WEBVTT - US-China Rivalry in the Trump Era: A Discussion

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.960
<v Speaker 2>Hi Wanha here, I'm excited to bring you a conversation

0:00:12.000 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 2>we had in Singapore earlier this week in front of

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 2>a live audience. This conversation has been edited and condensed.

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 2>Hope you enjoy it. Hello everyone, welcome to the special

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 2>edition of The Big Take Asia the US China Rivalry

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 2>in the Trump Era. It's only been, if you can

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:34.520
<v Speaker 2>believe it, eight weeks since US President Donald Trump took

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 2>office again, and we've been confronted with a slew of

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 2>executive orders and policy moves that have royaled markets and

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:45.880
<v Speaker 2>stemied businesses. And of course a lot of these moves,

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 2>especially those focused on trade, have serious ramifications here in Asia,

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 2>and they've dramatically increased this competition between the US and China.

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 2>To help us unpack how this is playing out for

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 2>the two economic super and the world, please help me

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 2>welcome a great panel speakers to the stage. So we've

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 2>got with us Nancy Cook, who is senior national political correspondent,

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:14.479
<v Speaker 2>who joins us from Washington, d C. And John lou

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:18.479
<v Speaker 2>who oversees Bloomberg's Greater China coverage based in Beijing. We've

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:22.039
<v Speaker 2>got Tim O'Brien Bloomberg Opinions Senior executive editor based in

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:25.040
<v Speaker 2>New York, and next to him Shuley Wrenn. She's the

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Opinion columnist who covers markets in China out of

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:31.479
<v Speaker 2>Hong Kong. Tim, by the way, is also the author

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:33.959
<v Speaker 2>of Trump Nation, The Art of Being the Donald, and

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 2>he's fantastic stories that he's been telling us about his

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 2>time with Donald. Welcome to Singapore, you guys. Well, since

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 2>we're in Singapore and food is such a big element

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 2>of the culture, right, we love the Hawker centers. I

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 2>think this very first question is appropriate to this place.

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 2>If US China relations were dish, what dish would it be?

0:01:57.600 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Let me start with Shuley down there.

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 3>I guess I have to star wars Harpot. Everybody is

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 3>at a table. One guest didn't ask everyone else and

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 3>turn on the heat, and that you have spices splattered

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 3>everywhere on everyone's face. This is what I think of

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 3>very appropriate.

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Tim.

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if sweet and sour pork is an

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:20.640
<v Speaker 4>American idea of what a good Chinese dish is, so

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 4>I might be stepping on my American toes and bring

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 4>this up, but I think sweet and sour pork is

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 4>useful because I think a strategy for dealing with Donald

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 4>Trump is, whether you're looking at trade or diplomacy, is

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 4>are you sweet with him? Or are you sour with him?

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 4>And I think people have learned over the years that

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 4>you get a little more out of him with sweetness

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 4>than with being sour, even though he gives other countries

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 4>and diplomats and investors a lot of reasons to be sour.

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 2>Very nice, thank you, very tasty insights. I think this

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 2>is also a good time to take you behind the

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 2>scenes of how we produce the podcast every week. So

0:02:55.600 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 2>we're going to cue up the music. Let's go. Welcome

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 2>to the Big Take Asia from Bloomberg News. I'm Wanha.

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 2>Every week we take you inside some of the world's

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:11.920
<v Speaker 2>biggest and most powerful economies and the markets, tycoons and

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:16.079
<v Speaker 2>businesses that drive this ever shifting region. Today in the show,

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 2>live from Singapore, the US China rivalry in the Trump era.

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 2>How are Trump's policies playing out in Asia? And is

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:27.239
<v Speaker 2>the US creating a vacuum for power and influence on

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 2>the world stage that allows China to step up? Nancy,

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 2>I want to start with you to get some perspective

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 2>because you have sat down with Donald Trump in mar

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 2>A Lago for a one on one interview, and you've

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 2>covered him since twenty fifteen. What's different this time around,

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:48.119
<v Speaker 2>you think when it comes to the US China relationship

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 2>and rivalry.

