1 00:00:00,040 --> 00:00:02,480 Speaker 1: What's up, Mets fans, got a special episode coming at 2 00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:05,320 Speaker 1: you today. We talked to Matt Eddie of Baseball America, 3 00:00:05,400 --> 00:00:08,520 Speaker 1: friend of the podcast in a couple of fantasy baseball leagues, 4 00:00:08,520 --> 00:00:10,640 Speaker 1: with James excited to get talking to him. 5 00:00:10,640 --> 00:00:11,840 Speaker 2: It's been a while since we brought him on. 6 00:00:11,920 --> 00:00:13,800 Speaker 3: Yeah, Mark under selves and Maddie's ether in chief of 7 00:00:13,800 --> 00:00:16,880 Speaker 3: Baseball America. I'm pretty sure from conversations with him back 8 00:00:16,880 --> 00:00:19,480 Speaker 3: in the day at Baseball America is the only job 9 00:00:19,520 --> 00:00:22,360 Speaker 3: he's has a professional human being, So he just lives, eats, 10 00:00:22,480 --> 00:00:25,919 Speaker 3: breeds everything prospect. So Matt Eddie, legend, friend of the 11 00:00:25,960 --> 00:00:28,760 Speaker 3: show listener, just great guests and like you guys will 12 00:00:28,760 --> 00:00:31,800 Speaker 3: feel like the wild knowledgey exudes about the Mets players 13 00:00:31,800 --> 00:00:34,400 Speaker 3: in general and just minor league baseball and like ever 14 00:00:34,520 --> 00:00:36,000 Speaker 3: changing landscape of player development. 15 00:00:36,040 --> 00:00:36,440 Speaker 4: He's great. 16 00:00:36,720 --> 00:00:37,960 Speaker 2: Love having him on. Hope you guys like it. 17 00:00:38,040 --> 00:00:40,280 Speaker 1: Yeah, quick housekeeping stuff maybe just real quick again, Like 18 00:00:40,280 --> 00:00:42,160 Speaker 1: our episode schedule is a little bit all over the place, 19 00:00:42,240 --> 00:00:45,160 Speaker 1: just because we're currently trying to revamp everything back up 20 00:00:45,640 --> 00:00:48,320 Speaker 1: since the big news of twenty twenty four with the podcast. 21 00:00:48,400 --> 00:00:50,440 Speaker 1: So I'm sure none of you are complaining that there's 22 00:00:50,440 --> 00:00:52,680 Speaker 1: more content. Just keep an eye out for it. Remember 23 00:00:52,720 --> 00:00:54,880 Speaker 1: to follow all our feeds. Remember to follow us on 24 00:00:54,920 --> 00:00:57,680 Speaker 1: social media Twitter, Instagram, TikTok at Mets Up. 25 00:00:57,920 --> 00:00:58,480 Speaker 2: Subscribe. 26 00:00:58,760 --> 00:01:01,960 Speaker 1: The YouTube channel is now the Mets Up Podcast. We're 27 00:01:01,960 --> 00:01:03,720 Speaker 1: no longer on the New York Mets YouTube channel. 28 00:01:03,880 --> 00:01:04,600 Speaker 2: We have our own. 29 00:01:04,880 --> 00:01:06,920 Speaker 1: You'll see our logo, you'll see our last uploads on 30 00:01:06,959 --> 00:01:08,759 Speaker 1: there if you want to see some video versions of that, 31 00:01:08,800 --> 00:01:12,120 Speaker 1: and there might be some videos that are exclusive to 32 00:01:12,160 --> 00:01:14,240 Speaker 1: YouTube as well, So make sure you are subscribed over there, 33 00:01:14,240 --> 00:01:16,000 Speaker 1: because some things just don't go on the podcast feed. 34 00:01:16,120 --> 00:01:18,240 Speaker 3: Yep, and again, without further ado, Matt ade. 35 00:01:38,040 --> 00:01:38,920 Speaker 2: What is up? Mets fans? 36 00:01:38,920 --> 00:01:42,080 Speaker 1: Welcome back to another episode of the Mets Up Podcast. 37 00:01:42,200 --> 00:01:46,160 Speaker 1: We now have a new champion of the most recurring 38 00:01:46,200 --> 00:01:48,960 Speaker 1: guests on the Mess Up Podcast, taking over that title 39 00:01:49,000 --> 00:01:51,320 Speaker 1: from Code I sangu They were tied at too. We've 40 00:01:51,320 --> 00:01:54,280 Speaker 1: got Matt Eddie of Baseball America, friend of the podcast. 41 00:01:54,320 --> 00:01:55,800 Speaker 2: Matt, thanks for coming on. How are we doing? 42 00:01:55,960 --> 00:01:57,960 Speaker 4: Hey guys, thanks for having me visit number three? 43 00:01:58,040 --> 00:02:00,240 Speaker 3: Yeah, visit number three again, passing Code I sank. Maybe 44 00:02:00,320 --> 00:02:02,880 Speaker 3: we'll make a little like mock like funny graphic about 45 00:02:02,880 --> 00:02:05,280 Speaker 3: that afterwards. This coming week, but that first thing we 46 00:02:05,280 --> 00:02:07,880 Speaker 3: want to do just talk about where this mess system 47 00:02:07,920 --> 00:02:10,120 Speaker 3: is right now. We know you guys dropped the Mets 48 00:02:10,160 --> 00:02:11,959 Speaker 3: Top ten on Baseball America. I believe it was a 49 00:02:11,960 --> 00:02:13,519 Speaker 3: few months ago now, one of the first ones you 50 00:02:13,560 --> 00:02:16,560 Speaker 3: guys did release of the offseason. So walk us through that. 51 00:02:16,680 --> 00:02:17,960 Speaker 3: Maybe you don't have to do the whole top ten. 52 00:02:18,040 --> 00:02:20,480 Speaker 3: Lead people something else subscribed for maybe the top five. 53 00:02:20,600 --> 00:02:24,360 Speaker 3: Talk about your favorites, maybe someone who rose, someone who fell, 54 00:02:24,520 --> 00:02:26,280 Speaker 3: just a nice broad overlay of the system. 55 00:02:26,400 --> 00:02:30,639 Speaker 4: Yeah, our list came out in November. Baseball America was 56 00:02:30,639 --> 00:02:33,040 Speaker 4: able to publish all of its top tens in at 57 00:02:33,080 --> 00:02:34,880 Speaker 4: the end of twenty twenty three for the first time 58 00:02:34,960 --> 00:02:38,160 Speaker 4: in one year. That was a landmark for us. With 59 00:02:38,520 --> 00:02:41,920 Speaker 4: the Mets in particular. Going into the process, I didn't 60 00:02:41,919 --> 00:02:44,639 Speaker 4: know who the number one prospect would necessarily be, but 61 00:02:44,680 --> 00:02:47,639 Speaker 4: the organization was pretty clear that Jet Williams was their guy. 62 00:02:47,680 --> 00:02:47,880 Speaker 1: You know. 63 00:02:47,960 --> 00:02:52,360 Speaker 4: He offers you some up the middle, upside, some hitting ability, speed, 64 00:02:53,120 --> 00:02:54,760 Speaker 4: so he was their pick, you know. And then the 65 00:02:54,800 --> 00:02:57,079 Speaker 4: rest of the top ten, especially crowded near the top, 66 00:02:57,120 --> 00:02:59,359 Speaker 4: are a lot of the trade acquisitions, you know, Drew 67 00:02:59,400 --> 00:03:04,160 Speaker 4: Gilbert luis Son Helkunya, Ryan Clifford. But it's in addition 68 00:03:04,200 --> 00:03:06,120 Speaker 4: to those guys, it's a lot of players that that's 69 00:03:06,160 --> 00:03:07,079 Speaker 4: have drafted recently. 70 00:03:07,200 --> 00:03:09,480 Speaker 3: You kind of see the system kind of into conversation 71 00:03:09,639 --> 00:03:11,520 Speaker 3: why like bring this whole thing too. Do you see 72 00:03:11,520 --> 00:03:14,000 Speaker 3: the system as kind of more that's like building something 73 00:03:14,080 --> 00:03:15,880 Speaker 3: as we kind of hoped and expected they would a 74 00:03:15,919 --> 00:03:17,440 Speaker 3: few years ago, or do you see right now it's 75 00:03:17,560 --> 00:03:20,360 Speaker 3: very much buoyed by these trades. I've been made without 76 00:03:20,880 --> 00:03:24,040 Speaker 3: this kind of like ample foundation, We've been like kind 77 00:03:24,080 --> 00:03:25,880 Speaker 3: of waiting and hoping for as the mess have kind 78 00:03:25,880 --> 00:03:28,160 Speaker 3: of overturned their player development scouting regimes. 79 00:03:28,160 --> 00:03:30,680 Speaker 4: I think it's a little both. I think the trades 80 00:03:30,760 --> 00:03:34,880 Speaker 4: do elevate them into top ten discussion among all farm systems, 81 00:03:34,960 --> 00:03:37,800 Speaker 4: but they have hit on some draft picks, notably Jet 82 00:03:37,840 --> 00:03:40,520 Speaker 4: Williams would be, you know, one of their biggest hits. 83 00:03:40,960 --> 00:03:44,000 Speaker 4: They've continued to develop Ronnie Mauricio. However, he's obviously going 84 00:03:44,080 --> 00:03:46,560 Speaker 4: to have a lost season bad timing on on that 85 00:03:46,600 --> 00:03:48,080 Speaker 4: injury there. But I would say it's a little bit 86 00:03:48,080 --> 00:03:48,320 Speaker 4: of both. 87 00:03:48,320 --> 00:03:51,320 Speaker 1: With Jet Williams specifically, he's been someone that's been I 88 00:03:51,320 --> 00:03:53,040 Speaker 1: feel like flying up. I know he had a lot 89 00:03:53,040 --> 00:03:55,520 Speaker 1: of like hype around the draft of just guys like 90 00:03:55,640 --> 00:03:57,800 Speaker 1: loved his makeup, they loved what he was able to do, 91 00:03:58,120 --> 00:04:00,880 Speaker 1: and now we've started to see him really perform at 92 00:04:00,920 --> 00:04:03,080 Speaker 1: the minor league level. Do you think that there's a 93 00:04:03,120 --> 00:04:05,840 Speaker 1: shot that Jet Williams could be a guy that maybe 94 00:04:05,960 --> 00:04:08,880 Speaker 1: sneaks up into the major league level at some point 95 00:04:08,920 --> 00:04:11,080 Speaker 1: next year with how he rose last season. 96 00:04:10,840 --> 00:04:15,160 Speaker 4: It's possible, probably a lower probability because he's I think 97 00:04:15,160 --> 00:04:17,919 Speaker 4: he's heading under his age twenty season. It's rare for 98 00:04:17,960 --> 00:04:21,599 Speaker 4: that to happen, but probably becoming increasingly less rare for 99 00:04:21,680 --> 00:04:25,120 Speaker 4: that to happen. I think he would really have to 100 00:04:25,480 --> 00:04:28,440 Speaker 4: dominate Double A, Triple A for that to be a possibility. 101 00:04:28,520 --> 00:04:32,880 Speaker 3: Will you see as Jet Williams more most likely home 102 00:04:32,920 --> 00:04:34,720 Speaker 3: as a fielder in the major leagues. We've seen him 103 00:04:34,720 --> 00:04:36,200 Speaker 3: play a lot of short top of the major leagues 104 00:04:36,240 --> 00:04:38,200 Speaker 3: that's taken up our Facisco indoor long term the Mets, 105 00:04:38,200 --> 00:04:40,120 Speaker 3: we've seen him play some center field as position. The 106 00:04:40,160 --> 00:04:42,280 Speaker 3: Mets seem to be a little looser on this year 107 00:04:42,279 --> 00:04:44,560 Speaker 3: compared to last year with the extition Harrison Bay the 108 00:04:44,760 --> 00:04:47,120 Speaker 3: David Stern saying they're well, they're comfortable with Brandon on 109 00:04:47,200 --> 00:04:48,880 Speaker 3: a corner or do you see him as somewhere else, 110 00:04:48,880 --> 00:04:50,760 Speaker 3: maybe on the diamond. Does he hit enough for a corner? 111 00:04:50,960 --> 00:04:52,480 Speaker 3: Does he have an arm enough for thirds? He more 112 00:04:52,520 --> 00:04:54,760 Speaker 3: likely a second baseman. Where do you see that evaluation? 113 00:04:54,839 --> 00:04:57,279 Speaker 4: I think there's a split camp there. I think I 114 00:04:57,360 --> 00:04:59,520 Speaker 4: probably think center field is most likely, you know, take 115 00:04:59,520 --> 00:05:02,960 Speaker 4: advantage of the speed athletic ability. He throws pretty well 116 00:05:03,000 --> 00:05:06,279 Speaker 4: obviously as a middle endfielder. He played a lot of 117 00:05:06,360 --> 00:05:08,680 Speaker 4: center in high school and on the showcase circuit and 118 00:05:08,839 --> 00:05:12,440 Speaker 4: was somewhat unrefined as a defensive shortstop, you know, for 119 00:05:12,480 --> 00:05:14,799 Speaker 4: a first round guy would not I think it's probably 120 00:05:14,880 --> 00:05:18,120 Speaker 4: most likely center field, maybe second base if that's a need. 121 00:05:18,320 --> 00:05:20,880 Speaker 4: He hasn't played that yet as a pro, but the 122 00:05:20,920 --> 00:05:22,839 Speaker 4: Mets think that he can take to that. 123 00:05:23,000 --> 00:05:25,760 Speaker 1: I think another guy too that people are probably wondering 124 00:05:25,760 --> 00:05:28,680 Speaker 1: where he's going to play, is gonna be Luis on Helicunya. Similarly, 125 00:05:28,760 --> 00:05:31,919 Speaker 1: middle infield guy, center field. Where do you see someone 126 00:05:32,000 --> 00:05:33,560 Speaker 1: like him maybe projecting for the future. 