WEBVTT - Why Lockdowns Haven’t Proved They’re Worth the Havoc

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penl Podcast. I'm Paul swing you,

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>along with my co host Lisa Brahma wits. Each day

0:00:07.760 --> 0:00:10.280
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.320 --> 0:00:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 1>that Bloomberg dot Com. Time for Bloomberg Opinion. You're joined

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>by Bloomberg Opinion columnist Joe and the Sarah. Joe, thanks

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. You got a fascinating column

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>a couple of days ago talking about you know, this

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 1>whole concept of a lockdown and quarantine. This is something

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>that we haven't necessarily done in some past epidemics in

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:40.599
<v Speaker 1>this country. And I guess as people think about opening

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:43.560
<v Speaker 1>up the economy, now there's really two camps out there.

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Those that are probably a little bit more aggressive about

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:47.880
<v Speaker 1>opening up the economy and those that are a little

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 1>bit more conservative. Talk to us a little bit about

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of lockdowns and how effective they've proven to be

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>in the past. Well, they've never been used in the past.

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 1>This is the first time they never became uh, sort

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>of uh policy, pandemic policy until two thousand six when

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:10.400
<v Speaker 1>George bush Um asked the government to come up with

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>a pandemic plan, and the and the scientists who came

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>up with the lockdown idea, Um, they were not infectious

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:19.480
<v Speaker 1>disease scientists. Um. Uh. And there was a lot of

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>controversy about it at the time. Uh. There've been pandemics

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen fifty seven, there was one in nineteen sixty eight,

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of course the famous one in eighteen. Absolutely a lot

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>of people stayed inside because they were terrified, but there

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>was never an official and official lockdown. So so the

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>answer is, um, there's no there's no previous science to

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:45.120
<v Speaker 1>know what good the lockdown does. And although it makes

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of intuitive sense that you would stay inside

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:50.559
<v Speaker 1>and therefore avoid the virus, there's a lot of downsides,

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>as we're about to find out when the economy starts

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 1>to open. Yeah, this is what people are saying that basically,

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>we don't know how effective it is to limit the spread,

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>and we know that it creates it's a lot of

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>problems when it comes to when it when it comes

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to the economy. That said, we are seeing a pretty

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>strong correlation and I know, correlation is not causation, but

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>it is becoming scientifically accepted that the economy is that

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:19.640
<v Speaker 1>shut down more aggressively and more quickly were those that

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:23.359
<v Speaker 1>managed to stave off some of the worst effects of

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>this virus that we've seen in places like New York

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and Milan. So from that perspective, how can you dismiss

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>that as showing the efficacy of this type of of shutdown. Well,

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't dismiss it. But you know, there's

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>also this mass the social distancing. There's the fact that

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>literally of the people who have died in this pandemic

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>have been the elderly, you know, whether you're inside or

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>outside um. And then you have states like Texas and

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Florida which have been very lax on lockdowns and and

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>their numbers of death are extremely low. So I mean,

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I would argue that, you know, it's really unclear as

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:06.959
<v Speaker 1>to whether the lockdown is saving a lot of lives

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>or not. All right, right there, where are you? Where

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:14.919
<v Speaker 1>where are you staying right now? I'm in Southampton, Okay,

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>So you're not in the city, right correct? Okay? And

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 1>my question is, let's say there were no state mandated

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 1>locktowns of any sort. Would you feel comfortable going about

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 1>your business the way that you had in the past

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 1>and going on the subway? Um, I don't know. That's

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a good question. I think that I if I think

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>if I had a mask and gloved, I would, And

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I also think that I would probably have to. I'm

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>also sixty eight years old, so I'm in the high

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>risk group. Um, there's a lot of Look. Look, you know,

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>in March, there's no question I came out to the

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Hamptons because I was scared. But you know, you watch,

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you watch data, you watch things happening, you watch what's

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>going to happen to the economy, and you think to yourself,

0:03:56.800 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, is this really the right way to continue

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to proceed. And one distinction that I've been making is

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 1>between the hotspot states and cities like Detroit, UH and

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>New York and New Orleans and places like Houston and

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Miami and San Diego which have very very very few Um.

