1 00:00:01,400 --> 00:00:05,600 Speaker 1: Hi, guys, Welcome to our very first episode of Legally Brunette. 2 00:00:05,640 --> 00:00:08,240 Speaker 1: I will be your host today, Emily Simpson, and I 3 00:00:08,320 --> 00:00:12,160 Speaker 1: felt like the best co host for kind of like 4 00:00:12,200 --> 00:00:17,800 Speaker 1: a pop culture slash legal podcast would be with my husband, 5 00:00:17,840 --> 00:00:21,239 Speaker 1: Shane Simpson. And so, are you excited to be here? 6 00:00:21,440 --> 00:00:23,599 Speaker 2: I am, because I know you have a lot of 7 00:00:23,640 --> 00:00:25,159 Speaker 2: knowledge on this, so I'm ready to hear it. 8 00:00:25,239 --> 00:00:27,639 Speaker 1: Yeah. So we're very excited for our first episode to 9 00:00:27,720 --> 00:00:33,200 Speaker 1: be about the Menindas brothers, the murders where we're at currently, 10 00:00:33,280 --> 00:00:35,360 Speaker 1: and I think what we're trying to do is kind 11 00:00:35,360 --> 00:00:37,680 Speaker 1: of pack as much information about Menindaz as we can 12 00:00:37,720 --> 00:00:41,080 Speaker 1: into one episode. As you all know, it's been a 13 00:00:41,240 --> 00:00:47,880 Speaker 1: cultural phenomena. I remember back in nineteen eighty nine when 14 00:00:47,920 --> 00:00:52,839 Speaker 1: this murder happened. I was a young girl in Middletown, Ohio, 15 00:00:53,360 --> 00:00:57,120 Speaker 1: and I used to watch this trial on court TV. Now, 16 00:00:57,160 --> 00:00:59,240 Speaker 1: clearly back at that time, I had a completely different 17 00:00:59,280 --> 00:01:02,600 Speaker 1: perspective on it than I do now. But I'm just wondering, 18 00:01:02,680 --> 00:01:04,600 Speaker 1: did you know about the murders because you grew up 19 00:01:04,600 --> 00:01:05,280 Speaker 1: in California. 20 00:01:06,080 --> 00:01:08,600 Speaker 2: I did. I did. I didn't know it as much. 21 00:01:08,640 --> 00:01:10,760 Speaker 2: I didn't follow it like you did. The way I 22 00:01:10,800 --> 00:01:16,080 Speaker 2: followed it was through David Letterman. He did a lot 23 00:01:16,080 --> 00:01:19,320 Speaker 2: of top ten lests that would include the Menendez brothers. 24 00:01:20,280 --> 00:01:22,360 Speaker 2: Jay Leno did a lot of jokes about it. So 25 00:01:22,400 --> 00:01:24,759 Speaker 2: for that reason, I always saw it, but I had 26 00:01:24,800 --> 00:01:27,840 Speaker 2: no opinion of it other than they killed their parents 27 00:01:28,280 --> 00:01:31,360 Speaker 2: for money. That's what's my knowledge, although I'm not saying 28 00:01:31,360 --> 00:01:34,080 Speaker 2: that's correct, but that's what I knew of it back then. 29 00:01:34,240 --> 00:01:36,440 Speaker 1: And you know, when you think about that time period, 30 00:01:36,480 --> 00:01:39,720 Speaker 1: back in the eighties and the nineties, I do believe 31 00:01:39,800 --> 00:01:44,120 Speaker 1: that that was the story that the media perpetuated, that 32 00:01:44,200 --> 00:01:48,400 Speaker 1: you had two wealthy, good looking young guys that grew 33 00:01:48,480 --> 00:01:52,320 Speaker 1: up in Beverly Hills, that led a very privileged lifestyle 34 00:01:52,720 --> 00:01:56,760 Speaker 1: and then decided that they wanted their parents' money and 35 00:01:56,880 --> 00:02:01,080 Speaker 1: they murdered them, right and even me following it on court, 36 00:02:01,120 --> 00:02:05,240 Speaker 1: TV and the media, that was my takeaway back then. 37 00:02:06,160 --> 00:02:09,600 Speaker 1: And so I really feel like it's so interesting that 38 00:02:09,720 --> 00:02:12,360 Speaker 1: thirty five years later, here we are talking about this 39 00:02:12,480 --> 00:02:16,480 Speaker 1: case and I was trying to understand what has made 40 00:02:16,480 --> 00:02:20,880 Speaker 1: it come back up and be such a huge phenomenon 41 00:02:20,919 --> 00:02:24,200 Speaker 1: that all these kids are making tiktoks about it. You know, 42 00:02:24,280 --> 00:02:27,160 Speaker 1: there was the recent release of Monsters on Netflix, which, 43 00:02:27,200 --> 00:02:29,400 Speaker 1: by the way, let's just be clear that Monsters is 44 00:02:29,440 --> 00:02:33,280 Speaker 1: a dramatization, it's not a documentary. And then there was 45 00:02:33,320 --> 00:02:36,600 Speaker 1: the recent documentary on Netflix where it's actually Eric and 46 00:02:36,680 --> 00:02:41,120 Speaker 1: Lyle speaking from prison. And I read something the other 47 00:02:41,160 --> 00:02:42,960 Speaker 1: day that I thought was really interesting because I did 48 00:02:43,000 --> 00:02:46,520 Speaker 1: not realize this, but this surge of TikTokers, who is 49 00:02:46,560 --> 00:02:48,880 Speaker 1: a completely different generation than you and I when we 50 00:02:48,880 --> 00:02:53,440 Speaker 1: were growing up. Their fascination with this case comes from 51 00:02:53,880 --> 00:02:57,320 Speaker 1: during the pandemic when we were all in quarantine. Court 52 00:02:57,400 --> 00:03:00,800 Speaker 1: TV was running reruns of the trial. 53 00:03:01,320 --> 00:03:03,120 Speaker 2: Oh is that what? I wondered? What started it? 54 00:03:03,320 --> 00:03:05,959 Speaker 1: Yeah? And I didn't understand that either, because I knew 55 00:03:06,040 --> 00:03:09,880 Speaker 1: that there were all these TikTokers that were making tiktoks 56 00:03:09,880 --> 00:03:12,160 Speaker 1: about the Meninda's brothers and it was all basically the 57 00:03:12,160 --> 00:03:14,040 Speaker 1: same theme that they should go free. 58 00:03:14,160 --> 00:03:16,639 Speaker 2: Well, wait a minute, that's interesting. That means TikTokers are 59 00:03:16,639 --> 00:03:17,640 Speaker 2: watching court TV. 60 00:03:18,000 --> 00:03:19,640 Speaker 1: Yes, that was the part with that. I was like, 61 00:03:19,680 --> 00:03:23,200 Speaker 1: why are TikTokers watching court TV? But apparently they were 62 00:03:23,280 --> 00:03:26,280 Speaker 1: running reruns of Court TV. They ran the Meninda's trial 63 00:03:26,400 --> 00:03:30,640 Speaker 1: during the pandemic and it caught on and this new 64 00:03:30,880 --> 00:03:35,120 Speaker 1: generation watched a lot of the trial and then probably 65 00:03:35,160 --> 00:03:38,160 Speaker 1: saw snippets of the trial on social media. 66 00:03:38,760 --> 00:03:40,760 Speaker 2: Sure, and the. 67 00:03:40,720 --> 00:03:45,800 Speaker 1: Consensus now it's a completely different phenomena is that they 68 00:03:45,840 --> 00:03:49,040 Speaker 1: should be released because they were abused by their parents. 69 00:03:49,280 --> 00:03:51,880 Speaker 1: And I was thinking about this, and this is what 70 00:03:51,920 --> 00:03:53,520 Speaker 1: I do, this is what keeps me up at nights. 71 00:03:54,040 --> 00:03:57,600 Speaker 1: I was thinking about how during our generation, we're kids, 72 00:03:57,640 --> 00:04:01,400 Speaker 1: we're gen X, right, Okay, were born in the seventies, 73 00:04:01,480 --> 00:04:03,480 Speaker 1: we were kids in the eighties, and we were in 74 00:04:03,560 --> 00:04:06,520 Speaker 1: high school and college in the nineties. And our generation, 75 00:04:06,920 --> 00:04:10,560 Speaker 1: I think made fun of the Menindez brothers, like you said, 76 00:04:10,600 --> 00:04:16,839 Speaker 1: because there was not the recognizing that sexual abuse could occur. 77 00:04:17,080 --> 00:04:19,520 Speaker 2: With no no always. Then you have someone like me 78 00:04:19,640 --> 00:04:22,520 Speaker 2: who's not really paying attention, but yet it's thrown in 79 00:04:22,560 --> 00:04:25,560 Speaker 2: my face all the time and all the you know, 80 00:04:25,680 --> 00:04:29,080 Speaker 2: shows that I'm watching and news flashes or whatever. And 81 00:04:29,760 --> 00:04:32,560 Speaker 2: you know, you know, certainly, I as an eighteen year 82 00:04:32,600 --> 00:04:34,960 Speaker 2: old kid, I'm not paying attention, but I'm it's thrown 83 00:04:35,000 --> 00:04:38,200 Speaker 2: at me that they're guilty, that they killed their parents, 84 00:04:38,240 --> 00:04:40,800 Speaker 2: that they wanted to be you know, rich, and so 85 00:04:40,920 --> 00:04:42,280 Speaker 2: you just assume that that's the. 86 00:04:42,279 --> 00:04:45,719 Speaker 1: Case, right, And I even remember seeing Saturday Night Live 87 00:04:46,160 --> 00:04:47,880 Speaker 1: snippets where they would make fun of them with the 88 00:04:47,920 --> 00:04:50,799 Speaker 1: sweaters with the with the blue and the pink sweaters, 89 00:04:50,880 --> 00:04:53,080 Speaker 1: because that's you know, remember in their first trial show. 90 00:04:53,160 --> 00:04:55,560 Speaker 2: Well then they'd always have the bad hairstyles, right because. 91 00:04:55,400 --> 00:04:57,039 Speaker 1: Lyle had the two pays, so they would always have 92 00:04:57,040 --> 00:04:59,040 Speaker 1: the bad hair. And then again you're. 93 00:04:59,000 --> 00:05:03,200 Speaker 2: Down playing showing that these when you're making fun of them, 94 00:05:03,240 --> 00:05:07,160 Speaker 2: even down to their hairstyles, what you're saying, you're discrediting 95 00:05:07,200 --> 00:05:10,360 Speaker 2: them as valid people, as kids that might have issues 96 00:05:10,400 --> 00:05:13,320 Speaker 2: and problems and there might be more depth to the 97 00:05:14,000 --> 00:05:18,480 Speaker 2: crime other than just privileged kids or immature kids or 98 00:05:18,520 --> 00:05:19,279 Speaker 2: something exactly. 99 00:05:19,760 --> 00:05:22,279 Speaker 1: And that's why I find this case so interesting. Now 100 00:05:22,360 --> 00:05:24,719 Speaker 1: Here we are in twenty twenty four and a different 101 00:05:24,800 --> 00:05:28,839 Speaker 1: generation has latched onto this case, and these kids are 102 00:05:28,839 --> 00:05:31,560 Speaker 1: more accepting. You know, we were Gen X, there was 103 00:05:31,720 --> 00:05:33,480 Speaker 1: you know, it was you were lucky if you got 104 00:05:33,480 --> 00:05:36,440 Speaker 1: a sandwich from your parents. So I think this new 105 00:05:36,480 --> 00:05:40,720 Speaker 1: generation of kids have been coddled more. There's more therapy, 106 00:05:40,800 --> 00:05:46,120 Speaker 1: there's gluten free, there's more acceptance of a lot of 107 00:05:46,240 --> 00:05:51,320 Speaker 1: things that go into your psyche and understanding psychological factors 108 00:05:51,360 --> 00:05:54,120 Speaker 1: and so that's where we are with Menendez. But let's 109 00:05:54,160 --> 00:05:56,000 Speaker 1: just go through because I know you don't know a 110 00:05:56,000 --> 00:05:58,479 Speaker 1: lot about the case, and I know so much about 111 00:05:58,480 --> 00:06:02,200 Speaker 1: this case. I could spend an entire probably nine hours 112 00:06:02,360 --> 00:06:04,120 Speaker 1: just talking about the facts of this case. But I'm 113 00:06:04,120 --> 00:06:06,400 Speaker 1: not going to do that, Please don't. I'm just going 114 00:06:06,480 --> 00:06:09,520 Speaker 1: to do a brief synopsis of some of the facts 115 00:06:09,600 --> 00:06:11,839 Speaker 1: of the night that it happened, and then we'll just 116 00:06:11,880 --> 00:06:14,880 Speaker 1: go from there. So Lyle and Eric Menindez were convicted 117 00:06:14,920 --> 00:06:17,560 Speaker 1: of the nineteen eighty nine murders of their parents, jose 118 00:06:17,880 --> 00:06:20,960 Speaker 1: and Mary Louise Mendez, who goes by the name Kitty, 119 00:06:21,480 --> 00:06:23,839 Speaker 1: and they're Beverly Hills home, which, by the way, the 120 00:06:23,839 --> 00:06:27,159 Speaker 1: address is seven twenty two North Elm Drive. And I 121 00:06:27,240 --> 00:06:29,880 Speaker 1: actually drove there. You know that I made a video. 