1 00:00:00,120 --> 00:00:04,080 Speaker 1: Let's get to Sean Darby, chief level equity strategist at Jeffreys. 2 00:00:05,080 --> 00:00:08,520 Speaker 1: Sean Powell promised pain, and it's like we're going to 3 00:00:08,560 --> 00:00:11,600 Speaker 1: get some some pain here, not only from the Fed 4 00:00:11,640 --> 00:00:15,240 Speaker 1: but from the delatarious effects of of inflation and and 5 00:00:15,280 --> 00:00:18,360 Speaker 1: the thing is that it just takes some time. This 6 00:00:18,440 --> 00:00:20,840 Speaker 1: is not like the GFC and it probably isn't even 7 00:00:20,880 --> 00:00:24,800 Speaker 1: like the pandemic in that the Fed knows what to do. 8 00:00:25,040 --> 00:00:27,920 Speaker 1: It will raise interest rates, eventually inflation will come down, 9 00:00:27,960 --> 00:00:32,640 Speaker 1: but it takes some time. Cue the pain it does. Unfortunately, 10 00:00:33,400 --> 00:00:36,280 Speaker 1: we live in a world where rates tend to only 11 00:00:36,479 --> 00:00:41,560 Speaker 1: have a lag effect on economic activities, and that's these 12 00:00:41,960 --> 00:00:44,280 Speaker 1: rate assumptions that are being pushed around now for a 13 00:00:44,360 --> 00:00:47,640 Speaker 1: hundred basis points at the next meeting are really going 14 00:00:47,720 --> 00:00:50,240 Speaker 1: to only hit the economy sort of some some six 15 00:00:50,320 --> 00:00:54,080 Speaker 1: to nine months later, so that the irony maybe that 16 00:00:54,160 --> 00:00:56,800 Speaker 1: this curve and version that we have and have had 17 00:00:56,880 --> 00:00:59,320 Speaker 1: for now good three to four months is going to 18 00:00:59,440 --> 00:01:02,840 Speaker 1: go pas system from much much longer. And that runs 19 00:01:02,880 --> 00:01:06,959 Speaker 1: the risk subsequently of having some spillover effects into the 20 00:01:06,959 --> 00:01:10,160 Speaker 1: financial system, which is of course where the markets are 21 00:01:10,200 --> 00:01:12,920 Speaker 1: what I think are more worried about in the last 22 00:01:12,959 --> 00:01:17,039 Speaker 1: twenty four hours. Of course, those inflation numbers are a 23 00:01:17,120 --> 00:01:20,720 Speaker 1: lagging indicator as well. Yeah, they were hotter than expected, 24 00:01:20,840 --> 00:01:25,080 Speaker 1: but still luller Um. What's your timeline now for inflation 25 00:01:25,319 --> 00:01:28,760 Speaker 1: getting back within the FITS window? So there's a good question. 26 00:01:28,840 --> 00:01:33,680 Speaker 1: I think the reality is the headline number was sort 27 00:01:33,720 --> 00:01:37,200 Speaker 1: of heading towards a sort of three point eight percent 28 00:01:37,360 --> 00:01:41,800 Speaker 1: handled towards for the end of three That still looks 29 00:01:41,840 --> 00:01:44,720 Speaker 1: reasonably achievable. But the more difficult one is the core 30 00:01:44,880 --> 00:01:49,680 Speaker 1: CPI because that really showed that actually demand was pretty strong. 31 00:01:49,720 --> 00:01:52,720 Speaker 1: If you look at the service price inflation for things 32 00:01:52,720 --> 00:01:57,000 Speaker 1: like travel, education, they all rose. So the demand side 33 00:01:57,040 --> 00:02:00,320 Speaker 1: of the equation equation hasn't yet balanced and therefore that 34 00:02:00,440 --> 00:02:03,720 Speaker 1: course CPI is going to remain sticky. And that is 35 00:02:03,760 --> 00:02:06,400 Speaker 1: what I think again has prompted the sell off on 36 00:02:06,440 --> 00:02:09,080 Speaker 1: Wall Street last night, is that we're not only going 37 00:02:09,120 --> 00:02:12,480 Speaker 