadel or Virture or Susquehanna, I just

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 1>need to go across the floor and say, hey, body,

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I need I need a new server, you know, right,

0:32:49.680 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and you check, you see, and you've seen that play

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 1>out as well as the regulatory infrastructure has not been

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 1>particularly favorable over the last decade. That's the big banks

0:32:58.440 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 1>in terms of taking risks. Now, on the other hand,

0:33:01.800 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, you look at the fixed income side, and

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 1>you look at the earnings that the big banks have

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:10.640
<v Speaker 1>turned out on the fixed income side, you're probably looking

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 1>at this quarter alone then making something like twenty to

0:33:15.280 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 1>thirty billion dollars on their trading business. Now that twenty

0:33:19.240 --> 0:33:22.760
<v Speaker 1>to thirty billion dollars is coming out of investors pockets,

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:24.760
<v Speaker 1>they are not making that kind of money on the

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 1>equity side. And that has a lot to do with

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the market structure and the efficiency and the way that

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:34.320
<v Speaker 1>these orders are internalized in how they trade, and so

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:36.360
<v Speaker 1>over the time I think you're going to see the

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 1>fixed income side become more efficient, probably will never be

0:33:39.880 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 1>as efficient as the equity side, mostly because there's if

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 1>it depending on if you include mortgages over a million

0:33:46.560 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 1>queues of some million individual securities that need to be priced,

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 1>but it's going to become more efficient and cheaper. Do

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you see these entities like Susquehanna and Citadel continuing to

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 1>ex spanned their lines of businesses and just continue you know,

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if cannibalization isn't the right word, but

0:34:06.400 --> 0:34:09.960
<v Speaker 1>find more areas where they can win market share against

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:14.879
<v Speaker 1>these legacy players, no question, no question. And so uh,

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you look at the you know, the

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:20.960
<v Speaker 1>markets that look closest to equities tend to be much

0:34:21.000 --> 0:34:25.360
<v Speaker 1>more easily able to be you know, aligned to electronic

0:34:25.400 --> 0:34:31.160
<v Speaker 1>trading type type strategies. So certainly options have gone that way.

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 1>If you look at an exchange, it's it's starting to

0:34:34.560 --> 0:34:37.160
<v Speaker 1>move in that direction. Some of the fixed income is

0:34:37.160 --> 0:34:38.799
<v Speaker 1>starting to move in that direction. And it may not

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:42.920
<v Speaker 1>necessarily be the same players. Some folks have different you know,

0:34:43.200 --> 0:34:46.319
<v Speaker 1>there are other players that focus in other markets, but

0:34:46.400 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the electronic guys are just they have lower overhead unless

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 1>regulatory burdens. So it's a combination of agility focus and

0:34:56.880 --> 0:35:02.440
<v Speaker 1>regulatory headwinds. And the banks over the last decade have

0:35:02.880 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 1>certainly had tremendous amounts of regulatory headwinds in the size

0:35:07.160 --> 0:35:09.480
<v Speaker 1>of the business. Before we go, I want to just

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:12.840
<v Speaker 1>go back to the robin Hood phenomenon. So you know,

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 1>people hear this stuff like Citadel is paying for order flow,

0:35:18.120 --> 0:35:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and they don't really understand what that means, and they're like, oh,

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you're you're being a front run, and that's really what's happening,

0:35:24.239 --> 0:35:26.359
<v Speaker 1>And as you described, that's really not and in fact,

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:30.480
<v Speaker 1>actually pricing is pretty good and it just keeps getting

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:35.360
<v Speaker 1>better and better, and so forth, should be sec or

0:35:35.400 --> 0:35:39.840
<v Speaker 1>regulators be more concerned about the gamification aspect. Of the

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 1>gamification aspect, the idea that, uh, you know, these entities

0:35:44.239 --> 0:35:47.719
<v Speaker 1>are sort of turning trading into a video game, and

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:50.400
<v Speaker 1>not so much whether people are getting bad prices are

0:35:50.400 --> 0:35:52.839
<v Speaker 1>being front run, but whether this is just sort of

0:35:52.880 --> 0:35:57.239
<v Speaker 1>like a risky, reckless way to introduced investors to the

0:35:57.280 --> 0:36:02.520
<v Speaker 1>stock market. Now, now your ring on politics, um, you know,

0:36:03.360 --> 0:36:06.400
<v Speaker 1>without oppinting on politics, but is this more the is

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:09.560
<v Speaker 1>this more the issue when people are like, something feels

0:36:09.560 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit wrong about this, or I'm a little

0:36:11.600 --> 0:36:15.399
<v Speaker 1>uncomfortable with this whole robin Hood thing. Is it more

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:20.719
<v Speaker 1>that side than the sort of more conspiratorial citadel stuff

0:36:20.760 --> 0:36:23.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that? There there are there are significant issues

0:36:24.000 --> 0:36:27.160
<v Speaker 1>there because if if now you can compare this pulls

0:36:27.360 --> 0:36:30.319
<v Speaker 1>to the dot com crisis, when you started to see investors,

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, piling the pets dot com and things like that.

