Speaker 1: All right, news round up, information overload hour. There's Friday
Speaker 1: toll free on numbers eight hundred and ninety four one
Speaker 1: sean if you want to be a part of the program. Well,
Speaker 1: the usual suspects in the state run legacy medium mob
Speaker 1: and these so called experts that hate Donald Trump in
Speaker 1: the legal profession rushing to the microphones to complain that
Speaker 1: the mortgage fraud case against Letitia James, Oh, it's weak.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, I'm calling bs and nonsense. Prosecutors have actual
Speaker 1: smoking gun documents signed by the Attorney General, and that
Speaker 1: would be Letitia James proving that she was claiming her
Speaker 1: primary residence would be in Norfolk, Virginia. Why because if
Speaker 1: that's your primary residence, you get a more favorable interest rate.
Speaker 1: So in that sense, I don't really see whether there's
Speaker 1: any ambiguity here. It was done to get a lower rate.
Speaker 1: There's a great irony in all of this, considering the
Speaker 1: case that she brought against Donald Trump, a phony evaluation
Speaker 1: tomorrow Lot, which it was not it at all. The
Speaker 1: only phony valuation of mar A Lago came from her
Speaker 1: and the judge Erduwan in that case in New York,
Speaker 1: which was obscene you know, I urge all of you
Speaker 1: if you want to know the real valuation of mar
Speaker 1: A Lago, go to realtor dot com, go to Zilo
Speaker 1: dot com and just peruse Palm Beach, Florida and ocean
Speaker 1: front property. And for example, there's a lot, a two
Speaker 1: acre lot for sale right now that I know of,
Speaker 1: in Pombeach, Florida, for two hundred million dollars. I know,
Speaker 1: it's obscene, it's crazy, it's nuts, it's absolutely beyond the pale,
Speaker 1: but that's what it's selling for. Mar A Lago has
Speaker 1: twenty two acres, it has a historic property, it is
Speaker 1: in pristine condition, it has over fifty bedrooms and bathrooms.
Speaker 1: It's got a club associated with it. It's a historical landmark.
Speaker 1: It's got a beach club, it's got the Inner Coastal Club,
Speaker 1: it's got all the amenities you could ever want in
Speaker 1: in any lifetime, including a salon and tennis courts, and
Speaker 1: you name it.
Speaker 2: They've got it.
Speaker 1: And anyway, so I would argue that the case against
Speaker 1: James is anything but weak. And but for the jurisdiction,
Speaker 1: and we'll see who the ultimate judges in this case.
Speaker 1: You know, will prosecutors be able to get a non
Speaker 1: biased judge and a jury in a liberal jurisdiction to
Speaker 1: try this case. The New York Post has details on
Speaker 1: the evidence against her. He bought a three bedroom, one
Speaker 1: bath Norfolk, Virginia home in August of twenty twenty, paid
Speaker 1: one hundred and thirty seven thousand dollars, most of which
Speaker 1: was financed one hundred and nine thousand, six hundred dollar
Speaker 1: loan that prohibited it from being used as a rental
Speaker 1: investment property that allowed her to obtain favorable loan terms
Speaker 1: not available for investment properties, they noted in the five
Speaker 1: page you Know filing, saving her approximately eighteen nine hundred
Speaker 1: and thirty three dollars over the life of the loan.
Speaker 1: And when a Post reporter visited this home in April,
Speaker 1: neighbors said they'd never seen James, not one time at
Speaker 1: the property. Her income tax forms designated the home as
Speaker 1: a rental that brought in thousands of dollars in additional income,
Speaker 1: So she's contradicting herself. Property records reviewed by the Post
Speaker 1: showed James granted power of attorney to her knees and
Speaker 1: authorized the purchase of the property for which they secured
Speaker 1: you Know This this mortgage anyway specific power of attorney
Speaker 1: for the purchase of real estate. Documents claim that the
Speaker 1: Virginia property was her primary residence, and this indictment puts
Speaker 1: the timeline of the alleged bank fraud scheme from August
Speaker 1: twentieth to January twenty twenty four for the purpose of
Speaker 1: influencing the action of OVM Financial a Fanny may back lender.