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>So I think President Trump this time is a much

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>more sort of self assured and confident leader than he

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>was when he first came into office. He has a

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>much better understanding of the levers of power in the

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>United States and how to use them. And I think

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>people have been surprised that he is acting and moving

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>so quickly. I think he has very firmly held beliefs

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 1>on things like trade, and then is more ideologically flexible

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>on things like what the Chinese relationship looks like. Ultimately,

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 1>what I'm watching, particularly in China is that I still

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 1>think he has He always likes to have a team

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>of rivals around him a little bit on different policy areas.

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>So there's sort of advisors, economic advisors competing to have

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>his ear on trade, and they have competing agendas. And

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the same is true of foreign policy. There is not

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:37.280
<v Speaker 1>one person that's going to be in charge of setting

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the course for what the US China relationship looks like

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>there's different foreign policy people competing, whether that's the Secretary

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>of State Marco Rubio or the National Security Advisor of

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Mike Waltz. And so everybody is trying to jockey and

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>find their place, and that will be very influential as

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:55.719
<v Speaker 1>they think about how to approach China and whatever they're

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>going to do there.

0:04:56.560 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I think that's also a great starting point

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 2>to also talk about itself. And I mean, if Trump

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 2>is different this time around, how is she president? She

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 2>also different?

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:10.359
<v Speaker 5>The difference now is president She and China are in

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 5>a different position. The economy is in a weaker position,

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 5>there are more headwinds, there's the property market. So I

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 5>think Beijing is trying to act in a more considered way,

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:24.839
<v Speaker 5>where maybe in the first term there was wolf warrior diplomacy.

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 5>I think there is an effort to be more measured

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 5>in its response. I mean, the ultimate question that I

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:32.159
<v Speaker 5>think everybody in Beijing is trying to figure out is

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 5>what does President Trump want?

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, certainly that's what we've seen so far. Tim in DC,

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 2>in New York in the US, do people understand what

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Trump is trying to achieve? I mean, you spent time

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 2>with him. What is a sense of the endgame here

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 2>from what we've seen so far.

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 4>You know, it was interesting, Juan, when you were giving

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 4>the introduction and you said, it's only been eight weeks,

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 4>but it seems like eight years. Because I think that's

0:05:56.920 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 4>a universal reaction to this, for flurry of activity from Trump,

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 4>wherever you are, and I think for people who are

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 4>feeling confused about it, or threatened by it, or just

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 4>wondering where it's headed. I think it's useful to try

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 4>to put all of that in context. A meaningful portion

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 4>of it is performative. Trump prides himself on being a

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 4>man of action and a disruptor. He is typically not.

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:23.919
<v Speaker 4>He doesn't put his hands on the steering wheel. His

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:28.360
<v Speaker 4>trade policies are not coming from a sophisticated place, that

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:31.839
<v Speaker 4>is not coming from an understanding of how markets or

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 4>economies or business growth develop. It is a blunt tool

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:42.040
<v Speaker 4>that he thinks he can use to repatriate manufacturing back

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:43.039
<v Speaker 4>to the United States.

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, we've seen certainly a lot of zigzagging on trade

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 2>and tariffs, so of course were the first thing that

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 2>Trump jumped on, and Trump is now talking about imposing

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 2>broad reciprocal tariffs and additional sector specific tariffs April second.

0:06:56.839 --> 0:06:59.480
<v Speaker 2>That's just a few weeks away. Truly, when you look

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:02.599
<v Speaker 2>at this through China's lens, I mean, Trump is obviously

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 2>using what some people call this weaponized uncertainty right to

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 2>bring businesses to closer to what he wants. Is China

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 2>buying any of that?