122 00:06:30,480 --> 00:06:33,320 Speaker 1: I was in LA and I was really close to 123 00:06:33,360 --> 00:06:35,600 Speaker 1: the house, and so I could not miss the opportunity. 124 00:06:35,640 --> 00:06:38,400 Speaker 1: So I actually drove over to the home and parked 125 00:06:38,400 --> 00:06:41,479 Speaker 1: in front of it. And I will tell you it 126 00:06:41,600 --> 00:06:49,120 Speaker 1: is such a beautiful, calm, serene, magnificent Beverly Hills neighborhood 127 00:06:49,160 --> 00:06:52,200 Speaker 1: that when I was standing there, I'm trying to visualize 128 00:06:52,720 --> 00:06:59,440 Speaker 1: cords well, I mean a brutal, brutal murder taking place 129 00:06:59,600 --> 00:07:03,440 Speaker 1: right there in the home. Some of the forensics who 130 00:07:03,480 --> 00:07:06,000 Speaker 1: worked on the Menindaz murder scene describe it as the 131 00:07:06,040 --> 00:07:09,039 Speaker 1: most brutal murder scene that they had ever witnessed. The 132 00:07:09,080 --> 00:07:12,400 Speaker 1: brothers claim the killings were in self defense after years 133 00:07:12,400 --> 00:07:16,160 Speaker 1: of sexual and physical abuse by their father, Jose Menindez, 134 00:07:16,600 --> 00:07:19,760 Speaker 1: but prosecutors argued that the brothers killed their parents in 135 00:07:19,840 --> 00:07:22,800 Speaker 1: a bid to inherit their wealth, which at the time 136 00:07:22,920 --> 00:07:26,000 Speaker 1: was supposedly around fourteen million dollars, which is what they 137 00:07:26,000 --> 00:07:28,000 Speaker 1: would inherit. And again, this is back in nineteen eighty 138 00:07:28,080 --> 00:07:29,920 Speaker 1: nine seen mony. You're talking about a lot of money. 139 00:07:30,080 --> 00:07:31,640 Speaker 2: Money to day, certainly a lot back then. 140 00:07:31,800 --> 00:07:35,880 Speaker 1: After a highly publicized trial, the first jury was unable 141 00:07:35,920 --> 00:07:40,080 Speaker 1: to reach a verdict. Actually, there were two juries in 142 00:07:40,240 --> 00:07:41,960 Speaker 1: the first trial. I don't know if you knew that 143 00:07:42,160 --> 00:07:44,640 Speaker 1: each boy, so Lyle and Eric, they each had their 144 00:07:44,640 --> 00:07:48,640 Speaker 1: own jury during the first trial. And there were actually 145 00:07:48,760 --> 00:07:52,160 Speaker 1: times when if there were specific witnesses that were speaking 146 00:07:52,200 --> 00:07:54,280 Speaker 1: to something that had specifically to do with Eric or 147 00:07:54,320 --> 00:07:56,480 Speaker 1: had to do with Lyle, the other jurors would have 148 00:07:56,520 --> 00:07:59,720 Speaker 1: to leave the courtroom. So can you imagine. 149 00:07:59,440 --> 00:08:01,760 Speaker 2: That legitly that's a lot, right. 150 00:08:02,160 --> 00:08:07,840 Speaker 1: Also, I believe the defense had fifty five. I might 151 00:08:07,840 --> 00:08:09,880 Speaker 1: not be right about that, but it was an exorbitant 152 00:08:09,880 --> 00:08:15,040 Speaker 1: amount of character witnesses who testified on behalf of Lyle 153 00:08:15,080 --> 00:08:18,960 Speaker 1: and Eric. So can you imagine just how long this 154 00:08:19,080 --> 00:08:22,800 Speaker 1: trial took, the depths of it, the character witnesses, the 155 00:08:22,800 --> 00:08:25,920 Speaker 1: two different juries. I don't know exactly. I think it 156 00:08:25,960 --> 00:08:28,400 Speaker 1: was maybe eight months. Don't quote me on that, but 157 00:08:28,440 --> 00:08:31,880 Speaker 1: it was a long It was a long trial. They 158 00:08:31,880 --> 00:08:34,640 Speaker 1: were sentenced after their second trial, which was in nineteen 159 00:08:34,720 --> 00:08:37,679 Speaker 1: ninety six. It resulted in both brothers being convicted of 160 00:08:37,920 --> 00:08:40,400 Speaker 1: first degree murder. They were sentenced to life in prison 161 00:08:40,440 --> 00:08:43,760 Speaker 1: without the possibility at the role. Also, there are you know, 162 00:08:43,800 --> 00:08:46,080 Speaker 1: I'll just go into a little bit, just a brief overlay, 163 00:08:46,200 --> 00:08:48,560 Speaker 1: but there a lot of people question the second trial 164 00:08:48,640 --> 00:08:52,600 Speaker 1: because the judge precluded a lot of the sexual abuse 165 00:08:52,640 --> 00:08:56,600 Speaker 1: evidence that was disclosed in the first trial. There were 166 00:08:56,600 --> 00:08:59,440 Speaker 1: a lot of emotions filed by the prosecution in the second trial, 167 00:08:59,440 --> 00:09:01,240 Speaker 1: which a lot of that evidence. 168 00:09:01,360 --> 00:09:03,040 Speaker 2: That brings up a lot of questions for me because 169 00:09:03,080 --> 00:09:06,760 Speaker 2: it's like, why wouldn't you present the same evidence, you know, 170 00:09:06,960 --> 00:09:08,719 Speaker 2: was it and I don't know the answers, But was 171 00:09:08,760 --> 00:09:11,880 Speaker 2: it the judge thinking, well, let's shake it up because 172 00:09:12,280 --> 00:09:15,560 Speaker 2: the jury couldn't convict or find or affirm, you know, 173 00:09:15,640 --> 00:09:17,760 Speaker 2: not guilty, so let's shake it up to try to 174 00:09:17,800 --> 00:09:21,040 Speaker 2: get an outcome. Why wouldn't you present the same evidence. 175 00:09:21,080 --> 00:09:23,400 Speaker 2: And if you present the same evidence and you get 176 00:09:23,400 --> 00:09:25,959 Speaker 2: the same outcome, which is a hung jury, well then 177 00:09:25,960 --> 00:09:28,160 Speaker 2: that goes to show there's not enough evidence to convict. 178 00:09:28,880 --> 00:09:30,960 Speaker 1: I don't disagree with what you're saying. I'll give you 179 00:09:31,000 --> 00:09:33,960 Speaker 1: a little bit of a timeline. When the Menindas brothers 180 00:09:34,200 --> 00:09:37,520 Speaker 1: went to trial for their second for the second trial, 181 00:09:38,040 --> 00:09:41,000 Speaker 1: it was I believe eight days after the OJ Simpson 182 00:09:41,120 --> 00:09:44,960 Speaker 1: verdict of not guilty, and the DA's office was looking 183 00:09:45,960 --> 00:09:48,600 Speaker 1: like an incompetent office. 184 00:09:49,200 --> 00:09:52,240 Speaker 2: Well, they were an incompetent office after the OJ trial exactly. 185 00:09:52,400 --> 00:09:55,240 Speaker 1: And so I think that a lot of that went 186 00:09:55,320 --> 00:09:59,160 Speaker 1: into the judge's decisions. Now here's where I have questions. 187 00:09:59,480 --> 00:10:03,080 Speaker 1: I am not a judge, but I don't know exactly 188 00:10:03,120 --> 00:10:06,160 Speaker 1: what authority a judge acted on that he precluded a 189 00:10:06,160 --> 00:10:09,760 Speaker 1: lot of the sexual abuse evidence in the second trial. Also, 190 00:10:10,080 --> 00:10:12,440 Speaker 1: I don't think there was a manslaughter option there were 191 00:10:12,800 --> 00:10:15,360 Speaker 1: there was either not guilty. 192 00:10:15,640 --> 00:10:17,679 Speaker 2: Wa Wait, In the first trial, what was what were 193 00:10:17,720 --> 00:10:18,319 Speaker 2: the charges? 194 00:10:19,200 --> 00:10:22,320 Speaker 1: Well, it was premeditated manslaughter or not guilty. 195 00:10:22,600 --> 00:10:25,560 Speaker 2: Okay, well always not guilty, right, What were the charges 196 00:10:25,600 --> 00:10:26,719 Speaker 2: In the second trial. 197 00:10:26,760 --> 00:10:29,640 Speaker 1: It was either they could either be convicted of premeditated 198 00:10:29,720 --> 00:10:31,880 Speaker 1: murder or not guilty. I don't think there was a 199 00:10:31,920 --> 00:10:36,000 Speaker 1: manslaughter option because there wasn't. There wasn't the allowance of 200 00:10:36,360 --> 00:10:39,520 Speaker 1: any mitigating factors of the abuse. Also, Lyle did not 201 00:10:39,600 --> 00:10:43,320 Speaker 1: take the stand and the second trial because he had 202 00:10:43,360 --> 00:10:46,760 Speaker 1: made a mistake and had spoken to a woman named 203 00:10:46,800 --> 00:10:52,079 Speaker 1: Norma Novelli. I believe that she was having phone conversations 204 00:10:52,080 --> 00:10:55,120 Speaker 1: with him over a long period of time from prison, 205 00:10:55,559 --> 00:10:58,720 Speaker 1: and I believe he made some incriminating statements that had 206 00:10:58,720 --> 00:11:00,840 Speaker 1: to do with his acting ability. You could have brought 207 00:11:00,880 --> 00:11:03,840 Speaker 1: that in and exactly so, he did not testify on 208 00:11:03,880 --> 00:11:07,719 Speaker 1: the stand because he could have been impeached with that. So, 209 00:11:08,320 --> 00:11:10,360 Speaker 1: you know, the second trial was completely different than the 210 00:11:10,360 --> 00:11:14,040 Speaker 1: first trial. They ended up getting convicted of premeditated murder 211 00:11:14,200 --> 00:11:17,960 Speaker 1: life without parole. So that's where we're at today and 212 00:11:18,040 --> 00:11:20,119 Speaker 1: now here we are, thirty five years. 213 00:11:19,920 --> 00:11:22,880 Speaker 2: Later, convicted of the same or both with the same 214 00:11:23,040 --> 00:11:24,760 Speaker 2: sentencing life without parole. 215 00:11:24,880 --> 00:11:26,000 Speaker 1: Yes, both, and life. 216 00:11:25,800 --> 00:11:27,920 Speaker 2: Without parole is different than life. A lot of people think, 217 00:11:27,960 --> 00:11:30,080 Speaker 2: you hear life, but life is I think twenty years 218 00:11:30,080 --> 00:11:34,400 Speaker 2: in California not necessarily life. But then life without parole 219 00:11:34,559 --> 00:11:37,320 Speaker 2: is truly what we think of as life in prison, 220 00:11:37,400 --> 00:11:40,440 Speaker 2: which is you are not being released, which means, regardless 221 00:11:40,440 --> 00:11:45,320 Speaker 2: of your behavior in prison, you will not be released, right, 222 00:11:45,400 --> 00:11:49,160 Speaker 2: which can lead someone to think, well, then when you 223 00:11:49,160 --> 00:11:50,760 Speaker 2: go to prison and you got nothing to lose, you 224 00:11:50,760 --> 00:11:54,480 Speaker 2: try to escape, you don't follow the rules, you're not 225 00:11:54,520 --> 00:11:57,640 Speaker 2: incentivized for good behavior, and I think that will come 226 00:11:57,720 --> 00:11:59,120 Speaker 2: up later, So I decided to mention. 227 00:11:59,000 --> 00:12:02,839 Speaker 1: That, right. So thirty five here we are, thirty five 228 00:12:02,880 --> 00:12:08,199 Speaker 1: years later, and this case has just been huge, mostly 229 00:12:08,280 --> 00:12:11,360 Speaker 1: because of the Monsters that came out on Netflix, which 230 00:12:11,400 --> 00:12:12,480 Speaker 1: you did not watch. 231 00:12:12,880 --> 00:12:15,000 Speaker 2: No, but I've heard you watching it every night for 232 00:12:15,080 --> 00:12:15,840 Speaker 2: the last few months. 233 00:12:15,840 --> 00:12:16,360 Speaker 1: I've watched it. 234 00:12:16,400 --> 00:12:18,079 Speaker 2: I think falls. 235 00:12:18,240 --> 00:12:21,319 Speaker 1: I think I've watched it maybe three times at this point, 236 00:12:21,480 --> 00:12:22,440 Speaker 1: And people go, why is. 237 00:12:22,400 --> 00:12:25,839 Speaker 2: The family so angry all the time, Well, she falls 238 00:12:25,840 --> 00:12:27,599 Speaker 2: asleep to true crime and Monsters. 