Speaker 1: Let not your heart be troubled. You are listening to
Speaker 1: the Sean Hannity Radio Show podcast. Hey, like most of you,
Speaker 1: I had not have had trouble sleeping, but I sleep
Speaker 1: better than ever. And you know what, It's all because
Speaker 1: of a pillow. Mike Lindell's My Pillow has changed my
Speaker 1: life for the better and it works. What makes my
Speaker 1: Pillow so different is their patented adjustable phil Now you
Speaker 1: can adjust a patent and filter your exact individual comfort
Speaker 1: need and get the support you absolutely must have, and
Speaker 1: that means you fall asleep faster, you stay asleep longer.
Speaker 1: It just works. Millions of people have already discovered that
Speaker 1: my Pillow works for them, and now it's time for
Speaker 1: you to experience my Pillow for yourself. Just go to
Speaker 1: my pillow dot com, use the promo code Sean, and
Speaker 1: when you do, Mike Lindell will give you his best
Speaker 1: offer ever. By one my pillow, get another one absolutely free. Now.
Speaker 1: My pillows, made in the USA has a ten year
Speaker 1: warranty and a sixty day unconditional money back guarantee, so
Speaker 1: you have nothing to lose. So get started and get
Speaker 1: to sleep. You crave and deserve my pillow dot com
Speaker 1: promo code Hannah and get Mike Lindell's special two for
Speaker 1: one offer. That's my pillow dot com promo code Sean.
Speaker 1: And we got incredible economic news to share with you today.
Speaker 1: Unemployment claims have now hit the lowest level and well
Speaker 1: nearly half a century. When you break it down demographically,
Speaker 1: it's even more fantastic. The daw was now added nearly
Speaker 1: eight trillion dollars and well to the US economy. We
Speaker 1: have a big story with Apple. But the President now
Speaker 1: is taken to the podium in Pennsylvania, just outside of Pittsburgh,
Speaker 1: and he's holding a rally, and we'll dip into this place.
Speaker 1: Not a great place. I met the workers and the
Speaker 1: people that really do make America great. They're incredible people.
Speaker 1: Thank you and thank you for being here. You're not
Speaker 1: very familiar with the setting. As you found out. This
Speaker 1: is something special and I am thrilled to be back
Speaker 1: in Pennsylvania with the hard working men and women of
Speaker 1: H and K A weapon. Good job you do, good job,
Speaker 1: good job you do. We're honored to be joined by
Speaker 1: the Secretary of the Treasury, Steve Benuchin. Director. They'll look
Speaker 1: at that stude. They must know you. There's about this group.
Speaker 1: The Director of National Economic Council, Gary Cone, your tax
Speaker 1: sky's our taxman? Where's Gary Garry did a good job
Speaker 1: in those Texas everybody being helped by those taxes, big texts,
Speaker 1: as well as a number of outstanding members of Congress.
Speaker 1: Representative lu Barletta. And he's been a friend of mine
Speaker 1: for a long time. Here's another one, Mike Kelly, myke
Speaker 1: I won't have you go through and over those gates.
Speaker 1: Pat mean Pat, Thank you Pat, great job you do. Pat.
Speaker 1: He's like real friends of mine for a long time.
Speaker 1: Representative Keith roth Fest, does everybody knowing Keith roth Fest?
Speaker 1: Thank you, Keith, thanks for being here. Keith a man
Speaker 1: that everybody in Washington knows and so respects. Bill Schuster, Bill,
Speaker 1: Thanks Bill. Representative G. T. Thompson and you know this G. T.
Speaker 1: A person that people are hearing more and more about.
Speaker 1: A real friend and a spectacular man. Rick sko Own
Speaker 1: and Mrs Sicoon, thank you for being here. Thank you
Speaker 1: special people. My daughter Avanca is also here with us today,
Speaker 1: and she worked so hard on the child tax credit. Ivanka,
Speaker 1: come up, come up here, come on, come on, and
Speaker 1: a very special thank you to George Cook for hosting us.
Speaker 1: Done a great done, a great job, really a great job.
Speaker 1: Thank you, Thank you. What an incredible company. Ivanka. Are
Speaker 1: you going to say a couple of words about the
Speaker 1: Child tax Credit board? Did you work hard? Safe? Come
Speaker 1: on hi everyone. It is always amazing to be here
Speaker 1: in Pencil Vania, to be here with all of you.
Speaker 1: We worked so hard on tax cuts and tax reform,
Speaker 1: and the President, my father, was very specific about what
Speaker 1: he wanted to accomplish. It was so core to him
Speaker 1: to support hard working, middle income families and the child
Speaker 1: tax credit is key to doing that. So it's going
Speaker 1: to be a big win for everyone in this room
Speaker 1: and everyone across this country. And we're very, very excited
Speaker 1: about that. Doubling the standard deduction, the child tax credit,
Speaker 1: all of these elements that make this a very family
Speaker 1: friendly plan but also enable great American businesses like this
Speaker 1: one to thrive and be competitive in a global landscape.
Speaker 1: So we're very proud of it, and America is just
Speaker 1: starting to realize just how great our tax cut plan is.
Speaker 1: So more of that to come. But thank you for
Speaker 1: having me here. Thanks, thank you, baby, Thank you very much. Shvanka.
Speaker 1: She worked hard it's a hard worker. All of our
Speaker 1: kids are hard workers, right, They work, and we love
Speaker 1: to see it, and they're doing a terrific job for
Speaker 1: a country. I've come to the great city of Pittsburgh
Speaker 1: to stand with people, and those people are incredible workers,
Speaker 1: and to show the world that America is back, and
Speaker 1: that we are coming back bigger and better and stronger
Speaker 1: than ever before. And we're making our own product again,
Speaker 1: and we're opening up our factories again. I mean, you
Speaker 1: take a look at what's going on where Toyota is
Speaker 1: coming in and the other day you just saw Chrysler
Speaker 1: announce their moving from Mexico back to Michigan. You don't
Speaker 1: hear that too often with a big, big monster factory
Speaker 1: for to spend a lot of money. At the center
Speaker 1: of America's researgence are the massive tax cuts that I
Speaker 1: just signed into law. And it's also reformed, but I
Speaker 1: usually just say tax cuts because that's what people where
Speaker 1: they don't want to hear about the reform. Believe me,
Speaker 1: the reform is very important. We don't have to go
Speaker 1: into it. But the tax cuts are the most significant
Speaker 1: tax cut, most significant reform in American history, with tremendous
Speaker 1: tax relief, for working families, for small businesses, for big businesses,
Speaker 1: that produced jobs for just about everybody, tremendous numbers. And
Speaker 1: you're already seeing what's happening. You're seeing what's going on.
Speaker 1: The signs of Americans come back can be seen at
Speaker 1: companies like this one, which just had its most successful
Speaker 1: year in its thirty five year history. Congratulations, good job.
Speaker 1: And I just learned from the powers that be that
Speaker 1: H and K equipment will soon be making at two
Speaker 1: point seven million dollar capital investment thanks to the new
Speaker 1: text cuts. So I appreciate that, and the workers appreciate
Speaker 1: that you're doing. Great, great job, great great equipment. That
Speaker 1: means more growth and ultimately it means more jobs. So congratulations.
Speaker 1: We have created nearly two point two million jobs since
Speaker 1: the election. The unemployment rate is that now an eighteen
Speaker 1: year low. I would say seventeen years, and now it
Speaker 1: just lifted to eighteen years. The number of Americans applying
Speaker 1: for unemployment benefits just hit a forty five year low,
Speaker 1: something I'm really proud of because I've been saying it,
Speaker 1: what do you have to lose? African American unemployment is
Speaker 1: at its lowest level ever recorded. Female unemployment is at
Speaker 1: the lowest level in seventeen years. Hispanic American unemployment has
Speaker 1: hit it's all time lows, lowest ever. Pensions and retirement
Speaker 1: accounts are surging in value as the stock market smashes
Speaker 1: one record high after another. How many people have four
Speaker 1: oh one? Case here, you're brilliant investors. I've had people
Speaker 1: come up, sir. My wife thinks I'm the most brilliant
Speaker 1: investor because I made in the last ten months and
Speaker 1: that's pretty good. But people are happy. Anybody unhappy with
Speaker 1: the four oh one? K I don't think so. Right, Wow,
Speaker 1: we can keep it like this. We're gonna win a
Speaker 1: lot of elections that I can tell you. It's something. Now,
Speaker 1: it's something. It's the economy, stupid Did you ever hear
Speaker 1: that one? It's the economy? It is. Indeed, as soon
Speaker 1: as really a few weeks from now, millions of American
Speaker 1: workers will be seeing the signs of America's come back
Speaker 1: in their paychecks in February. Very simply, your paychecks will
Speaker 1: be much bigger because under our tax cuts, you will
Speaker 1: be keeping more of your hard earned money. We are
Speaker 1: doubling the child tax credit, increasing the refundable credit by
Speaker 1: forty forty, and we are making the child credit available
Speaker 1: to more families than ever before, not even close. When
Speaker 1: we began our push for tax cuts, I promised that
Speaker 1: our bill would result in more jobs, higher wages, and
Speaker 1: tremendous relief for middle class families. And that is exactly
Speaker 1: what we have delivered. There's only one thing. Even I
Speaker 1: never knew how big it would be. It's much bigger,
Speaker 1: and you see it than anybody anticipated. We kept our promise.
Speaker 1: In Pennsylvania alone, families will see a tax cut of
Speaker 1: about eleven billion dollars just this year alone. It's pretty good.
Speaker 1: That's pretty good. A typical family of four earning seventy
Speaker 1: dollars will see an income tax cut of more than
Speaker 1: two thousand dollars. Yeah, it's like a two thousand dollar raise,
Speaker 1: slashing their income tax bill in half. Many will save
Speaker 1: much more than that. Ken Wilson is a great example.
Speaker 1: Where's Ken, Ken Wilson, the legendary Ken Wilson. Hi, Ken,
Speaker 1: come on over here where we see it. Ken, You
Speaker 1: gotta be happy with this? Is Ken doing a good job.
Speaker 1: Ken's everybody knows. Ken. Come on over here, can come
Speaker 1: on out here? Ken, Come on if you can make it,
Speaker 1: He'll figure out how to get that thing open. If
Speaker 1: he can't do it, nobody can, right. That's what he does.
Speaker 1: He works on machinery all the time. Ken joined H
Speaker 1: and K fourteen years ago as a mechanic and worked
Speaker 1: his way up to become a project foreman. Because of
Speaker 1: our tax cuts, Ken will save almost two thousand, two
Speaker 1: hundred dollars in income taxes two thousand. So Ken, you
Speaker 1: just got a two thousand, two hundred dollar raise, huh
Speaker 1: from them. And if I had a head of hair
Speaker 1: like that, I would I really would have been I
Speaker 1: would have been president years ago, Ken, years ago. But
Speaker 1: we've nearly doubled the amount of income text at the
Speaker 1: rate of zero. So Ken, you've seen a big difference.
Speaker 1: Thank you man, he said, he said, just the right thing.
Speaker 1: You never know. I want to say, say something to
Speaker 1: your workers, say something to you you. Uh. It's not just
Speaker 1: uh me, it's everybody as a whole. This company is
Speaker 1: an incredible company. We work with a bunch of great people. Uh.
Speaker 1: Everybody pulled together this week and pulled this off. It
Speaker 1: wasn't It was a sight to see. It's something to
Speaker 1: always remember here. So thank everybody. Obviously, thank you, Mr Tu,
Speaker 1: thank you, Thank you. Ken. He did good. We didn't
Speaker 1: know about that. He didn't know it all about that, right, Ken,
Speaker 1: good job. All right, we're gonna break right there we are.
Speaker 1: We're gonna continue this. I mean, some amazing economic statistics
Speaker 1: will get into all of that today. Uh. Just as
Speaker 1: another point of news, we are following so the House
Speaker 1: Intel Committee. I've been telling you that they got these
Speaker 1: documents last minute from the Department of Justice. They now
Speaker 1: beginning the process of sharing with members of Congress, and uh,
Speaker 1: we're getting dribs and drabs of information and it is
Speaker 1: probably as explosive as I've been hearing. We'll get to
Speaker 1: that today. Pap Buchanon, Sarah Carter, the NYPD is rated
Speaker 1: news week. We'll get an update on that coming up. Lets.