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 3>I think China has realized that the US Trump is

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 3>serious about rebalancing the economy. I mean, before it worked

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 3>very well, right, US is the big consumer, China is

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 3>the big producer. China sells products into the US and

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:28.679
<v Speaker 3>then with the trade surplus day in turn by US treasures.

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 3>It worked very well. And Trump just doesn't want that.

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 3>He wants the US society to be more producers based.

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 3>And for China, they have realized that is done deal,

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 3>and what they're trying to do these days is to

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 3>turn China into a more consumer based economy. We all

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 3>know Chinese consumers don't spend, right, and they're trying to

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 3>encourage consumers to spend or if they still try to

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 3>produce and sell, they will try to sell to the

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 3>global self. So that's what they've been trying to do.

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:59.559
<v Speaker 2>But in the end, can these stear ups really break

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 2>Chinese grip on manufacturing at this point truly.

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, there was no doubt China was a manufacturing powerhouse.

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 3>You look at like all the ev makers bid this year,

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 3>they're putting the autonomous driving technology into the cards without

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 3>raising price. It's not just the price point. It's not

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 3>that Chinese products are cheap, they're just more useful. But

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 3>the narrative a year or two ago was like, basically,

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 3>there is a new technological upgrade called AI, and the

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 3>China is being locked out. So the next decade forward,

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 3>China will.

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 2>Not get that.

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 3>And what we're seeing with deep Seek is that actually

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 3>China is not being locked down.

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 5>And then it's not just AI.

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 3>They're talking also about robotics, bringing AI features into robotics,

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 3>and I think US has a lot of things to

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 3>catch up on. And also like a lot of Chinese

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 3>companies think that this is a great opportunity. That Trump

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:56.320
<v Speaker 3>is distracted and unfocused, and Elon Musk is also in focused.

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean does he even run Tesla anymore? Right? And

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:01.599
<v Speaker 3>BID is coming in. Shall me used to be a

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 3>Spark film maker and now they are making pretty high

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.839
<v Speaker 3>end electric vehicles and the smartphones. They are taking on

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 3>Tesla and the Apple, so a lot of Chinese companies

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 3>actually think this is an opportunity. So then tim is

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 3>this whole focus on bringing back manufacturing to the US.

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 3>Is that a bit shortsighted?

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I think when you ask about what's his endgame,

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 4>has this mercant dealist view of how economies function and

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 4>how political power is wielded. You know, I think it's

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 4>always a mistake to talk about what Trump's strategy is

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 4>because he's not a strategic thinker. He's emotional, he's visceral,

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:38.439
<v Speaker 4>but he has very clear goals and I think essentially

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 4>what they are right now is an economic hegemony for

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 4>the US and political hegemony for himself. So I think

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 4>one of the reasons he's dangerous politically in the United

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 4>States is he's trying to undermine institutions in the US

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 4>that would be checks on his own political hegemony, the courts,

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 4>the media, universities, is political opponents. And then he've views

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:01.559
<v Speaker 4>political agemony as the US having its own defined sphere

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:04.959
<v Speaker 4>of influence that is essentially the Americas, and he doesn't

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:09.319
<v Speaker 4>want Europe or China interfering with that, and so he

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 4>will latch onto any tools that allow him to get there.

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:14.320
<v Speaker 4>And then I think, you know, in terms of Trump himself,

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 4>he enjoys creating chaos because it keeps his audience and

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 4>his opponents back on their heels, and it allows him

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 4>to be in control of the narrative. I've covered Trump

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:26.839
<v Speaker 4>since nineteen ninety in various forms, and I was with

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 4>him at mar A Lago once. We golfed together and

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 4>we came off the course and he had a brand

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 4>new yellow Ferrari in the driveway, and he looked at

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:36.599
<v Speaker 4>me and he said, do you want to go for

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 4>a ride in it together? And I said sure. So

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 4>we hop in the car and it had a paddle

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 4>shifters on the steering wheel that he didn't know how

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 4>to use. So he was grinding the gears out on

