WEBVTT - How Nafta Made Mexicans Fat

0:00:01.920 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Thank you very much. Then President Bill Clinton

0:00:07.680 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 1>stepped up to a podium to make an announcement. I

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>believe we have might a decision now that will permit

0:00:14.320 --> 0:00:17.439
<v Speaker 1>us to create an economic order in the world that

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>will promote more growth, more equality, better preservation of the environment,

0:00:22.920 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>and a greater possibility of world peace. That clip is

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>from the William J. Clinton Presidential Library, and in it,

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the President signs into law the North American Free Trade Agreement,

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:37.840
<v Speaker 1>or NAFTA. The goal of that law was to boost

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the U s economy by opening up trade with Canada

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and Mexico. Twenty four years later, trade has grown. For example,

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Mexico now sends almost eleven billion dollars worth of fruit

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 1>and vegetables each year into the US, and farmers in

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>states like Iowa make their living by sending korn south.

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>But NAFTA also caused something else to expand, a different

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of boom. Clinton didn't mention back in After more

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>than two decades of America exporting corn, cork, and dairy

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>products to Mexico, what's also growing our Mexican waistlines. Welcome

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:24.960
<v Speaker 1>to benchmark. I'm Scott Landman, economics editor of Bloomberg News

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>in Washington on Benchmark. We've discussed before how the Trump

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>administration thinks NAFTA is unfair to American workers, but we've

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 1>never really looked at how the trade agreement has changed

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Mexico and its citizens. One big change America has made

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Mexico more opies. A recent study by researchers in the

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>US and Europe, posted on the website fox Eu, found

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 1>a direct correlation between declining public health in Mexico and

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the increase in soybean and pork products being shipped there.

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Shelley Hagen, our economy team intern in DC, wrote an

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>article about this study, and she's here with us today. Shelly,

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Benchmark. Thanks for having me, Scott. So what

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 1>did this paper say, Shelly? A group of economists found

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that Mexico has been importing a large amount of unhealthy

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:15.640
<v Speaker 1>American food and beverage products, a number that has grown

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 1>since NAFTA went into effect in the ninety nineties. At

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the same time, Mexico's imports of healthy American products like

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>fruits and veggies have not grown nearly as fast as

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the unhealthy imports. Well, Mexico has been purchasing more and

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>more unhealthy goods from America. Mexico's obesity rates have also

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 1>risen as much as fifteen in twenty years. In fact,

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:40.919
<v Speaker 1>Mexico now has more overweight and obese people as a

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>share of the population than more than thirty major economies,

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 1>including the US. All right, thanks Shelly. Now to discuss

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:52.080
<v Speaker 1>this change in public health, we're joined by Simone Barkara.

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>He's the executive director of the Nutrition and Health Research

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:59.799
<v Speaker 1>Center at Mexico's National Institute of Public Health, and he's

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 1>spent years studying obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. He joins

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>us from Cuernavaca, Mexico, just outside Mexico City. Dr Barkarra,

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:13.919
<v Speaker 1>Bien beneito, and welcome to Benchmark. Thank you very much. First,

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>just a bit of full disclosure. Dr Barkerra's research has

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:20.959
<v Speaker 1>been partially funded through an unrestricted grant from Bloomberg Philanthropies,

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>which encompasses the charitable activities of Mike Bloomberg, the founder

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and majority owner of Bloomberg LP, which is the parent

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>company of this podcast. So let's go back in time

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 1>thirty years ago to the nineteen eighties. Dr Barkerra, what

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:40.559
<v Speaker 1>did Mexicans eat back then at that time, the consumption

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>was mostly of basic foods that were prepared in houses,

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>mostly beings, tortilla, and many vegetables that are combined in

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the dishes. Also fruits that are locally produced, and different

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>types of water infusions that we called our fascus, some

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>of them with some amount of sugar, but not as

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:08.119
<v Speaker 1>much as a soda. And that has changed a lot

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>since then. And how would you describe the general health

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:16.279
<v Speaker 1>of Mexicans thirty years ago. Well, in the eighties there

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 1>was a very low prevalence of overweight and obesity, maybe

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>only about less than thirty percent of the population had

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>obviosity all overweight, and right now is seventy percent. So

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:34.160
<v Speaker 1>we basically are thinking of another country where where over

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>city was very uncommon. And how did this change throughout

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:42.599
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen nineties and the two thousand's. Well, it was

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:46.600
<v Speaker 1>very interesting to see that in just an eleven year

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 1>periods from night to nineteen nine, the increase, for example,

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>in so that consumption was of about four percent. At

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the same time at that moment, the consumption of fruits

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and vegetables decrease, and there was a very important change

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>in the patterns of food consumption but also in the

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:15.039
<v Speaker 1>general food system in the country. How much of a

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:19.039
<v Speaker 1>problem is obesity in Mexico today? Today, I can say

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>that is the most important public health problem. We have

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:27.039
<v Speaker 1>an alert and epiemiologic alert due to the side rates

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:31.360
<v Speaker 1>of diabetes and obesity that we are facing. Since maybe

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 1>since two thousand and twelve, we have sevent of all

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:40.839
<v Speaker 1>adults with overweight and obesity and one out of every

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:44.840
<v Speaker 1>three children has overweight or obesity. So it's a very

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>complex situation. In the case of diabetes, we are one

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:51.720
<v Speaker 1>of the countries in the world with the highest mortality

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and bordering of this condition, which is mostly related to

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the high rates of ovicity. And what would you say

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:04.039
<v Speaker 1>are the byproducts of this trend? I mean, how is

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>that affecting, say, health services in the country, hospitals, doctors.