Speaker 1: We substantially reduced tax rates in American companies. Economists estimate
Speaker 1: that annual household income will rise by an average of
Speaker 1: four thousand dollars. Think of that. More than two million
Speaker 1: American workers have already received a tax cut bonus from
Speaker 1: their employers, pay raisers, more money for retirement, checks as
Speaker 1: high as two thousand dollars, and more, all because of
Speaker 1: our tax cuts and It hasn't even been a month
Speaker 1: since I signed the bill. It's turned out to be
Speaker 1: much bigger than we all thought. Even the people that
Speaker 1: did it right, Gary and Right, all of the Congressmen
Speaker 1: that voted for us and fought so hard, nobody had
Speaker 1: any idea one thing we didn't project in a positive way.
Speaker 1: Nobody thought that the companies were going to step up
Speaker 1: and pay all of these great bonuses to people. A
Speaker 1: T and T started it, but they came up and
Speaker 1: they paid all of these bonuses. A Florida software company,
Speaker 1: spell X just announced one thousand dollar tax cut bonusors workforces.
Speaker 1: Apple just announced they are giving their employees tax cut
Speaker 1: bonuses worth two thousand, five d dollars each. And because
Speaker 1: of our business tax reforms, Apple has just announced that
Speaker 1: they are bringing three hundred and fifty billion dollars and
Speaker 1: putting it into investment into our country. Three billion, fifty
Speaker 1: And when I heard the news yesterday, and Tim Cook
Speaker 1: is a great guy, the head of Apple. And when
Speaker 1: I heard the news, I heard three hundred and fifty billion.
Speaker 1: I said, you mean three hundred and fifty million. That's
Speaker 1: gonna be a beautiful plan. The top of the hour,
Speaker 1: we're gonna go back to this speech that the president,
Speaker 1: and you haven't missed a second, is now giving. It's
Speaker 1: just outside Pittsburgh. Um as he is now really highlighting
Speaker 1: the economic success that he has had since he's been president.
Speaker 1: We've got a lot to get to today. They quote
Speaker 1: looming shutdown that nobody knows about. More importantly, our top
Speaker 1: story today is that the do O J dump that
Speaker 1: they finally made it the last minute. This is getting
Speaker 1: interesting now other congressmen and women have had access to
Speaker 1: it today. The little dribs and drabs of information I'm
Speaker 1: slowly accumulated. I'm actually working as as we're playing the
Speaker 1: speech are devastating in terms of abuses. So we'll get
Speaker 1: to all that. But back to the president. Outside of Pittsburgh.
Speaker 1: They said, no, it's three hundred and fifty billion dollars,
Speaker 1: and I just called Tim Cook and I thanked him.
Speaker 1: But I don't imagine there's ever been an investment that
Speaker 1: big in this country by a company, And just think
Speaker 1: of what that means. And they're gonna build plants, and
Speaker 1: I think some of you remember I said I will
Speaker 1: not consider our economic situation complete until we get Apple
Speaker 1: to start building some of those massive plants in the
Speaker 1: United States. They're gonna build plants, They're gonna build a
Speaker 1: big campus. They're really going to town. So we want
Speaker 1: to thank Apple three fifty billion dollars. All right, what
Speaker 1: did good? Here? In the great Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, thousands
Speaker 1: of workers have already received tax cut bonuses thanks to
Speaker 1: employers like Comcast, next Year, Bank, American Airlines, PNC Financial names.
Speaker 1: I'm very familiar with. One of those hard working Pennsylvania's
Speaker 1: is Kevin Hotas. Kevin is a Marine Corps veteran who
Speaker 1: received a Bronze Star and a purple Heart for his
Speaker 1: courageous service during three tours in Iraq and a great
Speaker 1: proud person. Where's Kevin? Where is Kevin? Kevin? He kept
Speaker 1: that hand down like he didn't want to come up
Speaker 1: and speak. Thank you, Kevin. He started working for Comcast
Speaker 1: in six and last week he received a thousand dollar
Speaker 1: bonus check thanks to our tax cuts, right out of Comcast,
Speaker 1: right into his bank. Now he's taken his family on
Speaker 1: a well deserved vacation, Kevin to visit his grandparents in Florida. Right,
Speaker 1: Thank you, Kevin, see in Florida. I want to thank
Speaker 1: you for your service for your patriotism, and congratulations for
Speaker 1: the bonus. It's really good millions of people. Not only
Speaker 1: are we already seeing the benefits of higher wages and
Speaker 1: bigger salaries, much bigger salaries, but we're also seeing the creation,
Speaker 1: very importantly to me, of new jobs. Pete O'Connor owns
Speaker 1: a personnel company called Carol Harris Staffing right here in Pittsburgh.
Speaker 1: Pete says that businesses of all kinds are seeing increased
Speaker 1: demand just recently and the hiring more and more workers.
Speaker 1: And that's only really great news, not only for Pete,
Speaker 1: it's great news for all of the people in Pittsburgh,
Speaker 1: for the citizens of Pennsylvania and Americans all across our country.
Speaker 1: Were Pete, Pete, thank you, Peter. You're seeing a big difference, right,
Speaker 1: big difference, big difference. We're putting America back to work,
Speaker 1: and we're ensuring the forgotten men and women of our
Speaker 1: country are never ever forgotten again. Remember the deplorables, the deplorables,
Speaker 1: we're all deplorables. Who would have thought that was going
Speaker 1: to turn into a landslide? Right? Who would have thought
Speaker 1: that was going to turn in? That was not a
Speaker 1: good phrase, That she used, Uh, some things you'd like
Speaker 1: to have back. And the good news keeps pouring in Americans.
Speaker 1: Monthly utility bills are also going down because may electric
Speaker 1: companies have announced they will pass their savings from taxes
Speaker 1: onto their customers, tremendous reduction and certain companies and people's
Speaker 1: energy costs. That means we're not only seeing higher wages,
Speaker 1: but lower energy bills. And that's because of the tax cuts,
Speaker 1: but it's also because of the regulation cuts. When I
Speaker 1: spoke to the folks in the plant, they said, the
Speaker 1: biggest thing is what's happened is regulations. Cutting of the regulations.
Speaker 1: And we have regulations, but they're fair and they're reasonable,
Speaker 1: and they're actually just as stringent. But you go to
Speaker 1: one group for for okay, you don't have to get
Speaker 1: it in nineteen different times or seven times, or go
Speaker 1: to different agencies. It's within the realm of reasonable. And
Speaker 1: that's why people are opening up, their expanding and they're
Speaker 1: hiring more people. Our tax bill also took a historic
Speaker 1: step to restore healthcare freedom. No longer will the federal
Speaker 1: government punish you for fines if you can't afford and
Speaker 1: Obamacare mandated health plan. Because we repealed Obamacare's cruel. It
Speaker 1: was cruel individual mandate where you were supposed to go
Speaker 1: out and you pay in order not to have to
Speaker 1: buy healthcare. Think of it. It should have been rejected
Speaker 1: a long time ago by a lot of different people,
Speaker 1: including the courts. Surprisingly, but we were able to repeal it.
Speaker 1: We got rid of the individual mandate, and you'll see
Speaker 1: what that means. It is such a big factor for
Speaker 1: so many people. It was so unfair it's gone. We've
Speaker 1: also opened up and wear in Alaska for energy exploration,
Speaker 1: creating even more jobs and more and more energy savings.
Speaker 1: But that's the biggest one. They've been trying to do
Speaker 1: that since Ronald Reagan for over forty years they've been
Speaker 1: trying to open and what we got it open. There's
Speaker 1: never been a better time to hire in America, to
Speaker 1: invest in America, and to believe in the American dream
Speaker 1: than right now. There is no limit to what we
Speaker 1: can achieve when we set free the dreams of our
Speaker 1: incredible people. You're incredible people. Americans crossed oceans, tamed the wilderness,
Speaker 1: dug out the Panama Canal, and launched a man onto
Speaker 1: the face of the moon. American hands and grit poured
Speaker 1: the concrete in our highways and forged the steel in
Speaker 1: our skyscrapers. Americans built the Hoover Dam, the magnificent Hoover
Speaker 1: day him if you've ever seen it. The Empire State Building,
Speaker 1: they built it in one year. Nobody knows that one year.
Speaker 1: It's actually less than one year. The Empire State Building.
Speaker 1: We won two World Wars. Americans do anything, build anything,
Speaker 1: and create anything, as long as we have pride in
Speaker 1: our country, confidence in our values, and respect for our
Speaker 1: great American flag. Right because America doesn't belong to the
Speaker 1: Washington power brokers. It belongs to you. And I think
Speaker 1: we've taught them that doesn't mean it's easy. It doesn't
Speaker 1: mean it's easy. It's nasty in Washington. But step by
Speaker 1: step by step, just keep going right, go and say
Speaker 1: it is a nasty place, whoo, but we're getting it.
Speaker 1: Nobody thought we were going to have this kind of success,
Speaker 1: so quickly. Thank you doing it belongs to the American people.
Speaker 1: With our destiny in your hands, America will once again
Speaker 1: be a nation that thinks big, dreams bigger, and always
Speaker 1: reaches for the stars. Nothing will keep this incredible nation
Speaker 1: of ours down. Nothing will stop us from reaching the
Speaker 1: highest peaks, because nothing is stronger than the strength and
Speaker 1: will and spirit of the American people. You are the
Speaker 1: ones who will shape America's destiny, especially all of these
Speaker 1: beautiful young people in the front. You're the ones that
Speaker 1: will restore our prosperity. And you are the ones who
Speaker 1: are making America great again. So, as many of you know,
Speaker 1: and that's what I talked about, make America great again.
Speaker 1: America first. We put America first. Now we're doing trade deals,
Speaker 1: we're doing a lot of things that I said we're
Speaker 1: going to be doing. It's not easy. These other countries
Speaker 1: have become very, very spoiled with taking advantage of us,
Speaker 1: But take advantage of us no longer, because now we
Speaker 1: want their country. For them, it should be their country first,
Speaker 1: But for us, it's America first. That's the way it is.
Speaker 1: So I want to thank the people of the great, great,
Speaker 1: great state of Pennsylvania. You remember that big night of
Speaker 1: November eight. Donald Trump has won this state of Pennsylvania, right,
Speaker 1: And I want to thank the people in this show.
Speaker 1: You are my friends. You are truly great, great people,
Speaker 1: and you are making America tick. You are really very special.
Speaker 1: Thank you all for being here. God bless you all,
Speaker 1: thank you, thank you very much. All Right, that's the
Speaker 1: president his remark speaking at H and K Equipment, and
Speaker 1: he's talking about how the economy has dramatically changed for
Speaker 1: the better. And he gave out a lot of information
Speaker 1: and statistics today that I'm sure the mainstream media will
Speaker 1: never focus on. There's been two point two million jobs
Speaker 1: created since he's been elected. Chrysler moving from Mexico to Michigan.
Speaker 1: That's a dramatic change of pace. You have, Chrysler, have
Speaker 1: massive tax cuts. Of course, we've discussed that length uh
Speaker 1: relief for small businesses and families, and you know, I
Speaker 1: think one of the best thing they did is get
Speaker 1: rid of a lot of these burdensome regulation. They got
Speaker 1: rid of about twenty two every one new one that
Speaker 1: they put in. Um. You know, we can look at
Speaker 1: some other numbers. Unemployment claims have now hit the lowest
Speaker 1: level in nearly a century. That's out today. I mean,
Speaker 1: the total number of workers claiming unemployment insurance fell to
Speaker 1: its lowest level in forty five years. I doubt fake news, Well,
Speaker 1: hang on, Hall, fake news network CNN is going to
Speaker 1: talk about it or the conspiracy network anyway. But in
Speaker 1: the first two weeks of the number of applications claiming
Speaker 1: unemployment insurance dropped by workers. That's the lowest record number
Speaker 1: since February nine, seventy three. The numbers came out one
Speaker 1: week after the Department of Labor announced the total number
Speaker 1: of workers who actually receive unemployment insurance fell to the
Speaker 1: lowest level in forty four years at the end of
Speaker 1: I mean, these are incredible numbers. And on top of that,
Speaker 1: and I know there's people that there's gonna be I'm
Speaker 1: sure ups and downs for those of you just that
Speaker 1: look at the stock market. It's not my biggest barometer,
Speaker 1: but it's certainly a good thing at there's such confidence
Speaker 1: in the markets. But the Dow at twenty six thousand
Speaker 1: has had a nearly eight trillion dollars in New Wealth
Speaker 1: to the US economy. And that was an Investors Business Daily.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's an incredible number. I mean, the Dow
Speaker 1: at twenty six thousand, that's up seven thousands since he
Speaker 1: became president. So it's a huge windfall for the entire country.