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 4>the car, on this four hundred and fifty thousand dollars

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:50.439
<v Speaker 4>car as we drove to downtown Palm Beach, and we

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 4>pulled up to a stoplight and the windows of the

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:55.079
<v Speaker 4>car were all dark, and so no one could see

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 4>who was in the car. And when we stopped at

0:10:56.800 --> 0:10:59.199
<v Speaker 4>the stoplight, he goes, watch this. Trump said to me,

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 4>watch this, and then he put the windows down, and

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 4>everyone on the sidewalk stopped and pointed at the car

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 4>and said, look, it's Donald Trump. And then he put

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 4>the windows back up, and he looked at me and

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 4>he said, isn't that cool? And this is what he's

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 4>doing with the world right now. He's essentially using the

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 4>United States as like a giant ferrari, and he's pulling

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 4>up to these various situations and putting the windows down,

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 4>whether it's berating Zelenski in the Oval office, or courting

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 4>Putin or embracing tariffs.

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Certainly keeping us busy in the news business. I want

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:32.559
<v Speaker 2>to talk about the markets real quick, because the US

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:37.440
<v Speaker 2>doc market's been sinking in reaction to tariffs and recession concerns. Meanwhile,

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 2>you've got China's market staying strong. Analysts are talking about

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:43.199
<v Speaker 2>what they call a she put, this idea that the

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 2>Chinese government is going to do everything it can to

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:49.439
<v Speaker 2>achieve this five percent growth target. There's certainly no talk

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 2>of a Trump put at the moment. What are the

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:56.559
<v Speaker 2>reactions on both sides of the Pacific telling us about

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 2>what investors are thinking and feeling.

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 1>The US businesses are panic gaing right now. I bet

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:05.560
<v Speaker 1>you know a number of US companies, everyone from McDonald's

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 1>that makes their French fries and canola oil that comes

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 1>from Canada to the big US automakers. They're calling the

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 1>White House flipping out about the tariffs. I mean, the

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:18.199
<v Speaker 1>stock market did so well at the beginning of the

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>first seven weeks, let's say, or six weeks, and all

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:24.080
<v Speaker 1>that wealth has been erased already. And the other thing

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:26.439
<v Speaker 1>that's changed from last time is that Republicans on the

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Hill just really have acquiesced him entirely and are very

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>afraid to publicly criticize him. So I think that what

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>will happen is if the stock market continues to slide

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and we do seem like we're headed towards a recession,

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>then I think he will be less popular among Republicans,

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 1>among donors, among businesses, and then maybe he will, of

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 1>course correct. But he is really full steam ahead right now.

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 2>This must be so hard to plan at this point

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:56.719
<v Speaker 2>when you've got such erratic news coming out of the

0:12:56.760 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 2>White House and erratic moves. Can businesses really plan at.

0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 1>The no, And that is the message that they're telling

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the White House. But part of the problem is that's

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of unclear who is totally in charge with the

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 1>US China sort of strategy. The same is true on

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 1>economics and tariffs. There are a number of Trump advisors

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:17.439
<v Speaker 1>and cabinet members who have their hands in tariffs, and

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>so it's just been a real sort of toss up

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 1>about what happens with this policy.

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 4>So this unpredictability. Can you really invest or build plant

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:28.680
<v Speaker 4>and equipment if you can't have a five year plan

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 4>because he's knocking you back on your feet every week

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 4>with a different policy position. That's going to, I think

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:37.199
<v Speaker 4>be a present factor for quite a while, and I

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 4>don't think the press or the business community will regulate that.

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:43.479
<v Speaker 4>As a deal maker, he's in charge of these processes.

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:46.599
<v Speaker 4>He has never been a great deal maker historically. In

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:49.719
<v Speaker 4>his business career, he presided over six corporate bankruptcies. He

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 4>almost went personally bankrupt, but his father bailed him out

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:55.439
<v Speaker 4>before that happened. And within the business community in the

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 4>United States, he was regarded as a cartoon character and

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 4>routinely got taken to the clean by better deal makers.