Speaker 1: Upon application for the loan, James represented and affirmed in
Speaker 1: uniform residential loan applications and related documents that the property
Speaker 1: would be used, you know, in a second case as
Speaker 1: a secondary residence, when in fact James James knew that
Speaker 1: the property was intended and used as an investment property
Speaker 1: and not personal occupancy anyway. Federal Housing regulator Bill Poulti
Speaker 1: actually referred James to the Justice Department and suggesting she
Speaker 1: had committed crimes including wire fraud, mail fraud, bank fraud,
Speaker 1: making false statements to a financial institution. By the way,
Speaker 1: if convicted in that under those circumstances, she would face
Speaker 1: sixty years in prison and an up to a two
Speaker 1: million dollar fine.
Speaker 2: Now I'm not sure where it's going to go. Now.
Speaker 1: Predictably, the media races to her defense the media mob. Well,
Speaker 1: first she races to her own defense and denies the allegations.
Speaker 3: Listen, this is nothing more than a continuation of the
Speaker 3: president's desperate weaponization of our justice system. He's forcing federal
Speaker 3: law enforcement agencies to do his bidding, all because I
Speaker 3: did my job as a New York State attorney general.
Speaker 2: He's charges are baseless, baseless.
Speaker 1: We'll find out then if you can turn into the
Speaker 1: legacy media mob fake news CNN, you have one anchor,
Speaker 1: somebody named Casey Hunt suggesting, Leticia James, mortgage fraud is something, oh,
Speaker 1: everyone in America does.
Speaker 2: No, everyone in America doesn't do this. Listen, Tis James.
Speaker 4: And again we're still getting the details. But if it's
Speaker 4: related to this mortgage issue, I mean, this is something
Speaker 4: that everyone in America, or many people at least, if
Speaker 4: you're lucky enough to be able to buy a house
Speaker 4: in America, you deal with this, right. The federal government
Speaker 4: doesn't go after all of these people for doing this.
Speaker 4: Does that play a role here? I mean, how often
Speaker 4: has there been a federal indictment for a bank fraud
Speaker 4: type of situation like the one we see here?
Speaker 1: Oh, pretty amazing, Eric, you want to hear about you.
Speaker 1: You want to see an example of media buys, Listen
Speaker 1: to fake news CNN's Aaron Burnett. Oh, if you're talking
Speaker 1: about Donald Trump or a Republican or a conservative, is
Speaker 1: she takes one pace position on mortgage fraud? You're talking
Speaker 1: about Letitia James take another position.
Speaker 2: Listen.
Speaker 5: These New York charges residential mortgage fraud among them, one of.
Speaker 6: The most serious.
Speaker 5: So he's looking at one to three years minimum, eight
Speaker 5: to twenty five years maximum.
Speaker 6: These are huge ranges. But those would be inescapable.
Speaker 7: Right.
Speaker 5: There's nothing a president can do to pardon on a
Speaker 5: state charge. James is the first Attorney General of New
Speaker 5: York to be indicted by the Justice Department, and it
Speaker 5: follows a nearly six month investigation into claims of mortgage fraud. Now,
Speaker 5: that is a charge the United States Justice Department rarely
Speaker 5: brings against individuals. But of course James is not an
Speaker 5: ordinary individual. Trump considers her an enemy after she sued
Speaker 5: him in twenty twenty two, accusing Trump of lying about
Speaker 5: his real estate empire and inflating the value of his properties.
Speaker 2: All right, joining us now?
Speaker 1: Greg Jarrett, Fox News Legal analyst number one New York
Speaker 1: Times bestselling author and Pierre de boss Is with us,
Speaker 1: managing partner of Romer Debas, which by the way, specializes
Speaker 1: in real estate. Welcome both of you to the forget
Speaker 1: about the media hypocrisy, Greg, let's just break down the
Speaker 1: facts of the cases. We know what the prosecution is
Speaker 1: saying in this case.
Speaker 8: Well, based purely on the paperwork that she executed, and
Speaker 8: we've seen that as exhibits. You cannot claim a house,
Speaker 8: whether it's primary or secondary, it doesn't matter. You can't
Speaker 8: claim it as an occupied residence. Then go about obtaining
Speaker 8: a lower, more favorable mortgage rate, then rent it out.
Speaker 8: You're cheating the lender by lying about its usage. And
Speaker 8: the document show that James incriminated herself. Both her mortgage
Speaker 8: and her insurance application said she would occupy the house
Speaker 8: at least partially, but then on i r S record
Speaker 8: she admitted it was purely a rental with zero personal occupancy. Well,
Speaker 8: it can't be both, and it's fraud. And you know,
Speaker 8: it turns out she never was there even briefly. Now
Speaker 8: her defend Sean you can see it coming because we've
Speaker 8: already heard from her attorney, is that well, it was
Speaker 8: all a terrible misunderstanding, a miscommunication, or a paperwork snaffoo.