Speaker 1: You heard the President bringing people on stage and how
Speaker 1: much more they're gonna have in their paycheck two thousand
Speaker 1: dollars or more. That's a raise for everybody. Um, we
Speaker 1: know that burdens and regulation is is really incredible. He
Speaker 1: talked about the move towards energy independence, which I have
Speaker 1: been saying for so many years on this program will
Speaker 1: not only be good for a national security, but high
Speaker 1: paying career jobs for so many people. He finally got
Speaker 1: Anmar opened up. Unemployment now at an eighteen year low,
Speaker 1: applications at a forty five year low. Black unemployment in
Speaker 1: America the lowest ever recorded. He said, female unemployment the lowest,
Speaker 1: and seventeen years Hispanic unemployment the lowest ever recorded. The
Speaker 1: Obamacare mandate is is cruel and unfair, and it's gone.
Speaker 1: And war is now finally opened up. How many people
Speaker 1: tried to get a more opened up and people's paychecks
Speaker 1: are gonna be better. They've doubled the child tax credit
Speaker 1: and families will get a tax cut off about eleven
Speaker 1: billion dollars this year alone. An economists or estimating that
Speaker 1: annual household income will rise by an average of four
Speaker 1: thousand dollars. This is really interesting stuff. Now, we do
Speaker 1: have a looming shutdown. We'll get to that today. We
Speaker 1: do have members of Congress that have now had an
Speaker 1: opportunity to see what the d o J has been
Speaker 1: dumping last minute on the House Intel Committee, and I
Speaker 1: am told that his devastated in terms of the abuse
Speaker 1: of power. And uh, one person that saw it told
Speaker 1: me Mueller needs to end his investigation. Peter Struck, Lisa
Speaker 1: Page needs to be fired, Bruce Or needs to be fired,
Speaker 1: McCabe needs to be fired, and Rosenstein needs to be fired.
Speaker 1: And it will prove that the call me firing was justified.
Speaker 1: That's just the tip of the iceberg. So we'll get
Speaker 1: an update on that from Sarah Carter today and pat
Speaker 1: U Cannon's gonna join us. All right, this looming government
Speaker 1: shutdown thing is a bunch of nonsense. I'll give me
Speaker 1: what I want or I'm not gonna fund the government
Speaker 1: a bunch of cry baby, sore losers. They can't get
Speaker 1: their job done. I don't care about government shutdowns. I
Speaker 1: don't care. And if the Democrats want to shut it,
Speaker 1: shut it down because nobody gets hurt in the meantime
Speaker 1: and everybody will get their money back. It always happens,
Speaker 1: all right, Pat you Cannon, Um, we have the the beginnings. Congressmen,
Speaker 1: are now making their way over to look at the
Speaker 1: information that the d o J at the last minute
Speaker 1: dumped on the House Intel Committee, and I am told
Speaker 1: it is blockbuster. Sarah Carter, Luke rosiac On, W Wasserman, Schultz,
Speaker 1: and so much more, including the fake news awards. The
Speaker 1: tax cuts and tax reform has not been working well
Speaker 1: for the Democrats. Now, yesterday you saw with Apple three
Speaker 1: and fifty billion dollar investment. Now they're also giving thousands
Speaker 1: of dollars to their employees. That's happening all over the country,
Speaker 1: and I'm really happy. People are really doing well. They're
Speaker 1: doing better than they have in years. And to be honest,
Speaker 1: the tax cuts not only if they worked, they're working
Speaker 1: much bigger and much faster than we ever thought possible.
Speaker 1: We'll talk to you last process was Trump before Trump?
Speaker 1: Brix the Cone said he was trunk before Trump. Ricky
Speaker 1: is a great guy. I think he's gonna do really well.
Speaker 1: He's a great guy who loves this area, loves his country.
Speaker 1: He just met me at the play and he's here someplace.
Speaker 1: But actually this is about tax cuts today. You know,
Speaker 1: there's about our economic reform. But rick is a great
Speaker 1: guy and special. He's a special person. He won. You've
Speaker 1: won this district by twenty points. Can he do as
Speaker 1: well as you? I hope? So I want him. I
Speaker 1: just said to him, I hope you're gonna do as well.
Speaker 1: But we're here, we're gonna be we're gonna be helping him.
Speaker 1: I'll be back for Rick and we're gonna fill up
Speaker 1: the stadium and we're gonna do something really special for Rick.
Speaker 1: I look forward to that. A lot of still workers.
Speaker 1: We'll see what happens now if there's a shutdown again.
Speaker 1: I really believe the Democrats want to shut down to
Speaker 1: get off the subject of the tax cuts because they've
Speaker 1: worked so well. Nobody thought, including the Democrats, they could
Speaker 1: work this well. They've been so good that I think
Speaker 1: the Democrats would like to see us shut down in
Speaker 1: order to get off that subject that is not a
Speaker 1: good subject for them. The text guts because of the
Speaker 1: way they've worked. All Right, that was the president outside
Speaker 1: of Pittsburgh not that long ago, and he went through
Speaker 1: a litany of all the success that he has had
Speaker 1: and just a short period of time, and you know,
Speaker 1: you've got two and two point two million new jobs
Speaker 1: Chrysler coming from Mexico, to Michigan, the massive tax cuts,
Speaker 1: the end of burdensome regulation, twenty regulations wiped away for
Speaker 1: every new one, you got, relief for small businesses and families.
Speaker 1: And unemployment now at an eighteen year low, applications for
Speaker 1: unemployment at a forty five year low. Black unemployment at
Speaker 1: the lowest recorded level ever, Female unemployment the lowest in
Speaker 1: seventeen years. Hispanic unemployment the lowest ever recorded. The Obamacare
Speaker 1: mandate is gone. And yeah, we're gonna be drilling in
Speaker 1: an war finally. And of course fracking has been saved
Speaker 1: and the coal industry has been saved. But that's only
Speaker 1: part of the news today. Patrick J. Buchanan joins us. Now,
Speaker 1: how are you, sir? During fine a good economy. Maybe
Speaker 1: there's a good reason by the stork markets done fairly
Speaker 1: well lately. I'm sure Pat, you've got millions in there,
Speaker 1: so I'm sure you're very happy about it. Smile every morning, shown, Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm vet you the Irish eyes a smile in my friend,
Speaker 1: I have no doubt about it. Um, I want to
Speaker 1: get your take. Give you look, you've been in the
Speaker 1: media for however many years have you ever seen it
Speaker 1: this bad? In terms of going after one person like
Speaker 1: they've gone after Trump. I've never seen it. John I
Speaker 1: came into came into journalism in nineteen sixty two, about
Speaker 1: a couple of months before the Cuban missile crisis, began
Speaker 1: writing editorials, and I'm going through lb J, who was
Speaker 1: seriously pounded back in six sixty eight. Nixon, of course,
Speaker 1: during Watergate was horrendous. I was in the White House then,
Speaker 1: and with Reagan and Iran contract, I've never seen anything
Speaker 1: like this. The only thing might compare with it initially,
Speaker 1: but nothing sustainable for a full year like this, and
Speaker 1: I'm surprised. I mean, I give Trump credit. He gets
Speaker 1: up every morning, smiles and starts punging back. It says
Speaker 1: he's I mean, there is a real constitution to the
Speaker 1: fell in a small sea sense, to the able to
Speaker 1: take all this stuff and keep coming back and smiling
Speaker 1: and throwing punches. Yeah, I mean, but it's the stories. Also,
Speaker 1: they're not covering. I don't know how much you're following
Speaker 1: what we're doing on this programming on TV at night,
Speaker 1: but you know every I follow it very closely, Sean,
Speaker 1: and I'll tell you, I think you're doing an outstanding
Speaker 1: job there. And there's really two great issues being covered,
Speaker 1: or two great stories. The one, of course we know
Speaker 1: about his Mueller is supposed to be closing in, but
Speaker 1: Muller's they found no collusion. I think what they're trying
Speaker 1: to do now is to set up sort of a uh,
Speaker 1: you know, an obstruction of justice, and they can't do that.
Speaker 1: To try to get some kind of not telling the
Speaker 1: truth to a federal agent on the other side, is
Speaker 1: what you're doing is is the truth is about Russian
Speaker 1: intervention in the election. Russian agents gave a lot of
Speaker 1: lies to this British spy who gave them to his employer,
Speaker 1: you know, Fusion GPS, which was paid by Hillary Roy
Speaker 1: Clinton and the d n C. And that caused the
Speaker 1: FBI to expand an investigation and to go seek face
Speaker 1: a warrants and survey and wire tap an American campaign
Speaker 1: and go after a candidate. And the bias of the
Speaker 1: FBI at its top levels, I'm saying in that investigation
Speaker 1: for Hillary Clinton was obvious in the way they handled
Speaker 1: the investigation of her. They went in the tank well.
Speaker 1: And also, look, I don't know, if you've you've been
Speaker 1: around government a long time, you have a hear of
Speaker 1: an exoneration before an investigation Patrick J. Buchanan, seventeen key
Speaker 1: witnesses and the principal were even interrogated, and she was
Speaker 1: allowed to bring in her lawyer. Yeah. I mean, and
Speaker 1: that's the most and I wasn't put under oath on
Speaker 1: top of it. You know. I think in the end,
Speaker 1: we've got a lot of different things happening here. Uh
Speaker 1: So Matt Gates, h he's this congressman from Florida. I
Speaker 1: think he's like one of the new rock stars there.
Speaker 1: He's part of the Freedom Caucus of course, And he
Speaker 1: actually was on Fox Business a few moments go saying,
Speaker 1: because remember there was the last minute d o J
Speaker 1: dump of subpoena documents that the House Intel Committee was
Speaker 1: looking for pat and they got it after Rod Rosenstein
Speaker 1: literally went into Paul Ryan's office begging him, begging him
Speaker 1: not to allow the d o J to release his information,
Speaker 1: and he was looking for Ryan not to side with
Speaker 1: Deba Nowness of the Intel Committee. Anyway, So now Matt
Speaker 1: Gates is on TV and he's literally saying that he
Speaker 1: just read and this is the first availability that other
Speaker 1: other members have had today, but they got to read it.
Speaker 1: Obviously in private, they can't remove the documents. But he
Speaker 1: just said and he read it, and he said, it
Speaker 1: is a threat to our democracy regarding the FBI, the
Speaker 1: d o J and President Trump, a vote on this
Speaker 1: to be released needs to be done now. Now it
Speaker 1: gets worse than that. I talked to one person today
Speaker 1: that had some access to some of the information and
Speaker 1: I'm only getting dribs and drabs here. And I was
Speaker 1: hold earlier in the week that this would shock the
Speaker 1: conscience of the American people. And one person said, this
Speaker 1: will absolutely justify Comey's firing, and Peter Struck, Lisa Page,
Speaker 1: Bruce or McCabe, and Rosenstein himself will need to be
Speaker 1: fired as a result of all of this, and that
Speaker 1: a lot of it, and Mueller will need to end
Speaker 1: as investigation as a result of this information. I don't
Speaker 1: know what to say. This the key thing, this has
Speaker 1: got to be gotten. I mean, you're doing a great
Speaker 1: job there at night, every evening, but this has got
Speaker 1: to be gotten on the front page. And we've got
Speaker 1: to take the narrative, if you will, away from this.
Speaker 1: In the constant preoccupation with what they haven't produced an
Speaker 1: eighteen months collusion and get this major story on page one.
