WEBVTT - MicroStrategy CEO on Bitcoin Surge

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes Tim Stinovic from Bloomberg Radio. Before the Game

0:00:09.280 --> 0:00:11.959
<v Speaker 1>Stop Frenzy, which we've all been obsessed with, we had

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the Bitcoin frenzy, and if you go back a month

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 1>or more, we were regularly talking about the run up

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 1>and bitcoin. It's up about so far this year after

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 1>gaining more than last year. One of our listeners, Alexander,

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:24.279
<v Speaker 1>messaged me and said, you really need to be talking

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>to our next guest, and uh, that was confirmed by

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>our own Bloomberg Intelligence commodity strategist Mike mcglome. So he

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>joins us. Are Mike mclog He's on the phone in Connecticut.

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>He follows bitcoin as well and joining us right now.

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Our guest is Michael Sailor, Chairman, CEO and founder of

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>micro Strategy, and he joins us as well. So, Mike, Michael,

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:47.640
<v Speaker 1>both of you. Great to have you here. Michael, Um,

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:52.199
<v Speaker 1>we did see bitcoin go above forty dollars. You were

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>buying last year, you are this year? Where are you

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>in terms of your buying strategy? You know how much

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of your balance sheet are you committing to do it? Um?

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Well more than a dent because we're leverage. We've we've

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>invested all of our free cash and we've borrowed six

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred fifty million dollars. So I don't know two of

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:16.959
<v Speaker 1>our balance sheet something like that, but but we're up

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>about one point two billion since we started buying, So

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:24.559
<v Speaker 1>so we have a lot of bitcoin um in terms

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>of our strategy. We were buying it at ten thousand,

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>we were buying it at eleven thousand, we bought it

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:34.319
<v Speaker 1>at nineteen thousand, and twenty one thousand, at thirty one thousand,

0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>and just today I announced to the world that we

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>bought our last batch of ten million dollars worth of

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty three thousand, eight hundred. I think we'll be buying

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>it forever forever. Where do you see it going buying? Well, yeah,

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>we know, we know you like it um. Where do

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>you see the value going. We've had, you know, various

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>guests come on and talk about a quarter of a

0:01:57.240 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>million dollars. Where do you see it going? Well, I

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>think bitcoin is digital gold on the world's first digital

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 1>monetary network, and so it represents a high yield savings

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 1>account to consumers, and there's plenty of them that would

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 1>like to get paid tax free. It represents digital gold

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>for institutions and they've got a big problem. They need

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a safe haven. It represents a monetary network for Facebook

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and Google and Amazon investors, and it's a lifeboat for

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>a billion people in the developing world that have currencies

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>that are collapsing. So if you wonder where's it going, Well,

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 1>at first it's going to flip gold, which is going

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to take it to five hundred thousand dollars a coin.

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Then it's going to start to it's going to start

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 1>to attract capital from weaker safe haven assets like negative

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 1>yielding sovereign debt, low yielding stock indexes, other types of

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 1>medals and commodities and uh and the light and that

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 1>that will take it up another factor of ten. Mike mcglo,

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>you want to come out, come on in on this conversation.

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh yes, well, Michael, thanks for coming on. And what

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the key thing that struck me about when I really

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>heard what you were doing last summer and you just

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 1>nailed the media and you hover and covered it so

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>well as your your sense of the history. So think

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the key question I really want to get out of

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:18.239
<v Speaker 1>an I think from you today's how do you think

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>future generations will look back upon you and us and

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>what we're doing now in bitcoin, um, say fifty hundred

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:28.799
<v Speaker 1>years from now, or maybe even just ten years from now.

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I think for five thousand years we had the Goal standard,

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and that was a non sovereign bearer instrument store of value.