127 00:05:33,600 --> 00:05:36,400 Speaker 4: Yeah, he's a stronger defensive player right now, so I 128 00:05:36,440 --> 00:05:39,080 Speaker 4: think second base is a pretty safe projection for him. 129 00:05:39,120 --> 00:05:41,280 Speaker 4: If he hits you know, I don't don't expect them 130 00:05:41,279 --> 00:05:43,000 Speaker 4: to be like a top of the order, you know, 131 00:05:43,200 --> 00:05:45,800 Speaker 4: impact hitter, but I think he's you can hit well 132 00:05:45,880 --> 00:05:47,279 Speaker 4: enough to play. 133 00:05:47,320 --> 00:05:50,120 Speaker 3: Both of those players definitely find themselves on the shorter side, 134 00:05:50,160 --> 00:05:52,440 Speaker 3: as just Drew Gilbert Jet definitely being the smallest of 135 00:05:52,480 --> 00:05:54,839 Speaker 3: all of them, especially thinking about center field, the position 136 00:05:54,880 --> 00:05:58,039 Speaker 3: that you need so much range and like theoretically speed 137 00:05:58,040 --> 00:06:00,599 Speaker 3: which could come from length and astride. Is there any 138 00:06:00,920 --> 00:06:03,839 Speaker 3: genuine limitations for these players based on their height, even 139 00:06:03,839 --> 00:06:06,200 Speaker 3: though as we are seeing many more kind of shore 140 00:06:06,200 --> 00:06:08,320 Speaker 3: their players, some people call them short kings making their 141 00:06:08,360 --> 00:06:11,360 Speaker 3: way up prospect rankings and LB rosters the last few years. 142 00:06:11,440 --> 00:06:13,960 Speaker 4: Yeah, that is really interesting. I hadn't thought of the stride, 143 00:06:14,000 --> 00:06:17,120 Speaker 4: length and the outfield I have to look at the 144 00:06:17,160 --> 00:06:20,920 Speaker 4: shortest major league center fielders. I think it's becoming increasingly 145 00:06:20,960 --> 00:06:23,760 Speaker 4: more common. Like I remember when Adam Eaton was coming 146 00:06:23,839 --> 00:06:26,560 Speaker 4: up as a prospect, he was disregarded a little bit 147 00:06:26,560 --> 00:06:30,520 Speaker 4: because he was short. But you know, obviously it didn't 148 00:06:30,520 --> 00:06:31,800 Speaker 4: prove to be a problem. I don't think it's an 149 00:06:31,880 --> 00:06:34,360 Speaker 4: organizational focus, but I do think they see the positive 150 00:06:34,360 --> 00:06:38,880 Speaker 4: attributes of it, you know, smaller shorter limbs helping with 151 00:06:41,200 --> 00:06:42,680 Speaker 4: the length of swing and such. 152 00:06:42,800 --> 00:06:44,800 Speaker 1: I know that the last time that we had you on, 153 00:06:44,800 --> 00:06:46,719 Speaker 1: because it's been a while since you've been back on 154 00:06:46,760 --> 00:06:48,960 Speaker 1: the podcast, so we're happy to have you back. We 155 00:06:48,960 --> 00:06:52,160 Speaker 1: were talking about prospects like Brett Batty, Francisco Alvarez, a 156 00:06:52,200 --> 00:06:53,599 Speaker 1: lot of guys that were seeing at the major league 157 00:06:53,680 --> 00:06:56,320 Speaker 1: level right now, and Brett Batty is quite the hot, 158 00:06:56,480 --> 00:06:59,760 Speaker 1: you know topic amongst Mets fans about playing third base 159 00:07:00,120 --> 00:07:02,479 Speaker 1: he actually going to look like and he relatively has 160 00:07:02,520 --> 00:07:04,600 Speaker 1: been disappointing so far from what we have seen. I 161 00:07:04,600 --> 00:07:07,159 Speaker 1: don't think there's any way around it. When we spoke 162 00:07:07,240 --> 00:07:09,880 Speaker 1: last we were all very high on him. You particularly 163 00:07:09,880 --> 00:07:11,320 Speaker 1: were a big fan of what he was able to 164 00:07:11,360 --> 00:07:12,520 Speaker 1: do at the played offensively. 165 00:07:12,800 --> 00:07:15,640 Speaker 2: Do you still have that same hope of Brett Bady, Yes. 166 00:07:15,400 --> 00:07:18,600 Speaker 4: Overall, though obviously with what we saw in twenty twenty three, 167 00:07:18,840 --> 00:07:20,800 Speaker 4: the hope is dimmed a bit. I think, you know, 168 00:07:21,120 --> 00:07:24,360 Speaker 4: getting him, you know, to meet the ballmar up front 169 00:07:24,360 --> 00:07:27,120 Speaker 4: and pull for power. He's always had that easy poppo power, 170 00:07:27,160 --> 00:07:29,960 Speaker 4: but I think for him to reach the ultimate upside 171 00:07:30,000 --> 00:07:32,680 Speaker 4: that he possesses, I think that's going to be a requisite. 172 00:07:32,760 --> 00:07:35,320 Speaker 4: And you know, the defensive home is also a question 173 00:07:35,360 --> 00:07:38,440 Speaker 4: because he has not established himself as a major league 174 00:07:38,440 --> 00:07:39,840 Speaker 4: third baseman at this time. 175 00:07:39,920 --> 00:07:42,239 Speaker 3: We would like to preach patients in this podcast, especially 176 00:07:42,240 --> 00:07:44,680 Speaker 3: with young players in general, doing it with Baty right 177 00:07:44,680 --> 00:07:48,640 Speaker 3: now as an evaluator, at what point in a player's 178 00:07:49,040 --> 00:07:52,080 Speaker 3: even brief major league career do you have to start 179 00:07:52,080 --> 00:07:54,520 Speaker 3: to look differently at how they were viewed as a prospect. 180 00:07:54,640 --> 00:07:56,640 Speaker 3: Baty right now is about four hundred, four hundred thirty 181 00:07:56,680 --> 00:07:59,640 Speaker 3: played appearances. Is it more about signal certain statistics? Is 182 00:07:59,680 --> 00:08:02,080 Speaker 3: it more playing times, more about makeup? Like where I 183 00:08:02,120 --> 00:08:03,920 Speaker 3: know it's definitely going to be subjective by the player, 184 00:08:03,960 --> 00:08:05,840 Speaker 3: but where does that line start to be drawn to 185 00:08:05,880 --> 00:08:08,240 Speaker 3: where you have to reevaluate your own evaluation. 186 00:08:08,360 --> 00:08:11,920 Speaker 4: Given Beaty's prospect pedigree, I would give him the entire 187 00:08:11,920 --> 00:08:15,080 Speaker 4: twenty twenty four season to see where you're at. He's 188 00:08:15,120 --> 00:08:19,240 Speaker 4: a player who historically has struggled at initial levels before 189 00:08:19,320 --> 00:08:22,160 Speaker 4: kind of finding his stride. And that's what we saw 190 00:08:22,240 --> 00:08:27,400 Speaker 4: last year. Started strong, slumped Triple A, dominated, and came 191 00:08:27,440 --> 00:08:30,640 Speaker 4: back up and it was okay. But I think I 192 00:08:30,640 --> 00:08:33,079 Speaker 4: think twenty twenty four, a full season of PA's will 193 00:08:33,080 --> 00:08:34,800 Speaker 4: tell us a lot about Baby's upside. 194 00:08:34,800 --> 00:08:37,280 Speaker 1: Talking about how Batty was dominating at Triple A. We've 195 00:08:37,280 --> 00:08:39,120 Speaker 1: seen this now happen with a lot of prospects. It 196 00:08:39,160 --> 00:08:42,960 Speaker 1: feels like recently that able to dominate Triple A the 197 00:08:43,000 --> 00:08:44,040 Speaker 1: major league level come up. 198 00:08:44,040 --> 00:08:45,559 Speaker 2: There's a lot of difficulty. 199 00:08:45,760 --> 00:08:48,840 Speaker 1: Is there just a bigger gap than we're we've been 200 00:08:48,840 --> 00:08:51,120 Speaker 1: accustomed to between Triple A and major league baseball right 201 00:08:51,120 --> 00:08:54,640 Speaker 1: now where there's like just kind of not much going 202 00:08:54,640 --> 00:08:55,680 Speaker 1: on at the Triple A level. 203 00:08:55,760 --> 00:08:58,560 Speaker 4: Yes, for sure. The quality of pitching in Triple A 204 00:08:59,320 --> 00:09:01,679 Speaker 4: is probably as bad as I can remember it, so 205 00:09:02,360 --> 00:09:04,760 Speaker 4: it's tough to read a lot into the offensive statistics. 206 00:09:05,280 --> 00:09:08,319 Speaker 4: And then in twenty twenty three, the Automated ball Strike 207 00:09:08,360 --> 00:09:11,160 Speaker 4: system just wreaked havoc. The walk rate of Triple A 208 00:09:11,280 --> 00:09:14,040 Speaker 4: was something like thirteen percent. It was just insanity. And 209 00:09:15,000 --> 00:09:17,040 Speaker 4: by the same token, it's hard to evaluate both pictures 210 00:09:17,040 --> 00:09:18,600 Speaker 4: and hitters and that kind of a context. 211 00:09:18,640 --> 00:09:20,600 Speaker 3: Did you think by that token it made this might 212 00:09:20,640 --> 00:09:23,120 Speaker 3: be a stupid question, but it made picture hitter evaluation 213 00:09:23,160 --> 00:09:24,840 Speaker 3: it's more difficult, especially at that level. 214 00:09:24,880 --> 00:09:28,120 Speaker 4: Yes, yeah, because in particular, in particular, the top three 215 00:09:28,160 --> 00:09:32,079 Speaker 4: quadrants of the nine boxes strike zone called strikes were 216 00:09:32,240 --> 00:09:34,040 Speaker 4: difficult to get in the top three. So any pitcher 217 00:09:34,080 --> 00:09:36,000 Speaker 4: who would ride a fastball up would have a hard 218 00:09:36,040 --> 00:09:37,960 Speaker 4: time getting a called strike on that pitch, and batters 219 00:09:37,960 --> 00:09:41,640 Speaker 4: would adjust to that right. And then as you see umpires, 220 00:09:41,679 --> 00:09:43,880 Speaker 4: you get also get a sense for the umpire strike zone, 221 00:09:43,920 --> 00:09:46,400 Speaker 4: so you can kind of take an extra advantage if 222 00:09:46,400 --> 00:09:48,400 Speaker 4: you're a hitter if you know what the umpire is 223 00:09:48,440 --> 00:09:48,960 Speaker 4: likely to call. 224 00:09:49,080 --> 00:09:52,160 Speaker 1: Everybody I feel like in the Mets world was freaking 225 00:09:52,200 --> 00:09:54,840 Speaker 1: out last year so much about the trade deadline and 226 00:09:54,960 --> 00:09:58,040 Speaker 1: getting pictures, and we didn't get any pictures. So in 227 00:09:58,120 --> 00:10:00,560 Speaker 1: terms of like some guys that maybe could make their 228 00:10:00,600 --> 00:10:02,560 Speaker 1: way to the major league level from the Mets forum system, 229 00:10:02,559 --> 00:10:04,719 Speaker 1: which pitchers are you most excited about right now? 230 00:10:04,800 --> 00:10:07,600 Speaker 4: Yeah, Christian Scott would be the most exciting arm for me, 231 00:10:07,800 --> 00:10:11,240 Speaker 4: just the level of pitchability, starter traits he has. He's 232 00:10:11,280 --> 00:10:13,280 Speaker 4: got the he seems to have this acumen where he 233 00:10:13,320 --> 00:10:17,760 Speaker 4: can really take to instruction and new ideas. You know, 234 00:10:17,840 --> 00:10:20,640 Speaker 4: he changed his reference war and pro ball. He's good 235 00:10:20,640 --> 00:10:22,400 Speaker 4: at holding runners. For a guy who was mostly a 236 00:10:22,400 --> 00:10:25,360 Speaker 4: reliever in college, it's pretty remarkable how far he's come. 237 00:10:25,640 --> 00:10:27,840 Speaker 4: So he would be number one and some in the 238 00:10:27,920 --> 00:10:30,800 Speaker 4: organization see him as a number three starter. Obviously, he 239 00:10:30,800 --> 00:10:33,640 Speaker 4: has not proven the durability of workload quite yet, but 240 00:10:33,679 --> 00:10:37,040 Speaker 4: we'll see this year and then Mike Mike Vasil and 241 00:10:38,000 --> 00:10:39,880 Speaker 4: Laide Tidwell are probably two of the other arms I 242 00:10:39,920 --> 00:10:43,680 Speaker 4: would be looking at as major test cases for Mets 243 00:10:43,720 --> 00:10:44,760 Speaker 4: pitching development this season. 