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:12.480
<v Speaker 1>How would you describe that well? Is very complicated. Is

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 1>a challenge because obesity is associated with more than faulting

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>causes of death, and so it goes from diabetes to

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the vascular disease and cancer. And these chronic conditions are

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>very expensive because they cannot be solved with antibiotic with

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a single treatment. These conditions require life treatments and complications

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>are very expensive and cause a lot of incapacity. So

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>these these conditions affect productivity. So, for example, the diabetes

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>is the main cause of blindness in the country, also

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:58.840
<v Speaker 1>also of amputations, and also of renal failure and dialysis,

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and this kind of treat meants are so expensive that

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:06.479
<v Speaker 1>there is no enough budget in the system to to

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>be able to treat all the patients with this problem.

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>So so definitely the only option is to try to

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>walk very fat on preventing and controlling these conditions through

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>reducing the rates of obesity. Why do you think Mexicans

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 1>have become more obese than many other countries that are

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 1>more developed and have higher incomes. Well, I think it's

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 1>a combination of factors, but one of the most important

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>is a very rapid transition to a model of industrialized food,

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 1>which is a phenomenon called accorporation, and without controlling the

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>new environment. So the population transition very quickly from drinking

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>aguas frisk ass and and traditional food basic food prepar

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>at home to ultra processful that is bought in a

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 1>supermarket that has a lot of ingredients that our own

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>healthy such as sugar, salt, and fat, and without knowing

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>really the relation of diet to these chronic conditions which

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>were not really prevalent in the country. So you can

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 1>still now see many populations in impoor areas of the country,

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>such as the South, where people have diabetes for the

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 1>first time in their families. So first generation and is

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 1>very complicated. They don't understand why they felt thirsty, and

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 1>they sometimes they don't know that that they have to

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>stop drinking soda. There are many communities where soda has

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 1>become part of local ritual traditions. So it is becoming

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:58.319
<v Speaker 1>very complicated to try to implement measures or policies to

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:02.960
<v Speaker 1>decrease this unhalth new habits in the population. And would

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you say that obesity is more of an issue in

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 1>cities or in rural areas or both. Well, obviosity is

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 1>more prevalent in the cities right now in Mexico, But

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:18.200
<v Speaker 1>when you mentioned the speed of increase, rural areas are

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>now having a higher speed of increasing the prevalence of obesity.

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:27.560
<v Speaker 1>That means that rural areas are very quickly catching up

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>with the high prevalence of obbicity that we are watching

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>in the cities. Simon, over the last twenty years or

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 1>So did it ever cross your mind that it was

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>NAFTA that was helped playing a role in delivering these

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 1>kinds of foods that were boosting obesity in Mexico. Yes, yes,

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>because we saw very interesting effect effects in food prices

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>after NaSTA. For example, Mexico is a big publisher of sugar,

0:09:56.559 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>but with NAFTA we started to have also high cone

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 1>fructose competing in the market. That and and the high

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>fructose is subsidized empowered by the United States, so it's

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:14.359
<v Speaker 1>really low priced. So to try to maintain the production

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and the workers of sugar, the government in Mexico also

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 1>started some sort of support and subsidies to sugar. So

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the net balance of nat time in this example was

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>that in a very short period of time we had

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 1>very inexpensive sugar, and that was an incentive for producers

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 1>of many kinds of ultra process foods of adding sugar,

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>which everybody likes, and it's an inexpensive way to make

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>to add something to a food. So this was one

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 1>of the very important changes. The other change that was

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>impressive was the amount of supermarkets in Mexico just after NATA.

0:10:58.120 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I could say that most of the football chases now

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>are done in supermarkets sometimes are the big change with

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the same names as in the US. And there used

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to be shopping in most people. Would you used to

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>shop at, say, smaller markets. Is that is that fair? Yes? Yes,

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>they used to shop in small markets of locally produced

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>foods for example, that there was always as the bakeries

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:28.560
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, we have the tortillas the cornery shop in

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 1>which there was a tortilla small little factor in in

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 1>in every town. And now the tortillas are in solved

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:41.679
<v Speaker 1>in the supermarket also and it's the same the same

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of preparation of flower for for all of them,

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's an industrialized process. So is the food system

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:53.839
<v Speaker 1>has changed a lot in only twenty two third years now.

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 1>There have also been some efforts to attack this problem,

0:11:56.920 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 1>to restrict the consumption of the kinds of foods that

0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:04.680
<v Speaker 1>are making people a beast. There's a soda tax and

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and also I believe a junk food tax. Are these

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 1>taxes working? Have they had any effect on obesity? Yes?

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>We we definitely have evidence that these taxes are working.

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>And when we first watch consumption of soada in the

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 1>end of the nineties, there was a very big amount

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>of calories coming every day from sugary beverage in all

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>age groups. So so it was it was a problem,

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and we started recommending a solar tax seems two and three.

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:42.640
<v Speaker 1>So after more than dangers, finally the government had a

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 1>window of opportunity to implement the tax, and we sad

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>don't different efforts to evaluate the effects in these two

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>years which is the period that we have the tax.

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:58.319
<v Speaker 1>It's a small tax, it's only one the super leader,

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>so equivalent to about ten and even though if smaller

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 1>than that what most international agencies recommend, it has been

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 1>able to show reductions in consumption that are of about

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>seven to twelve depending on the on the groups. And

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot that in a country that has one

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:27.479
<v Speaker 1>and twenty six million inhabitants, having these kind of reductions

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to cap it them represent many tons of sugar that

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 1>are not consumed thanks to this policy. Besides taxes, what

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:43.439
<v Speaker 1>other policies could help. Well, we are trying very intensively

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>to promote some warning levels on food products that are unhealthy,

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 1>particularly so that and ultra process foods that are hiring salt,

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 1>sugar or fat. We have seen that countries like Chili

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:03.439
<v Speaker 1>that implemented. These kind of warning levels in the foods

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 1>allow the consumers to very quickly identify on healthy foods

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:12.720
<v Speaker 1>and look for healthier decisions. So I think this is

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:16.319
<v Speaker 1>one policy that in which we need to work very hard.

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 1>We are trying to to convince the decision makers that

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 1>this is a very powerful tool in a population that

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't know how to interpret these complex labelings with numbers

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and percentages. That it's almost like a cigarette warning labels

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:39.240
<v Speaker 1>for chunk food right exactly, you're saying this product is

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>high or has an excess of sugar, and then the

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 1>consumer can compare this one with one that doesn't have

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>this level, and and that that is very helpful in

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the context. And the other policy that cool health a

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 1>lot is controls on marketing. So again in the same

0:14:57.680 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 1>way as in tobacco, market think is a very powerful

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>tool of corporations to increase consumption. And sometimes this marketing

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>in foods is directed to children. So we need to

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>develop better policies and regulations to protect children from having

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 1>on healthy foods. We are for example, evaluating point of

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 1>purchase and in the supermarkets it is completely directed to

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>attract children's and most of the foods that are sold

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>have have excess of sugar and other ingredients that are unhealthy.

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 1>So this is something that which we also need to

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>work a lot, and in schools and other sites in

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>which children are very frequently, such as public parks, try

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>to increase availability of water and to decrease marketing and

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 1>also sale off on healthy products. Dr bark Hera, we

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 1>can't let you go without talking about the big issue,

0:15:56.520 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>loving all over this and trace Manuel Lopez over Doors

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the leading candidate in Mexico's upcoming presidential election, and he

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>likes to talk about how NAFTA has driven Mexican farmers

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>out of business, just as a side not check out

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>our new poll tracker on Bloomberg dot com for the

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Mexican presidential election. Dr Barca, is there any link between

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the loss of local agriculture in Mexico and the rise

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>in obesity? My sense is that in general, many of

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the macro egonomic indicators of Mexico have been improving. Even

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about health and development, we have been a nation

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 1>that is showing a little bit about average improvement compared

0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>to other Latin American countries. So it is complex to

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>evaluate something such as the food system that has many effects.

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Many experts, for examples from the World Health Organization are

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 1>trying to understand the net benefits of trade, which some

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>times are for example, food availability and reduction of on

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 1>their nutrition, and then compare the trade offs such as

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>increasing no communical point diseases. This is a challenge and

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:16.439
<v Speaker 1>we don't have very clear understanding of it, but in

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>general I think the main challenge is a challenge that

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 1>can be solved mostly by regulating and helping the food

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:31.639
<v Speaker 1>environment more than avoiding phrase just as a solution. All right,

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 1>a very diplomatic answer, Dr Barkerra, thank you so much

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:37.880
<v Speaker 1>for joining us today on Benchmark. Thank you very much.

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:44.199
<v Speaker 1>Scott Benchmark will be back next week. Until then, you

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 1>can find us on the Bloomberg terminal, Bloomberg dot com,

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:50.920
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg app, and podcast destinations such as Apple, podcast,

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:54.359
<v Speaker 1>Overcast and Stitcher. Please take time to rate and review

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the show, and you can also find us on Twitter.

0:17:57.119 --> 0:18:00.440
<v Speaker 1>You can follow me at Scott Landman Show le You're

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 1>at at Shelley k Hagen s h E l l

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 1>y k h A g A. N our guest is

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>at at s b A r q U E r

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 1>A and as a side note, check out our new

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 1>pull tracker on bloomberg dot com for the Mexican presidential election.

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Benchmark is produced by tofor foreheas the head of Bloomberg

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Podcast is Francesco Levy. Thanks for listening, See you next time.