239 00:12:29,000 --> 00:12:30,720 Speaker 1: I do want to make clear though, that I know 240 00:12:30,760 --> 00:12:33,640 Speaker 1: a lot of people have watched monsters, and we just 241 00:12:33,679 --> 00:12:36,960 Speaker 1: have to clarify that Monsters is a dramatization. I do 242 00:12:37,000 --> 00:12:39,760 Speaker 1: think that there are a lot of factual things and monsters, 243 00:12:40,000 --> 00:12:43,840 Speaker 1: but there are also a lot of scenes that are 244 00:12:44,559 --> 00:12:48,480 Speaker 1: the creator's imagination. There are scenes between Jose and Kitty 245 00:12:48,640 --> 00:12:50,360 Speaker 1: that no one could have known what they said or 246 00:12:50,400 --> 00:12:54,440 Speaker 1: what happened. They're obviously a creation. I also think that 247 00:12:55,640 --> 00:12:59,320 Speaker 1: the characters of Lyle and Eric and Monsters were very, 248 00:13:00,400 --> 00:13:04,480 Speaker 1: very one dimensional. They made Eric out to be kind 249 00:13:04,480 --> 00:13:10,120 Speaker 1: of a depressed, sad, weak person, and they clearly made 250 00:13:10,320 --> 00:13:14,559 Speaker 1: Lyle the aggressor. I think every scene that Lyle's in, 251 00:13:15,000 --> 00:13:17,480 Speaker 1: he's arguing, fighting, or yelling at someone. 252 00:13:18,760 --> 00:13:22,080 Speaker 2: Which I think the viewers or listeners will have which 253 00:13:22,760 --> 00:13:25,160 Speaker 2: one of the brothers is the one with no hair, 254 00:13:25,760 --> 00:13:28,080 Speaker 2: Which is the one with hair? That'll help me identify that. 255 00:13:28,160 --> 00:13:31,240 Speaker 1: Okay. Eric is the younger brother. He was eighteen when 256 00:13:31,280 --> 00:13:33,520 Speaker 1: they committed the murders, and he has a full head 257 00:13:33,520 --> 00:13:36,640 Speaker 1: of hair, okay. And then Lyle is the older brother. 258 00:13:36,840 --> 00:13:39,880 Speaker 1: He was twenty one when the murders were committed, and 259 00:13:40,120 --> 00:13:43,320 Speaker 1: he has a to pay. Well, I don't in prison now. 260 00:13:43,360 --> 00:13:45,199 Speaker 1: If you see photos of them now, he just shaved 261 00:13:45,240 --> 00:13:48,480 Speaker 1: his Heady's balt but when he was younger, in his twenties, 262 00:13:48,480 --> 00:13:50,520 Speaker 1: he wore a to pay. And Eric even says that 263 00:13:50,559 --> 00:13:52,960 Speaker 1: he did not know his brother wore a to pay. 264 00:13:52,960 --> 00:13:55,079 Speaker 1: And there's a scene in Monsters where it shows Kitty 265 00:13:55,160 --> 00:14:00,600 Speaker 1: ripping off Lyle's to pay, and apparently, according to interviews 266 00:14:00,640 --> 00:14:03,720 Speaker 1: with Lyle and Eric, that was true, that really did happen. 267 00:14:03,800 --> 00:14:06,439 Speaker 1: She got angry, she ripped his two pay off, and 268 00:14:06,559 --> 00:14:08,840 Speaker 1: Eric had no idea that he had worn a to pay. 269 00:14:09,080 --> 00:14:11,920 Speaker 2: It's a little insight into their the way their dinners 270 00:14:11,920 --> 00:14:12,920 Speaker 2: are taking place. 271 00:14:13,160 --> 00:14:23,880 Speaker 1: Right all right. So here's something I just want to do. 272 00:14:24,000 --> 00:14:28,880 Speaker 1: There are lots of lots of documentaries, TV series, There's 273 00:14:29,000 --> 00:14:31,440 Speaker 1: films that have to do with the Menendez you know. 274 00:14:31,640 --> 00:14:34,600 Speaker 1: I think for me, the one that I would suggest 275 00:14:34,600 --> 00:14:37,200 Speaker 1: someone watching if you're trying to get into the Menindez 276 00:14:37,240 --> 00:14:39,120 Speaker 1: for the first time and you want some background information. 277 00:14:39,560 --> 00:14:43,360 Speaker 1: I do like the most recent documentary that is on Netflix. 278 00:14:43,400 --> 00:14:46,600 Speaker 1: It's Lyle and Eric their Interview from Prison. I think 279 00:14:46,680 --> 00:14:49,200 Speaker 1: that it gives a lot of background information. It interviews 280 00:14:49,200 --> 00:14:52,920 Speaker 1: the prosecutor, it interviews Lyle and Eric, it gives a 281 00:14:52,960 --> 00:14:57,960 Speaker 1: lot of insight. It interviews cops, police involved detectives. It's 282 00:14:58,240 --> 00:15:01,520 Speaker 1: very interesting and I think it's a good synopsis of 283 00:15:01,520 --> 00:15:04,000 Speaker 1: what happened. There's a lot of things out there that 284 00:15:04,080 --> 00:15:07,240 Speaker 1: are TV movies and things like that. I don't know. 285 00:15:07,280 --> 00:15:10,440 Speaker 1: I find them to be highly dramatized. But anyway, let's 286 00:15:10,440 --> 00:15:12,120 Speaker 1: get into here's something I want to do because I 287 00:15:12,120 --> 00:15:14,960 Speaker 1: want to hear your thoughts on this, because you never 288 00:15:15,000 --> 00:15:18,040 Speaker 1: agree with anything I say. But the biggest question right 289 00:15:18,080 --> 00:15:21,440 Speaker 1: now is should they be released? Because where we're at 290 00:15:21,520 --> 00:15:26,680 Speaker 1: now is there's two options. There's the Habeas petition and 291 00:15:26,720 --> 00:15:28,720 Speaker 1: there's also a recent and sing request. 292 00:15:28,760 --> 00:15:30,680 Speaker 2: Okay, well, explain the Habeas petition. 293 00:15:31,000 --> 00:15:33,640 Speaker 1: The Habeas petition was filed back in May of twenty 294 00:15:33,720 --> 00:15:36,240 Speaker 1: twenty three. And actually we'll have Alexandra on in a 295 00:15:36,280 --> 00:15:39,040 Speaker 1: little bit. Who is the current she represents them Meninda's 296 00:15:39,080 --> 00:15:42,320 Speaker 1: brothers currently, so we'll get some more insight into that. 297 00:15:42,640 --> 00:15:45,680 Speaker 1: But the Habeas petition was basically based on some new 298 00:15:45,720 --> 00:15:50,120 Speaker 1: evidence that came forward that corroborates the abuse. And those 299 00:15:50,160 --> 00:15:54,440 Speaker 1: two pieces of new evidence is one there is the 300 00:15:54,520 --> 00:15:57,800 Speaker 1: man named Roy Roussello. There was a new documentary. It's 301 00:15:57,800 --> 00:15:59,760 Speaker 1: not on Netflix. I'm not sure where it's at. But 302 00:15:59,800 --> 00:16:02,360 Speaker 1: it's the Menudo Menindez documentary. 303 00:16:02,480 --> 00:16:05,320 Speaker 2: Okay, So the Habeast petition is just new evidence that 304 00:16:05,360 --> 00:16:07,760 Speaker 2: they want to introduce, right, Okay, in late terms. 305 00:16:07,920 --> 00:16:08,120 Speaker 1: Right. 306 00:16:08,200 --> 00:16:10,880 Speaker 2: And then the second one was a resentencing hearing. 307 00:16:11,040 --> 00:16:13,640 Speaker 1: The second one is a recencing hearing, and it's basically 308 00:16:13,680 --> 00:16:16,080 Speaker 1: a request to re sentence, and it's based on a 309 00:16:16,080 --> 00:16:17,880 Speaker 1: lot of factors. I'm not sure exactly what all those 310 00:16:17,880 --> 00:16:21,560 Speaker 1: factors are, but it's basically like the family supports them. 311 00:16:21,720 --> 00:16:26,680 Speaker 1: They've been model prisoners during their time. There has been 312 00:16:26,760 --> 00:16:29,960 Speaker 1: some corroboration of abuse. They've been in prison long enough, 313 00:16:30,040 --> 00:16:33,360 Speaker 1: their family supports them. They're not, you know, a menace 314 00:16:33,400 --> 00:16:35,920 Speaker 1: to society. No one suspects that they would, you know, 315 00:16:36,040 --> 00:16:38,080 Speaker 1: commit crimes if they were really back to. 316 00:16:38,080 --> 00:16:42,160 Speaker 2: The life without parole. So they're not incentivized for good 317 00:16:42,240 --> 00:16:46,440 Speaker 2: behavior and hopes of getting out. But yet they're maintaining 318 00:16:46,800 --> 00:16:50,480 Speaker 2: good behavior and I think they're working on their education, yes, 319 00:16:50,640 --> 00:16:53,760 Speaker 2: and they were supporting other prisoners in probably reforming it 320 00:16:53,880 --> 00:16:54,520 Speaker 2: and abuse. 321 00:16:55,440 --> 00:17:00,520 Speaker 1: They work with hospice patients, they work with abuse suffers, abuse, 322 00:17:00,800 --> 00:17:04,040 Speaker 1: they've been model prisoners and like you said, it's very 323 00:17:04,080 --> 00:17:08,159 Speaker 1: significant that they were doing those things, never thinking that 324 00:17:08,240 --> 00:17:12,320 Speaker 1: there was a chance for them to be paroled. All Right, 325 00:17:12,359 --> 00:17:14,040 Speaker 1: I just want to go into a little bit of 326 00:17:14,080 --> 00:17:17,880 Speaker 1: an analysis because you're an attorney, and let's just talk 327 00:17:17,920 --> 00:17:21,400 Speaker 1: about some of the things that make this a premeditated 328 00:17:22,040 --> 00:17:25,719 Speaker 1: brutal murder that would suggest that they should stay in prison. 329 00:17:26,720 --> 00:17:30,520 Speaker 1: So Eric wrote a screenplay about a team killing his 330 00:17:30,640 --> 00:17:35,199 Speaker 1: parents for their inheritance. Before the murders, they also supposedly 331 00:17:35,240 --> 00:17:37,680 Speaker 1: watched a movie called The Billionaire Boys Club, which was 332 00:17:37,720 --> 00:17:39,760 Speaker 1: about murdering their parents for money. 333 00:17:40,040 --> 00:17:41,680 Speaker 2: Which start Judd Nelson. 334 00:17:41,720 --> 00:17:43,199 Speaker 1: By the way, have you seen that movie? You are 335 00:17:43,240 --> 00:17:45,960 Speaker 1: a big jo when I watched it, Well, you might 336 00:17:46,000 --> 00:17:48,800 Speaker 1: have watched it the same night the Meninda's brothers watched it. 337 00:17:49,480 --> 00:17:53,240 Speaker 2: Possibly they bought that of a. 338 00:17:53,280 --> 00:17:56,960 Speaker 1: Parent, right, but was it for for money? For an inheritance? 339 00:17:58,800 --> 00:18:03,080 Speaker 1: They bought the shotguns and the ammunition two days prior 340 00:18:03,119 --> 00:18:06,360 Speaker 1: to the murders. They use a fake ID to buy 341 00:18:06,359 --> 00:18:09,480 Speaker 1: the guns. And let's just talk a minute, because I 342 00:18:09,520 --> 00:18:11,560 Speaker 1: think this is just to be fair, we have to 343 00:18:11,600 --> 00:18:15,000 Speaker 1: talk about the brutality of the murders before. 344 00:18:14,840 --> 00:18:17,679 Speaker 2: You get to the brutality. Yeah, those facts that you 345 00:18:17,720 --> 00:18:22,840 Speaker 2: stated two days before bought ammunition or whatever you said, 346 00:18:23,960 --> 00:18:27,280 Speaker 2: that would have that would take place regardless of the 347 00:18:27,320 --> 00:18:31,320 Speaker 2: intent behind the murders. If they were going to kill 348 00:18:31,680 --> 00:18:35,119 Speaker 2: and eliminate their parents because of abuse, they'd still have 349 00:18:35,200 --> 00:18:37,399 Speaker 2: to go get a gun, they'd still have to do 350 00:18:37,440 --> 00:18:41,600 Speaker 2: all those things. So it doesn't That doesn't sway someone. 351 00:18:41,680 --> 00:18:46,440 Speaker 2: That shouldn't sway someone as to the motive for reasoning 352 00:18:46,520 --> 00:18:47,880 Speaker 2: behind the murders. 353 00:18:48,000 --> 00:18:50,320 Speaker 1: I think though, but when you buy the guns two days. 354 00:18:50,080 --> 00:18:53,960 Speaker 2: Although the high school script is a little questionable because 355 00:18:53,960 --> 00:18:55,600 Speaker 2: I didn't write high school script. 