WEBVTT - Muster Your Peafowl!

0:00:00.960 --> 0:00:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:06.800 --> 0:00:11.039
<v Speaker 2>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from iHeartRadio, your weekly

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 2>source for the nation's best fantasy football advice, speculation, and

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 2>whatever stupid stuff they decided to drop into the show. Now,

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:20.280
<v Speaker 2>here's your host, Paul Chargion.

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:25.919
<v Speaker 1>So much stupid stuff, Scott Fish, lots of stupid stuff. Yeah,

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>we probably we prode ourselves on stupid stuff here at

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly. We only get to break down games, Scott. Yeah,

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>this show and one more show, one more show, three

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>games left, three games left, that's all.

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, what a bummer. And then we're going to talk

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 3>about ardvarks and cox and badgers and stuff. Just the

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 3>animal talk.

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, a lot of it. There'll be a lot of uh,

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>there'll be a lot of this. A little little peacock

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>in there. Yeah, So yeah, we'll work some stuff in.

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I think next week's show, Matt Harrison will joined to

0:00:57.040 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 1>talk about ways to play fantasy and play around the

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl. And then the show after that will be

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the big Super Bowl preview show. Yes, not after that,

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:07.759
<v Speaker 1>we start looking at twenty twenty four already.

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:11.960
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I know, imagining Caleb Williams or Drake May and purple.

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 3>I get it like that.

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you think the Ravens are going to change quarterbacks.

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 3>It's you know, it's anything's possible now, not that No,

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:24.760
<v Speaker 3>not that really right, you're right, But we've got two

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 3>full games to break down today, yes, and tons of

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 3>tons of angles, and like we've done the last several weeks,

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 3>we're not doing like letter grades on every guy.

0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:36.319
<v Speaker 1>But I just I just want to hear about angles.

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:40.400
<v Speaker 1>You're interested in angles that fantasy players could exploit. Sometimes

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 1>there might be betting angles for those of you that

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>do that in a legal area. Great, but yeah, I

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>just want to get your thoughts on the games and

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>let's just let's talk through the sort of the fun

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>angles that you've got. The first game is Kansas City Baltimore.

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 3>Yes, sounds like a rainy, sloppy mess.

0:01:56.760 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>It might be. It might be rainy, it might be ray.

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 3>The most recent reports like it went from might be

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 3>raining to it sounds like it's going to rain the

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 3>entire game. Wow, so good, good thing for party. He's

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 3>not at that one based on last.

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Week, right, Yes, and that's you know. This came up

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>on My camfe In Show with the host Paul Allen

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Rock perty's had two of his last three games have

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>been pretty bad. If he stinks in this one.

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 3>The Ravens one, Yeah, the Christmas Ravens one, that must

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 3>be the one.

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Christmas Ravens, and then last week's game was not good.

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>If he lays an egg here, then what do the

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Niners do? Are they in the kirk Cousin sweet Steaks

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>at that point?

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:41.359
<v Speaker 3>Oh?

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>May you know what?

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 3>You know?

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Where could what might they do at that point?

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 3>Oh?

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Would be fascinating?

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Wow, their off season would take a would become so

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:52.360
<v Speaker 1>much more complicated than what we expected.

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 3>I feel like that team has faith in party, believe

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 3>the party. I mean, he had a good playoff run

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:00.639
<v Speaker 3>until he you know, his arm fell off last year,

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:04.239
<v Speaker 3>and you know he's back in the NFC Championship game.

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 3>I have trouble believing they make that move. But it's

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 3>that's possible, Lamaro. But this one, this one, I can.

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 3>This one is a little especially because pretty so cheap,

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, like.

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:17.959
<v Speaker 1>Right, and that's helped them in other areas, so they've

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:21.080
<v Speaker 1>been able to, you know, put big money towards you know,

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:24.080
<v Speaker 1>like Bosa and Christian McCaffrey. You know, they've got you

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 1>know they've spent lavishly on there are heroes and Zero's

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 1>roster with big, big money on like four or five players,

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and then everybody else is just cheap guys. And it's

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>worked for San Francisco to this point. All right, let's

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>let's talk Kansas City Baltimore. You mentioned rain could be

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>a factor, and I like the running backs in this game. Yes,

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>and this is before weather.

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 3>Mister runs like he bites people. Did you hear about that?

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 3>This week as the Poteco finally responded to all the

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 3>things people talk about his running.

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>No, I didn't hear that.

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, someone's like sub reporters, like people say, you run

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 3>like you're trying to bite people. He's I et no,

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 3>zombie man.

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>That's really good. Come on, I know.

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 3>Good.

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Well let's start with Pajaco. Sure, who runs like he

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>bites people? Hey, I love that he just runs mad.

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 3>Yes, it's I always worry about the career longevity of

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 3>those types of runners. We've seen it a few times.

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 3>But yes, he runs mad.

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Now I see lots of running coming. Here's why Ravens

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 1>have lost four games this year? How did they get

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:32.799
<v Speaker 1>beat on the ground? Listen to this the four losses

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the opponents averaged thirty rushes, three zero rushes, one hundred

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:43.479
<v Speaker 1>and twenty three rushing yards. That's how you beat the Ravens.

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>It's such a good second hear.

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 3>Keep their keep their offense off the field and keep

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 3>them off the field from making special plays.

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 1>That's part of it. But also they're really good run

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:53.719
<v Speaker 1>a pass defense in and not they're not a great

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 1>run defense.

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so Hamilton, we're gonna talk about him in a minute.

0:04:57.880 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I'm fascinated by Kyle h.

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 3>It's yeah, that's an interesting matchup there too.