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I think for forty or fifty years we've we've drifted

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>through the Fiance standard, and we've been looking for a

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 1>new anchor. And I think the Bitcoin is going to

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>is the emergent digital monetary protocol for moving money through

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 1>time and space, and I think it's good for another

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>five thousand years. Mr mcglow, I think it's I think

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>that fifty years from now people are to say this

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>was that transition period when the world figured out what

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>a digital monitoring network was and what a protocol for

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 1>moving money around is, and they can't imagine a world

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 1>without it. Michael, though, let me understand something, because what

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I keep hearing as though there's going to be a

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>fixed supply, So how can it then become something on

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>par there's a fixed supply of gold as well, but

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:28.160
<v Speaker 1>can it be something that we really put on par

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>with gold? And I'm just curious what your thesis is BEI,

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:35.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, behind investing so much in in one asset

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:39.359
<v Speaker 1>essentially well, you know, people say fixed supply, but of

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>course what we're really talking about is twenty one million

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>coins infinitely divisible. They're divisible infinitely, so it's only fixed

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that the numbers one through ten are fixed.

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>You have the principles of mathematics or arithmetic and geometry,

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>there's three or sixty degrees in a circle, specified supply,

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and fix supply applies the geometry, arithmetic and conservation of

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 1>energy and the laws of physics, like there's a fixed

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:09.479
<v Speaker 1>supply of energy and you can't make or eliminate it.

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:14.160
<v Speaker 1>So it's not a limitation in fact. In fact, conservation

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 1>of the laws of physics and energy are critical to

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the working of electrical systems, pneumatic systems, hydraulic systems, every

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>engineering system on the face of the earth. And so

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:26.840
<v Speaker 1>when people talk about fixed supply of bitcoin, what they

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 1>mean is this is a monetary network that works and

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't leak. Listen, Michael, one thing that we've got to

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>ask you about is risk, and um, what could go

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:43.040
<v Speaker 1>wrong here when it comes to bitcoin? Is this a

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:46.239
<v Speaker 1>question for Michael mcgloan or Michael Sailor from Michael Sailor

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>for you. Okay, I know it's confusing. Yeah, Um well

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:56.279
<v Speaker 1>I think that, uh, most of the risk around bitcoin

0:05:56.400 --> 0:06:00.279
<v Speaker 1>is really just news fund and regulatory fund cons earns

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:05.839
<v Speaker 1>about how will various governments treated and what will happen. Um,

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>as governments normalize the regulation, they're putting some know your

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:14.599
<v Speaker 1>customer and anti money laundering rags in place to normalize

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>it compared to other assets, and sometimes people get a

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:21.599
<v Speaker 1>little bit skittish about it, but but ultimately as it normalizes,

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 1>that risk will go away. Um, Michael, Mike McGlone. How

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>about any The question I've heard from other people is

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>this is a revolutionary and nary technology. How about another

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:38.600
<v Speaker 1>technology improving upon it or replacing it? And that's from

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a person as it was, the markets guy, not really

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>technology guys. There is that a risk? Do you view

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>that as a potential risk? You know? I think non

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:49.600
<v Speaker 1>technologists sometimes think that, But what they don't understand is

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>that it's a monetary protocol like t C P I P,

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>or like the English language, Like when everybody agrees to

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 1>speak English, there might be a better language, but we're

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>not replacing it. When we all agree to use inches

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:07.679
<v Speaker 1>and pounds, the metric system comes along, but it's really

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 1>difficult to get people to replace it. And bitcoin is

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>a monetary protocol. All the innovations going on on the

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 1>edge with companies like Square and PayPal, and the underlying

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>protocol has power because of the network effect and the

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 1>and the network is not just a function of the

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred million plus people to use it. The other part

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of the network effect is new Tony and laws of gravity.

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 1>When you have hundreds of billions of dollars of monetary

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>energy on the network, there's no way that's moving. Once

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 1>people decide what's the winning network, they're going to stick

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>with it, just like we stick with Twitter and Facebook

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and Google and YouTube. It's incredibly powerful and new technology

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>like a better YouTube rank better Twitter isn't gonna win,

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and everybody knows that they're not winning. We want the

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 1>network that all of our friends is where all the

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 1>money is. Yeah, it's interesting. Well, you know, I have

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>someone tweeting at me, Michael, and they're saying, I'm curious

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 1>about all the people have lost their mind bitcoins. Lots

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>of people have have lost them, and a lot of

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 1>them have been hoarded, So how do you factor that in,

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>especially if you're thinking that this can be something that

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>is accepted, you know, much more broadly and use more

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>widely financially. You know, in the early days of the Internet,

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>we didn't have Netscape browsers and web browsers, and people

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>had to type the tcpaddresses in by hand, and it

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 1>was really difficult and only the techies did it. But

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>then along came Netscape and it got really easy and

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 1>it became consumer thing. So when people talk about losing

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>their bitcoin, it's like the early days when they're trying

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>to do it all in machine code. You can also

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:52.560
<v Speaker 1>buy bitcoin by owning a share of gray Scale, or

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 1>or you can actually buy it with one click on PayPal.

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>That's like ten thousand times easier. And so there's a

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of ways to have bitcoin, and the new ways

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>are wrapped in consumer apps by Square and PayPal. People

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 1>aren't losing their bitcoin with those apps, right, It's a

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>different thing, it's and it's much simpler. Well, one of

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the main question I have to ask you, Michaels, we're Americans.

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 1>We deal with the reserve currency, the dollar, and it's

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 1>still the reserve currency so how about the rest of

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the world doing something similar that you did with corporate treasuries.

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 1>It seemed to me that's much more prudent um for

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 1>most of the most of the company's the rest of

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the world that are not dollar based, even those that

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>aren't eural based. I operate a business in Argentina and

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>I watched, and our business makes a lot of money.

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 1>I watched the pay soo go from a paso to

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the dollar, to two to a dollar, to ten to

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:49.319
<v Speaker 1>the dollar, to twenty to the dollar, to forty to

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the dollar, to eighty to the dollar, to and now

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the block market rates a hundred and fifty to the dollar.

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:58.719
<v Speaker 1>Now our our logical policy as we sweep all our

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 1>patios into dollar and we get them out of Argentine

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 1>banks as soon as possible. But I've still lost millions

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 1>of dollars in Argentina. So clearly I think I think

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 1>it's common sense anywhere in the world you do business,

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>if the currency is weakening or collapsing, you convert your

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 1>local currency into a scarce asset. You know, if I

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 1>had known about bitcoin twenty years ago, I would have

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:26.679
<v Speaker 1>bought bitcoin instead of losing all my money with paso devalued.

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 1>And you know, two years ago my lawyers came and

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 1>said the paso's devaluing again and there's capital controls And

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I said, can we buy gold? They said no, you

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 1>can't get it to the airport. I said, can we

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:42.079
<v Speaker 1>buy a yacht and sailor from Argentina to the Caribbean.

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>And it looked at me like I'm out of my mind.

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>If I know it about bitcoin, I would have bought bitcoin, right,

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>hard asset. Hey, listen, one thing we want to ask

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:54.199
<v Speaker 1>you about. UM. You are hosting a bitcoin conference and

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot of leaders, executives, UM officers and directors

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and advisers of corporation and what is it about the

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>conversation around bitcoin? Do you think that has changed dramatically

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 1>that tells you maybe about where it's going? And and

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>just got about a minute here. Yeah, a bitcoin rotated

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>from being a consumer leveraged, you know, strange digital asset

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to being an institutional safe haven store of value in

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the last twelve months. Every corporation with cash on the

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 1>books has a liability as the money supply explates by

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>fiercent a year, if they can flip it to a

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:32.840
<v Speaker 1>scarce asset like bitcoin. It becomes an asset, not a liability.

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 1>That's driving thousands of companies to want to do this,

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's that those the people that will be at

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 1>our conference tomorrow. Alright, interesting, interesting stuff. Is there anything

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>that keeps you up at night over Bitcoin? Just got

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:48.439
<v Speaker 1>like twenty five seconds here. I think it's a certain

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:51.680
<v Speaker 1>that I'm gonna lose se of my value in cash

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>instruments over the next ten years. So no, I'm not

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 1>kept up at night at all. I'm happy to have

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>done it and I and I think that everybody can

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 1>benefit from discovering bitcoin is a store of value. All Right,

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:07.679
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna leave it on that note. Listen, Michael, thank

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:10.439
<v Speaker 1>you so much, really appreciate it. Michael Sailor, chairman, CEO

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:13.559
<v Speaker 1>and founder of micro Strategy joining us on the phone

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and her own Mike mcglogan. Pretty cool stuff, Mike, that's great,

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me. Yeah, thanks to both of you.

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Mike mcglogan also of our Bloomberg Intelligence team. He's a

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:25.959
<v Speaker 1>commodity strategist and follows bitcoin for us