Speaker 1: But I would mean, from what I have seen, while
Speaker 1: you can't conclude the circumstantial evidence, if for everything you
Speaker 1: just said about all these folks in there, the bias
Speaker 1: inside the f the the way they really favored Hillary
Speaker 1: Rodham Clinton during that investigation, and the idea that the
Speaker 1: Russians did get inside the presidential election and had, frankly,
Speaker 1: had the mainstream media printed that dociare as they were
Speaker 1: pushing the media to do, I think it would have
Speaker 1: changed the election. I think it would have taken down Trump.
Speaker 1: I mean, you only needed a few thousand votes in
Speaker 1: those swing states Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania to take him down. John,
Speaker 1: I really this is a this is a tremendous story.
Speaker 1: You're exactly right, but it isn't of whose stories are
Speaker 1: against Trump to put it on page one. I I
Speaker 1: honestly don't mind being out on a limb hanging by
Speaker 1: a twig here all by myself, of which I've done frankly,
Speaker 1: my whole career. I'm not looking for credit. There are
Speaker 1: a few of us that are doing this, but everybody
Speaker 1: that knows is telling me that the very thing you're
Speaker 1: talking king about, and what some congressmen have now seen
Speaker 1: and we're gonna have a full report. Sarah Carter is
Speaker 1: gonna be reporting at the bottom of the hour. I
Speaker 1: think there's gonna be a very big report coming up.
Speaker 1: But when you have this scenario, imagine Pat, that it
Speaker 1: was Donald Trump that rigged a primary election. Imagine it
Speaker 1: was Donald Trump that had the FBI Director UH and
Speaker 1: other FBI members take back from the field offices of
Speaker 1: the FBI and investigation and put it in a special category,
Speaker 1: wrote an exoneration before investigation. It was Hillary that bought
Speaker 1: and paid for the phony Russian dossier, and I thought
Speaker 1: that was such a horrible thing to be involved with
Speaker 1: the bad actor putin in Russia, which by the way,
Speaker 1: I agree with. I don't want anybody messing with our elections.
Speaker 1: But she paid for lies, and then those lies, it's
Speaker 1: now a hundred percent confirmed, were used as the basis
Speaker 1: for a FISA warrant against an opposition candidate in a
Speaker 1: presidential election year and against the incoming president elect and
Speaker 1: his team. Now, Pat, I I've got to leave. You
Speaker 1: were there for Watergate, my friend, you are one of
Speaker 1: the last ones. As a matter of fact, I've got
Speaker 1: to believe that this If this is Trump, he's gone.
Speaker 1: But it's listen, if this were Trump, he would be finished.
Speaker 1: You're exactly, well, this were Trump, the story that you
Speaker 1: are talking about right now, this huge story, that would
Speaker 1: be the one on page one, and the media we're saying, well,
Speaker 1: let's who cares about whether they You know, these fellas
Speaker 1: might have talked to the Russians about sending something to
Speaker 1: Wicked Leaks, that's not a story. They would be right
Speaker 1: on top of this one. But the key thing, as
Speaker 1: Sean as I mentioned, you got to get it on
Speaker 1: page one. I will say this back. I watched mccable
Speaker 1: news very closely and closely and background Christmas. You could
Speaker 1: see that basically the mainstream media was saying, this other
Speaker 1: issue is being raised about the credibility the investigation about Moehler,
Speaker 1: about the DOSI are about what they did to get
Speaker 1: those fights of warrants. They said, this is all coming
Speaker 1: for It looked like that story was going to predominate,
Speaker 1: but it does not. There are these two stories there
Speaker 1: and the one larger story I think in the fresher
Speaker 1: one where you get new more information, is the one
Speaker 1: you're talking about. But the other one, now they got
Speaker 1: they got their running after panning, you know, and so
Speaker 1: they now got pushing that on page one. So this
Speaker 1: is really the Rump jumped from from crisis to crisis
Speaker 1: to crisis as long as it's anti Trump. Look, there
Speaker 1: was there was an eleven count indictment last week pat
Speaker 1: is on Uranium one. The week before, we learned that
Speaker 1: the d o J had been opened up an investigation
Speaker 1: in the Clinton Foundation for months now, I didn't know
Speaker 1: that was happening, but that is confirmation that what we've
Speaker 1: been following as one person and a source of mindset,
Speaker 1: I'm over the target, you know, but it's that's Urania.
Speaker 1: Then the email server investigation is now back and play
Speaker 1: because the fix had been in and had been rigged.
Speaker 1: And then on top of the key thing here is
Speaker 1: Arthur Schlessinger said, you know, Mark said, powers control of
Speaker 1: the means of production. Power in our time is control
Speaker 1: of the means of communication. So up on Drudge and
Speaker 1: I read a story there of what is written about
Speaker 1: the President of the United States, and he's the number
Speaker 1: one topic for the last year. Almost every day is negative.
Speaker 1: And I'll tell you it's a testament to the American
Speaker 1: people that one horrible story after another. They still are
Speaker 1: sticking with the guy and the guys I mean he's
Speaker 1: doing I mean, whatever you say about some of the
Speaker 1: mistakes and things, I mean he takes, he takes a beating,
Speaker 1: like those old British heavyweights stand up there and do
Speaker 1: you think we're gonna win this? Even with the media
Speaker 1: basically blacking out the biggest story of their lifetime. This
Speaker 1: story has got to, if you will, pop onto the
Speaker 1: front pages and frankly, but the as for the other side,
Speaker 1: the story is Muller and his investigation, and those guys
Speaker 1: are clearly moving and what if you see you they're
Speaker 1: still talking about the indictments they brought. I don't know,
Speaker 1: Sean again, I mean, it's very tough to defeat them.
Speaker 1: The media is a real power in this country. It
Speaker 1: is immense political power, and it's almost unchained and untrammeled,
Speaker 1: and it's now it's fire main mainline. So you don't
Speaker 1: know at this point which side. You don't know what
Speaker 1: side is gonna win, do you. That's what you're saying
Speaker 1: to me. I don't think. I mean, I don't see
Speaker 1: anything impeachable. I don't see how they don't they take Trump.
Speaker 1: Let me say this, what's happened to the Mueller investigation,
Speaker 1: and partly from what you guys have done. The American people,
Speaker 1: don't they believe this is a political war. Mueller is
Speaker 1: one on one side. He's being cheered by the by
Speaker 1: the media, and he's being applauded and everything from everybody
Speaker 1: on their side of the field. And Trump is being
Speaker 1: applauded by by our side of the field. And if
Speaker 1: they come down with some kind of charges of Trump
Speaker 1: and try to go for an impeachment, I don't think
Speaker 1: it will go. Even the Democrats control the House. I
Speaker 1: just don't believe they can do it. So it's gonna
Speaker 1: have to take something else. But we'll see. This is
Speaker 1: this is as exciting as it was in Watergate during
Speaker 1: the late fall of This is bigger than Watergate, Pat,
Speaker 1: I'm promising you, well, that was pretty big. I think
Speaker 1: I got a lot of my friends can tell you
Speaker 1: about Dad from there at minimum security facilities. This this
Speaker 1: is bigger. And I'm speaking from knowledge, not from I'm
Speaker 1: not guessing here. I gotta get it, and gotta get
Speaker 1: it on page one. Sean, you're doing a great job,
Speaker 1: but it's got to get up there. I agree with you.
Speaker 1: All right, Pat, thank you to be sustained by the
Speaker 1: major media. Appreciate it, Pat Buchanan. When we come back,
Speaker 1: Sarah Carter will blow this wide open. So what is
Speaker 1: what did the d o J sent over to the
Speaker 1: House Intel Committee. We're getting new information as we speak.
Speaker 1: We got a lot more coming up in the course
Speaker 1: of the program today. Uh Luke Rosiak is investigating Wasserman Schuldon. Alright,
Speaker 1: glad you with a Sean Hannity Shaw all right, Um,
Speaker 1: I'm just working the phones here. So what happened is,
Speaker 1: if you remember I've been telling you about the subpoenaed
Speaker 1: documents by the House Intel Committee, they were given to
Speaker 1: the Department of Justice, the Department of Justice, delay delay, delay, delay, delay, anyway,
Speaker 1: last minute the night. It's literally coming up to the
Speaker 1: midnight hour, and Devin Newness, who is the chair of
Speaker 1: the House Intel Committee, he's saying to the Justice Department, Okay,
Speaker 1: if you don't do it, we're gonna take every legal
Speaker 1: means at our disposal and we're gonna get this information.
Speaker 1: All right. Rod Rosenstein, the guy that appointed Mueller, he
Speaker 1: goes to plead with Paul Ryan, please don't make us
Speaker 1: turn these things over. It's turned over. I am told again,
Speaker 1: I've been telling you for days now that it is
Speaker 1: shocking to the conscience and the American soul when people
Speaker 1: will see this. Well, now members of Congress have had
Speaker 1: the opportunity to go see it today and we're getting
Speaker 1: dribs and drabs about it. I'll explain. We'll have a
Speaker 1: full report Sarah Carter, Congressman Matt Gates who saw it today,
Speaker 1: and much more. We'll have a big report tonight on
Speaker 1: Hannity ten, Eastern ninetiester on the Fox News children Russian
Speaker 1: dossier and the Hey, we don't have time. I don't
Speaker 1: want to waste a minute of time. I gotta set
Speaker 1: this up here because this is important. So I want
Speaker 1: to explain to everybody what we're about to do here
Speaker 1: is really important. So anyway that the House Intel Committee
Speaker 1: has been trying to get information from the Department of Justice,
Speaker 1: they had it under subpoena. They've been asking and requesting
Speaker 1: for a long period of time. Anyway, so the final
Speaker 1: hours before the deadline is reached, all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: Rod Rosenstein, he goes into the Speaker of the House,
Speaker 1: Paul Ryan's office, begging do not make US release this.
Speaker 1: Why he did that, that's a question that we'll need
Speaker 1: to be answered in the days to come. Bottom line is,
Speaker 1: at the last minute, the last hour, the d o
Speaker 1: J hands over documents to the House Intelligence Committee. Now,
Speaker 1: the little dribs and drabs that I've been able to get,
Speaker 1: I was only told that it will shock the conscience
Speaker 1: of the American people, and that this goes to the
Speaker 1: to the heart and soul of our constitutional republic. It
Speaker 1: was that severe. The information is that damning. So for
Speaker 1: the first time today members of Congress have had the
Speaker 1: opportunity to go and look at that. All they could
Speaker 1: do is look at the some of the documents, the
Speaker 1: summary of what it is that they have discovered. And
Speaker 1: I am told that as a result, this is my
Speaker 1: own intelligence that I'm putting together through numerous sources, I
Speaker 1: have that the justification for Comey's firing is way beyond
Speaker 1: the any standard. That people like Peter struck At, Lisa
Speaker 1: Page and Bruce Orr and Andrew McCabe and Rod Rosenstein
Speaker 1: all need to be fired and investigated. That's how severe
Speaker 1: this is. Then, I am being told this should immediately
Speaker 1: bring an end to the Mueller Special Council that this
Speaker 1: is an abuse of Faizer warrents, an abuse of the
Speaker 1: Constitution or Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable search and seizure.
Speaker 1: The House rules allow all of this information to be
Speaker 1: made available to we the people, the public, and there
Speaker 1: is now a movement within the Freedom Caucus that there
Speaker 1: will be no continuing resolution until this information is released.
Speaker 1: It's that powerful. Joining us now, Fox News contributor and
Speaker 1: investigative reporter Sarah Carter, We've been unpeeling this onion, night
Speaker 1: after night after night now for almost a year. Also,
Speaker 1: Matt Gates, Congressman from Florida, and he is a member
Speaker 1: of the Freedom Caucus. Before I get to Sarah, Congressman,
Speaker 1: have you seen have you taken the time to go
Speaker 1: over and see this information I have shown, And only
Speaker 1: since one o'clock today has members of Congress been able
Speaker 1: to evaluate the intelligence that has been collected through the
Speaker 1: great work of Devin Nownist, Trade Gaudi and others. I
Speaker 1: have seen the intelligence memo and it is absolutely essential
Speaker 1: that we get this information into the public square immediately, Sean.
