1 00:00:05,120 --> 00:00:09,200 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane. Along 2 00:00:09,200 --> 00:00:13,160 Speaker 1: with Jonathan Ferrell and Lisa Brownwitz. Daily we bring you 3 00:00:13,280 --> 00:00:18,600 Speaker 1: insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and international relations. 4 00:00:18,840 --> 00:00:23,799 Speaker 1: To find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple podcast, Suncloud, Bloomberg dot Com, 5 00:00:23,920 --> 00:00:31,120 Speaker 1: and of course on the Bloomberg terminal. Sometimes you get 6 00:00:31,160 --> 00:00:34,120 Speaker 1: lucky in your scheduling. We do that with William Cohen. 7 00:00:34,720 --> 00:00:38,040 Speaker 1: To say he's chairman and chief executive officer of Cohen 8 00:00:38,080 --> 00:00:42,159 Speaker 1: Group barely describes it. He's a former Secretary of Defense, 9 00:00:42,200 --> 00:00:45,760 Speaker 1: and of course this public service and really bipartisan approach here, 10 00:00:46,240 --> 00:00:50,000 Speaker 1: but far more back to Nixon Kissinger on China, he 11 00:00:50,440 --> 00:00:53,680 Speaker 1: among few is on the high ground. Maybe Mike Mansfield 12 00:00:53,920 --> 00:00:56,960 Speaker 1: up in Jaman, up in Japan would be somewhat the 13 00:00:57,000 --> 00:01:01,160 Speaker 1: equivalent Secretary Cohen. We're honored to have you here today. 14 00:01:01,360 --> 00:01:06,080 Speaker 1: Is Speaker Pelosi making the right decision if she travels 15 00:01:06,120 --> 00:01:11,600 Speaker 1: and lands in Taipei and greets the Taiwanese people. Well, 16 00:01:11,640 --> 00:01:14,480 Speaker 1: I think what we have to do is understand what 17 00:01:14,640 --> 00:01:19,200 Speaker 1: our policy towards China is and what our strategy is. 18 00:01:19,920 --> 00:01:23,880 Speaker 1: We have taken a one China policy, Uh as far 19 00:01:23,959 --> 00:01:28,399 Speaker 1: as the last fifty sixty years, and the question then becomes, 20 00:01:28,440 --> 00:01:31,920 Speaker 1: what is our strategy for implementing that. Do we make 21 00:01:31,959 --> 00:01:34,360 Speaker 1: a decision do we want to have any kind of 22 00:01:34,400 --> 00:01:37,160 Speaker 1: a positive relationship going forward, and if so, how do 23 00:01:37,240 --> 00:01:39,760 Speaker 1: we get there? And so I think what has happened 24 00:01:39,760 --> 00:01:43,120 Speaker 1: with Speaker Pelosi's trip is she has raised very high 25 00:01:43,120 --> 00:01:47,960 Speaker 1: expectations in Taiwan, very high anxieties in China. I believe 26 00:01:48,920 --> 00:01:51,840 Speaker 1: that are how we deal with the Taiwan is a 27 00:01:52,040 --> 00:01:54,640 Speaker 1: very big, bright red line as far as the Chinese 28 00:01:54,680 --> 00:01:59,400 Speaker 1: are concerned, and I think they will respond, if not militarily, 29 00:01:59,480 --> 00:02:01,760 Speaker 1: I don't expect that to take place. If she should 30 00:02:01,800 --> 00:02:04,400 Speaker 1: go to Taiwan, I think they will find a way 31 00:02:04,440 --> 00:02:08,000 Speaker 1: to respond in their own fashion that will inflict some 32 00:02:08,080 --> 00:02:10,639 Speaker 1: harm upon us. So it's got a tough decision to make. 33 00:02:10,680 --> 00:02:14,799 Speaker 1: The military is apparently indicated it's rather dangerous time for 34 00:02:14,919 --> 00:02:17,400 Speaker 1: us in the region, and she'll have to take that 35 00:02:17,440 --> 00:02:20,480 Speaker 1: into account. In the arc that we have of our 36 00:02:20,520 --> 00:02:25,440 Speaker 1: relationship with China A one China and with FOREMOSTA with Taiwan, 37 00:02:26,080 --> 00:02:30,760 Speaker 1: there have been assurances six assurances over time. You are 38 00:02:30,840 --> 00:02:35,680 Speaker 1: directly involved with that. How strong are our six assurances 39 00:02:36,000 --> 00:02:42,880 Speaker 1: to Taiwan. Well, it's the assurances are inconsistent with the 40 00:02:42,880 --> 00:02:45,520 Speaker 1: passage of the Taiwan Relations Act, and I was a 41 00:02:45,520 --> 00:02:49,040 Speaker 1: part of that. Going back to nine, we said that 42 00:02:49,120 --> 00:02:52,760 Speaker 1: we will help provide for the defense of Taiwan. Since 43 00:02:52,800 --> 00:02:56,960 Speaker 1: that time, President Biden has said we will defend Taiwan. 44 00:02:57,600 --> 00:03:01,040 Speaker 1: That has caused great confusion in terms not only with China, 45 00:03:01,120 --> 00:03:04,800 Speaker 1: but also our Asian allies. All of those in the 46 00:03:04,840 --> 00:03:09,160 Speaker 1: Asia Pacific region are now the Indo Pacific region are concerned. 47 00:03:09,280 --> 00:03:11,640 Speaker 1: What does that mean? Are we prepared to go to 48 00:03:11,760 --> 00:03:15,520 Speaker 1: war with China over Taiwan and will they be with us? 49 00:03:15,919 --> 00:03:18,360 Speaker 1: So we have to get more clarity in terms of 50 00:03:18,400 --> 00:03:21,359 Speaker 1: exactly what we're prepared to do. Is it just helped 51 00:03:21,680 --> 00:03:25,840 Speaker 1: provide defensive equipment or actually go to war should China 52 00:03:25,919 --> 00:03:28,880 Speaker 1: try to attack Taiwan. So this confusion that needs to 53 00:03:28,919 --> 00:03:33,360 Speaker 1: be clarification, and that's something I would think that speak of. 54 00:03:33,400 --> 00:03:37,000 Speaker 1: Pelosi has talked with the administration, has talked obviously to 55 00:03:37,040 --> 00:03:39,840 Speaker 1: the military, and I think during this trip she needs 56 00:03:39,880 --> 00:03:42,280 Speaker 1: to talk and we'll talk with all of our allies 57 00:03:42,320 --> 00:03:44,800 Speaker 1: in the Asia Pacific region because they have a lot 58 00:03:44,840 --> 00:03:47,560 Speaker 1: at stake in terms of what we'll do and what 59 00:03:47,560 --> 00:03:51,000 Speaker 1: will fail to do