1: to have higher short rates, but they're going to remain 38 00:02:12,880 --> 00:02:15,519 Speaker 1: much much longer. And I think, you know, to say 39 00:02:15,560 --> 00:02:17,440 Speaker 1: this comes back to the curve in version. It's going 40 00:02:17,480 --> 00:02:20,639 Speaker 1: to be pretty painful going into the early part of 41 00:02:20,760 --> 00:02:24,080 Speaker 1: next year. So we're seeing proof positive the affair doesn't 42 00:02:24,120 --> 00:02:27,720 Speaker 1: care too much about start prices going down. It it 43 00:02:27,800 --> 00:02:30,440 Speaker 1: did care about them going up. But what it does 44 00:02:30,520 --> 00:02:33,240 Speaker 1: care about is the plumbing. And you just hinted a 45 00:02:33,240 --> 00:02:35,920 Speaker 1: few moments ago that we might see some issues in 46 00:02:35,960 --> 00:02:39,639 Speaker 1: the plumbing. Can you sort of give us the transmission 47 00:02:39,639 --> 00:02:42,720 Speaker 1: mechanism for that. Well, there's there's a lot of similarities 48 00:02:42,880 --> 00:02:46,000 Speaker 1: for this cycle to the Y two K period after 49 00:02:46,120 --> 00:02:49,320 Speaker 1: two thousand, where the central banks left policy way too 50 00:02:49,400 --> 00:02:52,280 Speaker 1: loose and then had to come back and tighten up again. 51 00:02:52,760 --> 00:02:56,680 Speaker 1: And what you found was that the credit markets seized up. 52 00:02:56,760 --> 00:03:01,080 Speaker 1: Actually there was no role as a capital markets conduit, 53 00:03:01,240 --> 00:03:03,400 Speaker 1: and the same for the stock market, and you actually 54 00:03:03,400 --> 00:03:05,919 Speaker 1: had a mini you had a recession during that period. 55 00:03:06,160 --> 00:03:10,280 Speaker 1: Companies not being able to refinance would go to the wall, 56 00:03:10,600 --> 00:03:13,800 Speaker 1: bankruptcies would rise, and then you have a typical and 57 00:03:13,840 --> 00:03:17,880 Speaker 1: more typical um downturn. And I think that's the risk 58 00:03:17,919 --> 00:03:20,480 Speaker 1: that's sort of coming coming into their headlights now, is 59 00:03:20,480 --> 00:03:24,280 Speaker 1: that we will get a pretty restrictive policy where loan 60 00:03:24,360 --> 00:03:29,280 Speaker 1: growth and capital markets are actually pretty tough for companies 61 00:03:29,280 --> 00:03:31,640 Speaker 1: to to raise money. But it's not seen in the 62 00:03:31,720 --> 00:03:35,480 Speaker 1: data yet. As I say, everything comes with a lag sean. 63 00:03:36,040 --> 00:03:38,360 Speaker 1: We've heard from a number of commentators about this harder 64 00:03:38,360 --> 00:03:42,160 Speaker 1: than expected inflation. Printer Larry Summers, No, mora. Now I 65 00:03:42,160 --> 00:03:44,200 Speaker 1: think that maybe the fird's going to high crates by 66 00:03:44,240 --> 00:03:47,680 Speaker 1: a hundred basis points when it meets next week. What 67 00:03:47,840 --> 00:03:50,560 Speaker 1: was already an interesting meeting just got a whole lot 68 00:03:50,640 --> 00:03:54,280 Speaker 1: more pointy. What are you usually the feed doing well? 69 00:03:54,280 --> 00:03:57,360 Speaker 1: The house few has been raised actually from fifty basis 70 00:03:57,400 --> 00:03:59,920 Speaker 1: points I think a week or so ago to seventy five. 71 00:04:00,200 --> 00:04:02,680 Speaker 1: And I don't think there was any necessary change to 72 00:04:02,760 --> 00:04:05,920 Speaker 1: that view last night. I think what it does do 73 00:04:06,160 --> 00:04:11,320 Speaker 1: is raised the prospects of maybe bigger hikes in subsequent meetings. 