356 00:18:55,280 --> 00:19:00,200 Speaker 1: On I think though that the fact that they bought 357 00:19:00,240 --> 00:19:03,600 Speaker 1: the guns two days prior and there's a cooling off 358 00:19:03,680 --> 00:19:07,600 Speaker 1: period and there wasn't anything that happened, well, I mean, 359 00:19:07,640 --> 00:19:09,440 Speaker 1: they do claim that they were scared for their life. 360 00:19:09,720 --> 00:19:13,640 Speaker 1: Their first defense was at an imperfect self defense. That's 361 00:19:13,680 --> 00:19:15,879 Speaker 1: where you have to really put yourself in the mind 362 00:19:15,960 --> 00:19:18,720 Speaker 1: of someone that's been sexually and physically abused. And I've 363 00:19:18,760 --> 00:19:20,560 Speaker 1: never been through that, so it's hard for me to 364 00:19:20,600 --> 00:19:22,040 Speaker 1: put myself in someone's shoes. 365 00:19:22,160 --> 00:19:25,440 Speaker 2: And I'm guessing an imperfect self defense is when they 366 00:19:25,520 --> 00:19:28,760 Speaker 2: they're under the reasonable belief that they have a defense, 367 00:19:29,560 --> 00:19:34,520 Speaker 2: but legally they do not, or factually, perhaps they're incorrect exactly. 368 00:19:34,680 --> 00:19:38,399 Speaker 1: That is where us, from a reasonable standard looking into it, 369 00:19:38,440 --> 00:19:42,760 Speaker 1: we would say your life wasn't in jeopardy. But from them, 370 00:19:42,800 --> 00:19:45,240 Speaker 1: given their own circumstances, the. 371 00:19:45,200 --> 00:19:47,040 Speaker 2: Equivalent would be if someone comes at me with a 372 00:19:47,080 --> 00:19:51,199 Speaker 2: fake gun and I defend myself, and then after the 373 00:19:51,240 --> 00:19:53,760 Speaker 2: fact we learned that the fake that the gun was fake, 374 00:19:54,280 --> 00:20:00,040 Speaker 2: and I never was really under any death threat of death, right, Okay. 375 00:20:00,160 --> 00:20:01,639 Speaker 1: All right, So let's get a little bit into the 376 00:20:01,640 --> 00:20:04,840 Speaker 1: brutality of the murders. Just on that evening. They use 377 00:20:05,000 --> 00:20:09,760 Speaker 1: Mossberg shotguns. They were pump action shotguns. They went into 378 00:20:09,840 --> 00:20:12,800 Speaker 1: the foyer where their parents were sitting watching TV. They 379 00:20:12,800 --> 00:20:16,000 Speaker 1: were watching a movie. They were seated on the couch. 380 00:20:16,080 --> 00:20:19,159 Speaker 1: I believe they were eating ice cream, and they shot 381 00:20:19,200 --> 00:20:22,480 Speaker 1: them at close range. There were ten shots that hit Jose, 382 00:20:22,760 --> 00:20:25,920 Speaker 1: and I believe no ten hit Kitty. Five hit Jose. 383 00:20:27,720 --> 00:20:31,960 Speaker 1: You're talking about brutal, in your face up front murders, right, 384 00:20:32,600 --> 00:20:35,560 Speaker 1: which to me, if I think about it as an adult, 385 00:20:36,880 --> 00:20:39,119 Speaker 1: there's a lot of rage. That's a rage killing. 386 00:20:39,800 --> 00:20:42,919 Speaker 2: Oh yeah, that's not one shot to the head. They're dead, Okay, 387 00:20:43,119 --> 00:20:47,800 Speaker 2: mission accomplished, right, that's the I want you freaking dead, right, 388 00:20:48,000 --> 00:20:50,520 Speaker 2: and also I have a question whether any words exchanged 389 00:20:50,560 --> 00:20:52,320 Speaker 2: prior to that that we know of, whether it's accurate 390 00:20:52,440 --> 00:20:52,639 Speaker 2: or not. 391 00:20:53,359 --> 00:20:55,920 Speaker 1: No, not that I not that I've ever read or 392 00:20:56,359 --> 00:20:59,040 Speaker 1: heard in testimony. Basically, what happened was they got the 393 00:20:59,080 --> 00:21:02,760 Speaker 1: shotguns out of the car. They entered into the foyer 394 00:21:02,840 --> 00:21:06,040 Speaker 1: of their home. Each son had a shotgun. They busted 395 00:21:06,080 --> 00:21:09,240 Speaker 1: through the double doors that were closed of the den 396 00:21:09,400 --> 00:21:12,000 Speaker 1: TV room. It was a wood paneled room, and they 397 00:21:12,240 --> 00:21:17,280 Speaker 1: just began firing at close range. And actually Kitty fell 398 00:21:17,359 --> 00:21:19,080 Speaker 1: to the ground. She jumped up from the couch. She 399 00:21:19,080 --> 00:21:20,440 Speaker 1: put her hand up in front of her face, a 400 00:21:20,520 --> 00:21:24,679 Speaker 1: defensive hand to stop the shot. She screamed, no, something 401 00:21:24,680 --> 00:21:28,000 Speaker 1: to that effect. She fell to the ground. She was 402 00:21:28,160 --> 00:21:31,160 Speaker 1: not dead. She tried to crawl away. They went back 403 00:21:31,200 --> 00:21:35,679 Speaker 1: to the car, reloaded, and entered the house and Lyle 404 00:21:35,720 --> 00:21:36,640 Speaker 1: shot her in the. 405 00:21:36,600 --> 00:21:38,760 Speaker 2: Face after Kitty was already dead. 406 00:21:39,080 --> 00:21:41,639 Speaker 1: No, she was not dead, she was okay, she was 407 00:21:41,680 --> 00:21:44,920 Speaker 1: still she was shot. She was still alive, she was crawling. 408 00:21:44,960 --> 00:21:47,439 Speaker 2: Where was she shot? Why did they shoot one in 409 00:21:47,480 --> 00:21:48,440 Speaker 2: the head and not the other. 410 00:21:49,080 --> 00:21:50,760 Speaker 1: Lyle walked around to the back of the couch and 411 00:21:50,800 --> 00:21:53,120 Speaker 1: shot Jose in the back of the head. So basically 412 00:21:53,160 --> 00:21:54,320 Speaker 1: eviscerated his brain. 413 00:21:54,760 --> 00:21:59,000 Speaker 2: Okay, okay, so that was without any warning, right, But 414 00:21:59,040 --> 00:22:01,479 Speaker 2: then then the mud probably had some reaction. 415 00:22:01,640 --> 00:22:04,480 Speaker 1: Well, she jumped up and apparently she put her arms up, 416 00:22:05,000 --> 00:22:07,560 Speaker 1: so she had shots through you know, her hand and 417 00:22:07,600 --> 00:22:09,800 Speaker 1: her arm. She I think she had a shot in 418 00:22:09,840 --> 00:22:12,439 Speaker 1: the face. She fell to the ground. She was not dead. 419 00:22:13,160 --> 00:22:15,160 Speaker 1: Jose was killed instantly. He was shot in the back 420 00:22:15,160 --> 00:22:17,520 Speaker 1: of the head. Kitty did not die instantly. She was 421 00:22:17,560 --> 00:22:21,280 Speaker 1: on the ground. She was crawling to get away. They 422 00:22:21,320 --> 00:22:25,080 Speaker 1: went back to the car, reloaded the shotguns, came. 423 00:22:25,040 --> 00:22:29,480 Speaker 2: Back to the car, reload the shotguns, came and shot 424 00:22:29,520 --> 00:22:32,520 Speaker 2: their mother in the face. Lyle how many times? 425 00:22:32,560 --> 00:22:33,600 Speaker 1: One time to the face. 426 00:22:34,440 --> 00:22:38,000 Speaker 2: Okay, it's pretty bad. Yeah. 427 00:22:38,119 --> 00:22:41,440 Speaker 1: Then after the murders, they left the house. They got 428 00:22:41,520 --> 00:22:43,360 Speaker 1: rid of This is interesting to me. They got rid 429 00:22:43,400 --> 00:22:46,040 Speaker 1: of the shotguns and apparently they dumped them somewhere along 430 00:22:46,080 --> 00:22:49,800 Speaker 1: Mall Hall and Drive. What is so incredible to me 431 00:22:50,000 --> 00:22:52,280 Speaker 1: is that thirty five years later, those shotguns have never 432 00:22:52,320 --> 00:22:52,840 Speaker 1: been found. 433 00:22:53,600 --> 00:22:56,560 Speaker 2: Well, you've said that before, and I don't know if 434 00:22:56,560 --> 00:22:58,800 Speaker 2: I agree with that. I mean, I'm sure there's lots 435 00:22:58,800 --> 00:23:01,199 Speaker 2: of weapons that get tossed, and it's in LA and 436 00:23:01,240 --> 00:23:03,919 Speaker 2: some people probably found it and no one knew what 437 00:23:03,920 --> 00:23:05,439 Speaker 2: it was at the time when they found it, and 438 00:23:05,440 --> 00:23:08,080 Speaker 2: they repurposed it for some other crime, and then that 439 00:23:08,160 --> 00:23:08,760 Speaker 2: was the end of it. 440 00:23:08,840 --> 00:23:10,560 Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean the only thing I can think is, 441 00:23:11,000 --> 00:23:13,720 Speaker 1: I mean they were found, no one knew the significance 442 00:23:13,760 --> 00:23:15,840 Speaker 1: of them, and then is there in some. 443 00:23:15,960 --> 00:23:18,320 Speaker 2: Side of the road. I mean, anything could happen. If 444 00:23:18,359 --> 00:23:19,959 Speaker 2: you said that they were in the house and it 445 00:23:20,000 --> 00:23:23,040 Speaker 2: was never found, then I'd questioned it. But it's on 446 00:23:23,119 --> 00:23:25,680 Speaker 2: the public road. I don't think that's as big of 447 00:23:25,720 --> 00:23:28,080 Speaker 2: a deal as you make it out to be. Secondly, 448 00:23:28,200 --> 00:23:30,639 Speaker 2: if they found the guns even today, if they found 449 00:23:30,640 --> 00:23:33,520 Speaker 2: them today and they were preserved, what value would that 450 00:23:33,680 --> 00:23:34,879 Speaker 2: they've confessed to the crime. 451 00:23:35,080 --> 00:23:37,040 Speaker 1: No, they did confess, and I know there's no value 452 00:23:37,080 --> 00:23:39,200 Speaker 1: to finding the weapons. I'm sure that's why the police 453 00:23:39,240 --> 00:23:42,600 Speaker 1: didn't bother searching, because it's not like they needed that 454 00:23:42,800 --> 00:23:44,160 Speaker 1: to you know, I mean, they. 455 00:23:44,280 --> 00:23:47,640 Speaker 2: Didn't need a smoking gun. But then I go back, 456 00:23:47,720 --> 00:23:49,840 Speaker 2: I go back and forth lot. I go back to 457 00:23:50,840 --> 00:23:53,080 Speaker 2: why did they throw away the guns? Why are they 458 00:23:53,119 --> 00:23:54,640 Speaker 2: hiding the evidence? 459 00:23:55,040 --> 00:23:56,840 Speaker 1: Well, that was this is part of the analysis. So 460 00:23:56,880 --> 00:24:01,239 Speaker 1: it's after they shot their parents, they they got rid 461 00:24:01,320 --> 00:24:03,639 Speaker 1: of the bloody clothes. I read. I think it was 462 00:24:03,640 --> 00:24:05,480 Speaker 1: in a book by Robert rand I read that they 463 00:24:05,520 --> 00:24:07,200 Speaker 1: got rid of the bloody clothes, like behind a gas 464 00:24:07,200 --> 00:24:10,439 Speaker 1: station somewhere they changed their clothes into I guess they 465 00:24:10,480 --> 00:24:12,679 Speaker 1: had some tennis clothes in their car. They tried to 466 00:24:12,720 --> 00:24:15,720 Speaker 1: buy movie tickets for an earlier movie time. They tried 467 00:24:15,760 --> 00:24:18,119 Speaker 1: to see Batman in an earlier time because they wanted 468 00:24:18,119 --> 00:24:21,600 Speaker 1: a timestamp on the movie to prove an alibi. They 469 00:24:21,640 --> 00:24:23,879 Speaker 1: also tried to meet up with a friend at the 470 00:24:23,920 --> 00:24:25,760 Speaker 1: Taste of La and then later tried to meet up 471 00:24:25,760 --> 00:24:28,200 Speaker 1: with him at Cheesecake, again trying to establish some type 472 00:24:28,200 --> 00:24:31,400 Speaker 1: of alibi. They were turned back. 473 00:24:31,200 --> 00:24:33,440 Speaker 2: To that after the fact they tried to establish alibis. 474 00:24:33,520 --> 00:24:35,479 Speaker 1: Yeah, after the fact they were trying to establish They 475 00:24:35,480 --> 00:24:37,159 Speaker 1: were trying to buy a movie ticket for earlier in 476 00:24:37,200 --> 00:24:39,560 Speaker 1: the night, you know, like the nine to ten showing. 477 00:24:39,640 --> 00:24:41,880 Speaker 2: How did they forget that part? They should have bought 478 00:24:41,920 --> 00:24:42,600 Speaker 2: the ticket. 479 00:24:42,359 --> 00:24:44,360 Speaker 1: Before, Yeah, but they couldn't. I don't think you could 480 00:24:44,359 --> 00:24:46,440 Speaker 1: buy a ticket that early for a nine pm showing. 481 00:24:46,480 --> 00:24:47,520 Speaker 1: I don't know, I. 482 00:24:47,200 --> 00:24:49,919 Speaker 2: I don't know. Presumably it was the Tim Burton Batman 483 00:24:50,000 --> 00:24:50,679 Speaker 2: with Chack Nicholson. 