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 1>So if you're Andy Reid and the Chiefs and you're

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:11.280
<v Speaker 1>looking at how teams beat the Ravens, it's on the ground. Pacheckos.

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:13.360
<v Speaker 1>For those of you that are of a betting ill,

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>can you like your prop bets? Pa Checko's over under

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 1>on attempts is only fourteen and a half. As I mentioned,

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>these losses, teams have averaged thirty rushing attempts. Add in

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>some weather that could be a game that could be

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 1>a rushing helper as well. Sixty three and a half

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards is prop number over the Now. Last week

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>they shut down Singletary on this show, I said, I

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>liked Singletary because of the reasons I'm mentioning, now, this

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>is how you go beat them, you know, get your

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>running game going. But the Texans got They were basically

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:42.040
<v Speaker 1>blown up by the third quarter. Singletary, I only got

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>nine carries the five games prior to last week against

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens. They ranked this is his last five weeks

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>of this season, not counting Week E teams, so they

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:55.839
<v Speaker 1>didn't play the starters. They ranked twenty ninth in rushing

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>yards allowed, thirtieth in yards per carry, and they gave

0:05:58.400 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>up five point two yards per rush.

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:01.159
<v Speaker 3>That's a lot.

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Isn't this a mandate to run?

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 3>Pachecko does feel like it. It does feel like it. Yeah,

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 3>and then they're a much more Yes, yes, it does

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 3>feel like. I was trying to train my get my

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 3>train of thought there, but I couldn't. But yes, it

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 3>does feel like a really good spot for Pacheco.

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Ravens are good pass defense, the path of least resistance

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>on the ground. Opposing runners average twenty four carries per

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 1>game against Baltimore, and Pachecko again sitting at fourteen and

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>a half, I think he won't need nearly twenty four

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>to have an effective game here, So I like Pacheco

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 1>to continue his hot streak. Yes, dude's good.

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 3>Yep, assuming he assuming he's I assume he's gonna go.

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 3>Like I know, he's had limited practices this week, but

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:44.720
<v Speaker 3>it he went last week, so I feel like it's

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 3>gonna go goo.

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk Kyle Hamilton since you brought his term. So

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>he's the best coverage safety in football. Yeah, you're two

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>of his career. He's the best coverage safety in football.

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Let me give you some numbers. The average receiving game

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>allowed in his coverage this year. You want to guess yards,

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 1>give me the yards.

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I'm gonna go with just the yards. Okay, I'm

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 3>gonna with twenty four yards.

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Fifteen yards went exactly exactly. He's allowed one touchdown in

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 1>his eighteen games, so his per game average is zero

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>point zero six touchdowns per game allowed Kyle Hamilton. But

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>now here's the question for you. Hamilton's usage Scott has

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>been like this this year. He plays in the slot,

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>but sometimes if the opposing team has got a good

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>slot receiver, he'll cover the receiver. If they don't, he'll

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>cover the tight end. So what did he do here?

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 1>When you have Travis Kelcey and Rashi Rice the two

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 1>guys you need to take away from the Chiefs passing attack.

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 1>If you take those two guys away, Chiefs passing attack

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 1>is dead. So what would what do they do with

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Hamilton? Do you take away Rashi Rice, who runs

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>over roughly half of his snaps from the slot, or

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 1>do you take away Travis Kelcey?

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this this this feels This feels like your classic

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 3>old school Bill Belichick cover the two and uh put

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 3>two people on the one. The question is which is which?

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 3>But I feel like I feel like they'll probably they

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 3>would probably just keep Kyle in the position he does

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 3>more often this season and just keep him in the

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 3>slot with Rice and probably just double keV Kelsey.

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Or Kelsey's also standing in the slot.

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 3>Or Amanda bump on Kelsey and have someone over the

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 3>top on him. But you could almost double both of them,

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 3>both of them with the rest of that receiver.

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 1>You really could, and just wait for MVS, who granted

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>did not drop his passes last week, but just wait

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 1>for him to drop his passes. Right, it's gonna be raining.

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is not MVS territory right here, right,

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:58.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't think a slow track, a slow, muddy track.

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think this is a good spot for MBS

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:05.679
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, and so I'll be fascinated. Either Rashi Rice

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>or Travis Kelsey could be sitting on a really bad game,

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 1>potentially Hamilton. Yeah, yep. So that's uh, that'll be one

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>worth watching. I've got a couple others in this game

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:27.319
<v Speaker 1>for you, Lamar Jackson. Get this. Opposing quarterbacks against Kansas City.

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Seven straight opposing quarterbacks zero or one passing touchdownst.

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 3>Kansas.

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 1>That's how good that pass defense have been. Ten of

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the past eleven zeros in there too, which, yeah, yep,

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>ten of the past eleven zero or one passing touchdown.

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson comes in. I think he's gonna run much

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 1>more than pass. I think the passing totals are going

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>to be low, particularly in this weather, and just given

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 1>how good the.

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs are, I can see that.

0:09:56.760 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 1>And that brings me to my favorite player of the week.

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 3>Oh boy.

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Were I allowed to legally bet in Minnesota, I would

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 1>be betting Justice Hills props. So Gus Edwards can't catch, right, Okay.

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Keithon Mitchell was the past catcher there, but he's dead.

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>So they've been. They're using Justice Hill more as the

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 1>pass catching back out of the backfield. He's running the

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 1>triple the routes of Gus Edwards. Over the last month,

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Hill's averaging thirty three receiving yards per game. Justice Hill's

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>prop numbers eleven and a half yards eleven and a half.

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:34.840
<v Speaker 1>He's averaging thirty three over the last month. Yep, So

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I see them doing, see them throwing well to throwing

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 1>fairly off in anyway to Justice Hill. An opposing runner

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>has topped that line in ten of the past eleven

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>games against the Chiefs. Justice will be served.

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:53.559
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's I like it. Justice like that. Yeah, he's

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 3>gonna hit. He's gonna hit both of those. In fact,

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:59.559
<v Speaker 3>I'm willing to bet those, and I'm willing to bet

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 3>both those probably go up in the next two days.

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 3>And here here's here's one reason why. First off, Charge

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 3>always does his own research. Like you always do your

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:14.079
<v Speaker 3>own research, right, Your rankings always have like stupid consensus

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:17.679
<v Speaker 3>and stuff like that. So this is I'm dumber than consensus.

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm prefacing this with Charge. This is a charge call.

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 3>I have seen that Justice Hill reception props so many

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 3>times this week. Really it's a very very talked about

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 3>like okay, all right, so that might move. So you

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 3>found your way on too, like you're like, yes, this.

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Is that's a hot button for other people.

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:37.719
<v Speaker 3>So I'm I get in on it now. If you're

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 3>listening to this.

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>His Justice Hill's rushing yards and by the way, dal

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>McCook factored in and through the passing game. But it

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>was the blowout time at the very end of the

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter last so I don't see blowout coming. Although

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I prefer Baltimore in this game. Justice hills rushing numbers

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>thirty three and a half and I think he gets

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>over that as well. Just the eye test, he's so

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>much more dynamic than gus Y really just straight ahead

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 1>four yards per carry. Over the last five weeks, Justice

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Hill averaging five and a half yards per carry.

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 3>Scott, Yeah, I'm always about three and a half four

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:18.080
<v Speaker 3>years earlier in these kinds of things, Nico Collins. Yes,

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 3>So whatever I say now in twenty twenty seven, just

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:25.960
<v Speaker 3>take it, take it to the bank. Yeah, No, I've been,

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 3>I've been. I liked Justice Hill a long time ago.

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 3>He's underwhelmed, he's never quite made it. He's been hurt

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 3>a lot, but he does have times when he's very

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 3>efficient with the ball.

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I would agree with all of that. Chiefs run defense

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:45.079
<v Speaker 1>has been better lately, but it's still the easiest way

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to beat the Chiefs is on the ground, not through

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the air. We already talked about good that pass that

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>pass defense was anything else you want to talk about

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 1>with this game? Who do you think wins? I got

0:12:55.480 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore winning, assuming the fixes an in right, who knows.

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you saw what Warren Sharp tweeted about how

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:05.559
<v Speaker 1>the referee, the referee they put show what's his name,

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Sean Smith yep, the referee who's got overwhelmingly the strongest

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 1>trends towards road upsets, yes, than any other referee crew.

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>So his crew's on it.

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's it's It's possible he just loves causing drama

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:26.719
<v Speaker 3>for home fans and it's and they like there, it's

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:29.560
<v Speaker 3>possibly not fixing the game on purpose. He just hates

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 3>the home fans like, he loves the animosity of it,

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 3>and the NFL put him there being like all right,

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:35.839
<v Speaker 3>let's make this happen.

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>No, I'm not a.

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 3>Big conspiracy theorist guy, but like, yeah, it is interesting.

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Isn't it interesting?

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:45.839
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, I think Baltimore should win.

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 3>I think they're just the better overall team. But it's

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:53.440
<v Speaker 3>it's really tough to rule out and Andy reid led

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:56.440
<v Speaker 3>Mahomes offense, like, isn't it It feels it feels like

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:58.559
<v Speaker 3>the old far for Rogers days, where I know they

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 3>only go ahead of super boyage, but no matter who

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 3>they played, you felt there's a puncher's chance. Yeah, you know, yeah,

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 3>I feel like that's what it is. I feel like

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 3>I feel like the Ravens should win, but I'm not

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 3>gonna rule out casey.

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know it's just the raven you know,

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens in addition to just winning way more games

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 1>than the Chiefs. The Chiefs were the games they were winning,

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>they're barely getting by mediocre opponents, are even losing to mediocre.

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 3>That's my thing about the Chiefs. I wonder if their

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 3>offense figured out like they're offense sputtered all y'all. Yeah,

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 3>started to come along at the end basically when they realized, oh,

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 3>Rashi Rice should be our number one wider. That helped, Yes,

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, yeah, I agree. I just feel like they

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 3>didn't put away bad teams.

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>They didn't, and here's the Ravens just smoking teams right.

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 3>Smoke San Francisco, as we've just mentioned.

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yeah, so I just I can't. I can't, I

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 1>can't look past that. I just I just think the Ravens.

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 1>If these two teams play the way they've played for

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the past two months, the Ravens are way better.

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 3>Right Yep, yep, absolutely.

0:14:57.400 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk Detroit San Francisco.

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 3>Yep, yep. We we get. We get a dry, warm,

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 3>mid sixties or high sixties, mid seventies mix of sunny

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 3>and cloudy day in San Francisco. I say this because

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 3>we all know Jared Goff is a housecat. I like

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 3>calling him a house cat. I We're gonna keep doing

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 3>it until he catches odd. He's a house cat. He's

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 3>way better.

0:15:18.160 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 1>And his outdoor games he averages two hundred and ten

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>yards and one passing touchdown.

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 1>That's not gonna beat the forty nine.

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 3>Ers, No, no, And this is you can say that,

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, some of those might have had more inclement

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 3>weather than others, but also this is a really good

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 3>forty nine Ers defense, so that kind of offsets that.

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 3>In his last four against this forty nine ers defense

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 3>where with the Rams. Yeah, and so the Ram not

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 3>against the defense. But in San Francisco he had multiple

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 3>scores in all of them, two of them really high

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 3>yardage games, two of them not so much. But yeah,

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 3>he's it's hard to bet on Jared Goff outdoors in

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 3>general against a really good defense. It makes it a

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:03.440
<v Speaker 3>little bit harder it does.

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Now. The weather here San Francisco.

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 3>Beautiful and almost no win too, which so it's just

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 3>it's basically like almost an indoor game. Maybe the sun

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 3>sun gets in his eyes. Maybe that's his problem. I

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 3>don't know. Uh No, I actually I like both these

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 3>teams to have a pretty close games here game here.

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 3>But on the Lions side, let's just stay on the

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 3>Lions side for a second. Did you know the only

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 3>player on Detroit Lion, on the Detroit Lions who was

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 3>alive the last time Detroit went to the NFC championship game?

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 3>You don't have anyways, So there was there's one.

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 1>There's one player, yes, who was alive from the nineteen fifties.

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 3>Ninety one, wasn't it anyone?

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>What was it that the Lions won the championship? I

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 1>thought you said or no, went to the playoffs.

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:49.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, went to the NFC championship.

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, whatever, I don't I don't know.

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's the it's the long snapper, Jake McQuaid. It's

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 3>the only one all than that.

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's not Super Bowl era. It's got to be

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>pre Super Bowl, right. They haven't been to an NFC

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>championship game in.

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 3>The Super Bowl era. Maybe it's a divisional round. Yeah,

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 3>maybe I read that wrong either way. Yeah, Now I

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:12.160
<v Speaker 3>want to look it.

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Up because if it were in the nineties that most

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:17.160
<v Speaker 1>of the team would be alive, guys would still be

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:17.959
<v Speaker 1>be alive.

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 3>Ninety one against Washington, they lost to Washington.

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>In the that was the they. I didn't remember that

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the Lions had gone that far. You're telling me the

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:27.360
<v Speaker 1>only player alive.

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 3>In nineteen ninety one was Jake McQuaid. But I mean,

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 3>what would that realistically make him thirty two?

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I got to I thought, you meant it's still

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 1>alive today. You met who was born on the.

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 3>Team, on the team, it's still playing on the team

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:45.159
<v Speaker 3>that was alive for that ninety one Cha gotcha? Yeah,

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 3>I know that the nineties for guys like us, feels

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 3>like ten years ago. It was actually quite a while ago.

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 3>One thing I think that's an interesting of note angle

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 3>for this is golf is not dealt with pressure. Well.

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:05.719
<v Speaker 3>This year he's He's top five in the league in

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 3>UH yards per attempt and e PA when not pressured.

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 3>He's bottom five when pressured. And for a good stretch

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 3>of the second half of the season, when you know

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 3>they lost a bunch of their games, he was the

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 3>worst quarterback in the NFL against pressure. And I know

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 3>that the forty nine ers got zero sacks with you know,

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 3>Hargrave and Warner and Bosa last week, but I think

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 3>that they could bring some pressure, especially depending on Frank

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 3>greg New who has ankle UH ankle injury, toe injury,

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 3>knee injury, and back injury. So basically basically he's just me.

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 3>He's just me out there shocking. He went back in

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:44.880
<v Speaker 3>to play that like he's a warrior.

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>They showed when they showed his his ankle getting all,

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, crunched up and twisted the wrong way in game.

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, well, that's the end of his season series

0:18:57.760 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 1>right now, out.

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:02.439
<v Speaker 3>There, get me out there. Yeah. So RAG news going

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 3>to be an interest. I think we have to assume

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:05.880
<v Speaker 3>he's gonna play like.

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah he is.

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:09.399
<v Speaker 3>He'll rest or whatever it takes to make sure he

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:12.639
<v Speaker 3>can suit up like this is this is this, Like

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 3>every game in this playoffs feels like a super Bowl

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 3>for the Lions, you.

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Know what I mean?

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:21.440
<v Speaker 3>So I think he goes. Another note, interesting note is

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:24.639
<v Speaker 3>the Lions have the lowest deep ball rate in the league.

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, they don't throw it low. And when

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:30.439
<v Speaker 3>you think about their offense with their Josh Reynolds, well,

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 3>Josh Reynolds can rundy, but you know Saint Brown gives

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:37.120
<v Speaker 3>out of the backfield Montgomery, La think about it. Yes

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 3>they don't.

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:41.680
<v Speaker 1>But they they take that deep shot every couple of times,

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, a couple of times a game.

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 3>They are one of the best and most efficient when

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 3>they do. They will over a fifty percent completion rate

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:52.920
<v Speaker 3>when they go over. All right, So maybe it's a

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 3>little rope see how old I am dropping rope of

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:01.919
<v Speaker 3>it here, But yeah, top an explosive success rate and

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 3>deep completion rate when they do go deep. So I

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:10.159
<v Speaker 3>found I found those those pretty interesting. When they get inside.

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 3>If you're looking for any time scorer type props and

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:15.119
<v Speaker 3>stuff like that, they run over seventy percent of the

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 3>time once they're inside the five. Wow, and they score

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 3>a touchdown on thirty one percent of their drives, which

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:26.199
<v Speaker 3>that's great. Yes, it's a fantastic ridiculous. Now nearly a

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:27.400
<v Speaker 3>third of the times.

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 1>They don't have to settle for many field goals because

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:33.159
<v Speaker 1>they're so efficient at scoring when they get in close,

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 1>which is you know, credit to credit the Lions. David Montgomery.

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, absolutely, Yeah. Over over on the other side, forty

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 3>nine er side. I think a lot of the talk

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 3>this week is going to be Party without debo. If

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 3>he goes or not. You know, he was what he's

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:50.439
<v Speaker 3>been doing in practice as the point as of the

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 3>point of the you know, the last time I checked

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 3>before we're doing this was that he was working out

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:58.199
<v Speaker 3>on the side. He was not doing practices. He was

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:00.439
<v Speaker 3>just working out on the side. There's not a lot

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:03.479
<v Speaker 3>of optimism for him to go. But if he does go,

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:06.160
<v Speaker 3>it changes things. But if he doesn't go, like we're

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 3>looking at guys like you garner a quarter of the

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 3>target share from Party. Once he does go, I believe

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:14.160
<v Speaker 3>his props are somewhere in the five for eighty range

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:17.640
<v Speaker 3>right now. Yeah, So if Deebo doesn't go, I would

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:19.879
<v Speaker 3>be I'd be happy with both of those numbers. I

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 3>feel like that both of those are in a shootout scenario.

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 3>I think five for eighty is easily obtainable for him.

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:31.919
<v Speaker 3>Kittle twenty two percent, target shair CMC, Christian McCaffrey eighteen percent,

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 3>Juwan Jenning's twelve percent. You correctly not hit that. During

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:38.919
<v Speaker 3>the season on Fantasy Football Weekly, on a week where

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 3>where Deebo was going to be out, You're like, I

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 3>think he was either you take a chance on me

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:44.479
<v Speaker 3>player or you had a starting great on him.

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:46.639
<v Speaker 1>You're like, this is why, Yeah it was I that

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 1>was Viking this week. Actually, yeah, Jennings, by the way,

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the best blocking receivers in the league.

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:55.160
<v Speaker 3>My gosh, yeah he's good.

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Did you see him block some guy into the gatorade

0:21:57.440 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 1>cart last week?

0:21:58.480 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 3>I missed that.

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I Oh, it was glorious. It was glorious. Kittle's really

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:09.639
<v Speaker 1>fascinating in the games without Deebo. Samuel Basically he explodes,

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you know all that middle of the

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:14.360
<v Speaker 1>field stuff where Deebo tends to get the ball out

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 1>just they siphon it all to Kittle. In six uh oh,

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>I saw the stat from us somebody on my Twitter feed.

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, I don't remember who. Six career games without

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Deebo Samuel, when George Kittle did play, he averages ninety

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:36.440
<v Speaker 1>one yards per game, three point three yards per route run.

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Gigantic number that is, that is huge. Those are big

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 1>numbers for Kittle if Deebo doesn't play, or if he's

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 1>a decoy. I also think Kittle's sitting on a big

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 1>game and Deebo could be a decoy in this game.

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 3>Yep, it's it's it's very possible if he goes in there,

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 3>he could. He could just be a few notes on

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:58.440
<v Speaker 3>party without Deebo with and without Debo. Nineteen games with Deebo,

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:03.879
<v Speaker 3>seven without Peres. Passer rating drops from one nineteen to eighty.

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:05.200
<v Speaker 3>Wow without Debo.

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Wow, that's a big change.

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 3>His yards per attempt nine point four to eight point

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 3>three his Wow.

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Deebo extends the field because Debo's known.

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 3>I have bubbles, screens and everything else, the yards after

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:19.440
<v Speaker 3>the catch or something, because this is yards per attempt,

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 3>not a dot okay, so it must be that he

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:24.360
<v Speaker 3>gets the yards on it to make it a difference.

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:28.920
<v Speaker 3>Completion percentage drops from seventy with deebo to sixty two

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 3>percent without debo.

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Because seventy is huge, sixty two is more like NFL norm.

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so everything about him drops without debo. But I

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:40.679
<v Speaker 3>feel like that's probably fair for any team losing their

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 3>wide receiver one or two. Okay, I'm listening to that.

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, you have Brandon Ayu, You've got George Kittle,

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 1>You've got the best pass catching running back in football.

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:52.880
<v Speaker 1>McCaffrey absolutely, Party should able to be shine.

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 3>He should be. He should be as long as he

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 3>doesn't have a Ravens or Packers style. I blame the

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 3>Ackers game on the web. I think he couldn't deal

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 3>with that downpour. I think that is mostly it. Maybe

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 3>maybe not maybe.

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe, But if you're the Lions, do you play to

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 1>just take away Christian McCaffrey. Go Look, we're not losing

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 1>a Christian McCaffrey. Brock Purty's gonna have to go play

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 1>hero ball.

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:20.880
<v Speaker 3>Right right? Yep. And unlike unlike Goff with the pressure,

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 3>Party had the third It was the third best quarterback

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 3>this year under pressure. Okay, which if any hunchins, I

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 3>think they can bring some pressure. But just just a

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:33.639
<v Speaker 3>note I'm gonna throw two things at you from a

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:36.440
<v Speaker 3>couple of my friends over at Fantasy Life. There Dwayne McFarlane,

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:39.199
<v Speaker 3>and I believe the second one was Ian Hartitz, so

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:42.239
<v Speaker 3>maybe maybe they're not both from Fantasy Life. I mean

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:46.679
<v Speaker 3>both those guys are. But the last, uh, the last

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 3>wide receiver is the last string of wide receiver ones

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:53.159
<v Speaker 3>versus the Lions. And this is a Brandon I you

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 3>kind of goes here, maybe kill a little bit. Ceedee

0:24:57.359 --> 0:25:01.399
<v Speaker 3>Lamb thirteen for two twenty seven, Justin Jefferson twelve for

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 3>one ninety two, Puka Nikola nine eighty one, Yeah, Keenan

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 3>Allen eleven for one to seventy five, Mike Evans eight

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 3>for one forty seven, Justin Jefferson six for one forty one.

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 3>And those guys scored about ten touchdowns combined. Unbelievable.

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:17.880
<v Speaker 1>That was so you should be sitting on a huge game.

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Should be Cam Sullivan their cornerbacks for the lines, Cam Sullivan, Kendallville.

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:24.880
<v Speaker 3>Door brutal, yep.

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 1>So bad.

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 3>It's so bad, yep.

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:28.919
<v Speaker 1>And that's uh. And that'll be priority number one in

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the offseason.

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 3>For and the second part, and I believe it was

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 3>Ena Hearts but if I'm crediting that wrong of this,

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 3>that sucks. I'm sorry. It's the kind of stat I

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 3>would have looked up anyway. Uh. But the last five

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:42.680
<v Speaker 3>quarterbacks against the Lions Baker Mayfield three forty nine and three,

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 3>Matthew Stafford three sixty seven and two, Nick Mullens three

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:49.640
<v Speaker 3>ninety six and two, Dak Prescott three forty five and two,

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Nick Mullens four eleven and two.

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, how about that?

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 3>So the worst gabe was three hundred and forty five

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:01.159
<v Speaker 3>yards at two Scotts. It's the Lions, and.

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:06.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, so that's forts Let's talk Christian McCaffrey, right,

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 1>because you know the Lions are so easy to pass

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 1>upon and so hard to run upon. I think McCaffrey

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:13.920
<v Speaker 1>could be sitting on a quiet game here.

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's very possible. It's very possible.

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 1>His his over under rushing number is eighty eight yards.

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Eighty seven and a half. Yes, you know how many

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 1>runners topped eighty eight yards against Detroit?

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 3>This I do because you heard it.

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Nobody, nobody, McCaffrey has to have for him to hit

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 1>his his Vegas line on yards, he has to have

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the best game anybody's had. Against the Chiefs or sorry,

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:39.159
<v Speaker 1>against the Lions by nineteen yards.

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I don't.

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Think it's happening.

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:44.440
<v Speaker 3>That's that's a it's a lot. The only the only

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 3>wonderful caveat for McCaffrey, if you want to try to

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:50.880
<v Speaker 3>play the over on that line, is that he gets

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 3>everything for them usually usually. Yeah. But yeah, and with

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:57.920
<v Speaker 3>de Bout, you know, he's he doesn't take too many,

0:26:58.520 --> 0:26:59.919
<v Speaker 3>too many rushes anymore anyway.

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 1>No, that's it. I think that's that's largely dried up.

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:03.160
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:07.359
<v Speaker 1>Lions, uh finished number one in rushing yards allowed number

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 1>three and yards per carry allowed number two in rushes attempted,

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:14.119
<v Speaker 1>in part because there their pass evens is so bad, right,

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 1>why run? Now it's Christian McCaffrey, And that's a good

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 1>reason to run. But maybe you just throw to McCaffrey

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:23.120
<v Speaker 1>instead as a possibility. But Lion's only giving up sixty

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards per game. It's just that's nothing. Yeah, So

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:30.879
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if McCaffrey is sitting on a quiet a

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>quiet game here.

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:35.880
<v Speaker 3>You are, Chargian said that the.

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Idea Christian McCaffrey. What a bummer that is? Who wants

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to sit all game long?

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:43.880
<v Speaker 1>And just go, oh, man, I hope Christian McCaffrey doesn't score. Yeah,

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 1>that's so fun.

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 3>I hope he doesn't do it right. That's there's no

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:50.639
<v Speaker 3>fun in that. That's why people love the overs and

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:53.400
<v Speaker 3>hate the unders. It's true. People know sharps don't care.

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 3>But people, your casual betters.

0:27:57.680 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 1>While we're talking lions for a second, did you know

0:27:59.920 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 1>you can already bet the Super Bowl MVP?

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:06.239
<v Speaker 3>Oh boy, you can, you can? Okay, So now they

0:28:06.320 --> 0:28:08.159
<v Speaker 3>got four teams worth of players of odds.

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:11.160
<v Speaker 1>That's right, you have four teams, that's right. Now. Ten

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 1>of the past fourteen have been quarterbacks. Ye tell me

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 1>if any of these interest you, you'd have to place

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 1>his wagers today. Lamar Jackson is the favorite. He's got

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 1>two at two for one. Would you bet that he would?

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 3>He would be, I was gonna say, even before I

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:25.399
<v Speaker 3>was going to try to guess him. But yeah, I

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 3>figured Lamar would be the first.

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Brock Purty three to one. You're interested in that?

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 3>Interesting? I guess a little bit. I mean, yeah, Patrick

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 3>Mahomes is four to one. I'd rather put way less

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 3>money on a longer shot.

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I hear you.

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:49.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Yeah, that's it's Mahomes at four to one, four

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 3>to one.

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 1>If they get past the Ravens and get to the

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl, I think you'd be pretty happy to have

0:28:57.480 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>that four to one. I'm Patrick Mahomes to win MVP

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:01.200
<v Speaker 1>since quarterbacks usually win it.

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I feel like Golf would be my fourth one,

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 3>just because I feel like if the Lions make it,

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 3>I feel like the Chiefs are Ravens should take care

0:29:11.120 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 3>of them. I know that they lost. The Chiefs lost

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 3>to them Week one, but.

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a million years ago.

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 3>Now, that's that's a different team.

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about Jared Goff nine to one

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and Super Bowl MVP?

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:24.480
<v Speaker 3>See, that's the one I would better, just because.

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 1>It's I know right, that part feels pretty good.

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 3>I feel like the order is correct though.

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 1>But what a great story would be for Jared Goff

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 1>who had the horrible Super Bowl game with the Rams

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and then they summarily go trade him, and you know,

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:41.959
<v Speaker 1>then with his new team he goes back to the

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl and wins MVP. Oh, what a great That's

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 1>such a typical NFL kind of storyline. Yep, it'd be

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:52.000
<v Speaker 1>a great.

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 3>There are so many storylines with this these last four teams.

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 3>It's just wonderful. It's just wonderful for that. But where

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 3>do you stand as the Viking fan on the Lions?

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 3>Like I am a I was Barry Sanders my favorite

0:30:04.000 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 3>player of all time, Like the Lions are my second team.

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 3>So like, I'm I'm fine if they win, I'm happy.

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 3>But I know there are a lot of Vikings fans

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 3>who are like, not another NFC North team before us,

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 3>not another you know, not a team that hasn't won

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 3>before us.

0:30:18.560 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not that way. The Lions fans are so humble

0:30:22.320 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and they're yeah, you know, they've been beaten down for

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 1>so long. They're so humble, they're so non arrogant.

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 3>I will say I'm happy for them for the most. Yeah,

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 3>ninety percent of the ones I know are that way.

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 3>I have found some that are not handling being good

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 3>as well as you would expect. They're not used to

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 3>being good, so they definitely have a but it's not

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 3>many of them. Most almost all, You're right, almost all

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Lions fans are are wonderful.

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because you know, they they just they don't have

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the arrogance here.

0:30:50.640 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

0:30:51.160 --> 0:30:55.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's and that's you can'tnot be and the other factor,

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's a real one. My wife and I watch

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Hard Knocks, yeah, you know, the season before or last,

0:31:00.560 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and she fell in love with Dan Campbell. She's absolutely

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:06.960
<v Speaker 1>one percent rooting for the Lions because she loves Dan Campbell.

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:10.240
<v Speaker 3>Yep. I'm I'm generally, especially with this if the Bills

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 3>were still in it, that make it a little more interesting,

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, a.

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Lose lose for Super Rights, yeah versus Lions, right versus.

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that one. But I'm I'm more along the lines

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:21.280
<v Speaker 3>of I would love to see a fan base that

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 3>has never had a championship get one for the whole

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:26.720
<v Speaker 3>fan base too. I'm for sure I like people being happy,

0:31:27.120 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 3>you know.

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 1>The other thing, uh, the other thing that and I

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:32.480
<v Speaker 1>think we may have mentioned this on last week's show,

0:31:32.520 --> 0:31:36.000
<v Speaker 1>but as great as Patrick Mahomes is, and you know,

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 1>his legacy's already set six championships, right, and it's just

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the league is healthier when you have Brady versus Manning,

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:46.680
<v Speaker 1>you know. And I wanted it to be Josh Allen.

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I wanted Josh Allen to win so we could have Brady,

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 1>we could have we could have Mahomes versus Josh Allen.

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Didn't work out. Maybe it's gonna be Mahomes versus Lamar Jackson.

0:31:56.440 --> 0:31:59.239
<v Speaker 1>It's just not as a competiti You want it as

0:31:59.240 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 1>a competitive league. You want to have that other players

0:32:02.360 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 1>who are good too, not just one team.

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:06.520
<v Speaker 3>Yep, yesep, absolutely well, let.

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Me give you one more Super Bowl MVP angle. Okay,

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:11.760
<v Speaker 1>if it's not going to be a quarterback, I told

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 1>you ten of the last fourteen have been quarterbacks. Yeah,

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to be a quarterback. It's got to

0:32:16.000 --> 0:32:20.520
<v Speaker 1>be somebody who's explosive that can turn the game on

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:24.239
<v Speaker 1>two or three gigantic plays. Right, that's gonna pile up

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and fifty yards.

0:32:26.160 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 3>Jamison Williams, No, give me another Lion. I'm one. Rustlin Brown,

0:32:33.720 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 3>Jamier Gibbs, Jamiir Gibbs.

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, now, I told you what the quarterback odds were.

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 3>Here's my tough thing with that. Hold on a second, Okay.

0:32:42.320 --> 0:32:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I told you the the the quarterback odds like two

0:32:44.880 --> 0:32:46.280
<v Speaker 1>to one, three to one, four to one. What do

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 1>you think the odds are for Jamier Gibbs to win

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl MVP one hundred and twenty five to one?

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, now, go ahead.

0:32:55.800 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 3>See here's my problem James White scored as running back

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:02.440
<v Speaker 3>three touchdowns.

0:33:01.800 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 1>And he caught like eighty passes.

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:07.560
<v Speaker 3>He had over one hundred total yards, and he scored

0:33:07.720 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 3>the game winging touchdown.

0:33:09.600 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 1>And they're like, nah, quarterback, I know, so I get it.

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady was on the field, he was gonna win it.

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 3>You do have a point, you know, It's it is

0:33:18.440 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 3>kind of a different point though, Like it's I'm not

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:24.480
<v Speaker 3>comparing golf to like the you know, golf is not

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:27.280
<v Speaker 3>Brady like Brady. Like, if you don't give it to Brady,

0:33:27.280 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 3>there's a thing there, you know. But if you don't,

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 3>I still think they'd give it to golf. But I

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:35.640
<v Speaker 3>do like it. That's a that's incredible odd.

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Just the odds are so good. One hundred and twenty

0:33:38.400 --> 0:33:40.560
<v Speaker 1>five to one. They played the super but they played

0:33:40.560 --> 0:33:42.800
<v Speaker 1>out this weekend next week. One hundred and twenty five

0:33:42.880 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 1>times Jimi or Gibbs would win MVP, like I don't know,

0:33:45.920 --> 0:33:47.719
<v Speaker 1>nine times or ten times or something like that.

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 3>Something I like.

0:33:49.200 --> 0:33:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Something in the ballpark of nine time, nine times times.

