WEBVTT - PGIM's Tipp: Virus Won't Likely Send US To Recession

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penl Podcast. I'm Paul swing you,

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>along with my co host Lisa Brahma wits. Each day

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.959
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.079
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. I think the big issue here

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:22.760
<v Speaker 1>is we've got equity markets off, you know, roughly fiftent

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>over the last seven trading days, just an extraordinary trade

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>down in the equity markets and financial markets. The question

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 1>I think now for a lot of investors is will

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the central bankers try to come in and stop the carnage.

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>There's absolutely nobody better to talk to about this issue

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>than Robert Tip. He's a chief investment strategist in Ahead

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 1>of Global Bonds for p G I M fixed income.

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:47.840
<v Speaker 1>He has crossed the river from the Jersey side, joining

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>us here in a Bloomberg eleven three oh studio. So, Robert,

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>what will the Fed do? When will they do it?

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>And will anybody even care? I think people will care

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>because there is a fundamental situation where uncertainty is rising,

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and activity levels, especially abroad already in the world's biggest

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>driver of growth, China, have been seriously impacted. Uh. You know,

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:13.759
<v Speaker 1>bottom line numbers like GDP and so on, those will

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>come out much later. But auto sales, for example, we're

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>down spectacularly, manufacturing, electricity usage and so on, and now

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the cases around the world are kind of that a

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>geometric increasing stage, and so there is going to be

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a shock. The FED is away from their mandate, which

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:35.319
<v Speaker 1>is not on the maximum employment side they're find there,

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 1>but inflation is persistently away from target. This morning we

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>had their preferred indicator of inflation, the PC print, and

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>if anything, that is moving systematically further away from their

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>target on the downside. So it would seem like there's

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>a great case for them to make an insurance cut

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty much at any time. And uh that could be

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>helpful because what we're seeing now is a tightening of

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>financial conditions. Granted, financial conditions were very easy a handful

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:10.239
<v Speaker 1>of weeks ago, but you know now it's going to

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:14.919
<v Speaker 1>make a difference going forward. Uh, financial conditions tightening, making

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 1>whatever is going to happen that would uh materialize in

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:22.639
<v Speaker 1>terms of a weekend economy weakening, economy worse. So I

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>think there's a pretty good argument for them to do

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>that now. Whether this is like that transition where they're

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 1>hiking way too late and it took them a little

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:35.960
<v Speaker 1>bit of time to to change the rhetoric around and

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>they really exacerbated things with that rate hike, or they'll

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>have a quicker turn. Uh, it remains to be seen.

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>But the initial indications are are not that good. But

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>hopefully they'll get the signal from the market quicker this time.

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>And Jim Bullard coming out this morning and sort of

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 1>taking a rather sanguent tone about the sell off and

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:56.799
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily signaling the rate cut that people were expecting. Nevertheless,

0:02:57.040 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>you are seeing in the Fed funds futures market to

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:02.800
<v Speaker 1>full rate cut. It's being priced in frankly before June

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>h and three rate cuts before the end of the year,

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 1>four rate cuts by the beginning of next year. So

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:09.919
<v Speaker 1>if the Fed doesn't capitulate, the market just seems to

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:12.640
<v Speaker 1>be moving further and further away from them. I just

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>want to ask you, though, how much will that loosen conditions?

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:19.920
<v Speaker 1>How much will that entice you as a portfolio manager

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 1>to go out and buy risk your debt at these levels, right,

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:27.919
<v Speaker 1>I think it will make a big difference. And when

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:31.960
<v Speaker 1>you look at what happened after August of last year

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>was the most recent incident of where the market got

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>way ahead of the fat in terms of expectations for

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>ease on concerns about downside risks that you know, once

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the underlying situation had stabilized, investor confidence returned, and this

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>time it didn't require the FED. But once that confidence returned,

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the market will ease up and we'll take these rate

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>cuts out of the market after they cut maybe you

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 1>know once and you can have a recovery and risk

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>and so on. So do you expe spreads to retest

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>their lows the extra yield that investors earned over benchmark

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>rates on high yield and investment grade credit? Do you

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>expect a lot of tightening later in the year an

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 1>incredible outperformance there. I think that this correction is the

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>same as the corrections we've had over the last handful

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 1>of years. This is this is not going to be

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the beginning, I would guess, of a major crisis in

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:25.039
<v Speaker 1>terms of a bear market in that goes on for

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>a year or two. This is probably something that's going

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 1>to be more measured in weeks or months after which

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>we go back to an environment it's not a feel

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>good environment for people. It's a very slow economic growth backdrop. UM.