Speaker 1: And it's worth noting that we had a partisan vote
Speaker 1: on whether or not even members of Congress could see
Speaker 1: this intelligence. Every Democrat on the Intelligence Committee voted against
Speaker 1: allowing me and Rhonda Santis and Jim Jordan and others
Speaker 1: to view this information. The Republicans voted for it. But
Speaker 1: I don't think it's enough to just have members of
Speaker 1: Congress looking at this these damning allegations. We have got
Speaker 1: to show this to the American people because it's my
Speaker 1: belief that if we can get this document and the
Speaker 1: supporting evidence to the public, it will really show what's
Speaker 1: been going on. I cannot discuss the specifics of the information.
Speaker 1: I've got to be very careful not to do that,
Speaker 1: but I can tell you, Sean, you are likely to
Speaker 1: feel very vindicated about the claims made on your television
Speaker 1: show and throughout the country. This investigation of Donald Trump
Speaker 1: is a sham. It was a set up, and we
Speaker 1: have got to know more and we've got to show
Speaker 1: the American people what's happened. That is a profound statement.
Speaker 1: And listen, I know people think, oh, you're a talk
Speaker 1: show host. We have been digging deep, and I will
Speaker 1: tell you people like Sarah Carter and John Solomon, and
Speaker 1: people like Greg Jared and Victoria Tunsing and Tom Fitton.
Speaker 1: There's only a few of us, to be honest, I
Speaker 1: mean less than a dozen of us that have been
Speaker 1: digging deep into all of this. Sarah carter Um, I
Speaker 1: don't know if you've had an opportunity to speak to
Speaker 1: any of the people that got a chance to go
Speaker 1: over and see this today. Is my description? Does that
Speaker 1: match the things you're hearing? It matches what you're saying,
Speaker 1: It matches what Congressman Gates is saying. I have also
Speaker 1: had the opportunity to talk to several source is about this.
Speaker 1: It is possibly if this if this information gets to
Speaker 1: the public the way the Congress wants it to get
Speaker 1: to the public. That means probably within the next few weeks,
Speaker 1: hopefully by the end of the month, is what I'm told.
Speaker 1: Why do we have to wait till the end of
Speaker 1: the month? People will let's finish your sense. I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: people in the FBI and the Department of Justice will
Speaker 1: be fired and who knows how far this could go.
Speaker 1: This apparently, what is in this documentation is so troubling.
Speaker 1: The conduct by the people who were involved in the case,
Speaker 1: and alongside with the dossier and everything involved with the vices,
Speaker 1: the abuse was so extensive that it's certainly once the
Speaker 1: public sees it. I think that people can move forward
Speaker 1: and those people that were involved with it will be
Speaker 1: held accountable. And that's what I was told. Can you
Speaker 1: go a little bit further in what you're hearing? This
Speaker 1: is what I've heard, that the players are known, the
Speaker 1: tactics are exposed, that we have a coordinated effort. We'll
Speaker 1: call them deep state, high rank, not, by the way,
Speaker 1: not rank and file. I want to always be clear,
Speaker 1: not rank and file Intelligence committee, I'm sorry, intelligence officers,
Speaker 1: not rank and file FBI officers, but the higher echelons
Speaker 1: of the deep state, if you will, that they literally
Speaker 1: it proves a coordinated and documented effort to try and undo,
Speaker 1: to try and stop a president or candidate Trump from
Speaker 1: ever getting elected, and then to undo a presidential election.
Speaker 1: Is it that severe? According to the sources I've spoken with,
Speaker 1: it is that severe, and well, the American people see
Speaker 1: that a lot of people answering for what they have done,
Speaker 1: and there needs to be an extensive and instigation. One
Speaker 1: of my questions is could what people have seen today,
Speaker 1: could this lead to criminal prosecutions? And it's very possible. Well,
Speaker 1: and Sean, this is Matt. I can tell you having
Speaker 1: looked at the information, it became very clear to me
Speaker 1: why Senator Graham and Senator grass Lee wanted to refer
Speaker 1: matters for criminal prosecution. It also led me to believe
Speaker 1: that the initial referral of the Fusion GPS people for
Speaker 1: criminal prosecution may not be the final referral if there
Speaker 1: is other criminal conduct that has found. I think that
Speaker 1: after this information is released will also have a lot
Speaker 1: of questions about what role the media and media reports
Speaker 1: and the mainstream media has played in the misinformation about
Speaker 1: our president and really in service of the people who
Speaker 1: have wanted to disrupt this presidency both before and after
Speaker 1: our national election. So those will be things that will
Speaker 1: have more questions about after we get this information into
Speaker 1: the public square. One area where I may disagree with
Speaker 1: Sarah slightly, and she has done phenomenal work on this
Speaker 1: in many other subjects. I don't think we can wait
Speaker 1: two weeks or a month. I want this information out immediately.
Speaker 1: If you have people currently in positions of power within
Speaker 1: our government who are working to undermine our democracy, and
Speaker 1: the current president of the United States that has not
Speaker 1: a Congressman Gates, the evidence is there in this information
Speaker 1: that would show I lost I feel like I couldn't
Speaker 1: pass the test, the cognitive test the president passed. But
Speaker 1: but you're saying that they literally have been trying to
Speaker 1: remove illegally the President of the United States of America. Well,
Speaker 1: I will leave that judgment to the American people when
Speaker 1: this information is released. But I think that we've got
Speaker 1: to get it out there, Sean. I mean, look, Republicans
Speaker 1: have been trying to get this information to the Blick.
Speaker 1: Democrats have been fighting against that. They didn't even want
Speaker 1: me to be able to see the information. They didn't
Speaker 1: want other members of Congress to see it. But I've
Speaker 1: been around this place for about a year now, and
Speaker 1: I don't think a bunch of secrets within the Congress
Speaker 1: serve the country. Well, we need to get this information out.
Speaker 1: And I mean, if this is so serious, I would
Speaker 1: schedule an emergency meeting of the Congress tonight tomorrow, this weekend,
Speaker 1: whatever I had to do procedurally to get a vote
Speaker 1: on this issue. Let's let the public know. I think
Speaker 1: that will vindicate Chairman Devin Newness. I think it will
Speaker 1: vindicate a number of other claims other people have made,
Speaker 1: and I think that it will show us where we've
Speaker 1: got to have a surgery to remove the cancer that
Speaker 1: currently exists within the d nite date, so that we
Speaker 1: can trust our government institutions against absolutely absolutely this. This
Speaker 1: information needs to be in the public eye, and I
Speaker 1: agree with you, Congressman Gates. I would like to see
Speaker 1: it within the hour. I wish it would come out
Speaker 1: within the hour. I've been told that it made take
Speaker 1: some time. But if, if not, if this can be
Speaker 1: moved quicker, I think it's valuable information for the American people. Actually,
Speaker 1: it's an international concern because this has affected both foreign
Speaker 1: policy and domestic domestic policy, and it's really hampered the
Speaker 1: ability of the administration to move forward. All right, let
Speaker 1: me let me ask that. Let me ask this question
Speaker 1: because will this go to the heart too of the
Speaker 1: Special Council? In other words, that this, this whole thing
Speaker 1: has been a witch hunt from the beginning. Everything I've
Speaker 1: said publicly about this being a witch hunt, uh, I
Speaker 1: continue to believe with even more fervor after reviewing this
Speaker 1: document again. I want to be careful about disclosing top
Speaker 1: secret information, but really this information if I get shot
Speaker 1: and Sarah and I get shot before at nine o'clock tonight,
Speaker 1: it will know why because Uh, there's only been a
Speaker 1: few of us that have been getting this in from
Speaker 1: nation out. Uh. Well, the other thing, Sean, I just
Speaker 1: want to make this point. We should not evaluate this
Speaker 1: exercise solely as a way to find out what happened
Speaker 1: in the past. I am concerned that there maybe ongoing efforts,
Speaker 1: ongoing undermining of our president and our democracy if we
Speaker 1: don't take swift action. So the American people shouldn't just think, well,
Speaker 1: we're looking in the rearview mirror here at things that
Speaker 1: have happened previously. There could be real threats to our
Speaker 1: democracy going forward if we do not disclose this information
Speaker 1: and then start having this over at Justice and the FBI.
Speaker 1: Compare this to Watergate, how much worse? I was sitting
Speaker 1: next to Mark Meadows. Yeah, I was sitting next to
Speaker 1: Mark Meadows as we were reviewing the intelligence information together,
Speaker 1: and he turned to me and said, I never thought
Speaker 1: we'd see something worse than water Gates. And that was
Speaker 1: that was his first reaction upon reading the introductory paragraph
Speaker 1: of the intelligence Meadow Oh my god, Sarah, I couldn't
Speaker 1: agree more because what we're seeing here is an undermining
Speaker 1: of a US election, a vote by the American people
Speaker 1: for a president and apparently, according to people who have
Speaker 1: had access to this information, what they've seen as people
Speaker 1: within the government undermining the rights of the American people
Speaker 1: and the foundation that our country is built upon. This
Speaker 1: is something that really needs to be exposed. It needs
Speaker 1: to be investigated, Sean. And Congressman Gates brought up a
Speaker 1: very good point while we're here talking about this, the
Speaker 1: people who are involved in this debacle of the FSA
Speaker 1: abuse are still sitting in government, so something needs to
Speaker 1: be done. Are the names that I mentioned at the
Speaker 1: beginning of this segment, and that is call me Struck
Speaker 1: Page or McKay Rosenstein. Is that on point, Sarah, from
Speaker 1: what you've heard, yes, it's on point. I have been
Speaker 1: told that many of the people that have and out
Speaker 1: already outed publicly in a lot of stories, um stories
Speaker 1: that I've written, stories that we've exposed on your show, Sean,
Speaker 1: are players within that would that be? Would that be
Speaker 1: people too that would that go to? People like Susan
Speaker 1: Rice and Loretta Lynch and Eric Calder and Samantha Power.
Speaker 1: I guess that we'd have to wait and see how
Speaker 1: extensive this was when those documents are revealed to the public.
Speaker 1: I believe they will be they will be declassified for
Speaker 1: the public. Congressman, can you weigh in on that in
Speaker 1: any way. I can't get into the specific names mentioned.
Speaker 1: I can say generally that names are named. If this
Speaker 1: memo was released, and it should be in the supporting
Speaker 1: intelligence information, we won't have to wonder who within the
Speaker 1: deep state was coordinating as a cabal to undermine our president.
Speaker 1: We will know who it was. But this is hard,
Speaker 1: This is hard for people to wrap their their minds
Speaker 1: are on. You're saying that people coordinated with the distinct
Speaker 1: purpose of destroying as it in Trump and using the
Speaker 1: powerful weaponry of intelligence and other means to destroy him.
Speaker 1: That has been my convention for many months. Nothing I
Speaker 1: have seen today dissuades me from that contention. And if anything,
Speaker 1: you think you're more right than you ever thought. Unquestionably,
Speaker 1: these are not just claims anymore. You have the intelligence
Speaker 1: and you have the evidence to back up what many
Speaker 1: people have been saying for quite some time. And that's
Speaker 1: why it's so important to get this information out to
Speaker 1: that the American people can judge for themselves. I've I've
Speaker 1: known this, but to hear the confirmation and know the
Speaker 1: evidence now exists. Well, I'm glad for my country, and
Speaker 1: I'm sad for my country. I'm sad that this could
Speaker 1: ever happen. I'm glad we're finally getting it exposed. We'll
Speaker 1: take a quick break. Matt Gates, Congressman Florida. Sarah Carter,
Speaker 1: investigative reporter, Fox News and investigative reporter. We're always running
Speaker 1: low on time. We've got other issues we're gonna get
Speaker 1: to in the next time. We'll have a lot more
Speaker 1: on this tonight on hand, any final word, Sarah Carter
Speaker 1: will join us, Matt Gates will join us tonight Jim
Speaker 1: Jordan's tonight. Um, will we get the whole truth? Congressman Gates, Oh,
Speaker 1: hang on, we discovered to him, I thought we have
Speaker 1: twenty seconds left, my friend, you say that on the
Speaker 1: air or off the air at Lisa went home for
Speaker 1: the day, but I'm here. By the way. How many
Speaker 1: people called you when I called you, Lisa? Because you
Speaker 1: cut school again when you make a mistake. Oh, good grief.