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 4>Robert bass on the sale of the Plaza hotel. You

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:06.319
<v Speaker 4>could go on and on down a whole list of deals.

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 4>But he's had this myth because of the Apprentice, that

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 4>he can fix complicated situations, that he's got the analytic

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 4>and intuitive skills to do that, and he's lacked them

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:16.559
<v Speaker 4>since he was seven.

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 2>After the break, the consequences of the Trump era on Asia,

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 2>will Asian economies become collateral damage in the wake of

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 2>the trade war, and how can China capitalize on this moment?

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 2>The ramifications of a US China trade war go beyond

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 2>just these two superpowers. And while Asia isn't directly targeted

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 2>by the latest US tariffs, the region is very trade dependent.

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 2>I asked our panel about what the impact would be

0:14:57.320 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 2>on the region. Here's Bloomberg's shulely Ren.

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 3>Again, Singapore has done very well because of China's capital

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 3>offlow in the last couple of years tremendously. I think

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 3>a Viennam like especially North Vietnam, has been doing very

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 3>well because it's a very natural China plus one destination

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 3>right like it's very close to mainland China's industry catalog.

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 3>And then Vietnamese people are hard working and entrepreneurial and educated.

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 3>But I do feel that countries like Vietnam had to

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 3>stay under Trump's radar because Vietnam believe or not, runs

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 3>the third and largest trade deficit with the US after

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 3>Mexico and China. So one day, if Trump wakes up

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 3>and say, wait a minute, you're using Vietnam to explore

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 3>your stuff into US, then I think Vietnam just has

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 3>to be very careful.

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 2>Nervous times, certainly for everyone. I want to pivot to

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 2>foreign policy. Trump has imposed tariffs on North American neighbors.

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 2>He had a shouting match with Ukrainian President Voladimir Zelinski

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 2>in the Oval Office. He's threatening tariffs on Europe. These

0:15:57.320 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 2>are the traditional allies of the US. All of that,

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 2>of course, must be having a very chilling effect for

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 2>America's friends here in Asia, from Taiwan to South Korea

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 2>to Japan. And I want to ask you, do you

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 2>think she sees this as an opportunity, especially here in Asia,

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 2>but around the world. How can China capitalize on this

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 2>moment when the US is being erratic, turning its back

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 2>on friends and allies.

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 5>I think Beijing sees this as an opportunity to advance

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 5>its interests around the world. If you listen to Chinese

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 5>officials now, they want the world to see Beijing or

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 5>see China as an anchor of stability in a chaotic

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 5>world as a result of American and Trump administration policies.

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 5>And it sounds like the administration has taken its eyes

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 5>off the ball a little bit, like it seems like

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 5>there's so much else going on. And if that is

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 5>the case, then yeah, then she has an opportunity, right

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 5>If the US is too busy thinking about Russia or

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 5>the Middle East, then China will have more room to

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:04.679
<v Speaker 5>do things and to try and advance its own interests.

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I also think that as Trump sheds sort of conventional

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:11.239
<v Speaker 1>allies in Europe or all these different places, there's going

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:15.400
<v Speaker 1>to be like a whole new reordering of global superpowers.

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:18.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think that presents an opportunity for China, don't

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you think so? Or maybe not.

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 5>Someone described the situation to me as Trump is digging

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 5>the world all the pieces and throwing them up in

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 5>the air, and everybody's trying to pick things up now.

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 5>And this person said, China's going to end up picking

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 5>up more pieces than it had before he got thrown up.

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 5>I think there's a really good chance that will happen.

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 1>And Trump, also, just to add it quickly, is an isolationist.

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 1>He does not think that the US needs to police

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the world. He really wants to focus on stuff at home.