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>But the down shifting of risk free interest rates around

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the world, which is still kind of happening on a

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 1>secular basis, it's not been fully priced yet on the coronavirus,

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>is accelerating that those low discount rates are gonna then

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:55.280
<v Speaker 1>fuel refuel that search for yield, and that is going

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>to pull the spreads in and UH and boost returns

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 1>on higher fixed income. But you have to get past

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:03.839
<v Speaker 1>this first. So I'm looking at the two year, you know,

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>zero point nine percent, a ten year one point one

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>six percent or zero percent rates reasonable to discount at all.

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I think in the short term that's that's not where

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>we're headed, unless this turns into a major economic crisis

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and the FED is forced to go into panic mode. UM.

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:25.279
<v Speaker 1>But I think that the range has really continued to

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>shift lower. We have the FED would like to maintain

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>a zero lower bound. They should be able to do that, UM.

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>But the top end of the rate cycle has gone

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>from twenty you know, back in eighty down to nine

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>three quarters in nine to six and a half in

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:47.559
<v Speaker 1>two thousand to the mid twos last year, and that's

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the new high water mark for Fed funds. And it's

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be a zero to three range on the

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Fed funds and probably a one and a half central

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:59.359
<v Speaker 1>tendency for the tenure treasury. Yeah. Well, right now, I

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 1>just want to say, we're looking at spreads on Highel

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:06.160
<v Speaker 1>debt for four point six percent and the first two

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>point six percentage points over benchmark rates. Literally one word

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:12.840
<v Speaker 1>answer Bob Michael of JP morgan As Management saying he

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>sees them going up to six dred before it's a

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>buying opportunity. Where's the sort of tipping point you know,

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where that's going to be. I would

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:23.919
<v Speaker 1>guess it's lower and uh and before it turns. But

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>that you know, it is going to be a bond

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>pickers market. Right. There will be areas of trouble, but

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:32.279
<v Speaker 1>in the long term, I think spread product is attractive.

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Robert Tip, thank you so much as always, and I

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>wish I had an hour with you. We would have

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 1>such a great time. Yes, well, I mean this is

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>such an interesting market. Robert Tip, Chief Investment Strategies, of

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 1>PJIM Fixed Income. Well, that's a coronavirus spreads outside of

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 1>China's first to the Middle East and then the other

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>parts of Asia than uh, the European continent with Italy.

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 1>The concerns is how prepared is the US for a

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:05.160
<v Speaker 1>potential outbreak of the coronavirus here in the US. To

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 1>help us answer that, we welcome Dr Philip Chan. He's

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>a CEO and president of Cytosorbents Corporation that trades on

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Nastack symbol ct s O. Up thirty six percent today,

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>up eight five percent year to date. Uh. Dr Chan,

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us here in our

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Interactive Broker's studio. Just from your expertise in the

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>healthcare industry, just give us a sense of kind of

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:30.680
<v Speaker 1>how you think the US is prepared for what might

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>be an outbreak of the coronavirus. Well, thank you very

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 1>much Paul Lisa for having me on the show. Um,

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I think to basically put my comments though in perspective,

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>just to give you a little bit of background about

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>my company. Citos Orbans is a medical device company that

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>specializes in blood purification to treat deadly inflammation often associated

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>with life threatening infection such as influenza, factoral pneumonia, virus

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>infections potentially like coronavirus, etcetera. UH. Cytosorp is approved in

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the European Union, has accumulate more than eighty thousand uses

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 1>over fifty eight countries UH and has generated about twenty

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>three million in sales last year. The cold goal of

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Cytosaur is to control the deadly inflammatory response that these

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>viral illnesses and bacterial illnesses often generate that can then

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>lead rapidly to organ failure and death of patients from

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the failure of organs like the heart, the lungs, and

0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the kidneys. Now, in the United States, we are not

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>yet approved. We're still an investigational product, but we are

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>actually in a process. We're in the regulatory process of

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>trying to get approved here in the United States. So

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>in terms of your question about how prepared are we,

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I think coronavirus COVID nineteen represents a very unique challenge

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:43.719
<v Speaker 1>because one we've never seen it before, It's a novel infection.

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:46.719
<v Speaker 1>No one has immenity to it. There are no antiviral

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 1>agents that are approved to treat it, and there are

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>no vaccinations approved also to treat it. And the problem

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 1>with this virus is that it's kind of an insidious virus.