0:36:33.800 --> 0:36:36.439
<v Speaker 1>This is different. Back then, it was really more about

0:36:36.480 --> 0:36:38.759
<v Speaker 1>I p O s and buying and holding, and you

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:42.080
<v Speaker 1>wound up, you know, with kind of plaky companies being

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:46.000
<v Speaker 1>valued and wait too much and and people holding um

0:36:46.120 --> 0:36:48.479
<v Speaker 1>all these overvalued assets and then all of a sudden

0:36:48.480 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the rug being pulled out. This seems to be a

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:54.160
<v Speaker 1>bit different and that this is more about trading. And

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the big things about robin Hood

0:36:56.680 --> 0:36:59.719
<v Speaker 1>is the transparency of their platform enables you to kind

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:02.840
<v Speaker 1>of see what other people are trading and joined the

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:07.440
<v Speaker 1>momentum train. And the problem with that is that that

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:12.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, because you're dealing with a handheld device, do

0:37:12.160 --> 0:37:15.480
<v Speaker 1>you have enough information to really understand if if you're

0:37:15.480 --> 0:37:19.040
<v Speaker 1>in the beginning stages of this momentum train or if

0:37:19.040 --> 0:37:21.520
<v Speaker 1>you're in the middle, or if you're really you know,

0:37:21.840 --> 0:37:25.200
<v Speaker 1>buying at the peak. The benefit is that are they

0:37:25.239 --> 0:37:28.160
<v Speaker 1>really investing a lot in each of these trades and

0:37:28.680 --> 0:37:30.960
<v Speaker 1>are they how long are they sticking in with it?

0:37:31.000 --> 0:37:33.920
<v Speaker 1>But there are certainly evaluation questions. But on the other hand,

0:37:33.920 --> 0:37:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of the SEC doesn't look at itself because I'm trying

0:37:39.120 --> 0:37:43.840
<v Speaker 1>to say, yes, we should allow you know, Larry or

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Joe or Tracy to buy Tesla whatever. They want to

0:37:48.719 --> 0:37:51.680
<v Speaker 1>make sure that you know, when you buy a Tesla

0:37:51.719 --> 0:37:55.640
<v Speaker 1>at whatever, is whatever the right price um and and

0:37:55.800 --> 0:37:58.919
<v Speaker 1>it is there transparency around that. And so I don't

0:37:58.920 --> 0:38:03.200
<v Speaker 1>see the SEC sticking their nose and the valuation issues

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:06.480
<v Speaker 1>that said people should be worried about the you know,

0:38:06.520 --> 0:38:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the value of what they're buying because it's an effective

0:38:08.719 --> 0:38:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that they're not really worried about it. Then you know,

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:15.839
<v Speaker 1>you're into the strategy of who's the next sucker who

0:38:15.880 --> 0:38:17.680
<v Speaker 1>is going to buy this for me at a higher price?

0:38:17.760 --> 0:38:24.600
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not sure that's great investing strategy right Well, uh, Larry,

0:38:24.640 --> 0:38:27.759
<v Speaker 1>this is a great conversation. This cleared up a lot

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:31.279
<v Speaker 1>of questions that I've had for a while and sort

0:38:31.320 --> 0:38:33.640
<v Speaker 1>of I think for me and Tracy gives us a

0:38:33.680 --> 0:38:37.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of new avenues to explore. So I really appreciate

0:38:37.360 --> 0:38:39.839
<v Speaker 1>you coming on and explaining it. I hope to play

0:38:39.880 --> 0:38:42.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't confuse everybody too much, but it's it's not that.

0:38:43.040 --> 0:38:45.560
<v Speaker 1>That's see, that's why we need market structure research because

0:38:45.600 --> 0:38:49.320
<v Speaker 1>it is complicated. Thanks so much. It feels like we

0:38:49.480 --> 0:38:52.080
<v Speaker 1>just scratched the service, but this was it was really great.

0:38:52.120 --> 0:39:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Thank you. Yeah. I have to admit tracing

0:39:01.040 --> 0:39:03.799
<v Speaker 1>this area it does sort of hurt my head a lot,

0:39:03.880 --> 0:39:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and I do have like a million more things I

0:39:05.920 --> 0:39:09.040
<v Speaker 1>want to explore now. But that was a really helpful

0:39:09.160 --> 0:39:11.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of overview of what is it kind of extraordinary

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:15.520
<v Speaker 1>moment in financial markets. Yeah, I mean I've read I've

0:39:15.560 --> 0:39:20.040
<v Speaker 1>read the criticism, and I've read some of Larry's research

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:22.880
<v Speaker 1>which kind of argues that payment for order flow isn't

0:39:22.960 --> 0:39:26.279
<v Speaker 1>as nefarious as it seems. And it's very hard for me,