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Death Yeah, well, look, Joe, he raised a really good point,

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and Paul, this I think is a really important thing.

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:26.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think that Joe, I feel like you want

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>to chop my head off, you know. I I honestly,

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I've I'm totally jealous that you're in the Hampton's. I

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>also think this is such a politically fraught issue, and

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the question is if they okay, I want to talk

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 1>about that. That is so right, This is the big

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>problem here, here's the big problem. It has become a

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:47.720
<v Speaker 1>political issue. And it's and and and It's like if

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>my political party believes in lockdowns, and I believe in lockdowns,

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>if my political party says lockdowns and BS, then I

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>say that's BS. Nobody on either side is willing to

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:01.040
<v Speaker 1>just sit down and say, let's look at this with

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:04.599
<v Speaker 1>fresh eyes, let's think about this from a from a

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>point of view of neutrality and science. It's not happening.

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:11.559
<v Speaker 1>Everybody on both sides says, you know, I'm following the science.

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:13.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm following the science. Well, what does that even mean

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:16.919
<v Speaker 1>with a lockdown? Where where? Where? There is where? The

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>science is unclear? It's no. I think the issue here

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 1>right now, you know, the conversation Joe is just, you know,

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the cost of the economic cost of lockdown versus the

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>cost in lives. And that's kind of what the reopening

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>debate seems to be evolving to. I think that's absolutely true.

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>And um, let me let me let me ask you this.

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>This is kind of how I ended my column yesterday.

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's quite likely that the virus will will

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>fade in the summertime, because that's often what happens, and

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>then it will probably come back with a vengeance in October.

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>And if that happens and we're reopening the economy, are

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you gonna say, well, let's shut everything down again for

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>three months, because back, I don't know that's gonna be

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:04.719
<v Speaker 1>really tough. I don't think. I don't think anybody's going

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:06.599
<v Speaker 1>to agree to that. I just don't think the society

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:08.160
<v Speaker 1>is gonna agree to that. And I think we're gonna

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>have to learn to live with this thing with with

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>measures like masks and social distancing that are less severe

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>than a lockdown, we could wind up in a depression.

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for us. We gotta run, Joe, Joe No.

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Colums for Bloomberg Opinion. It's an awesome column. Check

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>it out on Bloomberg dot Com, slash Opinion. All his

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:31.919
<v Speaker 1>great work. This is Bloomberg Markets with Lisa Abramowitz and

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:35.919
<v Speaker 1>Paul Sweeney on Bloomberg Radio. What I mean listening to

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>healthcare officials, the big, big thing right now is to

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>continue to test for the virus and then contact trace

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:46.359
<v Speaker 1>to see to kind of contain, uh, this spread of

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the virus. That's certainly important now and will be even

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>more important. Ty Center is a second wave. And when

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you talk about the contact tracing, there's been a lot

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:56.159
<v Speaker 1>of apps that people have been talking about, mostly the

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Apple and Google approach, kind of a joint venture there,

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:01.359
<v Speaker 1>which is really in and of itself, has been getting

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>most of the press, but a startup out there has

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 1>also been they think they might have a better mouse trap,

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and that is a Jared all Good, co founder and

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>chief strategy officer for the firm twenty. They're based in

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. They've got their own app, Healthy Together, and

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>in fact, the state of Utah is actually adopting it. Jared,

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. Tell us about

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>your app and why say a state like Utah would

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 1>select your app versus at Apple Google, which would seem

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>to be the easy choice. Yeah, good, good morning, Paul

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>and Liza, thanks for having me on um. Yeah. So,

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Healthy Together was developed to work in partnership and in