0:08:56.760 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 1>It lays dormant UH and people remain asymptomatic for up

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>to fourteen days. They may have it, they may be

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:06.200
<v Speaker 1>spreading it all over the community, but they would never

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>know that they have it, and so only until they

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:11.839
<v Speaker 1>start manifesting the common symptoms of fever, cough, and and

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>just UH shortness of breath and fatigue that they know

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 1>that they have it. So this is why, all of

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>a sudden you see these massive outcroppings of virus happening

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>all over the world, and so in the United States,

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that we need better ways to prevent the spread,

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think the initiatives that we heard about recently,

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:33.439
<v Speaker 1>the two point five billion dollars that are going towards this,

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>will be helpful. But prevention and controlling the spread of

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 1>this outbreak is key, but also is controlling the deadly

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>complications of lung failure and shock and other things that

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>currently we have no approved therapies to treat today, and

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>that's what Citosorb is doing our product. Have you had

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>conversations with the government about expediting UH the accreditation of

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 1>your product given what the threat is. Yeah, we've had

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 1>a longstanding dialogue with MAY many agencies throughout the US government.

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:07.200
<v Speaker 1>In fact, we've gotten more than twenty nine million dollars

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 1>in grants and contracts towards our technology over the years

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>because of that. But we have been in touch, most

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 1>recently with BARDA, for example, that is leading the charge

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 1>against developing potential countermeasures against UH coronavirus. We have we

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 1>are still in the early stages of those discussions, but

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>UM our hope is that UH they understand the fact

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that there are no approved treatments for this illness and

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 1>that one of the hallmark features of what is killing

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 1>people is this out of control immune response, and that

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>is what we are very well positioned to do. Do you.

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Are you aware of any patients that may have been

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>as part of the treatment outside of the US, may

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 1>have been prescribed or using your product. So the product

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:52.079
<v Speaker 1>again has been used in more than eighty thousand cumulative

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>treatments to date, but we don't have any indication that

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 1>it's yet been used for coronavirus since it is so new.

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>I think some of the exciting news that we announced

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:04.680
<v Speaker 1>today is that through a partnership with China Medical System

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Holdings Limited in China. UM that we have now UH

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 1>that hospitals in the Wuhan, China area have now received

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 1>our Cytosaur product and are well positioned to potentially use

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 1>this on act on patients with coronavirus infection. We just

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>did the training just very recently of key physicians in

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 1>those hospitals in the United States, So I can tell

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>you that when we had the swine flu epidemic that

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the intensive care units, which receives the sickest of the

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 1>sick patients of the hospital and we're cito survice typically used,

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:44.440
<v Speaker 1>were inundated with patients. And UH that is really a

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:48.559
<v Speaker 1>key concern should this uh, should this outbreak turn into

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>a full blown pandemic. But I think that UM to

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>put it into perspective. You know, flu this year has

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 1>already infected thirty million people in the United States alone,

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:02.319
<v Speaker 1>killing eighteen thousand people. Right, that's one in two thousand

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 1>people have died from the flu here in the United States,

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 1>And even though it was considered a fairly severe outbreak,

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:10.319
<v Speaker 1>it's not the worst we've seen. One year when the

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:13.440
<v Speaker 1>swine flu outbreak, eighty people died here in the United States,

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:16.679
<v Speaker 1>so compare that to coronavirus. It is still the major

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:20.559
<v Speaker 1>health concern today. Dr Philip Chan, thank you so much

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 1>for being with us. Dr Philip Chan, CEO and President

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 1>of Psyto Sorbins Corporation. Right now, we are looking at

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:42.200
<v Speaker 1>a market that has been clying back from some of

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>its earlier losses, although it really is whipping around. NASDAC

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 1>now had been briefly positive, now down nine tenths of

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>a percent. The key, uh, the key issue here is

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 1>a lack of conviction, a lack of understanding of the

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>threat that we're dealing with. Michael Tiedenman joining us now

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 1>chief executi of Officer of Titamin Advisers with billion dollars

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:05.440
<v Speaker 1>of assets under management. Michael, there are a lot of

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:09.079
<v Speaker 1>calls saying that recession is now likely in the United States,

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>if not globally, as a result of the spread of

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:16.959
<v Speaker 1>the coronavirus. Is that becoming your base case? First of all,

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 1>thank you for having me on such a quiet week.