Speaker 8: And you know somebody else is to blame, not Letitia Well.
Speaker 8: Under Ltisia's own stated standard in case she brought against
Speaker 8: Donald Trump, she declared, it is not an excuse. The
Speaker 8: borrower is always responsible, regardless of what others did. Even worse,
Speaker 8: a year ago, she issued the following statement, and this
Speaker 8: is going to haunt her in court. Quote. When powerful
Speaker 8: people cheat to get better loans, it comes at the
Speaker 8: expense of hard working people. Everyday. Americans cannot lie to
Speaker 8: a bank to get a mortgage, and if they did,
Speaker 8: our government would throw the book at them. There simply
Speaker 8: cannot be different rules for different people.
Speaker 1: Man, that's pretty devastating. That's check made her. She's checkmating herself.
Speaker 8: Yeah, she really is, So that'll be used against her.
Speaker 1: Pierre, this is what you do for a living, you know,
Speaker 1: to listen to a fake news CNN hosts say, oh,
Speaker 1: everyone does this. No, everyone doesn't do this.
Speaker 9: You know, it's it's something that unfortunately is widespread in
Speaker 9: throughout the country. But it doesn't make it right. Whether
Speaker 9: it's widespread or allegedly everybody does this. You're right, first
Speaker 9: of all, not everybody does this because bottom line is
Speaker 9: it's indefensible. It's fraud. That is really what it boils
Speaker 9: down to. There's no representation you can possibly have made
Speaker 9: with truthfulness and accuracy that you will be residing in Northfolk,
Speaker 9: Virginia as an elected official, or that you intended on
Speaker 9: buying a second home that you never occupied and fully
Speaker 9: rented out. Now again, like as a real estate attorney,
Speaker 9: we represent every major lending institution in the country and
Speaker 9: a number of consumers, and we've seen people do this,
Speaker 9: and mortgage brokers will do this to get a competitive
Speaker 9: advantage to offer better rates. It does not make it right.
Speaker 9: And I think the moral of the story here is
Speaker 9: that our elected officials, you know, really need to be
Speaker 9: held to a higher standard than your average civilian. I
Speaker 9: don't think there's going to be an investigation throughout the
Speaker 9: entire country for every borrower that's ever done this, but
Speaker 9: an elected official who has a higher standard to oblige
Speaker 9: by that violates this. It's completely mortgage fraud. And then
Speaker 9: the funny thing that Greg brings up is just the
Speaker 9: hysterical hypocrisy of her case against President Trump and all
Speaker 9: the statements she made which now We're coming back full
Speaker 9: circle and one of the most comical measures possible.
Speaker 2: All Right, quick break, welcome back.
Speaker 1: Final moments with Greg Jarrett and Pierre de Bosses with us,
Speaker 1: and then your calls on the other side this Friday,
Speaker 1: eight hundred and nine to four one seawn. All Right,
Speaker 1: Final moments with Greg Jarrett, Pierre de Bosses with us.
Speaker 1: Why is it that if you're buying a home as
Speaker 1: your primary residence versus an investment property or a vacation property,
Speaker 1: why do you get better loan terms?
Speaker 9: It's a great question. Go back to the financial crisis.
Speaker 9: The best way I can highlight this. During the global
Speaker 9: financial crisis, which was sparked by subprime lending, everybody who's
Speaker 9: flipping houses. People are buying houses left and right. They're
Speaker 9: buying second homes or buying rental properties. The further detached
Speaker 9: you are from the use of the property from the
Speaker 9: bank's underwriting perspective, the higher likelihood there is to be
Speaker 9: a default on the mortgage and you throw the keys
Speaker 9: to the bank. So primary residence, You're going to do
Speaker 9: whatever you can to save your home. That's the roof
Speaker 9: you put over your head. A second home, maybe you'll
Speaker 9: try you'll try a little harder an investment property. If
Speaker 9: it ever goes underwater, it's negative equity, it's not cash flowing.
Speaker 9: You're going to throw the keys to the bank. What
Speaker 9: do you have to lose? Right, there's no personal recourse
Speaker 9: in most states in America, you'll throw the keys of
Speaker 9: the bank. So really like it is a material you know, uh,
Speaker 9: material fraud on behalf of any borrower, because it strips
Speaker 9: away the bank's right to properly assess the risk and
Speaker 9: issuing this loan.
Speaker 1: You know what really bothers me, greg and it annoys
Speaker 1: me to no end, is that Latitia James, every Democrat
Speaker 1: I've never heard any any liberal, pundent democratic politician ever
Speaker 1: speak out of what I thought was one of the
Speaker 1: most outrageous and egregious examples of absolute lying to the
Speaker 1: American people. And that is that the judge in the
Speaker 1: New York case against Donald Trump that Letitia James brought,
Speaker 1: this was a case where she's talking about the valuation
Speaker 1: of mar A Lago and alone that Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: Had gotten and paid back in full.
Speaker 1: Every lender was paid back completely, and the judge and
Speaker 1: Letitia James were allowed to get away with valuating mar
Speaker 1: A Lago at eighteen million dollars. It is by every
Speaker 1: objective measure, based just a one minute, two minute perusal
Speaker 1: of Palm Beach, you know, intercoastal ocean front property, twenty
Speaker 1: two acres. It is over a billion dollars in valuation.
Speaker 2: It just is.
Speaker 1: But they were allowed to sell this and not one
Speaker 1: Democrat ever objected to the phony valuation of eighteen million.
Speaker 1: They wouldn't let Donald Trump bring in a real estate expert.
Speaker 8: I know, Arthur and Gorin was the judge in his
Speaker 8: handling in that case was such an embarrassment. And of
Speaker 8: course the fact that you know, his financial judgment against
Speaker 8: Trump that he rendered was completely tossed out and mocked
Speaker 8: by the Higher Court, which by the way, is a
Speaker 8: liberal court. I mean that would be enough. If I
Speaker 8: were him to resign and disgrace I mean, I'm not
Speaker 8: equipped to be a judge. I'd probably say to myself,
Speaker 8: you know, think about what Letitia James did. I mean,
Speaker 8: she promised her on the campaign trail that she was
Speaker 8: going to abuse the powers of her office elected. Because
Speaker 8: she committed herself, she preordained an outcome. She said, I'm
Speaker 8: going to target one individual, Donald Trump, I haven't seen files,
Speaker 8: I don't have access to the investigator. I don't care.
Speaker 8: I'm going to go after him. I'm going to assume him.
Speaker 8: She promised to abuse her no power, she went about
Speaker 8: doing it. She brought an utterly absurd case that, of course,
Speaker 8: as I say, was overturned on appeal, and there were
Speaker 8: so many mistakes there you need a calculator to keep track.
Speaker 8: And the eighteen million dollar valuation was just one aspect
Speaker 8: of it. You know, Pompey sptter than I do, but
Speaker 8: I don't think you can buy a porta potty on
Speaker 8: a spit of land for eighteen million, And so that
Speaker 8: I think to the court, the Higher Court, that just
Speaker 8: underscores what a crooked case this was and what a
Speaker 8: rogue judge.
Speaker 2: In Goron was unbelievable.
Speaker 1: I appreciate both of you. Thanks for your time and
Speaker 1: your expertise. Greg Jarff Pierre, thank you both. Eight hundred
Speaker 1: and nine four one, Shawn is on number we had
Speaker 1: on Jack Chitdarelli in New Jersey. In New Jersey, absolutely
Speaker 1: for the first time that I can see in my
Speaker 1: lifetime that gubernatorial races in play and some of the
Speaker 1: liberal polls I don't trust them. I know we're going
Speaker 1: to get some new numbers from the likes of Matt
Speaker 1: Towery and Robert ka Haley next week, and I think
Speaker 1: this will give us a better snapshot of where we
Speaker 1: really are because this controversy all over the Democrats in
Speaker 1: both states you have, you know, in the case of
Speaker 1: what's going on Mikey Cheryl in New Jersey, I mean,
Speaker 1: it's just getting worse by the day for her. She
Speaker 1: just lost her mind in the debate last night. I
Speaker 1: couldn't believe the debate with Lieutenant Governor Wins some Earl Sears,
Speaker 1: who I really like a lot. We've had her on
Speaker 1: the program. We like her in the Commonwealth of Virginia.
Speaker 1: She pulled no punches last night in her attack against
Speaker 1: their Democratic opponent, Abigail Spamberger. At one point, the debate
Speaker 1: turned to the topic of transgender issues and locker rooms.
Speaker 1: Listen to this exchange.
Speaker 7: Focusing on a K through twelve school system. Should transgender
Speaker 7: girls who are biological males be allowed to use girls'
Speaker 7: bathrooms and play on girls sports teams? You have sixty seconds.
Speaker 10: I'm a mother of three daughters in Virginia public schools,
Speaker 10: and nothing is more important to me than their safety
Speaker 10: and their experience in schools. I'm also a former federal
Speaker 10: agent and I work to investigate crimes against children, and
Speaker 10: so nothing is more important to me than the safety
Speaker 10: of all of our children, and that work, in part,
Speaker 10: has earned me the endorsement of Virginia's police Benevolent associates.
Speaker 2: The Samburger is talking, please.
Speaker 10: Find issues related to what's happening in our schools in
Speaker 10: each individual community. I think it's important that we have
Speaker 10: parents and teachers and administrators making decisions about their individual schools,
Speaker 10: not politicians. And if we are talking about the safety
Speaker 10: of our children, I would ask why my opponent continues
Speaker 10: to support efforts to defund public safety, an effort carried
Speaker 10: on continually.
Speaker 6: By this mis foundation.
Speaker 7: Once again, the question was should transgender girls who are
Speaker 7: biological males be allowed to use girls' bathrooms and play
Speaker 7: on girls sports teams? In K through twelve? You have
Speaker 7: fifteen seconds to clarify in.
Speaker 10: Cases across Virginia. I think it's incumbent upon parents and
Speaker 10: educators and administrators in each local community to make decisions locally.
Speaker 2: That's what this is about.
Speaker 10: There should never be ins.
Speaker 2: We finally have her saying that, but you voted for
Speaker 2: that intruding on right now?
Speaker 7: Are this is Miss Spanberger's time. Have a follow up
Speaker 7: question for Miss Spanberger. Would you rescind the young and
Speaker 7: administration policy requiring boys and girls to use bathrooms aligning
Speaker 7: with their biological sex? You have thirty seconds.
Speaker 10: My priority would be to ensure that local communities, importantly
Speaker 10: parents and teachers, that's educators, are able to work together
Speaker 10: to meet the unique needs of each school in each
Speaker 10: community girls.
Speaker 6: And that is important.
Speaker 10: And I say that as a mother of three daughters
Speaker 10: in Virginia public schools and as someone who used to
Speaker 10: investigate crimes against children. The way that we keep our
Speaker 10: children safe is by ensuring they are safe in schools,
Speaker 10: which includes funding law enforcement and public safety.
Speaker 7: But Miss Svanberger, the question was should the young Would
Speaker 7: you rescind the youngin administration policy requiring boys and girls
Speaker 7: to use bathrooms aligning with their biological sect You have
Speaker 7: fifteen seconds to clarify that question.
Speaker 10: Yes, and my answer is that in each local community,
Speaker 10: decisions should be made between parents and educators and teachers
Speaker 10: in each community. It shouldn't be dictated viral collegoricians.
Speaker 1: Please would you rescind it answer the question. Spanberger had
Speaker 1: to be asked four times and still never answered the
Speaker 1: question to clarify if she endorses you know in this case,
Speaker 1: you know this issue about allowing biological boys in girls'
Speaker 1: locker rooms. Now, there was another exchange with span Berger
Speaker 1: was asked about Jay Jones. You may remember Jones was
Speaker 1: exposed as putting out these text messages wishing if I
Speaker 1: had if I only had two bullets, and it was
Speaker 1: Hitler and Paul Pott and the Speaker of the House
Speaker 1: and the Commonwealth, well, who would do I'd shoot the
Speaker 1: Speaker twice and then wish death upon his family. And
Speaker 1: Jones has not dropped out of the race. And when
Speaker 1: this came up, Spamberger had to be asked four times
Speaker 1: to clarify if she still endorses the Democratic nominee Jones
Speaker 1: for attorney general. And still after four attempts, they didn't
Speaker 1: get an answer on that question.
Speaker 2: Either. This is unbelievable.
Speaker 11: Will you continue to endorse Jay Jones to be the
Speaker 11: next Attorney General of Virginia?
Speaker 2: And were you.
Speaker 11: Aware of these text messages before they released? You have
Speaker 11: thirty seconds.