484 00:24:50,800 --> 00:24:52,520 Speaker 1: It was it was the nineteen eighty nine Batman that 485 00:24:52,560 --> 00:24:55,600 Speaker 1: they were trying to buy tickets too. They returned back 486 00:24:55,640 --> 00:24:58,920 Speaker 1: to the home. This is almost around midnight, and at 487 00:24:58,960 --> 00:25:00,919 Speaker 1: a they realized they back home, and they realized that 488 00:25:00,920 --> 00:25:02,920 Speaker 1: there's no police there. They thought for sure that someone 489 00:25:02,920 --> 00:25:06,639 Speaker 1: would have heard the shots in this quiet, sleepy you know, 490 00:25:07,119 --> 00:25:09,280 Speaker 1: Beverly Hills neighborhood. 491 00:25:09,119 --> 00:25:10,359 Speaker 2: As you described it earlier. 492 00:25:10,440 --> 00:25:12,840 Speaker 1: It was it is, and no one did. So they 493 00:25:12,840 --> 00:25:14,720 Speaker 1: return home. They don't know what to do. There's no 494 00:25:14,800 --> 00:25:18,199 Speaker 1: police there. They enter the home. Lyle calls nine one 495 00:25:18,480 --> 00:25:22,480 Speaker 1: at eleven forty seven. They are yelling. They're emotional. They're saying, 496 00:25:22,520 --> 00:25:25,320 Speaker 1: someone shot our parents. The police show up two minutes later. 497 00:25:25,440 --> 00:25:27,600 Speaker 1: They come out of the house. They drop to their knees. 498 00:25:27,880 --> 00:25:31,240 Speaker 1: They're crying, pounding the ground. Our parents have been shot. 499 00:25:31,480 --> 00:25:35,200 Speaker 1: They blame it on the mafia because their dad was supposedly, 500 00:25:35,280 --> 00:25:37,119 Speaker 1: you know, it was a big wig at RCA. So 501 00:25:37,160 --> 00:25:39,119 Speaker 1: they blame it on well, not at the time. He 502 00:25:39,280 --> 00:25:41,280 Speaker 1: worked for RCA earlier, but then he worked for Live 503 00:25:41,440 --> 00:25:48,439 Speaker 1: Entertainment after that. There's all the evidence of the spending spree. 504 00:25:48,480 --> 00:25:50,320 Speaker 1: You know, they bought rolllexes they house. 505 00:25:50,480 --> 00:25:52,040 Speaker 2: Soon after, they spend money. 506 00:25:52,080 --> 00:25:55,800 Speaker 1: Okay, well, they bought new suits and rolllexes. I believe 507 00:25:55,840 --> 00:25:58,320 Speaker 1: either one day or two days before the funeral, the 508 00:25:58,359 --> 00:26:01,600 Speaker 1: memorial service in Hollywood for their parents, they spent sixteen 509 00:26:01,600 --> 00:26:05,080 Speaker 1: thousand dollars on money clips and three new rolexes. That 510 00:26:05,320 --> 00:26:08,080 Speaker 1: was a day or two before the memorial so that 511 00:26:08,160 --> 00:26:10,000 Speaker 1: was within days of the murders. 512 00:26:10,000 --> 00:26:13,280 Speaker 2: Probably not related. But in Billionaire Boys Club they did 513 00:26:13,320 --> 00:26:16,679 Speaker 2: the same thing. They spiffed themselves up with Mercedes and 514 00:26:16,760 --> 00:26:19,560 Speaker 2: suits and Rolexes and try to really look like we 515 00:26:19,640 --> 00:26:21,600 Speaker 2: got our a game on right. But of course they 516 00:26:21,640 --> 00:26:23,080 Speaker 2: were also pursuing business ventures. 517 00:26:23,119 --> 00:26:25,439 Speaker 1: But anyway, go ahead, okay, so well then that's another Also, 518 00:26:25,800 --> 00:26:28,320 Speaker 1: I believe Lyle bought a restaurant in New Jersey, so 519 00:26:28,400 --> 00:26:31,120 Speaker 1: they spent. They spent a lot of money. They actually 520 00:26:31,160 --> 00:26:34,800 Speaker 1: got I think seven hundred thousand dollars from an insurance 521 00:26:34,840 --> 00:26:39,080 Speaker 1: policy pretty immediately after the murders, and they also were 522 00:26:39,119 --> 00:26:41,680 Speaker 1: authorized to use their dad's AMX up to two hundred 523 00:26:41,680 --> 00:26:43,720 Speaker 1: and fifty thousand. They also bought I think a Geep 524 00:26:43,800 --> 00:26:44,520 Speaker 1: a Porsche. 525 00:26:44,600 --> 00:26:46,760 Speaker 2: But see if they had all this money, like the 526 00:26:46,760 --> 00:26:49,639 Speaker 2: two hundred and fifty grand or whatever line of credit 527 00:26:49,720 --> 00:26:53,560 Speaker 2: or whatever it was. Then they had access to money. 528 00:26:53,920 --> 00:26:57,359 Speaker 2: It's not like, you know, Dad won't buy us this, 529 00:26:57,760 --> 00:27:00,760 Speaker 2: and they're stingy and they're going to give away the money, 530 00:27:01,080 --> 00:27:03,439 Speaker 2: and you know, we have to go to school. We 531 00:27:03,440 --> 00:27:05,879 Speaker 2: don't want to go to school. We just want our money. Now, 532 00:27:06,920 --> 00:27:09,239 Speaker 2: that leads me to think that they were living a 533 00:27:09,240 --> 00:27:14,840 Speaker 2: wonderful life financially, So why would they Where's the motive? No, 534 00:27:14,920 --> 00:27:18,760 Speaker 2: I agree, I think that I have anyway, not conclusion. 535 00:27:18,840 --> 00:27:20,760 Speaker 1: No, I don't disagree with you. I think the prosecution 536 00:27:20,840 --> 00:27:23,480 Speaker 1: and the media pushed very hard that the motive was 537 00:27:23,520 --> 00:27:27,160 Speaker 1: for money. But if you analyze their lifestyle, you're not 538 00:27:27,200 --> 00:27:31,240 Speaker 1: talking about two kids that were withheld anything. I think 539 00:27:31,280 --> 00:27:34,800 Speaker 1: they lived. Yeah, they had to pay, they had They 540 00:27:34,840 --> 00:27:37,440 Speaker 1: lived a very lavish lifestyle. I don't think their parents, 541 00:27:38,280 --> 00:27:41,560 Speaker 1: you know, I think they gave them everything that they needed. 542 00:27:41,680 --> 00:27:45,440 Speaker 1: So sometimes when I think about the spending spree, if 543 00:27:45,440 --> 00:27:51,600 Speaker 1: we're talking about the abuse being true, then maybe that 544 00:27:51,840 --> 00:27:57,320 Speaker 1: was their way of exhibiting their freedom. Yeah, not so much. 545 00:27:57,880 --> 00:27:59,760 Speaker 1: We just want all this money, but that was the 546 00:27:59,800 --> 00:28:04,040 Speaker 1: way that they could outwardly exert that. They find out. 547 00:28:04,960 --> 00:28:07,880 Speaker 2: Now we have money. It's now we don't have our 548 00:28:07,960 --> 00:28:14,600 Speaker 2: parents abusing us or controlling us and dictating our lives. 549 00:28:14,920 --> 00:28:17,440 Speaker 2: Right yeah. So it's like you let a dog out 550 00:28:17,440 --> 00:28:19,200 Speaker 2: in the yard, out of the yard, and all of 551 00:28:19,200 --> 00:28:29,680 Speaker 2: sudd Now they're just roaming free, right yeah. 552 00:28:29,760 --> 00:28:34,080 Speaker 1: Okay, So let's talk about some things that I think 553 00:28:34,359 --> 00:28:37,160 Speaker 1: were very fundamental for me when I was going through 554 00:28:37,160 --> 00:28:39,400 Speaker 1: this case and reading things and watching things that really 555 00:28:39,480 --> 00:28:43,280 Speaker 1: led me to believe that the abuse allegations were real. 556 00:28:44,520 --> 00:28:47,040 Speaker 1: There was detailed testimony and a lot of emotion in 557 00:28:47,080 --> 00:28:49,920 Speaker 1: the first trial when Eric and Lyle both testified. If 558 00:28:49,920 --> 00:28:53,920 Speaker 1: you have the opportunity, I would say, either watch their testimony. 559 00:28:53,960 --> 00:28:56,520 Speaker 1: You can find YouTube videos of it, or read the 560 00:28:56,520 --> 00:29:00,320 Speaker 1: trial transcripts. I don't think that you can act. To me, 561 00:29:00,440 --> 00:29:06,280 Speaker 1: that's not acting. That's real, hardcore emotion. There are also 562 00:29:06,880 --> 00:29:10,040 Speaker 1: two family witnesses that corroborated the abuse. I believe there 563 00:29:10,040 --> 00:29:12,640 Speaker 1: were two cousins that testified that they had seen abuse 564 00:29:12,680 --> 00:29:16,080 Speaker 1: within the home. There was a letter that Eric had 565 00:29:16,080 --> 00:29:19,360 Speaker 1: written to his cousin Andy eight months prior to the murder, 566 00:29:19,480 --> 00:29:22,440 Speaker 1: kind of outlining that the abuse was happening. That's one 567 00:29:22,440 --> 00:29:25,920 Speaker 1: of the pieces of evidence that was found later, there's 568 00:29:26,000 --> 00:29:29,360 Speaker 1: the declaration of Roy Roussello from Minuto, who claims that 569 00:29:29,480 --> 00:29:32,560 Speaker 1: Jose Mendez drugged him and raped him in his home. 570 00:29:34,040 --> 00:29:36,800 Speaker 1: And then also in the most recent Netflix documentary, this 571 00:29:37,000 --> 00:29:40,680 Speaker 1: was really an AHA moment for me. They're interviewing Pam 572 00:29:40,760 --> 00:29:43,880 Speaker 1: who was the prosecutor in the first trial, and she 573 00:29:44,200 --> 00:29:48,960 Speaker 1: openly admits that they could not find one character witness 574 00:29:49,040 --> 00:29:51,560 Speaker 1: to testify on behalf of Jose to say he was 575 00:29:51,600 --> 00:29:54,840 Speaker 1: a good man. Not one, not a single character witness. 576 00:29:55,040 --> 00:29:58,440 Speaker 2: Would they testify the opposite? 577 00:29:58,920 --> 00:30:00,520 Speaker 1: I'm sure, But the prosecutor is not going to. 578 00:30:00,520 --> 00:30:03,840 Speaker 2: No, no, But have you heard anything or because not 579 00:30:03,840 --> 00:30:08,720 Speaker 2: not witnessing or testifying that he was a good man 580 00:30:09,400 --> 00:30:12,120 Speaker 2: doesn't mean he was a bad man. Was anyone Did 581 00:30:12,160 --> 00:30:14,840 Speaker 2: anyone have bad thoughts and interactions with him? 582 00:30:15,040 --> 00:30:17,200 Speaker 1: Well, I'm sure they did. I think he was ruthless 583 00:30:17,200 --> 00:30:19,600 Speaker 1: in business, we know that, Yeah, I mean, all the 584 00:30:19,600 --> 00:30:21,600 Speaker 1: things I've read is he was ruthless, he had a 585 00:30:21,640 --> 00:30:24,440 Speaker 1: bad reputation, he was difficult to deal with, like, he 586 00:30:24,600 --> 00:30:27,920 Speaker 1: was not liked. I mean all those attributes also made 587 00:30:27,960 --> 00:30:32,720 Speaker 1: him a very highly skilled executive. I mean he got 588 00:30:32,760 --> 00:30:39,000 Speaker 1: pretty far. And then lastly, it's just their behavior in 589 00:30:39,080 --> 00:30:42,040 Speaker 1: prison I think is very commendable. The fact that they are. 590 00:30:42,200 --> 00:30:44,560 Speaker 1: They were sentenced to life without parole, and yet they 591 00:30:44,600 --> 00:30:48,800 Speaker 1: dedicated their lives to being educated, getting degrees and they're 592 00:30:48,840 --> 00:30:49,960 Speaker 1: both married. 593 00:30:50,840 --> 00:30:58,080 Speaker 2: Well they are, maybe they are crazy. What are your 594 00:30:58,080 --> 00:31:00,560 Speaker 2: thoughts on that? I don't know. All I know is 595 00:31:00,560 --> 00:31:02,680 Speaker 2: there's no conjugal visits for people that are in prison 596 00:31:02,680 --> 00:31:04,760 Speaker 2: for life without problem is very true. I was going 597 00:31:04,800 --> 00:31:06,400 Speaker 2: to get to that how they did marry for love? 598 00:31:06,560 --> 00:31:09,120 Speaker 1: They did for love because it wasn't for sex, for sure, 599 00:31:09,160 --> 00:31:13,160 Speaker 1: it was not supposedly though. So Eric is still married 600 00:31:13,200 --> 00:31:15,120 Speaker 1: to the same woman. Her name is Tammy. They got 601 00:31:15,120 --> 00:31:18,080 Speaker 1: married I believe, back in the nineties. She I think 602 00:31:18,240 --> 00:31:21,680 Speaker 1: is close to sixty at this point, he's like fifty 603 00:31:21,720 --> 00:31:22,440 Speaker 1: five or something. 