1 00:00:05,120 --> 00:00:09,200 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane. Along 2 00:00:09,200 --> 00:00:13,200 Speaker 1: with Jonathan Farrell and Lisa Abramowitz. Daily we bring you 3 00:00:13,280 --> 00:00:18,600 Speaker 1: insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and international relations. 4 00:00:18,840 --> 00:00:23,320 Speaker 1: To find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcast, sun Cloud, Bloomberg 5 00:00:23,360 --> 00:00:29,320 Speaker 1: dot Com and of course on the Bloomberg terminal. It 6 00:00:29,480 --> 00:00:32,559 Speaker 1: is such an honor, and this is before the news 7 00:00:32,600 --> 00:00:36,720 Speaker 1: of yesterday on a missile, and this is south of Belarus, 8 00:00:36,720 --> 00:00:41,080 Speaker 1: on the Polish border with Ukraine, that you get to 9 00:00:41,120 --> 00:00:44,280 Speaker 1: turn Paul Sweeney as I have this morning to Elliott 10 00:00:44,320 --> 00:00:48,159 Speaker 1: Ackerman of the Marine Corps, and now James Travitas of 11 00:00:48,240 --> 00:00:50,720 Speaker 1: the U. S. Naval Academy and his service to the 12 00:00:50,800 --> 00:00:56,080 Speaker 1: nation as Supreme Commander of NATO as well. Almost Tavidis, 13 00:00:56,120 --> 00:00:59,560 Speaker 1: thank you so much for joining us this morning. There 14 00:00:59,640 --> 00:01:02,280 Speaker 1: is in her book two thousand thirty four, my book 15 00:01:02,280 --> 00:01:04,240 Speaker 1: of this summer a few years ago, folks. I can't 16 00:01:04,240 --> 00:01:07,480 Speaker 1: say enough about about it. On the first page of 17 00:01:07,480 --> 00:01:11,440 Speaker 1: the South China Sea. How many times over her career 18 00:01:12,120 --> 00:01:15,080 Speaker 1: has she stood as she did now on the bridge 19 00:01:15,080 --> 00:01:19,760 Speaker 1: of a ship, observing this miracle of stillness. There was 20 00:01:19,800 --> 00:01:24,480 Speaker 1: a stillness in Poland yesterday. That appears to be violated 21 00:01:24,520 --> 00:01:29,880 Speaker 1: by chance. How afraid should we be of exhaustion a 22 00:01:29,880 --> 00:01:32,560 Speaker 1: war that goes on and a war that goes on 23 00:01:32,640 --> 00:01:38,160 Speaker 1: to the winter where chance overtakes us. We gotta wake 24 00:01:38,240 --> 00:01:42,199 Speaker 1: up call yesterday. And it turned out as well as 25 00:01:42,280 --> 00:01:46,440 Speaker 1: it possibly could have. Tom, Um, let's face it, that 26 00:01:46,560 --> 00:01:50,400 Speaker 1: could have been a deliberate attack by Russia. It would 27 00:01:50,440 --> 00:01:54,000 Speaker 1: be crazy for Putin to start a war with NATO, 28 00:01:54,120 --> 00:01:57,680 Speaker 1: particularly by firing missiles into a field in Poland, but 29 00:01:58,080 --> 00:02:00,200 Speaker 1: could have been deliberate. It could have been in a 30 00:02:00,360 --> 00:02:04,960 Speaker 1: Russian offensive missile that went extremely stupid, and we've seen 31 00:02:05,680 --> 00:02:10,360 Speaker 1: several instances of that. Turns out apparently it's it's a 32 00:02:10,600 --> 00:02:15,600 Speaker 1: Ukrainian air defense missile, entirely justified in its use. But 33 00:02:15,720 --> 00:02:20,200 Speaker 1: here's the point, Tom. Wars sometimes start on incidents that 34 00:02:20,440 --> 00:02:24,880 Speaker 1: people overreact to move too quickly. I think, Tom, you 35 00:02:25,000 --> 00:02:27,360 Speaker 1: and I are old enough to remember the Tonkin Gulf 36 00:02:27,520 --> 00:02:32,440 Speaker 1: incident kind of preciprocated Vietnam or the assassination of an 37 00:02:32,560 --> 00:02:35,960 Speaker 1: archduke that starts World War One. I wasn't there for that, 38 00:02:36,080 --> 00:02:42,400 Speaker 1: than you are you sure? In any event, Um, we 39 00:02:42,480 --> 00:02:46,280 Speaker 1: gotta wake up call about how dangerous this situation is, 40 00:02:46,400 --> 00:02:48,520 Speaker 1: and we are to pay attention. And you are expert 41 00:02:48,560 --> 00:02:50,360 Speaker 1: in this. Paul Sweeney wants to jump in here, but 42 00:02:50,480 --> 00:02:55,359 Speaker 1: very quickly, Admiral, our solution in America is our modern 43 00:02:55,560 --> 00:03:00,320 Speaker 1: technocracy are technocratic engineering. We've got the toys, we got 44 00:03:00,360 --> 00:03:03,799 Speaker 1: the radar, we've got the planes. But that doesn't work 45 00:03:03,840 --> 00:03:08,280 Speaker 1: in a ward, does it. You gotta have the technology. 