1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:02,040 Speaker 1: P and L is brought to you by proper Cloth, 2 00:00:02,120 --> 00:00:05,120 Speaker 1: a leader in men's custom shirts, with proprietary smart sized 3 00:00:05,120 --> 00:00:08,720 Speaker 1: technology and top rated customer service. Ordering a custom shirt 4 00:00:08,760 --> 00:00:11,680 Speaker 1: has never been easier. Visit proper cloth dot com to 5 00:00:11,760 --> 00:00:19,920 Speaker 1: order your first custom shirt today. Welcome to the Bloomberg 6 00:00:20,000 --> 00:00:22,599 Speaker 1: P and L Podcast. I'm pim Fox. Along with my 7 00:00:22,640 --> 00:00:25,759 Speaker 1: co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we bring you the 8 00:00:25,800 --> 00:00:29,360 Speaker 1: most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for you and your money, 9 00:00:29,360 --> 00:00:32,360 Speaker 1: whether at the grocery store or the trading floor. Find 10 00:00:32,400 --> 00:00:35,840 Speaker 1: the Bloomberg P and L Podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud and 11 00:00:36,080 --> 00:00:44,680 Speaker 1: at Bloomberg dot com. President Trump just now, in his comments, 12 00:00:44,720 --> 00:00:48,320 Speaker 1: reiterated his statement that he has said many times before 13 00:00:48,640 --> 00:00:52,040 Speaker 1: that the best thing politically for Republicans to do would 14 00:00:52,040 --> 00:00:54,520 Speaker 1: be just to allow Obamacare to fail because it will 15 00:00:54,560 --> 00:00:57,120 Speaker 1: be a disaster with us to get a little bit 16 00:00:57,160 --> 00:01:01,120 Speaker 1: more insight into what potentially are the problems and what 17 00:01:01,160 --> 00:01:05,039 Speaker 1: the disaster may have looked like. Is Susan divorce. She's 18 00:01:05,120 --> 00:01:09,560 Speaker 1: CEO of Premiere, which advises healthcare systems across the country 19 00:01:09,600 --> 00:01:12,680 Speaker 1: and has a really good vantage point to look across 20 00:01:12,720 --> 00:01:15,880 Speaker 1: the US healthcare system Susan, We're so glad to have 21 00:01:15,959 --> 00:01:18,479 Speaker 1: you today. So just to weigh in on that point, 22 00:01:19,000 --> 00:01:22,200 Speaker 1: what are the main problems that President Trump is probably 23 00:01:22,240 --> 00:01:27,679 Speaker 1: talking about when he calls Obamacare disaster that it would 24 00:01:27,720 --> 00:01:31,120 Speaker 1: evolve into one should the Republicans not do anything to it. 25 00:01:31,720 --> 00:01:34,480 Speaker 1: Thanks so much, Lisa. I think what he's talking about 26 00:01:34,760 --> 00:01:38,959 Speaker 1: is that healthcare and Obamacare, the Affordable Care Act, it's 27 00:01:39,080 --> 00:01:43,280 Speaker 1: very costly, it limits choice in some ways for patients, 28 00:01:43,440 --> 00:01:47,160 Speaker 1: and it's very complicated. And I think that he um. 29 00:01:47,200 --> 00:01:51,480 Speaker 1: I think he believes that uh, consumers being more engaged 30 00:01:51,520 --> 00:01:54,640 Speaker 1: in their health care and having a more free market 31 00:01:54,640 --> 00:01:59,200 Speaker 1: competitive system will be more effective for consumers. But that 32 00:01:59,200 --> 00:02:01,320 Speaker 1: doesn't sound like it is aaster. Where's the disaster part, 33 00:02:02,000 --> 00:02:05,640 Speaker 1: you know? I think the disaster part is really um 34 00:02:05,640 --> 00:02:10,000 Speaker 1: probably embedded in just the overall total cost. The benefit 35 00:02:10,040 --> 00:02:14,040 Speaker 1: plan design is pretty rich, the subsidies to Medicaid are 36 00:02:14,080 --> 00:02:16,919 Speaker 1: pretty high, and so I think what he worries about 37 00:02:17,160 --> 00:02:21,480 Speaker 1: is the impact to businesses, the impact to taxpayers for 38 00:02:21,520 --> 00:02:24,120 Speaker 1: the cost of healthcare. Can we just step back for 39 00:02:24,240 --> 00:02:27,679 Speaker 1: just a second, because I noted that Brad Wilson was introduced. 40 00:02:27,760 --> 00:02:30,040 Speaker 1: He is the head of a Blue Cross Blue Shield 41 00:02:30,120 --> 00:02:33,720 Speaker 1: in North Carolina. Which is where a premier is headquartered. 42 00:02:33,760 --> 00:02:36,000 Speaker 1: So you've got an ally or at least a colleague 43 00:02:36,320 --> 00:02:40,840 Speaker 1: speaking with the president. Is healthcare a national issue or 44 00:02:40,919 --> 00:02:46,200 Speaker 1: is it a state issue? Healthcare is actually delivered locally. 45 00:02:46,639 --> 00:02:50,760 Speaker 1: It's even smaller than state or national because these health 46 00:02:50,800 --> 00:02:54,720 Speaker 1: care systems in communities are there forever serving those populations, 47 00:02:54,720 --> 00:02:59,200 Speaker 1: whether there's any payment or exchanges or Medicaid subsidy um. 48 00:02:59,240 --> 00:03:02,000 Speaker 1: But I would say that the Trump administration would like 49 00:03:02,200 --> 00:03:06,320 Speaker 1: for it to be a more state based system. And 50 00:03:06,560 --> 00:03:09,880 Speaker 1: part of the changes that we believe are coming are 51 00:03:09,919 --> 00:03:12,800 Speaker 1: really around how do you empower the states to take 52 00:03:12,840 --> 00:03:15,520 Speaker 1: more control of Medicaid? So talk a little bit about that, 53 00:03:15,560 --> 00:03:18,040 Speaker 1: I mean, how would you? So? I think the plan 54 00:03:18,240 --> 00:03:23,000 Speaker 1: is that if you could change the level of subsidy 55 00:03:23,120 --> 00:03:25,959 Speaker 1: and in some ways have a fixed amount a cap 56 00:03:26,080 --> 00:03:28,040 Speaker 1: or a block grant and give it to the states, 57 00:03:28,200 --> 00:03:31,200 Speaker 1: you would then give the states the flexibility to decide 58 00:03:31,200 --> 00:03:33,800 Speaker 1: how best to take care of their Medicaid populations. But 59 00:03:33,840 --> 00:03:37,360 Speaker 1: how does that jibe with this idea of allowing UH 60 00:03:37,560 --> 00:03:41,440 Speaker 1: people are participate in a government sponsored health plan to 61 00:03:41,480 --> 00:03:43,840 Speaker 1: go across state lines? I mean, how does that? How 62 00:03:43,840 --> 00:03:47,280 Speaker 1: does that play into that whole discussion makes it harder. 63 00:03:47,440 --> 00:03:50,720 Speaker 1: I mean what I call it fifty shades a healthcare 64 00:03:51,040 --> 00:03:54,440 Speaker 1: I mean you will have fifty different programs, fifty different 65 00:03:54,480 --> 00:03:57,080 Speaker 1: measurement systems. If you're a provider, you're a doctor, or 66 00:03:57,080 --> 00:03:59,640 Speaker 1: you're a health care system, and especially if you're a 67 00:03:59,680 --> 00:04:03,480 Speaker 1: multi state health care system, you will have multiple different 68 00:04:03,480 --> 00:04:07,480 Speaker 1: programs trying to essentially accomplish the same things. Well, let's 69 00:04:07,480 --> 00:04:10,640 Speaker 1: just follow on with that topic, because it seems as 70 00:04:10,640 --> 00:04:15,800 Speaker 1: though with the introduction of technology, greater information sharing and 71 00:04:16,000 --> 00:04:19,039 Speaker 1: the ability of people to be mobile. Right, if you 72 00:04:19,279 --> 00:04:21,799 Speaker 1: want an operation and you know that the best result 73 00:04:21,839 --> 00:04:24,240 Speaker 1: can be garnered from a hospital in Texas, and you 74 00:04:24,279 --> 00:04:27,320 Speaker 1: happen to live in Illinois, um that should be or 75 00:04:27,440 --> 00:04:31,080 Speaker 1: that maybe an option for you? Is there a better 76 00:04:31,120 --> 00:04:34,920 Speaker 1: way to deliver healthcare on this scale and take advantage 77 00:04:35,080 --> 00:04:39,400 Speaker 1: of the the cost savings. If only that worked, it 78 00:04:39,400 --> 00:04:41,599 Speaker 1: would be a much better way. The problem is we 79 00:04:41,640 --> 00:04:44,600 Speaker 1: have to lift this iron curtain on data because there 80 00:04:44,640 --> 00:04:48,160 Speaker 1: are so many limitations in the portability of data across 81 00:04:48,279 --> 00:04:52,159 Speaker 1: multiple information information systems. It just doesn't work today. And 82 00:04:52,200 --> 00:04:54,000 Speaker 1: that's not even a health care issue, not even a 83 00:04:54,000 --> 00:04:55,800 Speaker 1: health care issue. So how would you do that? What 84 00:04:55,560 --> 00:04:57,080 Speaker 1: what do you think if you would like to see 85 00:04:57,120 --> 00:05:01,520 Speaker 1: new legislation introduced in Congress? We need legislation introduced. There's 86 00:05:01,520 --> 00:05:04,800 Speaker 1: already been some legislation introduced along with the twenty one 87 00:05:04,800 --> 00:05:09,880 Speaker 1: Cures Act Century Cures Act, which really requires standards for healthcare. 88 00:05:09,920 --> 00:05:14,479 Speaker 1: I mean, every other industry has had standards for transmitting information, 89 00:05:14,800 --> 00:05:19,400 Speaker 1: privacy standards, security standards, reporting standards. We don't have it yet. 90 00:05:19,600 --> 00:05:23,440 Speaker 1: You know. Ultimately, this whole debate about Obamacare comes down 91 00:05:23,680 --> 00:05:26,480 Speaker 1: to cost, right, I mean that's the that's the essential 92 00:05:26,520 --> 00:05:31,960 Speaker 1: issue here. Is there a way to meaningfully reduce costs 93 00:05:32,040 --> 00:05:36,679 Speaker 1: at a time when the US population is aging dramatically? Yeah? 94 00:05:36,720 --> 00:05:39,520 Speaker 1: So at Premier we spend every day figuring out how 95 00:05:39,520 --> 00:05:41,760 Speaker 1: do we improve quality and safety and lower the cost 96 00:05:41,760 --> 00:05:45,360 Speaker 1: of healthcare. The demographics are are driving the cost up. 97 00:05:45,600 --> 00:05:48,960 Speaker 1: The lack of coordination, coordination and the fragmentation of care 98 00:05:49,080 --> 00:05:52,680 Speaker 1: is driving cost up. The inability to exchange this information 99 00:05:52,760 --> 00:05:55,479 Speaker 1: is driving cost up, and cost are growing at one 100 00:05:55,520 --> 00:05:58,720 Speaker 1: to two percent faster rate than the GDP. That is 101 00:05:58,760 --> 00:06:00,880 Speaker 1: not going to work, right, But is there a way 102 00:06:00,920 --> 00:06:03,840 Speaker 1: to let's say, you did, uh, you know, streamline the 103 00:06:03,920 --> 00:06:07,159 Speaker 1: data bullet I mean, like but I'm just trying to 104 00:06:07,200 --> 00:06:09,039 Speaker 1: figure out. I mean, if we sort of follow a 105 00:06:09,040 --> 00:06:12,920 Speaker 1: certain prescription with streamlining of the data, with you know, 106 00:06:13,040 --> 00:06:15,240 Speaker 1: maybe I don't know if you would advocate for government 107 00:06:15,240 --> 00:06:18,760 Speaker 1: negotiation for prices, you know, pharmaceutical prices or not. I mean, 108 00:06:18,800 --> 00:06:22,240 Speaker 1: that's a very touchy subject um. But are there ways 109 00:06:22,360 --> 00:06:25,240 Speaker 1: to bring it down or is this just an inevitable 110 00:06:25,360 --> 00:06:29,320 Speaker 1: inevitability of an aging population. Lots of ways to bring 111 00:06:29,360 --> 00:06:32,760 Speaker 1: it down. And at Premiere where we we we process 112 00:06:32,839 --> 00:06:36,200 Speaker 1: fifty billion dollars of supply chain spend by creating competitive 113 00:06:36,240 --> 00:06:39,560 Speaker 1: friction between suppliers to drive the cost down. We work 114 00:06:39,600 --> 00:06:44,400 Speaker 1: with healthcare systems to you know, reduce infections, reduce readmissions, 115 00:06:44,440 --> 00:06:47,320 Speaker 1: lower the length of stay in a hospital. We have 116 00:06:47,480 --> 00:06:50,240 Speaker 1: just three and fifty hospitals that have been working together 117 00:06:50,320 --> 00:06:53,719 Speaker 1: on this for several years. They alone have saved fifteen 118 00:06:53,760 --> 00:06:56,680 Speaker 1: billion dollars. So there are lots of ways to do it. 119 00:06:56,720 --> 00:06:59,640 Speaker 1: But you have to coordinate the care, you have to 120 00:06:59,640 --> 00:07:03,400 Speaker 1: have anders for reporting, you have to enable providers to 121 00:07:03,520 --> 00:07:07,560 Speaker 1: actually work together. Remove a bunch of the regulations and barriers, 122 00:07:07,560 --> 00:07:11,360 Speaker 1: which I do think the Trump administration is intent on doing. Well. 123 00:07:11,400 --> 00:07:14,040 Speaker 1: We see a system in which will actually be able 124 00:07:14,080 --> 00:07:16,680 Speaker 1: to know how much the healthcare costs. And I don't 125 00:07:16,680 --> 00:07:19,320 Speaker 1: mean on a larger level, you know, billions, but in 126 00:07:19,440 --> 00:07:23,680 Speaker 1: terms of an individual, a patient actually being able to 127 00:07:24,240 --> 00:07:28,520 Speaker 1: know at the very least how much a procedure costs. Yeah. 128 00:07:28,560 --> 00:07:31,440 Speaker 1: I think that part of the push for the Trump 129 00:07:31,440 --> 00:07:35,080 Speaker 1: administration and the Republicans is to get consumers engaged. So 130 00:07:35,120 --> 00:07:37,680 Speaker 1: if you have health care savings accounts, you start to 131 00:07:37,720 --> 00:07:41,840 Speaker 1: get transparency. Consumers start to demand transparency to the to 132 00:07:41,920 --> 00:07:44,400 Speaker 1: the price of procedures and to the things that are 133 00:07:44,440 --> 00:07:47,920 Speaker 1: being used and get involved in those decisions. So I 134 00:07:47,960 --> 00:07:49,800 Speaker 1: think it's going to take a while, but I think 135 00:07:49,840 --> 00:07:52,560 Speaker 1: that is definitely where the Republicans want to go. One 136 00:07:52,600 --> 00:07:55,800 Speaker 1: thing that President Trump mentioned was Tom Price, Dr. Price, 137 00:07:56,280 --> 00:08:01,160 Speaker 1: Head of Health and Human Services. What can doctors do 138 00:08:01,680 --> 00:08:05,400 Speaker 1: in this context? And is that also a challenge because 139 00:08:06,040 --> 00:08:10,480 Speaker 1: you have the American Medical Association still is a state 140 00:08:10,800 --> 00:08:15,080 Speaker 1: based program, right and you know many have said that 141 00:08:15,720 --> 00:08:17,760 Speaker 1: of the cost of health care comes from the doctor's pen, 142 00:08:17,920 --> 00:08:20,440 Speaker 1: so they really are the place where a lot of 143 00:08:20,480 --> 00:08:25,360 Speaker 1: decisions are being made. We actually think this whole repeal 144 00:08:25,440 --> 00:08:27,960 Speaker 1: and replace will take two to three years. It will 145 00:08:28,000 --> 00:08:31,080 Speaker 1: have three steps. The first is the repeal with reconciliation, 146 00:08:31,200 --> 00:08:34,520 Speaker 1: The second is dr Price. He has a lot of 147 00:08:34,600 --> 00:08:39,199 Speaker 1: regulatory flexibility, and the third will be several incremental bills 148 00:08:39,240 --> 00:08:41,520 Speaker 1: to replace it over time. Have you been in touch 149 00:08:41,720 --> 00:08:45,880 Speaker 1: with representatives who are drafting the new version of Obamacare? 150 00:08:46,040 --> 00:08:49,440 Speaker 1: We have. We have a big Washington based UM office 151 00:08:49,480 --> 00:08:52,040 Speaker 1: and we routinely meet with a lot of the Republicans 152 00:08:52,040 --> 00:08:54,120 Speaker 1: and a lot of them. Do you get a sense 153 00:08:54,280 --> 00:08:59,360 Speaker 1: of how cohesive the Republicans are when it comes to 154 00:08:59,600 --> 00:09:02,760 Speaker 1: a new proposal. There's a lot of discussion and debate, 155 00:09:02,840 --> 00:09:05,199 Speaker 1: and it's what makes us at Premier think this is 156 00:09:05,240 --> 00:09:07,439 Speaker 1: going to take time and it's going to be an 157 00:09:07,440 --> 00:09:10,440 Speaker 1: incremental bills that they can build support for. What's the 158 00:09:10,480 --> 00:09:15,439 Speaker 1: most controversial aspect. The most controversial aspect I think at 159 00:09:15,480 --> 00:09:18,880 Speaker 1: this point is that you have Medicaid expansion for ten 160 00:09:18,920 --> 00:09:22,880 Speaker 1: million people and the benefit plan design is rich and 161 00:09:22,920 --> 00:09:26,760 Speaker 1: the subsidy is rich, and how how do you pull 162 00:09:26,800 --> 00:09:29,400 Speaker 1: that back? How do you change that and how do 163 00:09:29,480 --> 00:09:33,520 Speaker 1: you get um some cost containment into that system? I 164 00:09:33,559 --> 00:09:35,520 Speaker 1: think is a big challenge and the people who have 165 00:09:35,640 --> 00:09:39,040 Speaker 1: expanded Medicaid have a hard time, you know, reducing it 166 00:09:39,120 --> 00:09:42,559 Speaker 1: or taking it away the people who haven't expanded Medicaid 167 00:09:43,280 --> 00:09:45,960 Speaker 1: can't maybe afford to expand Medicaid. So I think that's 168 00:09:46,040 --> 00:09:49,040 Speaker 1: probably the toughest part of this. Well, it's interesting because 169 00:09:49,080 --> 00:09:51,240 Speaker 1: that it ties back to Lisa's first question having to 170 00:09:51,280 --> 00:09:54,240 Speaker 1: do with block grants and money flowing to the states. 171 00:09:54,280 --> 00:09:58,800 Speaker 1: What's the implication for Medicaid in that context. So, Brad Wilson, 172 00:09:58,840 --> 00:10:01,360 Speaker 1: you mentioned from North Carolina NA. In North Carolina, they're 173 00:10:01,400 --> 00:10:04,320 Speaker 1: taking two approaches. One is a managed care insurance approach. 174 00:10:04,440 --> 00:10:08,160 Speaker 1: The other is a provider led healthcare system lead approach. 175 00:10:08,679 --> 00:10:12,280 Speaker 1: If you give states a flat rate, a capt amount, 176 00:10:12,360 --> 00:10:15,640 Speaker 1: a block grant, there's all kinds of flexibility for those 177 00:10:15,640 --> 00:10:18,440 Speaker 1: states to figure out how to coordinate that care. And 178 00:10:18,520 --> 00:10:21,080 Speaker 1: so I think that is that that is the method 179 00:10:21,120 --> 00:10:23,080 Speaker 1: that they will use to try to contain costs and 180 00:10:23,120 --> 00:10:26,440 Speaker 1: get predictability to that line item. At the same time, 181 00:10:26,480 --> 00:10:27,760 Speaker 1: some of this stuff has to be done at the 182 00:10:27,760 --> 00:10:31,240 Speaker 1: federal level. Well, this is the problem with fifty different 183 00:10:31,280 --> 00:10:34,480 Speaker 1: programs for Medicaid. If you had fifty different programs from Medicare, 184 00:10:34,480 --> 00:10:36,839 Speaker 1: I mean actually managing that if you're a doctor, or 185 00:10:36,880 --> 00:10:39,160 Speaker 1: you're a hospital, or you're a health system, it's it's 186 00:10:39,200 --> 00:10:42,640 Speaker 1: it's totally unmanageable. So I do think we need federal standards, 187 00:10:43,120 --> 00:10:47,319 Speaker 1: federal framework. We need to make sure that patients are protected, 188 00:10:47,360 --> 00:10:51,240 Speaker 1: transparency is their costs are predictable and managed, and so 189 00:10:51,320 --> 00:10:54,600 Speaker 1: I think it is a combination of federal and state programs. Well, 190 00:10:54,640 --> 00:10:56,520 Speaker 1: thank you very much for coming in and spending time 191 00:10:56,520 --> 00:10:59,439 Speaker 1: with us and educating us all. Susan Davore is the 192 00:10:59,520 --> 00:11:03,760 Speaker 1: chief exam ecorative of Premier the symbol p i NC 193 00:11:04,040 --> 00:11:07,480 Speaker 1: based in Charlotte, North Carolina. Thank you very much. I 194 00:11:07,520 --> 00:11:09,000 Speaker 1: know this is going to be a topic that we're 195 00:11:09,000 --> 00:11:24,240 Speaker 1: going to keep calling on your expertise in the future. Well, 196 00:11:24,320 --> 00:11:27,080 Speaker 1: let's get more on what Warren Buffett said in his 197 00:11:27,120 --> 00:11:31,560 Speaker 1: annual letter to shareholders on Saturday with Noah Bloyer. He 198 00:11:31,640 --> 00:11:35,040 Speaker 1: is a Bloomberg reporter covering Berkshire Hathaway covering this letter 199 00:11:35,120 --> 00:11:39,680 Speaker 1: and subsequent commentary from Warren Buffett. Noah, what was your 200 00:11:39,720 --> 00:11:43,760 Speaker 1: biggest takeaway from this letter? I think the biggest thing 201 00:11:44,200 --> 00:11:48,160 Speaker 1: that that Buffett commented on here was just a tremendous 202 00:11:48,200 --> 00:11:51,400 Speaker 1: amount of money that has been wasted on active management. 203 00:11:51,960 --> 00:11:57,360 Speaker 1: Uh he he estimated conservatively that money managers, have you 204 00:11:57,520 --> 00:12:01,960 Speaker 1: enough a hundred billion dollars over the last ten years 205 00:12:02,800 --> 00:12:05,959 Speaker 1: on on fees that really didn't deliver returns um to 206 00:12:06,240 --> 00:12:08,840 Speaker 1: beat the market. So that was that was far and 207 00:12:08,880 --> 00:12:11,280 Speaker 1: away his his his big takeaway from this one. So 208 00:12:11,400 --> 00:12:14,720 Speaker 1: it doesn't warm Buffet have a one million dollar bet 209 00:12:15,240 --> 00:12:17,880 Speaker 1: he will give one million dollars to charity if he 210 00:12:18,000 --> 00:12:20,720 Speaker 1: can beat hedge fund managers by investing in a passive 211 00:12:20,800 --> 00:12:25,240 Speaker 1: SMP five hundred index this year. Yeah, it's it's it's 212 00:12:25,240 --> 00:12:27,200 Speaker 1: a ten year bet and it's coming to an end. 213 00:12:27,280 --> 00:12:30,160 Speaker 1: He bet that. Uh, like you said, an m P 214 00:12:30,400 --> 00:12:36,160 Speaker 1: five tracker from Vanguard could could beat um a basket 215 00:12:36,200 --> 00:12:40,280 Speaker 1: of hedge funds, it was actually several funds of funds um, 216 00:12:40,360 --> 00:12:43,440 Speaker 1: and nine years into that bet, he's way ahead. It 217 00:12:43,559 --> 00:12:46,640 Speaker 1: ends on December thirty one, and he basically declared in 218 00:12:46,720 --> 00:12:53,240 Speaker 1: early victory. Now explain what warm Buffets position is on 219 00:12:53,440 --> 00:12:57,200 Speaker 1: people who can actually outpace the market when it comes 220 00:12:57,240 --> 00:13:00,720 Speaker 1: to returns. So, yeah, that's a great question. He did. 221 00:13:00,800 --> 00:13:02,880 Speaker 1: He did throw that crowded bone. He said it's not 222 00:13:02,960 --> 00:13:06,520 Speaker 1: impossible to do that. Obviously, Buffett himself as an example, 223 00:13:06,640 --> 00:13:09,200 Speaker 1: and and he thinks that he can keep doing that. 224 00:13:09,280 --> 00:13:13,720 Speaker 1: At Berkshire he's not buying index funds for Berkshire. What um. 225 00:13:14,640 --> 00:13:17,680 Speaker 1: What he did say though, is that it's incredibly difficult 226 00:13:17,720 --> 00:13:20,880 Speaker 1: to identify people who can outperform over the long haul 227 00:13:21,280 --> 00:13:23,440 Speaker 1: early on in their careers, because if you don't do 228 00:13:23,480 --> 00:13:25,880 Speaker 1: it early in their careers, it's you're you're often going 229 00:13:25,920 --> 00:13:28,560 Speaker 1: to miss out on that incredible performance that that those 230 00:13:28,559 --> 00:13:31,520 Speaker 1: managers are going to have. You know, I found it compelling, 231 00:13:31,559 --> 00:13:35,679 Speaker 1: aside from the passive and active debate that is quite 232 00:13:35,720 --> 00:13:38,440 Speaker 1: heated and topical. At the moment, I thought that Warren 233 00:13:38,440 --> 00:13:43,560 Speaker 1: Buffett's optimism was somewhat surprising because Warren Buffett was a 234 00:13:43,640 --> 00:13:48,160 Speaker 1: longtime supporter of Hillary Clinton, and he made no mention 235 00:13:48,320 --> 00:13:51,960 Speaker 1: of President Trump. And he said that children born in 236 00:13:52,000 --> 00:13:56,440 Speaker 1: America today have the brightest future ever and considered continued 237 00:13:56,520 --> 00:13:59,040 Speaker 1: to reiterate his faith in the economy that even if 238 00:13:59,080 --> 00:14:01,840 Speaker 1: there are hiccups, that it will keep chugging along. What 239 00:14:01,880 --> 00:14:04,440 Speaker 1: did you make of this? Well, actually, I thought that 240 00:14:04,559 --> 00:14:08,400 Speaker 1: those passages were quite consistent with what he's what he said, um, 241 00:14:08,600 --> 00:14:12,280 Speaker 1: and you know, he's he has expressed optimism about the 242 00:14:12,320 --> 00:14:15,120 Speaker 1: prospects or business in America for a long long time. 243 00:14:15,559 --> 00:14:18,240 Speaker 1: And you can go back to his letters, He's he's 244 00:14:18,240 --> 00:14:21,280 Speaker 1: obviously been an incredible beneficiary of it um but but 245 00:14:21,280 --> 00:14:23,400 Speaker 1: but so have lots of other people. And I think 246 00:14:23,800 --> 00:14:28,720 Speaker 1: his point there really was to tell people that business 247 00:14:28,720 --> 00:14:31,200 Speaker 1: will do fine in America. We have a good economic 248 00:14:31,280 --> 00:14:35,480 Speaker 1: system and it doesn't matter who's in the OPA office. 249 00:14:36,320 --> 00:14:37,920 Speaker 1: You are right to point out that he was a 250 00:14:37,960 --> 00:14:41,560 Speaker 1: big bactor of Hillary Clinton and policy wise lined up 251 00:14:41,600 --> 00:14:44,440 Speaker 1: with her a lot more. But I think what Buffett 252 00:14:44,480 --> 00:14:46,440 Speaker 1: was trying to do in this letter is remind people 253 00:14:46,680 --> 00:14:51,800 Speaker 1: that over the history of America, business has done just fine. 254 00:14:51,800 --> 00:14:56,520 Speaker 1: Our capitalist system has worked very, very well, and and 255 00:14:56,520 --> 00:14:59,280 Speaker 1: and he was reminding people that they shouldn't get too 256 00:14:59,280 --> 00:15:02,280 Speaker 1: wrapped up maybe the doom and gloom of the moment. 257 00:15:02,840 --> 00:15:08,040 Speaker 1: He also spoke, uh, sort of eloquently about his his 258 00:15:08,120 --> 00:15:10,480 Speaker 1: vision for his position in the future, right, I mean, 259 00:15:10,520 --> 00:15:12,680 Speaker 1: he said that, you know, he's ready to go. He 260 00:15:12,760 --> 00:15:17,160 Speaker 1: doesn't foresee retirement anytime soon, although he did say something 261 00:15:17,240 --> 00:15:19,160 Speaker 1: that's you know, it's difficult to identify the things that 262 00:15:19,200 --> 00:15:21,680 Speaker 1: he's going to be interested in, but he's always ready 263 00:15:21,680 --> 00:15:25,360 Speaker 1: to take advantage of opportunities, right right, right, Yeah, I 264 00:15:25,360 --> 00:15:27,960 Speaker 1: mean it's it's kind of incredible at eighty six. He just, 265 00:15:28,960 --> 00:15:32,040 Speaker 1: I mean just this morning, said he increased his Apple steak. 266 00:15:32,120 --> 00:15:34,400 Speaker 1: It's now north of eighteen billion dollars. I mean, this 267 00:15:34,440 --> 00:15:36,240 Speaker 1: is the guy whose clipped that he still uses the 268 00:15:36,240 --> 00:15:41,360 Speaker 1: flip phone. Um so, uh yeah. I mean, there was 269 00:15:41,400 --> 00:15:44,080 Speaker 1: nothing in the letter that suggested he's ready to hang 270 00:15:44,160 --> 00:15:47,760 Speaker 1: up his police and you know, quite to the contrary, 271 00:15:47,800 --> 00:15:51,240 Speaker 1: he Berkshire keeps evolving and he keeps thinking about ways 272 00:15:51,280 --> 00:15:53,960 Speaker 1: to expand and grow the business over time. Let's talk 273 00:15:54,000 --> 00:15:57,440 Speaker 1: about Apple. This morning, Warren Buffett said that he continued 274 00:15:57,480 --> 00:16:02,400 Speaker 1: to buy Apple shares at at a rapid clip, and 275 00:16:02,440 --> 00:16:04,880 Speaker 1: that it is now I believe, his second biggest holding. 276 00:16:05,280 --> 00:16:09,640 Speaker 1: What do you make it? I mean, what I make 277 00:16:09,720 --> 00:16:11,720 Speaker 1: of that is I think what we wrote last year 278 00:16:11,760 --> 00:16:15,440 Speaker 1: when when the stake was first disclosed, is that Apple. 279 00:16:15,880 --> 00:16:18,600 Speaker 1: You know, Buffett has long had this aversion to tech companies, 280 00:16:18,640 --> 00:16:20,920 Speaker 1: but they're not looking at Apple as a tech company. 281 00:16:20,960 --> 00:16:23,800 Speaker 1: They're looking at it more as a consumer products company. 282 00:16:23,880 --> 00:16:26,920 Speaker 1: And if you think about Apple from the advantage, it 283 00:16:27,000 --> 00:16:29,480 Speaker 1: really does start to check some of the boxes that 284 00:16:29,480 --> 00:16:33,280 Speaker 1: that Buffett cares about. The iPhone, you know, he said 285 00:16:33,280 --> 00:16:37,280 Speaker 1: this morning is just this incredibly sticky product. And when 286 00:16:37,320 --> 00:16:41,040 Speaker 1: you have an ecosystem of apps and all the stuff 287 00:16:41,040 --> 00:16:45,840 Speaker 1: that Apple is is providing in terms of the cloud, Um, 288 00:16:45,920 --> 00:16:50,040 Speaker 1: people are just reluctant to change devices or switched to 289 00:16:50,080 --> 00:16:54,400 Speaker 1: a different ecosystem. So, um, I think I think that 290 00:16:54,560 --> 00:16:59,880 Speaker 1: played in more than uh, his you know, past reservation 291 00:17:00,240 --> 00:17:03,360 Speaker 1: about being able to guess where technology is going. No, 292 00:17:03,560 --> 00:17:05,800 Speaker 1: he also spoke about furniture. Maybe you want to sit 293 00:17:05,840 --> 00:17:09,320 Speaker 1: on something while you're using your Apple product, and that 294 00:17:09,480 --> 00:17:13,480 Speaker 1: is a good connection to taxes. He spoke a little 295 00:17:13,520 --> 00:17:16,680 Speaker 1: bit about that as well. Yeah, I mean I think 296 00:17:16,720 --> 00:17:19,920 Speaker 1: I think he was cautioning people. Um, you know, there's 297 00:17:19,920 --> 00:17:23,159 Speaker 1: been a lot of talk about the border adjustment and 298 00:17:23,200 --> 00:17:25,960 Speaker 1: what's going to happen with respect to tax reform, and 299 00:17:26,400 --> 00:17:29,359 Speaker 1: I think he threw some cold water on the idea 300 00:17:29,440 --> 00:17:31,640 Speaker 1: that we were going to have this major, major overhaul. 301 00:17:32,119 --> 00:17:37,000 Speaker 1: Um in part because um uh there's uh, there's some 302 00:17:37,000 --> 00:17:41,160 Speaker 1: political realities and um, well economic realities too, right, because 303 00:17:41,160 --> 00:17:44,240 Speaker 1: he's got furniture stores. He says, it's seventy of what 304 00:17:44,280 --> 00:17:46,399 Speaker 1: you see is important, and then if you have to 305 00:17:46,400 --> 00:17:48,080 Speaker 1: pay an import tax on it, they're just going to 306 00:17:48,160 --> 00:17:51,880 Speaker 1: pass it along to two consumers. Yeah, that's that's that's 307 00:17:51,920 --> 00:17:54,920 Speaker 1: exactly what he said. And um, uh, we're gonna have 308 00:17:54,960 --> 00:17:57,600 Speaker 1: to see over the course of this year if he's right. Um, 309 00:17:57,640 --> 00:18:00,000 Speaker 1: I want to ask about bonds. He was pretty naked 310 00:18:00,080 --> 00:18:04,400 Speaker 1: have about treasuries and he did reduce proportion of government 311 00:18:04,440 --> 00:18:08,320 Speaker 1: bond holdings in his portfolio. How how well has he 312 00:18:08,440 --> 00:18:13,440 Speaker 1: timed the bond market? You know, I think I think 313 00:18:13,480 --> 00:18:17,399 Speaker 1: the more important thing to look at there is just 314 00:18:17,720 --> 00:18:22,640 Speaker 1: the Buffett has had this ban um towards stocks, towards 315 00:18:22,680 --> 00:18:27,200 Speaker 1: wayne to own productive assets for a long time. And uh, 316 00:18:27,240 --> 00:18:30,880 Speaker 1: it's even though the bond portfolio has been shrinking, He's 317 00:18:30,920 --> 00:18:33,119 Speaker 1: got a lot of other investments that are bond Like. 318 00:18:33,560 --> 00:18:35,679 Speaker 1: If you look at the amount of money that Berkshire 319 00:18:35,720 --> 00:18:38,840 Speaker 1: has poured into the utility industry, for example, I mean 320 00:18:38,880 --> 00:18:43,240 Speaker 1: the balance sheet of these electric uh power companies that 321 00:18:43,320 --> 00:18:46,960 Speaker 1: they own. These are regulated utilities that kick off pretty 322 00:18:47,160 --> 00:18:51,720 Speaker 1: dependable returns um and in certain ways they serve as 323 00:18:51,760 --> 00:18:54,359 Speaker 1: a bond block investment on Berkshire's balance sheets. So I 324 00:18:54,520 --> 00:18:57,320 Speaker 1: don't think the discussion is really about whether Buffet time 325 00:18:57,359 --> 00:18:59,680 Speaker 1: the market right or wrong. He just he just has 326 00:18:59,720 --> 00:19:03,520 Speaker 1: a fullosophy about investing in productive assets and wanting to 327 00:19:03,600 --> 00:19:06,040 Speaker 1: be an owner of companies, and I think that's reflected 328 00:19:06,080 --> 00:19:11,840 Speaker 1: in Berkshire portfolio. Burlington Northern Santa Fe spoke in the 329 00:19:11,960 --> 00:19:15,720 Speaker 1: letter about the industrials and the infrastructure in the United States. 330 00:19:15,720 --> 00:19:19,159 Speaker 1: To give us your take, Yeah, b NSF had a 331 00:19:19,280 --> 00:19:22,320 Speaker 1: had a tougher year last year, and I think Buffett 332 00:19:22,359 --> 00:19:25,119 Speaker 1: laid that out pretty clearly. A big challenge with the 333 00:19:25,280 --> 00:19:29,679 Speaker 1: NSF is that, uh, it's a major one of the 334 00:19:29,720 --> 00:19:32,320 Speaker 1: major things that hauls this coal and we've seen a 335 00:19:32,400 --> 00:19:35,159 Speaker 1: shift in the US away from power plants using as 336 00:19:35,520 --> 00:19:39,040 Speaker 1: much coal. We have more natural gas electric generation now, 337 00:19:39,119 --> 00:19:42,560 Speaker 1: so that's hurt the railroad. UM. Also some of the 338 00:19:42,600 --> 00:19:46,800 Speaker 1: business they were getting from, you know, providing uh materials 339 00:19:46,840 --> 00:19:50,159 Speaker 1: and hauling oil away from from our onshore production in 340 00:19:50,200 --> 00:19:54,160 Speaker 1: the US, that that business has declined. UM. But overall, 341 00:19:54,600 --> 00:19:57,760 Speaker 1: you know, Buffett reiterated that he's committed to spending lots 342 00:19:57,760 --> 00:20:01,760 Speaker 1: of capital to make sure the railroad, uh you know, 343 00:20:01,800 --> 00:20:05,280 Speaker 1: they upgrade their tracks and have um you are spending 344 00:20:05,280 --> 00:20:07,359 Speaker 1: the kind of capital that that that they need to 345 00:20:07,359 --> 00:20:11,120 Speaker 1: make that a world class uh company. He also said 346 00:20:11,119 --> 00:20:14,240 Speaker 1: he did I'm saying a parton go ahead. Well, I 347 00:20:14,400 --> 00:20:17,919 Speaker 1: thought that He also talked about spending money. He doesn't 348 00:20:17,920 --> 00:20:20,960 Speaker 1: mind spending big money for fees if he gets a 349 00:20:20,960 --> 00:20:25,439 Speaker 1: good deal. Yeah, yeah, you know that was that was 350 00:20:25,920 --> 00:20:29,560 Speaker 1: Buffett sort of typical advertisement that he sticks in the 351 00:20:29,600 --> 00:20:33,560 Speaker 1: annual letter. He wants to wants to buy businesses he's 352 00:20:33,600 --> 00:20:36,879 Speaker 1: he has said that Berkshire is a sprawling conglomerate that 353 00:20:36,960 --> 00:20:41,720 Speaker 1: wants to sprawl ever further. So that was that to me, 354 00:20:41,920 --> 00:20:45,480 Speaker 1: was an advertisement telling, you know, investment bankers who have 355 00:20:45,640 --> 00:20:48,520 Speaker 1: ideas about businesses Berkshire might want to buy a you know, 356 00:20:48,640 --> 00:20:51,960 Speaker 1: coming off on his door. Thanks very much, Noah bou Hire. 357 00:21:02,119 --> 00:21:04,080 Speaker 1: P and L is brought to you by proper Cloth, 358 00:21:04,200 --> 00:21:07,280 Speaker 1: a leader in men's custom shirts. At proper cloth dot com, 359 00:21:07,440 --> 00:21:10,720 Speaker 1: ordering custom shirts has never been easier. Create your custom 360 00:21:10,800 --> 00:21:14,160 Speaker 1: shirt size by answering ten easy questions, select from over 361 00:21:14,240 --> 00:21:18,000 Speaker 1: five fabrics to suit your personal taste. Shirts start from 362 00:21:18,000 --> 00:21:20,600 Speaker 1: eighty five dollars and are delivered in just two weeks 363 00:21:20,840 --> 00:21:24,840 Speaker 1: with proper Cloths perfect fit guarantee. Remakes are completely free 364 00:21:24,920 --> 00:21:28,760 Speaker 1: and expert staff are standing by to help. For premium quality, 365 00:21:28,840 --> 00:21:32,840 Speaker 1: perfect fitting shirts, visit proper cloth dot com Custom shirts 366 00:21:32,880 --> 00:21:43,640 Speaker 1: made Smarter. I want to bring in Brendan Brown, chief 367 00:21:43,640 --> 00:21:47,120 Speaker 1: economist and head of economic research at Mitsubishi u f 368 00:21:47,240 --> 00:21:52,000 Speaker 1: J Securities. UH Brennan, you wrote about how the US 369 00:21:52,080 --> 00:21:54,439 Speaker 1: can win currency wars, and I want to get to that, 370 00:21:54,480 --> 00:21:55,920 Speaker 1: but I want to start with something else that we're 371 00:21:55,920 --> 00:21:58,680 Speaker 1: talking about earlier in the program, about how the bond 372 00:21:58,680 --> 00:22:02,119 Speaker 1: market right now is is sending a veto to the 373 00:22:02,160 --> 00:22:05,919 Speaker 1: FED as far as hiking rates in March, and I 374 00:22:05,960 --> 00:22:09,639 Speaker 1: wanted to ask you, do you agree that the FED 375 00:22:09,800 --> 00:22:14,320 Speaker 1: would accept the bond markets guidance as absolute It would 376 00:22:14,359 --> 00:22:16,879 Speaker 1: only would only high rates if the bond market was 377 00:22:16,880 --> 00:22:19,040 Speaker 1: absolutely pricing it. Do you agree with that? I don't 378 00:22:19,040 --> 00:22:21,200 Speaker 1: agree with that at all. I think the bond market 379 00:22:21,240 --> 00:22:25,119 Speaker 1: at the moment is entranced by the FED, as are 380 00:22:25,160 --> 00:22:28,399 Speaker 1: many other markets. Um. If you look at for general 381 00:22:28,400 --> 00:22:31,840 Speaker 1: way markets behaving been behaving in recent week, stock market up, 382 00:22:31,840 --> 00:22:34,800 Speaker 1: gold market up, credit credit spreads down, you've got a 383 00:22:34,880 --> 00:22:40,120 Speaker 1: general vibrant asset price inflation going here. And that's dominated 384 00:22:40,160 --> 00:22:42,680 Speaker 1: I think by a perception of FED is being pretty easy. 385 00:22:42,720 --> 00:22:45,400 Speaker 1: If not the easing policy, you have to go back 386 00:22:45,400 --> 00:22:47,480 Speaker 1: to an observation of Milton Friedman. But you can't you 387 00:22:47,520 --> 00:22:51,040 Speaker 1: can't measure the stance of monetary policy by looking at 388 00:22:51,080 --> 00:22:53,920 Speaker 1: interest rates at a time when growth is accelerating everywhere 389 00:22:53,920 --> 00:22:56,439 Speaker 1: around the world. If rates in the US only go 390 00:22:56,520 --> 00:22:59,240 Speaker 1: up twenty five basis points once a year, the US 391 00:22:59,359 --> 00:23:03,240 Speaker 1: is actually expanding monetary policy at a at a more 392 00:23:03,359 --> 00:23:06,400 Speaker 1: rapid rate than ever before. Well, does that bode well 393 00:23:06,560 --> 00:23:10,280 Speaker 1: for our future economic performance and the future asset prices? No, 394 00:23:10,520 --> 00:23:12,320 Speaker 1: because I think what we're seeing in the US is 395 00:23:12,359 --> 00:23:16,120 Speaker 1: classic to many other asset price inflation cycles we've seen 396 00:23:16,119 --> 00:23:18,800 Speaker 1: in the US. But you get to a fairly late stage, 397 00:23:18,880 --> 00:23:21,480 Speaker 1: like in early two thousand and sixteen, where the asset 398 00:23:21,520 --> 00:23:24,760 Speaker 1: markets look very shaky. The FED comes in and does 399 00:23:24,800 --> 00:23:27,080 Speaker 1: the greenspan poot or a strong pood or a yell 400 00:23:27,160 --> 00:23:29,720 Speaker 1: and put whatever you want to call it um six 401 00:23:29,760 --> 00:23:31,919 Speaker 1: months down the road. If it works, the whole global 402 00:23:31,920 --> 00:23:34,880 Speaker 1: economy begins to pick up, asset markets begin to look frothy, 403 00:23:34,920 --> 00:23:36,800 Speaker 1: And I think that's where we are now. But we 404 00:23:36,840 --> 00:23:39,880 Speaker 1: know from previous history that that sort of late cycle 405 00:23:40,080 --> 00:23:42,399 Speaker 1: doesn't normally end up well. Well. Okay, So given the 406 00:23:42,440 --> 00:23:44,639 Speaker 1: fact that we're in a sort of later cycle in 407 00:23:44,680 --> 00:23:48,920 Speaker 1: the credit in the credit markets, you have an unpredictable 408 00:23:49,080 --> 00:23:51,919 Speaker 1: president in the United States. You know, you have a 409 00:23:51,920 --> 00:23:54,719 Speaker 1: federal reserve that may or may not hike three times 410 00:23:54,760 --> 00:23:58,080 Speaker 1: or more this year. How do you then go from 411 00:23:58,160 --> 00:24:03,360 Speaker 1: that to pricing in the path of the US dollar. Well, 412 00:24:03,400 --> 00:24:08,199 Speaker 1: the US dollar is dominated by first of all, perceptions 413 00:24:08,200 --> 00:24:11,480 Speaker 1: of relative strength around the world, the US economy versus 414 00:24:11,520 --> 00:24:17,120 Speaker 1: everyone else, plus perceptions about the extraordinary policies being followed 415 00:24:17,160 --> 00:24:22,639 Speaker 1: in Europe and Japan. So at the moment, the dollar 416 00:24:22,800 --> 00:24:25,600 Speaker 1: is sort of looking a bit weakish, especially against the yend, 417 00:24:26,760 --> 00:24:31,160 Speaker 1: because of the perception that Janet Yellen is going very 418 00:24:31,200 --> 00:24:33,479 Speaker 1: slow in rate rises and may not raise rates at 419 00:24:33,520 --> 00:24:37,800 Speaker 1: all in April we were on March. We don't know, um, 420 00:24:37,840 --> 00:24:41,320 Speaker 1: but if if, if that perception changes, then the dollar 421 00:24:41,400 --> 00:24:46,520 Speaker 1: will change with that. What's the biggest miscalculation that you've experienced, 422 00:24:46,720 --> 00:24:48,880 Speaker 1: let's say over the last twelve months. Now, that's something 423 00:24:48,920 --> 00:24:51,119 Speaker 1: you thought was going to happen with that wasn't going 424 00:24:51,160 --> 00:24:54,280 Speaker 1: to happen, and it came back to the face. Well, 425 00:24:54,320 --> 00:24:58,560 Speaker 1: that's put it this way. When the Fed exercised the 426 00:24:58,760 --> 00:25:02,600 Speaker 1: yell and put last and effectively backed away from any 427 00:25:02,680 --> 00:25:07,560 Speaker 1: rate rises, Um, could one be sure that was going 428 00:25:07,600 --> 00:25:09,800 Speaker 1: to work? But it was going to bring a rebound 429 00:25:09,840 --> 00:25:13,679 Speaker 1: in markets and an acceleration in economic recovery. I certainly 430 00:25:13,680 --> 00:25:16,040 Speaker 1: had that as a scenario, But if I go back 431 00:25:16,040 --> 00:25:18,320 Speaker 1: and look at my work last spring, I was probably 432 00:25:18,320 --> 00:25:23,720 Speaker 1: giving that scenario thirty or forty probability as against. So, yeah, 433 00:25:23,880 --> 00:25:28,480 Speaker 1: what's your highest conviction forecast right now? My highest conviction 434 00:25:28,560 --> 00:25:32,280 Speaker 1: forecast is that we're going to see continue to see 435 00:25:32,440 --> 00:25:37,840 Speaker 1: quite a strong growth momentum around the world for several quarters, um. 436 00:25:37,880 --> 00:25:43,480 Speaker 1: But but within six quarters to two years, I think, 437 00:25:43,520 --> 00:25:47,159 Speaker 1: like all previous late cycle monetary inflations, this is going 438 00:25:47,200 --> 00:25:49,679 Speaker 1: to end up badly, gonna end up badly. Well, is 439 00:25:49,680 --> 00:25:53,920 Speaker 1: there anything, Is there any way to protect oneself? Well, 440 00:25:54,119 --> 00:25:56,000 Speaker 1: I think I think for the way to protect oneself 441 00:25:56,080 --> 00:25:59,400 Speaker 1: against these outcomes of the obvious ones m long positions 442 00:25:59,440 --> 00:26:06,359 Speaker 1: and got positions in long treasury bonds, positions and equities. Um. 443 00:26:07,040 --> 00:26:10,800 Speaker 1: But as you as as we know, Arthur Miller famously said, 444 00:26:10,840 --> 00:26:13,160 Speaker 1: but if it's Wednesday in the market and enough people 445 00:26:13,160 --> 00:26:15,320 Speaker 1: think it's thirsty, then it's thirsty. But of course, after 446 00:26:15,320 --> 00:26:18,720 Speaker 1: a hundred Wednesdays, people may begin to realize it's not thirsty. 447 00:26:19,119 --> 00:26:20,960 Speaker 1: I want to thank you very much for joining us 448 00:26:21,200 --> 00:26:25,439 Speaker 1: Brendan Brown on This Monday, chief economist and head of 449 00:26:25,520 --> 00:26:42,840 Speaker 1: economic research at the Mitsubishi u f J Securities. Last week, 450 00:26:42,880 --> 00:26:47,280 Speaker 1: Bloomberg's Michael McKee sat down exclusively with Mexico's economy minister 451 00:26:47,760 --> 00:26:52,720 Speaker 1: uh and he found out some interesting, interesting tidbits about 452 00:26:52,840 --> 00:26:56,160 Speaker 1: Mexico's approach to negotiating trade with the U. S. Let's 453 00:26:56,200 --> 00:26:59,240 Speaker 1: take a listen. You'll never an engage in a knew 454 00:26:59,320 --> 00:27:02,480 Speaker 1: that look with the with the idea in your mind 455 00:27:02,800 --> 00:27:04,879 Speaker 1: to go into a trade war that will be a 456 00:27:04,960 --> 00:27:09,480 Speaker 1: loose proposition proposition for both nations. You rather engage in 457 00:27:09,520 --> 00:27:13,440 Speaker 1: a very propositive view trying to move forward an agreement 458 00:27:13,480 --> 00:27:18,560 Speaker 1: that will benefit Canada, the US and Mexico. We hear 459 00:27:18,640 --> 00:27:22,439 Speaker 1: a lot about whether or not Mexico is going to 460 00:27:22,480 --> 00:27:25,520 Speaker 1: talk with the US, but we're getting maybe perhaps a 461 00:27:25,520 --> 00:27:29,560 Speaker 1: clear sense of what lines are being drawn. To get 462 00:27:29,680 --> 00:27:32,160 Speaker 1: more of a sense of that is Eric Martin, economy 463 00:27:32,160 --> 00:27:36,040 Speaker 1: reporter for Bloomberg in Mexico City. So Eric, what was 464 00:27:36,080 --> 00:27:41,200 Speaker 1: the big takeaway for you from this interview? The big 465 00:27:41,200 --> 00:27:47,760 Speaker 1: takeaway is that Mexico is absolutely and unequivocally unwilling to 466 00:27:47,800 --> 00:27:52,560 Speaker 1: accept tariffs being added to NAFTA, The idea is that 467 00:27:52,640 --> 00:27:54,800 Speaker 1: this is a free trade agreement, and so if you 468 00:27:54,800 --> 00:27:57,440 Speaker 1: start talking about trade which is in some way limited 469 00:27:57,800 --> 00:28:00,760 Speaker 1: by definition, it stops becoming a free trade agreement. In 470 00:28:00,800 --> 00:28:04,840 Speaker 1: Mexico has been very firm on that stance, and they've 471 00:28:04,880 --> 00:28:08,640 Speaker 1: reiterated in various ways, but perhaps never as forcefully as 472 00:28:08,640 --> 00:28:12,199 Speaker 1: Minister Guaharda last Friday. Can you talk to the issue 473 00:28:12,240 --> 00:28:15,680 Speaker 1: of whether this really is a trade agreement that needs 474 00:28:15,720 --> 00:28:19,399 Speaker 1: to be updated. Let's put the political rhetoric to the side, 475 00:28:19,440 --> 00:28:22,640 Speaker 1: but are there some things that need to be renegotiated 476 00:28:22,680 --> 00:28:24,919 Speaker 1: given the fact that this is a treaty that was 477 00:28:24,960 --> 00:28:29,800 Speaker 1: completed before the iPhone was released. Kim, certainly that is 478 00:28:30,160 --> 00:28:32,840 Speaker 1: a point of view that's popular even among the people 479 00:28:32,920 --> 00:28:37,360 Speaker 1: who wrote NAFTA negotiated it more than twenty years ago. 480 00:28:37,640 --> 00:28:39,920 Speaker 1: I spoke in January with Carla Hills, who was the 481 00:28:40,000 --> 00:28:44,040 Speaker 1: U S trade negotiator, and she compared it to a 482 00:28:44,040 --> 00:28:49,160 Speaker 1: house that needs some remodeling and repainting, but that when 483 00:28:49,200 --> 00:28:51,800 Speaker 1: you have an old house that still serves, you don't 484 00:28:51,840 --> 00:28:54,440 Speaker 1: knock down the house. That was a metaphor that she used, 485 00:28:54,440 --> 00:28:57,440 Speaker 1: and with NAFTA, it was before the iPhone. There was 486 00:28:57,480 --> 00:29:01,240 Speaker 1: no e commerce, No Amazon, Uh, there was very little 487 00:29:01,280 --> 00:29:04,760 Speaker 1: done in terms of intellectual property protections. Then Mexico had 488 00:29:05,000 --> 00:29:09,320 Speaker 1: enshrined in its constitution a prohibition on foreign in private 489 00:29:09,360 --> 00:29:14,920 Speaker 1: companies being involved in oil exploration and production. Here, so 490 00:29:15,200 --> 00:29:17,680 Speaker 1: all of those areas are areas that Mexico has said 491 00:29:18,080 --> 00:29:21,040 Speaker 1: should be incorporated into an AFTAH. The law has since 492 00:29:21,040 --> 00:29:26,080 Speaker 1: been changed to welcome that kind of foreign investment in 493 00:29:26,120 --> 00:29:28,760 Speaker 1: the oil and energy industry. And so those are some 494 00:29:28,840 --> 00:29:31,760 Speaker 1: of the areas where Mexico has said, yes, definitely, twenty 495 00:29:31,800 --> 00:29:34,440 Speaker 1: three years in, we should be updating, we should be modernizing. 496 00:29:34,640 --> 00:29:38,120 Speaker 1: What we don't want to do is adopt any rules 497 00:29:38,120 --> 00:29:41,280 Speaker 1: in any tariffs that would take a step backwards and 498 00:29:41,280 --> 00:29:44,560 Speaker 1: would interrupt supply chains, would put an end to some 499 00:29:44,640 --> 00:29:47,800 Speaker 1: of his integration that has been so key to the 500 00:29:47,880 --> 00:29:52,440 Speaker 1: increase in trade between the two countries. Right, well, Eric, 501 00:29:52,840 --> 00:29:54,800 Speaker 1: then let's look at it from the US point of view. 502 00:29:54,840 --> 00:29:58,120 Speaker 1: If Mexico will not negotiate any deal that even talks 503 00:29:58,160 --> 00:30:01,480 Speaker 1: about tariffs, will the U US negotiate a deal that 504 00:30:01,840 --> 00:30:06,360 Speaker 1: does not include tariffs? You know, that's a question that 505 00:30:06,400 --> 00:30:10,040 Speaker 1: everyone is asking. Steve Manuchin was out last week saying 506 00:30:10,120 --> 00:30:14,280 Speaker 1: that the US is interested in a scenario or in 507 00:30:14,280 --> 00:30:17,480 Speaker 1: a solution that would be a win win situation for 508 00:30:17,840 --> 00:30:21,160 Speaker 1: Mexico and the US. And UH, you know, a lot 509 00:30:21,240 --> 00:30:26,280 Speaker 1: of Trump's kind of emissaries and deputies have been making 510 00:30:26,720 --> 00:30:30,160 Speaker 1: positive statements about NAFTA and about working with the US. 511 00:30:30,160 --> 00:30:32,400 Speaker 1: But then you have in the beginning of January, Trump 512 00:30:32,680 --> 00:30:36,200 Speaker 1: tweeting about General motors and Toyota imports to the US, 513 00:30:36,320 --> 00:30:40,520 Speaker 1: threatening a tariff which not only would violate NAFTA, but 514 00:30:40,560 --> 00:30:43,240 Speaker 1: would also violate the norms of the w t O. 515 00:30:43,720 --> 00:30:47,200 Speaker 1: And so for Mexico, Uh, the real nightmare scenario is 516 00:30:47,240 --> 00:30:50,680 Speaker 1: not Trump leaving NAFTA. The minister said, that's something Mexico 517 00:30:50,760 --> 00:30:54,000 Speaker 1: can essentially live with. Uh, it's the concern that Trump 518 00:30:54,040 --> 00:30:57,160 Speaker 1: would leave the w t O or adopt policies to 519 00:30:57,280 --> 00:30:59,520 Speaker 1: violate the w t O. But in that case, it's 520 00:30:59,560 --> 00:31:02,440 Speaker 1: a concern and a problem not only for Mexico but 521 00:31:02,600 --> 00:31:06,640 Speaker 1: for the entire world and the multilateral trading system. If 522 00:31:06,680 --> 00:31:10,800 Speaker 1: the United States seeks to amend or change the World 523 00:31:10,800 --> 00:31:16,680 Speaker 1: Trade Organization's relationship with the countries trade and tariff laws, 524 00:31:16,720 --> 00:31:22,400 Speaker 1: what's likely to trans transpire. There would be any number 525 00:31:22,400 --> 00:31:27,000 Speaker 1: of legal challenges. Countries could adopt reciprocal measures that mirror 526 00:31:27,080 --> 00:31:31,680 Speaker 1: U S terroiffs and quotas. Really is a spiral, a 527 00:31:31,720 --> 00:31:35,200 Speaker 1: death spiral for globalization as we know it, and it 528 00:31:35,200 --> 00:31:40,120 Speaker 1: would cause all kinds of distortions and issues in terms 529 00:31:40,120 --> 00:31:42,920 Speaker 1: of international trade. I mean, that's what really every endalyst 530 00:31:42,960 --> 00:31:45,880 Speaker 1: who we speak to tells us. Now, I want to 531 00:31:45,920 --> 00:31:48,360 Speaker 1: thank you very much for joining us. Eric Martin is 532 00:31:48,360 --> 00:31:52,960 Speaker 1: our economy reporter for Bloomberg News in Mexico City, giving 533 00:31:53,040 --> 00:31:56,840 Speaker 1: us an update on any revamp or a change or 534 00:31:56,920 --> 00:32:07,400 Speaker 1: renegotiation to the North American Free Trade Agreement. Thanks for 535 00:32:07,480 --> 00:32:10,120 Speaker 1: listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can 536 00:32:10,160 --> 00:32:14,560 Speaker 1: subscribe and listen to interviews at iTunes, SoundCloud, or whatever 537 00:32:14,880 --> 00:32:18,360 Speaker 1: podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm out there 538 00:32:18,400 --> 00:32:21,440 Speaker 1: on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm out there on Twitter 539 00:32:21,560 --> 00:32:24,520 Speaker 1: at Lisa Abramo. It's one before the podcast. You can 540 00:32:24,520 --> 00:32:35,800 Speaker 1: always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio. P and L 541 00:32:35,920 --> 00:32:37,880 Speaker 1: is brought to you by proper Cloth, a leader in 542 00:32:37,960 --> 00:32:41,400 Speaker 1: men's custom shirts, with proprietary, smart sized technology and top 543 00:32:41,480 --> 00:32:45,160 Speaker 1: rated customer service. Ordering a custom shirt has never been easier. 544 00:32:45,440 --> 00:32:48,080 Speaker 1: Visit proper cloth dot com to order your first custom 545 00:32:48,160 --> 00:32:49,000 Speaker 1: shirt today,