WEBVTT - Kwasi Plays His Hand: Who Wins?

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>After a historic few days in Britain with the Queen's

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>state funeral this week, it's really now back to business.

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>It is back to business for the UK. But Dave

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:25.759
<v Speaker 1>really are a question, Like our last episode pointed out,

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>was there ever really a break for the new government

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Behind the scenes, we know furious work going on for

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a huge economic support package bailing out households, businesses, also

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 1>a vast rat of tax cards to try to stimulate

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the economy. Yes, it is a big week for the

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:42.879
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister. She started the week by flying to the

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:45.839
<v Speaker 1>United Nations General Assembly New York, where I am. It's

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:48.479
<v Speaker 1>her first outing on the world stage as UK Premier.

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:50.479
<v Speaker 1>And then of course she ends the week in the

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:53.519
<v Speaker 1>House of Commons as her chancellor lays out a mini budget.

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>And the day before that we're going to have the

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Bank of England the markets forecasting yet more rate hikes.

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>That meeting was delayed for a week because of the

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>official morning period, so we're gonna have the Bank of

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:08.320
<v Speaker 1>England Thursday afternoon. Dramatic moves there, and then this statement

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>which really is a sort of emergency budget from the

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:14.959
<v Speaker 1>new Chancellor on Friday. She's really back full throttle under

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:19.680
<v Speaker 1>pressure over a deepening economic crisis. I'm David Merritt in

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the London studio and I'm francing like when the New

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:25.320
<v Speaker 1>York studio not together again, David, But this for the

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>first time a long time, is actually for a reason.

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm here for the UN General Assembly and it's especially

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:33.119
<v Speaker 1>important for the UK Prime Minister. It's her first foreign

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:35.960
<v Speaker 1>trip as PM is first trip as well, exactly. So

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 1>this is in the City Blombergs podcast, connecting you to

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:40.119
<v Speaker 1>the stories at the heart of the City of London.

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:44.400
<v Speaker 1>This week, as Francine mentioned, British politics has returned full

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>throttle with the new Prime Minister considering to face pressure

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 1>over a deepening economic crisis. So our Liz trusts and

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>her team ready for this high stakes moment. And does

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the City of London think they're making the right calls?

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 1>We'll hear from Eagle and General Chief Executive Officer Nigel Wilson,

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>who says Chancellor Quasi Kwarteng has the right intent, but

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 1>still the question remains can he deliver the first Bloomberg

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Opinion columnist Marcus Ashworth joins us in conversation over some

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>headline grabbing policies that might be coming and whether Quartengs

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:24.800
<v Speaker 1>all systems go approach is winning anyone over. So Marcus,

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:28.519
<v Speaker 1>let's start with reports that the government is considering scrapping

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>its cap on bankers bonuses. The problem is that if

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>you focus on bonuses, it means a lot of people

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>will be discontent. I think that I'm going to hope

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 1>that this was just the leak, not a good sign

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 1>of the start of a new government, but that old

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>government had lots of leaks and this one probably is

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 1>going to have the same problems. You wouldn't put this

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:51.800
<v Speaker 1>particular cart before the horse of of changing the rules

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>generally in the city, which you've got thoroughly ignored throughout

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the whole Brexit process. And perhaps this new government wants

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 1>to try and appreciate that one to the economy is

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:03.079
<v Speaker 1>focused on financial services. The city needs to have a

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>clearer sense the direction and perhaps some of these rules

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>need to be changed. But um, the government needs to

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>do this in sync with the Bank of England and

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:15.079
<v Speaker 1>the wider administration part of it, and indeed with the

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 1>with the city itself, which is going to be circumspect

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 1>about bonuses, because this is actually a good thing for banks,

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>not necessary for bankers. It's good to focusing the attractiveness

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 1>of the city, but in the right way, and it

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>needs to be part of an overall package, not leading

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>with these ridiculous bonus right. I'm their very They're very

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 1>headline catching, aren't they, But not a vote winner, well know,

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>quite the reverse and more active, willful sort of please