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>conjunction with the public Health Department of the State of

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Utah UM. So they approached us several weeks ago UM

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>and saw that we had some technology that was unique

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 1>for helping to augment and automate certain parts of the

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>manual contact tracing process. So we partner with them to

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 1>develop the Healthy Together application both as a friend end

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>application and also has back in services and tools that

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 1>we deploy back into the Department of Health UM. So really,

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>what we've built as a way for residents to UH

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to help the manual public health contact tracing effort by

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>using an app on their phone that helps us UH

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and them identify where they've been and who they've been

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 1>in contact with should they come out positive with COVID nineteen,

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 1>so that manual contact go ahead. No. I find this

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>so fascinating, this idea that people are are going to

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 1>help the effort by volunteering to be tracked on their phones.

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>It strikes me that the scope of data is important

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 1>for this to be effective, that the greatest number of

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 1>people need to be registered and tracked for this to

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 1>actually prevent the virus from spreading. What's your advantage over

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 1>say Google and Apple who also have an app and

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 1>also have the host of data in the footprint. Yeah.

0:08:57.600 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 1>So something that I would say to that is, first

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 1>of all, Healthy Together is more than just a contact

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 1>tracing application. UM. The State of Utah's strategy is to

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 1>do assessing, testing and tracing. So the Healthy Together platform

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 1>allows residents to assess themselves to find out if they

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:16.440
<v Speaker 1>should get tested for COVID nineteen uh and then if

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:18.720
<v Speaker 1>they should and we can refer them to, you know,

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the nearest testing resource through the application. And so just

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 1>shortening the time from somebody becoming symptomatic to getting them

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 1>into the testing process and then finding out if they're

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 1>positive and then quarantining themselves is a huge part of

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the value proposition that we've delivered with the State of Utah. Now,

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 1>as it pertains to contact tracing UM, our approach is

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 1>actually not an opposition with the Google and Apple approach. UM.

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Google and Apple are, at least as we understand or not,

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>coming out with applications. What they have built up as

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a set of APIs the application developers like us can

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 1>integrate with to to tap into a broader network of

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 1>contact tracing. And that's something that we see as a

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>as a huge value add uh. We hope to to

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 1>find a way to work and partner with Apple and

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Google to use those API s UM so that we

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:07.679
<v Speaker 1>can augment our current process. So you're in the state

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:12.439
<v Speaker 1>of Utah. Are there other states you're in discussions with? Yeah,

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 1>of course. Look since UM, since we released just a

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>few weeks ago in the state of Utah, UM, we've

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 1>had a tremendous amount of inbound from other states who

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>are interested, who are doing similar strategies in terms of

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>standing up more manual contact tracing and then looking for

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>tools and technology to augment and expedite that process. UM.

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>So we had several conversations with other states. UM. We

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 1>will be announcing some partnerships with other states coming soon. UM.

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 1>And something that's been interesting to us that you know,

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>we we we learned as we got into this UM

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 1>is that businesses are also participating in contact tracing UM.

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:48.319
<v Speaker 1>Companies now have UH. You know, they're feeling the pressure

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:50.679
<v Speaker 1>to bring their employees back to work UM, and they

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>need to do it in a safe way, and they

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>need to communicate to their team members UM that they

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 1>have a plan and a strategy for dealing with the

0:10:57.080 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 1>occasion UM that somebody in their workforce turns out to

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 1>be positive for COVID nineteen. And so we're seeing, um,

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, lots of interest from companies as well who

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 1>want to implement tools and and just figure out the

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>way to respond to this effort using manual and technological

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 1>contact tracing as well. There's a tension for anyone who's

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 1>creating a business in order to help facilitate the social

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:21.199
<v Speaker 1>distancing and prevention at this proNT of the pandemic. How

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 1>you make money at a time when you're providing a

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:26.719
<v Speaker 1>service for the social good. How does that tension get

