WEBVTT - Not So Fast Episode 8

0:00:01.260 --> 0:00:05.220
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Not So Fast with Andrew Perloff and Paul Pabst,

0:00:05.440 --> 0:00:08.740
<v Speaker 1>where two longtime friends challenge each other on the biggest

0:00:08.780 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>sports stories of the day.

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:12.640
<v Speaker 2>Here's Andrew Perloff and Paul Pabst.

0:00:13.540 --> 0:00:14.660
<v Speaker 3>Not so fast, my friends.

0:00:17.980 --> 0:00:20.820
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Not So Fast. I'm Andrew Perloff. He is

0:00:20.950 --> 0:00:22.829
<v Speaker 2>Paul Pabst. Paul, we got a game in the books.

0:00:22.970 --> 0:00:25.090
<v Speaker 4>We got one in the books. Wednesday night football. I

0:00:25.170 --> 0:00:27.470
<v Speaker 4>sit down. I take the afternoon nap like a professional.

0:00:27.530 --> 0:00:29.890
<v Speaker 4>Get set for the big game on NBC. I put

0:00:29.910 --> 0:00:32.090
<v Speaker 4>it on, and my wife walks in, and she goes, Wednesday?

0:00:32.150 --> 0:00:35.519
<v Speaker 4>They're playing on Wednesdays now? I thought Wednesdays and Tuesdays

0:00:35.550 --> 0:00:36.019
<v Speaker 4>was for us.

0:00:36.220 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I could get used to this, by the way.

0:00:37.780 --> 0:00:39.500
<v Speaker 2>I take a game every night of the week.

0:00:39.620 --> 0:00:41.070
<v Speaker 4>I got to tell you, I was fine with it.

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:42.580
<v Speaker 4>I loved it. I was fired up for the start

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:44.460
<v Speaker 4>of the game. I was looking forward to maybe a shootout.

0:00:44.540 --> 0:00:46.260
<v Speaker 4>I should have known better, more defensive teams.

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a not-so-fast moment. The game started. It was

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:51.739
<v Speaker 2>a grind, and then Sam Darnold got hurt.

0:00:51.820 --> 0:00:53.260
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think that's what took the air out of

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:56.740
<v Speaker 4>the room. You got the Super Bowl champs, big crowd, NBC,

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:59.550
<v Speaker 4>everything you'd want. Cam Chancellor is there getting the crowd

0:00:59.570 --> 0:01:01.310
<v Speaker 4>fired up and Sam Darnold on the fifth play of

0:01:01.330 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 4>the game goes down. We're going to talk more about

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:05.300
<v Speaker 4>that But it felt maybe worse.

0:01:05.740 --> 0:01:07.860
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what was your reaction? What did you think it was?

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:10.020
<v Speaker 4>I think I'm conditioned. Maybe I got a little triggered

0:01:10.060 --> 0:01:12.140
<v Speaker 4>after what happened to Aaron Rodgers a couple years ago.

0:01:12.300 --> 0:01:14.330
<v Speaker 4>I start looking on the replay. Was that his Achilles?

0:01:14.390 --> 0:01:16.790
<v Speaker 4>I'm looking for that Achilles thing. And I thought the worst.

0:01:16.990 --> 0:01:17.789
<v Speaker 4>We'll keep an eye on that.

0:01:17.910 --> 0:01:19.709
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we were texting back and forth all night like

0:01:19.770 --> 0:01:21.830
<v Speaker 2>we used to. One of the ones texting sent me,

0:01:22.230 --> 0:01:23.950
<v Speaker 2>in the third quarter, the game started to pick up

0:01:23.970 --> 0:01:26.350
<v Speaker 2>a little bit. And you wrote, we're back, exclamation point.

0:01:26.390 --> 0:01:28.630
<v Speaker 4>We're back. Sam Darnold wasn't back. You could see here

0:01:28.670 --> 0:01:30.730
<v Speaker 4>he's scrambling. When I saw that on the turf, I'm like...

0:01:31.069 --> 0:01:32.390
<v Speaker 4>Not the Achilles, not the Achilles.

0:01:32.410 --> 0:01:34.610
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the game did pick up. And then I think

0:01:34.650 --> 0:01:38.110
<v Speaker 2>the story shifted not to Drew Locke, who was great

0:01:38.150 --> 0:01:38.649
<v Speaker 2>for the Seahawks.

0:01:38.670 --> 0:01:38.979
<v Speaker 4>Did a nice job.

0:01:38.990 --> 0:01:41.530
<v Speaker 2>Played a really good job. To Drake May. To me,

0:01:41.569 --> 0:01:43.810
<v Speaker 2>the story of the game was Drake May and his struggles,

0:01:43.950 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 2>especially late in the game.

0:01:45.060 --> 0:01:46.660
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he looked like he was doing enough in the

0:01:46.700 --> 0:01:48.260
<v Speaker 4>first half. They were running the ball a little bit.

0:01:48.340 --> 0:01:49.940
<v Speaker 4>He was moving the ball down the field against the

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:52.940
<v Speaker 4>toughest defense. And he scrambles well. He gets out of

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 4>the pocket well. But that fourth quarter, it's like every

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:57.980
<v Speaker 4>decision he made in the fourth quarter was the wrong one.

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:00.490
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the pass to Dobbs was double coverage. The

0:02:00.550 --> 0:02:03.090
<v Speaker 4>next interception after Dobbs drops the ball was double coverage,

0:02:03.370 --> 0:02:04.170
<v Speaker 4>and then the last play.

0:02:04.630 --> 0:02:06.110
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's the thing with Drake May. He thinks

0:02:06.130 --> 0:02:08.500
<v Speaker 2>he can do anything. He was second in MVP voting

0:02:08.540 --> 0:02:12.079
<v Speaker 2>last year. Maybe he thinks he's Patrick Mahomes, and he's not.

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 4>You're saying he's a little emboldened by the run they

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 4>went on.

0:02:15.020 --> 0:02:17.990
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. You could see it last night. On the key

0:02:18.130 --> 0:02:20.810
<v Speaker 2>interception at the end of the game, he thought, I

0:02:20.850 --> 0:02:22.650
<v Speaker 2>can make a play. You know what? This might not

0:02:22.669 --> 0:02:24.570
<v Speaker 2>even be called, but I see a guy back there.

0:02:24.590 --> 0:02:27.850
<v Speaker 2>You see it now. He thought, I'm the MVP guy.

0:02:27.870 --> 0:02:30.329
<v Speaker 2>I have the huge arm. I will make this happen.

0:02:30.370 --> 0:02:33.090
<v Speaker 4>That play reminded me of Roethlisberger to Santonio Holmes back

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:35.239
<v Speaker 4>at the end zone. And Roethlisberger put it where only

0:02:35.300 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 4>Holmes could catch it. You look at his stats there

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 4>last night. It's three horrible decisions. Not passes. The decision

0:02:41.139 --> 0:02:43.850
<v Speaker 4>and the pass. But that last play... You could take

0:02:43.900 --> 0:02:45.579
<v Speaker 4>a sack. You could throw it out of bounds. You

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 4>could burn a timeout. Anything but the pick.

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 2>So he obviously cannot solve the Seahawks' defense. The last

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 2>two games have been terrible, but it's really been the

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:55.140
<v Speaker 2>last five games. I saw the stat today, Paul. In

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:59.260
<v Speaker 2>the last five games, he has 11 turnovers, four fumbles lost,

0:02:59.260 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 2>24 sacks taken. His numbers are down across the board.

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:05.830
<v Speaker 2>He had a hard time in the playoffs. Remember the Chargers, Texans,

0:03:05.990 --> 0:03:06.790
<v Speaker 2>everyone took him down.

0:03:06.889 --> 0:03:09.390
<v Speaker 4>Okay, let's play concern level if you're a New England

0:03:09.490 --> 0:03:12.079
<v Speaker 4>Patriots fan. Drake May took you to a Super Bowl, or...

0:03:12.430 --> 0:03:14.070
<v Speaker 4>was part of a Super Bowl team. I don't know

0:03:14.190 --> 0:03:16.030
<v Speaker 4>how you want to say it. But what's your concern

0:03:16.050 --> 0:03:16.870
<v Speaker 4>level going forward?

0:03:17.470 --> 0:03:20.030
<v Speaker 2>A little concerned. He's got to get that impatience out

0:03:20.070 --> 0:03:23.350
<v Speaker 2>of his game. He needs to not throw that pass, obviously.

0:03:23.690 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 2>But to me, this is like I'm looking at some

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:30.020
<v Speaker 2>other quarterbacks, Brock Purdy, Trevor Lawrence, C.J. Stroud, Jaden Daniels.

0:03:30.380 --> 0:03:32.820
<v Speaker 2>Guys can have big years, and everyone gets film on them.

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 2>So Drake Mays has got to grow up a little bit.

0:03:34.780 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 4>So is this about the defense figuring him out or

0:03:36.930 --> 0:03:39.830
<v Speaker 4>him thinking he can throw like Josh Allen and Patrick Mahomes?

0:03:40.730 --> 0:03:42.730
<v Speaker 2>The latter. He thinks he can do what Josh Allen

0:03:42.750 --> 0:03:44.610
<v Speaker 2>can do. And let's face it, Josh Allen's had some

0:03:44.670 --> 0:03:46.810
<v Speaker 2>ups and downs, too. Right. He can have all the

0:03:46.850 --> 0:03:49.290
<v Speaker 2>ability in the world. There's so much more to the position.

0:03:49.770 --> 0:03:52.370
<v Speaker 2>I think he'll get there, but there's a little concern here, Paul.

0:03:52.410 --> 0:03:54.190
<v Speaker 4>It sure would help if Dobbs would have caught that ball.

0:03:54.210 --> 0:03:55.870
<v Speaker 4>That would have taken, because that was the following play.

0:03:55.910 --> 0:03:58.250
<v Speaker 4>Look right there at the interception, which, no matter what,

0:03:58.310 --> 0:03:58.990
<v Speaker 4>is a bad decision.

0:03:59.050 --> 0:04:00.450
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you guys were talking about it on the Dan

0:04:00.470 --> 0:04:02.790
<v Speaker 2>Patrick show. He saw the defender out of the corner

0:04:02.810 --> 0:04:03.230
<v Speaker 2>of his eye.

0:04:03.570 --> 0:04:03.850
<v Speaker 4>He did.

0:04:04.070 --> 0:04:04.530
<v Speaker 2>He absolutely did.

0:04:04.610 --> 0:04:07.150
<v Speaker 4>All right, let's get to the other thing in the game,

0:04:07.190 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 4>because if you're a Seahawks fan... You got the win,

0:04:10.060 --> 0:04:13.250
<v Speaker 4>the Sam Darnold injury, no news yet on his MRI.

0:04:13.690 --> 0:04:15.150
<v Speaker 4>At first it looked like it was lower, and then

0:04:15.190 --> 0:04:18.210
<v Speaker 4>it's like a hip area injury. Drew Locke comes in.

0:04:18.430 --> 0:04:19.990
<v Speaker 4>He's been in the league now six years, which we

0:04:20.010 --> 0:04:20.890
<v Speaker 4>were both surprised by.

0:04:20.910 --> 0:04:21.710
<v Speaker 2>I can't believe that.

0:04:21.790 --> 0:04:24.570
<v Speaker 4>Six years out of Missouri. How do you feel level

0:04:24.589 --> 0:04:26.510
<v Speaker 4>of confidence in Drew Locke as your backup?

0:04:26.790 --> 0:04:30.630
<v Speaker 2>So Sam Darnold went down and Twitter X started going

0:04:30.750 --> 0:04:33.040
<v Speaker 2>mad about it. Who are they going to bring in?

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:34.140
<v Speaker 2>Andy Dalton from Philly.

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 4>You and I thought it was Jalen Milrow for a second.

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:38.740
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So Drew Locke has been there a long time.

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:41.190
<v Speaker 2>I thought he did a great job. He has a

0:04:41.310 --> 0:04:44.010
<v Speaker 2>lot of arm talent. He can sling it. Now, his

0:04:44.070 --> 0:04:47.770
<v Speaker 2>problems are more in his head. He gets really impatient

0:04:47.810 --> 0:04:50.969
<v Speaker 2>at times, and you saw that last night. I'm psyched

0:04:51.130 --> 0:04:54.430
<v Speaker 2>for him as a backup because he knows that team.

0:04:54.550 --> 0:04:56.930
<v Speaker 2>It's basically the same offense as last year, even though

0:04:56.970 --> 0:04:59.750
<v Speaker 2>Clint Kubiak is gone. I think he's the perfect backup

0:04:59.770 --> 0:05:00.529
<v Speaker 2>for this situation.

0:05:00.550 --> 0:05:02.190
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think it's a really good situation because you

0:05:02.210 --> 0:05:04.170
<v Speaker 4>look at that last couple of clips we just showed.

0:05:04.410 --> 0:05:06.810
<v Speaker 4>He had that out pattern to JSN. His arm looks great.

0:05:07.150 --> 0:05:08.630
<v Speaker 4>And then they let him go for it on fourth

0:05:08.670 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 4>and two, which became the touchdown to JSN. The play

0:05:11.380 --> 0:05:14.050
<v Speaker 4>by the goal line where he got a little confused,

0:05:14.089 --> 0:05:16.540
<v Speaker 4>is that on the OC or him when he's not

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:19.360
<v Speaker 4>sure what the play is? He's checking his wristwatch or

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:21.650
<v Speaker 4>whatever it is, and next thing you know, it's a

0:05:21.650 --> 0:05:22.070
<v Speaker 4>delay game.

0:05:22.610 --> 0:05:25.090
<v Speaker 2>It looked a lot like you when you had a

0:05:25.130 --> 0:05:27.070
<v Speaker 2>test in high school and you didn't study the night before.

0:05:27.130 --> 0:05:30.130
<v Speaker 2>I didn't have the art. You're practicing. Oh, be honest, Paul.

0:05:30.370 --> 0:05:31.950
<v Speaker 4>Did I have a cheat sheet? Is there a statute

0:05:31.970 --> 0:05:33.170
<v Speaker 4>of limitations at Marion Catholic?

0:05:33.370 --> 0:05:35.130
<v Speaker 2>I blame the coaching staff. First of all, you could

0:05:35.150 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 2>see in the fourth quarter, they were taking a long

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:39.220
<v Speaker 2>time to get the play in because he was verbalizing

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 2>the play in the huddle on camera way too late.

0:05:42.220 --> 0:05:44.740
<v Speaker 2>And then he didn't even have the play. Just hike

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:47.260
<v Speaker 2>and sneak the ball if you have to. Then why

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 2>didn't they call a timeout? Why didn't Seattle's coaching staff

0:05:49.580 --> 0:05:51.849
<v Speaker 2>call a timeout there? to save from the delay game.

0:05:52.089 --> 0:05:53.870
<v Speaker 2>They end up going for a field goal instead of

0:05:53.910 --> 0:05:56.970
<v Speaker 2>a touchdown. Almost lost the game because of that one play,

0:05:57.029 --> 0:05:59.070
<v Speaker 2>and I blame the coaching staff, not the quarterback.