244 00:10:44,760 --> 00:10:47,560 Speaker 3: Picture I'm really intrigued by in the Mets system is 245 00:10:47,800 --> 00:10:49,839 Speaker 3: Dominic Hamell right now, because he's someone who just in 246 00:10:49,920 --> 00:10:52,080 Speaker 3: terms of like a single pitch, his breaking ball is 247 00:10:52,160 --> 00:10:53,800 Speaker 3: it just seems special. Mark and I got a chance 248 00:10:53,800 --> 00:10:56,839 Speaker 3: to watch him up close last year in the Double A, 249 00:10:56,920 --> 00:10:59,760 Speaker 3: the Eastern League semifinal match, and he just he completely 250 00:10:59,800 --> 00:11:03,200 Speaker 3: did a summer st Patriots lineup that had Ben Rice 251 00:11:03,240 --> 00:11:06,400 Speaker 3: in it, it had Specer Jones. It was unhittable for 252 00:11:06,440 --> 00:11:08,480 Speaker 3: I think eight innings on the mat or seven, seven 253 00:11:08,520 --> 00:11:11,160 Speaker 3: to two thirds. He's someone that you see as a 254 00:11:11,160 --> 00:11:13,439 Speaker 3: major league starter. Is he more in the reliever line 255 00:11:13,480 --> 00:11:15,800 Speaker 3: like or is he someone that could even develop and 256 00:11:15,840 --> 00:11:17,720 Speaker 3: grow into that role this upcoming year. 257 00:11:17,800 --> 00:11:22,280 Speaker 4: Yeah, you know, I think most evaluators would have him 258 00:11:22,320 --> 00:11:25,280 Speaker 4: as back of the rotation swingman type of upside, but 259 00:11:26,000 --> 00:11:27,679 Speaker 4: he does have a lot of starter traits, and as 260 00:11:27,720 --> 00:11:30,240 Speaker 4: you mentioned, like he's he's pretty platoon neutral even with 261 00:11:30,360 --> 00:11:32,960 Speaker 4: its repertoire, which you wouldn't necessarily expect, so that there's 262 00:11:33,000 --> 00:11:36,720 Speaker 4: something too to his approach that works against both sides 263 00:11:36,760 --> 00:11:39,240 Speaker 4: that could make him, you know, sneaky good as a 264 00:11:39,240 --> 00:11:39,960 Speaker 4: major league starter. 265 00:11:40,040 --> 00:11:41,320 Speaker 3: Of all those guys too, we were talking a lot 266 00:11:41,360 --> 00:11:44,200 Speaker 3: about Christian Scott, and Blade said, well before, we've read 267 00:11:44,280 --> 00:11:46,920 Speaker 3: and spoke to you about privately that allegedly both of 268 00:11:46,960 --> 00:11:50,559 Speaker 3: them underwent massive changes in the repertoire since being drafted 269 00:11:50,559 --> 00:11:52,480 Speaker 3: by the Mets just a few years ago. You'd mentioned 270 00:11:52,480 --> 00:11:54,160 Speaker 3: that Scott had this kind of acumen to take a 271 00:11:54,160 --> 00:11:57,280 Speaker 3: few instructions and then put that into practice. Do you 272 00:11:57,360 --> 00:12:00,320 Speaker 3: see that as something that is more on where Mets 273 00:12:00,320 --> 00:12:02,200 Speaker 3: pitching development has gone in the last few years, or 274 00:12:02,200 --> 00:12:05,440 Speaker 3: more of something that specifically on those twos just strength 275 00:12:05,480 --> 00:12:06,600 Speaker 3: as a prospect. 276 00:12:06,200 --> 00:12:11,800 Speaker 4: An element is frankly the way Florida uses pitchers, emphasizing 277 00:12:12,000 --> 00:12:18,440 Speaker 4: sinkers and sliders and really fastballs above all. So changing 278 00:12:18,440 --> 00:12:21,880 Speaker 4: the way Christian's got attacked hitters for more of a 279 00:12:21,880 --> 00:12:24,640 Speaker 4: pro approach was going to bear fruit, and it might 280 00:12:24,679 --> 00:12:26,920 Speaker 4: even with Brandon sprote where they drafted last year, so 281 00:12:26,920 --> 00:12:29,679 Speaker 4: that's something to keep an eye on, and if his 282 00:12:29,960 --> 00:12:32,920 Speaker 4: pitch mix and usage evolves in Pro ball and with Tidwell. 283 00:12:33,400 --> 00:12:35,000 Speaker 4: I just don't think he needed to throw a change 284 00:12:35,080 --> 00:12:38,760 Speaker 4: up very much in the n SEC, So finding the 285 00:12:39,080 --> 00:12:41,200 Speaker 4: split grip that worked for him and able to really 286 00:12:41,200 --> 00:12:44,920 Speaker 4: get that late action on the pitch has elevated his 287 00:12:44,960 --> 00:12:48,640 Speaker 4: stock with him. Obviously, strike throwing has been a major 288 00:12:48,720 --> 00:12:52,400 Speaker 4: challenge and could be impediment to starting if he's not 289 00:12:52,440 --> 00:12:53,200 Speaker 4: able to clear that up. 290 00:12:53,240 --> 00:12:56,559 Speaker 1: You spoke about the draft and how you know Brandon 291 00:12:56,600 --> 00:12:57,920 Speaker 1: Sprot was a guy that the Mets were able to 292 00:12:57,920 --> 00:13:00,520 Speaker 1: take again in the draft, a guy from Florida. What 293 00:13:00,559 --> 00:13:03,200 Speaker 1: players from the draft last year from the Mets are 294 00:13:03,240 --> 00:13:04,800 Speaker 1: some of your favorites right now in their system? 295 00:13:04,880 --> 00:13:07,600 Speaker 4: Yeah, you know the first round of Colin Helck, obviously 296 00:13:08,720 --> 00:13:12,240 Speaker 4: Brandon Sprout the second rounder. Well, I like both those picks. 297 00:13:12,559 --> 00:13:15,960 Speaker 4: The sneaky player that the Mets are excited about is 298 00:13:16,000 --> 00:13:20,360 Speaker 4: Nolan McLean, the Oklahoma State two way player. As a 299 00:13:20,400 --> 00:13:24,720 Speaker 4: DH closer. He is very unproven as a strike thrower 300 00:13:24,880 --> 00:13:27,199 Speaker 4: and as any kind of a starting pitcher in college, 301 00:13:27,240 --> 00:13:29,720 Speaker 4: but they are very encouraged by what they saw in 302 00:13:30,280 --> 00:13:32,200 Speaker 4: off season labs. I think there's a lot of raw 303 00:13:32,240 --> 00:13:35,520 Speaker 4: material to work with, just a matter of getting into 304 00:13:35,559 --> 00:13:37,600 Speaker 4: a starter workload and getting them to throw strikes. 305 00:13:37,679 --> 00:13:39,920 Speaker 3: Is there anything there that you saw you can disclose 306 00:13:40,000 --> 00:13:42,559 Speaker 3: either bread our gun or certain types of pitches that 307 00:13:42,640 --> 00:13:45,719 Speaker 3: have good properties, maybe even just as a dhho's ex 308 00:13:45,720 --> 00:13:47,480 Speaker 3: of lolosses. I know he's a big, big, strong kid, 309 00:13:47,559 --> 00:13:50,199 Speaker 3: so anything there that day the wise we can gleany. 310 00:13:49,880 --> 00:13:53,600 Speaker 4: Hey averages ninety five easy motion up to ninety eight. 311 00:13:53,760 --> 00:13:57,040 Speaker 4: Getting him on a routine should help because he hasn't 312 00:13:57,040 --> 00:14:00,280 Speaker 4: really had a starter routine ever because he's been two 313 00:14:00,280 --> 00:14:02,959 Speaker 4: way and bullpen high spin slider up to eighty eight. 314 00:14:03,080 --> 00:14:06,040 Speaker 4: Makings of a change up that there obviously will be 315 00:14:06,040 --> 00:14:07,360 Speaker 4: a focus if they want to keep them as a 316 00:14:07,400 --> 00:14:09,760 Speaker 4: starter this year. I think there's there's an expectation that 317 00:14:09,800 --> 00:14:11,560 Speaker 4: he's one of the quickest to the majors guys from 318 00:14:11,640 --> 00:14:12,280 Speaker 4: this track class. 319 00:14:12,360 --> 00:14:14,560 Speaker 3: That more of a hard slider that's like kind of 320 00:14:14,559 --> 00:14:16,120 Speaker 3: like a gyro, like a shoot down or does that 321 00:14:16,200 --> 00:14:17,160 Speaker 3: have any sweep on. 322 00:14:17,559 --> 00:14:20,520 Speaker 4: Two plane mid eighties? Two plane Wow. 323 00:14:20,320 --> 00:14:21,000 Speaker 2: It's pretty good. 324 00:14:24,480 --> 00:14:27,000 Speaker 3: I mean two plane slitherer just to speak like it 325 00:14:27,000 --> 00:14:28,800 Speaker 3: moves two planes so it is moving downward and is 326 00:14:28,840 --> 00:14:30,840 Speaker 3: moving with the arm action of the pitch as opposed 327 00:14:30,880 --> 00:14:33,320 Speaker 3: to I asked mattat gyro slider because those are usually 328 00:14:33,360 --> 00:14:35,960 Speaker 3: those pitches that kind of seem more colorish and they 329 00:14:35,960 --> 00:14:38,040 Speaker 3: can be thrown harder because they move less. Talk about 330 00:14:38,040 --> 00:14:40,080 Speaker 3: this and times the ball like falls over itself, has 331 00:14:40,160 --> 00:14:43,040 Speaker 3: more change up action with slytherer spin. But that hard 332 00:14:43,040 --> 00:14:44,720 Speaker 3: of a slider with that kind of two plane action 333 00:14:44,840 --> 00:14:46,800 Speaker 3: is It's kind of fascinating. And then I want to 334 00:14:46,800 --> 00:14:50,040 Speaker 3: ask another question about coming with the Mets draft last year. 335 00:14:50,080 --> 00:14:52,360 Speaker 3: The big story with the Mets draft now this most 336 00:14:52,360 --> 00:14:54,360 Speaker 3: recent draft, again after the lottery, is that the Mets 337 00:14:54,640 --> 00:14:56,840 Speaker 3: pick was to be pushed backwards because of their luxury 338 00:14:56,840 --> 00:14:59,840 Speaker 3: tax penalties. Did you see anything that you can glean 339 00:14:59,880 --> 00:15:03,160 Speaker 3: your anything different from either their strategy other teams around 340 00:15:03,240 --> 00:15:05,560 Speaker 3: the league like the Padres or the Yankees are believe 341 00:15:05,640 --> 00:15:08,920 Speaker 3: last year also just Padres and Yankees who are moving back, 342 00:15:09,040 --> 00:15:11,160 Speaker 3: losing part of their bonus pool, but still able to 343 00:15:11,320 --> 00:15:13,200 Speaker 3: possibly stockpile talent through the draft. 344 00:15:13,240 --> 00:15:16,800 Speaker 4: Yeah, it's tough. I think these new CBT penalties have 345 00:15:16,880 --> 00:15:19,400 Speaker 4: a lot of teeth. I don't think it impacted the 346 00:15:19,400 --> 00:15:22,440 Speaker 4: Mets tremendously because how would have been a fine pick 347 00:15:22,480 --> 00:15:25,240 Speaker 4: even ten spots earlier. He kind of slipped down the 348 00:15:25,240 --> 00:15:28,360 Speaker 4: board a little bit. I think a larger strategy adjustment 349 00:15:28,400 --> 00:15:31,280 Speaker 4: teams have made is just focusing on college pitchers because 350 00:15:31,280 --> 00:15:34,360 Speaker 4: we have this condensed minor league environment, which is actually 351 00:15:35,080 --> 00:15:37,400 Speaker 4: going to become more condensed this season when they go 352 00:15:37,440 --> 00:15:41,040 Speaker 4: to one to sixty five total domestic players. So you 353 00:15:41,120 --> 00:15:43,840 Speaker 4: have fewer players to fill the same amount of innings, 354 00:15:43,880 --> 00:15:45,960 Speaker 4: so therefore you need more pitchers or are just ready 355 00:15:45,960 --> 00:15:47,600 Speaker 4: to go and give you as many innings as they can, 356 00:15:47,720 --> 00:15:50,520 Speaker 4: So that that has shifted for all organizations, including the 357 00:15:50,520 --> 00:15:51,400 Speaker 4: Mets in the draft. 358 00:15:51,440 --> 00:15:53,080 Speaker 3: Do you think you've seen that now that's been going 359 00:15:53,120 --> 00:15:55,040 Speaker 3: on with this condensed system for a few years now 360 00:15:55,080 --> 00:15:57,760 Speaker 3: across the league. Is that the reason that we're seeing 361 00:15:57,800 --> 00:16:00,360 Speaker 3: both players get to the league more quick clean that 362 00:16:00,360 --> 00:16:02,520 Speaker 3: when those players get to the league, I think especially 363 00:16:02,560 --> 00:16:04,480 Speaker 3: on the hitting side and me just looking across that 364 00:16:04,520 --> 00:16:05,880 Speaker 3: a lot of players come to the league really ready 365 00:16:05,920 --> 00:16:08,360 Speaker 3: to rip. Just do you think that enhances the development 366 00:16:08,360 --> 00:16:09,760 Speaker 3: and makes them more ready when they arrive. 