Speaker 1: We'll continue, alright, this was funny. Glad you want us
Speaker 1: snooz round up information overload hour. So the President releases
Speaker 1: the highly anticipated Fake News Awards last night, and he
Speaker 1: sends it to gop dot com and in seconds, and
Speaker 1: they had prepared for a lot of extra traffic and
Speaker 1: build up this service. Within seconds, the whole site crashed
Speaker 1: and went down. We're going that couldn't handle the amount
Speaker 1: of traffic, all right, So it's really simple. Let me
Speaker 1: go through them quick. The Fake News Awards Paul Krugman,
Speaker 1: claiming the day the President Trump wins the presidency, he
Speaker 1: says the markets will never recover from Trump will the
Speaker 1: Dow hit a record high six thousand. The second award
Speaker 1: goes to Brian Ross and Brian Ross of course his
Speaker 1: report about you know General Flint, it happened during his
Speaker 1: time he was during the time that he was uh
Speaker 1: working for Trump, that he was in the campaign. No,
Speaker 1: that didn't happen. It was when he was reaching out
Speaker 1: to his counterpart or soon to be counterpart. Number three
Speaker 1: CNN falsely reporting candidate Donald Trump and Donald Trump Jr.
Speaker 1: Had access to hack documents from Wiki Leaks. Another false report,
Speaker 1: fake news report number four. By the way, CNN, we
Speaker 1: have renamed them the the whole fake news network. Number
Speaker 1: four time falsely reporting that Trump this was on day
Speaker 1: one removed the bust of Martin Luther King Jr. From
Speaker 1: the Oval Office. That's not true either. Number five goes
Speaker 1: to the Washington Post for falsely reporting the president when
Speaker 1: he had a massive sold out rally in Pensacola, Florida,
Speaker 1: that the seats were empty. The only problem is they
Speaker 1: took pictures of the arena hours before the event. Number
Speaker 1: six was the edited video to make it appear that Trump,
Speaker 1: the President defiantly overfed the fish with a visit with
Speaker 1: the Japanese Prime minister. Well, he was just following what
Speaker 1: the Japanese Prime minister did, because the Japanese Prime Minister
Speaker 1: led the way. Number seven CNN falsely reporting Anthony Scaramucci's
Speaker 1: meeting with a Russian but then they retracted it due
Speaker 1: to a significant breakdown in the process. Number eight Newsweek,
Speaker 1: which probably just got invaded by the New York Police
Speaker 1: officers just raided their headquarters. That's pretty interesting anyway. Newsweek
Speaker 1: falsely reporting that the Polish First Lady did not shake
Speaker 1: President Trump's hand, Well, we just happened have real evidence
Speaker 1: of that. CNN gets number nine reporting that the FBI
Speaker 1: director former FBI Director James Comey would dispute President Trump's
Speaker 1: claim that he was told he's not under investigation. Uh.
Speaker 1: False Number ten The New York Times falsely claiming on
Speaker 1: the front page that the Trump administration had hidden a
Speaker 1: client climate report. No, that wasn't true either. And last,
Speaker 1: but not least, the last winner of the Fake News
Speaker 1: Awards seventeen goes to all of the media and their
Speaker 1: Russia collusion phony narrative, which is perhaps the greatest hoax
Speaker 1: ever perpetrated on you, the American people, because there is
Speaker 1: no collusion. But we did create nearly two million jobs.
Speaker 1: We have gained over eight trillion dollars in wealth. We
Speaker 1: now have hit seven thousand above when that when he
Speaker 1: got elected. Uh. African Americans and Hispanics are enjoying the
Speaker 1: lowest unemployment rate and recorded history. The President signed historic
Speaker 1: tax cuts for relief for hard working Americans. The biggest
Speaker 1: ins Ronald Reagan and President Trump's planned to cut regulations.
Speaker 1: Oh instead of two for everyone, well twenty two for everyone.
Speaker 1: The President's unleashed the energy boom. He's opened up an moir.
Speaker 1: He has now saved the coal industry, is now allowing
Speaker 1: natural gas and fracking to occur. ISIS is in retreat
Speaker 1: and have been crushed in Iraq and Syria, and the
Speaker 1: President followed through and his promise to recognize Jerusalem as
Speaker 1: the capital of the State of Israel. And with the
Speaker 1: President's encouragement, more members member nations are paying their fair
Speaker 1: share with NATO, and he signed the Veterans Accountability and
Speaker 1: whistle Blower Protection Act. And President Trump kept his promises
Speaker 1: appointing Neil Gorsut's to the Supreme Court. Here to way
Speaker 1: in Danielle McLaughlin attorney, constitutional expert and d C. McCalister
Speaker 1: with the Federalist and PJ Media, UM, I would say
Speaker 1: that that only is a tip of the iceberg, Daniell
Speaker 1: about how bad the news media has been. And I
Speaker 1: think even and you were probably embarrassed at their behavior
Speaker 1: with the president's doctor. Actually, I will show on high
Speaker 1: good afternoon, High DC. Always good to be here. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you know this press conference with the doctor, Uh, it was.
Speaker 1: It was puzzling, and I think it was troubling for
Speaker 1: a number of reasons. They're far more things we have
Speaker 1: to worry about here. President's health clearly is and one
Speaker 1: of them his height, his weight. Let's talk about the
Speaker 1: things that really matter. Why Americans going to have to
Speaker 1: pay eighty dollars to get into a national park. What
Speaker 1: are we doing about plans for a great use of
Speaker 1: nuclear weapons? What are we doing about North Korea? What
Speaker 1: are we doing about jobs? We've got good news. I
Speaker 1: think good news should be reported. But the job of
Speaker 1: the press is to hold the president to account, not
Speaker 1: to cross examine his doctor. All right, you know the idea.
Speaker 1: And then you've got people like doctor Liberal Joe Scarborough
Speaker 1: and Dr Mika Brazinski. They go on the air today
Speaker 1: and they're trashing this admiral who has has been the
Speaker 1: doctor of Obama, George W. Bush and now President Trump
Speaker 1: as if he's lying. I've never seen such behavior behavior
Speaker 1: from people DC. Well. I even read an article today,
Speaker 1: I think it's from the Washington Post where they're calling
Speaker 1: on questioning the doctor's mental health because they didn't like
Speaker 1: what he had to say. It's ridiculous and how they
Speaker 1: behaved they were even you could just see the glee
Speaker 1: or not glee, to the angst. They just wanted desperately
Speaker 1: something to be wrong with this president, even asking about
Speaker 1: his life expectancy. You know, how long do you think
Speaker 1: he's really gonna live? Like they don't want him to
Speaker 1: make it to the next four years. This is the
Speaker 1: press has become just an attack dog, of course, for
Speaker 1: the leftist ideology too much. Too many outlets are acting
Speaker 1: like this, and it's bad for our society. It's bad
Speaker 1: for people running for office. But it's also you know,
Speaker 1: this attack that they say from Donald Trump, they accused
Speaker 1: him of attacking the free press. This word should really
Speaker 1: offend everyone because he's not attacking the free press. He's
Speaker 1: attacking a lying press, as he should, and many presidents
Speaker 1: have done this throughout history. Well, I mean that's the point.
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, I don't understand that the media
Speaker 1: has ignored so many big stories. Don't you think it's
Speaker 1: a big story of if James called me you're a layer? Right? Yeah? Sure?
Speaker 1: Unless so. Did you ever hear of a case where
Speaker 1: the FBI director and members of the FBI write an
Speaker 1: exoneration before they ever do the investigation before I know
Speaker 1: you're ferry to it. I know the reporting that you're ferring.
Speaker 1: It's not reporting. We know because we have the actual
Speaker 1: early renditions of the exoneration of Hillary that was written
Speaker 1: months before the key members of that of that investigation
Speaker 1: we're even talked to. You know, what I know about
Speaker 1: it because it was reported in the Price. You know,
Speaker 1: in all honesty, I understand there's a lot of negativity
Speaker 1: directed at the president, but I think some of them
Speaker 1: some answering my question at all. No, I know about
Speaker 1: it because James called me right is writing draft draft
Speaker 1: memos of an exoneration of Hillary as it relates to
Speaker 1: her email server scandal. But he didn't do the investigation.
Speaker 1: Did you ever hear that before? Well? I heard about
Speaker 1: it through the press. Absolutely. I'm asking did you ever
Speaker 1: hear about that type of behavior? Did you ever hear about,
Speaker 1: for example, call me taking it away from field agents
Speaker 1: and taking a special category just for Hillary Clinton? No,
Speaker 1: I have not. He doesn't that sound like the FBI
Speaker 1: director at the time, James Collmey, was putting the fix
Speaker 1: in and rigging an investigation so that Hillary can continue
Speaker 1: her run for the presidency. Well, in the end, James
Speaker 1: call me totally blew up. You didn't answer my presidential
Speaker 1: So I look at the facts. Right, So he issued
Speaker 1: a letter to letters to Congress just for the election,
Speaker 1: and maybe was he afraid if he didn't do that
Speaker 1: on October that it would be discovered one day that
Speaker 1: he had exonerated her without investigating. Maybe he was doing
Speaker 1: a c y A. I think there were a lot
Speaker 1: of people who thought that Hillary Clinton was going to win,
Speaker 1: and I think that he was. It was a c
Speaker 1: y a because he didn't want to get to the
Speaker 1: other side of the election. Have had help if he
Speaker 1: had followed the rule of law as it relates to
Speaker 1: the handling of classified top secret Special Access Program information
Speaker 1: and the destruction of such and the leading and bleach
Speaker 1: bit and breaking up of blackberries. If he had done
Speaker 1: his job, she would have been indicted. Right. I don't
Speaker 1: know enough to know that for sure, you know, Like
Speaker 1: I'm a lawyer, and specifically because of it. I'm not
Speaker 1: going to sit here and say she should have been
Speaker 1: indicted or she wouldn't be. Was the mishandling of classified
Speaker 1: information of felony? Yes? Is the destruction of classified information
Speaker 1: of felony? Yes? The facts now proven that Comey even
Speaker 1: admit that had happened with Hillary. Yes, she sat before
Speaker 1: any number of congressional inquiries talking about not only being Ghazi,
Speaker 1: but she said there there are felonies. If you mishandle
Speaker 1: classiff you do. Yes, If I was under a subpoena
Speaker 1: by a congressional committee to hand over emails, and I
Speaker 1: delete them, and I asked it wash my hard drive
Speaker 1: with bleach bit, and then I broke up any devices
Speaker 1: I might have that had that information. Does that sound
Speaker 1: like obstruction of justice to you? Well, there's a couple
Speaker 1: of things. Spoliation is not necessarily obstruction of justice, although
Speaker 1: it can be evidence. They're subpointed, Why would you delete
Speaker 1: something that's subpoenaed? So I understand it as it's been reported.
Speaker 1: It was a contractor in Colorado that did this, specifically
Speaker 1: against the instructions of the Clinton campaign. I don't believe.
Speaker 1: I've never seen that want them to. Yeah, why did
Speaker 1: she Why did she have our personal assistance out there
Speaker 1: with hammers busting up the blackberries? Well, she's not the
Speaker 1: first person in the world to destroy ath. Well, no,
Speaker 1: because they seems to be backed up as you well know.
Speaker 1: It sound like destroying evidence and basically colluding to cover
Speaker 1: up and allow her candidacy to go further. Well, that's
Speaker 1: the press of been doing its job and actually investigating
Speaker 1: these things as they're supposed to be doing. We would
Speaker 1: have had more information, there would have been more exposure
Speaker 1: of these kind of things that were going on behind
Speaker 1: the scenes, but we didn't have that. We don't have
Speaker 1: a press that's really doing the job is should be doing. Instead,
Speaker 1: they're instead they're going after fake news stories like the
Speaker 1: Russian collusion instead of looking at and do real things
Speaker 1: that are happening, holding real people in real situations accountable,
Speaker 1: and in telling the American people so that we're better informed.