0:39:26.400 --> 0:39:28.839
<v Speaker 1>as a non expert to con you know, to come

0:39:28.840 --> 0:39:32.040
<v Speaker 1>out on either side of that. But what I did

0:39:32.080 --> 0:39:34.520
<v Speaker 1>find very interesting and something that I think we can

0:39:34.560 --> 0:39:38.080
<v Speaker 1>all agree with was Larry's point about this idea of

0:39:38.880 --> 0:39:42.840
<v Speaker 1>commission free trading sort of turning the market into a

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:47.680
<v Speaker 1>very momentum driven one. You know, people aren't necessarily holding

0:39:47.680 --> 0:39:50.240
<v Speaker 1>for the long term because it doesn't cost them anything

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:54.040
<v Speaker 1>to make these trades, and so everything does really become

0:39:54.080 --> 0:39:58.239
<v Speaker 1>about momentum or flows, you know, just guessing where the

0:39:58.280 --> 0:40:01.440
<v Speaker 1>money is going to go in in next and one

0:40:01.480 --> 0:40:03.719
<v Speaker 1>of our Bloomberg colleagues, Luke Kaw, did a really good

0:40:03.719 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 1>story on robin Hood and this dynamic recently, and it

0:40:06.640 --> 0:40:10.960
<v Speaker 1>was sort of around people kind of agreeing what stocks

0:40:11.040 --> 0:40:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to buy and then pushing for them in online forums

0:40:14.800 --> 0:40:16.439
<v Speaker 1>and then the stock would go up and they would

0:40:16.480 --> 0:40:18.440
<v Speaker 1>make a lot of money on robin Hood through options

0:40:18.440 --> 0:40:22.160
<v Speaker 1>trading and things like that. Anyway, That's that's the dynamic

0:40:22.239 --> 0:40:24.719
<v Speaker 1>that that I think is very new and important for

0:40:24.800 --> 0:40:29.919
<v Speaker 1>markets overall. Yeah, tell the right. I also like, um,

0:40:30.120 --> 0:40:31.839
<v Speaker 1>we should have Chris White on again soon. I mean,

0:40:31.880 --> 0:40:33.719
<v Speaker 1>I know we've had them on like nine times, but

0:40:33.920 --> 0:40:37.440
<v Speaker 1>thinking about again revisiting this topic in light of just

0:40:37.480 --> 0:40:41.640
<v Speaker 1>this massive quarter that the Wall Street banks had trading

0:40:41.960 --> 0:40:45.640
<v Speaker 1>UH fixed income, we should definitely have them back on

0:40:45.880 --> 0:40:50.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about market structure on that side too, because obviously

0:40:50.120 --> 0:40:52.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a huge pot of gold there for anyone who

0:40:52.760 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 1>is in a good position to, uh, you know, continue

0:40:55.239 --> 0:40:58.239
<v Speaker 1>to disrupt that space like they've done with the equities. Hey,

0:40:58.320 --> 0:41:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I am always up for a market's ructure episode. Great,

0:41:01.719 --> 0:41:05.279
<v Speaker 1>well let's do more. So do we leave it there? Yeah?

0:41:05.320 --> 0:41:08.480
<v Speaker 1>You know what I forgot to ask Larry. I wonder like,

0:41:08.760 --> 0:41:12.000
<v Speaker 1>will we ever break the zero lower bound with brokerages? Like?

0:41:12.040 --> 0:41:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Can I get someone will pay us? Yeah? Yeah, maybe

0:41:15.400 --> 0:41:18.479
<v Speaker 1>that's the Maybe that's the next frontier. That'd be fun.

0:41:18.560 --> 0:41:21.080
<v Speaker 1>You could you know, maybe make more money than you

0:41:21.080 --> 0:41:25.200
<v Speaker 1>could on on interest rates by doing that? Yeah? Okay,

0:41:25.239 --> 0:41:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I I meant to ask that, but next time, Okay,

0:41:28.440 --> 0:41:32.200
<v Speaker 1>next time. All right, Well, this has been another episode

0:41:32.239 --> 0:41:34.799
<v Speaker 1>of the All Thoughts Podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway. You can

0:41:34.840 --> 0:41:38.000
<v Speaker 1>follow me on Twitter at Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe

0:41:38.000 --> 0:41:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Why Isn't All? You could follow me on Twitter at

0:41:40.680 --> 0:41:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the Stalwart, And you should follow our guests on Twitter

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Larry tab He's at el Tab with two Bees. Follow

0:41:47.040 --> 0:41:50.160
<v Speaker 1>our producer on Twitter, Laura Carlson at Laura M. Carlson.

0:41:50.320 --> 0:41:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Follow the Bloomberg head of podcast, Francesca Leave at Francesca Today,

0:41:54.800 --> 0:41:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and check out all of our podcasts under the handle

0:41:57.840 --> 0:42:13.520
<v Speaker 1>at podcast. Thanks for listening to