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 1>resolved with you? Hi, Yeah, that's a great question. Look, UM,

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, as uh, you know, as you know, this

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 1>was not our business. UM. You know, coming into this

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>UM and we did not raise our hand and say,

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, we want to build contact tracing and sell

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 1>it to the world. UM. The state of Utah, the

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Governor's office, reached out to us and identified us as

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a solution. UM, and you know, to be able to

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:54.359
<v Speaker 1>pivot our business and dedicate the number of resources engineers, designers,

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 1>product managers UM to really build a high quality product

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:00.199
<v Speaker 1>both in the mobile application and also in these back

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>end systems, and those things just cause resources to be

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>able to do it um and so our goal is

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:08.199
<v Speaker 1>to serve as many you know, states and enterprises as

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>we possibly can um and to do that and to

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 1>scale up, it's just going to take money for us

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 1>to be able to do it. Twenty co founder Jared

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 1>all Good, thank you so much for being with us,

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about his Healthy Together contact tracing app, which has

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>been deployed by the State of Utah. This is Bloomberg

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:32.319
<v Speaker 1>Markets with Lisa Ramowitz and Paul Sweeney on Bloomberg Radio.

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Certainly a lot of news coming out of China and

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong in the last twenty four hours. We've seen

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 1>some news here that it's uh, you know, really trying

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>to really trying to reassert some or reassert more power

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and control over Hong Kong. To get a sense of

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>what's really going on, what it means for Hong Kong,

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's economy and it's people. We welcome Yvonne Man.

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>She's the anchor for Daybreak Asia and Bloomberg Markets China Open.

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>She's in Hong Kong, and Tom or like chief economist

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:02.040
<v Speaker 1>for Bloombrick Economics, on the phone from Washington, d C.

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Tom spent a lot of time living in Beijing as well. So, Yvon,

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. I want to start

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 1>with you just give our listeners a sense of what

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:14.679
<v Speaker 1>actually happened between China and Hong Kong over the last

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hours. Well, it certainly has been quite an

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 1>interesting twenty four hours fall And basically what has happened

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 1>is that the NPC, the National People's Congress in Beijing,

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 1>decided to enact this National Security Law which basically curbs

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 1>DIO sessions addition for interference and terrorism in Hong Kong.

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>It's also known as Article twenty three here in the city,

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:42.560
<v Speaker 1>and which was legislation that has basically been installed in

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the Legislative Council for for many years now, since two

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 1>thousand and three. Back then when it was introduced, is

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 1>fueled some widespread demonstrations. The government was then forced to

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>scrap it. So we now see a very stronger and

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 1>much more bold in Beijing than seventeen years ago. So

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 1>they're taking matters into our own hands. They're frustrated by

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the months of unrest that it's hearth the economy. They're

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:08.359
<v Speaker 1>frustrated by lawmakers who have failed to get through this legislation.

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>So the new strategy now from Beijing is to basically

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 1>by pass Legislative Council here, skip the whole legislative process

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and do this. And they're from the MPC, so that's

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>why this jokes so much outrage from those in the

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 1>pro democracy side. Yvonne, you've done a great job of

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 1>outlining this, and we thank you so much for staying

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>so late to speak with us and lay it out

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>for us here. Tom, I'd love your perspective from an

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 1>economic viewpoint. Why Beijing is doing this now against a

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 1>backdrop of a pandemic and a huge hit to its

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>economic growth. Why is it not more concerned about the

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 1>loss of Hong Kong as an international center and hub

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 1>for finance and beyond UM So, I think what's what's

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>really clear, Lisa, is that the politics is trumping the

0:14:56.040 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>is trumping the economics UM and the national curiocy considerations

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the Beijing are more important than any risk to Hong

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 1>kong status as a as a financial hub and a

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 1>pathway for capital and expertise in trade between the mainland

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and the rest of the world. I think the other

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 1>point to keep in mind about that the timing of

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 1>this is, I mean, this is a move um, which

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 1>in normal times would be expected to be controversial internationally. Right,

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>a move which would be controversially in the United States,

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 1>with the United Kingdom with its historic relationship with Hong Kong,

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Um with potentially some European countries as well. But at

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 1>this particular moment in time, the world is in crisis, Um.