367 00:16:09,960 --> 00:16:13,880 Speaker 4: I think I think that the need to find challenges 368 00:16:13,880 --> 00:16:16,160 Speaker 4: for some of these young talented hitters has sped up 369 00:16:16,160 --> 00:16:19,120 Speaker 4: development timelines for sure. I think that's and many of 370 00:16:19,120 --> 00:16:21,600 Speaker 4: them have proven ready. I think that's the testament to 371 00:16:21,800 --> 00:16:24,480 Speaker 4: you know, instruction and the data that wasn't available even 372 00:16:24,480 --> 00:16:25,080 Speaker 4: ten years ago. 373 00:16:25,280 --> 00:16:27,320 Speaker 1: But yeah, I know with Colin Holk last year, the 374 00:16:27,320 --> 00:16:30,080 Speaker 1: big conversation about him was that he did drop down 375 00:16:30,120 --> 00:16:33,080 Speaker 1: to where the Mets were at. Was there really any 376 00:16:33,120 --> 00:16:34,720 Speaker 1: reason outside of money for that? 377 00:16:35,000 --> 00:16:35,280 Speaker 4: Was there? 378 00:16:35,360 --> 00:16:37,720 Speaker 1: Is there anything that people were seeing that made him 379 00:16:37,760 --> 00:16:39,600 Speaker 1: drop down because it felt like all the mock drafts 380 00:16:39,600 --> 00:16:41,440 Speaker 1: and all the hype was kind of place them in 381 00:16:41,480 --> 00:16:43,480 Speaker 1: like that top ten to fifteen range. 382 00:16:43,520 --> 00:16:46,520 Speaker 4: Yeah. I think with him, I think it's the potential 383 00:16:46,560 --> 00:16:49,080 Speaker 4: that there's no separating tool, that he's just like a 384 00:16:49,120 --> 00:16:51,800 Speaker 4: fifty to fifty five across the board. So you're looking 385 00:16:51,840 --> 00:16:55,360 Speaker 4: at every day second or third baseman who doesn't put 386 00:16:55,400 --> 00:16:58,480 Speaker 4: up loud numbers, but that's you know, high makeup, high athleticism, 387 00:16:58,600 --> 00:17:01,480 Speaker 4: a chance to be a winning player, spike not having 388 00:17:01,520 --> 00:17:03,680 Speaker 4: like outstanding raw tools. 389 00:17:03,800 --> 00:17:06,479 Speaker 3: Is there a level of awkwardness with a guy like 390 00:17:06,480 --> 00:17:09,320 Speaker 3: Sprode who was drafted by the Mets, rebuff them and 391 00:17:09,359 --> 00:17:12,119 Speaker 3: then now comes back into the organization with significantly less leverage. 392 00:17:12,160 --> 00:17:15,360 Speaker 4: You know, I don't know specifically. I know what's interesting 393 00:17:15,359 --> 00:17:18,040 Speaker 4: about spro is that McLean also was an unsigned second 394 00:17:18,119 --> 00:17:20,280 Speaker 4: rounder by the Orioles, So the Mets have two of 395 00:17:20,320 --> 00:17:23,440 Speaker 4: these guys. McLean was a eligible sophomore, so he wasn't 396 00:17:23,520 --> 00:17:25,800 Speaker 4: he hadn't used four years of eligibility. But it is 397 00:17:25,880 --> 00:17:28,159 Speaker 4: kind of an interesting footnote to this draft class. 398 00:17:28,240 --> 00:17:30,880 Speaker 1: With this draft class like coming up, I know it's 399 00:17:30,880 --> 00:17:34,760 Speaker 1: probably not necessarily like easy, but what what are like 400 00:17:34,800 --> 00:17:36,800 Speaker 1: the big Is there a plethora of pitching in this 401 00:17:36,880 --> 00:17:37,480 Speaker 1: draft class? 402 00:17:37,520 --> 00:17:39,000 Speaker 2: Is there better high school hitters? 403 00:17:39,000 --> 00:17:39,040 Speaker 4: Like? 404 00:17:39,080 --> 00:17:40,200 Speaker 2: What are we looking at right now? 405 00:17:40,240 --> 00:17:44,560 Speaker 4: This draft class projects to be pretty weak overall, especially 406 00:17:44,600 --> 00:17:47,399 Speaker 4: on the pitching side, So this might be one to 407 00:17:48,080 --> 00:17:51,359 Speaker 4: shoot the moon on some some prep hitters early anyway, 408 00:17:51,400 --> 00:17:53,120 Speaker 4: because you're going to need to come back with pitchers later, 409 00:17:53,359 --> 00:17:54,760 Speaker 4: the guys who pop up during the season. 410 00:17:54,840 --> 00:17:56,440 Speaker 3: With that, I want to now bring it back from 411 00:17:56,560 --> 00:17:58,560 Speaker 3: like the from draft talk back to Mets stuff. It's 412 00:17:58,560 --> 00:18:00,040 Speaker 3: funny that we've gone through like what Tony men and 413 00:18:00,080 --> 00:18:01,920 Speaker 3: so almost of talking about Mets prospects and we haven't 414 00:18:01,960 --> 00:18:04,879 Speaker 3: mentioned a word about Francisco Alvarez with twenty five homers 415 00:18:04,920 --> 00:18:07,119 Speaker 3: as a twenty one year old last year. Did he 416 00:18:07,400 --> 00:18:12,440 Speaker 3: do enough as a rookie into offensively, defensively, makeup attitude 417 00:18:12,480 --> 00:18:15,800 Speaker 3: by language everything to kind of drive home the ideas 418 00:18:15,800 --> 00:18:17,480 Speaker 3: that you have told us in his podcast before that 419 00:18:17,520 --> 00:18:19,119 Speaker 3: he does have the chance to be that kind of 420 00:18:19,119 --> 00:18:21,040 Speaker 3: like special game breaker type of player. 421 00:18:21,119 --> 00:18:23,199 Speaker 4: Oh yeah, I was very inpressed with him, like just 422 00:18:23,240 --> 00:18:25,600 Speaker 4: as much what he was doing on the side, like 423 00:18:25,640 --> 00:18:29,080 Speaker 4: you're talking about, like doing interviews in English, really developing 424 00:18:29,119 --> 00:18:33,680 Speaker 4: a rapport with pictures, and being a better framer than 425 00:18:34,200 --> 00:18:37,879 Speaker 4: anybody could expect. You know, the drawbacks. Obviously, he tanked 426 00:18:37,880 --> 00:18:40,880 Speaker 4: really bad in the second half. He was probably worn down. 427 00:18:41,560 --> 00:18:44,080 Speaker 4: The throwing needs work, but I think there's just so 428 00:18:44,160 --> 00:18:45,680 Speaker 4: much outside there, especially with the bat. 429 00:18:45,800 --> 00:18:48,000 Speaker 1: What about Mark Vientos, a guy who's going to be 430 00:18:48,040 --> 00:18:49,879 Speaker 1: probably fighting for one of the last couple spots on 431 00:18:49,920 --> 00:18:50,760 Speaker 1: the roster going. 432 00:18:50,640 --> 00:18:51,360 Speaker 2: Into the season. 433 00:18:52,359 --> 00:18:56,120 Speaker 1: Wasn't particularly impressed with what we saw last year, especially 434 00:18:56,119 --> 00:18:59,040 Speaker 1: on the defensive side. It's very hard to project where 435 00:18:59,240 --> 00:19:01,639 Speaker 1: or if you'll ever play the field. What are you 436 00:19:01,640 --> 00:19:03,040 Speaker 1: thinking about him going into the season. 437 00:19:03,080 --> 00:19:06,320 Speaker 4: Yeah, he's got a tough road because he's probably limited 438 00:19:06,320 --> 00:19:10,600 Speaker 4: to first base, so he has the mash and you know, 439 00:19:10,600 --> 00:19:14,440 Speaker 4: I know, at least reputation wise, he was struggled a 440 00:19:14,480 --> 00:19:16,880 Speaker 4: little bit with the right on right spin, So we'll 441 00:19:16,880 --> 00:19:19,120 Speaker 4: see if he can correct that. But obviously the raw 442 00:19:19,160 --> 00:19:22,920 Speaker 4: power measures up with probably anybody except for Elbarez among 443 00:19:22,960 --> 00:19:24,320 Speaker 4: the young up and coming players. 444 00:19:24,359 --> 00:19:27,080 Speaker 3: Back to the trade deadline last season, the Mets acquired 445 00:19:27,359 --> 00:19:31,120 Speaker 3: Drew Gilbert, luis An Haloicunya, and Ryan Clifford as as 446 00:19:31,119 --> 00:19:33,600 Speaker 3: the big names, as well as Jeremy Rodriguez and Tommy 447 00:19:33,600 --> 00:19:38,320 Speaker 3: fan Trade and Marco Vargas and Marco Vargas and Ral Hernandez. Yes, 448 00:19:38,359 --> 00:19:40,920 Speaker 3: of those prospects, not necessarily which one is the best 449 00:19:40,960 --> 00:19:42,920 Speaker 3: right now, which anything has the highest ceiling, but which 450 00:19:43,080 --> 00:19:46,480 Speaker 3: was your favorite, maybe even just from an acquisitional cost 451 00:19:46,480 --> 00:19:49,560 Speaker 3: standpoint than what they are now. The changes they've even 452 00:19:49,560 --> 00:19:50,639 Speaker 3: made already in the Mets system. 453 00:19:50,680 --> 00:19:53,720 Speaker 4: Yeah, I like. I like Gilbert for probability, but I 454 00:19:53,760 --> 00:19:58,320 Speaker 4: think for creativity. I like the Jeremy Rodriguez trade, Yes, 455 00:19:59,480 --> 00:20:01,920 Speaker 4: you know, being a to get who was the Diamondbacks 456 00:20:02,000 --> 00:20:05,920 Speaker 4: top signee who was heard an outstanding debut in the DSL. 457 00:20:06,560 --> 00:20:08,680 Speaker 4: Able to get him and get creative, but they were 458 00:20:09,080 --> 00:20:11,200 Speaker 4: you know, paying down like half of fan's contract to 459 00:20:11,320 --> 00:20:14,000 Speaker 4: acquire a better talent. I think that's a good sign 460 00:20:14,040 --> 00:20:15,800 Speaker 4: for the future as well, especially as we look at 461 00:20:15,840 --> 00:20:17,720 Speaker 4: some of these short term deals they've signed this offseason. 462 00:20:17,880 --> 00:20:19,879 Speaker 4: We could get, you know, repeats of this at this 463 00:20:19,960 --> 00:20:22,240 Speaker 4: upcoming trade deadline if the season goes south. 464 00:20:22,320 --> 00:20:23,240 Speaker 3: What about Rodriguez? 465 00:20:23,280 --> 00:20:26,600 Speaker 4: Do you like? Hitterish, good athlete, probably a second baseman, 466 00:20:27,000 --> 00:20:29,280 Speaker 4: but a chance to be a first division guy at 467 00:20:29,280 --> 00:20:31,400 Speaker 4: this point. I mean, he started the season at sixteen. 468 00:20:31,480 --> 00:20:33,439 Speaker 4: He's super young at this point. He's got to hit 469 00:20:33,440 --> 00:20:35,480 Speaker 4: the ball harder, but he's got a lot of the 470 00:20:35,480 --> 00:20:38,280 Speaker 4: the swing decisions and the hitter trades that he like. 471 00:20:38,560 --> 00:20:41,440 Speaker 1: It's just like crazy to think, Like when you said sixteen, 472 00:20:41,480 --> 00:20:43,600 Speaker 1: it's like, wow, the guy's born in like two thousand 473 00:20:43,640 --> 00:20:46,840 Speaker 1: and what seven six, Like it's like, oh my god, 474 00:20:47,000 --> 00:20:50,720 Speaker 1: Like the met the Mets were blowing the division that year, Like. 475 00:20:51,359 --> 00:20:53,840 Speaker 4: He doesn't know, he doesn't have that baggage. 476 00:20:54,720 --> 00:20:56,840 Speaker 3: Would you say something like hitherish like a scouting term? 477 00:20:56,880 --> 00:20:59,320 Speaker 3: Can you tell listeners what what that means? Even though 478 00:20:59,320 --> 00:21:01,359 Speaker 3: if it's there's a feeling around that way, But like 479 00:21:01,400 --> 00:21:03,879 Speaker 3: when you say hitherish, like well, like the three traits below, it. 480 00:21:03,960 --> 00:21:08,000 Speaker 4: Let's see good rhythm, swings the strikes, does it chase? 481 00:21:08,160 --> 00:21:09,840 Speaker 4: You can kind of hit the ball where it's pitched 482 00:21:10,200 --> 00:21:13,000 Speaker 4: when needed. And he's not a guy who's obviously signing 483 00:21:13,040 --> 00:21:15,640 Speaker 4: out for power based on his exi velos. So yeah, 484 00:21:16,200 --> 00:21:17,080 Speaker 4: attributes like that. 485 00:21:17,320 --> 00:21:18,680 Speaker 1: Is it just one of those things like where it's 486 00:21:18,680 --> 00:21:21,320 Speaker 1: like instinctually he just acts like a hitter. 