Speaker 1: I mean, Daniel talked about facts. Well, we can't have
Speaker 1: the facts if the press isn't doing its job and
Speaker 1: we need those sex we need. Instead, they're just looking
Speaker 1: at ways to persecute this president. And that press conference
Speaker 1: with the doctor was just embarrassing and more evidence of
Speaker 1: how they're just trying to build their own agenda and
Speaker 1: spew their own propaganda instead of actually doing investigative journalism
Speaker 1: the way that don't you believe. And then when they
Speaker 1: ignore your rainy um one And now we had an
Speaker 1: eleven count indictment last week and now a congressional committee,
Speaker 1: they now realize that they have to get back into
Speaker 1: the email server scandal. So now that's now back in play.
Speaker 1: Then this whole dossier issue, and you know, I'm I'm
Speaker 1: hearing from my sources, I'm only getting you know, dribs
Speaker 1: and drabs of of information, but I hear what the
Speaker 1: Department adjusted handed over is explosive on so many different
Speaker 1: levels as it relates to everything that happened there. Well
Speaker 1: with all of the misinformation that we're getting from the press,
Speaker 1: it's just creating a chaotic environment where people just throw
Speaker 1: up their hands and like they don't believe anybody. And
Speaker 1: this is a detrimental effect on our society and on
Speaker 1: our democracy, and we really need to be aware of
Speaker 1: this and hold the press to account in each other,
Speaker 1: each outlets holding each other to account, because I think
Speaker 1: that's the best way to hold a check onto the press,
Speaker 1: is the press itself doing it to each other, and
Speaker 1: which I think some outlets are doing a really good
Speaker 1: job out but we need to hold them to account
Speaker 1: to give these facts that we can actually have a
Speaker 1: civil society to live in. You know, I agree, but
Speaker 1: I don't think that fake News awards is a way
Speaker 1: of holding the press to account. The first number one
Speaker 1: is an opinion piece by Paul Krugman predicting predicting that
Speaker 1: the stock market would crash. He was wrong. Then. The
Speaker 1: reason it's number one is because obviously and and rightfully.
Speaker 1: President Trump is very, very proud of what he has
Speaker 1: done and what he has pushed in terms of growth
Speaker 1: and in terms of what corporations are bringing back from overseas.
Speaker 1: There are lots of good things, lots of good economic
Speaker 1: news coming out of this presidency. And he's right to
Speaker 1: put this at number one. But it was an opinion piece.
Speaker 1: It is not false. It is not meaningfully and an
Speaker 1: intentional It was aninion. But not only was it false,
Speaker 1: I mean it was beyond false. We'll take a break,
Speaker 1: We'll come back. Danielle McLaughlin. Do you see McAlister as
Speaker 1: we continue part as a continue, the President gave out
Speaker 1: as fake news awards last night. Danielle McLaughlin constitutional attorney
Speaker 1: is whe us d C. McCalister, the Federalist and PJ
Speaker 1: Media is with us. UM. I just think that after
Speaker 1: a year of Russia collusion without any evidence, you would
Speaker 1: think and every time the President goes in front of
Speaker 1: a crowd and he's had a rally and he starts
Speaker 1: mean to the people in the back of the room,
Speaker 1: you know they you know, they basically start saying CNN sucks.
Speaker 1: And I would think that if that was happening to
Speaker 1: my network, I might have to take a long hard
Speaker 1: look at the network and say, Okay, what are we
Speaker 1: doing wrong here? Your reaction DC They don't care because
Speaker 1: their goal is not truth. It's this propaganda that they
Speaker 1: have to defend, an ideology that goes against the Republicans.
Speaker 1: And then we've just seen this time and time again
Speaker 1: ever since the nineties, really were with Bill Clinton, you know,
Speaker 1: and they're just not doing their job as journalists in
Speaker 1: holding power to account. And we see it, and the
Speaker 1: American people resent it, and then they turn around when
Speaker 1: when Trump does something like tostake news Awards, which I
Speaker 1: think is hilarious. I think it's great, and I think
Speaker 1: that it's fine for the president to poke the press
Speaker 1: and to make funt of them or to criticize them.
Speaker 1: We've had that ever since. You listen to Teddy Roosevelt
Speaker 1: and his Muckbreaker speech back in nineteen o six, he
Speaker 1: was going after the press, calling them a bunch of
Speaker 1: scoundrels and liars and how that's bad for society. So
Speaker 1: this is not really any they knew of a president
Speaker 1: doing this, and I think it can be effective because
Speaker 1: it does hold this the press to account, because it
Speaker 1: exposes them, and you can tell because they're all angry
Speaker 1: about it. You know, this is your press. I mean,
Speaker 1: you know. I just think that if you are an
Speaker 1: American citizen, you're not being served by people that just
Speaker 1: advanced one agenda and they don't do it with with
Speaker 1: any upfront honesty. They actually claim that their news. Um,
Speaker 1: I would think that, Danielle. Look, I agree. Since George
Speaker 1: Washington didn't run for a third term. He didn't run
Speaker 1: for a third term because he was so upset about
Speaker 1: the press and they called them lying scoundrels. I think
Speaker 1: it was so d See. I take your point that
Speaker 1: since time immemorial, only since before and after the First
Speaker 1: Amendment was even as signed into the Bill of Rights,
Speaker 1: presidents have stood up for the idea of a free press,
Speaker 1: but have really not liked the media in many ways
Speaker 1: because the media have stood up to them. And sometimes
Speaker 1: the media have got it wrong. But they've held presidents
Speaker 1: to account, and that is their job. They are the
Speaker 1: proxies of the people. And whether you're a liberal or conservative,
Speaker 1: I think you have to stand for this. You are
Speaker 1: we're not into the president. It also has First Amendment rights,
Speaker 1: and the media has been so wrong so often can
Speaker 1: We've had a year worth of Trump Russia collusion. Can
Speaker 1: you give me any evidence after a year of that?
Speaker 1: Because Bob mull is doing his job and it's underapp
Speaker 1: Excuse me, I don't believe. But what has Bob Mueller
Speaker 1: done that it has anything to do with Trump Russia collusion?
Speaker 1: It had nothing to do with what happened to General
Speaker 1: Flynn and nothing to do with what happened with Paul Manafort.
Speaker 1: So tell me where is the evidence? After all this
Speaker 1: time and all these stories and all this coverage, what
Speaker 1: do we have? Well, we have we know that moll
Speaker 1: is looking into obstruction. We know that MOLLI is looking
Speaker 1: into whether our President Trump flied called me because Commy
Speaker 1: was trying to stop the investigation. And certainly like wait
Speaker 1: a minute, the j d J sent over information today
Speaker 1: to the House Intel Committee, and I am told that
Speaker 1: this should result in the firing of Peter Struck, of
Speaker 1: this guy Bruce or of McCabe, of Rosenstein himself, and
Speaker 1: justifies will prove to justify that what the President did
Speaker 1: with callmey was a thousand percent right. And by the way,
Speaker 1: the president has the right to fire whoever he wants
Speaker 1: to fire. He absolutely does be can't do it to
Speaker 1: obstruct an ongoing investigation. That substruction of justice, and that's
Speaker 1: what he's looking into. Okay, you're not going to get it.
Speaker 1: Good luck. Held doubt in my opening statement, my prepared statement, Um,
Speaker 1: the first time I recall hearing about the hack into
Speaker 1: the d n C, and I recalled that it had
Speaker 1: been some months before I was learning of this, that
Speaker 1: the FBI and the d n C had been in
Speaker 1: contact with each other about this, and I was not
Speaker 1: very happy to be learning about it several months later.
Speaker 1: Very clearly, Well, there's there's two things I guess going on.
Speaker 1: The DNC hack was at some point time, what was
Speaker 1: the delay between the hacks that that FBI was a
Speaker 1: waerever who found the hacks to the to the the
Speaker 1: scanning as you call it, of the various voter registration systems,
Speaker 1: that the attempted intrusions perhaps into the voter records. Who
Speaker 1: who discovered that? And if it was the FBI, then
Speaker 1: how long was your delay between uh that? And you're
Speaker 1: because using your analogy of the coppent fireman, that the
Speaker 1: flames are going up, we did need the farm in
Speaker 1: there first. And what how was that delayed between the
Speaker 1: infrastructure where concerned my recollection, and part of this is
Speaker 1: from open source reporting I've read more recently, is that
Speaker 1: the FBI first discovered the intrusion, that's my recollection, intrusion
Speaker 1: to the state systems into the d n C. Okay
Speaker 1: uh the and I recall very clearly that there was
Speaker 1: a delay between that initial contact with the d n
Speaker 1: C and when the report got to me as Secretary
Speaker 1: of DHS. It may have been that there were others
Speaker 1: at the staff level in DHS who were privy to
Speaker 1: this before it filtered up to me in an intelligence report.
Speaker 1: But that's my that's my recollection. Under my understanding, the
Speaker 1: Capital Police is not able to confiscate members equipment when
Speaker 1: the member is not under investigation. It is their equipment
Speaker 1: and it's supposed to be returned. Well, I think there's
Speaker 1: stenuating circumstances in this case, and I think I think
Speaker 1: that you know, working through my council, and you know
Speaker 1: the necessary personnel if if that in facts the case,
Speaker 1: and with the permission of through the investigation and more
Speaker 1: return equipment. But until us accomplished, I can't return to equipment.
Speaker 1: I think you're violating the rules when you when you
Speaker 1: conduct your business that way and should expect that there
Speaker 1: would be consequences. Let me just be very clear, at
Speaker 1: no point during my tenure at the d n C
Speaker 1: was I contacted by the FBI, DHS or any government
Speaker 1: agency or alerted or made aware that they believed that
Speaker 1: the Russians, a an enemy state, was intruding on our network.
Speaker 1: At no point, and I am a member of Congress
Speaker 1: who had the ability to sit down and be briefed
Speaker 1: in a classified setting. Even Director Comey testified publicly that
Speaker 1: he wished that he had gone to the top of
Speaker 1: the organization. Were one of the two national political parties.
Speaker 1: It is astounding that when they had a member of
Speaker 1: Congress who was leading that organization, that no one felt
Speaker 1: it was any more important when we had a foreign
Speaker 1: enemy intruding on one of the two political parties networks
Speaker 1: to do anything more than lava phone call in to
Speaker 1: our tech support through our main switchboard. But how can
Speaker 1: both's outrageous? I mean, Secretary Johnson says the d n
Speaker 1: C rebuffed the health that they offered. You're saying that
Speaker 1: no one ever, respectfully respectfully, the Secretary Johnson is utterly
Speaker 1: misinformed that is simply not accurate, and much that has
Speaker 1: been has been written about the timeline of events by
Speaker 1: the New York Times, the Washington Post that document through
Speaker 1: multiple sources, including me, that that the the FBI and
Speaker 1: other federal agencies did virtually nothing to make sure that
Speaker 1: when they were aware, at the point that they were
Speaker 1: aware that there was or concerned that there was an
Speaker 1: intrusion on our network by the Russians, that they did
Speaker 1: virtually nothing to sound the alarm bells to make us
Speaker 1: aware of that, and they left. Essentially the Russians on
Speaker 1: our network for were more than for almost a year.
Speaker 1: I kept him on the payroll during the time that
Speaker 1: he was not arrested and not charged with anything, and
Speaker 1: that was pupped because, as I said, that I was
Speaker 1: concerned about the violation of his two process rights and
Speaker 1: also that there were racial and ethnic profiling concerns as well.
Speaker 1: Now another breaking story we have now we're just playing.
Speaker 1: You know, this goes to the whole Debbie Wasserman Schultz issue,
Speaker 1: and if you remember, she had this I T worker
Speaker 1: And as a result, we now are getting information from
Speaker 1: the Daily Caller that is a house report that has
Speaker 1: concluded that Pakistani's actually made unauthorized access to congressional servers.
Speaker 1: There's another story completely ignored by the mainstream media that
Speaker 1: means hostile actors. Well, that would mean classified information again,
Speaker 1: just like in the Hillary email Clay case and top
Speaker 1: secret and special Access program information. And remember all the
Speaker 1: other Democrats got rid of this guy im Rona Juan
Speaker 1: who was the guy that was responsible, you know, hiring
Speaker 1: people that worked at McDonald's and hiring people that that
Speaker 1: worked at card dealerships that had no no knowledgeable background
Speaker 1: in ninety at all, and they were double billing. Anyway,
Speaker 1: Luke Rosiak has been all over the story. Joins us
Speaker 1: with today's developments. How are you, sir, I'm good, Sean,
Speaker 1: thanks for having me so. Uh well, before before you
Speaker 1: tell us about the new stuff, you got to set
Speaker 1: the table because this is separate and apart from Uranian one.
Speaker 1: This is separate and apart from the dossier, the email
Speaker 1: server scandal. So I want you to because it begins
Speaker 1: to get confusing the people, even me and I lived
Speaker 1: this day and night. So I want you to just
Speaker 1: go back set the foundation for everybody. Sure, So I've
Speaker 1: been saying for the last year, and we've talked about
Speaker 1: this a couple of times. But shortly before the twenty
Speaker 1: sixteen election, the House of Representatives was the victim of
Speaker 1: a major cyber breach by a family of Pakistani's who
Speaker 1: had been hired by Democrats. As I t eight, and
Speaker 1: you know, there was no shorts of information. If you
Speaker 1: guys are really bad guys even tied to hes blah
Speaker 1: running moving millions of dollars around. Their own mother said
Speaker 1: that they were being kept in cat She was they
Speaker 1: were keeping her in captivity. These are just really frightening guys.
Speaker 1: And they had access to all the emails and all
Speaker 1: the data of forty four Democrats. They could read everything
Speaker 1: a lot of the people they worked for on committees
Speaker 1: like nationally like Foreign Affairs and intelligence. And these guys
Speaker 1: were fired, uh like right after the election. But the
Speaker 1: Democrats started being super super sensitive and sketchy about what
Speaker 1: was going on. And I've been saying for a long
Speaker 1: time that it was a cyber breach. I've now obtained
Speaker 1: a report written by the House is nonpartisan watchdog, the
Speaker 1: Office of Inspector General. Now they did a four month
Speaker 1: investigation and they concluded. They came out with a report
Speaker 1: that had the headline unauthorized access. You talked about a
Speaker 1: server being used for nefarious purposes in the House Representatives,
Speaker 1: they talked about reading and removing information. It said that
Speaker 1: this guy and Runawan and his family had in thousands
Speaker 1: of times to house servers they had no connection to,
Speaker 1: including fifteen members of Congress, and they didn't work for
Speaker 1: at all. And they had even locked in using members
Speaker 1: personal user names. So they were impersonating members of Congress.
Speaker 1: They were moving files off the network, they were taking
Speaker 1: steps to conceal their activity, according to the House Inspector General,
Speaker 1: and even after they were fired, they continued to log in.
Speaker 1: So if there any doubt, is this some misunderstanding? Is
Speaker 1: there a reasonable explanation for this? When you fire a
Speaker 1: guy for doing something wrong and he keeps logging into
Speaker 1: your server anyway, I mean, there's really no other way
Speaker 1: to construe that. So this is an incredible i G report.
Speaker 1: It's an official government report from House Representatives UM And
Speaker 1: so for anyone who claims to care about hacking, this
Speaker 1: all happened at the same time the d n C
Speaker 1: was hacked. Uh, you know this is all part of
Speaker 1: the same atmosphere of the audio that you played, where
Speaker 1: the Democrats. Now they're always talking about Russia and how
Speaker 1: terrible it is to be hacked. But if you look
Speaker 1: at at the time, the FBI was telling the d
Speaker 1: NC that they were hacked, and the d NC didn't care. Uh,
Speaker 1: it's even worse than the House representatives. They love it
Speaker 1: about it. They got this report from the Inspector General,
Speaker 1: whose job it is to investigate this kind of thing.
Speaker 1: And after they fired these guys, they got the forty
Speaker 1: four members whose data was jeopardized by these guys, and
Speaker 1: they lied to them about why they were being fired.
Speaker 1: They said it was about a theft investigation. The word
Speaker 1: fest did not even appear in the final report from
Speaker 1: the i G. It was a cyber security investigation. Wait,
Speaker 1: the word what didn't appear, the word theft. They're acting
Speaker 1: like it's a criminal. You know, it's about the money disappearing,
Speaker 1: it's about bank fraud. When you look at what the
Speaker 1: Inspector General who did this case did, it was entirely
Speaker 1: cyber security, is cyber breach case. It doesn't talk about theft. Well,
Speaker 1: in fact, the only time it talked talks about theft
Speaker 1: is that they had this server, which is the House
Speaker 1: Democratic Caucus server Now that's a sister group of the
Speaker 1: DNC and it exists physically in the House. Now, they
Speaker 1: were taken data, it seems like from fifteen other members
Speaker 1: of Congress, and it seems like they were putting it
Speaker 1: onto the House Democratic Caucus server and to the cops
Speaker 1: being watching it as part of this cyber security probe.
Speaker 1: And while they're watching it, and this is really the
Speaker 1: prime evidence, the entire server, presumably with all that data
Speaker 1: on it, disappeared. So the only theft you could say,
Speaker 1: was this incredible example of tampering with the criminal investigation
Speaker 1: and stealing evidence from under a cops nose. So any
Speaker 1: member of Congress who is concerned about data, and these
Speaker 1: are concerned about cybersecurity, and these are members on the
Speaker 1: Intelligence Committee, we trust these guys to be prudent when
Speaker 1: make good decisions. Um at the point where there's unauthorized
Speaker 1: access and then an entire server with your data on
Speaker 1: it is stolen. Um to act like this is a
Speaker 1: theft case is almost moorewell, I and I mean this
Speaker 1: is this is a major cyber breach. But the most
Speaker 1: troubling thing about it is not even that it happened.
Speaker 1: Is if that's not bad enough, it's that members has
Speaker 1: completely misrepresented it. So why would Democrats lie about the
Speaker 1: House Democratic Caucus being hacked right before the election. It
Speaker 1: really blows your mind. Well, I mean that's the whole thing,
Speaker 1: you know. I mean that I guess at the end
Speaker 1: of the day, here, how many different ways are we
Speaker 1: going to have America's security hacked into by foreign entities
Speaker 1: that don't like us? And allow this to continue because
Speaker 1: it's the same like for example, you know, one of
Speaker 1: the things that frustrated me the d n C hack um.
Speaker 1: And I think I'm the only person that ever interviewed
Speaker 1: Julian Osane five times, but he was very clear it
Speaker 1: wasn't Russia or a state of any kind. Now that
Speaker 1: goes into the whole issue of the Muther investigation. That
Speaker 1: goes into the issue and frankly, it's connected here in
Speaker 1: some ways. So now the question is, Okay, well, if
Speaker 1: you didn't get the information from Russia, why do we
Speaker 1: have a special counsel? And number two, Uh, if he's
Speaker 1: the one person that uploaded the information, wouldn't he be
Speaker 1: the one person that knows where it came from? Right?
Speaker 1: And I think it gets to the idea that Democrats
Speaker 1: By the way, I don't care if people like him
Speaker 1: or not. It doesn't that's irrelevant in this case. Right.
Speaker 1: And when Democrats are saying, you know, we're so mad
Speaker 1: we got hacked, and we say it's by Russia, are
Speaker 1: you really mad? Or is this an excuse that you
Speaker 1: needed to justify losing the election? Because there are all
Speaker 1: kinds of signs that they don't actually care about being hacked.
Speaker 1: And me, the worst thing about it is that the
Speaker 1: d n C is just merely a political group. I mean,
Speaker 1: when you've got classified information coming out from the Hillary
Speaker 1: Clinton State Departament and whom abode and put it out
Speaker 1: there and they didn't care. And then you've got the
Speaker 1: House of Representatives, the US government being hacked and they
Speaker 1: don't care. I mean, you're telling me that you value
Speaker 1: political information more than well, that's all of the US government,
Speaker 1: that's politics, that's party over country. Well well, and then
Speaker 1: why would they hide that, Why would they be so
Speaker 1: against us knowing about it? Right? And it's not a
Speaker 1: rational Uh, it's not a rational response. And I think
Speaker 1: that's why you're not seeing media coverages. They assume that
Speaker 1: if Democrats were hacked, they'd be saying so well, now
Speaker 1: you can see the report. The idea report is out there.
Speaker 1: It's not really in dispute. Uh. You know, anyone who's
Speaker 1: in good faith and wants to look into this, they
Speaker 1: will see that there was this major breach and then
Speaker 1: you can see the bizarre response. Now people on the
Speaker 1: Hill have been saying that these this family of id ads, Uh,
Speaker 1: they suspect them of um basically engaging in a kickback
Speaker 1: scheme with a handful of members where they were, you know,
Speaker 1: putting no show employees on the payroll and splitting the money,
Speaker 1: and some of them even think they were blackmailing members
Speaker 1: with their own data. I think that becomes very very credible,
Speaker 1: I really do, based on their response to this, because
Speaker 1: there is no reason they should be okay with this
Speaker 1: kind of cybersecurity breach and to go to such links
Speaker 1: to avoid addressing it. The other thing is the prized
Speaker 1: Russian narrative. I think if you look at the facts
Speaker 1: of this, this was the House Democratic Caucus, which is
Speaker 1: a d NC sister organization, being hacked in the same
Speaker 1: month as the d n C, and they caught the
Speaker 1: guy who did it, and he wasn't Russian, he was Pakistani.
Speaker 1: And I think they're worried that either they're going to
Speaker 1: find out that he really did half the d n
Speaker 1: C or at least that it's going to muddle the narrative.
Speaker 1: And they care about the narrative. They don't care about
Speaker 1: actually being hacked. It's all about narrative now. When we
Speaker 1: first found out that this was questionable, and Rona Juan
Speaker 1: and his family that they had been double billing and
Speaker 1: that they had people not qualified to work in I
Speaker 1: T the other people besides Debbie Wasserman Schultz, they were
Speaker 1: willing to let those people go. Debbie Wasserman Schultz though,
Speaker 1: those a police report indicating, you know, number one, what
Speaker 1: we saw a video of our fighting to get back
Speaker 1: a laptop that the police had, the Metro police. And
Speaker 1: then of course we have this aid and Rona Juan
Speaker 1: planting the computer in this phone booth for investigators to find.
Speaker 1: So what's the latest there. So this guy, the day
Speaker 1: after I reported that the FBI had sees mass hard
Speaker 1: drives from this guy, he got on literally the next
Speaker 1: flight to Pakistan and he tried to and the FBI
Speaker 1: arrest of him at the airport. And the prime evidence
Speaker 1: in that case is now Debbie Wasserman Schultz's laptop, so
Speaker 1: she hired a lawyer to prevent the cops from looking
Speaker 1: at it, and eventually his lawyers that attorney client privilege,
Speaker 1: We're going to keep you from looking at it. So
Speaker 1: right now it's basically up to in Ronawan whether you know,
Speaker 1: everyone gets to see Debbie Wasson schultz is laptop. So
Speaker 1: there's another point of leverage for him there, and it
Speaker 1: gets back to this idea of potential I've got to run.
Speaker 1: Do you think that Debbie Wasserman Schultz, uh, maybe going
Speaker 1: to jail? Um, you know, I think it could be
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi not necessarily going to jail. But this is
Speaker 1: the leadership of the of the entire Democratic Party. The
Speaker 1: way that they handled this whole thing. It really Uh
Speaker 1: it's sacrificed national security at the expense of politics, which
Speaker 1: is a terrible thing. And I don't see how Democrats
Speaker 1: let themselves get hacked by Pakistani's with this kind of
Speaker 1: track record without some seriously frightening stuff going on. All right,
Speaker 1: thank you Luke Rozi at eight shot right, Hannity Tonight nineties,
Speaker 1: who do not miss Tonight Show information you won't get anywhere,
Speaker 1: all right, so the d o J gives us this information.
Speaker 1: The information now shows that everything we have been telling
Speaker 1: it is true. Now we got to get it out
Speaker 1: to the public. We have Jim Jordan, we have Matt Gates,
Speaker 1: we have Sarah Carter, we have Greg Just you, you're
Speaker 1: going to want to see this show, all right, set
Speaker 1: your DVR. I hope you'll join us nine Eastern tonight
Speaker 1: on the Fox News Channel. We'll have the very latest
Speaker 1: on all of this that's infant today. I see you
Speaker 1: back here tomorrow, see tonight at night.