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Domestic leaders President Trump, Boris Johnson, Angelo Merkel, Um, they

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>have other things on their mind. Right, They're dealing with

0:15:55.120 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>a pandemic. They're dealing with economies in deep, in deep crisis. Um.

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>So I don't have a crystal ball into the thinking

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 1>of China's leadership, But potentially this is also a moment

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 1>where they can make this controversial, mute move with perhaps

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>less global repercussions than they would see in normal times. Yvonne,

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 1>what is the expected response from those in China? Prior

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>in Hong Kong, prior to the pandemic, the protesters were

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 1>consistent week after week after week in their protests. Um,

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>what is the expectation here for this move. Well, there's

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>already some calls for people to hit the streets this

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 1>weekend and the following uh A week after as well,

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and we've seen the activists already hitting the streets tonight

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>handing out leaflets to the people in the streets educating

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 1>about them about this national security law. So we have

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 1>seen the anger resurface thing again and potentially we are

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>could be saying the stage for a repeat of what

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>we saw late last year. So the prospects aren't good

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>at this moment. And it just seems like at this

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:07.920
<v Speaker 1>point from from the opposition side, they believe that by

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:13.400
<v Speaker 1>bypassing legislative process, that this is the end of one country,

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:16.639
<v Speaker 1>two systems, this is the end of Hong Kong's autonomy.

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 1>So it's hard to see that this national security law

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:24.200
<v Speaker 1>could actually end the the unrest out there, even carry

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:27.399
<v Speaker 1>a LANDA chief executive herself said tonight that she doesn't

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 1>expect protests to end amid this security law, and if anything,

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:34.160
<v Speaker 1>it's it's only feels more anger on the streets, especially

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 1>now that this this outbreak and the coronavirus has eased

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:40.680
<v Speaker 1>a bit here in the city. It's it's calm down

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:43.200
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the numbers of local infections has been

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>down for the last couple of weeks. Now that's given

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>a little more comfortable people to come out again to

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 1>you thought. I'm just wondering from your perspective, I saw

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:53.440
<v Speaker 1>that real estate stocks got hit the hardest in Hong Kong.

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:57.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering how much you're seeing anecdotally or from data

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:01.359
<v Speaker 1>perspectives foreign money and will the money going out of

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the property sector in Hong Kong. Yeah, certainly was a

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:08.880
<v Speaker 1>concern late last year when when you were hearing people

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 1>saying that they were pulling money out of Hong Kong

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 1>and moving it to Singapore, for example. There's a lot

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 1>of questions of whether Hong Kong status as an international

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:20.720
<v Speaker 1>finance hub is now under a question. Uh, and so

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 1>markets really took this by surprise, the fact that the

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 1>MPC we heard this type of legislation. Um, you know,

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>at this point, we haven't seen a whole lot of

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:33.120
<v Speaker 1>those concerns or at least that type of movement just yet.

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:37.440
<v Speaker 1>But what's different now versus say, back in two thousand

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and eight, and what led to Hong Kong I should

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>say stars not two thousand and eight, was that what

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:45.880
<v Speaker 1>led to a revival in the economy was the fact

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 1>that they opened up the borders from mainland tourists to

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 1>come that essentially gave it a v shaped recovery here

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 1>in Hong Kong. Now that we're in a recession, a

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of economists say it's unlikely we're going to see

0:18:56.840 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that quick of a bounce back in the economy because

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 1>we have been the mainline tours arrivals dwindle. In fact,

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:06.439
<v Speaker 1>I think they're they're in a single digit at most,

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 1>so and given the anti China sentiment there is in

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the streets there, you can't exactly rely on Chinese tourists

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 1>to revive the economy anymore. And they were key buyers

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:20.680
<v Speaker 1>in the property market as well, so potentially we could

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 1>see thumb rupture there in in the property market. We

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen a whole lot of it just yet. It's

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 1>actually been still quite table at this point. But you know,

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:32.639
<v Speaker 1>Tim will tell Tom just real quick here thirty seconds

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 1>before we let you go, what are you looking for

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:39.360
<v Speaker 1>over the weekend? As Beijing has its annual power So

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 1>we've already seen China step back from its growth target,

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that GDP target, which set the tone set expectations for

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:51.439
<v Speaker 1>the year UM. They've significantly ramps up fiscal stimulus, so

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 1>that will provide some support to sentiment and demand UM

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>in terms of Hong Kong is As Von said, I

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:01.920
<v Speaker 1>think the key thing to look for now is what's

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the reaction on the Hong Kong Street. Does this bring

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 1>a very large number of people back out to protest?

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 1>And if that happens, what then are the consequences for

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:15.399
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong markets, real estate and the economy going forwards.

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Tom or Like chief economist for Bloomberg Economics, and Von Man,

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>anchor of Daybreak Asia and Bloomberg Markets, which had to

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>open for Bloomberg joining us, staying late to give us

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 1>that report from Hong Kong. Definitely a historic seizure rupture

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:35.639
<v Speaker 1>here between Hong Kong and Beijing. Long time in the works,

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:39.120
<v Speaker 1>yet really raising questions about why now amid a backdrop

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:44.719
<v Speaker 1>of rising see no US tension. You're listening to Bloomberg

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:48.879
<v Speaker 1>Markets with Lisa Abrama Ed's and Paul Sweeney on Bloomberg Radio.

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:52.440
<v Speaker 1>We've talked a lot about how passive investing is all

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the rage and everyone wants to go into an index fund,

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:58.639
<v Speaker 1>and yet we often failed to discuss the very active

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 1>process of composed using the underlying index, and that's very

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:05.359
<v Speaker 1>much in the forefront of people's minds right now. Is

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the SMP, which is the most tracked index bypassive funds,

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>goes under potentially a pretty big overhaul. Joining us now

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:15.680
<v Speaker 1>to discuss this is Nick KOLs, co founder of Data

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Trek Research. Always great to get your thoughts, Nick, I

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 1>want to start with why the SMP may have to

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 1>rejigger which companies includes. Yes, the biggest reason, and you

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:31.400
<v Speaker 1>know we see this day to day, is that there

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of companies at the bottom end of

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:36.960
<v Speaker 1>this index in terms of market cap, that have fallen

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 1>away below the typical levels where the SMP committee begins

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 1>to think about replacing them. So, for example, Harley Davidson

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:48.680
<v Speaker 1>three billion dollar market cap, GAP stores at three point

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 1>five billion dollar market cap, that's well below these five

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 1>to eight billion dollars the committee tends to think about

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>in terms of taking companies out of the index and

0:21:57.040 --> 0:21:59.239
<v Speaker 1>replacing them with new ones. And it's a function of

0:21:59.840 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 1>all the issues of the COVID crisis that we've seen

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>in terms of how different companies are doing versus others. So, Nick,

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>is the SMP that the committee there that looks at

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>some of these companies. Are they trying to give some

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:14.120
<v Speaker 1>of these companies the benefit of the doubt and turn

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 1>in a sense that hey, this is really related to

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 1>this pandemic, and the pandemic is we think it will

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 1>be a relatively short lived issue. And then once we

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 1>get to the other side of this, these stocks were rebound.