should there be a conflict, Secretary 60 00:03:51,160 --> 00:03:54,640 Speaker 1: as at tensions begin and continue to really escalate in 61 00:03:54,680 --> 00:03:57,560 Speaker 1: a new way between China and the US. Is the 62 00:03:57,640 --> 00:04:00,720 Speaker 1: US dealing with a weekend or an emboldened Jijian paying 63 00:04:00,840 --> 00:04:05,760 Speaker 1: a strength in Jijian Ping then perhaps a few years ago. Well, 64 00:04:05,800 --> 00:04:09,160 Speaker 1: I think he's much stronger than he's ever been. I 65 00:04:09,200 --> 00:04:11,560 Speaker 1: think that he will not be contested in the so 66 00:04:11,640 --> 00:04:15,760 Speaker 1: called election coming up. I think you'll have a third term. 67 00:04:15,800 --> 00:04:18,920 Speaker 1: And I think the Chinese will regard this, even though 68 00:04:18,960 --> 00:04:21,479 Speaker 1: we've tried to persuade them that this is something that 69 00:04:21,560 --> 00:04:27,360 Speaker 1: we do. We defend democracies, we defend human rights, they 70 00:04:27,400 --> 00:04:29,920 Speaker 1: will see this as pointing a finger in the eye 71 00:04:30,000 --> 00:04:32,760 Speaker 1: of Titian pay. And I think when we talk about 72 00:04:32,760 --> 00:04:36,800 Speaker 1: red lines, going back to red lines with Russia, for example, 73 00:04:37,200 --> 00:04:40,120 Speaker 1: going back as early as two thousand three, Bill Burns, 74 00:04:40,120 --> 00:04:44,239 Speaker 1: our current CIA director, wrote to the Bush administration said 75 00:04:44,720 --> 00:04:47,760 Speaker 1: Russia will see any move on the part of Ukraine, 76 00:04:47,960 --> 00:04:51,200 Speaker 1: Tornado or EU as a red line that they will 77 00:04:51,200 --> 00:04:54,640 Speaker 1: not allow Ukraine to cross. Well, that was twenty years ago. 78 00:04:55,000 --> 00:04:57,800 Speaker 1: I think from what my travels in the entire region 79 00:04:58,240 --> 00:05:00,680 Speaker 1: China will see this as a red line and they 80 00:05:00,680 --> 00:05:04,640 Speaker 1: will find a way to take reaction to the United 81 00:05:04,680 --> 00:05:08,200 Speaker 1: States that will in some way impact negatively upon the 82 00:05:08,279 --> 00:05:11,000 Speaker 1: US and our allies. So it's one of those issues 83 00:05:11,440 --> 00:05:14,680 Speaker 1: the Chris Christofferson song is the going up worth the 84 00:05:14,800 --> 00:05:18,160 Speaker 1: coming down? We will have to decide is going up 85 00:05:18,200 --> 00:05:21,120 Speaker 1: in terms of ratcheting up the attentions with China with 86 00:05:21,200 --> 00:05:25,000 Speaker 1: China worth coming after that? What will be the nature 87 00:05:25,080 --> 00:05:28,480 Speaker 1: of the relationship. Will we still be engaged with China 88 00:05:28,839 --> 00:05:31,440 Speaker 1: or do we want to follow a policy of decoupling. 89 00:05:31,800 --> 00:05:36,360 Speaker 1: Can we pull our economic engagement with China out? And 90 00:05:36,400 --> 00:05:39,960 Speaker 1: if we pull out, will the European allies pull out? 91 00:05:40,360 --> 00:05:43,640 Speaker 1: Will the Southeast Asian allies pull out? So these are 92 00:05:43,680 --> 00:05:46,520 Speaker 1: all issues tied up with our relationship with China. So 93 00:05:46,680 --> 00:05:51,400 Speaker 1: it's not easy. It's very complicated. Secretary, just quickly here. 94 00:05:51,839 --> 00:05:54,880 Speaker 1: Do you think that this trip by Nancy Pelosi is 95 00:05:54,880 --> 00:05:59,600 Speaker 1: advisable or a grave mistake? I don't know the answer 96 00:05:59,600 --> 00:06:01,719 Speaker 1: to that. I would think that one option would be 97 00:06:01,880 --> 00:06:06,159 Speaker 1: to um say that you will visit Taiwan, but perhaps 98 00:06:06,200 --> 00:06:08,719 Speaker 1: at a later time. That would be one option. But 99 00:06:08,839 --> 00:06:11,440 Speaker 1: she may feel that she's compelled to do so now, 100 00:06:11,880 --> 00:06:14,960 Speaker 1: but understanding what the risks are. I think it's going 101 00:06:15,040 --> 00:06:18,520 Speaker 1: to be complicated again because of expectations that she's being 102 00:06:18,560 --> 00:06:22,000 Speaker 1: pushed by Republicans and Democrats to go. I think the 103 00:06:22,000 --> 00:06:25,120 Speaker 1: administration slashing a warning sign without telling her not to. 104 00:06:25,600 --> 00:06:28,359 Speaker 1: So the decision ultimately will be up to her, but 105 00:06:28,440 --> 00:06:32,040 Speaker 1: I think it does. It certainly has some grave dangerous involved. 106 00:06:32,040 --> 00:06:34,640 Speaker 1: There are many who feel China's bluffing. I don't think 107 00:06:34,720 --> 00:06:37,719 Speaker 1: China's bluffing. William Cohen, thank you so much. We looked 108 00:06:37,760 --> 00:06:41,560 Speaker 1: forward to speaking to you again, particularly on the US military. 109 00:06:41,640 --> 00:06:44,160 Speaker 1: In a in a fract just two thousand and twenty two, 110 00:06:49,880 --> 00:06:52,560 Speaker 1: Laura Ram joins US right now FS Investments with a 111 00:06:52,640 --> 00:06:56,320 Speaker 1: really really sharp note about what to watch as we 112 00:06:56,440 --> 00:06:59,479 Speaker 1: vault into August. Let me take you back to March 113 00:06:59,680 --> 00:07:03,880 Speaker 1: of the beginning of the pandemic. Claims exploded higher five 114 00:07:03,920 --> 00:07:07,640 Speaker 1: point nine million. I believe that number is. It's a 115 00:07:07,720 --> 00:07:10,520 Speaker 1: huge statistic, and we've come down to the glory two 116 00:07:10,640 --> 00:07:13,360 Speaker 1: years later of a hundred and seventy one thousand with 117 00:07:13,440 --> 00:07:16,840 Speaker 1: a survey this Thursday of two hundred and sixty thousand. Laura, 118 00:07:16,880 --> 00:07:19,960 Speaker 1: good morning. You say it is these statistics that matters, 119 00:07:20,280 --> 00:07:24,200 Speaker 1: and you benchmarketed two hundred eighty thousand, how close are 120 00:07:24,200 --> 00:07:27,480 Speaker 1: we to get into the rum two hundred eighty thousand. 