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>We it's not our base case, but there's no question

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be short term economic impact. What you're really

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>we think the lasting impact will be on lower quality

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 1>higher lever's businesses that had less room coming into this

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 1>less room for air. Higher quality businesses with great balance

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 1>sheets will obviously have an impact, certainly one they can

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 1>sustain and earn their way out of inventories. You also

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 1>have to remember, depending on how short this is right now,

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:48.559
<v Speaker 1>things are moving so quickly as inventories run off, then

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:51.199
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna begin in seeing some supply chain issues that

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 1>people have been worried about. The big delta going out

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:57.680
<v Speaker 1>to three or four weeks will be if demand people

0:13:57.720 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>stop going in restaurant, if it really if there's a shift,

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>dramatic shift of US service demand and consumer activity. So

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that we've been discussing this morning

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>is kind of the market seems to be really pricing

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>in three maybe four rate cuts by the Federal Reserve

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:17.560
<v Speaker 1>over the next twelve months. How do you think that

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Fed's going to try to address what has been a

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>supply issue today but could morph into you know, a

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 1>demand issue. There's only so much they can do, but

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I think they will, they will be sensitive to it.

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I think they're obviously going to be speaking with a

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of corporations and CEOs and the leven idea of

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>any pressures that are throughout the economic system. But I

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's that's not that that's a blunt tool

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 1>when you need a lot of other tools possibility deal

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 1>with something this. How many frantic phone calls have you

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>fielded from your clients saying should I sell everything? We've

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 1>had a few, um, but only a few. I think

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 1>there's always an inverse correlation between phone calls incoming from

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 1>clients and directions of markets. So this is pretty extreme,

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's been very quick. You know, it's this really

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 1>a five day dramatic sell off, So it's it's coming.

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 1>But there's also just a lack of information that everyone has.

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 1>That's the real issue is that no one can Investors

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>won't make a decision until they understand exactly what their

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 1>analysis is. Traders have one decision, sell or short, so

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 1>you've got this sort of one community of people that

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>have a very easy decision to make. In longer term

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>investors are looking in the market that you know, after

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a fifteen percent corraction, it's still pretty fairly valued. You know,

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 1>we were here a month ago talking about growth expectations

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 1>being h we're too high. That seems like a good

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 1>protection every day. But so the investing base is going

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to sit and watch and wait, and that doesn't help

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>market short term. So what do you tell those folks

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 1>who call you up frantically? Um, is it kind of

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>just kind of the we're long term investors here, you know,

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 1>don't panic, you know, we we do. Luckily, we begin

0:15:57.280 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 1>trimming some of our equity positions in Q four exclusively

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 1>because evaluations, and we always have hedges on, but we

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>actually avalued the hedges not to do the coronavirus just

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>because cost of protection and evaluations in at the end

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 1>of January. So we have some some good narrative to

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>tell our clients and that there's some protective elements of

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>our portfolio. But ultimately, quality assets survived periods like this,

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 1>lower quality assets are challenged, and the corporate credit market

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 1>with gearing and really the high yield market, there's a

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>big imbalance there that this maybe that's that bears watching.

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 1>That would say that's the one thing that we're going

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>to keep an eye on over the next couple of

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 1>weeks and months. So the FED very much in focus

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>today as people ramp up their rate cutting expectations. Charles

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Retzky over at Missoojo Security is putting out a note

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about the last time the FED actually had an

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 1>inter meeting rate cut was February two and eight. We

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>know what happened after that, UM, But I am wondering

0:16:56.680 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>from your perspective, is that a sure bed and well

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>that support markets? The FED comes out and does what

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the what what traders are certainly pricing in, which is

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:10.679
<v Speaker 1>more than two rate cuts by June. I think the

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 1>news flow will still dominate markets. It will be helpful, clearly,

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:17.200
<v Speaker 1>it's always helpful. But I think ultimately the the information

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that is gathered either incrementally positive information about the virus,

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:27.679
<v Speaker 1>greater understanding new rules UH and maybe containment of spread,

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 1>that will have a much more pronounced and back to

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 1>markets or the converse. So again, I think a monetary

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>tool is helpful. It's certainly helpful of corporations or that

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:40.639
<v Speaker 1>are levered and have you know, real interest rates and

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:43.640
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden they may have a sharp drop

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 1>from the demand. But I think the news from this,

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 1>it's all about this right now. So how do you

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 1>typically in your I mean, you can think back that

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter of eighteen or certainly going back to

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the financial crisis. But when you see markets falling like

0:17:57.200 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 1>this again in fifteen six, just in seven trade days, um,

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of that falling knife analogy comes here, and

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to be the person catching that falling knife.