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:48.639
<v Speaker 1>When I interviewed him at mar A Lago, you know,

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:51.360
<v Speaker 1>his comments on Taiwan were really some of the most

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 1>striking ones in the interview. We sat with him for

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>an hour and a half and he was basically like,

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 1>what has Taiwan done for the US lately? He said

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:01.640
<v Speaker 1>that he was like, I don't see what they're doing

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:04.400
<v Speaker 1>for us. You know, they've stolen our jobs, Like why

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>should we protect them? And I think you know what

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing happening with Ukraine and sort of his unwillingness

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to defend Ukraine or pull back intelligence there, pull back money.

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>If I were living in Taiwan, I would be fairly

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:18.640
<v Speaker 1>freaked out.

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:24.399
<v Speaker 5>Taiwan's Defense minister, right after the blow up in the

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:28.120
<v Speaker 5>Oval office with President Zelenski, had this quote I thought

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 5>was really interesting and I'm paraphrasing, but essentially said, we

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:36.680
<v Speaker 5>realize that when talking with the US, you cannot discuss

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:41.880
<v Speaker 5>values with the US without also addressing national interests, which

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 5>is like very different from what Taiwan's officials were saying

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 5>during the Biden administration, which was all about shared.

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:51.639
<v Speaker 4>Values you know, I remember this conversation I want to

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:54.400
<v Speaker 4>here with that screenwriter about his process, and he said

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:56.959
<v Speaker 4>he would write scenes out on index cards, throw them

0:18:57.000 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 4>into the middle of the floor, and then rearrange them

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 4>to see what works. And that's essentially Trump's foreign policy.

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 4>And the danger with that is I have to believe

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:07.440
<v Speaker 4>China and Russia are shocked at how much progress they've

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 4>made over the last two months without having after decades,

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:17.400
<v Speaker 4>decades of strategically and economically and militarily trying to find

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 4>ways to get around the US or supersede the US,

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 4>and Trump has just walked up in a few short

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:25.119
<v Speaker 4>weeks and delivered to them on a platter. But it

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 4>also isn't a sophisticated understanding of what we all get

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 4>when we have shared defenses, which it creates stability, it

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 4>creates economic opportunity, It allows people to spend domestically in

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 4>their economies on things other than defense, and it encourages

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:42.920
<v Speaker 4>integration that is safer and more prosperous for the world.

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:47.119
<v Speaker 4>And that's what's informing his defenestration of USAID, because he

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 4>doesn't understand how American soft power functions in the world.

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 4>And these come from hard won lessons about how you

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 4>successfully achieve peace and prosperity, and he grew up. John

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 4>and I were talking on less earlier. His father made

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:05.879
<v Speaker 4>his fortune building subsidized housing for working class Americans, and

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 4>he ended up cheating the federal government during the nineteen

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 4>forties and fifties, and he got kicked out of that program.

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 4>And then he did a similar thing in New York State,

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 4>and he was getting funds from New York State for

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 4>housing development, and he did the same thing. He was overbilling.

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 4>He was creating faith companies, and he got kicked out

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:26.160
<v Speaker 4>of the New York State programs. And he essentially resigned

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:29.920
<v Speaker 4>after that or retired rather from building. But within the family,

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 4>they never said Dad got in trouble because he was

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:35.399
<v Speaker 4>dealing from the government. What they said was the government

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 4>came and took Dad's properties away. The government came and

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 4>took his candy away. And that informs Trump's view of

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 4>emigration and informs Trump's view of foreign policy. It's beware,

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:47.639
<v Speaker 4>someone's going to come and take things away from you,

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 4>and if you don't protect those things, you're a sucker

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 4>and you will be ripped off. And the only way

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 4>to do that is to isolate and put walls up

0:20:57.280 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 4>and defend yourself. And that's a perilous calcil in the

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 4>world we live in.