121 00:07:28,880 --> 00:07:33,000 Speaker 1: Still think we're about a quarter away from getting to 122 00:07:33,080 --> 00:07:37,720 Speaker 1: a level that much more clearly predicts a recession as 123 00:07:37,880 --> 00:07:42,600 Speaker 1: defined by the body that really is the arbiter of this, 124 00:07:42,720 --> 00:07:46,840 Speaker 1: the official referee um. You know, claims typically bottom about 125 00:07:46,920 --> 00:07:50,520 Speaker 1: nine to twenty four months ahead of a recession, and 126 00:07:50,640 --> 00:07:54,119 Speaker 1: they bottomed back in March at a very historically low level, 127 00:07:54,560 --> 00:07:57,080 Speaker 1: but they've been slowly creeping up, and there's a seasonal 128 00:07:57,120 --> 00:07:59,680 Speaker 1: component to that. I think that's why I'm watching something 129 00:07:59,760 --> 00:08:02,800 Speaker 1: a little bit higher, more like two eight, to try 130 00:08:02,840 --> 00:08:07,000 Speaker 1: to differentiate between something that's more cyclical and something that's 131 00:08:07,000 --> 00:08:10,520 Speaker 1: just easy. Does the FED weight is the fed ex 132 00:08:10,680 --> 00:08:13,440 Speaker 1: post where they just have to wait for the lower 133 00:08:13,520 --> 00:08:18,360 Speaker 1: rain to or the act before so that you know 134 00:08:18,400 --> 00:08:21,240 Speaker 1: they're acting. And I think this is the big you 135 00:08:21,280 --> 00:08:24,840 Speaker 1: know question that we saw after Wednesday, right, the markets 136 00:08:24,840 --> 00:08:28,200 Speaker 1: are now really pricing in rate cuts and it's caused 137 00:08:28,280 --> 00:08:32,560 Speaker 1: the FED funds futures curve to diverge significantly from the 138 00:08:32,640 --> 00:08:36,200 Speaker 1: dot plot um, which you know, I grant you the 139 00:08:36,280 --> 00:08:39,880 Speaker 1: FED really has removed there forward guidance piece of this, 140 00:08:40,240 --> 00:08:42,000 Speaker 1: but I do think that that is going to be 141 00:08:42,120 --> 00:08:45,760 Speaker 1: at the core of FED speak this week. FED speakers 142 00:08:45,800 --> 00:08:49,720 Speaker 1: are looking at the market reaction and the higher inflation 143 00:08:49,880 --> 00:08:53,760 Speaker 1: is a game changer. You cannot price in the same 144 00:08:53,800 --> 00:08:56,400 Speaker 1: FED that we had in two thousand eighteen. You can't 145 00:08:56,440 --> 00:09:00,640 Speaker 1: price the same reaction function at the first sign of weakness. 146 00:09:00,720 --> 00:09:02,920 Speaker 1: And we're already seeing that the FED is not gonna 147 00:09:02,920 --> 00:09:05,000 Speaker 1: be able to come in and ride to the rescue 148 00:09:05,000 --> 00:09:08,040 Speaker 1: with rap cuts with the same speed and flexibility that 149 00:09:08,080 --> 00:09:10,160 Speaker 1: they would have, and we have inflation a super second. 150 00:09:10,520 --> 00:09:14,000 Speaker 1: What's driven you crasia the recession debate or the interpretation 151 00:09:14,080 --> 00:09:18,320 Speaker 1: of that meeting last week of this FED. I think 152 00:09:18,360 --> 00:09:23,199 Speaker 1: the recession debate, to me, is really taking the oxygen 153 00:09:23,240 --> 00:09:26,959 Speaker 1: away from what we really need to be focused on, 154 00:09:27,440 --> 00:09:29,720 Speaker 1: because the start date of the recession at the end 155 00:09:29,720 --> 00:09:33,280 Speaker 1: of the date is really only good for years later 156 00:09:33,520 --> 00:09:37,200 Speaker 1: when we're comparing it to other recessions. The reality is 157 00:09:37,240 --> 00:09:40,400 Speaker 1: the economy is weakening, It's probably going to weaken further. 158 00:09:40,920 --> 00:09:45,920 Speaker 1: Job losses are the hallmark of the classic definition of 159 00:09:46,000 --> 00:09:51,600 Speaker 1: recession that or they're a hallmark component of that, and 160 00:09:51,880 --> 00:09:56,480 Speaker 1: looking forward there's more, probably more weakness ahead. And you 161 00:09:56,520 --> 00:09:59,480 Speaker 1: know right now Q three GDP is actually shaping up 162 00:10:00,040 --> 00:10:04,000 Speaker 1: to be positive, a small positive, But I think we 163 00:10:04,080 --> 00:10:06,240 Speaker 1: really need to wait. That there's another shoe out there 164 00:10:06,280 --> 00:10:09,199 Speaker 1: to drop, and it's the jobs. And the FED probably 165 00:10:09,240 --> 00:10:12,800 Speaker 1: said that about ten times that to them, they're really 166 00:10:13,640 --> 00:10:17,720 Speaker 1: going to continue to address inflation primarily until they see 167 00:10:17,800 --> 00:10:19,680 Speaker 1: problem with the jobs. It's in the first line of 168 00:10:19,679 --> 00:10:22,080 Speaker 1: the statement. You can see in the first paragraph they 169 00:10:22,080 --> 00:10:25,360 Speaker 1: reference the jobs market, writes the question, what do you 170 00:10:25,400 --> 00:10:28,600 Speaker 1: expect to see that weakness bleed into the labor market? 