0:33:53.400 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I mentored, you know, not one out

0:33:55.560 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 1>of one hundred and twenty five, nine out of five.

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:00.840
<v Speaker 1>You get the idea.

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 3>I get it. I like it. I like it's a

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 3>it's a really deep I don't think it's happening, but

0:34:04.600 --> 0:34:07.040
<v Speaker 3>it's no problem. I hope it happens. That'd be abvioazy,

0:34:07.200 --> 0:34:09.719
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't be And then everybody, you get the peacock of

0:34:09.719 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 3>all peacocks. If that happened, that so good. We'd have

0:34:12.680 --> 0:34:15.719
<v Speaker 3>to find a super peacock. But super because it's a

0:34:15.760 --> 0:34:17.560
<v Speaker 3>super Bowl, we need a super peacock.

0:34:17.600 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Good point.

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:20.040
<v Speaker 3>Maybe it's like an auto tune peacock.

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 1>What what maybe we need more than one peacock. What

0:34:22.760 --> 0:34:24.480
<v Speaker 1>is a group of peacocks call?

0:34:24.600 --> 0:34:26.719
<v Speaker 3>I actually don't know this a pot of peacocks? I

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 3>don't know.

0:34:28.200 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's like, uh, there's a pot of whales.

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:36.279
<v Speaker 1>There's a murder murder of throro, right, what is more than?

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:38.719
<v Speaker 1>What's a group of peacocks called? How do I and

0:34:38.760 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 1>how do we not know this yet?

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? This is this is insane because we're a group

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 3>of people that a muster A muster, you said, an

0:34:47.280 --> 0:34:48.959
<v Speaker 3>ostentation or a muster?

0:34:49.160 --> 0:34:53.319
<v Speaker 1>Oh, ostentation is way better an ostentation of peacocks?

0:34:53.400 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 3>Yes, oh, I love it. Oh. And the plural is

0:34:55.760 --> 0:34:57.480
<v Speaker 3>pea fowl. Is it really?

0:34:57.760 --> 0:34:59.959
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know that we've been saying it wrong because

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 1>all the time it's a fowl. There's no way, no way,

0:35:05.560 --> 0:35:06.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not peacocks.

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:11.920
<v Speaker 3>It's p fowl. Females are p hens. What I'm not

0:35:12.000 --> 0:35:18.400
<v Speaker 3>gonna believe. I'm not gonna geographic about peacock. I don't

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:19.120
<v Speaker 3>know anything.

0:35:19.840 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 1>A muster of pe pe pe fowl, a mustard pie.

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:30.560
<v Speaker 3>I gotta imagine that's the correct one. But other people,

0:35:30.640 --> 0:35:33.040
<v Speaker 3>but people, but you can use peacocks. I gotta believe

0:35:33.040 --> 0:35:36.960
<v Speaker 3>that's a dual thing where you can use if you.

0:35:37.040 --> 0:35:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Got to the end of this peacocks.

0:35:38.440 --> 0:35:40.520
<v Speaker 3>Even the thing says group of what is a group

0:35:40.560 --> 0:35:43.799
<v Speaker 3>of peacocks called so like? It doesn't even say p

0:35:44.040 --> 0:35:44.719
<v Speaker 3>fowl in there.

0:35:45.120 --> 0:35:47.720
<v Speaker 1>If you got to the end of this podcast, which right.

0:35:47.600 --> 0:35:49.640
<v Speaker 3>Now a group of p hens is a harem?

0:35:50.160 --> 0:35:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Is it really? Who comes up with this stuff?

0:35:53.400 --> 0:35:56.719
<v Speaker 3>P fowl are members of the pheasant family? Interesting? No,

0:35:56.800 --> 0:35:58.000
<v Speaker 3>it is definitely.

0:35:57.800 --> 0:35:59.840
<v Speaker 1>You made it to the end of this podcast. Jesus

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:04.040
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Scott Fish twenty four at Paul Chargi

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:09.880
<v Speaker 1>in hashtag muster of pea fowl.

0:36:11.480 --> 0:36:15.239
<v Speaker 3>God, oh beautiful. I don't know what I'm gonna I

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:17.640
<v Speaker 3>don't we said, what do we do with this information?

0:36:18.719 --> 0:36:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to know if people actually get to this

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:22.560
<v Speaker 1>point or if they've long since turned this thing off.

0:36:22.760 --> 0:36:24.279
<v Speaker 3>Gosh, we'll find out.

0:36:24.600 --> 0:36:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for listening, everybody. We'll be back next week.

0:36:26.600 --> 0:36:29.399
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about super Bowl games you can play. Matt

0:36:29.440 --> 0:36:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Harrison's already prepping it. He's very excited. Ways you can

0:36:32.480 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 1>have fun with your Super Bowl parties and stuff like that.

0:36:35.520 --> 0:36:37.640
<v Speaker 1>And then the week after that we'll be breaking down

0:36:37.680 --> 0:36:40.759
<v Speaker 1>the super Bowl. Can't wait on our last chance to

0:36:40.800 --> 0:36:43.279
<v Speaker 1>talk about football from the twenty twenty three season. And

0:36:43.840 --> 0:36:47.279
<v Speaker 1>after that we're gonna start getting four heavy with a

0:36:47.360 --> 0:36:50.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of a lot of rookie Yeah. Yeah, he's in

0:36:50.800 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Mobile this week Senior Bowl stuff, So that'll that'll be great.

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening, everybody, talk to you soon. Fantasy Football

0:36:58.600 --> 0:37:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Weekly is a production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio,

0:37:02.600 --> 0:37:06.240
<v Speaker 1>visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen

0:37:06.280 --> 0:37:07.280
<v Speaker 1>to your favorite shows.