604 00:31:22,600 --> 00:31:23,800 Speaker 2: That's fine, that's close in age. 605 00:31:23,920 --> 00:31:27,280 Speaker 1: My question is if they do get released, do you 606 00:31:27,360 --> 00:31:28,800 Speaker 1: think that marriage will last? 607 00:31:28,880 --> 00:31:31,840 Speaker 2: Well, I don't know. I don't know anything about the marriage. 608 00:31:32,120 --> 00:31:33,960 Speaker 2: I mean, I can't I can't comment on that. I 609 00:31:34,040 --> 00:31:37,360 Speaker 2: just can say that they haven't lived together before along, 610 00:31:37,480 --> 00:31:39,320 Speaker 2: they haven't even gone out to eat. I mean, I 611 00:31:39,320 --> 00:31:42,600 Speaker 2: don't even know. Yeah, they're going to come across new, 612 00:31:43,400 --> 00:31:47,280 Speaker 2: uh traits of their personalities. They go out together. Yeah, 613 00:31:47,560 --> 00:31:48,760 Speaker 2: so we're hopeful. 614 00:31:49,400 --> 00:31:51,560 Speaker 1: So Lyle has been married a couple of times. He's 615 00:31:51,560 --> 00:31:55,120 Speaker 1: currently married, but he's been married. Yeah, he's been married 616 00:31:55,120 --> 00:31:56,960 Speaker 1: a couple of times. I think I believe he's married 617 00:31:56,960 --> 00:32:00,320 Speaker 1: to his second wife right now. But she recently hosted 618 00:32:00,400 --> 00:32:02,480 Speaker 1: on Facebook because she runs a Facebook page for him, 619 00:32:03,000 --> 00:32:06,720 Speaker 1: that they are separated, but they remain best friends and 620 00:32:06,760 --> 00:32:10,200 Speaker 1: she still supports him. But he currently as far as 621 00:32:10,240 --> 00:32:12,160 Speaker 1: I know, I think the Daily Mail reported this, he 622 00:32:12,200 --> 00:32:15,960 Speaker 1: has a girlfriend that's twenty one and she's British. I 623 00:32:15,960 --> 00:32:19,600 Speaker 1: believe she flew out to the prison and she has 624 00:32:19,720 --> 00:32:21,800 Speaker 1: visited him and there were photos of them together. 625 00:32:22,000 --> 00:32:25,160 Speaker 2: Oh, this makes for a good episode of Life After 626 00:32:25,240 --> 00:32:29,560 Speaker 2: lock Up, it does, right now. That's good reality TV. 627 00:32:29,720 --> 00:32:31,080 Speaker 1: Shane and I used to watch that a lot. 628 00:32:31,440 --> 00:32:33,280 Speaker 2: Yeah, the Menenda's edition. 629 00:32:33,720 --> 00:32:36,400 Speaker 1: All right, So, based upon what we've gone through, we 630 00:32:36,440 --> 00:32:39,280 Speaker 1: did an analysis of why it was premeditated, the brutality 631 00:32:39,280 --> 00:32:41,240 Speaker 1: of the murders. But then some of the things that 632 00:32:41,360 --> 00:32:45,280 Speaker 1: convinced me that the abuse is true, that the abuse 633 00:32:45,320 --> 00:32:47,800 Speaker 1: was corroborated by family members. There was the letter that 634 00:32:47,920 --> 00:32:50,480 Speaker 1: was found from the cousin or that Eric had written 635 00:32:50,480 --> 00:32:54,120 Speaker 1: to the cousin the Menudo, you know, member that came 636 00:32:54,160 --> 00:32:56,320 Speaker 1: forward and said Jose had raped him. 637 00:32:56,560 --> 00:32:58,920 Speaker 2: Well, let's be clear then, so all this new evidence 638 00:33:00,200 --> 00:33:03,520 Speaker 2: leans towards they were abused and that would be the motive, 639 00:33:04,160 --> 00:33:07,080 Speaker 2: which doesn't mean it wasn't a murder, and it doesn't 640 00:33:07,200 --> 00:33:11,880 Speaker 2: justify murder because my parents have annoyed me from time 641 00:33:11,920 --> 00:33:15,800 Speaker 2: to time, and the world knows you've annoyed me for 642 00:33:15,960 --> 00:33:16,640 Speaker 2: time to time. 643 00:33:16,800 --> 00:33:17,520 Speaker 1: I do, I do. 644 00:33:18,000 --> 00:33:20,880 Speaker 2: Murder is never an option. Now, I haven't been abused 645 00:33:20,880 --> 00:33:22,880 Speaker 2: to the extent that they claim they have been, so 646 00:33:22,960 --> 00:33:27,760 Speaker 2: I certainly can't judge them. But what I'm getting at is, 647 00:33:28,120 --> 00:33:32,440 Speaker 2: so if if we find we being the court finds 648 00:33:32,680 --> 00:33:35,760 Speaker 2: that they have been abused, and that indeed is the 649 00:33:35,760 --> 00:33:40,320 Speaker 2: motive and it was not money, then are they supposed 650 00:33:40,320 --> 00:33:42,440 Speaker 2: to be out of jail? Should they still be in 651 00:33:42,520 --> 00:33:44,400 Speaker 2: jail because you know, murder is not. 652 00:33:44,680 --> 00:33:48,560 Speaker 1: Well, that's the argument that's to be made, And I'm 653 00:33:48,640 --> 00:33:52,560 Speaker 1: asking you from your legal analysis your opinion based upon 654 00:33:52,680 --> 00:33:55,000 Speaker 1: all the things we talked about that make it premeditated 655 00:33:55,040 --> 00:33:57,600 Speaker 1: a brutal murder, and then some of the things that 656 00:33:57,640 --> 00:33:59,280 Speaker 1: I put on the other side that have to do 657 00:33:59,360 --> 00:34:02,360 Speaker 1: with the crop of abuse, what they endured, what they've 658 00:34:02,400 --> 00:34:06,960 Speaker 1: gone through, do you think that they should be re 659 00:34:07,200 --> 00:34:09,799 Speaker 1: sentenced to a lesser sentence which would allow them to 660 00:34:09,840 --> 00:34:11,920 Speaker 1: be immediately eligible for pearl. 661 00:34:12,760 --> 00:34:16,600 Speaker 2: Okay, I have real strong opinions on this. Okay, Ready, 662 00:34:16,719 --> 00:34:19,759 Speaker 2: I don't know. I know enough to know that I 663 00:34:19,760 --> 00:34:21,960 Speaker 2: don't know what it's like to be abused, right, And 664 00:34:22,000 --> 00:34:24,160 Speaker 2: I don't know what the situation would be to have 665 00:34:24,200 --> 00:34:27,440 Speaker 2: a father as he's painted out to be. So far 666 00:34:28,520 --> 00:34:31,839 Speaker 2: to say, you know, I mean, and how I would 667 00:34:31,920 --> 00:34:34,480 Speaker 2: handle it if I would run away or leave or 668 00:34:34,640 --> 00:34:36,759 Speaker 2: punch my dad in the face or whatever it is. 669 00:34:37,239 --> 00:34:39,759 Speaker 2: I mean, I don't know how. I don't know how 670 00:34:39,760 --> 00:34:42,440 Speaker 2: I would handle it. So who am I to sit 671 00:34:42,520 --> 00:34:47,920 Speaker 2: here and judge them for how they handled whatever abuse 672 00:34:47,960 --> 00:34:51,760 Speaker 2: they encounter. I just don't know, and I'm not, Unfortunately, 673 00:34:52,120 --> 00:34:55,719 Speaker 2: I'm not in a position where my opinion really matters 674 00:34:55,920 --> 00:34:59,120 Speaker 2: to them. So I just can't go any further than 675 00:34:59,120 --> 00:35:00,880 Speaker 2: that other than saying I don't know, and I have 676 00:35:00,960 --> 00:35:04,279 Speaker 2: sympathy for people in that situation. I know. There's the 677 00:35:04,320 --> 00:35:08,160 Speaker 2: battered woman syndrome, right, which is I don't know where 678 00:35:08,160 --> 00:35:11,440 Speaker 2: it stands today legally, but it was recognized at one 679 00:35:11,520 --> 00:35:18,000 Speaker 2: point that in the battered woman syndrome, that she's in 680 00:35:18,040 --> 00:35:20,120 Speaker 2: no position to be able to get up and leave, 681 00:35:20,239 --> 00:35:23,600 Speaker 2: that her only way of survival for her and possibly 682 00:35:23,600 --> 00:35:26,719 Speaker 2: her children is to kill the man and that's the 683 00:35:26,760 --> 00:35:30,320 Speaker 2: only way out, and that was recognized before. 684 00:35:30,840 --> 00:35:32,960 Speaker 1: And I think that's a valid point that you make, 685 00:35:33,040 --> 00:35:36,279 Speaker 1: because I've read and heard many people who have commentated 686 00:35:36,320 --> 00:35:39,759 Speaker 1: on this case who are psychologists who are knowledgeable, who 687 00:35:39,800 --> 00:35:43,680 Speaker 1: have said things such as, if these were the Menindez sisters, 688 00:35:44,520 --> 00:35:46,160 Speaker 1: they would either have been it would have been a 689 00:35:46,239 --> 00:35:48,440 Speaker 1: lesser charge of manslaughter because it. 690 00:35:48,520 --> 00:35:52,399 Speaker 2: Comes off less violent and less physically aggressive if it's 691 00:35:52,400 --> 00:35:52,960 Speaker 2: a female. 692 00:35:53,640 --> 00:35:55,240 Speaker 1: I think you mean. 693 00:35:56,239 --> 00:36:00,080 Speaker 2: It's perceived if it's the Menendez sisters, as you said, 694 00:36:00,200 --> 00:36:04,160 Speaker 2: just I think me watching it as a young child, 695 00:36:04,239 --> 00:36:08,520 Speaker 2: and even now, it just naturally comes off as less aggressive. Wow, 696 00:36:08,600 --> 00:36:11,440 Speaker 2: they really that was their only way out, you know. 697 00:36:11,560 --> 00:36:17,440 Speaker 2: And you don't see daughters killing parents. You don't vision 698 00:36:17,520 --> 00:36:21,560 Speaker 2: and vision daughters killing parents for money. So you're saying, 699 00:36:22,840 --> 00:36:25,160 Speaker 2: and it's all prejudging and none of it's accurate. We 700 00:36:25,200 --> 00:36:27,080 Speaker 2: shouldn't be like that, But I'm just saying that's how 701 00:36:27,120 --> 00:36:27,640 Speaker 2: it comes off. 702 00:36:27,840 --> 00:36:30,439 Speaker 1: But I'm just saying if they were females, I think 703 00:36:30,480 --> 00:36:34,480 Speaker 1: the abuse allegations that they made would have been believed. 704 00:36:34,480 --> 00:36:36,239 Speaker 2: Oh, yes, I'm sorry, I'll start listening to you now. O. 705 00:36:36,320 --> 00:36:39,520 Speaker 1: Yes, okay, I'm just saying if they were females when 706 00:36:39,520 --> 00:36:42,120 Speaker 1: the abuse allegations came up, I think people would have 707 00:36:42,239 --> 00:36:46,200 Speaker 1: probably wholeheartedly believed what they were saying. You know, the 708 00:36:46,280 --> 00:36:48,160 Speaker 1: prosecutor paying it's. 709 00:36:47,920 --> 00:36:51,960 Speaker 2: More easy to accept that a man would be horrific 710 00:36:52,120 --> 00:36:56,120 Speaker 2: towards young women, right versus the other way around, exactly. 711 00:36:56,200 --> 00:36:59,200 Speaker 1: It was the understanding during that time period. In the 712 00:36:59,239 --> 00:37:03,320 Speaker 1: early nineties, there were two hung juries. In the first trial, 713 00:37:03,719 --> 00:37:08,000 Speaker 1: all of the men voted for premeditated murder. Men could 714 00:37:08,000 --> 00:37:11,280 Speaker 1: not wrap their heads around the fact that boys could 715 00:37:11,320 --> 00:37:15,040 Speaker 1: be sexually abused by their fathers. Right and the prosecution. 716 00:37:15,280 --> 00:37:16,799 Speaker 1: I saw it in a video I believe was on 717 00:37:16,840 --> 00:37:20,920 Speaker 1: YouTube somewhere where the prosecutor Pam says to the judge 718 00:37:21,360 --> 00:37:24,800 Speaker 1: in open court, it is our position that boys cannot 719 00:37:24,800 --> 00:37:31,719 Speaker 1: be sexually abused. Yeah, that's that's why this case is 720 00:37:31,800 --> 00:37:37,960 Speaker 1: so fundamental for today's society, and it's such an earmark 721 00:37:38,120 --> 00:37:40,719 Speaker 1: of accepting the fact that boys can be abused by 722 00:37:40,760 --> 00:37:45,560 Speaker 1: their parents. Right and that's where we're at, and hopefully 723 00:37:45,600 --> 00:37:48,720 Speaker 1: we have a recensing hearing coming up on January thirtieth. 