Speaker 10: In fact, it appears that it was those who released
Speaker 10: the text messages and held them for years, so the
Speaker 10: public was unaware who had knowledge of these.
Speaker 6: Text messages or many of us.
Speaker 10: You do the text messages the day that they came out,
Speaker 10: and I denounced them as soon as I learned of
Speaker 10: She announces Merian Importantly at this point, as we move forward,
Speaker 10: the voters now have this information, information that was withheld
Speaker 10: for You're running, presumably for affairs reasons. But the voters
Speaker 10: now have the information and it is up to voters
Speaker 10: to make an.
Speaker 6: Individual choice based on this information.
Speaker 11: Miss Memory. I understand what you're saying about the voters,
Speaker 11: but for you yourself, do you still continue to endorse
Speaker 11: j Jones?
Speaker 6: Fifteen seconds?
Speaker 2: Yes or no?
Speaker 6: We are all running our individual races.
Speaker 10: I believe my opponent has said that about I'm for
Speaker 10: Lieutenant governor nominee affairs and up every person to make
Speaker 10: their own decision. I am running my race to serve
Speaker 10: Virginia and that is what I intend to do.
Speaker 11: Thank you, missus spam Berger.
Speaker 6: We just want to clarify.
Speaker 11: You know what you're saying is that as of now
Speaker 11: you still endorse Jay Jones as attorney General.
Speaker 10: I'm saying, as of now, it's up to every voter
Speaker 10: to make their own individual decision.
Speaker 6: I am running for governor. I am accountable for the words.
Speaker 10: That I say, for the acts that I take, for
Speaker 10: the policies that I have put out.
Speaker 2: I mean, it's unbelievable.
Speaker 1: Lindad do you have a first of all, credit to
Speaker 1: the moderators in this debate for demanding the answers.
Speaker 12: But wow, it's painful to listen to. I've never I mean,
Speaker 12: she said she was a federal agent. I mean, I honestly,
Speaker 12: she sounds more like an ambulance chaser. She just is
Speaker 12: like word salad. She gives Kamalaw a run for our money,
Speaker 12: that's for sure. If you're looking for absolutely nothing to
Speaker 12: get done, for your little girls to change with grown
Speaker 12: ass men, and for her to talk to people and
Speaker 12: have people and force.
Speaker 2: And repeat that for grown ass men, is that what you.
Speaker 12: Grown ass men? Just disgusting? I mean it is. I
Speaker 12: just don't There's got to be some common sense. There's
Speaker 12: got to be people that go, it's like what I
Speaker 12: said to you the other day, like it's cool man,
Speaker 12: you want to call yourself whatever and wear whatever and
Speaker 12: say whatever. That's fine, But nobody else has to subscribe
Speaker 12: to your crazy It's not up to you to make
Speaker 12: everybody else agree with you. Just because you don't like
Speaker 12: it doesn't mean I can't say it. Just because it
Speaker 12: hurts your feelings doesn't mean it's not true.
Speaker 2: You know what the sad thing is.
Speaker 1: Even though this is the quintessential politician, this is the
Speaker 1: quintessential non answer, This is the quintessential obfuscation, the quintessential duck,
Speaker 1: dodge and pivot.
Speaker 12: I mean it was honestly, she started remind me of
Speaker 12: Mikey Cheryl. I'm like, do you guys have the same
Speaker 12: communications team, like literally options.
Speaker 1: The problem is they know the answer that they would
Speaker 1: give would terrible, not be, not be palpable with the
Speaker 1: people in either New Jersey or in the Commonwealth of Virginia,
Speaker 1: so they don't answer the question even directly yes or no.
Speaker 2: That was what was funny.
Speaker 12: But even then she followed up. She said, Okay, fine,
Speaker 12: so your campaign is not weighing in on either side,
Speaker 12: but personally, do you support Jay Jones after hearing that
Speaker 12: he wants to murder small children in the.
Speaker 2: Arms people's Virginia?
Speaker 12: But they decide, well, you are a person in Virginia,
Speaker 12: are you not a person in Virginia or did you
Speaker 12: get lost? I mean, I'm so sick of their crap.
Speaker 12: And then you got the other psycho out in California,
Speaker 12: Katie Porter. I mean, this woman what s showing up
Speaker 12: in a batman costume and dropping her coffee and screaming
Speaker 12: at staffers?