46 00:03:08,280 --> 00:03:11,520 Speaker 1: But I would argue, we got people, We know what 47 00:03:11,560 --> 00:03:15,800 Speaker 1: we're doing. We have been in a lot of combat operations. 48 00:03:16,120 --> 00:03:21,520 Speaker 1: Our opponents Russia looking like they're flailing badly here. China 49 00:03:21,680 --> 00:03:26,200 Speaker 1: hasn't been in a sustained war since the nineteen fifties. Um, 50 00:03:26,320 --> 00:03:28,720 Speaker 1: we have a strong advantage in our people. We are 51 00:03:28,760 --> 00:03:31,799 Speaker 1: to be confident in that, and we are to understand 52 00:03:31,800 --> 00:03:36,880 Speaker 1: that hopefully that creates real deterrence against these other powers. Admiral, So, 53 00:03:37,080 --> 00:03:39,720 Speaker 1: given what we kind of feared yesterday, which might have 54 00:03:39,760 --> 00:03:43,120 Speaker 1: been an escalation of some sort against what appears to 55 00:03:43,160 --> 00:03:45,680 Speaker 1: be a brutal winter coming up and who knows how 56 00:03:45,680 --> 00:03:50,440 Speaker 1: to play out, should we be thinking about ways to 57 00:03:50,560 --> 00:03:53,880 Speaker 1: give Mr putin Away out of this thing, Because from 58 00:03:53,880 --> 00:03:56,520 Speaker 1: his perspective, he's got to recognize that this is at 59 00:03:56,640 --> 00:04:03,400 Speaker 1: best just a stalemate. He should be awakening. But I think, uh, Paul, 60 00:04:03,560 --> 00:04:06,880 Speaker 1: he wants to play a couple of cards. Yet he 61 00:04:06,960 --> 00:04:09,480 Speaker 1: wants to wait and see how the winter comes out. 62 00:04:09,520 --> 00:04:13,280 Speaker 1: You know, as the Europeans struggle with high energy costs 63 00:04:13,280 --> 00:04:15,640 Speaker 1: and a cold winner is it a warm winner. He 64 00:04:15,680 --> 00:04:18,520 Speaker 1: wants to see if there's impact there. And he is 65 00:04:18,560 --> 00:04:22,400 Speaker 1: also waiting to see how divisive are politics here are 66 00:04:22,520 --> 00:04:25,919 Speaker 1: in the United States. I think the mid terms probably 67 00:04:26,760 --> 00:04:29,480 Speaker 1: gave him some pause. That was not a good outcome 68 00:04:29,520 --> 00:04:32,960 Speaker 1: for him, and I think as the winner goes on, um, 69 00:04:33,000 --> 00:04:35,760 Speaker 1: I think the Europeans are gonna stand pretty strong. So 70 00:04:36,080 --> 00:04:40,960 Speaker 1: point being, yes, this thing will end up in a negotiation. 71 00:04:41,520 --> 00:04:45,520 Speaker 1: I think it probably head stored negotiation after the winter, 72 00:04:46,400 --> 00:04:50,880 Speaker 1: when both sides are facing real exhaustion. Putin because he 73 00:04:51,000 --> 00:04:55,760 Speaker 1: runs out of resources, Zelinsky because the patients the resources 74 00:04:55,800 --> 00:04:59,240 Speaker 1: of the West become harder to obtain. I think that 75 00:04:59,360 --> 00:05:05,160 Speaker 1: drives both parties potentially to negotiation early next marine. Let's 76 00:05:05,160 --> 00:05:08,000 Speaker 1: hope so Emial Stevids. Thank you so much again, Elliott 77 00:05:08,000 --> 00:05:11,360 Speaker 1: Ackerman and James Travidas. The book is two thousand thirty four. 78 00:05:11,400 --> 00:05:20,520 Speaker 1: It has my highest highest recommend dation. Elliott Ackerman joins 79 00:05:20,600 --> 00:05:23,719 Speaker 1: us to say he's former White House fellow US Marine 80 00:05:23,720 --> 00:05:27,719 Speaker 1: Corps veteran, is to miss the point of my book 81 00:05:28,000 --> 00:05:30,880 Speaker 1: of the Summer a number of summers ago. The book 82 00:05:30,960 --> 00:05:34,120 Speaker 1: is two thousand thirty four, a novel of the next World, 83 00:05:34,800 --> 00:05:39,400 Speaker 1: except the next world is coming ever closer. Eliott Ackerman, 84 00:05:39,480 --> 00:05:41,880 Speaker 1: thank you so much for joining us today. Let me 85 00:05:41,960 --> 00:05:47,719 Speaker 1: start with the basic reconninance, reconnaissance issues of a missile attack. 