171 00:10:28,679 --> 00:10:32,040 Speaker 1: It's Friday too soon? Is next month too soon? Yeah? 172 00:10:32,120 --> 00:10:35,280 Speaker 1: It is too soon. We've seen this consistent strength. We 173 00:10:35,320 --> 00:10:38,640 Speaker 1: still have the job openings. It's not it's something that 174 00:10:38,760 --> 00:10:41,480 Speaker 1: I don't really affect to materialize until the fourth quarter 175 00:10:41,960 --> 00:10:44,080 Speaker 1: or even early in the first quarter next year. Which 176 00:10:44,160 --> 00:10:46,720 Speaker 1: raises a question, Laura, about whether the dual mandate of 177 00:10:46,760 --> 00:10:50,400 Speaker 1: the Fed comes into question at that point, whether inflation 178 00:10:50,760 --> 00:10:53,280 Speaker 1: starts to become less of the obvious goal if the 179 00:10:53,320 --> 00:10:56,079 Speaker 1: labor market is also struggling. Do you think that when 180 00:10:56,120 --> 00:10:59,520 Speaker 1: we get there, inflation will have come down significantly to 181 00:10:59,559 --> 00:11:02,600 Speaker 1: a level where it will be a more comfortable discussion 182 00:11:02,679 --> 00:11:06,520 Speaker 1: for the Federal Reserve to have. No it's so much 183 00:11:06,600 --> 00:11:09,560 Speaker 1: has to go right to get inflation back down to 184 00:11:09,640 --> 00:11:13,520 Speaker 1: anything close to where the FED can plant a flag 185 00:11:13,559 --> 00:11:17,760 Speaker 1: in a clear victory. You need either deep energy price deflation, 186 00:11:18,280 --> 00:11:20,880 Speaker 1: you need rents to turn around, and you need durable 187 00:11:20,920 --> 00:11:26,160 Speaker 1: goods price deflation. All those three components will be required. 188 00:11:26,559 --> 00:11:28,640 Speaker 1: And right now I'm looking at your end g d P, 189 00:11:28,840 --> 00:11:32,200 Speaker 1: it's hard to even get it below seven percent UM. 190 00:11:32,240 --> 00:11:34,640 Speaker 1: You know, my forecast still is around six percent, but 191 00:11:34,920 --> 00:11:38,760 Speaker 1: that's looking increasingly optimistic with every month UM where you 192 00:11:38,840 --> 00:11:42,760 Speaker 1: just get these reports filled with upside surprises and inflation 193 00:11:42,880 --> 00:11:46,000 Speaker 1: bubbling up from virtually every quarter of the economy. So 194 00:11:46,120 --> 00:11:48,960 Speaker 1: it's a lot of economic uncertainty over the next year. 195 00:11:49,440 --> 00:11:52,680 Speaker 1: And this is something that traditional you know, equity markets 196 00:11:52,720 --> 00:11:55,400 Speaker 1: just haven't wrapped their head around. They're looking at a 197 00:11:55,440 --> 00:11:59,439 Speaker 1: more classic V shape recovery, and I would argue we 198 00:11:59,520 --> 00:12:01,520 Speaker 1: still have an hit the bottom of that yet. Just 199 00:12:01,640 --> 00:12:04,680 Speaker 1: quickly here, Laura, given the fact that FED Chair J. 200 00:12:04,760 --> 00:12:06,959 Speaker 1: Powell came out and said that we are getting closer 201 00:12:07,000 --> 00:12:09,560 Speaker 1: to neutral, and that Larry Summers came out and said 202 00:12:09,559 --> 00:12:12,800 Speaker 1: that that was indefensible where do you see this idea 203 00:12:12,840 --> 00:12:16,520 Speaker 1: of neutral kind of evening out? You know, the their 204 00:12:16,679 --> 00:12:19,600 Speaker 1: estimates of neutral are so based on their Phillips curve 205 00:12:19,640 --> 00:12:23,240 Speaker 1: related models, and they really take for granted this deep 206 00:12:23,480 --> 00:12:27,040 Speaker 1: durable goods price deflation that we've seen from China in 207 00:12:27,080 --> 00:12:31,440 Speaker 1: the face of the globalization. Neutral is likely higher. Their 208 00:12:31,480 --> 00:12:34,200 Speaker 1: models haven't caught up to that yet, and I think 209 00:12:34,280 --> 00:12:36,520 Speaker 1: that's what so many of us are sort of pounding 210 00:12:36,520 --> 00:12:39,000 Speaker 1: the table about. It's going to have to be a 211 00:12:39,080 --> 00:12:42,000 Speaker 1: higher terminal rate. It may even be three and a 212 00:12:42,000 --> 00:12:45,880 Speaker 1: half percent, but even that, I think would require a 213 00:12:45,960 --> 00:12:49,440 Speaker 1: hawkish pivot from where markets are positioning today. Right. Thank 214 00:12:49,480 --> 00:12:57,320 Speaker 1: you of FS Investment. This is a joy Edward Moore's 215 00:12:57,360 --> 00:13:01,440 Speaker 1: defines a global oil and on analysis. He's how to 216 00:13:01,440 --> 00:13:03,360 Speaker 1: come out of his research at City Group. Let's get 217 00:13:03,440 --> 00:13:05,800 Speaker 1: right to it, Ad Morris, I want to talk about 218 00:13:05,840 --> 00:13:11,680 Speaker 1: demand responsiveness or demand elasticity nation to nation. Is the 219 00:13:11,760 --> 00:13:15,960 Speaker 1: demand dynamics of less demand in the United States the 220 00:13:16,040 --> 00:13:21,640 Speaker 1: same as the demand dynamics say in Germany or Singapore. Absolutely, 221 00:13:21,720 --> 00:13:26,520 Speaker 1: European economic conditions are worse than they are in the US. 222 00:13:26,720 --> 00:13:29,320 Speaker 1: Compound that with the higher price and yes, we're not 223 00:13:29,360 --> 00:13:32,480 Speaker 1: seeing any demand growth in Europe. We're not seeing very 224 00:13:32,559 --> 00:13:36,160 Speaker 1: much demand growth around the world. It's just two prices 225 00:13:36,160 --> 00:13:38,280 Speaker 1: are too high, and even though they've come off, the 226 00:13:38,360 --> 00:13:42,400 Speaker 1: gasoline prices have come off, the continued strength of the dollar, 227 00:13:42,480 --> 00:13:45,120 Speaker 1: even they'll use you noted, it's weakening, and just the 228 00:13:45,400 --> 00:13:48,360 Speaker 1: sheer high price is to turn people from using the 229 00:13:48,400 --> 00:13:50,160 Speaker 1: car as much as they were in the past. Do 230 00:13:50,240 --> 00:13:52,959 Speaker 1: you assume out of the bulls and you've been right, 231 00:13:53,040 --> 00:13:55,959 Speaker 1: right right in the last number of months, add morse, 232 00:13:56,040 --> 00:13:59,000 Speaker 1: do you assume the demand clicks in if COVID is 233 00:13:59,040 --> 00:14:03,440 Speaker 1: solved in Asia? Well, certainly there's one level where demand 234 00:14:03,440 --> 00:14:06,600 Speaker 1: will absolutely kicked in, and that's jet field demand. China 235 00:14:06,720 --> 00:14:09,839 Speaker 1: is a very large user of jet fuel. They've shut 236 00:14:09,880 --> 00:14:13,320 Speaker 1: down international travel, so they've they've they're down about a 237 00:14:13,320 --> 00:14:15,280 Speaker 1: million barrels a day from where they've been just on 238 00:14:15,320 --> 00:14:18,320 Speaker 1: the jet fuel side. So yes, we do expect a 239 00:14:18,440 --> 00:14:20,600 Speaker 1: year from now all our sequels that we're going to 240 00:14:20,640 --> 00:14:24,240 Speaker 1: see significantly more jet field demand. We don't see that happening, 241 00:14:24,520 --> 00:14:27,640 Speaker 1: by the way, in the other transportation fuels. We think 242 00:14:27,640 --> 00:14:31,000 Speaker 1: gasoline and diesel are likely to remain weak unless for 243 00:14:31,040 --> 00:14:33,720 Speaker 1: some reason there's going to be a rebirth of global 244 00:14:33,720 --> 00:14:37,120 Speaker 1: trade um and some shot in the arm to to 245 00:14:37,240 --> 00:14:39,560 Speaker 1: get people driving again. If this is the case, side, 246 00:14:39,560 --> 00:14:43,040 Speaker 1: why are we not seeing inventories build more? Well, we 247 00:14:43,080 --> 00:14:45,760 Speaker 1: are seeing inventories build. The problem is I've been such 248 00:14:45,840 --> 00:14:48,400 Speaker 1: at such a low level. That's one of the problems. 249 00:14:48,400 --> 00:14:50,320 Speaker 1: The other problem is that when we look back at 250 00:14:50,360 --> 00:14:52,880 Speaker 1: the second quarter, there was a good inventory build, but 251 00:14:53,040 --> 00:14:55,120 Speaker 1: most of it took place in China. We had a 252 00:14:55,160 --> 00:14:57,560 Speaker 1: month and a half in which demand, real demand was 253 00:14:57,640 --> 00:15:00,800 Speaker 1: down about a million barrels a day a little bit more, 254 00:15:01,120 --> 00:15:04,920 Speaker 1: and we had inventories building because there was another million 255 00:15:04,920 --> 00:15:08,920 Speaker 1: barrels a day of imports coming out of taking advantage 256 00:15:08,920 --> 00:15:12,320 Speaker 1: of the low price of Russian crude and actually stock building. 257 00:15:12,400 --> 00:15:14,960 Speaker 1: They We had a lot of imports of Saudi crude, 258 00:15:15,160 --> 00:15:18,160 Speaker 1: up around seven hundred thousand barrels a day alone one 259 00:15:18,200 --> 00:15:21,560 Speaker 1: month after the other. So the inventory building Q two, 260 00:15:21,760 --> 00:15:25,960 Speaker 1: which is unevenly distributed, we're seeing actually an inventory build 261 00:15:26,000 --> 00:15:28,520 Speaker 1: west of Suez right now, which is not seeing it 262 00:15:28,560 --> 00:15:31,480 Speaker 1: in the US. The US is in this bizarre position 263 00:15:31,680 --> 00:15:35,640 Speaker 1: of being not one market, but three or four different markets. 264 00:15:36,280 --> 00:15:39,680 Speaker 1: We are an open market. We can't export other than 265 00:15:39,680 --> 00:15:43,080 Speaker 1: by pipeline, and I used the word to export euphemistically. 266 00:15:43,160 --> 00:15:46,080 Speaker 1: We had export from the Gulf coast to the East coast. 267 00:15:46,560 --> 00:15:50,240 Speaker 1: Um uh. We can export to Europe and other places. 268 00:15:50,800 --> 00:15:55,200 Speaker 1: The turning away from Russia by European countries and companies 269 00:15:55,440 --> 00:15:58,320 Speaker 1: have had them turning to the United States. But last 270 00:15:58,360 --> 00:16:01,720 Speaker 1: week the data from the A had US exports that 271 00:16:01,800 --> 00:16:04,480 Speaker 1: are record high of ten point nine million barrellars a 272 00:16:04,520 --> 00:16:09,960 Speaker 1: day growth ten point nine million of of of including 273 00:16:10,440 --> 00:16:12,920 Speaker 1: well over four million barrels a day of crude oil. 274 00:16:13,040 --> 00:16:18,120 Speaker 1: So we're having the kind of this discontinuities in the market, 275 00:16:18,720 --> 00:16:21,800 Speaker 1: pulling oil out of the US going into other parts 276 00:16:21,840 --> 00:16:24,400 Speaker 1: of the world. But there definitely is weakness on the 277 00:16:24,400 --> 00:16:27,560 Speaker 1: inventory side, and we're seeing that in the level of backgradation. 278 00:16:28,240 --> 00:16:32,240 Speaker 1: Prices have gone down. PROMP prices are going down when 279 00:16:32,280 --> 00:16:36,040 Speaker 1: it comes to crude at a faster rate than deferred prices. 280 00:16:36,080 --> 00:16:38,800 Speaker 1: The difference between the prompt month and the second month 281 00:16:38,880 --> 00:16:42,880 Speaker 1: is narrowing, and we're seeing flows coming out of commodities. 282 00:16:43,160 --> 00:16:45,600 Speaker 1: The liquidity of the market is low UH, and it's 283 00:16:45,640 --> 00:16:50,440 Speaker 1: getting lower as people are abandoning commodities for other other assets. 284 00:16:50,440 --> 00:16:52,320 Speaker 1: At the moment, one of the reasons why the oil 285 00:16:52,360 --> 00:16:54,360 Speaker 1: picture has been so complicated at it is because of 286 00:16:54,360 --> 00:16:57,120 Speaker 1: how much it does hinge on the zero COVID policy 287 00:16:57,200 --> 00:16:59,800 Speaker 1: in China, how much it hinges on whether that Russian 288 00:16:59,800 --> 00:17:03,320 Speaker 1: oil ill can actually move around more consistently or actually 289 00:17:03,320 --> 00:17:06,080 Speaker 1: not at all, whether it's restricted more. How much do 290 00:17:06,119 --> 00:17:09,000 Speaker 1: you change your parameters, how much do you change what 291 00:17:09,160 --> 00:17:12,040 Speaker 1: your base case is for the price if say China 292 00:17:12,119 --> 00:17:14,760 Speaker 1: does reopen, or if we do get some sort of 293 00:17:14,760 --> 00:17:18,960 Speaker 1: continuing of a studying in the global economy, well we 294 00:17:19,040 --> 00:17:21,800 Speaker 1: do have that as a as a contingency. We think 295 00:17:21,840 --> 00:17:24,479 Speaker 1: the bigger risk on the upside at the moment is 296 00:17:24,520 --> 00:17:28,120 Speaker 1: not a change in the economic situation globally, but rather 297 00:17:28,720 --> 00:17:32,960 Speaker 1: we understand the fragility of exports in some countries. It's 298 00:17:33,000 --> 00:17:35,240 Speaker 1: not just Olivia, which has gone up by the way 299 00:17:35,280 --> 00:17:37,639 Speaker 1: by seven or eight hundred thousand bars a day in 300 00:17:37,680 --> 00:17:40,240 Speaker 1: the last couple of weeks. How long will that last 301 00:17:40,320 --> 00:17:42,560 Speaker 1: is a barris factor of the market. Will we be 302 00:17:42,600 --> 00:17:47,040 Speaker 1: seeing disruptions to supply there? Again? Also in Nigeria, uh 303 00:17:47,200 --> 00:17:50,760 Speaker 1: we're noticing that the Iraq has not yet had a 304 00:17:50,800 --> 00:17:54,040 Speaker 1: government since the elections of last October. We've had the 305 00:17:54,080 --> 00:17:59,120 Speaker 1: Parliament house occupied twice by protesters worrying about a government 306 00:17:59,160 --> 00:18:03,080 Speaker 1: that's going to be too moose to Iran. The the 307 00:18:03,160 --> 00:18:07,080 Speaker 1: likelihood of disruption risks in both Iran and Iraq is 308 00:18:07,080 --> 00:18:10,600 Speaker 1: not exactly zero. Uh So there are bullets factors that 309 00:18:10,600 --> 00:18:13,240 Speaker 1: are hanging over the market. And I don't want to 310 00:18:13,240 --> 00:18:15,200 Speaker 1: caut you on awares on this. And if City Group 311 00:18:15,240 --> 00:18:18,720 Speaker 1: has a banking relationship, please speak up and I apologize. 312 00:18:18,880 --> 00:18:22,080 Speaker 1: Moments ago we have a headline that a Ramco will 313 00:18:22,080 --> 00:18:25,760 Speaker 1: take out the global products division of Velvioline. Folks Ed 314 00:18:25,800 --> 00:18:29,080 Speaker 1: Morrison are the only ones in financial media that actually 315 00:18:29,160 --> 00:18:32,080 Speaker 1: used a can of velvoline in the first car we 316 00:18:32,160 --> 00:18:34,280 Speaker 1: are allowed ever to do an oil change. And there's 317 00:18:34,280 --> 00:18:38,840 Speaker 1: a romance here of the troops from Lexington, Kentucky discussed 318 00:18:38,840 --> 00:18:42,600 Speaker 1: that the synergies of a giant like a Ramco was 319 00:18:42,720 --> 00:18:49,160 Speaker 1: something that's so absolutely iconic in America. UM, I can't 320 00:18:49,160 --> 00:18:53,440 Speaker 1: speak to the synergies. I can speak to a company that, 321 00:18:54,160 --> 00:18:57,119 Speaker 1: as our own my own college, who report on a 322 00:18:57,200 --> 00:19:00,719 Speaker 1: rampo of noted is a wash in cash uh and 323 00:19:00,960 --> 00:19:03,399 Speaker 1: is under pressure to spend it uh. And there are 324 00:19:03,440 --> 00:19:07,359 Speaker 1: market niches that are highly profitable that companies like that 325 00:19:07,400 --> 00:19:11,400 Speaker 1: go after so, without speaking to product issue, I think 326 00:19:11,440 --> 00:19:15,000 Speaker 1: it's just has to do with what the extraordinary cash 327 00:19:15,000 --> 00:19:17,920 Speaker 1: flow and cash position of that company is looking for 328 00:19:18,480 --> 00:19:21,560 Speaker 1: good investments to make. And do you see this to 329 00:19:21,680 --> 00:19:25,120 Speaker 1: continue across all of big oil. I mean, we think 330 00:19:25,160 --> 00:19:28,640 Speaker 1: of x On and XTO, But is this the future 331 00:19:28,840 --> 00:19:33,040 Speaker 1: of an oil a washing cash? Well, the question is 332 00:19:33,080 --> 00:19:36,840 Speaker 1: how long will oil companies be a washing cash. We've 333 00:19:36,840 --> 00:19:41,600 Speaker 1: had very unusual cracks friends. At the moment, A significant 334 00:19:41,600 --> 00:19:45,000 Speaker 1: amount of that profitability doesn't come from the price of 335 00:19:45,000 --> 00:19:47,800 Speaker 1: oil itself. It comes from other things in the market, 336 00:19:47,880 --> 00:19:51,399 Speaker 1: and particularly the strength of the product markets. The strength 337 00:19:51,400 --> 00:19:54,720 Speaker 1: of the product markets is very unusual. China has a 338 00:19:54,760 --> 00:19:57,960 Speaker 1: massive role to play in it. China, as I noted earlier, 339 00:19:58,119 --> 00:20:01,479 Speaker 1: was building inventory. They not only building inventory, but at 340 00:20:01,520 --> 00:20:04,720 Speaker 1: the same time they've cut out exports of product and 341 00:20:04,800 --> 00:20:08,480 Speaker 1: particularly diesel. A year ago they were exporting seven hundred 342 00:20:08,480 --> 00:20:11,680 Speaker 1: thousand barrels today of diesel it's now zero. That's seven 343 00:20:11,720 --> 00:20:14,399 Speaker 1: hundred thousand barrels a day. If it were in the market, 344 00:20:14,680 --> 00:20:16,800 Speaker 1: and if there were some other adjustments, would bring that 345 00:20:17,320 --> 00:20:21,800 Speaker 1: cracks and the refinery margins the profitability of reviding down significantly. 346 00:20:22,000 --> 00:20:24,520 Speaker 1: And before I let you go, what's your base case 347 00:20:24,680 --> 00:20:27,480 Speaker 1: for how low oil prices could go in the next 348 00:20:27,480 --> 00:20:31,120 Speaker 1: six months. Well, our base cases for oils to continued 349 00:20:31,160 --> 00:20:34,920 Speaker 1: to drift downward is seeing rent in the mid eighties 350 00:20:35,000 --> 00:20:38,880 Speaker 1: and w t I in the low eighties for year end. Uh, 351 00:20:38,920 --> 00:20:43,280 Speaker 1: and then continuing on that path into the months into 352 00:20:43,320 --> 00:20:46,040 Speaker 1: the eighties. Low a t C around at Molsa City. 353 00:20:46,080 --> 00:20:52,960 Speaker 1: Thank you, what a move we've had in July, the 354 00:20:52,960 --> 00:20:55,280 Speaker 1: biggest month of gangs of the SMP bats in November. 