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>write this into your Labor Party h and liberal Democratic

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 1>election of leaflets. But at the same point, if it's

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>part of a wider package, then yet the government should

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>not be in the paid having businesses. It was a

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 1>rule forced on the city which never really worked with

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>it very well. As a consequence, basic salaries went through

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the roof. It's an ugly situation. But this can be

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>unwell at a better time, perhaps after a deal or

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the European Union there ever is to be one on

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>regulatory equivalence. Moves like this make it less likely, not

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>more likely, and that isn't what the city wants. So

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>that was what I was going to ask, because I mean,

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 1>is this move likely to provoke the European Union into

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:20.600
<v Speaker 1>some sort of tougher line on the city. Well, I'm

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>not sure. I think they're probably a bit stunned. Like

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the rest of US as in really this one. First,

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>they know that a bit of divergence is going to come.

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>That's written in the stars. The question is whether or

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:31.719
<v Speaker 1>not there can be an overall deal, whether the EU

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>can relax that. Essentially the City is going to allow

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the control and perhaps the gentle stimulation of the European

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:41.159
<v Speaker 1>financial system now certain things like clearing. I think the

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>city has won that argument. But with regards to you know,

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:47.039
<v Speaker 1>where bankers are based and should people trading Euros be

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:49.839
<v Speaker 1>based in Europe rather than just in the city, I

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:52.279
<v Speaker 1>think there's a there's a fair middle ground to be

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>had and I think you know, we are getting towards

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 1>their whether the city likes or not, because the ECB

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>is quite insistent on this, but you know, the Bank

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 1>of England. We have to play quite a careful game

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>on this and it needs help from the government, not unhelped,

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>but somewhere because this is not about bringing back the

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 1>bankers that left because of Brexit. I don't think is

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>that ship has sailed. Um. I think it does help

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 1>US banks and their flexibility, and that's really the big

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>audience here and across Europe and the city. You want

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>to make sure your Golden Saxes and your and your

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America's, etcetera. Are encouraged to employ people here

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and be able to compensate them without less hassle that

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>they would be maybe in Hong Kong or New York.

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's the comparison I think the bankers have left

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:36.599
<v Speaker 1>for for Europe. Are there for a reason I would

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>likely stay there. And timing timing aside. You said the

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 1>timing is bad potentially in terms of like the publicity,

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:44.600
<v Speaker 1>but just this message that the government is getting out

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:48.160
<v Speaker 1>of the business setting pay. I mean, surely that's kind

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:50.360
<v Speaker 1>of a good thing for Britain's image around the world,

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>isn't it. Yeah. I mean obviously doing the same with

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 1>corporation tax. They're not going to hike it. They are

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>trying to say global Britain. You know, lots of clacks

0:05:55.800 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 1>alerts going off here, aren't there Aspiration Nation? Sure, that's

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>what people thought when it was about Bagger's bonuses. But

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:05.720
<v Speaker 1>nonetheless it does send an image if they can back

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 1>it up. But as a one off of his just

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:09.600
<v Speaker 1>a one off, then it's it's it's the wrong cart

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:12.160
<v Speaker 1>before you know, the much more valuable horse of of

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>regulatory equipments with Europe, which may or may not be

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>ever achieved. But this isn't necessary if this is just

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>on its own the right way of going about it, Marcus,

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much, Thanks Marcus. Earlier this month, in

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 1>one of his first official acts, Quasi Quarteing held a

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:35.720
<v Speaker 1>meeting in Downing Street with a group of chief executives

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and senior figures from banks, insurers and asset managers, and

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:43.280
<v Speaker 1>he announced his plans to release a sort of big

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>bang two of reforms to boost the city of London. Now,

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.279
<v Speaker 1>one of the people who was actually in that meeting,

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:53.599
<v Speaker 1>Legal ind General Chief executive Officer Nigel Wilson, joins us

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>now for his take on the Chancellor's vision, and also

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:01.920
<v Speaker 1>with us is Bloomberg's finance editor through Griffiths. No I thot,

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:03.720
<v Speaker 1>it feels like it was only a few months ago

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>when we spoke, but it we're on another planet now,

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>aren't we. We We've got a different government, We've got

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>a radical new agenda they're going to be pushing through now.

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 1>The new Chancellor, Quasi Quateng hosted business leaders in Downing

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Street fairly recently. You were in that meeting. What can

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>you tell us we'll do a bit of a reporting

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>for us. What was it like in the room and

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>did he convince you all that his plan is the

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>right one? I think it was. First of all, it

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 1>was great that invited us. You know, the first Cabinet

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 1>meeting had just finished and the people who wanted to

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>see were the chief executives of them are the biggest

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 1>financial institutions in Britain. That was a very positive signal

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>around it. And he's naturally a pretty up big guy,

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and so he was very upbeat about the prospects for

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the UK and he was actively listening as well as

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 1>being on broadcast mode. So it was positive meeting from

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 1>that point point of view. So you think the government

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 1>is pivoting to listening a bit more? He said he

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 1>was in broadcast mode as well. But you know it's

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>no secret is it that Boris Johnson's government um had

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>a different attitude throughout the Brexit years, perhaps to the

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 1>business community. Without quoting him, I think Catherine I recruited

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time we spoke about this and that

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>pivots are actually listening. Do you do you think there's

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>a real kind of meat on the bones of that. Yes,

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I would hope. So I think we desperately need to

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 1>have everybody pointing in the same direction that we need

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>investment led growth across the UK. We've never had that

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>for thirty or forty years, and you need the business

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>leaders to support that investment led growth. And you know,

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 1>there's still a huge amount of unused capital in the

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 1>UK and we've got to use that capital to develop

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and deliver better outcomes. And it's great that the government

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>wants to engage on that. What would be your top

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 1>few things that you'd really like to hear from the

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 1>new chancellor to kind of achieve this proper leveling up

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and and real kind of getting investment going to kind

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:53.719
<v Speaker 1>of do the kind of things that you that you

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 1>would like to see. Yes, I mean, if you if

0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:58.560
<v Speaker 1>you go back to the seventies and the eighties, I mean,

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the seventies are a predio ismal time and there's lots

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>of parallels between what happened in the nineteen seventies in

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:07.079
<v Speaker 1>Britain and what is happening today with inflation rates, a

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:09.959
<v Speaker 1>war going on, oil prices, energy prices. We had three

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:13.679
<v Speaker 1>day a week and energy was rationed in the nineteen seventies.

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>We've got a similar sort of situation right now. But

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 1>what happened in ninety in the early eighties was big

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>back and actually policy, regulation, planning all work together and

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>we built this new city called the City of City

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>of London and it became very dynamic. We stopped there, though,

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>and we never went and made that right across We

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 1>never delivered right across the country. So London, you know,

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>became this incredible shining staff for the for the for

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the world. You know, in the seventies, rubbish was piled

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 1>thirty feet high in parts of London and learning was

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:50.439
<v Speaker 1>depopulating at the time, and we saw a dramatic turnaround.

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>We saw a dramatic turnaround in the economy between Nino

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 1>n three and you know, I had this discussion with

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 1>John Major, you know where you know, there was a

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>huge difference between between it because we started to get

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>policy planning and regulation right to create the right backdrop.

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 1>And that's what I want to hear the government talking about.

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>And it matters for the whole country that we get

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 1>policy planning and regulation and everybody collaborates together because there's

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:16.440
<v Speaker 1>still the money around, you know, the big banks, in

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:19.960
<v Speaker 1>part by accident, we ring fence the big banks, and

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>so there was ring fence. Banks are sitting on huge

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 1>amounts of capital, the pension funds are sitting on huge

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 1>amounts of capital. The insurance companies have huge amount of capital.

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>We need to redeploy that capital into useful activities and

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>there's tons of opportunities for doing that. Virtually every sector

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>in the UK can have a change of regulation, a

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>bit better planning and more investment and that will allow

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:43.839
<v Speaker 1>you GDP to grow and per capital income to grow,

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and we haven't seen that for a long time. So

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>it's specifically to get that done. Then are we talking about,

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean things like solvency too is one. You're talking

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 1>about freeing up capital that's currently tied up. That's sort

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 1>of reform that needs to happen. Yes, I mean solvently

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:00.840
<v Speaker 1>two is the easiest win because it doesn't have the

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>overlay of basil, which the banks have to a more

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 1>complicated situation as a consequence of that. But someboty two

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:11.839
<v Speaker 1>we've had the right to change since sixteen. For whatever reason,

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 1>we've chosen not to do that, and that's an easy

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 1>win for the government to encourage more investment by firms

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:20.679
<v Speaker 1>like ours and we're putting our hands up and say yes,

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:22.719
<v Speaker 1>we'd like to invest more in the UK because it

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 1>is a great place to invest. And policy has not

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:28.680
<v Speaker 1>been changed fast enough. It's been a very difficult time

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>for the government to get through real changes in policy,

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and all of these things have to change, and the

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 1>change in a crisis. When I talked about the seventies,

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the part of the reason that we got stuff done

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:41.959
<v Speaker 1>in the eighties because there had been a crisis. There

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 1>was a crisis. Check the records, big growth here for

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:48.839
<v Speaker 1>the UK. And we're in a crisis now right, we're

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>in an energy crisis. When an inflation crisis, we're war

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>obviously the Ukraine with Russia. Yes, we are in a crisis,

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:58.319
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's why, you know, just blaming the

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Bank of England for inflation isn't the right answer, and

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:04.079
<v Speaker 1>it's actually you know, America has got a very similar

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 1>level of inflation. Most of Europe has a very similar

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>level of inflation. Inflation is very complicated. We've lived in

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a world where we hadn't really considered inflation for a

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>very long period of time. Rates have been very constant

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 1>and so there hasn't been not so much going on

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>now we've got an enormous amount of things going wrong

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:23.840
<v Speaker 1>and people are very fearful of that. And Nigel, what

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 1>about tax? How how important is it for the government

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>to say something on tax? Obviously we know where what

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>List Trusts is likely to say it's been very well

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>flagged on corporation tax. But do you think that in

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:41.199
<v Speaker 1>fact there could be more that's done on tax across

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:44.079
<v Speaker 1>the business world or indeed perhaps for the financial sector

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>that could kind of really kick start investment. I think

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>tax is one item, but actually it's not such a

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:55.080
<v Speaker 1>high priority item right now as many of the other

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>other issues that we have. People have underinvested in Britain

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>during numerous different tax regimes over the last thirty or

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 1>forty years, and that's because of the lack of collaboration

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and coordination across the across the across the UK, which

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>has meant our GDP per capital has performed poorly against

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:16.440
<v Speaker 1>lots of our peer groups. And we have you know,

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 1>as we know, only London has a hyper capital income

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:23.440
<v Speaker 1>of any of any city or town, any large city

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 1>or town in the UK was compared with Dresden, Leipzig

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and Berlin. And that's in a generation they've caught up

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 1>in past past us and that's because of these reasons

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:34.439
<v Speaker 1>that we haven't done the right things here in the

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>UK for a long period of time. People haven't collaborated together,

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and people have pointed fingers that other people giving them

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the blame when it actually isn't their fault. So do

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 1>you think corporation tax doesn't have a huge effect. I mean,

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've had a concert the it's been a

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 1>previous Conservative chancellors right who raised corporation tax and said, look,

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't necessarily drive away investment. Trust is pretty clear,

0:13:57.240 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 1>she says. And Quartack they're saying, look, we have to

0:13:59.840 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 1>have lower corporation tax rates that are than our neighbors,

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 1>than our European competitors if we're going to attract businesses.

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:08.679
<v Speaker 1>Is she broke up. It's not the wrong tree, but

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>it's just one of the elements. And I think it

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 1>goes back to you know what, what is a comprehensive

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>package that makes the UK more attractive. It isn't a

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:18.319
<v Speaker 1>single item if all of the other things are. You know,

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>if it's going to take your seven years to get

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>planning in London, doesn't matter what the corporation taxes. To

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>be frank you keep talking about planning. Actually, and this

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 1>is really interesting, I think because actually this is sort

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>of out of the remit I guess, of the normal

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of chancellors plans. But are you saying, do you

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 1>think this government is going to finally face through Well,

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 1>they talked about sort of cuts, making it easier to

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>push through programs, getting rid of some of the planning

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 1>laws that's pretty controversial in some parts of the country.

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 1>We have to be more forward looking about changing plan

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 1>changing planning, using compultory purchase orders, which people have always

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>been reluctant to do in the past. And we have

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>to be bald about these things. You know, when I

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 1>think of how much the city changed in the in

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen eighties for the better. We have to do

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that right across the country. That's just an absolute given.

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 1>You know. Corporation tax is just one of those signals

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that actually we are open for business to do more

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>investment here in the UK and you'll see a more

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 1>dynamic government as a consequencer. That's the messaging they're giving.

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>That's certainly the messaging that the that we the chief

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>executives of the financial services sector picked up and we

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>now we we have our job to deliver, and we

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 1>try and deliver, you know, continuously and for a long

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 1>period of time. The government has to do the same.

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 1>To talking about messaging, I mean this boat, the banker

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>bonus cap that is called a lot of headlines in

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the last few days. There's Trust is in New York.

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>As we record this, she's told our reporter that, um, well,

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 1>this might not be particularly popular. It's not a vote winner,

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 1>is it. But is it about the messaging that sends

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 1>to investors, to financial institutions that the government shouldn't be

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 1>in the business of setting pay and leave it up

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>to corporations. Yes, I think this is about messaging. This

0:15:57.840 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>is not about massive amounts of um and it's you know,

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I think this is one of the things that leaked

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 1>ahead of time because it's an immotive issue and an

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 1>unpopular issue, and therefore people want to rant rant about it.

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 1>But actually it's just one of the tools and the

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>many tools that the government is trying to adopt to

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>change the position of the UK. Now, so I do

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 1>wonder on this planning stuff. You know, Trust and Quotaine

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>have been very keen to talk about how radical they

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>are and how keen they are to be bold and

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>take on all these sorts of foes, real or imagined

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>around the world. Do you think that they have a

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of appetite to listen when it comes to these

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>perhaps slightly less kind of exciting sounding policies for for

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the UK. And again when we kind of put the

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>overlay of the fact that it's two years till the

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>next general election, Yeah, that's the awkward thing because planning

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 1>takes longer than two years from what things in the UK. Therefore,

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 1>even if you want to start stuff under the current regime,

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>just just it's quite difficult to get these You know,

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about shove already products for a very long

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>period of time and we haven't seen anywhere near enough

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 1>of them happen across the UK. Does anybody think we

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 1>don't need more affordable housing, social housing, built to rent

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 1>housing here in the here in the UK. That absolutely

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the case. Would we like to see much more progress

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>made in terms of investment in climate change? Absolutely? Would

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:21.439
<v Speaker 1>would we like to be to have the equivalent of

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Portugal in terms of our five gene network And the

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:27.160
<v Speaker 1>answer to that is yes, these things have not happened

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and the conscovered government has been on watch why these

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 1>things have happened. So actually you need to change something

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to get them to happen, because the capital is around,

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:39.920
<v Speaker 1>sitting around waiting to invest in these things, and it's

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:43.359
<v Speaker 1>barriers around policy, planning and regulation that have stopped it.

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>But when we look at London's record of the last

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:51.119
<v Speaker 1>couple of years for attracting capital, protracting companies to raise capital,

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>even you know that crown has been lost, hasn't it

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 1>to other centers? Do you sit coming back? Yeah, well

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to come back unless we change things.

0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>And that means that you know, regulation has to be

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 1>has to change change quicker. You know, if we go

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 1>on to you know, the whole digital digital network that

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 1>we see and and five g across across Europe, we've

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:17.160
<v Speaker 1>fallen right behind lots of places. We can't let that happen.

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Where we're you know, in the teens, not at the top.

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:21.919
<v Speaker 1>We want to be at the top, not in the teams.

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 1>And you think Quantine as the matter, Now I think

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:28.440
<v Speaker 1>he's he's certainly got the intent. You know, it's now

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:31.919
<v Speaker 1>can you deliver? It's the delivery and execution. We've been

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:35.119
<v Speaker 1>incredibly welcomed in the United States. You know, if we

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:36.959
<v Speaker 1>were as welcomed in the in the UK as we

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 1>were in the United States, that would be a fantastic thing.

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>And we we have our capital that we can allocate

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 1>outside the KOK of our UK annuity assets over fifty

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>of them outside the UK outside of the UK already

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:55.400
<v Speaker 1>under the current the current rules, you know, and that's

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 1>not the you know, these are backing UK liabilities. So

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:02.440
<v Speaker 1>we've got the diverse a vacation through international rather than

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>through investing in a different different types of assets here

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>in the UK. That's not the best solution. So delivered

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:11.399
<v Speaker 1>that I think there's trust. Use that word, didn't she

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 1>and her first speech as Prime minister. We're going to deliver.

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna deliver. How long do you give them before

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:18.920
<v Speaker 1>you can tell whether they're going to be We'll see

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 1>on Friday whether it's solid. Me two gets a strong

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>mention and actually there's a plan and a timetable for

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 1>getting changes here in there here in the UK. And

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:30.639
<v Speaker 1>I think all of my banking colleagues will see that

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:33.160
<v Speaker 1>as a positive signal if they've sorted out the easiest problem,

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:35.199
<v Speaker 1>which is solvings. You two and then move out to

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 1>move on to some of the more difficult ones around

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 1>around banking and also fun management. So do you think

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>we're at a moment where people might come to the

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:49.199
<v Speaker 1>view that both banks and insurers in this country simply

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>are being forced to hold too much capital as as

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a consequence of the financial crisis and that and that

0:19:56.920 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, perhaps while still being proved intensensible, actually that

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:07.639
<v Speaker 1>needs to be fundamentally reconsidered. You know, we're more talking

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:10.159
<v Speaker 1>about the acid eligibility, what it is we're allowed to

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:12.919
<v Speaker 1>invest in. That's why over fifty of our assets are

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 1>outside of the outside of the UK. If there was

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 1>more assets that were qualified here in the UK, we'd

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 1>invest in them here in the UK. And so the

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the capital treatment is just a nudge, And actually it's

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 1>a nudge which will be broadly equivalent with what's going

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:29.159
<v Speaker 1>to happen in in the U anyway. So it's not

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:33.919
<v Speaker 1>that these these are going to hugely divert just that

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Europe you set some rules which are not the same

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>as the American rules. So the Americans, although they have equivalents,

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 1>have much better and more attractive capital rules than than

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 1>we do here in the UK. Nigel Wilson, thank you

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Thank you once again. Will

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>you come back in a few months in times, I

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:55.680
<v Speaker 1>will be back, don't worry, a great story to tell.

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Thanks are listening to this week's in the City. We'll

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 1>be back next week, but in the meantime, if you

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:06.919
<v Speaker 1>like our show, please head on over to Apple Podcasts

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:10.919
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to podcasts and rate, review and subscribe.

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:12.680
<v Speaker 1>And if you're looking for a daily rap of the

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:14.919
<v Speaker 1>stories that matter in the UK, sign up now for

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 1>a newsletter, The read Out with Allegra Stratton on Bloomberg

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:20.880
<v Speaker 1>dot com Slash Newsletters, or check out the show notes

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 1>for a link. This episode was hosted by Me David

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Merritt and for a good portion of it me Francin Lakwa.

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 1>It was produced by Summersati Special thanks to Marcus Ashworth,

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:33.679
<v Speaker 1>Catherine Griffiths and Nigel Wilson.