487 00:21:21,960 --> 00:21:24,680 Speaker 4: That's the thing. It's like Major league teams through time 488 00:21:24,760 --> 00:21:28,040 Speaker 4: have demonstrated that they can identify future Major leaguers at 489 00:21:28,040 --> 00:21:31,320 Speaker 4: a very young age hitters sixteen seventeen eighteen. They have 490 00:21:31,320 --> 00:21:34,920 Speaker 4: a very strong track record with those types of players. Pitchers, 491 00:21:34,960 --> 00:21:37,560 Speaker 4: no chance, but hitters. So when you get a young 492 00:21:37,600 --> 00:21:40,399 Speaker 4: guy who impresses scouts at that age, I take that 493 00:21:40,440 --> 00:21:40,960 Speaker 4: as a good. 494 00:21:40,800 --> 00:21:42,840 Speaker 3: Sign when you say that he saw us to get 495 00:21:42,920 --> 00:21:45,280 Speaker 3: his eggs of losses. But he's also a sixteen seventeen 496 00:21:45,359 --> 00:21:48,600 Speaker 3: year old. Where where are those benchmarks for literal teenager 497 00:21:48,640 --> 00:21:50,240 Speaker 3: eggs of laws here? Are you guys pulling that from 498 00:21:50,280 --> 00:21:52,520 Speaker 3: what you take from high school data or is there 499 00:21:52,560 --> 00:21:55,040 Speaker 3: something that's more You expect more from these players who 500 00:21:55,040 --> 00:21:57,840 Speaker 3: are already professional Where where are those benchmarks? And how 501 00:21:57,920 --> 00:22:01,280 Speaker 3: much room do you give them for legit physical maturation. 502 00:22:01,440 --> 00:22:03,399 Speaker 4: I don't know exactly where the line is. I have 503 00:22:03,400 --> 00:22:06,480 Speaker 4: to look that up. I think at that age, which 504 00:22:06,480 --> 00:22:10,640 Speaker 4: is what I'm really zeroing in on, is how evaluators. 505 00:22:11,040 --> 00:22:13,640 Speaker 4: How convinced are they that this player can hit or 506 00:22:14,000 --> 00:22:16,439 Speaker 4: will hit, because obviously at a sixteen, like the present 507 00:22:16,920 --> 00:22:18,760 Speaker 4: hit tool in the major leagues would be like a 508 00:22:18,920 --> 00:22:22,480 Speaker 4: negative one. But I mean, but you know, you're kind 509 00:22:22,520 --> 00:22:24,840 Speaker 4: of placing your faith in those emails. 510 00:22:24,480 --> 00:22:26,960 Speaker 1: With Ryan Clifford, I know, a favorite of James. Last year, 511 00:22:27,320 --> 00:22:28,639 Speaker 1: he kind of struggled a little bit when he went 512 00:22:28,640 --> 00:22:32,040 Speaker 1: to Brooklyn, and we know about you know how lefties 513 00:22:32,080 --> 00:22:35,119 Speaker 1: in particular in that ballpark tend to struggle because you 514 00:22:35,200 --> 00:22:39,240 Speaker 1: are hitting into the ocean. It's a very very difficult 515 00:22:39,280 --> 00:22:41,680 Speaker 1: ballpark to hit in, regardless if you're a lefty, and 516 00:22:41,720 --> 00:22:43,960 Speaker 1: then you add in the wind from the waves coming, 517 00:22:44,240 --> 00:22:47,040 Speaker 1: it's not very easy. Clifford's outlook going forward, he was 518 00:22:47,080 --> 00:22:49,359 Speaker 1: someone who's kind of had a little bit of hype 519 00:22:49,440 --> 00:22:50,480 Speaker 1: because of that hit tool. 520 00:22:50,720 --> 00:22:52,240 Speaker 2: Anything changed with him, I don't think so. 521 00:22:52,480 --> 00:22:55,560 Speaker 4: I think he's a tough player to evaluate on the 522 00:22:55,600 --> 00:22:58,400 Speaker 4: surface numbers, just because he went from Ashville to Brooklyn. 523 00:22:58,720 --> 00:23:01,159 Speaker 4: Probably one of the more severe Hiya switch ups that 524 00:23:01,200 --> 00:23:03,520 Speaker 4: you'll see, you know, the bad of all Dada was good. 525 00:23:04,040 --> 00:23:06,320 Speaker 4: He's you know, the power production was good. Twenty four 526 00:23:06,320 --> 00:23:09,000 Speaker 4: homers as a teenager, that's a good total. I think 527 00:23:09,520 --> 00:23:11,159 Speaker 4: what he does at double A when he reaches it 528 00:23:11,200 --> 00:23:12,800 Speaker 4: this year will be a lot more telling. 529 00:23:12,840 --> 00:23:15,920 Speaker 3: You mentioned very Erillion's interview about Louis and Helakunya is 530 00:23:16,000 --> 00:23:18,040 Speaker 3: ceiling as a hitter, and I feel like that's something 531 00:23:18,080 --> 00:23:21,600 Speaker 3: that's very contentious right now in both Mets and prospect circles, 532 00:23:21,680 --> 00:23:24,400 Speaker 3: mostly probably because of his last name, and then secondly 533 00:23:24,400 --> 00:23:25,919 Speaker 3: because of the player who we just happened to be 534 00:23:25,960 --> 00:23:27,840 Speaker 3: traded for. It's a lot to stand up to as 535 00:23:27,880 --> 00:23:30,199 Speaker 3: a as a young baseball player, and we see him 536 00:23:30,200 --> 00:23:33,159 Speaker 3: take batting practice and he sometimes can just hit the 537 00:23:33,280 --> 00:23:34,840 Speaker 3: shit out of the ball like he'll take a hack. 538 00:23:34,880 --> 00:23:36,639 Speaker 3: Even sometimes in a game when he gets a hanger, 539 00:23:37,440 --> 00:23:39,399 Speaker 3: he hits tower home runs you can't even believe, especially 540 00:23:39,400 --> 00:23:42,399 Speaker 3: from his size. So where is that game power lacking 541 00:23:42,480 --> 00:23:46,040 Speaker 3: and how hard or easier or what kind of changes 542 00:23:46,119 --> 00:23:48,480 Speaker 3: need to happen for a player, not even Acunya specifically 543 00:23:48,520 --> 00:23:50,360 Speaker 3: to tap into more of what's wrong. 544 00:23:50,440 --> 00:23:52,679 Speaker 4: Yeah, he's one of the borderline players right where he 545 00:23:52,680 --> 00:23:54,760 Speaker 4: does have the good raw power, but for him to 546 00:23:54,800 --> 00:23:57,600 Speaker 4: be an effective major leaguer, he's probably not. Probably his 547 00:23:57,680 --> 00:23:59,879 Speaker 4: best version is not selling out for that all the time, 548 00:24:01,640 --> 00:24:04,480 Speaker 4: and in practice he does tend to go the other 549 00:24:04,520 --> 00:24:06,919 Speaker 4: way and hit the ball on the ground to you know, 550 00:24:07,480 --> 00:24:09,960 Speaker 4: as the old maxim is to take advantage of his speed. 551 00:24:11,240 --> 00:24:13,560 Speaker 4: So I think the best version of him is probably 552 00:24:14,480 --> 00:24:16,760 Speaker 4: someone who takes his shots obviously takes his a swing 553 00:24:16,880 --> 00:24:20,280 Speaker 4: early incounts, but is more inclined to try to work 554 00:24:20,320 --> 00:24:20,880 Speaker 4: his lamb base. 555 00:24:20,960 --> 00:24:23,000 Speaker 3: And you also said in the player evaluation from the 556 00:24:23,000 --> 00:24:24,720 Speaker 3: Trade that he's like you like Drew Gilbert the most 557 00:24:24,760 --> 00:24:27,240 Speaker 3: based on probability, which I'm sure a lot of fans 558 00:24:27,240 --> 00:24:30,560 Speaker 3: will here be like what whatal? But what makes you 559 00:24:30,600 --> 00:24:33,440 Speaker 3: think that he's so? He has just less of a 560 00:24:33,520 --> 00:24:35,520 Speaker 3: range of outcomes as more of a certain major leaguer 561 00:24:35,520 --> 00:24:36,600 Speaker 3: than these other players acquired. 562 00:24:36,760 --> 00:24:40,480 Speaker 4: He has the attributes that you know, he's got the 563 00:24:40,480 --> 00:24:43,520 Speaker 4: the IQ, the makeup, the energy and the tools of 564 00:24:43,600 --> 00:24:46,679 Speaker 4: a of a winning player. I think you know and 565 00:24:46,840 --> 00:24:48,800 Speaker 4: I don't know that he necessarily has a plus tool. 566 00:24:49,160 --> 00:24:51,280 Speaker 4: I think you would look at him and say he's 567 00:24:51,280 --> 00:24:53,440 Speaker 4: fifties across the board. But he's but he's but he's versatile. 568 00:24:53,480 --> 00:24:55,520 Speaker 4: He can play any outfield position, throw as well as 569 00:24:55,640 --> 00:24:57,719 Speaker 4: a former pitcher. You know, his on base ability might 570 00:24:57,760 --> 00:25:00,840 Speaker 4: be his best attribute and there might be some overlap 571 00:25:01,560 --> 00:25:04,280 Speaker 4: to like a Brandon Nimmo coming up in terms of 572 00:25:04,320 --> 00:25:05,160 Speaker 4: what he does well. 573 00:25:05,240 --> 00:25:07,120 Speaker 1: This is something like we like to say, and I'm 574 00:25:07,119 --> 00:25:09,640 Speaker 1: sure it's not a term that a lot of scouting 575 00:25:09,840 --> 00:25:12,360 Speaker 1: or evaluators use, but like Drew Gilbert's got a little 576 00:25:12,400 --> 00:25:14,960 Speaker 1: dog in him, Like he's just kind of that guy. 577 00:25:15,040 --> 00:25:16,840 Speaker 1: Like he seems like he's a leader, He's got a 578 00:25:16,880 --> 00:25:19,879 Speaker 1: lot of fire. Is does that play into how people 579 00:25:20,200 --> 00:25:21,240 Speaker 1: perceive a prospect? 580 00:25:21,280 --> 00:25:24,720 Speaker 4: Oh yeah, yeah, you definitely want the players who who 581 00:25:24,800 --> 00:25:26,760 Speaker 4: just want it. You know, I think it's an important 582 00:25:26,760 --> 00:25:28,680 Speaker 4: separator when we're talking about the best of the best. 583 00:25:28,760 --> 00:25:30,399 Speaker 3: It feels like he has that feels like again, we 584 00:25:30,440 --> 00:25:32,560 Speaker 3: went to that semi final game last year with the 585 00:25:32,560 --> 00:25:35,639 Speaker 3: Binghamton Met the Rumble Ponies and the Patriots, and you 586 00:25:35,720 --> 00:25:39,040 Speaker 3: felt that him, Jet and Akunya and Hamill like kind 587 00:25:39,040 --> 00:25:42,080 Speaker 3: of together had this little had this little like walk 588 00:25:42,119 --> 00:25:45,400 Speaker 3: in their step. Is there something about these players having 589 00:25:45,440 --> 00:25:48,200 Speaker 3: this exposure playing together and playing at a high level 590 00:25:48,560 --> 00:25:50,359 Speaker 3: before they reached the major league. Is that's something that 591 00:25:50,400 --> 00:25:53,280 Speaker 3: we can that should be and maybe is tracked in 592 00:25:53,320 --> 00:25:56,080 Speaker 3: a way that can create the better likelihood of being 593 00:25:56,080 --> 00:25:56,959 Speaker 3: better major leaguers. 594 00:25:57,000 --> 00:25:59,400 Speaker 4: I think there's something to it. There is a lot 595 00:25:59,440 --> 00:26:03,679 Speaker 4: of correlation between organizations that win in the minor leagues, 596 00:26:03,680 --> 00:26:06,560 Speaker 4: like at all levels, and in the major leagues. Right 597 00:26:06,560 --> 00:26:09,280 Speaker 4: It's not one to one, obviously, but there is some 598 00:26:09,320 --> 00:26:12,280 Speaker 4: correlation there. So it is encouraging to see groups of 599 00:26:12,320 --> 00:26:16,280 Speaker 4: players rise and master each level. And you know, we'll 600 00:26:16,280 --> 00:26:17,959 Speaker 4: see if it bears fruit in the major leagues, but 601 00:26:18,000 --> 00:26:19,560 Speaker 4: I think it's a good start at double A. 602 00:26:19,600 --> 00:26:22,320 Speaker 1: Team one prospect we haven't spoke about yet. Former first 603 00:26:22,359 --> 00:26:24,639 Speaker 1: round pick by the Mets, Kevin Parada. I think he 604 00:26:24,680 --> 00:26:27,320 Speaker 1: came in at number ten on Baseball America's list, and 605 00:26:27,480 --> 00:26:30,359 Speaker 1: he's someone who I think draft time had a lot 606 00:26:30,400 --> 00:26:32,199 Speaker 1: of hype and then he obviously dropped down to the 607 00:26:32,240 --> 00:26:35,880 Speaker 1: Mets and it seems like he's been a little underwhelming 608 00:26:35,960 --> 00:26:39,200 Speaker 1: thus far. What are we looking at with Kevin Parada 609 00:26:39,200 --> 00:26:40,160 Speaker 1: moving forward right now? 610 00:26:40,320 --> 00:26:42,520 Speaker 4: A tough year. I ended up giving giving him a 611 00:26:42,600 --> 00:26:46,240 Speaker 4: mulligan because he did play well for stretches at Brooklyn 612 00:26:46,680 --> 00:26:48,480 Speaker 4: kind of had an injury late and then struggled to 613 00:26:48,520 --> 00:26:51,480 Speaker 4: double a. But you know, he's either got to improve 614 00:26:51,760 --> 00:26:54,600 Speaker 4: his hitting or he's got to improve his ability to 615 00:26:54,600 --> 00:26:57,080 Speaker 4: stay behind the plate. There's probability to stay behind the plate. 616 00:26:57,240 --> 00:27:00,760 Speaker 4: It's hard to see him in the current version being 617 00:27:00,760 --> 00:27:01,520 Speaker 4: a major league ger. Up. 618 00:27:01,560 --> 00:27:03,720 Speaker 3: Note when you say in the current version, what and 619 00:27:03,760 --> 00:27:06,320 Speaker 3: specifically like his hitting at his field, it's very broad. 620 00:27:06,440 --> 00:27:07,800 Speaker 2: Up What does we are his. 621 00:27:07,800 --> 00:27:09,960 Speaker 3: Weaknesses right now as a prospect, and what are things 622 00:27:10,000 --> 00:27:12,120 Speaker 3: that can kind of elevate his status. 623 00:27:12,240 --> 00:27:15,360 Speaker 4: The arm is the biggest issue. He allows a ton 624 00:27:15,400 --> 00:27:18,000 Speaker 4: of stolen based attempts at a high success rate of 625 00:27:18,840 --> 00:27:22,800 Speaker 4: successful stolen bases, doesn't get into position very well. Framing 626 00:27:23,080 --> 00:27:26,119 Speaker 4: higher pitches needs work. The hitting was okay at times. 627 00:27:26,119 --> 00:27:28,359 Speaker 4: He's got a good disciplined approach. I think there was 628 00:27:28,440 --> 00:27:31,920 Speaker 4: more miss even on pitches in the zone than expected. 629 00:27:31,960 --> 00:27:35,600 Speaker 4: I think there's more rawness than expected just for this hitting. Overall, 630 00:27:35,640 --> 00:27:37,199 Speaker 4: I think there's some teams that would still go like 631 00:27:37,359 --> 00:27:39,919 Speaker 4: by future hit and power on him. So he's not 632 00:27:39,960 --> 00:27:43,320 Speaker 4: like a lost cause. If he can tweak and get 633 00:27:43,359 --> 00:27:44,960 Speaker 4: to where he was two years ago. 634 00:27:45,000 --> 00:27:47,160 Speaker 2: I've got more of a question just for you in general. 635 00:27:47,560 --> 00:27:50,359 Speaker 1: We've been naming prospects for thirty minutes, and you're able 636 00:27:50,400 --> 00:27:52,520 Speaker 1: to just like rattle off like instantly, like. 637 00:27:52,600 --> 00:27:53,919 Speaker 2: Just stuff about all these guys. 638 00:27:54,119 --> 00:27:55,879 Speaker 1: How do you even keep track or how do you 639 00:27:55,880 --> 00:27:59,320 Speaker 1: even have enough time to watch or evaluate all these 640 00:27:59,359 --> 00:28:00,200 Speaker 1: kinds of players? 641 00:28:00,560 --> 00:28:03,359 Speaker 4: Well, I did I read my chapter again before I 642 00:28:03,359 --> 00:28:06,720 Speaker 4: did this interview. That helps, and it's kind of fresh 643 00:28:06,720 --> 00:28:08,639 Speaker 4: in mind because I wrote it in December, so I 644 00:28:08,680 --> 00:28:13,480 Speaker 4: was able to call back to a lot of that. Yeah, 645 00:28:13,520 --> 00:28:17,240 Speaker 4: it's just a lot of conversations with people all season long, 646 00:28:17,520 --> 00:28:21,040 Speaker 4: just kind of thinking about where players fit in an 647 00:28:21,040 --> 00:28:21,719 Speaker 4: overall context. 648 00:28:21,800 --> 00:28:23,600 Speaker 3: It's even fun having these conversations with you because it 649 00:28:23,640 --> 00:28:25,440 Speaker 3: feels like so second nature and like to feel the 650 00:28:25,520 --> 00:28:27,760 Speaker 3: lingo coming out in the way you talk about these 651 00:28:27,760 --> 00:28:30,240 Speaker 3: players and things you can rattle off about them. It's 652 00:28:30,240 --> 00:28:32,040 Speaker 3: great and I love every time you come on. We 653 00:28:32,080 --> 00:28:34,359 Speaker 3: all have some nice, funny little group chat. We talked 654 00:28:34,440 --> 00:28:36,720 Speaker 3: somewhat often about this stuff as much as we can, 655 00:28:36,840 --> 00:28:38,800 Speaker 3: but now just like zoom out a little bit and 656 00:28:38,880 --> 00:28:42,200 Speaker 3: talk about the Mets sis, the Mets like organization as 657 00:28:42,200 --> 00:28:44,440 Speaker 3: a whole. In terms of minor league's player development. They 658 00:28:44,480 --> 00:28:47,600 Speaker 3: made two pretty significant highers earlier this offseason in Chris 659 00:28:47,640 --> 00:28:50,280 Speaker 3: Gross to be a VP of Amateur Scouting and Andy 660 00:28:50,320 --> 00:28:52,920 Speaker 3: Green to be I remember his actual title, but I 661 00:28:52,960 --> 00:28:55,720 Speaker 3: think it was also a VP of player development. Whether 662 00:28:55,760 --> 00:28:57,840 Speaker 3: you know or whether you heard about those two guys 663 00:28:57,920 --> 00:29:00,560 Speaker 3: and whether you think they fit in to this Mets 664 00:29:00,600 --> 00:29:01,600 Speaker 3: puzzle players development. 665 00:29:01,680 --> 00:29:05,760 Speaker 4: Yes, Gross has a tremendous reputation around the game, so 666 00:29:05,800 --> 00:29:08,720 Speaker 4: that was an exciting for the organization to have him 667 00:29:08,840 --> 00:29:11,440 Speaker 4: running the drafts. I think that will be I think 668 00:29:11,440 --> 00:29:13,400 Speaker 4: that will be good for the organization. I know less 669 00:29:13,400 --> 00:29:16,320 Speaker 4: about Green, just because he's been like a minor league 670 00:29:16,360 --> 00:29:19,080 Speaker 4: manager briefly a major league manager. I believe it. So 671 00:29:19,080 --> 00:29:22,960 Speaker 4: I'm not mistaken good reputation obviously because he was had 672 00:29:22,960 --> 00:29:24,880 Speaker 4: a prominent role over the Cubs before he was hired. 673 00:29:25,520 --> 00:29:28,400 Speaker 4: But yeah, we'll look forward to seeing what he can 674 00:29:28,440 --> 00:29:30,920 Speaker 4: do with the farm system this year. 675 00:29:31,080 --> 00:29:34,640 Speaker 1: Has the addition of Eric Jaegers to the Mets farm 676 00:29:34,680 --> 00:29:37,360 Speaker 1: system in the pitching lab. Has that been something that 677 00:29:37,440 --> 00:29:39,720 Speaker 1: evaluators have taken note of as like. 678 00:29:40,160 --> 00:29:42,320 Speaker 2: He might have a little something going on here? 679 00:29:42,400 --> 00:29:45,480 Speaker 4: I think so. I think we've seen pictures, you know, 680 00:29:45,760 --> 00:29:48,400 Speaker 4: broaden the repertoires just the number one thing that we've 681 00:29:48,400 --> 00:29:51,360 Speaker 4: seen from most of the emerging Mets pitching prospects, because 682 00:29:51,360 --> 00:29:54,120 Speaker 4: in most cases it's not guys who were like, you know, 683 00:29:54,160 --> 00:29:59,479 Speaker 4: first round picks or even necessarily even prominent college pitchers, 684 00:29:59,520 --> 00:30:01,560 Speaker 4: but and Scott and then they're going to try to 685 00:30:02,120 --> 00:30:04,480 Speaker 4: get Nolan McLean to kind of take that route as 686 00:30:04,920 --> 00:30:08,200 Speaker 4: college believer to pro starter, and if that's successful, that 687 00:30:08,200 --> 00:30:09,880 Speaker 4: will definitely be a major feather in it. 688 00:30:10,200 --> 00:30:12,800 Speaker 3: I remember, I think from last year's draft, another believer 689 00:30:12,840 --> 00:30:14,520 Speaker 3: they're trying to make a start of their Brandon Banks, 690 00:30:14,560 --> 00:30:17,800 Speaker 3: who also had the same kind of crazy underlying pitch data. 691 00:30:17,840 --> 00:30:20,440 Speaker 3: So is there just a general and it could be no, 692 00:30:20,960 --> 00:30:22,520 Speaker 3: We're not looking for a glazed answer here. Like I 693 00:30:22,560 --> 00:30:24,160 Speaker 3: remember few yearsgo, we're talking about the fact that Mets 694 00:30:24,200 --> 00:30:26,440 Speaker 3: were putting so much into making this player development like 695 00:30:26,480 --> 00:30:28,560 Speaker 3: their machine that was going to push the organization forward. 696 00:30:28,600 --> 00:30:30,840 Speaker 3: And you've seen that. We've heard that top down now 697 00:30:30,880 --> 00:30:33,200 Speaker 3: for the last year, especially with the trade deadline, how 698 00:30:33,400 --> 00:30:35,600 Speaker 3: serious they were about building up the minor leagues and 699 00:30:35,600 --> 00:30:39,200 Speaker 3: not selling out these prospects this offseason. Does it feel 700 00:30:39,240 --> 00:30:41,680 Speaker 3: like they could be doing enough now to start putting 701 00:30:41,680 --> 00:30:43,960 Speaker 3: themselves in the conversations with some of these teams that 702 00:30:44,040 --> 00:30:45,840 Speaker 3: have these player development machines possible. 703 00:30:45,880 --> 00:30:48,920 Speaker 4: I know for certain they have integrated player development more 704 00:30:48,960 --> 00:30:52,640 Speaker 4: into the draft decision process, bringing PD into the room, 705 00:30:52,760 --> 00:30:55,479 Speaker 4: so to speak, and identifying players, Yes, we can develop 706 00:30:55,520 --> 00:30:58,440 Speaker 4: this type of player, so let's draft this guy instead 707 00:30:58,440 --> 00:31:01,320 Speaker 4: of this guy because we think we can develop these attributes. 708 00:31:01,760 --> 00:31:05,640 Speaker 4: I know that's a big positive step they've taken lately, 709 00:31:06,000 --> 00:31:08,800 Speaker 4: and I would obviously expect things like that to continue 710 00:31:08,920 --> 00:31:10,120 Speaker 4: under David Stearns. 711 00:31:10,160 --> 00:31:12,680 Speaker 3: Is that something and not all organizations do. Sounds like 712 00:31:12,720 --> 00:31:13,160 Speaker 3: a nature. 713 00:31:13,440 --> 00:31:16,040 Speaker 4: It sounded like it was somewhat novel to the Mets, 714 00:31:16,040 --> 00:31:19,000 Speaker 4: like something introduced under Eppler and that scouting. 715 00:31:18,600 --> 00:31:22,800 Speaker 1: Department so well, concerning that player development wasn't involved in 716 00:31:22,840 --> 00:31:24,000 Speaker 1: the draft process before. 717 00:31:24,280 --> 00:31:26,840 Speaker 3: So here take some guys, enjoy what we didn't know 718 00:31:26,840 --> 00:31:28,520 Speaker 3: the draft was today. Otherwise, now bring it back to 719 00:31:28,560 --> 00:31:30,880 Speaker 3: the Mets system in general. Outside of the top ten, 720 00:31:31,000 --> 00:31:34,560 Speaker 3: are there any sleepers iness system players that you can 721 00:31:34,640 --> 00:31:37,240 Speaker 3: see getting into this top ten next year? Maybe even 722 00:31:37,400 --> 00:31:40,479 Speaker 3: just touching, caressing kissing up against your top hundred as 723 00:31:40,480 --> 00:31:43,240 Speaker 3: it comes out, Who could be the riser in the system? 724 00:31:43,240 --> 00:31:45,520 Speaker 3: Who should fans be aware of heading into twenty twenty four. 725 00:31:45,560 --> 00:31:47,959 Speaker 4: Yeah, I'm excited to see what sprot and McLean can do. 726 00:31:48,200 --> 00:31:50,920 Speaker 4: I'm excited to see what Jeremy Rodriguez can do. The 727 00:31:51,200 --> 00:31:54,680 Speaker 4: Florida Complex League shortstop Haesu's Baiaz might be one who's 728 00:31:54,680 --> 00:31:57,480 Speaker 4: stepped on a little bit because he does have raw ability, 729 00:31:57,680 --> 00:32:02,840 Speaker 4: just had poor surface stats this year in twenty twenty three, 730 00:32:03,240 --> 00:32:05,400 Speaker 4: but he's someone who has the attributes to be an 731 00:32:05,400 --> 00:32:08,360 Speaker 4: impact power hitter in particular and played and stay on 732 00:32:08,400 --> 00:32:10,560 Speaker 4: the infield, probably at third base. He'd be one I'd 733 00:32:10,600 --> 00:32:12,840 Speaker 4: be watching as well. In addition to those other three. 734 00:32:12,680 --> 00:32:15,080 Speaker 1: I feel like Mets fans are clamoring for a big 735 00:32:15,120 --> 00:32:18,280 Speaker 1: trade and that would probably involve giving up some prospects. 736 00:32:18,440 --> 00:32:20,440 Speaker 1: And one of the names that I feel like we 737 00:32:20,520 --> 00:32:22,960 Speaker 1: talked about probably a lot the last time we spoke 738 00:32:23,400 --> 00:32:27,080 Speaker 1: was Alex Ramirez and someone that not really getting that 739 00:32:27,160 --> 00:32:29,480 Speaker 1: same kind of love that he was a couple of 740 00:32:29,520 --> 00:32:32,520 Speaker 1: seasons ago. What was the reason for that? Is it 741 00:32:32,600 --> 00:32:35,280 Speaker 1: just not really seeing that growth from him. 742 00:32:35,880 --> 00:32:40,200 Speaker 4: I think, you know, the defense, the arm, the speed 743 00:32:40,600 --> 00:32:43,440 Speaker 4: have all developed well, and when he's putting a maximum effort, 744 00:32:44,000 --> 00:32:47,080 Speaker 4: he's very strong in those categories. The hitting has always 745 00:32:47,120 --> 00:32:50,680 Speaker 4: been the potential stumbling block. He's got unusual swing mechanics, 746 00:32:51,080 --> 00:32:53,440 Speaker 4: so they're trying to find a balance between what he 747 00:32:53,560 --> 00:32:56,080 Speaker 4: wants to do and then we will work so there's 748 00:32:56,080 --> 00:32:58,640 Speaker 4: a level of comfort and production. The Mets didn't get 749 00:32:58,640 --> 00:33:01,280 Speaker 4: any production in twenty twenty three. You a bad year inha, 750 00:33:01,520 --> 00:33:04,640 Speaker 4: but you know he's got talent and if he takes 751 00:33:04,680 --> 00:33:06,360 Speaker 4: to the instruction, there's a chance he could have a 752 00:33:06,440 --> 00:33:07,120 Speaker 4: rebound season. 753 00:33:07,160 --> 00:33:09,680 Speaker 3: Does it act as some kind of organizational impediment to 754 00:33:09,720 --> 00:33:12,120 Speaker 3: have a high a team like the Mets have where 755 00:33:12,160 --> 00:33:14,200 Speaker 3: you just know that offense is going to be completely 756 00:33:14,240 --> 00:33:16,760 Speaker 3: suppressed and pitching is going to be something that's relatively 757 00:33:16,800 --> 00:33:17,560 Speaker 3: easy to come by. 758 00:33:17,800 --> 00:33:19,560 Speaker 4: A lot of the Northeast teams have that, where you 759 00:33:19,600 --> 00:33:23,080 Speaker 4: have these very power suppressing parks in the minor leagues, 760 00:33:23,160 --> 00:33:25,680 Speaker 4: especially the lower levels, and then it's the opposite for 761 00:33:25,680 --> 00:33:26,960 Speaker 4: a lot of the West teams, where it's a lot 762 00:33:26,960 --> 00:33:31,200 Speaker 4: of bombs away and the low levels. It's a strange setup. 763 00:33:32,240 --> 00:33:34,600 Speaker 4: I think it helps because they know it allows pitchers 764 00:33:34,600 --> 00:33:36,960 Speaker 4: to build confidence and hitters probably don't get into as 765 00:33:36,960 --> 00:33:39,640 Speaker 4: any bad habits as they would in like a former 766 00:33:39,640 --> 00:33:41,640 Speaker 4: friendly park. I think overall it's good. 767 00:33:41,680 --> 00:33:44,200 Speaker 3: Is there a world where these kind of power suppressing 768 00:33:44,280 --> 00:33:47,920 Speaker 3: environments on the East kind of become viewed similarly as 769 00:33:47,960 --> 00:33:51,560 Speaker 3: the power potent parks in the at West and the 770 00:33:51,600 --> 00:33:54,960 Speaker 3: PCL where we see a lot of teams, especially the Mariners, 771 00:33:55,040 --> 00:33:58,120 Speaker 3: just routinely have their pitchers completely skip triple A because 772 00:33:58,120 --> 00:34:00,520 Speaker 3: there's no nothing good to be done there is there 773 00:34:00,680 --> 00:34:03,120 Speaker 3: is that level too important high A to jump from 774 00:34:03,160 --> 00:34:04,720 Speaker 3: low way to Hya double A? Or is there a 775 00:34:04,720 --> 00:34:07,200 Speaker 3: world at some point where we start seeing teams move 776 00:34:07,240 --> 00:34:09,040 Speaker 3: their players from low way straight to double A to 777 00:34:09,080 --> 00:34:12,080 Speaker 3: avoid this kind of mental gymastics to players have to 778 00:34:12,080 --> 00:34:14,319 Speaker 3: go through. And they have nine homers in ninety games 779 00:34:14,320 --> 00:34:16,120 Speaker 3: when they used to have twenty. 780 00:34:15,840 --> 00:34:18,200 Speaker 4: Five, I don't think they would do that with high 781 00:34:18,239 --> 00:34:20,800 Speaker 4: A just because it's an important step. I think because 782 00:34:20,800 --> 00:34:23,880 Speaker 4: the quality of play at low A has gotten worse. Rightly, 783 00:34:23,960 --> 00:34:26,680 Speaker 4: it's now more equivalent to what the Penn League used 784 00:34:26,680 --> 00:34:29,240 Speaker 4: to be in terms of experience and ability and such. 785 00:34:29,360 --> 00:34:32,320 Speaker 4: But yeah, I think Triple A is going to continue 786 00:34:32,320 --> 00:34:34,520 Speaker 4: to be skipped with more regularity, similar to what the 787 00:34:34,560 --> 00:34:35,160 Speaker 4: Mariners did. 788 00:34:35,200 --> 00:34:37,520 Speaker 3: And then I think, just last question before I want 789 00:34:37,560 --> 00:34:38,879 Speaker 3: to ask you like one or two things just about 790 00:34:38,880 --> 00:34:41,680 Speaker 3: other baseball stuff, dynasty baseball stuff, so people can tune 791 00:34:41,680 --> 00:34:43,759 Speaker 3: out for that at the end. But in terms of 792 00:34:43,880 --> 00:34:47,239 Speaker 3: the Mets system right now, very vaguely, very broadly, what 793 00:34:47,280 --> 00:34:49,919 Speaker 3: would you say are the strongest positional groups in terms 794 00:34:49,920 --> 00:34:52,920 Speaker 3: of either ability to help the major leagues or just 795 00:34:52,960 --> 00:34:54,640 Speaker 3: in the system in general? And where would you say 796 00:34:54,640 --> 00:34:56,960 Speaker 3: the system right now has its biggest gaps. 797 00:34:57,080 --> 00:35:00,080 Speaker 4: Infield is definitely the strongest group for the Mets. It 798 00:35:00,080 --> 00:35:02,440 Speaker 4: seems to be a focus for them internationally as just 799 00:35:02,520 --> 00:35:05,319 Speaker 4: for a lot of teams and in the draft so so, 800 00:35:05,560 --> 00:35:07,239 Speaker 4: and that low way group is going to be very 801 00:35:07,239 --> 00:35:11,799 Speaker 4: interesting this year with Colin how Marco Vargas, has Baiez. 802 00:35:11,920 --> 00:35:14,480 Speaker 4: It's going to be a good group there weaknesses. Left 803 00:35:14,480 --> 00:35:17,040 Speaker 4: handed pitching has been a constant weakness for the system. 804 00:35:17,040 --> 00:35:19,000 Speaker 4: They don't really have a left hander of note right 805 00:35:19,000 --> 00:35:21,239 Speaker 4: now who's prospect eligible. I don't know if that was 806 00:35:21,239 --> 00:35:23,440 Speaker 4: a big thing with the Brewers, with win Stearns is 807 00:35:23,440 --> 00:35:25,440 Speaker 4: with the Brewers, if they were, I don't think they 808 00:35:25,480 --> 00:35:26,560 Speaker 4: overvalued left handers. 809 00:35:26,719 --> 00:35:28,959 Speaker 1: I will say I feel like they were the team 810 00:35:29,000 --> 00:35:31,160 Speaker 1: more so than anybody would like take flyers on like 811 00:35:31,160 --> 00:35:33,920 Speaker 1: a Hoby Milner or like try out like pitchers like that, 812 00:35:34,200 --> 00:35:36,560 Speaker 1: and they tend to be left handed, and like they 813 00:35:36,600 --> 00:35:39,320 Speaker 1: loved Brent Sooner forever, and he's a guy who obviously, 814 00:35:39,360 --> 00:35:41,560 Speaker 1: like prospect wise, I'm sure wasn't very exciting because he 815 00:35:41,600 --> 00:35:45,320 Speaker 1: throws like eighty three. So probably I'm going to assume 816 00:35:45,320 --> 00:35:46,759 Speaker 1: that they didn't really value and they just kind of 817 00:35:46,760 --> 00:35:48,400 Speaker 1: stumbled into Josh Hater a little bit too. 818 00:35:48,480 --> 00:35:51,000 Speaker 4: Yeah, Hater was part of a trade with the Astros. 819 00:35:51,040 --> 00:35:52,920 Speaker 4: I forget exactly, but yeah. 820 00:35:52,760 --> 00:35:55,000 Speaker 2: I think it was Carlos Gomez actually might depend. 821 00:35:55,120 --> 00:35:57,760 Speaker 3: Yeah, that is that a piece of development that sometimes 822 00:35:57,800 --> 00:35:59,680 Speaker 3: it might take lefties a little longer, and rivies and 823 00:35:59,680 --> 00:36:02,520 Speaker 3: pitching even takes most guys longer than significally longer than 824 00:36:02,560 --> 00:36:03,800 Speaker 3: Hiss anyway, traditionally. 825 00:36:03,880 --> 00:36:06,320 Speaker 4: Yes, I think there's some truth to that, to that axiom, 826 00:36:06,600 --> 00:36:08,640 Speaker 4: maybe maybe less so than it used to be, just 827 00:36:08,640 --> 00:36:12,439 Speaker 4: because it's it's more about fastball and breaking pitch rather 828 00:36:12,480 --> 00:36:14,759 Speaker 4: than having that dominant change up that used to be 829 00:36:14,800 --> 00:36:18,319 Speaker 4: the defining characteristic the left handed starter. It's more of 830 00:36:18,320 --> 00:36:19,839 Speaker 4: a field more more of a field pitch that might 831 00:36:19,840 --> 00:36:21,200 Speaker 4: take time to develop, but yeah. 832 00:36:21,040 --> 00:36:22,680 Speaker 3: You're talking about change up and that being the pitch 833 00:36:22,760 --> 00:36:25,040 Speaker 3: is actually reminded me of something else. Jose Bu though, 834 00:36:25,120 --> 00:36:27,840 Speaker 3: someone that I think we all privately have expressed some 835 00:36:28,719 --> 00:36:31,759 Speaker 3: optimism for as he he guys, he goes through the 836 00:36:31,800 --> 00:36:33,920 Speaker 3: minor league system, kind of gets up the major leagues, 837 00:36:33,960 --> 00:36:36,040 Speaker 3: gets his hard, goes back down, gets up, goes back down. 838 00:36:36,040 --> 00:36:39,759 Speaker 3: Now it gets up again and sees seems different do 839 00:36:39,840 --> 00:36:42,080 Speaker 3: we Is it just recency biased to believe that he 840 00:36:42,160 --> 00:36:44,520 Speaker 3: actually now has a little bit more ceiling and helium 841 00:36:44,520 --> 00:36:47,000 Speaker 3: that we ever thought, or is there tangible changes that 842 00:36:47,040 --> 00:36:47,759 Speaker 3: have happened with him? 843 00:36:48,040 --> 00:36:50,360 Speaker 4: That's yeah, He's another player who had that triple a 844 00:36:50,520 --> 00:36:54,319 Speaker 4: major league divide, A tough player to evaluate, but like 845 00:36:54,360 --> 00:36:56,440 Speaker 4: you're saying, the way he finished the year was very 846 00:36:56,520 --> 00:36:59,719 Speaker 4: encouraging that there's some role for him, you know. It's 847 00:36:59,760 --> 00:37:01,560 Speaker 4: it's it's hard to see it three times through the 848 00:37:01,600 --> 00:37:03,960 Speaker 4: lineup role based on his repertoire, but there is a 849 00:37:04,040 --> 00:37:06,400 Speaker 4: role for him who you know, and he showed what 850 00:37:06,480 --> 00:37:08,719 Speaker 4: he was capable of at his best in twenty twenty 851 00:37:08,719 --> 00:37:09,440 Speaker 4: three and the three. 852 00:37:09,280 --> 00:37:10,879 Speaker 3: Times to the lineup thing. Mark and I've talked about 853 00:37:10,880 --> 00:37:12,319 Speaker 3: that a lot on the show last week, and I'm 854 00:37:12,320 --> 00:37:14,320 Speaker 3: probably going to talk about more going forward with the Brewers. 855 00:37:14,640 --> 00:37:16,480 Speaker 3: Took them a very long time to give young pitchers 856 00:37:16,520 --> 00:37:18,680 Speaker 3: the third time through the order we saw Freddie Peralta, 857 00:37:18,719 --> 00:37:21,000 Speaker 3: Brandon Wood raw Van Corbin Burns, three three guys who 858 00:37:21,040 --> 00:37:23,200 Speaker 3: can all be considered top fifteen pitchers now went healthy, 859 00:37:23,200 --> 00:37:26,000 Speaker 3: if not better. All take about a full year, if 860 00:37:26,040 --> 00:37:28,080 Speaker 3: not more in the case of especially Burns and Peralta, 861 00:37:28,160 --> 00:37:30,799 Speaker 3: to actually get that third time. Is that something that 862 00:37:31,560 --> 00:37:33,680 Speaker 3: you think is a positive for pictures in player development, 863 00:37:33,680 --> 00:37:35,920 Speaker 3: where like you can kind of bite off your trunks 864 00:37:35,960 --> 00:37:38,439 Speaker 3: more slowly rather than just be simply thrown to the fire. 865 00:37:38,600 --> 00:37:40,520 Speaker 3: Is that just player by player, team by team? 866 00:37:40,600 --> 00:37:42,640 Speaker 4: Yeah, well, I love I love that approach. I think 867 00:37:42,719 --> 00:37:45,239 Speaker 4: there's a lot of merit to working pictures into a 868 00:37:45,320 --> 00:37:48,520 Speaker 4: role by having them take you long reliever. It used 869 00:37:48,560 --> 00:37:50,440 Speaker 4: to be called like it was kind of that. I mean, 870 00:37:50,440 --> 00:37:52,719 Speaker 4: it's a throwback approach that managers used to do it 871 00:37:52,719 --> 00:37:55,719 Speaker 4: all the time. You'd work in the young pitcher as 872 00:37:55,719 --> 00:37:58,560 Speaker 4: a reliever when he was a rookie and build up 873 00:37:58,600 --> 00:38:00,880 Speaker 4: his confidence, build up the stamina. 874 00:38:00,960 --> 00:38:03,120 Speaker 2: It worked for Chris Sale, didn't work for job A Chamberlain. 875 00:38:03,200 --> 00:38:05,600 Speaker 1: I remember that one specifically where they were like, Wow, 876 00:38:05,680 --> 00:38:06,920 Speaker 1: this guy's lights out reliever. 877 00:38:07,000 --> 00:38:09,239 Speaker 2: We have a dilemma here, let's make him a starter again. 878 00:38:09,360 --> 00:38:10,560 Speaker 2: And he was never the same. 879 00:38:10,640 --> 00:38:13,120 Speaker 1: So yeah, it seems like there's like now this in 880 00:38:13,200 --> 00:38:15,840 Speaker 1: between again of like understanding, like we're just going to 881 00:38:15,880 --> 00:38:17,359 Speaker 1: be trying to stretch these guys out and not really 882 00:38:17,360 --> 00:38:18,040 Speaker 1: mess with them as much. 883 00:38:18,160 --> 00:38:19,840 Speaker 3: It didn't work. Didn't work for Henry Miha either, but 884 00:38:19,960 --> 00:38:22,200 Speaker 3: we'll away. We'll always give the one a shot. 885 00:38:22,200 --> 00:38:26,640 Speaker 4: When you have one of my most regrettable number one rankings. 886 00:38:26,680 --> 00:38:30,239 Speaker 4: I think he was number one for us twice. It 887 00:38:30,239 --> 00:38:32,319 Speaker 4: speaks to the state of the system, though I'll use 888 00:38:32,360 --> 00:38:33,439 Speaker 4: that as my defense. 889 00:38:33,560 --> 00:38:35,480 Speaker 3: And Nelson I think it. Hendry, I got another question here, 890 00:38:35,520 --> 00:38:37,400 Speaker 3: But the Mets last year one of three teams in 891 00:38:37,400 --> 00:38:38,880 Speaker 3: the whole league not to throw a pitch over one 892 00:38:38,920 --> 00:38:41,400 Speaker 3: hundred miles an hour. Is there a flamethrower in the 893 00:38:41,400 --> 00:38:45,640 Speaker 3: system that is at least could be a major leaguer 894 00:38:45,719 --> 00:38:47,480 Speaker 3: at some point? Do they have a guy down there 895 00:38:47,480 --> 00:38:49,839 Speaker 3: who's like, oh, yeah, he's he's he's cooking with gas. 896 00:38:49,960 --> 00:38:54,719 Speaker 4: Raymon Gomez did touch one hundreds a right, and then 897 00:38:54,760 --> 00:38:57,520 Speaker 4: he had TJ so great, all right, well, but he 898 00:38:57,600 --> 00:38:58,960 Speaker 4: but he is a dude. He is a dude. He 899 00:38:58,960 --> 00:39:01,240 Speaker 4: has a prospect, so okay, we'll take it too. Hopefully, 900 00:39:01,320 --> 00:39:04,319 Speaker 4: hopefully we see him and flashes at the end of 901 00:39:04,320 --> 00:39:06,160 Speaker 4: the season, and hopefully it's stuff comes back. 902 00:39:06,200 --> 00:39:08,480 Speaker 1: Matt, you are a Mets fan, this is Mets Podcast, 903 00:39:08,719 --> 00:39:12,680 Speaker 1: and everybody's talking about this offseason is just it's either 904 00:39:13,120 --> 00:39:15,279 Speaker 1: the greatest offseason ever or it's a failure. There's no 905 00:39:15,320 --> 00:39:17,680 Speaker 1: in between. How are you feeling as a Mets fan 906 00:39:17,719 --> 00:39:18,080 Speaker 1: about it? 907 00:39:18,160 --> 00:39:23,880 Speaker 4: Okay, I like the discipline, like I like, frankly, the 908 00:39:23,880 --> 00:39:27,879 Speaker 4: new approach. You know, none of the contracts they signed 909 00:39:27,880 --> 00:39:31,040 Speaker 4: impacts them in the draft or you know, commits them 910 00:39:31,080 --> 00:39:32,719 Speaker 4: long term, so I think there's it gives them a 911 00:39:32,719 --> 00:39:36,600 Speaker 4: lot of flexibility. You guys have mentioned, and it's true 912 00:39:36,680 --> 00:39:40,760 Speaker 4: that the forty man with shallow so adding some forty 913 00:39:40,800 --> 00:39:43,799 Speaker 4: five and fifty great players as value and. 914 00:39:43,800 --> 00:39:45,960 Speaker 3: Just for people at home. Again, that's on the scausing 915 00:39:45,960 --> 00:39:48,280 Speaker 3: scale of twenty to eighty, So once you get to fifty, 916 00:39:48,400 --> 00:39:51,719 Speaker 3: that's like you're a trusted regular, but you're not spectacular. 917 00:39:51,760 --> 00:39:53,759 Speaker 3: Forty five is more of a tweener platooner, and the 918 00:39:53,760 --> 00:39:55,960 Speaker 3: that's just again something lacked a lot of these guys 919 00:39:56,239 --> 00:39:57,839 Speaker 3: on the upper levels of the miners and the fringe 920 00:39:57,840 --> 00:39:58,360 Speaker 3: of their roster. 921 00:39:58,520 --> 00:40:01,879 Speaker 4: But like that lineup trade deadline last year was yeah, 922 00:40:02,160 --> 00:40:05,239 Speaker 4: it was an indictment on the organization's depth. So this 923 00:40:05,320 --> 00:40:07,320 Speaker 4: is this helps address that line. 924 00:40:07,239 --> 00:40:09,759 Speaker 3: Up in the end, the bullpen between Raphael Ortega and 925 00:40:09,920 --> 00:40:11,520 Speaker 3: pulling in a guy like Phil bick Fer. It's just 926 00:40:12,200 --> 00:40:15,040 Speaker 3: it was a lot. Yeah, Trevor gott Trevor got nothing, 927 00:40:15,080 --> 00:40:17,600 Speaker 3: but actually Trevor got actually had wildly good results the 928 00:40:17,640 --> 00:40:19,960 Speaker 3: second half of the year. But just it looked, it 929 00:40:19,960 --> 00:40:21,520 Speaker 3: didn't look pretty. It was just a lot of color 930 00:40:21,640 --> 00:40:24,520 Speaker 3: sinkers and fastballs, which again it's just it's bizarre that 931 00:40:24,560 --> 00:40:26,480 Speaker 3: this team, with all they've they had invested the last 932 00:40:26,480 --> 00:40:29,080 Speaker 3: few years, like could totally lacked in triple A. And 933 00:40:29,120 --> 00:40:30,719 Speaker 3: if you felt that and then you're like, oh that 934 00:40:30,880 --> 00:40:31,640 Speaker 3: was really obvious. 935 00:40:31,760 --> 00:40:34,959 Speaker 4: Yes, but the one one silver lining is that DJ 936 00:40:35,040 --> 00:40:36,120 Speaker 4: Stewart might be a keeper. 937 00:40:36,520 --> 00:40:39,000 Speaker 3: Yes, we love Dj the tch strew This is a keeper. 938 00:40:39,040 --> 00:40:41,279 Speaker 3: I'm gonna I'm in a Best Ball draft right now, 939 00:40:41,360 --> 00:40:43,480 Speaker 3: my first one. I'm like, I'm he's so circled in 940 00:40:43,480 --> 00:40:45,120 Speaker 3: like the thirty fifth round, Like I can't wait. I 941 00:40:45,160 --> 00:40:46,839 Speaker 3: can't wait to take him and be able to throw 942 00:40:46,920 --> 00:40:49,319 Speaker 3: him into one of my three utility spots. But I 943 00:40:49,360 --> 00:40:51,560 Speaker 3: want to ask you quick last couple two minutes here. No, 944 00:40:51,640 --> 00:40:54,200 Speaker 3: Matt's an avid player, dynasty player, wearing a couple of 945 00:40:54,280 --> 00:40:56,920 Speaker 3: dynasty leagues together where he finishes much higher than me 946 00:40:57,000 --> 00:40:59,759 Speaker 3: usually in the standings. But this year, time of year 947 00:40:59,800 --> 00:41:02,320 Speaker 3: is the FYPD drafts. That's the first year player. So 948 00:41:02,360 --> 00:41:04,399 Speaker 3: your dynasty leagues where you go back through last year's 949 00:41:04,480 --> 00:41:09,120 Speaker 3: draft international class. It's very top heavy this year, between Langford, Cruz, 950 00:41:09,320 --> 00:41:12,319 Speaker 3: Yoshobiamo though, and even maybe someone like Max Clark, who 951 00:41:12,400 --> 00:41:15,280 Speaker 3: I think is kind of wedging himself into that top discussion. 952 00:41:15,680 --> 00:41:18,359 Speaker 3: But outside of those very obvious blue Chippers, is there 953 00:41:18,400 --> 00:41:22,239 Speaker 3: a player that seems like they could be a guy 954 00:41:22,400 --> 00:41:24,480 Speaker 3: becomes like a top twenty twenty five prospect in the 955 00:41:24,520 --> 00:41:24,960 Speaker 3: near future. 956 00:41:25,000 --> 00:41:28,680 Speaker 4: Yeah, Jenkins is the obvious one, the super talented, tooled 957 00:41:28,680 --> 00:41:33,279 Speaker 4: out North Carolina prep outfielder, great swing, good, good physicality. 958 00:41:33,960 --> 00:41:37,160 Speaker 4: I like him, and I like Mariners shortstop Cole Emerson. 959 00:41:37,200 --> 00:41:39,760 Speaker 2: Cole Emerson. Yeah, I know the Marriagers had a fantastic draft. 960 00:41:39,800 --> 00:41:42,120 Speaker 4: Yeah they did. If you're looking upside those would be 961 00:41:42,120 --> 00:41:43,000 Speaker 4: my two favorites. 962 00:41:43,480 --> 00:41:45,720 Speaker 3: I love Cole Young last year too. He has insane 963 00:41:45,719 --> 00:41:48,319 Speaker 3: results in his first professional year. He's like Walks Sam 964 00:41:48,360 --> 00:41:49,319 Speaker 3: Walks the strikeouts. 965 00:41:49,600 --> 00:41:52,000 Speaker 4: He's good too. But the way that Scott You're talking 966 00:41:52,040 --> 00:41:54,520 Speaker 4: about Emerson is that a tier higher than Young, so 967 00:41:54,680 --> 00:41:56,080 Speaker 4: I'm really interested in him. 968 00:41:56,239 --> 00:41:58,000 Speaker 1: Good to know from the card side as well for 969 00:41:58,080 --> 00:42:02,640 Speaker 1: me and on it all over, Colt Everson there, Matt, 970 00:42:02,880 --> 00:42:05,480 Speaker 1: as always, thank you so much for coming on the podcast, 971 00:42:05,680 --> 00:42:08,880 Speaker 1: the first three time guest of the met Stub podcast. 972 00:42:08,920 --> 00:42:11,480 Speaker 1: Glad to have you back, Glad to be able to 973 00:42:11,480 --> 00:42:14,080 Speaker 1: talk some prospects with you. Let everybody at home know 974 00:42:14,080 --> 00:42:16,160 Speaker 1: where they can find your stuff as well as plugin 975 00:42:16,200 --> 00:42:17,080 Speaker 1: Baseball America. 976 00:42:16,880 --> 00:42:20,319 Speaker 4: At baseball America dot com. I'm on x Twitter at 977 00:42:20,840 --> 00:42:22,279 Speaker 4: matt EDDIEBA great. 978 00:42:22,320 --> 00:42:24,799 Speaker 3: Thanks so much, Matt, appreciate it as always, and thank 979 00:42:24,800 --> 00:42:25,399 Speaker 3: you for see us soon. 980 00:42:26,280 --> 00:42:26,840 Speaker 4: Thanks guys,