355 00:20:56,160 --> 00:20:58,960 Speaker 1: Off the lows of June, the June sixteenth closing low 356 00:20:58,960 --> 00:21:00,760 Speaker 1: on the NASTAG one hundred, we have round eight more 357 00:21:00,800 --> 00:21:04,160 Speaker 1: than sixteen percent. Stewart Kins was waiting for that move. 358 00:21:04,320 --> 00:21:06,680 Speaker 1: The head efectuity thrivers. This research at ups joins this 359 00:21:06,840 --> 00:21:08,480 Speaker 1: right now, Stewart, Is it too added to take a 360 00:21:08,560 --> 00:21:12,000 Speaker 1: victory lap? I don't think there's any victory laps in 361 00:21:12,040 --> 00:21:14,200 Speaker 1: these in these markets, John, But uh, look, I think 362 00:21:14,240 --> 00:21:16,760 Speaker 1: I think the big picture here's expectations just got you know, 363 00:21:16,880 --> 00:21:18,800 Speaker 1: so extremely low that it didn't take a whole lot 364 00:21:18,840 --> 00:21:22,080 Speaker 1: to kind of surprise sentiment to the upside, especially given 365 00:21:22,080 --> 00:21:24,280 Speaker 1: more positioning. Is But yeah, I think any any victory 366 00:21:24,359 --> 00:21:27,560 Speaker 1: laps are short lived these days. I look, Stewart at 367 00:21:27,880 --> 00:21:32,800 Speaker 1: the move we've had. When you synthesize all of UBS research, 368 00:21:32,880 --> 00:21:36,040 Speaker 1: can you say it is a bull market? Can you say, 369 00:21:36,080 --> 00:21:38,760 Speaker 1: as we've heard from a number of other guests, optimistic 370 00:21:38,800 --> 00:21:41,639 Speaker 1: guests like you, that is a bottom um. I think 371 00:21:41,680 --> 00:21:43,359 Speaker 1: we do see some room for the market to continue 372 00:21:43,400 --> 00:21:45,239 Speaker 1: to move higher in August. I don't think I call 373 00:21:45,280 --> 00:21:46,920 Speaker 1: it a bull market. You know, when when the how 374 00:21:46,920 --> 00:21:49,639 Speaker 1: do you know when it's a bull market? I mean, 375 00:21:49,680 --> 00:21:51,040 Speaker 1: that's a great question. I think for us, we'd like 376 00:21:51,080 --> 00:21:52,560 Speaker 1: to see some follow through. I think if you look 377 00:21:52,560 --> 00:21:54,720 Speaker 1: at performers in the equity markets the last five months, 378 00:21:55,240 --> 00:21:58,919 Speaker 1: winners have outperformed underperformed losers that the following month for 379 00:21:58,960 --> 00:22:02,280 Speaker 1: five consecutive months. So basically, people have been aggressively selling winners. 380 00:22:02,640 --> 00:22:05,119 Speaker 1: And I think if we could see some a little uh, 381 00:22:05,160 --> 00:22:07,320 Speaker 1: you know, follow through in August, we probably see that 382 00:22:07,359 --> 00:22:10,919 Speaker 1: as a as incrementally positive. But look until until the 383 00:22:10,960 --> 00:22:13,879 Speaker 1: Fed seems comfortable that inflations under control and they're willing 384 00:22:13,920 --> 00:22:15,720 Speaker 1: to sort of back off a little bit of these 385 00:22:15,720 --> 00:22:17,600 Speaker 1: hard landing outcomes, I think it's hard to really call 386 00:22:17,680 --> 00:22:20,400 Speaker 1: for a bull market at this point, Stuart, understanding technical 387 00:22:20,680 --> 00:22:23,920 Speaker 1: versus fundamental underpinnings of the rally that we just saw. 388 00:22:24,080 --> 00:22:26,480 Speaker 1: There was a story that caught my attention on Friday 389 00:22:26,520 --> 00:22:29,840 Speaker 1: that QUANTZ sold a huge amount of their barrished positions 390 00:22:29,840 --> 00:22:32,399 Speaker 1: they had to close out over the past few weeks 391 00:22:32,400 --> 00:22:35,439 Speaker 1: and that that was fueling the rally. How much is 392 00:22:35,440 --> 00:22:38,320 Speaker 1: that the main factor that's really been driving a market 393 00:22:38,400 --> 00:22:41,520 Speaker 1: that's been operating in thin liquidity and very uncertain economic 394 00:22:41,880 --> 00:22:43,919 Speaker 1: outlooks At least, I think it's actually a pretty big 395 00:22:43,960 --> 00:22:45,280 Speaker 1: part of it. If you look at the performance of 396 00:22:45,359 --> 00:22:48,080 Speaker 1: hot short interest stocks, they they've rallied considerably in July, 397 00:22:48,160 --> 00:22:49,960 Speaker 1: and I think that's evidence of what you've been seeing 398 00:22:49,960 --> 00:22:51,679 Speaker 1: on the quant side. But you know, I think that 399 00:22:51,760 --> 00:22:54,480 Speaker 1: just speaks to bigger picture that that positioning and sentiment 400 00:22:54,560 --> 00:22:57,720 Speaker 1: had been so washed out that you've got a relatively 401 00:22:57,760 --> 00:23:00,000 Speaker 1: solid earning seasons, certainly not as as strong as we've 402 00:23:00,000 --> 00:23:02,800 Speaker 1: seen the past couple, but a solid earning season, and 403 00:23:02,840 --> 00:23:04,760 Speaker 1: the FED that just sort of stayed on scripts. So 404 00:23:04,840 --> 00:23:07,800 Speaker 1: didn't you know, provide an additional negative catalyst into the market, 405 00:23:07,880 --> 00:23:10,000 Speaker 1: And and that's you know, hasn't to your point, I 406 00:23:10,000 --> 00:23:11,880 Speaker 1: don't think it's drawn a lot of new investors into 407 00:23:11,920 --> 00:23:13,359 Speaker 1: the market, but I think it's scared a lot of 408 00:23:13,359 --> 00:23:15,600 Speaker 1: the shorts out. And and that's kind of what we've 409 00:23:15,600 --> 00:23:18,280 Speaker 1: seen in July story your response to when we tried 410 00:23:18,320 --> 00:23:20,639 Speaker 1: to give you a victory lap spoke volumes, it was 411 00:23:20,640 --> 00:23:23,000 Speaker 1: just sort of this exhaustion from this whip saw action 412 00:23:23,000 --> 00:23:26,080 Speaker 1: that we've been seeing in the uncertainty. What's your