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you wait for a day or two of green

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 1>on the screen before you say, okay, I think this

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>thing might have found bottom. Generally well, from a trading standpoint,

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:19.879
<v Speaker 1>three huge down days, high volume days, that's generally a

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>capitulation point. Um. And we're we've seen some of that.

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we've seen enough of that candidly, but

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 1>we're not traders. In the end of Q for eighteen,

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>we saw that as a non fundamental We disagreed with

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the market analysis that we're entering our session. That's why

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>we added risk exposure at that time. Today where everyone's

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:41.200
<v Speaker 1>in a huge void of information. Every you know, you're

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 1>seeing cancelate this week alone, you look at the news

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>flow about cancelations and people banning, you know, corporations not

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:50.159
<v Speaker 1>allowing people to fly out of the country, mean, etcetera.

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 1>It's expanding. Schools are being getting emails about my kids preschools,

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:59.679
<v Speaker 1>and you know, so all this stuff is very fluid. Um.

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 1>It's uh, it's no, this is not what people are

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:06.199
<v Speaker 1>trained analyze. Ultimately, Michael, just lastly to wrap it all

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 1>up and put a sort of a bow on the day.

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Today is another day to find a haven investment. What's

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the best haven big side? Yea, we have such a

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 1>negative forward view and treasury, so it's been the best

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 1>haven and gold we own gold. We think that is

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:26.399
<v Speaker 1>just but that's not a trade. We think that's just

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 1>a generally a good asset to have in the mix.

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 1>So you're basically, uh, putting cash in a mattress and

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:35.680
<v Speaker 1>sleeping as well as you possibly. Yeah, I never agreed

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 1>with the cash is trash quote that came out a

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 1>couple of months ago. Every great long term investor always

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:44.359
<v Speaker 1>has a little liquidity when things like this happen. Interesting, Okay,

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Michael Teaman, thanks so much for joining us. Michael Taman

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 1>is a chief executive officer for Team Advisors, twenty one

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars under management, so lots of capital in the marketplace,

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 1>joining us here in our Bloomberg in Direactive broker studio.

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 1>The message to the Federal Reserve today is we don't

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:08.160
<v Speaker 1>care what you say. We are expecting for rate cuts

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:10.440
<v Speaker 1>by the end of January. That at least is the

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 1>impression from markets joining us now to discuss. Brian Schappato

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:16.879
<v Speaker 1>is a Blueberg opinion columnist covering all things debt related,

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and Brian, I'm looking right now, it's nearly a full

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>four rate cuts by the end of January currently priced.

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 1>And this comes even after Jim Bullard, the Fed's Jim

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Bullard came out earlier today and basically said, yeah, I

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>guess we'll cut if it's a pandemic, but you know

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 1>it's too early to know, which wasn't comforting to markets, right. Yeah,

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the base case is still for keeping policy on hold

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and for the federal reserve. Not from markets. No, from

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean markets, like people are hedging effectively

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:47.200
<v Speaker 1>for rates hitting the zero bound, like by mid year

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 1>at this point, which is just kind of nuts. I mean,

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:52.479
<v Speaker 1>obviously you've got a hedge, so you don't necessarily the

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:54.120
<v Speaker 1>rates to hit zero by then, but I mean it's

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>just kind of crazy. Um, the Fed is not willing

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 1>to appease the market. It's at least not to this extent.

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just a massive market meltdown in a

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>freak out right now, and people are just buying things up,

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's of course causing the pricing to look like

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be a lot of cuts. But I

0:21:11.040 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 1>mean people talk about inter meeting cuts like happening over

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the weekend or on Monday morning if stocks keep falling.

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:19.879
<v Speaker 1>I just don't see that at all. So but Brian

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>one could argue with a cynical mind, like we have

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:27.199
<v Speaker 1>some cynics around. He just pointed to who are Wadio

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>on radio that this is a friend who maybe has

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:32.679
<v Speaker 1>responded to the markets, maybe more than they should have.