86 00:05:48,200 --> 00:05:51,240 Speaker 1: Do we have, as the West, or as America, or 87 00:05:51,279 --> 00:05:55,719 Speaker 1: as NATO, do we have intelligence systems from space or 88 00:05:55,800 --> 00:05:59,560 Speaker 1: from ground that know where various and sundry missiles move? 89 00:06:01,800 --> 00:06:04,480 Speaker 1: We do. Generally speaking. What we have is what's called 90 00:06:04,520 --> 00:06:08,600 Speaker 1: counter battery radar. So you can uh with with basic math, 91 00:06:08,800 --> 00:06:12,279 Speaker 1: figure out the trajectory of these missiles, the direction of impact, 92 00:06:12,400 --> 00:06:15,320 Speaker 1: and where they have come from. So, I mean, that's 93 00:06:15,360 --> 00:06:18,159 Speaker 1: basically how we've seen NATO very quickly figure out that 94 00:06:18,400 --> 00:06:21,120 Speaker 1: this missile that landed in Poland was in fact launched 95 00:06:21,120 --> 00:06:24,799 Speaker 1: from Ukraine. The dystopian nature of your book two thousand 96 00:06:24,839 --> 00:06:28,039 Speaker 1: thirty four, without giving the plot away, is that when 97 00:06:28,400 --> 00:06:33,359 Speaker 1: adversaries come together, the biggest problem is mistakes. The biggest 98 00:06:33,400 --> 00:06:37,799 Speaker 1: problem is risks as you perceive Ukraine and Russia into 99 00:06:37,800 --> 00:06:40,640 Speaker 1: the winter. Is that the problem. They're worn out, Their 100 00:06:40,720 --> 00:06:44,799 Speaker 1: exhausted systems are failing. They're just close. So like your book, 101 00:06:45,240 --> 00:06:49,919 Speaker 1: things fall apart rapidly. Well, exactly, you hit the nail 102 00:06:50,200 --> 00:06:54,240 Speaker 1: right on the head that you know, wars are escalatory 103 00:06:54,240 --> 00:06:59,600 Speaker 1: by nature, and once you enter uh this escalatory cycle, Uh, 104 00:06:59,600 --> 00:07:02,479 Speaker 1: it's us picks up and picks up, and each incident 105 00:07:02,560 --> 00:07:05,320 Speaker 1: becomes increasingly dangerous. You know. That's why we see the 106 00:07:05,400 --> 00:07:09,600 Speaker 1: Secretary General of NATO caution, caution in calm, because all 107 00:07:09,720 --> 00:07:12,880 Speaker 1: sides don't want to see the war in Ukraine spill 108 00:07:13,000 --> 00:07:16,520 Speaker 1: outside of the borders of Ukraine, which would be disastrous, 109 00:07:16,800 --> 00:07:19,400 Speaker 1: and that calm wasn't there yesterday The Foreign Minister of 110 00:07:19,480 --> 00:07:22,680 Speaker 1: Ukraine put this tweet out fourteen hours ago. I want 111 00:07:22,680 --> 00:07:24,400 Speaker 1: to read it at because I think it's important. He said, 112 00:07:24,480 --> 00:07:27,400 Speaker 1: Russia now promotes a conspiracy theory that it was allegedly 113 00:07:27,400 --> 00:07:29,400 Speaker 1: a missile of Ukrainian air defense that found on the 114 00:07:29,400 --> 00:07:31,800 Speaker 1: Polish territory, which is not true. Now we should by 115 00:07:31,880 --> 00:07:36,480 Speaker 1: Russian propaganda or amplify its message. Hasn't that just been 116 00:07:36,520 --> 00:07:40,360 Speaker 1: totally contradicted by the NATO Secretary General just moments ago. 117 00:07:42,520 --> 00:07:44,640 Speaker 1: Well it has and it's you know, it's an important 118 00:07:44,680 --> 00:07:48,200 Speaker 1: reminder that, you know, although Russia is waging an illegal 119 00:07:48,240 --> 00:07:52,360 Speaker 1: war in Ukraine, and although the Western nator are supporting 120 00:07:52,360 --> 00:07:55,680 Speaker 1: the Ukrainian people, it obviously has to be well within 121 00:07:55,840 --> 00:08:01,360 Speaker 1: a rational context. We can't go fly off handle each 122 00:08:01,400 --> 00:08:04,080 Speaker 1: time that there is an incident or the war spills 123 00:08:04,160 --> 00:08:07,280 Speaker 1: over in unfortunate ways. So I think NATO is doing 124 00:08:07,400 --> 00:08:09,840 Speaker 1: the right thing. Um, you know, I don't necessarily, I 125 00:08:09,880 --> 00:08:14,160 Speaker 1: wouldn't necessarily say the Ukrainians are are doing the wrong thing, 126 00:08:14,240 --> 00:08:16,080 Speaker 1: but I think you can expect, you know, they are 127 00:08:16,160 --> 00:08:20,080 Speaker 1: in a crisis situation that they reality they've been living 128 00:08:20,080 --> 00:08:26,080 Speaker 1: in since February, an existential war fought on their land, uh, 129 00:08:26,120 --> 00:08:28,920 Speaker 1: and we need to be good partners and helping them 130 00:08:29,160 --> 00:08:31,960 Speaker 1: manage that war and hopefully bring it to a successful conclusion. 131 00:08:32,160 --> 00:08:34,680 Speaker 1: Does it Botherly, the Elliott that perhaps Russia has a 132 00:08:34,679 --> 00:08:37,880 Speaker 1: bit more leverage because they're backed into a corner and 133 00:08:38,000 --> 00:08:40,680 Speaker 1: it's Vladimir Putin's pride and he could act in a 134 00:08:40,720 --> 00:08:43,080 Speaker 1: more rash way because he doesn't really care what the 135 00:08:43,120 --> 00:08:46,000 Speaker 1: West does to him at this point, because of just 136 00:08:46,080 --> 00:08:51,160 Speaker 1: simply their reluctance to engage in a conflict. Sure, I 137 00:08:51,160 --> 00:08:54,800 Speaker 1: think that you know that is obviously uh a point 138 00:08:54,880 --> 00:08:57,320 Speaker 1: that that we need to weigh. You know, Russia is 139 00:08:57,360 --> 00:09:01,200 Speaker 1: backed into a corner prutent, it would see, doesn't have 140 00:09:01,360 --> 00:09:03,920 Speaker 1: that much left to lose. Um, if you want to 141 00:09:03,960 --> 00:09:06,040 Speaker 1: look at the nation that really has nothing left to lose, 142 00:09:06,120 --> 00:09:09,160 Speaker 1: it's I mean it's Ukraine. I mean, Ukraine is fighting 143 00:09:09,200 --> 00:09:12,240 Speaker 1: for its very existence, it's very life. The thing that 144 00:09:13,000 --> 00:09:15,920 Speaker 1: concerns me the most is that I think we, by we, 145 00:09:16,040 --> 00:09:18,600 Speaker 1: I mean sort of a collective West, have in the 146 00:09:18,679 --> 00:09:22,800 Speaker 1: last decade or two of warfare, gotten into a psychology 147 00:09:22,800 --> 00:09:25,240 Speaker 1: where wars are very long. They're photos of five ten 148 00:09:25,440 --> 00:09:27,480 Speaker 1: as we sign up against an even twenty year periods. 149 00:09:27,840 --> 00:09:29,600 Speaker 1: The war in Ukraine is a different type of war. 150 00:09:29,679 --> 00:09:31,480 Speaker 1: It's a bit of a throwback. When I've been there 151 00:09:31,520 --> 00:09:33,160 Speaker 1: to cover the war, I mean, their air raids are 152 00:09:33,200 --> 00:09:35,559 Speaker 1: running down to bomb shelters. It feels like a twentieth 153 00:09:35,600 --> 00:09:38,600 Speaker 1: century war. And it's a ward that needs to be 154 00:09:38,679 --> 00:09:41,280 Speaker 1: resolved really in the next year or two. And if 155 00:09:41,280 --> 00:09:44,600 Speaker 1: the war bleeds over into three, four or five ten years, 156 00:09:44,960 --> 00:09:47,800 Speaker 1: that only advantages the Russians. And the wonderful to hear 157 00:09:47,840 --> 00:10:00,840 Speaker 1: from you, as always said at him in that I 158 00:10:00,880 --> 00:10:04,160 Speaker 1: can stay unequivocally on the island of Manhattan. There is 159 00:10:04,200 --> 00:10:09,200 Speaker 1: no one steeped Inness and Dana Telsey CEO, Chief Research Officer, 160 00:10:09,280 --> 00:10:13,320 Speaker 1: Telsey Advisory Group kind of get Bear Stearns years ago. 161 00:10:13,480 --> 00:10:16,520 Speaker 1: And Dana, I want you to fifty seven and fifth Avenue, 162 00:10:16,559 --> 00:10:20,800 Speaker 1: give us one little window into your childhood at Bergdorf 163 00:10:21,000 --> 00:10:24,080 Speaker 1: Bergdorf Goodman. Give us just one little moment there in 164 00:10:24,080 --> 00:10:26,800 Speaker 1: your childhood. I think the moment at Bergdorf Goodman comes 165 00:10:26,840 --> 00:10:29,920 Speaker 1: from my grandmother working at Bergdorf Goodman and going in 166 00:10:30,040 --> 00:10:32,719 Speaker 1: and seeing that on the house wears floor, seeing all 167 00:10:32,720 --> 00:10:35,839 Speaker 1: the different Christmas trees and holiday decorations they have. It 168 00:10:36,000 --> 00:10:38,960 Speaker 1: changes every year, and it's a wow. Every year. We're 169 00:10:38,960 --> 00:10:42,000 Speaker 1: coming off a pandemic that your grandparents never could have 170 00:10:42,320 --> 00:10:45,720 Speaker 1: imagined it was over in nineteen No, it was not. 171 00:10:46,000 --> 00:10:48,800 Speaker 1: What does the holiday season look like this year? I 172 00:10:48,800 --> 00:10:51,280 Speaker 1: think the holiday season, for the most part, is going 173 00:10:51,320 --> 00:10:53,600 Speaker 1: to be about gathering. I think people want to be 174 00:10:53,640 --> 00:10:56,120 Speaker 1: together more than they ever have in the past. But 175 00:10:56,200 --> 00:10:59,640 Speaker 1: I think it's still a challenge holiday season economically. Yes, 176 00:10:59,679 --> 00:11:02,200 Speaker 1: three tail sales figures came out, but you have a 177 00:11:02,240 --> 00:11:04,800 Speaker 1: real bifurcation between the high end and the low end. 178 00:11:05,120 --> 00:11:07,679 Speaker 1: The high end still spending, but the growth rate of 179 00:11:07,679 --> 00:11:10,360 Speaker 1: that high end spend is moderating from what it had 180 00:11:10,400 --> 00:11:12,439 Speaker 1: been in the past. And what we need. You need 181 00:11:12,480 --> 00:11:15,520 Speaker 1: new product and who's delivering new product. You and I 182 00:11:15,600 --> 00:11:19,240 Speaker 1: talked about the Trunk's exhibition at Louis Vuitton on Madison Avenue. 183 00:11:19,559 --> 00:11:21,920 Speaker 1: That's new. You look at Deckers and they have new 184 00:11:22,040 --> 00:11:25,839 Speaker 1: Uggs platform shoes that are taking off on running. If 185 00:11:25,840 --> 00:11:28,679 Speaker 1: you don't have the waffle soul, that is pretty good too. 186 00:11:28,720 --> 00:11:30,920 Speaker 1: But that's the luxury sector. This is the people who 187 00:11:30,920 --> 00:11:33,680 Speaker 1: have discretionary spending. We just saw from the targets of 188 00:11:33,679 --> 00:11:36,320 Speaker 1: the world. Maybe that's not the case for the vast 189 00:11:36,360 --> 00:11:39,040 Speaker 1: majority of other people. What is your takeaway in terms 190 00:11:39,080 --> 00:11:42,720 Speaker 1: of the discretionary spending ability in mass from the Target 191 00:11:42,720 --> 00:11:46,120 Speaker 1: and Walmart earnings, It's cautious when you think about the 192 00:11:46,120 --> 00:11:48,960 Speaker 1: inflation hairy headwinds that they have. They don't have the 193 00:11:49,000 --> 00:11:52,320 Speaker 1: same spending power that they did before, especially when food 194 00:11:52,440 --> 00:11:54,560 Speaker 1: is going up as as much as it did. You 195 00:11:54,600 --> 00:11:57,800 Speaker 1: look where the value is. Everyone's competing on promotion today, 196 00:11:57,840 --> 00:12:00,000 Speaker 1: which is different than three hundred and sixty five day 197 00:12:00,040 --> 00:12:02,400 Speaker 1: years ago. But you look at t J access numbers 198 00:12:02,400 --> 00:12:06,120 Speaker 1: today which are better than expected, and frankly, even the guidance, 199 00:12:06,120 --> 00:12:08,800 Speaker 1: it was nice to see how they're setting up. They're 200 00:12:08,800 --> 00:12:12,200 Speaker 1: getting better brands at more value prices, and so is 201 00:12:12,240 --> 00:12:15,120 Speaker 1: there some share shifts that's going on and is off 202 00:12:15,160 --> 00:12:18,000 Speaker 1: price returning. It's a great point, especially because we saw, 203 00:12:18,040 --> 00:12:20,880 Speaker 1: for example, Walmart gain share in the grocery store sector, 204 00:12:20,920 --> 00:12:23,440 Speaker 1: which actually buffered a lot of their sales right because 205 00:12:23,480 --> 00:12:26,520 Speaker 1: people are still buying food and you're seeing that, where 206 00:12:26,520 --> 00:12:28,760 Speaker 1: do you expect to see the big share shifts? How 207 00:12:28,840 --> 00:12:32,160 Speaker 1: much do you see consolidation among the strongest players and 208 00:12:32,200 --> 00:12:35,520 Speaker 1: the loser is really losing even bigger. I think overall, 209 00:12:35,520 --> 00:12:37,560 Speaker 1: when we're thinking about the changes that are going on, 210 00:12:37,920 --> 00:12:40,400 Speaker 1: who has the assortment and who has value? I think 211 00:12:40,400 --> 00:12:43,120 Speaker 1: one of the surprises tomorrow could be Macy's and I 212 00:12:43,160 --> 00:12:45,400 Speaker 1: think they've been more innovative than they have been in 213 00:12:45,440 --> 00:12:48,560 Speaker 1: the past, and I think we're gonna see some improvement there. 214 00:12:49,000 --> 00:12:51,920 Speaker 1: I think overall we're seeing on the specialty apparel side, 215 00:12:52,240 --> 00:12:54,560 Speaker 1: there's newness there. You look at a Ritzia who's been 216 00:12:54,559 --> 00:12:57,680 Speaker 1: taking share and I think the issues at the gap 217 00:12:57,960 --> 00:13:01,240 Speaker 1: continue to remain headwinds. I think they are shared donors, 218 00:13:01,400 --> 00:13:03,920 Speaker 1: not share gainers in the in the near term. And 219 00:13:03,960 --> 00:13:06,520 Speaker 1: I think when we do have all of the changes 220 00:13:06,520 --> 00:13:09,280 Speaker 1: that are happening, you take a look at urban outfitters 221 00:13:09,280 --> 00:13:12,160 Speaker 1: with anthropology and free people, where I think that a 222 00:13:12,160 --> 00:13:14,800 Speaker 1: little bit higher income and women are buying. I think 223 00:13:14,840 --> 00:13:18,000 Speaker 1: there's a benefit there. The teen retailers are having issues 224 00:13:18,200 --> 00:13:21,480 Speaker 1: because they don't have the discretionary spend, so it's a 225 00:13:21,520 --> 00:13:24,840 Speaker 1: it's a share shift. And let's not forget inventory levels. 226 00:13:25,080 --> 00:13:27,679 Speaker 1: We have too much inventory. No one is getting rid 227 00:13:27,679 --> 00:13:29,800 Speaker 1: of it as fast as they would like, and that's 228 00:13:29,800 --> 00:13:32,000 Speaker 1: going to mean a bargain for the consumer. So where's 229 00:13:32,000 --> 00:13:33,880 Speaker 1: the value in equity here? I want to go back 230 00:13:33,880 --> 00:13:36,000 Speaker 1: to the central statement, which, as we talk about and 231 00:13:36,120 --> 00:13:39,960 Speaker 1: Lisa needs a pair of statement sunglasses, very important UH 232 00:13:40,280 --> 00:13:44,319 Speaker 1: to have in a recession. Do you go long luxury 233 00:13:44,400 --> 00:13:47,800 Speaker 1: which is already richly priced, or do you find value 234 00:13:47,840 --> 00:13:50,360 Speaker 1: in troubled big box or something else. I don't know. 235 00:13:50,800 --> 00:13:52,520 Speaker 1: One of the things I'm seeing with so many of 236 00:13:52,520 --> 00:13:55,440 Speaker 1: my stocks at fifty two week lows. I think investors 237 00:13:55,440 --> 00:13:58,000 Speaker 1: are doing their homework on the names preparing for twenty 238 00:13:58,000 --> 00:14:00,599 Speaker 1: three and twenty four. The tail when next year is 239 00:14:00,640 --> 00:14:03,280 Speaker 1: about lower freight rates, the headwind is weird. Give me 240 00:14:03,320 --> 00:14:05,000 Speaker 1: a single best buy here, you're with us or no 241 00:14:05,000 --> 00:14:07,360 Speaker 1: one's watching. Come on, Andy's single best buy right now. 242 00:14:07,600 --> 00:14:09,560 Speaker 1: When I think the names out there that are interesting, 243 00:14:09,760 --> 00:14:11,560 Speaker 1: I mean I like t j X for what they 244 00:14:11,600 --> 00:14:13,880 Speaker 1: can continue to deliver. But I think there's other names 245 00:14:13,920 --> 00:14:16,280 Speaker 1: that are interesting also when I think of names like 246 00:14:16,600 --> 00:14:19,160 Speaker 1: Loi est Lauder just delivered. If you have to look 247 00:14:19,200 --> 00:14:21,440 Speaker 1: at some of the value names out there and what 248 00:14:21,560 --> 00:14:24,200 Speaker 1: could be a change, I think Abercrombie and Fitch. I 249 00:14:24,240 --> 00:14:27,040 Speaker 1: think the newness that they're the other day and what 250 00:14:27,040 --> 00:14:30,240 Speaker 1: did you think I was kidding? Okay, I'm going to 251 00:14:30,280 --> 00:14:31,680 Speaker 1: line up to go in an A and F. You 252 00:14:31,720 --> 00:14:33,400 Speaker 1: don't have to line up, you can walk in and 253 00:14:33,440 --> 00:14:37,360 Speaker 1: you're gonna get you say ladder, But tom Ford and 254 00:14:37,360 --> 00:14:40,000 Speaker 1: that's what we're talking about, the biggest purchase in its history. 255 00:14:40,400 --> 00:14:43,200 Speaker 1: I am wondering there is this theory out there put 256 00:14:43,240 --> 00:14:45,560 Speaker 1: forward by the likes of Morgan Stanley, that at some 257 00:14:45,640 --> 00:14:48,160 Speaker 1: point there'll be a tipping point next year and these 258 00:14:48,200 --> 00:14:50,600 Speaker 1: will be the names that will benefit the most is 259 00:14:50,680 --> 00:14:53,000 Speaker 1: there going to be a roll up in between? Will 260 00:14:53,040 --> 00:14:55,720 Speaker 1: there be some sort of consolidation or bankruptcies that have 261 00:14:55,800 --> 00:14:58,800 Speaker 1: not yet been experienced. I think you'll continue to see 262 00:14:58,840 --> 00:15:01,920 Speaker 1: some of the acquisitions take place in consolidation, but I 263 00:15:01,920 --> 00:15:04,240 Speaker 1: think you're also going to see the vestures some of 264 00:15:04,240 --> 00:15:07,360 Speaker 1: the companies that maybe not having had performed as well 265 00:15:07,360 --> 00:15:09,480 Speaker 1: and want to focus on brands that are working. You 266 00:15:09,520 --> 00:15:12,400 Speaker 1: look at a Wolverine Worldwide, for example, where the maryl 267 00:15:12,480 --> 00:15:14,920 Speaker 1: business is their strength. They may not need all the 268 00:15:14,920 --> 00:15:17,360 Speaker 1: other brands in their portfolio. So I think you're gonna 269 00:15:17,360 --> 00:15:20,240 Speaker 1: see both. And I also think you may see a 270 00:15:20,440 --> 00:15:23,920 Speaker 1: change up in terms of the physical locations becoming more important. 271 00:15:24,280 --> 00:15:28,040 Speaker 1: I think stores are the new gathering spots and pandemic 272 00:15:28,080 --> 00:15:31,600 Speaker 1: did is they basically brought together that people want to socialize, 273 00:15:31,920 --> 00:15:34,920 Speaker 1: and frankly, you look at as the pandemic hopefully goes 274 00:15:34,960 --> 00:15:38,000 Speaker 1: into the rear view that yes, you are seeing people 275 00:15:38,080 --> 00:15:41,080 Speaker 1: shop at stores. It's one of the changes for Holiday 276 00:15:41,640 --> 00:15:44,320 Speaker 1: China to the rescue. That's a big theme that's out there, 277 00:15:44,360 --> 00:15:47,680 Speaker 1: isn't it doesn't work, not yet. I'm still seeing China 278 00:15:47,720 --> 00:15:50,840 Speaker 1: being being a tough place for a lot of my brands. 279 00:15:51,080 --> 00:15:53,200 Speaker 1: I think it's not until twenty three. Bring Joe Pelman 280 00:15:53,280 --> 00:16:01,280 Speaker 1: next time. Dana Telson where Advisory Group AMY with SILVERMA 281 00:16:01,360 --> 00:16:05,240 Speaker 1: joined just now, I Couity, Derivative Strategistic obviously Capital Markets Amy. 282 00:16:05,400 --> 00:16:08,040 Speaker 1: Can we kill this amount up the last week? And 283 00:16:08,120 --> 00:16:09,840 Speaker 1: what do you make of this Runnie we've seen from 284 00:16:09,840 --> 00:16:14,120 Speaker 1: the nast act to the SMP. Yeah, I think melt 285 00:16:14,200 --> 00:16:16,400 Speaker 1: up is an accurate way to describe it. Look, it 286 00:16:16,720 --> 00:16:18,720 Speaker 1: feels like a lifetime ago, but you know one week 287 00:16:18,760 --> 00:16:21,920 Speaker 1: ago is when we got that CPI number, and options 288 00:16:21,920 --> 00:16:25,400 Speaker 1: were you know, somewhat of a culprit outside of fundamental information. 289 00:16:25,440 --> 00:16:28,480 Speaker 1: About one third of all SMP options that traded that 290 00:16:28,560 --> 00:16:31,720 Speaker 1: day were for that expiration on that Wednesday, and that 291 00:16:31,840 --> 00:16:34,800 Speaker 1: certainly exacerbates some of the moves you see. Now we've 292 00:16:34,840 --> 00:16:38,400 Speaker 1: gotten to a point, John, in terms of positioning where 293 00:16:38,440 --> 00:16:41,760 Speaker 1: you know, essentially investors are are selling calls and and 294 00:16:41,920 --> 00:16:44,840 Speaker 1: basically just watching a grind up. So you know, they 295 00:16:44,840 --> 00:16:47,720 Speaker 1: were very worried about participating in that upside. But we 296 00:16:47,800 --> 00:16:51,480 Speaker 1: haven't seen reinitiation of even new levels from here, so 297 00:16:51,520 --> 00:16:54,520 Speaker 1: I think from the options perspective, they kind of think, again, 298 00:16:54,560 --> 00:16:56,360 Speaker 1: it's a melt up, but not a rip up. I mean, 299 00:16:56,360 --> 00:16:58,640 Speaker 1: I'm gonna go to your research note where you mentioned 300 00:16:58,640 --> 00:17:01,760 Speaker 1: bitcoin and your study of the bitcoin moves and all 301 00:17:01,800 --> 00:17:04,399 Speaker 1: the uproar that's ensued, and I want to go to 302 00:17:04,480 --> 00:17:08,200 Speaker 1: quantitative finance and this concept of drift of moving tick 303 00:17:08,280 --> 00:17:13,360 Speaker 1: by tick in a time series. Does bitcoin trade like apple? 304 00:17:13,840 --> 00:17:17,520 Speaker 1: Does bitcoin trade in a time series like a given 305 00:17:17,560 --> 00:17:20,879 Speaker 1: bond or a given foreign exchange pair? What does the 306 00:17:21,040 --> 00:17:26,640 Speaker 1: drift look like for bitcoin? Yeah, you know, look for 307 00:17:26,640 --> 00:17:28,960 Speaker 1: for something like bitcoin and crypto in general does so 308 00:17:28,960 --> 00:17:31,399 Speaker 1: there's obviously not as long a time series as there 309 00:17:31,440 --> 00:17:34,000 Speaker 1: are for other assets. But the way it trades when 310 00:17:34,000 --> 00:17:36,120 Speaker 1: you look at it historically and you look at realized 311 00:17:36,119 --> 00:17:39,880 Speaker 1: correlations is it's just another risk asset. And certainly given 312 00:17:39,880 --> 00:17:42,960 Speaker 1: the information that came out of FTX and everything that's 313 00:17:43,000 --> 00:17:45,720 Speaker 1: going on, you know, people want to know what direction 314 00:17:45,760 --> 00:17:48,360 Speaker 1: it's going. And I will say similar to all other 315 00:17:48,480 --> 00:17:51,760 Speaker 1: risk assets, Tom, you know, on the downside, it tends 316 00:17:51,800 --> 00:17:55,119 Speaker 1: to be more correlated. So we're seeing decently strong correlations, 317 00:17:55,400 --> 00:17:57,440 Speaker 1: you know, as the market had sold off and it 318 00:17:57,560 --> 00:18:01,280 Speaker 1: still remains strong, but it doesn't you know, on the upside, 319 00:18:01,280 --> 00:18:03,800 Speaker 1: it actually tends to diverge more than downside. All things 320 00:18:03,840 --> 00:18:06,199 Speaker 1: tend to go to one when things are you know, 321 00:18:06,280 --> 00:18:08,880 Speaker 1: selling off very hard. And we've been talking about how 322 00:18:08,920 --> 00:18:11,680 Speaker 1: incredible the swoon and bitcoin has been, but you point 323 00:18:11,680 --> 00:18:13,560 Speaker 1: to the other side of things that actually it's been 324 00:18:13,800 --> 00:18:16,879 Speaker 1: quite resilient, just the crypto space in general. Given the 325 00:18:17,040 --> 00:18:20,359 Speaker 1: entire collapse overnight of an entire firm, I wonder if 326 00:18:20,359 --> 00:18:22,880 Speaker 1: there's a broader message about the markets and just how 327 00:18:23,040 --> 00:18:26,040 Speaker 1: resilient and how invested a lot of institutions are, not 328 00:18:26,119 --> 00:18:29,200 Speaker 1: in the crypto space, but more broadly, and the reluctance 329 00:18:29,240 --> 00:18:33,320 Speaker 1: to really retrench in a meaningful way. Yeah, it's a 330 00:18:33,320 --> 00:18:36,680 Speaker 1: great question. And look a few months ago we we 331 00:18:36,720 --> 00:18:38,879 Speaker 1: spoke with both Sam Bank and Fried and Brett Harrison, 332 00:18:38,960 --> 00:18:41,600 Speaker 1: who was the president of FTS at the time. And 333 00:18:41,640 --> 00:18:45,440 Speaker 1: I think one thing that's underappreciated Lisa about what they 334 00:18:45,440 --> 00:18:48,000 Speaker 1: were doing was was not only on the crypto side, 335 00:18:48,000 --> 00:18:51,520 Speaker 1: but there were huge implications for just market structure, for 336 00:18:51,640 --> 00:18:55,760 Speaker 1: just normal markets, for futures, for derivatives. And the other 337 00:18:55,800 --> 00:18:58,800 Speaker 1: thing I would say is, you know, like given where 338 00:18:58,800 --> 00:19:02,120 Speaker 1: the CFTC proposals likely and now it's probably not going 339 00:19:02,160 --> 00:19:03,800 Speaker 1: to pass, or at least regulators are going to look 340 00:19:03,840 --> 00:19:07,800 Speaker 1: at things differently. But the resilience to me seemed to 341 00:19:07,840 --> 00:19:10,800 Speaker 1: speak of kind of the institutional adoption that did happen 342 00:19:11,160 --> 00:19:13,280 Speaker 1: because there was a lot of interest at the time, 343 00:19:13,320 --> 00:19:16,640 Speaker 1: and you know, we'll see how that changes. But institutions, 344 00:19:16,680 --> 00:19:18,400 Speaker 1: and this has been a theme that they talked about 345 00:19:18,400 --> 00:19:21,879 Speaker 1: a lot, was institutions continue adopt, continue to investigate, and 346 00:19:21,920 --> 00:19:24,359 Speaker 1: continue to have heads of digital and I don't know 347 00:19:24,400 --> 00:19:27,320 Speaker 1: that that would change even with where FDS is now. 348 00:19:27,800 --> 00:19:29,560 Speaker 1: I'm a wonderful a half from you, brilliant and so 349 00:19:29,680 --> 00:19:33,000 Speaker 1: whites Amy with Silverman that MC capitol, mar This is 350 00:19:33,000 --> 00:19:37,000 Speaker 1: the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Thanks for listening. Join us live 351 00:19:37,119 --> 00:19:40,919 Speaker 1: weekdays from seven to ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio 352 00:19:41,119 --> 00:19:44,720 Speaker 1: and on Bloomberg Television each day from six to nine 353 00:19:44,800 --> 00:19:49,200 Speaker 1: am for insight from the best in economics, finance, investment, 354 00:19:49,359 --> 00:19:54,359 Speaker 1: and international relations. And subscribe to the Surveillance Podcast on 355 00:19:54,480 --> 00:19:58,280 Speaker 1: Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot com, and of course on 356 00:19:58,400 --> 00:20:02,440 Speaker 1: the terminal. I'm I'm keen in. This is Bloomer