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 2>We're really talking about re ordering of alliances and friendships

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:08.119
<v Speaker 2>and coalitions. Right at this point, since we don't have

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 2>much time left, I wonder if we can just stare

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:15.360
<v Speaker 2>into an imaginary crystal ball. Right, we're twenty twenty nine,

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 2>four years from now, Right, what does the world look like,

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:22.160
<v Speaker 2>and Asian in particular, four years after Trump?

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:26.440
<v Speaker 3>I would just talk about the development of an economy

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 3>after World War Two in Asia. The economies that have

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:33.439
<v Speaker 3>done very well are mostly driven by export, right, export

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 3>oriented economy. So how do the rest of the Asian

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:41.920
<v Speaker 3>economies that have now reached the upper middle income level

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:45.159
<v Speaker 3>become rich themselves? They have to think of a model

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 3>that's other than exports.

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 4>I think there's a happy and a sad answer to that.

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 4>And I'd hate to end on a sad note for everybody,

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 4>but I'll start with the sad and then go to

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:55.879
<v Speaker 4>the happy. The sad note is that I think what

0:21:56.040 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 4>you're seeing around isolationism and predation continues on that, and

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:03.199
<v Speaker 4>we have a world in which people have armed up

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:07.920
<v Speaker 4>and trading sufferers and diplomacy suffers, and again we're in

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 4>an earlier century with the fallout all that entails. I

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 4>think the happy outcome is that people understand why it's

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 4>important to stand up for institutions and values and processes

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:25.640
<v Speaker 4>that we need to have civilized societies and push back

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 4>against that. But I think we're on a knife edge.

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:31.400
<v Speaker 4>I think we are in a very historically perilous place

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 4>right now.

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:35.480
<v Speaker 5>I think Asia will be more Chinese, like I think

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 5>you're going to have Chinese electric cars and lots of

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:41.879
<v Speaker 5>markets around Asia. I think you'll have people in Asia

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:45.640
<v Speaker 5>using deep seek and Chinese Ai. And then I think

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:47.879
<v Speaker 5>when people travel from Singapore to New York, they'll have

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 5>to get like completely different devices because none of those

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 5>things will exist in the US. I think Europe is

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 5>really hard to read at the moment where that goes.

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:58.920
<v Speaker 5>But I do feel like this four years will see

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 5>China being more of fluential in Asia.

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I think in four years it will be like Russia,

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:07.119
<v Speaker 1>China and the US sort of competing against one another

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:10.400
<v Speaker 1>and then sometimes cutting deals with each other, but also

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 1>trying to sort of woo either through force potentially in

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Russia's case, or Trump with Greenland or the Panama Canal

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of competing with one another, but also trying to

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 1>select new allies or new territories, each to their own side.

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think those will be the three accesses that

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll be watching.

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:32.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, certainly a new world order they were seeing forming

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:35.920
<v Speaker 2>right now. With that, I want to thank my wonderful panelists.

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for your lovely and insightful thoughts. I think

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 2>with that we're going to call it a rap And

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 2>if you enjoy this discussion, please subscribe to The Big

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:51.680
<v Speaker 2>Take Asia. You can find us wherever you get your podcasts,

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:59.919
<v Speaker 2>and we'll see you next week. This is The Big

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 2>Take Asia from Bloomberg News.

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 4>I'm wan Ha.

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 2>This episode was produced by Young Young and Naomi. It

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:08.920
<v Speaker 2>was edited by Grace Jennings, ed Quist, Patti Hirsch, and

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:11.920
<v Speaker 2>John Leu. It was fact checked by Naomi and mixed

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:15.600
<v Speaker 2>and sound designed by Taka Yasuzawa and Alex Hugia. Our

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:19.359
<v Speaker 2>senior producer is Naomi Shaven. Our senior editor is Elizabeth Ponso.

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:23.720
<v Speaker 2>Our executive producer is Nicole Miemsterboer. Sage Bauman is Bloomberg's

0:24:23.760 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 2>head of Podcasts. Thanks for listening. See you next time