0:05:59.110 --> 0:06:00.850
<v Speaker 4>Okay, we don't know what's up with Darnold. They make

0:06:00.910 --> 0:06:02.650
<v Speaker 4>it seem like it's not that big of a deal,

0:06:02.690 --> 0:06:04.870
<v Speaker 4>but not so fast. If it is a bigger deal

0:06:04.910 --> 0:06:06.770
<v Speaker 4>than we think it is, they have, if not the

0:06:06.810 --> 0:06:09.490
<v Speaker 4>best defense, top two in football. Could they pull off

0:06:09.529 --> 0:06:12.310
<v Speaker 4>a season, if they had to, like your Eagles when

0:06:12.330 --> 0:06:12.970
<v Speaker 4>they had Nick Foles?

0:06:13.550 --> 0:06:16.210
<v Speaker 2>Nick Foles only had to play three or four games

0:06:16.250 --> 0:06:18.510
<v Speaker 2>during the regular season in the playoffs. That's a long

0:06:18.570 --> 0:06:19.430
<v Speaker 2>time to go, Nick Foles.

0:06:19.450 --> 0:06:22.010
<v Speaker 4>Okay, but let's say, for instance, Sam Darnall is 80%.

0:06:22.010 --> 0:06:25.050
<v Speaker 4>You have the Cardinals next week. You have Washington.

0:06:25.070 --> 0:06:28.729
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well, that's fine. Drew Locke is perfect there. Then

0:06:28.990 --> 0:06:32.710
<v Speaker 2>down the road, though, you obviously have the Rams to

0:06:32.730 --> 0:06:34.570
<v Speaker 2>deal with at the end of the season. You have

0:06:34.589 --> 0:06:37.510
<v Speaker 2>the Eagles on there. You know what? I think Drew

0:06:37.529 --> 0:06:40.110
<v Speaker 2>Locke is fine. I think with that defense, you can

0:06:40.150 --> 0:06:41.929
<v Speaker 2>go at least to the midway point of the season

0:06:41.990 --> 0:06:42.690
<v Speaker 2>and still make the playoffs.

0:06:42.750 --> 0:06:44.539
<v Speaker 4>I may give Sam Darnall a bye week next week

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 4>against your Cardinals.

0:06:45.830 --> 0:06:48.110
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I don't expect to see Sam Darnold next week.

0:06:48.130 --> 0:06:51.270
<v Speaker 2>Put your feet up. Well, listen, it's still early. I

0:06:51.330 --> 0:06:55.010
<v Speaker 2>hope we see him next month because hips are bad.

0:06:55.150 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 2>Guy Bo Jackson, you know what can happen with your hip.

0:06:58.000 --> 0:06:59.859
<v Speaker 4>Don't go there. Don't go there. Keep it positive and

0:06:59.900 --> 0:07:01.700
<v Speaker 4>not so fast with Pabst and Perloff. All right, new

0:07:01.740 --> 0:07:03.900
<v Speaker 4>thing here. No one's ever done this in sports radio

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 4>or TV history. We're giving out helmet stickers for whoever

0:07:06.700 --> 0:07:08.420
<v Speaker 4>had the best game. If you could take a look

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 4>at these helmet stickers, they're gorgeous. It's me and you.

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 4>And what player wouldn't want this on their helmet? Who

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 4>are you picking for the helmet sticker for last night's game?

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:17.450
<v Speaker 2>So it's like college football. It's like we're talking like Michigan,

0:07:17.490 --> 0:07:18.090
<v Speaker 2>Ohio State.

0:07:18.150 --> 0:07:20.190
<v Speaker 4>Right, like the Buckeye if you're an Ohio State guy.

0:07:20.490 --> 0:07:22.670
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well, I mean, it's pretty obvious then. Josh Jobe,

0:07:22.730 --> 0:07:27.330
<v Speaker 2>the cornerback who had the game-winning interception, former Eagle.

0:07:27.380 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 4>Look at that.

0:07:28.180 --> 0:07:29.900
<v Speaker 2>Oh, that's lovely. That would be a big honor. This

0:07:29.940 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 2>is an undrafted guy, a backup. I can't believe he

0:07:33.500 --> 0:07:36.250
<v Speaker 2>made that play, Paul. To get his both toes inside,

0:07:36.490 --> 0:07:39.090
<v Speaker 2>you know, that's like a JSN play. That's like a

0:07:39.110 --> 0:07:40.050
<v Speaker 2>Puka Nakua play.

0:07:40.070 --> 0:07:42.230
<v Speaker 4>He toe tapped it like a defensive back. He was

0:07:42.310 --> 0:07:44.210
<v Speaker 4>in by just a millimeter or so. I'm going to

0:07:44.250 --> 0:07:46.610
<v Speaker 4>say same play. Here's my helmet sticker. I'm going to

0:07:46.630 --> 0:07:48.929
<v Speaker 4>give it to Demarcus Lawrence. If you watch that play again,

0:07:49.430 --> 0:07:52.930
<v Speaker 4>the reason he was like off kilter, Drake May, Demarcus

0:07:52.970 --> 0:07:55.590
<v Speaker 4>Lawrence hopped a chop block and got right in his face.

0:07:55.610 --> 0:07:57.650
<v Speaker 4>So Demarcus Lawrence, you also get a helmet sticker.

0:07:57.730 --> 0:08:00.830
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that Seahawks D line. We don't talk about it enough.

0:08:00.850 --> 0:08:01.670
<v Speaker 2>Look at this.

0:08:01.850 --> 0:08:02.350
<v Speaker 4>Right off the bat.

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:05.500
<v Speaker 2>That's the thing with, you notice there, Seattle, they're only

0:08:05.540 --> 0:08:07.780
<v Speaker 2>rushing four guys so they can keep so many guys back.

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 2>That's what was giving Drake May such a hard time

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:12.380
<v Speaker 2>last night. I like that. I think the guy who

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 2>got the pass really deserves a sticker more than the

0:08:15.140 --> 0:08:15.690
<v Speaker 2>pass rush.

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:17.610
<v Speaker 4>Either way, I think they're both honored at the first

0:08:17.750 --> 0:08:20.490
<v Speaker 4>ever stickers, helmet stickers, in Not So Fast history. We'll

0:08:20.550 --> 0:08:22.450
<v Speaker 4>hear from them, I'm sure, soon. All right, let's get

0:08:22.490 --> 0:08:25.710
<v Speaker 4>to it. 49ers versus Rams in Australia tonight. We're done

0:08:25.750 --> 0:08:27.950
<v Speaker 4>talking about jet lag. Let's talk about the game itself.

0:08:28.210 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 4>How do you think this plays out?

0:08:29.990 --> 0:08:32.170
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think Kyle Shanahan has a lot of bulletin

0:08:32.190 --> 0:08:34.910
<v Speaker 2>board material. The entire NFL world's been talking about the

0:08:34.970 --> 0:08:36.910
<v Speaker 2>Rams for how many months right now?

0:08:36.950 --> 0:08:37.910
<v Speaker 4>Biggest favorite in history.

0:08:38.130 --> 0:08:41.230
<v Speaker 2>So Shanahan is basically saying, hey, last year we were

0:08:41.270 --> 0:08:43.460
<v Speaker 2>really close to this team and now everyone's forgotten about us.

0:08:43.750 --> 0:08:46.470
<v Speaker 2>So I think the 49ers are fired up. Now the

0:08:46.510 --> 0:08:50.050
<v Speaker 2>question is, do they get through four quarters with everybody intact?

0:08:50.410 --> 0:08:52.569
<v Speaker 4>Okay, now I look at this game, and like you said,

0:08:52.790 --> 0:08:55.590
<v Speaker 4>everyone is focused on the Rams. There's more coverage of

0:08:55.610 --> 0:08:58.770
<v Speaker 4>Aaron Donald not being there than 49ers being there. It

0:08:58.820 --> 0:09:00.979
<v Speaker 4>feels like a trap game, a classic trap where the

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:02.930
<v Speaker 4>Rams lose when everyone thinks they're going to win.

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:05.339
<v Speaker 2>Can you have a trap game in Australia, though? That

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:07.380
<v Speaker 2>seems like you'd be fired up to play overseas.

0:09:07.420 --> 0:09:09.559
<v Speaker 4>It probably means something different. A trap game in Australia

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:11.560
<v Speaker 4>probably means some type of meat-related product.

0:09:11.740 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think the real issue is George Kittle's coming back,

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:18.459
<v Speaker 2>and Nick Bosa are coming back. Now, they were injured.

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:21.650
<v Speaker 2>Kittle was January 11th when he got hurt. Are they

0:09:21.690 --> 0:09:24.550
<v Speaker 2>going to be not only effective, but are they going

0:09:24.570 --> 0:09:26.310
<v Speaker 2>to stay healthy? I don't want to be in the

0:09:26.350 --> 0:09:28.470
<v Speaker 2>third quarter of this game, Paul, and the Niners have

0:09:28.530 --> 0:09:31.090
<v Speaker 2>already short-circuited their whole season because of injuries.

0:09:31.150 --> 0:09:33.550
<v Speaker 4>Should the Niners have pulled a Greg Popovich and left

0:09:33.630 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 4>those guys at home, Bosa and Kittle, because there's no

0:09:36.300 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 4>season if those two guys aren't present. Leave them at home,

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 4>not similar to Aaron Donald, but don't burn this trip.

0:09:42.020 --> 0:09:42.220
<v Speaker 1>Rest.

0:09:42.550 --> 0:09:44.050
<v Speaker 4>If we take the loss, we take the loss, but

0:09:44.070 --> 0:09:45.970
<v Speaker 4>I get you guys an extra 10 days home rest.

0:09:46.210 --> 0:09:48.929
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah. I mean, honestly, I think they're okay without Kittle,

0:09:48.970 --> 0:09:52.100
<v Speaker 2>believe it or not. Kittle, he's getting older right now.

0:09:52.750 --> 0:09:54.940
<v Speaker 2>If Bosa gets hurt again, I don't think they can

0:09:54.980 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 2>even do as well as they did last year. And

0:09:57.000 --> 0:09:59.319
<v Speaker 2>McCaffrey led the league in touches. Is he going to

0:09:59.380 --> 0:10:01.610
<v Speaker 2>stay healthy? I mean, we've seen him get hurt before.

0:10:01.750 --> 0:10:03.190
<v Speaker 2>I'm really nervous about this team.

0:10:03.290 --> 0:10:04.650
<v Speaker 4>I don't think any team, and I think you said

0:10:04.690 --> 0:10:07.209
<v Speaker 4>this last week, no team is better at being injured

0:10:07.309 --> 0:10:07.870
<v Speaker 4>than the Niners.

0:10:08.230 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they're good. They have, obviously, a great coach. All right,

0:10:13.140 --> 0:10:16.540
<v Speaker 2>coming up next, not so fast. It's a year of defense,

0:10:16.580 --> 0:10:18.780
<v Speaker 2>at least in my opinion. Got off to a defensive

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:20.469
<v Speaker 2>start last night, and we're going to see that all

0:10:20.510 --> 0:10:22.770
<v Speaker 2>season long. We'll break it down, not so fast.

0:10:24.970 --> 0:10:27.670
<v Speaker 4>Okay, Perloff, this is just for you and definitely not

0:10:27.730 --> 0:10:30.430
<v Speaker 4>for me. The midday pick-me-up. We do this little baseball.

0:10:31.429 --> 0:10:31.550
<v Speaker 2>Oh!

0:10:31.570 --> 0:10:32.970
<v Speaker 4>Shocker, Kyle Schwarber went long.

0:10:34.270 --> 0:10:35.110
<v Speaker 2>That's a grand slam.

0:10:35.130 --> 0:10:36.270
<v Speaker 4>That's a grand salami.

0:10:36.429 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, how do you feel about that as a Cubs

0:10:38.170 --> 0:10:40.290
<v Speaker 2>fan watching Kyle Schwarber lead the league in homers?

0:10:40.429 --> 0:10:43.540
<v Speaker 4>It never doesn't hurt. It never doesn't hurt. The Cubs

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 4>years ago said, you know, we've seen Kyle Schwarber's best work.

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:48.960
<v Speaker 4>He's got knee injuries. Let's let him go. 300 homers

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:49.980
<v Speaker 4>later or whatever.

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:52.380
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it matters who you root for. I

0:10:52.420 --> 0:10:55.670
<v Speaker 2>think Kyle Schwarber's the kind of player... who is goes

0:10:55.750 --> 0:10:58.209
<v Speaker 2>way beyond the team oh yeah everybody i know loves

0:10:58.230 --> 0:11:00.630
<v Speaker 2>him he's a softball player playing major league baseball.

0:11:00.410 --> 0:11:02.530
<v Speaker 4>Yeah he's one of those players that are entertaining back

0:11:02.570 --> 0:11:04.690
<v Speaker 4>in our day like a george brett or mike schmidt

0:11:04.710 --> 0:11:06.970
<v Speaker 4>you hated facing him but you respected what they did

0:11:07.010 --> 0:11:07.490
<v Speaker 4>for the game.

0:11:07.390 --> 0:11:09.470
<v Speaker 2>Yeah and also schwarber's a bit of an everyman like

0:11:09.530 --> 0:11:11.450
<v Speaker 2>he kind of looks like he would be at the

0:11:11.490 --> 0:11:13.670
<v Speaker 2>game in chicago not playing the game.

0:11:13.590 --> 0:11:16.270
<v Speaker 4>He looks like a 16 inch softball beer in one

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 4>hand throwing it underhand.

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's great. Sorry he's a Philly and not a Cub.

0:11:21.260 --> 0:11:23.500
<v Speaker 4>I'm almost over it. Alright, it's time for Warm Takes.

0:11:23.540 --> 0:11:25.330
<v Speaker 4>You kids like it out there. It's sweeping the nation.

0:11:25.350 --> 0:11:27.490
<v Speaker 4>You can play at home. Here we go, Perloff. I'm

0:11:27.510 --> 0:11:29.030
<v Speaker 4>going to go first Warm Take of the day, and

0:11:29.050 --> 0:11:31.650
<v Speaker 4>it's NFL related. One of the great things about the NFL,

0:11:31.670 --> 0:11:33.270
<v Speaker 4>and I know this is kind of kept and obvious,

0:11:33.330 --> 0:11:35.670
<v Speaker 4>is that almost every team has hope. But if you

0:11:35.690 --> 0:11:37.650
<v Speaker 4>look at it, how many teams this year don't really

0:11:37.700 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 4>have hope? Maybe the Arizona Cardinals. But the Titans. Some

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 4>people like the Titans. The Cleveland Browns. You really have

0:11:43.820 --> 0:11:45.440
<v Speaker 4>to scratch and claw to find a team that has

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:47.570
<v Speaker 4>no hope. And the teams that don't have hope are

0:11:47.610 --> 0:11:50.730
<v Speaker 4>tanking for the 2027 draft. But you look at the NBA.

0:11:50.890 --> 0:11:52.030
<v Speaker 4>How many teams can win the title?

0:11:52.190 --> 0:11:52.450
<v Speaker 2>Six?

0:11:52.890 --> 0:11:53.199
<v Speaker 1>Seven?

0:11:53.510 --> 0:11:55.719
<v Speaker 4>Possibly? The rest of the teams are just kind of

0:11:55.780 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 4>playing out the string and hoping for Wemba Nyama.

0:11:58.000 --> 0:11:58.500
<v Speaker 3>Baseball.

0:11:58.660 --> 0:12:01.860
<v Speaker 4>Ten teams can win the title, and that's maybe. Sometimes

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:04.679
<v Speaker 4>it feels like Dodgers in the field. Football has everybody

0:12:04.710 --> 0:12:06.329
<v Speaker 4>in place, and the only thing that can really take

0:12:06.390 --> 0:12:08.949
<v Speaker 4>hope away from you is your quarterback getting injured in

0:12:08.970 --> 0:12:10.990
<v Speaker 4>game one. Now, the Seahawks look like they're going to

0:12:11.010 --> 0:12:13.349
<v Speaker 4>be fine. Sam Darnold will probably be okay. But if

0:12:13.370 --> 0:12:15.790
<v Speaker 4>you go back a couple years ago, Aaron Rodgers getting

0:12:15.809 --> 0:12:17.550
<v Speaker 4>hurt in the first game, it's like, oh, that's the

0:12:17.610 --> 0:12:19.729
<v Speaker 4>only thing I can take away from you. But football,

0:12:19.850 --> 0:12:22.230
<v Speaker 4>it feels like every team goes into the season with like,

0:12:22.910 --> 0:12:25.699
<v Speaker 4>we may not have Super Bowl aspirations, but wildcard weekend

0:12:25.740 --> 0:12:27.020
<v Speaker 4>aspirations feel pretty good as well.

0:12:27.420 --> 0:12:29.059
<v Speaker 2>Are you just saying this because the Seahawks and the

0:12:29.100 --> 0:12:31.199
<v Speaker 2>Patriots were in the Super Bowl last year and none

0:12:31.220 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 2>of us had that prediction?

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:34.339
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and that really doesn't happen in other sports. I

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 4>guess sometimes there's a wildcard in baseball. Arizona Diamondbacks, literally

0:12:38.260 --> 0:12:41.440
<v Speaker 4>a wildcard. But the NBA, it feels like, There's six

0:12:41.500 --> 0:12:43.260
<v Speaker 4>teams that could be there, and I may be stretching

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 4>it sometimes.

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:46.500
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, although I think there are a few teams who

0:12:46.540 --> 0:12:48.080
<v Speaker 2>know they're not going to be in it. The Cardinals,

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:51.420
<v Speaker 2>the Browns, the Raiders, Titans. You're right, there are people

0:12:51.450 --> 0:12:52.250
<v Speaker 2>who have Titans in the playoffs.

0:12:52.270 --> 0:12:54.330
<v Speaker 4>We may have to cap that at three or four teams,

0:12:54.350 --> 0:12:55.510
<v Speaker 4>and that's pretty good for the league.

0:12:55.770 --> 0:12:58.229
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let's revisit this on Monday after some of those

0:12:58.270 --> 0:13:00.910
<v Speaker 2>teams play. All right, I've got to go back to

0:13:00.990 --> 0:13:04.890
<v Speaker 2>last night. You saw why NFL teams need to play

0:13:04.929 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 2>their starters in the preseason. It was quite obvious for

0:13:08.980 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 2>Seahawks and Patriots. You know, both quarterbacks sat out the

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:15.500
<v Speaker 2>entire preseason. Unfortunately, Sam Darnold got hurt, so you don't

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:17.059
<v Speaker 2>know what he was going to play like. But it

0:13:17.100 --> 0:13:20.140
<v Speaker 2>looked sloppy. There were so many penalties. There were so

0:13:20.179 --> 0:13:23.680
<v Speaker 2>many pre-snap penalties. It wasn't just the players. The coaches

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:26.110
<v Speaker 2>looked like they were struggling figuring out what was going on.

0:13:26.450 --> 0:13:29.429
<v Speaker 2>Seahawks had a touchdown pulled back because of the legal shift.

0:13:29.790 --> 0:13:32.339
<v Speaker 2>That was all. what should have been taken care of

0:13:32.380 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 2>in the preseason and was not. Get ready, Paul. Week

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 2>one is going to be nothing but unders. Now, historically,

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:42.860
<v Speaker 2>the unders carry week one. You can see it, especially

0:13:43.179 --> 0:13:46.220
<v Speaker 2>last night, with three preseason games. Teams are not ready

0:13:46.260 --> 0:13:48.750
<v Speaker 2>to go. We're going to see some really, really ugly football.

0:13:49.090 --> 0:13:51.090
<v Speaker 2>Might take to week four until we see what teams

0:13:51.170 --> 0:13:51.650
<v Speaker 2>really are.

0:13:51.809 --> 0:13:54.030
<v Speaker 4>You know, I agree with your thesis on this, that

0:13:54.150 --> 0:13:56.589
<v Speaker 4>setting up teams to play poorly is because of the

0:13:56.630 --> 0:13:58.810
<v Speaker 4>preseason games. And now there's three instead of four, like

0:13:58.850 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 4>a generation ago. But I'm going to not so fast

0:14:01.130 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 4>you here because I think coaches would rather lose in

0:14:03.860 --> 0:14:06.020
<v Speaker 4>week one and take the criticism for not playing certain

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:09.010
<v Speaker 4>players than somehow play a starter longer than he should

0:14:09.030 --> 0:14:11.390
<v Speaker 4>in a preseason. And if that starter gets hurt, that's

0:14:11.410 --> 0:14:12.330
<v Speaker 4>where a coach gets lit up.

0:14:12.390 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm wondering from a health standpoint, though, Sam Darnold

0:14:15.020 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 2>got hurt five plays in, and A.J. Brown got hurt.

0:14:17.620 --> 0:14:20.500
<v Speaker 2>Does getting that preseason warm-up help you keep healthy for

0:14:20.540 --> 0:14:23.100
<v Speaker 2>week one? Let's get the scientists in on this.

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:26.260
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, call your people at Dartmouth-Mass. How about this, though?

0:14:26.340 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 4>I think what you're saying, though, is bared out by

0:14:28.900 --> 0:14:31.340
<v Speaker 4>the Bengals. The Bengals, the past couple years, they've had

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 4>a lot of injury issues, especially Joe Burrow. And it

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:35.900
<v Speaker 4>seems like this preseason, they let their starters play a

0:14:35.900 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 4>little more to be ready. whether it be physically ready

0:14:38.700 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 4>or football ready, but they're leaning towards your direction.

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:43.700
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, you get down to was last night's

0:14:43.740 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 2>game important too. I kind of think it was because

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:47.620
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots are going to be in a wild card race,

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:50.070
<v Speaker 2>and they got to play a backup quarterback. They might

0:14:50.110 --> 0:14:51.910
<v Speaker 2>look back at this and say, man, we should have

0:14:51.930 --> 0:14:52.890
<v Speaker 2>won that game in Seattle.

0:14:53.010 --> 0:14:55.490
<v Speaker 4>And vice versa. If Seattle somehow gets home field advantage

0:14:55.510 --> 0:14:57.230
<v Speaker 4>over the Rams by a half a game later in

0:14:57.250 --> 0:14:58.850
<v Speaker 4>the season, you're like, oh, that's the one they stole.

0:14:59.050 --> 0:15:01.630
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if I'm a coach, I know the injury risk.

0:15:01.750 --> 0:15:03.260
<v Speaker 2>I still play my guys in August.

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 4>All right, my next warm take, let's go to my

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:08.300
<v Speaker 4>warm take number two. It's about Australia. Never been there, Perloff.

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:10.160
<v Speaker 4>Seems like somewhere you would go. You're a world traveler.

0:15:10.540 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 4>But the NFL pushing to Australia is pretty extreme. They've

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:17.300
<v Speaker 4>tried Europe before, obviously many years, South America, Mexico, all

0:15:17.340 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 4>over the place. But sometimes I wonder what the long

0:15:20.220 --> 0:15:23.250
<v Speaker 4>game is for the NFL with overseas play. And I

0:15:23.260 --> 0:15:25.130
<v Speaker 4>don't think it's a Super Bowl overseas. I don't think

0:15:25.190 --> 0:15:28.390
<v Speaker 4>it's a team overseas. I think it's like a 50-year

0:15:28.570 --> 0:15:31.010
<v Speaker 4>plan where they're just going to chip away at a

0:15:31.030 --> 0:15:34.450
<v Speaker 4>new fan base. They've got the U.S. maxed out. If

0:15:34.490 --> 0:15:36.830
<v Speaker 4>you don't like football in America, there's nothing they can

0:15:36.850 --> 0:15:39.510
<v Speaker 4>do to change your mind. You're probably watching, I don't

0:15:39.530 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 4>know what, McNeil-Lehrer report on weekends. So I just think

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:45.220
<v Speaker 4>that the NFL is playing the long game, and they'll

0:15:45.260 --> 0:15:48.020
<v Speaker 4>never go too deep with a Super Bowl in Wembley.

0:15:48.100 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 4>When I say never, I mean the next 10, 15 years.

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 4>Years ago, we thought there'd be a Super Bowl in London.

0:15:53.500 --> 0:15:54.990
<v Speaker 4>I don't think they want the blowback of that. I

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:57.170
<v Speaker 4>think they want to chip away and develop fan bases

0:15:57.210 --> 0:15:59.810
<v Speaker 4>over a 25-year period, and then they're going to keep

0:15:59.850 --> 0:16:02.030
<v Speaker 4>doing it. I think with the 18-game schedule, it's going

0:16:02.050 --> 0:16:03.090
<v Speaker 4>to allow them to do it even more.

0:16:03.410 --> 0:16:05.530
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Albert Breer was on the Dan Patrick Show from

0:16:05.570 --> 0:16:09.510
<v Speaker 2>Sports Illustrated, said that they're looking at Tokyo next, then Italy,

0:16:10.070 --> 0:16:13.230
<v Speaker 2>and the Middle East, possibly Abu Dhabi or somewhere like that.

0:16:14.010 --> 0:16:14.810
<v Speaker 2>How do we get in, Paul?

0:16:15.010 --> 0:16:16.750
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so we want to put it out there now.

0:16:16.890 --> 0:16:19.690
<v Speaker 4>If NBC's Football Night in America is going to Rome,

0:16:20.410 --> 0:16:21.970
<v Speaker 4>We'll pay the airfare.

0:16:21.990 --> 0:16:23.370
<v Speaker 2>I want to go to Tokyo, too.

0:16:23.550 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 4>Mike Tirico, if you're watching, we'll help you out.

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 2>So tonight's game is important because if the teams struggle

0:16:30.140 --> 0:16:32.220
<v Speaker 2>or if somebody gets hurt, then they might not want

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:34.980
<v Speaker 2>to go that far. But I can see, I totally agree,

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:38.020
<v Speaker 2>they're laying groundwork. Did you know that the Olympics 2032

0:16:38.020 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 2>are in Australia? So they're also trying to sell flag

0:16:40.740 --> 0:16:43.190
<v Speaker 2>football over there. I heard that's a big initiative out

0:16:43.210 --> 0:16:43.710
<v Speaker 2>of the NFL.

0:16:43.770 --> 0:16:45.790
<v Speaker 4>I don't think I realize how big flag football is

0:16:45.850 --> 0:16:48.010
<v Speaker 4>as an initiative for the league. And it's becoming a

0:16:48.050 --> 0:16:50.370
<v Speaker 4>thing with the NCAAs. A little side topic here. A

0:16:50.410 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 4>girl from a local high school is getting a scholarship

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:55.570
<v Speaker 4>to college for flag football, a partial scholarship to college.

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:58.700
<v Speaker 4>This is that way to find another fan base by

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 4>the NFL. They don't leave any stone unturned.

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:02.370
<v Speaker 2>By the way, did you know that Australia was hosting

0:17:02.380 --> 0:17:03.730
<v Speaker 2>the Olympics in 2032?

0:17:03.730 --> 0:17:05.449
<v Speaker 4>I did because I heard it two minutes ago by you.

0:17:05.650 --> 0:17:09.109
<v Speaker 2>All right, I'm up for my warm take. If you

0:17:09.150 --> 0:17:11.990
<v Speaker 2>don't like defense, this might not be the NFL season

0:17:12.109 --> 0:17:15.270
<v Speaker 2>for you. You saw it last night, obviously, a defensive battle,

0:17:15.290 --> 0:17:17.330
<v Speaker 2>but the best teams in the league are really focused

0:17:17.369 --> 0:17:20.090
<v Speaker 2>around their defense. I know the Rams have Matthew Stafford,

0:17:20.290 --> 0:17:22.169
<v Speaker 2>but when you've got Aaron Donald and Miles Garrett, you

0:17:22.230 --> 0:17:26.530
<v Speaker 2>are a defensive-oriented team. Philadelphia Eagles have those great players

0:17:26.609 --> 0:17:29.929
<v Speaker 2>up front. They're going to be about the defense. Obviously, Denver,

0:17:30.050 --> 0:17:32.609
<v Speaker 2>one of the top defenses. The Houston Texans could get

0:17:32.630 --> 0:17:35.850
<v Speaker 2>to the Super Bowl with no offense whatsoever. And the

0:17:35.869 --> 0:17:40.570
<v Speaker 2>defending champion, Seattle Seahawks, even with injuries, their defense was dominant. Now,

0:17:40.770 --> 0:17:44.889
<v Speaker 2>I go back to Eagles defensive coordinator Vic Fangio. Fangio

0:17:44.930 --> 0:17:45.540
<v Speaker 2>or Fangio, Paul?

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 4>Fangio, I think.

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:47.419
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I call him Fangio.

0:17:47.460 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Italy.

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:51.359
<v Speaker 2>Italy. He has a shell defense, which basically eliminates big plays.

0:17:51.420 --> 0:17:54.459
<v Speaker 2>So the result has been passing numbers going down, down, down.

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:57.450
<v Speaker 2>Now I have some numbers here for you, Paul. In 2020,

0:17:57.450 --> 0:18:02.899
<v Speaker 2>240 yards per game of passing. Last year, 209. Last night, 178.

0:18:02.900 --> 0:18:06.940
<v Speaker 2>I got to tell you right now, quarterbacks are not adjusting.

0:18:07.070 --> 0:18:10.750
<v Speaker 2>Offenses are not adjusting. One more factor, the kickoff rules.

0:18:11.290 --> 0:18:13.330
<v Speaker 2>You don't want to score too fast because then you're

0:18:13.369 --> 0:18:14.889
<v Speaker 2>giving the other team the ball, the 35 or the 40.

0:18:14.869 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 2>It's all about conservative play. Run-oriented offense. I think that's

0:18:20.580 --> 0:18:23.340
<v Speaker 2>going to be the story of the year. No big

0:18:23.380 --> 0:18:24.820
<v Speaker 2>passing yards at all. I love it.

0:18:24.820 --> 0:18:26.379
<v Speaker 4>You know, I've always loved the running game, and I

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:28.500
<v Speaker 4>think it's interesting at defense. I think having a great

0:18:28.540 --> 0:18:31.500
<v Speaker 4>defense allows you to not necessarily find your quarterback. You

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:34.020
<v Speaker 4>can find a good quarterback, not a great quarterback. Look

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:37.119
<v Speaker 4>at the Seahawks. If you get B-level quarterback play, like

0:18:37.140 --> 0:18:39.590
<v Speaker 4>the Houston Texans, if they can get nice quarterback play

0:18:39.609 --> 0:18:41.030
<v Speaker 4>out of C.J. Stroud this year, they're going to be

0:18:41.070 --> 0:18:43.629
<v Speaker 4>just fine with that defense. The other thing, though, the

0:18:43.710 --> 0:18:45.489
<v Speaker 4>NFL does not like when scoring goes down.

0:18:45.510 --> 0:18:46.390
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I was about to say.

0:18:46.490 --> 0:18:48.350
<v Speaker 4>We'll save this for maybe later in the season or

0:18:48.390 --> 0:18:50.930
<v Speaker 4>for February with the competition committee, but if scoring goes

0:18:50.970 --> 0:18:53.179
<v Speaker 4>down noticeably this year, the NFL will react.

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:55.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, they'll probably do it through officiating, call

0:18:55.900 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 2>more offensive pass, sorry, defensive pass interference. Did you notice

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:02.060
<v Speaker 2>last night's side topic? They called offside on a tush push.

0:19:02.380 --> 0:19:04.550
<v Speaker 2>Seattle had a tush push, and it was completely made up.

0:19:04.619 --> 0:19:06.810
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I looked at it right down the line. Nobody

0:19:06.830 --> 0:19:07.430
<v Speaker 4>was offsides.

0:19:07.490 --> 0:19:09.790
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they're basically saying we don't want the tush push.

0:19:09.910 --> 0:19:12.090
<v Speaker 2>It wasn't even the Philadelphia Eagles. It was the Seahawks.

0:19:12.500 --> 0:19:15.200
<v Speaker 2>But if the NFL wants to change something, they will

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:15.460
<v Speaker 2>do it.

0:19:15.660 --> 0:19:18.290
<v Speaker 4>It does feel like the NFL can't outlaw the tush-push

0:19:18.330 --> 0:19:21.369
<v Speaker 4>because that's like an attack of one team's success, but

0:19:21.390 --> 0:19:23.270
<v Speaker 4>they'll just keep calling it and calling it and calling it.

0:19:23.350 --> 0:19:26.230
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so we'll see. I know a lot of people

0:19:26.290 --> 0:19:28.210
<v Speaker 2>don't like this defense, but I think it is a

0:19:28.250 --> 0:19:29.410
<v Speaker 2>trend and it's not going away.

0:19:29.430 --> 0:19:31.020
<v Speaker 4>All right, we're time for a little game here. We

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:32.399
<v Speaker 4>like to play this a couple times a week. It's

0:19:32.420 --> 0:19:34.119
<v Speaker 4>called Who Said It? You and I, I think, are

0:19:34.140 --> 0:19:37.820
<v Speaker 4>pitching an offer on this game. Who said it? Probably football-related.

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:39.859
<v Speaker 4>Here we go, Perloff. Here's the first one. I'll give

0:19:39.900 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 4>it to you. You go first. He's like a mountain

0:19:42.340 --> 0:19:44.930
<v Speaker 4>lion in a zoo that's just like pacing. I saw

0:19:44.950 --> 0:19:46.530
<v Speaker 4>a mountain lion in a zoo and he was pacing

0:19:46.570 --> 0:19:48.470
<v Speaker 4>back and forth. And I was like, you don't want

0:19:48.530 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 4>to be that boy out to get I'm going to

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:53.359
<v Speaker 4>get not going to be good that's what it reminds

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:54.980
<v Speaker 4>me of okay I had to reread that.

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:57.540
<v Speaker 2>One pacing I'm going to say this is Miles Garrett

0:19:57.580 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 2>talking about his new teammate Aaron Donald in practice like

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:02.460
<v Speaker 2>you don't want to block this guy he's going.

0:20:02.380 --> 0:20:04.020
<v Speaker 4>To be really good I'm going to stay with the

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 4>Rams I think this is Matt Stafford talking about Miles

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:09.500
<v Speaker 4>Garrett okay here we go let's take a look.

0:20:11.270 --> 0:20:14.210
<v Speaker 5>He's like a mountain lion that's in the zoo that's

0:20:14.230 --> 0:20:17.640
<v Speaker 5>just pacing. I saw a mountain lion at the Colorado Zoo.

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:19.780
<v Speaker 5>He was just pacing back and forth. I was like,

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:21.359
<v Speaker 5>y'all don't want that boy to get out. It's not

0:20:21.380 --> 0:20:24.230
<v Speaker 5>going to be good. But that's what Bo reminded me of.

0:20:24.900 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 4>It sure would have helped if we knew it was

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:27.720
<v Speaker 4>Colorado Zoo. That would have narrowed the field down a

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:29.580
<v Speaker 4>little bit. Nice job by our producers hiding that one

0:20:29.619 --> 0:20:29.869
<v Speaker 4>from us.

0:20:30.140 --> 0:20:32.380
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't see it. I like Bo Nix a lot,

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:35.699
<v Speaker 2>but is he a mountain lion? Yeah. He seems more

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 2>of a pleasant animal. Maybe a sheep. Not a sheep, but...

0:20:40.230 --> 0:20:40.909
<v Speaker 2>Maybe a horse.

0:20:41.090 --> 0:20:43.370
<v Speaker 4>Shockingly, we got it wrong again. All right, let's go.

0:20:43.470 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 4>Round two. Who said it?

0:20:44.830 --> 0:20:45.570
<v Speaker 2>Football-related.

0:20:45.630 --> 0:20:48.850
<v Speaker 4>Here we go. Set it up on the screen. I've

0:20:48.890 --> 0:20:51.250
<v Speaker 4>never been a big chip guy. I'm more just I

0:20:51.270 --> 0:20:53.359
<v Speaker 4>don't dwell on the past too much. I see the

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 4>potential that we have. We've had that for a few

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:58.460
<v Speaker 4>years now. Whatever's happened in the past is forgotten.

0:20:58.480 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 6>Oh, okay.

0:20:58.820 --> 0:20:59.899
<v Speaker 4>I got it. Chip on the shoulder?

0:21:00.869 --> 0:21:02.909
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is a team that's gotten close but come

0:21:02.970 --> 0:21:05.490
<v Speaker 2>up short. So it's either the Bills or the Ravens.

0:21:05.550 --> 0:21:07.510
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to go Lamar Jackson, Baltimore quarterback.

0:21:07.530 --> 0:21:09.389
<v Speaker 4>Okay, I'm going to go safety pick here. I'm going

0:21:09.410 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 4>to go Josh Allen. Here we go. Who said this?

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:16.980
<v Speaker 6>I've never been like a big chip guy. I'm more just, man,

0:21:17.420 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 6>I don't dwell on the past too much. I see

0:21:20.619 --> 0:21:23.580
<v Speaker 6>the potential that we have, and we've had that for

0:21:23.619 --> 0:21:28.140
<v Speaker 6>a few years now. So whatever's happened in the past

0:21:28.420 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 6>is forgotten.

0:21:29.980 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we've got to get one of these.

0:21:31.580 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 4>We're not good at this game.

0:21:32.700 --> 0:21:34.980
<v Speaker 2>No, we're already at the NFL season. Do you think

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:36.740
<v Speaker 2>we'll get our first one week five, week six?

0:21:36.859 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 4>I thought you're supposed to have a chip on your shoulder.

0:21:38.540 --> 0:21:40.129
<v Speaker 4>You're supposed to be motivated by something. He's got a

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:42.149
<v Speaker 4>high motor, and then next thing is obvious, you have

0:21:42.170 --> 0:21:42.850
<v Speaker 4>a chip on your shoulder.

0:21:42.930 --> 0:21:45.590
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, it could be a bone deposit, though,

0:21:45.609 --> 0:21:47.350
<v Speaker 2>and you might need surgery for a chip on your shoulder.

0:21:47.369 --> 0:21:49.050
<v Speaker 4>You don't want to scare the Lions fans with that.

0:21:49.070 --> 0:21:50.909
<v Speaker 4>All right, coming up next, we're going to do on

0:21:50.950 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 4>the table some more NFL questions and maybe a little

0:21:53.100 --> 0:21:56.340
<v Speaker 4>bit about Otani and his situation. Stick around. Not so fast.

0:21:56.380 --> 0:21:56.940
<v Speaker 4>Come back in a minute.

0:21:58.109 --> 0:22:01.070
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back. Not so fast. Okay, we got Shohei Otani.

0:22:01.090 --> 0:22:05.179
<v Speaker 2>He goes on the 15-day IL for the Dodgers. This

0:22:05.260 --> 0:22:07.899
<v Speaker 2>is not good, Paul, if you're a Dodgers fan, although

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 2>we've seen him play injured before. What do you make

0:22:11.180 --> 0:22:12.359
<v Speaker 2>of the new designation?

0:22:12.500 --> 0:22:14.830
<v Speaker 4>Now, a couple things here. When did it go from

0:22:15.230 --> 0:22:21.129
<v Speaker 4>IR to IL? Because, you know, DL is the disabled list,

0:22:21.869 --> 0:22:24.949
<v Speaker 4>injured reserve. I still have come to grips with that.

0:22:25.010 --> 0:22:27.929
<v Speaker 4>I'm told it's 2019. Why change that?

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. Is that really a big deal?

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:31.899
<v Speaker 4>Okay, here's the other thing that should be concerning. If

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:33.780
<v Speaker 4>I'm a fan of the Dodgers, they say he's got

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:35.180
<v Speaker 4>arm issues. Is that the elbow?

0:22:35.590 --> 0:22:36.290
<v Speaker 2>Is that the shoulder?

0:22:36.670 --> 0:22:38.719
<v Speaker 4>Can we be a little more specific here? Because... You

0:22:38.740 --> 0:22:40.450
<v Speaker 4>don't necessarily need him as a pitcher. You were talking

0:22:40.470 --> 0:22:42.330
<v Speaker 4>about the rotation there, and they're going to be just fine.

0:22:42.570 --> 0:22:44.990
<v Speaker 2>Dodgers are stacked. Now that everyone's coming back, they do

0:22:45.070 --> 0:22:47.030
<v Speaker 2>not need him as a starter, a specialist.

0:22:47.070 --> 0:22:49.430
<v Speaker 4>So they're managing him as a hitter for the postseason,

0:22:49.450 --> 0:22:50.570
<v Speaker 4>I would think, less than a pitcher.

0:22:50.730 --> 0:22:52.930
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is the first time we've really talked Otani

0:22:52.990 --> 0:22:55.880
<v Speaker 2>on Not So Fast. Paul, I am a believer that

0:22:55.900 --> 0:22:58.060
<v Speaker 2>they should never pitch him. I think he should be

0:22:58.100 --> 0:23:00.020
<v Speaker 2>a hitter for the rest of his career like Babe

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 2>Ruth because the pitching is going to wear down what

0:23:03.300 --> 0:23:05.640
<v Speaker 2>I would say is the best hitter of our generation

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 2>by far.

0:23:06.330 --> 0:23:07.970
<v Speaker 4>I think this is such a quandary because a couple

0:23:08.010 --> 0:23:09.969
<v Speaker 4>years ago when he had the elbow procedure, which was

0:23:10.030 --> 0:23:12.290
<v Speaker 4>not a Tommy John, they said it wasn't a Tommy John.

0:23:12.590 --> 0:23:14.610
<v Speaker 4>They got him back to hit, and he went 50-50,

0:23:14.630 --> 0:23:18.439
<v Speaker 4>50-plus steals and hits. He was the best hitter in

0:23:18.460 --> 0:23:20.260
<v Speaker 4>the baseball and one of the best seasons of all

0:23:20.300 --> 0:23:22.330
<v Speaker 4>time a hitter's ever had. And then they bring him

0:23:22.369 --> 0:23:24.770
<v Speaker 4>back as a pitcher, and now he's a good hitter.

0:23:25.070 --> 0:23:27.130
<v Speaker 4>He's not having an Otani-ish season at the plate.

0:23:27.150 --> 0:23:30.430
<v Speaker 2>Wow, he's hurt. He's clearly not himself. When he's healthy,

0:23:30.490 --> 0:23:32.310
<v Speaker 2>maybe Aaron Judge is better, but he's right there as

0:23:32.330 --> 0:23:33.630
<v Speaker 2>the top hitter.

0:23:33.750 --> 0:23:35.550
<v Speaker 4>We may never know this from Dave Roberts or if

0:23:35.570 --> 0:23:37.250
<v Speaker 4>the people do the contracts with the Dodgers, but do

0:23:37.290 --> 0:23:39.750
<v Speaker 4>you think it's in his contract, Otani, that he pitches

0:23:39.790 --> 0:23:40.250
<v Speaker 4>for the Dodgers?

0:23:40.710 --> 0:23:41.950
<v Speaker 2>That he has a choice, you're saying?

0:23:41.990 --> 0:23:43.710
<v Speaker 4>Yes, that his decision to be a pitcher.

0:23:44.030 --> 0:23:46.750
<v Speaker 2>Oh, man, that would be tough. If you're an organization,

0:23:46.810 --> 0:23:48.310
<v Speaker 2>I guess they didn't really have any leverage because they

0:23:48.390 --> 0:23:50.710
<v Speaker 2>wanted him so badly. But you've got to control what

0:23:50.730 --> 0:23:52.909
<v Speaker 2>position the guy plays. Can you actually put that in

0:23:52.950 --> 0:23:53.430
<v Speaker 2>a contract?

0:23:53.690 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 4>Somehow I think the Dodgers are going to be just

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:57.260
<v Speaker 4>fine because they have four aces ready to go, even

0:23:57.280 --> 0:23:59.100
<v Speaker 4>if he's not ready. We'll keep an eye on that story.

0:23:59.300 --> 0:24:01.180
<v Speaker 4>Let's get back to football, Perloff. Let's play a game

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:03.360
<v Speaker 4>we like to call On the Table. On the Table

0:24:03.380 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 4>or Off the Table. I'll give you the concept. Ooh,

0:24:05.660 --> 0:24:06.260
<v Speaker 4>new graphics.

0:24:06.300 --> 0:24:06.619
<v Speaker 2>Whoa.

0:24:07.619 --> 0:24:09.580
<v Speaker 4>Broke the budget for those graphics. All right, let's go

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:09.959
<v Speaker 4>On the Table.

0:24:09.980 --> 0:24:10.060
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:24:10.830 --> 0:24:12.350
<v Speaker 4>Here we go. Let's say this one. This is a

0:24:12.369 --> 0:24:16.409
<v Speaker 4>little forward thinking of us. Is this Joe Burrow's final

0:24:16.490 --> 0:24:19.430
<v Speaker 4>year with the Bengals? Assuming it doesn't go well.

0:24:19.690 --> 0:24:22.930
<v Speaker 2>Well, obviously, right. It doesn't go well. There is logic there.

0:24:22.990 --> 0:24:26.060
<v Speaker 2>They've put all their chips into this season. They got

0:24:26.100 --> 0:24:28.060
<v Speaker 2>Dexter Lawrence from the Giants, one of the best defensive

0:24:28.100 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 2>tackles in the game. But I don't think so. I

0:24:30.940 --> 0:24:33.700
<v Speaker 2>actually heard a good point from a Cincinnati reporter. Joe

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:36.790
<v Speaker 2>Burrow has never mentioned leaving. We've talked a lot about it.

0:24:36.820 --> 0:24:40.879
<v Speaker 2>We have. We have. Joe Burrow, we have no idea

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:43.490
<v Speaker 2>what he's thinking about Cincinnati. We just look at history.

0:24:43.850 --> 0:24:46.810
<v Speaker 2>Carson Palmer wanted his way out of Cincinnati after about

0:24:46.869 --> 0:24:49.270
<v Speaker 2>eight or nine years. So we were thinking Burrow might

0:24:49.330 --> 0:24:53.310
<v Speaker 2>want the same. Now, the organization's done exactly what he wanted.

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:57.580
<v Speaker 2>They re-signed T. Higgins. Obviously, you have Chase. I'm not

0:24:57.640 --> 0:25:00.340
<v Speaker 2>sure he's quite as unhappy there as we think he is.

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:02.169
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he just seems to be a little more candid

0:25:02.210 --> 0:25:04.250
<v Speaker 4>in press conference, and he kind of wears his emotions

0:25:04.330 --> 0:25:07.129
<v Speaker 4>on his sleeve sometimes after those big losses. But I

0:25:07.170 --> 0:25:09.109
<v Speaker 4>go back to the T. Higgins thing. They spent money

0:25:09.350 --> 0:25:12.340
<v Speaker 4>on a good wide receiver and got him a lot

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:16.180
<v Speaker 4>of missed playoffs there. But the Dexter Lawrence addition shows

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 4>their commitment financially. All the different financial commitments show him

0:25:19.820 --> 0:25:21.440
<v Speaker 4>that they're in. This doesn't feel like the Bengals of

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:22.179
<v Speaker 4>15 years ago.

0:25:22.590 --> 0:25:25.850
<v Speaker 2>No, banality doesn't necessarily loan itself to being a malcontent.

0:25:26.490 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Like a real malcontent, like a wide receiver who's trying

0:25:28.780 --> 0:25:29.670
<v Speaker 2>to get his way out of town.

0:25:29.780 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 4>Okay, next one on the table for you, Perloff. Brock

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:33.659
<v Speaker 4>Bauer is a great tight end for the Raiders. A

0:25:33.900 --> 0:25:36.680
<v Speaker 4>little nicked up, got a little cut on the meniscus

0:25:36.700 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 4>the other day like he's going to super cuts. Will

0:25:39.260 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 4>the Raiders have a winning record?

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:44.879
<v Speaker 2>That is absolutely not on the table. Guaranteed it? Oh,

0:25:44.900 --> 0:25:46.879
<v Speaker 2>my God. Yeah, I will guarantee it. It's not on

0:25:46.900 --> 0:25:48.679
<v Speaker 2>this table. I don't see it anywhere here. How are

0:25:48.700 --> 0:25:49.870
<v Speaker 2>the Raiders going to have a winning record?

0:25:50.470 --> 0:25:52.260
<v Speaker 4>It does seem more than unlikely.

0:25:52.500 --> 0:25:55.380
<v Speaker 2>Yes, so they have no receivers. They have Kirk Cousins

0:25:55.700 --> 0:25:59.060
<v Speaker 2>in his late 30s starting. I don't think the average

0:25:59.100 --> 0:26:01.060
<v Speaker 2>fan can name three or four guys on defense. I

0:26:01.100 --> 0:26:04.340
<v Speaker 2>know Max Crosby is there, but for how long? DP

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:06.139
<v Speaker 2>threw out that maybe he's a cowboy by the end

0:26:06.180 --> 0:26:10.010
<v Speaker 2>of the season. In that division, to me, that's not

0:26:10.050 --> 0:26:12.369
<v Speaker 2>on the table at all. I like what they're building,

0:26:12.710 --> 0:26:13.950
<v Speaker 2>but it's not about this year.

0:26:14.190 --> 0:26:16.550
<v Speaker 4>You have to find one winnable game on that list,

0:26:16.590 --> 0:26:18.270
<v Speaker 4>and it's the Jets, and the Jets by that time

0:26:18.310 --> 0:26:18.929
<v Speaker 4>could be decent.

0:26:18.950 --> 0:26:20.730
<v Speaker 2>Well, they got the Dolphins, too.

0:26:20.790 --> 0:26:21.910
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you're Dolphins.

0:26:22.470 --> 0:26:25.210
<v Speaker 2>Another tanking team. Actually, you know what? And look at

0:26:25.250 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 2>that schedule. Just maybe. It is a last-place schedule. Titans? Yeah,

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:32.300
<v Speaker 2>but to me, the Bowers injury was everything. I cannot

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:36.359
<v Speaker 2>believe their ultimate weapon. Probably the best tight end in

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:38.899
<v Speaker 2>the game. One or two games, but is he 100%

0:26:38.900 --> 0:26:40.270
<v Speaker 2>when he gets back? I mean, they do have other

0:26:40.290 --> 0:26:42.330
<v Speaker 2>tight ends, so it's not the worst position to have

0:26:42.369 --> 0:26:44.409
<v Speaker 2>an injury, but he is their whole offense.

0:26:44.430 --> 0:26:46.369
<v Speaker 4>All right, let's keep skewering negative. We like to do

0:26:46.390 --> 0:26:47.709
<v Speaker 4>that on Not So Fast. All right, Perloff.

0:26:48.090 --> 0:26:48.350
<v Speaker 2>J.J.

0:26:48.369 --> 0:26:51.470
<v Speaker 4>McCarthy is now third string for the Vikings, not second string.

0:26:51.869 --> 0:26:53.790
<v Speaker 4>You do that because you don't want to see him

0:26:53.850 --> 0:26:55.170
<v Speaker 4>on the field. When you put him at third string,

0:26:55.190 --> 0:26:58.120
<v Speaker 4>that's like he's basically inactive for the game unless there's

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:00.379
<v Speaker 4>double injuries. What does that say about his future?

0:27:00.859 --> 0:27:04.460
<v Speaker 2>It is not long in Minnesota. You know, it's funny.

0:27:05.180 --> 0:27:07.780
<v Speaker 2>I rooted for J.J. McCarthy. I love Kevin O'Connell, the

0:27:07.820 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 2>coach there. You could see that marriage was not working

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:12.420
<v Speaker 2>at all. I bet you they shopped him for a

0:27:12.460 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 2>sixth or seventh round pick this offseason. After the season

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:17.879
<v Speaker 2>is over, unless he comes in and really does something,

0:27:18.380 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 2>I think they find a way to part ways. Even

0:27:20.020 --> 0:27:21.880
<v Speaker 2>though they'll have him under contract at his rookie deal

0:27:22.180 --> 0:27:25.990
<v Speaker 2>for a little bit longer, you can tell just in preseason,

0:27:26.030 --> 0:27:28.149
<v Speaker 2>you saw that fastball he just threw there in the highlight.

0:27:28.650 --> 0:27:30.750
<v Speaker 2>He is not the right guy for that system. I

0:27:30.770 --> 0:27:32.330
<v Speaker 2>don't know why they didn't figure it out before.

0:27:32.670 --> 0:27:35.010
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it does feel like his career is elsewhere. And financially,

0:27:35.030 --> 0:27:36.490
<v Speaker 4>they can keep him on the roster for as long

0:27:36.510 --> 0:27:38.150
<v Speaker 4>as they want until they get some type of offer.

0:27:38.490 --> 0:27:40.870
<v Speaker 4>I wonder if they're hoping that, not hoping, but looking

0:27:40.890 --> 0:27:43.230
<v Speaker 4>for an opportunity where another team has a series of

0:27:43.270 --> 0:27:45.950
<v Speaker 4>injuries at the quarterback position and has to find some depth.

0:27:46.150 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you know how I feel about Carson Wentz,

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:50.060
<v Speaker 2>the backup. I still think Carson Wentz is a good

0:27:50.080 --> 0:27:52.340
<v Speaker 2>enough quarterback to win some games in the NFL. I

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:55.180
<v Speaker 2>am a little worried about Kyler Murray. Can he stay healthy?

0:27:55.200 --> 0:27:57.100
<v Speaker 2>So we'll see if the backups in Minnesota get some play.

0:27:57.119 --> 0:27:59.880
<v Speaker 4>All right, this is very mean-spirited by our production team here.

0:27:59.940 --> 0:28:02.900
<v Speaker 4>Here's the next one for On the Table. Tua plays

0:28:02.980 --> 0:28:07.030
<v Speaker 4>past week one with the Falcons. Wow, geez, that's Oh, boy.

0:28:08.040 --> 0:28:10.179
<v Speaker 2>Obviously, is this referring to Mike Tomlin?

0:28:10.619 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 4>We're going to get to that. But generally, do you

0:28:12.859 --> 0:28:15.820
<v Speaker 4>think Tua will earn another week or stay healthy for

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:16.260
<v Speaker 4>another week?

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:20.790
<v Speaker 2>So I think it's on the table that they pull

0:28:20.810 --> 0:28:22.690
<v Speaker 2>him after one week and they go to Michael Penix.

0:28:23.070 --> 0:28:23.830
<v Speaker 2>That being said.

0:28:23.850 --> 0:28:24.369
<v Speaker 4>Health related.

0:28:24.670 --> 0:28:28.230
<v Speaker 2>Health related. No, I mean for Penix. Right, right. That

0:28:28.250 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 2>being said, Penix, four days before the season says I'm

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:34.450
<v Speaker 2>not 100%. Can you get 100% in 10 days?

0:28:34.540 --> 0:28:36.500
<v Speaker 4>I never had 100% in school. This is your thing.

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 4>So tell me, how can you do that?

0:28:37.700 --> 0:28:40.620
<v Speaker 2>I think Atlanta wants to see more of Tua. And

0:28:40.660 --> 0:28:43.900
<v Speaker 2>it's not about Tua. Tua will be somewhere between okay

0:28:43.940 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 2>and bad.

0:28:44.380 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 4>So stopgap quarterback?

0:28:45.940 --> 0:28:48.140
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I just think they're not ready to go with Penix.

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:50.060
<v Speaker 2>Because if they were, they would have pushed him out

0:28:50.100 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 2>there week one. I think you need a month to

0:28:52.300 --> 0:28:53.420
<v Speaker 2>get Penix where he wants to be.

0:28:53.420 --> 0:28:55.700
<v Speaker 4>All right, you referenced Mike Tomlin, who made his debut

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:59.719
<v Speaker 4>on NBC Sports yesterday. And Tomlin... was asked about Aaron Rodgers,

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:02.240
<v Speaker 4>who faces Tua in week one. And here's what Mike

0:29:02.280 --> 0:29:04.100
<v Speaker 4>Tomlin had to say about Tua. Not so good.

0:29:04.860 --> 0:29:06.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's less about Aaron for me, and it's

0:29:06.540 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>more about the quarterback on the other side. His last

0:29:09.270 --> 0:29:11.650
<v Speaker 1>visit to Pittsburgh didn't go well. I was in the

0:29:11.670 --> 0:29:12.550
<v Speaker 1>stadium that day.

0:29:13.110 --> 0:29:13.690
<v Speaker 2>They lost.

0:29:13.730 --> 0:29:15.730
<v Speaker 1>He got benched. And so I think it's going to

0:29:15.750 --> 0:29:18.970
<v Speaker 1>be a good day for Mike McCarthy, Patrick Graham, and

0:29:18.990 --> 0:29:21.030
<v Speaker 1>the Pittsburgh Steelers and company. I'm going to pull a Devin.

0:29:21.150 --> 0:29:22.750
<v Speaker 4>Mike, I have something to do with that.

0:29:22.770 --> 0:29:23.470
<v Speaker 5>I've got a little.

0:29:23.310 --> 0:29:24.030
<v Speaker 2>Something to say here.

0:29:24.050 --> 0:29:24.850
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to pull a Devin.

0:29:24.870 --> 0:29:25.890
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to go with the Steelers.

0:29:26.330 --> 0:29:28.100
<v Speaker 4>Coach Tomlin said it with a smile on his face.

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 4>That was an assault.

0:29:29.460 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, but it is a little bit of

0:29:31.420 --> 0:29:34.780
<v Speaker 2>Steelers hyperbole, though. He still has black and gold in

0:29:34.820 --> 0:29:35.220
<v Speaker 2>his blood.

0:29:35.330 --> 0:29:37.830
<v Speaker 4>He just said that quarterback for Atlanta, he got pulled

0:29:37.870 --> 0:29:38.660
<v Speaker 4>last time I saw him.

0:29:38.670 --> 0:29:42.170
<v Speaker 2>That's horrible. Okay, I'm going to defend Tua. Tua was

0:29:42.190 --> 0:29:44.340
<v Speaker 2>a good quarterback at one point. Everyone seems to forget

0:29:44.380 --> 0:29:44.780
<v Speaker 2>that part.

0:29:44.950 --> 0:29:46.730
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he had that one year, I think it was 2023,

0:29:46.720 --> 0:29:49.420
<v Speaker 4>where it looked like he recovered his career, the injuries

0:29:49.460 --> 0:29:51.780
<v Speaker 4>had gone away, and he was just dialing. They had Waddell,

0:29:51.840 --> 0:29:54.300
<v Speaker 4>they had Hill, they had McDaniel. Everything was going well.

0:29:55.300 --> 0:29:58.420
<v Speaker 2>Fired coaches have to say the team they last were

0:29:58.530 --> 0:30:01.270
<v Speaker 2>on is going to be really good. The Bills coach,

0:30:01.310 --> 0:30:03.570
<v Speaker 2>Sean McDermott, former Bills coach, said the Bills are going

0:30:03.590 --> 0:30:05.370
<v Speaker 2>to finally win the Super Bowl with him out of

0:30:05.390 --> 0:30:07.330
<v Speaker 2>the building. Now, I don't think he really wants that

0:30:07.350 --> 0:30:10.430
<v Speaker 2>to happen necessarily, but Tomlin, I think, was thinking he's

0:30:10.470 --> 0:30:13.420
<v Speaker 2>a Steelers guy there. That being said, no one's excited

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 2>for Tua.

0:30:13.780 --> 0:30:15.479
<v Speaker 4>All right, that is a little on the table. We'll

0:30:15.500 --> 0:30:17.340
<v Speaker 4>do some more football coming up. But this is called

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:19.540
<v Speaker 4>the rando, some random topic that drops in our lap.

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:21.300
<v Speaker 4>The other guy doesn't know it's coming. I was in

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:22.860
<v Speaker 4>Chicago the other day, and a buddy of mine is

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:25.900
<v Speaker 4>redoing this, like, man cave, rec room downstairs, and he's

0:30:25.940 --> 0:30:28.330
<v Speaker 4>building a bathroom from scratch. He goes, you know what

0:30:28.350 --> 0:30:29.770
<v Speaker 4>I'm doing, Paul? He goes, I'm going to put a

0:30:29.890 --> 0:30:32.170
<v Speaker 4>urinal in here, like the stand-up urinals that you'd see

0:30:32.210 --> 0:30:34.870
<v Speaker 4>at a bar back in the day. Is this approved,

0:30:34.940 --> 0:30:36.290
<v Speaker 4>not approved by Not So Fast?

0:30:36.950 --> 0:30:39.450
<v Speaker 2>I am a strong approval. In fact, that's one of

0:30:39.490 --> 0:30:42.790
<v Speaker 2>my dreams, to have a urinal in your bathroom. Right.

0:30:43.250 --> 0:30:44.190
<v Speaker 2>It's so much less work.

0:30:44.430 --> 0:30:46.430
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you could go in and out and probably not

0:30:46.470 --> 0:30:47.830
<v Speaker 4>even miss an entire commercial break.

0:30:47.930 --> 0:30:50.260
<v Speaker 2>And you don't leave the seat up or down. Your

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:51.170
<v Speaker 2>wife's not going to care.

0:30:51.300 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 4>Very man-friendly. Now, you have to run that past the wife,

0:30:53.960 --> 0:30:56.020
<v Speaker 4>I'm assuming, at some juncture in the building process.

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, I'm not sure she would like it. Now,

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:01.300
<v Speaker 2>can you also have wings and everything else that goes

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:02.580
<v Speaker 2>with a sports bar in your house?

0:31:02.700 --> 0:31:05.970
<v Speaker 4>You could have a drop basket of wings. That'd be fantastic.

0:31:06.110 --> 0:31:08.430
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, I would love it. Are you pro or con?

0:31:08.810 --> 0:31:11.150
<v Speaker 4>You know, I worry sometimes about sanitation, you know, like

0:31:11.210 --> 0:31:13.170
<v Speaker 4>how sanitary it is. You know, me as a Cubs fan,

0:31:13.190 --> 0:31:15.140
<v Speaker 4>I'd rather have a trough, a full trough so the

0:31:15.180 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 4>bros can get into it. But yeah, I would love

0:31:17.340 --> 0:31:17.860
<v Speaker 4>a urinal.

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 2>At the house. Okay. So we're approving not so fast

0:31:21.380 --> 0:31:25.030
<v Speaker 2>as Urinals in the house are acceptable. All right, coming up,

0:31:25.550 --> 0:31:29.030
<v Speaker 2>we have a new segment called Superloftives. We're going to

0:31:29.050 --> 0:31:32.690
<v Speaker 2>look at some big statements for the NFL season, including

0:31:33.120 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 2>the one-off season move that we forgot to talk about.

0:31:35.500 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 2>We'll get into that next. Not so fast.

0:31:42.300 --> 0:31:46.060
<v Speaker 7>What's it like when the backup quarterback comes in and

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:50.580
<v Speaker 7>how your job may change, like Seattle's offensive line last night?

0:31:51.820 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 8>Well, playing for 20 quarterbacks during my NFL career, I'm

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:57.860
<v Speaker 8>not sure I know what it's like when the starting quarterback.

0:31:57.420 --> 0:31:57.980
<v Speaker 2>Is in there.

0:31:58.540 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 8>But let me put my hat on here as an

0:32:01.780 --> 0:32:05.020
<v Speaker 8>analyst and just think about it. It makes you very concerned, right?

0:32:05.060 --> 0:32:08.770
<v Speaker 8>Because as a tackle, now I'm not exactly sure where

0:32:08.810 --> 0:32:10.590
<v Speaker 8>that quarterback is going to be. I know where he's

0:32:10.610 --> 0:32:13.910
<v Speaker 8>supposed to be, but every quarterback, because of height and

0:32:13.930 --> 0:32:15.930
<v Speaker 8>different body measurements, is going to end up at a

0:32:15.950 --> 0:32:18.190
<v Speaker 8>different spot in their drop. And some guys, especially if

0:32:18.210 --> 0:32:20.190
<v Speaker 8>they're shorter... They like to be a little bit deeper.

0:32:20.230 --> 0:32:22.150
<v Speaker 8>They like to scramble. They like to step up maybe

0:32:22.170 --> 0:32:24.570
<v Speaker 8>a little bit more. And so having reps with a

0:32:24.610 --> 0:32:27.340
<v Speaker 8>backup is really important so that I have an understanding

0:32:27.660 --> 0:32:29.820
<v Speaker 8>of where he's going to be on any given pass

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 8>protection because I don't have eyes in the back of

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 8>my head.

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:36.260
<v Speaker 4>Back on Not So Fast, Paps and Furlough, NBC Sports Now.

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:39.230
<v Speaker 4>That was unintentionally my favorite moment of the day. Dan

0:32:39.290 --> 0:32:41.970
<v Speaker 4>asking Joe Thomas just casually about playing with a backup quarterback.

0:32:42.030 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 4>And Joe Thomas saying... Most of the time I did

0:32:43.940 --> 0:32:45.020
<v Speaker 4>play with backup quarterbacks.

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:46.780
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I wonder if you can name all of them.

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:48.780
<v Speaker 2>By the way, Joe Thomas is the man. Can we

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:52.110
<v Speaker 2>just state that right now? His post-playing career, he's at

0:32:52.210 --> 0:32:54.310
<v Speaker 2>Hall of Fame Farms. He looks like a farmer, but

0:32:54.350 --> 0:32:55.090
<v Speaker 2>he's so cool.

0:32:55.150 --> 0:32:57.170
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he's dropped like 50 pounds. He's completely jacked.

0:32:57.390 --> 0:32:59.970
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, he is right. He did not have

0:33:00.030 --> 0:33:00.870
<v Speaker 2>steady quarterback play.

0:33:00.970 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 4>Okay, I got a list of backup quarterbacks. It feels

0:33:02.940 --> 0:33:05.420
<v Speaker 4>like Seattle's in pretty good shape as backup quarterbacks. I

0:33:05.460 --> 0:33:09.020
<v Speaker 4>have some other high-end backup situations. My backup quarterback rankings

0:33:09.060 --> 0:33:11.320
<v Speaker 4>list drops tomorrow. I'm going to tease this a little bit.

0:33:11.870 --> 0:33:14.220
<v Speaker 4>Tyson Bajan with the Bears. He's kind of a hot property.

0:33:14.260 --> 0:33:16.140
<v Speaker 2>Oh, and Case Keenan behind him, my guy.

0:33:16.260 --> 0:33:19.140
<v Speaker 4>Well, you know what's funny? That's a great third-string quarterback.

0:33:19.180 --> 0:33:22.270
<v Speaker 4>I hope he never plays. Joe Flacco with the Bengals.

0:33:22.770 --> 0:33:25.170
<v Speaker 4>Tyrod Taylor with the Packers. That's a nice guy to have.

0:33:25.710 --> 0:33:26.850
<v Speaker 4>Davis Mills with the Texans.

0:33:27.750 --> 0:33:30.510
<v Speaker 2>Oh, you know what? Too threatening? I don't even know

0:33:30.530 --> 0:33:33.090
<v Speaker 2>if he's threatening enough because Texas can win the Super Bowl.

0:33:33.230 --> 0:33:35.450
<v Speaker 2>We've seen Davis Mills high end. I know there are

0:33:35.490 --> 0:33:37.830
<v Speaker 2>Davis Mills-ites out there. I'm not one of them.

0:33:37.850 --> 0:33:40.310
<v Speaker 4>I am one of them lightly. Justin Fields with the Chiefs.

0:33:40.470 --> 0:33:42.450
<v Speaker 4>I don't want to see him play because that means

0:33:42.520 --> 0:33:44.740
<v Speaker 4>something happened, but I kind of want to see him play.

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, apparently Andy Reid doesn't want to see him play

0:33:46.860 --> 0:33:47.720
<v Speaker 2>because he's going to Holmes.

0:33:47.980 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 4>Rams have Stetson Bennett, unproven, but a veteran.

0:33:50.860 --> 0:33:51.620
<v Speaker 2>And Ty Simpson.

0:33:51.740 --> 0:33:54.100
<v Speaker 4>Ty Simpson, who I think they have third string, so

0:33:54.500 --> 0:33:56.640
<v Speaker 4>he doesn't play week one with a little ankle spur.

0:33:57.360 --> 0:34:00.460
<v Speaker 4>The Vikings have Carson Wentz, your boy. And the 49ers

0:34:00.500 --> 0:34:03.480
<v Speaker 4>have Mac Jones, who might be the highest of high second-stringers.

0:34:03.600 --> 0:34:06.220
<v Speaker 2>He's probably the 33rd best quarterback in the NFL.

0:34:06.240 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, there's some teams that would probably take Mac Jones.

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:10.009
<v Speaker 4>If he didn't have a two-year contract with the Niners,

0:34:10.070 --> 0:34:11.910
<v Speaker 4>I think people would have made plays for Mac Jones.

0:34:12.030 --> 0:34:16.350
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's another resuscitation project for Kyle Shanahan. Now, I

0:34:16.390 --> 0:34:19.390
<v Speaker 2>know my backups, but that being said, you really don't

0:34:19.410 --> 0:34:21.810
<v Speaker 2>want a quarterback injury early in the season. You've got

0:34:21.830 --> 0:34:23.090
<v Speaker 2>to have a guy who can fill in late. But

0:34:23.110 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 2>the plan is never, like, you don't want to see

0:34:25.140 --> 0:34:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Tyson Badgen in Chicago playing. in week two.

0:34:27.340 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 4>No, but you also want to look at being prepared.

0:34:29.120 --> 0:34:31.299
<v Speaker 4>Like the Chiefs last year, you didn't know Mahomes was

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:32.980
<v Speaker 4>going to be down, but they didn't have a situation

0:34:33.000 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 4>in place because they had a couple backups hurt. All right,

0:34:35.100 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 4>let's get to the next thing. We talked about Drake

0:34:37.060 --> 0:34:39.140
<v Speaker 4>Bay yesterday. Not a good game. Three picks in the

0:34:39.180 --> 0:34:41.469
<v Speaker 4>fourth quarter. Getting back to the game, here's what he

0:34:41.489 --> 0:34:42.610
<v Speaker 4>had to say about his performance.

0:34:44.750 --> 0:34:49.049
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, lost patience and cost of this. I think just

0:34:49.090 --> 0:34:52.350
<v Speaker 7>decisions that cost us the game on my part and

0:34:52.430 --> 0:34:56.170
<v Speaker 7>my end. I've asked myself to to be better and

0:34:56.210 --> 0:34:57.650
<v Speaker 7>realize it's, you know, it's a long season, but at

0:34:57.670 --> 0:34:59.509
<v Speaker 7>the same time, you can't have those, you can't have those.

0:34:59.550 --> 0:35:02.810
<v Speaker 7>And it's unacceptable. And I know that, uh, you're getting

0:35:02.830 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 7>back to work because, you know, that wasn't, you know,

0:35:05.660 --> 0:35:08.339
<v Speaker 7>how I play football and how I want to represent, um,

0:35:08.360 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 7>you know, my game and, and, you know, playing quarterback

0:35:10.060 --> 0:35:10.460
<v Speaker 7>for Patriots.

0:35:11.620 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 2>You can actually see, Paul, Drake may lose his patience

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:16.020
<v Speaker 2>in real time. He started taking these shots downfield. He

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:18.650
<v Speaker 2>definitely did not need to do it. But he's a

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:21.610
<v Speaker 2>big guy. He's a confident guy. Maybe he was just bored.

0:35:21.630 --> 0:35:25.130
<v Speaker 2>The underneath stuff, he was incredible. The underneath stuff, he

0:35:25.150 --> 0:35:28.250
<v Speaker 2>hit every pass. But he was 0 for 4 on

0:35:28.290 --> 0:35:31.560
<v Speaker 2>passes over 20 yards with bad, bad results. I think

0:35:31.600 --> 0:35:33.339
<v Speaker 2>he wanted to prove something last night. He thinks he's

0:35:33.380 --> 0:35:36.880
<v Speaker 2>an elite quarterback. and he spoke about it right there.

0:35:37.340 --> 0:35:38.600
<v Speaker 2>He got impatient.

0:35:38.840 --> 0:35:40.690
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I think he got impatient. He got frustrated. I

0:35:40.730 --> 0:35:43.529
<v Speaker 4>think after the Dobbs drop, he tried to force the

0:35:43.590 --> 0:35:46.230
<v Speaker 4>next one in, and he threw a laser, but he

0:35:46.250 --> 0:35:47.569
<v Speaker 4>threw it about 5 feet too high, and he got

0:35:47.590 --> 0:35:47.930
<v Speaker 4>picked off.

0:35:48.230 --> 0:35:50.819
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, now you get to the Patriots' schedule

0:35:50.840 --> 0:35:54.279
<v Speaker 2>from last year. Is he great against bad teams, and

0:35:54.300 --> 0:35:56.700
<v Speaker 2>can he play against the good teams? There's a lot

0:35:56.739 --> 0:35:57.879
<v Speaker 2>to be determined there. It's weird.

0:35:57.940 --> 0:35:59.960
<v Speaker 4>He does not feel like a guy who just played

0:35:59.980 --> 0:36:00.460
<v Speaker 4>in the Super Bowl.

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:03.840
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's go to the other side, Seattle. JSN,

0:36:04.140 --> 0:36:07.319
<v Speaker 2>amazing again last night. Offensive player of the year from

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:09.259
<v Speaker 2>last year. We'll see if he can do it with

0:36:09.280 --> 0:36:11.580
<v Speaker 2>a backup quarterback. He talked about losing Sam Darnold.

0:36:13.700 --> 0:36:16.580
<v Speaker 3>It's tough losing 14. I mean, he's the head of

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:19.300
<v Speaker 3>the snake. But we have each other's backs, like I said.

0:36:19.460 --> 0:36:22.700
<v Speaker 3>You know, we fully trust in Drew Locke to come

0:36:22.760 --> 0:36:25.320
<v Speaker 3>in and do his thing. Done it time and time again.

0:36:25.380 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 3>So we just have to have each other's back, like

0:36:28.719 --> 0:36:31.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm saying, and play. And like I said, I'm just

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:33.200
<v Speaker 3>super proud of everybody.

0:36:34.260 --> 0:36:37.400
<v Speaker 4>That's a veteran maneuver there by JSN. You completely compliment

0:36:37.440 --> 0:36:40.620
<v Speaker 4>Sam Darnold and then pivot and completely compliment Drew Locke.

0:36:40.900 --> 0:36:43.620
<v Speaker 4>Because you have to think, I may be playing with

0:36:43.719 --> 0:36:45.100
<v Speaker 4>one of these guys next week. I don't know what.

0:36:45.160 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 4>You've got to be completely complimentary of both guys.

0:36:47.440 --> 0:36:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely. He's a veteran. He knows what he's doing.

0:36:50.390 --> 0:36:52.129
<v Speaker 2>But if you told me when Sam Darnold got hurt

0:36:52.230 --> 0:36:54.270
<v Speaker 2>that JSN was going to go for 122 yards, that

0:36:54.330 --> 0:36:58.509
<v Speaker 2>was an unbelievable performance. He saved Drew Locke.

0:36:58.570 --> 0:37:01.759
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think that's smart by Drew Locke. Target JSN

0:37:01.940 --> 0:37:04.150
<v Speaker 4>and good things will happen. You're not going to throw interceptions.

0:37:04.170 --> 0:37:05.920
<v Speaker 4>That guy is almost always open or he's going to

0:37:05.940 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 4>make a play for the ball. And you know it's

0:37:07.700 --> 0:37:09.620
<v Speaker 4>a bit funny if JSN got up there and said, hey, man,

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:11.279
<v Speaker 4>as long as I'm healthy, we're going to be just

0:37:11.320 --> 0:37:12.839
<v Speaker 4>fine because that's what everyone really thinks.

0:37:13.010 --> 0:37:15.150
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, maybe, maybe. I don't know if that's true because

0:37:15.170 --> 0:37:17.370
<v Speaker 2>I would double-team JSN. But then Cooper Cupp is out

0:37:17.390 --> 0:37:21.230
<v Speaker 2>there making one-handed catches. Wait, by the way, this is

0:37:21.250 --> 0:37:22.910
<v Speaker 2>a side topic here. What did you think of their rookie,

0:37:22.930 --> 0:37:24.750
<v Speaker 2>Jadarian Price, for Seattle?

0:37:24.790 --> 0:37:26.669
<v Speaker 4>You know, I like Jadarian Price. I had the over.

0:37:26.730 --> 0:37:29.010
<v Speaker 4>He had 52 yards. I had 51 and a half.

0:37:29.660 --> 0:37:30.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh, there you go.

0:37:30.300 --> 0:37:32.900
<v Speaker 4>Just got that in. I think Jadarian Price, Chris Collinsworth

0:37:32.940 --> 0:37:35.839
<v Speaker 4>mentioned Jadarian Price in the preseason, in the pregame and said,

0:37:36.170 --> 0:37:38.060
<v Speaker 4>He didn't get any run in the preseason, so they

0:37:38.080 --> 0:37:40.379
<v Speaker 4>may work him in lightly. But he averaged six yards

0:37:40.440 --> 0:37:42.210
<v Speaker 4>a carry in college. He felt like he was on

0:37:42.230 --> 0:37:45.130
<v Speaker 4>the cusp of breaking one last night. Again, we predicted

0:37:45.150 --> 0:37:46.609
<v Speaker 4>him to be Rookie of the Year. When I say we,

0:37:46.670 --> 0:37:47.049
<v Speaker 4>I mean me.

0:37:47.330 --> 0:37:49.969
<v Speaker 2>All right. So we had a game last night and

0:37:49.989 --> 0:37:51.410
<v Speaker 2>we have a second game tonight. I think we could

0:37:51.450 --> 0:37:53.690
<v Speaker 2>still do season preview stuff, Paul. Are we allowed?

0:37:53.890 --> 0:37:55.290
<v Speaker 4>Is it time for Superloftives?

0:37:55.370 --> 0:38:00.410
<v Speaker 2>I think it's time for Superloftives. Let's go. It's catching

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:02.109
<v Speaker 2>fire around the nation here.

0:38:02.219 --> 0:38:03.700
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think a lot of people, like a lot

0:38:03.719 --> 0:38:05.700
<v Speaker 4>of players, want to get a Superloftives. I could feel

0:38:05.739 --> 0:38:06.400
<v Speaker 4>them calling for it.

0:38:06.500 --> 0:38:08.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I haven't gotten those calls yet. I must have

0:38:08.860 --> 0:38:12.680
<v Speaker 2>been busy. All right, first Superloftive. Who is the first

0:38:12.780 --> 0:38:16.140
<v Speaker 2>quarterback to get the hook this season? Now, earlier in

0:38:16.160 --> 0:38:18.719
<v Speaker 2>the show, we were talking about Tua at Atlanta. I

0:38:18.760 --> 0:38:21.320
<v Speaker 2>don't think it's him. I think it's in Cleveland. I

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:24.750
<v Speaker 2>think Deshaun Watson has a real chance of getting pulled

0:38:25.270 --> 0:38:28.410
<v Speaker 2>after two weeks, Paul. Look at the schedule. At Jacksonville,

0:38:29.010 --> 0:38:32.009
<v Speaker 2>at the Bucs. Now, if Cleveland goes 0-2 and loses

0:38:32.070 --> 0:38:34.950
<v Speaker 2>both those games and Watson plays poorly, like he did

0:38:34.989 --> 0:38:37.270
<v Speaker 2>in the preseason, like he did the last time we

0:38:37.310 --> 0:38:39.630
<v Speaker 2>saw him on the field, then I think you try

0:38:39.650 --> 0:38:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Shador in Week 3, which is a home game against

0:38:42.219 --> 0:38:46.160
<v Speaker 2>the Panthers. Here's the thing. Week 4, Thursday night game

0:38:46.280 --> 0:38:49.040
<v Speaker 2>against the Steelers. So if it's a Thursday night game,

0:38:49.280 --> 0:38:52.310
<v Speaker 2>you can't immediately put Shador in after three days of rest.

0:38:53.110 --> 0:38:54.870
<v Speaker 2>I think they really look at week two. I think

0:38:54.890 --> 0:38:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Deshaun's in trouble because I don't expect the Browns to

0:38:57.600 --> 0:38:58.219
<v Speaker 2>do well in these games.

0:38:58.260 --> 0:38:59.540
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm with you on this one. I think it's

0:38:59.560 --> 0:39:01.540
<v Speaker 4>going to be a short leash on this one. The

0:39:01.560 --> 0:39:03.520
<v Speaker 4>superlative is the only thing he's going to win this year.

0:39:03.580 --> 0:39:06.020
<v Speaker 4>I think he starts the month of September, goes 0-4,

0:39:06.340 --> 0:39:07.339
<v Speaker 4>and the experiment is over.

0:39:07.920 --> 0:39:09.460
<v Speaker 2>I like it. I mean, he's got a lot of money,

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:13.219
<v Speaker 2>so he'll be okay. All right, my second superlative, the

0:39:13.280 --> 0:39:15.989
<v Speaker 2>player that you and I and the rest of NFL

0:39:16.010 --> 0:39:19.650
<v Speaker 2>Nation forgot to talk about enough this offseason, that is

0:39:19.830 --> 0:39:23.549
<v Speaker 2>Trey Hendrickson in Baltimore. Now, you're seeing the Ravens as

0:39:23.590 --> 0:39:26.730
<v Speaker 2>a popular Super Bowl pick. It's got to be better

0:39:26.930 --> 0:39:30.490
<v Speaker 2>on defense, and Trey Hendrickson was sort of the consolation. prize.

0:39:30.810 --> 0:39:33.029
<v Speaker 2>They traded for Max Crosby. That guy called off for

0:39:33.070 --> 0:39:36.340
<v Speaker 2>medical reason. Hendrickson comes over. I think he is a

0:39:36.500 --> 0:39:39.670
<v Speaker 2>great pass rusher. On a really bad Cincinnati defense, he

0:39:39.710 --> 0:39:41.210
<v Speaker 2>always stood out to me. I think he's going to

0:39:41.250 --> 0:39:43.450
<v Speaker 2>make a lot of noise in Baltimore. And if you

0:39:43.489 --> 0:39:45.670
<v Speaker 2>pick the Ravens for the Super Bowl, it's got to

0:39:45.690 --> 0:39:48.110
<v Speaker 2>be in part because of Trey Hendrickson. But, Paul, you

0:39:48.150 --> 0:39:49.910
<v Speaker 2>and I have not done a lot of Trey Hendrickson.

0:39:49.930 --> 0:39:52.149
<v Speaker 4>No, we haven't chopped him up yet. It's more about

0:39:52.250 --> 0:39:55.760
<v Speaker 4>us than him. He had back-to-back seasons of 17.5 sacks

0:39:55.800 --> 0:39:59.239
<v Speaker 4>a couple years ago. He's perpetually underrated by playing. It's

0:39:59.300 --> 0:40:02.440
<v Speaker 4>weird because he was the only defender you knew. Remember

0:40:02.460 --> 0:40:03.779
<v Speaker 4>Geno Atkins years ago?

0:40:03.800 --> 0:40:04.239
<v Speaker 3>Oh, yeah.

0:40:04.360 --> 0:40:05.299
<v Speaker 2>That's a long time ago now.

0:40:05.320 --> 0:40:06.839
<v Speaker 4>I know, but he was Pro Bowl like seven times

0:40:06.860 --> 0:40:08.560
<v Speaker 4>in a row. He got no run with the Bengals.

0:40:08.820 --> 0:40:10.990
<v Speaker 4>And now it's him. Trey Henderson gets no run. He'll

0:40:11.010 --> 0:40:12.310
<v Speaker 4>get some run when he makes a statement here.

0:40:12.370 --> 0:40:13.930
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and by the way, we need to get back

0:40:13.969 --> 0:40:16.990
<v Speaker 2>to that vicious Ravens defense. It can't be all Lamar

0:40:17.030 --> 0:40:19.009
<v Speaker 2>all the time. If they want to win again, and

0:40:19.070 --> 0:40:20.550
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people expect them to, it's got to

0:40:20.570 --> 0:40:21.029
<v Speaker 2>be with the defense.

0:40:21.070 --> 0:40:22.149
<v Speaker 4>Any excuse to mention Ed Reed.

0:40:22.650 --> 0:40:27.940
<v Speaker 2>Okay, my last superloftive non-skill player... with the biggest impact

0:40:28.000 --> 0:40:30.460
<v Speaker 2>this season. So that means no quarterbacks, no wide receivers,

0:40:30.500 --> 0:40:32.160
<v Speaker 2>no running backs. And I'm not even going to give

0:40:32.180 --> 0:40:33.899
<v Speaker 2>you a pass rusher. I don't want to hear about

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:36.739
<v Speaker 2>Micah Parsons and Aiden Hutchinson. I want a lineman. And

0:40:36.760 --> 0:40:40.030
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be Eagles right tackle Lane Johnson.

0:40:40.070 --> 0:40:40.410
<v Speaker 5>Wow.

0:40:40.650 --> 0:40:42.630
<v Speaker 2>It's really weird for a team with all these stars

0:40:42.930 --> 0:40:45.250
<v Speaker 2>to have a right tackle be their MVP. But I'm

0:40:45.270 --> 0:40:48.170
<v Speaker 2>telling you right now, on the field, he's huge. But

0:40:48.230 --> 0:40:50.469
<v Speaker 2>when he is out, which has been a little bit

0:40:50.510 --> 0:40:53.530
<v Speaker 2>too much in recent years, The Eagles lose their confidence.

0:40:53.630 --> 0:40:56.380
<v Speaker 2>He's a mountain of a man. When you're at Eagles practice,

0:40:56.700 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 2>he will block the sun. You don't need sunscreen when

0:40:58.580 --> 0:41:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Lane Johnson's around. And they are just so much better. Sorry,

0:41:02.940 --> 0:41:04.279
<v Speaker 2>I don't have the exact number of what they are

0:41:04.320 --> 0:41:05.780
<v Speaker 2>without him, but I know it's bad, Paul.

0:41:05.820 --> 0:41:08.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I would co-sign that without looking up. They're bad

0:41:08.219 --> 0:41:10.969
<v Speaker 4>when Lane Johnson's not there. He's fantastic. And if you

0:41:10.989 --> 0:41:13.290
<v Speaker 4>look at how the Eagles were built over the years,

0:41:13.370 --> 0:41:15.790
<v Speaker 4>Dennis Kell, all those different players on the offensive line,

0:41:15.870 --> 0:41:18.730
<v Speaker 4>Fletcher Cox in the defensive line, They win with those

0:41:18.770 --> 0:41:20.690
<v Speaker 4>sides of the ball. If those guys don't get the pub,

0:41:20.890 --> 0:41:21.870
<v Speaker 4>they go to the Pro Bowl every year.

0:41:22.070 --> 0:41:24.490
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely. We had a lot of offensive line injuries

0:41:24.530 --> 0:41:27.450
<v Speaker 2>in Philadelphia last year. It really hurt Saquon Barkley, so

0:41:27.489 --> 0:41:29.569
<v Speaker 2>it's not just about Jalen Hurts. They've got to get

0:41:29.610 --> 0:41:32.030
<v Speaker 2>that run game going to protect Hurts, and it starts

0:41:32.050 --> 0:41:32.750
<v Speaker 2>with Lane Johnson.

0:41:32.830 --> 0:41:34.489
<v Speaker 4>Good job. I can't wait for the players to get

0:41:34.530 --> 0:41:38.680
<v Speaker 4>their awards. All right, coming up next, constructive criticism and

0:41:38.700 --> 0:41:40.960
<v Speaker 4>a lot, lot more, plus the feel-good. Stick around. This

0:41:41.020 --> 0:41:41.800
<v Speaker 4>is Not So Fast.

0:41:43.140 --> 0:41:46.040
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to Not So Fast, NBC Sports Now Peacock.

0:41:46.120 --> 0:41:49.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm Andrew Perloff. He's Paul Paps. Now, every day here,

0:41:49.780 --> 0:41:51.380
<v Speaker 2>we have leftovers. There's so many things we want to

0:41:51.420 --> 0:41:54.000
<v Speaker 2>talk about, but we get to the leftovers, and we

0:41:54.040 --> 0:41:57.700
<v Speaker 2>haven't talked enough today about George Kittle, Paul. He's back.

0:41:58.040 --> 0:42:00.600
<v Speaker 2>There is no designation. He is playing for the San

0:42:00.620 --> 0:42:03.580
<v Speaker 2>Francisco 49ers in Melbourne, Australia.

0:42:04.020 --> 0:42:05.020
<v Speaker 4>Melbourne? Melbourne?

0:42:05.520 --> 0:42:07.380
<v Speaker 2>I've been hearing it all over the place.

0:42:07.500 --> 0:42:08.900
<v Speaker 4>Definitely Australia. I checked it.

0:42:08.900 --> 0:42:09.140
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:42:09.380 --> 0:42:10.799
<v Speaker 4>How good do you feel about Kittle? I know he's

0:42:10.820 --> 0:42:11.340
<v Speaker 4>a little banged up.

0:42:11.600 --> 0:42:12.969
<v Speaker 2>I'm a little worried about Kittle. I'm not going to

0:42:13.030 --> 0:42:15.009
<v Speaker 2>lie to you. He's one of those guys who does

0:42:15.150 --> 0:42:18.830
<v Speaker 2>not have a change-up pitch. He goes full speed on

0:42:19.030 --> 0:42:22.370
<v Speaker 2>every single play. And he's a bit magical. Like, things

0:42:22.430 --> 0:42:25.130
<v Speaker 2>work out for him. But I think they need him healthy.

0:42:25.630 --> 0:42:28.230
<v Speaker 2>I would not even send him to Australia. But he's

0:42:28.290 --> 0:42:31.020
<v Speaker 2>so excited. I've seen him do some press conferences over there.

0:42:31.460 --> 0:42:33.700
<v Speaker 2>He's become the ambassador for the NFL because he's got

0:42:33.719 --> 0:42:37.720
<v Speaker 2>the best personality ever. But, you know, he's 32, got

0:42:37.760 --> 0:42:40.969
<v Speaker 2>hurt in January. This is a rush job to me,

0:42:41.010 --> 0:42:41.790
<v Speaker 2>and I'm very nervous.

0:42:41.910 --> 0:42:44.649
<v Speaker 4>All right, 49ers, Rams tonight. I don't know what time

0:42:44.670 --> 0:42:46.450
<v Speaker 4>zone it is. I don't know what time they're playing.

0:42:46.489 --> 0:42:48.650
<v Speaker 2>Sean McVay pregame. Can I give you a snippet?

0:42:48.670 --> 0:42:50.310
<v Speaker 4>You're going bulletin board versus bulletin board?

0:42:50.469 --> 0:42:51.759
<v Speaker 2>Let me give you a snippet of Sean McVay.

0:42:51.840 --> 0:42:51.990
<v Speaker 4>Go.

0:42:52.580 --> 0:42:54.799
<v Speaker 2>Everyone's saying that we have the wrong sleep science, that

0:42:54.840 --> 0:42:57.060
<v Speaker 2>we did this wrong. He basically is going to be

0:42:57.100 --> 0:42:59.280
<v Speaker 2>so desperate to prove that he didn't have the wrong

0:42:59.320 --> 0:43:01.980
<v Speaker 2>strategy by flying over at the last minute. He's going

0:43:02.000 --> 0:43:04.219
<v Speaker 2>to get the team fired up like never before. I

0:43:04.260 --> 0:43:08.299
<v Speaker 2>got the Rams 29-24. In reality, though, I just think

0:43:08.320 --> 0:43:10.719
<v Speaker 2>the Rams are a better team. They're a more well-rounded

0:43:10.739 --> 0:43:13.800
<v Speaker 2>team right now, even without Aaron Donald. I think Stafford,

0:43:14.280 --> 0:43:17.010
<v Speaker 2>while healthy, is going to really step up here. Now, listen,

0:43:17.030 --> 0:43:19.630
<v Speaker 2>Kyle Shanahan has generally had the Rams number. So this

0:43:19.650 --> 0:43:21.450
<v Speaker 2>is going to be a really close game. But I

0:43:21.469 --> 0:43:23.189
<v Speaker 2>think the Rams feel a lot of pressure, and they're

0:43:23.250 --> 0:43:24.149
<v Speaker 2>veterans of the liver.

0:43:24.270 --> 0:43:26.469
<v Speaker 4>By the way, 29 is a very wonky score, and

0:43:26.489 --> 0:43:27.989
<v Speaker 4>I like it here at Not So Fast. We don't

0:43:28.010 --> 0:43:30.069
<v Speaker 4>like round numbers here. I'm going to go with the

0:43:30.090 --> 0:43:32.330
<v Speaker 4>49ers because they shouldn't win this game. You know, the 49ers,

0:43:32.690 --> 0:43:34.350
<v Speaker 4>no one's picking them. Everyone thinks that the Rams are

0:43:34.370 --> 0:43:37.009
<v Speaker 4>the biggest heavyweight of all time. I only want to

0:43:37.030 --> 0:43:39.370
<v Speaker 4>see the 49ers win, not rooting, but to see how

0:43:39.430 --> 0:43:42.360
<v Speaker 4>Sean McVay explains the sleep schedule and the travel schedule

0:43:42.380 --> 0:43:44.350
<v Speaker 4>thing because he'll be asked about it. forever if they

0:43:44.390 --> 0:43:44.850
<v Speaker 4>somehow lose.

0:43:44.930 --> 0:43:47.220
<v Speaker 2>By the way, all overseas games end in like a

0:43:47.219 --> 0:43:51.600
<v Speaker 2>15 or a 19. There's never been 28-21. Overseas, it

0:43:51.640 --> 0:43:52.819
<v Speaker 2>was a weird, weird game.

0:43:52.840 --> 0:43:54.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, they used different math over there. The metric system

0:43:54.840 --> 0:43:56.180
<v Speaker 4>has something to do with it. All right, a little

0:43:56.200 --> 0:43:58.600
<v Speaker 4>more leftovers here. Bobby Plump, if you don't know the name,

0:43:58.700 --> 0:44:02.390
<v Speaker 4>happy birthday to Bobby Plump. Age 90. He was the,

0:44:02.950 --> 0:44:05.910
<v Speaker 4>if you remember Hickory, the movie Hoosiers, he was part

0:44:05.930 --> 0:44:08.390
<v Speaker 4>of the Milan Miracle, Milan High School. He was the guy,

0:44:08.450 --> 0:44:09.969
<v Speaker 4>Bobby Plump, who hit the shot at the end of

0:44:09.989 --> 0:44:12.709
<v Speaker 4>the game. He actually stood there for four minutes before

0:44:12.750 --> 0:44:14.790
<v Speaker 4>he took the shot. and then Jimmy Chitwood did in

0:44:14.810 --> 0:44:15.890
<v Speaker 4>the movie with Gene Hackman.

0:44:16.310 --> 0:44:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so Hoosiers is a documentary, basically, is what I'm hearing.

0:44:19.820 --> 0:44:24.020
<v Speaker 4>Hoosiers is based on the Milan Miracle, Milan High School, 1954.

0:44:24.020 --> 0:44:27.360
<v Speaker 4>Bobby Plump hit the shot. against Crispus Atticus High School,

0:44:27.500 --> 0:44:28.180
<v Speaker 4>and they won the whole thing.

0:44:28.200 --> 0:44:29.719
<v Speaker 2>Now, what about the backstory where Jimmy Chitwood.

0:44:29.760 --> 0:44:30.940
<v Speaker 4>Actually, check that. Not Crispus Atticus.

0:44:31.380 --> 0:44:33.279
<v Speaker 2>Jimmy Chitwood was going to leave the team, and then

0:44:33.320 --> 0:44:35.069
<v Speaker 2>he came back because he liked the coaches. All that.

0:44:35.190 --> 0:44:35.950
<v Speaker 2>Bobby Plump, too?

0:44:36.070 --> 0:44:37.910
<v Speaker 4>That's more Hollywood. I think that's more Hollywood.

0:44:37.930 --> 0:44:38.320
<v Speaker 2>Got it, got it.

0:44:38.370 --> 0:44:40.109
<v Speaker 4>Bobby Plump, age 90, did hit the shot.

0:44:40.130 --> 0:44:40.210
<v Speaker 7>Okay.

0:44:40.310 --> 0:44:42.810
<v Speaker 4>All right, it's time for a little constructive criticism, something

0:44:42.850 --> 0:44:45.310
<v Speaker 4>we did good, bad, or ugly. Pearl, if your new

0:44:45.350 --> 0:44:47.469
<v Speaker 4>shirt is in play as a topic. Here we go.

0:44:47.510 --> 0:44:51.739
<v Speaker 4>Constructive criticism. First one. CyHawk Week.

0:44:51.840 --> 0:44:52.380
<v Speaker 2>Ooh, yes.

0:44:52.700 --> 0:44:56.050
<v Speaker 4>I'm a huge Cyclone fan. Iowa State at Iowa. Hawkeye

0:44:56.090 --> 0:44:58.580
<v Speaker 4>buddies invited me to their tailgate and seats for the game,

0:44:58.900 --> 0:45:02.020
<v Speaker 4>but he's an Iowa State fan. How subdued, frantic, polite

0:45:02.040 --> 0:45:04.259
<v Speaker 4>should I be? If you're hanging with friends at a

0:45:04.300 --> 0:45:07.670
<v Speaker 4>tailgate and you don't agree on the teams, you could poke,

0:45:07.910 --> 0:45:09.649
<v Speaker 4>you could jab, just don't go for the knockout punch.

0:45:10.050 --> 0:45:12.120
<v Speaker 4>Have a few drinks, eat a few bratwurst, and keep

0:45:12.160 --> 0:45:12.980
<v Speaker 4>it friendly, as we say.

0:45:13.260 --> 0:45:16.700
<v Speaker 2>Well, my sense of Iowa fans is generally they're pretty nice.

0:45:16.900 --> 0:45:19.219
<v Speaker 4>But Iowa State seems to ramp it up a little bit.

0:45:19.300 --> 0:45:22.820
<v Speaker 2>But still, it's not Giants-Cowboys. You're not going to get

0:45:22.880 --> 0:45:24.540
<v Speaker 2>beat up for rooting for the other team? I don't

0:45:24.560 --> 0:45:25.219
<v Speaker 2>think so. Or maybe you are.

0:45:25.560 --> 0:45:28.540
<v Speaker 4>No, they'll probably make fun of whatever you're wearing, but

0:45:28.760 --> 0:45:29.399
<v Speaker 4>still offer you a brat.

0:45:29.920 --> 0:45:32.900
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, see, I'm very careful because I grew up in Philadelphia.

0:45:32.940 --> 0:45:34.960
<v Speaker 2>That's different. If you come into the link wearing an

0:45:35.020 --> 0:45:36.540
<v Speaker 2>opposing team's jersey, it's bad.

0:45:36.660 --> 0:45:38.510
<v Speaker 4>They don't do that in Ames or Iowa City. All right,

0:45:38.590 --> 0:45:41.549
<v Speaker 4>here you go. Next one for constructive criticism, Perloff. How

0:45:41.610 --> 0:45:43.509
<v Speaker 4>is it possible the Bears have still not had– wow,

0:45:43.530 --> 0:45:45.330
<v Speaker 4>did you set this one up? The Bears have still

0:45:45.370 --> 0:45:48.689
<v Speaker 4>not had a 4,000-yard passer. Well, by choice, by conscious choice.

0:45:48.710 --> 0:45:50.870
<v Speaker 4>We want to focus on the running game for 100 years.

0:45:50.910 --> 0:45:53.370
<v Speaker 4>That's what the Bears wanted to do. It does feel

0:45:53.390 --> 0:45:56.870
<v Speaker 4>like Kayla Williams was close last year and could get 4,000.

0:45:56.870 --> 0:45:59.469
<v Speaker 4>Bears fans don't care. I know you want to check

0:45:59.489 --> 0:46:02.070
<v Speaker 4>that box at 4,000 yards, but just beat the Packers

0:46:02.110 --> 0:46:02.989
<v Speaker 4>in advance in the playoffs.

0:46:03.239 --> 0:46:05.110
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's funny because Coach Ben Johnson said they were

0:46:05.140 --> 0:46:08.340
<v Speaker 2>going to have a record-setting offense. Yeah, just get to 4,000.

0:46:08.340 --> 0:46:11.500
<v Speaker 2>I think Eric Kramer is still the franchise's leading passer.

0:46:11.660 --> 0:46:12.120
<v Speaker 4>Good poll.

0:46:12.239 --> 0:46:15.540
<v Speaker 2>It's bizarre. It is completely bizarre they haven't hit this number.

0:46:15.980 --> 0:46:18.000
<v Speaker 2>That being said, they like to run the ball, Paul,

0:46:18.020 --> 0:46:19.800
<v Speaker 2>so I wouldn't be surprised if Ben Johnson was a

0:46:19.820 --> 0:46:20.590
<v Speaker 2>little conservative.

0:46:20.719 --> 0:46:24.110
<v Speaker 4>There were years where they aspired for a 3,000-yard pass.

0:46:24.170 --> 0:46:27.569
<v Speaker 4>All right, last one for constructive criticism. I think we

0:46:27.610 --> 0:46:30.089
<v Speaker 4>have one more left. Constructive criticism, here we go. Let's

0:46:30.150 --> 0:46:34.290
<v Speaker 4>check this one out, Perloff. Rye, the librarian, I think

0:46:34.330 --> 0:46:35.989
<v Speaker 4>people are sleeping on the Titans this year as a

0:46:36.010 --> 0:46:39.470
<v Speaker 4>potential wildcard team. They make a lot of sneaky offseason moves.

0:46:39.950 --> 0:46:41.960
<v Speaker 4>And I'm curious to see how Cam Ward does. So

0:46:42.020 --> 0:46:43.180
<v Speaker 4>sneaky that we don't know about them.

0:46:43.420 --> 0:46:47.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, and then they did a rope-a-dope in the preseason. Basically,

0:46:47.500 --> 0:46:48.980
<v Speaker 2>Cam Ward played terribly.

0:46:49.000 --> 0:46:49.700
<v Speaker 4>Oh, it's a setup?

0:46:50.140 --> 0:46:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was a setup. I mean, he does have

0:46:52.140 --> 0:46:55.509
<v Speaker 2>good receivers. He's got Carnell Tate, Calvin Ridley. They have

0:46:55.550 --> 0:46:57.730
<v Speaker 2>had a running game. We love Robert Sala. Did you

0:46:57.770 --> 0:46:59.890
<v Speaker 2>hang out with Robert Sala in Tahoe with the Dan

0:46:59.910 --> 0:47:00.190
<v Speaker 2>Patrick show?

0:47:00.210 --> 0:47:03.810
<v Speaker 4>We saw him, his beautiful skull. It's completely jacked. Very frustrating.

0:47:03.830 --> 0:47:04.430
<v Speaker 4>Good looking guy.

0:47:04.680 --> 0:47:06.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, there's a lot of people in on the

0:47:06.620 --> 0:47:10.060
<v Speaker 2>Titans team. Cam Ward, second-year jump. Second-year quarterbacks can make

0:47:10.080 --> 0:47:12.799
<v Speaker 2>the Super Bowl. I love Cam Ward. You never know

0:47:12.820 --> 0:47:14.440
<v Speaker 2>what's going to happen when he drops back. He might

0:47:14.500 --> 0:47:17.240
<v Speaker 2>scramble 30 yards backwards and then hit a backup tight

0:47:17.300 --> 0:47:20.190
<v Speaker 2>end 50 yards down the field. I'm into the Titans.

0:47:20.290 --> 0:47:21.129
<v Speaker 2>I hope they're good.

0:47:21.230 --> 0:47:23.410
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Cam's going to complete it to somebody. Our team,

0:47:23.430 --> 0:47:25.950
<v Speaker 4>your team, whatever team. All right, let's get to the feel-good.

0:47:25.989 --> 0:47:27.850
<v Speaker 4>Something to leave you feeling good before the day as

0:47:27.890 --> 0:47:28.310
<v Speaker 4>you go off.

0:47:29.250 --> 0:47:29.830
<v Speaker 2>Here we go, Pearl.

0:47:32.370 --> 0:47:35.070
<v Speaker 4>The feel-good for today. Oh, of course. White Sox Pirates,

0:47:35.150 --> 0:47:38.920
<v Speaker 4>bring your own dog night. Come and pet the puppy,

0:47:39.180 --> 0:47:40.900
<v Speaker 4>you kids. Come hang out.

0:47:42.060 --> 0:47:43.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm noticing that a lot of the field goals happen

0:47:44.040 --> 0:47:45.060
<v Speaker 2>in baseball crowds.

0:47:45.420 --> 0:47:47.930
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, because baseball, I don't know who started this, bringing

0:47:47.950 --> 0:47:49.370
<v Speaker 4>a dog to a game night. I don't know if

0:47:49.390 --> 0:47:50.770
<v Speaker 4>it's the Pirates or not, but it seems to be

0:47:50.790 --> 0:47:51.230
<v Speaker 4>catching on.

0:47:51.390 --> 0:47:53.190
<v Speaker 2>Now, what if it's not a good boy and you

0:47:53.210 --> 0:47:55.110
<v Speaker 2>have a dog? What if the dog is getting a

0:47:55.110 --> 0:47:57.160
<v Speaker 2>little out of control, sees a hot dog three rows up?

0:47:58.030 --> 0:47:59.530
<v Speaker 4>That would be a problem. That would be a problem.

0:47:59.590 --> 0:48:00.469
<v Speaker 2>That would not be feel good.

0:48:00.510 --> 0:48:02.410
<v Speaker 4>When you buy your ticket, you buy the ride. And

0:48:02.430 --> 0:48:03.779
<v Speaker 4>what happens, you get bit by a dog, you get

0:48:03.800 --> 0:48:04.219
<v Speaker 4>bit by a dog.

0:48:04.480 --> 0:48:04.620
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:48:04.640 --> 0:48:04.739
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:48:05.219 --> 0:48:07.060
<v Speaker 2>By the way, my takeaway from the show is about

0:48:07.080 --> 0:48:09.339
<v Speaker 2>the urinals in your house. That's the biggest deal to me.

0:48:09.420 --> 0:48:11.100
<v Speaker 4>We all aspire to have one. All right, thanks for

0:48:11.280 --> 0:48:14.680
<v Speaker 4>watching Not So Fast. Dan Patrick's show tomorrow on NBC

0:48:14.719 --> 0:48:16.880
<v Speaker 4>Sports Now. And stick around, hang with us, get you

0:48:16.900 --> 0:48:18.719
<v Speaker 4>a recap of the entire game, 49ers-Rams.

0:48:18.940 --> 0:48:21.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. No more sleep science talk after this game. No,

0:48:21.719 --> 0:48:22.330
<v Speaker 2>we're all going.

0:48:23.860 --> 0:48:28.109
<v Speaker 8>To take a nap.

0:48:28.530 --> 0:48:29.810
<v Speaker 2>We'll be right back.