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Um still though, you think they're gonna be focusing on

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the data. Yeah, I mean Robert Kaplan said it's a

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Fox Business today. He said, I will make a decision

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 1>on a rate cut by March seventeenth, eighteenth, which is

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:47.119
<v Speaker 1>their meeting. And I expect a rate cut at the

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:49.680
<v Speaker 1>March meeting. I mean, I don't unless the markets somehow

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:52.200
<v Speaker 1>rebound tremendously. I think they would lose a lot of

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:55.119
<v Speaker 1>credibility if they don't do anything. But for them to

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>do something extraordinary right now doesn't seem likely. It's not

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 1>like I think pretty much everyone conclude that one rate

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 1>cut will not solve the coronavirus, right, and it's unclear

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 1>whether it's kind of comical. I mean, I mean, I mean,

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 1>it's unclear whether anybody out there who's pounding the table

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:14.439
<v Speaker 1>for a rate cut. I mean, if you've got a

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:17.400
<v Speaker 1>basis rate cut this afternoon, would you be buying stocks?

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure. Well, this actually is a really interesting question.

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 1>What will it take for people to go in buy

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 1>stocks by risk or debt? I mean you came into

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:28.399
<v Speaker 1>the studio and you said, you know, people have been

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:30.439
<v Speaker 1>saying they're just waiting for an opportunity to buy the

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:34.120
<v Speaker 1>dip here it is. I'm not going to fall I'm

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 1>not going to catch this falling knife. What do they

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:38.360
<v Speaker 1>have to see? What are the people you're talking to saying? Yeah?

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it sounds like people just want some clarity

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:45.679
<v Speaker 1>around how uh you know, elected officials are gonna get

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:49.199
<v Speaker 1>their hands around the coronavirus. And there's nothing that the

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 1>Fed canoe again. I mean, they have a few options.

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 1>They can either go back to quee and they're still

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:57.880
<v Speaker 1>already buying treasury bills. So for all those who said, oh,

0:22:57.960 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're buying treasury bills and that's causing the

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 1>stock market to melt up. I mean, they're still doing

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:04.440
<v Speaker 1>that but doesn't really matter right now, or they can

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>cut rates, and neither of those things provides any certainty

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 1>around the coronavirus front. You see Mick Mulvaney come out

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:13.159
<v Speaker 1>today and say it's possible schools will have to close

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:15.919
<v Speaker 1>in the US and people get really freaked out, like

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:18.680
<v Speaker 1>they don't want their daily lives to be affected by this.

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:23.440
<v Speaker 1>And even if borrowing costs are the cheapest they've ever been, uh,

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:26.920
<v Speaker 1>that's not going to really resolve that concern. So, I

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 1>mean that kind of goes to the issue. I think

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing maybe in some of this accelerating risk

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 1>off field, it's just every day is you know, there's

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 1>another potentially big shoe to drop, and that is, you know,

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:41.160
<v Speaker 1>a spread within the U S which we really haven't

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 1>seen yet. That's the headline risk that I think a

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of traders probably don't want to deal with its

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>hold on a second, do you think that the market

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:51.200
<v Speaker 1>that for at the market, that the economy isn't starting

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:52.919
<v Speaker 1>to prepare for that? I mean, how many people have

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:58.119
<v Speaker 1>you known who've been stockpiling food? Answer to your question

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:01.639
<v Speaker 1>is no, I don't think the market is discounted. UM

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:04.639
<v Speaker 1>A spread a material spread in the US. But I

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:07.199
<v Speaker 1>think that potentially what I think that's just kind of

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 1>what the market is telling is maybe. And the thing

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:12.480
<v Speaker 1>is is you saw Christine Lagarde yesterday come out and say,

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:15.119
<v Speaker 1>even on the E c B side, we don't see

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 1>it necessary monetary policy responses yet, and that you know,

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:21.919
<v Speaker 1>she oversees Italy obviously, and Italy has had quite an

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:26.159
<v Speaker 1>outbreak over there. So even even people who are overseeing

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:30.360
<v Speaker 1>economies that have been hit by this are saying this

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>is not a monetary policy issue. I don't know what

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you want from US, UM. And that's gonna be really

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:38.720
<v Speaker 1>interesting for markets to digest because to the point about

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 1>last year's rate cuts, I mean, they effectively backstopped a

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 1>trade war, and trade war could have been stopped by

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 1>elected officials and this cannot necessarily be so the Fed

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:53.639
<v Speaker 1>used a bunch of ammunition on a problem that could

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 1>be resolved by people relatively easily. UM. And this is

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a lot harder branch about it. Thanks so

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. We appreciate your thoughts. We know

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 1>you are busy. Uh here you can read Brian's a

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 1>great opinion, work at on the Terminal at O P

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I n Go, and on Bloomberg dot com slash Opinion.

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast.

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:17.920
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pt Sweeney. I'm Lisa abram Woy. It's

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Lisa abram woits one before the podcast.

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio