WEBVTT - The 2014 Sony Hack Revisited

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with iHeart Radio and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.639
<v Speaker 1>I love all things tech. And for today's show, I

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>thought I would cover kind of an infamous thing that

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:32.520
<v Speaker 1>happened in tech a few years ago. So in hackers

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>infiltrated the computer systems of Sony Pictures and they stole

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:41.239
<v Speaker 1>an enormous amount of data. This was one of the

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:47.840
<v Speaker 1>highest profile incidents of hacking in that decade, and it

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>involves everything from political posturing to the studio of Sony

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>waffling over whether or not it was actually going to

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>release a movie. So I thought we could revisit that

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:01.639
<v Speaker 1>story kind of walk through you to see what we

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:05.040
<v Speaker 1>know about it and what we suspect, or maybe it

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 1>might be more accurate to say, you know, what is

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:11.319
<v Speaker 1>the official stance of the FBI, and what do other

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>people think, and also what has happened since, including how

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the people accused of being behind the attack also stand

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:21.760
<v Speaker 1>accused of other cyber crimes. And I should point out

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:26.399
<v Speaker 1>that early on a lot of these details um around

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the hack. I mean even now, they still remain unknown,

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>or at least if they are known, the folks who

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>know it are kind of keeping it to themselves. And

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a lot of speculation out there, with

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>conflicting accounts as to when things got started, why the

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>hack happened, and who is behind the whole ding dang

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>darn thing. There's even a suspect whom an entire country

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>insists does not actually exist. So it's a legit mystery,

0:01:55.400 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>including conspiracy theories and enormous consequences. But let's begin with

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the morning of Monday, November twenty four, two thousand fourteen.

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Sony Pictures employees come in to go to work. Yeah,

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:13.240
<v Speaker 1>they boot up their machines and they see something that

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>could have come straight out of a Sony Pictures film.

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it feels like something straight out of the

0:02:19.240 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>nineties movie A red Skeleton Cartoons skeleton appears on their

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>computer screen, and then their computer speaker system plays the

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 1>sounds of gun shots, and there's a message that pops

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 1>up that says hacked by hashtag g O P. Now

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>for Americans, that might have caused a little bit of

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>confusion because here in America, GOP typically stands for Grand

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Old Party. It's another name for the Republican Party, the

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 1>one commonly associated with conservative political views here in the

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>United States. But that was not the GOP behind this attack.

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>This GOP stood for Guardians of Peace. As to who

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>was behind that, well, it's obviously a big part of

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the mystery. There was a further bit to this message.

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't just hacked by hashtag g OP. It read quote,

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>We've already warned you, and this is just a beginning.

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:23.679
<v Speaker 1>We continue till our request be met. We've obtained all

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>your internal data, including your secrets and top secrets. If

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>you don't obey, us will release data below to the world.

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Determine what will you do? Till November two p m

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>g MT End quote. Then there were data links to

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 1>a list of the assets the hackers had stolen from

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Sony's systems. Employees found that pretty much every aspect of

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>their network was inaccessible. Voicemail was offline, the telephone directory

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>in general was gone. There was no way to access

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the Internet, and even the cafeteria couldn't connect to credit

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>card verification services, which meant all transactions had to be

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>cash only that day, not just that day either. This

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>lasted a while so never mind trying to access something

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 1>off of Sony's servers. Before lunchtime, news of the hack

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 1>had already broken online, with outlets like geek dot com

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and Deadline reporting on it straight away. Sony employees found

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:29.919
<v Speaker 1>themselves unable to do any work or they had to

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 1>switch to you know, like pen and paper or white

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 1>boards in an old school approach to trying to to

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:39.280
<v Speaker 1>do anything productive in the face of a massive attack.

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:43.599
<v Speaker 1>In fact, when it was all said and done, Sony

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 1>had to wait until February of twift to get systems

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>back online, so you know, that's like more than a

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 1>month of the systems being down. They had to retire

0:04:55.320 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>three thousand, two hundred sixty two employee PCs that's how

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 1>of six thousand, seven nine seven total, so almost half

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>of all computers had to be replaced, and had to

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>do the same with eight hundred thirty seven out of

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>one thousand, five hundred fifty five servers, so more than

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>half of their servers had to be replaced. This is

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:21.359
<v Speaker 1>all according to a Vanity Fair article titled The Untold

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Story of the Sony Hack by Richard Stingle. At the

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 1>time of the hack, Stingle was actually working for US

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Secretary of State and had a direct connection as he

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 1>was friends with the the then CEO of Sony Pictures.

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:42.479
<v Speaker 1>According to Sony itself, as reported by computer World, the

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 1>hack represented a thirty five million dollar cost in I

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:49.839
<v Speaker 1>T repairs. That was the figure quoted for quote restoring

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:53.279
<v Speaker 1>our financial and I T systems end quote according to

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:57.599
<v Speaker 1>a Sony spokesperson, And that actually sounds low to me.

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:00.920
<v Speaker 1>And of course there were other monitor are damages as

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 1>well due to how the hackers would release much of

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>that stolen information online. And then there's the damage to

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Sony's reputation, a rep that already had more than a

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>little tarnish on it before the hack even happened. Meanwhile,

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the details of the attack included links that the hackers

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 1>left behind two sites that showed off some of the

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 1>data they had taken, So this was more of like

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a directory of what was stolen, with the actual data

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>itself to follow in the weeks to come. As it

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>would turn out, the hackers who had infiltrated the system

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>had been hard at work inside Sony's cyber walls for

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>at least a few weeks at the point where they

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>left this message, and some accounts suggest that the initial

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>intrusion might have happened even more than a year in

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:54.919
<v Speaker 1>advance because of just the enormous amount of information that

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 1>got siphoned away. But either way, this was not some

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:01.039
<v Speaker 1>sort of hasty message that was sent immediately after the

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>hackers got access to the system. Now, the hackers had

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:08.599
<v Speaker 1>clearly already copied a vast amount of information, which again

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 1>depending on the account, ranged anywhere from forty gigabytes to

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 1>around a hundred terra bytes or more, a truly astonishing

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 1>amount of information. They also deleted files on Sony's systems

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>and then they sent the message. So it's only after

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 1>they had siphoned off the data and burned everything behind

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>them that they tipped their hand that they were involved.

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, this was the moment where the world at

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>large learned about the attack, But again, it had clearly

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>happened or at least started before November. In fact, this

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>wasn't even the first attack on Sony's computer systems in

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>and the company had a history of cybersecurity issues which

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>did not make it look particularly strong. Let's go back

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 1>to April of two thousand eleven, and don't worry, this

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>bit is just a quick overview to set the stage,

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and this is going to focus not on Sony Pictures,

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 1>but another branch of Sony. So in two ten, there

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 1>was a security hacker named George Hots, a k a.

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Geo Hot, and he became the target of Sony's ire

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>after Geo Hot started working on a method to breach

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the PlayStation three consoles security in order to unlock the

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>console so that you could do all sorts of different

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>stuff with it. You could hack it, in other words,

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and and really use that special hardware of the PS

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 1>three to tackle specific types of computational problems, because the

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>architecture of the PS three was very different from other

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 1>consoles at the time. Sony brought some legal action against Hots,

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>who had pointed out a pretty massive flaw in Sony's

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>own security, and then Anonymous got involved. And you don't

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 1>hear about Anonymous as much these days as used to.

0:08:55.960 --> 0:09:00.560
<v Speaker 1>But it's it's a loosely organized activist group and there's

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 1>usually no identifiable leadership within the group itself, and members

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 1>can have drastically different philosophies and approaches, So you can

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 1>have like concerned activists to nihilistic anarchists in that same group.

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Anonymous named Sony a prime target for hacking in response

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to how Sony was pursuing hots and what followed was

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:27.079
<v Speaker 1>a distributed denial of service or d d o S

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>attack on Sony's PlayStation network servers, which interrupted service for

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>millions of Sony PlayStation owners. Sony would actually end up

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>taking the network offline entirely on April twenty while looking

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:43.440
<v Speaker 1>for a way to counter the attacks. Later the world

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>learned that a you know, leading up to Sony taking

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>down the PlayStation network, hackers had actually infiltrated Sony systems

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>and accessed a database containing user data for seventy seven

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>million accounts, including people's names, their email addresses, their past

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 1>words they're log in. There was a question about maybe

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>their credit card information got leaked as well, something that

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Sony said did not happen. But this was just the

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>beginning of Sony's woes. Different groups of hackers, most of

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>which were using fairly unsophisticated tools, attacked Sony Online Entertainment,

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:23.559
<v Speaker 1>Sony websites, and numerous other Sony sites and services, so

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>they weren't necessarily coordinating with one another, but rather kind

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>of all acting on an opportunity that presented itself. And

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 1>this isn't to suggest that the people behind these attacks

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>in eleven were linked to the ones we saw in fourteen,

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:41.680
<v Speaker 1>but rather to point out that Sony as a company

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 1>had truly atrocious cybersecurity systems and practices in place. This

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>was in so you would think that after that experience

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 1>of being hit by these attacks, that Sony would really

0:10:56.880 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 1>beef up security considerably and make future attack its less likely.

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you would think that, but you'd be wrong.

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:10.199
<v Speaker 1>According to multiple sources, Sony systems had poor password protection,

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:15.199
<v Speaker 1>like super poor like according to the Hollywood Reporter, some

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 1>servers had passwords like Sony pictures, which you know, is

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:23.200
<v Speaker 1>not great, not super secure, And the fact that security

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 1>was so poor meant that the list of possible perpetrators

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 1>would be really, really big, big enough so that even

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>when the FBI would announce a suspect that being hackers

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>connected to North Korea, there was enough doubt among the

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 1>security community to raise questions about it. All right, so

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>let's get back to our timeline. The Hollywood Reporter article

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:49.560
<v Speaker 1>titled five years Later, Who Really Hacked Sony includes the

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 1>fact that, according to leaked internal emails at Sony, the

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>company discovered an earlier breach inteen. That's the February one,

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>and the keep in mind that the big hack, the

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:04.079
<v Speaker 1>one that we're really focused on in this episode, would

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:07.560
<v Speaker 1>take place later that year in November. But in that

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 1>February hack, there was a fear that the hackers managed

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:14.320
<v Speaker 1>to secure the credentials to get administrative control of a

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Sony Pictures system, potentially uploading malware into the system in

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the process, and as we just covered, Sony's security wasn't

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>really up to code. Now, I tried to track down

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 1>more information about this February two, fourteen hack and came

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 1>up empty. Now it's possible that this was something that

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Sony just tried to contain completely internally and it just

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 1>never went beyond those internal emails. At any rate, it

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 1>is very challenging to search for anything related to Sony

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and hacking that happened in that doesn't relate to the

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:54.559
<v Speaker 1>more notorious event that happened in November. However, there's one

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>thing I do have to talk about that happened between

0:12:57.080 --> 0:13:02.040
<v Speaker 1>February and November that does play into the story, and

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 1>that's the Interview. The Interview is a film. It's a

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 1>comedy that was developed by Seth Rogan and Evan Goldberg

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 1>about a TV journalist and his producer getting a gig

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:19.559
<v Speaker 1>to come to North Korea and interview the country's leader,

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Kim Jong Un. Only they are intercepted by members of

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the c i A who want to use this rare

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to assassinate Kim Jong Un, turning the vacuous Hollywood

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 1>types into state backed assassins. Seth Rogan and James Franco

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:41.080
<v Speaker 1>played the producer and the TV host, respectively. Randall Park

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 1>a k agent, Jimmy Wou and the m c U

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 1>played Kim Jong Un. The film went into production in

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 1>two thousand thirteen with Sony Pictures behind it, and the

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 1>release date was set for October of two thousand fourteen.

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:58.440
<v Speaker 1>So in the summer of two thousand fourteen, when the

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:01.439
<v Speaker 1>movie's publicity was starting to get all the ground, that's

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>when there were rumblings from North Korea. The media. North

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Korea condemned the film months before it was set to premiere,

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:13.680
<v Speaker 1>calling for Sony to not release it and even to

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 1>just destroy the movie, and that the release of the

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>movie would be considered an act of terrorism and war. Now,

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 1>on the one hand, the Interview is a pretty dumb movie.

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 1>It's it's not a hard hitting thriller. It doesn't say

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 1>anything particularly insightful about North Korea or Kim Jong un.

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 1>But on the other hand, it's pretty darn taboo to

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>make a fictional film about a planned assassination of a

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>real world person who is very much still alive. I mean,

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>it has been done, but it's a tricky thing to do. Honestly,

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 1>I think if someone were to make a movie about

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to assassinate me, I'd take it a little personally.

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Sony pushed back the release of the film from October

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 1>to Decen two thousand fourteen, the idea of being of

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>releasing it on Christmas Day, and they also made some

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 1>changes to the movie. Now, whether these changes were meant

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 1>as concessions to North Korea or not, I don't know,

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>but there's a pretty solid story of the company easing

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 1>back on the death scene of Kim Jong un. Spoiler alert.

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 1>He does die in the movie. He gets blown to

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 1>smithereens when his helicopter is hit with a shot from

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>a Franco driven tank, and apparently in the version that

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 1>they filmmakers originally created, that death scene was far more

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>graphic than it is in the finished film. Well, North

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Korean media was pushing rhetoric that suggested that release of

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the film would lead to disastrous consequences, and Sony pushed

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 1>back the date but still planned to release the film.

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 1>And then in November, the other shoe dropped, or at

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>least it appeared too. I'll explain more after we take

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>this break. Before the break, I said that the other

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 1>shoe appeared to drop. And the reason I used that

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 1>wishy washy language is that when it comes to what happened,

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>there's some stuff we can say for sure and some

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 1>stuff we have to kind of guess at what. When

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the stuff we can say for sure,

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 1>we can summari rise like this. You know, hackers definitely

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>got access to Sony systems. They definitely stole information, and

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 1>we know this because they later posted that information online,

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 1>frequently using Pastebin to do so. Pastebin is a plain

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 1>text content hosting service, So you can post the code

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 1>to something in plain text on a paste bind service,

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>but you can't host you know, streaming media or you know,

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 1>working files or anything like that. You could post the

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>code to a file, but you wouldn't be able to,

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, have an execute he able file in pace

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 1>bin format. So the hackers released lots of stuff over

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the weeks following the attack, much of which appeared to

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 1>be aimed specifically at harming Sony. More on that in

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit as well. On November, just three days

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 1>after the hack, someone in that hacker group made available

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 1>five Sony films on online file sharing hubs, and they

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 1>included four films that had not yet even been released

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>to theaters, proving that this was part of the information

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:35.440
<v Speaker 1>stolen during the hack. The four unreleased films were Annie,

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Mr Turner, to Write Love on Her Arms and Still Alice.

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:44.959
<v Speaker 1>The fifth film, Fury starring Brad Pitt, was already in

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 1>its theatrical run at the time. The hackers also definitely

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>wiped Sony systems, using legit tools to erase and overwrite

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 1>data to make it extremely difficult to retrieve. Now, you

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:01.640
<v Speaker 1>probably know that when you delete a file from your

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:06.440
<v Speaker 1>hard drive, that information does not just magically disappear. It's

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 1>not like it's gone. It's not like using in a

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:13.119
<v Speaker 1>racer to erase away stuff you've written. The information is

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 1>actually still there on your hard drive, at least until

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 1>your hard drive overwrites the old data with new data.

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>So essentially your hard drive flags the drive space where

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:27.680
<v Speaker 1>you're deleted files are, and it says this is fair game.

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:30.360
<v Speaker 1>So whenever we have to write new data, you can

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 1>do it here if you want to. But until the

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 1>computer actually does write new information to that section of

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the hard drive, that data can sometimes be retrieved with

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:43.120
<v Speaker 1>tools like the ones that the hackers used, this process

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 1>gets cut off, and that's because these tools they first

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 1>delete data on a drive, then they overwrite the drives

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:54.159
<v Speaker 1>with gibberish. So this is what you might use. If

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to wipe a personal computer before you sold

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 1>it or traded it in or or recycled it or whatever,

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>you would go through this process, and then you don't

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>have to worry about whether or not you overlooked a

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 1>folder that contained personal information in it, because this type

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of tool essentially nukes it from orbit, because it's the

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>only way to be sure. So we know that someone

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:21.399
<v Speaker 1>gained access to Sony's systems, they stole an enormous amount

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 1>of information. They proved that they stole it by posting

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 1>some of that online, and they wiped the infected computers

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 1>after extricating the data. So let's talk about some of

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the actual data leaks now. The movies were probably the

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>highest profile example of a data leak to a lot

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:42.119
<v Speaker 1>of people, right because people are really familiar with movies,

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>so something like that happening, it's easy to take notice.

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>There were also some screenplays of films that had not

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 1>yet gotten into production that got released. Those I would

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>argue were probably one step lower than the finished films were.

0:19:56.400 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>And then for folks in the film industry or for

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:02.240
<v Speaker 1>people who are really interested in the business side of filmmaking,

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:06.680
<v Speaker 1>what really stood out were the internal documents revealing things

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 1>like people's salaries and personal emails between Sony employees and

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:20.120
<v Speaker 1>other folks, emails that frequently contained embarrassing or downright damaging information.

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 1>On December one, two thousand, fourteen files that detailed Sony

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:30.120
<v Speaker 1>salaries hit the internet. The top seventeen Sony executives had

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 1>their salary information pre bonus that is leaked online. Other

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>files had more than six thousand Sony employees, current and former,

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>and their salary information, including other stuff like personal information

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that was personally identifiable information. Several media outlets published this information.

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:55.399
<v Speaker 1>At least the information about the executive salaries, and that

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:58.879
<v Speaker 1>showed a pretty large disparity in the company. Like it

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>was no real surprise, because I mean, it's kind of

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:05.239
<v Speaker 1>an open secret, but it was no real surprise that

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the white men in the executive area of Sony, we're

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 1>making substantially more money than people of any other designation

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:18.679
<v Speaker 1>than white male. Right, Like that was top tier was

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:22.399
<v Speaker 1>white male. This, by the way, would lead some people

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 1>like Richard Stingle to criticize the media, and the criticism

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>mostly centers on the fact that there was a dangerous

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 1>story here about hacking and cybersecurity that was in need

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 1>of addressing. Like the focus in Stingles might need to

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>be on the hackers and what they had done and

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:45.119
<v Speaker 1>the extent of their crime and the serious nature of

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that crime, but the media was focusing on illegally obtained

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>information that made Sony look bad. Now to that, I say,

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I understand where you're coming from, and absolutely it would

0:21:57.320 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 1>be good to spend more time to focus on the

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>ramafic cations of cybersecurity. That is a conversation that is

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:08.879
<v Speaker 1>not held often enough and never with enough sincerity or gravity.

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 1>But we also know that you know what kind of

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 1>content drives clicks, Right, if you write about cybersecurity, you're

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 1>going to get a fraction of the number of clicks

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>that you're going to get if you wrote about how

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:24.360
<v Speaker 1>certain male executives were making way more money than their

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 1>female counterparts, for example. And ultimately, media is a business,

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 1>so you kind of see where that's going to go. Right,

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:36.359
<v Speaker 1>It's no surprise that media companies are going to really

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 1>focus on the stuff that drives traffic, because ultimately that's

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 1>what drives revenue. Sony leadership went into damage control, with

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:48.959
<v Speaker 1>Sony chiefs Amy Pascal and Michael Linton sending out a

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 1>memo urging patients and understanding among Sony employees, saying, you know,

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:59.399
<v Speaker 1>calm down, chill out, it will be okay, and the

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:02.439
<v Speaker 1>two states that the hackers had taken a large amount

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 1>of information and that it was pretty safe to assume

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 1>that any information about the employees themselves could have been

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 1>a part of all that, and that if Sony had

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:15.879
<v Speaker 1>information about you as an employee, there was a really

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>good chance that the hackers had that info at this point.

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 1>So I think this was a clear effort to get

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:23.919
<v Speaker 1>ahead of problems like people finding out how much they

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:27.640
<v Speaker 1>were paid compared to their peers, which could definitely promote

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 1>some uncomfortable discussions if they were to turn out that

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 1>salaries weren't equitable across the board. Also to kind of

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:38.680
<v Speaker 1>alert employees like, hey, you might have to pay very

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 1>special attention to things like your credit report now because

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 1>your personal information, including stuff like social Security numbers, is

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 1>now in the hands of hackers who are making it

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 1>freely available. So even if the hackers don't do anything

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:56.440
<v Speaker 1>with your data, they're making it freely available for other

0:23:56.560 --> 0:24:00.880
<v Speaker 1>cyber criminals to make use of that data. By December third,

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 1>another dump caught headlines, and this data dump included stuff

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:09.360
<v Speaker 1>like scans of visas and passports of people who are

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:13.639
<v Speaker 1>working on various Sony films, so even more personal information.

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:18.160
<v Speaker 1>This also included some notable celebrities like Angelina Jolie. There

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:21.640
<v Speaker 1>were also documents that include the user names and passwords

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:25.120
<v Speaker 1>for the accounts of several Sony executives. But one thing

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:29.719
<v Speaker 1>that got wide circulation was a collection of Sony employees

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 1>takes on the works of a Mr. Adam Sandler. Turns

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 1>out a lot of Sony employees have a low opinion

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:41.120
<v Speaker 1>of Adam Sandler's art and it was stories like these

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that received far more media coverage than the actual attacks,

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:49.399
<v Speaker 1>because again, juicy, right, watching Hollywood eat its own is

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:53.920
<v Speaker 1>something that the media thought was very entertaining and would

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:57.919
<v Speaker 1>drive a lot of engagement. Then again, you could argue

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 1>that there wasn't a whole lot you would say about

0:25:01.160 --> 0:25:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the attacks other than you know they had happened. While

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:07.639
<v Speaker 1>some people had been circulating the theory that it was

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 1>North Korea behind it all, even in the early stages,

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:14.120
<v Speaker 1>there were there were no smoking guns that you could

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:17.919
<v Speaker 1>point to. Rather, there was a suspicion because of the timing,

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:21.879
<v Speaker 1>along with the upcoming release of the film the Interview,

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and the reaction of North Korea's media to the idea

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:30.400
<v Speaker 1>of the film the interviews, So while people were mentioning

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 1>North Korea, there wasn't any definitive evidence yet to kind

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:37.879
<v Speaker 1>of lean on. In fact, on December three, Sony issued

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 1>a statement that said a report that North Korea was

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 1>behind the attack was not accurate. On December five, someone

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 1>claiming to be the Guardians of Peace sent a threatening

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>message to Sony employees, and on the eighth, someone claiming

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to be that same group posted a message on a

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:57.919
<v Speaker 1>file sharing site that said sony was to quote stop

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>immediately showing the movie of terrorism, which can break regional

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:05.440
<v Speaker 1>peace and cause the war end quote. But this message

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 1>says that the previous one on the fifth was written

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:11.720
<v Speaker 1>by someone else, someone who was not affiliated with the group,

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and the plot thickens. In the meantime, North Korea media

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:19.439
<v Speaker 1>states that the North Korean government played no part in

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the attack, but does call out the attack as a

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 1>quote righteous deed end quote. So, in other words, their

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:29.440
<v Speaker 1>statement is, hey, we didn't do it, but whoever did

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 1>is aces in our book. On December nine, the hackers

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 1>dumped a huge number of Amy Pascal's email correspondence online.

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 1>This dump included some stuff that was particularly embarrassing for

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:45.679
<v Speaker 1>the studio, such as an exchange between Pascal and producer

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Scott Rudin, who called Angelina Jolie quote a minimally talented,

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 1>spoiled brat end quote. The following day, more emails between

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:58.679
<v Speaker 1>Pascal and Rudin emerged, showing the two joking about what

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>President Obama's films might be. And those were jokes that

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:07.640
<v Speaker 1>were at best racially insensitive, which is a gentle way

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 1>of putting it. I have some other thoughts but I'll

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 1>reserve them. I should add that Ruden earned a reputation

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:18.120
<v Speaker 1>as a real piece of work. In fact, just earlier

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 1>this year, in one he was essentially forced to resign

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 1>from Broadway League after numerous people were stepping forward to

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, accuse him of engaging in abusive, violent behavior.

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Hecked Wall Street Journal said he would brag about burning

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:39.880
<v Speaker 1>through one nineteen personal assistants in five years. Anyway, this

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 1>is the kind of juicy stuff that media companies go

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:45.360
<v Speaker 1>gaga for, and clearly I am no exception to that.

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 1>By December twelve, people discovered that the hackers had posted

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:54.359
<v Speaker 1>documents that included Sony employee medical records. Some of the

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:57.920
<v Speaker 1>details include not just the Sony employees, but their families.

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 1>The media, for once did not go bunkers and start

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:06.119
<v Speaker 1>publishing those documents, which I guess is a small favor.

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Right On December, screenwriter and director Aaron Sorkin had an

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:15.200
<v Speaker 1>editorial piece published in The New York Times calling out

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the media for playing a part in helping the hackers.

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Sorkin's point was that the hackers committed the crime, but

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:25.159
<v Speaker 1>the media was disseminating the information to the public. On

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:27.720
<v Speaker 1>a scale that would not have been possible by the

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 1>hackers alone. That, in fact, the way the hackers were

0:28:30.640 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 1>posting information was really challenging to sieve through. Your average

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 1>person isn't just gonna troll through a paste bend site

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 1>to read through mountains of text files to look for

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 1>something juicy. The media companies had folks like on staff

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 1>or probably a lot of unpaid or barely paid interns,

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 1>who were doing precisely that thing all day, and so

0:28:56.960 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Sorkin argued, the hackers saw their goals real lies, not

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>through their own efforts, but because the media was taking

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 1>care of all that, bringing more harm to Sony and

0:29:07.720 --> 0:29:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the people who worked there, which is at least partly true.

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I think, honestly, I don't think we really have any

0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:18.800
<v Speaker 1>good guys in this story. Because we've got Sony, which

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:21.440
<v Speaker 1>was clearly the victim of an attack, but it was

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 1>also a company that had a lot of skeletons in

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:27.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of closets. Then you have the general media

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 1>sensationalizing every revelation, and then you had the actual hackers

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 1>who were responsible for the attack itself. It was kind

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 1>of like a Tarantino movie. Everybody is at least to

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 1>some degree a bad guy. On December sixte we got

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 1>a major development in the saga. The hackers presumably the

0:29:47.280 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 1>hackers anyway, posted a threat stating that movie theaters that

0:29:51.480 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 1>chose to screen The Interview would be targeted for attacks,

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 1>likening the effort to the terrorist attacks. On September eleven,

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 1>two thousand one, the Department of Homeland Security issued a

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:04.800
<v Speaker 1>statement saying that it had no credible evidence that any

0:30:04.840 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 1>such attack was actually being planned or prepared, and so

0:30:09.440 --> 0:30:12.560
<v Speaker 1>there wasn't any evidence to show that this was something

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 1>that was really going to happen. But Rogan and Franco

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 1>canceled their promotional tour for The Interview, and movie theaters,

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:22.280
<v Speaker 1>including Big Chains, began to issue statements that they would

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 1>not carry the film. Sony Pictures, seeing this quick response

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:30.719
<v Speaker 1>from theaters, makes the decision to postpone the release of

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 1>The Interview, essentially canceling its debut on Christmas Day. Now

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I should add this was really after movie theaters had

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:40.960
<v Speaker 1>already said they were not going to show the movie,

0:30:41.440 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 1>But once Sony made this announcement, there was a huge

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>backlash against the company, with people calling the studio to

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 1>reverse its decision. But we gotta take a quick detour here, right, Okay,

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 1>in the old days of the movie business, movie studios

0:30:55.360 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty much owned a piece of every part of the

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 1>movie making process. Us. I'm talking about everything from you know,

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the production studios that were shooting movies, to the companies

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that were actually producing Cellu Lloyd film to shoot on

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 1>to chains of theaters to where you would show the film.

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 1>But the US government broke all that up because it

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 1>was considered to be anti competitive and a monopoly. And

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 1>so then movie theater companies were divorced from movie studios

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:25.719
<v Speaker 1>and they had more of a say of what films

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 1>they would and would not show in their respective houses.

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 1>So Sony could reverse its decision, in fact, it ultimately did,

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 1>but it couldn't force theaters to play the interview because

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Sony didn't own the theaters, and a lot of theaters

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 1>just didn't want to take then the risk without you know,

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, and didn't become the company that potentially put

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 1>audiences in mortal peril or were associated with that desire.

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 1>A few theaters still had plans to show the interview,

0:31:54.040 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 1>but then, you know, Sony makes this decision, So then

0:31:56.760 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 1>those theaters announced that they would instead screen a print

0:31:59.840 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 1>of the film Team America World Police, which was made

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:06.920
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand four and which features Kim jong Il,

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Kim Jong UN's father as the antagonist of the movie.

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 1>And if you're not familiar with Team America World Police,

0:32:15.440 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 1>that was made by the creators of South Park, so

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you probably get the gist of it. Anyway. Paramount Pictures

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:25.040
<v Speaker 1>released a statement that said it was not going to

0:32:25.080 --> 0:32:28.480
<v Speaker 1>offer the film for redistribution, so it canceled those backup

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 1>plans as well. A couple of days later, President Obama

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 1>said that Sony really made a mistake canceling the release

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 1>of the film, And at this point, the general belief

0:32:37.040 --> 0:32:39.800
<v Speaker 1>was that the hack was directed by North Korea and

0:32:39.840 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 1>that capitulating to the demands was sending a bad international message,

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and Sony was kind of in a tight spot on

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 1>this one. Following that, there was an escalation and rhetoric

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 1>between the United States government and North Korea, with the

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 1>US calling on North Korea to compensate Sony for the

0:32:56.280 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 1>losses that had suffered as a result of the attack.

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:02.440
<v Speaker 1>North Korea continue you to deny involvement, but it did

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 1>extend an offer to help investigate the attack and both

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 1>countries leveled some veiled and not so veiled threats against

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 1>each other. On December, Sony announced it was in fact

0:33:14.440 --> 0:33:17.120
<v Speaker 1>going to release the interview on Christmas Day, both in

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Speaker 1>any theater that wanted to show it, as well as

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 1>video on demand. Sony got praise from the President for

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:27.680
<v Speaker 1>this decision. And then the movie comes out and no

0:33:27.920 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 1>theaters are attacked, and for some media outlets, this was

0:33:31.400 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the end of the story. But we actually have a

0:33:34.040 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 1>lot more to cover. But first we're gonna take another break.

0:33:44.080 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 1>So the Guardians of Peace, who the heck were slash?

0:33:49.320 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Are they? There were six messages signed as though they

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 1>came from this group. One is generally thought to be

0:33:57.080 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 1>from someone else, a journalist who sent a hoax message,

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, then, of course you have the

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 1>instance of the one message from the Gardens of Piece

0:34:07.680 --> 0:34:10.680
<v Speaker 1>that says a previous message was not written by them.

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:15.319
<v Speaker 1>So maybe we just have four official messages. But who

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 1>sent them? Who was behind the attack? Different people have

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 1>different answers to that question, and they are contradictory answers. See,

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 1>there are a few different theories as to who was

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:31.280
<v Speaker 1>behind the whole thing. Attribution is very hard with cybersecurity,

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:33.640
<v Speaker 1>it is much easier to get a handle on what

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 1>damage was done than it is to definitively say this

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:41.080
<v Speaker 1>is who was behind it. One story that tends to

0:34:41.120 --> 0:34:44.880
<v Speaker 1>be pitched is that the attacks were not particularly sophisticated,

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:48.759
<v Speaker 1>largely because you know, Sony had such terrible security that

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 1>it actually didn't require a state backed military hacker group

0:34:52.560 --> 0:34:56.400
<v Speaker 1>to gain access, that it could have potentially been carried

0:34:56.400 --> 0:34:59.440
<v Speaker 1>out by amateurs. And since one of the big theories

0:34:59.520 --> 0:35:02.440
<v Speaker 1>was that it was a North Korea sponsored hacker group

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 1>that was to blame, this would cast some doubt on

0:35:05.760 --> 0:35:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that particular story. After all, anyone could infiltrate this system,

0:35:11.760 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 1>then there's no reason to suspect it was a really

0:35:14.080 --> 0:35:17.600
<v Speaker 1>well equipped, well funded, and highly trained group of hackers

0:35:17.640 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 1>that were to blame. But you get into some other elements,

0:35:22.000 --> 0:35:24.680
<v Speaker 1>each of which makes the actual difficulty of pulling off

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing a little more steep if you assume

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:31.719
<v Speaker 1>the attackers were not from North Korea. For one thing,

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:34.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the stuff posted from the raid included

0:35:35.640 --> 0:35:38.640
<v Speaker 1>code that appeared to have been compiled on a machine

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:42.040
<v Speaker 1>running in the Korean language. Now, as many people have

0:35:42.080 --> 0:35:45.280
<v Speaker 1>pointed out, that could just be a strategy to throw

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:48.520
<v Speaker 1>investigators off the scent. You could have said it to

0:35:48.960 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the internal language of the computer to Korean

0:35:51.680 --> 0:35:53.520
<v Speaker 1>as a smoke screen, and it could just be a

0:35:53.560 --> 0:35:56.800
<v Speaker 1>red herring in order to shift the blame to North Korea.

0:35:57.000 --> 0:35:58.759
<v Speaker 1>Then there was the issue that some of the i

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:02.239
<v Speaker 1>P addresses so seated with posting stuff about the raid

0:36:02.600 --> 0:36:06.279
<v Speaker 1>appeared to be originating from North Korea. And again you

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:09.719
<v Speaker 1>can fake that. You can use tools to hide your

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:13.439
<v Speaker 1>true i P address and substitute another one, and this

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:16.759
<v Speaker 1>is not really that hard to do, but it's also

0:36:16.800 --> 0:36:19.920
<v Speaker 1>not exactly the sort of thing a really amateurish group

0:36:19.920 --> 0:36:23.680
<v Speaker 1>of hackers wouldn't necessarily think about. So my point is

0:36:23.719 --> 0:36:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that if we use critical thinking, we see that the

0:36:27.080 --> 0:36:31.680
<v Speaker 1>argument of anyone could have done this doesn't necessarily hold water,

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:34.920
<v Speaker 1>simply because it would require a bit more thought and

0:36:35.040 --> 0:36:38.240
<v Speaker 1>effort put into it then a lot of folks would

0:36:38.280 --> 0:36:41.080
<v Speaker 1>typically manage. Now that's not to say that the North

0:36:41.160 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Korea hypothesis is iron clad, but rather that dismissing it

0:36:45.080 --> 0:36:48.719
<v Speaker 1>out of hand is something we cannot do either. It's

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:53.360
<v Speaker 1>certainly a huge challenge to make off with that much data.

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:57.920
<v Speaker 1>If you're talking about actual terabytes of information? How do

0:36:57.960 --> 0:37:00.799
<v Speaker 1>you get that off of Sony's serves and into your

0:37:00.800 --> 0:37:04.839
<v Speaker 1>own grubby little hands without anyone noticing? Now, as I'm

0:37:04.840 --> 0:37:08.800
<v Speaker 1>sure you're aware, data transfer speeds hit a limit. Depending

0:37:08.880 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 1>upon the nature of your connection, you could have a

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:15.239
<v Speaker 1>data throughput that would mean transferring a terrabyte could take

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:19.160
<v Speaker 1>several hours or more than a day, depending on those speeds.

0:37:19.360 --> 0:37:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Higher bandwidth connections can do this a lot faster, but

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:25.120
<v Speaker 1>you're still talking about a ton of data from a

0:37:25.120 --> 0:37:29.439
<v Speaker 1>lot of different Sony systems. This takes time. On top

0:37:29.440 --> 0:37:32.520
<v Speaker 1>of that. On the I T side over at Sony,

0:37:32.560 --> 0:37:36.120
<v Speaker 1>these kinds of transfers could potentially raise some red flags

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:39.279
<v Speaker 1>if anyone is paying attention and I T admin could

0:37:39.280 --> 0:37:42.000
<v Speaker 1>see that amount of data transferring out of the company,

0:37:42.000 --> 0:37:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and they might have some questions, or they might at

0:37:44.560 --> 0:37:46.800
<v Speaker 1>least look into it to see what the heck Sony

0:37:46.920 --> 0:37:50.040
<v Speaker 1>is transferring and and to whom and why is that

0:37:50.120 --> 0:37:52.400
<v Speaker 1>much information going to a single place or or a

0:37:52.520 --> 0:37:56.600
<v Speaker 1>small group of IP addresses. Of course, it's possible that

0:37:56.760 --> 0:38:00.879
<v Speaker 1>no one even noticed, but another possibility. One the hypotheses

0:38:00.960 --> 0:38:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that some people put forward is that the hack was

0:38:04.000 --> 0:38:08.479
<v Speaker 1>at least in part an inside job. The story goes

0:38:08.960 --> 0:38:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that there was some Sony employee or maybe a former employee,

0:38:13.400 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 1>who had beef with the company. Maybe it was over salaries,

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:19.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe it was over work conditions, maybe it was a

0:38:20.000 --> 0:38:23.799
<v Speaker 1>general culture issue or whatever. But this person then had

0:38:23.840 --> 0:38:27.160
<v Speaker 1>a plan to help some hackers get access to a

0:38:27.320 --> 0:38:31.239
<v Speaker 1>huge amount of data that could damage the company that

0:38:31.480 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the employee hated oh so much. This narrative helps explain

0:38:35.960 --> 0:38:38.920
<v Speaker 1>how the hackers might have gained access to data without

0:38:38.960 --> 0:38:44.480
<v Speaker 1>anyone noticing, with someone perhaps literally transferring files onto drives

0:38:44.520 --> 0:38:48.399
<v Speaker 1>inside Sony and then just smuggling those drives out rather

0:38:48.480 --> 0:38:52.680
<v Speaker 1>than establishing some sort of external network connection with another computer.

0:38:53.200 --> 0:38:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Then at some point the hackers introduced the tools to

0:38:56.239 --> 0:39:00.719
<v Speaker 1>wipe those systems, which might have been done remotely or premises.

0:39:01.600 --> 0:39:06.359
<v Speaker 1>But that theory is a little iffy. I mean, it's

0:39:06.920 --> 0:39:10.360
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly possible. I don't know if I would go

0:39:10.400 --> 0:39:13.160
<v Speaker 1>so far as to say plausible. There were definitely Sony

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:15.799
<v Speaker 1>employees who had beef with Sony. Sony was going through

0:39:15.840 --> 0:39:19.760
<v Speaker 1>layoffs in two thousand and fourteen, and morale at Sony

0:39:19.840 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 1>was pretty low. But it's it's challenging to see how

0:39:25.239 --> 0:39:27.719
<v Speaker 1>this kind of approach would also have hackers say, oh,

0:39:27.840 --> 0:39:31.239
<v Speaker 1>let's throw the sent off and cast the blame on

0:39:31.560 --> 0:39:37.200
<v Speaker 1>North Korea. Um Also, one of the arguments that supports

0:39:37.239 --> 0:39:42.600
<v Speaker 1>this is that the evidence that was dropped had a

0:39:42.640 --> 0:39:47.200
<v Speaker 1>particular harm towards Sony and was targeted specifically at Sony,

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:50.719
<v Speaker 1>and that only people in the know in Hollywood would

0:39:50.760 --> 0:39:53.560
<v Speaker 1>know to drop that specific information. That I think is

0:39:53.600 --> 0:39:57.360
<v Speaker 1>a spurious argument because the information that was dropped was

0:39:57.400 --> 0:40:01.320
<v Speaker 1>in huge, huge chunks of data, and yes, there was

0:40:01.360 --> 0:40:06.520
<v Speaker 1>incredibly damaging stuff thrown in there, but it wasn't necessarily targeted, right.

0:40:06.600 --> 0:40:09.720
<v Speaker 1>It was more like the shotgun approach. Lots of little pellets,

0:40:09.800 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 1>some of which are hitting the target, but it I

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:17.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know necessarily that the hackers had a deep appreciation

0:40:18.160 --> 0:40:21.520
<v Speaker 1>for which bits of information have potentially the biggest punch.

0:40:21.960 --> 0:40:25.359
<v Speaker 1>I think it was just that shotgun approach. Then there's

0:40:25.360 --> 0:40:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the theory that the hacks orchestrator wanted to hurt Sony

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:31.759
<v Speaker 1>for financial gain, and this story says that the person

0:40:31.840 --> 0:40:35.200
<v Speaker 1>responsible maybe they wanted to short sell Sony stock. So

0:40:35.239 --> 0:40:37.560
<v Speaker 1>that's when you borrow stock in a in a specific

0:40:37.560 --> 0:40:40.880
<v Speaker 1>company from some other investor, you sell that stock at

0:40:40.920 --> 0:40:43.560
<v Speaker 1>whatever the current market value is, and then you wait.

0:40:43.840 --> 0:40:46.799
<v Speaker 1>Now you have to return the stocks you borrowed at

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:50.440
<v Speaker 1>some specific deadline, but what you're hoping is that the

0:40:50.440 --> 0:40:53.400
<v Speaker 1>stock price will drop, So then you buy back the

0:40:53.440 --> 0:40:55.400
<v Speaker 1>shares you borrowed, but you do so at a lower

0:40:55.440 --> 0:40:59.000
<v Speaker 1>price and you get to keep the difference. Anyway, that

0:40:59.080 --> 0:41:01.840
<v Speaker 1>was another hypothesis as being thrown around, But the really

0:41:01.880 --> 0:41:05.160
<v Speaker 1>big one, the main one, the one that the FBI pushed,

0:41:05.680 --> 0:41:09.200
<v Speaker 1>was that North Korea directed a government funded hacker group

0:41:09.280 --> 0:41:12.480
<v Speaker 1>to conduct these attacks, and some of the evidence seemed

0:41:12.480 --> 0:41:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to point that way, such as the fact that, as

0:41:14.520 --> 0:41:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I said, the code was definitely compiled on machines that

0:41:18.280 --> 0:41:21.160
<v Speaker 1>were switched to the Korean language, and that some of

0:41:21.160 --> 0:41:24.000
<v Speaker 1>these IP addresses associated with the attack appeared to be

0:41:24.080 --> 0:41:28.040
<v Speaker 1>from Korea. While some security experts questioned the reliability of

0:41:28.080 --> 0:41:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the evidence cited by the FBI, the National Security Agency

0:41:31.600 --> 0:41:35.840
<v Speaker 1>or an essay, said it had more ironclad evidence that

0:41:35.880 --> 0:41:37.920
<v Speaker 1>supported the link to North Korea, but it was not

0:41:38.080 --> 0:41:41.719
<v Speaker 1>able to publicize what evidence was due to concerns about

0:41:41.800 --> 0:41:46.080
<v Speaker 1>national security, which then critics said was oh, isn't that convenient.

0:41:46.960 --> 0:41:49.440
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand eighteen, the U s Department of Justice

0:41:49.520 --> 0:41:52.960
<v Speaker 1>charged a man named Park Jin Yolk, who was believed

0:41:52.960 --> 0:41:55.920
<v Speaker 1>to be in North Korea, as being a responsible party

0:41:55.960 --> 0:41:59.640
<v Speaker 1>in several hacking attacks, among them the attack on Sony.

0:41:59.760 --> 0:42:02.240
<v Speaker 1>He was also charged with stealing more than eighty million

0:42:02.280 --> 0:42:05.759
<v Speaker 1>dollars from a bank in Bangladesh and being partly responsible

0:42:05.800 --> 0:42:08.759
<v Speaker 1>for the development and deployment of a famous piece of

0:42:08.840 --> 0:42:13.080
<v Speaker 1>ransomware called Wanna Cry. US officials said that a multi

0:42:13.160 --> 0:42:16.240
<v Speaker 1>year investigation led to the discovery that Park was one

0:42:16.280 --> 0:42:19.319
<v Speaker 1>of the hackers responsible for these attacks, and that he

0:42:19.400 --> 0:42:22.640
<v Speaker 1>belonged to a North Korean backed hacker organization called the

0:42:22.719 --> 0:42:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Lazarus Group. The officials said that Park had headed up

0:42:26.480 --> 0:42:30.279
<v Speaker 1>a company in China that posed as a legit tech company,

0:42:30.320 --> 0:42:33.120
<v Speaker 1>but it was in fact affront for this hacker group.

0:42:33.880 --> 0:42:36.160
<v Speaker 1>And from a code perspective, there seemed to be links

0:42:36.160 --> 0:42:39.440
<v Speaker 1>to the Lazarus Group, which was known to repurpose bits

0:42:39.440 --> 0:42:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of code in updated malware design, so they just would

0:42:43.040 --> 0:42:45.520
<v Speaker 1>reuse certain bits of code, and that was one way

0:42:45.520 --> 0:42:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that security researchers could say this either came from the

0:42:49.239 --> 0:42:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Lazarus Group or it came from someone who was taking

0:42:52.360 --> 0:42:55.480
<v Speaker 1>malware that was developed by the Lazarus Group and repurposing it,

0:42:55.880 --> 0:42:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and that this this code dates back to two thousand

0:42:58.960 --> 0:43:01.799
<v Speaker 1>nine in some cases, which suggests that the Lazarus Group

0:43:01.840 --> 0:43:04.480
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a long time actor in the hacking world.

0:43:05.160 --> 0:43:08.640
<v Speaker 1>North Korea, I should point out, denies that Park even exists,

0:43:09.120 --> 0:43:12.720
<v Speaker 1>But earlier this year, US federal prosecutors announced charges against

0:43:12.800 --> 0:43:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Park and two other North Korean citizens, Jong Chung Yolk

0:43:17.600 --> 0:43:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and Kim Ill with criminal conspiracy, conspiracy to commit wire fraud,

0:43:22.400 --> 0:43:26.279
<v Speaker 1>and bank fraud. And again, this is about more than

0:43:26.360 --> 0:43:29.799
<v Speaker 1>just sony pictures. These charges include claims that the three

0:43:29.800 --> 0:43:33.960
<v Speaker 1>set up fraudulent blockchain operations and defrauded targets of millions

0:43:34.000 --> 0:43:39.919
<v Speaker 1>of dollars. There is zero chance that these men will

0:43:39.960 --> 0:43:42.960
<v Speaker 1>ever have to face charges in the United States for

0:43:43.000 --> 0:43:45.560
<v Speaker 1>their crimes, because the United States and North Korea do

0:43:45.640 --> 0:43:51.600
<v Speaker 1>not have the sort of diplomatic relationship to extradite people

0:43:51.680 --> 0:43:54.680
<v Speaker 1>from one country to the other to stand trial for crimes.

0:43:55.120 --> 0:43:57.840
<v Speaker 1>That is just not where North Korea and the United

0:43:57.880 --> 0:44:02.879
<v Speaker 1>States are diplomatically, not by a long shot. So these

0:44:02.960 --> 0:44:06.160
<v Speaker 1>charges are you know, they're formal charges, but they're also

0:44:06.280 --> 0:44:10.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of paper threats because there's there's not any chance

0:44:11.440 --> 0:44:15.000
<v Speaker 1>that these three will stand trial for those crimes, and

0:44:15.280 --> 0:44:19.799
<v Speaker 1>so we're left with just the charges, and that is

0:44:19.920 --> 0:44:24.040
<v Speaker 1>very weak evidence for a lot of people, right like

0:44:24.400 --> 0:44:27.680
<v Speaker 1>it could just be they could argue it's a convenience

0:44:28.160 --> 0:44:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and that we don't really have the full or real

0:44:31.120 --> 0:44:34.560
<v Speaker 1>story about who was behind the Sony hack. So it's

0:44:34.560 --> 0:44:37.240
<v Speaker 1>one of those things that feeds into things like conspiracy theories,

0:44:37.239 --> 0:44:39.560
<v Speaker 1>because when you have a lack of information, people will

0:44:39.640 --> 0:44:44.400
<v Speaker 1>fill that gap in with speculation, and often they become

0:44:44.480 --> 0:44:48.640
<v Speaker 1>more and more certain that that speculation is fact. As

0:44:48.680 --> 0:44:52.799
<v Speaker 1>for me, I do not know who committed the Sony hack.

0:44:52.920 --> 0:44:57.799
<v Speaker 1>I honestly don't know. I'm inclined to think it was

0:44:57.840 --> 0:45:00.320
<v Speaker 1>North Korea. But at the same time, I must honest

0:45:00.360 --> 0:45:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and how clumsy the whole handling of it was it

0:45:05.800 --> 0:45:09.239
<v Speaker 1>it is also it's it's simultaneously easy and hard to

0:45:09.280 --> 0:45:12.560
<v Speaker 1>believe that it was North Korea. Um, but only because

0:45:12.600 --> 0:45:16.360
<v Speaker 1>of the lack of sophistication and how the aftermaths of

0:45:16.400 --> 0:45:19.439
<v Speaker 1>the attack was carried out. So I do not know,

0:45:19.800 --> 0:45:21.879
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not gonna put my money down on any

0:45:21.920 --> 0:45:24.719
<v Speaker 1>particular party at this point. I hope one day we

0:45:24.800 --> 0:45:28.040
<v Speaker 1>have a definitive answer and UH, and that we can

0:45:28.080 --> 0:45:31.239
<v Speaker 1>see exactly how this was carried out, why it was

0:45:31.320 --> 0:45:36.560
<v Speaker 1>carried out and UH, and more importantly, figure out how

0:45:36.600 --> 0:45:42.279
<v Speaker 1>to prevent future attacks, largely by practicing better security hygiene.

0:45:43.080 --> 0:45:45.880
<v Speaker 1>But that's it for this episode. Hope you enjoyed this.

0:45:46.360 --> 0:45:48.360
<v Speaker 1>If you have suggestions for topics I should cover in

0:45:48.360 --> 0:45:50.520
<v Speaker 1>future episodes of tech Stuff, please reach out to me.

0:45:51.040 --> 0:45:54.360
<v Speaker 1>The handle on Twitter is text stuff h s W

0:45:55.160 --> 0:46:03.720
<v Speaker 1>and I'll talk to you again release it. Text Stuff

0:46:03.800 --> 0:46:06.960
<v Speaker 1>is an I Heart Radio production. For more podcasts from

0:46:06.960 --> 0:46:10.759
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio, visit the i Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:46:10.840 --> 0:46:12.840
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.