compass 413 00:23:26,240 --> 00:23:28,520 Speaker 1: when you try to get a gauge of what's to come? 414 00:23:28,920 --> 00:23:31,840 Speaker 1: Is it the economic data? Is it the prognostications for 415 00:23:31,960 --> 00:23:35,000 Speaker 1: FED officials, or is it the line by line reports 416 00:23:35,040 --> 00:23:36,600 Speaker 1: that we're getting from a lot of companies as they 417 00:23:36,640 --> 00:23:39,240 Speaker 1: report earnings. I think right now it's it's the earning 418 00:23:39,280 --> 00:23:41,679 Speaker 1: side of it. But just because expectations, especially from the 419 00:23:41,680 --> 00:23:43,639 Speaker 1: more barre side of the of the ledger, have been 420 00:23:43,680 --> 00:23:45,560 Speaker 1: so negative on earning, so I think you know, about 421 00:23:45,560 --> 00:23:48,320 Speaker 1: a five percent upside to EPs has really helped in 422 00:23:48,400 --> 00:23:49,760 Speaker 1: terms of the feed. Look, I mean the feed as 423 00:23:49,760 --> 00:23:51,800 Speaker 1: a dual mandate, and their view, I think has been 424 00:23:51,880 --> 00:23:54,359 Speaker 1: that the the tail risk on the inflation side of 425 00:23:54,359 --> 00:23:57,560 Speaker 1: their mandate was was so far off and so huge 426 00:23:57,600 --> 00:24:00,000 Speaker 1: that they had to prioritize that, and they frontloaded high 427 00:24:00,000 --> 00:24:02,880 Speaker 1: makes and and to their credit market based inflation expectations 428 00:24:02,880 --> 00:24:05,640 Speaker 1: have come under control. What they've sacrificed there is they've 429 00:24:05,680 --> 00:24:07,760 Speaker 1: sort of introduced a tail risk on the growth side 430 00:24:07,760 --> 00:24:09,760 Speaker 1: of the market. So it's going to be that back 431 00:24:09,800 --> 00:24:12,080 Speaker 1: and forth between how the FED is managing, you know, 432 00:24:12,119 --> 00:24:14,520 Speaker 1: inflation risk in the face of declining growth. And I 433 00:24:14,560 --> 00:24:16,560 Speaker 1: think the real challenge is going to be if we 434 00:24:16,600 --> 00:24:19,520 Speaker 1: see weakness in the labor market, how will the FEDG 435 00:24:19,600 --> 00:24:23,639 Speaker 1: communication evolve. I think from their perspective right now, the 436 00:24:23,680 --> 00:24:26,160 Speaker 1: tail risk on the growth side is smaller and further 437 00:24:26,200 --> 00:24:29,520 Speaker 1: in the future, so they're gonna prioritize inflation as that 438 00:24:29,600 --> 00:24:32,359 Speaker 1: growth tail risk gets closer. How does that communication of 439 00:24:32,440 --> 00:24:33,960 Speaker 1: office that's going to be I think the number one 440 00:24:33,960 --> 00:24:36,320 Speaker 1: focus for us as we get through earnings is is 441 00:24:36,320 --> 00:24:39,520 Speaker 1: how the fact communicates that balance. I'm asking for a friend, 442 00:24:39,560 --> 00:24:42,440 Speaker 1: but for people that have missed the equity market completely, 443 00:24:42,560 --> 00:24:45,240 Speaker 1: I mean, just you know a few people that have 444 00:24:45,880 --> 00:24:49,480 Speaker 1: actually completely missed the equity market, how do you begin 445 00:24:49,560 --> 00:24:52,440 Speaker 1: to get on board? Do you do you plunge in? 446 00:24:52,560 --> 00:24:55,880 Speaker 1: Is it you have such an enthusiasm that you dive in, 447 00:24:56,280 --> 00:24:59,399 Speaker 1: or is it the proverbial dollar cost average. Um, you know, 448 00:24:59,520 --> 00:25:01,160 Speaker 1: we're not in We're not in the diving camp at 449 00:25:01,160 --> 00:25:03,320 Speaker 1: this point. I think if if the FED is focused 450 00:25:03,320 --> 00:25:06,040 Speaker 1: on growth and is willing to allow hard landing outcomes, 451 00:25:06,080 --> 00:25:08,120 Speaker 1: I think you need to enter this through higher quality, 452 00:25:08,440 --> 00:25:10,639 Speaker 1: you know, larger market cap type companies. And I think 453 00:25:10,680 --> 00:25:13,199 Speaker 1: that's frankly why large cap tech has benefited, because they 454 00:25:13,200 --> 00:25:15,719 Speaker 1: fall into that category. So for us, it's you know, 455 00:25:15,760 --> 00:25:17,480 Speaker 1: I think you want to be careful legg again here, 456 00:25:17,480 --> 00:25:20,199 Speaker 1: it's hard to recommend to buy value and cyclicals at 457 00:25:20,200 --> 00:25:22,240 Speaker 1: a time when the FED seems comfortable, you know, causing 458 00:25:22,240 --> 00:25:25,040 Speaker 1: a recession. And look at the investor conversation is not 459 00:25:25,200 --> 00:25:27,440 Speaker 1: if there's a recession, right, it's when and how much? 460 00:25:27,680 --> 00:25:29,080 Speaker 1: And if that's the case, I think you need to 461 00:25:29,119 --> 00:25:31,000 Speaker 1: be pretty cautious about how you add risk at this point. 462 00:25:31,160 --> 00:25:32,600 Speaker 1: So it kinds they're also going to catch out with 463 00:25:32,640 --> 00:25:34,800 Speaker 1: you as a wise here in New York City. Steve, 464 00:25:34,840 --> 00:25:38,879 Speaker 1: thank you said, this is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Thanks 465 00:25:38,880 --> 00:25:42,199 Speaker 1: for listening. Join us live weekdays from seven to ten 466 00:25:42,280 --> 00:25:46,760 Speaker 1: am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio and on Bloomberg Television each 467 00:25:46,840 --> 00:25:50,600 Speaker 1: day from six to nine am for insight from the 468 00:25:50,600 --> 00:25:55,840 Speaker 1: best in economics, finance, investment, and international relations. And subscribe 469 00:25:55,880 --> 00:26:00,800 Speaker 1: to the Surveillance podcast on Apple podcast, SoundCloud, bomer dot com, 470 00:26:00,880 --> 00:26:04,159 Speaker 1: and of course, on the terminal. I'm Tom keene In. 471 00:26:04,240 --> 00:26:06,000 Speaker 1: This is Bloomer