74 00:04:11,360 --> 00:04:14,800 Speaker 1: And I think the market consensus was that, you know, 75 00:04:14,880 --> 00:04:17,240 Speaker 1: this meeting would be the peak of peaks, if I 76 00:04:17,320 --> 00:04:21,960 Speaker 1: may use that euphemism, and that we wouldn't get any 77 00:04:22,080 --> 00:04:25,560 Speaker 1: you know, further shocks or surprises. And I think what 78 00:04:26,080 --> 00:04:28,960 Speaker 1: probably troubled Wall Street yesterday was that that was removed 79 00:04:29,000 --> 00:04:31,560 Speaker 1: from the table. It may, you know, there is a 80 00:04:31,600 --> 00:04:34,960 Speaker 1: reasonable probability of a of a of a of a 81 00:04:35,040 --> 00:04:37,719 Speaker 1: hundred basis points, but I think the more likely courses 82 00:04:37,760 --> 00:04:41,000 Speaker 1: that we're going to get bigger numbers at the subsequent meetings. 83 00:04:41,040 --> 00:04:44,080 Speaker 1: I think that's the way that Wall Street played out yesterday, 84 00:04:44,160 --> 00:04:47,400 Speaker 1: so Jackson Hole, the comments from j Pal seemed like 85 00:04:48,160 --> 00:04:51,520 Speaker 1: really soft landing was just not in the picture really, 86 00:04:51,839 --> 00:04:54,119 Speaker 1: And then we had Leo Brainer had sort of raised 87 00:04:54,200 --> 00:04:57,080 Speaker 1: that back up, and markets definitely responded to that. And 88 00:04:57,080 --> 00:04:59,120 Speaker 1: now we're back to this. I mean, should we really 89 00:04:59,160 --> 00:05:01,880 Speaker 1: forget about us landing here? They're going to have to 90 00:05:02,000 --> 00:05:05,159 Speaker 1: push the economy into recession to get inflation down to 91 00:05:05,200 --> 00:05:09,680 Speaker 1: acceptable levels. Well that's I think probably now more the 92 00:05:09,800 --> 00:05:13,960 Speaker 1: more likely course has has said. Unfortunately, the yield curve 93 00:05:14,120 --> 00:05:16,919 Speaker 1: is going to keep inverted, and the longer you have 94 00:05:17,040 --> 00:05:20,080 Speaker 1: that deep inversions, the more difficult it is really to 95 00:05:20,200 --> 00:05:24,440 Speaker 1: come out. So I looked last night, for example, and 96 00:05:25,160 --> 00:05:28,520 Speaker 1: you know, we had a pretty good thirty year treasury auction, 97 00:05:28,680 --> 00:05:30,520 Speaker 1: so you know, there's a lot of attraction or the 98 00:05:30,560 --> 00:05:34,440 Speaker 1: reach for yield was still there. But paradoxically, credit spreads 99 00:05:34,440 --> 00:05:38,200 Speaker 1: were well behaved. So perversely, I think if you want 100 00:05:38,200 --> 00:05:41,000 Speaker 1: to gauge about how much distress has got to be 101 00:05:41,080 --> 00:05:44,120 Speaker 1: pushed into the real economy, we're going to have to 102 00:05:44,160 --> 00:05:46,560 Speaker 1: see a widening of credit spreads from here, and that 103 00:05:46,960 --> 00:05:50,080 Speaker 1: you know, presages are much higher default rate and much 104 00:05:50,120 --> 00:05:53,040 Speaker 1: more difficult economic conditions in which you try to have 105 00:05:53,080 --> 00:05:57,520 Speaker 1: to revive yourself from Subsequently, well, we're probably going to 106 00:05:57,600 --> 00:05:59,880 Speaker 1: see a stampede for the exits when we get going 107 00:06:00,040 --> 00:06:03,560 Speaker 1: the top of the hour. Have you been changing your strategy? 108 00:06:03,560 --> 00:06:06,200 Speaker 1: How do your hedge against what's about to happen. So 109 00:06:06,320 --> 00:06:09,320 Speaker 1: we've been I've been wrongly playing wrong footed by by 110 00:06:09,360 --> 00:06:13,599 Speaker 1: the moves in the last twenty four hours. So I'm 111 00:06:13,640 --> 00:06:15,680 Speaker 1: you know myself, are going to have to probably issue 112 00:06:15,720 --> 00:06:18,560 Speaker 1: a mayor cooper, which is um, you know, just to 113 00:06:18,680 --> 00:06:22,039 Speaker 1: support something. It's it's difficult for the financials, I think 114 00:06:22,160 --> 00:06:24,440 Speaker 1: is where I would put things. At the moment. It 115 00:06:24,560 --> 00:06:30,240 Speaker 1: is hard to see any respite for home builders, the banks, um, 116 00:06:30,279 --> 00:06:33,480 Speaker 1: you know, consumer finance. That's the area that's really the 117 00:06:33,480 --> 00:06:35,480 Speaker 1: FED is going to have to target. He's got to 118 00:06:35,760 --> 00:06:39,479 Speaker 1: restrict loan growth, he's got to tighten up financial conditions, 119 00:06:39,760 --> 00:06:42,080 Speaker 1: and that's the sector that's going to bear the brunt. 120 00:06:42,160 --> 00:06:45,000 Speaker 1: So we're gonna have to issue a mayor coper on 121 00:06:45,200 --> 00:06:49,560 Speaker 1: being too early on the interest rate sensitives. I mentioned 122 00:06:49,560 --> 00:06:51,960 Speaker 1: that we wanted to talk a little bit about us China. 123 00:06:52,080 --> 00:06:55,000 Speaker 1: I know that it's really eclipsed by this big story 124 00:06:55,040 --> 00:06:57,960 Speaker 1: about inflation, but we we did see more from the 125 00:06:58,000 --> 00:07:02,000 Speaker 1: Biden administration. Now they're talking about sayings over Taiwan. We 126 00:07:02,160 --> 00:07:05,279 Speaker 1: heard about this push for the biotech industry, big sell 127 00:07:05,360 --> 00:07:09,400 Speaker 1: off here with wish biologics, wush A tech, these are 128 00:07:09,440 --> 00:07:13,040 Speaker 1: these are troubled waters. It is, I think in that 129 00:07:14,000 --> 00:07:16,200 Speaker 1: things are working on a number of different levels. I mean, 130 00:07:16,360 --> 00:07:18,600 Speaker 1: if you go back four or five months ago, there 131 00:07:18,680 --> 00:07:20,840 Speaker 1: was a great hope that their actual tariffs will be 132 00:07:20,840 --> 00:07:24,760 Speaker 1: removed and that hasn't happened. We've now we've had the 133 00:07:24,840 --> 00:07:27,360 Speaker 1: Chips Act go through in the United States, which is 134 00:07:27,400 --> 00:07:31,440 Speaker 1: subsidies for building the semiconductor plants in the United States, 135 00:07:31,560 --> 00:07:35,320 Speaker 1: and now of course funding for biotech. I think on 136 00:07:35,360 --> 00:07:38,080 Speaker 1: the biotech side, um, it's a little bit more of 137 00:07:38,120 --> 00:07:41,080 Speaker 1: a difficult one because actually the US leads in most 138 00:07:41,120 --> 00:07:44,520 Speaker 1: of those industries, so there's not a race to catch 139 00:07:44,640 --> 00:07:47,280 Speaker 1: up in that way. But I guess what it's saying 140 00:07:47,440 --> 00:07:49,880 Speaker 1: is that they'll they'll have to you know, they're going 141 00:07:49,960 --> 00:07:53,520 Speaker 1: to match China's pace of technology growth in that area, 142 00:07:53,880 --> 00:07:56,000 Speaker 1: and that's the funding route that's going to be given 143 00:07:56,040 --> 00:07:59,120 Speaker 1: to them. So it's a subsidy and we're coming back 144 00:07:59,120 --> 00:08:03,160 Speaker 1: to this thing about Nash champions alright. Sean Darby, chief 145 00:08:03,200 --> 00:08:06,360 Speaker 1: Global equity strategist at Jefferies, thanks, as always for joining 146 00:08:06,440 --> 00:08:08,520 Speaker 1: us on Bloomberg at Daybreak Asia