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:30.399
<v Speaker 1>You know that that has to be part of their calculus,

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>because one virtue of the five hundred is that it

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:37.120
<v Speaker 1>is pretty sticky. You only see twenty to thirty changes

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 1>in the index a year, and they try to maintain

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>a very low portfolio turnover because that's one of the

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 1>advantages of index investing, is not having a lot of

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>churned and transaction costs in the portfolio. But as we

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:49.920
<v Speaker 1>go through the balance of the year, some of this

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have their force their hand. How much longer do

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:55.680
<v Speaker 1>you want to wait before some of these companies that

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 1>were already in structural decline, like anybody that sells stuge

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 1>department stores, Gaps stores, or Harley Davidson. How long do

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>you want to give them before you realize, Okay, they're

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:06.360
<v Speaker 1>not going to come back in any really serious form

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and we've got to move along. What's the reputational pressure

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 1>for them? For the S ANDP Committee, the reputational issue

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 1>is as you said at the top, this is the

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>most widely followed, widely indexed measure of U S stocks

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:24.640
<v Speaker 1>anywhere in the world. It is the most popular, not

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:27.920
<v Speaker 1>just here in the US, but everywhere, largely because it's

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:31.400
<v Speaker 1>done so well relative to any of the same For example,

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 1>M s C I EFA M S C I E M.

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, the ST five hundred has been an absolute

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:39.200
<v Speaker 1>horse of an investment over the last ten years, compounding

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 1>at thirteen percent annually until the fall off the beginning

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand and twenty. Done far better than everything else.

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:49.119
<v Speaker 1>So it's really important from an indexing perspective, from a

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>business perspective, that this index continue to hold that structural

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:55.920
<v Speaker 1>advantage over every other measure of global stocks. So, Nick,

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I know there are traders out there that like to

0:23:58.200 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of, you know, speculate on aims that are going

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to come into the SMP. Conversely, also and also names

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:06.639
<v Speaker 1>that that will come out of the index. Are we

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>seeing some higher volatility around some of those names? You know,

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 1>it has been hard to measure. We did look at

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 1>that for our client. Note it was very hard to

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 1>pick out what the volatility from the macro environment has

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>been versus what you really point out is a very

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 1>common kind of index ad index um delete kind of mentality.

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 1>So hard to tell right now, but if you look

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 1>at I'm looking at the bottom ten names in the

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 1>SMP right now, Haynes Brands, Harley Davidson, Norwegian Crews, L Brands,

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:39.960
<v Speaker 1>PVH Clow, Serve, H and R, Block, Discovery, and Xerox.

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Those are at the very bottom of the list, all

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:46.359
<v Speaker 1>brand names, all things we know, some of them. I

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:48.159
<v Speaker 1>would assume we're going to leave the index in the

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 1>next year, just because there's gonna be new names that

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the committee wants to add. I'm struck, Nick by a

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:56.879
<v Speaker 1>point that you made in your recent research, which I

0:24:56.920 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>thought was really fantastic, which is this concept that yes,

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 1>people want to invest passively in broad markets, and yet

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:07.959
<v Speaker 1>the decision and how to how to count that market

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 1>is very subjective, the sort of active quality of index composition.

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:17.119
<v Speaker 1>What types of subjective measures does the SMP committee have

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:21.120
<v Speaker 1>to consider were deciding on some of these issues. Yeah,

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 1>it's it is to me the most fascinating points in

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:26.359
<v Speaker 1>all this because it is ultimately a choice. You know,

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the committee has a very well, you know historically, you know,

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>very precise measure of what they want to add. There's

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:39.119
<v Speaker 1>profitability requirements as market cap requirements. I would kind of

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>take the conversation a little bit different direction, and just

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 1>everybody considered the fact that Tesla is not in the

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 1>SP five hundreds, but Hard Davidson is um which to

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 1>me is a central irony, and the issue is one issue,

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 1>It is profitability. Tesla has not yet had a sequence

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 1>of four quarters with a strunk together a profitable four

0:25:57.040 --> 0:25:59.719
<v Speaker 1>quarter trailing. They could have done it this quarter, they