Speaker 1: And my favorite is dropping the hot food on our
Speaker 1: husband's head and scalding his head and having to go
Speaker 1: to anger management. By the way, have you ever thought
Speaker 1: of anger management classes?
Speaker 2: Ew?
Speaker 12: No, do not compare me to her.
Speaker 2: I'm just teasing. All right, let's get to our phones.
Speaker 1: Eight hundred and nine four one, Sean, if you want
Speaker 1: to be a part of the program, let us say
Speaker 1: hello to ann in California. That's Gavin Newsom's in a
Speaker 1: United Socialist utopia.
Speaker 13: How are you hello, mister Sean Hannity. I'm thrilled to
Speaker 13: speak with you.
Speaker 2: I'm thrilled that you called. Thank you for calling.
Speaker 13: And you're a hero, an American hero, and I want
Speaker 13: you to know people rely on you every day.
Speaker 1: Well, I don't feel like a hero, but I'm honored
Speaker 1: to be able to do what I do. And we're
Speaker 1: all in this together and we want a better country.
Speaker 1: We want better states. I want a better country and
Speaker 1: a better state for you out in California. And we're
Speaker 1: just fighting for the things we know to work and
Speaker 1: the values that we hold dear in our constitution.
Speaker 13: Yes, I called to mention about what I perceive as
Speaker 13: mister President Trump's humanity, that he has shown that all
Speaker 13: over the world and that people have The Left clearly
Speaker 13: has not been able to perceive that. For some reason,
Speaker 13: He's tried to.
Speaker 2: I don't think. I don't think they want to perceive it.
Speaker 2: I just don't.
Speaker 13: Well, you're probably right.
Speaker 1: Remember when the President I said this earlier, when the
Speaker 1: President said during his Joint Session speech, and that's when
Speaker 1: the Democrats wouldn't stand for the fan only a Lake
Speaker 1: and Riley or Joscelyn Nungary or that young man that
Speaker 1: became a Secret Service agent.
Speaker 2: It would beat in cancer.
Speaker 1: You remember when the President said, I could basically this
Speaker 1: cure cancer, and nothing I ever do is going to
Speaker 1: be good enough. Of these people on this side of
Speaker 1: the aisle. And I've been saying it way before he
Speaker 1: said it. That's how much they hate him.
Speaker 13: Yeah, that's an illness.
Speaker 2: They're not that's the arrangement. Yes, well, I just.
Speaker 13: Feel like it's sort of communistic brainwashing. And I don't
Speaker 13: want to lose our young people. And I think that
Speaker 13: he saved this country, he's saving parts of the world,
Speaker 13: and we need to support him as much as we
Speaker 13: possibly can. And if we can't lose you, we can't
Speaker 13: lose him. This country meets both of you so very much.
Speaker 1: You know, we're all we can't lose the principles, the
Speaker 1: common sense that God gave us when we were born.
Speaker 1: This isn't complicated. You know, you don't have to go
Speaker 1: to MIT or Avid business to understand the principles of
Speaker 1: common sense. And you know, look at this case in Virginia. No,
Speaker 1: you don't want men biological men and women's locker rooms
Speaker 1: or bathrooms. No, you don't want a guy that you
Speaker 1: know is is carelessly calling for the assassination of the
Speaker 1: speaker in the House of Representatives in the Commonwealth of Virginia. No,
Speaker 1: you don't want that guy to be elected. And you're
Speaker 1: not going to endorse him. It's not a hard question.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 1: This is you want law and order, you want safety
Speaker 1: and security, you want limited government, you want more freedom,
Speaker 1: you want lower taxes. You know you want America to
Speaker 1: prosper you want a strong national defense. I'd love to
Speaker 1: tell you that what I say is complicated. It really
Speaker 1: is not. Anyway, God bless you. You have a great,
Speaker 1: great weekend. Appreciate your call. Eight hundred ninety four one
Speaker 1: shown is a number if you want to be a
Speaker 1: part of the program. All right, that's gonna wrap things
Speaker 1: up for today. Let not your heart beat trouble. Let's
Speaker 1: say a prayer, and all our thoughts and prayers are
Speaker 1: with the hostages for a safe release and the president's
Speaker 1: trip to the Middle East. And we'll be watching and
Speaker 1: monitoring as warranted. Thank you for being with us. Have
Speaker 1: a great Columbus Day weekend. We will see you back
Speaker 1: here next week. Thank you for being with us. Thank
Speaker 1: you for making this show possible.