724 00:37:48,760 --> 00:37:51,880 Speaker 1: There's a new DA in LA. His name's Nathan Hochman. 725 00:37:52,200 --> 00:37:55,560 Speaker 1: He's taking office soon. They had to delay the resentencing 726 00:37:55,680 --> 00:37:58,680 Speaker 1: to January thirtieth because he said he wanted time to 727 00:37:58,760 --> 00:38:01,800 Speaker 1: review everything. He wants to at the totality of the circumstances. 728 00:38:02,120 --> 00:38:03,680 Speaker 1: I believe he wants to go back and read all 729 00:38:03,680 --> 00:38:05,480 Speaker 1: the trials, transcripts, both trials. 730 00:38:05,600 --> 00:38:07,239 Speaker 2: I did see an interview with him where he said, 731 00:38:07,280 --> 00:38:08,839 Speaker 2: I'm not going to, you know, just because they got 732 00:38:08,920 --> 00:38:11,080 Speaker 2: popularity on Netflix and this, and that we're not going 733 00:38:11,120 --> 00:38:13,440 Speaker 2: to just rush it. I think he was like, I'm 734 00:38:13,440 --> 00:38:15,440 Speaker 2: going to treat this like any other case, which is 735 00:38:15,520 --> 00:38:17,960 Speaker 2: I need to look at everything, not just watch a 736 00:38:18,040 --> 00:38:19,160 Speaker 2: documentary exactly. 737 00:38:19,200 --> 00:38:21,840 Speaker 1: I saw a recent interview I respected that on TMZ 738 00:38:22,200 --> 00:38:24,520 Speaker 1: and he said that he wanted to make two things 739 00:38:24,600 --> 00:38:28,799 Speaker 1: crystal clear, One that there was no preferential treatment, that 740 00:38:28,840 --> 00:38:30,560 Speaker 1: he was going to do a thorough review of all 741 00:38:30,600 --> 00:38:33,120 Speaker 1: the facts in the Meninda's case. And two and I 742 00:38:33,120 --> 00:38:35,400 Speaker 1: thought this was really interesting. He said he loves the 743 00:38:35,440 --> 00:38:38,960 Speaker 1: media attention that this case is getting because it allows 744 00:38:39,040 --> 00:38:42,600 Speaker 1: so many people to get involved in the criminal justice system, 745 00:38:43,080 --> 00:38:46,480 Speaker 1: and he really urged everyone to not just watch a 746 00:38:46,560 --> 00:38:49,680 Speaker 1: dramatization like Monsters, but if you truly want to get 747 00:38:49,719 --> 00:38:52,440 Speaker 1: involved and you truly want to understand it, read the 748 00:38:52,480 --> 00:38:55,759 Speaker 1: trial transcripts, watch the trial, watch the cour TV. 749 00:38:56,200 --> 00:38:58,600 Speaker 2: Be so quick to judge exactly, Know that there's a 750 00:38:58,640 --> 00:39:03,120 Speaker 2: lot more to a murder then just it's cold blooded exactly. 751 00:39:04,080 --> 00:39:07,759 Speaker 1: And with that, I think, thank you for giving me 752 00:39:07,800 --> 00:39:11,279 Speaker 1: your opinion. Sure, what we're going to do now. I 753 00:39:11,360 --> 00:39:13,600 Speaker 1: actually have a very good friend named Alexandra who is 754 00:39:13,680 --> 00:39:16,560 Speaker 1: an attorney and she represents them and in those brothers. 755 00:39:16,600 --> 00:39:19,000 Speaker 1: She works for Mark Geragos, and we're going to have 756 00:39:19,040 --> 00:39:20,319 Speaker 1: her come on and we're going to ask her some 757 00:39:20,400 --> 00:39:21,279 Speaker 1: questions about the case. 758 00:39:21,560 --> 00:39:22,320 Speaker 2: I'll be exciting. 759 00:39:23,000 --> 00:39:28,120 Speaker 1: Hi, guys, Hi alex thanks for being here of course. Okay, 760 00:39:28,160 --> 00:39:31,320 Speaker 1: first of all, give me a little background. Alex and 761 00:39:31,360 --> 00:39:34,520 Speaker 1: I are friends. I actually adore her. But besides that, 762 00:39:35,160 --> 00:39:37,080 Speaker 1: give us a little background on how long you've been 763 00:39:37,120 --> 00:39:40,840 Speaker 1: involved with the case. How long have you worked with Garagoes. 764 00:39:41,000 --> 00:39:41,799 Speaker 1: Where are we at with that? 765 00:39:42,840 --> 00:39:46,760 Speaker 3: Oh, I've been with Mark probably, I mean probably about 766 00:39:46,760 --> 00:39:49,960 Speaker 3: eight years now. I've known in my whole life when 767 00:39:50,000 --> 00:39:51,759 Speaker 3: I was a public defender. He used to think I 768 00:39:51,800 --> 00:39:56,360 Speaker 3: worked for him already, a really good family friend, and 769 00:39:56,840 --> 00:40:00,560 Speaker 3: we've been partners probably for about eight years now, and 770 00:40:01,040 --> 00:40:04,759 Speaker 3: we came on to the Menandez case. I think it's 771 00:40:04,760 --> 00:40:06,640 Speaker 3: been a little bit more than a year now. 772 00:40:06,800 --> 00:40:07,359 Speaker 1: Right when the. 773 00:40:07,320 --> 00:40:10,040 Speaker 3: Habeas was filed, we came in because it was filed 774 00:40:10,040 --> 00:40:12,359 Speaker 3: by Cliff Gardner, who's really behind the scenes, but he's 775 00:40:12,400 --> 00:40:15,479 Speaker 3: a genius in a pellet work, and so he asked 776 00:40:15,560 --> 00:40:17,719 Speaker 3: us if we would come in and do the footwork, 777 00:40:18,120 --> 00:40:20,919 Speaker 3: and so we came in right about them. 778 00:40:21,640 --> 00:40:24,560 Speaker 1: Okay, Now, we were talking about this earlier because we 779 00:40:24,560 --> 00:40:27,640 Speaker 1: were trying to distinguish the habeas petition from the resentencing, 780 00:40:27,680 --> 00:40:31,520 Speaker 1: which are two different routes to grant them freedom. At 781 00:40:31,520 --> 00:40:34,600 Speaker 1: this point, do you have a preference, like do you 782 00:40:34,800 --> 00:40:37,080 Speaker 1: feel like the resentencing is a better route for your 783 00:40:37,080 --> 00:40:38,480 Speaker 1: clients or the habeas. 784 00:40:39,719 --> 00:40:43,440 Speaker 3: Well, the resentencing is cleaner because if the resentsing is granted, 785 00:40:43,560 --> 00:40:48,200 Speaker 3: if the judge reduces it to a misdemeanor, they're immediately released. 786 00:40:48,320 --> 00:40:49,000 Speaker 1: So that's the. 787 00:40:49,040 --> 00:40:52,040 Speaker 3: Cleanest way for them to get out. If the habeas 788 00:40:52,080 --> 00:40:55,000 Speaker 3: is granted, it gives them the option of a new trial. 789 00:40:55,360 --> 00:40:57,520 Speaker 3: So there's a potential there that we have an entirely 790 00:40:57,640 --> 00:40:59,879 Speaker 3: new Menendez Brothers Jurney. 791 00:41:00,600 --> 00:41:02,000 Speaker 1: And that's a mess. 792 00:41:02,239 --> 00:41:04,840 Speaker 3: So for me, as a representative of my clients, I 793 00:41:04,960 --> 00:41:06,759 Speaker 3: would love to have the door just be opened and 794 00:41:06,840 --> 00:41:09,960 Speaker 3: let them be freed. So the resentencing is my preference 795 00:41:10,000 --> 00:41:11,399 Speaker 3: obviously right now. 796 00:41:11,440 --> 00:41:14,200 Speaker 1: The hearing coming up on January thirtieth is that is 797 00:41:14,239 --> 00:41:15,840 Speaker 1: the resentencing. Is that correct? 798 00:41:15,920 --> 00:41:16,600 Speaker 2: That's correct? 799 00:41:16,960 --> 00:41:19,319 Speaker 1: Okay, Now when we talk about resentencing, what are the 800 00:41:19,360 --> 00:41:22,600 Speaker 1: factors that they taken into consideration, Like is the new 801 00:41:22,640 --> 00:41:25,440 Speaker 1: evidence taken into consideration at that point as well, or 802 00:41:25,480 --> 00:41:28,320 Speaker 1: is it more based upon kind of the family support, 803 00:41:28,400 --> 00:41:30,359 Speaker 1: their behavior in prison, things like that. 804 00:41:30,960 --> 00:41:33,479 Speaker 3: So the resentsing is really just what have they done 805 00:41:33,880 --> 00:41:36,280 Speaker 3: from the time that they've been in prison until now. 806 00:41:36,400 --> 00:41:39,640 Speaker 3: That's really the only thing you're looking at and the 807 00:41:39,640 --> 00:41:43,040 Speaker 3: only real consideration for the judges. Is there a potential 808 00:41:43,120 --> 00:41:46,040 Speaker 3: that they're going to be released and re offend by 809 00:41:46,120 --> 00:41:51,239 Speaker 3: committing a super strike? And there's very specific charges that 810 00:41:51,280 --> 00:41:54,120 Speaker 3: are super strikes, you know, murder, rape, things like that. 811 00:41:54,880 --> 00:41:58,200 Speaker 3: So the question is is there anything in their history 812 00:41:58,239 --> 00:42:00,719 Speaker 3: while they've been in prison that would make you think 813 00:42:00,760 --> 00:42:04,279 Speaker 3: that they are potentially going to refund at a very 814 00:42:04,360 --> 00:42:05,239 Speaker 3: very serious level. 815 00:42:06,280 --> 00:42:10,040 Speaker 1: And I assume there's nothing. Everything I've read is that 816 00:42:10,080 --> 00:42:14,320 Speaker 1: they've been nothing about model prisoners. They've gotten degrees, they've 817 00:42:14,360 --> 00:42:18,239 Speaker 1: helped other prisoners and abuse sand hospice and things like that. 818 00:42:18,360 --> 00:42:19,800 Speaker 1: Is that correct, that's correct. 819 00:42:19,840 --> 00:42:21,879 Speaker 3: Not only have they been model citizens, but there are 820 00:42:22,040 --> 00:42:25,440 Speaker 3: no other inmates that I have ever heard of that 821 00:42:25,520 --> 00:42:28,040 Speaker 3: are like them. They had no potential for getting out, 822 00:42:29,040 --> 00:42:31,120 Speaker 3: all of their appeals had been denied, and so they 823 00:42:31,120 --> 00:42:32,560 Speaker 3: were resolved to the fact that they were going to 824 00:42:32,600 --> 00:42:34,160 Speaker 3: be in prison for the rest of their lives. And 825 00:42:34,239 --> 00:42:38,719 Speaker 3: at that point they started creating programs for other prisoners 826 00:42:38,960 --> 00:42:41,439 Speaker 3: so that when they were released they had a better 827 00:42:41,520 --> 00:42:45,680 Speaker 3: chance of survival without recidivism. And they focused solely on 828 00:42:46,160 --> 00:42:48,560 Speaker 3: people who needed to be comforted towards the end of 829 00:42:48,600 --> 00:42:51,680 Speaker 3: their life, who were in prison. Everything for everyone else. 830 00:42:52,280 --> 00:42:57,400 Speaker 3: So yeah, I cannot even imagine if somebody wanted to 831 00:42:57,440 --> 00:43:01,120 Speaker 3: come in and actually focus on the resentencing shoes, anything 832 00:43:01,120 --> 00:43:03,840 Speaker 3: that they would say about their time in prison, that 833 00:43:03,880 --> 00:43:06,040 Speaker 3: shows that they have not been rehabilitated. 834 00:43:06,760 --> 00:43:09,440 Speaker 1: Right. And also, let me ask you, I know you 835 00:43:09,480 --> 00:43:13,959 Speaker 1: know them personally because you speak to them often. How 836 00:43:14,040 --> 00:43:17,920 Speaker 1: are they doing emotionally or mentally with everything that's going on, 837 00:43:18,000 --> 00:43:20,919 Speaker 1: with all the support they're getting from social media, are 838 00:43:20,960 --> 00:43:25,399 Speaker 1: they prepared if because there is the possibility that they 839 00:43:25,760 --> 00:43:26,879 Speaker 1: remain in prison. 840 00:43:27,320 --> 00:43:31,920 Speaker 3: It's always an option, It's always on their minds. You know, 841 00:43:32,000 --> 00:43:35,359 Speaker 3: there's been already through this process. Just in the last year, 842 00:43:35,400 --> 00:43:38,960 Speaker 3: there's been these peaks in these valleys. I think that 843 00:43:39,719 --> 00:43:42,840 Speaker 3: from the inside it's hard to know exactly what's happening 844 00:43:42,880 --> 00:43:46,040 Speaker 3: on the outside. They don't get watched TMZ. They get 845 00:43:46,080 --> 00:43:49,080 Speaker 3: reports that are you know, third, fourth, fifth parties sometimes 846 00:43:49,400 --> 00:43:52,640 Speaker 3: and so they've had a lot of ups and downs. 847 00:43:52,840 --> 00:43:54,760 Speaker 1: But they're dealing with it with it better. 848 00:43:54,560 --> 00:43:57,040 Speaker 3: Than I ever would. They deal with everything better than 849 00:43:57,080 --> 00:43:57,640 Speaker 3: I ever would. 850 00:43:58,000 --> 00:43:59,360 Speaker 2: Right, That was a question I was gonna ask. Are 851 00:43:59,400 --> 00:44:02,000 Speaker 2: they aware of all the support that they're getting outside 852 00:44:02,480 --> 00:44:04,400 Speaker 2: the gates, outside the prison? 853 00:44:05,080 --> 00:44:05,560 Speaker 1: Yeah, they are. 854 00:44:05,680 --> 00:44:06,279 Speaker 3: It means a lot time. 855 00:44:06,320 --> 00:44:09,360 Speaker 2: I mean, that's got to be somewhat humbling to finally 856 00:44:09,400 --> 00:44:11,360 Speaker 2: have that support after you know, three decades. 857 00:44:11,680 --> 00:44:15,320 Speaker 3: Yeah, and it's funny that you say that it they 858 00:44:15,360 --> 00:44:17,160 Speaker 3: are very thoughtful, very humble people. 859 00:44:18,000 --> 00:44:19,759 Speaker 1: You know, Shane and I were talking before you came 860 00:44:19,800 --> 00:44:22,000 Speaker 1: on about how when the trial first occurred back in 861 00:44:22,080 --> 00:44:24,480 Speaker 1: the nineties. It was a completely different time period, and 862 00:44:24,520 --> 00:44:26,279 Speaker 1: I was saying, I think a lot of that. I've 863 00:44:26,280 --> 00:44:28,439 Speaker 1: actually I text you at night. I'm like, I'm laying 864 00:44:28,440 --> 00:44:30,360 Speaker 1: in bed and I think about these things. I was 865 00:44:30,360 --> 00:44:33,239 Speaker 1: thinking about how that time period, the people within our 866 00:44:33,320 --> 00:44:37,520 Speaker 1: peer group, we were gen X, and that was very 867 00:44:37,719 --> 00:44:39,920 Speaker 1: you know, you just you put your big girl pants on. 868 00:44:40,000 --> 00:44:43,360 Speaker 1: There weren't participation trophies, there wasn't gluten free, there was 869 00:44:43,440 --> 00:44:45,799 Speaker 1: nothing warm and fuzzy. It was basically like you just 870 00:44:45,880 --> 00:44:48,279 Speaker 1: you took care of yourself. And now we have this 871 00:44:48,360 --> 00:44:52,760 Speaker 1: whole new generation that watch court TV, that saw the trial, 872 00:44:52,840 --> 00:44:55,640 Speaker 1: that listened to them testify, that knows about what they've 873 00:44:55,640 --> 00:44:59,360 Speaker 1: been through. And it's a different generation and they accept 874 00:44:59,400 --> 00:45:03,919 Speaker 1: them and they believe them, and they and they embrace them. 875 00:45:04,280 --> 00:45:07,719 Speaker 1: And that has to be so amazing for them to 876 00:45:07,760 --> 00:45:10,560 Speaker 1: after all this time, to actually feel like what they've 877 00:45:10,600 --> 00:45:13,319 Speaker 1: been through is being recognized, right. 878 00:45:13,360 --> 00:45:15,239 Speaker 3: I Mean, they were the butt of jokes. They were 879 00:45:15,239 --> 00:45:17,959 Speaker 3: Saturday Night Live skits about them. They were just made 880 00:45:17,960 --> 00:45:20,320 Speaker 3: fun of constantly. And for them to be this complete 881 00:45:20,320 --> 00:45:24,239 Speaker 3: oneint eighty is I think great just for them. I mean, 882 00:45:25,080 --> 00:45:26,520 Speaker 3: people don't like it. When I say it, a lot 883 00:45:26,560 --> 00:45:27,880 Speaker 3: of times I get black for it. But you know, 884 00:45:27,880 --> 00:45:30,160 Speaker 3: they are victims. They are victims, and they were put 885 00:45:30,160 --> 00:45:32,160 Speaker 3: in the position that they were in because they were abused, 886 00:45:32,480 --> 00:45:35,200 Speaker 3: and so it's I think it's healing for them to 887 00:45:35,280 --> 00:45:38,360 Speaker 3: see that they are being recognized as victims, not just 888 00:45:38,480 --> 00:45:39,440 Speaker 3: as monsters. 889 00:45:40,000 --> 00:45:40,200 Speaker 1: Right. 890 00:45:40,400 --> 00:45:43,920 Speaker 3: Yeah, I think it's great. And one thing that hasn't 891 00:45:44,040 --> 00:45:46,960 Speaker 3: really been spoken about a lot is that when they 892 00:45:46,960 --> 00:45:50,160 Speaker 3: were in and when they were putting their story out there, 893 00:45:50,200 --> 00:45:52,240 Speaker 3: when they got on the stand and they started talking 894 00:45:52,239 --> 00:45:54,960 Speaker 3: about what was happening, people inside of the jails came 895 00:45:55,000 --> 00:45:57,359 Speaker 3: to them and said, oh, my god, I would never 896 00:45:57,440 --> 00:46:00,120 Speaker 3: have done that. I never would have told my story. 897 00:46:00,280 --> 00:46:02,759 Speaker 3: But now that you have, can I talk to you 898 00:46:02,840 --> 00:46:05,520 Speaker 3: about it? Because I've never had anybody to talk to. 899 00:46:05,680 --> 00:46:10,920 Speaker 3: So they've started support groups inside for victims of sexual 900 00:46:11,480 --> 00:46:16,080 Speaker 3: violence and abuse that did not exist. And the idea 901 00:46:16,120 --> 00:46:18,719 Speaker 3: that there are not support groups for things like that 902 00:46:18,760 --> 00:46:22,680 Speaker 3: inside of the prisons boggled my mind. But they are 903 00:46:22,719 --> 00:46:26,000 Speaker 3: the ones who started the creation of those support groups. 904 00:46:26,040 --> 00:46:31,560 Speaker 1: Or Yeah, that's really amazing work that they've done. Also, 905 00:46:31,920 --> 00:46:34,640 Speaker 1: how do you see them if they were let go, 906 00:46:34,760 --> 00:46:37,680 Speaker 1: if they become free. How do you see them giving back? 907 00:46:37,800 --> 00:46:39,840 Speaker 1: Is that what they talk about? Have you had conversations 908 00:46:39,880 --> 00:46:42,160 Speaker 1: with them about that? Like how they see themselves once 909 00:46:42,200 --> 00:46:43,480 Speaker 1: they're free. 910 00:46:43,520 --> 00:46:45,520 Speaker 3: They want to keep continuing doing the work that they've 911 00:46:45,520 --> 00:46:49,120 Speaker 3: been doing. Everything they talk about about their goals are 912 00:46:49,200 --> 00:46:51,960 Speaker 3: to continue doing the work of reforming the prisons that 913 00:46:51,960 --> 00:46:53,239 Speaker 3: they've been doing from the inside. 914 00:46:53,400 --> 00:46:56,160 Speaker 2: They might be even more motivated to do so if 915 00:46:56,200 --> 00:46:58,560 Speaker 2: they were to be released in any terms, they would 916 00:46:58,600 --> 00:47:04,120 Speaker 2: probably see the value in speaking up and recognizing prisoners 917 00:47:04,160 --> 00:47:07,680 Speaker 2: as victims of abuse or whatever they've been through. That 918 00:47:07,719 --> 00:47:09,960 Speaker 2: they might want to continue their work because they're seeing 919 00:47:10,040 --> 00:47:14,279 Speaker 2: like the fruits, right, Yeah, that that that people can 920 00:47:14,320 --> 00:47:16,880 Speaker 2: be released, people can be reformed, people can you know, 921 00:47:16,960 --> 00:47:19,719 Speaker 2: continue to help others. So they might be in you know, 922 00:47:19,800 --> 00:47:22,520 Speaker 2: they might feel it's more valuable for them to do 923 00:47:22,560 --> 00:47:25,279 Speaker 2: this and they'll want to just continue it. Yeah, that's 924 00:47:25,320 --> 00:47:28,279 Speaker 2: that's that's yeah, it's probably it'd probably be hard for 925 00:47:28,280 --> 00:47:30,120 Speaker 2: them to not want to continue it if they see 926 00:47:30,120 --> 00:47:31,960 Speaker 2: the results that can come of it. 927 00:47:32,400 --> 00:47:34,319 Speaker 1: Thank you so much. I appreciate it, and I will 928 00:47:34,360 --> 00:47:38,240 Speaker 1: talk to you soon. Okay, bye bye, okay, bye bye Okay. 929 00:47:38,280 --> 00:47:42,720 Speaker 2: So, if they do get released under under any terms, 930 00:47:42,760 --> 00:47:46,600 Speaker 2: whether it be resentencing or a new trial. And they 931 00:47:46,600 --> 00:47:50,000 Speaker 2: get out of jail, then you know, we wonder if 932 00:47:50,000 --> 00:47:52,200 Speaker 2: they're going to stay married, and this's that. But can 933 00:47:52,239 --> 00:47:56,719 Speaker 2: they there's so much popularity around this, so much Hollywood 934 00:47:56,760 --> 00:47:59,279 Speaker 2: around this, so to speak, can they benefit from any 935 00:47:59,320 --> 00:48:02,880 Speaker 2: of this because obviously Netflix drama, everyone's benefiting from it. 936 00:48:03,040 --> 00:48:05,640 Speaker 1: Yeah, you know what, they actually can. So in New 937 00:48:05,719 --> 00:48:09,480 Speaker 1: York you're precluded from making money from a crime. However, 938 00:48:09,520 --> 00:48:14,080 Speaker 1: in California that's not true. So they actually can profit 939 00:48:14,440 --> 00:48:15,440 Speaker 1: from their stories. 940 00:48:15,560 --> 00:48:17,000 Speaker 2: As far as you know, there's no restrictions. 941 00:48:17,040 --> 00:48:20,799 Speaker 1: There's no restrictions, you know they As far as what 942 00:48:20,840 --> 00:48:22,960 Speaker 1: I've read, there is no There's nothing left of this 943 00:48:23,120 --> 00:48:25,839 Speaker 1: fourteen million dollar inheritance. It has all gone. It went. 944 00:48:26,080 --> 00:48:27,759 Speaker 1: A lot of it paid for the defense the first 945 00:48:27,760 --> 00:48:31,560 Speaker 1: couple of trials. Also, the house had a mortgage that 946 00:48:31,600 --> 00:48:33,040 Speaker 1: had to be paid, there were taxes that had to 947 00:48:33,040 --> 00:48:33,400 Speaker 1: be paid. 948 00:48:33,600 --> 00:48:35,760 Speaker 2: Everyone was probably, yeah, putting their hand in thee. 949 00:48:36,640 --> 00:48:40,839 Speaker 1: There's no money left. However, you're talking about two men 950 00:48:40,920 --> 00:48:44,560 Speaker 1: that are on the popularity scale of like a Kardashian. 951 00:48:44,760 --> 00:48:47,480 Speaker 1: So if they do happen by chance to come out 952 00:48:47,520 --> 00:48:49,879 Speaker 1: of prison, I am sure that there will be some 953 00:48:49,920 --> 00:48:52,279 Speaker 1: bidding wars over who gets the first interview with them, 954 00:48:52,640 --> 00:48:54,800 Speaker 1: and you're talking millions. 955 00:48:54,280 --> 00:48:56,000 Speaker 2: Of because the worry would be they come out of 956 00:48:56,080 --> 00:48:59,880 Speaker 2: jail or prison and then they don't like have something 957 00:49:00,080 --> 00:49:04,080 Speaker 2: to you know, to grasp on to financially support themselves. 958 00:49:04,480 --> 00:49:07,480 Speaker 2: And yet everyone else is profited. But you're saying that 959 00:49:07,520 --> 00:49:11,200 Speaker 2: they can they carefully, they do it properly and not 960 00:49:11,320 --> 00:49:15,440 Speaker 2: be taken advantage of. But they can use their stories. 961 00:49:15,840 --> 00:49:21,279 Speaker 1: Yes, interviews, social media, book deals. Yes, there there is 962 00:49:21,320 --> 00:49:22,279 Speaker 1: the potential for. 963 00:49:22,400 --> 00:49:26,560 Speaker 4: The reality shows podcast, There is the potential for them 964 00:49:27,000 --> 00:49:29,160 Speaker 4: to make a lot of money. Yes, okay, all right, 965 00:49:29,200 --> 00:49:31,440 Speaker 4: thanks guys for listening to our very first podcast on 966 00:49:31,480 --> 00:49:33,880 Speaker 4: the Menindez Brothers, and thanks so much for listening. 967 00:49:34,239 --> 00:49:34,560 Speaker 2: Thank you,