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 1>miss by about a hundred and twenty four million dollars,

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 1>and so as a result, they're not going to be

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 1>an index for a while. Now, that's a hundred and

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 1>fifty billion dollar plus market cap company that could have

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>been added when it was ten or twelve or even

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:14.440
<v Speaker 1>fifty billion dollars and added a hundred billion dollars of

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 1>values the index, and yet because of that profitability measure,

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>they're not, And given what's going on in the world,

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:22.239
<v Speaker 1>they're not gonna be there for a while. So does

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 1>that kind of suggest Nick that the SMP needs to

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:26.960
<v Speaker 1>rethink some of this as you think about some of

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the technologies out there, you know, like a Tesla, like

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:33.200
<v Speaker 1>some other tech companies that are just huge, and they're

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:37.199
<v Speaker 1>focusing more on market share gains than profitability, and the

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:39.159
<v Speaker 1>market seems to be okay with that and rewarding that.

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>So should not the name like Tesla be in there?

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 1>It absolutely should be, But I understand the committee's tension

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 1>because for every test that there's an uber or lift

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:52.160
<v Speaker 1>or if you had added those, you know it would

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:54.160
<v Speaker 1>not have had the same results. You've got to take

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:56.399
<v Speaker 1>good with the bad in the end. You know, the

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>SMP Committee may one day decide, okay, let's add an

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:02.679
<v Speaker 1>ear G overlay to some of our decision making. And

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>if a company is clearly relevant from saying E standpoint,

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 1>then it should have some weight against the lack of profitability.

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 1>But the committee is not there yet. And these are

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:13.159
<v Speaker 1>things that take a long time to develop, but I

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 1>think they're going to have to get there just real quick. Nick,

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I wonder how much the reconsideration here of the SMP

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:22.199
<v Speaker 1>Committee comes in the heels of NAZDAC success. Is that

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:25.680
<v Speaker 1>part of it? You know, that is definitely a part

0:27:25.680 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 1>of it. And I would also say, look at, for example,

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:31.200
<v Speaker 1>what the Hong Kong the Hang Sang is thinking about

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>in terms of adding some Chinese companies purely based on

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 1>whether or not they have enough stock listed in Hong Kong.

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:40.639
<v Speaker 1>Hang Sang is a big property and bank index, and

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:43.359
<v Speaker 1>that's not really where the world is going. So I

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 1>think every index provider and every exchange is thinking about

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:49.200
<v Speaker 1>how do we pull things into something that we can

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 1>index because the world has not so passive and it's

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 1>become a much more important conversation. And Nick, thanks so

0:27:55.000 --> 0:27:57.160
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. We appreciate you taking some time

0:27:57.200 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 1>here before the three day weekend, Nicholas kofe under Data

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:04.639
<v Speaker 1>Trek Research giving us some always some interesting food for thought, Lisa,

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and that is, you know, kind of looking at that

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:09.160
<v Speaker 1>SMP five hundred, the components of the SMP five hundred,

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and Nick brought up a great point that Harley Davidson,

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 1>with a five billion dollar market cap is in there,

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 1>but uh Tesla is not. Yeah, but how do you

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 1>even determine who the winners and the losers are going

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 1>to be in this environment when you've got no forward guidance,

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you have such an uncertain backdrop. It becomes a very

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:28.119
<v Speaker 1>difficult decision to make for the longer term. Yeah, it

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:30.439
<v Speaker 1>really does. And I think as Nick was suggesting the

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 1>SMP Committee favors some stability and stability and profitability, so

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 1>but interesting to see how that plays out. For Lisa

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Bramo it's on Paul Sweeney that does it for Bloomberg

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 1>markets for this week and during the weekend. This is Bloomberg.

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast.

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. Paul Sweeney, I'm on

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at pt Sweeney. And Lisa abram Woyds I'm on

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Lisa A. Bramwoit's one before the podcast. You

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio.